All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 22, 2020 - Sean Hannity Show
01:42:12
Previewing the Class of 2021

Congressman Louie Gohmert drops by for the vacationing Sean and previews the Class of 2021! Though the Republicans are in the minority, there are some strong coalitions that will be in a good place for the upcoming year.The Sean Hannity Show is on weekdays from 3 pm to 6 pm ET on iHeartRadio and Hannity.com. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is an iHeart Podcast.
You want smart political talk without the meltdowns?
We got you.
I'm Carol Markowitz and I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
We've been around the block in media and we're doing things differently.
Normally is about real conversations.
Thoughtful, try to be funny, grounded, and no panic.
We'll keep you informed and entertained without ruining your day.
Join us every Tuesday and Thursday, normally, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So down with Verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
Hi, folks.
This is Louis Gomert, servant in United States Congress from Texas, here on behalf of a guy that I really love in a good platonic kind of way.
He, in fact, Sean Hannity, when I tested positive for COVID back, I guess something like the end of July, I got a call from Sean every day for a week, just making sure I didn't have a bad flare up, making sure I had what I needed.
I mean, what an incredible guy.
So it's always an honor to be here on behalf of Sean.
We have an incredible lineup today.
And you want to know why this is such an important show.
And Linda's been fantastic with the work she's done.
Lauren used to be the associate producer here.
And now, thank goodness, she's helping me in D.C.
But they've been doing a great job.
But the show mainly today is going to be, and get ready for it, fraud in the election.
And if you have another person saying, well, I thought all of that had been debunked, you can say, no, no.
And in fact, no court has allowed an evidentiary hearing.
None, zero.
You can't debunk something unless you have an evidentiary.
I know I was a litigator.
I was a judge.
I was Chief Justice.
I know about these things.
And even the Supreme Court, when the Constitution says you shall have original jurisdiction over any suit in which a state sues other states, another state, the Supreme Court, they wouldn't even allow a hearing.
They just turned it down.
People are afraid to deal with the fraud on the magnitude in which it occurred.
And we're going to be talking about that.
But really glad to have you with us today.
This country is in crisis.
I've heard people say it's at a crossroad.
No, folks, this country is not at a crossroad.
We passed the crossroad a good while back.
We're at the edge of a cliff.
We're about to either go off that cliff and end the greatest gift of a country God ever allowed a people to have, or we'll get back to the crossroads where we headed off in the direction of socialism a good while back so that we can get back on the track of freedom,
self-determination, freedom of choice in education, for example, and ending the pure socialist indoctrination that's been going on for quite some time.
And personally, I think Dostoevsky had it right in the late 1800s when he was mocking and taking on the things that some idiot named Marx was throwing out there.
And really, folks, a guy that could not even foresee the arising of a middle class, which is America's strength, that's not somebody you ought to listen to, read, and pay attention to.
He's an idiot.
One thing historically, though, is true about education.
You cannot manipulate a people into choosing socialism until you have taught them lies about the best parts of their history, and you've made them think that something good and wholesome is evil.
The Soviets use that tactic.
And in fact, that has been the tactic of socialists and progressives everywhere.
Many of them are not evil, but they have just been manipulated and miseducated themselves.
You know, the Bill Ayers and the revolutionists of the 1960s, they realized eventually that they weren't accomplishing anything by blowing things up or killing or having sit-ins.
And they apparently realized that if they became tenured professors in colleges and taught the future teachers of young Americans how evil America was, how grandiose socialism was, they could achieve a revolution that their tactics of the 60s just couldn't do.
So we're at a point where vast numbers of our universities, whether they have good sports teams or not, have become liberal bastions of miseducation, leading young people into wanting to leave behind what was once the most free country in the history of the world.
Took over 200 years to get there, but then they started moving on the socialist Orwellian totalitarian track, and we've got to get off that track.
We're headed over the cliff if we don't.
You cannot have socialism, by the way, without a totalitarian government that forces its people into subjugation.
That's the only way it goes.
Now, Dostoevsky commented, the problem with socialism is not economic.
The problem with socialism is atheism.
The government has to become God.
And I'm telling you, the summer I was there as an exchange student, and there were eight Americans allowed in on the program that year, and we were to the city stay point of the summer.
We were going out to see Zygorsk.
It was the only authorized Christian seminary, religious seminary in the whole country because Lenin was the god.
Socialism was the god.
And it was so ironic, but as you looked at this, I don't know, four or five-story buildings, like it was a big building there, as you turned into the gates of the seminary, and there was a picture of Lenin, and it said, Lenin Znami, Lenin is with us.
You may be going in here and thinking you believe in God, but really it's Lenin, rubber ears and all.
At least that was what they saw him.
I don't know if his ears were rubber or not, but that was the rumor back at the time.
But anyway, that's brought us to this stolen election.
The election model that the thieves used was based on the notion that President Trump could not possibly get more votes than the Obama high point 2008.
So when President Trump's votes flew by those numbers by the millions, it forced these socialist election thieves into moving quickly and overtly.
They couldn't do it secretly so well because Trump was about to win the whole thing.
More so than originally planned.
And even rolling out suitcases of ballots and loading hundreds of thousands of ballots into their easily manipulated systems.
So we're going to be covering a lot of things about that.
And by the way, I haven't checked this week, but a week or so ago, I'd heard it was true.
And so I did a Google request.
I don't normally use Google at all.
Don't trust them.
But about the stoppage of the vote counting the night of the election.
And lo and behold, I got all these responses on the first page about that didn't happen.
Politihack had done their check and it was false.
And all these, you know, leftists used to be called mainstream media, but let's face it, they're not mainstream media.
They're alt-left media.
That's what they are.
And, you know, they were confirming that nobody stopped vote counting.
That was a lie.
It was a false.
And it reminded me of my summer in the Soviet Union.
Don't believe your eyes and ears.
We'll tell you what you can believe.
And in fact, Ethan, can we play that?
This is what was in the media there, if you would do that, Montage.
We are live outside of that warehouse in the north side this morning, and they decided to press pause because they noticed there was an issue with their precinct information not loading correctly, not getting that information outright either or even correctly.
So they decided to press a pause on that and get back to it later this morning.
We go to Gwinnett County.
That's where a software glitch caused a delay in counting votes there.
In Fulton County, we had a bit of a snafu overnight in the ballot counting there.
CBS is Sabrina Silva live at Fulton County's elections warehouse with brand new information this hour.
Sabrina volunteers actually, it looks like ran out of steam last night.
From what we hear is that these volunteers, they were simply too tired to continue counting these ballots last night and were sent home around 1 a.m.
Nevada, meanwhile, has stopped counting votes until 9 a.m. on Thursday.
So we will not know what's happening in Nevada until then.
All right, there you go.
If you heard that and all the talk about stoppage, your ears were lying to you.
That didn't happen.
You can't believe what your ears told you you were hearing.
Why?
Because you can do a Google search and find out that's all false.
Nope, that never happened that night.
So let's face it, this is socialist right out of the socialist manifesto, basically.
I mean, it's Orwellian.
One of the few things I've been quoted accurately as saying is, gee, the only thing Orwell got wrong apparently was the year.
What in 1984?
It's now.
And this is exactly what's been going on.
But I was in my first meeting about electronic election fraud in December, two full years ago.
And there were some former Intel folks that had a firm and they said, you need to see this.
And they showed evidence of electronic fraud in Dallas County election counting back in the primary in 2018 and then in the general election in 2018.
So I'm not new to this whole story.
We have been trying to get, we were trying to get law enforcement in Texas, including the Texas Attorney General, to do something because I felt like, look, if we can get the state of Texas to act on this fraud, there's plenty of evidence here from which to get a search warrant to seize the vote counting equipment, the voting equipment, and the flash drives that were used in early voting, all this stuff.
We could get that stuff before they get rid of it.
And then we can save the whole country from what's coming in 2020 because in 2018, they used the primary and general election as really practice.
And they learned from mistakes.
They got better at their fraud.
