Sean Hannity Show - Constitutional Crisis - 10.31

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 1, 2016 - Sean Hannity Show

01:29:55

Constitutional Crisis - 10.31

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is an iHeart podcast.
	Let not your heart be troubled.
	You are listening to the Sean Hannity Radio Show Podcast.
	There was an extensive, as you know, Brad, investigation by the FBI under the direction of a wonderful and tough career public servant, Jim Comey.
	This is a great man.
	We are very privileged in our country to have him be the director of the FBI.
	No one can question the integrity, the competence.
	And he's somebody with the highest standards of integrity.
	I'm going to continue to be scrupulous about not commenting on it just because I think Director Comey could not have been more exhaustive, amazingly.
	Some Republicans who were praising you just days ago for your independence, for your integrity.
	Despite your impeccable reputation for independence and integrity.
	And your honesty instantly turned against you because your recommendation conflicted with the predetermined outcome they wanted.
	Republicans have turned on you with a vengeance.
	If you indict Comey's integrity, then you are making a big mistake.
	Director Comey, whose reputation for independence and integrity is unquestioned.
	But why?
	Before that decision came out, everybody loved James Comey.
	He was beautiful.
	They didn't lay a glove or a finger on James Comey, and he walked out of that room with his integrity and honor intact.
	The FBI director is a career public servant.
	He served this country with honor.
	Jim Comey is widely respected as a guy of integrity.
	They have attacked you personally.
	They have attacked your integrity.
	I honor your professionalism and your service to our country.
	Given the depth of that investigation and his own credibility, I think his conclusion probably gets it right.
	Does Secretary Clinton and Senator Kaine still believe those things about Jim Comey?
	These Clinton emails, there's the emails, the emails, okay?
	Has anyone found any definitive proof that any foreign government has obtained these emails?
	Have they found any definitive proof that there's anything in it that imperils national security?
	So I think the whole thing has been exaggerated from the start, but let me say this.
	Hillary Clinton has no one else to blame but herself.
	Why in the world did she do this incredibly stupid thing?
	Given that this investigation is going to go on for many months after the election.
	No matter who wins.
	No matter who wins.
	But if the Secretary of State wins, we will have a president under criminal investigation with whom Aberdeen under investigation, the Secretary of State, the president-elect should she win under investigation.
	Harris, under these circumstances, I am actively reassessing my support.
	I'm not a Trump whoa.
	Whoa, whoa, whoa, wait a minute.
	Right.
	You're not going to vote for Hillary Clinton?
	Harris, I'm deeply concerned that we will have a constitutional crisis if she's elected.
	Josh, in the same way that I'll neither criticize nor defend Director Comey's decisions about what to make public in the context of this investigation, that's because I just don't have independent knowledge of the decisions that are made to release this information.
	And there are other people that have the luxury of being able to opine, writing op-eds, or serving as anonymous sources for reporters to weigh in with their own view.
	But when I'm standing here representing the institution of the presidency, I don't have that luxury.
	And so, you know, in the same way that I'll neither defend nor criticize Director Comey's decisions with regard to what to make public in the context of this investigation, I don't have any recommendations to make to him either with regard to what information should be communicated to the public.
	All right, glad you're with us eight days to go to Election Day.
	What you just heard there, Josh Ernest, the Obama White House, I take is ostensibly washing their hands of this.
	Now, there's good reason because they have now been dragged into this, the combination of what may be now 650,000 emails the FBI must go through.
	It may include the 33,000 deleted emails.
	We'll see very shortly if they were about yoga, wedding, a funeral, and emailing Bill who doesn't email.
	America with eight days to go to an election is literally on the verge of a constitutional crisis.
	The president seemingly now needing to distance himself from what is going to probably end up a huge criminal matter.
	I don't care what any liberal on television is telling you in these final eight days as they now try to clean up another Clinton mess here.
	But there are people that are jumping ship.
	It appears starting at the White House in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
	And Thomas Friedman of the New York Times and Doug Schoen, longtime Clinton ally, friend, supporter.
	The American people are now beginning to get it.
	Even before this came out, you have the L.A. Times poll has Trump up four today.
	That's a national poll.
	That's not what matters.
	That's not going to make the difference.
	I still don't get in terms of numbers to 270, and I'll explain that in the course of this hour.
	I am trying as best I can to break this down for you in as understandable a way as I possibly can because there's so much material here.
	But at the heart and soul of this, the American people are getting the gist of it.
	Because when Donald Trump, before this even broke, had recovered 10 points, ABC Washington Post poll, one that heavily favors Democrats based on a 2012 election turnout model that probably won't apply this year, in my opinion, has Trump just down one three-day tracking poll, which included two days where the top story was the FBI's open email probe.
	You now see 60% of likely voters in this ABC News Washington Post survey now dislike her.
	Her unfavorable rating is 60%.
	How is it possible?
	And which, by the way, is higher than Donald Trump's.
	And for all the beatdown he has gotten, that is pretty remarkable.
	Here's some questions before we get to some facts.
	You know, is the FBI examining now the truthfulness of Hillary Clinton's FBI interview in the light of new evidence?
	Do you understand she may have committed perjury here?
	And now here's another question.
	If it is, in fact, related to Anthony Wiener and Uma Abedeen, you know, has he now become an informant for the government as an effort to deflect from potential sex charges of taking pictures of his wiener and sending it, you know, God forbid, what a pervert to a 15-year-old girl?
	Is Uma Abedeen, does she now realize she's got massive legal issues?
	I'll get to that.
	Is she now going to decide to protect herself?
	She clearly has violated laws.
	I'll get to that in a second.
	Is Hillary going to agree that in the event she's indicted, will she resign?
	Now they've gone full Ken star on Comey.
	That's why I played all those Democrats back in July praising James Comey.
	So now they decided, nope, James Comey's got to go.
	Now they're going to go full Ken Star on him for the next eight days.
	And instead of pressuring Comey, will Hillary call for a grand jury to end any doubt or ask the president to get an outside investigator?
	But even if he does, we're not going to know for any time.
	This is going to put the country and any potential progress of getting 95 million Americans out of the labor force back into the labor force, 13 million more Americans in poverty, nearly 50 million Americans in poverty and on food stamps, 8 million more in poverty, 13 million more on food stamps.
	You know, we've already doubled the debt.
	We still have Obamacare dying on the vine.
	Good luck, Nevada, and good luck Arizona with your 100% plus increases out there and 50% around the rest of the country.
	Are Americans now willing to risk at this point electing an individual for president who is now potentially about to be under indictment?
	Should the feds continue to give her national security briefings?
	How's that for a question?
	You know, why would anyone credit any of her statements considering the falsity of her March 2015 press conference statements?
	What else does WikiLeaks have to drop on top of this?
	Will WikiLeaks drop, will their drops cause an FBI investigation into the foundation?
	Apparently, there might be as many as five field offices investigating the Clinton Foundation here.
	There's so many individual questions.
	And I think you're going to see something we didn't see because Bill, I guess, was much more likable than her and was already the president.
	Are you going to see Democrats with intellectual honesty and integrity like Doug Schoen say, I don't know if I can put the country through what is inevitable now?
	It will be a constitutional crisis.
	We already know James Comey has uncovered new evidence of criminal conduct.
	What do I mean by that?
	Because we already know, and again, according to reports, thanks to the Wiener connection, but I would also argue thanks to WikiLeaks that they've uncovered brand new evidence of criminal conduct.
	This laptop of Uma Abedeen, 650,000 pertinent emails, all of which were supposed to be turned over to the FBI.
	And that means that UMA right now, Uma Abedee, Mrs. Weiner, is facing extraordinary charges in her future.
	Perjury, obstruction of justice.
	That all means jail time, unless perhaps UMA turns state evidence against her boss, which could undoubtedly produce some very serious charges against Hillary.
	We had spent time, a lot of time in this entire year telling you what we're talking about.
	18 USC 201, bribery, 18 USC 208, acts affecting a personal financial interest.
	By the way, that includes a foundation for charity.
	Conspiracy to commit crime, 18 USC 371, false statements, 18 USC 1001, frauds, swindles, mail fraud, 18 USC 1341, wire fraud, attempt and conspiracy to commit fraud, obstruction of justice is in the play, destruction, alteration, falsification of records and federal investigations and bankruptcy, perjury, disclosure of confidential information,
	unauthorized removal, retention of classified documents.
	You know, even the mishandling of classified materials, it is in of itself a crime.
	You know, setting up the private email server in and of itself was the mishandling of classified documents, a crime.
	And then you go through every just, again, just the things that we know here are major.
	And I think you'll see a distancing coming very, very quickly all across the board.
	Let me give you some other information here.
	Bill Clinton never would have been indicted.
	Do you know this without the 11th hour?
	And he never would have been elected president in 92.
	How short our memories are.
	It was 1992.
	And if you remember, on the eve of the election, what was it, four days out, October 30th?
	You know, everyone says, wow, that's outrageous.
	Well, if you don't remember an independent counsel, Lawrence Walsh did this in a case involving associates in the Bush administration.
