All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Jan. 29, 2008 - Skeptoid
14:27
Skeptoid #85: World Trade Center 7: The Lies Come Crashing Down

The collapse of 7 World Trade Center was not a controlled demolition. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
The Building 7 Conspiracy 00:06:02
The events of 9-11 have become something of the granddaddy of conspiracy theories.
To this day, many believe it was an inside job conducted by the U.S. government.
Among the structures that collapsed on that day was Building 7, which came down hours after the others and was not struck by an airplane.
Today, we're going to find out if Building 7 is indeed the smoking gun some claim it is.
World Trade Center Building 7 is coming right up on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
World Trade Center 7.
The lies come crashing down.
Today we're going to point our skeptical eye once again at the events of September 11th, specifically at World Trade Center 7, the building that collapsed after the Twin Towers for no apparent reason, in a manner consistent with a controlled demolition.
We're entering the weird, wild, and wacky world of conspiracy theories, men in black, deceit, doubt, mistrust, and delusion.
But on which side?
First, let's be clear about what the two sides are, then we'll examine the evidence supporting each of them.
The conspiracy theory states that World Trade Center 7 was a controlled demolition, an intentional destruction of the building by our government.
The evidence supporting this theory is threefold.
First, the video of the collapse and the tidy distribution of the resultant debris appear consistent with known controlled demolitions.
Second, photographs of the building before it collapsed showed little or no damage to cause a collapse.
Third, fire alone cannot destroy a steel building, and so the cause must lie in high-energy explosives.
A great deal more information is put forward by the supporters of this theory as evidence, but it's really only suppositions about proposed motives and observations of events perceived as unusual, and so it is actually not testable evidence of a direct physical cause.
This information includes government offices located in the building, the establishment of Giuliani's emergency management headquarters on the 23rd floor, and portions of the government's preliminary reports that openly stated that certain unknowns remained.
The competing theory is found in those very same government reports.
The first, a preliminary report issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency only eight months after the event, concluded that fires on the fifth through seventh floors caused the collapse.
But infamously noted, the specifics of the fires in World Trade Center 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time.
Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence.
Further research, investigation, and analysis are needed to resolve this issue.
Three years later, the National Institute of Standards and Technology issued a working draft of the Complete Theory, scheduled to be finished in 2008.
This report states that the building suffered two major failures, either of which could have been survived on its own, but not in combination.
The first failure was severe damage to 10 stories of the south side of the building, dramatically shown in a single frame of video from an ABC News helicopter, which destroyed several major columns.
The second failure was the fire, fed in part by diesel generator fuel from high-pressure tanks, which proceeded unfought for seven hours due to a lack of water pressure and caused terminal weakening in the remaining columns that were already overloaded from the loss of the initial columns.
Firefighters noted a growing bulge between the 10th and 13th floors and major structural creaking sounds and finally evacuated.
Two hours later, the east wall began to crack and bow.
The east penthouse sank into the structure and eight seconds later, the northeast corner fell, bringing the rest of the building down on top of it.
No evidence of any explosives were ever found, but the conspiracy theory states that this is because the government took away all the debris before it could be independently tested.
Since it's normal for debris to be removed following any such destruction, this particular piece of information is too ambiguous to be given serious weight as proof of a conspiracy.
The claim that fire has never before destroyed a steel-framed building seems to hold up well, as it's hard to find a recent example of it.
The reason is that modern building fires are always fought.
They have sprinkler systems, and their steel is well insulated.
Turn the clock back a few decades to World War II, when there was massive worldwide incendiary bombing of major cities, there were no sprinkler systems, and firefighters had no hope of responding.
There were many hundreds of steel-framed buildings that were destroyed by fire.
Not by bombs, by fire.
The Edo Museum in Tokyo has preserved gnarled masses of giant girders twisted into knots by fire.