But anyway, and let me tell you, when I first heard that Soros or somebody was spending a bunch of money trying to get people in charge of vote counting in different places and elections in different places,
and then also the effort to get prosecutors of their choice in certain places, I thought, well, at least we're safe in Texas because the Secretary of State's appointed by the Republican governor, so we're okay.
I didn't think about the fact that where the biggest source of fraud would be coming from was huge counties that were all Democrat run and had been for a while, and that they would hire vote counting firms that could potentially be massive problems.
And so we've seen that carried out.
I got frustrated last year and gave up on Texas actually protecting the country and itself.
And I know there were a few indictments, but none of the big stuff that could have really made a difference.
So I presented some stuff to folks in the federal government that I thought would make a difference.
But our Department of Justice is just so compromised.
But fortunately for the socialist fascists, they've had social media monopolies that can tell you you can't believe anything that you saw or heard that might indicate problems like suitcases full of ballots being pulled out when all the Republican poll watchers were run off.
No, I don't believe any of that.
But listen, folks, to have free and fair elections, the voting process, the counting process must be 100% visible, must be witnessed by bipartisan observers.
And as cheap as cameras are, for heaven's sake, just videotape everything.
Let's make sure everybody knows that it's going to be free and fair.
And by the way, another thing, we say, well, you know, they got rid of evidence and Alito ordered ballots to be kept of a certain type.
And they didn't.
They mixed and mingled.
There's a legal doctrine called spoliation.
If one party in a suit controls evidence and that party either destroys the evidence or mingles it, confuses it with others so it cannot be produced, or if they refuse to produce it, then the judge or jury may consider that that evidence they refused to produce or lost, got rid of, that evidence proved the allegation that the other party was making.
A court can take notice of that.
And nobody's talking about that.
It matters.
And so we say, well, they don't have the evidence.
What can we do?
Well, the court should take judicial notice that they didn't produce the evidence that would have proved or disproved the allegations.
And since they hid them, destroyed them, got rid of them, obviously it proved that they were engaged in fraud.
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
This is Sean's friend Louie Gomert in for Sean.
And I hope you'll come right back.
There's a lot more ahead in this show, and you're going to be able to take on your friends about the fraud issue if you'll listen.
Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
And I'm Carol Markowitz.
We've been in political media for a long time.
Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
That's why we started Normally, a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass.
You're our kind of people.
Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday.
On the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So download Verdict with Ted Cruz Now, wherever you get your podcasts.
Hello, folks.
This is Sean Hannity Show.
This is Louis Gomert sitting in.
And look, we're going to have the whole show.
We're going to be talking about the fraud in the election.
And people, listen, just if people you know are discouraged, have them tune into Sean's show because they're going to come away with all kinds of ammunition.
My website is www.gomert.com.
And look, you want to call in?
We're going to be taking calls.
We're going to have experts and hopefully most of them will be able to take calls.
It's 800-941-7326.
That's 800-941-Sean, and that's Sean S-E-A-N.
So anyway, I know one of the Democrats' favorite words is disenfranchisement of voters.
Well, look, this was the largest, most massive disenfranchisement of voters in world history.
The courts have shown that not one of them is willing to pursue justice, not one.
So we're going to be talking about that.
Please come back.
Matt DiPerno is going to be with us, Constitutional Attorney out of Michigan, and you're going to learn a whole lot more.
Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
And I'm Carol Markowitz.
We've been in political media for a long time.
Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
That's why we started Normally, a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass.
You're our kind of people.
Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday.
On the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So download Verdict with Ted Cruz Now, wherever you get your podcasts.
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
This is Louis Gomert, lowly member of Congress from Texas.
And we're glad you're here with us.
And by the way, to help, you know, I've mentioned my website at gomert.com.
But Linda, you've got some great stuff up.
Where do people go?
So on Hannity.com, we wrote it up yesterday, and we have a whole list for the six battleground states for all of your legislators in those all-important states.
So make sure you call them, email them, let them know that the best Christmas gift is the gift of freedom.
If you want to see all the videos about it, go to Election Night Facts.
This Rembel account has some of the best videos I've seen out there.
Just check it out.
Stay on those legislator guys.
They work for you.
And anybody that says the fraud has all been debunked, that unfounded, ask them where there was a hearing that debunked it because there's been no evidence here.
Yeah, I'd love to watch it.
For sure.
It hadn't happened.
Not even the Supreme Court.
Well, look, we have a constitutional attorney from Michigan, Mark Diperno, with us.
I'm sorry, I said Mark going to, yeah.
Matt, sorry, Matt.
He represents William Bailey, a resident of Antrim County, and he is just all over this stuff, and he knows there was fraud as well in this election.
Matt DiPerno, welcome to the Sean Hannity Show.
Thanks, Louie.
Thanks for having me on.
Hey, man, it's great to have you on.
And we really appreciate your work.
You know, you had apparently done an analysis.
You had access to the Dominion software and the machines, and then your analysis was put under a gag order.
How could things be unfounded when the things that would debunk them if it were such get put under gag order?
I mean, it's incredible.
But you have been fighting, and we need more of your fighting spirit in Congress.
But tell us what you have found with regard to fraud in this election from all your deep dive into this stuff.
Sure, thank you.
We filed a lawsuit in Antrim County on November 23rd because we wanted to get to the bottom of why the results were so skewed in favor of Joe Biden on November 3rd.
This is a county that's historically 60 to 65 percent Republican, but on election night, it flipped to 60 percent Joe Biden.
And my client in particular was concerned about some down ballot races for school board elections.
So we filed a lawsuit.
No one knew about our lawsuit because it was just an issue that we raised regarding the down ballot races.
And we were able to get a court to issue an injunction and allow us to examine the Dominion software and bring in a team of experts to take forensic images of those computers, thumb drives, and program cards.
And we obtained those on December 6th on a Sunday.
My team worked throughout the week to collect or research the data, collect their data, and write a preliminary report.
And we filed a motion with the court to allow us to release those findings to the country on December 14th.
And we had a hearing on December 14th, and the judge granted that, and we were able to release that report.
And the report tells us, and I'm just going to quote from the report, it says, We conclude that the Dominion voting system is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.
The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors.
The election ballots are then transferred for adjudication.
The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail.
This leads to voter or election fraud.
And based on our study, we conclude that the Dominion voting system should not be used in Michigan.
We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.
And we're able to extrapolate those results to the other 47 counties in Michigan that also use this system.
Wow.
That's phenomenal.
Not only was the fraud not debunked or unfounded, it was quite founded from your terrific research and work.
We really appreciate what you've been doing.
Now, I understood also that in Michigan there were some places where there was more turnout than there were people.
Had you seen anything on that, Matt?
Well, our study was specific to Antrim County.
We did see what we did see even last Thursday when the Secretary of State, after our lawsuit was filed, the Secretary of State decided to do what she called a low-risk audit throughout the state.
And she hand-picked certain precincts in the state, which would be beneficial to her argument.
But she also said that she would audit the entire Antrim County results.
So we did that last Thursday, but it was false in terms of what she said.
It wasn't an actual audit.
What she did was nothing more than a hand recount, which has already been done up in Antrim County.
But what we found during that hand recount were a number of oddities or errors, including blank ballots mixed in with the regular ballots, and not in big stacks, but in ones and twos and threes.
And we know that when you feed a blank ballot through the Dominion software system, it doesn't reject the ballot, but it creates an error and sends ballots to adjudication.
So that was an issue we found.
And we found other irregularities.
Now, Matt, if there's no marked vote, it's a blank ballot.
Gee, that sounds like something that would require adjudication, somebody to examine it closely to see, gee, I wonder who the voter of this blank ballot really intended to vote for.
Must have been Biden.
And of course, I'm prone to sarcasm, but wasn't it in Antrim County also that there was a 68% error rate?
Right.
That's what the forensic team found, that there's a 68% error rate when you feed a ballot into the machine.
And remember, when you feed a ballot into the machine, that's a paper ballot.
That machine translates that written ballot into data.
That data can be manipulated.
And through this system and the adjudication process, someone somewhere sitting in another room or another state or another country can mass adjudicate bunches of ballots with a single click of the button for whichever candidate they see fit.
Wow.
