Sean covers the latest news that the polls are showing Donald Trump losing badly. "I'm going with my head and not my heart," said Sean, "Scientifically, if you go by the polls, Donald Trump is going to lose." Newt Gingrich, however, thinks this is going to be a Brexit year. The Sean Hannity Show is live Monday through Friday from 3pm - 6pm ET on iHeart Radio and Hannity.com. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
You are listening to the Sean Hannity Radio Show Podcast.
All right, glad you're with us.
18 days to go.
Happy Friday.
And boy, do I need a Friday.
You know, just red eyeing different time zones, no sleep, no sleep on the plane.
It just throws you off.
But I feel good today.
I do.
I uh yesterday I was half in a days.
I'm not gonna lie doing the program for you, but we try to do it and fight.
What am I gonna do?
Take off 19 days before the election?
I cannot do that.
It's not in my DNA.
Is it, Linda?
Is it?
She goes, you know, you really should take off.
You know, you're really gonna get sick.
She's like my mom.
I you know, you really you know what?
You're very stubborn.
You're really stubborn.
You know what?
You you just you don't listen to me anyway, so why should I even bother?
Did you not say all that to me?
Yes or no?
That sounds pretty accurate, actually.
Why don't you take it off?
You need to do it.
You look like hell.
I didn't say that.
You look like you look like you look like you got hit by a truck, you said.
I said you said I look like I got hit by a truck, and I said, You look pretty good, actually.
It doesn't look like the truck went over your face.
Oh, okay.
Oh, such a big difference.
It's such a totally different.
You know, this is what we do, you know, and I wish I could tell all of you how this is gonna turn out, and I can't.
And I don't think anybody can.
And and I'm I am being honest.
Can Trump lose in in a big way?
Yeah.
Can Hillary lose in a big way?
I think that's possible too.
Could it be a very close election with the popular vote and electoral college vote is different?
I see that as a possibility too.
Now, if you follow the media, this election's over.
It's done.
I mean, Nate Silver, I think, is up to 86% chance that Hillary wins the election.
I don't know what to make of the polls.
There are some polls that really concern me, but I'm not sure I believe them at all.
We'll get Newt's take on it.
Newt is convinced the polls aren't accurate.
I just I'm not gonna go with my heart.
I'm gonna go with my head.
My heart would say, yeah, this is gonna be a Brexit year.
Yeah, there is untold numbers of people out there that are not telling pollsters w which way they're gonna vote, and they're gonna show up in droves.
And that's my heart, because that's what I would love to see happen.
But I'm sticking with my head, I'm sticking with the numbers, and I'm just giving you scientific facts and whether or not they are off because this year has been so unpredictable.
I'm not going with that part.
I am just telling you that there's an opportunity.
According to the polls, if the election were held today, Donald Trump would lose.
18 days out.
Now, does that put fear strike fear into your heart?
Does that the last thing that you want to hear me say?
Probably.
Does fe is fear in life a great motivator?
I've always had in my career a fear of failure.
From the day that I got behind a radio microphone and actually got paid for it after I work years for free.
I I thought every on any given day I was gonna be fired.
I'd never thought I'd survive.
And there were some of you out there saying, Yeah, you should have been fired.
That's the problem.
They didn't fire you.
And look at this, look at what you turned into.
A success.
It's so unfair.
You know.
I'm not gonna mention this guy's name, but I actually find a lot of humor in it.
There's a guy out there that is just begging for me.
Please, please mention me.
I need to help as much as possible in the recognition.
Because as you know, I get into little Twitter fights with, you know, like the Pip Squeak at CNN.
Well, I actually don't even hate the guy.
I just do it out of more entertainment and fun purposes for myself or that other guy, Dylan from the he's that's another CNN guy.
And I just I just mess with these guys and have fun with them.
And then we had Twitter wars with some NRO guys, and we had Twitter wars with the Wall Street Journal guy and and other people.
I do this for fun.
I do not do this out of meanness.
You know, and I do say to some people on Twitter, are you a jackass in real life or only on Twitter?
And then people seem to like it, so it encourages me to go a little further in the next tweet.
And then people inevitably will write, Hannity, you must be drunk because I'm tweeting late at night because I'm bored stiff and I've nothing better to do, and everything that I've checked out on TV that night doesn't interest me.
And that's just pure entertainment on my part.
Um but you know, at the end of the day, I I I want to do my best to tell you and inform you what the election is about.
I want you to know what choice is available to you.
Uh I see Hillary Clinton as the most morally corrupt single biggest liar, the person that has enriched herself more than anybody else ever to seek the presidency, that has done more in terms of being a hypocrite in terms of systematically organizing an abusive system towards women, especially those that have accused her husband that I believe are truthful.
Later on, I noticed the media has ignored this nine-page special investigative report from the National Inquirer.
Yeah, they're the same people that got Gary Hart and monkey business, you know, the same people that got Jesse Jackson and the Love Child, the same people that got John Edwards and the affair and John Edwards and the baby, and the same people, by the way, that even went after Rush and attacked him years ago.
So now they have a nine-page bombshell investigation, more pages, I think, than they've ever had in any investigation, where they were able to download this guy, Mr. Fix It.
They spent two years investigating this whole thing, and they would deploy this guy to keep the uh president and his bimbo eruptions and whatever other shenanigans they were involved in out of the press and out of the media, but it it does seem to fit the past behavior of all of them,
and the same media that we now know is bankrupt and corrupt and an extension of the entire Clinton campaign, and that's Univision and ABC and MBC and CBS and the New York Times and uh Politico and the Boston Globe and you know, CNBC, CNN and MSNBC.
They're all caught up in the WikiLeaks lies.
So, I mean, Donald Trump has an uphill battle by any stretch, he just does.
Any objective analysis you see that he's going up against a Republican establishment that hated, that hates him.
They just hate him.
And by the way, between the media, the Republican Party, we have a lot of unfinished business that I'll begin 19 days from now, win, lose, or draw.
That we've got to we have we have an informational crisis of enormous magnitude in this country with the revelations of how the media in this country is so corrupt.
We have a crisis within the Republican Party to the extent of sabotage by the highest ranks of the establishment Republicans doing everything they can do to undermine Donald Trump.
And meanwhile, help elect Hillary Clinton.
In terms of the punditry class, you know, they'll own whatever Hillary does in terms of their assistance, but my biggest complaint is not really even with them because every American is entitled to their own opinion as I'm entitled to my opinion.
And I'll proudly pull the lever for Donald Trump come election day.
And I know many of you will as well.
We see the size of his rallies.
Can we factor in an enthusiasm factor here that we I don't know.
I don't know the answer.
I the enthusiasm certainly seems by a magnitude of ten to be on Trump's side.
Uh, we see that I do believe there are people that are not going to tell posters they're voting for Trump.
Why?
Because they're going to say, Oh, you must hate Muslims.
Uh, you hate immigrants.
You want to build the wall.
You're racist, like those talk radio and and Hannity guys out there.
Um, so I do I do suspect that's a part of it.
Is it a thousand people?
Is it a million people?
Is it five million people?
I don't know.
I have no way of knowing.
I'll know who is elected president when I hear Fox News projects so-and-so has been elected the 45th president of the United States.
So until then, if you have that fear, then I think you really should be very, you know, just I think you should fight with a sense that you're behind.
Fight with a sense that you're down.
I'm not believing those people that are saying with any certainty that this candidate's gonna win or that candidate's gonna win.
You know, Nate Silver's been wrong a lot this entire election cycle.
Maybe he's right this time.
It's 50 50 shot, you know, just flip of the coin.
Um we do have a lot of wiki leaks revelations to share with you today.
Don't worry, the media won't share it with you in any way.
But let me just say also on the election, experts have long predicted that Hillary can't win the White House unless minority voters turn out for her in the same record numbers that they turned out for Obama four and eight years ago, but in a trend that I think is almost, you know, pretty much unanimous.
Recent polling analysis is ignoring here is that while Clinton is still winning the minority vote by a landslide, that support is about 20 points below Obama's 2012 number.
Now, the latest investors business daily tip survey, they're the ones that came closest to predicting the actual results in the last three presidential elections.
So maybe we ought to use them.
They were the most accurate the last three elections.
I'll stick with them for now.
They now have Trump up by one.
All the other ones.
Kellery by 11, Hillary by seven, Hillary by four.
I don't know.
I can't tell you.
So anyway, so the well, what I'll use the one that has been most accurate in the last three presidential elections.
She has five times the support that Trump has in the black community, and that support is currently plunged a whopping twenty-two points below where it was for Obama.
Now Trump's black support, on the other hand, is more than double Romney's percentage.
Obama won 93% of the black vote, Romney just six.
And the latest investors business daily tip survey, Clinton gets 71% of the black vote.
Trump gets 14%.
Clinton has an even worse problem with Hispanic voters.
In 2012, 71% of the Latino vote went for Obama, only 27% for Romney.
