Sean is live in Vegas as he shares his thoughts about what Donald Trump will need to do to win tomorrow's last presidential debate. The focus for Trump tomorrow needs to be on the deliberate efforts that the Clinton campaign has undertaken to coerce Trump supporters to act violently at political rallies. "If we had a functioning rule of law," offered former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, "The FBI would be investigating this." The Sean Hannity Show is live Monday through Friday from 3pm - 6pm ET on iHeart Radio and Hannity.com. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
You are listening to the Sean Hannity Radio Show Podcast.
All right, glad you're with us, Sean Hannity Show from Vegas tomorrow night.
Debate number three, presidential debate, the third and final debate.
We've got the best coverage.
Let me tell you where we are three weeks from today.
You will go to the polls, I hope, and you will decide America's future.
You know, with all that we're going to talk about today, Project Veritas, James O'Keefe have released another video.
This time showing voter fraud on a grand scale with connections all the way up to the DNC and Hillary Clinton's campaign.
Now we'll get to all of that.
James O'Keefe will be joining us later in the program.
Newt Gingrich will join us.
Also, we have our cyber experts, considering this is such a big issue in the campaign.
But I want you to remember this as we discuss all of these other issues that are very, very important.
What is this election really all about?
You know, I was watching, who was I listening to?
Jamie Weinstein.
I guess he has a podcast thing that somebody sent a link to, and he had Rick Wilson on.
They're both anti-Trumpers.
I think Jamie is engaged to uh Michelle Fields.
And they both got mad at me when I didn't see Corey Lewandowski assaulting Michelle.
I didn't see it.
And I've been in many a scrum in my day, and when you're around other reporters and the candidate says, all right, no more questions, then you go up and ask a question.
You're probably gonna have somebody put their hand up and say, no, you can't do it.
Anyway, but I always liked Michelle.
Jamie got mad at me, sent me a pretty mean email, but that's okay.
Anyway, I was just listening to the Republicans and Rick Wilson in particular describe how they want to, you know, the next dumps on Trump.
You're not working to stop Hillary Clinton.
You know, it's and it's funny because conservatives like me over the years have been told you got to suck it up.
You got to support Bob Dole, and you got to support John McCain.
And I didn't for me it wasn't a suck-up.
I didn't have to suck it up.
I felt like Mitt Romney would have been a real president.
And he's a good person and he's a good man.
I don't know what happened to him.
Sadly, I've seen this happen before.
People lose presidential elections, and I don't know, they kind of go off the rails a little bit.
And I understand Trump is, you know, he's had a number of self-inflicted wounds, and he's a flawed person and a flawed candidate.
And he wasn't spending his entire life trying to run for president.
And he used to go and have fun on the Howard Stern show.
And the whole purpose of going on Howard Stern's show, and I've met Howard Stern.
He's a great guy.
And he's very different in real life.
He doesn't spend every second that you talk to the guy talking about naked bodies and lesbians.
I mean, it's somewhat shtick.
It's something that he's interested in, obviously.
And he he found a real powerful niche.
And that was, you know, being politically incorrect at a time where the country was moving towards political correctness.
And even Stern, who I read is supporting Hillary, that can't be true.
Is he supporting Hillary?
God help us.
What happened to him?
Great.
I can't wait till they give you the 65% death tax, Howard.
All that money, that Sirius XM page, good luck.
You can just give it to the government.
Give it over to Hillary.
Hand it over.
Send the Brinks truck to your bank.
They'll they'll unpack the entire bank with your money and give it to the government.
Which I thought you were more libertarian.
So, yeah, I agree.
There are so there's not a perfect candidate in this race.
And Donald Trump did not spend his entire life running for president and being a politician.
And Donald Trump is a combative, hard-driving New York business guy that has been very successful, and also a guy that understands the media.
And I know that some of the things that he says offend people.
I understand that.
But at the end of the day, that's not what this election is really all about.
We have a well-funded, coordinated effort now to propagandize, mislead, lie to the American people by advancing a false narrative that Democrats themselves are fomenting of violence at Trump rallies.
And they're on tape bragging about their accomplishments, bragging how they were responsible for shutting down Trump's speech in Chicago, bragging that they're responsible for an incident in Asheville, North Carolina, where an elderly woman was allegedly assaulted outside of a Trump rally.
She's there wearing her oxygen mask, heckled the uh heckling a visibly impaired 73-year-old Trump supporter than pursued him.
Well, it turns out that she's an operative.
And all of this, this is you understand what this is.
This is built on a huge lie.
They have been fomenting.
They have been purposefully funding and organizing all of these media events to lie to the American people about not only who Donald Trump is, but who his supporters are.
And then you've got the never Trumper people, and they're doing everything.
Oh, we can dump everything on Trump.
We got more document dumps on Trump.
We got more op research coming out on Trump.
We're gonna take this one's gonna take Trump down.
And as I was listening to this interview, I'm thinking it's unbelievable how the big picture is lost here.
And I'm not gonna defend Trump and what he said on that stupid tape with bully Bush.
You know, a number of the women that the media spent a week talking about end up having major holes in their stories.
That's not reported.
That part's missing.
But they're not looking at the big picture.
And the big picture is this country is in a precipitous rapid decline.
And I give these statistics out every day.
And I'll tell you every day what this election is really all about.
And, you know, I'm I'm watching the maneuverings and the anger and the angst, and you know, there is a real contempt among the Republican establishment, the Democratic establishment, the media establishment, in terms of they want to manipulate you.
And they want to propagandize you.
And they want you to vote the way they want you to vote.
And unanimously, pretty unanimously, the Republican establishment, Democratic establishment, media establishment wants Hillary Clinton.
That means that she would appoint Supreme Court justices that are hardcore left-wing activists that would believe in legislating from the bench, citing foreign constitutions and decisions to justify what they do, not American law, not the American Constitution, compared to Trump who would prefer that we have originalists like Scalia and Thomas.
And he's actually given us the names of people that he would put on the court.
This election's also about whether or not we have a president that can recognize radical Islam as our enemy.
In other words, those that commit acts of terror in the name of Allah, Jihad advancing a caliphate with the design and purpose of converting every person on this earth or making them die.
Then we have the issue of refugees.
Now it gets more interesting when you combine WikiLeaks with Project Veritas, because in WikiLeaks, Hillary brags about how she takes one position publicly, another position privately, and privately she admits we can't possibly vet refugees.
Publicly, she's saying we can.
If we believe what she says privately, then that means her public position is an admission that she's willing to gamble with the lives of the American people and increase the number of refugees by 550%.
And that means more risk to the American people.
That's what this election is about.
Donald Trump's saying we have to protect the American people first.
We've got to be able to vet these people, especially people that grow up in in cultures and societies where women can't drive and women are told that to dress, and women are given permission if they can go to school or if they can go to work, and where gays and lesbians are executed and where Christians and Jews are persecuted.
And of course, the WikiLeaks points out that Cutter came to gave a mil give a million dollar check to Bill Clinton.
By the way, rape is legal in Cutter.
The champion of women's rights, gay and lesbian rights, religious freedom.
Their silence was bought.
So that's in play here, too.
An economy where we're going to continue down the same path of massive government spending and bureaucracy, like Hillary Clinton wants 1.2 trillion in new spending.
She wants 1.4 trillion 1.2 trillion in new taxes, 1.4 trillion in new spending.
Well, we already have 20 trillion in debt, 120 trillion in unfunded liabilities.
We're broke.
We've already robbed our kids' piggy banks.
There's no money left.
Which would pretty much ensure that America's going to be in a steep decline.
This election's about protecting our borders, building a wall, or having open hemispheres as WikiLeaks describes what Hillary Clinton wants.
We want somebody beholden of Wall Street that paid them millions and millions of dollars.
She praises them to the hilt in private, but publicly she acts like she's against them.
She says uh a Syrian, you know, safe zone in the air is well, that's not possible.
That's not but she says publicly that that's what she wants.
She's for fracking behind the scenes, but publicly she's dead set against it because she has to cater to an electorate of environmentalists.
And the same thing with the Keystone Pipeline.
This election's about keeping Obamacare, which basically Hillary now says was only a first step towards single payer.
Donald Trump wants free market solutions.
You know, education's gonna be top down or it's gonna be run by the states.
That's what's at stake here.
On the Supreme Court alone, that ought to motivate people.
Because it impacts this country for generations.
Now, what we have uncovered through Project Veritas, and as I said, James O'Keefe will join us later is a nexus.
You've got this guy Fovel, the dark arts operative doing the work of the DNC.
They're all on tape bragging.
They go to the White House to visit Obama.
They have connections to the White House, they have conversations regularly with the White House.
They talk regularly, almost daily to the Clinton campaign.
They talk to the DNC regularly.
He explains in detail how they set up an operation to foment violence at Trump rallies, which isn't real.
So then Hillary Clinton, by the way, and this was in WikiLeaks, they talk a lot in WikiLeaks all about what bird caging, a bird, what do you call this thing?
Bird dogging is all about.
And then Hillary Clinton, after this violence at a Trump event, she actually goes out there and she says, you know, before I send you off, it's important.
I want to say a few words about what happened last night in Chicago.
You know, we'll always have our differences, won't we?
That's what happens in a democracy like ours, but the ugly divisive rhetoric we're hearing from Donald Trump and the encouragement of violence and aggression is wrong and it's dangerous.
And if you play with matches, you're gonna start a fire that you can control.
That's not leadership.
That's political arson.
The test of leadership and citizenship is the opposite.
If you see bigotry, oppose it.
If you see violence, condemn it.
Because what I saw last night in Chicago was deeply disturbing.
Now, meanwhile, on these tapes, they described that Clinton knew about it.
The DNC knew about it.
Foval explained how the operation set up to allow the Clinton campaign, the DNC, quote, plausible deniability, their words not mine, in the event that the true nature of the deliberate violence is discovered.
The Drudge Report just put up.
National Inquirer story that is going to break tomorrow.
Now I know a lot of people are probably going to say, well, National Inquirer.
Let's see the same people that caught.
Pull that up closer to me, Uncle James.
Uncle James is sweet baby James.
He's really the uncle to my children.
He's married to my sister, and I'm the godfather to their kids.
All right, where are we here?
I don't know how to make I don't know how to use a Mac.
I don't use Macs.
I use regular computers.
I know that sounds stupid to people.
Yeah, just pull them.
All right.
They finding Ennis Cosby's killer, walking in O.J.'s shoes.
I guess they figured out the Bruno Mogley shoe.
Okay.
Jesse Jackson.
They got the story.
Go back.
One at a time.
One at a time.
They got the story of him fathering an illegitimate daughter.
They got that right.
They got the story that Bob Dole was once frisky, and anyway, that the future Viagra spokesman once had a mistress.
I didn't know that.
They're the ones that broke the Gary Hart monkey business story.
They're the ones that got OJ again in the hypothetical confession if I did it.
That was in 2007.
Remember the Rush Limbaugh case.
And then they've got John Edwards and the baby there.
All right, you can have your Mac back.
I hate that thing.
I like what I'm used to.
I like iPads and I like iPhones.
Well, wait a year what they're coming out with tomorrow.
Now have I corroborated it?
No.
I'm just telling you what's in the news.
I'm going to be beaten up in five seconds.
Hannity goes with the National.
Okay, the National Inquirer's been right.
John Edwards, the baby, weren't they the people that did that?
Jesse Jackson, Love Child.
All these other instances we talked about.
Gary Hart, monkey business.
These are big breaks.
Anyway, the headline is Hillary's Fixer breaks ranks.
I arrange sex trists for her with men and with women.
I'm reading directly from what's on Drutch.
Hillary Clinton in a secret is apparently uh paid fixers to set up illicit romps with both men and women.
Blockbuster revelation from a former Clinton family operative who is sensationally breaking ranks with his one-time bosses to speak to the National Inquirer and what is a bombshell nine-page cover story that hits newsstands on Wednesday.
Quote, I arranged a meeting for Hillary and a woman in an exclusive Beverly Hills hotel.
The man who was by the way, anybody in the media?
Are you the same people that ran with the lady that was in the airplane with Donald Trump, but you didn't put on the guy that was there that said it didn't happen?
Are you the ones that didn't press the issue?
Well, 15 minutes was okay, but then after 15 minutes, well, why didn't you say something in the airplane?
So I don't want lectures about ethics from media people.
Anyway, so the woman in exclusive Beverly Hills Hotel, the man who was hired by the Clintons via a Hollywood executive to cover up their scandals.
He told the inquirer.
So this is a verbatim account of somebody that worked with the Clintons.
She had to come to the studio to see the filming of a movie in 1994.
While I was there, I helped her slip out of a back exit for a one-on-one session with another woman with the other woman.
It was made to look casual, leaving quietly rather than being caught up in the melee, but it really was for something presumably more sordid.
What's more, it wasn't just Hillary's flings with women that the shadowy, the shadowy Mr. Fix helped orchestrate.
Hillary's former bag man finally confessed to the inquirer just how he helped her to cover up her affair with married lover Vince Foster.
This figure who provided proof of his employment for the Clintons also revealed twelve fixes that he covered up, including how Hillary Clinton secretly plotted to a counterattack on Bill's mistress Monica Lewinsky via a document buried for two decades.
This campaign's getting interesting.
What crooked reporters were on the take from the Clinton campaign and the Clinton camp.
How he covered up Bill's CD romp with hookers, which a list celebrity had a secret affair with Bill during his presidency.
And the bombshell expose, the inquirer will reveal the fixer's dossier of smoking gun proof, including twenty-four years of documents, notes, and journals.
He also tells his confessions of a Clinton bagman story in his own words for the first time.
Wow.
Linda, I can't see you right now because I'm in Vegas, but I'm just thinking your mouth is wide open, and you'll say, What the heck is going on here?
Are you?
Am I right?
Yeah, you know, I I think it's uh I think I think it'll be interesting to see how this is received by our MSM who's so obsessed with unfounded accusations against the GOP nominee.
Uh, you mean the same people that went into the tank for Hillary, the same people that oh, let's see, WikiLeaks reveals that Univision's president is telling advising the Clinton campaign on how to argue with Trump and go after Trump and CNBC's John Harwood bragging he got under Trump's skin while he was moderating a debate and how in the tank he is for Hillary,
or that uh reporters and anchors at MSNBC were given the questions to ask Hillary before interviews or CNN having one of their political operatives leaking the questions to Hillary ahead of time, or the New York Times and political giving her edit rights over whatever they're writing about her, or let's see, CBS, ABC, MBC, the Boston Globe, and it can go on and on.
Yeah, I mean, the bottom line is the woman collapsed at on 911 in 70 degree weather.
They said she overheated, she lost her shoe, like Cinderella, and they don't cover it.
So as far as I'm concerned, I can't trust the mainstream media, and I can't trust the polls, and you know, everybody's just gotta get out there and vote for the I am sick and tired of the Republican establishment, and we're gonna deal with this in 21 days.
In exactly three weeks from today, people go to the polls and we'll decide our future.
But I gotta tell you, there is a corporate establishment.
They're in bed with the Republican establishment, they're in bed with the Democratic establishment, they're in bed with the globalist establishment, and we have been lied to on a scale, and we have been manipulated on a scale that frankly, in my opinion, is reminiscent of former Soviet Union propaganda and mind control.
That's how bad I think it is.
You know, look at what we discovered.
The political reporter, Glenn Rush.
Oh, isn't that nice?
He identifies himself as a hack for John Podesta.
Just please don't tell anybody I'm a total hack for you.
And then WikiLeaks, they got all the journalists that dined at Clinton Stafford's homes.
Isn't that nice?
John Podesta meeting with a lot of these people, you know, off the record.
Let's see, Cecile Varga uh Vega from ABC, David Muir, Diane Sawyer.
She could only stay 30 minutes, George Stephanopoulos, Nora O'Donnell from CBS, oh CNN, Brianna Keeler, and Gloria Borger and John Berman and Kate Bodine, or whoever that I don't even know these people.
MSNBC, Alex Wagner, Rachel Maddow, Savannah Guthrie from MBC.
Isn't that nice?
John Harwood was a moderator.
I mean, let's see.
The Clinton campaign invited Jeff Zucker runs CNN and Phil Griffin, who's the president of MSNBC.
Zucker declined, Griffin RSVP'd yes.
WikiLeaks releases the emails of the Democratic National Committee.
They showed DNC chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, scheduled or attempted to schedule private meetings with these executives.
RSVPs come from journalists who've been cited in the WikiLeaks Podesta emails.
John Harwood is one.
Politico's Glenn Thrush is another.
It's pretty unbelievable.
The Washington bureau chief of People Magazine.
I mean, the list goes on and on and on.
Cecil Vega, David Muir, Diane Sawyer, John Carl, John Heileman, Mark Halperin, Nora O'Donnell, Jeff Zelney, John Berman.
It just goes on.
All these people.
Isn't that nice?
Rachel Maddow, Savannah Guthrie, Jonathan Martin, Gail Collins from the New York Times, Maggie Haberman, let's see, Mike Allen, John Allen, Ben Smith, Gail King, Eddie Schultz, Joey Scarborough.