	And that was the pre-election indictment of Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger by Lawrence Walsh.
	And that contained information about then Vice President George Bush's role in the affair.
	And it broke Bush's bid for a second term.
	You know, it also noted a Clinton-Gore campaign release.
	Remember, just days before the election, the weekend before the drunk driving release certainly hurt George W. Bush.
	And people saying, well, Hillary's angrily saying, turn over what you got.
	Well, the problem is they didn't even have a search warrant to turn over what they had.
	650,000 emails.
	The DOJ tried to block this.
	We already learned through WikiLeaks the collusion between Hillary's campaign and the State Department, Hillary's campaign and the Justice Department, and Hillary's campaign in the White House.
	And my thought here is Obama's had it because he's already been exposed as a liar saying, I learned about this in the press.
	You didn't learn about it in the press.
	You were emailing her.
	And now we know you knew that it was a private server.
	So he himself has some issues here that he's going to have to answer for.
	I know they're trying to blame Comey and they're going full Ken Starr on him, but I don't think that's going to work.
	And what's Uma Abedeen going to do, considering she filed a form called the OF-109 form, a separation agreement that states that people understand when they leave government and that they are maintaining no classified information.
	She said and promised she had turned everything over.
	She also swore under oath she gave up all devices with State Department emails.
	And Clinton now and her team is calling Comey, this is strange.
	This is deeply troubling.
	And the Attorney General, who met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac just on the eve before Comey made his announcement and she made her announcement, you know, she disagrees with the FBI chief.
	And then we got Eric Holder trying to weigh in on all of this.
	The same Loretta Lynch, by the way, who pled the fifth on the secret Iranian ransom payments.
	Do you see how deep this goes?
	The FBI director was able to defy them because he had made a promise to Congress that he would keep them informed.
	And this is a new development.
	Even Carl Bernstein, a liberal Hillary supporter, says the FBI never would have revisited this unless they know this is a real bombshell in here.
	And now we got the Clinton camp and all those people you heard praising Comey in July.
	You know, that FBI, oh, he's, he needs to, what he's done is unprecedented and wrong and light on facts and heavy on innuendo.
	Well, James Comey, you better buckle up because you're about to be trashed in ways you've never imagined by the same people praising you back in July, which, by the way, based on your answers to Trey Gowdy, you should have indicted her then because you admitted while giving testimony that she violated the law.
	So if they're turning up the heat on James Comey and all of this, and they're saying that the FBI director broke the law, they even flip it that way.
	It was in Business Insider.
	So you got an FBI in an internal feud over all of this.
	And Uma apparently has no clue how those emails ended up there.
	Who would have thunk it?
	Who would have ever thunk it that Anthony Weiner and his wiener problem created this bigger problem for the Clintons?
	Now you've got to ask yourself, are you willing to vote for somebody that is going to precipitate a massive constitutional crisis that will prevent this country from moving forward for years, likely ending with her impeachment, indictment, and jail time?
	Because that's where this is headed.
	I'm sure a lot of you may be asking what this new email story is about and why in the world the FBI would decide to jump into an election with no evidence of any wrongdoing with just days to go.
	That's a good question.
	And first of all, for those of you who are concerned about my using personal email, I understand.
	And as I've said, I'm not making excuses.
	I've said it was a mistake and I regret it.
	And now they apparently want to look at emails of one of my staffers.
	And by all means, they should look at them.
	And I am sure they will reach the same conclusion they did when they looked at my emails for the last year.
	There is no case here.
	If they're going to be sending this kind of letter that is only going originally to Republican members of the House, that they need to share whatever facts they claim to have with the American people.
	Robbie, why would she say something that is so flatly untrue?
	I have a copy here.
	It's not very long.
	It's the letter that Comey sent to Congress.
	On the front page, it's got the eight Republican chairmen of the committees.
	If you just turn it over, next page, you got the eight top Democrats on the committee.
	Why would she say that it was just sent to the Republicans when in fact it was sent to the Republicans and Democrats?
	You know, Chris, this has been really overhyped.
	Well, she said it, I didn't.
	We were all surprised by this letter.
	She looked at the front page, and as you just said yourself, on the front page of that memo, it lists those Republican chairs.
	Were the Democrats CC'd at the end of the letter?
	Absolutely.
	She looked at the front page of the letter.
	She has acknowledged, we all acknowledge this was sent to everybody.
	But Robbie, I want to make one more point about this letter.
	You say it's hyped.
	Comey sent the letter about 1 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday.
	Your campaign chairman, John Podesta, put out a statement at 3.45 p.m. in which he's made exactly the same charge that this letter had been sent just to the Republicans, not to the Democrats.
	Three hours and 15 minutes later, Hillary Clinton makes the same charge.
	This was a point of your campaign, and frankly, it was a dishonest talking point.
	Chris, if your question is whether Democratic leaders were CC'd on that letter, the answer is absolutely yes.
	In a congressional hearing on July 7th, Director Comey directly contradicted what you had told the public.
	I had not sent classified material nor received anything marked classified.
	Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private email.
	Was that true?
	Our investigation found that there was classified information sent.
	So it was not true.
	And I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received.
	Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails, either sent or received.
	Was that true?
	That's not true.
	There were a small number of portion markings on, I think, three of the documents.
	I never sent classified material on my email, and I never received any that was marked classified.
	Secretary Clinton said I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email.
	There is no classified material.
	Was that true?
	There was classified material emailed.
	People across the government knew that I used one device.
	Maybe it was because I am not the most technically capable person and wanted to make it as easy as possible.
	Secretary Clinton said she used just one device.
	Was that true?
	She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as Secretary of State.
	But we turned over everything that was work-related.
	Every single thing.
	Personal stuff, we did not.
	I had no obligation to do so and did not.
	Secretary Clinton said all work-related emails were returned to the State Department.
	Was that true?
	No, we found work-related emails, thousands that were not returned.
	All I can tell you is that when my attorneys conducted this exhaustive process, I did not participate.
	Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive.
	Did her lawyers read the email content individually?
	No.
	He directly contradicted what you said.
	Let me just, he not only directly contradicted what you said, he also said in that hearing that you were extremely careless and negligent.
	Well, Chris, I looked at the whole transcript of everything that was said, and what I believe is, number one, I made a mistake not using two different email addresses.
	I have said that, and I repeat it again today.
	It is certainly not anything that I ever would do again.
	I take classification seriously.
	I relied on and had every reason to rely on the judgments of the professionals with whom I worked.
	Yeah, that's why they bleach bit, cleaned it, and acid washed it just for good measure.
	Now, what Gowdy got Comey to admit to is crimes, because the mishandling of classified material is in and of itself a crime.
	To purposefully lie about it and try and erase it and destroy it and get rid of it, well, that's part of the 16 to 18 crimes that Rudy Giuliani has identified.
	And then for Clinton to go out there angry at Comey at Comey, as she did this weekend, trying to attack him the way she did this weekend, and go out there and say this is outrageous, and I can't light on facts heavy on innuendo and rebooting the vast right-wing conspiracy playbook and saying it's deeply troubling.
	It just belies the fact that Comey made the mistake the first time because Comey, when interviewed by Gowdy, is admitting to crimes.
	An interesting bit of breaking news is beyond Anthony Weiner's laptop.
	One of the biggest and most confusing and beyond bewildering facts in this case is why so many Clinton aides were given some form of proffer agreement or not full immunity deal, but a proffer in terms of information they gave to the FBI as part of their ongoing investigation could not be used against them.
	Those are all going to have to be gone over with a fine-tooth comb here.
	But there was the revelation that the FBI had destroyed laptops given to them by aides of Hillary Clinton as part of their deal.
	Well, the Daily Caller is reporting and Kerry Pickett is reporting that in fact that never happened.
	Joe DeGenova was on with my buddy David Webb and said that despite the FBI agreeing to destroy the laptops of Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson as part of their whatever immunity deals or proffer agreements, the agents involved in the case refused to do so.
	And DeGenova said, contrary to published reports, the laptops were not destroyed.
	And the reason is the agents who were tasked with destroying them refused to do so.
	And the laptops are at the FBI for inspection by Congress or federal courts.
	And he said the laptops have already been subpoenaed and the FBI is waiting for Congress to ask for them.
	So this The country is now on the verge of a massive, massive constitutional crisis.
	650,000.
	You think they're all exculpatory, Hillary?
	Really?
	And, you know, the reason the FBI couldn't go after him, they needed a subpoena.
	They needed a court's approval, which they've gotten.
	And now, the, where did I find this just moments ago?
	Because this just broke.
	That, in fact, the New York Times is reporting that they finally actually got permission to move forward and actually look, they've begun the process of looking into the emails.
	Look, she can blame Comey all she wants, like they blame Ken Starr all they want.
	And she also has a problem because Uma Abedeen now is likely on the hook for perjury.
	She signed an OF-109 form separation agreement with the government, maintained that any classified information she had was turned over and she possessed none of it.
	Well, that's now a big problem for her because that means jail time for Uma.
	She swore under oath she gave up all devices with the State Department, just like Hillary, used 14 of them that were broken by hammers.
