All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 22, 2020 - Sean Hannity Show
01:42:12
Previewing the Class of 2021

Congressman Louie Gohmert drops by for the vacationing Sean and previews the Class of 2021! Though the Republicans are in the minority, there are some strong coalitions that will be in a good place for the upcoming year.The Sean Hannity Show is on weekdays from 3 pm to 6 pm ET on iHeartRadio and Hannity.com. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This isn't iHeart Podcast.
You want smart political talk without the meltdowns?
We got you.
I'm Carol Markovich.
And I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
We've been around the block in media and we're doing things differently.
Normally is about real conversations.
Thoughtful, try to be funny, grounded, and no panic.
We'll keep you informed and entertained without ruining your day.
Join us every Tuesday and Thursday, normally on the iHeartRadio app Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
I'm Ben Ferguson.
And I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So down a verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
Hi, folks.
This is Louis Gomert, uh servant in the United States Congress from Texas, here on behalf of a guy that I really love in uh good platonic kind of way.
Uh he uh in fact, Sean Hannity, when I when I tested positive for COVID back uh, I guess something like the end of July, I got a call from Sean every day for a week, just making sure I didn't have a bad flare up, make sure I had what I needed.
I mean, what an incredible guy.
So it's always an honor to be here on behalf of Sean.
We have an incredible lineup today, and you want to know why this is uh such an important show, and and Linda's been fantastic with the work she's done.
Lauren used to be the associate producer here, and now thank goodness she's helping me in DC.
But uh they've been doing a great job, but the show mainly today is going to be, and get ready for it, fraud in the election.
And if you have another person saying, Well, I thought all of that had been debunked, you can say, no, no, and in fact, no court has allowed an evidentiary hearing.
None.
Zero.
You can't debunk something unless you have an evidentiary.
I know I was a litigator, I was a judge, I was chief justice.
I know about these things.
And even the Supreme Court, when the when the Constitution says you shall have original jurisdiction over any suit in which a state sues other states, another state, the Supreme Court, they wouldn't even allow a hearing.
They just turned it down.
Uh people are afraid to deal with the fraud on the magnitude in which it occurred, and we're gonna be talking about that.
But uh really glad to have you with us today.
This country is in crisis.
It's I I've heard people say it's at a crossroad.
No, folks, this country is not at a crossroad.
We passed the crossroad road a good while back.
We're at the edge of a cliff.
We're about to either go off and that cliff, and in the greatest gift of a country God ever allowed a people to have, or we'll get back to the crossroads where we headed off in the direction of socialism a good while back,
so that we can get back on the track of freedom, self-determination, freedom of choice in education, for example, uh, and ending the pure socialist indoctrination that's been going on for quite some time.
And personally, uh I think uh Dostoevsky had it right in the late 1800s when he was he was mocking and taking on the things that some idiot named Marx was was throwing out there.
And really, folks, a guy that could not even foresee the arising of a middle class, which is America's strength.
That's not somebody you ought to l it listen to, read, and pay attention to.
He's an idiot.
So one thing historically, though, is true about education.
You cannot manipulate a people into choosing socialism until you have taught them lies about the best parts of their history and you've made them think that something good and wholesome is evil.
The Soviets use that tactic.
And in fact, uh that has been the tactic of socialists and progressives everywhere.
Many of them are not evil, but they have just been manipulated and miseducated themselves.
You know, the Bill Ayers and the revolutionists of the 1960s, they realized eventually that they weren't accomplishing anything by blowing things up or killing or having sit-ins.
And they apparently realized that if they became tenured professors in colleges and taught the future teachers of young Americans how evil America was, how grandiose socialism was.
they could achieve a revolution that their tactics of the 60s just couldn't do.
So we're at a point where vast numbers of our universities, whether they have good sports teams or not, have become liberal bastions of miseducation, leading young people into wanting to leave behind what was once the most free country in the history of the world.
It took over 200 years to get there, but then they started moving on the socialist Orwellian totalitarian track, and we've got to get off that track.
We're headed over the cliff if we don't.
You cannot have socialism, by the way, without a totalitarian government that forces its people into subjugation.
That's the only way it goes.
Now, Dostoevsky commented, the problem with socialism is not economic.
The problem with socialism is atheism.
The government has to become God.
And I'm telling you, the summer I was there as an exchange student, and there were eight Americans allowed in on the program that year, and we were to the city stay point of the summer.
We were going out to see Zagorsk.
It was the only authorized Christian seminary, religious seminary in the whole country, because Lenin was the God.
Socialism was the God.
And it was so ironic, but as you looked at this, I don't know, four or five-story buildings, something like that.
It was a big building there.
As you turned into the gates of the seminary, and there was a picture of Lenin, and it said, Lenin Znami.
Lenin is with us.
You may be going in here and thinking you believe in God, but really it's Lenin, rubber ears and all.
At least that was what they said.
I saw him.
I don't know if his ears were rubber or not, but that was the rumor back at the time.
But anyway, that's brought us to this stolen election.
The election model that the thieves used was based on the notion that President Trump could not possibly get more votes than the Obama high point, 2008.
So when President Trump's votes flew by those numbers by the millions, it forced these socialist election thieves into moving quickly and overtly.
They couldn't do it secretly so well because Trump was about to win the whole thing, more so than originally planned, and even rolling out suitcases of ballots and loading hundreds of thousands of ballots into their easily manipulated systems.
So we're going to be covering a lot of things about that.
And by the way, I haven't checked this week, but a week or so ago, I'd heard it was true.
And so I did a Google request.
I don't normally use Google at all.
Don't trust them.
But about the stoppage of the vote counting the night of the election.
And lo and behold, I got all these responses on the first page about that didn't happen.
Politihack had done their check, and it was false.
And all these, you know, leftists used to be called mainstream media, but let's face it, they're not mainstream media.
They're alt-left media.
That's what they are.
And, you know, they were confirming that nobody stopped vote counting.
That was a lie.
It was a false.
And it reminded me of my summer in the Soviet Union.
Don't believe your eyes and ears.
We'll tell you what you can believe.
And in fact, can we play that?
This is what was in the media, uh, there, if you would do that montage.
We are live outside of that warehouse in the north side this morning, and they decided to press pause because they noticed there was an issue with their precinct information not loading correctly, not getting that information outright either, or or even correctly.
So they decide to press a pause on that and get back to it later this morning.
We go to Gwynett County.
That's where a software glitch caused a delay in counting votes there.
In Fulton County, we had a bit of a snafu overnight and the ballot counting there.
CBS is Sabrina Silva live at Fulton County's elections warehouse with brand new information this hour.
Sabrina volunteers actually it looks like ran out of steam last night.
From what we hear is that these volunteers, they were simply too tired to continue counting these ballots last night and were sent home around 1 a.m.
Nevada, meanwhile, has stopped counting votes until 9 a.m. on Thursday, so we will not know what's happening in Nevada until then.
All right, there you go.
If you heard that and all the talk about stoppage, your ears were lying to you.
That didn't happen.
You can't believe what your ears told you you were hearing.
Why?
Because you can do a Google search and find out that's all false.
Nope, that never happened uh that night.
So uh let's face it, this is socialist right out of the socialist manifesto, basically.
Uh may i I mean, it's Orwellian.
One of the few things I've been quoted accurately as saying is uh, gee, the only thing Orwell got wrong apparently was the year.
What 1984?
Uh it's now, and this is exactly what's been going on.
But I was in my first meeting about electronic election fraud in December, two full years ago.
And uh there were some former Intel folks that had a firm, and they said you need to see this.
And they uh showed evidence of um electronic fraud in Dallas County election counting back in the primary uh uh in tw 2018, and then in the general election in 2018.
So I'm not new to this whole story.
We have been trying to get, we were trying to get law enforcement in Texas, including the Texas Attorney General, to do something uh because I I felt like look, if we can get the state of Texas to act on this fraud, there's plenty of evidence here from which to get a uh a search warrant to seize the vote counting equipment, the voting equipment and the flash drives that were used in early voting, all this stuff.
We could get that stuff before they get rid of it.
And uh then we can save the whole country from what's coming in 2020 because in 2018 they used the primary and general election as really practice, and they learned from mistakes, they got better at their fraud.