Oh, there.
Do you notice my name's not on this?
Ariana Huffington, Chuck Todd, Aaron Burnett, Mika Brzezinski, Andrea Mitchell, Thomas Roberts.
It's unbelievable.
It is unbelievable.
Cheryl Atkinson, remember she worked at CBS News?
I really like her.
And she doesn't always agree with me.
She has a piece that she put out, which I think is the absolute best must-read.
If we can link it to my website, I would.
Newsgate 2016.
And regardless of who is your chosen or least favorite presidential candidate, independent minds should be concerned about the latest revelations in the news media's unseemly relationships with government and political actors.
While there are many responsible journalists working today, inside documents and leaks have exposed serious lapses, constituting the most far-reaching scandal our industry has ever known.
It's our very own newsgate.
Compromised reporting has always existed.
For example, in my new book out next year, The Smear, I'll report on instances of collusion that surfaced or in the Bush administration, et cetera, et cetera.
Then she lays out the players.
The AP, the Atlantic.
You know, the The Atlantic gave uh asked the Hillary Clinton aid for advance of a text of a speech.
Conditions include you and your own voice describing Hillary's words as muscular.
CNBC's John Harwood.
The Clinton campaign emailing the CNN producer.
The Clintons were basically courting each other.
Then the Donna Brazil incident.
And then the Daily Costs pro Hillary Clinton smear group, Media Matters named Daily Cause, is one of the several news outlets that are helpful in getting out Media Matters agenda.
The Huffington Post is mentioned.
MSNBC is mentioned.
The LA Times is mentioned.
Politico is mentioned.
Salon is mentioned.
The San Francisco Chronicle, the Washington Post.
Then she goes in, she offers a window into all of this.
It's so corrupt.
And now we've got on tape top operatives conspiring for voter fraud.
It's on my website.
Go watch it.
You got the firebombing in North Carolina of a Republican headquarters.
Nobody pays attention.
You got encouraging of violence and fomenting of violence at Trump events.
Concerted efforts to commit massive voter fraud in our country.
All on video.
All on video.
Texas Attorney General was lost in investigation into this widespread voter fraud.
Indiana is uncovered, this was in Law News.
Thousands of forged voter registrations.
No.
That's not good.
I told you everything that was the bullets, all the wiki leaks from the past.
I can go over it again if you want.
You know how Podesta wanted the San Bernardino shooter to be named Chris.
Politico offered to edit their story, the campaign kinetic uh edit it.
Focus group tested that Obama's father was a Muslim.
Pretty dirty tricks to Obama.
Why is Obama supporting her?
Asking voters about Obama's cocaine use.
Campaign believed Obama committed voter fraud.
Clinton had public and private positions on issues.
In other words, she lies with regularity.
We know that Obama knew about the Clinton's private email account.
Whoopsie daisy didn't learn it in the press, like he said.
Clinton claims Saudi Arabian cutter funded ISIS.
We know they persecute women, gays, lesbians, Christians, and Jews.
She still took money and never criticized them.
We know that Clinton showed concern.
It was a bad idea.
We can't vet refugees, but she's willing to gamble with your life.
She bragged about being invited to Putin's inner sanctum.
She said that she's too removed from the struggles of the middle class.
She's too rich.
They want to infiltrate the Catholic church and foment change, just like Goodolinskyites that they are.
She admitted a no-fly zone in Zyria would be very difficult.
She flipped and flopped over Keystone and fracking.
She praised Wall Street repeatedly as she took their money, a plan that would cut Social Security.
She wants an open hemisphere on top of open borders.
Hated the use of the phrase everyday Americans, took all this free support from The media.
Top Clinton 8 also may have tried to bribe the FBI according to the FBI documents.
That was Donald Trump.
I think it would be pretty big news.
Witnesses found sensitive Clinton files on a Romanian server, so it was hacked.
Hacked emails show raise the possibility of the ethics breach.
Pay for play.
Hillary Clinton to Goldman Sachs.
Americans who want to limit immigration are unAmerican.
And there's issues about her health.
How afraid they are about her health.
I'll take the next one, James.
I can't get to all of this.
I can't possibly.
And now they're trying to shut off the internet.
They shut off the internet of Julian Assange.
And we won't find out till well after the election who's responsible for that.
Your country is dying.
Economically and in foreign policy.
And these people, all they care about, they don't give a damn about you.
The Republicans, the Democrats, the media.
The globalists they just want to lie and manipulate you into doing what they want so they keep their power.
In three weeks you decide if they do.
If you're there and you're protesting and you do these actions, you will be attacked.
It's not bad.
Oh, so that's part of the process of eliciting the reaction.
The whole point of it is we know that trans people, they're freaking out.
The security team that freak out and his supporters will lose their this is Scott Fovel.
He is the national field director for Americans United for Change.
He used to work for people for the American Way, an organization funded by George Soros.
He also has his own company called the Foval Group.
He is one of the dark operatives for the Clinton campaign.
We were contracted directly with the DNC and again.
Yeah.
I am contracted to him.
I answer to the head of special events for the DNC.
And the head of the special events of political for the campaign.
campaign pays DNC.
DNC pays Democracy Partners, Democracy Partners pays the FOMO group, the FOMO group goes and executes Democracy Partners is a private political consulting company with deep ties to Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama's White House and the Democratic National Committee.
We are the primary mechanism as a team.
Democracy Partners is the, that took the spear out of You could do your mother in front of the government and not go to turn.
You know what?
We've been busting people in today for 50 years, and we're not gonna stop now.
I assume you don't often tell these conversations.
No, no, no.
No, absolutely.
Absolutely.
So no, uh again, it's this whether it's necessary that we have partners, right?
Or it's about us.
What's the goal of this community?
Right?
What's the goal of overall again?
However, as an activist, do we want to do this?
Do we want to take the test?
Listen, let's talk about it.
Take that data and you love it out, and you give it to people, and you have people know about it.
That's right.
However, other people can make things happen that you don't need to know about.
We talk about lots of things that we don't talk about.
All right, hour two, Sean Hannity show.
That is more from Project Veritas and James O'Keefe and his undercover work as he went into great detail yesterday, and then we thank him for being back on the program today.
He detailed all of this violence that is going on that it has been perpetrated against you, the American people, to create a false narrative that Donald Trump rallies are violent.
So they did all of that, and of course it's called bird dogging, which also shows up in WikiLeaks emails, which directly links them, of course, to the DNC and the Clinton campaign.
As he pointed out yesterday, the flow of money in their rapid response operation to keep the bird dogging up, in other words, to lie and propagandize the American people about who Trump supporters are and who Donald Trump is, is they've got money from the campaign that pays the DNC, and the DNC pays democracy partners, democracy partners pays this FOVO group, and the Foval group goes out there and executes all of the madness and mayhem and agitation and violence and false narrative and perceptions.
Now today, the new audio video that have come out.
This is part two of their investigation where massive voter fraud is discussed at length and specific tactics used to perpetrate this against the American people and steal an election if possible.
And James O'Keefe from Project Veritas is back with us today.
How are you, sir?
Hey, Sean.
Great to be with you again.
What did I tell you seven years ago again?
He said I need to cross my T's and dot my I's Okay.
And didn't I say you need lawyers to go over every single thing?
And and we certainly did that.
We had a dozen lawyers go through this.
And didn't I say at the time that you need at least a few lawyers, and yesterday you told me a dozen lawyers?
Can I advise you?
I would up that to about a d about fifty to a hundred because they are gonna come after you so hard.
This is very explosive what you're what you're what you're showing us here.
And I want to get serious for a minute.
How long have you been involved in this investigation?
Uh over a year.
We've had eight full-time undercover, full-time investigative journalists working for my organization, Veritas, for over a year.
We had to the lengths to which we had to go as deep as we did, building relationships, putting our people I mean, we our people were literally risking their lives to do this.
Um the young 22-year-old, 23-year-old uh uh people that were involved in this, went and worked for them and built relationships with them.
And that's and we got invited to the White House, Sean.
They they I couldn't go because it I would be entering by false pretenses, but did any did any of your people go?
I couldn't because I we we we would have to forge a social security number, we wouldn't pass a background check.
We were using an alias.
But we were so far embedded in their infrastructure, they told us everything.
What is amazing to me is the level to which they brag about what they're doing.
Brag about the violence they created, brag about take responsibility for what happened in Chicago.
Brag that a sixty-nine-year-old woman, it was widely reported was a victim of violence at a Trump rally.
It turns out that she is one of their operatives, and this was purposely designed to manipulate the minds of the American people.