Well, and you mentioned the Secretary of State, As I understand it, she sent a board of electors directive out on one December to all the clerks telling them to delete all electronic records, which is a violation of state law records retention requirements.
Do you know if she's been called on that at all?
Well, I think a lot of people have called her out on that, and we certainly have because she knew that we had filed a lawsuit.
And then after the lawsuit was filed, once she got wind of it, she did two things.
Number one, she tried to intervene in the case, and she intervened in the case because she wanted to try to block the report that we prepared from coming out to the public.
And number two, she's been on a relentless attack.
Her and Dana Nessel, the Attorney General here in Michigan, have been on a relentless attack against me and my client and the team that we work with, the forensic team.
She's attempted to discredit them, discredit us.
I've been threatened repeatedly by the Attorney General.
She's now attempting to come after my law license.
This is tyranny is what we're seeing.
It's totalitarianism and it's fascism, what we're seeing.
They're attempting to squash the public discourse regarding elections.
They don't want anyone to challenge election results.
And when you do, they try to silence you.
So in that regard, we've attempted to put up a fundraising campaign for my client on my website.
It's duperno law.com, D-E-P-E-R-N-O-L-A-W.com.
And we're asking anyone if you can help to try to combat and fight this fascism.
Yeah, it's exactly what it is.
And I know that our chairman of judiciary gets upset when I point it out, but they like to say, you know, Republican is a Nazi, is Hitler and whatnot.
But if you just do any check at all with your history, you find out that the Nazi Party was the German Socialist Workers Party.
It was the socialists that were the Nazis, the fascists.
And we're sure seeing that here, that you can't have a free and fair election if people can't rely on the vote counting.
And of course, I'm sure you remember it was historically Stalin that said basically it doesn't matter who votes, it matters who counts the votes.
And that's what the socialists in this country have figured out.
And that's why they stack the deck the way that they did.
So, well, Matt, you are verifying that there is fraud.
There was fraud in this election.
It hasn't not only not been debunked and it's not unfounded.
You have found a basis in fact for it.
So where do things stand legally in Michigan as a result of your suit?
Well, right now, legally, we've been able to release the report.
Anyone who wants to read the report can go to my website, dupernolaw.com.
It's posted there.
But in terms of the lawsuit, we're now in the discovery phase.
The Secretary of State made a calculated decision to try to intervene in the case because she wanted to stop the release of the report.
The court denied that request, allowed us to release it, and now she's a party defendant, subject to discovery, and we get to take her deposition and ask for records.
Fantastic.
So that was a calculator she made.
But we need help.
We really need help from all the people across the country to help support this cause because we're the only lawsuit in the country that's been given access to the Dominion voting system.
Great.
We need to analyze this and study it properly.
So we need help from everyone out there.
If you can tell them how to help you.
Well, help us by donating at dipernolaw.com.
There's two fundraisers that some kind citizens have created to help us fund this litigation.
And we need your help.
We need everyone's help because the Secretary of State and the Attorney General are trying to stop this information from coming out.
Matt, we can't thank you enough.
You've heard Matt.
He's doing great work, but he needs help.
And there are people out there that can help him.
I hope that works out because we're in a fight for the country.
We're going to take a break and we're going to be right back and take your calls at 800-941 Sean.
And Matt, thanks so much for being with us and providing the clarity you have.
We'll be right back.
Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
And I'm Carol Markowitz.
We've been in political media for a long time.
Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
That's why we started Normally, a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass, you're our kind of people.
Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So down with Verdict with Ted Cruz Now, wherever you get your podcasts.
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
This is Louis Gomert sitting in for Sean.
Let's go to the phones.
Let's see Rick from Michigan.
We just heard from Michigan attorney.
Rick, thanks for listening to the Sean Hannity show.
Yes, after watching all these people pulling ballots out from under tables and people being kicked out viewers, why hasn't anybody been arrested yet?
You know, that is such a good question, Rick, and it frustrates the heck out of me.
I've been a prosecutor before, and, you know, for people to get away with this stuff and then for the media to cover for them and say it's not even happening, it's outrageous.
The Department of Justice has become the Department of Injustice.
I had great hope for our Attorney General Barr and Durham.
I didn't know Durham, but it seemed like it was going well, but nothing resulted.
And, you know, when Barr keeps saying, I've seen no evidence of fraud, well, he's not the one that goes out and investigates.
He has to rely on the FBI for that.
And as I've told the president, as long as Christopher Wray was in the FBI, America's was not safe.
I think, in my opinion, he took his admonition to clean up the FBI and he swept everything under the rug.
That's the way it appears to me.
And they have not been a Department of Justice.
They have not been investigators.
They've been cover-up artists here in Washington, D.C.
But that's why nobody's been arrested.
I tried to get our Attorney General's office in Texas to do something for two years and nothing happened.
So it is very frustrating.
I know I've got friends that are saying we just need to get rid of the FBI and start fresh with a new federal investigation bureau of some kind.
But I hoped that Ray might come in and clean it up.
He didn't.
And as a result, you know, and I know there were FBI that lied to Jeff Sessions.
No, there's no evidence here or there or Jan.
So I figured they did the same thing to Barr.
But great question.
We'll be right back and we're going to be diving in deeper to the fraud that did occur in the last election.
This is Sean Hannity Show, 800-941-Sean.
Call us.
We'll be right back.
Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Ham.
And I'm Carol Markowitz.
We've been in political media for a long time.
Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
That's why we started Normally, a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass, you're our kind of people.
Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So down with Verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
This is Louie Gomert, a little member of Congress from Texas, sitting in for Sean.
And I'm glad to have heard that montage.
It is incredible how vast the media has moved just to try to convince people that there is no fraud there when it is clear to anyone, as the Bible says, anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear.
And we've got a couple of guests here that have eyes and ears.
They understand.
They have seen what's going on.
And that's Ian Northen from the Amistad Project and Thomas More Society, as well as Phil Klein, the Amistad Project Director, former Kansas Attorney General.
Welcome to the Sean Hannity Show, guys.
Well, thank you.
Thanks for having us, Congressman.
Well, thanks for being had.
Little joke.
But anyway, look, I appreciate so much y'all's dive into this.
Do y'all support the idea, and I'm sorry to use the term y'all to somebody north of the Southern Line.
But hey, the language needed a second person plural.
What can I say?
We supplied it and it works.
Y'all for, you know, two or three people, all y'all for a big crowd.
But anyway, you guys, To use New York slang, youth guys, you really have done a deep dive, and you didn't take the answer that there wasn't any fraud here.
Tell us about what you've found from all your research on the election.
Well, Congressman, we've been in the field for about two years now, and early on, we witnessed the beginning of the movements of lots of private money into managing the election.
And it started in March of 2020 when you had David Pluth, Obama's former campaign manager, who published a book called The Citizen's Guide for Defeating Donald Trump.
And on page 81, he spoke about the need of an effort, if the Democrats are going to win, to do a block-by-block street fight to turn out the vote in Minneapolis, Detroit, and Philadelphia, and the urban core cities.
Soon after that, you started to see a sleepy little 501c called the Center for Tech and Civic Life reaching out to these Democrat mayors and saying, look, we got some money coming, and we want to give you a little money now to plan your election.
And if you do it the way we want you to do it, you know, essentially they're buying those local government election offices.
We're going to buy these offices from you, and we'll tell you how to run the election, and we'll send money your way.
And soon enough, Mark Zuckerberg gave a total of $350 million to that charity who started to buy up these local election offices and dictate how they're going to run the election.
And all the illegalities, the sidestepping of state law, the ignoring of the signature projects, the consolidated counting centers that locked Republicans out, the breach of the chain of custody of drop boxes occurred everywhere Zuckerberg money touched.
In total, he gave $419 million.
So, yes, there's obvious and admitted illegalities that call into question the election.
And now, I would just say the Democrat officials are doubling down.
And we see that in Michigan, where Ian North is our local counsel there and handling our litigation.
And in Michigan, it went so far as the attorney general of the state threatening legislators with criminal investigation if they disagreed with the results of the election.
And the governor locking Republicans out of the state house while allowing Democrats in.
