All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Oct. 30, 2007 - Skeptoid
20:53
Skeptoid #72: Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Real or Imagined?

Some claim to be hypersensitive to electromagnetism. Science has already solved what's really going on. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
The Rise of Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity 00:02:52
Every human with a human body suffers from what we call symptoms of life.
Occasional fatigue, headaches, joint pain, stress, etc.
But some who feel these insist that the explanation must lie in an undiagnosed, unrecognized medical condition.
And for many, they have decided that they have electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
Literally, an allergy to technology.
And that's coming up today on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and we'll replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
Real or imagined?
Today we're going to put on a suit made of metal screening to shield us from electromagnetic radiation and walk around looking like Robbie the robot.
For today's topic is one of the latest fad illnesses caused by the evils of our modern technological society.
Electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
You've seen them on the TV news and on the internet.
Thousands of people worldwide, though mostly concentrated in the United Kingdom and Sweden, who believe that their bodies are being afflicted by the electromagnetic radiation put out by computers, wireless data networks, cell phone networks, radio and television broadcasting, power lines, and virtually anything that uses electricity.
Mass media trumpet the alarmist headlines, like one article that proclaims, for years, opponents of cell towers and wireless technology have voiced concerns about potential health effects of electromagnetic fields.
Once ridiculed as crackpots, they're starting to get backup from the scientific community.
Real Symptoms or Psychosomatic Illness 00:06:32
Generally called electrosensitivity, or ES for short, the condition manifests itself in sufferers as skin sensitivity and blemishing, light sensitivity, fatigue, high blood pressure, headaches, joint pain, dizziness, and a whole array of associated symptoms.
Interestingly, these are also the exact same symptoms caused by simple stress.
We'll come back to that later.
There is no cure that is broadly accepted among ES advocates, but they do agree on one point.
Shielding, or complete removal from the environment, is the only surefire way to alleviate the symptoms.
Brake Spear Hospital, located in Hertfordshire, UK, advertises itself as the world's leading facility for the treatment of ES, among other things.
On its list of treatments for ES, unfortunately, is chelation therapy, a dangerous and tedious drug-based treatment for removing heavy metal contamination from the body.
People who choose this option should be aware that the drugs used in chelation therapy are approved only for use in cases where a blood test has proven acute heavy metal contamination.
This is because chelation therapy ravages the body and can produce side effects as dangerous as liver failure.
Any doctors or alternative practitioners who prescribe such therapy in the absence of its prescribed condition should be approached with extreme caution and probably also reported to the relevant medical board.
Other practitioners who claim to treat ES prescribe holistic treatments such as acupuncture, vitamin megadosing, chiropractic, exposure to energized crystals, reflexology, shiatsu, clay baths, and avoidance of genetically modified foods.
The Environmental Health Center in Dallas, Texas will even rent you their safe vacation home in Jamaica where you can be free of the causes of ES.
Although the pictures they post on their website show it to apparently be as full of electrical appliances as any other home, including a TV and VCR, which are alleged to be among the worst causes of ES.
What does the medical establishment have to say about ES?
Well, that depends on whom you ask.
Electrosensitivity.org, a website set up by Troy Knight, a young man suffering from ES, blames great opposition from medical establishments and governments for the lack of a definitive diagnosis of ES in mainstream science.
I'm not sure how he defines great opposition or what form he believes such opposition might take, but quite to the contrary, a number of studies have been done.
Nobody doubts that a large number of people worldwide report this condition, and nobody doubts the reality of their symptoms or the suffering they endure.
What falls under skepticism is their self-diagnosis that their condition is caused by the proximity of electrically powered devices.
Quite obviously, people in many countries around the world have been using electricity for over a century, and in poorer regions like parts of Asia, Africa, and South America, there are populations who, even today, use no electricity at all.
If normal levels of electromagnetic radiation were indeed harmful to the body, then we would see correlation on a massive scale between such physiological damage and geography.
There is no such correlation, and no cases of observed physiological damage caused by electromagnetic radiation, even in the most industrialized regions.