The latest IBD poll survey, it showed that Trump's Latino support is at 23%, a little below Romney's, and Clinton's Latino support has collapsed to 44%.
That's 27 points below that of Barack Obama.
So the current lack of enthusiasm for Clinton's candidacy among minority voters mirrors a persistent trend that the that I think first became apparent in the primaries.
I mean, remember, she had to go to all the way to California with Bernie Sanders.
That doesn't, that was not a sign of strength for somebody that was supposed to be coronated into this position that we now know needed help and surveillance and sabotage of Bernie Sanders to actually help get her over the top.
In three precincts, this was back in March, they reported of Virginia's third congressional district, which is the heart of the state's African American community where overwhelming black turnout in 08 helped Obama win the state.
Turnout was down an average of almost 30% on Tuesday night.
That was during the primary.
In Nevada, exit polls suggested Hispanic voters who have helped push the once deeply Republican state towards the Democrats in national elections voted in significantly lower numbers in 08.
I'm sorry, since 08.
And even Clinton's strong victory in South Carolina, which was celebrated for a dominance among African American voters, well, it obscured a decline in black turnout of about 40%.
I know, look, I know these numbers, I'm getting in the weeds, perhaps maybe even a little bit too much here.
I'm just looking at some trends, some whatever it may happen to be.
Oh, and we also have a Trump rally assault victim, the older 69-year-old woman, Shirley Teeter of Asheville, North Carolina.
Uh she accused Donald Trump's supporters of punching her outside a Trump rally in North Carolina.
Well, now that the James O'Keefe Project Veritas videos have been released showing Democratic operatives saying she was with them.
She was a trained activist.
Anyway, she now says it's possible that 73-year-old Richard Campbell merely just touched her accidentally, as his attorney had claimed all along.
So she's getting out of this as quickly as she possibly can.
Here are the latest WikiLeaks headlines.
Five hundred specific conflicts of interest for the Clinton Foundation.
I'll get into that in a minute.
Pay to play, the Moroccan King gave 12 million dollars, but insisted that Hillary have to go to an event in Morocco.
And that was after she had announced she's going to run for president, and it caused great angst and anxiety among her staff, but Uma said it's a non starter for her to back out because they wanted the money so bad.
The Muslim Brotherhood is planning a media venture with their Qatari partners.
I don't know how that involves the Clintons, but anyway.
His proposal sucks.
Bernie Sanders, savaged by Podesta in WikiLeaks.
John Harwood, even closer to John Podesta than we once thought.
Podesta's response to the restaurant terror attack that killed 14.
I had lobster there.
Well, glad you care about the 14 killed.
A January 2016 email detailing how Clinton boasted of her great relations with bankers.
Isn't that nice?
Behind the scenes, she's one way.
In front of you, the American people, she's another way.
The latest WikiLeaks email comes for the uh from interim DNC chairwoman and media darling now, Donna Brazil, clearly trashing the current state of the economy under Obama.
Whoopsie Daisy.
Yeah, they know that what I've been telling you is true.
In July, I'm sorry, June 2013, a speech to Goldman Sachs.
It detailed Clinton's hopes to intervene in Syria as covertly as possible, and that the U.S. used to be much better at this than we are now.
Wonder if the Obamas are aware of how much they were trashed behind the scenes and how much dirt and garbage and slime the Clintons were using the Muslim father, the cocaine use.
No wonder why they love me back in 08 and 07.
Hannity, you're doing a great job.
Keep it up.
As I was vetting Obama when nobody else will.
All right, 25 till the top of the hour, 800 941 Sean.
You want to be a part of the program.
Oh, look at this.
Turns out Hillary was slightly off the other night when she claimed that 90% of the cash that the Clinton Foundation raises goes directly to charity.
Well, it turns out more than 90% does not go to charity.
It goes to overhead, which mostly consists of paying for luxurious lifes lifestyles for the Clintons and their little hangers on.
Anyway, only 5.7% of the Clinton Foundation's massive 2014 budget actually went to charitable grants, according to the tax exempt organization's IRS filings.
Well, the rest, the 96% went to salaries, employee benefits, fundraising, other expenses.
The Clinton Foundation spent a hair under 91.3 million in 2014, the organization's IRS following show, but less than 5.2 million actually went to charitable grants.
Isn't that really generous of them, taking good care of their buddies and their friends?
We have new WikiLeaks documents.
Our buddy Jamie Dupree actually got retweeted by WikiLeaks, which I thought was pretty cool.
You know, I know some of you have been asked.
I might as well say this on air.
Jamie Dupree is still with the program.
He's been a very close personal friend for years.
I see him at almost every event covering the event for Cox Media and a lot of our affiliate stations.
And uh we are still good friends.
We've been emailing all day today.
Um Jamie has had an issue with his voice.
And he is a part of our team.
He's working behind the scenes, and as soon as his voice gets better, he'll be back on the air.
And if not, he'll be a part of our team as long as he wants to be.
Because we love Jamie Dupree, and he's a good guy.
Anyway, so he got retweeted today, you know, with more of these emails out by WikiLeaks from uh from John Podesta.
They hinted it may hold even more up-to-date emails from John Podesta's news reports indicate the original hack on Podesta occurred in the midst of the 2016 presidential campaign.
In other words, in late March of this year.
And so Jamie DuPe spotted something.
He says when you dig through the Podesta emails released by WikiLeaks, one notices right away that they only go to a certain point, as no emails to or from Podesta have a date that is after March 21st, 2016.
And he noted that on Twitter.
And then WikiLeaks noticed his tweet.
And uh Jamie Dupree says, well spotted.
Something to look forward to.
Now the March date is a pretty interesting one because according to News reports in the last 48 hours, that's right around the time that Podesta's email account was hacked, maybe by a hacking group known as Fancy Bear, and a story from the website Motherboard shows that hackers used a faked email link that Podesta used to enter his password in and give his Gmail account information away.
And there's a graphic of used in the motherboard to show the phishing clicks.
Anyway, Jamie points out that the motherboard report specifically says Podesta got the phishing email on March 19th, and as of now, the WikiLeaks emails from Podesta extend just two days after that.
Meanwhile, the New York Times reported today that a private internet security firm based in Atlanta has concluded that Podesta was hacked by Russian foreign intelligence service after it tricked him into clicking on a fake Google login page last March.
And that would square with the motherboard report and square with the evidence that Podesta's emails only go to March 21st, 2016 at this point.
Anyway, specific targets is it's just in other words, it's going to be interesting to find out what WikiLeaks knows.
Here's the thing I'll say about Julian Assange.
My biggest fear when that story broke was holy sugar.
Things are, you know, somebody's going to get killed here.
And to their to their credit, to their credit, they have not released emails of private people, but public officials that are sworn to serve the public.
And to their ever credit, I think the United States owes them a debt of gratitude.
Now you say, Hannity, why?
He's evil.
He's hacked the United States.
Well, if he didn't do it, maybe we wouldn't know how vulnerable we are, because maybe him exposing it now puts us in a position to fix it.
And number two, I don't think any of us knew just how deeply corrupt this country is.
How the establishment is so deeply fundamentally corrupt.
Republicans, Democrats, the media, the whole bit.
I have no faith in any of these people anymore.
I despise all of them.
They're all in this for themselves, end of sentence.
Anyway, one of the revelations is about Hillary Clinton soliciting twelve million dollars a donation from a government, which is Morocco, that her State Department considered corrupt, and then realized the mess it would cause to her presidential run, according to these newly relieved leaked emails.
Quote, Huma Abedin says this was Hillary's idea.
Our office approached the Moroccans, and they a hundred percent believe they are doing this at her request, according to Uma Abedin.
The king has personally committed twelve million dollars both for the foundation's endowment and to support the meeting.
It will break a lot of China to back out now when we know so many opportunities to do it in the past few months when we had them.
She created this mess and she knows it.
Now the King of Morocco agreed to give the money to the Clinton Foundation.
By the way, she's Secretary of State.
Jeez.
Talk about pay to play.
Provided that it hold a convention in this country in May of 2015.
She was going to be the keynote speaker.
Clinton realized that the conference was a month after she was planning to announce a run for president with hurt or presidency.
No matter what happens, she will be in Morocco hosting the Clinton Global Initiative on May 5th through 7th.
Her presence was a condition for the Moroccans to proceed.
So there's no going back on this, Uma Abedin wrote to the campaign manager, Robbie Mook, in a November 2014 email revealed by WikiLeaks.
The deal with Morocco was struck even though the State Department, under Hillary Clinton, accused the country and their government of arbitrary arrest and corruption.
It's so corrupt.
It's so disgusting.
And you really want to upset the Foreign Office and Security Services?
Anyway, if you go to the foreign office and read the top ten secret documents about the United Kingdom's collaboration with torture, anyway, blah, blah, blah, blah.
I left Julian.
I don't know what this is.
You're trying to hand me something, and I have no clue what you're telling me here.
Why don't you just say it yourself instead of making me look stupid?
