All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
July 30, 2007 - Skeptoid
13:27
Skeptoid #58: All About Fluoridation

A few fringe activists claim that fluoridation of water carries more danger than benefit. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
The Fluoridation Lobby 00:08:04
The fluoridation of water is one of those inflammatory issues that divide communities around the world.
Health science says that the level of fluoride in our tap water should be closely controlled, while anti-fluoride activists insist that it be left at its natural level, whether that's higher or lower, as they believe that human intervention will result in horrific health consequences.
Fluoridation is today on Skeptoid.
Hi, I'm Alex Goldman.
You may know me as the host of Reply All, but I'm done with that.
I'm doing something else now.
I've started a new podcast called Hyperfixed.
On every episode of Hyperfixed, listeners write in with their problems and I try to solve them.
Some massive and life-altering, and some so minuscule it'll boggle your mind.
No matter the problem, no matter the size, I'm here for you.
That's HyperFixed, the new podcast from Radiotopia.
Find it wherever you listen to podcasts or at hyperfixedpod.com.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from skeptoid.com.
Fluoridation, death from the faucet.
Today we're going to wrap our big juicy lips around the kitchen faucet, turn on the valve, and fill our bodies with a poisonous chemical placed in our water by the government.
Fluoride.
Most people understand that fluoridation of water means that fluoride is added by the local municipal water supplier, and that's generally correct.
What most people don't know is that in some cases, fluoridation means removing excess fluoride that occurs naturally in the water supply.
Fluoride is a natural component of groundwater, and it occurs naturally everywhere in the world, in varying amounts.
The process of fluoridation is to adjust the fluoride content of the water to the most healthful level.
So how did fluoridation become a normal part of municipal water supply?
It all goes back to an early 20th century dentist named Dr. Frederick McKay, who practiced dentistry in Colorado and noticed that a lot of his patients seemed to have brown teeth.
In Texas, brown teeth were so prevalent that they were simply called Texas teeth.
Dr. McKay spent 30 years investigating the cause.
Why?
Because it also turned out that people with Texas teeth also had extremely low levels of dental decay.
If you had brown teeth, you were only one-third as likely to have cavities.
Finally, in 1931, it was determined that naturally occurring fluoride in the local drinking water was responsible for both the discoloration and the lack of decay.
Texas and Colorado had extremely high levels of natural fluoride, causing the discoloration, a condition now known as dental fluorosis, which is harmless if a tad unattractive.
Years of research and testing in different cities and states, conducted by the National Health Service, determined that one part per million was the ideal proportion, giving the same protection from decay and avoiding the dental fluorosis.
Ever since then, it has been the standard practice to regulate fluoride levels in municipal water supplies to one part per million.
There has been broad scientific and medical consensus for decades that one part per million of fluoride is best for health, and exactly zero rigorously conducted scientific trials that have indicated any sign of danger.
For all practical purposes, it is an over and done with issue.
And yet, like so many advances in science or medicine, fluoridation is criticized by a small yet vocal fringe group.
There is absolutely an anti-fluoridation lobby in this country.
Their process is to flood the mass media with as many claims as they can invent.
Claims like fluoridation causes cancer or other illnesses.
That insufficient research has been done or that there is scientific controversy surrounding fluoridation.
That fluoride is a dangerous chemical poison.
That fluoridation has been banned in Europe.
That it eliminates your freedom of choice.
or any of a dozen other baseless and untrue statements intended to alarm and frighten the public.
Alarming the public is not hard to do.
There are many communities in the United States where voters have been compelled to ban fluoridation by this widespread misinformation campaign.
Let's turn our eye onto one such community, Arcata, an idyllic coastal hamlet in Northern California that recently won this battle after a divisive and painful fight in the newspapers and in City Hall.
A principal champion of the science behind fluoridation is Kevin Hoover, editor of the Arcata I newspaper.
In answering the flood of anti-fluoridation scare tactics, Hoover said, There are no known victims.
If there was a problem with municipal fluoridation, wouldn't we at least have a few people who showed some signs of harm after 44 years?