And Ian was there.
Ian was trying to get them in to do their work.
Just incredible.
You know, I mentioned earlier in the show, when I first heard that there was big money coming from Democrats to buy spots for people that control elections, I thought, well, Texas will be safe because Secretary of State's in charge.
But I didn't think about the big Democrat-controlled cities where we've found out that's where an awful lot of fraud has occurred.
And really, guys, I'm not sure about what you've run into.
But in Texas, if you're a rural county and you're elected to be the county clerk in charge of the elections and you go out and hire somebody else to come in and do all your election counting for you, well, you're probably not going to win again because you got hired to do that.
And yet that's what we're seeing in the big cities of Texas.
And I couldn't help but think when I've read about what you guys were doing that that must be what you're running into around the country as you've dug into this.
Well, that's exactly right, Congressman.
You know, we saw money being poured into places like Flint, Michigan, Muskegon, Michigan, Pontiac, Michigan, you know, $400,000, $475,000, then Detroit, the coup d'état, $3.5 million.
You know, about $10 million total poured into Michigan through these Zuckerberg charities.
And when you saw that, it translated directly into high-paid consultants in the adjudication board, looking at absentee ballots, deciding who voted for whom.
You saw money being paid to workers that in the rural counties, like where I grew up in Michigan, Michigan has a few cities, but most of it's rural.
It's the woods.
And they'd get minimum wage or would be volunteers.
And then you go into these targeted areas with Zuckerberg money, and they're being paid $600,000, $650 a day.
And when you start to do that, you start to have a disparate impact and disparate treatment.
Votes are being treated differently in those counties and those cities than they were everyplace else in the state.
And you can't help but think, and in fact, it did translate into different effects and different results in the way veterans' ballots and other ballots were being treated in real time.
And when you translate that out, not just to Michigan, but to other states as well, those targeted monies, targeted areas.
What's so difficult about this is when I filed lawsuits before the election, before everything was in controversy, they were over technical violations.
People look up statutes with weird names like HAVA, the Help America's Vote Act.
Well, when you do that, it says every penny has to be accounted for.
The monies have to go to the federal agencies or the states themselves.
You keep the receipts.
It's transparent.
You have rules and regulations that track it.
But when this money comes in through these private sources, not only does it arguably violate HAVA, but now there are clawback provisions.
So instead of being transparent, it's concealed.
Instead of saying follow the federal guidelines for air rates for voting machines, for example, now, if you don't follow Mark Zuckerberg's guidelines, he says he's going to claw back that money through charity agreements.
That's the kind of stuff that shocks people's conscience when it's put in front of their nose.
But the media and so many others are out there trying their darndest to keep people from finding out about what happened.
And, you know, that's a pretty cheap date.
$10 million for Michigan with only about 5.5 million people voting.
It's about $1.75 a vote.
And when you target it to those specific areas, he got off, he made a pretty cheap business decision that if you or I were to do that as an individual, it would arguably be a felony.
It would be a crime.
It's improper for an individual to pay money into election officials.
But yet somehow it's okay when it's done through a charity or through these local governments.
I don't think so.
And that's why we sued before the election, and that's why we've continued our lawsuits since.
What's the status of the suit?
We've talked about that, but we filed one yet today in D.C. federal court.
Good.
Good.
Our new federal suit challenges these deadlines, which are arbitrary, that Congress has set on state legislatures to review and exercise their authority under the Constitution.
And, Congressman, I would just add one point just as an example of the disparate impact that occurred.
This occurred.
Zuckerberg money flew into these states at the same time blue state governors were shutting down in-person polling places, claiming COVID was the concern.
And as you know, Republicans prefer to vote in person on Election Day.
Yet they were opening up opportunities for more voting in person in all of these urban cores with Zuckerberg money.
For example, in Philadelphia, they mandated that Philadelphia have 800 satellite polling locations.
They put a drop box in Democrat strongholds in Pennsylvania, one every four square miles.
That's a drop box, you know, two mile by two mile square.
You could stroll and vote.
In the 59 counties that Trump won in 2016, there was one dropbox for every 1,159 square miles.
So if you live in the Democrat area, it's, hey, we'll pick up your ballot or walk down to the corner and vote.
If you live in a Republican area, it's go on a weekend vacation and find Waldo.
Government can't do that.
That's wrong.
Shouldn't.
Well, and they shouldn't be privatizing the election as we've seen in the big counties where the corruption seems to be at its very worst.
So you don't support the idea that all of the allegations of fraud have been debunked and are unfounded, correct?
That is absurd.
In fact, there's admitted lawlessness in each and every one of these states with local officials saying we will not follow voter ID for indefinitely confined persons requirements like in Wisconsin.
Or we're not going to follow signature requirements like they did in Michigan.
Or we're not going to require witnesses on the ballot like they did in several of these states.
There are admitted illegalities in every one of these states that cause into question the results of the election.
You know, and what's worse, Congressman, is that when legislatures, whose ultimately it's their responsibility to manage the time, place, and manner of elections, but when state legislatures try and do something about it, they get locked out of their own chamber like in Michigan, or when they demand that the Secretary of State in Michigan come before them and answer questions under oath.
She refuses.
So again, this is a situation where, you know, legislatures, you know, I think in many respects, you know, winter came early, so to speak, in Michigan.
A lot of them were sleeping or maybe already in hibernation.
But, you know, they're starting to wake up to this and starting to look at the evidence.
But even those efforts to try and do the right thing and make sure that a fraudulent election isn't sealed and delivered to D.C., you know, their efforts to do that have been thwarted.
They've not been able to meet in person because of COVID exceptions.
Well, there's no COVID exception to the Constitution.
No.
You know, they've been locked out of their own building.
The People's House in Lansing and other places, too.
We've heard of interference, of these threats of reprisals and other interferences.
And that's the type of stuff that I would call upon those legislators to stand up, stand up to their executive branch.
There's supposed to be a balance of powers and separation of powers, and they need to assert themselves now or else they'll never have the chance to do it again in the future.
Well, nothing motivates legislators like having, and I know being one, like having their constituents call, email, let them know that they feel strongly about an issue, and there shouldn't be much that you feel more strongly about than free and fair elections.
We didn't have one this time.
It was so corrupted.
But tell people how they can find out more about what you're doing.
Well, I would encourage people to go to, one, do as you suggested, Congressman, call the legislatures and let them know they need to act, and they need to act now and not let the governor stand in their way.
You can learn more about us at www.got got-freedom.org.
Got dash freedom.org.
That's great.
And as you know, from being litigators, it takes time to get discovery.
I'm wondering about in Arizona, though, where the Arizona legislature had subpoenaed some voting machines, as I understand it, and the clerk says, nope, you can't have them.
Seems to me like maybe it's time to cut off some state money to places that don't comply that try to cover up results of elections.
You guys are doing great work and we appreciate what you're doing so much.
And we'll be right back.
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Come on back.
You're going to find out about more fraud.
Hey there.
I'm Mary Catherine Howe.
And I'm Carol Markowitz.
We've been in political media for a long time.
Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
That's why we started Normally, a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass, you're our kind of people.
Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So down with Verdict with Ted Cruz Now, wherever you get your podcasts.
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
This is Louie Gomert sitting in for my friend Sean.
And let's go to the phones.
We've got Margaret in Utah.
Margaret.
Good afternoon.
Welcome.
Thank you so much.
It is a pleasure to talk to you.
Long time listeners, listener, but never were able to.
Bless you as well.
I'm glad I got to hear from you.
You have a question, Margaret?
Yes, I have a couple of questions.
One of them is, what is the White House or the senators and congressmen going to do on January 6th?
Is there a way to stop this craziness at that point?
Yep, there is, and it requires objection by both House member and senator.
And hopefully, as I understand it, Tubberville from Alabama has said he will object.
We know you don't have to be from the state that votes to which you're objecting since Barbara Boxer objected, I think it's to Ohio back in 2005.
But we have got to have enough evidence out there, and the courts have not allowed it.
So we got to do like Reagan and go over the heads and get evidence out there to the public so that they can be screaming to their representatives and senators that they better object and they better support this effort or they're going to be out on the street.