I mean, it's it shocks the conscience that this is going on in America.
And the new video show is about 15 minutes of video.
This is this is even more inflammatory.
The the guy in the video, Scott Fovel introduces us as introduces us to a dark operative named Caesar Vargas, an illegal alien who runs a group called Vochis de la Frontera in Wisconsin, and they describe how they commit the voter fraud.
This has never been seen before by the American people.
It's never been seen.
He didn't have a lot of people.
Let me play the let me play the audio and then you could explain it out of it so we can we have enough time to go through all of this uh slowly.
Let's play it.
Vargas is an interesting character.
He is the co-founder of the Dream Action Coalition, a New York lawyer and a dreamer himself.
Born in Mexico, Vargas is an undocumented alien.
What I mean was, you know, essentially what's going on.
Was, you know, this idea and, you know, Scott made it seem possible.
He said it wasn't possible, but I need to know if it's not possible.
You know, essentially getting a bunch of people on what so whatever, taking them around the country.
They are they are basically vote.
So they can vote.
At the same time, they're also getting work permanents under a different name.
Yeah, I was gonna say like, you know, can we make some requests, especially within uh uh elections in 2018?
Right?
I know that.
So I think it's a lot about, for us, let's see who the next president is, if it doesn't come.
If it even makes more sense, the issue will be even more incredible and much more opportunity for us to jump into this.
Right.
If it's Secretary Clinton and the...
Uh 49 laws are who said that we have much more particular people to vote and have an admission for it's not gonna be as significant, right?
So I think it's not possible.
Um let's just wait and found that bridge and bridge only.
Yeah, no, absolutely.
So they're describing the difference of taking people around or bussing them in or taking them around the country so they can vote illegally, and at the same time They're also getting work permits under a different name.
Um, and again, voting on behalf of people who cannot vote.
Why don't you explain specifically?
Because Vargas says, Yeah, right, during the midterm elections in 20 uh 18, we could definitely work on this.
Yeah, I think Sean, you have another that was Vargas.
I think your producers might have another bit of sound from it's better to hear, where it's it's Fovel describing the the plan, the the sinister plots to transport people from one state into another.
I don't know if you can line that sound up, but it's basically he just says to us the plan they're gonna do is transport people from one state into another to vote illegally using the case.
All right, let me let me play that one just so just to keep it you're right.
That one was hard to hear.
Let's play this one.
It's a very easy thing for Republicans to say, well, they're busting people in.
Well, you know what?
We've been busting people in to deal for 50 years, and we're not gonna stop now.
So, I mean, I grew up with that idea.
You know, they they used to bust people out to Iowa.
You can prove conspiracy.
There's a bus.
Yeah.
If there are cars, then it's much harder to prove.
And there's enough money.
If there's enough money, then you're having to drive their POV.
Absolutely.
Or you have honestly the rightest environment to do it.
Within within striking.
Michigan, Indiana.
Least restrictive donation caps and and campaign finance laws and investigation and any investigative arms and they have weakened it so bad in these three states.
Wow.
Explain that in more detail.
Yeah, so what you just heard there was a graphic and obscene conversation from Scott Foval, who works with a Soros group called People for the American Way.
Now he's been fired.
You reported that last night that on your show that he was fired.
Um he's describing the plan.
And the plan he describes, if you didn't hear it, was to transport people from one state into another state to vote illegally, using personal vehicles instead of buses to make the fraud more difficult to pinpoint and expose.
Scott even says to us the WikiLeaks emails are difficult for them because they have to be careful about putting the stuff in writing.
So they moved it, Sean, into encrypted messaging.
They they said we can only do this stuff on encrypted uh black box communications.
He also explains the use of shell companies to disguise the fraud.
And he says, You gotta start a shell company and move the cars over state lines.
And then he says, Listen, we got to be real careful of of anyone finding out about this.
So here's what we're gonna do.
I'm gonna put you in touch with someone who can hook you up.
That man's name was Cesar Vargas, and that's the illegal alien who runs the um uh Volches de la Frontera Group.
You can see that in the video.
He says, let's do this.
He describes how to do it, and he says, not only do we need to do it here, we need to do it in a 2018 election.
Explain the beginning when Fovel says you could blank your mother in front of the governor and not go to jail, because he was basically saying we can get away with all of this and we're not gonna get caught.
I'll play it for our audience.
You could your mother in front of the governor and not go to drink.
If you had enough money.
Explain the context of that.
He's talking about uh he's describing which states to do it in.
He says, it's a really good to do this in Wisconsin, and it's really good to do it in Indiana and Michigan.
The reason why he brings up Michigan, Sean, is because the governor of Michigan is a Republican, but Scott Fovel thinks that these some of these Republicans are sort of rhino republicans.
They're they're unwilling to stand up to the fraud, specifically in Michigan because there was the Flint crisis and the uh Flint water crisis, and the Republican governor is uh spineless, afraid because he's being inundated with attacks from the opposition.
So he says, do it in Michigan, because the governor would you could blank your mother in front of the governor and they won't prosecute you.
So Fovel is describing our political climate where the Republicans are weak in the knees and unwilling to do anything about it.
And Sean, the reason why these guys are singing like songbirds is to take a little credit.
My team built a relationship over a year, but it's also because they live in a vacuum where the media didn't does not hold them accountable.
That they they know that they can get away with it.
No one will ever do anything about it.
The mainstream I've broken the story, the mainstream media still hasn't covered it.
So they are just arrogant, unaccountable, and willing to do whatever it takes to win.
It's very important, I think, as I looked at the new video today That you keep in in your mind what you disclosed yesterday.
There was a point yesterday where Foval is explaining how the operation is set up to allow the Clinton campaign and the DNC, quote, plausible deniability in the event that the true nature of the deliberate violence is discovered.
So, and then they go on to explain the flow of money.
That's why the flow of money is so important.
And yesterday they also talked about we have direct contact with the campaign, direct contact with the White House, direct contact with the DNC, and you know, we have to just make sure that there's a double blind between the actual campaign, the actual DNC, and what we're doing.
There's got to be a double blind so they can have plausible deniability about any of this.
And what they're saying is they're all in on it.
Hillary's in on it, the campaign's in on it, the DNC is in on it, and even it goes to the Obama White House.
Yeah, and the term he uses Sean is Pony Express.
He says it's like a pony express, which I think is one of the most powerful blinds.
He says we need plausible deniability, it's a pony express, and Hillary knows about it.
In fact, I'm gonna it's the context is important from yesterday.
He says, quote, the Clinton campaign pays the Democratic National Committee.
Democratic National Committee pays democracy partners, which is the dirty tricks operation.
They pay me to go out and execute the blank, the expletive, the violence.
So what this is, just like the old mob families, is they use money and influence to put union thugs on the streets to incite violence and steal the vote.
And never before in American history have we been able to hear it, watch it, and smell it.
You read about it, you've heard conspiracy theories about it, but now it's been corroborated.
Not just by one guy, but by a guy illegal alien in Wisconsin who tells us how to do it.
Bob Creamer is married to United States Congresswoman.
We're on White House conference calls, and Scott Fobel, who by the way has been fired.
And now that he's been fired, and by the way, thank thank you, Sean, for reporting that.
Thank you for reaching out to them for comment.
You're the only person, the first person to do that, and CNN just called me, and they're gonna do a story because you did that.
So thank you for reaching out to them for comment.
They fired Scott Fovel, who's taking the fall for Bob Creamer, and the new video has something on Bob Creamer.
So the question is it's not Fobel's fault, it's the system's fault.
It's the White House, it's everyone above Fovel, and are they gonna take the fall too?
And by the way, CNN is a daylight and a dollar short as usual, and it's only the pressure that we have.
Uh all right, stay right there.
We gotta take a break.
We'll come back.
We have more with James O'Keefe, Project Veritas.
Now, not only have we learned about the dark arts of fomenting violence at campaign events to create a false narrative for you, the American people, about Donald Trump and his supporters, but now we've got voter fraud on a level that you cannot believe, and you can see it and hear it with your own eyes and your own ears.
We continue now with Project Veritas and James O'Keefe is back with us.
I want to go back, I want to talk a little bit more in detail about part two today that you just released.
All right, before we get to that, James, I want to remind people what you released yesterday in part one.
If you're there and you're protesting and you do these actions, you will be attacked at Trump Ralph.
That's what we're oh so oh oh, so that's part of the process.
We know that Trump's people will freak the security team that freak out and his supporters will lose their s this is Scott Fovel.
He's the national field director for Americans United for Change.
He used to work for people for the American Way, an organization funded by George Soros.
He also has his own company called the Foval Group.
He is one of the dark operatives for the Clinton campaign.
We were contracted directly with the DNC and the campaign.
Yeah.
I'm contracted to him.
But my I answer the head of special events for the DNC.
And the head of the special events of political for the campaign.
The campaign is DNC.
DNC is democracy partners, democracy partners pays the Fobel group.
The Fobel group goes and executes.
Democracy Partners is a private political consulting company with deep ties to Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama's White House, and the Democratic National Committee.
We are the primary mechanism as a team.
Democracy Partners is the tip of Speed up.
we have events.
Okay.
And we have a whole team across the country that does that.
Both consultants and people from the Democrat Party and Ros and people from the uh campaign.
Um my role for the campaign is to manage all that.
So I'm uh basically deputy rapid response director for the DNC for all things Trump on the ground.
This guy is Aaron Black.
He works full time for Creamer at Democracy Partners.
He directs the spontaneous protests at Trump and Pence events.
His real name is actually Aaron Minter.
We don't know why he uses the name Black.
Nobody's really supposed to know about me.
So the Chicago protest when they shut all that, that was us.
It was more him than me, but none of this is supposed to come back to us because we want it coming from people.
We don't want it to come from the party.
So if we do a protest and it's brown, oh DNC protest, it's right away the press gonna say partisan.
But if I'm in there coordinating with all the groups on the ground and sort of playing field general, but they're the ones talking to the cameras, it then it's actually people.
But if we send out press advisories with DNC on them and Clinton campaign, it just doesn't have the same effect.
Sometimes the crazies fight, and sometimes the crazies don't fight.
They're starting confrontations in the line.
Right?
They're not starting conference of volunteers in the rally.
Because once they're inside the rally, they're on the Secret Services control.
When they're outside the rally, they're more affected out they're harder to get in.
The media will cover it no matter where it happens.
I assume it's always in the rally.
Initiating the conflict by having leading conversations with people who are naturally psychotic.
Okay, I mean, honestly, it is not hard to get some of these to pop off.
Right.
It's it's a matter of showing up to want to get into the rally in a plan Haronhood t-shirt saying or you know uh Trump is a Nazi, you know, you get you can message to draw them out and draw them to punch you.
So there's like a Morse code between the DNC and super packs.
And you guys have a most fail than there's a a text a text conversation and everyone.
The thing that we have to watch is making sure there's a double blind between the actual campaign and the actual DNC and what we're doing.
There's a double blind there.
So that they can plausibly deny that they didn't do anything about it.
Undercover investigation that has gone on for over a year.
You had eight separal separate people that have been able to infiltrate this this dark arts group that has direct connections to Hillary Clinton's campaign, the DNC, democracy partners, and even up to the White House.
Now, in this investigation today, you talk about this backroom dark arts effort for voter fraud.
Explain in detail exactly what people will see when they watch your tape.
Thank you, Sean.
So the video the video yesterday was about inciting violence of Trump rallies, and and uh we can revisit that.
But today's video is about voter fraud and the election being rigged.
This has been the number one dominant media narrative all over the last few days was that Republicans need to condemn Trump because he said that the voting is reached.
Well, guess what?
The video today shows operatives, these are dark money operatives, dirty tricks operatives that by the way are illegally coordinating with the super pack of Hillary and Hillary's campaign.
We'll get to that in a minute.
And these operatives are describing how they commit the voter fraud.
They describe a bust quote, I've been we've been busting people into the in across state lines for fifty years, and he uses language I cannot repeat on the radio.
And he says, we can go to certain states with weak need Republican governors who won't prosecute us and get away with it.
And he describes a state like Michigan and and Rick Snyder and Indiana and and and Wisconsin.
And then he says how they do it, and and and I'm I can't quote him because it's so graphic and obscene, but I'll at least summarize it.
He says, Well we'll we'll create shell companies to disguise the fraud.
We'll use rental cars instead of buses because rental cars you you can't tell that they're that where it's coming from.
And uh he describes that he's a former private investigator.
He used to run the investigation so he understands how the system works and how to get around it.
And then this individual, this dark operative, describes a person that he can connect us with, someone that he says, do not repeat his name to anybody.
He says his name is Caesar Vargas, and we go meet with Caesar Vargas in New York City, and Caesar Vargas runs an illegal immigration organization where he gets out the illegal immigrants to vote and commits quote unquote civil disobedience is what he calls it.
We say you mean voter fraud and he says, Well, it's illegal, but we can try to do it.
He's on tape saying that it's illegal and that he's gonna do it, not just now, but specifically in the midterms in 2018.
And Sean Sean, the only way we got access to all these people is because we spent a yeah infiltrating and investigating and building relationships with them.
But Foval also said we've always done it, we're gonna continue to do it, and if we can't bust them in, we'll just bring him in by car.
Yes, yes, he's gonna be a good idea.
He talked bragged about how he's old school.
Yeah, he's old school.
They've been doing this for fifty years.
Yes, and and and by the way, just a little bit of news here.
Um someone just puts this on in front of me, the Cruz Subcommittee on Federal Rights wants to hold a wants to call a congressional hearing before the election, and they're going to subpoena Bob Creamer and uh Scott Fovel for more information.
Uh don't but don't worry about that because James Comey will step in and he'll he's gonna end up giving them a a special deal and of course they uh they will plead the fifth and we're not gonna find out.
People are gonna have to watch this video themselves.
Let me let me tell you how this is gonna work.
They will offer immunity, probably to all of them.
And then nothing is gonna happen because the whole system is bankrupt and it is corrupt.
It's corrupt at a level that nobody ever imagined before this election season.
Between WikiLeaks and what you're doing, I feel like America's now a banana republic.
America is a country in massive decline.
Hillary is Sean Let me let me just say one thing that's a little hopeful because I'm you're preaching to the choir, we're in violent agreement with one another.
Nothing's gonna happen within the Well, not violent, but go ahead.
I mean I'm violent, but we're in complete agreement with one another.
Uh I I believe that this story, and I and I'm watching Twitter and Facebook and Reddit and all these things, it's like the barbarians at the gates.
Their dam is cracking and the and this social media, uh, grassroots media is now becoming equal to or greater than the mainstream media.
Because I'm getting like 10,000 retweets on every one of my tweets.
Uh uh, we're inundating the inboxes of CNN, ABC, NBC, and all these places, and they are now starting to ask for comment.
So what my point is I think we have to, like you said, we have to put pressure on the government and the people have to there's a power shift from the mainstream media to the grassroots happening as I speak.
And I think that that's what's happening.
I think it's a good thing for democracy, and I think I I agree with you.
Listen, I think there's a chance, a chance.
I I think between WikiLeaks and what you're releasing every day.
And uh, how many more days will you be releasing stuff?
Um well, my team has pulled almost two all nighters in a row, so we're gonna try to do it every day, if not every day, almost every day up until the election.
Okay.
I think this could have a profound impact on this election.
But this is what the media's gonna do to you, James, because they've done it to you before, and I've been putting you on my programs for years.
And that is they're gonna go, oh, James, where did you get your money from?
Oh, James, how did you edit this?
Oh, James, isn't this selective editing?
And clearly you can't take out of context the things that these people are saying.
But you know that's coming, and I know that's coming.
Uh, let me tell you something.
Uh sources are telling me, I mean, I I people are are whispering, the the people see this video, and there hasn't been Sean, there hasn't been one left wing website which has said a darn thing about me about this video.
Not even media matters?
Not even Media Matter.
By the way, Media Matters is implicated in this.
We have a video coming out on Media Matters.
Media Matters were funded.
We met with their president.
Um we'll get into that another day.
But they're not they haven't said anything, and because it's it's so manifestly damning.
There is n this video, I have a change.
It is damnable.
This should change.
If American people if the American people watch these videos, James, this should absolutely ensure that Hillary Clinton can never be the president of the United States.
They're that powerful.
But but if the media but see here's the thing, right?
The media needs to push the videos.
And what you're seeing right now is a grassroots media, which is almost as powerful as the mainstream media.
If they play these videos on the air at ABC News, Hillary would lose.
There's no question about it.
Because if people could hear and smell the rot and the stench of what they're saying, they would be like, I don't want to live in that world.
But the media has a firewall, and we have to break through it, and the only way to break through it is to mobilize your army of people, which is listening right now.
And if I could make one request, it would be for everyone listening to this program to go get this video, it's on YouTube and everywhere else, and tweet it out at the journalists.
Because we did this yesterday and it worked.
And Sean, you did it on your TV program or your your program, and you you you asked people to get it out, and it worked.
So go on Twitter, go on Facebook, embed the video.
