All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
July 15, 2008 - Skeptoid
15:28
Skeptoid #109: Will the Large Hadron Collider Destroy the Earth?

Some people believe that CERN's Large Hadron Collider will create black holes that will destroy the Earth. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Tiny Black Hole Fears 00:09:49
At the time of its construction, CERN's Large Hadron Collider was the biggest and most powerful particle collider ever built, capable of reproducing energy levels rarely seen in the universe.
So much so that a subculture of people have risen up to protest its use on the grounds that it might trigger a global catastrophe.
How seriously should their claims be taken?
The Large Hadron Collider is up today on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast for Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Will the Large Hadron Collider destroy the Earth?
Imagine a $10 billion underground ring-shaped tunnel, 27 kilometers in circumference, so big that it stretches through both France and Switzerland.
One ring to rule them all.
The new Large Hadron Collider at the European Organization for Nuclear Research, better known as CERN.
Scheduled to come online around about August 2008.
A collider is the basic tool of particle physics.
You take a stream of particles, accelerate them to really high kinetic energy levels, and slam them into a target.
Depending on the experiment, all sorts of exotic things happen.
Most experiments are to create new particles predicted by theory or to examine their behavior.
The Large Hadron Collider, or LHC, has two beams traveling in opposite directions around the 27 kilometer circle, each accelerated to 7 TeV trillion electron volts, of energy and traveling at 99.999999% the speed of light, held in place by powerful magnets.
All around the ring are different experiment stations.
To perform an experiment, you turn on the experimental detector and use the magnets to collide the beams into each other head-on inside your detector, creating 600 million 14 TeV collisions per second.
That's a pretty high energy level, and we expect to learn all sorts of new and exotic things about the universe.
Most famously, we hope to find the theorized Higgs boson, the particle that creates mass.
But the collider's various experiments will produce knowledge that will permeate virtually every science we have.
As you may have heard by now, some people have voiced concerns that particle collisions from the LHC will create tiny black holes.
Black holes have such intense gravity that they consume everything around them, even light, and so within a fraction of a second, this tiny black hole will consume the collider itself, France, Switzerland, and then the entire Earth, presumably followed shortly thereafter by our whole solar system.
Clearly, not a fear to be taken lightly.
The best-known opposition to the Large Hadron Collider comes in the form of a much-publicized lawsuit filed in Hawaii by two individuals, science writer Luis Sancho and retired nuclear safety officer Walter L. Wagner, against the U.S. Department of Energy, Fermilab, CERN, the National Science Foundation, and DOES 1 through 100.
The lawsuit presents affidavits from the plaintiffs and five other individuals, stating their opinion that dangerous black holes could be formed and seeking to block operation of the collider until these fears can be adequately studied.
It seems a reasonable precaution, given how incredibly gigantic and powerful the LHC is, and how biblical the scale of the destruction it might wreak.
Yet the Large Hadron Collider is but a doughnut compared to what the United States superconducting supercollider would have been.
The SSC, as it was known until its cancellation in 1993, would have had a circumference of 87 kilometers and a beam energy of 30 TeV.
That's more than three times the size of the LHC and more than twice the energy.
And even the mighty SSC was but a Cheerio compared to the hypothetical very large Hadron Collider proposed by Fermilab, with a circumference of 105 to 650 kilometers and a beam energy of 40 to 200 TeV.
So when you compare the LHC to other possible colliders, you realize that, yeah, it's crazy big, but it's not that big, and it's nowhere near the energy levels that are possible.
It's certainly not the ultimate doomsday device that some fear-mongering detractors are making it out to be.
And even after looking at other possible larger colliders, if you're still concerned that 14 TeV represents the pinnacle of danger, just look at the naturally occurring collisions happening all around us every day.
Cosmic rays in the LHC's energy range are hitting the atmosphere constantly, and have been for 4 billion years, creating the same type of collisions that the collider will produce.
Some of these, called ultra-high energy cosmic rays, have been measured at over 10 to the 20th electron volts, 10 million times as energetic as the LHC's maximum energy.
While that sounds like a staggering amount, it's about the kinetic energy of a baseball thrown at 100 kilometers per hour.