But uh anyway, and and let me tell you, when I first heard that uh Soros or somebody was spending a bunch of money trying to get uh people in charge of vote counting in different places and uh, you know, elections in different places, and then also the effort to get uh prosecutors uh uh their choice in in certain places.
I thought, well, uh at least we're safe in Texas because the Secretary of State's appointed by the Republican governor, so we're okay.
I didn't think about the fact that where the biggest source of fraud would be coming from was huge counties that were all Democrat uh run and had been for a while, and that they would hire vote counting firms that uh could potentially be massive problems.
And so we've seen that carried out.
Uh I got frustrated uh last year and gave up on Texas actually protecting the country in itself.
And I know there were a few indictments, but none of the big stuff that could have really made a difference.
Uh so I presented some stuff to the folks in The federal government that I thought would make a difference, but our our Department of Justice is just so compromised.
But uh fortunately for the socialist fascists, um, they've had social media monopolies that can tell you you can't believe anything that you saw or heard that might indicate problems like suitcases full of ballots being pulled out when all the Republican poll watchers were were run off.
No, I don't believe any of that.
But listen, folks, to have free and fair elections, the voting process, the counting process must be a hundred percent visible, must be witnessed by part bipartisan observers, and as cheap as cameras are, for heaven's sake, just videotape everything.
Let's make sure everybody knows that it's gonna be free and fair.
And by the way, another thing, we say, well, you know, they got rid of evidence, and Alito ordered uh, you know the ballots to be kept that of a certain type, and they didn't, they mixed and mingled.
There's a legal doctrine called spoliation.
If one party in a suit controls evidence, and that party either destroys the evidence or mingles it, confuses it with others so it cannot be produced, or if they refuse to produce it, then the judge or jury may consider that that evidence they refused to produce or lost, got rid of that evidence proved the allegation that the other party was making.
A court can take notice of that, and nobody's talking about that.
It it matters.
And so we say, well, they don't have the evidence.
What can do?
Well, the court should take judicial notice that they don't didn't produce the evidence that would approved or disapprove the allegations, and since they hit them, destroyed them, got rid of them, obviously it proved that they were engaged in fraud.
This is the Sean Hannity show.
This is Sean's friend Louis Gomert in for Sean, and I hope you'll come right back.
There's a lot more ahead in this show, and you're gonna be able to take on your friends about the fraud issue if you'll listen.
Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
And I'm Carol Markowitz.
We've been in political media for a long time.
Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
That's why we started normally, a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass.
You're our kind of people.
Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So down a verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
Hello, folks.
This is uh Sean Hannity's show.
This is Louis Gormart sitting in.
And look, we're gonna have the whole show.
We're gonna be talking about the fraud in the election.
And uh uh people listen, just uh if people out uh you know are discouraged, have them tune in to Sean's show.
Um, because they're gonna come away with all kinds of ammunition.
Uh my website is www.gomert um dot com.
And uh look, uh you want to call in, we're gonna be taking calls.
Uh, we're gonna have experts and hopefully most of them will be able to take calls.
That's 800-941-7326.
That's 800-941 Sean, and that's Sean S-E-A-N.
So anyway, uh I know one of the Democrats' favorite words is disenfranchisement of voters.
Well, look, this was the largest, most massive disenfranchisement of voters in world history.
The courts have shown that not one of them is willing to pursue justice, not one.
So we're gonna be talking about that.
Please come back.
Matt DePurno is gonna be with us, constitutional attorney out of Michigan, and you're gonna learn a whole lot more.
Hey there.
I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
And I'm Carol Markowitz.
We've been in political media for a long time.
Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
That's why we started normally a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sas, you're our kind of people.
Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So Dow, verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
This is the Sean Hannity show.
This is Louie Gomert, uh, lowly member of Congress from Texas.
And we're glad you're here with us.
And by the way, uh to help, yeah, I've mentioned my website at uh gomert.com.
But uh Linda, you've got some great stuff up.
Where do people go?
So on Hannity.com, we wrote it up yesterday, and we have a whole list for the six battleground states um for all of your legislators in those m all important states.
So make sure you call them, email them, let them know that the best Christmas gift is the gift of freedom.
If you want to see all the videos about it, go to election night facts.
This this Rumble account has some of the best videos I've seen out there.
Just check it out.
Stay on those legislator guys, they work for you.
And anybody that says the fraud has all been debunked that uh unfounded and ask them where there was a hearing that debunked it because there's been no evidence.
Yeah, I'd love to watch it.
For sure.
It hadn't happened.
Not even the Supreme Court.
Well, look, we have a constitutional attorney from Michigan, Mark DePurno with us.
I'm sorry, I said Mark Denner.
Yeah.
Matt.
Matt, sorry, Matt.
Uh he represents William Bailey, a resident of Antrim County, and uh he is just all over this stuff, and he knows there was fraud as well in this election.
Matt DePurno, welcome to the Sean Hannity show.
Thanks, Louie.
Thanks for having me on.
Hey, man, it's great to have you on.
And we really appreciate your work.
You know, you had apparently done um uh an analysis, uh, you had access to the Dominion software and the machines, and then your analysis was put under a gag order.
How could things be unfounded when the things that uh that would debunk them if it were such uh get put under gag order?
I mean, it's incredible.
But you have been fighting, and we need more of your fighting spirit in Congress.
But tell us uh what you have found with regard to uh fraud in this election from all your deep dive into this stuff.
Sure, thank you.
Um we filed a lawsuit in Antrim County on November 23rd because we wanted to get to the bottom of why the uh the results were so skewed in favor of Joe Biden on November 3rd.
This is a county that's historically 60 to 65% Republican, but on election night it flipped to 60% Joe Biden.
Uh and my client in particular was concerned about some down ballot races for school board elections.
Uh so we filed the lawsuit.
No one knew about our lawsuit because uh it was just an issue that we raised regarding the uh down ballot races.
Um, and we were able to get a court to issue an injunction and allow us to examine the Dominion software and bring in a team of experts to take forensic images uh of those uh computers, thumb drives and uh uh program cards.
And we obtained those on December 6th on a Sunday.
Uh my team worked throughout the week to uh collect or research the data, collect their data and write a preliminary report, and we filed a motion with the court to allow us to release those findings to the country on December 14th.
And we had a hearing on December 14th and the judge granted that and we were able to release that report.
And the report tells us and I'm just gonna quote from you from the report it still is we conclude that the Dominion voting system is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.
The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors the election ballots are then transferred for adjudication.
The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency and no audit trail.
This leads to voter or election fraud and based on our study we conclude that the Dominion voting system should not be used in Michigan.
We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.
And we're able to extrapolate those results to the other 47 counties in Michigan that also use this system.
Well that that's phenomenal not only was the uh fraud not debunked or unfounded it was quite founded from your terrific uh research and work that we really appreciate what you've been doing.
Now, I understood also that in Michigan there were some places where there was more turnout than there were people.
Had you seen anything on that, Matt?
Well, our study was specific to Antrim County.
Got you.
What we did see even last Thursday when the Secretary of State, after our lawsuit was filed, the Secretary of State decided to do,
do uh what she called a low risk audit throughout the state and she handpicked certain precincts in the state um which would be beneficial to her argument but she also said that she would uh audit the entire Antrim County results so we did that last Thursday but but it was false in terms of what she said it wasn't an actual audit what she did was nothing more than a hand recount which has already been done up in Antrim County.
So but what we found during that hand recount were a number of oddities or errors including um uh blank ballots mixed in with uh the regular ballots um and and not in big stacks but in ones and twos and threes and we know that when you feed a blank ballot through the Dominion software system it doesn't reject the ballot but it it creates an error and sends ballots to adjudication.
So that was an issue we found, and we found other regulators as well.
um wasn't it uh in Antrim County also that uh there was a 68% error rate right that's what that the that's what the forensic team found that there's a 68% error rate when you feed a ballot into the machine and remember it's unreal when you feed when you feed a ballot into the machine that's a paper ballot.
That machine uh uh translate that that written ballot into data that data can be manipulated and through this system and the adjudication process someone somewhere sitting in another room or another state or another country can mass adjudicate bunches of ballots with a single click of the button for whichever candidate they see fit.
Wow that well and you mentioned the Secretary of State um as I understand it, she sent a board of electors directive out on one December to all the uh clerks telling them to delete all electronic records, which is a violation of state law records retention requirements.
