Sean Hannity Show - The Economy Is So Great... - 8.11

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 12, 2016 - Sean Hannity Show

01:30:37

The Economy Is So Great... - 8.11

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is an iHeart podcast.
	Let not your heart be troubled.
	You are listening to the Sean Hannity Radio Show Podcast.
	Hey, it's National Make a Will Month and LegalZoom.com makes taking care of your will or trust easier than ever with advice from independent attorneys now available in 48 states and no expensive hourly fees because legalzoom.com is not a law firm.
	Just enter Hannity One at checkout for special savings now only at legalzoom.com.
	All right, glad you're with us.
	What day is it's Thursday?
	It's a Thursday edition.
	Is today Thursday?
	All day.
	I mean, it's amazing.
	Where does these weeks fly by?
	89 days till election day.
	The best election coverage available on your radio dial.
	Write down our toll-free number.
	We'd love to hear from you today.
	It's 800-941 Sean, if you want to be a part of the program.
	Linda says to me today, how many people can you fight at one time?
	And I said, as many as necessary.
	That's the answer.
	I absolutely, maybe I'm a masochist.
	I love making the points that I am making because I know in my heart, in my mind, in my body, and my soul what's going on here.
	And I understand that the arguments that we are making on this program every day, why it is infinitely better to elect Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton is just the right thing to do.
	And it's, you know, use every example that you want.
	And I stand by my calling out those people that are sabotaging on the Republican side Donald Trump's campaign.
	And when, if God forbid Hillary were to win, and I'm naming names, Bill Kristol, Governor Mitt Romney, I still like Mitt Romney personally.
	By the way, there are some friends of mine that are in this never-Trump movement.
	I don't judge my friends based on their political thoughts or views.
	I have plenty of friends that are on the left.
	That's their position.
	They're wrong.
	But people like Susan Collins, I'm especially angry at those that ran for the presidency and made a pledge and a promise.
	How do we ever trust you, John Kasich, again?
	Seriously, John Kasich has been a friend of mine for years.
	He made a promise and a pledge.
	He didn't think Trump was going to win, did he?
	That he would support the winner.
	And Trump wins, and I'm not going to endorse him.
	Really?
	No Republican has won the presidency without the state of Ohio ever in our history.
	And you made a promise, and you're not going to stick by that promise?
	You're going to run for president again and make promises?
	How do we trust you?
	You know, that same goes for Lindsey Graham, although he's been long gone for ages.
	Listen, I like the Bush family.
	I like George W. Bush.
	He's such a good guy.
	And I think in the aftermath of 9-11, he did everything he could do to keep our country safe and secure, and he succeeded.
	Anyway, then, and you've got, you know, I'm a fan of Ted Cruz.
	I'm still a fan.
	Ted Cruz fighting when others wouldn't fight, filibustering when others wouldn't do it.
	Very disappointed, though.
	Senator Ben Sass and Meg Whitman and all these other people.
	And I stand by my comments that this is a stubborn game that they're playing and it's a dangerous one.
	And some of these people need to lick their wounds because if in the end they continue this sabotage and the circular firing squad, they will be responsible for what Hillary Clinton does to the country and it's not going to be good.
	And, you know, I just start at the Supreme Court.
	Hillary Clinton will appoint the most radical justices to the United States Supreme Court.
	And it will change this country for generations, The makeup of this country for generations to come.
	You know, Donald Trump has laid out the type of person that he wants.
	He said, and he has named specific names of the types of people that he's looking for.
	People that are originalists, like Anthony Scalia and Justice Clarence Thomas.
	They're my two favorite, were my two favorite justices in the case of Scalia.
	I still love Clarence Thomas.
	These are people with real fidelity to the Constitution and its original intent.
	And they're the ones that believe in separation of powers and co-equal branches of government.
	They're the people that are on the front lines in this battle of liberals what they can't get done at the ballot box, what they can't get done legislatively.
	They try to get through the courts.
	That's why John Roberts, that's why it was such a big mistake for Republicans.
	Oh, we're going to send Obamacare to the courts.
	Well, you can't let the courts, you can't give away your enumerated constitutional authority and powers like that.
	Look what happened.
	Didn't work out the way Republicans thought it would work out.
	Big surprise with Justice John Roberts in that particular case.
	So that's, you'll get, you'll get the Supreme Court you deserve with your whatever inexplicable, I guess, reluctance and resistance towards Donald Trump.
	When Obamacare continues in some way, shape, matter, or form, or Hillary care, you know, you bear responsibility for that too.
	When we have open borders and maybe some terrorists cross that border and they want to bring harm to American small towns and cities, well, we could have had a border wall because Hillary's going to keep open borders.
	I personally prefer a president that can identify and say the words radical Islamic terrorism.
	I personally think if we can't vet these refugees that James Comey and James Clapper and Michael Steinbeck and General John Allen and Mike McCall and CIA Director Brennan all say ISIS will infiltrate and Hillary wants a 550% increase in unvetted refugees.
	Well, if something happens and the refugees do things like what has happened in Great Britain and Paris and Germany and Belgium and the rest of Europe, well, you get the Hillary you deserve at that point.
	And sadly, you're probably not going to be the one that pays the price.
	It'll be some innocent American that'll pay the price.
	If you want the dilapidated military to stay the way it is, then, you know, you're helping elect Hillary.
	You want a top-down common core education that is failing our children?
	You'll get that too.
	You're refusing to support Trump.
	You think you are some of these guys.
	So, by the way, some are intellectually honest in their opposition.
	I can respect that.
	But there's most of them that are politically motivated.
	Most of them are looking out for themselves.
	Most of them are saying how this can impact them.
	You know what most of them really want to do?
	If I'm going to be totally blunt and honest, they want to be able to take their middle finger, go on national television and national radio, and stick their middle finger in your face and tell you you're an idiot, that all you people that voted for Donald Trump are dumb.
	See?
	Meanwhile, they are doing everything they can do to help elect Hillary Clinton so they can say, I told you so.
	And, you know, if that's what they want, they're going to get the America they deserve.
	Now, I'm going to tell you something.
	Guy on Twitter today, I'm going to go to my Twitter account while I'm on the air here because I think it's important to bring up.
	The guy on Twitter today actually says to me something that I found, you know, actually fairly interesting.
	Who are you?
	Who are you to be telling us?
	I'll, you know, here it is.
	I'll read it directly.
	Who are you to tell people what to do?
	You're not even a registered Republican.
	Who are you?
	So I decided in a series of tweets, even though I'm busy, to actually answer the guy.
	If you're a regular listener to this program, you'll know where I'm coming from in all of this.
	I must have sent out 12 tweets to this guy.
	And I said, who am I?
	He said, I'm an American citizen who sees the country that he loves in decline.
	I'm somebody that cares about 95 million Americans out of the labor force.
	I care about 50 million Americans in poverty.
	I care about 46 million Americans on food stamps, 12 million more than eight years ago.
	I care about the lowest home ownership rate in 51 years and the worst recovery since the 1940s.
	I care about the record debt we're passing on to our children, Obama accumulating more debt than all previous presidents before him combined.
	I care about the 50% unemployment rate for black teenagers.
	They can't get a summer job.
	I know if I didn't have summer jobs, I'd be in trouble.