All the anti-fluoride people could say was that the victims are undiagnosed, but not why.
They produced no victims, just lots of dubious statistics and horror stories with no provenance.
Measure W to ban fluoridation was carefully crafted by the anti-fluoridation lobby to simply require FDA approval of anything added to Arcata's water supply, which sounds reasonable and sounds like a good idea, and a layperson otherwise uninformed would be likely to vote for it.
The catch is that the Food and Drug Administration has nothing whatsoever to do with municipal water supplies.
And so of course, FDA approval would never happen by law.
Measure W was essentially a devious, deceitful trick intended to further the anti-fluoridation lobby's agenda at the expense of the dental health of Arcata's children.
Generally, it's this same tactic that has been responsible for most anti-fluoridation measures that have passed in the United States.
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Málaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finish the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating, skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast and this ship does always sell out.
Act now or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Contrarian Scientists Speculate 00:03:38
How else does the anti-fluoridation lobby go about spreading their misinformation?
Generally, they distribute an eight-page pamphlet written by Dr. John Yamu Yannis, the grandfather of anti-fluoridation activism.
Dr. Yamu Yannis was a naturopath who rejected modern medicine and was the principal originator of the claim that fluoridation causes cancer.
He raised his family with an emphasis on a fluoride-free diet to avoid cancer.
And, as I'm sure you've guessed, Dr. Yamu Yannis died of cancer in 2000, which he had refused to treat in accordance with his naturopathic philosophy.
His type of cancer has a 95% five-year survival rate when properly treated.
Most other experts cited by the activists are people like Dr. Hugo Thorell, who did indeed oppose fluoridation in the early days.
What they don't tell you is that Dr. Thorell changed his mind and became a supporter after the research was published.
They'll often cite Swedish Nobel Prize winner Arvid Carlson, known for his work with dopamine.
He's the only known Nobel Prize winner to oppose fluoridation, but the activists multiply him and frequently say that dozens or many Nobel Prize winners oppose it.
When you can only find one guy who opposes something, and his work is in a completely different field anyway, that's a pretty sad commentary on your position.
It's also a case of the exception proving the rule.
There are always a few contrarian scientists in every field with opinions opposite from the consensus.
It's also stated that fluoridation adds dangerous levels of lead, arsenic, and mercury to the water.
Again, this is simply untrue, and making such a claim is really a form of terrorism.
In Arcata, no detectable levels of any of those are found in the fluoridated water.
Not just below safe levels, mind you.
Zero.
You'll also hear the claim that fluoridation has been banned in Europe.
This is also completely untrue.
In Europe, it's more common to fluoridate salt instead of water, thus bringing the same benefits via a different delivery method.
As long as you don't look at that fact, the anti-fluoridation people can truthfully say that Europe rejects fluoridation of water.
Thanks to the efforts of Hoover and all of Arcata's doctors, dentists, educators, social workers, and newspapers, Measure W to ban fluoridation was soundly defeated in the election.
And it's a good thing, too.
According to sources in Arcata, if Measure W had passed, the same people were going to try and ban childhood vaccinations next.
Why do they do it?
We can really only speculate.
Presumably, most of these people are good citizens who love their families and want the best for everyone.
I speculate that a lot of them are simply ignorant of the facts, and possibly mistrust of the government or anti-corporatism compels them to tend to ignore information from official sources and embrace alternative claims, whatever their source.
Hoover gave his own answer to this question in an editorial for the Arcata I. Billion-dollar industries thrive around entirely imaginary phenomena.
Astrology, numerology, UFOs, alien abductions, Holocaust denial, the face on Mars, chemtrails, innumerable media-centered conspiracy theories and fluoride phobia thrive because they inhabit that magical nexus where paranoia meets superstition.
Saving Money on Fear 00:01:40
Fertile ground for fomenting fear.
The United States Public Health Service estimates that every dollar spent fluoridating water saves $50 in dental expenses.
If fluoridation is truly just another conspiracy, then at least this is one that saves money.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone, this is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX
Export Selection