Do you know if she's been called on that at all?
Well I think a lot of people have called her out on that and we certainly have because she knew that we had filed the lawsuit and then after the lawsuit was filed, once she got wind of it, she did two things.
Number one, she tried to intervene in the case and she intervened in the case because she wanted to try to block the report that we prepared from coming out to the public.
And number two, she's been on a relentless attack her and Dana Nessel, the attorney general here in Michigan, have been on a relentless attack against me and my client and the the team that we work with, the forensic team, she's attempted to discredit them, discredit us.
I've been threatened repeatedly by the Attorney General.
She's now attempting to come after my law license.
This is tyranny is what we're seeing.
It's totalitarianism and it's fascism what we're seeing.
They're attempting to squash the the public discourse regarding elections.
They don't want anyone to challenge election results and when you do they try to silence you.
So in that regard we've attempted to put up a fundraising campaign for my client on my website.
It's depernow.com D E P E R N O L A Welp to try to combat and fight this fascism.
Yeah it's exactly what it is and I know that uh our chairman of judiciary gets upset when I'm pointing out but you know they like to say you know Republican is a Nazi is Hitler and whatnot but if you just do a c any check at all with her your history you find out that the Nazi Party was the German Socialist workers party.
Uh it was the socialists that were the Nazis, the fascists and we're sure seeing that here that it it you can't have a free and fair election if people can't rely on the vote counting.
And, of course, I'm sure you remember it was historically Stalin that said basically it doesn't matter who votes.
It matters who counts the votes.
And that's what the socialists in this country have figured out.
And that's why they stacked the deck the way they did.
So, well, Matt, you are verifying that there is fraud.
There was fraud in this election.
It has not only not been debunked and
not it's not unfounded you have found a a basis in fact for it uh so where do things stand legally in uh Michigan as a result of your suit well right now legally we've we've been able to release the report anyone who wants to read read the report can go to my website deperno law.com it's posted there but in terms of the lawsuit we're now in the discovery phase the Secretary of State made a calculated decision
to try to intervene in the case because she wanted to stop the release of the report the court denied that request allowed us to release it and now she's a party defendant subject to discovery and we get to take her deposition and ask for records.
Fantastic so that was a calculate move she made but we need help we really need help from all the people across the country to help support this cause because we're the only lawsuit in the country that's been given access to the Dominion voting system.
We need to analyze this and study it properly so we need help from everyone out there if you tell them how to believe tell them how to help you well help us by donating at deperno law dot com there's two fundraiser raisers that uh some some kind citizens have created to help us fund this litigation.
And we need your help.
We need everyone's help because the Secretary of State and the Attorney General are trying to stop um this uh information from coming out.
Matt, we can't thank you enough.
Uh you've heard Matt, he's doing great work, but he needs help.
And there are people out there that can help him.
I hope uh that works out because we're in a fight for the country.
We're gonna take a break and we're gonna be right back and take your calls at 800-941.
Sean and Matt, thanks so much for being with us and providing the clarity you have.
We'll be right back.
Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
And I'm Carol Markowitz.
We've been in political media for a long time.
Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
That's why we started normally, a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass.
You're our kind of people.
Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So down a verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
This is the Sean Hannity show.
This is Louis Gomert sitting in for Sean.
Uh let's go to the phones.
Uh let's uh see uh Rick from Michigan.
We just heard from Michigan attorney.
Rick, thanks for listening to the Sean Hannity show.
Yes.
After watching all these people pulling ballots out from under tables and people being chicked out viewers, why hasn't anybody been arrested yet?
You know, it that is such a good question, Rick, and it frustrates the heck out of me.
I've been a prosecutor before, and it you know, for people to get away with this stuff and then for the media to cover for them and say it's not even happening, it's outrageous.
The Department of Justice is become the Department of Injustice.
I had great hope for uh our attorney general Barr and Durham.
I didn't know Durham, but it seemed like it was going well, but uh nothing resulted.
And you know, when when Barr keeps saying, I've seen no evidence of fraud, well, he's not the one that goes out and investigates.
He has to rely on the FBI for that.
And as I've told the president, as long as Christopher Ray was in the FBI, America's not safe.
I think my opinion, he took his uh admonition to clean up the FBI and he swept everything under the rug.
That's the way it appears to me.
And uh they have not been a Department of Justice.
They have not been investigators, they've been cover-up artists here in what or in Washington, D.C. Uh, but that's why nobody's been arrested.
Uh tried to get uh our attorney general's office in in Texas to do something for two years and and nothing happened.
So it is very frustrating.
Um I know there I've got friends that are saying we just need to get rid of the FBI and start fresh with a new federal investigation bureau of some kind, but I hoped that Ray might come in and clean it up.
He didn't, and as a result, uh uh, you know, and I know the FB there were FBI that lied to Jeff Sessions.
No, there's no evidence here or there or yon.
So I figure they did the same thing to Barr.
But great question.
We'll be right back, and we're gonna be diving in deeper to the fraud that did occur in the last election.
This is Sean Handicop Show, 800 941 Sean.
Call us.
We'll be right back.
Hey there.
I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
And I'm Carol Markowitz.
We've been in political media for a long time.
Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
That's why we started normally a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass.
You're our kind of people.
Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.
We break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So download Verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
This is Louie Gohmert, a little member of Congress from Texas, sitting in for Sean and And uh I'm glad to have heard that montage.
Um it is incredible how vast the media has uh moved uh just to try to convince people that there is no fraud there uh when it is clear to anyone, as the Bible says, anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear.
Um and we've got a couple of guests here that have eyes and ears.
They understand they they have seen what's gone on.
And uh that's Ian Norton from the Amistad Project and Thomas Moore Society, as well as Phil Klein, the Amstad Project Director, former Kansas Attorney General.
Uh welcome to the Sean Hannity show, guys.
Well, thank you.
Thanks for having us, Congressman.
Well, thanks for being had.
Um joke.
But anyway, uh look, I appreciate so much y'all's dive into this.
Uh do y'all support the idea that oh and I'm sorry to use the term y'all to somebody north of uh the Southern Line.
But hey, hey, the language needed a second person plural.
What can I say?
We supplied it and uh it works.
Y'all for you know, two or three people, all y'all for a big crowd.
But anyway, you guys to use uh New York slang, uh, you guys, uh you really have done a deep dive, and you didn't take uh the answer that there wasn't any fraud here.
Tell us about what you've um found from all your research on the election.
Well, Congressman, we were we've been in the field um for about two years now, and early on we witnessed uh the beginning of the movements of lots of private money into uh managing the election.
And it started in March of 2020 when you had David Pluth, Obama's former campaign manager, who published a book called The Citizens' Guide for Defeating Donald Trump.
And on page 81, he spoke about the need of an effort if the Democrats are gonna win to do a block-by-block street fight to turn out the vote in Minneapolis, Detroit, and Philadelphia and the urban core cities.
Soon after that, you started to see um sleepy little 501c called the Center for Tech and Civic Life reaching out to these Democrat mayors and saying, Look, we got some money coming, and we want to give you a little money now to plan your election.
And if you do it the way we want you to do it, you know, essentially they're buying those local government election offices.
We're going to buy these offices from you, and we'll tell you how to run the election and we'll send money your way.
And soon enough, Mark Zuckerberg gave a total of 350 million dollars to that charity who started to buy up these local election offices and dictate out of them from the election.
And all the illegalities, the sidestepping of state law, the ignoring of the signature projects, the consolidated counting centers, the locked Republicans out, the breach of the chain of custody of drop boxes occurred everywhere.
Zuckerberg money touched.
Totally gave 419 million.
So yes, there's obvious and admitted uh illegalities that call into question the election.
And now I I would just say the Democrat officials are doubling down, and we see that in Michigan where Ian Dorson is uh our local counsel there and handling on litigation.
And in Michigan, it went so far as the attorney general of the state threatening legislators with criminal investigation if they disagreed with the results of the election.
And the governor locking Republicans out of the State House while allowing Democrats in.
And Ian was there.
Ian was trying to get them in their work.
Just incredible.
Well, you know, I mentioned earlier in the show, when I first heard that there was big money coming from Democrats to buy spots for people that control elections, I thought, well, Texas will be safe because Secretary of State's in charge.
But I didn't think about the big Democrat control cities where we found out that's where an awful lot of fraud has occurred.