	I care about a 58% increase in the number of black Americans on food stamps in the last eight years and a 20% increase of black Americans out of the labor force.
	I care about the average family seeing over a $4,000 increase in health care costs while median income is down in eight years.
	That's just eight years.
	I care about taking in refugees when Clapper and Comey and Steinbeck and McCall and General Allen say ISIS will infiltrate that population.
	And national security, I care about our open borders.
	I also care about illegal immigrants competing with the 95 million Americans out of the labor force for jobs, which also drives down wages.
	I wrote this guy said, I care about Iran getting a nuclear weapon and the money that Obama and Hillary supported giving to them.
	I wrote him that I care about the growth of ISIS in Iraq and in Syria and in Libya and in North Africa.
	Well, and frankly, all over Europe, too.
	I didn't add that part.
	I'm adding it now.
	I care about that, too.
	I care about a president that can't say the word radical Islam.
	And then I went on to answer him.
	Well, who am I?
	Okay, I'm a former paperboy, former dishwasher.
	I'm a former cook.
	I'm a former waiter.
	I'm a former bartender.
	I'm a former house painter.
	I'm a former paper hanger.
	I'm a former construction worker, house framer, roofer, tile layer that was blessed and lucky enough to come of age when America still provided a lot of opportunity.
	And in those years, Ronald Reagan was president.
	I first voted, was 18 in 1980.
	I voted for Reagan.
	And I was very blessed to have many of my dreams, even beyond.
	I've had things happen to me that I never thought would happen to me.
	And I'll be the first to tell you I probably don't deserve it.
	That's how I feel.
	It's not false humility.
	I just believe that.
	I've been blessed beyond measure.
	Who am I?
	I'm an American that loves my country deeply, and I want to see the American dream available for the next generation of kids.
	And I said, thank you for asking.
	And then I said, one last point.
	I also want an America to be energy independent as soon as possible.
	I don't want coal miners to lose their jobs and coal companies to go out of business.
	That's who I am.
	Now, that to me is what defines this election.
	And there's a whole group of people out there that want to be able to say to the numbers of you that voted for Donald Trump in the primary that you were wrong and that, see, we know better and that we're smarter than you.
	And meanwhile, they're helping to facilitate this so that they have their moment of pride.
	Well, there's going to be consequences to their actions.
	And the consequences, there's a liberal Supreme Court, a president that can't say radical Islam, open borders, a continuation of Obamacare, horrible economic policies that have created a disaster.
	Statistics I just gave you.
	It'll result in more unvetted refugees that our intelligence community has been warning us about.
	You know, a broken-down, dilapidated, corrupt educational system, a dilapidated military that desperately needs rebuilding.
	And the list goes on.
	You'll support a woman by thinking you're smarter than every Republican in the primary that voted for Trump.
	You'll vote for a woman that has proven time and time again she is a liar and corrupt.
	And these newly released emails prove that again.
	The State Department, colluding with the Clinton Foundation and rewarding all their top donors.
	New York Post summed it up well.
	Hillary Clinton put the State Department up for sale.
	Top aides pulling the strings and doing favors for fat cat donors to the Clinton Foundation, including a shady billionaire.
	Okay.
	Clinton lied about what she knew when she knew it about the Benghazi terror attack, lied to the families.
	We know what she lied about with her email server.
	Now, I kept my promise.
	I'm going back to it right now.
	This was my promise at CPAC in 2015 to all of you.
	This is my pledge to you.
	As somebody who's undecided, on both my radio and television program on the Fox News channel, I promise you this.
	As somebody who has not made up his mind, I am going to give access to every single solitary candidate as often as I can, as often as they'll come.
	By the end of the process, I will ask them every question I can possibly think of.
	And then I am putting this all in your hands.
	I let you decide.
	And in 2016, one month after the primary started, still very early in the process, I said this at CPAC.
	The problem is at the end of this process, only one person is going to be the winner.
	And what I'm worried about here tonight is that if your candidate doesn't win, that some of you are going to be angry and emotional that your guy lost, and some of you are going to want to pout, and some of you are going to go on TV and radio and call my show and say, I can't support that guy.
	And then what's going to happen is you are giving half a vote to Hillary Rodham Clinton.
	I don't care if you support Trump, Cruz, Rubio, or Kasich.
	Any one of them are better than Hillary Clinton.
	But this is my question for all of you here at CPAC.
	Will you ask yourself in your heart, regardless of who the candidate is you support, will you, at the end of the day, I want to ask you, as a matter of fact, I want you to stand.
	Wait, wait, don't stand yet.
	I want to see in this room if your candidate doesn't win, you know how the Republican Party made people a pledge.
	Will you all pledge to support whoever wins the nomination?
	If you will, stand up.
	And except for one girl, everybody stood.
	I kept my promises throughout the whole process.
	Now I'm outlining for you that unfortunately I was right in March.
	I was like, what, March 2nd, Linda?
	I think it was very early in March this year, right?
	So about one month after the primary started.
	Keep it on Hannity.com for the next 89 days.
	I told Jennifer Rubin, who doesn't particularly like me, I was very respectful to her, though, on Twitter.
	I do like her.
	I mean, in some ways, she's just one of these people.
	They'll be responsible for what happens by this sabotage, this circular firing squad.
	I'm not going to spend every day on this program telling you who to vote for.
	That's up to you.
	I'm telling you, I'm voting for Trump for all the reasons I just laid out for you.
	It's National Make a Will Month, so it's time to check an important item off that to-do list, that honeydew list at legalzoom.com.
	Hey, spending a few minutes right now on your will or trust, that means that you can enjoy a worry-free summer filled with family vacations and barbecues.
	Now, you don't want government making decisions on important matters like finances or your kids.
	LegalZoom.com, they make it easy.
	They're not a law firm, so you don't have to take time out of your day for office visits or pay expensive hourly rates.
	Instead, you get flat rate pricing and can save over $100 with LegalZoom's will or trust estate plan bundles.
	Now, if you don't know whether a will or trust is right for you, let not your heart be troubled.
	You're going to work with an independent attorney now available in 48 states.
	They can answer your questions and recommend the estate plan that fits your specific needs.
	Now, save money today.
	Do the right thing during National Make a Will Month at legalzoom.com.
	Don't forget, enter Hannity 1 in the referral box when you check out, and you'll save even more.
	So spend time with your family this summer.
	Let legalzoom.com take care of the legal stuff.
	That's legalzoom.com, legalzoom.com.
	You don't feel like there was impropriety in the relationship between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department.
	We talked to a wide range of people at my level, at various levels in the department.
	NGOs, think tanks, business leaders, you know, experts on a variety of subjects.
	Except in this importantly, in this case, Secretary Clinton made a pledge that she would not personally or substantially in any way involve herself with the Clinton Foundation.
	So it's not just any outside organization, it's a specific organization that she said ahead of time she wouldn't have contact with.
	So doesn't that, doesn't this then seem to violate that pledge?
	So again, to reiterate, you know, department officials are in touch with a wide range of individuals.
	I'd note that former Secretary Clinton's ethics agreement did not preclude other State Department officials from having contact with Clinton Foundation staff.
	Can you at least try to answer Abigail's question, which was, has the department looked into this and determined that there was no impropriety?
	The department is regularly in touch with people across the whole spectrum now.
	That's not the question.
	The question is whether or not you've looked into this, the building has looked into it and determined that everything was okay, that there was nothing wrong.
	We feel confident in our ability and our past practice of reaching out to a variety of sources and being responsive to ours.
	I'm sorry.
	Am I not speaking English?
	Is this, I mean, is it coming across as a form?
	I'm not asking you if no one is saying it's not okay or it's bad for the department to get a broad variety of input from different people.
	The question is whether or not you have determined that there was nothing improper here.
	We feel confident that all the rules were followed.
	Wow.
	Matthew Lee.
	Was it Mike Lee?
	Hang on, it was Matthew Lee, AP reporter, digging in.
	That's a rare moment with the State Department.
	So embarrassing.
	Am I not speaking English here?
	What part of this question don't you understand?
	And you get this, well, why won't they answer the question?
	Because Hillary did promise she would cut off all ties to the Clinton Foundation when she was Secretary of State.
	But no, you got a list of people here, all high rollers, a bunch of rich people, donated a fortune to the Clinton Foundation, and they had access that you would never have.
	She was bought off.
	Give you one example.
	Gilbert Chagari, billionaire, Nigerian, Lebanese businessman, gave up to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation and pledged $1 billion to the 2009 and 2009 to the Clinton Global Initiative.
	What did he get?
	Well, he got Uma Abedeen and Cheryl Mills to arrange for him to meet the former ambassador to Lebanon and a very urgent email request from the guy that was running the Clinton Foundation.
	Very important.
	Got another guy, Raj Fernando, gave up to $5 million in the Clinton Foundation.
	He has absolutely zero national security experience, but that's all right.
	He got paid off, too.
	He got to be appointed to the International Security Advisory Board.
	Hey, let's put in a nobody that knows nothing.
	He's a securities guy.
	Good grief.
	A trader.
	And you got Frank Gustra, Giostra, who's a billionaire mining magnate from Canada.
	He pledged $100 million to the Clinton Foundation.
	What did he get?
	Well, he had dinner with Bill and Hillary in 2010.
	She's the Secretary of State.
	Wonder if the money had anything to do with it.
	Anyway, right afterwards, the Clintons met with Columbia's president the next day.
	Right after that, the company that Giostra owns, well, he got the timber rights to the Colombian forests.
	I thought liberals cared about trees.
	You know, you got another guy, Daniel Abram, Slim Fast, billionaire, gave between $5 and $10 million to the foundation.
	He was able to meet three times with Hillary Clinton while she was the Secretary of State, and it goes on.
	Algeria, they gave $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
	What did they get?
	The Clinton State Department approved $165 billion worth of arms sales to countries that were Clinton Foundation donors, including Algeria, despite, by the way, their dismal human rights record.
	State also okay to 70% jump in military exports to the country.
	Great.
	Pay to play.
	And by the way, the emails, the rest of them, we only got these.
	These were supposed to be turned over.
	33,000 emails about yoga, a wedding, a funeral, conversations with Bill, who does an email.
	You get where we're going here?
	We'll get into that later with Ed Klein also.
	Why did Hillary brag?
	You know, she's talking about this guy, Thomas Alfred Taylor.
	She was the defense attorney for this guy, accused of raping a 12-year-old girl.
	She says, bragging, laughing, joking.
	I had him take a polygraph and he passed it, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs.
	What does that mean?
	Mean she knows he was guilty and she got him off on a technicality.
	Guy that raped a 12-year-old girl.
	Well, I wonder if Donald Trump had done something like that, what the media reaction would be.
	We got the tape of it.
	We'll play it later in the program.
	We've been playing it.
	We're doing our job here.
	That's right.
	All you really stubborn Republicans out there, stay with Hillary.
	Keep helping her.
	Because that's what you're going to get.
	You're going to get the government that you deserve.
	There are some interesting poll numbers out.
	Rasmussen has a poll out today.
	Within the last, what, number of days, we've had Reuters, UPI, Bloomberg, all of which have Trump closing within three points of Hillary.
	And Rasmussen, latest survey, it's 43-40.
	Trump gets 20% of the black vote in that particular poll.
	I got a Towery poll, opinion savvy poll in Florida that has a one-point race in the swing state of Florida.
	Clinton 45, Trump 44.
	Rubio 45, Murphy 43.
	That's a tighter race for Marco Rubio than I thought it would be.
	By the way, I am supporting Marco Rubio in the race.
	And for those of you who say, what about immigration?
	What about immigration?
	I just, I don't want to hear it anymore.
	He's paid a big price for it, and he said he learned, and I trust him and believe him.
	There's my answer.
	I don't care what anybody thinks anymore.
	I just don't care.
	I'm giving my opinion.
	Whatever it's worth, you take it or leave it.
	Anyway, there's going to be a lot of important states.
	I'm telling you right now, if you live in North Carolina, you're an important state.
	Florida, obviously important.
	Ohio, obviously important.
	Pennsylvania, obviously important.
	Virginia, important.
	New Hampshire, important.
	Wisconsin and Michigan important.
	Iowa is important.
	New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada, all important.
	You guys will make the difference.
	That's going to be where this election is won or lost, in case you're interested.
	I'm assuming that the polls that I'm reading are correct.
	No, I've got to tell you.
	So CNN was all day.
	I'm sure, by the way, what's that guy's name that does that Sunday show?
	Stelter.
	Sure, Brian Stelter's going to be all over this if Jeff Zucker lets him.
	I heard from a friend of mine, everything is handed down to him from Jeff Zucker, which was pretty amusing to me.
	The guy works at CNN told me that.
	And where's Dylan Byers?
	Because all day yesterday, CNN was reporting, this is even in the New York Post today, that the Secret Service has spoken to Donald Trump's campaign about the controversial Second Amendment comments CNN reported on Wednesday.
	There's been more than one conversation, the network quoted a Secret Service official is saying.
	Trump tweeted, no such meeting or conversation ever happened.
	A made-up story by low-rating CNN.
	The Secret Service at that time declined to comment, but now we learn after 24 hours of breathless media reporting that, in fact, the Secret Service contacted Donald Trump.
	The Secret Service is now backing Donald Trump's claim and his denial that any such conversation took place.
	In other words, the mainstream media, CNN, got it all wrong.
	Caught fabricating another anti-Trump story.
	I'm sure Brian Stelter and Dylan Byers and Eric Wimple and all the great media reporters out there are going to be all over this.
	Oh, Dan Rathers wade in, you know, the same guy that made up stories back in, what, 2000?
	Yeah, he's back out there.
	He's saying that, calling on the media to shame Donald Trump out of the race.
	But he's very, he's not biased.
	He's very fair, balanced, and objective.
	Let's see, Trump.
	Yeah, you know, he made the comment.
	He said the media is almost as crooked as Hillary.
	You know what Mike Pence told me last night?
	It's like two-on-one.
	Do you know that you've got in the great state of Ohio, you got Ted Strickland declaring at an AFL-CIO event?
	I mean, the death of Scalia saved labor from a terrible decision.
	You know, the big three networks, you know, literally all over the comment by Donald Trump and false reporting about the Secret Service and the Second Amendment people issue.