	And of course, the email servers washed with bleach bit.
	You know, and she could attack the Comey letter as strange and deeply troubling.
	I'll tell you who else isn't going to be in trouble in all of this is Loretta Lynch.
	Why is Loretta?
	Why did she meet with Bill Clinton?
	What did they really talk about on the tarmac?
	Why did she plead the fifth on the secret Iranian ransom payments?
	Why did the Attorney General disagree with the FBI chief when the FBI chief, James Comey, you know, he had to defy his justice bosses to go forward with all of this?
	And to what extent is WikiLeaks influencing the Justice Department and the FBI because they're scared to death.
	They're all going to be exposed here.
	I think it's all, I don't know how you put it all together, but I don't see any other result coming of this, except this country is going to face a constitutional crisis that could be years ongoing because the Clintons will do all they can to reestablish their war room and go to war with Comey, go to war with the Justice Department.
	That means every minute of every working day, if God forbid she was ever elected, will be spent defending herself.
	Now, here's the problem.
	If Donald Trump wins, every state that Mitt Romney won, and if he runs the table and he wins all, look, if he's going to win Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, South Dakota, Tennessee, Alaska, Kansas, Nebraska, Congressional District 2, okay?
	I still believe I'm worried a little about Utah, but not that worried.
	I think he wins Utah, South Carolina, Missouri, Texas, Indiana.
	I think Georgia's closer than I like, but I believe Georgia will wake up and realize we can't have this problem.
	Then he's got to win.
	And let's say he runs the table and takes North Carolina.
	He has to win it.
	Let's say he runs the table and he gets to Florida.
	He has to win that.
	Has to win North Carolina, Florida, Ohio, Nevada, Iowa, Arizona.
	You know, well, now we've got at this point, you know, does he win Colorado?
	He has to get Maine's Congressional, 2nd District 2.
	He needs four more.
	He needs New Hampshire, or he needs New Mexico, or he needs Wisconsin, or Minnesota, or Pennsylvania, or Virginia, or Connecticut.
	He still needs one more state here.
	Let's see.
	Well, actually, if he got Nevada back in his column, that would go a long way, too.
	That would help a lot.
	He's got to win it.
	These are all now important states here.
	We have the latest polls: LA Times tracking poll, Trump plus four.
	IBD, it was Clinton plus four at the end of last week.
	Week, it's now Clinton plus one.
	We've got, let's see, ABC Washington Post, Clinton plus one, but that's that's not what matters here.
	The interesting number I see is Pennsylvania.
	Pennsylvania will solve all of Donald Trump's problems.
	Clinton plus two.
	That is huge for Donald Trump.
	North Carolina, Trump plus two.
	Too close for my comfort.
	Nevada has Trump plus four, too close for comfort in my wheelhouse.
	So we're going to have to watch all this unfold, but it shows.
	But at the heart of this, you've got to ask yourself a question.
	Why did she set up this secret email?
	Well, because they wanted the separate list.
	Remember, all of this goes back to what I think is the whole RICO argument.
	In other words, racketeering argument of the Clintons.
	How did they, in other words, a scheme involving 55% of all people that saw her as Secretary of State?
	Well, okay, they all were donors to the Clinton Foundation or pledge money.
	So they're giving political favors and access to people in exchange for money being backdoored into their charity or being backdoored into their pockets through exorbitant speaking fees.
	Donations come in, they spike because of access to Hillary.
	Opportunities and massive fees, they spike because she is the Secretary of State for her husband.
	Disproportionate payments and gifts are made.
	You know, then they circumvent campaign finance laws.
	Then they allow foreign donations, another crime.
	Then they allow the State Department, literally, the vehicle to shield her State Department email communications, then they set up a private server, illegal in and of itself.
	That's the mishandling of classified materials.
	Then they lie about it.
	That's the cover-up.
	And the cover-up is always worse than a crime.
	Then a means for Clinton insiders to also get private monies.
	That was the whole thing.
	Their Clinton contributions skyrocketed to $126 for the foundation million dollars in 2009, the year she is at the State Department.
	Then you got this whole Russian uranium deal, you know, with this, you know, under the guise of addressing HIV, Kazakh, you got Bill Clinton helping a Canadian billionaire to convince this despot to, you know, grant coveted uranium mining rights to Gustra's company, Eurasia Energy, and uranium is a key component for nuclear power.
	We get 20% of our total electrical power from there.
	Then anyway, this guy Gustra gives an astounding $31 million to the Clinton Foundation, pledges $100 million more.
	He ends up getting the Kazakh rights to uranium.
	Eurasia is able to expand their holdings.
	They get investors like Ian Teffler.
	Telfer, he ends up donating to the Clinton Foundation.
	Eurasia merges with Uranium One, a South African company, a $3.5 million deer.
	Teffler, Telfer becomes Uranium One's chairman, you know, and then the rights, the valuable mining rights to foreign entities, Eurasia, Uranium One, it ends up getting in the state control of Russia.
	And then they need the State Department to approve cable show and WikiLeaks shows.
	Uranium One officials wanted more than a statement from the U.S. media.
	They wanted Hillary Clinton's approval.
	And she jumped into action because a lot of the money was being backdoor to her foundation.
	This is a RICO statute, just like, you know, the State Department, just like the Quid Pro quo with the Moroccan appearance and money going back to the Clinton Foundation.
	And then it goes to the Clinton Foundation and exploiting Haiti earthquake relief money and creating a friends of bill and a Clinton Foundation donor list so they can capitalize on that.
	It is so deeply corrupt to get to the bottom of this is going to take years.
	Do you want an America that will not govern for the next however many years till she gets sent to jail?
	That's what this election's about.
	These Clinton emails, there's the emails, the emails, okay?
	Has anyone found any definitive proof that any foreign government has obtained these emails?
	Have they found any definitive proof that there's anything in it that imperils national security?
	You know, so I think the whole thing has been exaggerated from the start, but let me say this: Hillary Clinton has no one else to blame but herself.
	Why in the world did she do this incredibly stupid thing?
	Given that this investigation is going to go on for many months after the election, no matter who wins, no matter who wins, but if the Secretary of State wins, we will have a president under criminal investigation with Humada Aberdeen under investigation, the Secretary of State, the president-elect, shouldn't she win under investigation?
	Harris, under these circumstances, I am actively reassessing my support.
	I'm not a Trump.
	Whoa, whoa, whoa, wait a minute.
	Right.
	You're not going to vote for Hillary Clinton?
	Harris, I'm deeply concerned that we will have a constitutional crisis if she's elected.
	If Americans go to the polls and there's an open question as to whether she's under investigation, wouldn't that mean there's an open question as to whether she faces some punishment down the road?
	I guess technically, but look, I don't, I can't believe that the answer is, I just think this is this, these things have been blown out of proportion.
	I think the easiest way to do it is just release the emails.
	I'm sure a lot of you may be asking what this new email story is about and why in the world the FBI would decide to jump into an election with no evidence of any wrongdoing with just days to go.
	That's a good question.
	And first of all, for those of you who are concerned about my using personal email, I understand.
	And as I've said, I'm not making excuses.
	I've said it was a mistake and I regret it.
	And now they apparently want to look at emails of one of my staffers.
	And by all means, they should look at them.
	And I am sure they will reach the same conclusion they did when they looked at my emails for the last year.
	There is no case here.
	The only problem is a lot of those emails were missing.
	Hour two, Sean Hannity show, 800-941-Sean, our toll-free telephone number.
	You want to be a part of the program.
	I mean, to hear Tom Friedman, to hear Doug Schoen talk about a constitutional crisis and now thinking about withholding support for Hillary, knowing how bad this would be, what would a November 9th actually look like, God forbid, if in fact the American people don't see this for the crisis that it is?
	I mean, it's beyond scary what would really end up happening.
	Any hope of turning this country around would be gone.
	You know, why did they care so much about circumventing the law and putting up a private email server?
	Why did they delete them not with like a cloth, but with bleach bit and acid?
	What was it that they were trying to hide?
	How impactful is all of this to this Quid Pro quo and the Russian Uranium One deal that enriched so many and literally gave plutonium to the Russians in the end, and she helped facilitate all of that?
	Or the Morocco deal or the lists that were brought up for people to help rebuild Haiti, all friends of Bill, all Clinton Foundation donors?
	Why did only 55%, why did 55% of those that got to see Clinton when she was Secretary of State, why were they all donors?
	Did she use this as a private little slush fund?
	Was this a RICO operation where they enriched themselves because a lot of the people that got access and got the contracts and got the contacts that they offered ended up kicking more money back to the Clinton Foundation?
	I mean, this is beyond anything that we have ever seen.
	Why did Comey punt the first time when it's clear he admitted to Trey Gowdy two days later that laws were violated?
	Here to help sort this out with eight days to go as former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich.
	How are you, sir?
	Well, I'm doing well, but I don't think that there are any words that can explain the level of confusion that the American political system finds itself in on this particular Monday.
	I mean, when you're told that the computer they're looking at might have 650,000 emails, and remember that Hillary deleted 33,000 on her own, even after they've been subpoenaed.