And and really, guys, I I'm not sure about uh what you've run into, but in Texas, if you're a rural county and you're elected to be the county clerk in charge of the elections, and you go out and hire somebody else to come in and do all your election counting for you, well, you're probably not going to win again because you got hired to do that, and yet that's what we're seeing in the big cities of Texas.
And and I couldn't help but think when I read about what you guys were doing, that uh that must be what you're running into around the country as you've dug into this.
Well, that's exactly right, Congressman.
You know, we saw we saw money being poured into places like Flint, Michigan, Muskegon, Michigan, Pontiac, Michigan, you know, 400,000, 475,000, then Detroit, the coup des gras, three and a half million.
You know, about ten million dollars total uh poured into Michigan through these Zuckerberg charities.
And when you saw that, uh it translated directly into high paid consultants in the you know, adjudication board, you know, looking at absentee ballots, deciding who who voted for whom.
You know, you saw uh, you know, money being paid to to workers that in the rural counties, you know, like where I grew up in Michigan, Michigan has a few cities, but most of it's rural, it's the woods.
And they'd get minimum wage or would be volunteers, and then you go into these uh these targeted areas with uh Zuckerberg money and they're being paid six hundred, six hundred and fifty dollars a day.
And when you start to do that, uh you know, you start to have a disparate impact and disparate treatment.
Votes are being treated differently in those counties and those cities than they were every place else in the state.
And y you can't help but think, and and in fact it did translate into different effects and different results and the way veterans' ballots and other ballots were being treated in real time.
And when you translate that out uh not just to Michigan but to other states as well, those targeted monies, targeted areas.
What's so what's so uh difficult about this is when I filed lawsuits before the election, before everything was in controversy, you know, they were over technical violations.
People look up statutes with weird names like Hava, the Help America's Vote Act.
Well, when you do that, it says every penny has to be accounted for.
The monies have to go to the federal agencies or the states themselves, you keep the receipts, it's transparent.
Uh you have you have rules and regulations that that track it.
But when this money comes in through these private sources, not only does it arguably violate Hava, but now there are clawback provisions.
So instead of being transparent, it's concealed.
Instead of saying uh follow the federal guidelines for air rates for voting machines, for example.
Uh now, if you don't follow Mark Zuckerberg's guidelines, he says he's gonna claw back that money through charity agreements.
Wow.
Uh that's that's the kind of stuff that shocks people's conscience when it's put in front of their nose.
But the media and so many others are out there trying their darndest to keep people from finding out about what happened.
And you know, that's a pretty cheap date.
Ten million bucks for Michigan with only about five and a half million people voting.
It's about a buck seventy-five a vote.
And when you target it to those specific areas, he got off uh he made a a pretty cheap business decision that if you or I were to do that as an individual, it would arguably be a felony.
It would be a crime.
It's improper for an individual to pay money into election officials.
But yet somehow it's okay uh when it's done through a charity or through um or or through these uh local governments.
I don't think so.
And that's why we sued before the election, and that's why we continued our lawsuits since.
What's the status of the suit?
Um we've got Bill can talk about that, but we filed one yet today in in DC federal court.
Good.
Good.
Yeah, we our new federal suit challenges these deadlines, which are arbitrary that Congress has set on state legislatures to review and exercise their authority under the constant constitution.
And Congressman, I would just add one point just as an example of the disparate impact that occurred.
You this occurred.
Zuckerberg Bunny flew into these states.
At the same time, blue state governors were shutting down in-person polling places, claiming COVID was the concern.
And as you know, Republicans prefer to vote in person on election day.
Yet they were opening up opportunities for more voting in person in all of these urban corps with Zuckerberg Bunny.
Um, for example, in Philadelphia, they mandated that Philadelphia have eight hundred satellite polling locations.
Wow.
They put a drop box in Democrat strongholds in Pennsylvania, one every four square miles.
That's a drop box, you know, two mile by two mile square.
You could stroll and vote.
In the fifty-nine counties that Trump won in two thousand sixteen, there was one drop box for every eleven hundred and fifty-nine square miles.
So if you live in a Democrat area, it's hey, we'll pick up your ballot or walk down to the corner and vote.
If you live in a Republican area, it's go on a weekend vike vacation and find Waldo.
Government can't do that.
That's wrong.
Shouldn't.
Well, and they shouldn't be privatizing the election as we've seen in the big uh counties where the corruption seems to be at its very worst.
So you don't support the idea that all of the allegations of fraud have been debunked and are unfounded, correct?
That is absurd.
Um in fact, there's admitted lawlessness in each and every one of these states, with local officials saying we will not vote uh follow voter ID for indefinitely confined persons requirements like in Wisconsin, or we're not going to follow signature requirements like they did in Michigan, or we're not going to require witnesses on the ballot like they did in several of these states.
There are admitted illegalities in every one of these states that calls into question the results of the election.
You know, and what's worse, Congressman, is that when when legislatures, whose ultimately it's their responsibility to manage the time, place, and manner of elections, but when state legislatures try and do something about it, they get locked out of their own chamber like in Michigan, or uh when when they demand that the Secretary of State in Michigan come before them and answer questions under oath, she refuses.
So again, this is a situation where you know legislatures uh, you know, I think in many respects, um, you know, uh winter came early, so to speak in Michigan.
A lot of them were were sleeping or maybe already in hibernation.
But you know, they're starting to wake up to this and starting to look at the evidence.
But even though those efforts to try and do the right thing and make sure that uh, you know, a fraudulent election isn't sealed uh and delivered to D.C., you know, their efforts to do that have been thwarted.
They've not been able to meet in person because of COVID acceptance.
Well, there's no COVID exception to the Constitution.
No.
You know, they've been locked out of their own building.
The people's house in Lansing and other places too.
We've we've heard of interference uh of uh these threats of reprisals and and other interferences.
And that's the type of stuff that I would call upon those legislators to stand up, stand up to their executive branch.
You know, there's supposed to be a balance of powers and separation of powers, and they need to assert themselves now or else they'll never have the chance to do it again in the future.
Well, nothing motivates uh legislators like having and I know being one, like having uh their constituents call, Email, let them know that uh they feel strongly about an issue, and there shouldn't be much that you feel more strongly about than free and fair elections.
We didn't have one this time.
It was so corrupted.
But tell people how they can find out more about what you're doing.
Well, I would encourage people to go to one, do as you suggested, Congressman.
Call the legislatures uh and and let them know they need to act.
And they need to act now and not let the governor stand in the way.
You can learn more about us at WWGOT hyphen freedom.org.org.
That's great.
And uh as you know from being litigators, uh, it takes time to get discovery.
I I'm wondering about in Arizona, though, where the Arizona legislature uh had subpoenaed some voting machines as I understand it, and the clerk says, nope, you can't have them.
Uh seems to me like maybe it's time to cut off some state money to places that don't comply that try to cover up results of elections.
But you guys are doing great work and we appreciate what you're doing so much, and we'll be right back.
This is the Sean Hannity show.
Come on back.
You're gonna find out about more fraud.
Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
And I'm Carol Markowitz.
We've been in political media for a long time.
Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
That's why we started normally a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass.
You're our kind of people.
Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So down with verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
This is the Sean Hannity show.
This is Louis Gilmert sitting in for my friend Sean.
And let's go to the phones.
We've got uh Margaret in Utah.
Margaret.
Good afternoon.
Welcome.
Thank you so much.
It is a pleasure to t talk to you.
Um listeners, listeners, but never were able to do that.
Bless you.
Well, I'm glad I got to hear from you.
You have a question, Margaret?
Yes, I have a couple of questions.
One of them is what is um uh the um white house or the senators and congressmen gonna do on uh January 6th.
Is there a way to stop this uh craziness at that point?
Yeah, there is uh, and it requires objection by both House member and Senator, and hopefully uh as I understand it, uh Tupperville from Alabama has said he will object.
Uh we know you don't have to be from the state uh uh the votes to which you're objecting since Barbara Boxer objected, I think it's to Ohio back in uh 2005.
Uh but we have got to have enough evidence out there, and the courts have not allowed it, so we gotta do like Reagan and go over uh the heads and get evidence out there to the public so that they can be screaming to their representatives and senators that they better object and they better support this effort or they're gonna be out on the street.
But that's what's gotta happen.