That's a lot for a single proton, but it's hardly the destruction of a planet.
So one way to think of this is that the Large Hadron Collider is just an impotent little spaghettio compared to the greatest supercollider of them all, the universe.
Nature's supercollider has been going for billions of years at energies millions of times higher than human scientists can dream about.
So far, neither Earth nor any of the other planets, nor even any super-dense astronomical bodies like neutron stars, have suffered from particle collisions.
In fact, according to Dr. Brian Cox at CERN, the universe conducts the equivalent of 10 trillion lifetime runs of the LHC every second, and has been doing so for billions of years, with not a single observable consequence.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
The main reason is that micro-black holes of the type that particle collisions can create behave very differently than the giant supernova-sized black holes you see in movies.
They don't eat anything.
Instead, they explode with a tiny little micro-pop.
Most people have heard of Hawking radiation, which is emitted by black holes.
As large black holes eat stuff, they also evaporate away as Hawking radiation.
The smaller the black hole, the more energetic this evaporation.
For a micro-black hole, this evaporation happens at essentially the same instant it is created.
Or at least this is what is theorized.
Specifically, they would decay instantaneously into hadron jets and high PT leptons, which are one thing that we actually hope to see with the LHC.
Strangelets and Micro-Pops 00:02:11
As for Sancho and Wagner's concerns, they are not the first people to conceive of these events.
And whether they like to think so or not, the subject has already been studied.
Exhaustively, in fact.
And it's been part of the plans since many years before they contrived their little lawsuit.
In fact, four years before Sancho and Wagner filed their lawsuit, CERN completed its report based on decades of research into the safety of the collider, which concludes, We consider all such objects that have been theoretically envisioned, such as negatively charged strangelets, gravitational black holes, and magnetic monopoles.
We find no basis for any conceivable threat.
As a backup in case their black hole alarmism should fail, Sancho and Wagner also proposed a danger from strangelets created by the LHC.
Strangelets are unusual particles composed of an eclectic mixture of similar numbers of up, down, and strange quarks.
This so-called strange matter is one candidate for the dark matter in the universe.
The theoretical threat from strangelets would be that their negative charge would attract and consume the positively charged nuclei of ordinary matter.
However, this supposition is based on a long chain of ifs, a chain in which every link is broken.
For one thing, most calculations of strange matter show that strangelets would have a positive charge.
For another, strangelets can only be stable enough to exist at extremely low temperatures, and their creation in a particle collision would result in extremely high temperatures, in which the strangelets must immediately decay.
And even if somehow a collision did create a very cold, stable, negatively charged strangelet, it could only grow so long as its charge remained negative, which of course would no longer be the case after it had consumed a handful of positively charged nuclei, and it would then become a harmless particle of ordinary matter.
Debunking Collider Alarmism 00:03:24
Unfortunately, the mass media isn't doing anyone any favors.
News outlets continue to promote alarmism with headlines like this one from MSNBC, Doomsday Under Debate, or this one from CNN, some fear debut of powerful atom smasher, claiming the safety of the powerful collider has been debated for years.
Absolutely untrue.
There is no debate among knowledgeable particle physicists.
There is plenty of fear-mongering and ignorance, and also plenty of cooler heads, quote-unquote, who have been given this misinformation and are now issuing reasonable sounding warnings like, the potential risks are so high that we should step back and investigate these concerns.
These people advocating caution have neither valid theoretical arguments nor any information to refute the physicists' observations and don't appear to have taken even the most fundamental steps to inform themselves about the issue they are so passionately pursuing.
Instead, they make apocalyptic anti-science websites like sanescience.org and lhcfacts.org to spread misinformation.
You don't have two sides to science.
There is no listening to both sides.
Science is not philosophy or opinion.
Science consists of what we've learned so far.
And one thing that we've learned so far, and validated with billions of years of universe-scale observation, is that a particle collider represents no plausible danger and offers astonishing potential for furthering our knowledge.
Hang on to your hats because the Large Hadron Collider is going to bring unprecedented advances in medicine, clean energy production, unified field theory, computing, and astrophysics.
Get on board for the ride.
You are listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone, this is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and moose.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From P R X
Export Selection