	And, you know, he wasn't talking about mobilizing.
	He's actually talking about, well, maybe they'll take her out.
	And I went through all the instances yesterday where Democrats, including John Kerry, have done the same thing, except on a much more direct basis.
	But liberals didn't care about that.
	And then Strickland says, you know, and I don't wish anyone ill, but it happened at a great time.
	I mean, I got to tell you, it happened at a great time when Anthony Scalia died because once that decision had been made, it would have been a tough decision to reverse, he said, as people cheered on.
	And then once the audio recording of the comments came to light, he said, oh, that was insensitive, and I apologize.
	You want to know on the latest email scandal?
	This was put out by newsbusters.
	The big three networks seem to try everything in their power, not to mention Hillary's latest email controversy.
	In other words, the selling of the State Department.
	And if you look at their morning and evening shows, they gave emails, let's see, six minutes and 59 seconds.
	Wow.
	It's not bad.
	Oh, but for the next day in the row, they gave the Trump Second Amendment people comment a whopping 25 minutes and 54 seconds.
	But don't worry, there's not media bias.
	You know, I keep asking these guys online, is Hillary a liar?
	None of them ever answer.
	They can't answer that question because then they would have to actually, they know it's a trick question.
	So, you know, the stelters of the world can't answer that question.
	I am honest about who I am.
	I'm voting for Donald Trump, and for the reasons I just spelled out in the last half hour of this program.
	I'll give you some more reasons if you want.
	Front page story in the Wall Street Journal: housing recovery that began in 2012 has lifted the overall market, but it's left behind a broad swath of the middle class threatening to create a generation of permanent renters and sowing economic anxiety and a frustration for millions of Americans.
	You know what owning a home means?
	The lowest home ownership rate in 51 years.
	You know what I mean?
	That is the American dream.
	That defines the American dream.
	I'll never forget the first house I got.
	I was in Atlanta.
	I was a local radio guy.
	I paid $123,000.
	I think I sold it for $148,000.
	I thought I was rich.
	And I was the greatest thing in my life.
	I felt I had, I honestly felt so happy and proud to have my little piece of property.
	American dreams dying.
	That's what I keep pointing out.
	Continuing Obama's failed economic policy is going to continue that.
	Anyway, home prices rose 83% in the nation's 178 major real estate markets in the second quarter.
	But most of the price gains, economists said, stem from a lack of fresh supply rather than the surge of new buyers.
	The pace of new home construction remains at levels typically associated with recessions.
	I know what that's like because I was in construction.
	Well, homeownership rate in the second quarter, it's lowest point since the Census Bureau began tracking quarterly data.
	Wow.
	In all, some 200 or 300,000 fewer households are purchasing a new home each year that they would during normal market conditions.
	That's not normal.
	This is bad.
	Home ownership rate is now at a 51-year low, 62.9% in the second quarter.
	Long-term declines could erase the gains made by the middle class, all the gains made by the middle class and the middle-class Americans since World War II.
	Wow.
	How bad is that?
	The Wall Street Journal goes on.
	The default savings mechanism for American households has been homeownership.
	Today we have historic lows.
	By the way, you know, most people save the best for their retirement is the home they buy in 1970 that they retire on the profit and buy a cheaper place down in Florida or somewhere else.
	People that I know anyway.
	Today we have historic lows for young households in terms of home ownership.
	How can young people buy a house when they're living in mommy and daddy's basement?
	When you have one in six American men 18 to 34 either incarcerated in jail or living in mommy and daddy's basement because they can't find a job.
	Nationally, the inventory for home sales has dropped more than 37% since 2011.
	All the net new households formed between 2006 and 2014 were renters rather than owners.
	And she's going to continue the economic policies that have given us the worst recovery since the 1940s.
	And by the way, then we have, of course, her corrupt character.
	But don't worry, all of you sanctimonious, self-righteous, arrogant Wall Street Journal columnists, et cetera, and politicians, Republicans that are sabotaging Donald Trump and creating a circular firing squad because you're going to get the Hillary you deserve.
	You will get the Hillary you deserve.
	You know, so I'm just saying when she selects the Supreme Court, don't come crying to me.
	I warned everybody about Obama and I'm warning you all about Clinton.
	Nobody listened then.
	Listen, everyone says, yo, you're so powerful, Hannity.
	If I was that powerful, Obama never would have been president.
	I have no illusions that I can help elect Donald Trump and that I do have this fundamental truth and belief system: America will get the government it deserves.
	And if we get Hillary Clinton, we deserve it.
	And that's just a fact.
	And it's going to be sad, and people will suffer needlessly.
	We have 12 million more people in poverty.
	I'm sorry, on food staff, 7 million more in poverty.
	Lowest labor participation rate since the 70s.
	And we still have open borders.
	People cross the border, they want to compete for the limited jobs available, driving down wages.
	Republicans, are you happy about open borders now?
	Ahmed, I am at such a piece in my life about where I am in this election and how we handled everything from the very beginning.
	And all this criticism to me is water off a duck's back.
	So I'm warning you, like I did in 07 and 08.
	I wish I were wrong about Obama, but I wasn't.
	I wish I'm wrong about Hillary if she got elected, but I won't be.
	You elect her, you'll pay the price.
	800-941 Sean Tolfree, telephone number.
	You want to be a part of the program?
	My buddy from Breitbart, Joel Pollock, I couldn't put his book down the last two nights.
	That's why I'm so tired.
	Also, we'll check in with two doctors about Hillary's health conditions.
	Ed Klein is going to speak about why did Hillary defend somebody that she believed was guilty in raping a 12-year-old girl.
	By the way, is CNN going to cover that?
	I doubt it.
	Remember, Hillary Clinton has some vulnerabilities herself, even as she calls for criminal justice reform because of her support in the 1990s for anti-crime legislation that ultimately helped contribute to this era of mass incarceration that she now speaks out again.
	We just lost.
	We just lost Breonna Keiller.
	With some Trump supporters, let's play what they said.
	David Duke and people like that, they come out of out from under the rocks all the time around this time this year.
	It got nothing to do with Donald Trump.
	We all Americans.
	I think we need to stop with all the racist stuff and the race being.
	Like me and my friend right here, we just met today and he was talking.
	You know, we got to stop with the racist stuff and this, that.
	We all Americans, man.
	And nobody paying baby to mine.
	Clearly, let me just be clear here.
	Obviously, the majority of Donald Trump supporters are not African American.
	I don't know how many African Americans were in that building, but that is one person that we have chosen to cut that sound from.
	The fact that the emails are out there somewhere, probably, and that we could have a president that could be blackmailed over them.
	That's what concerns me.
	It's about our national security.
	You can't just invent things.
	You can't just invent things.
	You just invented an entire thing.
	The FBI has already come out with a report on Hillary Clinton's emails.
	What you just said was an invented thing.
	Nope.
	The FBI also said that the FBI also said that she has not turned over.
	She didn't turn over all the emails.
	No, ma'am.
	You cannot invent things.
	You cannot say things.
	You're putting on incredibly inflammatory.
	I'd like to bring Hillary Clinton's actions into it.
	Absolutely.
	She was given the choice between standing with a serial sexual abuser.
	All right, Curry.
	Stop, stop, stop, stop, stop.
	Stop.
	Stop, stop.
	That's not fair.
	Can we stop that, please?
	It is not fair.
	It is not fair.
	It is a low blow.
	It is the, yes, I want to end this.
	This is the lowest of the low, and it has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton.
	And it's just a cheap shot.
	Millions of other people.
	Can you stop?
	Can you cut him off?
	Donald Trump.
	Thank you.
	We're done.
	Thank you.
	We'll be right back.
	A girl who was raped by a pedophile that Hillary Clinton bragged about getting off.
	Wait, let me finish.
	Hillary Clinton black.
	What do you mean?
	You don't even want to hear it?
	That Hillary Clinton is on tape bragging about as a lawyer getting off on a technicality.
	That woman now says Hillary ruined my life.
	What's wrong with the people?
	I'm going to put there.
	No, no.
	Thanks for watching.
	I'm going to defend there.
	God forbid that I should defend.
	She was afforded to represent somebody.
	So she's got to do her job.
	I'm going to leave it there.
	Goodbye.
	Hillary Clinton blamed the victim.
	Number 101, when you're dealing with rape cases, don't blame the victim.
	She blamed a 12-year-old girl, a sixth-grade 12-year-old girl, of seeking the attention of older men and fantasizing about being with older men.
	There is audio.
	Wait, we haven't corroborated any of this.
	So, I mean, I just think you should be very widely reported.
	It says the National Inquiry widely reported.
	It doesn't mean anything.
	It's not on this network, I would point out.
	Wow.
	Powerful examples of media bias.
	That is at the top of the Drudge report today, and it is a link, and you can actually click on it.
	It's from the Daily Wire, and just shows how biased the media is.
	They put that montage together.
	Anyway, 800-941-Sean, told Free telephone number, you want to be a part of the program.
	And speaking of media bias, I got a book from a really good friend of mine, somebody I've known for a long time, and I respect so much.
	And I don't have time right now to read books.
	I just don't.
	I'm that busy.
	It just, my life is crazy.
	But I couldn't put this book down.
	And I'm staying up late at night, losing sleep, reading my friend Joel Pollack's book.
	And he is the senior editor-at-large and in-house counsel at Breitbart News, author of the brand new book, 19 Hard Truths the Left Refuses to See, Hear, or Speak About.
	And it just exposes, I mean, it just tears down, you know, this myth about the left and shows them to be, you know, the frenetic attempts that they have to avoid the facts and contradict their agenda.
	Anyway, my friend Joel Pollack joins me.
	How are you?
	I'm great.
	How are you, Sean?
	You know, Breitbart's under fire because you see the difference where Donald Trump would be on Supreme Court justices on Obamacare, on energy independence, on saying the words radical Islam, fixing the VA, building the wall, education back to the states.
	But some of our brethren in the news media are angry at people like you and me for pointing out what is a very distinct difference in governance between these two candidates, and they're mad at us.
	Right, and they're continually harping on what Donald Trump says while ignoring completely what Hillary Clinton does.
	You can't get them to discuss her record.
	It's only what Donald Trump said yesterday, not what Hillary Clinton has been doing for 20 years or more.
	I mean, that's such a good point.
	And you can see, last night we had Mike Pence on television.
	Mike Pence says to me, well, it's really two-on-one, Sean, because you've got the entire left-wing media establishment just totally taking everything out of context.
	We see this with many examples.
	And then you've got me and Donald Trump.
	In other words, it's them and maybe a few of us, like you and Breitbart and Bannon and myself and some talk radio people.
	But most of the media has made it now their number one goal is to smear, slander, and defeat Donald Trump.
	That's right.
	And they want to destroy the people who support Trump, not just Trump himself.
	The New York Times last week said Democrats looking past mirror victory hope to end the Trump movement.
	So they think this is a moment of total victory for them.
	They want to go after everybody who resists the left agenda, whether it's social conservatives or working people who support Trump.
	They want to completely destroy the conservative movement that's lined up behind Trump, and they see their opportunity to do it.
	I don't think they can do it because we've got you, we've got Breitbart, we've got other people who are going to push back.
	But that's their real agenda in this.
	Yeah, you just look at the economic numbers that I talk about every day, and she says that she likes where the state of the economy is, and she's going to continue Obama's policies.
	She's made no separation from what has been a failure for eight years and millions more in poverty and millions more on food stamps and millions more out of work, except they don't get counted in the unemployment numbers, a doubling of the debt, one in five American households, not a single person working.
	All of these statistics, nobody in these media outlets ever talks about that.
	I never see that.
	And here's the other question: What offices is she selling to her donors right now?
	Because that's what comes out in the Clinton Foundation emails, that she was giving away offices and policies and favors to people who donated to her family's private charity foundation, which they use as a piggy bank for travel and other expenses.
	So what's she giving away?
	She's trading away uranium to the Russians.
	She's giving away Lebanese policy to her Clinton donors.
	I mean, what is she going to give away now?
	What is she trading away right now as she collects money from Silicon Valley and other people?
	I think that's such a good point.
	You want to talk about pay-to-play, but Hillary liked to play favorites, and there's a long list of people that she's helped.
	If you donate to the Clinton Foundation, like this guy, Gilbert, what's his name?
	Chagery.
	He's a billionaire, Nigerian-Lebanese businessman.
	Anyway, he donated between $1 and $5 million to the foundation, and he pledged $1 billion to the Clinton Global Initiative.
	And when he needed access, he contacted Uma Abedeen and Cheryl Mills, and they arranged for him to meet with the former U.S. ambassador to Lebanon.
	It's all caught on these emails that just magically appeared because of Judicial Watch.
	Those were emails that were supposed to be turned over years ago to the FBI.
	You got another guy who is a securities trader, gave between $1 and $5 million.
	And Hillary Clinton appointed him to the International Security Advisory Board, even though he was a securities trader with zero security background or credentials.
	And I can keep going on from there.
	You know, one of the things I talked about in my book is the left-wing myth that only government can do what we need in society, that people can't do it for themselves.
	Markets can't do it.
	And what the left ignores is that government can be such a repressive force.
	And when you've got these powerful people using their connections with the Clintons, and when you've got Obama conspiring with the IRS to suppress conservative groups and Tea Party organizers all across the country, you can see just how destructive government can be.
	But the left ignores that.
	They want to suppress that.
	And that's why they're suppressing the Clinton Foundation scandal.
	They don't want to see how corrupt our government has really become.
	Well, you saw this report yesterday, and that is the FBI approached the Justice Department earlier this year.
	They wanted information and an investigation into the Clinton Foundation, but the public integrity probe was declined.
	I mean, so basically we have a two-tier justice system.
	Now, if I did this, what would happen to me?
	I think I would be handcuffed and probably perp walk with cameras in front of me, and I'd be, let's see, I'd get a mug shot, and I'd probably be put in jail for years, like Dinesh D'Souza.
	Right, and the Justice Department had a conflict of interest because they were working with the IRS in sicking the tax collecting agencies on conservative groups back in 2010, 2011.
	And nobody wants to talk about that.
	They just swept it under the rug.
	And this is what's going on because the truth is being kept from the American people.
	And when Obama says he's outraged by it, everybody nods and says, okay, the president understands.
