| Time | Text |
|---|---|
|
Legal Battle Ahead
00:13:59
|
|
| This is an iHeart podcast. | |
| Guaranteed human. | |
| Or two, Sean Hannity Show this Friday, 800-941 Sean is on number. | |
| If you want to be a part of the program. | |
| All right. | |
| So I have been pointing out, and again, I'm going to tell the story. | |
| I don't often have time during the week to meet up with friends. | |
| My schedule is too tight, and I'm just busy, and I'm focused and dialed in on my job every day. | |
| And I have a lot of reading to do, and I like to work out and eat right, and I like to cook my own food. | |
| But it was a rare moment. | |
| I had a very good friend that happened to be in town, was able to grab breakfast this morning. | |
| And while I'm there, my phone is blowing up because this decision comes down as it relates to tariffs, a 6'3 decision. | |
| Okay. | |
| And I'm reading it. | |
| And I'm like, I'm getting doom and gloom all over my phone. | |
| This is a disaster. | |
| We may have to pay back $300 billion. | |
| And I'm like, okay, let me finish my breakfast. | |
| I'm going to go home. | |
| Went home, read the opinion as quickly as I could, read the dissents of both Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Clarence Thomas. | |
| And I realized very quickly, and then I watched the press conference of President Trump, that this decision in many ways is meaningless. | |
| And it's right there in the dissent of Justice Kavanaugh, who went, you know, and the president cited him when he gave his remarks today. | |
| And that is, although I firmly disagree with the court's holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a president's ability to order tariffs going forward. | |
| He was correct. | |
| And then what's even better is he laid out the solution that can be implemented. | |
| And he said it would be an unmitigated disaster and utter chaos if it ever came down to having to work out some repayment plan and how do you, you know, who paid the money, et cetera, et cetera. | |
| But putting all that aside, and what the president then went on to say is he can charge a lot more. | |
| And he announced that he would be charging more, 10% more. | |
| And numerous other federal statutes, in fact, authorized the president to impose tariffs and justify most, if not all, of the tariffs at issue. | |
| And then the exact statutes were referenced in part in the dissent by Kavanaugh as echoed by Clarence Thomas in a separate dissent, building off of Kavanaugh's dissent. | |
| And then the president announcing that these statutes include the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. | |
| He gave the exact section, Section 232, the Trade Act of 1974, Sections 122, 201, 301, the Tariff Act, Section 338. | |
| And, you know, he points out it's a little longer process, but he implemented it all today, all of it. | |
| So the decision in that sense, in all practical terms, is rendered meaningless almost immediately. | |
| Now, the president did talk about the court in general, that there are some justices that will never rule for him. | |
| He's not wrong. | |
| It's political. | |
| That's why I worry about justice in this country because there is too much there are too many political agendas in play. | |
| Like you may be charged with a crime in one jurisdiction and there's no evidence to convict you and yet you go into a politicized jurisdiction if you're a political figure and you're going to be found guilty just by walking in the courtroom. | |
| Pretty unbelievable. | |
| As Justice Thomas said, neither the statutory text nor the Constitution provide a basis for ruling against the president. | |
| Congress authorized the president to regulate importation. | |
| And of course, there's a lot of precedents behind it. | |
| Long story short, I'm going to get analysis, legal analysis from our friend Greg Jarrett, Fox News, legal analyst. | |
| And we really do have a special guest today, Anthony Esposito. | |
| Now, Anthony happens to be a saint. | |
| And I say that affectionately. | |
| I've spent time with Anthony. | |
| He's a great guy. | |
| And he is married to our very own Linda, but he's also runs his own capital group as he's the CEO of Ascalon 6, which is a capital group which obviously is impacted by this decision, if in fact he was going to be impacted by it. | |
| Anthony, great to have you. | |
| Thank you for being with us. | |
| Hey, Sean, thank you so much for having me. | |
| I appreciate that. | |
| By the way, does Linda overfeed the cats? | |
| Because we're going to get to that later in the program. | |
| I'm just asking. | |
| Let's just say the cats are very fat and very happy. | |
| Okay. | |
| Well, one got so fat that it needs the fat shot, but instead, I guess we sent it to the fat farm. | |
| Now that President Trump made same fat okay again. | |
| All right, let's start on the legal side. | |
| Greg Jarrett, your analysis of the decision and the dissents. | |
| Well, the court got it wrong because Article 2 of the Constitution, Section 2, gives the president broad power over foreign affairs and international commerce. | |
| And tariffs qualify, quite obviously, as both. | |
| But on top of that, as you pointed out, Shaunch, Congress delegated to the president even more authority under several trade acts and the Emergency Powers Act to, quote, regulate imports. | |
| What is that? | |
| Well, it's tariffs. | |
| But the majority today decided, well, we're going to draw a distinction without a difference by saying, gee, when Trump invoked the Emergency Act, it doesn't actually say the word tariffs. | |
| And since we think tariffs are really taxes in disguise, that's the power of Congress. | |
| They're playing word games, Sean. | |
| They're twisting the plain meaning of the phrase regulate imports, because that's a very comprehensive term historically. | |
| And of course it means tariffs. | |
| It means duties and license fees, limits on imported goods. | |
| It means all those things. | |
| But, you know, look, I listened to the oral arguments. | |
| You could see this coming. | |
| It had less to do about the law, more about political perceptions at a time when, you know, the Supremes may feel under siege by Democrats for always siding with Trump, which is not true at all. | |
| He's lost quite a few. | |
| And it's no coincidence that John Roberts wrote the majority opinion because, you know, as Chief Justice, he cares more about the reputation of the court and his own personal legacy than he does fidelity to the law. | |
| Anthony, let me get your take on this from an investor's point of view. | |
| And more specifically, the options that are available for the president to not only not have to pay back, but to continue an even more statutory authority than he was even using or implementing in this particular case. | |
| For example, Section 301 of the Trade Act or Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act or Section 122 of the Trade Act, all of which seem applicable and all of which the president imposed today. | |
| Yeah, I think from an investor point of view, it's concerning to me. | |
| We were actually looking at this mosaic of the Trump policy, the Trump agenda, and we were looking at deregulation. | |
| We were looking at Drill Baby Drill. | |
| We were looking at lower taxes, the Big Beautiful Bill, the tariff trade deficit conversation, private investment in the country. | |
| Everything was moving in the right direction, which I'm sure was driving the Democrats crazy. | |
| And then we look at the tariffs in particular, and there were two things that were really important as far as the trajectory of the economy. | |
| First one was simply the tariffs we received, right? | |
| So we're receiving tariffs. | |
| We received about $250 billion in tariffs. | |
| Not only is that money that's coming into the United States and helping work on a deficit reduction, which we desperately need, but on the trade deficit side, where we are relinquishing less U.S. dollars abroad. | |
| So we've been exporting our wealth with these massive trade deficits for decades. | |
| And that has done damage to the dollar. | |
| It's done damage to the standing of the United States. | |
| And on an inflationary front, it's been horrible. | |
| So we've taken in tariff dollars and we've exported less U.S. dollars. | |
| This is really important. | |
| The second part of the negotiation, as far as the financial part, we've taken in about $7 trillion in investments pledged to the United States through these negotiations from everyone from the UAE to Saudi Arabia to Japan to South Korea. | |
| These investments are key to the growth of private industry in the United States, private GDP growth, not government-funded, taxpayer-funded, inflationary growth, which we saw under Biden, but private investment growth and the reigniting of manufacturing, construction, and the private economy in the country. | |
| So we're now, the Supreme Court is now ruling, and I agree 100%, obviously, with Greg, that unconstitutionally they took away the tariff revenue. | |
| They're allowing us to now start to have to send more U.S. dollars overseas. | |
| And now you're taking away $7 trillion in private investments, which would equal higher real wages, more private industry jobs, a growth and an onshoring of manufacturing in the country. | |
| It's a disaster that the Supreme Court ruled in this way. | |
| It is clearly political. | |
| It's biased. | |
| and it is truly hurting the american worker at far as we're talking about that uh... uh... | |
| i'm sorry continue No, really quick, Sean. | |
| Thank you. | |
| As far as where Trump goes, he already said that they're drafting Section 122, which is a 15% tariff across the board for the next 150 days. | |
| And then you can look at other items. | |
| And I love the fact that Kavanaugh, in particular, in his opinion, gave the path to where this could actually give Trump more power as far as tariffs. | |
| If you look at Section 338, for example, of the Tariff Act of 1930, he could actually put tariffs of 50% across the board if he wants to under that section. | |
| So he has some ways to go. | |
| He's going to use every tool in the toolbox, and he's going to continue to fight the fight, I'm sure. | |
| What about the power that this president has used as commander-in-chief to keep the country safe and secure by basically saying to countries that you either get on board and you adopt peaceful policies or I will institute a tariff on your country? | |
| It seems to me that the left is all too willing to Bigfoot on top of the president's authority, constitutional authority as commander-in-chief, Greg. | |
| Yeah, but Congress, you know, dithers. | |
| That's the only thing they're good at. | |
| Look, Trump knew this was coming. | |
| I know that because I actually talked to him in November, shortly after the oral arguments. | |
| And he knew a lot about those oral arguments. | |
| He was paying attention. | |
| And as a consequence, you know, the White House had been preparing to do what he did today, replicate the exact same tariffs under three different trade acts that Congress passed over the last century that gives the president authority to levy tariffs. | |
| And they literally use the word tariffs. | |
| So there'll be no bickering over that. | |
| So, for example, under Section 301 of the 74 Trade Act, he can do it to counter unfair trade practices or injury to our domestic industry or balance of payment deficits, all of which have been happening to the United States for a long time and damaging our economy. | |
| And Trump's the first one to finally stand up and say no more. | |
| There are two other trade acts that empower him to assign tariffs against countries that discriminate against the U.S. or threaten our national security. | |
| So his power is not going away. | |
| As for the messy business of billions in refunds to importers, don't forget, Trump has enormous leverage. | |
| I mean, he can say to these foreign importers, you better waive your right that you think you have to a refund or the next round of tariffs that I'm going to invoke against you or under a different authority are going to be a lot more harsh. | |
| So, you know, let's not forget Trump is the consummate negotiator. | |
| He is more than capable of driving hard bargains. | |
| He's been doing it his whole life, Sean. | |
| Well, that was the first thing I thought. | |
| I'm like, if you think this is over, you people do not understand Donald Trump. | |
| Anthony, where does this end up? | |
| Has this now become the next legal battle, the next court battle? | |
| Yeah, I believe it does. | |
| I believe, however, the Trump administration needs to move through that process legally. | |
| They will, but we're going to end up in the same place. | |
| The tariff conversation, the trade deficit conversation is key to the Trump agenda. | |
| And to your point, they truly do not understand Trump, his drive, or where he's directing this country. | |
| So we'll end up in the legal battle. | |
| We'll run through the motions that we need to, and we're going to end up in the same place. | |
| And true to form, I would bet that we end up in an even better place because it seems like every time they come at Donald Trump, he comes out right and he comes out in a stronger position. | |
| So that's kind of how I see this playing out. | |
|
Innovation Feeds the World
00:02:58
|
|
| All right. | |
| We really appreciate your expertise. | |
| Anthony Esposito and Greg Jarrett. | |
| And Anthony, by the way, married to Linda. | |
| My last question to you is, you don't really like those cats either, do you? | |
| I'm going to tell you something. | |
| Linda is a heaven sent, and I can fat animal if I need to to have her in my life. | |
| I'm very happy with my fat cats. | |
| Oh, okay. | |
| I'm just, see, Linda, he's acknowledging that they're fat. | |
| We'll get to that with PAGS later in the program today, okay? | |
| Appreciate you both being with us. | |
| Greg Jarrett, Anthony Esposito, thank you. | |
| His company, by the way, is Ascalon 6. | |
| That's his wheelhouse. | |
| And Greg Jarrett, of course, the best of the law. | |
| So I was a local radio host in Huntsville, Alabama, and I would go up about 60, 90 minutes north to Nashville, Tennessee. | |
| I often would go there. | |
| Love Music City. | |
| It's exploded in ways I can't even describe on this radio program ever since then. | |
| But even back then, there were issues involving the Tennessee Valley Authority and the power company power line, and it's gotten bigger than ever. | |
| And anyway, now there is a fight, a battle. | |
| Now, we've lost a lot of family farms over the last number of decades, even in the last year. | |
| And we've got to pay attention to our farmers. | |
| I mean, it's amazing the innovation that they have, the explosion that allows them to feed all of us in the world. | |
| They don't get credit for all the great hard work that they do. | |
| And unfortunately, they are often subject to unfair trade practices, which, of course, we dealt with in the Supreme Court decision, the president's powerful response and statutory authority to keep the tariffs in place just using authorities that have been affirmed by the Supreme Court over and over again without regurgitating what we've been talking about all day. | |
| But so there's plans to expand the power infrastructure in Gallatin, which is in Tennessee. | |
| And it's drawing huge opposition. | |
| You have multi-generational farming families that are saying that the Tennessee Valley Authority, the TVA power line, would cut through their property and threaten long-standing educational programs, farming communities, et cetera. | |
| And a lot of people are pushing back. | |
| One of them is a good friend of this program, our friend John Rich, big and rich. | |
| And, of course, he's also the founder of Redneck Riviera Whiskey. | |
| Now he's in the banking business with Old Glory Bank, which we'll ask him about in a second. | |
| Mr. Rich, sir, welcome to the program. | |
| How are you? | |
| I'm good, Sean. | |
| Good to be with you again. | |
| I hear that you're becoming a lot like your old man, the preacher, and that you're getting closer and closer to our Lord. | |
| And you are proud to say it to anybody, any place, anywhere. | |
|
Shift Focus Together
00:07:32
|
|
| Congratulations. | |
| I stand with you, brother. | |
| Well, I think we all go through our wild times in our lives, don't we, Sean? | |
| Where we get a little out there too far away, and then thank goodness. | |
| Well, you mean like the night you kept me out till dawn and the sunrising a couple. | |
| I think that's twice of my life. | |
| I remember a couple of those days. | |
| Yeah. | |
| That would describe it, 100%. | |
| And those days, I got two teenage sons now. | |
| That'll drastically change the way you live and look at things. | |
| And, you know, I wanted to shift my focus. | |
| Many years ago, I decided to shift my focus from being successful to being significant. | |
| Those are not one and the same, as you know. | |
| And I thought, I've got enough plaques. | |
| I've done everything I want to do in music. | |
| What can I do now that is significant? | |
| Things that don't really help me at all, but they do help other people. | |
| And I think that brings us to this conversation. | |
| Well, let's talk about how you got involved in this. | |
| And it was interesting. | |
| The Tennessee Valley Authority actually put out a post and a press release and even stated that they invited you to co-chair this task force that they're putting together, but you declined to serve, but they're encouraging you to get involved. | |
| Tell me what's going on. | |
| Yeah, so this all started last year when I waged my first battle against TVA for Cheatham County, which is where my brother and dad both have farms. | |
| And they were going to wreck about 6,000 acres of farmland, 420 houses. | |
| I mean, basically an atomic bomb going off in Milvis County. | |
| And I took the fight straight to them. | |
| It got the attention of the president, the attention of Secretary Rollins. | |
| They started to weigh in on it, and we were able to push the TVA out of that county. | |
| Well, it wasn't long after that. | |
| President Trump called me and said, hey, John, I want to appoint you to a board seat on the TVA. | |
| There's nine board seats. | |
| And I said, I really appreciate that, but I'm going to have to decline. | |
| And the president says, you're telling me no. | |
| I said, I'm telling you respectfully no, and here's why. | |
| I don't want to work for a power company. | |
| I want to work on behalf of landowners who are being egregiously abused every single day by companies like TVA and others and state governments and local governments that are abusing our farmers and our ranchers. | |
| I said, could I be a citizen advocate, Mr. President? | |
| That's what I want to be. | |
| He said, you know what? | |
| Let me see what I can put together. | |
| And so there's now a lawfare committee of incredibly powerful attorneys, patriots at my back that when we find one of these battles like the one in Gallatin, Tennessee, now I can go in there, talk with the TVA, and then if they don't want to do the right thing, we can go meet them in a courtroom. | |
| And that's a great position for me to be in because it is a place of significance where I can help my fellow citizens. | |
| We do have conflicting interests in this sense, is that power is the lifeblood of our economy. | |
| So we need power. | |
| You're not against power. | |
| I'm all for drilling and fracking and coal mining, and I'm even for nuclear energy. | |
| All of the above is the strategy we've got to have. | |
| However, I think there's a way to do all of it and satisfy our needs, especially the power needs that artificial intelligence are needing with our ability to protect our farmers. | |
| And I don't think there's been a president that has been more pro-farmer than Donald J. Trump. | |
| Yeah, I mean, you're making a great point. | |
| I mean, for TVA, that's critical energy. | |
| We have to have the energy that TVA creates. | |
| But you don't have to wreck family farm after family farm to do it. | |
| What I've found in the past 18 months is I've been engaging TVA on one or two issues. | |
| There's always these alternative routes that we will lay in front of them and go, why are you putting it here instead of here or here or here, where you already have right of way, already have easements. | |
| Why are you picking the one spot that's going to do the most damage to the landowner? | |
| They don't want to answer that question. | |
| When I posed that question to the CEO, Don Moole, who he and I have been emailing each other back and forth and are going to meet in person, Sean, at my house on March 3rd, I posed that question and all I get back is this. | |
| God help him if you bring out Riviera redneck whiskey. | |
| Right, right. | |
| By the way, he's going to lose in that environment. | |
| I promise you, I've been with John Rich. | |
| He will lose. | |
| Well, I think he will, too. | |
| I'm pretty direct, and I don't appreciate this farm in Gallatin is an eighth-generation revolutionary war-era farm, Sean. | |
| Okay, this ain't that's a guy that just moved into town. | |
| You're talking 1787 when they first started farming that ground, and they've kept it continuous now for eight generations that TVAs wanted to cut their land in half with these high-voltage transmission lines. | |
| And so I saw that and went, wow, that's ironic. | |
| TVA, don't you know this is America 250? | |
| We're celebrating the birth of our country, and you're going to go pick on a revolutionary war-era farm who's never bothered anybody and just done what they're supposed to do. | |
| These are the fights I am invigorated to take on. | |
| It's an honor that the president allowed me to do this and to have people at my back that, if necessary, we can come in and defend these landowners. | |
| Well, it already seems with the paws in place that it's going to be permanent. | |
| I think you've already won this battle before it's been fought, which is good news. | |
| But we'll keep focused on the Gregory family. | |
| This is now John Gregory's the eighth generation. | |
| Let me ask you a little, how did you get into the banking business? | |
| And I know you went into this business with a bunch of people I know, including Ben Carson. | |
| And congratulations, but this is a bank designed to appeal to conservatives that have been debanked by certain institutions. | |
| Yeah, it's called O'Glory Bank, and the whole premise of it is you will never be penalized for exercising your constitutional rights. | |
| What a marketing plan. | |
| I mean, it's pretty pathetic. | |
| We have to have a bank that states that. | |
| But unfortunately, the woke banking system targets people that they don't like what they have to say. | |
| Or if the federal government tells these banks to turn over their customers' information or close their bank accounts, they just do it. | |
| And Dr. Carson, Larry Elder, myself, and a lot of others got together and said we need an alternative banking platform where people will not be canceled just for exercising, for instance, freedom of speech. | |
| So we built O Glory Bank about four or five years ago, and it has absolutely exploded. | |
| OGloryBank.com is where everybody's going. | |
| It takes like eight minutes to open an account. | |
| And I always say this, Sean, when you call the hotline, an American citizen answers the phone, and you can understand what they're saying. | |
| What a concept. | |
| That's a very odd concept in this day and age. | |
| Are you on the road at all doing any concerts? | |
| Are you still out there with Kenny? | |
| What are you doing? | |
| Oh, yes, sir. | |
| We're pulling about 45 to 50 cities a year right now with Big and Rich. | |
| And it's cool that my sons are old enough now. | |
| I can take them on a lot of the shows. | |
| And we're having a blast. | |
| The crowds are bigger now, believe it or not, than they were 15 years ago. | |
| I think our music has just kind of become part of culture. | |
| And when people want to have a rocking Patriot time, they know to come see the Big and Rich show. | |
| Oh, it sounds like fun. | |
| And we'll have to meet you out there on the road. | |
| Anyway, good catching up. | |
| I miss hanging out with you. | |
| I miss talking to you. | |
| It's great to catch up. | |
| John Rich, appreciate all you're doing. | |
| And good luck to the Gregory family and tell them they have me in their corner as well, if I can help in any way. | |
| I will certainly tell them, Sean. | |
| Thank you for having me on. | |
|
CJ's Exciting South Carolina Meeting
00:04:48
|
|
| You bet. | |
| Thank you. | |
| John Rich, Big and Rich, 800-941-Sean. | |
| Our number, if you want to be a part of the program, board. | |
| Let's get to our phones this Friday. | |
| CJ is in beautiful South Carolina. | |
| What's up, CJ? | |
| How are you? | |
| I know you're seeing explosive growth in South Carolina due to migration out of New York, New Jersey, New York, New Jersey, and Illinois. | |
| They're allowed to move there as long as they don't bring their dumb liberal politics with them. | |
| Yeah, actually, I'm out of North Carolina, but it's the same exact thing you just said, Sean. | |
| The reason I'm calling is about the tariffs. | |
| I am an industrial fitting supplier to the U.S. markets, Canada, and beyond. | |
| And when Obama hit the markets and destroyed oil and gas a long time ago, it put all of us in a position that we had to start importing because we were losing manufacturing processes in the USA. | |
| It was too expensive. | |
| When this thing just happened today, when I heard it this morning, I was blown away that the Supreme Court went against Trump. | |
| And then I'm sitting here going, well, if they did it against Trump, then how did Biden get away in July of the year that he was done, before he was done, he implemented a 25% tariff on industrial aluminum products and steel products coming in from China because I am an importer. | |
| And nobody knew about it. | |
| I had a container was supposed to hit my port on the 27th, supposed to be delivered to my place in North Carolina on the 28th or 29th. | |
| And they held it up. | |
| And on November 1st, I get a new tariff bill that says they won't release a tariff for another 28 grand. | |
| And it just floored me. | |
| I called my international company I deal with and said, what is going on? | |
| They didn't even know about Biden's hidden tariff of 25% more. | |
| And so I had to pay it. | |
| I get my product. | |
| And all these other tariffs Trump put on, they do hurt our companies. | |
| But it's bringing manufacturing back to my competitors. | |
| I'm a friendly competitor to a lot of big companies. | |
| And I'm glad to see that because I still have my business because of loyalty. | |
| And when they implemented that today, it blew me away with the idea that does that mean they're going to go back on all these other things? | |
| I mean, as the president explained, a great specificity and detail, and even as Justice Kavanaugh and his dissenting opinion points out, repeatedly, and as the president said, this does not stop tariffs. | |
| They're just disagreeing with the methodology that the president used or the justification for it. | |
| But it doesn't take it away in any way, shape, matter, or form. | |
| Matter of fact, the president announces a 10% tariff. | |
| So I had to meet somebody for breakfast today. | |
| I usually don't take time out of my work week to ever do this, but it was somebody important to me. | |
| And I met for breakfast and we're eating breakfast. | |
| My phone is blowing up about the decision as it came down. | |
| And I looked at this person who happens to be, you know, pretty important in his industry. | |
| And I said, and he's, he's like nervous. | |
| And I'm like, it's meaningless. | |
| There are multiple other provisions that are indisputable that the president can use. | |
| These tariffs are going nowhere, I promise you. | |
| And I started writing some of my friends that they just, you know, they weren't believing me. | |
| And then the president comes out, holds his press conference today. | |
| And, you know, then I finally read the decision, read the dissent, read both Kavanaugh's dissent and Clarence Thomas's dissent. | |
| And it just, it echoed everything that I had been, that I have known would be coming. | |
| They had Plan B the entire time, truth be told. | |
| So let not your heart be troubled. | |
| It's not going to be any issue. | |
| About 10, 15 minutes ago, I just got back in my office. | |
| I heard it. | |
| I was actually ecstatic that he is approaching it the way he should to keep it going. | |
| And I'm against tariffs because they affect my business, but at the same time, they're bringing manufacturing jobs back to America. | |
| And I need America to be strong because I do not want to be taken over by a foreign entity. | |
| I just don't want to be. | |
| Not going to be. | |
| Not under this president. | |
| And hopefully, you know, we'll elect another, you know, strong MAGA conservative president after Donald Trump leaves. | |
| That's my hope, but we've got to focus on the midterms this year. | |
| That is paramount in my mind. | |
| Congrats on your business. | |
| Congrats on your success. | |
| Thanks for being with us. | |
| CJ, we appreciate it. | |
| You have a great weekend, my friend. | |
| God bless you and your family. | |
| 800-941-Sean, our number. | |
| If you want to be a part of the program, we'll have some Friday fun on the other side as we continue. | |
| This is an iHeart podcast. | |