Thus, there is very good reason for science to not simply accept this self-diagnosis without inquiry.
But the symptoms and suffering are still real.
So what do we do?
Well, we do science.
One of the first steps in doing science is to throw out the anecdotal evidence of personal testimonials, with apologies to the people wearing tinfoil helmets, and design randomized controlled trials to test for the true causes of the ailment and to test the efficacy of potential treatments.
So if it's not too politically incorrect to do so, let's take a look at some of these trials and see what's been learned.
Well-performed trials always have a number of features in common.
First, they do include subjects who objectively report themselves to be electrosensitive, and they also include people who do not.
Second, all subjects are usually surveyed to gauge their own perceived sensitivity to various electromagnetic phenomena, whether they claim to suffer from ES or not.
Third, the trials are blinded wherever possible.
Test administrators never know anything about a given subject's claimed sensitivity.
All subjects are randomly assigned to different test groups.
Subjects typically do not know what is being tested.
And finally, the statisticians who evaluate the results do not know the identity of any of the subjects or about the procedures performed on each group.
Statistical methods are employed to cancel out any bias wherever possible.
The first study we'll look at is one from 2005 by the UK Health Protection Agency, which found that a disproportionately large segment of self-reported ES sufferers also report suffering from other idiopathic symptom-based conditions.
Now, this doesn't tell us anything about ES, of course, but it does tell us that ES sufferers are more likely to also report other conditions that are commonly classified as psychosomatic, or as it's more politically correct to say, psychophysiologic illnesses.
It's fair to note that some psychosomatic cases are people simply faking symptoms, and while some ES sufferers might be faking, probably the great majority are not and are experiencing real symptoms.
And now we know that many of these people also report conditions known to be psychosomatic in nature.
Read between my lines at your own peril.
This finding is certainly consistent with the findings of other studies, which have tested various treatments for ES.
What these studies have found is that the only successful treatment has been psychotherapy.
Testing the Ability to Detect Signals 00:10:09
A trial at Sweden's University of Uppsala's Department of Clinical Psychology took blood samples from subjects and analyzed them for indicators of stress, both before and after the test.
Some subjects were secretly exposed to electromagnetic radiation, but there were neither any differences between ES sufferers and control subjects in how they reacted to it, nor were there any differences in stress among those who received radiation and those who did not.
When subjects received psychotherapy, the patients who reported themselves as ES sufferers had a greater reduction in stress levels following psychotherapy than did subjects who did not report themselves as hypersensitive.
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Malaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finished the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast and this ship does always sell out.
Act now or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com/slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board.
That's skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Another such trial was performed at the Environmental Illness Research Center in Hödinga, Sweden.
Half the subjects reported themselves as hypersensitive, half did not.
Half received cognitive behavioral therapy.
Half did not.
All were evaluated for stress before the study, after the study, and six months later.
Just like in the other trial, subjects with perceived hypersensitivity benefited more from cognitive behavioral therapy than did those who were not hypersensitive.
There were no other significant differences among any groups.
So before all of you ES sufferers band together and have me tarred and feathered for proclaiming that yours is not a physical condition, allow me to remind you that I'm not saying that.
Psychological conditions do cause physical symptoms.
Like I said at the beginning of this episode, stress is a psychological condition, and it causes all the same symptoms that ES does.
These conditions can be very traumatic, and at their most severe, even life-threatening.
So it's not to be taken lightly, but every reasonable person should agree that it's best to understand the condition's true nature.
A 2005 trial at the Psychiatric University Hospital in Germany found further support for the hypothesis that ES sufferers are not having a physiological response to electromagnetic radiation.
The major study endpoint was the ability of the subjects to differentiate between real magnetic stimulation and a sham condition.
There were no significant differences between groups in the thresholds, neither of detecting the real magnetic stimulus nor in motor response.
But the three groups differed significantly in differentiating between stimulation and sham condition, with the subjectively electrosensitive people having the lowest ability to differentiate, and the control group with a high level of EMF-related complaints having the best ability to differentiate.
Differences between groups were mostly due to false alarm reactions in the sham condition reported by subjectively electrosensitives.
We found no objective correlate of the self-perception of being electrosensitive.
These results represent the preponderance of evidence from well-performed trials seeking to find whether ES sufferers can actually detect the presence of electromagnetic fields and react to them.
Going back to Sweden again, a 2000 study at the Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine at the Center for Public Health Sciences found that ES sufferers were no better than the control group at deciding whether or not they were exposed to electric and magnetic fields.
In this test, subjects were exposed to four provocations at irregular and unknown intervals over several days, with at least several days of recovery time between each provocation.
Each subject received two real provocations of actual electromagnetic radiation and two sham provocations.
The study concluded that exposure to electromagnetic fields is not a sufficient cause of the symptoms experienced by ES sufferers.
Some researchers have turned their attention to causes that would correlate to the presence of common environmental EM sources, like computers or offices, most notably, flickering lights.
In the United States, televisions flicker at 30 Hz, fluorescent lights at 60 Hz, and computer monitors at a variety of frequencies in the same approximate range.
This flickering is usually imperceptible unless you look for it specifically, for example by waving your hand in front of a CRT monitor.
Generally, if your brain can detect flickering light sources, it knows that there are probably electromagnetic sources nearby.
Thus, an ES sufferer can correctly conclude that electromagnetic sources are irradiating them and logically, if incorrectly, associate that with their symptoms.
This was evidenced by another study from Sweden in 1997 from the University of Umea's Department of Environmental Medicine.
An increasing number of people in Sweden are claiming that they are hypersensitive to electricity.
These patients suffer from skin as well as neurological symptoms when they are near computer monitors, fluorescent tubes, or other electrical appliances.
Provocation studies with electromagnetic fields emitted from these appliances have, with only one exception, all been negative, indicating that there are other factors in the office environment that can affect the autonomic and or central nervous system, resulting in the symptoms reported.
Flickering light is one such factor and was therefore chosen as the exposure parameter in this study.
Ten patients complaining of electrical hypersensitivity and the same number of healthy volunteer control subjects were exposed to amplitude-modulated light.
A higher amplitude of brain cortical responses at all frequencies of stimulation was found when comparing patients with the control subjects.
The ability of a human brain to convince itself of just about anything is not to be underestimated.
If you are experiencing stress, and just about everyone is experiencing some stress, whatever you attribute it to will inevitably create more stress whenever you encounter it.
It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
If you believe yourself to be electrosensitive, then you will be, quite literally, whenever you perceive the presence of electromagnetism.
This doesn't mean that you have a paranormal ability to detect electromagnetic fields.
You don't.
But you might be able to hear the high-frequency ring of your neighbor's television set, or see the 60 Hz flickering of a fluorescent light bulb, or you might see that your computer has found a Wi-Fi network, or that your cell phone has four bars of signal.
There are many ways that a person can detect the probable presence of electromagnetic radiation without the ability to directly sense it.
And if you've fallen into the self-fulfilling syndrome of believing yourself to be electrosensitive, you will actually suffer measurable physical symptoms and can potentially become acutely ill.
By the same token, if you believe strongly enough that acupuncture or vitamins will cure your electrosensitivity, they probably will.
But all this strategy accomplishes is to reinforce faulty assumptions and leave you equally vulnerable to a recurrence in the future.
A better strategy is to understand the true cause of your stress, possibly through psychotherapy or possibly on your own, and either solve it or simply find a way to relax and blow off some steam.
I'll close with an experience related by a listener who wrote in that aptly illustrates this phenomenon.
We had an interesting incident near Humboldt State University.
A new cell tower went up and the local newspaper asked a number of people what they thought of it.
Some said they noticed their cell phone reception was better.
Some said they noticed the tower was affecting their health.
To paraphrase the bottom line, think about how much more pronounced these effects will be once the tower is actually operational.
A Listener's Cell Tower Experience 00:01:16
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone, this is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX
Export Selection