I'm asking everybody.
It's on my Twitter account.
It's on Hannity.com at Sean Hannity on Twitter.
It's on my Facebook account.
Find it, retweet it, post it, and get your friends and get everybody you know to watch these videos because if any if the American people see this and then they add to it.
I don't know if you notice in the work that I'm trying to do on the WikiLeaks revelations too, the media's not touching that either.
I mean, I mean the me the media talked about that hot mic sex comment for a week.
Oh my gosh.
This is this is something that's much more fundamental and constitutional and is I mean, can you imagine if Corey Lewandowski for the Trump campaign said, quote, I don't care about the law, we need to win this mother effort, unquote.
Can you imagine?
Wall.
That's in the tape today.
Yeah, that's in the tape today.
Yeah, but they've gotten all over the TV for doing ten hundred t times things less than that.
Well, let me ask you this.
Can you tell me the last question?
What else g as much as you can tell, and how many more people are going to be implicated and how how high up will this go?
Well, we do we so our next installment we have more uh tape involving commentary about and and discussion about Hillary Clinton and what she's personally approved.
Um and these are not low level people, these are high level people that meet with her, that visit with her, and we have a paper trail.
So I think we're gonna write yeah.
Yeah, I don't I don't mean to cut you off, and uh hopefully we uh will continue these interviews every day.
James O'Keefe, thank you.
Thank you.
You could be your mother in front of the government and not go to drink.
You know what?
We've been busting people in fifty years, and we're not gonna stop now.
No, I'm gonna have this conversation.
No, no, no.
No, absolutely.
Absolutely.
So again, it's it's a per whether it's invasive.
We have wonder this, right?
Or it's about I don't know of us.
What's the goal of this community, right?
What's the goal of overall again?
This is easy.
However, as an activist, do we want to do this?
We want to take this up.
And you have people know what it's rushing.
However, other people can make things happen that you don't need to know about.
We talk about lots of things that we don't talk about.
All right, the final hour of the Sean Hannity show, news roundup information overload as we come to you from Los Vegas, the site of tomorrow's third presidential debate.
We are twenty-one days away from election day.
That means three weeks from today you will be going to the polls and you will decide America's future.
Or will you?
As we just had James O'Keefe's latest in-depth investigative report on voter fraud.
Remember, I'll take you back to yesterday.
He described in detail the flow of money uh that went throughout the Democratic Party, how the campaign of Hillary Clinton is paying the DNC, how the DNC pays democracy partners, how Democracy Partners pays the FOBOL group,
how the FOVOL group goes out and executes uh all of the chaos you have seen all election year long, it's called bird dogging, as a means of creating A false narrative that Donald Trump and his supporters are violent, they're out of control, they're mean, they fight, they're horrible people.
This is well organized, well funded, and well orchestrated.
Fast forward to today's video, and you have a systematic attempt at using the same money sources apparently to fund an effort of massive, massive voter fraud going into all of the details of how they do it.
Where do we begin here?
Former Speaker of the House, New Gingrich is with us.
What's your reaction to this today?
Well, first of all, I think it's a remarkable job that that uh he was able to put together a year of investigative reporting and and to actually get these guys talking so arrogantly about routinely breaking the law and about their relationship to the Clinton campaign.
And I think that the firebombing of the North Carolina Republican Party raises this to a whole new level of asking, you know, who who actually is out there on the left, encouraging uh violence against Republican activists against Republican headquarters.
Uh what what kind of attitude is it?
And of course, I I said to you at the time when Trump decided to go to uh the University of Illinois uh campus in Chicago, which no Republican had ever gone to, which from the standpoint of left-wing Democrats who have to own the black community to survive.
They cannot afford competition of the black community.
And so I said at the time when they they had this uh organized demonstration effort to block him even there, and he did back off because it was a real danger of violence.
We now have this proof that that came from people who were being funded indirectly by Hillary Clinton.
It's just it's astonishing as an assault on American self-government and as an assault on the American electoral process that you'd have this kind of of deliberate overt effort to uh basically undermine our whole process of self-government by intimidating and and uh creating the kind of violence that they're talking about.
I think it's very sobering.
Uh, and I think that it's the sort of thing that, again, if we had an honest rule of law right now, you'd have the FBI investigating this guy, you'd have them investigating exactly what the chain of money was uh in the Chicago event.
Uh and remember, Chicago's a city that is in such terrible shape in terms of African Americans on the South side that they announced today that they're now a thousand shootings more than last year.
It's just it's unbelievable how bad it is that they can't afford the risk of somebody like Donald Trump coming in to become genuinely competitive, and that apparently will do virtually anything uh to stop him, and I think this is going to become the next week or so a very big question.
Can they really say that they're gonna block the American people from having a free election?
I mean, it's it's extraordinary.
You talk about the fire bombing.
Why do I believe, and God forbid, because we do not want violence in our country, but God forbid this it happened at a democratic headquarters?
Why do I believe and know in my heart that it would be covered very differently?
But you've also got this whole bird dogging strategy, which is encouraging violence, bragging about the success of the the violence that they created, like in Chicago at Trump events, advancing a phony narrative, propagandizing the American people into believing something that is not true is true, to create a false image in the hopes of, you know, electing Hillary Clinton, now a concerted effort that is well funded to literally commit massive, widespread voter fraud.
One other thing.
In the WikiLeaks dump, the Democrats talk about the bird dogging.
So clearly there's connection.
I mean, I think a lot of people never heard of bird dogging before yesterday.
And I think now that it was well within the let me just remind you, Winston Lord wrote a brilliant article in the last couple of days on the scale of voter fraud in Philadelphia.
And nobody can read that article and ever again question that it is legitimate to be concerned about exactly what is going on and how it's going on.
And that that's the sort of thing we're up against where the elite media doesn't even want to consider it as possible.
Well, we actually have clear evidence that there is a substantial amount of fraud underway, and that in fact uh the Democrats to some extent use that as an entire model of how they operate.
Now we've got the question how is it that now Julian Assange Internet has now been cut off?
Now I think an unreported story, and my first instinct tells me that it's probably the Obama administration's effort to do this.
As a matter of fact, there's been, it seems the Obama administration's effort to save the presidential candidacy of Hillary Clinton is finally starting to yield tangible results.
As WikiLeaks just provided the following update to Julian Assange was cut off from using the Internet at an at the Ecuadorian embassy in London effective Saturday evening.
We can confirm that Ecuador cut off Assange's Internet access, they said after the publication of Clinton's Goldman Spa uh Goldman Sachs speeches.
So what role did Obama and Kerry play in silencing Assange?
Well, you and you have this whole story, by the way, that you may remember in the the where you have the Vice President Biden saying that the United States is going to launch an offensive against uh the uh Russians uh on cyber behavior again over WikiLeaks.
I mean, so so what you have is WikiLeaks is essentially a political issue, it's not a national security issue.
Um there is no direct proof that the Russians are doing it, because the truth is if the Russians were doing it, then the signs being cut off wouldn't matter.
Uh but the fact the objective fact is that this administration is desperate to prop up Hillary.
Uh, they understand that every day that goes by there are more revelations, but these revelations make her look worse and worse.
Uh and so they are trying to find some way to keep her propped up despite everything that that is going on.
And I think inch by inch in fact is losing ground because it is so blatantly obvious that the team that that that she has put together is anti-Catholic bigotry, uh is is totally pro-Moslim and against telling the the truth about the killer in San Bernardino, for example, is routinely willing to accept foreign money.
I mean, the number of different things they're doing wrong will someday make uh a very thick book when people have time to analyze it and put it all together.
Let me read a paragraph from Cheryl Atkinson at her website, Sheryl Atkinson.com.
It's called Newsgate 2016, because this is a big factor in this election, too.
And she writes, regardless of who is your chosen or least favorite presidential candidate, independent minds should be concerned about the latest revelations in the news media's unseemly relationships with government and political actors.
Now, while there are many responsible journalists working today, inside documents and leaks have exposed serious lapses constituting the most far-reaching scandal in our industry and what our industry has ever known, and it's our very own newsgate.
Now, we have learned through WikiLeaks that in fact CNN and CMBC and MBC and and the New York Times and and ABC MBC CBS have all been in the tank in some way, shape, matter, or form for Hillary Clinton.
We know that the political reporter, this guy named Thrush, that in fact his case, he actually gave, like the New York Times did, he gave the Clinton campaign uh the opportunity to edit the articles they're writing about him.
Then we have another piece out today that all the top news people we know George Stephanopoulos, Nora O'Donnell, uh Glenn Thrusher, uh all the top anchors at the news networks and Savannah Guthrie and CNM people, everybody, that they're all dining at the homes of Clinton staffers.