There is evidence, and we're gonna be getting it out for people to see, and you need to be contacting your senators to make sure they understand what you expect from them.
But we're gonna be objecting.
We're gonna be uh making clear that this fraud has to be dealt with and it's not appropriate to steal elections and hopefully we'll get a justice department at some point that will punish crime instead of just Republicans.
This is the Sean Hannity show and this is Louie Gomert sitting in for Sean.
And uh by the way, the uh question from Margaret uh in Utah about, you know, what can President Trump do.
Well uh when I was at the White House yesterday, one of the things I told him is look, bars checked out uh you know we didn't get anything near like we expected in the way of justice.
And as I know from being a former felony judge, you know, the law in Texas makes very clear, when you assess a sentence, you're supposed to consider general deterrence, that you have a significant enough sentence that others are deterred from engaging in the same conduct.
You have specific deterrence, so it's powerful enough that it deters this person from ever repeating the conduct, and you have safety of the general public.
uh we have not gotten anything in the order of general deterrence uh to to scare people away from cheating in elections and it's gotta happen.
I told the president look uh you you could appoint a special counsel you know Barr's checked out he's not doing his job you could appoint so well they're telling me I can't appoint a special counsel.
Well whoever's telling him that does not understand the government in the United States.
All power under the president in the executive branch comes through the president and he can appoint a special counsel.
I encouraged him in June of twenty seventeen look they appointed Mueller for nothing.
He's not going to be fair uh you ought to have a special counsel appointed you ought to appoint him to uh to just investigate how we ever got to the place of having a special counsel.
investigate this whole thing.
It stinks to high heaven.
But he was persuaded back then not to do that, let it run its course, and it was a very wasteful course, of course.
Well, Mueller came out good financially, and Weissman, they got to trash a lot of people and destroy some good people.
But nonetheless, we have some great guests, and they've been doing deep dives.
John Basham, a data scientist, meteorologist.
He loves to dig into data.
We have Justin Mealy, former Arabic linguist, and he's an intelligence analyst at the NSA, has been, software developer.
And Dave Laboo, he's artificial intelligence expert.
You put these guys together, and they're kind of like Russ Ramson's group.
Phil Waldron's group they have got some brilliant people they're brilliant they're working with
with good people and they've done some deep dives into the raw data and that's where there's an awful lot of answers it appears but guys welcome to the Sean Hannity show thanks for being here no need to call me Congressman I'm just Louie but glad to have you here and uh Linda was saying you know these guys are so good just let them take it and run with it.
Well that's that's scary.
First I will call you Congressman and this is this is uh John Basham I wanted to say that because Congressman uh also I'm from Texas and you are from Texas one and we could not be any prouder than to have you represent us in in Congress sir.
It it is uh an honor to talk to you you're very kind John thank you.
If I were still a judge or chief justice you'd have to call me judge or chief justice but now I'm just a lowly legislator so Louie is quite adequate.
But thank you.
Well get into the data guys.
You said we we've been looking at this and we have been doing a lot of uh deep dives and and these guys that that are that are on here with me they're they're incredible at at going into the individual granularity the one nice thing about being a meteorologist is my job is to take that insane amount of science and turn it into something that people can understand and it really comes down to after we looked at all the data and just keep in mind that no one I keep hearing all of these people say that they haven't seen anything,
they haven't seen anything.
No one has taken the time that we have taken hundreds and hundreds of man hours to review all of this data across multiple states down to the county and precinct level to identify what we've identified, which was something that I think all of us felt on election night that something might be wrong.
And and when we dug into the data, we did find we found multiple anomalies and errors that that needed to be addressed and and needed to be answered.
And you know, uh, from one of the ones that stuck out to me immediately was when we started seeing election data where votes went backwards.
Uh how do you mean from what you know, we would see the the raw election data, and these guys who will go into greater detail on that, but we would see the raw election data say uh uh the votes would come in, and I'll give just uh uh a random number here, but say there were a thousand votes for Trump, and then twenty minutes later Trump only had eight hundred votes.
So where did the two hundred votes go?
How did that happen?
And we thought, well, maybe that was uh an error in the reporting.
Maybe it was uh a human error.
Maybe there's a hundred different reasons it it could have happened.
But we saw it across multiple counties, precinct states, and we started to see this replicate in a very specific pattern that that started to uh to leave us a lot of questions.
So did you get any answers?
Yeah, I think you know, I'm uh uh Justin has uh has a a great deal of uh expertise in in explaining how this data was moving back and forth, and I I'll defer to him on that, Congressman.
Yeah, please, Justin, just don't speak it in Arabic.
Definitely so cron, Congressman.
So yeah, basically uh obviously we came together real quick, you know, just give you uh a little history.
We came together uh directly after the election as a bunch of volunteers because hey, we saw there was a bunch of things that happened election night, they were not explained.
Nobody gave us any sufficient explanation as to why we saw these things happening, and so we wanted to look at the real data.
So we took an approach of you know, uh other people had taken other approaches where they were looking at uh voter rolls and things like that, dead voters, uh uh illegals voting, you know, out of state, that type of thing, and that's fine.
I'm not saying that you know those things didn't happen, but it could be argued in court that those people voted for Trump.
You can't prove that.
So we want to take an approach of looking at things that were hard, irrefutable facts that that could 100% be proved that could not be disproved, right?
So that's that that's the exactly, and that's that's that's the approach that we took.
So um obviously uh right now our folk our biggest focus is on Arizona because we have data sets right now that show without a doubt at a statistically impossible level that there were uh irregularities, I will call them, but obviously you don't know what that means.
Um that there were things that happened in during that election that is now proven in our data set, which we're gonna release our data set and our methodology and everything like that.
You know, we've released a couple videos, but we're gonna release our all that stuff out there to show people and have them take a look at it and be able to replicate uh what we've done here and show that basically there was there's no way it could have happened the way it did.
So they're gonna go into more detail about the uh the actual numbers and everything like that, but just wanted to show you know, talk to you about uh, you know, just like why we did this because it's really really important that um, you know, we'll go ahead.
Well, Rudy Giuliani had given me some information yesterday.
Um indicates there's like 22,000, nearly 23,000 mail-in ballots were received the day before the ballot was recorded as being sent out.
Uh did you see any kind of anomalies like that?
Well, we have um we have very specific data that we're looking at, which is directly from the Secretary of State's website.
So you can go right now to the Secretary of the State's website uh and and download some data.
And so the data that that shows is really like you're looking at uh vote totals for you know for vote photos for the different candidates for the different questions, you know, president, uh you know, voting for Congress, voting for you know this this local thing, all that stuff.
So the thing is is that we are only like we only have those data points.
Now, what we did was we originally started with you know what what people might know as the Edison data set.
It's kind of it's basically a data set that goes out to CNN and you know the national election pool.
So when you were were to watch the news, you would be looking at the Edison data set, you know, and that that has been uh basically told to us from the uh Secretary of State's website.
Well, that's completely um you know irrelevant because it's not accurate to what our data is.
But luckily enough, in the last couple days, we actually got the time series data from the Secretary of State's website as they released it that night, provided by um you know a patriot known as Garrett Archer.
I guess he put out the he put out this uh originally to debunk our methodology, but all he did was prove that our data was 100% matching exactly what the Secretary of State had put out.
So this was this the data that is that sec that the state of Arizona used to certify the election.
And so, you know, as we release this out and release the details out in further videos, you know, you'll be basically be able to see that there is something going on that um proves that there's no way that this could have happened uh statistically.
Yeah.
Uh Dai, you have any comment?
Yeah, absolutely.
And just to take a step back to talk about you know what this data looks like, so you know the listeners can conceptualize what we're working with.
You can think about it um, you know, from an election standpoint, but just as you'd manage your own personal finances, you'd log into your bank and you'd check your checking account and savings account, typically you have them tied together on the same screen.
And once we strung together these different data sources from the precinct, county, and state level, and we had them merge side by side against these sort of uh time series updates.
Imagine you logged in on you know November 4th and look back at your bank statement, and in the last 24 hours you saw a flurry of activity back and forth between your checking account and your savings account.
And sometimes you'd say, okay, well, it's just going from my account to my account.
That's strange, but at least it's balancing out.
And that happens a good portion of the time.
In other instances, you'd see a certain amount that just evaporates entirely.