	And then he says he never heard about it except from the news.
	And then a few months later, he says he's not outraged about it anymore and can't imagine why anyone is.
	I mean, this is what's happening in our country.
	And they want to keep the truth and the facts off the table.
	And conservatives can win these debates if you just get the facts out there.
	And that's what my book is about.
	You know, you go through a series of arguments that the left make that are so lacking in common sense and logic.
	Like they believe gun control is the answer to mass killings.
	They believe that raising the minimum wage is going to help the poor.
	And if you oppose it, you're just greedy and selfish.
	And they believe, for example, that Israel is the main obstacle for peace in the Middle East, which is just a lie.
	And they also, I think, believe if you don't really rattle the cage of those that are cutting our heads off and committing a terror attack every 84 hours, ISIS and groups like them, that somehow they're going to like us and stop doing these evil deeds.
	Right.
	And that myth came up the last week or so over this Kaiser Khan controversy.
	You know, he went on CNN and said that terror has nothing to do with Islam.
	And that's the Obama administration policy.
	That's the Hillary Clinton foreign policy.
	And it's absurd.
	I mean, most reasonable Americans understand that isn't the case, but the left clings to that because if they allow fact and reason to enter the discussion, they know they're going to lose the debate.
	You know, but that's the thing.
	I mean, those are the really, when you break it down the way you did in the book, that's why I couldn't put it down.
	You're so annoying, by the way, for keeping me up every night when I should be sleeping.
	But, you know, they believe, for example, that the differences between men and women, male and female, are arbitrary and artificial somehow.
	To say that, for example, men, generally speaking, are physically stronger than women doesn't mean men are superior.
	It just means that we are different.
	And in many ways, I would argue that there is no way any man can ever offer a mother's love to a child and that bond that a mother has with a child.
	Does that mean I'm inferior, that my love is inferior?
	No, it means that there are certain fundamental biological truths in life, doesn't it?
	It certainly does, and they can't deny that.
	The idea that you would raise a child without a gender, which I talk about in the book, there are couples actually trying to do this right now, and that that would somehow be helpful to the child is so bizarre.
	You know, there's also some pushback, actually, from the feminist movement because feminists are saying, hey, we fought for women all these years, and now suddenly the transgender movement is coming in, and you've got these men who say they're women who are basically taking away all of our political achievements and claiming them for their own.
	This is a problem that even the left is starting to realize is contradictory.
	And look, you can be whatever you want to be.
	I think we're a diverse enough society we can tolerate people behaving whatever way they want to behave when they're adults.
	I mean, you know, you're in New York.
	You know that New Yorkers can tolerate a very wide variety of expressions of gender and other things as well.
	But fundamentally, it doesn't change the fact that men and women are different, have differences, and that those differences matter.
	That we need women to be women and men to be men at some basic level.
	I actually would argue women are better.
	But, you know, that's my own opinion.
	What can I say?
	Yeah.
	You know, what do you make of all of these Republicans?
	Let's start with, for example, the other presidential candidates that all made a pledge that they would support the eventual nominee.
	I think they made it, assuming they were just going to crush Donald Trump, and that didn't work out that way.
	But, you know, people like Jeb Bush and John Kasich and Lindsey Graham and even somebody who I like as Senator Ted Cruz.
	Right.
	And it exposes that what they were about wasn't really the health of the party and wasn't really about principles either.
	That there's now a contest in the Republican Party about what the party represents and whom it represents.
	And the Beltway is very frightened by Donald Trump, and they're climbing on the left-wing bandwagon and saying, yes, we want a major victory for Hillary Clinton.
	It has to be a blowout win, I think was the word someone used this week.
	They want Donald Trump's movement to be destroyed.
	And whatever that means for the people behind him, whether it's the people who want an end to illegal immigration, whether it's the people who want an end to abuses of executive authority, they want to end that.
	And they somehow have this fantasy that the millions of people who voted for Donald Trump in record numbers are, number one, going to go away or change their minds.
	And number two, that they're not going to be very upset about that.
	And instead of trying to heal the rift or instead of trying to use the other means that they have to oppose a President Trump, let's say, why not develop a conservative agenda to hold Donald Trump to his promises once he's in office?
	But no, they got to bring the man down, and they want to bring down all the millions of people who supported him.
	And that, to me, is just immature.
	Well, it's more than immature, you know.
	So I got into ⁇ I really wasn't painted.
	Some guy writes me on Twitter today, who are you?
	Who are you, Hannity, to tell us anything?
	And then I told him who I was.
	I told him about my background and why I think every American has the right and obligation to speak out in these very difficult, troubling times.
	Anyway, I just love the book.
	I couldn't put it down.
	Very well put together.
	I've always known you're incredibly bright, smart, and I just enjoyed it.
	Joel Pollock, senior editor-at-large, in-house counsel, Breitbart News, his brand new book, 19 Truths, that the left refuses to see, hear, or speak about.
	All right.
	So just go and pick it up at Amazon.com, bookstores everywhere.
	We have it up on Hannity.com now.
	And thanks, sir, for being with us.
	We appreciate it.
	Thank you.
	All right, 800-941-Sean, our toll-free telephone number.
	By the way, Ed Klein is going to weigh in.
	We have more on this ongoing controversy with Hillary Clinton and her saying, oh, yeah, I knew he was guilty as hell, but I still got the rapist of a 12-year-old off.
	We'll get to that next.
	In a congressional hearing on July 7th, Director Comey directly contradicted what you had told the public.
	I had not sent classified material nor received anything marked classified.
	Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private email.
	Was that true?
	Our investigation found that there was classified information sent.
	So it was not true.
	And I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received.
	Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails, either sent or received.
	Was that true?
	That's not true.
	There were a small number of portion markings on, I think, three of the documents.
	I never sent classified material on my email, and I never received any that was marked classified.
	Secretary Clinton said I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email.
	There is no classified material.
	Was that true?
	There was classified material emailed.
	People across the government knew that I used one device.
	Maybe it was because I am not the most technically capable person and wanted to make it as easy as possible.
	Secretary Clinton said she used just one device.
	Was that true?
	She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as Secretary of State.
	But we turned over everything that was work-related.
	Every single thing.
	Personal stuff, we did not.
	I had no obligation to do so and did not.
	Secretary Clinton said all work-related emails were returned to the State Department.
	Was that true?
	No, we found work-related emails, thousands, that were not returned.
	All I can tell you is that when my attorneys conducted this exhaustive process, I did not participate.
	Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive.
	Did her lawyers read the email content individually?
	No.
	He directly contradicted what you said.
	Let me just just not only directly contradict what you said, he also said in that hearing that you were extremely careless and negligent.
	Well, Chris, I looked at the whole transcript of everything that was said, and what I believe is, number one, I made a mistake not using two different email addresses.
	I have said that, and I repeat it again today.
	It is certainly not anything that I ever would do again.
	I take classification seriously.
	I relied on and had every reason to rely on the judgments of the professionals with whom I worked.
	All right, 25 now until the top of the hour, 800-941-Sean is a toll-free television number.
	It's been a month now since the FBI director ripped into Hillary Clinton and her extreme carelessness.
	And then, of course, going before Trey Gowdy, yeah, she lied here.
