All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Oct. 19, 2006 - Skeptoid
13:19
Skeptoid #3: Ethics of Peddling the Paranormal

A proposal that it might be ethical for non-believers to sell paranormal services to the grieving in certain cases. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Ethics of Selling the Paranormal 00:01:37
In a world where the conversation about mental health tends to take center stage more often, we should focus on the alternative providers who cater to the same customer base with products that are not quite so scientific, like psychics.
People are going to seek out psychics no matter what.
So is it possible to find an ethical way to sell paranormal services?
We're going to find out today on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and we'll replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Redefining Ethical Skepticism in Psychic Services 00:09:34
The ethics of peddling the paranormal.
Today we're going to re-examine a popular mantra among those who identify as being of a skeptical bent, the idea that anyone knowingly selling a worthless paranormal service is being unethical.
It's an area where I've broken ranks with some of my colleagues and had to agree to disagree.
And obviously, we're not talking about cases where harm is done because there's no question that's unethical.
But even that leads us into a gray area.
So let's dive in and examine the ethics of peddling the paranormal.
In our society, people have the right to purchase things they want that are of no benefit or even harmful.
Cigarettes, alcohol, expensive cosmetic products containing questionable ingredients like extract of oleander.
These are just a few examples.
It's a free country and most people want these things.
We've decided as a nation that the preferences of a few should not curtail the freedoms of the many.
We've decided as a nation that businesses selling paranormal services, from palm readers to homeopathy stores, have every right to exist.
Many might raise convincing arguments that they're violating certain trade laws or defrauding customers, but the fact is that enough voters and lawmakers disagree.
And where we are is where we are.
Legally, these businesses are not being unethical, so long as they're causing no harm.
But of course, legally unethical is not the entire spectrum and still leaves plenty of room for consumers to be harmed.
Since these services legally have the right to exist and since people are free to make their own choices about using them, customers are going to do so.
These customers are believers who are going to buy these services.
If they don't buy them from the first shop, they're going to buy them from the second shop next door.
So let's imagine an ethical skeptic who understands this reality and hopes to come across an opportunity to do some good.
He knows cold reading.
He could be perfectly convincing and tell them exactly what they hope to hear for their money.
In fact, the customer's experience will be identical to that they'd receive from the, quote, real psychic next door.
This believing customer is going to be deceived, and no power on earth could convince that customer that he's being deceived.
Add it all up, and we have a customer who insists on being deceived, and who has the right to purchase that deception.
I believe it's perfectly ethical, perhaps even beneficial, for an ethical skeptic to be the one selling that product.
If you're like most people, you're disagreeing with me.
You're probably saying that our ethical skeptic is being dishonest and lying to the customer, while the real psychic, though his powers are no more real than mine, is at least being honest.
He's wrong, but he's honest.
They're selling the same thing, both giving the customer a satisfying experience.
I see it just like a supermarket manager who allows cigarettes to be sold in his store.
He knows they're a bad product, but people want them, and that's the way it is.
Hate the game, not the player.
Fixing the player isn't going to fix the game.
In my proposal here, we've at least accomplished one thing.
We've made the game a little bit safer by having one of the options out there be a responsible, ethical skeptic who's never going to give harmful advice and will sometimes be able to give good advice.
The best argument I've heard against my position is that this takes away the customer's dignity in removing his right to make a choice.
Our ethical skeptic is being disingenuous, telling him that he's someone he's not, when the psychic competitor next door is being honest in claiming psychic powers.
The customer chooses to go to a psychic.
Ethical skeptic is lying to him, while the psychic next door is not.
I understand this argument, and I agree that it's true.
But the reason this argument doesn't convince me is that it's irrelevant.
The net result is exactly the same.
The personal beliefs of the provider have no bearing on the transaction, just like the supermarket manager.
And focusing on this question is ignoring the elephant in the room.
The person wants to buy nonsense.
The personal feelings or opinions of the person selling it are simply not part of the equation.
Once the rubber meets the road, the seller's belief have no impact on the buyer's experience.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
Now it's time to address the point that's probably foremost on your mind.
What about the case where the pseudoscience being purchased is either harmful or takes the place of essential medical or psychiatric care?
I said at the very beginning this is about cases where no harm is done.
And this is the vast majority of cases.
Grandma thinks her poodle talks with her dead goldfish.
But what about the exceptions?
Here's a hypothetical case where the customer really needs medical care.
They have treatable cancer but prefer to pay a psychic for a new age healing by the laying on of hands.
Our ethical skeptic is neither completely stupid nor irresponsible nor in any particular need of blood money.
In this case, he puts on his best New Age hat and explains to this person in New Age terms that they'll understand and accept that new age healing can only help when applied alongside conventional cancer treatment.
If we tell him new age healing is bunk and he should go to the doctor, he'll write us off as a debunker and not listen and go instead to the psychic next door.
Here is where our ethical skeptics' New Age services are better, infinitely better, than those of the real psychic, who genuinely believes that laying on of hands should be used to the exclusion of real medicine.
It's the same in cases where the customer needs psychiatric care.
Let's say his mother died and for some reason his grief has developed into real mental illness that's impacting his ability to live his life and he wants to contact his dead mother.
This is not someone who wants to predict tomorrow's horse race.
This is someone who probably needs help beyond the ethical skeptic's abilities.
In this case, ethical skeptic can dim the lights, hold as convincing a seance as he can, and tell the sufferer that his mother is worried about him and begs him to seek some professional help.
If you tell him in this manner, he's likely to actually listen and a qualified doctor can handle it from there.
But if you take the usual skeptical path and explain to him that talking to the dead is bunk and only a real doctor can help him, he won't listen.
He'll go to the real psychic next door and his problems will continue.
Again, the ethical skeptic's services are good because they'll actually lead to a professional solution.
The real psychic services are bad because they perpetuate the harm.
This customer is not open to any solution that does not confirm his belief in psychics.
And you have to understand that reality if you hope to actually help him.
Yes, it's a lie to confirm his belief in the paranormal, but it's a white lie that helps.
I argue that paranormal services are better provided by people who understand their limitations rather than by those who believe they can do something they can't.
Think how much better off believers would be if the paranormal services they received always led them to trained professionals in cases where such is needed.
However, these cases are in the minority.
Most of the time, people who buy paranormal products or services, be it goddess worshiping seminars, homeopathy, acupuncture, or psychic readings, are buying completely harmless services.
Supporting Shows with White Lies 00:02:04
It's not something I would do because I want different things from my career.
But as long as the paranormal businesses are going to exist whether we like it or not, I hope to see even more ethical skeptics entering the business.
Less harm would be done.
And even if it's only every once in a while, people would be actually helped instead of merely tricked into thinking they were helped.
Skeptoid is a 501c3 nonprofit and this show is completely listener supported.
If you like it, please come to our website skeptoid.com and sign up to make a recurring monthly micropayment that'll make a big difference in my ability to continue producing the show.
Thanks very much.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone, this is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX
Export Selection