But that's what's got to happen.
There is evidence and we're going to be getting it out for people to see.
And you need to be contacting your senators to make sure they understand what you expect from them.
But we're going to be objecting.
We're going to be making clear that this fraud has to be dealt with and it's not appropriate to steal elections.
And hopefully we'll get a Justice Department at some point that will punish crime instead of just Republicans.
This is the Sean Hannity Show and this is Louie Gomert sitting in for Sean.
And by the way, the question from Margaret in Utah about, you know, what can President Trump do?
Well, when I was at the White House yesterday, one of the things I told him is, look, bars checked out.
You know, we didn't get anything near like we expected in the way of justice.
And as I know from being a former felony judge, you know, the law in Texas makes very clear when you assess a sentence, you're supposed to consider general deterrence, that you have a significant enough sentence that others are deterred from engaging in the same conduct.
You have specific deterrence, so it's powerful enough that it deters this person from ever repeating the conduct, and you have safety of the general public.
But we have not gotten anything in the order of general deterrence to scare people away from cheating in elections, and it's got to happen.
I told the president, look, you could appoint a special counsel.
You know, Barris checked out.
He's not doing his job.
You could appoint him.
He said, well, they're telling me I can't appoint a special counsel.
Well, whoever is telling him that does not understand the government in the United States.
All power under the president in the executive branch comes through the president.
And he can appoint a special counsel.
I encouraged him in June of 2017.
Look, they appointed Mueller for nothing.
He's not going to be fair.
You ought to have a special counsel appointed.
You ought to appoint him to just investigate how we ever got to the place of having a special counsel.
Investigate this whole thing.
It stinks to high heaven.
But he was persuaded back then not to do that, let it run its course, and it was a very wasteful course, of course.
Well, Mueller came out good financially, and Weissman, they got to trash a lot of people and destroy some good people.
But nonetheless, we have some great guests, and they've been doing deep dives.
John Basham, a data scientist, meteorologist, he loves to dig into data.
We have Justin Amealy, former Arabic linguist, and he's an intelligence analyst at the NSA, has been, software developer.
And Dave LeBoux, he's artificial intelligence expert.
You put these guys together, and they're kind of like Russ Randolph's group, Phil Waldron's group.
They have got some brilliant people.
They're brilliant.
They're working with good people.
And they've done some deep dives into the raw data.
And that's where there's an awful lot of answers, it appears.
But guys, welcome to the Sean Hannity Show.
Thanks for being here.
No need to call me Congressman.
I'm just Louis.
But glad to have you here.
And Linda was saying, you know, these guys are so good.
Just let them take it and run with it.
Well, that's scary.
First, I will call you Congressman.
This is John Basham.
I wanted to say that because, Congressman, also, I'm from Texas, and you are from Texas One, and we could not be any prouder than to have you represent us in Congress, sir.
It is an honor to talk to you today.
You're very kind, John.
Thank you.
If I were still a judge or Chief Justice, you'd have to call me Judge or Chief Justice.
But now I'm just a lowly legislator, so Louie is quite adequate.
But thank you.
Get into the data, guys.
As you said, we've been looking at this.
Yeah.
And we have been doing a lot of deep dives.
And these guys that are on here with me, they're incredible at going into the individual granularity.
The one nice thing about being a meteorologist is my job is to take that insane amount of science and turn it into something that people can understand.
And it really comes down to after we looked at all the data and just keep in mind that no one, I keep hearing all of these people say that they haven't seen anything, they haven't seen anything.
No one has taken the time that we have taken hundreds and hundreds of man hours to review all of this data across multiple states down to the county and precinct level to identify what we've identified, which was something that I think all of us felt on election night that something might be wrong.
And when we dug into the data, we did find multiple anomalies and errors that needed to be addressed and needed to be answered.
And, you know, from one of the ones that stuck out to me immediately was when we started seeing election data where votes went backwards.
How do you mean?
Well, you know, we would see the raw election data, and these guys will go into greater detail on that, but we would see the raw election data.
Say the votes would come in, and I'll give just a random number here, but say there were a thousand votes for Trump.
And then 20 minutes later, Trump only had 800 votes.
So where did the 200 votes go?
How did that happen?
And we thought, well, maybe that was an error in the reporting.
Maybe it was a human error.
Maybe there's 100 different reasons it could have happened.
But we saw it across multiple counties, precincts, states, and we started to see this replicate in a very specific pattern that started to leave us a lot of questions.
So did you get any answers?
Yeah, I think, you know, Justin has a great deal of expertise in explaining how this data was moving back and forth.
And I'll defer to him on that, Congressman.
Yeah, please, Justin, just don't speak it in Arabic.
All right, definitely.
So come on, Congressman.
So, yeah, basically, obviously, we came together real quick.
I'll just give you a little history.
We came together directly after the election as a bunch of volunteers because, hey, we saw there was a bunch of things that happened election night.
They were not explained.
Nobody gave us any sufficient explanation as to why we saw these things happening.
And so we wanted to look at the real data.
So we took an approach of, you know, other people had taken other approaches where they're looking at voter rolls and things like that, dead voters, illegals voting, you know, out of state, that type of thing.
And that's fine.
I'm not saying that, you know, those things didn't happen, but it could be argued in court that those people voted for Trump.
You can't prove that.
So we wanted to take an approach of looking at things that were hard, irrefutable facts that could 100% be proved, that could not be disproved, right?
So exactly.
And that's the approach that we took.
So obviously, right now, our biggest focus is on Arizona because we have data sets right now that show, without a doubt, at a statistically impossible level, that there were irregularities, I would call them, but obviously you don't know what that means.
That there were things that happened during that election that is now proven in our data set, which we're going to release, our data set and our methodology and everything like that.
We've released a couple of videos, but we're going to release all that stuff out there to show people and have them take a look at it and be able to replicate what we've done here and show that basically there's no way it could have happened the way it did.
So Dave's going to go into more detail about the actual numbers and everything like that, but just wanted to show, you know, talk to you about just like why we did this because it's really, really important that, you know, go ahead.
Well, Rudy Giuliani had given me some information yesterday.
Indicates there's 22,000, nearly 23,000 mailing ballots were received the day before the ballot was recorded as being sent out.
Did you see any kind of anomalies like that?
Well, we have very specific data that we're looking at, which is directly from the Secretary of State's website.
So you can go right now to the Secretary of the State's website and download some data.
So, the data that that shows is really like you're looking at vote totals for, you know, vote totals for the different candidates for the different questions, you know, president, you know, voting for Congress, voting for, you know, this, this local thing, all that stuff.
So, the thing is, is that we are only like, we only have those data points.
Now, what we did was we originally started with what people might know as the Edison data set.
It's kind of basically a data set that goes out to CNN and the national election pool.
So, when you were to watch the news, you would be looking at the Edison data set.
And that has been basically told to us from the Secretary of State's website.
Well, that's completely irrelevant because it's not accurate to what our data is.
But luckily enough, in the last couple of days, we actually got the time series data from the Secretary of State's website as they released it that night, provided by a patriot known as Garrett Archer.
I guess he put out this data.
He put out this data set originally to debunk our methodology, but all he did was prove that our data was 100% matching exactly what the Secretary of State had put out.
So, this was the data that the state of Arizona used to certify the election.
And so, as we release this out and release the details out in further videos, you'll basically be able to see that there is something going on that proves that there's no way that this could have happened statistically.
Yeah.
Dave, you have any comment?
Yeah, absolutely.
And just to take a step back to talk about what this data looks like so listeners can conceptualize what we're working with, you can think about it from an election standpoint, but just as you'd manage your own personal finances, you'd log into your bank and you'd check your checking account and savings account.
Typically, you have them tied together on the same screen.
And once we strung together these different data sources from the precinct, county, and state level, and we had them merged side by side against these sort of time series updates, imagine you logged in on November 4th and looked back at your bank statement.
And in the last 24 hours, you saw a flurry of activity back and forth between your checking account and your savings account.
And sometimes you'd say, okay, well, it's just going from my account to my account.
That's strange, but at least it's balancing out.
And that happens a good portion of the time.
In other instances, you'd see a certain amount that just evaporates entirely.
So there was a number of different activities that were not only suspicious, but you'd imagine if you logged in and saw that happening, you'd want to know exactly what was going on between those hours.
And the combination of both the activity within accounts and across accounts really hasn't been addressed or explained as this data presents itself.
So we brought this out.
We are bringing this out just to get answers for, or at least a basic explanation as to what's happening from this data standpoint.
Well, and that's one of the problems when you're dealing with complex litigation like things involving this issue would be, it takes time to go through discovery to get answers.
And I can't help but think that the people that engaged in the fraud were counting on the fact that a new president is sworn in, whether the same one is re-sworn in or a new one sworn in on January 20th.
And that's not enough time to find all the fraud, the different ways we've engaged in it.
And so it is important that it be ferreted out, but it's difficult.
Congressman?
Yeah, go ahead.
Yeah, you know, you bring up an excellent point.
And one of the things that has been so frustrating for us, now that we've put together a data integrity group that's full of data scientists, which is full of mathematicians and experts in numbers theory and artificial intelligence, you name it.
And we've built a system that allows us to identify where errors or anomalies, you can call it fraud or not.
We don't know.
We don't know what the actual cause of it was.
But when we start to dig into it, every time we try to go and look at the actual source of it, we get stonewalled by the local agencies, either from the Secretary of State level or even we had a big series in Georgia where we were supposed to be able to go in and look at Dominion machines across five different counties.
And I'm only saying their name because they're one of the groups that we were looking at.
And we were blocked the day before we were to fly in from seeing anything.
And it's hard to imagine when you've got, since the election, three respected national pollsters who have come out and said that a majority of elections believe this election was either fraudulent or so error-filled that it's invalid.
A majority believe that we had an election like a third world country or a banana republic.
And it's hard when you've got data scientists who are wanting to go in and willing to go in.
And we have the questions.
We know the questions that need to be asked because we now see the data and where there were problems.
Specifically, I'll give you an example in Georgia.
We had over 100 different precincts in the Fulton County area that had the mail-in ballots come in at a 90% or greater for one candidate, Joe Biden.
And from a statistical standpoint, one, two, three, 10.
It can't happen.
It can happen.
But we saw that replicated across a number of states.
And one of the things that could answer some of these questions everywhere where we had ballot scanners is every one of those ballots is scanned and in a memory card.
And I don't understand since the public owns that information, owns those ballots.
And it's my understanding, sir, and you can tell me if I'm wrong, but all federal ballots have to be kept for two years.
Well, they're supposed to be, and some states have different rules and laws.
And we're about out of time.
But let me just say, go back to this.
I've talked to Rudy Giuliani about it and Sidney Powell.
They're both quite familiar with it, the doctrine of spoliation.
When time's of the essence, if one party gets rid of evidence, refuses to produce it, then the court should take notice that it is an admission that the evidence proves what the plaintiff's trying to say.
So listen, tell people right quick how they can follow up with your information that you're digging out.
Well, yes, Congressman, we're actually releasing, we released three videos on Rumble, and we're going to release a further one that goes into more detail about all these things and also releases our methodology and the code that we use and everything like that so everybody can go and replicate that.
Correct tonight, thanks.
That's right.
Time is out, but thank you so much for the work you're doing.
This is the Sean Hannity Show, and we will be right back.
This is the Sean Hannity show.
This is Louis Gomert sitting in for Sean.
And, you know, that was big and rich, bumper music coming in.
But yeah, John has a swimming pool on top of his house, and my name tag blew off.
And when I went to tell him, that window is right there into the side of the pool.
And John, I'm worried my name tag is going to clog up your filter.
So now he said, we got a grinder.
It'll grind it up.
But he said, yeah, we all watched your name tag float by the window.
And everybody said, look, Louie Gomert's name tag is floating by the window.
That's what you can do when you got a window into the side of your pool.
But anyway, and speaking of John, guy I went all through school with in Mount Pleasant, went to four years of A ⁇ M with, he said about our last guest, hey, did he say Rumble?
Where can we watch his video?
Well, it is Rumble, and apparently that's an alternative to YouTube for conservatives where conservatives don't get censored and the truth can come out, so that's a good thing.
But it's rumble.com, and it's Election Night Returns.
Right, Linda?
It's Election Night Facts.
Okay.
It sounds like returns.
I hear you.
Yeah, okay.
Election Night Facts on Rumble.com.
So you go to rumble.com, put in Election Night Facts, and you will find the video that our last guest was talking about.
Now, our guest we have with us now, she's a friend.
She's from Texas.
And actually, I started knowing more about her.
I heard about her.
I knew she had a great, terrific book that exposed corruption in the Department of Justice, licensed to lie.
But Sidney Powell was a tremendous help to Mike Flynn until she ran into a criminal defense attorney that thought, or he thought he was a criminal prosecutor, actually, even though he was a federal judge.
He kept trying to prosecute.
He should be impeached, I think.
But nonetheless, Michael Flynn is out from under the savage misuse and injustice that the DOJ hurled at him.
And glad to have Sidney Powell on.
Sidney, great to have you on.
And actually, you and I, you know, a couple of years ago were immersed in the fraud that was found to have occurred in the Dallas County election two years ago.
And it was just we couldn't get people that had authority to do what needed to be done to save the country from going through what we've been through.
But you've continued to go after this.
And, you know, there are independent attorneys going after the fraud.
And I know you're one person, Sidney, that can verify that all of the fraud has not been debunked.
It's not unfounded.
So tell us about what you've been finding.
Oh, Louis, you're absolutely right.
I mean, there's stunning mathematical and statistical evidence and data that's absolutely irrefutable of massive amounts of votes just disappearing from the system in the hundreds of thousands.
And we know, for example, that in Michigan and Antrim County, when we actually examined the Dominion voting machines, forensic experts did that.
That they have this way of sending votes computer-wise to what they call adjudication, and then they can just disappear them.
And they did that for more than 80% of the votes.
So somebody can just drag and drop them to the trash pile.
Well, it's pretty amazing.
Of course, we heard that the machines were never hooked up to the internet, not accessible by the internet.
And yet in Georgia, we had one of the workers saying, yeah, when there was a problem with one of the voting machines or an iPad, then they'd contact their people.
And I believe it was Dominion folks, wasn't it, that would access her iPad, access the voting machine, and get them fixed from a remote location.
I'm not sure how you do that without having that equipment accessible through the Internet.
Is there a way to do that otherwise?
No, it has to be.
It was accessible through the internet, and that's an automatic violation of the federal law that requires voting machines to be protected from any sort of intrusion like that.
And we also know they erased certain files on the machines in Antrim County, specifically the adjudication tiles that would have shown exactly where they put those votes that went missing.
And there is evidence from other people in other states that machines were connected to the internet, evidence from people in multiple states that people uploaded thumb drives of information to the machine.
They can inject votes and create votes from thin air.
They have done that, it appears, in any number of places.
This election is the biggest crime in American history.
And there was, in fact, foreign interference in it.
We already have a finding from the FBI and CISA, CISA, the supposed election security division of Homeland Security, that there was foreign interference by Iran in this election.
We have traced internet information to Serbia, China, Iran.
It was visible to people who were watching the night of the election and there are data packages, they call them, that were transferred between foreign countries regarding our election.
The server that's owned by CIITL, one of the companies related to Dominion in Germany, in Frankfurt, Germany, spiked 30% the night of our election.
Unbelievable.
Unreal.
Well, now, Sydney, you mentioned CISA, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.
That was headed by Christopher Krebs.
And I saw a puff piece on him the day of the election in which he assured us that this would be the most secure election ever, totally secure, no chance of any problems.
Are you telling me that you have full faith and credit in what Christopher Krebs has to say?
Well, Mr. Krebs is either incompetent or a liar because when he spoke the day of the election, he was ignoring a statement publicly issued by the FBI and his organization a few days before that found that Iran had intentionally interfered in this election and gotten information of over 200,000 voters at a minimum.
Well, I have to use that information to manufacture votes and distort the entire voting process.