	Yeah, she lied again.
	And now, thanks to Judicial Watch, we now have new emails.
	I thought all the emails were supposed to have been turned over.
	Well, it appears they are not.
	And it appears that some of these emails won't even be released until after the election.
	Remember, the media used to assure us the FBI director was a straight shooter, James Comey, the straight shooter.
	No, that's not actually happening.
	Anyway, none of Hillary's work-related emails discovered by the FBI after being deleted on our private server have been released, raising questions about whether or not we, the people, will see these before Election Day.
	I'd also like to see her medical records, as we were discussing, or as we'll discuss later.
	And I'd also like to see, for example, the speeches she gave to insurance companies and big banks and Wall Street companies.
	Anyway, the FBI said it found several thousand work-related emails that were deleted, but the State Department is not committed to a schedule for their release.
	It will be up to a federal judge to determine when they could be made public.
	Anyway, so we have just received some material.
	Multiple Freedom of Information Act requests and lawsuits have gone forward to cover and recover these emails.
	Litigants include Judicial Watch.
	And the FBI director said last month that among those emails recovered, several thousand were work-related.
	And he cautioned at the time that the FBI did not uncover evidence that Clinton intentionally tried to thwart transparency laws, really.
	That was the biggest joke of the whole thing.
	Well, now what we are beginning to discover is that, for example, there was a big pay-to-play scandal going on with Hillary Clinton and the foundation and the State Department.
	For example, you have the shady Lebanese Nigerian business guy.
	His name is Gilbert Chagri is his name.
	Anyway, he was a guy that donated between $1 and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation, pledged $1 billion in 2009 to the Clinton Global Initiative.
	And this is a guy that had special access.
	Clinton AIDS, Uma Abedeen, Cheryl Mills, they arranged for Chagari to meet with Jeffrey Feltman, the former U.S. ambassador to Lebanon, in response to an urgent email request from Doug Brand, who was overseeing the Clinton Foundation at the time.
	Now, somebody who's way ahead of the curve on this is a guy by the name of Ed Klein.
	You know, the guy the media likes to slander and besmirch.
	Well, he is, of course, a senior, a New York Times best-selling author.
	His book, Unlikable, The Problem with Hillary Clinton.
	Anyway, he has talked about not only Chagari in this book, but so many others.
	How are you?
	I'm great.
	Great to be with you.
	I would argue this is a bit of a vindication story for you.
	Well, you know, it's interesting.
	The press has been talking about this guy, Gilbert Chagri, who is a Lebanese Nigerian.
	And as you know, there is an al-Qaeda-linked group in Nigeria by the name of Boko Haram that kidnaps and enslaves Nigerian schoolgirls, been responsible for thousands of deaths.
	And Hillary, all during her career, while she was Secretary of State, said that she was her central issue was women and children.
	And yet, for reasons that nobody understood until now, she refused to list Boko Haram as a terrorist organization.
	And why did she do that?
	And the reason she did that is because our friend Gilbert Shaguri has the largest construction conglomerate in Nigeria and did not want Boko Haram to be listed officially as a terrorist organization, gave millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation, and in return, Hillary did not list the organization Boko Haram as a terrorist organization because he was concerned that if she had,
	it would get in the way of his business there.
	That's the real scandal.
	But it's not just him.
	It's this guy, Raj Fernando, the securities trader, that gave between $1 and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation.
	He ends up being on an international security advisory board with zero experience.
	Not one bit.
	Or Frank Giestra, the billionaire mining magnet from Canada, pledged over.
	I've been writing about this.
	Sean, I've been writing about this for two, three years, and nobody's been paying any attention until finally now.
	Well, excuse me.
	With all due respect, I've been paying attention.
	Well, no, you have been.
	I mean the press.
	I'm sorry.
	The mainstream media is what I meant to say.
	Yeah, no, they've tried to ignore you, and not only that, slander you and smear you.
	And now everything that you've been writing about now has come to fruition, and we have the emails now to prove it.
	Giestra had dinner in 2010 with Bill and Hillary, and the Clintons met with Columbia's president the next day.
	And right afterwards, Giestra partially owns, acquired timber rights, guess where, in Colombian forests.
	Yeah, and the same guy, by the way, sold 20% of the American uranium production to Rostron, which is the Russian nuclear facility in Russia.
	And right after that, Bill Clinton was invited to Moscow and was paid $500,000 for giving one speech.
	You got a guy from New York by the name of Robert J. Congle, and he gave $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
	And as senator, Hillary ensured that millions of dollars in federal aid went to his mall projects in New York.
	Or Daniel Abram, who was a slim fast billionaire, he gave between $5 and $10 million.
	And he was able to meet three times with Hillary Clinton while she served as Secretary of State.
	And it goes on, and all these companies, Algeria, Boeing Corporation, Monsanto, and UBS, you know, people that are, aren't they giving her speech money too?
	That's right.
	You know, one of the interesting things about this that nobody's touched on except you, perhaps, is that the people in the White House, Valerie Jarrett and Barack Obama, were aware of some of these things going on with the Clinton Foundation and warned Hillary not to do this.
	And she ignored their warnings.
	So the President of the United States was not completely in the dark about all this.
	Yeah.
	I want to switch topics a little bit because we now have this woman by the name of Kathy Shelton gave an interview for the Daily Mail.
	Now, for those that don't know, I told the story yesterday when Kathy Shelton was 12 years old.
	She was raped.
	Oh, yes.
	And by a guy by the name of Thomas Alfred Taylor, 41-year-old.
	He was accused of this.
	And Hillary, in the process of all this, used legal technicalities to plead with, to make a plea deal for her client.
	At one point, she was quoted in this interview laughing, bragging at how she got this guy that was pretty much guilty as hell off.
	And she said, I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs.
	In other words, bragging that she got a rapist of a 12-year-old girl off, and in the process said, well, young girls like this from broken homes, they fantasize a lot, et cetera, et cetera.
	This was all brought up.
	And she's laughing about it.
	Let me play the tape.
	I have a guy called Malin Gibson that I had, well, I probably can't remember his name, but I cut out who's who, and I've done all this stuff.
	I haven't done Malin Gibson.
	I said, well, I'm just getting ready to talk to New York Justice.
	So we were at plea market, so I went before Moffat Cove and sent the plea.
	And Moffin said, what is this?
	I found first-degree raising deal, but dropping the charge of dropping my parents.
	So Moffat has to, you know, I was supposed to determine whether the round factual is important.
	Moffat asked me to leave the room while he examined my client officer for the fire respections for us.
	He said, I can't leave Bragging, laughing that, ha, he passed the lie detector test.
	That forever killed my belief in lie detectors.
	And then laughing when discussing the crime lab's accidental destruction of DNA evidence that had tied this guy Taylor to the crime.
	And also, she said, well, I went to see, you know, these younger women tend to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing.
	And she bragged about getting this big New York psychologist, a big name that's going to absolutely tear her apart on the stand as part of these plea negotiations and how young adolescents tend to exaggerate, romanticize sexual experiences, and that adolescents from disorganized families such as the complainants are more prone to exaggerate behavior.
	And she's laughing.