I'm sorry, I it's really good stuff.
This is actually an ex-British ambassador.
He's friends with Julian Assange, and he was able to visit with him the other night at the Ecuadorian embassy, And has proof, 100% accuracy that the uh accusations that all of these wiki leaks are by a Russian hacker are 100% false.
100%.
So, what she said at the debate the other night, we really ought to be concerned about the Russians.
We shouldn't pay any attention to our corruption that's revealed here and the lies we tell here and the conflict of interest in pay to play and all the other manipulations and screwing all Bernie Sanders over.
No, we ought to let's just pay it to the Russians did it.
Let's blame the Russians and create a narrative that Donald Trump is buddies with Vladimir Putin.
That ought to work.
We have a detailed WikiLeak email how Clinton boasted of her great relations with bankers.
Isn't that nice?
Another email from uh Donna Brazil trashing the current state of the economy under Obama.
And uh based on the emails that Brazil sent to a Clinton campaign chairman, uh John Podesta earlier this year.
She felt people were in despair about the current economy.
Brazil points out that while new jobs may have been added, they're low wage jobs.
And they're not even really adding jobs, Donna.
Jobs have gone to the extent we don't count people anymore that are out of the labor force.
But don't worry, in June of 2013, in one of these two hundred and fifty thousand dollar speeches to Goldman Sachs, Clinton hoped to intervene in Syria as covertly as possible.
Great.
Politicize it after Americans fight, bleed, die, and get their legs blown off and get their faces disfigured, and then say, oops, sorry, it's a mistake.
Let's learn from it.
An email chain in November of 2015 between campaign staffers discussed planting a Wall Street speech in the media to give the impression that Clinton's speeches to all of the fat cats were nothing to worry about.
So we'll just release the one speech that doesn't prove what a what phony crony capitalism is going on.
And an e in an email sent on election night 08, minutes before major TV network called the election for Obama.
Podesta sent a message to Obama discussing the G twenty summit on chance that Bush raises this with you tonight.
I want you to be aware that it is the unanimous recommendation for your advisors that you not attend.
Another email, 2016, February, titled Speaking at the Banks, Nera Tandon, the president and CEO for the Center for American Progress.
That's John Podesta's group, suggests to Podesta that Clinton should just return the money if she loses badly.
Another email sent to Uma.
Well, that was the Clinton Foundation and access to the King of Morocco, sorry.
That's a duplicate page here.
After Clinton gave an interview which referenced the email scandal to Andrea Mitchell, Tandon once again gives an interesting insight into Clinton's shortcomings.
Everyone wants her to apologize.
I don't think that's ever going to happen.
It's like she's never going to return the money to Saudi Arabia or Qatar.
And she should.
Apologies are like her Achilles heel.
She didn't seem like a B.I.T. Bad word.
Uh in the interview, and she said the word sorry.
She will get a full apology in a few interviews.
She'll get to a full apology.
Not really in her DNA to apologize, of course.
Why would she ever want to apologize?
Anyway, Obama promises the Saudis he will block 9-11 lawsuits.
Why would he promise that?
Forty-one percent of the American people, the morning consult poll and U.S. News and World Report say, yeah, they agree with Trump.
The elixir the election can be stolen.
Trump's rigged election campaign claim prompts new safeguards against voter fraud.
Well, that would be a good thing.
Authorities in Philly are now going to station prosecutors throughout the city on election day to respond to any reports of voter intimidation or other illegal activity.
As it relates to Donald Trump saying that the campaign may be rigged.
Trump expands his lead among military voters.
He polled around 40%, or just 20% for Hillary.
Oh, here's something that ought to interest you.
If you like to keep your doctor and your plan and save $2,500 per family per year, and this is goes back to my irritation with Republicans.
They don't criticize Obama.
They don't fight Obama.
They don't use their constitutionally enumerated powers.
They don't keep their promises about repealing Obamacare.
They just have phony show votes and they don't use the power of the purse, just like they wouldn't use the power of the purse when you they said give us the Senate and we'll stop illegal unconstitutional executive amnesty.
Zero hedge points out that Obama premiums, Obamacare premiums are skyrocketing.
A jump of a mere 30% looks like a good deal compared to jumps of over 50% in some states and a jump of 93% in New Mexico.
Hey, New Mexico, guess what?
Your Obamacare costs are going up 93%.
He's still going to vote for Hillary?
Good luck with that.
You deserve you get the government you deserve.
The defense secretary will not say whether Hillary blurted out a nuclear launch secret during the debate the other night.
They're refusing to deny allegations that Hillary blurted it out.
It would be one of the most closely guarded nuclear secrets during the debate.
Anyway, the defense secretary, Ash Carter, refused to answer a reporter's question about a possible intelligence disclosure by Hillary.
Remember at the final debate on Wednesday, she accused Trump of being very cavalier, even casual about the use of nuclear weapons.
And according to Clinton, the bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed.
But here's the deal.
The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed.
There's about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.
And that's why ten people who have had that awesome responsibility have come out and in an unprecedented way said they would not trust Donald Trump with the nuclear codes or to have his finger on the nuclear button.
I don't have her, I don't have any confidence with her running the economy.
I don't have any confidence with her in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Russia, China, Libya, Egypt, either.
I don't have any confidence that jobs are going to come back.
Good grief.
And I don't want her hand on the nuclear button myself.
Anyway, so the defense secretary was asked if what she revealed is classified or not, which is the nuclear launch time frame.
Is that classified or not?
He said, I'm sorry, I'm not going to answer your question because it's cast in the terms of the ongoing presidential campaign.
And I said, I'm not going to answer questions in that context.
So not going to answer that one.
So let me translate.
Yeah, it's probably likely that Hillary Clinton blabbed out one of America's most closely guarded nuclear secrets, all in an attempt to make Donald Trump look bad.
And the reason I think I'm pretty sure she did it is because of Obama's Secretary of Defense could have truthfully let her off the hook on the allegation, which is explosive, he would have.
And the only reason for him not to let her off the hook is because he couldn't lie that a new U.S. nuclear launch secret has just been, a classified secret has just been given away.
Unbelievable.
Are you ready for this election?
A lot at stake, the Supreme Court saying radical Islam, lowering taxes, raising taxes, eliminating Obamacare, not eliminating Obamacare, vetting refugees, not vetting refugees, building a wall, not building a wall, top-down education, education sent back to the states, energy independence, no energy independence, Obamacare, repeal it, replace it, or don't do it.
That's what the election's about.
Supreme Court will impact this country for generations.
But you never Trumpers, you hang on to your principles.
You sleep well at night when the next Supreme Court justice destroys the country.
You go right ahead.
Sleep well at night.
because you own it i do recognize that i come into this event with a little bit of an advantage I know that so many of you in the archdiocese already have a place in your heart for a guy who started out as a carpenter working for his father.
I was a carpenter working for Not for a long period of time, but I was about three weeks.
But the candidates have some lighthearted moments together, which is true.
I have no doubt that Hillary is going to laugh quite a bit tonight, sometimes even at an appropriate moment.
And even tonight, with all of the heated back and forth between my opponent and me at the debate last night, we have proven that we can actually be civil to each other.
In fact, just before taking the days, Hillary accidentally bumped into me, and she very civilly said, Pardon me.
laughter applause applause And I very politely replied, let me talk to you about that after I get into office.
Oh, this one's going to get me in trouble.
I...
Not with Hillary.
You know, the president told me to stop whining.
But I really have to say the media is even more biased this year than ever before.
Ever.
You want the proof?
Michelle Obama gives a speech, and everyone loves it.
It's fantastic.
They think she's absolutely great.
My wife Melania gives the exact same speech.
And people get on her case.
And I don't get it.
I don't know why.
And it wasn't her fault.
Stand up, Melania.
Come on.
He took a lot of abuse.
Oh, I'm in trouble when I go home tonight.
She didn't know about that one.
All right, that was from the Alford uh E. Smith dinner last night in New York City.
It's a Memorial Foundation dinner.
And uh, well, I I thought it was a great night all round, although Trump, in that pretty liberal Irish Catholic environment, if you don't mind me saying, is an Irish Catholic, was uh booed occasionally for for hitting the edge of that uh line of humor, which I thought was fun, and Hillary did the same thing.
They both uh gave as good as they got.
Uh hour two, eight hundred-nine four one Sean, if you want to be a part of this extravaganza.
Uh joining us now is former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich.
He's been out on his book tour now for a number of days.
New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today bestseller, and he will be at the Barnes and Noble in Clarendon, Virginia, at one o'clock tomorrow.
How are you, sir?
Well, I'm doing great, and uh I I agree with you.
I thought that humor was good.
I actually thought the Melania speech line was uh about as good as you're gonna get.
Uh I'm curious what she said to him later.
Yeah, me too.
I wish I knew.
I have to also say I uh watched him today in North Carolina, and I thought he gave a tremendous speech, and I thought he said a tremendous tone of leadership about bringing us together, solving our problems, being one country.