So there was a number of different activities that were not only suspicious, but you'd imagine if you logged in and saw that happening, you'd want to know exactly what was going on between those hours.
And the combination of both the uh activity within accounts and across accounts really hasn't been addressed or explained as you know this data presents itself.
So we've brought this, we brought this out and we are bringing this out just to get answers for or at least a basic explanation as to what's happening from this data standpoint.
Well, and that's one of the problems uh it when you're dealing with uh complex litigation like uh things involving this issue would be, uh it takes time to go through discovery to get answers.
And I can't help but think that the people that engaged in the fraud were counting on the fact that a new president is sworn in, whether the same one is resworn in or a new one sworn in on January 20th, and that's not enough time to find all the fraud, the different ways we've engaged in it.
And uh so it is important that that it be ferreted out, but it's difficult.
Uh Congressman, yeah, go ahead.
Yeah, you know, that you you bring up a yeah an excellent point.
And and one of the things that has been so frustrating for us, now that we've put together a data integrity group that's full of data scientists, which is full of mathematicians and experts in numbers theory, you know and artificial intelligence, you name it, and we've built a system that allows us to uh identify where errors or anomalies uh you can call it fraud or not, we don't know.
We don't know what the actual cause of it was.
But when we start to dig into it, every time we try to go and look at the actual source of it, we get stonewalled by the local agencies, by the either from the Secretary of State level or even we had a big series in Georgia where we were supposed to be able to go in and look at Dominion machines across five different counties.
And and I'm only saying their name because they're one of the groups that we were looking at.
And it we were blocked the day before we were to fly in from seeing anything.
And it's it's hard to imagine when you've got since the election, three respected national pollsters who have come out and said that a majority of elections believe this election was either fraudulent or so error-filled that it's invalid.
A majority believe that we had an election like a a third world country or uh or a uh you know, a banana republican.
It it it's hard when you've got dot data scientists who are wanting to go in and willing to go in, and and we have the questions, we know the questions that need to be asked because we now see the data and where there were problems.
Specifically, I'll give you an example in Georgia.
It we had uh over a hundred different precincts in the Fulton County area that had the uh mail in ballots come in at a ninety percent or greater for one candidate, Joe Biden.
And from a statistical standpoint can't happen.
But we saw that replicated across a number of states.
And one of the things that can answer some of these questions everywhere where we had ballot scanners is those every one of those ballots is scanned and in a memory card.
And I don't understand since the public owns those that information, owns those ballots, and it's my understanding, sir.
You can tell me if I'm wrong, but the all federal ballots have to be kept for two years.
Well, they're supposed to be, and some states have different rules but and laws, and we're about out of time.
But let me just say go back to this.
I've talked to uh Rudy Giuliani about it and Sidney Powell.
They're both quite familiar with it.
The doctrine of spoliation, when times of the essence, if one party gets rid of evidence refuses to produce it, then the court should take and take notice that it is an admission that the evidence proves what the plaintiff's trying to say.
So uh listen, tell people right quick how to uh how they can follow up with your information that you're digging out.
Well, yes, Congressman, we're actually releasing uh we released you know, three videos on Rumble, and we're gonna release a uh a further one that has goes into more detail about all these things and also releases our methodology and the code that we use and everything like that, so everybody can go and replicate that.
Election night.
That's right.
Time is out.
But I I'm thank you so much for the work you're doing.
This is the Sean Hannity show, and we will be right back.
This is the Sean Hannity show.
This is Louis Gomert sitting in for Sean.
And uh you know, that was big and rich, bumper music coming in.
But yeah, John has a swimming pool on top of his house, and my name tag blew off, and when I went to tell him that window is right there into the side of the pool, and John, I'm worried my name tag is gonna clog up your filter.
So now he said we got a grinder, it'll grind it up.
But he said, Yeah, we all watched your name tag float by the window, and everybody said, Look, Louis Gomert's name tag is floating by the window.
Uh that's what you can do when you got a window into the side of your pool.
But uh anyway, and speaking of John, um guy went all through school with in Mount Pleasant, went to four years of uh AM with, he said about our last guest.
Hey, um uh did he say rumble?
Where where can we watch his video?
Well, it is rumble, and apparently that's an alternative to YouTube for conservatives where conservatives don't get censored and the truth can come out, so that's a good thing.
But it's rumble.com and it's election night returns, right, Linda?
It's election night facts.
Okay.
It sounds like returns.
I hear that.
Yeah, okay.
Election night facts on Rumble.com.
So you go to Rumble.com, put in election night facts, and uh you will find uh the video that our last guest was talking about.
Now our guest we have with us now.
She's a friend, uh she's from Texas.
And actually, I started knowing more about her.
I heard about her.
I knew she had a great terrific book that exposed corruption in the Department of Justice, a licensed to lie, but Sydney Powell was a tremendous help to Mike Flynn until she ran into a criminal defense attorney uh that thought or he thought he was a criminal d um prosecutor, actually, uh, even though he was a federal judge, uh he kept trying to prosecute.
He should be impeached, I think.
Um but nonetheless, uh Michael Flynn is out from under the savage misuse and injustice that the DOJ hurled at him.
And um glad to have Sidney Powell on.
Sidney, great to have you on.
And actually you and I, you know, a couple of years ago were immersed in the fraud that was Found to have occurred in the Dallas County election two years ago, and it was just we couldn't get people that had authority to do what needed to be done to save the country from going through what we've been through.
But you've continued to go after this, and uh, you know, there are independent attorneys going after the fraud.
Uh, and I know you're one person, Sidney, that can verify that all of the fraud has not been debunked.
It's not unfounded.
So tell us about what you've been finding.
Oh, Louie, uh, you're absolutely right.
I mean, there's stunning mathematical and statistical evidence and data that's absolutely irrefutable of massive amounts of votes just disappearing from the system in the hundreds of thousands.
And we know, for example, that in Michigan and Antrim County, when we actually examined the Dominion voting machines, forensic experts did that, that there were they s they have this way of sending votes computer wise to what they call adjudication, and then they can just disappear them.
And they did that for more than 80 percent of the votes.
So somebody can just drag and drop them drop them to the trash file.
Well, it it's pretty amazing.
And of course, we heard that uh the machines were never hooked up to the Internet, not accessible by the Internet, and yet in Georgia we had uh one of the workers saying, yeah, when there was a problem with one of the voting machines or an iPad,
and they'd contact uh their people and I believe it was Dominion folks, wasn't it, that would access her iPad, access the voting machines and get them fixed uh from a remote location.
I'm not sure how you do that without having those that equipment uh accessible through the Internet.
Is there a way to do that otherwise?
Uh no, it has to be it was accessible through the Internet, and that's an automatic violation of the federal law that requires voting machines to be, you know, protected from any sort of intrusion like that.
And we also know they erased certain files on the machines in Antrim County, specifically the adjudication tiles that would have shown exactly where they put those votes that went missing.
And there is evidence from other people in other states that machines were connected from the internet to the internet, evidence from people in multiple states that people uploaded thumb drives of information to the machine.
They can inject votes and create votes from thin air.
They have done that, it appears in any number of places.
This election is the biggest crime in American history.
And there was, in fact, foreign interference in it.
We already have a finding from the FBI and SISA, CISA, the supposed election security division of Homeland Security, that there was foreign interference by Iran in this election.
We have traced Internet information to Serbia, China, Iran.
It it was visible to people who were watching the night of the election, and there are data packages, they call them that were transferred between foreign countries regarding our election.
The server in that's owned by Seidel, one of the companies related to Dominion in Germany and Frankfurt, Germany, spiked 30 percent the night of our election.
Unbelievable.
Unreal.
Well, now, Sidney, you mentioned SISA, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.
That was headed by Christopher Krebs.
And I saw a puff piece on him the day of the election in which he assured us that this would be the most secure election ever, Totally secure, no chance of any problems.
Uh are you telling me that you have full faith and credit in what Chris for Krebs has to say?
Well, Mr. Krebs is either incompetent or a liar because when he spoke the day of the election, he was ignoring an statement publicly issued by the FBI and his organization a few days before that found that Iran had intentionally interfered in this election election and gotten information of over 200,000 voters at a minimum.
Well, uh, that information to manufacture votes and distort the entire voting process.
