All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 22, 2022 - Sean Hannity Show
34:08
Democrats' Accomplishment - October 21st, Hour 1

The Democrats have had two years in office and Sean goes over the list of accomplishments.... the list is definitely not very long!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is an iHeart Podcast.
All right, glad you're with us.
Thank you, Scott Shannon, 18 days till the all-important midterm elections.
Uh hope everybody is uh jazzed up, ready to go, excited to vote and do your part and help and save the uh country from further damage and destruction of uh all things Democrat.
We're gonna be back out on the road three days next week.
Our first uh date is in Arizona, we'll be there on Monday, and we'll be doing a town hall in uh Arizona.
Carrie Lake will be there, Blake Masters will be there as always.
We will have special guests as well.
Uh, and then we'll tell you more about the other dates, places that we're going uh next week as well.
I think you'll be pretty happy with uh where we're headed.
You know, Linda, so we should bring people behind the scenes.
I'm just I'm looking at these races, and what I'm realizing is every single Democrat, I don't care if it's a senatorial candidate or a gubernatorial candidate, they've all adopted the the Biden basement bunker strategy, and of course the the media mob, which is nothing but an extension of their their press offices, have done nothing to press these democratic candidates on positions.
I watched the debate with Marco Rubio and Val Demings, and they must it was like four on one.
And and they're they're they're hammering Marco Rubio on the issue of abortion, and meanwhile, sitting, you know, uh standing across the other the podium on the other side is Val Demings, and they're not demanding an answer to the question, do you support any restrictions on abortion?
And their answer seems to be the same.
Looks like it's been, you know, this this is what the the talking point that has been sent around because they're all using the same line, and that is we don't believe that the government should be in the birthing room, that should be the doctor and the woman.
That's what they keep saying.
Marco had a great line.
He goes, Oh, the problem, Miss Demings, is that um you brought the government into the the birthing room because you're asking the taxpayers to pay for that abortion.
I mean, I thought that was a great line.
Every Republican should do it.
You know, this is an issue.
I I said in the beginning, Democrats are gonna run on January 6th, hating Donald Trump, that they are going to run on the Dobbs decision.
That this is now backfiring on Democrats.
Because almost every Democrat running for office supports no restrictions at all on abortion.
Now I know people very well that say that they're pro-choice.
None of them like the idea of abortion.
They don't think it's the best option, but they think you know, they're kind of in the Bill Clinton legal and rare category.
And but they're also in the legal, rare and early category.
Most people don't know that about half of abortions, 52% to be precise, uh, are now done with a pill, and it's it's it's not a procedure because it is done early.
I think it if you do it within the first ten weeks, you can do it that way.
That's my understanding.
Um so anyway, they're not following the science here.
I couldn't believe Stacey Abrams comments about this.
I mean, I was frankly shocked.
You know, if you're worried about the high process of inflation and and gas, you know.
Well, do you have that cut, JC Home?
Let's see if we can play that.
And because it's the most radical thing I ever heard.
After she denied the science, which is you can hear a heartbeat after six weeks.
That's a scientific fact.
Let me play the other comment.
I guess we don't have it.
You don't have it?
I'm looking.
Not yes or no, one or the other.
Just tell me something.
Okay, you don't have it.
When you have it, let me know.
Give me a thumbs up and we'll play it.
But it's the most extreme comment I've ever heard from anybody, but this is the position.
But the mob, the media, they don't press Democrats on their radicalism of that position.
I mean, think about it.
We're talking now, if you support late-term abortions, that is infanticide because the child can live outside the womb.
Anyway, so they're running on Jan 6, hate Trump.
They're running on the Dobbs decision, which by the way, there's there's no enumerated right to abortion in the Constitution, which the Supreme Court rightly said in their decision, and thus the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution uh kicks in, which is it then defers to the states to make their own laws, rules, and regulations.
And uh, and that's where most states abortion is not being outlawed in this country.
And when they tell you that, they are just lying to you.
And this is, you know, become most people, I think, have figured it out.
Now, Democrats are saying, oh, we peaked too early.
They were wishing that after the Dobbs decision that that would have been the defining issue for most women.
It's not.
What we're finding.
Oh, you have the lemmings and Rubio cut.
All right.
Um, Demings, yes.
Well, you support a 24-week ban?
Because you didn't support a 20-week ban.
You didn't support the time of vapability.
But when is that?
That's the vague language they all give.
And then they talk about the doctor and the family.
Let me tell you who else is in that room in that abortion room.
The government is in that room because she brought them in there.
She wants the taxpayer to pay for that.
That's government involvement.
Not just to pay for that abortion.
But to pay for them all over the world.
I mean, what a great line by Rubio.
I thought that was amazing.
Anyway, so we've got 18 days to go.
Uh later in the program, we got a list.
You got all these Democrats, all these election year conversions.
I mean, for example, Kamala Harris put 1,956 people convicted them as San Francisco's DA.
Now she's out there saying nobody should have to go to jail for smoking weed.
John Fetterman, we could reduce our prison population by a third and not make anyone less safe in 2020, repeated it many, many times.
And now he said, just what, a week or two ago, the idea that I want to release all these prisoners is just a lie.
Not true.
By the way, there was a uh an article that came out today.
I I saw this, I couldn't believe it.
I think we got it on Philly.com or I'm not sure exactly where.
John Fetterman praised this guy, Larry Kranzer's release and Krasner's release of uh Jameer Harris just days ago.
Harris currently is on the run after being confirmed as the lead suspect of a murder that he committed in September of this year.
Fetterman's now trying to cover his past comments by describing these individuals as Morgan Freeman.
I mean, how stupid is this?
When asked when first degree murderers should be let out, Betterman replied, it's really a very simple choice.
I believe the perfect metaphor is the movie Shawshank Redemption.
Would you want Morgan Freeman to die in prison or not?
No, that's not what the question is.
Twenty-five times this guy was the lone voice to release convicted murderers in Pennsylvania.
This guy said he wants to release a third to half of people in prison in Pennsylvania.
This is the guy that wants the moratorium on fracking in Pennsylvania, 81 billion dollar industry in the commonwealth.
He's out of his mind.
He wants taxpayers.
Um safe heroin injection sites paid for courtesy of the taxpayer.
No restrictions on abortion.
He wants the Seuss oil company CEOs and energy company CEOs.
He wants, you know, it's the most radical candidate.
But I'm looking at these polls, and you got to take them for what they're worth.
4646 in in Pennsylvania, 4444 in Georgia.
You've got Adam Laxalt up by one in Nevada.
You've got uh Blake Masters down by one in Arizona.
I mean, I'm assuming every one of these races is tight.
You got now General Bullduck is now within the margin of error.
I think it's a one-point race now in against Senator Hawson in in New Hampshire.
I mean, if you're in New Hampshire, name me one thing that Senator Hansen has ever done to make the life of people in New Hampshire better.
I mean, General Bolduck, he will be a conservative.
He's not part of this crazy climate alarmist cult.
And all these decisions, all these Democrats.
There's you know, they're blaming Biden for all of the same policies that they all support.
Forty-one years.
Tell me what they have done in their time in office that has made your life better.
Because there's not a single thing I can think of.
Are you happy with the 41-year high of inflation when Donald Trump left office inflation, the consumer price index?
It was 1.4%.
Nine consecutive months of 41 year high, over 8% the consumer price index.
You're feeling it in every store you go to, every store you shop at.
You're paying more for every item you buy because of their policies that are failing.
You see what's happened to the price of a gallon of gasoline.
We're now worried that New England is going to have blackouts this winter and that people are not going to be able to heat their homes this winter.
And I'm not making any of this up.
This is this is all real.
And if you look at the price of energy, it is it is going through the roof.
Heating costs now are going to rise.
Heating bills, if you heat your house with natural gas, you're going to go up a minimum of 28% this year.
If you heat your home with oil, you're going to go up a minimum of 27% this year.
Electricity costs already up 15% are going to go up another 10% over the winter.
It's only going to get worse.
And you already have suffered if you have a retirement plan, a 401k plan, if you have any money in the market, the average person has lost 34,000 or 25 or 30% of their retirement money.
Now we see the housing market being impacted.
I told you that would be the final indicator.
I mean, things are bad.
U.S. has what?
25 days worth of diesel fuel supply on hand according to zero hedge.
Demand for diesel fuel is surging.
Supplies remain at the lowest seasonal level for the for this time of year ever.
According to the Energy Information Administration, the U.S. now has only 25 days of diesel supply, the lowest since 2008.
Joe has been rating the strategic oil preserves.
He inherited 700 million barrels of oil, and we're now down to about half of that, a 50 year low.
And he's doing it even further.
He's doing it again now because of the election is coming up, and because he got turned down by Iran, Venezuela, Russia, Saudi Arabia, OPEC Plus.
And not only did he get turned down, he got exposed as trying to collude with them to delay their announcement that they weren't going to uh give him the answer that he wanted, which was to increase production.
Instead, they responded by saying, no, we're going to decrease production by two million barrels a day.
That means energy prices are going to go further.
So Joe's answer is all right, let me release the strategic petroleum reserves, even though it's bad for national security.
Those reserves are there for an emergency.
Democrats about to lose on midterm is not a national emergency.
For him it is, but not that's not what it was designed for.
What are we going to do if we have a real emergency?
What if they run out of natural gas?
The problem is the supply.
We had Governor Sanunu on, and we had uh General Bulldock on, who's running for Senate in New Hampshire.
They're both saying the same thing.
The supply that's necessary of natural gas to actually power the grid might not be sufficient enough to power it on top of the increase in price that you're gonna have.
You know, usually whatever metric you have, you know, they are ten times lower the level that they need to be at to guarantee that every person in New England is able to heat their home this winter.
This is a real clear present danger to them.
You would think that, oh, well, we have more natural resources than all of these countries that we mentioned combined that we would produce it domestically, and they're not.
I don't know.
Can all of you it's can are you happy with where the country is?
Are you better off since Joe Biden's become your president and the radical socialist climate cultists have taken over?
Are you happy with the record high inflation, 40 year high of inflation?
Are you uh you're happy with two, three times the amount per gallon of gasoline?
Are you happy with our borders being wide open the way they are?
Are you happy with no, you know, defund, dismantle, no bail uh laws?
How's that working out in your town and your city?
Are you happy with woke education?
Or would you rather go back to reading, writing, math, science, history, And computers.
That's what the election's about.
It's not complicated.
It's not hard.
I'm repeating myself, but that's what's at stake in in 18 days.
And it's still only the first half of what we need to accomplish to turn the country around.
Because we got to win the next election also.
But it would be easier if you elect these senators now.
Make a big difference.
Listen, if you've ever gotten a derogatory or aggressive email, text, social media message from someone you don't know, it could be cyber stalking.
It's a serious crime.
It could take many forms, including blackmail, false accusations.
They could track your location.
They post hateful comments about you.
Basically, you'd be living my life for about a day.
Anyway, in all seriousness, a lifelot.com by Norton, they see all of these threats that we usually miss on our own.
If in fact your information's compromised, you you'll get an alert from LifeLock.
If your identity's stolen, you'll get a dedicated U.S.-based restoration specialist uh to fix it for you.
Uh it's a low annual rate.
You can save an additional 25% off your first year when you call 1-800 LifeLock, mention my name Hannity, or mention my name Hannity when you go to life-lock.com.
Protect your good name and reputation and your finances and your credit score.
LifeLock.com, 1-800-LIFELOCK, promo code HANNITY to save 25%.
LifeLock.com.
The Sean Hannity Show, a thermonuclear MMA assault on fake news.
Hannity's on right now.
All right, as we roll along, 800-941-SEAN-IN.
If you want to be a part of the program.
Well, I want to talk a little bit about Steve Bannon and what happened with him today.
And put aside whether your feelings about Steve Bannon.
Some people don't like Steve Bannon.
He's controversial, he's combative, he's iconoclastic.
Um I happen to like people like that.
Uh it's just my own personal taste.
So anyway, he's he gets uh sentenced today, four months in prison for contempt of Congress.
Um, and he was following his lawyer's advice on this.
Now, here's what he gets.
He can so he gets four months of prison time and a fine.
Um, how come Eric Holder, who was held in contempt of Congress, how come he was never charged?
How come Lois Lerner was never charged?
How come Janet Reno was never charged?
I mean, Eric Holder, he was held in contempt.
Lois Lerner held in contempt, defied a subpoena, refused to testify.
Eric Holder refused to fail failed to turn over documents.
Janet Rena Reno defied a subpoena.
Steve Mannon is now the first person to be charged for being in contempt of Congress since 1983.
And the last time that happened, it was a Reagan EPA official by the name of Rita Lavell, who was acquitted at trial and not sentenced.
Now, the Biden DOG DOJ sentences to jail time, they're giving more time than the FBI lawyer caught fabricating Pfizer court evidence.
You just can't make any of this up.
You know, this is what I mean.
This is why it's important these whistleblowers talk to Grassley Johnson and Jim Jordan.
This is why we've got to stop the politicizing the FBI, how it's been politicized, and the weaponizing of our DOJ.
Hannity is on right now.
All right, 25 now until the top of the hour, 800-941.
Sean, you want to be a part of the uh program.
And uh anyway, if you're just joining us, so Steve Bannon, uh, earlier today was sentenced to four months, four months in prison.
Now, prosecutors have been requesting what, six months in prison.
Uh, but you know, if you go back and you look, and this is for contempt of Congress, you know, prominent figure.
Maybe you agree with Steve Bannon, maybe you don't agree with Steve Bannon.
That's not the point of this.
I have been raising questions about whether this country is moving away from its constitutional order.
Because our laws are directly the result of our constitution.
It's the foundation of our legal system.
And the the principle of equal justice under the law, equal application of our laws, should matter to every American.
This should transcend politics.
Shouldn't be about red, blue, Republican, Democrat, conservative, liberal in any in any way.
But that's not the system that we're currently living in.
And I go back and I'll just tell you again.
If you look at past precedents as it relates to this very specific issue, you know, we we now see that, you know, the Attorney General Eric Holder, you know, what happened when he was held in contempt of Congress.
You know, all of this should scare the living daylights out of all of you.
Because if this can happen to Steve Bannon, this can happen to you, it can happen to any American, and it's it really should.
So if you go back and Bannon will now, in this particular case, our two-tiered justice system on display.
So Bannon's sentenced to four months in prison, you might say, ah, four months is not a big deal, Hannity.
Uh, I don't think anyone wants to give up their freedom for four months uh of their life.
Anyway, after being convicted for contempt of Congress for failing to comply with the subpoena with this, you know, predetermined outcome January 6th committee.
Now, Bannon reacted to it earlier today, but he will remain free pending appeal.
I'll get to that in a second.
But it's just the latest greatest example that the Biden Department of Justice has been playing politics, is now weaponizing justice in America and using the justice system to go after only conservatives, only Republicans, only Donald Trump supporters.
There's one justice system for the Clintons, there's one justice system for the Bidens, and another for the rest of us.
That's the way it's working out.
How many Democrats have been held in contempt of Congress, just like Steve Bannon that were never charged?
Well, one person was uh Eric Holder, held in contempt.
He refused to turn over documents related to the Obama administration's gun running scandal at the time fast and furious.
Oh, what about disgraced IRS official Lois Lerner, 2015, held in contempt?
She defied a subpoena related to the Obama IRS Tea Party targeting scandal.
Or back in 1998, Clinton Attorney General, Janet Reno defied a congressional subpoena, never charged.
In fact, Bannon is the first person to be charged and prosecuted with contempt of Congress since 1983.
And that person or Reagan administration EPA worker was found not guilty, was acquitted.
But there's one rule for Democrats, one rule for the rest of us.
And he even pointed out, and I think this is important, that the judge, even the judge recognized that Bannon's conviction is likely going to get tossed out.
And the judge took a pretty extraordinary step of issuing a stay of sentence pending appeal.
When Bannon was subpoenaed by the January 6th committee, uh President Trump's lawyer sent him a letter saying that the president is invoking executive privilege, therefore directing him not to testify.
Now, you can make all the legal arguments you want, but you have to come to a legal decision before deciding if something is applicable or not.
Now, in other words, some people would argue, all right, well, he's not part of the administration anymore.
He'd been gone for a long period of time, so therefore executive privilege might not hold up.
And now it might not have held up in court.
I don't know.
But they never did it that way.
But anyway, so that was the issue.
It's Donald Trump that holds privilege.
It's not Bannon.
It's Trump's privilege.
He has executive privilege.
He gets to exercise executive privilege, which, by the way, is one of the reasons why this show vote that they had, their grand crescendo of the January 6th committee, they know darn well he's never going to show up before that committee because of executive privilege.
But anyway, under law, Bannon can't waive it or violate it if you're going to follow the law.
So on advice of his own counsel, Bannon declined to testify.
And by the way, which was the correct advice.
Now, the only other option they might have had just to make life easier, he probably could have gone in.
if somebody goes in, if if you call before Congress, if you're subpoenaed, you could plead the fifth all day, walk out of there.
They can't hold you in contempt.
He could have done that.
That was an option, but that was not the advice of his counsel.
Now the judge in this case, uh Greg Jarrett did a great analysis of this, applied the wrong standard on the issue of willful defiance of the subpoena.
He relied on an outdated sixty-one-year-old DC circuit court case 1961 based on a Supreme Court decision that was later overturned.
So in other words, the correct standard, as the Supreme Court since stated, is that prosecutors have got to show that the defendant knew his actions were unlawful.
If a defendant believes his response to the subpoena is lawful, then they cannot be convicted.
So there's past precedent here.
Now Bannon relied on the advice of his attorney that he could not testify because the president invoked his executive privilege, his right to invoke, not Bannon's.
Then Bannon thought he was acting lawfully.
And as long as he relied on the advice and good faith of his own lawyers by law, he did not violate it and should never have been convicted.
Now, it's kind of insane.
These prosecutors claim that executive privilege didn't apply or that Biden waived his predecessor's privilege, because that is well established.
Greg Jarrett, we should put it up on Hannity.com.
He wrote a great piece on this.
But it's important for all presidents to be able to seek outside advice instead of always relying on insiders who tend to tell them what he or she wants to hear.
So it's pretty well established that privilege covers both employees of an administration and non-employees alike.
And moreover, it's subsequent, if a subsequent president can waive his predecessor's privilege, then it renders privilege meaningless.
There is no law that says that Biden has any authority to waive someone else's executive privilege.
None.
As a matter of fact, the opposite is true.
Only the president who invokes the privilege holds the privilege.
I'm not trying to get too deep into the weeds here.
I'm just trying to get you to understand.
So there's never been anyone else that was charged since 1983.
Eric Holder held in contempt, failing to turn over documents.
Lois Lerner held in contempt, never charged, defying a subpoena, refusing to testify.
Janet Reno defying a subpoena, but Steve Bannon, the first person charged with contempt of Congress since 1983.
Now liberals are happy.
Democrats are happy.
You know, what they're not thinking is you're now setting up precedents that might apply to you sooner than later.
So buckle up.
Be careful what you wish for.
So the AP reports it this way Bannon, longtime ally, former of former President Trump sentenced Friday to four months behind bars after defying a subpoena from the House Committee investigating January 6th at the U.S. Capitol.
The judge allowed Bannon a stay free pending appeal, imposed a fine of $6,500 as part of the sentence.
Bannon convicted in July of two counts, contempt of Congress for refusing to sit for a deposition, and the other for refusing to provide documents.
Quote, in my view, Mr. Bannon has not taken responsibility for his actions, according to the judge, before he imposed the sentence.
Others must be deterred from committing similar crimes.
Now, when you compare this jail sentence for refusing to cooperate with a committee that we all know was one-sided.
We all know that Nancy Pelosi kicked Jim Jordan and Jim Banks off the committee.
We all know that everybody on the committee had voted to impeach Donald Trump.
We all know that they had a predetermined outcome.
We all know that if they really cared about preventing something like January 6th from ever happening again, which should have been their goal, which would have been a noble goal, uh, they would have brought in the Capitol Police Chief that requested the National Guard six times.
They would have brought in the people that told me on camera four of them, that in fact, days before Donald Trump authorized calling up the troops, they would have brought in Muriel Bowser, who in writing rejected calling up troops.
They would have brought in Nancy Pelosi in charge of the House security and asked her about the issue.
They would have brought in General Milley who was in the room, who, according to Biden's own inspector general in the Department of Defense, said he recalled such discussions about protecting the Capitol.
So, you know, lying to any court would be a serious crime.
But if that's the case, we now know based on the recent trial of Danchenko that in fact FBI agents flew over to the pond to meet with Christopher Steele in Great Britain, and they made an offer of one million dollars in early October 2016 if Christopher Steele could in fact corroborate the dirty Russian dossier that Hillary Clinton paid for by funneling money through a law firm to an op research firm into Christopher Steele's pocket.
And then he gets this information from Igor Danchenko, who apparently got it from a friend of Hillary's by the name of Charles Nolan and was leaked to the media in the lead up to the election in 2016.
And then we find out that Christopher Steele couldn't get his million dollars because he couldn't corroborate the dirty dossier.
And the FBI did that in early October 2016.
They didn't even apply for the first Pfizer warrant until late October 2016.
And it was deputy FBI Director McCabe that said without the dirty dossier, they never the court never would have granted the Pfizer application.
It says in the top of a Pfizer warrant, verified.
Well, their source, Christopher Steele couldn't verify it.
If he did, he would have gotten a million dollars.
And then when they finally met Danchenko in January of 2017, he confirmed he was the main source of Christopher Steele.
He said none of this was true.
This was all bar talk.
The FBI reaction to that put Danchenko on the on the payroll.
That's equal justice under the law.
Anyway, but I digress.
We have the midterms coming up.
U.S. existing home sales tumbled to a 10 year low as mortgage rates now skyrocket.
We are now at 6.9% for a 30-year fixed rate mortgage, and we expect another 75 basis point increase in the next week, week and a half.
U.S. heating worries mount amid growing costs.
You're going to see a minimum of 25 to 35% increase, whether you heat your home with natural gas, oil, or electricity this winter.
Dr. Doom, this guy, we've had him on the program before, Noriel Robini, they call him Dr. Doom.
He says brace for a crash, and he's talking about an economic crash, that combines the worst of the financial crisis and the 1970 style stagflation.
He said markets should brace for a period of decline that echoes the crashes of the 1970s and 2008.
He predicts that central banks will wimp out from fighting inflation, fueling a financial crisis.
He says it's going to get ugly.
He said the recession, and you will have a financial crisis, he said to Bloomberg.
The global economy will experience a period of decline that combines the worst aspects of the 2008 financial crisis and the 1970s.
They call him Dr. Doom.
He's often been right, by the way.
He said it's going to get ugly.
The recession, you'll have the financial crisis, and he sees supply side shocks, including the coronavirus pandemic, the war in Ukraine as contributing factors to global stagflation, which he refers to as a combination of soaring prices and sluggish growth.
That would echo the economic pain of the 1970s.
Many of you don't remember this.
Double digit inflation, 21.5% interest rates.
I mean, crazy numbers.
You know, long lines for gasoline.
I mean, what's going to happen?
You know, it's, you know, the if the average family as of now, and he's saying the worst is yet to come.
That's what that is what is on the ballot in 18 days.
That's what you need to know.
And just simply ask yourself, and when you talk to your friends this weekend, you're hanging out wherever you hang out, whatever, watching a football game, you think you're better off than you were two years ago before Joe Biden became president.
And that's why the president is snapping at why he's nobody Wants to be seen with him.
The only idiot that wanted to be seen with him was John Fetterman.
And it didn't go very well when Biden suggested it was his wife that was going to be the senator.
Rick Scott actually thinks that Republicans have a path to 55 Senate seats.
I don't see that myself.
I'm looking at 52, 53 max if things go the right way.
But when you have Herschel Walker and Raphael Warnock 4444, Oz and Fetterman tied at 46.
When you've got Adam Laxalt up by one and Blake Masters down by one, um, you have to win all those races.
Now, you don't, they're not factoring in.
Usually, if that's the number 18 days out of an election, late deciders are going to go to the challenger.
Pew Research is saying Republicans lead by 13 points among those that say the economy is their top issue.
Uh, Lee Zeldon, now it is a neck and neck race in New York.
That is fascinating to me.
Uh, Marco Rubio is now pulling away from Val Demings.
Uh as Lieutenant Governor John Fetterman was AWOL for just about every key economic meeting.
He only cared about releasing criminals.
Seems like his obsession.
All right, one way to save money is to say bye-bye to ATT, Verizon and T-Mobile and do what I did and make the switch to Pure Talk.
Simple, it's easy, and the average family saving close to a thousand dollars a year for the exact same service.
In other words, you use the same cell towers, you use the same 5G network.
You look at your phone, you have the same number of coverage bars.
You get to keep your phone and your phone number.
That's real money in your pocket, especially in these inflationary and recessionary times.
Uh, that money matters now more than ever.
So you're gonna love the great coverage that you'll get.
You're paying for the exact same towers, the exact same 5G network, average family saving close to a thousand dollars a year, some people saving much more.
It takes a few minutes of your time to make the switch, dial pound 250 on your cell phone.
Say the keywords, save now.
Pound 250 on your cell phone.
Keywords save now, make the switch to Pure Talk.
All right, when we come back, Devin Nunes will join us and much more as we continue.
Sean Hannity.
All right, a lot of ground to cover.
We'll check in with Devin Nunes on the other side.
We'll talk about the Bannon case.
We'll talk about what we learned in the Danchenko trial, much more, and later on, Joni Ernst than your calls on this Friday.
▲
Export Selection