Uh it was really as good as I've seen him.
On Saturday, tomorrow, he is going to be a Gettysburg, where we are told that he will lay out promises.
In other words, something like a contract with America.
I've always thought this was a good idea.
Um you laid out your contract, I believe, in October of 94, if I'm not mistaken.
Uh I would have preferred that he laid it out earlier, but the idea of putting on paper promises that you're making directly to the American people, I've always loved the idea because it holds people accountable, and especially in a year where every exit poll in the primary showed 65% of Republicans felt betrayed.
I thought this was particularly important this year.
Well, I I think this is good timing for him because he's gotten through the presidential debates.
He's in the final stretch.
He now has a way of focusing people's attention on what the choice really is.
Uh and I think that uh it will be compelling and be positive and remind people that a Trump presidency is gonna have a lot of very positive achievements.
Some people are saying if you look at staple's where it's it's fairly close in one poll in Utah, one poll in Georgia has him at plus two, one poll in Georgia has him at plus four.
And Texas he's at plus five, and in Arizona, Hillary is trying to take Arizona.
Um you have said you think these presidential polls are wrong, and that you think that there is a hidden vote out there and perhaps a Brexit effect.
I'm not sh I just have no idea what's going to happen.
I I've never looked I've been in r on radio for thirty years.
You know this.
This is the one year I don't have any feel for what's going to happen.
Well, I I did a event yesterday uh with Dick Gephardt, the former majority leader in the House who uh ran twice for president as a Democrat, uh clear Hillary supporter.
And um we you know he he said emphatically when people ask him, he said, I don't know what's gonna happen.
He said, I I can't tell you.
He said I don't I don't know that the polls have any resemblance to reality.
And uh I don't understand, you know, who's gonna decide to vote, who's not gonna vote.
So I think you have a lot of those things going on right now.
Historically, I think that he has you know that the Trump my sense is that Trump has a very real likelihood of taking this.
I just saw a Rasmussen poll that has something like seventy percent of the country is upset by what they believe is Hillary's dishonesty by fifty-three to thirty-nine, they would like uh they think wouldn't like that they think she should have been indicted.
Uh that's absolutely true.
Well how do you elect somebody that you think ought to be indicted?
You know, if fifty-three percent of the country thinks you ought to be indicted, it's pretty hard for me to imagine how you're gonna get fifty-three percent of the vote.
You know, win lose or draw, I think there is a lot of unfinished business out of this election.
I mean, we we uh uh look I think there is such a been such a stinging rebuke and indictment of the media coverage in this country, and now we have the evidence to prove that they are extraordinarily abusively biased towards the American people and their coverage.
That's number one.
Number two, I think the Republican Party needs to have a real coming to Jesus because the sabotage of so many people w again, win lose or draw, this conversation is going to be held.
And I have found that Republicans are far more critical of Trump than they have ever been of either Obama or Clinton.
And their undermining and sabotage has has had some effect, impact, I think, in terms of Donald Trump and his credibility even with the base of the party, and that's problematic.
And I think but think look, it depends on what happens on election day.
If Trump wins, it'll be a natural restructuring uh because he'll be president, he'll be the driving force.
Uh people will organize themselves around the things they'll vote for, the things they won't vote for, and we'll have a very healthy process of give and take and and and Trump will have a surprising number of Democrats who work with him on things because he's he knows people like Chuck Schumer and he knows how to talk to him and how to deal with them.
And I think uh they'll have a broad coalition if he wins.
On the other hand, if Hillary wins, uh she's gonna face an immediate gigantic choice to either stay with the Bernie Sanders wing, in which case every Republican will oppose her.
I mean, they will have no choice.
You wouldn't be able to survive a primary if you were seen as a pro-Hillary left-wing Republican.
Uh and the party will rapidly reunify.
And I think what Trump is doing is he is setting a new benchmark.
He's talking about corruption, he's talking about the border, he's talking about fundamental change, and I think in that sense he's laying a baseline that's not gonna go away.
And people in the Republican Party need to understand, you know, he isn't gonna go away.
I mean, he's either gonna win or he's gonna come very, very close.
And in neither circumstances he's gonna be is he gonna go anywhere.
Uh so you they're gonna be dealing with Donald Trump for a long time.
My hunch is, because I am an optimist, but also because I believe in what happened in Great Britain and I believe in the degree to which uh the the uh the unbelievably biased, and this is gonna be part of our post-election focus, the unbelievably biased news media has suppressed the Trump vote because they've just made it very hard for people to say to an operator, I'm gonna vote for Donald Trump, which I think means he's probably got four or five percent more vote than you're seeing in any of these polls.
Listen, I I hope you're right.
I I just from a historic standpoint, this has been unlike any other election we've ever seen.
I just I honestly just don't know.
And I do believe there are people that will never tell a pollster that they're gonna vote for Trump.
I also I'm looking all throughout Europe, Not just Brexit, but all throughout Europe, this nationalist populist movement is real.
Uh I think people don't want to be called racist if they suggest that they support Donald Trump because Donald Trump believes in betting refugees or building a wall, and but yet they want that done.
You know, the my problem with the Republican Party is they've not evolved, and they are missing something dramatic that's happened.
When you have ninety five million Americans out of work, the worst recovery since the forties, when you have the lowest homeownership rate in fifty-one years, when you've doubled the national debt, when thirteen million more Americans are on food stamps, and eight million more are in poverty, and you've had a president is the first president in history that never reached three percent GDP growth in the history of pres of of presidencies, forty-five presidents, forty-four presidents.
There is something really radically wrong that they don't understand that they need a positive forward looking agenda.
Now, I've always loved your contract because it held you accountable.
You said give us a chance, we'll vote on ten items, and we'll do it in the first hundred days, and you fulfilled the promise.
You know, if we would have a promise that says very simply we recognize radical Islamists, we believe all refugees should be vetted.
We believe in balanced budget and the lowest corporate tax rate.
We believe in energy independence, and we're gonna move towards that quickly and expeditiously.
Obamacare's been a disaster.
We'll replace it with free market solutions.
Education is a disaster.
We'll give it back to the states and local local municipalities.
There's nothing that I am saying here is complicated except that that messaging doesn't exist among any Republicans.
That's sad to me.
Well, it is, and that's one of the places where Donald Trump may be able to teach the Republican Party some big lessons.
I mean, he's clearly one of the best communicators we've seen.
He's totally different than Ronald Reagan, who was also a great communicator, but he is very effective in his own terms.
He gets his messages out.
He uses social media brilliantly.
And I think we have to recognize that uh, you know, he there's a lot he can teach the Republican Party about communicating.
Uh, I listened to him today in North Carolina.
He spoke more about helping the inner city and helping African Americans than any Republican I can ever remember.
Uh so I I think there's something real going on here.
And I keep getting approached, Evan has been on the road with our two new books, and and I can tell you um the number of African Americans who walk up to me and say I am for Donald Trump.
No, that doesn't mean he's gonna carry the black vote, but I suspect two things are gonna happen.
Uh Hillary's not gonna be able to frighten people into voting, and her share of it's gonna be down substantially, and you may have noticed Oprah Winfrey's very tepid, very s very mild endorsement of her.
At the same time, I think there is gonna be a significant increase uh in in the vote for Trump.
And uh as recently as it's coming through the Atlanta Airport.
I I talked to two people who are African Americans who are both strongly intensely for Trump.
And so so the things happening out there that are that are different than I think the Washington political class believes.
Well, I agree.
If you were gonna put together a contract for America for Trump in these final two weeks, what would it be?
Well, I think I think he's laid out a lot of stuff.
It would be school choice, to go back to one of your points.
Uh it would be cleaning up corruption in Washington.
Uh it would be term limits, and I remind people term limits was in the original contract.
Uh we voted on it, got a majority, but couldn't get a constitutional majority.
Uh but but people are fed up.
I think it it would it would include uh job creation and and uh cutting taxes, include uh controlling immigration and s and the border.
I mean, uh you know the standard things that he that he's for.
The things that got him 14 million votes, the the things that made him the Republican nominee against sixteen other people.
I mean it's not complicated.
Uh you have a contract that gives the American people what the American people want, and in return they give you power.
It's really that simple.
And uh there's gotta be a realignment.
Um the Republican Party's gotta they've gotta stand up for the working man and woman.
They've gotta they've gotta connect with the black community and point out how Democrats have failed them at such a such a incredible rate.
They've they've got a touch, they've got to make people understand that the class warfare divisive rhetoric, rich versus poor, old versus young, man versus woman, black versus white, you know, typical strategy of Democrats has got to be seen for what it is.
That's right.
And I I really like Trump today as as he came to the close talking about bringing us together that we are one country under God, etc.
I mean, the way he said it was very compelling.
The tone of his voice was exactly right.
And that's what the country's hungry for.
Uh, and give us a chance to create jobs and to be once again governed uh under the rule of law.
Yeah, well said.