Well, sometimes people like to take all the credit, but to his credit, in that same Election Day article, he gave a lot of credit to his dear friends in Silicon Valley for all of their help in making sure everything was the way it was supposed to be in our cybersecurity for our election.
So I guess you and I need to give some credit to Silicon Valley for all their help in creating a voting system such as it was.
And again, you know I'm prone to sarcasm, but yeah, we need to give them a lot of credit, all right, because Mark Zuckerberg spent over $400 million to affect the vote and create all kinds of issues for lawful voting in any number of states, particularly the swing states where we're seeing the problems.
The Thomas More Society Amistad Project has documented a lot of that.
I haven't even had a chance to review all that evidence.
We've been focused on the fraud that occurred across the country as a result of the voting machines.
And I'm not just talking about Dominion.
They all use the same software.
And we're finding more and more evidence that they ran an algorithm in the machines that automatically flipped a certain percentage of votes from Biden, from Trump to Biden to give Biden a 2.7% flip, which amounts to like a 5.5% edge.
Well, you know, we have testimony from the CEO of Dominion Voting Systems, John Polis, and he made some statements in testifying that were pretty dramatic.
He said that voting systems are by design meant to be used as closed systems, not networked, meaning they're not connected to the Internet.
He said that Dominion does not have any ties to SmartMatic.
Dominion and SmartMatic are two separate companies.
He said we do not use or license SmartMatic software.
But as I understand it, SmartMatic software has been incorporated into Dominion voting systems since 2004.
Was that your understanding?
Yes, that's my understanding.
And there's also a lawsuit between the two of them that documents their relationship.
Tracy Beans, T-R-A-C-Y-B-E-A-N-Z on Twitter has a lovely thread that includes the documents themselves so people can look at it themselves and see what they think the relationship between SmartMatic and Dominion is in their own words.
Well, you know, we've got people that are asking what can be done about all of this fraud.
I mean, somebody needs to suffer some consequences of the fraud.
What would you suggest?
You've seen this from a whole lot of different angles, Sidney.
Well, I don't think the president is being well represented at all.
In fact, I think everyone around him is misrepresenting things to him and misleading him and not serving him well in any way, shape, or form, because he has the absolute authority under the executive order entered in 2018 on election security that already declared a state of emergency for it and cites all the relevant statutes and authorities that he can use to secure the voting machines that need to be assessed around the country,
have them assessed, appoint special counsel to oversee it all and get that done right now.
I have no doubt that if the shoe had been on the other foot and the Democrats had been in power with the magnitude of fraud we've seen running across this country in every way, shape, and form, whether it's dead voters, double voting, massive injections of false fake ballots into the system, five systems stopping across the country the night of the election, which has never happened before, the lies from the Atlanta Fulton County arena,
the documented videotape of people pulling buckets of ballots out from under a table after they've run everybody off with a lie.
We've got thousands of affidavits all uploaded, or a lot of them uploaded at defendingtherepublic.org so people can see the evidence and testimony themselves, including the expert reports.
If the shoe had been on the other foot, if this had happened when Obama was in office and this method and madness had been used to defeat him, they would have seized the machines the day after the election.
Yeah, but done the audit immediately.
There's a big difference, though.
There would have been a whole bunch of Republicans that would have been encouraging that so we could get to the bottom of the fraud.
Some of us have spoken up when Republicans have acted inappropriately or abused somebody's rights under the Fourth Amendment.
But it just doesn't seem that we get any of those people that sometimes claim they're really concerned about civil rights and about our rights under the Constitution.
They seem to go completely silent unless they're belittling those of us that just want justice.
Yes, they're the ultimate hypocrites, Louie, because even Senator Warren and Klobuchar and some others in December of 2019 were complaining about the Venezuelan connection and the corruption in the Dominion systems.
And Carolyn Maloney was one of the congressmen who 10 years ago or so called it out and tried to get the government not to approve its use whatsoever.
And you know who spread its use?
None other than Eric Holder through an antitrust settlement in the Justice Department when he was there and expanded the use of the Dominion machines.
Wow.
And there's a picture of President Obama voting on one for the first time in Chicago as if it's a big accomplishment.
Well, it was for them.
They knew exactly what they were doing.
Goodness.
They are behind all of this and more.
But the government of China is trying to steal the United States of America.
They've bought us in any number of ways, from any number of our companies to our ports to our real estate, all over the country.
Now they have donated millions, hundreds of millions to universities to steal our technology and data.
President Trump's the only person who has tried to rein them in on any of it, and that's why they have been determined to take him out.
Well, thank you, Sidney.
Thanks for your fight.
You are a great American patriot warrior, and thank you for that.
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Louis Gomert will be right back.
This is the Sean Hannity Show, and we're glad you're with you.
Howard, let's hear from you in Wilmington, North Carolina.
Hey, Congressman, thanks for taking my call.
Of course.
I'm going to get right to it.
With all of the corruption that's going on, and I mean throughout the whole damn government, even the Supreme Court, it's terrible.
It is.
It is.
It's ridiculous.
We have no representation.
The Patriots are really, I'm telling you, I don't know how much longer they're going to stay quiet.
Well, that's you and me both.
But so what do we do?
Yeah, it's a great question.
We ought to be able to go to the courts.
The courts have shut people out.
They have not been willing to do their jobs.
It's not a great answer, but what we've got left is the people to get upset.
And, you know, some have proposed coming to Washington on January 6th.
But we have got to make sure that this fraud is exposed.
And I don't know what else to do except get it to the people and also get it out in Congress.
And we need the Senate's help to do that.
But appreciate the question.
We'll be right back with more of the Sean Hannity Show.
We've got Andy Biggs coming back with Mo Brooks and Paul Gosar.
Is what's right with America.
You're listening to the Sean Hannity Show.
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
This is Louis Gomert sitting in.
And I've got some great friends that are joining me here on Sean's show.
Mo Brooks has put together a great strategy for January 6th.
It would be better if the courts had done their job, and then it would be a cohesive government that could work together, but they haven't done their job, so we have got to use every tool at our disposal.
In Arizona, Andy Biggs and Paul Gozar have been pushing to have the legislature there in Arizona do the right thing.
So, guys, welcome to the Sean Andy Show.
I know the public is really interested.
There have been calls wanting to know what we can do, what can we do.
And you and all four of us were talking yesterday, and we did have a meeting at the White House.
Mo, let people know what the strategy is.
Well, the strategy is to, at this point, make sure that we have a United States Senator who has the courage and the understanding, the intellect, to co-sponsor the objections that we can have a serious discussion on the House and Senate floor about the magnitude of the voter fraud and election theft that occurred on and before November 3rd of 2020, affecting not only the presidential race, but also any number of House, Senate, and other races up and down the ballot.
So, all the listeners who hear my voice, I strongly encourage you to write, call your senators and congressmen too.
It can't hurt, but particularly your senators, to help give them the backbone they need to stand tall for our republic that is underpinned by our election system.
And if we don't have an honest and accurate election system, you do not have a republic, and I'm afraid that's where we're headed.
Well, that is exactly where we're headed.
And when people work and connive and scheme to prevent a free and fair election, that's exactly where we're headed.
As we know, socialism requires a totalitarian government.
No middle class, just a tiny ruling class, and then everybody else.
And we are all determined to make sure that to do everything we can to keep that from happening.
Andy and Paul, did the Arizona legislature have hearings today?
Yes, so Louis, what happened is there's been hearings, and the Board of Supervisors, who controls the machines, this is for an audit.
They want a forensic audit.
The Board of Supervisors said they didn't want to turn over the machines or any of the documents, and they basically disregarded the legislative setup.
So the legislature, literally, right before we got on with you, they were having a hearing with a judge here.
And they're going to continue having a hearing.
They're going to have a hearing tomorrow again to see whether the court will help enforce a writ of mandamus against the Board of Supervisors.
All of the Board of Supervisors say, oh, yeah, we want to do an audit, but they're dragging their feet because they're trying to run out the clock.
But the legislature has and will continue fighting this matter, both in court and wherever else they can get it.