And they're being fed and they're given drinks, and they've got this nice cozy relationship, so it shouldn't surprise us that the Center for Public Intern uh Integrity has discovered 96% of journalist donations go to Hillary Clinton this election season.
Well, I think uh first of all I think I was right in 08 when I said journalism is dead.
Uh renaming the Columbia School of Journalism into this Columbia School of Propaganda.
The fact is, the most recent study that came out just yesterday from the Center for Public Integrity points out that uh you have ninety-six percent of all donations go to Hillary.
Four percent this is from reporters and people in the news business.
Uh four percent go to Trump.
That's a twenty-four to one ratio in favor of uh Clinton.
In addition, that happens to be almost precisely the level of bias on the Friday that WikiLeaks came out, uh and that the Trump uh 11-year-old tape came out when the networks, the three big networks uh put twenty-three minutes into attacking Trump in 57 seconds.
Think about it, all three networks combined put in 57 seconds on WikiLeaks.
I mean, you can't get any kind of better example of how totally biased they are than to look at both the donation numbers and to look at the uh the situation that we've got in terms of uh the way they're allocating time and the way they're allocating stories.
And you know, the Washington Post actually ran the the cover of their opinion section on Sunday was uh after Trump loses.
Now, this is three weeks out in an election which, you know, I think is uh clearly undecided, And you have the the Washington Post having decided not only is it over, but by the you know, by the way, uh Donald Trump lost.
It's just crazy.
Can I but you know something?
What you and I have been doing on television every night, and I keep asking you, you know, as I'm listing every single discovery of wiki leaks, each one to me is a bigger scandal than the than the previous one.
And then now we've got the O'Keefe videos, one showing that they are purposely causing violence at Trump rallies, the other showing uh a massive effort at voter fraud.
And in the tape yesterday, we have the explanation from the guy on tape saying, well, the flow had money for rapid response, in other words, the the dark arts of politics operations is well, the campaign pays the DNC.
The DNC pays democracy partners.
Democracy Partners pays the FOVO group, and the FOVO group goes out and foments anger and violence at events, and apparently is up to their eyeballs and voter fraud, and they bragged about all the contact they have with the campaign and even the Obama White House.
Now, if I'm a journalist, I'm thinking this these are the plumbers.
This is Watergate.
These are the people that are doing the dirty work.
What did Hillary know?
When did she know it?
What did Obama know when did he know it?
But the but the difference was you have never seen the Justice Department as politically corrupt as it is now.
You've never been who do you turn to to enforce the law when the people who are supposed to enforce the law are corrupt?
And what Comey did, I have yet to find a single retired FBI agent who can explain uh the decisions the FBI made about evidence, about about interrogations, about go down the list.
Uh, you know, and to suggest, for example, that General Cartwright has got a problem because he may he lied to the FBI, but Hillary Clinton, who 39 times couldn't remember.
I mean, if you notice there are zero occasions in two presidential debates where she couldn't remember, but thirty-nine times in her FDI interview, she couldn't remember.
I mean, if that's not obstruction of justice by somebody who deleted thirty-three thousand emails, which was illegal, you just get on the list.
So the problem you got right now is as long as the Clintons can follow the Obamas, and as long as the President has the power to pardon people, how are you going to go out to track down these people, even if they engage in explicit violation of the law?
You know, it's sort of like Juan Ada Broderick said after the incident with with then Attorney General Clinton, who was I gonna go to?
You know, do you you have one email exchange between Podesta and Cheryl Mills, and they're talking about, well, should we not turn over the the exchanges between Secretary Clinton and President Obama?
Now, President Obama had already told the American people that he learned about her private email from from the news.
Meanwhile, he was emailing her.
So he lied, and then they're talking about these were subpoenaed emails, and then they're talking about not turning them over.
Well, that would be obstruction of justice.
Here's my last question.
Trump is down in the polls, Mr. Speaker.
If you look at the polls, he's losing.
How does this play out?
Well, I think if you look at uh the polls on Brexit, they were losing.
I think that we're in a cycle, because I've said to you before, my good friend John Engler was running against the incumbent governor of Michigan on the Sunday before the election.
Uh the Detroit liberal Detroit newspaper had a page one story that Engler was behind by fourteen points.
He won on Tuesday.
Um the news media has done everything it could to batter him.
Uh, I think that uh in fact uh my experience being out in these various uh book signings is enormous.
Uh uh support for Trump uh and people who are very intense.
And people will walk up to me and say, I can't tell anyone but I am for Trump.
So I'm I'm gonna wait and see.
I I think he has a real chance to win.
I think every day that goes by, it's more obvious how corrupt and how sick the system is.
I even have senior reporters admitted private how how much they are worried by the degree of sickness that is now undermining our whole system.
So I think this is uh this is a long way from being over, and I tell everybody just make sure you vote and you get your friends to vote, and you're gonna have an amazing impact.
All right, Mr. Speaker, as always, we'll see you tonight on Hannity.
Thank you for being with us.
By the way, his new book, he's gonna be at the Reagan and Nixon Library later this week, and he'll tell us more about that uh as the week unfolds.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Appreciate it.
So many cities are corrupt, and voter fraud is very, very common.
The following information comes straight from Pew Research.
Quote approximately twenty-four million people, one of every eight voter registrations in the United States are no longer valid or significantly inaccurate.
One in eight.
More than one point eight million deceased individuals right now are listed as voters.
Oh, that's wonderful.
Of the one point eight million, one point eight million is voting for somebody else.
Approximately two point seven five million people have registrations in more than one state.
Then there's the issue of illegal immigrants voting.
The following comes from a 2014 report from the Washington Post.
This article was entitled, Could Non-Citizens Decide the November Election?
Here are some excerpts.
More than 14% of non-citizens in both 2008 and 2001 samples indicated that they were registered to vote.
Oh, isn't that wonderful?
Because non-citizens tend to favor Democrats, to put it mildly.
Obama won more than 80% of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 sample.
You don't read about this, right?
They don't tell you about this.
Your politicians don't tell you about this when they tell you how legitimate all of these elections are.
They don't want to tell you about this.
We find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for democratic victories in various close elections.
Okay.
But but the larger point that I want to emphasize here is that there is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even you could even rig America's elections in part because they're so decentralized.
And the numbers of votes involved.
There's no evidence that that has happened in the past, or that there are instances in which that will happen this time.
And so I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes.
One week, Wisconsin.
One week.
One week from today, you get to choose a new government.
And because early voting runs through this Friday, you don't have to wait till election day.
You can vote all week.
I mean, you can only vote once.
It's in Chicago now.
You get in Chicago, I'm messing with you.
That was a long time ago.
All right, glad you're with us uh 24 now till the top of the hour, right down our toll-free telephone number.
You want to be a part of the program.
Those statistics that Donald Trump has thrown out there are chilling.
The one in eight are questionable uh registrations of people.
1.8 million deceased.
You've got millions of illegal immigrants.
Now, you would hear and believe that Obama even jokes about how dead people have voted in in past elections in Chicago.
I think it's been pretty well chronicled that Richard Nixon probably won the 1960 election.
We know from WikiLeaks that Clinton allies, quote, believe the Obama forces committed voter fraud in 2008.
So Hillary Clinton has made the case.
Quote, they go on to say two attorneys with close ties to the Clinton family believe that then Senator Barack Obama and his campaign flooded the caucuses with ineligible voters according to leaked emails.
Emails hacked from Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, John Podesta cites two attorneys and old friends of the Clintons, James Lyons and Michael Driver, tasked with caucus protection, election protection, and had to raise hard money for the 2016 Colorado caucus.
And then, of course, we've got the tapes by Project Veritas that came out earlier today, and we just spent a lot of time on the program with James O'Keefe.
Now, think about it this way.
Ah, well, maybe it's conspiratorial.
Maybe it's not real.
Okay, did you think that the DNC would be colluding with the Clinton campaign as we have now proven to cheat Bernie Sanders out of a legitimate opportunity to become his party's nominee?
Well, that happened this election season.
Now that we have evidence of collusion where the Obama Justice Department is tipping off the Clinton campaign, and the State Department is colluding just like the Justice Department with the Clinton campaign and giving them heads up.
And then of course the White House is up to their eyeballs.
They president lied when he said, I learned about the email in the in the press just like you.
No, he didn't, because he was emailing Hillary Clinton on a private server.
So he told lies.
Do you think there are dead people still registered?
Yes.
Do you think there are illegal immigrants voting this election?
Yes.
Did we see on these videos today?
Wide spread, basically a concerted effort to cheat, manipulate, and rob the American people of their choice.