Well sometimes people like to take all the credit but uh to his credit uh in that same election day article uh he gave a lot of credit to his dear friends in Silicon Valley for all of their help and making sure everything was the way it was supposed to be in our cybersecurity for our election.
So I guess you and I need to give some credit to Silicon Valley for all their help in creating a voting system such as it was.
And again, you know I'm prone to sarcasm.
Right.
Yeah, we need to give them a lot of credit, all right, because Mark Zuckerberg spent over $400 million to affect the vote and create all kinds of issues for lawful voting in any number of states, particularly the swing states where we're seeing the problem problems the Thomas Moore Society Amistad project has documented a lot of that.
I haven't even had a chance to review all that evidence.
We've been focused on the uh fraud that occurred across the country as a result of the voting machines and I'm not just talking about Dominion they all use the same software and uh we're finding more and more evidence that they ran an algorithm in the machines that automatically flipped a certain percentage of votes from Biden from Trump to Biden to give Biden a two point seven percent flip which amounts to like a five point five percent edge.
Well, you know, we have testimony from the CEO of Dominion Voting Systems, John Polis, and he made some statements in testifying that were pretty dramatic.
He said that voting systems are by design meant to be used as closed systems, not networked, meaning they're not connected to the Internet.
He said that Dominion does not have any ties to Smartmatic.
Dominion and Smartmatic are two separate companies.
He said we do not use or license Smartmatic software.
But as I understand it, Smartmatic software has been incorporated into Dominion Voting Systems since 2004.
Was that your understanding?
Yes, that's my understanding.
And there's also a lawsuit between the two of them that documents that their relationship uh Tracy Beans um T R A C Y B E A N Z on Twitter has a lovely thread that includes the documents themselves so people can look at it themselves and see what they think the relationship between Smartmatic and Dominion is in their own words.
Well you know we've got people that are asking what can be done about all of this fraud.
I mean somebody needs to suffer some consequences of the fraud what would you suggest?
You've seen this from a whole lot of different angles, Sidney Well I don't think the president is being well represented at all.
In fact I think everyone around him is is misrepresenting things to him and misleading him and not serving him well in any way, shape or form because he has the absolute authority under the executive order entered in 2018 on election security that already declared a state of emergency for it and cites all the relevant statutes and authorities that he can use to secure the voting machines that need to be assessed around the country have them assessed,
appoint special counsel to oversee it all and get that done right now.
I have no doubt that if the shoe had been on the other foot and the Democrats had been in power with the magnitude of fraud we've seen running across this country in every way, shape and form whether it's dead voters, double voting, massive injections of uh false fake ballots into the system,
five systems stopping across the country the night of the election which has never happened before the lies from the Atlanta Fulton County arena, the documented videotape of people pulling buckets of ballots out from under a table after they've run everybody off with a lie.
And we've got thousands of affidavits all uploaded or a lot of them uploaded at Defending the Republic dot org so people can see the evidence and testimony themselves, including the expert reports.
If the shoe had been on the other foot, if this had happened when Obama was in office and it this method and madness had been used to defeat him, they would have seized the machines the day after the election.
Yeah, but they bought it immediately.
The the there's a big difference though.
There would have been a whole bunch of Republicans that would have been encouraging that so we could get to the bottom of the fraud.
Some of us have spoken up when uh Republicans have acted inappropriately or abused somebody's rights under the Fourth Amendment, but uh it just doesn't seem that we get any of those people that sometimes claim they're really concerned about civil rights and about our rights under the Constitution they seem to go completely silent unless they're belittling those of us that just want justice.
Yes, they're the ultimate hypocrites, Louie, because even Senator Warren and Cloboshar and some others in December of twenty nineteen were complaining about the Venezuelan connection and the corruption in the Dominion systems.
And Carolyn Maloney was one of the congressmen who 10 years ago or so called it out and tried to get the government not to approve its use whatsoever.
And you know who spread its use?
None other than Eric Holder through an antitrust settlement in the Justice Department when he was there and expanded the use of the Dominion machines.
Well and yet there's a picture of President Obama voting on one for the first time in Chicago as if it's a big accomplishment.
Well it was for them they knew exactly what they were doing.
Goodness they are behind all of this and more but the government of China is trying to steal the United States of America they've bought us in any number of ways from any number of our companies to our ports to our real estate all over the country now they have donated millions, hundreds of millions to universities to steal our technology and data.
President Trump's the only person who has tried to rein them in on any of it and that's why they have been determined to take him out thank you Sidney thanks for your fight uh you are a great American patriot warrior and thank you for that Louis we'll be right back.
This is the Sean Hannity show and we're glad you're this with you.
Howard let's hear from you in Wilmington, North Carolina.
Hey Congressman thanks for taking my call.
Of course I'm gonna get right to it.
Yeah.
Um with all with all of the corruption that's going on and I mean throughout the whole damn government.
Uh even the Supreme Court it's it's terrible.
It is what do it is it's ridiculous.
We have no representation.
The Patriots are really I'm telling you they're I don't know how much longer they're going to stay quiet.
Well that's you and me both.
But uh so what do we do?
Yeah it's a it's a great question.
Uh we ought to be able to go to the courts.
The courts have shut people out.
They have not been willing to do their jobs.
It's not a great answer but what we've got left is the people to to get upset and you know some have proposed coming to Washington on January 6.
But we have got to make sure that this fraud is exposed and I don't know what else to do except get it to the people and also uh get it out in Congress and we need the Senate's help to do that.
But appreciate the question.
We'll be right back with more of the Sean Hannity Show.
We've got Andy Biggs coming back with Mo Brooks and Paul Gosar.
This is what's right.
right with America.
You're listening to the Sean Hannity Show.
This is the Sean Hannity show.
This is Louis Gomert sitting in.
And I've got some great friends that are joining me here on Sean's show.
Mo Brooks has put together a great strategy for uh January 6th.
It would be better if the courts had done their job, and then it would be a cohesive government that could work together, but they haven't done their job, so we have got to use every tool at our disposal.
In Arizona, Andy Biggs and Paul Gozar have been pushing to have the legislature there in Arizona do the right thing.
So uh guys, welcome to the Sean Handy show.
Uh I know the public is really interested.
There have been calls wanting to know what can we do?
What can we do?
And uh you and uh all four of us were talking yesterday, and we did have a meeting at the White House.
Um, what's uh let people know what the strategy is.
Well, the strategy is to at this point make sure that we have a United States Senator who has the courage and the understanding, the intellect, to co-sponsor the objections that we can have a serious discussion on the House and Senate floor about the magnitude of the voter fraud and election theft that occurred on and before November 3rd of 2020, affecting not only the presidential race, but also any number of House, Senate, and other races up and down the ballot.
So all the listeners who hear my voice, I strongly encourage you to write, call your senators and and congressmen too.
It can't hurt, but particularly your senators, to help give them the backbone they need to stand tall for our republic that is underpinned by our election system.
And if we don't have an honest and accurate election system, you do not have a republic, and I'm afraid that's where we're headed.
Well, that is exactly where we're headed, and when people uh work and connive and scheme to uh prevent a free and fair election, that's exactly where we're we're headed.
Uh as we know, socialism uh is it requires a totalitarian government, no middle class, just a tiny ruling class, and then everybody else.
And we are all determined to make sure that to do everything we can to keep that from happening.
Uh, Andy and Paul uh did the Arizona legislature have uh hearings today.
Yeah, so so Louie, what happened is uh there was there's been hearings and uh the Board of Supervisors who controls the machines.
This is for an audit.
They want a forensic audit.
The Board of Super Supervisors uh said they didn't want to turn over the machines or any of the documents.
Um and and they basically disregarded the legislative situation.
So the legislature literally right before we got on uh with you, uh they were having a hearing with a judge here.
Um and they're gonna continue having a hearing, they're gonna have a hearing tomorrow again to see what uh the whether the court will help enforce uh and uh rid of mandemas against the board of supervisors.
All of the board of supervisors say, Oh, yeah we want to do an audit, but they're dragging their feet because they're trying to to run out the clock.
But the legisl but the uh legislature has and will continue uh fighting this matter both in court and whoever else they can get it, man.
This would all be uh a lot easier if the governor would just call the legislature into special session, but he refuses to do so.
Paul, what's your thought?
No, Andy, you've got Pennizes it just right.
But i it's sad, uh Louis, when you see a board of supervisors so entrenched, I mean, and these are Republicans for crime any sake.