All right, Mr. Speaker, so you are going to be tomorrow in Clarendon, Virginia at one o'clock.
Yeah.
Barnes and Noble.
Fifth printing of treason.
I know.
It's you sold out on Amazon.
You're on the USA Today, Washington Post, uh New York Times bestseller list.
It's awesome.
Congratulations.
That's great.
Well thanks in that listen, I this is a very exciting time.
I look forward to being with you again next week.
All right, he will be in Clarendon, Virginia tomorrow with his brand new book Treason.
Thank you so much for being with us and I'm sure he'll be talking to the crowd as well.
Right, 800 nine for one Sean our number you want to be a part of this extravaganza.
Also later on we'll be checking in with Dylan Howard.
He is the chief content officer and vice president of AMI and the parent company of the National Inquirer, this big nine page exclusive on Hillary Clinton, uh John McLaughlin, Doug Schoen or pollsters coming up next.
All right, so some of the polls out today investors business daily tracking Trump plus one.
LA Times tracking Trump plus one.
This is not good news the Atlanta Journal Constitution, Trump plus two in Georgia, that would not be good news for him.
Another poll I got a preview of is Trump plus four that is coming out later this afternoon.
If you look at some of the other states it's Virginia Clinton plus twelve not good for Trump in that particular case.
Oregon no surprise Clinton plus ten.
Trump is up in Utah anywhere between one and ten points in two separate polls that have come out in the last two days.
Michigan has Clinton plus 13.
Louisiana had Trump by a pretty significant amount.
And joining us now are our pollsters 18 days out of this election.
We welcome back to the program John McLaughlin is a pollster, founder of McLaughlin & Associates.
Doug Schoen, pollster, author, political analyst for Fox News and many, many more.
Welcome both of you to the program.
Thanks so much, John.
All right.
I'm not so sure.
There's a lot of balls in the air.
I want to know, first of all, do you both agree that.
that we don't have polling post second debate we don't have polling post America absorbing Project Veritas we don't have polling with the public absorbing this massive wiki leak dumps that continue today.
Do you all agree that those three things can impact polls moving forward?
John?
Yes, and there's a lag in a lot of these statewide polls that you're referring to.
They either started or were done completely before the last debate.
And those of us who were, you know, in our office until after 3 o'clock last night looking at data, things are getting better.
And it's going to be a gradual grind, but she's definitely, before the debate, You know, you mentioned Rasmussen and you mentioned the investor business,
daily those polls were getting better and there's usually a leg between them and the statewide like at like at one point before the last debate Clinton was uh was uh up as uh over you know in those in these uh predictions of the electoral vote she was over three hundred now she's fallen back down to around two fifty two sixty two fifty and I think she's gonna fall even further because what I noticed was but does it matter that five thirty eight Nate Silver's website has her at 86% chance to win.
She's gonna come down and what's going to happen is what's going to happen is I noticed that when Melania did her interview before the debate a couple days before and she said she forgave him he apologized to her etc.
and then when the stories about the corruption, the Clinton Foundation, and these WikiLeaks started percolating again, where it was clear there's a pay-to-play scheme going on, and there's a cover-up going on where that one fellow who was being paid to go find people, this guy Kramer, he never worked with you, Doug, did he?
I don't know the gentleman.
Good, good.
Because, I mean, the guy was in the White House 40-some times.
to see the president and he was he was paying people to go to Trump rallies and incite violence and if anything the Republicans instead of being brain dead they should be out there demanding an FBI investigation a criminal investigation and uh I've heard I I guess Newt Gingrich was on your show last night it should be a Rico act or whatever.
This is this is a major cover up where they're gonna make they're gonna make Watergate look like jaywalking Doug look I think it's an open question where we stand.
The state polls you reported certainly pre-debate showed that the Secretary is poised to win a narrow but clear a victory.
What'll happen post debate, I think is anyone's guess.
We don't really know how much, whether it'd be Veritas, Clinton Foundation's WikiLeaks will in fact penetrate.
But the problem, Sean, and we've talked about it, is Donald Trump has not been focused.
Like a laser on his message.
And to get this stuff through, he has to do it.
Doug, you gotta talk a little tighter into that microphone.
But if you uh if if you look at the honesty and trustworthiness issue, I mean Hillary Clinton, you have 70% of Americans that think she probably should have been indicted for crying out loud.
But the message hasn't been driven, Sean.
That's the real problem.
Donald Trump has to drive the argument.
You do it every night.
You do it very well.
I I am you know very pleased that you're doing it and not the candidate.
If the candidate was doing it, I think the secretary would have a much more difficult road.
So you're you're saying that if I was running against Hillary, I'd be winning right now.
Is that what you're suggesting?
I tried to get you to run, I will do it in the future.
I stand committed to your candidacy.
Now, the John, my unelectable, I've got 30 years of radio tapes, 21 years of television tapes.
This would be manna from heaven for all those uh media outlets that now uh that we now know are an extension of the Clinton campaign.
And and here is my friend Doug Schoen trying to send me out to to slaughter before before the Lions.
You do something that few do, which is to your everlasting benefit.
If people come back at you, you said this, you did that, you said yeah, so what?
Integrity, honesty, and you are disciplined in your message, something Donald Trump lacks, and I think John McLaughlin, you'd agree that Trump lacks focus.
Well, the what I'm saying about Sean is there's no surprises.
It's out there.
That's exactly right.
So we'll be pollsters together, a bipartisan team.
Oh, you and me, John.
Okay, all right.
Let's get on to some serious issues and matters here.
Well, when the primaries are a walk.
Exactly.
All right, great, great ideas, but uh, I've got a life to live beyond this.
Uh all right.
Let's but let's talk about what happens in the next eighteen days.
I did particularly like the speeches that Trump has given in the last two days.
I know for a fact that there's more Project Veritas videos coming out.
We have new developments and wiki leaks today, and I think they're so damning.
You know, we gotta pay to play.
The Moroccan King was paid twelve million dollars to meet with Hillary Clinton, but she had to show up a month after she announced that she was gonna run for the presidency, that was part of the deal to give twelve million dollars to the Clinton Foundation.
That to me reinforces, you know, corruption at a very high level.
John Harwood emails Podesta trying to set up a lunch date, and that shows more media bias.
The mother Muslim Brotherhood planning on on media ventures with Qatari partners and all these people are paying the Clintons.
It's it's so despicable what they've done.
Right.
And let me let me just follow up on what Doug said, the focus here.
A couple days ago, after the Milani interview, it switched from the major factor being Trump's temperament to being her corruption, the Clinton corruption.
The the Trump has to go out there and say, with the focus, the laser focus is like if you want change, I'm your only vote that counts.
And I'm the only one who can stop her.
And if you're tired of twenty-five years of corruption, that's now threatening the economy, uh, with trade deals and bad trade deals and all these other things, and security of our country.
You know, she has been selling the security of our country from the State Department.
And if you want to end that kind of corruption, you have to vote for me.
And and that's what's flipped him, because what I saw last night in in our internal polls for various clients across the country, Trump was either holding or getting better.
And if that's the case, it's gonna be a close race right through to the election, which is just two and a half weeks out.
And uh uh, but it's gotta be like, like Doug said, it's gotta be like a laser focused message on change, but now the element is the real lead thing is the corruption.
The idea America, the reason she's not blowing them away in these polls and really taking it away is Americans are really uneasy about her character and the corruption right now.
And the best thing Donald to do to get rid of the distractions, Sean, is to say, assuming that the election is free and fair, he will re accept the results either way, whether he wins or loses.
You gotta get rid of the distractions.
The campaign's been filled of with and that explains why the secretary continues to lead.
And what's your response to that, John?
Well my res absolutely if if it's a fair and f if it's a fair election where there's none of these uh uh shenanigans that are that are going on if that goes on and there's no criminal activity then you have to accept the results.
But I think what what Donald Trump didn't do well in the debate that gave her another little uh molehill to turn into a big mountain of you know it's his temperament was he didn't explain what he's concerned about is hey you're paying people to go incite violence in my rallies.
Hey you're you've got voter fraud that's massive going on in places like Indiana.
If the if it's an honest election, I'll absolutely accept the results.
But if you're trying to steal it you know I'm gonna make an issue of it but legally through the courts like John Kerry you know or Al Gore tried to do John Kerry still thinks he won Ohio.
But uh uh but he but he didn't say that and he needs to say that explicitly and say, you know, we're a country of laws, we're a country of of uh th that has rules and regulation and if there's no corruption I'll accept the results of of this election.
By the way that's something what frustrates me is everyone acting so outraged over this.
I always call it selective moral outrage but you know with all the outrage over what Donald Trump said, I mean we have a million people Hillary, Bernie, Obama, Kerry all saying the same thing.
And Al Gore, too.
Listen.
Vice President, sir, is this the last battleground, sir, if you lose at the Supreme Court of Florida?
Well, the effort I have underway is simply to make sure that all the votes are counted.
And when the issues that are now being considered in the Florida Supreme Court are decided, that'll that'll be an important uh point uh but I don't want to speculate on what the Florida Supreme Court the the thing that has most animated this election on the Democratic side has been the sense of a rigged system.
The game is rigged against them.
So there's a sense the game is rigged.
This is what a rig the company about system.
They'll do anything to rig the system to those at the top the game is rigged against a lot of people who have done the dead level.
That the system is rigged.
People say the game is rigged keeps the system rigged for those at the top.
The system is rigged their obstruction is keeping a system that is rigged the game is rigged.
We must fix an economy in America that is rigged.
The game is rigged and it's not right.
The game is rigged and the economy is rigged the American people know that the system is rigged against the system rigged against the middle class.
Oh I know it is great.
It's still too many people feel like the system is rigged.
People say the game is rigged oh the game is rigged for economy is rigged.
People feel like the system is rigged against them.
And here's the painful part.
You're right.
You know the system folks is rigged.
It's a rigged system.
Our our presidential election came down to one state where the brother of the man running for president was the governor of the state.
So m we have our problems too.
I would just like to know what you can say to reassure us that this election will not be rigged or stolen.
Well I tell you what it helps in Ohio that we got uh Democrats in charge of the machines.
Um but but look I come from Chicago.
So so I want to be honest it's not as if it's just Republicans who have monkey around with elections in the past.
Sometimes Democrats have to you know whenever people are in power they're you know they have this tendency to try to tilt things in their direction.
It's amazing the media narrative after the debate the other night nobody talked about this at all.
Thoughts John Maglaquin Well I I mean I mean it's it's a matter of the Democrats Want to try to deflect away from that, but but they have a real scandal going on right now that the Republicans, whether it's the RNC or the Trump campaign, should be just a full court press on the idea that somebody that was in the White House on a regular basis and can be connected to the Democrat National Committee and the Clinton campaign was uh uh you know working on voter fraud,
was working on uh inciting violence at these rallies.
I think it's uh it's a major turning point because there's so much about Hillary Clinton's character that we know she's dishonest, that we know she doesn't tell the truth, that she was really selling access to the uh uh to the State Department and to and to deals like that's unbelievable.
She goes she talks about Putin with with Donald Trump, but you know, her State Department okayed uh the sale of an American uranium company to a Russian company that's now selling the uranium to Iran, and they were Clinton uh foundation donors.
So i there's a tipping point here where if the Republicans really push this uh with the focus and with the determination, I think the majority of Americans will just reject it.
That's why she can't get away from Trump and the polls.
So we're eighteen days away.
Give me your best professional guess after years and years of doing this, who's gonna win?
It should be it should be Trump.
And it should be a matter of because Americans are voting now, so we have to push this right now because a lot of these states that are very close, like North Carolina, um uh Ohio, you have early voting right now.
And Florida, you have early voting.
So these the these issues have to be pushed right now because of the uh the number of people in these key battleground states that are voting early.
All right, John McLaughlin, as always, we appreciate it, and uh thanks for being on the program.
We just lost Doug Schoen, but thank you, Doug, as well.
All right, news roundup and information overload hour here on the Sean Hannity Show.
Write down a toll-free telephone number.
You want to be a part of the program, it's eight hundred nine four one Sean.
So let me look at the media, which we now know this election cycle is totally in the pocket of Hillary Clinton.
And they're basically an extension of the Hillary campaign.
You know, do I need to name the many ways that we have now discovered through WikiLeaks and other means?
But when Univision is advising the Clinton campaign on how to handle Donald Trump, and when CNBC's John Harwood is giving advice to the Hillary campaign and bragging as a moderator of a debate that he got under Donald Trump's skin, and we have CNN feeding questions ahead of a town hall to Hillary Clinton.
Uh, and then we have MSNBC feeding questions to those about to interview Hillary Clinton, and then you've got the New York Times and Politico, they offer Hillary Clinton's campaign the opportunity to edit the articles before they go out publicly.
And as somebody that's been interviewed by the New York Times three times in the last month, I could tell you that option is never given to me ever, and never to Donald Trump either.
Uh so you add ABC and CBS and MBC and the New York Times and the Boston Globe and Politico and all these other cable news outlets, and you've got what I have always said.
You've got an alliance that has existed between the Democratic Party and especially presidential candidates, they're an extension of whatever the campaign happens to be in that given year.
Now, if you notice when the allegations, five women in a day came out against Donald Trump, well, you had outlets like CNN giving forty-five minutes to one of the accusers, and the woman's story goes something like this that she was sitting on a plane next to Donald Trump and Donald Trump groped her and grabbed her and kissed her for fifteen minutes,
uh plus, and she was okay with the first fifteen minutes as long as he was only groping in this area of her body, but it was when he went to the other areas of her body that she became traumatized and offended, and these, you know, decades later now she's telling the story.
Unfortunately for her, there was somebody sitting next to them on the plane that is an eyewitness that said it never happened.
And then one does have to ask the question if somebody is groping and fondling and touching you against your will, which I would find predatory and offensive and absolutely morally repugnant.
Well then the next question would be uh if you're on an airplane that is packed with people, including flight attendants, why didn't you say help me, help?
Um, I think that would be a fair analysis, and I think like a number of the other people that have come forward, it's been debunked, but that didn't stop CNN for going forty five minutes.
Now the National Inquirer has a nine page layout, a story about the Clintons.
The bombshell proof that Hillary silence Bill's sex victims.
Now we've interviewed Paula Jones and Juanita Broderick and Kathleen Willie and Kathy Shelton, and yesterday on the program you had this woman who was a Leslie Millie is a a former reporter down in Arkansas, and she was on this program telling her story.
And then of course we have Monica Lewinsky in cigars and oval office and blue dresses.
And then lying under oath and lying about Jennifer Flowers, later admitting that that was true.
And some people say, all right, well, the National Inquirer.
Well they were right about Jesse Jackson.
They were right about O.J. Simpson.
They were right about Gary Hart.
They were right about John Edwards.
They've been right an awful lot of times.
And they've broken many, many stories in the past, but they have a nine page special investigation.
Now it's interesting that the very same quote quote so-called news networks that interviewed all of these women, many of whom have been debunked.
They don't go on with the same amount of time and coverage saying, oopsie Daisy, we were wrong.
But anyway, they're not covering the National Inquirer story.
Big surprise.
Dylan Howard is the chief content officer, vice president for AMI, which is the parent company of the National Inquirer.
And he joins us to uh talk more about this exclusive interview that they had with this fixer for the Clintons over this long period of time.
And how are you, sir?
Good to be with you, Sean.
Okay, but the guy doesn't come out and give his name.
Why?
Well, at this point, uh, let me explain that the rationale behind this investigation.
I began looking into uh the Clintons' behavior over the course of the presidency uh and really tried to see um how they would orchestrate things to cover up scandals, because as we know, it was a scandal sheet in itself, there uh President Bill Clinton's tenure as president.
I've been working on this story for two years, and I had uncovered something that I confronted this fixer with in relation to something that he had done, and I convinced him to come forward.
And what he revealed was a backroom operation that was used to settle and muzzle claims arising from Bill Clinton's repeated uh sexual dalliances with other women and Hillary's own infidelities with both men and women, he said.
But what was intriguing about this, Sean, was that this is a Nixon style operation, and it was first established in 1992.
It was managed off the books, it was linked to a major Hollywood studio, and ran right through until Mr. Fixit's resignation in two thousand and eight.
He detailed with twenty-four years of proof through dossiers, documents, a secret payoff ledger, twelve fixes that he orchestrated on behalf of the Clintons to ensure that scandals were silenced.
Why did he not come forward?
Let's just say watch this space.
Let me ask you this question.
When you talk about twenty-four years worth of documentation and ledgers in terms of the people that he paid off, which he claimed he paid off reporters and others involved here.
Um what convinced you that they were legitimate and real?
Well, the reason I found this, Mr. Fixett, was that he was involved in a massive conspiracy to silence one particular scandal.
And let me tell you how I was able to convince him to come forward.
Incidentally, he decided that he was coming forward because of the hypocrisy of uh the media with the Donald Trump situation, and he said that he felt it was his uh duty to come forward and expose the hypocrisy of the Clintons.
But there is one powerful piece of information that confirms that this Mr. Fixit, if you like, um, was pulling strings to silence scandals for the Clintons.
And this centers around a report uh involving Bill Clinton's brother, the uh Coke addicted Roger Clinton.
At the time, um this hatchet man was involved in covering up a story as Roger Clinton was about to get married to his then eight-month uh pregnant bride.
There was a bachelor party, prostitutes were involved, recordings were made, according to Mr. Fixit.
And Bill Clinton, the president was there.
His own words, recordings were made involving Bill Clinton.
Uh Bill Clinton.
Arrangements for a meeting between Bill and a twenty six-year-old brunette were discussed and when the president was to arrive in Dallas for the ceremony.
Now the National Inquirer, the very same publication that I am now the editor in chief of, was offered a tape recording that would have busted Bill as a cheater, but that's when Mr. Fixit stepped in.
His own words to me, I swooped in and negotiated for the White House to give this paper, the National Inquirer, exclusive access to the ceremony itself.
Now not even the Washington Post or the New York Times, Sean had that access.
Yet the National Enquirer, a scandal sheet that had covered the Clintons and in all their sort of detail was given leave to publish exclusive White House photographs and quotes with Roger Quint Clinton and Hillary Clinton, their first.
Well, let me let me get you to step back for one second here.
So you actually had the first offer for tapes that would have implicated Bill Clinton in a prostitution scandal while he was president of the United States.
And in comes Mr. Fixit, and as part of the deal, he buys those tapes outright.
No, so before the National Inquirer, according to Mr. Fixit, could do a deal with the prostitute that was attempting to sell the tape, he swooped in, cut a deal with the inquirer and its then management, and uh orchestrated for the National Inquirer to have a front row seat at the Roger Clinton wedding.
So all right, so then whatever happened to the tapes?
The tape disappeared.
Mr. Fixit's not aware of its existence today.
Nevertheless, one would have to assume that the Clinton machine must have been behind muzzling that particular tape too.
Wow.
It's a pretty powerful story, and especially with the access that was given.
Indeed.
And it in and if you look at this, this is a story that ultimately did publish in the National Inquirer with a photo um of Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton at this Dallas wedding of Bill's little brother.
Um and that is the indisputable indisputable proof that Mr. Fixit worked for the Clinton and that the inquirer was able to get a front row.
Were you able to verify payment from the Clintons?
There was no payment from the Clintons to the inquirer.
No, no, no.
Payment to Mr. Fixit.
I'm sorry?
Payments to Mr. Fixit.
Yes, indeed.
Mr. Fixit had provided us with, as I said, uh twenty-four years of uh documentation that proved his existence in working for this off the books operation.
So it's incontrovertible that he was paid from the Clintons directly, or did they have surrogates pay?
Surrogate.
So, in a s in in essence, the Clintons spent essentially a small fortune to silence these scandals, and the money trail leads back to an award-winning Hollywood executive who Mr. Fixit provide he's provided his name to us and were able to confirm his employment through this particular organization.
Now, this entertainment industry Titan used a secret and untraceable slush fund to buy off uh these scandals and these unscrupulous reporters.
It was a fund that was always maintained in cash in an office safe, and many of these payoffs occurred to people in restaurants, cars, and darkened movie theaters.
It's the stuff of almost fiction if you could really think about it.
I mean, it would make for an ultimate Watergate too.
Um but I think what you see here is that what we what the inquiry was able to uncover through interviewing Mr. Fixit over the course of two years was not only is this a shocking uh cover-up from the Clinton, the Clinton family, the illuminating part is the depths of which the Clintons were depraved, but the scale of Hillary's involvement in the conspiracy to hide the truth.
And in many ways, um it's outrageous.
And it's breathtaking to me that the Clintons had so much confidence to think that they could fix these situations and not get caught until this whistleblower has stepped forward.
Let's talk about the level of depravity that you're describing here.
And you know, look, I want to even give everybody the benefit of the doubt.
What evidence, truth do you have of these specific trists that you're mentioning in the piece?
Well, this is Mr. Fixit's hand written diaries over the course of twenty-four years.
Well, for example, if he if there was one instance where he described Hillary Clinton leaving a movie theater and supposedly hooking up with some some female Hollywood so-and-so, but he didn't actually see the hookup himself, did he?
Correct.
And and he's open about that.
He says presumably it was for a hookup.
He does not say that it was equivocally a lesbian trist.
But in regards to these twelve fixes, they are in various different natures as to what the Clintons wanted done.
But one particular uh fix centered around um Markey Post, uh, the former television superstar, who at the time of the fix was the star of the MBC sitcom Nightcore.
Now, according to Mr. Fixit, there were photos of Bill Clinton and Markey alone in a car that was snapped by a paparazzo.
But before those images could be sold to the tabloid media, he arranged for a ten thousand dollar payoff in cash.
Uh they were used bills, and that was paid off to a photographer.
The photographer's studio burned down the night before.
And according to Mr. Fixit, I don't know anything about that, and I don't want to.
But let me tell you about another piece of smoking gun proof, Sean that he provided us.
This was a never before seen dirt file that he authored and sent to former Deputy White House uh chief of staff Harold Okees.
Yeah, I read that.
Uh this is a two-page memo that he was ordered by the Clintons to dig up dirt on Monica Lewinsky.
And for the very first time, this also provides indisputable proof that Hillary engineered a smear campaign against uh Monica Lewinsky, a dirty trick if you like.
But this two-page memo, dated January twenty-seventh, nineteen ninety-eight, was part of the conspiracy from the Clintons to destroy Monica Lewinsky.
It was written thirty days after she made her final visit to the White House and 15 days after Linda Tripp contacted Ken Star.
So but uh so this was actually sent to Ic uh Ickies from Mr. Fixit.
Why is so much of that document redacted?
They are names of individuals whom are not pertinent to the revelations, individuals whom he discovered.
So in other words, but but it does formant.
Yeah, but it does outline a total smear, slander, besmirching, destroy this woman at all cost strategy.
That's what it does describe.
Indeed.
Indeed.
And I can tell you, uh Sean, we're also working on another explosive story that will come out on Wednesday, which details probably one of the more sordid and evil uh maneuvers that the Clinton machine made in order to suppress a scandal.
Uh we obtained this information over the last twenty-four hours.
It is uh explosive by its very, very nature.
Let me ask you this question.
D has anybody in the media besides me contacted you?
Uh we did get a call from CNN um on Tuesday when it was revealed that we were coming forward with this story.
Uh, presumably, given that we didn't hear from them again that we did not uh meet their certain uh editorial agenda or what they would like to do.
But what I would say to that is every media outlet is able to choose what they want to cover.
That is their prerogative.
But what is quite clear is that people are not prepared to do the good old-fashioned type of reporting that the national inquiry.
You are very aware that if there's anything in this nine-page blockbuster uh, I guess, investigation that's wrong, you know you would get sued.
All right, can you stay a little bit longer?
We've got to take a quick break here.
Dylan Howard is the chief content officer, vice president for AMI, the parent company of the National Inquirer.
They have this nine-page special investigation report on the Clintons and the treatment of women and some of their behaviors that kind of fit in with their past, what we know about their past behaviors and but more importantly, how they covered it up.
All right, 18 days till election day, the best election coverage available on your radio dial.
Toll free or telephone number.
We'll get to some of your calls here, 800 941 Sean.
If you want to join us, National Inquirer.
Yeah, that national inquirer that Yeah, they did an expose that proved Jesse Jackson had a love child.
They did a numerous uh investigations into O.J. Simpson, including proving the Bruno Mogley shoes issue, and then of course there was Monkey Business and Gary Hart, and then of course John Edwards and his girlfriend, and later his baby.
Uh, and now they have a nine-page special investigation, uh, the bombshell proof that Hillary Clinton silence Bill's sex victims, and it talks a lot about her life as well.
And we continue on our newsmaker line with uh Dylan Howard, he's the chief content officer, vice president for AMI, the parent company of the National Inquirer.
As we were going a break, I was asking you did the same media like CNN that put on a woman that made allegations against Donald Trump that he was groping her on an airplane with a lot of other people there, and that she didn't mind the first fifteen minutes of groping,
but it was the sixteenth minute that really offended her, and then there turned out to be an eyewitness that said nothing of the sort happened, and the woman never asked for help in the airplane, where I'm sure just one little cry for help would have resulted in everybody standing up.
Uh they went forty-five minutes with that interview on CNN, but but they've not put you or Mr. Fixit on TV.
They've not.
They've not even requested uh whether or not Mr. Fixit would unmask himself as part of this expose.
Now, obviously the conservative uh media has followed this and it has been a dominant talking point on social media, but to me it's quite embarrassing about the state of the fourth estate that there are bombshell revelations here that inevitably should should send shockwaves through this campaign.
Listen, you guys went after Rush Limbaugh, too.
I mean, did we expose the drug ring that he was involved in?
And the the National Inquirer has a proud history of playing a pivotal role in exposing the duplicity of uh public officials and politicians.
And I felt so passionately about this story in working it for two years, Sean, that it needed to be written.
It needed to be exposed.
This is essentially a story of how the Clintons have lied to America, used sorted payoffs, and potentially implicated themselves in crimes in order to cover up, for want of a better phrase, their twisted double lives.
Well, let me ask you this.
What about Mr. Fixit, and what about the possibility that he would come out of the shadows and talk to me?
I think Sean, that's uh something that could be weighed up over the course of the next twenty-four to forty-eight hours, and I do think that it will be hard for the mainstream media to ignore this story and the story that we're about to break if Mr. Fixit does, as you point out, come out from the shadows and tell his story for the very first time.
What is holding him back?
Uh he's just waiting for the right moment.
He feels that he wanted to see uh what the reaction of this story was, because the whole purpose for him to come out and speak was that he believed uh that he could no longer keep these secrets for a quarter century because even though he worked for the Clintons, he had to come forward because of the endless his own words, the endless attention that the alleged indiscretions of Donald Trump had received.
Nothing I have heard, he said, comes close to the sexual and moral corruption of the Clintons, many of which have yet to be revealed.
He writes predictably, the liberal media is focusing on one man's alleged misdeeds and ignoring another's proven sins.
So he's disappointed.
He feels besmirched by the fact that the mainstream media has not grabbed a hold of what is essentially a very compelling story.
And I can tell you that this operative is weighing up the option of coming forward, and there would be no better place to tell it than with you, Sean, because you've shown an interest in this story, and we at the National Inquire can only thank you for that.
Well, let me ask you, because you did talk about twenty-four years worth of journals that he kept.
You did talk about a secret payoff ledger that he has.
Did he have direct contact himself with the Clintons that can be verified?
Indeed.
Yes, he did, and he was able to provide that to us.
Wow.
And the people that he did work with.
Mm-hmm.
And you did have this this memo that he did send to Harold Dickies and Harold Ickeys would have been the person that you would send something like this to as they orchestrated the smear against Monica Lewinsky.
I mean, it goes into real horrible, horrible slander details that well, Mana Monica apparently had a pension for gay men.
Uh she tried for many relationships with them and and it goes on from there.
And Monica was known among the parents who drove her in a carpool when she was attending this particular school as very unstable and emotionally needy, and it goes on from there just to really hurt her as if, you know, it's really was it really Monica Lewinsky's fault as an intern.
Look, she's twenty-one, she's an adult.
I understand she's of age.
That argument can be made, but he's the president of the United States.
And she is the first lady that at that point was eyeing her own political career.
And I think what's illuminating about this expose is that it really does shed light into who the Clintons are, who the real Clintons are.
And after reading this and working on this story for two years, I can only say that I feel that they are indeed corrupt, and they will do anything to ensure that their power is retained or maintained.
And whilst Mr. Fixit was concerned about uh the possible Blowback, if you like, if he was to identify himself, the fact that the mainstream media has has ignored such a compelling tale, and the fact that he does have a top secret trove of documents really lends itself that I think he's I think he probably will come forward.
I think he will come forward and and and tell all about this dark and dirty business that he was involved in.
You also go back and re revisit the issue of Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster, and I think one of the more salacious issues that never got picked up at the time was the fact that as soon as the the White House had found out that Vince Foster had killed himself, that they immediately their instinct was to go right into his office and open up his safe and open up his files and remove all of these things uh before they could be secured.
And in fact, uh I mean that to me was criminal, and that was some type of obstruction of justice, and certainly a cover-up of some kind was taking place that we already knew that, and you know, Maggie Williams was hauling away boxes of papers before the park police ever showed up to seal that office, and then they just sent back what they wanted after apparently everything had been filed through, but you also talk about an affair that had been rumored many years that took place between them.
How do you confirm that?
Well, this is uh information that was relayed to Mr. Fixit via the people working as part of this operation, and he says that his role in the Vince Foster suicide was to hold the media at bay for thirty or forty minutes, whilst he was told people associated with the Clintons, including Hillary's chief of staff, Margaret Williams, were able to haul away those boxes before the police could arrive.
Now, of course, uh this individual was working on the West Coast at the time, so he was getting his information from those associated in the in this backroom operation.
He also said that it was quite common knowledge because he was involved in covering up the rumors about uh Hillary's longtime relationship with Vince Foster.
Um these are his recollections of what was told to him at the time from other people that were involved in protecting uh the Clinton family.
We know this election cycle, and I've talked to Secret Service officers myself that have pretty much confirmed to me that this woman that they have dubbed the energizer, this this girlfriend of Bill Clinton does exist in Chappaqua, New York, and it was even confirmed in some of the WikiLeaks emails where the subject line in particular read Julie,
which is the woman's real name, saw and John Podesta was writing other Cheryl Mills at the time and they saw her picture, meaning Julie's in the tabloids this week, and they mentioned the inquirer and the message at the top went on to say we probably need to revisit our our White Haven conversation, which means that they'd been worried about Bill Clinton's infidelities and his current girlfriends in this election cycle.
And Sean, in the new batch of WikiLeaks emails that's been released, this just goes to show you how tricky they were.
They actually used the English spank spelling of the word energizer, E-N-E-R-G-I-S-E-R, presumably so, in the event that uh there was a a need for plausible deniability.
And there are indeed more emails that have come out between Podesta and Cheryl Mills about the energizer and attempting to coordinate a uh conference call to discuss this issue.
So you've got to ask this question.
Uh in my eyes, it seems remarkable and amazing that everyone associated with Hillary Clinton's campaign seemed to be okay with Bill Clinton doing his own sexual thing, even though they know his wife, whom they work for, is going to run for the presidency of the United States.
So whilst Mr. Fixit may have worked for the Clintons through Hillary's failed two thousand and eight campaign, the reality is that the club the cover-ups are still going on, and the go-to man is no longer Mr. Fixit.
It's Podesta, Mills, and others that will do anything in order to enable these people to get away with stuff.
And Wiki talks about this woman, the energizer is one of only a long list of potential bimbo problems in this election cycle.
Now we also have to go back and take it back to ninety-two, because Bill and Hillary at the time, Jennifer Flowers had come out, and Jennifer Flowers had made her allegations, and then Hillary mentioned she wanted a crucifier, and it wasn't until Ken Starr and impeachment that Bill Clinton actually admitted that what he said on 60 minutes with his wife there was an outright lie.
And then if you take it one step further than that, you got pedestal warning in January that an that aides and staffs are are are leaking issues about Bill's sex life and that it's rampant, And the Clintons would be well advised to get these people in their orbit to shut the hell up, and there was an email exchange discussing an an effort uh in terms to cauterization of the email scandal by and it goes on from there.
Tell the story.
You know, Sean, I find it so hypocritical of Hillary Surrogates to stand there and say, well, Bill Clinton's not running for office.
Hillary is.
The reality is, you know, this is essentially a backroom uh operation from those associated with the campaign to allow the Clintons to get away with lies, payoffs, infidelities, and the such.
And it's still going through to this very day.
And that makes the issue of character essential to whether or not Hillary Clinton is fit for office.
And what's become apparent through my reporting and through the WikiLeaks releases is that it's becoming increasingly questionable as to whether or not she is.
Her role in covering up these types of things, including things for the Clinton Foundation, cannot be ignored.
It is corruption, and it's corruption of the highest level.
Yeah.
Uh I don't want to give the whole article away, because I think people should go and read it for themselves, and we'll link what we can on Hannity.com, and I know it's on newsstands everywhere, and on your website, I I believe it's nationalinquirer.com, if I'm not mistaken.
Indeed it is.
And um I I look forward if Mr. Fixit would come on, we'd love to uh have an opportunity to speak with him and look at all the corroboration he has, because I think what you're talking about is multi-layered.
Not only are you talking about ongoing behavior that caused our country great trouble in the nineties, uh, but on top of that you got a pattern of behavior of smearing and slandering and besmirching of women when she claims to be the candidate of women, which is great hypocrisy that I would argue needs to be exposed.
And on top of that, there might even be laws broken here that need to be look looked into like so many other issues involving the Clinton.
So there's a lot of layers here.
Indeed, there is.
I mean, the question about whether or not these funds in any way were involved in the political process, whether uh there was a blatant abuse of authority, I think you would say that there was, and whether or not there was potential use of campaign or political funds to mount this operation and this backroom um darkhouse operation,
if you like, these are inevitable questions, and I think it comes back to the one thing character and what Hillary Clinton's character is and what her involvement in this cover-up was.
And that strikes at the very heart of the question.
Should she be the next president of the United States?
You know, it's really fascinating.
As you went through this two-year investigation and work with this man, what do you think the general public doesn't know about the Clintons?
I think that uh they see only one face of the Clinton family.
There are many people whom view the Clintons as being critical to the uh the growth of this country over the last two decades.
But what they don't understand is what goes on behind the scenes, and it is the job of the media not to be in the pocket of those associated in the beltway.
It is their job to be rogues and renegades.
They need to investigate things like this, because the very freedom of our country depends upon it.
And what voters don't know is that the Clintons are a vicious political machine that will do anything in their power to silence those that challenge the public face of their family.
All right, we want to thank you very much, Dylan Howard, he's the chief content officer, vice president of AMI, the parent company for the National Inquirer.
It is a nine-page special investigative uh edition if you want to get a hold of it.
It's the bombshell proof of Hillary Clinton silencing Bill's sex victims and other issues.
We really appreciate your time, Dylan, and if Mr. Fixit wants to uh come on, he's very welcome on these airways.