You cannot look at it any other way.
And as O'Keeffe's video proved yesterday, there is coordination with these dark art political operatives and the DNC and the big money people and the Clinton campaign.
Even going up with these people that are involved in this, what I would argue in many cases may turn out to be illegal activity, uh, to the Obama White House.
So why would you be surprised?
I wonder now that the O'Keefe video's out, all those People say it's irresponsible for Donald Trump to talk about, you know, this election being rigged.
How can you not watch these top Democratic operatives that they are organizing a specific effort for the very purpose to commit voter fraud?
How could you interpret it any other way?
I'm watching the video, it's right there and in front of your own eyes.
And it's up on Hannity.com if you want to take a look at it yourself.
Uh there's a story out about voting machines and electronic voting machine was hacked in ten minutes.
Now, with all due respect, this was on regated on their website.
You know, one hacker could jeopardize an entire election.
One hacker.
We know that in the case of Julian Assange, at the age of sixteen, he was able to break into our defense department and their websites and break into NASA and their websites, and he said it was very easy to do.
And what is WikiLeaks proven to us?
We have no cybersecurity.
Our government's not secure.
And the Romanians, we believe, from the FBI dump yesterday.
We believe in fact they did get Hillary Clinton's information.
But the media is not playing that up because we have a corrupt media, corporate media out there.
They're as out of touch with politicians.
You know, you got the political reporter, you know, offering the Clinton camp a chance to edit a piece they're writing and bragging about.
Just don't tell anybody.
What's this guy's name?
Glenn Thrush.
Then we got revelations from WikiLeaks.
You got the ABC News guy, whatever his name is, ABC Nightly News.
You got George Stephanopoulos, Nora O'Donnell, you got Savannah Guthrie, you got um all these NBC people, CNN people.
They're all they're all dining at top Clinton staffers' homes.
Oh, that's not incestuous at all.
That's not corrupt at all.
Cheryl Atkinson has a great piece out today.
It's called Newsgate 2016.
Regardless of who is chosen or least favorite presidential candidate, independent mind should be concerned about the latest revelations in the news media's unseemly relationships with government and political actors.
And while there are many responsible journalists, inside documents and leaks have exposed serious lapses, constituting the most far-reaching scandal our industry has ever known.
Our own newsgate.
And that's just how she starts off.
The Center for Public Enter integrity pointing out, you know, journalist shower Hillary Clinton with a ton of campaign cash.
Then you got the media piling up on Donald Trump while ignoring Wik WikiLeaks, which we basically are doing the job alone.
Reminiscent of 2007 and 2008.
Anyway, here to weigh in on this and comment on this, we got Brian Finch.
He's the co-chair of the cybersecurity practice at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman.
Jamie Finch is the co-founder of Social Assurity.
Ethan Pepper specializes in content management, internet marketing, social media, search engines.
Thank you all for being with us.
Brian, let me start with you.
How likely, how possible is it to hack into these voter machines in your view?
Well, Sean, anything can be hacked.
I think we we've known that uh we've talked about this for for a long time.
You know, you remember that we were on this program eighteen months ago talking about how easy it was going to be for someone to hack into Secretary Clinton's server and uh that it would be the Russians, and now everybody's acting surprised and and outraged that that actually happened, even though you've been talking about it for at least 18 months, not two years.
When it comes to these voting machines, they're like anything else at this point.
Anything can be hacked.
When someone talks about a device or a computer or a system being hack proof, you know basically that you should ignore them because uh functionally anything that is out there can be hacked given enough time and energy, and you know what probably of greater concern is how quick it could be.
Uh, ten minutes, ten seconds, that type of thing to actually go into these uh devices, these voting machines and actually manipulate the selections that people are making.
And whether they can do it on a widespread brace, uh I think that's something else to be investigated, but you know in terms of how easy it is to be hacked, it's it's nothing at all.
Jamie, you're not related to this guy Brian, are you?
Never never met him in my life.
That's pretty funny.
Um, let me ask you this.
I my first position on Julian Assange was, oh my God, people are gonna die because of what he's picked up.
And I was really afraid.
Ten years have now passed.
And in the ten year period, he's never been proven wrong, not one single time.
Now they're trying to shut him down.
I think he did America two favors.
One, he showed that we have no government cybersecurity, and two, he is he is bringing us in the inner sanctum of how deeply, deeply rooted this corruption in our government is.
Is that a good thing?
You know what?
I I think the the issue with all of this really has to focus on, like you said, Where where the money is coming from and the campaign cash.
And when I look at that issue, I look to Facebook and no one seems to be talking or calling them out on the fact that fifty percent of Americans get their news from Facebook, and yet Facebook has been categorically implicated in changing their trending news stories.
That to me is really scary, coupled by the fact that um, you know, in other words, what wouldn't that be an in-kind donation?
If they change what is trending, if they alter and manufacture in favor of a candidate, isn't that a donation in a way?
You know, Sean, it's uh it's a huge conflict of interest that I just I don't understand.
They actually on Facebook's uh business platform, you can buy campaign ads, campaign uh resources, uh and this is across the board.
This is uh worldwide.
Facebook's co-founder Duskin Moss Dustin Moskowitz uh contributed twenty million dollars in September to Hillary's campaign.
Facebook staff members have the highest individual contributions to Hillary's campaign of any other campaign, and they have manipulating trending news.
That that to me is really scary.
And ninety-six percent of journalists, as I mentioned earlier, they um they're voting for Hillary Clinton and donating to her.
I mean, it tells you go ahead.
You you know the difference, Sean though, I think most Americans don't trust mainstream media.
Facebook portrays itself as a neutral third party, and it's not.
I think that's well said.
Ethan, what's your take on all of this?
Well, hey, Sean, Ethan Pepper here.
Uh and I just wanted to let you know that I actually wrote the article for uh for regated, and what makes it a little bit more scary is that it was actually it only took ten seconds for uh the computer scientist to hack the voting machine, not uh not ten minutes.
Wow.
Explain explain how this happened, walk us through it.
So basically these uh computer scientists from Princeton uh they ran a little experiment in showing how they could actually hack a voting machine, and uh all they really had to do was they the guy was able to pick the lock in under ten seconds, install his own software, and the machine was compromised instantly.
And that means and that and that means you could alter the voting in that district.
For example, you'd probably be able to know exactly how many votes were put in, and you could alter it, say it went seventy percent for Trump, you could alter it, make it 80 percent for Clinton and have the same number of votes, and nobody would suspect fraud.
Basically, but I think like the experiment was the interesting aspect of it was uh they set it up, it was George Washington versus uh Benedict Arnold.
So the obviously people were gonna vote for George Washington, and uh three people voted for George Washington, and that's the end of uh the experiment.
Benedict Arnold won uh two to one just because of the voting software that they had used for uh that voting machine.
Now as much effort as it takes to change one vote, you could honestly do that, you could change a million votes.
So this is definitely something that should be taken into consideration for uh this election.
All right, last exit question for all three of you, Brian, Jamie, and Ethan.
Is it your belief that in fact it would be very easy to hack into these machines and alter the results?
Really quick answers, Brian.
Absolutely.
And if it were happening uh in favor of the Democrats, like we've seen over the years of questions about voter fraud and intimidation, Justice Department would be all over it.
If that was a Democratic Party office in North Carolina that got fire bombed, uh uh Loretta Lynch would be down there on uh mock three jet.
Jamie?
I I think that the American public has been uh you know the victim of being deceived about this election for quite some time, and the actual election will only be the icing on the cake.
And I'll give you the last word, Ethan, by the way, great piece that you wrote.
You need all the credit you deserve.
Oh well, thank you very much, John.
I appreciate it.
And I think uh you deserve a lot of credit credit for uh covering the O'Keefe story, one of the few journalists out there to tackle that, and I have a lot of respect for you for doing that, so I just want to say thanks to you as well.
But uh I also wanted to say if you can hack a car, you can easily hack a voting machine.
Oh my god.
And the fact that uh George Sormo or George Saros is chairman is uh the director of Smart Matic, which is uh a voting machine that is in sixteen states.
I think uh that is something that should also be evaluated as well.
Unbelievable.
Hey, you guys are all terrific.
Thank you all for being with us.
And uh by the way, I admire I can barely download an app, so I admire you guys more than you know.
Um, as a matter of fact, I I I wish you all worked for me.
You could teach me how to download an app.
I tried the other day, it took me two hours.
It's pathetic.
Um I just go to my my fifteen-year-old daughter and I'm like, Can you do this for me?
Can you do this for me?
Can you do this for me?
And she rolls her eyes and like does it in two seconds.