Why Controlled Demolition Claims Fail 00:06:39
London's Imperial War Museum has thousands of photographs of the same and even a large collection of contemporary art depicting warped steel girders.
Dresden's City Historical Museum also shows examples of steel girders from buildings that collapsed from fire during that city's most infamous of all large-scale incendiary attacks.
These museum collections all predate any alleged September 11th conspiracy.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding.
Together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
There are three videos of the actual collapse that are of decent quality, and all show a collapse that appears reasonably consistent with what most laypeople have seen of controlled demolitions on television.
The most obvious difference is that controlled demolitions start with a multiple series of minor explosions distributed throughout the building to cut various support structures in a carefully planned sequence, followed a few seconds later by the charges to blow the key structural elements in a sequence designed to initiate the collapse in the desired direction.
None of the videos of Building 7's collapse show any minor explosions.
They simply show the top of the building begin to gracefully sag, as if it's made of clay, then the whole thing drops.
So while the manner of collapse may look superficially similar to a controlled demolition at first glance, a more careful examination shows critically important and non-ambiguous differences.
The neat, tidy arrangement of the debris of Building 7 is another characteristic of controlled demolitions that is claimed by the conspiracy theorists.
WTC7.net states that the pile was almost entirely within the footprint of the former building.
In fact, Building 7's debris field was neither tidy nor well contained within the footprint.
The videos of the collapse are all from far away and show only the top portion of the building before it disappears behind the skyline.
Lower down, the collapse became much more chaotic.
Two nearby buildings were nearly destroyed by it.
The Verizon building suffered $1.4 billion in damage from the collapse of Building 7, but was able to be repaired.
Manhattan Community College's Fitterman Hall building, however, was not so lucky and suffered such major damage that it could not be saved.
What remains of it is still being deconstructed, piece by piece.
Could a building with such little apparent external damage collapse like this?
The photos and videos on the conspiracy theory websites are from other angles and show only relatively minor, superficial damage to the building.
And even the NIST has said that the fire alone would probably not have destroyed the building.
But let's not forget that Building 7 did have damage.
Severe damage.
A deep gouge cutting a quarter of the way through the building, 10 floors high.
Yet even if there was such extensive damage, argue the conspiracy theorists, that fact alone would invalidate the government report.
Also from WTC7.net.
The alleged damage was asymmetric, confined to the tower's south side, and any weakening of the steelwork from fire exposure would also be asymmetric.
Thus, even if the damage were sufficient to cause the whole building to collapse, it would have fallen over asymmetrically, toward the south.
This claim forgets that nobody has said the damage alone was responsible for the collapse.
According to the NIST report, the initial loss of the columns served only to transfer the building load to the remaining columns, thus exceeding their load-bearing capacities, which then gave way after being adequately softened by the fire.
In such a condition, the building would have insufficient support throughout.
The east side, already sagging, dropped first and pulled the rest of the building down in a slightly diagonal collapse.
The conspiracy theorists are correct in that the fall was not entirely symmetric, as it strayed enough to do the aforementioned damage to the Verizon and Manhattan Community College buildings.
The conspiracy theorists have hardly proven that explosives are the only possible explanation for the collapse.
There's really nothing that's either mysterious or unexpected about the manner of Building 7's collapse.
It was doomed by the damage, the diesel-fed fires, and the lack of firefighting capability.
All the physical evidence, photographic evidence, and testimony of the firefighters is perfectly consistent with the government's official report.
The conspiracy theory is supported by no evidence and is inconsistent with all of the events in the seven hours preceding the collapse.
The cause of Building 7's collapse is a question where very little critical analysis needs to be applied by a rational person.
Skepticism as the Best Medicine 00:01:42
Judge the evidence for yourself.
Don't forget, Skeptoid is licensed for use in the classroom and is encouraged.
Also, see the appearances page on skeptoid.com for information about having me come and speak at your school or skeptical, scientific, or secular club or organization.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone, this is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double-doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection