All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Oct. 9, 2007 - Skeptoid
11:49
Skeptoid #69: Ann Coulter, Scientist

Conservative pundit Ann Coulter should stick to politics; her science is too screwed up for words. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Debunking Political Science Claims 00:06:17
One thing that we strive for here on Skeptoid is to remain non-partisan and unbiased.
So you wouldn't expect to get an episode debunking some politician's policies, for example.
But when anyone, political figure included, makes factual scientific claims, those are absolutely fair game for skeptical analysis.
And that's what we've got for you today.
An examination of the science claims made by political pundit Ann Coulter.
And that's coming up right now on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's Hyperfixed, the new podcast for Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Ann Coulter, scientist.
Today we're going to crack open a best-selling book from a prominent author and read all sorts of pseudoscience.
Gee, haven't heard that one before, have we?
Sometimes it seems that the more popular a cultural phenomenon, the further away from true science it's likely to be.
Today's target is a purveyor of claimed science that disputes the scientific consensus on the origin of species.
And in scientific circles, this author is a pretty easy target, Ann Coulter.
Obviously, Ann Coulter is best known as a political figure.
She has a very clear, very well-known political stance, and you can agree with it or disagree with it.
Not what we talk about here.
What I want to talk about is Ann Coulter's science, the information she presents in her best-selling books that purports to be factual and educational.
In one of her recent books, Godless, The Church of Liberalism, she attacks evolutionary biology, but using only logical fallacies stemming from unfamiliarity with the scientific method to support her points, and urges a religious creation story to be taught in schools instead, even though creation and evolution are not necessarily mutually exclusive.
Coulter's attacks on evolution center around the usual creationist arguments.
Predictably, she hasn't come up with any original ones.
She generally relies on these four.
That evolutionary biology is a godless religion with Darwin as its prophet.
That evolution fails to explain things it has nothing to do with, like the origin of the universe.
That predictable gaps in the fossil record invalidate all other evidence.
And that hoaxes such as Piltdown Man cast doubt upon legitimate evidence.
I respect anyone who has a valid point and argues it intelligently, whether I agree with it or not.
But too often, the points you hear trumpeted the loudest are argued only with logical fallacies, straw man arguments, explaining an unknown with another unknown, or just plain good old-fashioned nonsense.
Anne Coulter may well have numerous valid political arguments and can probably debate them most intelligently.
But when she turns instead to science, all she finds in her bag of verbal ammunition is the latter, a cornucopia of unsupportable drivel.
This is what happens when you choose to make your opinions about science dependent on your religious convictions.
We hear this when the Kansas Board of Education notes that in two separate places, 1 Kings 7, 23-26 and 2 Chronicles 4, 2, the Bible reports a circumference as three times a diameter.
And so the board votes on officially redefining pi as exactly 3.0.
This is the type of science Ann Coulter wants our future scientists and engineers to work with.
When the courts, the media, the schools, and parents disagree with this flagrant attack on reason, Ann Coulter attacks them as godless enemies.
A far more fascinating and useful lesson for our students would be Archimedes' exciting calculation of pi using a circle and hexagons, without the benefit of algebra, trigonometry, or even decimal notation, and he did it in 250 BC.
This was the type of human achievement that we should be proudly celebrating, understanding, and emulating.
This was an example of true inspiration of the human spirit.
But it wasn't in the Bible, so vilify it.
Label it as blasphemous and tear it out of our textbooks.
Pi equals three, and we'll hear no more about it, despite the fact that you can't find a single circle anywhere on the planet whose circumference can be measured as exactly thrice its diameter.
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Málaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finished the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating, skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
Evolutionary Biology Is Valid 00:04:21
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast and this ship does always sell out.
Act now or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board.
That's skeptoid.com slash adventures.
How does Ann Coulter, who's obviously very smart and knows what she's doing, justify her science?
Does she really believe it?
Or is she another P.T. Barnum saying whatever her fans will buy at the cash register?
If it's the latter, fine, I can understand that.
If it's the former, and she really believes what she espouses, something's wrong somewhere.
Very wrong.
Finding evolutionary biology to be invalid as a science because it has nothing to do with the origin of the stars is a logical fallacy, and someone as smart as Ann Coulter should know that.
Finding evolutionary biology to be invalid as a science because some hoaxers once tried to make money exhibiting a fake skeleton they built is a logical fallacy.
and someone as smart as Ann Coulter should know that.
Finding evolutionary biology to be invalid as a science because some examples of one foundation of its evidence are buried under millions of years of rock and can't reasonably be expected to ever be found, despite the fact that other foundations of its evidence, such as genetics, resistant bacteria, and observation, are perfectly intact, is a logical fallacy, and someone as smart as Ann Coulter should know that.
The crime lab doesn't throw out all the DNA evidence, bloodstains, and the murder weapon just because many of the fingerprints were wiped clean.
Finding evolutionary biology to be invalid as a science because it's about speciation and not other subjects like the origin of life is a logical fallacy, and someone as smart as Ann Coulter should know that.
Finding evolutionary biology to be invalid as a science because we learn new information and incorporate it to improve our theory over time, like you're supposed to do with all theories, is a logical fallacy, and Ann Coulter should know that.
Finding evolutionary biology to be invalid as a science because you want to pretend that it's about worshiping Darwin rather than about studying and explaining speciation, or even to pretend that anything about the theory forbids you to think God intended it to happen this way, is just plain stupid and laughable, and I'm really sorry for anyone who feels that antagonistic against our natural world and against the learning process.
One reviewer notes that Ann Coulter writes with a keen appreciation for genuine science.
But her genuine science seems to have no supported theory of its own and instead consists merely of attacking mainstream science with a transparent collection of hoary devices such as ad hominem, special pleadings, observational selection, non-sequiturs, slippery slopes, and straw men.
Charles Darwin wrote The Origin of Species and it was generally correct in its fundamentals, but it was also massively incomplete compared to what we know now, and he was also wrong in many of his conjectures.
This is to be expected of any pioneering work.
Little or none of Darwin's specific theories of the mechanisms of natural selection survive in their original form.
But Anne Coulter characterizes this treatment of Darwin as absolute devotion to a prophet which allows no challenges to the official religion.
I wonder how she expects the rest of us to characterize her science.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from skeptoid.com.
Skepticism As The Best Medicine 00:01:06
Hello everyone, this is Adrienne Hill from Skookam Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and moose.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection