All Episodes
Previous Next
May 30, 2023 - Sean Hannity Show
33:33
Best of Hannity - Border Control - May 29th, Hour 2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is an iHeart Podcast.
All right, hour two, Sean Hannity show toll free.
It's 800 941.
Sean, if you want to be a part of the program, these explosive hearings uh in Jim Jordan's Judiciary Committee today.
Um it just was unbelievable uh in terms of of the length and the depth of these whistleblowers and and what they've been able to expose.
Uh so much of this we had already exposed on this program about uh when they were investigating January sixth, there was so many details that were left out.
You know, all of a sudden we find out even MBC News reports, oh, there was significant actionable intelligence in the days leading up to uh January sixth.
Here we have a 30-year law enforcement veteran in Washington, D.C., former chief of police of the United States States Capitol Police, uh, who had been begging in the days leading up to January sixth because he saw some of this intelligence and got no help, no listening, no assistance at all whatsoever.
And and yet he requested the National Guard personally numerous times.
Uh now there was a terrific book that nobody in the media really wanted to pay attention to, and that was the Capitol Police Chief.
Now notice when they had the January 6th hearing, certain people were not involved.
Nancy Pelosi's phone records, her text messages, mine were, mine were made public, you know, uh uh without my permission.
My privacy was invaded multiple times.
It's now happened, what, five times in my life?
Uh, but they didn't have Nancy Pelosi's text emails.
Uh this video of Nancy Pelosi and her daughter walking through the halls on January sixth.
Nobody wants to see that video on uh tape as well.
And anyway, the same thing can be said for the sergeant of arms in the House and the Senate.
Uh the same thing could be said for Muriel Bowser, who said no in writing to bringing up any guard troops.
Uh, or did anyone want to hear from the Capitol Police Chief himself, who was a sole voice of sanity saying, guys, we have actionable intelligence here.
Pay attention.
Give me the help.
So they knew in advance and they did nothing.
Did nothing.
And here's the Democrats, you know, in temp trying to just beat up the the ever so love whistleblowers.
My colleagues have brought in these former agents, men who lost their security clearances because they were a threat to our national security.
Who, out of malice or ignorance or both, have put partisan agenda above the oath they swore to serve this country and protect its national security.
On December 5th, 2022, an account under the name of Marcus Allen retweeted a tweet that said, quote, Nancy Pelosi staged January 6th.
Retweet if you agree, end quote.
Do you agree with that statement?
Yes or no?
That that is I don't know, ma'am.
That's not my account at all.
More than that, this hearing is an insult to the brave whistleblowers out there who do risk their careers for the good of their country.
This circus of embedded secret accusations puts it risk.
The critical role whistleblowers play in holding the power powerful accountable.
Most whistleblowers aren't interested in in being political pawns in Congressional Republicans' games.
Playing politics is holding up this scheme as whistleblowers will make other public servants fearful of coming forward out of fear they'll just be used.
When it comes to whistleblowers, you are not entitled to it.
That's the expression of Mr. Allen.
Mr. Chairman, these individuals have been determined to be whistleblowers.
These are not whistleblowers.
They've been determined by the agency not to be whistleblowers.
Are you deciding that they're whistleblowers?
Yes, the law decides.
Did you not listen to Mr. Levitt's testimony?
Do you not read the law?
The law decides to be able to do that.
The law is not determined.
Joining us now is uh Chief Sun, 30-year law enforcement vet in DC, former chief of the uh police, the the U United States Capitol Police.
He wrote a best-selling book, Courage Under Fire under Siege and outnumbered 58 to 1 on January 6th.
Uh he tells his story.
He's one of only 10 men in history to ever hold the title of Chief of the U.S. Capitol Police.
Uh sir, welcome back to the program.
Thank you.
Sean, I certainly uh appreciate you having me on your program.
and you're absolutely right.
You know, there's a time uh they used to support whistleblowers, uh they used to also support the First Amendment.
So here it is, you get actionable intelligence.
Now finally, you know, after the January 6th committee hearings to bludgeon Trump, uh, and if you want to criticize Trump on January 6th, that's fair game.
Uh but they didn't tell the whole story, did they?
They purposely left out important parts that would have added a lot of context and texture to what actually happened.
Absolutely.
They left out the part about the law they passed that required by federal law that I seek uh approval from the Capitol Police Board and Congressional Leadership to request National Guard in advance of uh of an event.
January 3rd, I went and requested the National Guard and was denied.
The January 6th committee wanted no part of that.
They wanted to tie no part of that to uh the Sergeant Arms or uh congressional leadership.
Let me play for you, Chief, uh, if you don't mind, because you're not the only one that said this.
Uh this is about the same date.
It's either January 2nd or 3rd.
I forget the it was the specific day, but it was right in the same time period.
Uh I asked in interviews uh four people, there were five people in the room, uh, and let me play it for you, including Donald Trump, his chief of staff, uh Secretary of Defense Miller, his chief of staff, and General Milley was in the room, and the inspector general report uh also cites him remembering that this was discussed.
Did you authorize calling up the guard?
And then it became uh the chain of command went to Nancy Pelosi and to the mayor of DC Muriel Bowser.
Did you, as required by law, authorize that?
Uh one hundred percent and attested to by many people, and they turned it down.
Nancy Pelosi turned it down.
Mayor Bowser's written refusal, the communications between the leader of the Capitol Police and their chain of command to the DOD refusing our request to allow National Guard's men and women to stage on January 4 and 5 before January 6th.
Did you both ask for the National Guard to be called up?
Uh without a doubt, Sean.
Uh we've made that very clear, not just once, but on numerous occasions.
We wanted to make sure that there was plenty of uh National Guard on the ready uh in case there was some kind of violence.
I had a meeting with President Trump on the third of January concerning some international threats, and at the very end, he asked if there were any requests for National Guard support.
What was the President's response to you with regard to the request made by Mayor Bowser?
Fill it and do whatever was necessary to protect the uh demonstrators.
Now, Chief, I understand that in the very beginning, you know, going out maybe eight days before, you did not see actionable intelligence, and at that point you did not request the guard.
But as you were getting closer to January sixth, you did see actionable intelligence.
Is that fair?
Yeah, for for me, coming up on that is specifically Sunday, January third, you know, I saw the size of the crowd that we were expecting.
I knew the size of the perimeter I was gonna have.
My big concern was the number of people I was gonna have on my perimeter, and that's specifically why I went and asked for the for the National Guard.
And yeah, it was it was denied.
DOD was eventually told that no, we would not be accepting it because you know federal law, I can't accept it without the approval of the Congressional Police Board, the Capitol Police Board, and Congressional Leadership.
Now let me ask you, in in light of what you have said, is is anybody in the mainstream media really reached out to you?
Was anybody in the mainstream media interested in your story?
I mean, you your background, your record is beyond impressive.
Only one of ten people in the history of this country to be the Capitol Police Chief.
One of ten, thirty-year law enforcement veteran in Washington, DC.
Um, your your background is impeccable.
Did anyone in Congress seek your testimony on the Democratic side?
The January 6th committee reach out to you?
Uh January 6th committee did uh interview me uh informally.
Uh it wasn't videotaped, I mean it wasn't videotaped, it was never broadcast to the uh to the public.
Um but any time I tried to relate to the denial I had from the National Guard, again, they did not want to accept that as a denial from leadership or a denial from the Capitol Police Board, and they did everything they keep they they could to keep clean hands for for leadership.
Um so any of the interviews I've had for the most part, mainstream uh media was you know, much like the covering some of the FBI stuff there, they're looking to their narrative is how was the White House involved uh versus you know, what are the facts.
When I wrote the book, Courage Under Fire, I wrote it by based on the facts.
Uh that's the type of policing.
I've been for uh police officer, I've been for thirty years, and that's what people were looking for with what happened on January sixth.
Uh so all the facts are there.
You know, you go back and look at what happened in the White House uh May 30th, uh to the beginning of June, all the people attacking it there.
Um they shut down the White House operations.
They've forced the President of the United States to evacuate with his family into the bunker.
That's as much an insurrection as it is to shut down the uh uh events up at the um the Capitol on January 6th.
More police officers were injured uh at the White House uh protest.
Secret Service was bloodied and beaten, and you had two two significant incidents there.
One, Metro Police Department, an agency formed by Congress to protect the president, wasn't allowed to go on a cap uh uh White House grounds to help defend the the White House, and DOG and FBI didn't pursue any of those suspects.
Quick break, we'll come back.
More with former Capitol Police Chief uh Sunda's with us, and uh by the way, don't forget his book Courage Under Fire, and by the way, it is on Amazon.com, Hannity.com, bookstores everywhere.
Hey, I love Henry Repeating Arms.
You're gonna love this company.
I mean, they are phenomenal.
They have a line of two hundred rifles and shotguns.
The company, man, I'm gonna tell you something, their owners are amazing patriots.
They're dedicated to our country.
Uh their products are all made in America or then not gonna be made at all.
Uh they're loyal customers.
No, they provide award-winning customer service.
Henry USA.com, the best company.
You're gonna love this company.
The Sean Hannity Show, a thermo nuclear MMA assault on fake news.
Hannity is on right now.
Hey, I've shared the importance of every school having a Knox entry access system that quickly gets law enforcement into locked doors when needed.
Now, tragically, the importance continues.
Eighteen U.S. school shootings have occurred from January through March.
Now many schools have a Knox entry system, but the statistics illustrate the need and importance for all schools to provide law enforcement with quick access to locked doors.
Now you can learn more about Knox entry when you go to schoolentry.com.
do it today school entry.com All right, we continue with former Capitol Police Chief Sund is with us, his book Courage Under Fire on Amazon.com, Hannity.com, bookstores everywhere.
Let me play Lester Holt.
This was uh from January of this year, uh, acknowledging that the federal uh law enforcement could have prevented the whole January sixth date from happening.
Listen.
Now to our NBC News exclusive.
The January sixth committee's final report was more than eight hundred pages, but some material did not make the cut, including much of its findings on the failures of federal law enforcement leading up to the attack.
The chief investigator of the January 6th committee says the government could have prevented it.
Had law enforcement agencies acted on the available intelligence, do you believe the attack on the Capitol could have been successfully repelled?
I think it would have been a lot different had law enforcement taken a more assertive, protective posture.
The intel in advance was pretty specific.
And it was enough in our view for law enforcement to have done a better job operationalizing a secure perimeter.
Law enforcement had a a very direct role in contributing to certainly the failures, the security failures that led to the violence.
People familiar with the committee's work tell NBC News, members downplayed that finding because they wanted to keep the focus on former President Trump.
Committee members dispute that.
Haiti would not discuss internal deliberations.
Was this an intelligence failure?
It was not an intelligence failure.
We need vacuum.
Hafey says the committee found the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and other agencies did not act on the intelligence they had, including this online threat forwarded to Capitol Police January 5th, calling on thousands to go to Washington and help storm the Capitol.
In a statement to NBC News, the FBI said it sent all the intelligence it had to the Capitol Police.
Well, it seems like they want to blame you for this, but simultaneously, sir, were you not Chief uh asking for assistance, National Guard assistance among them?
Absolutely.
Uh and I've got uh I've turned over all my phone records.
They actually even have video records of me going into both the House and Senate Sergeant Arms office because I went in person because I knew the sensitivity of of my request.
So absolutely I went in and request it.
Absolutely I was denied.
Uh what they need to do is honestly look at the intelligence that uh FBI produced uh in advance.
Uh it wasn't like any other event I've uh dealt with, or the intelligence that was provided to me by my you know within Capitol Police.
There's a reason Capitol Police uh department also had whistleblowers much like uh the FBI was dealing with now.
So they buried your testimony.
Uh is it fair to say, do you conclude, and I don't want to put words in your mouth.
My conclusion is that they had a political agenda, which was to make this report about Donald Trump, not to prevent something like this from God forbid ever happening again.
Uh it's it's hard not to come to that conclusion when you think about it, because they used so just one aspect of what the January 6th committee used as evidence in that hearing was some of the internal video from from my video cameras at the Capitol.
None of those video cameras have audio, yet they went ahead and purposely imported um dramatic uh audio sounds of demonstrators.
Imagine if any police chief in the country had used that on a body worn camera and changed the audio to help support a narrative.
Um yeah, it was that it was clear they had a predetermined narrative, one they were focused on sixteen hundred Pennsylvania Avenue and doing everything they could to keep uh any dirt off of uh congressional leadership.
Amazing.
So basically they had a predetermined outcome, which I had been saying from the very beginning.
They never wanted to get to the truth.
Here's the sad thing, Chief, uh, because you could have prevented this if the had they listened to you, had they listened to other law enforcement, had they looked at the intelligence that was readily available, actionable intelligence.
Um to me it is sad that they put politics above the safety of our elected officials, our institution, the Capitol, uh, and that this could have been prevented, and that that's not the lead of their report should tell you everything I think you need to know.
Um I want to remind everybody if this this book is phenomenal.
It's called Courage Under Fire, under siege, um outnumbered 58 to 1 on January sixth.
Unbelievable.
Uh you did the right thing, sir, and I don't know why you ended up leaving when it should have been the other people leaving, and Congress should be ashamed of itself because they've done nothing since to protect that capital, and they should.
You're absolutely correct.
And uh Speaker Pelosi didn't give me a whole lot of options, uh, but I certainly appreciate uh all the sport, and there's a lot of facts uh people still don't know about January sixth.
All right, we're gonna put the book on Hannity.com, a link.
It's on Amazon.com.
Hopefully bookstores everywhere.
Uh get yourself a copy.
Steven Sund, uh former only one of ten, uh Capitol Police Chiefs in history.
We really appreciate you being with us and giving us a very different story than we we were fed by the January sixth committee.
I appreciate sir.
Thank you.
All right, eight hundred nine four one Sean, if you want to be a part of the program.
But you know what?
He's like a whistleblower.
Just like the people today.
They get smeared, slandered, besmirched, attacked, silenced.
Um all right, so we have a lot of other issues here.
You know, we have these hearings from earlier today, which you know, unbelievable to me with these whistleblowers.
Everybody loves whistleblowers except uh when they are democratic whistleblowers.
They only like ones that go after Donald Trump.
Um, you know, we're still waiting to get full reports.
I know Senator Rubio released a report this week, and we had him on TV earlier, uh, exposing the the the COVID origins in more detail and specificity than ever before.
Uh what about what's going on with the border?
Are we ever gonna get details on that?
Uh what about the FBI now we know has been weaponized and politicized?
Uh the same with the DOJ and and what's happening to our country.
Uh Congressman Tom Tiffany is with uh from Wisconsin sounding the alarm on the Biden administration, in this case about the border, the World Health Organization.
Uh sir, welcome to the program.
Thanks for being with us.
Don, it's good to join you, and the hits just keep coming, don't they?
They really do.
I mean, what did you think of these whistleblowers today?
Yeah, you know, I didn't get a chance to watch the transcripts um of what happened.
I don't serve on that committee, but hearing that the Democrats went after the whistleblowers, and as you said at the top here, Um Democrats used to love whistleblowers.
Um they used to believe that that person who worked in the rank and file that they should have something to say if leadership is failing them.
The leadership of the FBI is failing us in this country.
We should be hearing the whistleblowers.
Well, we should be, and they spoke out today, and predictably the Democrats attack them and and tried to smear them, just as the FBI has been trying to do for speaking out.
I thought we had whistleblower protection laws in this country.
Do we no longer have them?
Did I miss the rescinding of those laws?
Well, Representative Wasserman Schultz went so far as to say that, well, these were not legitimate whistleblowers because FBI leadership says they're not.
Of course they are going to say they're not legitimate uh whistleblowers because they're the people that are perpetrating the leadership of the FBI that is that are perpetrating this on the people of the United States, the dual system of justice.
We see another example today, the dual system of justice in America.
I don't know what the answer is.
Is the answer now that we know that the FBI put their cinder blocks on the scales of not one but two consecutive presidential elections, obviously in the case of giving Hillary Clinton every break possible, imaginable, uh, and yet leaning into something that was never corroborated, uh a dirty Hillary Clinton bought and paid for Russian disinformation dossier and and pushing a phony false narrative from the beginning, as we learned from the Durham report this week.
You know, uh nobody seems to be held accountable in the end, Congressman.
Why is that?
So it's a great point that you're bringing up.
And I would propose the following thing.
The FBI has a massive new building that is slated to be built in Washington, DC.
I believe we pulled funding back from that until we actually see reforms, until the agency is reformed.
I think we use the appropriations process as we go forward to defund those that are not doing their job until we see reforms, a concrete plan of reform.
We shouldn't give them any more we should we should inject ourselves into the appropriate.
Okay, well, well, Christopher Ray, the FBI director, swore that he implemented all the inspector generals r uh reforms, uh, but yet here the FBI had Hunter Biden's laptop in December of twenty nineteen.
It was authenticated according to John Solomon by the spring of twenty twenty.
Uh and yet FBI agents uh in the months leading up to the twenty twenty presidential election were meeting weekly with every big tech company, and according to testimony in Missouri, uh that they were being warned that they might be victims of a foreign misinformation campaign that might have to do with issues involving Joe and Hunter Biden.
So then the Hunter Biden laptop story breaks, the very real laptop, uh, and then it gets totally censored by big tech who had been pre-bunked by the FBI agents for months and months on end.
Is that putting is that putting their own influence on a presidential election?
Seems like that to me.
No doubt about it.
And if you read the Durham report, the Durham report makes it very clear they have little confidence that they're going to enact the reforms that need to be done in the FBI.
That's where Congress comes in, and we need to use the power of the first.
We also need to use the Holman rule, Sean.
Well, I you know, I'm I'm looking at all of these issues, and I'm gonna be I'm gonna be honest.
I'm not sure that we're gonna get the changes that are necessary.
Because, you know, at the end of the Durham report, which frankly, in my view was three years through too late, um, with all that we now know and all that we knew about you know, all the lying to Pfizer court judges and all of the disinformation and all of the the accommodations given to Hillary Clinton and the dual system of justice as all things related to Donald Trump.
Uh does the FBI and the CIA should they be having this type of involvement in our our election process?
No, they should not have that type of involvement, but the one way in which we can affect this is to use the power of the purse in Congress.
We need to have the fortitude to do that.
We also should be using the Holman rule.
Holman rule um can we can take an employee of the government down to one dollar, their salary for a year down to one dollar, and we need to do that with a few people to send a very clear message.
But I get it, Sean.
I hear from people at home all the time.
They're like, they just don't have any confidence that we're going to be able to get to it.
But I believe via the appropriations process, we gotta be we gotta be brave, like we've been so far with some of this stuff that we've been doing in the House of Representatives.
We need to do the right thing for the American people.
Now what's gonna happen when Kevin McCarthy meets again?
I know that Joe Biden is in Japan, I guess.
He's busy probably falling asleep in meetings, but um so he's gonna come back.
He he wasted nearly a hundred days, ninety-seven days.
He refused to meet with Kevin McCarthy.
He's said in the beginning he refused to negotiate with Kevin McCarthy.
So you in the House, House Republicans, the majority, it's a small one, but it's the majority, uh, voted to pass a debt ceiling increase bill uh that brings us back to 2022 spending levels, which I think is very responsible, that also reduces baseline budgeting increases to a maximum of one percent,
uh, that allows for more drilling so we can be more energy independent, good for national security and job creation, and uh was scored out by the CBO as saving four point eight trillion dollars in ten years, and I'm tired of robbing our kids and grandkids blind.
So my question is what's gonna happen if if Joe Biden insists on this change, that change, and then another change.
Uh our House Republicans gonna sign on to that bill.
I would tend to doubt it in four in thirteen days.
What I'm urging leadership to do is to hold firm.
We passed a responsible bill.
I mean, in exchange for the debt limit increase, the American people should get fiscal responsibility, and that's exactly what we're doing, as well as the pro-growth policies that you mentioned, including work requirements, which just passed by an eighty percent vote here in my home state of Wisconsin, we should be insisting that these things are done.
We should stand firm.
We're the only ones that have put together a responsible budget, and we need to stand tall now as the Democrats try to beat us into submission that oh, just do a debt ceiling increase.
Well, they they walked away for a hundred days.
They wouldn't negotiate, so you guys had no choice but to act on your own.
You passed a responsible debt ceiling increase uh that also stops the bleeding in terms of stealing money from future generations.
I'm not sure I would change the thing either.
And if Biden wants to, you know, in the end be the first president to have a default on the country, then that's up to him.
He made that decision a long time ago.
And I'm gonna tell you why, Congressman.
He was betting there was no way that all of you, especially after the all the votes to get Speaker McCarthy across the finish line, he was betting you would not unite.
He was betting that you'd never pass a bill, and he was betting that he'd get a clean debt ceiling bill with no responsibility, fiscal responsibility measures in it.
You think I'm wrong on that?
Oh no, no, that's exactly what they were thinking.
And what we should do now is if you don't want to do this, then let's up the ante.
Let's include HR2, the Secure the Border Act.
Let's put that in there also now.
The price tag does not get lower.
If you're not gonna negotiate for as you said, 97 days, and you're thinking you're just going to be able to steamroll us.
No.
Well, I love the idea.
Let me ask you this question.
It's an election question because I it impacted the state of Wisconsin where you're from.
And I'm making the case that Republicans have got to be very careful.
Uh I don't see Democrats running traditional campaigns anymore.
They don't shake hands, they don't kiss babies, they don't take selfies, they don't do press surveils, they don't do town halls.
They spend hundreds of millions of dollars on negative ads, uh, and then they have quote legal ballot harvesting efforts that have proven very successful, especially in swing states.
Now, if Republicans don't adopt early voting, mail-in voting, and the same measures and hopefully surpassing even the the measures the Democrats have adopted with legal ballot harvesting, I think they'll lose elections, that they can win.
The second thing is you just had an election for seat open on your Supreme Court, and the issue of abortion was front and center.
And I think Republicans, if they if they continue to run candidates, and I'm not uh I'm not trashing Doug Mastriano, but the fact that he had no exceptions for rape incest or the mother's life in Pennsylvania, uh a purple state at best, uh, was it was political suicide.
Um do you think abortion played that big a role in that in that Supreme Court race?
It played a big role, but we also need to talk about we're not talking about other things that affect w w women, especially crime.
We do talk we've done some of that.
But we also need to talk about Title Nine.
Sean, I got three daughters.
They all participate in interscholastic sports.
And now men get to take women's positions.
We're not talking about that enough.
And the other thing we're not talking about enough is that every Democrat except one in the last Congress voted for abortion on demand all the way up to nine months.
People don't know that, and we need to tell them that Democrats are beyond extreme on abortion.
No, I couldn't agree anymore.
Anyway, Congressman uh Tom Tiffany, Wisconsin, we appreciate you being with us.
Please come back, check in with us often thank you.
Sean, always good to join you.
800-941-SEAN if you want to be a part of the program.
Final hour roundup is next.
You do not want to miss it.
And stay tuned for the final hour free-for-all on the Sean Hannity Show.
Hey, Sean Hannity here from my friends at Lone Star Transfer.
If you felt like booking your timeshare was difficult in the past, you know it's recently been almost impossible.
Now most clients are shocked to learn that their timeshare is now available to the public, and that severely limits booking options.
Many owners have also reached out and they're upset that their yearly dues have nearly doubled during the maintenance fee season.
Now for well over a decade, our friends at Lone Star Transfer, a family-owned company, they have had the pleasure of helping thousands and thousands of people legally and permanently get out of their never-ending timeshare fees.
Now, Lone Star Transfer guarantees the release of all liability to your timeshare in writing and in a specific time frame.
Call my good friends for a free, no obligation consultation.
Write this down.
Call today 833-594-0075.
833-594-0075.
They're online at Lone Starrtransfer.com.
All right, back to our busy phones.
800-941 Sean, our number if you want to join us.
Hi, Jim in Florida.
Jim, you're on the Sean Hannity Show.
What's going on?
Hey, Sean, thank you so much for continuing to stand firm in the faith.
I'm calling you because uh, of course, you're a believer, I'm a believer.
Uh we're kind of fond of America.
And last time I checked and pulled out a bill, it still says in God We Trust.
My question is with the latest debacle with the FBI and those funny words somebody said about, yeah, we had a couple of missteps.
Well, as the light is being shined on them, it's becoming apparent that there's been really some nefarious things afoot.
So here's my question to you.
It took a few guys to stand up, uh, a very few.
If we could get a few more, what is it, 3% started a revolution, then 15% listened, and it changed America's history.
If we could get 20 to 30 percent of the FBI to say, you know what?
There's something awry here.
There's something afoot.
It's obviously not the foot soldiers and the people out in the field.
Uh, but the upper management has got something going on.
What what do you say to that?
You know, um, I am seeing more and more that look, there's a lot of factors in play here for somebody to become a whistleblower.
It does take a lot of courage because you are risking your career, and in most cases, you you're probably destroying any chance of advancement, uh, especially in an organization that is so so bureaucratic and so politicized as the FBI, and that's sad.
You know, we should be encouraging those people that have the bravery and the courage to, you know, hold tr hold true to the fidelity of the Bureau's mission.
Um, I've said it all many, many times.
This was the world's premier law enforcement agency.
It is not anymore.
I can't say that and believe it because it's not true.
And it's unfortunate that you know, we have now weaponized the FBI, politicize the FBI, politicize the DOJ.
We have a dual system of justice, and we don't have equal justice or application of our laws.
So, yeah, it's gonna take it would take a lot of people to make that happen to make that big a statement, and maybe that'll happen one day.
Well, a few people like you, Sean, doing the great job you're doing.
I would encourage my fellow Americans to read the first two sentences, the preamble.
Don't even read the whole Constitution.
Read the first two sentences of the c of the Constitution.
Right in there where it says establish justice, promote domestic or ensure domestic tranquility.
I mean, just get through the first two sentences and think about what our forefathers did when they signed the Constitution.
Most of them in the Declaration of Independence thought they were signing their death warrant because they risked their life, their families, their sacred honor, and their name.
And by the way, they have something that's very scarce now: a conscience, a godly conscience that you and I grew up with.
When we swore an oath, it was to God.
Well, I can't say it any better.
God, faith, family, country, boy.
That that would never lead us in the wrong direction, would it?
You know, it's really not that complicated.
Uh uh, these hearings were blockbuster today, but just like the Durham Report, they will ignore it.
Hey, there's still a lot more ahead on the best of the Sean Hannity show.
Stay tuned for more right after news on this station.
Verizon ATT T Mobile.
Now, if you're with them, you are overpaying, and it's that pure and that simple.
Pure Talk can easily save the average family close to a thousand dollars a year.
And right now you get unlimited talk, unlimited text, and ultra fast 5G data for 20 bucks a month.
This is one of their best deals ever.
Now, what about the coverage you ask?
It's phenomenal.
Why?
Because I'm on it.
It's my cell phone company.
Pure Talk uses the most dependable 5G network in the country, the same one that the big carriers use, the same cell towers that they use.
Grab your phone, dial pound two fifty, say the keywords save now, and you can get unlimited talk, text, and plenty of data for 20 bucks a month.
Choose this veteran-owned company.
They care about keeping jobs right here in America and saving you money for the exact same service.
Take up your phone, dial pound two fifty, use the keywords save now for unlimited talk, text, and plenty of 5G data.
20 bucks a month, pound two fifty, keyword save now from Pure Talk.
▲
Export Selection