Sean is live in Vegas as he shares his thoughts about what Donald Trump will need to do to win tomorrow's last presidential debate. The focus for Trump tomorrow needs to be on the deliberate efforts that the Clinton campaign has undertaken to coerce Trump supporters to act violently at political rallies. "If we had a functioning rule of law," offered former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, "The FBI would be investigating this." The Sean Hannity Show is live Monday through Friday from 3pm - 6pm ET on iHeart Radio and Hannity.com. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
You are listening to the Sean Hannity Radio Show Podcast.
All right, glad you're with us.
Sean Hannity Show from Vegas tomorrow night.
Debate number three, presidential debate, the third and final debate.
We've got the best coverage.
Let me tell you where we are.
Three weeks from today, you will go to the polls, I hope, and you will decide America's future.
You know, with all that we're going to talk about today, Project Veritas, James O'Keefe, have released another video, this time showing voter fraud on a grand scale with connections all the way up to the DNC and Hillary Clinton's campaign.
Now, we'll get to all of that.
James O'Keefe will be joining us later in the program.
Newt Gingrich will join us.
Also, we have our cyber experts, considering this is such a big issue in the campaign.
But I want you to remember this as we discuss all of these other issues that are very, very important.
What is this election really all about?
You know, I was watching, who was I listening to?
Jamie Weinstein.
I guess he has a podcast thing that somebody sent a link to, and he had Rick Wilson on.
They're both anti-Trumpers.
I think Jamie is engaged to Michelle Fields.
And they both got mad at me when I didn't see Corey Lewandowski assaulting Michelle.
I didn't see it.
And I've been in many a scrum in my day.
And when you're around other reporters and the candidate says, all right, no more questions, then you go up and ask a question.
You're probably going to have somebody put their hand up and say, no, you can't do it.
Anyway, but I always liked Michelle.
And Jamie got mad at me, sent me a pretty mean email, but that's okay.
Anyway, I was just listening to the Republicans and Rick Wilson in particular describe how they want to, you know, the next dumps on Trump.
They're not working to stop Hillary Clinton.
You know, and it's funny because conservatives like me over the years have been told, you got to suck it up.
You got to support Bob Dole and you got to support John McCain.
And I didn't, for me, it wasn't a suck up.
I didn't have to suck it up.
I felt like Mitt Romney would have been a ripper.
President.
And he's a good person and he's a good man.
I don't know what happened to him.
Sadly, I've seen this happen before.
People lose presidential elections and I don't kind of go off the rails a little bit.
And I understand Trump is, you know, he's had a number of self-inflicted wounds and he's a flawed person and a flawed candidate.
And he wasn't spending his entire life trying to run for president.
And he used to go and have fun on the Howard Stern Show.
And the whole purpose of going on Howard Stern Show, and I've met Howard Stern.
He's a great guy.
And he's very different in real life.
He doesn't spend every second that you talk to the guy talking about naked bodies and lesbians.
I mean, it's somewhat shtick.
It's something that he's interested in, obviously.
And he found a real powerful niche.
And that was, you know, being politically incorrect at a time where the country was moving towards political correctness.
And even Stern, who I read is supporting Hillary.
That can't be true.
Is he supporting Hillary?
God help us.
What happened to him?
Great.
I can't wait till they give you the 65% death tax, Howard.
All that money that Sirius XM paid you.
Good luck.
You can just give it to the government.
Give it over to Hillary.
Hand it over.
Send the Brinks truck to your bank.
They'll unpack the entire bank with your money and give it to the government, which I thought you were more libertarian.
So, yeah, I agree.
There's not a perfect candidate in this race.
And Donald Trump did not spend his entire life running for president and being a politician.
And Donald Trump is a combative, hard-driving, New York business guy that has been very successful and also a guy that understands the media.
And I know that some of the things that he says offend people.
I understand that.
But at the end of the day, that's not what this election is really all about.
We have a well-funded, coordinated effort now to propagandize, mislead, lie to the American people by advancing a false narrative that Democrats themselves are fomenting of violence at Trump rallies.
And they're on tape bragging about their accomplishments, bragging how they were responsible for shutting down Trump speech in Chicago, bragging that they're responsible for an incident in Asheville, North Carolina, where an elderly woman was allegedly assaulted outside of a Trump rally.
She's there wearing her oxygen mask, heckling a visibly impaired 73-year-old Trump supporter, then pursued him.
Well, it turns out that she's an operative.
And all of this, this is, do you understand what this is?
This is built on a huge lie.
They have been fomenting.
They have been purposefully funding and organizing all of these media events to lie to the American people about not only who Donald Trump is, but who his supporters are.
And then you've got the Never Trumper people, and they're doing everything.
Oh, we can dump everything on Trump.
We got more document dumps on Trump.
We got more op research coming out on Trump.
We're going to take this one's going to take Trump down.
And as I was listening to this interview, I'm thinking, it's unbelievable how the big picture is lost here.
Now, I'm not going to defend Trump and what he said on that stupid tape with bully Bush.
You know, a number of the women that the media spent a week talking about end up having major holes in their stories.
That's not reported.
That part's missing.
But they're not looking at the big picture.
And the big picture is this country is in a precipitous, rapid decline.
And I give these statistics out every day.
And I tell you every day what this election is really all about.
And, you know, I'm watching the maneuverings and the anger and the angst.
And, you know, there is a real, real contempt among the Republican establishment, the Democratic establishment, the media establishment in terms of they want to manipulate you and they want to propagandize you and they want you to vote the way they want you to vote.
And unanimously, pretty unanimously, the Republican establishment, Democratic establishment, media establishment wants Hillary Clinton.
That means that she would appoint Supreme Court justices that are hardcore left-wing activists that would believe in legislating from the bench, citing foreign constitutions and decisions to justify what they do, not American law, not the American Constitution, compared to Trump, who would prefer that we have originalists like Scalia and Thomas.
And he's actually given us the names of people that he would put on the court.
This election is also about whether or not we have a president that can recognize radical Islam as our enemy.
In other words, those that commit acts of terror in the name of Allah, jihad, advancing a caliphate with the design and purpose of converting every person on this earth or making them die.
Then we have the issue of refugees.
Now, it gets more interesting when you combine WikiLeaks with Project Veritas, because in WikiLeaks, Hillary brags about how she takes one position publicly, another position privately.
And privately, she admits we can't possibly vet refugees.
Publicly, she's saying we can.
If we believe what she says privately, then that means her public position is an admission that she's willing to gamble with the lives of the American people and increase the number of refugees by 550%.
And that means more risk to the American people.
That's what this election is about.
Donald Trump's saying we have to protect the American people first.
We've got to be able to vet these people, especially people that grow up in cultures and societies where women can't drive and women are told how to dress and women are given permission if they can go to school or if they can go to work and where gays and lesbians are executed and where Christians and Jews are persecuted.
And of course, the WikiLeaks points out that Cutter came to give a million-dollar check to Bill Clinton.
By the way, rape is legal in Cutter.
The champion of women's rights, gay and lesbian rights, religious freedom.
Their silence was bought.
So that's in play here, too.
An economy where we're going to continue down the same path of massive government spending and bureaucracy, like Hillary Clinton wants $1.2 trillion in new spending.
She wants $1.4 trillion, I'm sorry, $1.2 trillion in new taxes, $1.4 trillion in new spending.
Well, we already have $20 trillion in debt, $120 trillion in unfunded liabilities.
We're broke.
We've already robbed our kids' piggy banks.
There's no money left, which would pretty much ensure that America is going to be in a steep decline.
This election's about protecting our borders, building a wall or having open hemispheres as WikiLeaks describes what Hillary Clinton wants.
We want somebody beholden to Wall Street that paid them millions and millions of dollars.
She praises them to the hilt in private, but publicly she acts like she's against them.
She says a Syrian safe zone in the air is, well, that's not possible.
But she says publicly that that's what she wants.
She's for fracking behind the scenes, but publicly she's dead set against it because she has to cater to an electorate of environmentalists.
And the same thing with the Keystone pipeline.
This election's about keeping Obamacare, which basically Hillary now says was only a first step towards single payer.
Donald Trump wants free market solutions.
You know, education is going to be top-down or it's going to be run by the states.
That's what's at stake here.
On the Supreme Court alone, that ought to motivate people because it impacts this country for generations.
Now, what we have uncovered through Project Veritas, and as I said, James O'Keefe will join us later, is a nexus.
You've got this guy, Foval, the dark arts operative, doing the work of the DNC.
They're all on tape bragging.
They go to the White House to visit Obama.
They have connections to the White House.
They have conversations regularly with the White House.
They talk regularly, almost daily, to the Clinton campaign.
They talk to the DNC regularly.
He explains in detail how they set up an operation to foment violence at Trump rallies, which isn't real.
So then Hillary Clinton, by the way, and this was in Wikileaks.
Talk a lot in WikiLeaks all about what birdcaging, a bird, what do you call this thing?
Bird dogging is all about.
And then Hillary Clinton, after this violence at a Trump event, she actually goes out there and she says, you know, before I send you off, it's important.
I want to say a few words about what happened last night in Chicago.
You know, we'll always have our differences, won't we?
That's what happens in a democracy like ours, but the ugly, divisive rhetoric we're hearing from Donald Trump and the encouragement of violence and aggression is wrong and it's dangerous.
And if you play with matches, you're going to start a fire that you can't control.
That's not leadership.
That's political arson.
The test of leadership and citizenship is the opposite.
If you see bigotry, oppose it.
If you see violence, condemn it.
Because what I saw last night in Chicago was deeply disturbing.
Now, meanwhile, on these tapes, they described that Clinton knew about it.
The DNC knew about it.
Foval explained how the operation's set up to allow the Clinton campaign, the DNC, quote, plausible deniability, their words, not mine, in the event that the true nature of the deliberate violence is discovered.
The Drudge Report just put up National Enquirer story that is going to break tomorrow.
Now, I know a lot of people are probably going to say, well, National Enquirer.
Let's see, the same people that caught pull that up closer to me, Uncle James.
Uncle James is sweet baby James.
He's really the uncle to my children.
He's married to my sister, and I'm the godfather to their kids.
All right, where are we here?
I don't know how to make, I don't know how to use a Mac.
I don't use Macs.
I use regular computers.
I know that sounds stupid to people.
Yeah, just pull them.
All right.
They finding Ennis Cosby's killer, walking in O.J.'s shoes.
I guess they figured out the Bruno Mogli shoe.
Okay.
Jesse Jackson.
They got the story.
Go back.
One at a time.
One at a time.
They got the story of him fathering an illegitimate daughter.
They got that right.
They got the story that Bob Dole was once frisky.
And anyway, that the future Viagra spokesman once had a mistress.
I didn't know that.
They're the ones that broke the Gary Hart monkey business story.
They're the ones that got OJ again in the hypothetical confession, if I did it.
That was in 2007.
Remember the Rush Limbaugh case?
And then they've got John Edwards and the baby there.
All right, you could have your Mac back.
I hate that thing.
I like what I'm used to.
I like iPads and I like iPhones.
Well, wait till you hear what they're coming out with tomorrow.
Have I corroborated it?
No, I'm just telling you what's in the news.
I'm going to be beaten up in five seconds.
Hannity goes with the National.
Okay, the National Enquirer's been right.
John Edwards, the baby, weren't they the people that did that?
Jesse Jackson, love child.
All these other instances we talked about.
Gary Hart, monkey business.
These are big breaks.
Anyway, the headline is: Hillary's fixer breaks ranks.
I arraign sextrists for her with men and with women.
I'm reading directly from what's on Drudge.
Hillary Clinton in a secret has apparently paid fixers to set up illicit romps with both men and women.
Blockbuster revelation from a former Clinton family operative who is sensationally breaking ranks with his one-time bosses to speak to the National Enquirer in what is a bombshell nine-page cover story that hits newsstands on Wednesday.
Quote, I arranged a meeting for Hillary and a woman in an exclusive Beverly Hills Hotel.
The man who was, by the way, anybody in the media, are you the same people that ran with the lady that was in the airplane with Donald Trump, but you didn't put on the guy that was there that said it didn't happen?
Are you the ones that didn't press the issue?
Well, 15 minutes was okay, but then after 15 minutes, well, why didn't you say something in the airplane?
So I don't want lectures about ethics from media people.
Anyway, so the woman in exclusive Beverly Hills Hotel, the man who was hired by the Clintons via a Hollywood executive to cover up their scandals, he told the Inquirer.
So this is a verbatim account of somebody that worked with the Clintons.
She had to come to the studio to see the filming of a movie in 1994.
While I was there, I helped her slip out of a back exit for a one-on-one session with another woman, with the other woman.
It was made to look casual, leaving quietly rather than being caught up in the melee, but it really was for something presumably more sordid.
What's more, it wasn't just Hillary's flings with women that the shadowy Mr. Fix helped orchestrate.
Hillary's former bagman finally confessed to the Inquirer just how he helped her to cover up her affair with married lover Vince Foster.
This figure, who provided proof of his employment for the Clintons, also revealed 12 fixes that he covered up, including how Hillary Clinton secretly plotted to a counterattack on Bill's mistress, Monica Lewinsky, via a document buried for two decades.
This campaign's getting interesting.
What crooked reporters were on the take from the Clinton campaign and the Clinton camp.
How he covered up Bill's CD romp with hookers, which aidless celebrity had a secret affair with Bill during his presidency.
In the bombshell expose, the inquirer will reveal the Fixer's dossier of smoking gun proof, including 24 years of documents, notes, and journals.
He also tells his confessions of a Clinton bagman story in his own words for the first time.
Wow.
Linda, I can't see you right now because I'm in Vegas, but I'm just thinking your mouth is wide open and you're saying, What the heck is going on here?
Are you?
Am I right?
Yeah, you know, I think it's, I think, I think it'll be interesting to see how this is received by our MSM, who's so obsessed with unfounded accusations against the GOP nominee.
You mean the same people that went into the tank for Hillary, the same people that, oh, let's see, WikiLeaks reveals that Univision's president is telling, advising the Clinton campaign on how to argue with Trump and go after Trump,
and CNBC's John Harwood bragging he got under Trump's skin while he was moderating a debate and how in the tank he is for Hillary, or that reporters and anchors at MSNBC were given the questions to ask Hillary before interviews,
or CNN having one of their political operatives leaking the questions to Hillary ahead of time, or the New York Times and Political giving her edit rights over whatever they're writing about her, or let's see, CBS, ABC, NBC, the Boston Globe, and it can go on and on.
Yeah, I mean, the bottom line is the woman collapsed on 9-11 in 70-degree weather.
They said she overheated, she lost her shoe, like Cinderella, and they don't cover it.
So, as far as I'm concerned, I can't trust the mainstream media and I can't trust the polls.
And, you know, everybody's just got to get out there and vote for it.
I am sick and tired of the Republican establishment, and we're going to deal with this in 21 days.
In exactly three weeks from today, people go to the polls and we'll decide our future.
But I got to tell you, there is a corporate establishment.
They're in bed with the Republican establishment.
They're in bed with the Democratic establishment.
They're in bed with the globalist establishment.
And we have been lied to on a scale and we have been manipulated on a scale that, frankly, in my opinion, is reminiscent of former Soviet Union propaganda and mind control.
That's how bad I think it is.
You know, look at what we discovered.
The political reporter, Glenn Rush.
Oh, isn't that nice?
He identifies himself as a hack for John Podesta.
Just please don't tell anybody I'm a total hack for you.
And then Wikileaks, they got all the journalists that dined at Clinton staffers' homes.
Isn't that nice?
John Podesta meeting with a lot of these people, you know, off the record.
Let's see, Cecile Vega from ABC, David Muir, Diane Sawyer.
She could only stay 30 minutes.
George Stephanopoulos, Nora O'Donnell from CBS.
Oh, CNN, Brianna Keillor, and Gloria Borger and John Berman and Kate Bodine, or whoever that.
I don't even know these people.
MSNBC, Alex Wagner, Rachel Maddow, Savannah Guthrie from NBC.
Isn't that nice?
John Harwood was a moderator.
I mean, let's see.
The Clinton campaign invited Jeff Zucker of run CNN and Phil Griffin, who's the president of MSNBC.
Zucker declined.
Griffin RSVP'd yes.
WikiLeaks releases the emails of the Democratic National Committee.
They show DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz scheduled or attempted to schedule private meetings with these executives.
Other yes RSVPs come from journalists who have been cited in the WikiLeaks Podesta emails.
John Harwood is one.
Politico's Glenn Thrush is another.
It's pretty unbelievable.
The Washington Bureau chief of People Magazine.
I mean, the list goes on and on and on.
Cecile Vega, David Muir, Diane Sawyer, John Carl, John Heilman, Mark Halperin, Nora O'Donnell, Jeff Zelany, John Berman.
It just goes on.
All these people.
Isn't that nice?
Rachel Maddow, Savannah Guthrie, Jonathan Martin, Gail Collins from the New York Times, Maggie Haberman.
Let's see, Mike Allen, John Allen, Ben Smith, Gail King, Eddie Schultz, Joey Scarborough.
Do you notice my name's not on this?
Arianna Huffington, Chuck Todd, Aaron Burnett, Mika Brzezinski, Andrea Mitchell, Thomas Roberts.
It's unbelievable.
It is unbelievable.
Cheryl Atkinson.
Remember, she worked at CBS News.
I really like her.
And she doesn't always agree with me.
She has a piece that she put out, which I think is the absolute best must-read.
If we can link it to my website, I would.
Newsgate 2016.
And regardless of who is your chosen or least favorite presidential candidate, independent minds should be concerned about the latest revelations in the news media's unseemly relationships with government and political actors.
While there are many responsible journalists working today, inside documents and leaks have exposed serious lapses, constituting the most far-reaching scandal our industry has ever known.
It's our very own newsgate.
Compromised reporting has always existed.
For example, in my new book out next year, The Smear, I'll report on instances of collusion that surfaced during the Bush administration, et cetera, et cetera.
Then she lays out the players.
The AP, the Atlantic.
You know, the Atlantic gave, asked the Hillary Clinton aide for advance of a text of a speech.
Conditions include you and your own voice describing Hillary's words as muscular.
CNBC's John Harwood.
The Clinton campaign emailing the CNN producer.
The Clintons were basically courting each other.
Then the Donna-Brazil incident.
And then the Daily Costs, pro-Hillary Clinton smear group, Media Matters named Daily Cost is one of the several news outlets that are helpful in getting out Media Matters agenda.
The Huffington Post is mentioned.
MSNBC is mentioned.
The LA Times is mentioned.
Politico is mentioned.
Salon is mentioned.
The San Francisco Chronicle.
The Washington Post.
And she goes in.
She offers a window into all of this.
It's so corrupt.
And now we've got on tape top operatives conspiring for voter fraud.
It's on my website.
Go watch it.
You got the firebombing in North Carolina of a Republican headquarters.
Nobody pays attention.
You got encouraging of violence and fomenting of violence at Trump events.
Concerted efforts to commit massive voter fraud in our country.
All on video.
All on video.
Texas Attorney General is lost in an investigation into this widespread voter fraud.
Indiana has uncovered, this was in law news, thousands of forged voter registrations.
Wow.
That's not good.
I told you everything that was the bullets of all the wiki leaks from the past.
I can go over it again if you want.
You know, how Podesta wanted the San Bernardino shooter to be named Chris.
Politico offered to edit their story.
The campaign can edit it.
Focus group tested that Obama's father was a Muslim.
Pretty dirty tricks to Obama.
Why is Obama supporting her?
Asking voters about Obama's cocaine use.
Campaign believed Obama committed voter fraud.
Clinton had public and private positions on issues.
In other words, she lies with regularity.
We know that Obama knew about the Clinton's private email account.
Whoopsie-daisy.
He didn't learn it in the press, like he said.
Clinton claims Saudi Arabia and Qatar funded ISIS.
We know they persecute women, gays, lesbians, Christians, and Jews.
She still took money and never criticized them.
We know that Clinton showed concern.
It was a bad idea.
We can't vet refugees, but she's willing to gamble with your life.
She bragged about being invited to Putin's inner sanctum.
She said that she's too removed from the struggles of the middle class.
She's too rich.
They want to infiltrate the Catholic Church and foment change, just like Goodolinskyites that they are.
She admitted a no-fly zone in Zyria would be very difficult.
She flipped and flopped over Keystone and fracking.
She praised Wall Street repeatedly as she took their money, a plan that would cut Social Security.
She wants an open hemisphere on top of open borders.
Hated the use of the phrase everyday Americans.
Took all this free support from the media.
Top Clinton aide also may have tried to bribe the FBI, according to the FBI documents.
That was Donald Trump.
I think it would be pretty big news.
Witnesses found sensitive Clinton files on a Romanian server, so it was hacked.
Hacked emails raised the possibility of the ethics breach.
Pay for play.
Hillary Clinton to Goldman Sachs, Americans who want to limit immigration are un-American.
And there's issues about her health, how afraid they are about her health.
I'll take the next one, James.
I can't get to all of this.
I can't possibly.
And now they're trying to shut off the internet.
They shut off the internet of Julian Assange.
And we won't find out till well after the election who's responsible for that.
Your country is dying economically and in foreign policy.
And these people, all they care about, they don't give a damn about you.
The Republicans, the Democrats, the media, the globalists.
They just want to lie and manipulate you into doing what they want so they keep their power.
In three weeks, you decide if they do.
If you're there and you're protesting and you do these actions, you will be attacked.
It's not bright.
That's what we are.
Oh, so, oh, oh, so that's part of the process.
Let's get over the reaction.
The whole point of it is we know that Trump's people will freak his security team that freak out and his supporters will lose their.
This is Scott Foval.
He is the national field director for Americans United for Change.
He used to work for People for the American Way, an organization funded by George Soros.
He also has his own company called the Foval Group.
He is one of the dark operatives for the Clinton campaign.
We were contracted directly with the DNC and again.
Yeah.
I am contracted to him, but I answer to the head of special events for the DNC and the head of the special events and political for the campaign.
The campaign pays DNC.
DNC pays Democracy Partners.
Democracy Partners pays the Foval Group.
The Foval Group goes and executes.
Democracy Partners is a private political consulting company with deep ties to Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama's White House, and the Democratic National Committee.
We are the primary mechanism as a team.
Democracy Partners is the that took this gear out of this guy.
You could your mother in front of the governor and not go to jail.
You know what?
We've been bucking people in to deal with them for 50 years, and we're not going to stop now.
I assume you don't go off and tell these conversations that.
No, no, no.
Because it's technically.
No, absolutely.
Absolutely.
So, yeah, no, again, it's the per whether it's in the cities that we have partners, right?
Or it's about that or above us.
What's the goal of this campaign, right?
What's the goal of the overall government?
And yeah, for me, as I'm trying to get this is easy, I'll decision something like that.
However, as an activist, do we want to do this?
Do we want to take a chance to listen to this public?
And you take that data and you pump it out and you give it to people and you have people know about it.
That's great.
I love it.
However, other people can make things happen that you don't need to know about.
We talk about lots of things that we don't talk about.
All right, hour two, Sean Hannity show, that is more from Project Veritas and James O'Keefe and his undercover work.
As he went into great detail yesterday, and we thank him for being back on the program today.
He detailed all of this violence that is going on that has been perpetrated against you, the American people, to create a false narrative that Donald Trump rallies are violent.
So they did all of that.
And of course, it's called bird-dogging, which also shows up in WikiLeaks emails, which directly links them, of course, to the DNC and the Clinton campaign.
As he pointed out yesterday, the flow of money in their rapid response operation to keep the bird-dogging up.
In other words, to lie and propagandize the American people about who Trump supporters are and who Donald Trump is, is they've got money from the campaign that pays the DNC and the DNC pays Democracy Partners.
Democracy Partners pays this Fovo group and the Fovo group goes out there and executes all of the madness and mayhem and agitation and violence and false narrative and perceptions.
Now today, the new audio video that has come out, this is part two of their investigation, where massive voter fraud is discussed at length and specific tactics used to perpetrate this against the American people and steal an election if possible.
And James O'Keefe from Project Veritas is back with us today.
How are you, sir?
Hey, Sean.
Great to be with you again.
What did I tell you seven years ago again?
You said I need to cross my T's and dot my I's.
Okay, and didn't I say you need lawyers to go over every single thing?
And we certainly did that.
We had a dozen lawyers go through this.
And didn't I say at the time that you need at least a few lawyers?
And yesterday you told me a dozen lawyers.
Can I advise you, I would up that to about 50 to 100 because they are going to come after you so hard.
This is very explosive what you're showing us here.
And I want to get serious for a minute.
How long have you been involved in this investigation?
Over a year.
We've had eight full-time undercover, full-time investigative journalists working for my organization, Veritas, for over a year.
We had to, the length to which we had to go as deep as we did, building relationships, putting our people, I mean, our people were literally risking their lives to do this.
The young 22-year-old, 23-year-old people that were involved in this went and worked for them and built relationships with them.
And we got invited to the White House, Sean.
I couldn't go because I would be entering by false pretenses.
Did any of your people go?
I couldn't because we don't have to forge a social security number.
We wouldn't pass a background check.
We were using an alias.
But we were so far embedded in their infrastructure, they told us everything.
What is amazing to me is the level to which they brag about what they're doing, brag about the violence they created, brag about take responsibility for what happened in Chicago, brag that a 69-year-old woman, it was widely reported, was a victim of violence at a Trump rally.
It turns out that she is one of their operatives, and this was purposely designed to manipulate the minds of the American people.
I mean, it shocks the conscience that this is going on in America.
And the new video is about 15 minutes of video.
This is even more inflammatory.
The guy in the video, Scott Fogel, introduces us to a dark operative named Cesar Vargas, an illegal alien who runs a group called Voches de la Frantera in Wisconsin.
And they describe how they commit the voter fraud.
This has never been seen before by the American people.
It's never been seen.
He did not.
Let me play the audio, and then you could explain it out of it so we have enough time to go through all of this slowly.
Let's play it.
Vargas is an interesting character.
He is the co-founder of the Dream Action Coalition, a New York lawyer and a dreamer himself.
Born in Mexico, Vargas is an undocumented alien.
What he was wanting was that this idea made it seem possible.
He said it wasn't possible to have everyone to be playing possible.
It's, you know, essentially getting a bunch of people on whatsoever, taking them around the country.
They are busy with votes so they can vote.
At the same time, they're also getting work permits under a different name of voting again.
Right.
Yeah, I was going to say, like, you know, can we make something, especially within elections in 2018?
No, this is not going to happen.
Right?
I know that.
So I think it's about seat for the next president.
It even makes more sense.
The issue would be more incredible and much more opportune for us to jump into this.
Secretary Flint in the 49 loose head that we have more to have different people to vote, and have an election for it's not going to be as significant, right?
So, I think it's possible.
But let's just wait till I can shake down that bridge and talk about how to do that.
Yeah, no, absolutely.
Okay, count me in.
So, they're describing the difference of taking people around or busing them in or taking them around the country so they can vote illegally.
And at the same time, they're also getting work permits under a different name.
And again, voting on behalf of people who cannot vote.
Why don't you explain specifically?
Because Vargas says, Yeah, right, during the midterm elections in 2018, we could definitely work on this.
Yeah, I think, Sean, you have another, that was Vargas.
I think your producers might have another bit of sound from it's better to hear where it's Foval describing the plan, the sinister plot to transport people from one state into another.
I don't know if you can line that sound up, but it's basically he just says to us, the plan they're going to do is transport people from one state into another to vote illegally using let me, let me play that one just so, just to keep it.
You're right, that one was hard to hear, let's play this one.
It's a very easy thing for Republicans to say, well, they're busting people in.
Well, you know what we've been busting people in to deal with for 50 years and we're not going to stop now.
They're just going to find a different way to do it.
So I mean, I grew up with that idea.
You know they, they used to bus people out to Iowa.
You can prove conspiracy if there's a bus, yeah.
If there are cars, it's much harder to prove.
And there's enough money, if there's enough money, then you're gonna have people drive their POV absolutely, or you have to drive run honestly the rife environment to do it in their country within, within striking distance, Michigan Indiana lease, restrictive donation caps and campaign finance laws and investigation and investigative arms and any of that, like they have weakened it so bad in these three states.
Wow, explain that in more detail.
Yeah, so what you just heard?
There was a graphic and obscene conversation from Scott Foval, who works with a Soros group called People FOR THE American WAY.
Now he's been fired.
You reported that last night on your show that he was fired.
He's describing the plan.
And the plan he describes, if you didn't hear it, was to transport people from one state into another state to vote illegally using personal vehicles instead of buses to make the fraud more difficult to pinpoint and expose.
Scott even says to us the WikiLeaks emails are difficult for them because they have to be careful about putting the stuff in writing.
So they moved it, Sean, into encrypted messaging.
They said we can only do this stuff on encrypted black box communications.
He also explains the use of shell companies to disguise the fraud.
And he says you've got to start a shell company and move the cars over state lines.
And then he says, listen, we've got to be real careful of anyone finding out about this.
So here's what we're going to do.
I'm going to put you in touch with someone who can hook you up.
That man's name was Cesar Vargas, and that's the illegal alien who runs the Voches de la Frontera group.
You can see that in the video.
He says, let's do this.
He describes how to do it.
And he says, not only do we need to do it here, we need to do it in a 2018 election.
Explain the beginning when Foville says you could blank your mother in front of the governor and not go to jail because he was basically saying we can get away with all of this and we're not going to get caught.
I'll play it for our audience.
You could your mother in front of the governor and not go to drink if you had enough money.
Explain the context of that.
He's talking about, he's describing which states to do it in.
He says it's really good to do this in Wisconsin and it's really good to do it in Indiana and Michigan.
The reason why he brings up Michigan, Sean, is because the governor of Michigan is a Republican, but Scott Fogel thinks that some of these Republicans are sort of rhino-Republicans.
They're unwilling to stand up to the fraud, specifically in Michigan because there was the Flint crisis and the Flint water crisis, and the Republican governor is spineless, afraid, because he's being inundated with attacks from the opposition.
So he says, do it in Michigan because the governor wouldn't, you could blank your mother in front of the governor and they won't prosecute you.
So Fogel is describing our political climate where the Republicans are weak in the knees and unwilling to do anything about it.
And Sean, the reason why these guys are singing like songbirds is, to take a little credit, my team built a relationship over a year, but it's also because they live in a vacuum where the media does not hold them accountable.
They know that they can get away with it.
No one will ever do anything about it.
The mainstream, I've broken the story, the mainstream media still hasn't covered it.
So they are just arrogant, unaccountable, and willing to do whatever it takes to win.
It's very important, I think, as I looked at the new video today that you keep in your mind what you disclosed yesterday.
There was a point yesterday where Fovil is explaining how the operation is set up to allow the Clinton campaign and the DNC, quote, plausible deniability in the event that the true nature of the deliberate violence is discovered.
And then they go on to explain the flow of money.
That's why the flow of money is so important.
And yesterday they also talked about we have direct contact with the campaign, direct contact with the White House, direct contact with the DNC.
And, you know, we have to just make sure that there's a double blind between the actual campaign, the actual DNC, and what we're doing.
There's got to be a double blind so they can have plausible deniability about any of this.
And what they're saying is they're all in on it.
Hillary's in on it.
The campaign's in on it.
The DNC is in on it.
And even it goes to the Obama White House.
Yeah, and the term he uses, Sean, is Pony Express.
He says it's like a Pony Express, which I think is one of the most powerful blinds.
He says we need plausible deniability.
It's a Pony Express, and Hillary knows about it.
In fact, the context is important from yesterday.
He says, quote, the Clinton campaign pays the Democratic National Committee.
Democratic National Committee pays democracy partners, which is the dirty tricks operation.
They pay me to go out and execute the blank, the expletive, the violence.
So what this is, just like the old mob families, is they use money and influence to put union thugs on the streets to incite violence and steal the vote.
And never before in American history have we been able to hear it, watch it, and smell it.
You've read about it.
You've heard conspiracy theories about it.
But now it's been corroborated, not just by one guy, but by a legal alien in Wisconsin who tells us how to do it.
Bob Creamer is married to a United States Congresswoman.
We're on White House conference calls.
And Scott Fogel, who, by the way, has been fired.
And now that he's been fired, and by the way, thank you, Sean, for reporting that.
Thank you for reaching out to them for comment.
You're the only person, the first person to do that.
And CNN just called me, and they're going to do a story because you did that.
So thank you for reaching out to them for comment.
They fired Scott Fogel, who's taking the fall for Bob Creamer.
And the new video has something on Bob Creamer.
So the question is, it's not Fogel's fault.
It's the system's fault.
It's the White House.
It's everyone above Fogel.
And are they going to take the fall, too?
And by the way, CNN is a daylight and a dollar short, as usual.
It's only the pressure that we have.
All right, stay right there.
We've got to take a break.
We'll come back.
We have more with James O'Keefe, Project Veritas.
Not only have we learned about the dark arts of fomenting violence at campaign events to create a false narrative for you, the American people, about Donald Trump and his supporters, but now we've got voter fraud on a level that you cannot believe, and you can see it and hear it with your own eyes and your own ears.
We continue now with Project Veritas and James O'Keefe is back with us.
I want to go back.
I want to talk a little bit more in detail about part two today that you just released.
All right, before we get to that, James, I want to remind people what you released yesterday in part one.
If you're there and you're protesting and you do these actions, you will be attacked at Trump Rallys.
That's what we.
Oh, so that's part of the process of get overwhelming the reaction.
The whole point of it is we know that Trump's people will freaking lose their Scott Fogel.
He's the National Field Director for Americans United for Change.
He used to work for People for the American Way, an organization funded by George Soros.
He also has his own company called the Fogel Group.
He is one of the dark operatives for the Clinton campaign.
We were contracted directly with the DNC and again.
Yeah.
I am contracted to him.
I answer to the head of special events for the DNC and the head of the special events and political for the campaign.
The campaign pays DNC.
DNC pays Democracy Partners.
Democracy Partners pays the Fogel Group.
The Fogel Group goes and executes.
Democracy Partners is a private political consulting company with deep ties to Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama's White House, and the Democratic National Committee.
We are the primary mechanism as a team.
Democracy Partners is the took this gear out.
Wherever Trump and Pence are going to be, we have events.
Okay.
And we have a whole team across the country that does that.
Both consultants and people from the Democratic Party and the Democratic Party Eparatos and people from the campaign, the Clinton campaign.
And my role for the campaign is to manage all that.
So I'm basically deputy rapid response director for the DNC for all things Trump on the ground.
This guy is Aaron Black.
He works full-time for Creamer at Democracy Partners.
He directs the spontaneous protests at Trump and Pence events.
His real name is actually Aaron Minter.
We don't know why he uses the name Black.
Nobody's really supposed to know about me.
So the Chicago protest when they shut all that, that was us.
It was more him than me.
But none of this is supposed to come back to us because we want it coming from people.
We don't want it to come from the party.
So if we do a protest and it's Brown DNC protest, it's right away the press is going to say partisan.
But if I'm in there coordinating with all the groups on the ground and sort of playing field general, but they're the ones talking to the cameras, then it's actually people.
But if we send out press advisories with DNC on them and Clinton campaign, it just doesn't have the same effect.
There's a script.
Okay.
There's a script of engagement.
Sometimes the crazies bite, and sometimes the crazies don't bite.
They're starting confrontations in the line.
Right?
They're not starting confrontations in the rally because once they're inside the rally, they're under Secret Service's control.
When they're outside the rally, they're more affected out.
They're harder to get in.
The media will cover it no matter where it happens.
I assume it's always in the rally.
Initiating the conflict by having leading conversations with people who are naturally psychotic.
Okay, I mean, honestly, it is not hard to get some of these to pop off.
It's a matter of showing up to want to get into the rally in a Planned Parenthood t-shirt saying, or, you know, Trump is a Nazi.
You know, you can message to draw them out and draw them to punch you.
So there's like a morse code between the DNC and the super PACs.
That's the morse code and is it a text conversation or whatever.
The thing that we have to watch is making sure there's a double blind between the actual campaign and the actual DNC and what we're doing.
There's a double blind there.
They can plausibly deny that they didn't hear anything about it.
Undercover investigation that has gone on for over a year.
You had eight separate people that have been able to infiltrate this dark arts group that has direct connections to Hillary Clinton's campaign, the DNC, Democracy Partners, and even up to the White House.
Now, in this investigation today, you talk about this backroom dark arts effort for voter fraud.
Explain in detail exactly what people will see when they watch your tape.
Thank you, Sean.
So the video yesterday was about inciting violence at Trump rallies, and we can revisit that.
But today's video is about voter fraud and the election being rigged.
This has been the number one dominant media narrative all over the last few days was that Republicans need to condemn Trump because he said that the voting is rigged.
Well, guess what?
The video today shows operatives.
These are dark money operatives, dirty tricks operatives that, by the way, are illegally coordinating with the super PAC of Hillary and Hillary's campaign.
We'll get to that in a minute.
And these operatives are describing how they commit the voter fraud.
They describe they bust, quote, we've been busing people across state lines for 50 years, and he uses language I cannot repeat on the radio.
And he says, we can go to certain states with weak-need Republican governors who won't prosecute us and get away with it.
And he describes a state like Michigan and Rick Snyder and Indiana and Wisconsin.
And then he says how they do it.
And I can't quote him because it's so graphic and obscene, but I'll at least summarize it.
He says, we'll create shell companies to disguise the fraud.
We'll use rental cars instead of buses because rental cars, you can't tell where it's coming from.
And he describes that he's a former private investigator.
He used to run the investigation, so he understands how the system works and how to get around it.
And then this individual, this dark operative, describes a person that he can connect us with, someone that he says do not repeat his name to anybody.
He says, his name is Cesar Vargas.
And we go meet with Cesar Vargas in New York City.
And Cesar Vargas runs an illegal immigration organization where he gets out the illegal immigrants to vote and commits, quote-unquote, civil disobedience, is what he calls it.
We say, you mean voter fraud?
And he says, well, it's illegal, but we can try to do it.
He's on tape saying that it's illegal and that he's going to do it, not just now, but specifically in the midterms in 2018.
And Sean, the only way we got access to all these people is because we spent a year infiltrating and investigating and building relationships with them.
But Foval also said we've always done it.
We're going to continue to do it.
And if we can't bust him in, we'll just bring him in by car.
Yes, yes.
He bragged about how he's old school.
Yeah, he's old school.
They've been doing this for 50 years.
Yes.
And by the way, just a little bit of news here.
Someone just put this in front of me.
The Cruz Subcommittee on Federal Rights wants to call a congressional hearing before the election.
And they're going to subpoena Bob Creamer and Scott Foval for more information.
Don't worry about that because James Comey will step in and he's going to end up giving them a special deal.
And of course, they will plead the fifth, and we're not going to find out.
People are going to have to watch this video themselves.
Let me tell you how this is going to work.
They will offer immunity, probably, to all of them, and then nothing is going to happen because the whole system is bankrupt, and it is corrupt.
It's corrupt at a level that nobody ever imagined before this election season.
Between WikiLeaks and what you're doing, I feel like America's now a banana republic.
America is a country in massive decline.
Hillary is.
Sean, let me just say one thing that's a little hopeful because you're preaching to the choir.
We're in violent agreement with one another.
Nothing's going to happen within the media.
Well, not violent, but go on.
I mean, I'm violent, but we are in complete agreement with one another.
I believe that this story, and I'm watching Twitter and Facebook and Reddit and all these things, it's like the barbarians at the gates.
Their dam is cracking, and the social media, grassroots media, is now becoming equal to or greater than the mainstream media.
Because I'm getting like 10,000 retweets on every one of my tweets.
We're inundating the inboxes of CNN, ABC, NBC, and all these places.
And they are now starting to ask for comment.
So what my point is, I think we have to, like you said, we have to put pressure on the government, and the people have to, there's a power shift from the mainstream media to the grassroots happening as I speak.
And I think that that's what's happening.
think it's a good thing for democracy and i think i agree with you look Listen, I think there's a chance, a chance, I think, between WikiLeaks and what you're releasing every day.
And how many more days will you be releasing stuff?
Well, my team has pulled almost two almiters in a row, so we're going to try to do it every day.
If not every day, almost every day up until the election.
Okay.
I think this could have a profound impact on this election.
But this is what the media is going to do to you, James, because they've done it to you before, and I've been putting you on my programs for years.
And that is, they're going to go, oh, James, where did you get your money from?
Oh, James, how did you edit this?
Oh, James, isn't this selective editing?
And clearly, you can't take out of context the things that these people are saying.
But you know that's coming, and I know that's coming.
Let me tell you something.
Sources are telling me, I mean, people are whispering, the people see this video, and there hasn't been, Sean, there hasn't been one left-wing website which has said a darn thing about me about this video.
Not even Media Matters?
Not even Media Matters.
And by the way, Media Matters is implicated in this.
We have a video coming out on Media Matters.
Media Matters.
We met with their president.
We'll get into that another day.
But they haven't said anything, and because it's so manifestly damning.
This video, I have a lot of people who are in the world.
It is damning.
This should change.
If the American people watch these videos, James, this should absolutely ensure that Hillary Clinton can never be the president of the United States.
They're that powerful.
But if it's a media, see, here's the thing, right?
The media needs to push the videos.
And what you're seeing right now is a grassroots media, which is almost as powerful as the mainstream media.
If they played these videos on the air at ABC News, Hillary would lose.
No question about it.
Because if people could hear and smell the rot and the stench of what they're saying, they would be like, I don't want to live in that world.
But the media has a firewall, and we have to break through it.
And the only way to break through it is to mobilize your army of people, which is listening right now.
And if I could make one request, it would be for everyone listening to this program to go get this video.
It's on YouTube and everywhere else, and tweet it out at the journalists.
Because we did this yesterday, and it worked.
And Sean, you did it on your TV program or your program, and you asked people to get it out, and it worked.
So go on Twitter, go on Facebook, embed the video.
I'm asking everybody, it's on my Twitter account.
It's on Hannity.com, at Sean Hannity on Twitter.
It's on my Facebook account.
Find it, retweet it, post it, and get your friends and get everybody you know to watch these videos.
Because if the American people see this and then they add to it, I don't know if you've noticed in the work that I'm trying to do on the WikiLeaks revelations, too.
The media's not touching that either.
I mean, the media talked about that hot mic sex comment for a week.
Oh, my God.
This is something that's much more fundamental and constitutional.
And I mean, can you imagine if Corey Lewandowski for the Trump campaign said, quote, I don't care about the law.
We need to win this mother effort, unquote.
Can you imagine why?
That's in the tape today.
Yeah, that's in the tape today.
They've gotten all over the TV for doing 100 times things less than that.
Well, let me ask you this.
Can you tell me the last question?
What else, as much as you can tell, and how many more people are going to be implicated and how high up will this go?
Well, we do.
So in our next installment, we have more tape involving commentary about and discussion about Hillary Clinton and what she's personally approved.
And these are not low-level people.
These are high-level people that meet with her, that visit with her, and we have a paper trail.
So I think I don't mean to cut you off, and hopefully we will continue these interviews every day.
James O'Keefe, thank you.
Thank you.
You could your mother in front of the governor and not go to jail.
You know what?
We've been busting people in for 50 years, and we're not going to stop now.
I assume you don't go off and tell these conversations anyway.
No, no, no.
Because that's technical.
No, absolutely.
Absolutely.
So, no, it's the per whether it's in the city that we have partners, right?
Or it's about us.
What's the goal of this campaign, right?
What's the goal of the overall government?
And yeah, for me, as an attorney, I get this idea.
However, as an activist, do we want to do this?
Do we want to take a chance to listen to this public?
And you take that data and you flip it out and you give it to people and you have people know about it.
That's right.
However, other people can make things happen that you don't need to know about.
We talk about lots of things that we don't talk about.
All right.
The final hour of the Sean Hannity Show News Roundup Information Overload as we come to you from Las Vegas, the site of tomorrow's third presidential debate.
We are 21 days away from Election Day.
That means three weeks from today, you will be going to the polls, and you will decide America's future.
Or will you?
As we just had, James O'Keefe, his latest in-depth investigative report on voter fraud.
Remember, I'll take you back to yesterday.
He described in detail the flow of money that went throughout the Democratic Party, how the campaign of Hillary Clinton is paying the DNC, how the DNC pays democracy partners, how Democracy Partners pays the Fauval Group, how the Fauval Group goes out and executes all of the chaos you have seen all election year long.
It's called bird-dogging as a means of creating a false narrative that Donald Trump and his supporters are violent.
They're out of control.
They're mean.
They fight.
They're horrible people.
This is well organized, well-funded, and well-orchestrated.
Fast forward to today's video, and you have a systematic attempt at using the same money sources, apparently, to fund an effort of massive, massive voter fraud, going into all of the details of how they do it.
Where do we begin here?
Former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich, is with us.
What's your reaction to this today?
Well, first of all, I think it's a remarkable job that he was able to put together a year of investigative reporting and to actually get these guys talking so arrogantly about routinely breaking the law and about their relationship to the Clinton campaign.
And I think that the firebombing of the North Carolina Republican Party raises this to a whole new level of asking, you know, who actually is out there on the left encouraging violence against Republican activists, against Republican headquarters.
What kind of attitude is it?
And of course, I said to you at the time, when Trump decided to go to the University of Illinois campus in Chicago, which no Republican had ever gone to, which from the standpoint of left-wing Democrats who have to own the black community to survive, they cannot afford competition of the black community.
And so I said at the time when they had this organized demonstration effort to block him going there, and he did back off because there was a real danger of violence.
We now have this proof that that came from people who were being funded indirectly by Hillary Clinton.
I mean, it's astonishing as an assault on American self-government and as an assault on the American electoral process that you'd have this kind of deliberate, overt effort to basically undermine our whole process of self-government by intimidating and creating the kind of violence that they're talking about.
I think it's very sobering.
And I think that it's the sort of thing that, again, if we had an honest rule of law right now, you'd have the FBI investigating this guy.
You'd have them investigating exactly what the chain of money was in the Chicago event.
And remember, Chicago is a city that is in such terrible shape in terms of African Americans on the South Side that they announced today that there are now 1,000 shootings more than last year.
It's just, it's unbelievable how bad it is that they can't afford the risk of somebody like Donald Trump coming in to become genuinely competitive, and that apparently will do virtually anything to stop him.
And I think this is going to become the next week or so a very big question.
Can they really say that they're going to block the American people from having a free election?
I mean, it's extraordinary.
You talk about the firebombing.
Why do I believe, and God forbid, because we do not want violence in our country, but God forbid does it happen at a Democratic headquarters?
Why do I believe and know in my heart that it would be covered very differently?
But you've also got this whole bird-dogging strategy, which is encouraging violence, bragging about the success of the violence that they created, like in Chicago, at Trump events, advancing a phony narrative, propagandizing the American people into believing something that is not true is true, to create a false image in the hopes of, you know, electing Hillary Clinton.
Now a concerted effort that is well-funded to literally commit massive, widespread voter fraud.
One other thing.
In the WikiLeaks thump, the Democrats talk about the bird-dogging.
So clearly, there's connection.
I mean, I think a lot of people never heard of bird-dogging before yesterday.
And I think now that it was well with voting.
Let me just remind you, Winston Lord wrote a brilliant article in the last couple days on the scale of voter fraud in Philadelphia.
And nobody can read that article and ever again question that it is legitimate to be concerned about exactly what is going on and how it's going on.
That's the sort of thing we're up against, where the elite media doesn't even want to consider it as possible.
Well, we actually have clear evidence that there is a substantial amount of fraud underway.
And that, in fact, the Democrats, to some extent, use that as an entire model of how they operate.
Now we've got the question, how is it that now Julian Assange's internet has now been cut off?
Now, I think an unreported story, and my first instinct tells me that it's probably the Obama administration's effort to do this.
As a matter of fact, there's been, it seems the Obama administration's effort to save the presidential candidacy of Hillary Clinton is finally starting to yield tangible results as Wikileaks just provided the following update to Julian Assange was cut off from using the internet at the Ecuadorian embassy in London effective Saturday evening.
We can confirm that Ecuador cut off Assange's internet access, they said after the publication of Clinton's Goldman Sachs speeches.
So what role did Obama and Kerry play in silencing Assange?
Well, and you have this whole story, by the way, that you may remember where you have the Vice President Biden saying that the United States is going to launch an offensive against the Russians on cyber behavior, again, over Wikileaks.
I mean, so what you have is WikiLeaks is essentially a political issue.
It's not a national security issue.
There is no direct proof that the Russians are doing it because the truth is, if the Russians were doing it, then Assange being cut off wouldn't matter.
But the objective fact is that this administration is desperate to prop up Hillary.
They understand that every day that goes by, there are more revelations, that these revelations make her look worse and worse.
And so they are trying to find some way to keep her propped up despite everything that is going on.
And I think inch by inch, she, in fact, is losing ground because it is so blatantly obvious that the team that she has put together is anti-Catholic bigotry, is totally pro-Muslim and against telling the truth about the killer in San Bernardino, for example, is routinely willing to accept foreign money.
I mean, the number of different things they're doing wrong will someday make a very thick book when people have time to analyze it and put it all together.
Let me read a paragraph from Cheryl Atkinson at our website, CherylAtkinson.com.
It's called Newsgate2016, because this is a big factor in this election, too.
And she writes, regardless of who is your chosen or least favorite presidential candidate, independent minds should be concerned about the latest revelations in the news media's unseemly relationships with government and political actors.
Now, while there are many responsible journalists working today, inside documents and leaks have exposed serious lapses, constituting the most far-reaching scandal in our industry and what our industry has ever known, and it's our very own newsgate.
Now, we have learned through WikiLeaks that, in fact, CNN and CNBC and NBC and the New York Times and ABC, NBC, CBS have all been in the tank in some way, shape, matter, or form for Hillary Clinton.
We know that the political reporter, this guy named Thrush, that in fact his case, he actually gave, like the New York Times did, he gave the Clinton campaign the opportunity to edit the articles they're writing about him.
Then we have another piece out today that all the top news people we know, George Stephanopoulos, Nora O'Donnell, Glenn Thrusher, all the top anchors at the news networks and Savannah Guthrie and CNN people, everybody, that they're all dining at the homes of Clinton staffers.
And they're being fed and they're given drinks and they've got this nice cozy relationship.
So it shouldn't surprise us that the Center for Public Integrity has discovered 96% of journalist donations go to Hillary Clinton this election season.
Well, I think, first of all, I think I was right in 08 when I said journalism is dead.
I said yesterday I thought that we ought to consider seriously renaming the Columbia School of Journalism into this Columbia School of Propaganda.
The fact is, the most recent study that came out just yesterday from the Center for Public Integrity points out that you have 96% of all donations go to Hillary.
4%, this is from reporters and people in the news business.
4% go to Trump.
That's a 24 to 1 ratio in favor of Clinton.
In addition, that happens to be almost precisely the level of bias on the Friday that WikiLeaks came out and that the Trump 11-year-old tape came out when the networks, the three big networks, put 23 minutes into attacking Trump in 57 seconds.
Think about it.
All three networks combined put in 57 seconds on WikiLeaks.
I mean, you can't get any kind of better example of how totally biased they are than to look at both the donation numbers and to look at the situation that we've got in terms of the way they're allocating time and the way they're allocating stories.
The Washington Post actually ran the cover of their opinion section on Sunday was After Trump Loses.
Now, this is three weeks out in an election which I think is clearly undecided.
And you have the Washington Post having decided not only is it over, but by the way, Donald Trump lost.
It's just crazy.
But you know something?
What you and I have been doing on television every night, and I keep asking you, you know, as I'm listing every single discovery of WikiLeaks, each one, to me, is a bigger scandal than the previous one.
And then now we've got the O'Keefe videos, one showing that they are purposely causing violence at Trump rallies, the other showing a massive effort at voter fraud.
And in the tape yesterday, we have the explanation from the guy on tape saying, well, the flow of money for rapid response, in other words, the dark arts of politics operations, is, well, the campaign pays the DNC.
The DNC pays democracy partners.
Democracy Partners pays the Folvo Group.
And the FOVO group goes out and foments anger and violence at events and apparently is up to their eyeballs in voter fraud.
And they bragged about all the contact they have with the campaign and even the Obama White House.
Now, if I'm a journalist, I'm thinking, these are the plumbers.
This is Watergate.
These are the people that are doing the dirty work.
What did Hillary know?
When did she know it?
What did Obama know?
When did he know it?
But the difference was, you have never seen the Justice Department as politically corrupt as it is now.
You've never, I mean, who do you turn to to enforce the law when the people who are supposed to enforce the law are corrupt?
And what Comey did, I have yet to find a single retired FBI agent who can explain the decisions the FBI made about evidence, about interrogations, about go down the list.
You know, and to suggest, for example, that General Cartwright has got a problem because he lied to the FBI, but Hillary Clinton, who 39 times couldn't remember, I mean, have you noticed there are zero occasions in two presidential debates where she couldn't remember, but 39 times in her FBI interview, she couldn't remember.
I mean, if that's not obstruction of justice by somebody who deleted 33,000 emails, which was illegal, you just get on the list.
So the problem you got right now is as long as the Clintons can follow the Obamas, and as long as the president has the power to pardon people, how are you going to go out and track down these people, even if they engage in explicit violations?
You know, it's sort of like Juan Ada Broderick said after the incident with then Attorney General Clinton, who was I going to go to?
You know, you have one email exchange between Podesta and Cheryl Mills, and they're talking about, well, should we not turn over the exchanges between Secretary Clinton and President Obama?
Now, President Obama had already told the American people that he learned about her private email from the news.
Meanwhile, he was emailing her.
So he lied.
And then they're talking about these were subpoenaed emails, and then they're talking about not turning them over.
Well, that would be obstruction of justice.
Here's my last question.
Trump is down on the polls, Mr. Speaker.
If you look at the polls, he's losing.
How does this play out?
Well, I think if you look at the polls in Brexit, they were losing.
I think that we're in a cycle.
As I've said to you before, my good friend John Engler was running against the incumbent governor of Michigan on the Sunday before the election.
The Detroit Liberals' Detroit newspaper had a page one story that Engler was behind by 14 points.
He won on Tuesday.
The news media has done everything it could to batter him.
I think that, in fact, my experience being out in these various book signings is enormous support for Trump and people who are very intense.
People who walk up to me and say, I can't tell anyone, but I am for Trump.
So I'm going to wait and see.
I think he has a real chance to win.
I think every day that goes by, it's more obvious how corrupt and how sick the system is.
I even have senior reporters admit in private how much they are worried by the degree of sickness that is now undermining our whole system.
So I think this is a long way from being over.
And I tell everybody, just make sure you vote and you get your friends to vote, and you're going to have an amazing impact.
All right, Mr. Speaker, as always, we'll see you tonight on Hannity.
Thank you for being with us.
By the way, his new book, he's going to be at the Reagan and Nixon Library later this week, and he'll tell us more about that as the week unfolds.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Appreciate it.
So many cities are corrupt, and voter fraud is very, very common.
The following information comes straight from Pew Research: quote: Approximately 24 million people, one of every eight voter registrations in the United States are no longer valid or significantly inaccurate.
One in eight.
More than 1.8 million deceased individuals right now are listed as voters.
Oh, that's wonderful.
Of the 1.8 million, 1.8 million is voting for somebody else.
Approximately 2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state.
Then there's the issue of illegal immigrants voting.
The following comes from a 2014 report from the Washington Post.
This article was entitled, Could Non-Citizens Decide the November Election?
Here are some excerpts: More than 14% of non-citizens in both 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote.
Oh, isn't that wonderful?
Because non-citizens tend to favor Democrats, to put it mildly, Obama won more than 80% of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 sample.
You don't read about this, right?
They don't tell you about this.
Your politicians don't tell you about this when they tell you how legitimate all of these elections are.
They don't want to tell you about this.
We find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in various close elections, okay?
But the larger point that I want to emphasize here is that there is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America's elections, in part because they're so decentralized and the numbers of votes involved.
There's no evidence that that has happened in the past or that there are instances in which that will happen this time.
And so I'd advise Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes.
One week, Wisconsin.
One week.
One week from today, you get to choose a new governor.
And because early voting runs through this Friday, you don't have to wait till election day.
You can vote all week.
I mean, you can only vote once.
It's in Chicago now.
I'm teeth in Chicago.
I'm messing with you.
That was a long time ago.
All right.
Glad you're with us.
24 now till the top of the hour.
Write down our toll-free telephone number.
You want to be a part of the program.
Those statistics that Donald Trump has thrown out there are chilling.
That one in eight are questionable registrations of people.
1.8 million deceased.
You've got millions of illegal immigrants.
Now, you would hear and believe that Obama even jokes about how dead people have voted in past elections in Chicago.
I think it's been pretty well chronicled that Richard Nixon probably won the 1960 election.
We know from WikiLeaks that Clinton allies, quote, believe the Obama forces committed voter fraud in 2008.
So Hillary Clinton has made the case.
Quote, they go on to say two attorneys with close ties to the Clinton family believe that then Senator Barack Obama and his campaign flooded the caucuses with ineligible voters according to leaked emails.
Emails hacked from Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's campaign manager.
John Podesta cites two attorneys and old friends of the Clintons, James Lyons and Michael Driver, tasked with caucus protection, election protection, and had to raise hard money for the 2016 Colorado caucus.
And then, of course, we've got the tapes by Project Veritas that came out earlier today, and we just spent a lot of time on the program with James O'Keefe.
Now, think about it this way.
Oh, well, maybe it's conspiratorial.
Maybe it's not real.
Okay, did you think that the DNC would be colluding with the Clinton campaign as we have now proven to cheat Bernie Sanders out of a legitimate opportunity to become his party's nominee?
Well, that happened this election season.
Now that we have evidence of collusion, where the Obama Justice Department is tipping off the Clinton campaign, and the State Department is colluding just like the Justice Department with the Clinton campaign and giving them heads up.
And then, of course, the White House is up to their eyeballs.
The president lied when he said, I learned about the email in the press just like you.
No, he didn't because he was emailing Hillary Clinton on our private server.
So he told lies.
Do you think there are dead people still registered?
Yes.
Do you think there are illegal immigrants voting this election?
Yes.
Did we see on these videos today widespread, basically a concerted effort to cheat, manipulate, and rob the American people of their choice?
You cannot look at it any other way.
And as O'Keeffe's video proved yesterday, there is coordination with these dark art political operatives and the DNC and the big money people and the Clinton campaign, even going up with these people that are involved in this, what I would argue in many cases may turn out to be illegal activity to the Obama White House.
So why would you be surprised?
I wonder now that the O'Keeffe video is out, all those people say it's irresponsible for Donald Trump to talk about, you know, this election being rigged.
How can you not watch these top Democratic operatives that they are organizing a specific effort for the very purpose to commit voter fraud?
How could you interpret it any other way?
I'm watching the video.
It's right there and in front of your own eyes.
And it's up on Hannity.com if you want to take a look at it yourself.
There's a story out about voting machines and electronic voting machine was hacked in 10 minutes.
Now, with all due respect, this was on Regated on their website.
You know, one hacker could jeopardize an entire election.
One hacker.
We know that in the case of Julian Assange, at the age of 16, he was able to break into our Defense Department and their websites and break into NASA and their websites.
And he said it was very easy to do.
And what has WikiLeaks proven to us?
We have no cybersecurity.
Our government's not secure.
And the Romanians, we believe from the FBI dump yesterday, we believe, in fact, they did get Hillary Clinton's information.
But the media is not playing that up because we have a corrupt media, corporate media out there.
They're as out of touch with politicians.
You know, you got the politico reporter, you know, offering the Clinton camp a chance to edit a piece they're writing and bragging about.
Just don't tell anybody.
What's this guy's name?
Glenn Thrush.
Then we got revelations from WikiLeaks.
You got the ABC News guy, whatever his name is, ABC Nightly News.
You got George Stephanopoulos, Nora O'Donnell.
You got Savannah Guthrie.
You got all these NBC people, CNN people.
They're all dining at top Clinton staffers' homes.
Oh, that's not incestuous at all.
That's not corrupt at all.
Cheryl Atkinson has a great piece out today.
It's called Newsgate 2016.
Regardless of who has chosen or at least favorite presidential candidate, Independent Mind should be concerned about the latest revelations in the news media's unseemly relationships with government and political actors.
And while there are many responsible journalists, inside documents and leaks have exposed serious lapses, constituting the most far-reaching scandal our industry has ever known, our own newsgate.
And that's just how she starts off.
The Center for Public Integrity pointing out, you know, journalists shower Hillary Clinton with a ton of campaign cash.
Then you got the media piling up on Donald Trump while ignoring WikiLeaks, which we basically are doing the job alone.
Reminiscent of 2007 and 2008.
Anyway, here to weigh in on this and comment on this, we got Brian Finch.
He's the co-chair of the cybersecurity practice at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman.
Jamie Finch is the co-founder of Social Assurity.
Ethan Pepper specializes in content management, internet marketing, social media, search engines.
Thank you all for being with us.
Brian, let me start with you.
How likely, how possible is it to hack into these voter machines in your view?
Well, Sean, anything can be hacked.
I think we've known that.
We've talked about this for a long time.
You know, you remember that we were on this program 18 months ago talking about how easy it was going to be for someone to hack into Secretary Clinton's server and that it would be the Russians.
And now everybody's acting surprised and outraged that that actually happened, even though you've been talking about it for at least 18 months, not two years.
When it comes to these voting machines, they're like anything else at this point.
Anything can be hacked.
When someone talks about a device or a computer or a system being hack-proof, you know basically that you should ignore them because functionally anything that is out there can be hacked given enough time and energy.
And what's probably of greater concern is how quick it could be.
Whether it's 10 minutes, 10 seconds, that type of thing to actually go into these devices, these voting machines, and actually manipulate the selections that people are making.
And whether they could do it on a widespread basis, I think that's something else to be investigated.
But in terms of how easy it is to be hacked, it's nothing at all.
Jamie, you're not related to this guy, Brian, are you?
Never met him in my life.
That's pretty funny.
Well, let me ask you this.
My first position on Julian Assange was, oh my God, people are going to die because of what he's picked up.
And I was really afraid.
Ten years have now passed.
And in the 10-year period, he's never been proven wrong, not one single time.
Now they're trying to shut him down.
I think he did America two favors.
One, he showed that we have no government cybersecurity.
And two, he is bringing us in the inner sanctum of how deeply, deeply rooted this corruption in our government is.
Is that a good thing?
You know what?
I think the issue with all of this really has to focus on, like you said, where the money's coming from and the campaign cash.
And when I look at that issue, I look to Facebook, and no one seems to be talking or calling them out on the fact that 50% of Americans get their news from Facebook, and yet Facebook has been categorically implicated in changing their trending news stories.
That to me is really scary, coupled by the fact that, you know.
In other words, wouldn't that be an in-kind donation?
If they change what is trending, if they alter and manufacture in favor of a candidate, isn't that a donation in a way?
You know, Sean, it's a huge conflict of interest that I just, I don't understand.
They actually, on Facebook's business platform, you can buy campaign ads, campaign resources.
And this is across the board.
This is worldwide.
Facebook's co-founder, Dustin Moscovitz, contributed $20 million in September to Hillary's campaign.
Facebook staff members have the highest individual contributions to Hillary's campaign of any other campaign.
And they have a lot of manipulating trending news.
That to me is really scary.
And 96% of journalists, as I mentioned earlier, they're voting for Hillary Clinton and donating to her.
Go ahead.
You know the difference, Sean, though?
I think most Americans don't trust mainstream media.
Facebook portrays itself as a neutral third party, and it's not.
I think that's well said.
Ethan, what's your take on all of this?
Well, hey, Sean, Ethan Pepper here.
And I just wanted to let you know that I actually wrote the article for Regated.
And what makes it a little bit more scary is that it was actually, it only took 10 seconds for the computer scientist to hack the voting machine, not 10 minutes.
Wow.
Explain how this happened.
Walk us through it.
So basically, these computer scientists from Princeton, they ran a little experiment in showing how they could actually hack a voting machine.
And all they really had to do was the guy was able to pick the lock in under 10 seconds, install his own software, and the machine was compromised instantly.
And that means you could alter the voting in that district.
For example, you'd probably be able to know exactly how many votes were put in, and you could alter it, say it went 70% for Trump.
You could alter it, make it 80% for Clinton, and have the same number of votes, and nobody would suspect fraud.
Basically, but I think the experiment was the interesting aspect of it was they set it up.
It was George Washington versus Benedict Arnold.
So obviously people were going to vote for George Washington.
And three people voted for George Washington.
And at the end of the experiment, Benedict Arnold won 2-1 just because of the voting software that they had used for that voting machine.
Now, as much effort as it takes to change one vote, you could honestly do that.
You could change a million votes.
So this is definitely something that should be taken into consideration for this election.
All right.
Last exit question for all three of you, Brian, Jamie, and Ethan.
Is it your belief that, in fact, it would be very easy to hack into these machines and alter the results?
Really quick answers, Brian.
Absolutely.
And if it were happening in favor of the Democrats, like we've seen over the years with questions about voter fraud and intimidation, Justice Department would be all over it.
If that was a Democratic Party office in North Carolina that got firebombed, Lorena Lynch would be down there on Mach 3 Jet.
Jamie?
I think that the American public has been the victim of being deceived about this election for quite some time.
And the actual election will only be the icing on the cake.
And I'll give you the last word, Ethan.
By the way, great piece that you wrote.
You need all the credit you deserve.
Oh, well, thank you very much, John.
I appreciate it.
And I think you deserve a lot of credit for covering the O-keef story, one of the few journalists out there that tackled that.
And I have a lot of respect for you for doing that.
So I just want to say thanks to you as well.
But I also wanted to say if you can hack a car, you can easily hack a voting machine.
Oh, my God.
And the fact that George Soros' chairman is the director of SmartMatic, which is a voting machine that is in 16 states, I think that is something that should also be evaluated as well.
Unbelievable.
Hey, you guys are all terrific.
Thank you all for being with us.
And by the way, I can barely download an app, so I admire you guys more than you know.
As a matter of fact, I wish you all worked for me.
You could teach me how to download an app.
I tried the other day.
It took me two hours.
It's pathetic.
I just go to my 15-year-old daughter, and I'm like, can you do this for me?
Can you do this for me?
Can you do this for me?
And she rolls her eyes and does it in two seconds.