Why wouldn't you want to extol the the virtues of a good election?
You know, because I know we had some chicaner in 2018 in regards to the the uh the Senate race, you know, because of Adrian Fontez.
But you know what?
The people are the governed, and they're the government, and they have to be able to hear from everybody.
So I gotta tell you, folks start lewing on loud and clear.
Call them, write them, text them, do uh anything possible.
Email them.
This is up to you.
We want a fair election.
Uh If we don't have that, we have nothing.
Well, and not just in Arizona.
That's needed there.
It's needed in Georgia.
Uh, it's needed in Wisconsin.
It's needed in Michigan and Pennsylvania.
These are all critical, just very critical.
Uh it and people need to make sure that they're elected representatives understand we're in a fight to save this little experiment in self-government.
And we're on the verge of losing it.
And uh these clown Republicans that think, oh, gee, if I act uh, you know, charitable and kind and tell Trump to just go ahead and give in, uh, give way to this fraudulent conclusion,
then I'll look better and I can be the Republican elected in 2024, not really grasping that if we let the fraud go this time, there won't be another Republican elected president.
Uh so this is critical stuff, and uh I'm so grateful to all three of you for the way that you stand and fight.
This is very important.
Uh so we're gonna uh we uh we know there was fraud.
Uh I know there was fraud in Texas, but since uh the president won Texas uh despite the fraud, there's no use in raising that uh and objecting uh on the House floor when the Senate joins us there on January 6.
Uh and one of the questions we had is what else can we do besides January 6th?
Uh it seems to me that's the best chance we have left when the Justice Department doesn't do their job.
The FBI has got too many people that uh are trying to push, well, have been trying to push the president out the door for four years.
Uh so uh I don't know of another another shot.
This seems to be our best chance to educate people.
The fraud is not unfounded.
And uh so Mo other recommendations based on the fraud that you've already seen.
Well, this is pretty much it uh for our country.
This is a pivotal moment in American history.
In my judgment, it rivals the election of 1860 between uh Douglas and Lincoln, and we saw what ensued from that.
Uh, this is the time when the socialists, by hook or by crook, by theft or by otherwise, intend on gaining power in the United States of America.
And once they get power, given how they're gonna legally and illegally manipulate so many different systems and parts of our government, uh, our country will probably be lost down the socialism path.
And you know, ultimately we will suffer a debilitating insolvency and bankruptcy because that is what happens to socialist countries as soon as you, as Margaret Thatcher used to say, run out of other people's money.
And I don't think people understand the depravity, the dangerousness of what occurs when a country goes insolvent and bankrupt.
But I would encourage them to look at economic history.
Right now, you can look at Venezuela.
It's not a pretty sight, what's happening in Venezuela with people losing their lives, uh fleeing the country as best they can in order just to get food on the table for themselves and their kids.
We don't want to go there, but that's what the socialist movement in America is doing right now and where they will take us if we don't stop them.
That's right.
So we need to win these two elections in Georgia.
We need to fight as best we can in the face of the expected voter fraud and election theft activities that the socialists will engage in there.
And then on January the 6th, this is somewhat akin to the Alamo, although I hope we will survive.
Um, but it was the Alamo where you had courageous people stand tall that had a great contributing effect in the creation of the nation of Texas, later become the state of Texas.
Well, it's true.
And you know, uh I know I we have a lot of Christian brothers and sisters in Congress, and one of the things that frustrates me is when I hear other members of Congress say, Louie, we don't have to worry.
God's in control.
He's in control.
And uh I haven't met Tommy Nelson.
He's a uh a pastor in Denton, Texas, but I listened to a Bible study where he one of his statements was, yeah, God's sovereign.
He's in control, but just because he's in control doesn't mean he wants us to lean on our shovel and pray for a hole.
Uh everybody has tools.
They have been given, and everybody needs to use every means at their disposal will uh at their disposal legally and ethically to make their feelings heard, make sure that the representatives and senators understand that uh they're not gonna put up with them allowing us to just slip into that good night of socialism.
Uh Paul, you've been a fighter as long as I've known you.
Any other thoughts on what people can do?
Yes, educate yourself.
There's a there's a uh movie uh uh held by HCO.
The Democrats actually made it.
It's called uh kill chain.
Uh it is worth your one hour.
It will scare the living bejesus out of you about these machines called Dominion uh and smart uh startmatics.
Folks, I mean, this is right in front of us.
This has happened uh a n different blue ways in each of these different states.
And I I implore you uh make those calls, get this back, this liberty and freedom that this experiment as Louis talked about, this republic.
Uh this happened.
Uh we've got to make sure that we correct it.
And there's no there's no reason why uh the voters out here in Arizona or in Michigan or or Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia shouldn't have an accounting about the education uh uh education about the voting, that it is true and and rightly done.
Yeah, well, I I'm thrilled with the help that we've got.
We've got some great stout uh new members of Congress coming in that'll be sworn in on January 3rd.
So they will be there and uh they're fighters.
Uh it is really encouraging.
We've got lots of new members uh in the Freedom Caucus.
And uh Andy, uh any other thoughts about what people you would encourage people to do as we approach uh the D Day really for the new administration.
Yeah, first of all, thanks thanks, Louie for and Mo and and Paul, great fighters, members of the Freedom Caucus all.
Thank you for what you guys do.
The second thing I would tell you is you can still talk to your your governors, your legislators, they your state legislators, they can also um put up uh if they're in a special session or a session, they could send up an alternative slate uh in these states that have sent up Biden's that are in these critical fraud states.
Um if they were to send up alternative electors, that would be beneficial as well.
That's that's good.
Mo, thoughts.
Yeah, I concur with that, and I hope Arizona will be a leader in this effort.
From what I understand, the Arizona legislature is very active.
We heard from Paul Gozar and Annie Biggs uh concerning that.
But if they will be more aggressive in contesting the election as they see it, exposing the fraud that has occurred, and then make a public statement as to who they believe the real electors to the electoral college from the state of Arizona are, that can have an earthquake-like effect on legislators in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, uh, Georgia, and elsewhere.
So, Arizona, take the lead in this.
Help us out.
Well, and if people follow Arizona's lead and they do that, I mean, they can vote to decertify or uncertify the electors based on all the fraud.
They could vote to certify Trump uh electors because uh of all the fraud, you take out the fraud, and clearly uh Trump was the winner.
It it it's obvious where this stands.
So uh others learn from that.
You can uh send us electors that represent the real winner, and uh that'll make it easier come January 6th.
So thank you all.
Uh you guys are great.
Uh just appreciate sharing the meetings and time we have, including yesterday with you.
Thanks so much, guys.
Uh this is Sean Hannity's show, and it it it's just so great to be here for Sean.
And thank you to the callers.
We've had some been so patient, we're not gonna be able to get to you, but great questions, great issues, and we tried to incorporate some of those.
Uh but listen, this country's in trouble.
And any country that was originally free, that people did not spend enough time protecting that freedom, they lose it.
It's it it's uh we're endowed by our creator, but it's not something you get to keep.
There are always evil people that want to take away your endowment, your inheritance.
We got to fight for this, and I'm not calling for revolution.
The fake media has tried to say I have.
I'm calling for peaceful uh uh demonstrations to make clear we've got to protect this.
And those that have tried to take us down the road of socialism, destroy our history.
How about this for history?
Thomas Jefferson uh, as our third president, uh recognized and and actually selected Isaac Watts poem palm, I'm sorry, Psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs uh for teaching the alphabet, teaching English, and Isaac Watts, of course, one of his famous uh songs went joy to the world.
The Lord's come, let Earth Receiver King.
You know the words.
That's part of our history.
Let's defend our history.
And that means if you sit back and you say nothing, and fraud decides this election because good people haven't raised up enough to raise Cain about it, we'll lose it.
And generations to come will know it was our fault.
Let's fight for what we have.
God bless you all.
This is Louie Gohmert signing out for Sean Hannity.
You want smart political talk without the meltdowns?
I'm Carol Markovich.
And I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
We've been around the block in media and we're doing things differently.
Normally is about real conversations.
Thoughtful, try to be funny, grounded, and no panic.
We'll keep you informed and entertained without ruining your day.
Join us every Tuesday and Thursday, normally on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So down a verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
▲
Export Selection