And this would all be a lot easier if the governor would just call the legislature into special session, but he refuses to do so.
Paul, what's your thought?
No, Andy, it epitomizes it just right.
It's sad, Louis, when you see a board of supervisors so entrenched.
And these are Republicans, for crime's sake.
Why wouldn't you want to extol the virtues of a good election?
You know, because I know we had some chicanery in 2018 in regards to the Senate race, you know, because of Adrian Fontes.
But you know what?
The people are the governed, and they're the government, and they have to be able to hear from everybody.
So I got to tell you, folks, start loud and clear.
Call them, write them, text them, do anything possible.
Email them.
This is up to you.
We want a fair election.
If we don't have that, we have nothing.
Well, and not just in Arizona.
That's needed there.
It's needed in Georgia.
It's needed in Wisconsin.
It's needed in Michigan and Pennsylvania.
These are all critical, just very critical.
And people need to make sure that their elected representatives understand we're in a fight to save this little experiment in self-government.
And we're on the verge of losing it.
And these clown Republicans that think, oh, gee, if I act, you know, charitable and kind and tell Trump to just go ahead and give in, give way to this fraudulent conclusion,
then I'll look better and I can be the Republican elected in 2024, not really grasping that if we let the fraud go this time, there won't be another Republican elected president.
So this is critical stuff.
And I'm so grateful to all three of you for the way that you stand and fight.
This is very important.
So we're going to, we know there was fraud.
I know there was fraud in Texas, but since the president won Texas despite the fraud, there's no use in raising that and objecting on the House floor when the Senate joins us there on January 6th.
One of the questions we had is what else can we do besides January 6th?
It seems to me that's the best chance we have left when the Justice Department doesn't do their job.
The FBI has got too many people that are trying to push, well, have been trying to push the president out the door for four years.
So I don't know of another shot.
This seems to be our best chance to educate people.
The fraud is not unfounded.
And so, Mo, any other recommendations based on the fraud that you've already seen?
Well, this is pretty much it for our country.
This is a pivotal moment in American history.
In my judgment, it rivals the election of 1860 between Douglas and Lincoln, and we saw what ensued from that.
This is the time when the socialists, by hook or by crook, by theft or by otherwise, intend on gaining power in the United States of America.
And once they get power, given how they're going to legally and illegally manipulate so many different systems and parts of our government, our country will probably be lost down the socialism path.
And ultimately, we will suffer debilitating insolvency and bankruptcy because that is what happens to socialist countries as soon as you, as Margaret Thatcher used to say, run out of other people's money.
And I don't think people understand the depravity, the dangerousness of what occurs when a country goes insolvent and bankrupt.
But I would encourage them to look at economic history.
Right now, you can look at Venezuela.
It's not a pretty sight, what's happening in Venezuela with people losing their lives, fleeing the country as best they can in order just to get food on the table for themselves and their kids.
We don't want to go there, but that's what the socialist movement in America is doing right now and where they will take us if we don't stop them.
That's right.
So we need to win these two elections in Georgia.
We need to fight as best we can in the face of the expected voter fraud and election theft activities that the socialists will engage in there.
And then on January the 6th, this is somewhat akin to the Alamo, although I hope we will survive.
But it was the Alamo where you had courageous people stand tall that had a great contributing effect in the creation of the nation of Texas, later become the state of Texas.
Well, it's true.
And, you know, I know we have a lot of Christian brothers and sisters in Congress.
And one of the things that frustrates me is when I hear other members of Congress say, Louie, we don't have to worry.
God's in control.
He's in control.
And I haven't met Tommy Nelson.
He's a pastor in Denton, Texas, but I listened to a Bible study where one of his statements was, yeah, God's sovereign.
He's in control.
But just because he's in control doesn't mean he wants us to lean on our shovel and pray for a hole.
Everybody has tools they have been given, and everybody needs to use every means at their disposal legally and ethically to make their feelings heard, make sure that the representatives and senators understand that they're not going to put up with them allowing us to just slip into that good night of socialism.
Paul, you've been a fighter as long as I've known you.
Any other thoughts on what people can do?
Yes, educate yourself.
There's a movie held by HBO.
The Democrats actually made it.
It's called Kill Chain.
It is worth your one hour.
It will scare the living to Jesus out of you about these machines called Dominion and Smart Mattix.
Folks, I mean, this is right in front of us.
This has happened different ways in each of these different states.
And I implore you, make those calls.
Get this back, this liberty and freedom, and this experiment, as Louis talked about, this republic.
This happened.
We've got to make sure that we correct it.
And there's no reason why the voters out here in Arizona or Michigan or Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, shouldn't have an accounting about the education about the voting, that it is true and rightly done.
Yeah, well, I'm thrilled with the help that we've got.
We've got some great, stout new members of Congress coming in that will be sworn in on January 3rd.
So they will be there, and they're fighters.
It is really encouraging.
We've got lots of new members in the Freedom Caucus.
And Andy, any other thoughts about what people, you would encourage people to do as we approach the D-Day, really, for the new administration?
Yeah, first of all, thanks, Louie, and Mo and Paul, great fighters, members of the Freedom Caucus all.
Thank you for what you guys do.
The second thing I would tell you is you can still talk to your governors, your legislators, your state legislators.
They can also put up, if they're in a special session or a session, they could send up an alternative slate in these states that have sent up Bidens that are in these critical fraud states.
If they were to send up alternative electors, that would be beneficial as well.
That's good.
Mo, thoughts?
Yeah, I concur with that.
And I hope Arizona will be a leader in this effort.
From what I understand, the Arizona legislature is very active.
We heard from Paul Gosar and Andy Biggs concerning that.
But if they will be more aggressive in contesting the election as they see it, exposing the fraud that has occurred, and then make a public statement as to who they believe the real electors to the Electoral College from the state of Arizona are, that could have an earthquake-like effect on legislators in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, and elsewhere.
So, Arizona, take the lead in this.
Help us out.
Well, and if people follow Arizona's lead and they do that, I mean, they can vote to decertify or uncertify the electors based on all the fraud.
They could vote to certify Trump electors because of all the fraud.
You take out the fraud, and clearly, Trump was the winner.
It's obvious where this stands.
So, others, learn from that.
You can send us electors that represent the real winner, and that'll make it easier come January 6th.
So, thank you all.
You guys are great.
Just appreciate sharing the meetings and time that we have, including yesterday with you.
Thanks so much, guys.
This is Sean Hannity's show, and it's just so great to be here for Sean.
And thank you to the callers.
We've had some been so patient.
We're not going to be able to get to you, but great questions, great issues, and we've tried to incorporate some of those.
But listen, this country's in trouble.
And any country that was originally free, that people did not spend enough time protecting that freedom, they lose it.
We're endowed by our Creator, but it's not something you get to keep.
There are always evil people that want to take away your endowment, your inheritance.
We've got to fight for this.
And I'm not calling for revolution.
The fake media has tried to say I have.
I'm calling for peaceful demonstrations to make clear we've got to protect this.
And those that have tried to take us down the road of socialism, destroy our history.
How about this for history?
Thomas Jefferson, as our third president, recognized and actually selected Isaac Watts.
I'm sorry, Psalms, Hymns, and Spiritual Songs for teaching the alphabet, teaching English.
And Isaac Watts, of course, one of his famous songs went joy to the world.
The Lord's come.
Let earth receive her king.
You know the words.
That's part of our history.
Let's defend our history.
And that means if you sit back and you say nothing and fraud decides this election because good people haven't raised up enough to raise cane about it, we'll lose it.
And generations to come will know it was our fault.
Let's fight for what we have.
God bless you all.
This is Louie Gohmert signing out for Sean Hannity.
You want smart political talk without the meltdowns?
We got you.
I'm Carol Markowitz, and I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
We've been around the block in media and we're doing things differently.
Normally is about real conversations.
Thoughtful, try to be funny, grounded, and no panic.
We'll keep you informed and entertained without ruining your day.
Join us every Tuesday and Thursday, normally, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Ben Ferguson.
And I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, We break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So download Verdict with Ted Cruz Now, wherever you get your podcasts.
▲
Export Selection