	And now you have to say to yourself, gee, what if those 33,000 are there among the 650,000 emails?
	And you also realize that this almost certainly means either Huma Abedin committed perjury by telling the FBI there was not another device, or in one of the weirdest twists of this year, she really didn't understand the technology and didn't know it was sitting there.
	I mean, can you imagine if you're Hillary Clinton and somebody walks in and says to you on Friday, they're reopening the case because when they were tracking down the text to a 15-year-old girl in North Carolina by Anthony Weiner, it turned out that his wife's emails were on the same computer as the text of the 15-year-old girl.
	And oh, by the way, it turns out now that there are 650,000 of Huma's emails on that computer.
	I mean, if you're Hillary Clinton, you have to look at her and think, were you insane?
	I mean, if you knew you were doing it, you were putting emails on Anthony Weiner's computer.
	Now, yes, he's your husband, but he's also nuts.
	And now he's caught in an FBI case, which has nothing to do with the presidential campaign, but which is leading him back to the email case for the FBI.
	And now we discover, because all of a sudden the FBI is leaking like crazy, there are five different field offices that have been actively investigating the Clinton Foundation in terms of public corruption.
	Well, I didn't, I mean, you may have known it because you have such great sources, but I certainly did not know that until today.
	So you have the Clinton Foundation, which I've always thought was the center of corruption for them, has five different FBI field offices, all of whom have been investigating it without Comey saying a word.
	I mean, when he talked about the emails in July, he never mentioned these investigations.
	And now that's the only thing that's happening.
	He actually denied that.
	And Loretta Lynch, who apparently didn't want Comey to come forward with this information, which I think would have been dereliction of duty on his part.
	Look, the whole exchange with Trey Gowdy to me, you have our FBI director admitting that she's guilty of crimes.
	Remember the questions.
	They were very specific by Trey Gowdy, who himself, you know, remember, this is the guy that was a prosecutor that never lost a case.
	And when Trey Gowdy asked Comey, you know, she said there was nothing more classified on her email sent or received.
	Was that true?
	He says that's not true.
	This is the FBI director.
	When Cowdy asks him, Clinton said, I didn't email any classified material to anyone on my email.
	There was no classified material.
	Was that true?
	No, there was classified material.
	And he goes through a series of questions.
	Each one, each time he admits that Hillary Clinton has violated the law in a severe way.
	Why don't I ask you, why is this so important?
	And what would happen if, God forbid, we woke up November 9th and she was elected?
	Well, I mean, first of all, and I mentioned this to you the other day because I was so struck when Callista and I were out at the Nixon Library, which has a great new exhibit and really remarkably well done.
	But they start with Watergate because they know that they have to get that dealt with for people to even open their mind up to Richard Nixon.
	And you suddenly realize, here's a guy who in 1972 carries 49 states, gets over 60% of the vote, the highest number since FDR in 1936, higher than Reagan got in 1984.
	One and a half years later, he's resigned.
	He's out of office.
	And so you say to yourself, we could be on the edge of repeating that because between the five field offices that are investigating the foundation, the entire question of national security and how Hillary handled emails.
	And then remember, the thing that always gets you as it got Nixon and Watergate is all the cover-up.
	I mean, it's inconceivable by this stage that they don't have so many different perjury counts and obstruction of justice counts being added up here.
	I was on the show one, the radio show with you at one point with Rudy Giuliani, who had been a U.S. prosecuting attorney, and he was commenting that he thinks there are literally hundreds to thousands of counts of a potential indictment.
	And he agrees with Andy McCarthy, who was the attorney who was a deputy U.S. attorney, prosecuted the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
	And McCarthy has said flatly, this is a classic RICO case.
	This is an organized crime case.
	You have to see the entire Clinton operation as parallel to the Gambino family or some other organized crime family.
	And when you put them in that context and you see the swapping of official favors for money, the fact that they're laundering it through the foundation doesn't matter.
	The fact is the foundation was under their control.
	They profited from the foundation.
	It was a conduit for them to enrich themselves.
	And the memo that Doug Band wrote is just, it is a 12-page roadmap for a prosecutor to lay out the case because Doug himself, in trying to justify himself to Chelsea Clinton, is saying, look, here's how I'm making your parents rich.
	You ought to love me.
	Look at all the different things I'm doing to make your parents rich.
	And of course, he's outlining stuff that's illegal.
	There's so much here on any level.
	There's so many different crimes.
	Now, you mentioned Rudy.
	I think he's up to about 18 specific felonies that he has found.
	Look, some of them are very, very simple.
	I mean, you have 18 U.S. Code 201 bribery.
	You know, in other words, did they benefit financially from all of this?
	Then you've got, you know, 18 U.S.C. 208 acts affecting personal financial interests.
	Well, that could be the Uranium One deal.
	That could be the Moroccan deal.
	That could be the Haiti deal, any of which benefited them financially.
	Did they conspire to commit a crime just by the whole issue of the email?
	I mean, for example, you have, you know, wire fraud possibilities here.
	You have disclosure of confidential information.
	You have obstruction of justice.
	You have perjury.
	You have false statements.
	I mean, there's so much here that I think when you look at it, really the magnitude of charges that she will face on top of starting at the beginning, mishandling classified information, removal of classified information, each of which individual case represents a felony.
	Each time they've let me make this very clear for everybody who's listening to this.
	This is much, much bigger than Watergate.
	Watergate was one truly stupid crime breaking into the Democratic National Committee headquarters, and then everything that came out of that was the cover-up.
	But it was one specific act.
	It was a stupid act.
	It was an illegal act.
	And then everything that came out of it was a cover-up.
	This involves years of corruption by the Clintons.
	I mean, this is the largest corruption by senior American officials in the history of the country.
	There is nothing like this ever before.
	And of course, what we're going to find out that is absolutely fascinating, it sounds to me, and again, as a historian, I'm just trying to analyze this stuff as though it was in the archives and I was writing a book about it.
	It sounds to me as though, and she may not have understood the technology, but Huma Abidin may have actually archived every email she ever sent.
	It's very possible.
	You and I both send lots of emails, but to get up to 650,000 emails.
	It's ridiculous.
	I don't know how you get that high.
	And you're right.
	The volume of emails that are sent by me on any given day are just the volume is dramatic.
	And I just don't know how you get to that many.
	Now, if you go back the many years, it sounds like that all of them were archived and sent to this particular device.
	And that's what they found.
	And if that's the case, we're going to learn so much stuff because she was the closest person to Hillary.
	Oh, yeah.
	I mean, and we're going to see so many laws violated.
	I mean, so walk me through if she wins.
	What does that mean?
	Well, I thought this will never end, and this is part of what, and by the way, I thought it was very telling today that the White House came out and said, the president has complete confidence in Comey.
	They did not pick up on Harry Reid's comments.
	They did not pick up on the Clinton campaign.
	They came back and said, despite the fact that the Attorney General is mad at Comey, they came back and said, whatever Comey's doing, he's doing with integrity and authenticity.
	Well, that's a devastating blow to Hillary because it means that Obama is in the process of washing his hands and moving a big step back.
	Well, remember, Obama's also implicated in this.
	I mean, go to WikiLeaks.
	And again, that's a whole other issue because WikiLeaks have shed so much light on everything that's gone on here because it exposes the Moroccan deal.
	It gives us more insight into the plutonium deal.
	It gives us insight into the Clinton Foundation.
	It gives us insight into the access that people had, all of those things.
	So, you know, all of this matters on a pretty deep level.
	And I think it's going to keep growing over the next three or four days.
	And I think it becomes, I mean, people have to decide that they want Hillary Clinton enough that they're willing to risk two or three or four years of constant criminal investigations, congressional investigations, the potential of a president who's embattled before she's even sworn in.
	I mean, this is not going to go away in December or January.
	It's going to be there hanging over her head.
	The FBI is just now beginning to look at 650,000 emails.
	And as I said, I had no idea that we had five different field offices trying to look into the corruption of the Clinton Foundation.
	That's all going to come piling on.
	All right, Mr. Speaker, we'll see you tonight on Hannity.
	You're going to be with us all week.
	We're eight days away from Election Day.
	Thank you, sir.
	Love having you on, as always.
	All this email issue worse than Watergate.
	How is it worse than Watergate?
	He just sees that there's this constant cloud of corruption that follows Hillary Clinton around.
	And for the remarkable move 11 days before the election means there must be something there.
	I think it was a criminal conspiracy led by the president of the United States that had 48 people plead guilty.
	Well, but George, and if you look at what's happened with Hillary Clinton and two FBI investigations this year, what Jim Comey did in July, on July 5th, he said, we declined to prosecute her.
	And then he went on to give us all the list of reasons he said.
	He didn't say that.
	The prosecution said no reasonable person.
	That's right.
	He said that.
	And then he, as a reasonable person, went through the whole list on July 5th in his very public statement of how reckless and careless she was.
	And then two days later, under oath in front of Congress, Jim Comey went through the whole list of contradictions of Hillary Clinton's own words.
	There was not just one device.
	There were 13.
	She did, in fact, exchange classified national security information.
	So he undercut his own premise, and he certainly undercut what Secretary Clinton have had.
	But look, I think for the voters at this stage, this plays right into their reluctance about Hillary Clinton anyway.
	In your own ABC polling where the race is virtually tied, a third of likely voters say that this will make them less likely to vote for Hillary Clinton.
	So there is political currency attached to this.
	I would also remark in your poll, something that is truly incredible.
	Whereas Mitt Romney lost to Barack Obama on the attribute of who cares more about people like you, 82 to 18, Trump and Clinton are tied.
	She's not seen as empathetic and compassionate.
	And I think issues like this where people are reminded that she has put the national security at risk just for her peevish personal reasons is very troubling for her.
	Josh, in the same way that I'll neither criticize nor defend Director Comey's decisions about what to make public in the context of this investigation, that's because I just don't have independent knowledge of the decisions that are made to release this information.
	And there are other people that have the luxury of being able to opine, writing op-eds, or serving as anonymous sources for reporters to weigh in with their own view.
	But when I'm standing here representing the institution of the presidency, I don't have that luxury.
	And so, you know, in the same way that I'll neither defend nor criticize Director Comey's decisions with regard to what to make public in the context of this investigation, I don't have any recommendations to make to him either with regard to what information should be communicated to the public.
	All right, first, that was Kelly Ann Conway, Donald Trump's campaign manager, on one of the many Sunday shows she appeared on this weekend.
	And Josh Ernest saying he's not going to either praise or criticize Comey, although the Clinton campaign is now deeply going full pen star on James Comey, as are most Democrats, the very person they praised.
	He's beyond reproach in any way.
	Just back in July, interesting how there's been a dramatic shift there, Kellyanne Conway, Donald Trump's campaign manager, joins us now.
	Boy, how many shows did you do on Sunday?
	Oh, hi, Sean.
	Probably about five.
	And then we did a big Facebook Live that we posted right after Mr. Trump's rally, which has a lot of unique hits.
	And Governor Pence was out there on the Hustings as well.
	I think Chairman Priebus were really just doing a surround sound.
	What struck me about the Sunday shows this week, Sean, is how ill-prepared and off-message the Democrats really were.
	They're just not used to what we're used to over here at Crisis Communication Central, the Trump campaign.
	They're not used to all the slings and arrows and being held to account and just not having a pleasant, friendly conversation with the mainstream media on the Sunday shows.
	So I think they're incredibly off-message.
	Josh Ernest, the White House press secretary today, said, quote, I'll neither criticize nor defend Comey.
	And then he went on to say, the president, President Obama does not think Comey is interfering with the election.
	Wow.
	I think President Obama needs to call Harry Reid and Hillary Clinton and Robbie Mook and John Podesta.
	They all said that it's unprecedented.
	A bunch of congressmen out there attacking Jim Comey, that he's interfering with an election.
	First of all, this is not about Jim Comey.
	He and you and I and Donald Trump, we did not put a homebrewed private server in our private residence to try to hide secrets and compromise national security information from the rest of the world.
	She did that.
	She's for account.
	And the Democrats own her.
	They took a risk by nominating somebody who's unfit and unqualified to be president.
	They cleared the field for her and they're stuck with her now.
	And let's start asking her how she's going to affect down ballot Democrats.
	I think she's a disaster and we're going to win.
	All right, I'm going to get to the specifics of that path to victory that you see in just a second.
	But, you know, I think you do raise a good point because they've now gone full Ken star on James Comey.
	And these are the same people back in July that were saying this.
	There was an extensive, as you know, Brad, investigation by the FBI under the direction of a wonderful and tough career public servant, Jim Comey.
	This is a great man.
	We are very privileged in our country to have him be the director of the FBI.
	No one can question the integrity, the competence.
	And he's somebody with the highest standards of integrity.
	I'm going to continue to be scrupulous about not commenting on it just because I think Director Comey could not have been more exhaustive, amazingly.
	Some Republicans who were praising you just days ago for your independence, for your integrity.
	Despite your impeccable reputation for independence and integrity.
	And your honesty instantly turned against you because your recommendation conflicted with the predetermined outcome they wanted.
	Republicans have turned on you with a vengeance.
	If you indict Comey's integrity, then you are making a big mistake.
	Director Comey, whose reputation for independence and integrity is unquestioned.
	But why is it before that decision came out?
	Everybody loved James Comey.
	He was unified.
	They didn't lay a glove or a finger on James Comey, and he walked out of that room with his integrity and honor intact.
	The FBI director is a career public servant.
	He served this country with honor.
	Jim Comey is widely respected as a guy of integrity.
	They have attacked you personally.
	They have attacked your integrity.
	I honor your professionalism and your service to our country.
	Given the depth of that investigation and his own credibility, I think his conclusion probably gets it right.
	Does Secretary Clinton and Senator Kaine still believe those things about Jim Comey?
	You know, it's pretty amazing to watch what is unfolding now.
	For most people, they don't even understand that they had to get a court order last night to actually begin the process of looking through what now it is reported to be 650,000 emails.
	So it's not like James Comey can put every FBI official he has on this case for the next five days and report back to the American people.
	Well, that's right, Sean.
	And by the way, why do we as taxpayers want those types of resources diverted just to mollify Hillary Clinton?
	Can we stop also calling this a Comey problem or an email server problem?
	It is a pay-for-play corruption problem.
	Let's not go off on all these rabbit holes the Democrats want us to go that it's Jim Comey's fault, that it's that it's the email server's fault, that it is Hillary Clinton's fault.
	We would not be having this conversation but for her very selfish Hillary First ways, whether she's defending 12-year-old Kathy Shelton's rapist in the 1970s and then laughing about the techniques that got her off, or it's the way she cleared the field for the U.S. Senate because she just felt like doing that in 2000 in New York, moving to New York, and whether it's her lying to the families of Benghazi, telling them one thing, telling her daughter and other officials another, and whether it's just having this private email server, which was unprecedented.
	And it turns out we know from WikiLeaks last week, President Obama discovered that she had a private email when he received an email from her and he was asking around, is this a private email she's using?
	And so this woman has had a pattern of Hillary First, and it's about time people recognize this is about pay-for-play corruption.
	It's no different than the $28 million the Clinton Foundation got from Morocco.
	It's a very important thing.
	Well, that's the whole Russian speech.
	That's the whole uranium deal.
	That's the whole Russia One deal.
	That's the whole Haiti relief deal.
	That's the whole Morocco deal, all of it, because it all results in money going back to the Clinton Foundation.
	That puts the emphasis on her time as tenure as Secretary of State that 55% of individuals that got to see her were only donors.
	Let me look at the electoral map with you.
	And as you know better than anybody, all your years doing polling and all the years that I've known you, it's always very hard.
	It's a razor's edge.
	It's a scenario.
	Republicans seemingly always have to run the table.
	If Donald Trump wins every state that Mitt Romney won in 2012, and then we add Iowa and we add Ohio and we add Florida and we keep North Carolina, we are still five electoral votes short of 270.
	Now, let's assume he gets the second congressional district in Maine.
	He's been up there many times.
	Where do the other four electoral votes come from?
	The other four, Sean, come from New Hampshire on the nose, or Nevada, or New Mexico, or Colorado, and or Pennsylvania.
	I mean, we feel everybody says, oh, Pennsylvania is always the big dream for Republicans.
	But Donald Trump's message plays in Pennsylvania, creating jobs over the next 25 million jobs over the next 10 years, renegotiating these bad trade deals.
	And, of course, his big message of last week, which is why the polls were tightening even before FBI Director Comey's announcement on Friday, is because Donald Trump's out there talking about Obamacare.
	And you and I know that Obamacare and its predecessor, Hillary Care, are the gifts that keep on giving for Republicans because it's the best example we have of how intrusive, invasive, expensive, and expansive the federal government has become in our lives.
	In Pennsylvania, they're facing 53% increase in premiums.
	Folks are getting whacked with that now when they open up their mailboxes and fire up their computers.
	And he's going to go, you know, he and Pence will keep going to Pennsylvania and driving home this messages.
	I will be in Pennsylvania tomorrow with Governor Pence and Donald Trump.
	They'll talk about Obamacare.
	And then they're each separating to do other rallies.
	And then on Thursday, I'll be there with Melania Trump for a big speech.
	So we feel very bullish about Pennsylvania.
	We know the Democrats are worried about Pennsylvania.
	They had Bill Clinton camping out there on Friday.
	Hillary and Kane have been there a lot.
	They just went up in the air paying a lot of money for ads in Wisconsin.
	They're sending her back to other states that are supposed to be truly blue.
	And they've just got the blue state blues now because this past weekend, I tell you, when the returns come in this past weekend was a big weekend for early voting.
	And Saturday and Sunday and even Friday night after work, those followed Comey's explosive revelations that there's more.
	How dramatic did you see an impact?
	How dramatic was the impact after the announcement?
	We see a few points here and there.
	You know, the ABC poll I thought was most telling.
	The ABC News poll, which had a plus 10 over Democrat over Republican sample, showed 35% of likely voters, Sean, said that they would be less likely to vote for Hillary Clinton because of the new FBI investigation.
	I mean, even if that calms down to half that number, it's huge because this close to the end when people are actively voting and when you know Hillary Clinton has no plan B, they've been waiting out the clock for, God, eight years, if not eight weeks.
	There's no plan B. There's no resilience.
	Are you prepared?
	I said to a friend of mine, by the end of the week, Donald Trump is going to be a axe murderer.
	He's going to be a drug dealer.
	He's going to be, I mean, who knows what the Clintons are capable of.
	They will come up with the most outrageous attacks and put something forward.
	Are you ready for that?
	We're ready for that.
	I mean, we're accustomed to that.
	We're the Trump campaign.
	We have Anthony Trump in our heads.
	It is a little loud.
	You're used to putting out a couple of fires in your day.
	There you go.
	There you go.
	We feel like it's the Edward Scissors hands of insults and crises over here sometimes.
	And look what's happened.
	Americans love the American spirit of resilience and nimbleness and steadfastness.
	And that is Donald J. Trump.
	And Hillary Clinton, the moment something like this happens, what is their first instinct to crouch down and shoot the messenger, attack Jim Comey as if it's not her, if it's not a pay-for-play corruption part.
	868.
	By the way, as if it doesn't all stem from pedophilia Anthony Weiner sexting his pictures of himself to a 15-year-old girl.
	If he had sexted my 15-year-old daughter, I'd be like a household name in this country.
	And I read in the New York Times the other day, Sean, something that was quite remarkable to me.
	I read it on Saturday night.
	Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton have never publicly condemned Anthony Weiner.
	If that's actually true, as the New York Times reported, it that itself is remarkable.
	They imbued immediately veracity, immediate veracity and credibility to these false accusers, and yet they've never condemned what they know to be true about Anthony Weiner.
	I mean, that's really telling.
	That tells you something about the Hillary-Huma relationship, and it tells you something about how these people can simply not be in charge of forming our next government.
	If God forbid we wake up a week from this Wednesday and she were elected president, this country would immediately be facing a constitutional crisis of historic magnitude.
	And I don't think there's any doubt about that.
	And that would mean all government operations, for the most part, would then stop at a time we need to fix the economy, fix Obamacare, control our borders, vet refugees.
	You know, all of these important issues would be back burner as she would go into full defense mode, divide the country even further than it is now, and there would be more legal wranglings than I think we ever saw in the history of this country.
	It would be that big a disaster.
	So, all right, Kellyanne, I know you're tired.
	I know our audience likes to hear directly from you.
	And I thought you did a great job on the Sunday shows.
	Man, it is November 9th.
	I have some unfinished business, and a big part of it is how corrupt, how the collusion between the news media has been unprecedented.
	I just don't have time now to get to everything I want to, but I think winning this election is a lot of fun.
	It's pretty stunning, but I think the American public knows that.
	Did you see the poll today that people believe by a 10-to-1 margin that the media want Clinton to win?
	And if you want them, you know, if you've got that home team jersey on every single day and you're showing your fandom, particularly this time, I think people are onto it.
	There's a huge backlash now against the elite, which includes the media of telling people what to do and how to think.
	I hope you stay in Nevada.
	I hope you stay in New Mexico, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, and even Virginia.
	I think anything's in play right now.
	All right, Kellyanne, thank you.
	Keep them hopping.
	Take care, Darling.
	800-941-Sean Tolfrey, telephone number.
	You want to be a part of this program.
	How's this all going to impact Congress?
	Congressman Louis Gomert weighs in, and we'll check in with Ann Coulter the next hour.
	There was an extensive, as you know, Brad, investigation by the FBI under the direction of a wonderful and tough career public servant, Jim Comey.
	This is a great man.
	We are very privileged in our country to have him be the director of the FBI.
	No one can question the integrity, the competence.
	And he's somebody with the highest standards of integrity.
	I'm going to continue to be scrupulous about not commenting on it just because I think Director Comey could not have been more exhaustive, amazingly.
	Some Republicans who were praising you just days ago for your independence, for your integrity.
	Despite your impeccable reputation for independence and integrity.
	And your honesty instantly turned against you because your recommendation conflicted with the predetermined outcome they wanted.
	Republicans have turned on you with a vengeance.
	If you indict Comey's integrity, then you are making a big mistake.
	Director Comey, whose reputation for independence and integrity is unquestioned.
	But why was that before that decision came out?
	Everybody loved James Comey.
	He was beautiful.
	They didn't lay a glove or a finger on James Comey, and he walked out of that room with his integrity and honor intact.
	The SBI director is a career public servant.
	He served this country with honor.
	Jim Comey is widely respected as a guy of integrity.
	They have attacked you personally.
	They have attacked your integrity.
	I honor your professionalism and your service to our country.
	Given the depth of that investigation and his own credibility, I think his conclusion probably gets it right.
	Does Secretary Clinton and Senator Kaine still believe those things about Jim Comey?
	Outcharging news roundup and information overload hour.
	Toll-free our telephone numbers, 800-941-Sean, you want to be a part of this extravaganza and this program.
	You know, a lot of people forget, well, in July, Democrats love James Comey.
	They absolutely loved him.
	Now, the reason that people like me were out there saying the things that we were saying is because, you know, when James Comey, just a day or two later, went before the House and started talking to the House leadership and started describing everything that he knew, we're like, hold on here a second.
	This isn't good.
	I mean, I think this will go down as a classic.
	I won't play it now, but you know, Secretary Clinton said there was nothing mark classified on her emails, either sent or received.
	Comey, that's not true.
	There were emails that were mark classified.
	Senator Clinton said, I didn't email any classified information to anybody.
	Comey said there was classified email.
	There was classified material emailed.
	Senator Clinton said she used one device.
	Is that true?
	She used multiple devices during her term as Secretary of State.
	She said all work-related emails were returned to the State Department.
	Was that true?
	No.
	We found work-related emails, thousands that were not returned, which, by the way, in and of itself is a crime.
	Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive.
	Did her lawyers read the email content individually?
	No, they didn't do it.
	It is one big line.
	Now, why does all of this matter?
	Which is what I keep getting back to in the course of discussing this.
	You know, I guess these Russian hackers, as I said, were better than we thought.
	You know, they got Clinton's emails and put them on Uma's laptop and pinned it on Anthony Weiner.
	And by the way, I can't see any emails about yoga, none whatsoever, or a wedding or a funeral.
	They've yet to produce any one of those.
	As who was this?
	Ruth King, writing on National Review, you know, points out felony handling of classified information, including our nation's most closely guarded intelligence secrets.
	You know, these are all crimes.
	Knowingly mishandling information, removing classified information, putting them on other devices.
	Each and every one of these represents a felony charge, every single one of them.
	And the Justice Department, you know, they found all these creative ways not to charge her when, in fact, anybody else would have been charged with multiple felonies and probably been in jail already.
	Now, one of the things you have to look at, well, what are they, you know, what were the Clintons doing here?
	And this is where we get into the Clinton, Gambino, Bonano, Lucchese crime family.
	And that is because this is a RICO Act, and that is the Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act.
	It doesn't matter that this is a foundation.
	The issue here was: did they monetize Hillary's power as Secretary of State?
	Did they exchange political favors?
	Did they exchange access and influence for millions of dollars in donations?
	The answer to the question is yes.
	Did they circumvent campaign finance laws that prohibit political donations by foreign sources?
	Yes.
	You know, was the State Department, was this a vehicle, you know, to shield her?
	Communications, did this whole separate email, what was it designed for?
	This is why when we discovered Loretta Lynch didn't want to go into any discussion about the Clinton Foundation, this is obscene because the whole purpose of it was designed to prevent the public and congressional oversight, also a violation of law.
	It was also a means for Clinton insiders to get private sector compensation.
	John Podesta and company and explore lucrative employment opportunities.
	This is why 55% when the AP reported of those individual citizens that saw Hillary as Secretary of State, why they were all donors or had pledged money to the Clinton Foundation mattered.
	That's why when the Haiti Relief Fund went up and they created a separate list, friends of Bill and Clinton Foundation donors so that they could cash in on the contracts to rebuild Haiti, which, by the way, the money never got there anyway.
	And then they would then funnel more money back to the Clintons.
	You know, it goes to the heart of Peter Schweitzer's description of what happened in the uranium deal.
	You know, you got this guy, you know, uranium, of course, a key component of nuclear power, in which the United States derives 20% of its total electrical power.
	And Bill Clinton helped his Canadian billionaire pal, Frank Gistra, to convince the ruling despot in Kakistan to literally convince him to work this uranium rights deal.
	And in the end, what happened is Gustra gives an astonishing $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation, pledged $100 million more.
	And then he gets the rights secured for the uranium from Kazakh.
	Eurasia was founded.
	They were able to expand their holdings.
	They attracted new investors like Ian Telfer.
	He donated $2.35 to the Clinton Foundation.
	Your Asia merges with Uranium One, a South African company, a $3.5 billion deal.
	Teffler becoming Uranium One's chairman.
	The new company proceeds to buy up major uranium assets here in the United States.
	Well, now this impacts our own national security issues.
	Anyway, uranium stock begins to fall.
	Uranium One then turns to Secretary Clinton's office for help.
	And as Wikileaks points out, Uranium One officials wanted more than a U.S. statement to the media.
	They pressed for written confirmation that the mining rights were valid.
	And Secretary Clinton's State Department leapt into action.
	An energy officer from the U.S. Embassy held meetings with the Kazakh regime.
	A few days later, it's announced that Russia's particular uranium company purchased 17% of uranium one.
	That means the Russians now have access to our own uranium, an enemy of the United States.
	Except it became a bigger problem when the Russian company sought to acquire a controlling interest in uranium-1.
	And that would mean a takeover not only of the Kazakh mines, but also U.S. uranium assets.
	All because Hillary Clinton wanted all of those donations to go straight to the Clinton Foundation.
	And it goes on from there.
	Is Ann Coulter here with us?
	I thought, why are you so late?
	What happened to you?
	I was originally going to be in studio about 10 minutes from now, I believe.
	And I was listening to, waiting to, waiting for what was originally a few minutes later.
	I was listening to Peter Thiel's amazing speech.
	Yeah, that was an amazing speech earlier today.
	You got to watch that.
	I was tweeting it out today, and it's really good, and it's really important.
	I mean, it's a strange thing what's going on.
	Sean, whatever happens in this election, and I do still think Trump is going to win, the media has got to be held accountable.
	This is no, you know, oh, we'll play nice.
	No, they have really exposed themselves.
	They're like, you know, they're like hitman.
	Well, they've been go into the witness protection program and after 20 years decide to use their own names, run for Congress or something.
	Okay, that's what the media has done this year.
	They're using their own name this year.
	And we've seen who they really are.
	It's unbelievable, the hysteria.
	And when you look at somebody like Donald Trump, there's nothing frightening about him to an independent, to a Democrat, even to a liberal, even to a Bernie Sanders supporter.
	He's not having religious ecstasies on stage.
	Yeah, he's pro-life, but he praises the other things Planned Parenthood does.
	Bernie Sanders agrees with him on Trans-Pacific Partnership, which is absolutely going through if Hillary is elected with the connivance of Paul Ryan.
	And Bernie Sanders used to agree with him on open borders.
	Who does that hurt?
	It hurts the American working class.
	Just last year, Bernie Sanders sneered at open borders, saying, yeah, that's a Koch brothers idea.
	This is the new two parties are not Republican against Democrat.
	It is the party of the American people against the ruling class, the UNA party, the Democrats and the Republicans who are against all of us.
	Let me ask you this question.
	I keep going through polls.
	I keep going through numbers.
	I keep scouring the electoral message.
	Don't waste your time.
	Well, no one will know.
	Well, the problem is this, though.
	There is an inherent advantage for the Democrats in any election cycle.
	And I keep going through and going through and going through.
	And unless Donald Trump takes one of the following states, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, New Mexico.
	And again, he's holding all of Romney's states, and he's getting Iowa, and he's going to take Florida, and he's going to take Ohio and North Carolina.
	Now, if he does all of that, he still needs either New Hampshire, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin.
	You're double counting New Hampshire.
	What's that?
	You're double counting New Hampshire.
	I know, because I want New Hampshire badly.
	The point, look, the only thing I'd say about this, well, no one will know.
	The way, and the reason, this is a very important point you're making.
	The reason Democrats start with this advantage is they've been rigging the election since Teddy Kennedy's 1965 Immigration Act.
	That is how they have rigged the election.
	They have dumped 40 million Democratic voters on the country.
	They have no more right to do that than the Republicans did.
	But that's what they've done through our immigration policy, which is why for 20 years, it's been like shouting the N-word to dare speak about our immigration policies, as you know, since I've been trying to for the last decade, and you see what's happened to me.
	It's all about immigration.
	Post-1970 immigrants, not only that come from vastly different regions of the world, the most different cultures you could imagine, nothing like pre-1970 immigration, are poverty stricken, need lots of government assistance that U.S. taxpayers have to pay for.
	But ha ha, they're voting eight to two for the Democrats.
	And that's why the Democrats changed their mind about caring about the working class whose jobs are being taken.
	They changed their mind about caring about black people whose jobs are expressly being taken.
	I mean, look at the black unemployment rate, and especially for teenage black kids in the inner city.
	You wonder where all these Fergusons and Baltimores are coming from.
	They're all unemployed.
	They're going to have lots of employment under Donald Trump.
	The Democrats gave up on it.
	They don't care about the working class anymore.
	All they care about is the voters.
	That's how they flipped California.
	Look at California.
	How did Reagan win?
	How did Nixon win?
	They took California.
	Thanks to immigration, Republicans will never win a statewide seat in California again.
	In fact, Daryl Issa, I just heard, and who knows it's MSNBC, but on MSNBC or CNN 102, I heard them saying he's in a tight race.
	Daryl Issa, of all people, slowly states just fall to the Democrats.
	And I just want to make this point.
	This is not because Democrats have made clever arguments and they've convinced the American people.
	They've gotten people to switch their votes.
	I'm no longer a Republican.
	Now I'm a Democrat.
	That has not happened.
	If anything, you have more American Democrats becoming Republicans.
	The Democrats brought in new voters, and that's what this election is about.
	We're going to find out, as I say at the end of chapter one of In Trump We Trust, I just want to know, is it already over?
	Because I want to stop wasting my time caring about politics.
	If Democrats have successfully changed the country so much that no Republican can win, we're going to find out this year, and at least we'll know.
	You say this is it.
	This is the litmus test.
	Either Donald Trump wins or it's over.
	A Republican will never be president again.
	Oh, absolutely.
	I mean, I thought that, as you know, I was deeply depressed the night Mitt Romney lost.
	I thought, wow, this is it.
	Teddy Kennedy won.
	I think I wrote a column saying that.
	But it must be said, once he won the nomination, thanks to his crack campaign advisor, Stuart Stevens, Romney never mentioned immigration again.
	He stopped talking about China's currency manipulation.
	That wasn't the big, it wasn't about trade anymore.
	He had run, his issues were very subtly more like Trumpian issues during the primary.
	That's a large part of the reason he won the primary.
	It's 100% of the reason why I supported him in the primary.
	But he didn't really know what to do.
	I have to go during the general wait.
	Do you think she'd be impeached?
	Do you think she gets away with this?
	Last question, real quick.
	If she wins, I won't even know that she's president.
	I'm building the bunker and hiring the cheap labor.
	It will be over.
	There will be no point in caring.
	I mean, the rest of you can keep talking about politics, but it's just going to be a slow decline until America becomes some combo platter of Afghanistan and Guatemala.
	All right.
	And Coulter, thanks for being with us.
	How will this impact Congress?
	All right.
	We always love having you.
	Thank you.
	800-941, Sean.
	You want to be a part of the program?
	Louis Gomert at the bottom of the hour.
	If November 9th you wake up and Hillary is the president, what does that mean for Congress?
	How bad would this constitutional crisis be?
	We'll get to that.
	Have you or any of your advisors heard from Comey or anyone else at the FBI today?
	And are you concerned at all that these new emails that they say they've found will in any way reveal classified information that you sent or received?
	No, we have not been contacted by anyone.
	First we knew about it is, I assume, when you knew about it, when this letter sent to Republican members of the House was released.
	So we don't know the facts, which is why we are calling on the FBI to release all the information that it has.
	Even Director Comey noted that this new information may not be significant.
	So let's get it out.
	But you've seen his mother.
	You've seen, I mean, the horror that people are going through.
	And then we allow Hillary Clinton to do what she did, and there's no retribution.
	And then people are complaining because they're a little bit surprised that this came up.
	But honestly, this whole thing should have been over with a year ago.
	She is so guilty.
	This should have come up a long time ago.
	But now the evidence, as I would imagine, is so overwhelming because they wouldn't have done this unless it was overwhelming.
	And despite that, if the reports are correct, despite that, the Attorney General didn't want anything to happen to Hillary.
	I wonder why.
	It's very sad.
	Folks, we're living in a third world country.
	This has never happened before.
	This has never happened before.
	This is the lowest point in terms of our judicial system.
	This is the lowest point in the history of our country.
	Remember that.
	All right, 25 now till the top of the hour.
	Glad you are with us.
	800-941, Sean, toll-free telephone number.
	As we've been discussing, a big part of the day here today, imagine November 9th, God forbid, Hillary Clinton wins.
	And with all the information, remember, the reason the FBI could not even begin to release any of the information as is being requested by Hillary.
	Number one, she's the one that deleted all the emails, which she shouldn't have done.
	She is the one that broke the law and didn't secure the emails.
	She's the one that decided she wanted to obfuscate the law or shrink away from the law vis-a-vis via an off-site, unprotected email server.
	And by the way, mishandling of classified information is in and of itself a crime.
	Not securing it is in and of itself a crime.
	And anybody else would have probably been in jail already.
	And it raises a whole lot of questions.
	You know, Bill Clinton probably wouldn't have been elected president without an 11th hour indictment.
	You may remember Ran Contra, independent counsel, filing a politically charged indictment four days before the 92 election.
	That impacted this.
	It took until late last night until investigators obtained the warrant to search Uma Abedeen's emails.
	The FBI apparently found 650,000 of them.
	And why did the Department of Justice try to block all of this?
	And Hillary, you know, she only has herself to blame.
	They're not about yoga.
	They're not about a wedding, and they're not about a funeral.
	So add to that, Uma Abedeen, she leaves the State Department.
	She had to file a form called an OF-109 form.
	The form is a separation agreement that states simply that people understand when they leave government, they're maintaining no classified information.
	And she could say all she wants.
	I have no idea how they got there, but they were there.
	And that means they weren't protected, just like Hillary Clinton didn't protect it.
	And Uma swore under oath she gave up all her devices and State Department emails.
	And Clinton can say this is strange all she wants.
	The only thing that was strange is everything that Hillary Clinton admitted or that James Comey admitted to Trey Gowdy that she had committed crimes and they did nothing about it.
	And why is the Attorney General disagreeing with the FBI director?
	And why is the Attorney General pleading the fifth on the secret Iranian ransom payment deal?
	And why did James Comey feel a compulsion at this late hour to move forward?
	Anyway, even Carl Bernstein said the FBI wouldn't revisit this email probe unless new documents contained a real bombshell.
	There's no doubt it's coming.
	It's just a matter of when.
	And you see, the Clinton camp is back in full Ken Star mode, attacking the FBI director, the guy they love back in July, rebooting the vast right-wing conspiracy playbook.
	And, you know, we need questions and we need answers to a lot of these issues.
	Anyway, joining us now, telling us from a congressional perspective, what would November 9th be like if, God forbid, Hillary is elected?
	To me, it would be the country goes to a standstill because the investigations will likely take years, very, very likely leading to impeachment, very likely leading to the most divisive time in American history.
	Louis Gormer, Congressman, how are you, sir?
	Great to be with you.
	As far as I know, I'm fine.
	And you put your finger on it.
	I mean, we would really have a constitutional crisis because we've never had anyone under this type of investigation at the time of the election.
	And Sean, as you were alluding to, there's nobody to blame but Hillary.
	I mean, some of the Democrats themselves were urging her two years ago.
	Let's get this stuff on out there now, 18 months ago.
	Let's get ahead of this.
	Let's get this out.
	And it was her calculation.
	Let's drag it out.
	And how incredible the gall of Hillary when they find all of these emails on Anthony Weiner's laptop that apparently, from what we're told, was sharing with Huma.
	But for Hillary to demand, I demand to know what the emails are that you found.
	What she doesn't say that she's thinking, I thought I destroyed all of those.
	We used hammers and destroyed the phones.
	We used bleach bit.
	We thought we'd gotten rid of everything.
	So tell me, I demand to know what you found of all the things I thought I had destroyed.
	I mean, that really takes gold.
	What would Congress's constitutional role be in all of this?
	I mean, assuming here, if God forbid she got elected, I agree with you.
	This would be a constitutional crisis because we already know just through Trey Gowdy's grilling of James Comey that laws were broken, that she mishandled secretive information, top secret information, even the most sensitive information.
	That's a crime.
	So does Congress not have a constitutional obligation at that point to step in if she was elected?
	And what would you do?
	The courts have made clear that Congress does not have the authority. to appoint a special prosecutor ourselves.
	And in fact, I've been working on this for some time and getting help from, I mean, even though I was a prosecutor and judge and chief justice, I looked to people that deal with the constitutional fights all the time, and the cases are clear.
	Congress can't appoint a special prosecutor.
	That is an executive function.
	But the bill that we've been working on, and then Blake Farenthal from Texas got involved.
	He was concerned about it.
	We've got a bill now.
	I still haven't filed it because we're trying to get it right.
	But since judges every day appoint defense attorneys to defend, well, they ought to be able to also appoint prosecutors.
	So in our bill, the three senior judges of the D.C. Circuit on petition would have the power to appoint a special prosecutor and then Congress would pay for it.
	So that's something we're working on.
	But in the meantime, since we don't have that, and this administration, unlike the Nixon administration and the Clinton administration, and even though the conflicts of interest have been extremely dramatic, they've said no special prosecutor, no special prosecutor.
	And clearly, we should have had one.
	This should have gone before a grand jury last July.
	Comey should not have held on to it.
	And I know there was op-ed in the New York Times and Harry Reid, you know, our good friend Harry Reid saying he thinks it's a violation of the Hatch Act for Comey to do what he's done.
	Actually, Sean, I think it would be a violation of the Hatch Act for him to have led the American people to believe that there's really nothing that a reasonable prosecutor would pursue.
	And then they find out about all these massive number of emails that may include the 33,000 or so that we were told were destroyed.
	And then he leaves America with the impression that there still is nothing.
	I think that would violate the Hatch Act.
	He would truly be using his position to manipulate the election.
	I think the least he should have done is come out and say, okay, we finally, we had to reopen.
	We don't have a choice.
	There's just too much here to ignore.
	Let me ask, assuming you hold on to the House, there's an AP article out today.
	Its headline is House Speaker Ryan, pressured by conservatives and Trump backers.
	It starts out by saying, Speaker Paul Ryan, under fire from fellow Republicans, upset with his messy political divorce from Donald Trump, with some threatening an effort to oust him.
	So far, the rumblings are limited, and no one has advanced a potential replacement, nearly as respected among colleagues as the Wisconsin Republican.
	That suggests an uphill path to deposing Ryan, who was his party's 2012 vice presidential nominee and could harbor White House ambitions.
	Do you see, are you hearing rumblings that he has been unhelpful, to say the least, in this effort for Donald Trump?
	Well, there were some people that got very upset when our leadership was saying, hey, it's going to be so important that we hold the House so that we can hold President Hillary Clinton accountable.
	So we've got to just quit worrying about the presidential race.
	Let's save the majority.
	And the point that I made to all the House Republicans was, we haven't held anybody accountable.
	We couldn't even get an impeachment vote, get anything done on Eric Holder.
	For heaven's sake, Koskin is so clear that he had lied to Congress, obstructed.
	We haven't held anybody accountable.
	So if Hillary Clinton's elected, I'm not sure that our current leadership would be interested in truly holding him accountable.
	We would be told, as Boehner used to say, well, you know, this is the first black president, so let's don't say anything critical about him.
	Well, you and I are in the same boat.
	We don't care what somebody's race is.
	Boehner had told us, don't ever criticize the first female speaker of the House.
	I don't care what her gender is.
	If she's hurting my country, do the same way.
	We don't care what the gender of the race is.
	We're going to stand up and call them out.
	But that's not what's happened.
	And I'm afraid that there are some devastating days ahead if Americans don't wake up and vote her out.
	Now, I know you don't talk like was in the tape that was played.
	And I would prefer to have had somebody that grew up as a fine, upstanding Christian guy, never used foul language.
	But I do have to say that if you go back to 1940, six countries, I believe five or six, had surrendered.
	They had just had the massive evacuation from Dunkirk back to England.
	And a new prime minister named Churchill was expected to make a speech and say, we've got to surrender.
	Churchill was foul-mouthed.
	And unlike Trump, he drank too much.
	He was often drunk.
	So he had drunkard, foul-mouthed.
	And that foul-mouthed drunkard saved Western civilization.
	Instead of saying we've got to work out terms for a surrender to the Germans, that's when he gave his powerful, we will fight them in the air.
	We'll fight them on the line.
	We'll fight them in the fight of the hills.
	Well, Sean, that's a good idea.
	But he saved civilization.
	Sorry, go ahead.
	That sounds really good, Sean.
	But that's my point.
	And oh, and then we have some of our friends who say, well, you know, the concern I have is Trump could turn into a dictator.
	Look, I've been in the House now for over 11 years, and I can tell you what, in my lifetime, no Republican will ever be a dictator because unlike the Democrats, Republicans will stand up to Republicans.
	We call them out just like Goldwater went up to Nixon at the White House and said, time to go.
	We're not defending you.
	You need to go.
	And just like when I called the White House and said, our Attorney General has got to go.
	He was a Republican, but there was abuses by the FBI.
	He had to go.
	Democrat, it doesn't matter how bad it is.
	They will circle the wagons and protect.
	Only a Democrat will have a chance possibly to be a dictator.
	It will never be Donald Trump.
	We'd stand up to him.
	All right, Louie Gomert, I got a role.
	I know you.
	I appreciate it.
	I love you, my brother.
	His challenge is to get to 270.
	We've got people out to realize how serious this is.
	He needs to hold Nevada, Arizona.
	He needs to pick up New Mexico, New Hampshire.
	I think they're going to make a play in Virginia, Wisconsin, and all these other states.
	He was in Michigan earlier today.
	All right.
	Thank you, Congressman Louie Gomeard, who's also re-election and one of the good guys.
	Texas is not in play.
	I understand.
	No, I don't.
	If it is, we're in trouble.
	Anyway, thank you, sir.
	God bless you.

▲