	And now this woman has spoken out for the first time in 40 years, calling Hillary a liar by defending this rapist, by smearing her, by blocking evidence in the case, and laughing, knowing that this guy was guilty and she got him off.
	That's right.
	And this was Hillary Clinton way back when in Arkansas, in which she was claiming that her whole life was dedicated to helping young women.
	And that the narrative at the time.
	Has to take seriously these charges that women say when they're raped, they take that charge seriously.
	This is the same woman, Hillary Clinton, who did, who laughed all about this.
	You're absolutely right.
	Well, you can add to that, though, the Clinton Foundation money from countries like Saudi Arabia.
	Women can't drive.
	They must listen to a man and dress a certain way.
	And they have to get permission from men to go to school or go to work.
	And, of course, you can't build a Jewish temple or a Christian church.
	And, of course, if you're gay or lesbian, you can be killed.
	But that didn't stop her and the foundation from taking up to $25 million for that and $10 million for the Clinton Library.
	And it pretty much bought her silence because I can't find any comments that her criticizing Saudi Arabia's mistreatment of gays, lesbians, women, Christians, and Jews.
	Yeah, and of course, that's because Saudi Arabia and all those Arab emirates have been giving millions and millions of dollars to Bill Clinton's Clinton Foundation and his global initiative.
	And that's why this is a very woman who is clearly up to her eyeballs in public corruption, and I think it's finally a lot of people.
	How does she get away with it all the time, though, Ed?
	She gets away with it.
	Everything.
	She's always gotten away with everything.
	She's gotten away with everything since Bill Clinton was raping and harassing women in Arkansas.
	And the police were backing up Bill Clinton instead of the women.
	And it's been true with Whitewater and Travelgate and, you know, the Rose Law firm Billings, you name it, everything she's gotten away with.
	And she just got away with the emails when Jim Comey, the director of the FBI, refused to recommend an indictment, even though he said she was extremely negligent.
	Which, by the way, is that's the legal standard.
	Using those words specifically because that's what the statute says.
	That's right.
	You don't need to prove intent.
	But what he was saying is he didn't think he could get a conviction with a jury.
	Well, who knows if he could.
	But with that said, I mean, she's now up in the polls, although Donald Trump has been tightening the last three days.
	But can she win?
	Well, no, I never think, I never undersell the Clintons' ability to wiggle out of all their troubles as they always have.
	I mean, they have this ability to do so, and they've got the media behind them, and that's one of the reasons that they get away with it.
	Absolutely right.
	All right, Ed Klein, appreciate it.
	800-941-Sean.
	All right, so what about the sort of uncontrollable almost look like a seizure she had the other day, inability to stand at all times on her own two feet and falling down?
	Is there some medical condition that Hillary has that we don't know about?
	Two doctors will join us next.
	One, by the way, hates Donald Trump, but that doesn't matter.
	So 59% of Americans now say they don't want to see her medical records.
	So we'll get to that next.
	So all of these questions are now coming up about Hillary Clinton, what happened when she was having these blood clots, the many times she's falling.
	She seemed to go into like a mini seizure the other day when answering a reporter's question.
	We showed you the video last night.
	It was very bizarre.
	And the fact that she continues to have these coughing fits.
	We talk a lot in this.
	And it goes on.
	These are not just like, okay, I need a second.
	Let me get my breath.
	This goes on forever.
	And yes, I don't want to hear that as I'm talking.
	It's very distracting.
	So the question is, okay, what's wrong with her?
	What actually happened?
	Was there a neurological event of some kind?
	What is causing all of this?
	Do the American people have a right to know her health issues before she were ever to be elected president of the United States, which I say, God forbid.
	But do we have to, don't we have a right to know this?
	Anyway, here to discuss and debate this is Dr. Josh Umber is with us, as well as Dr. Kathleen London.
	Thank you both for being here.
	My pleasure.
	Thank you for having us.
	All right.
	So 67% of likely U.S. voters think that all presidential candidates should release their medical records.
	So in other words, it's reasonable to want to know what Hillary's health is.
	And it's reasonable to want to know what Trump's tax returns are.
	And it would be reasonable.
	It's reasonable.
	And I would actually like to know Mr. Trump's health as well.
	I'd like a psychological evaluation since I think both of their health issues.
	Are you suggesting that he's psychologically unstable?
	I think he's psychologically unstable.
	I also think he might actually have neurologic issues as well.
	I think he has early Alzheimer's.
	Really?
	You do.
	And what about Hillary Clinton?
	He clearly has narcissistic personality disorder.
	Really?
	And you can diagnose that from a, and you're able to diagnose that.
	Now, here's the question.
	I'm being able to diagnose that since the 80s, absolutely.
	Really?
	Well, Alzheimer's is a clinical diagnosis, so you can't really confirm that with anything short of a brain bot.
	See, so you can't validate that.
	And narcissism, everybody who runs for president could fill the criteria for narcissism.
	I mean, let's be honest.
	Dr. Umber, what do you think of when you hear what do you think of the issues involving the falls, the blood clot, the many instances where she appears to be propped up by other people, the fact that she doesn't do any public events in terms of the press, she won't do a press conference.
	Do you think there's something going on here?
	Have you seen the video where she kind of is twitching and twitching and twitching?
	Yeah, I've seen the videos and read the news reports, and I think it is concerning enough that something might be going on.
	It's an interesting conversation to have.
	Where is the balance between your health history but the voters' right to know?
	I think the assumption is that they get a lot of leniency on health privacy, except for when there is mounting evidence that there could be a condition that would cause you to not be able to take the role as president.
	When you look at what is public about her health records, the falls, the being propped up, the video that I'm talking about, the concussions, do you see that she had some type of neurological event?
	Is there any chance she had a question?
	Kathleen, I didn't ask you yet.
	I'm going to get to you in a minute, okay?
	Relax.
	Dr. Umber, do you think there's anything neurological going on?
	I think it's possible.
	And, you know, as a good physician, we can just speak to what is possible since we don't have her medical records and can't examine her.
	But there's enough mounting evidence that if my patient were having those symptoms, I would be concerned.
	I would want to investigate that further.
	So I think it's reasonable for the voters to know.
	What would cause the type of twitching we saw the other day?
	Good question.
	It could be as simple as fatigue, low blood sugar.
	It could be something as complex as seizures or even more worrisome.
	And that's the problem with healthcare is there's such a wide spectrum of what it could be.
	And if it was just simple things like low blood sugar, that would happen probably inconsistently.
	But if she's to the point where she can't do public events, she's being propped up.
	If it's true that they carry diazepam on a diazepam pen, what would that indicate to you?
	Seizures.
	And where would those, what would be causing those seizures?
	Could it have been related to a TIA or a stroke?
	Very possible.
	And an MRI would tell us if she had had a stroke in the past.
	Correct.
	But not necessarily a TIA.
	Correct.
	Yeah, TIA just being a short-lived stroke by definition doesn't leave enough damage or scar tissue behind to always see.
	Now, over time, you'd see microvascular changes that would be consistent with many TIAs.
	And in other words, would, for example, blood clotting be an issue that could cause such a neurological event?
	She definitely has some of the risk factors.
	As we age, if we travel a lot, if we don't have good circulation, the fact that she has a history of a blood clot are all positive indicators.
	All right, let me ask Dr. London some specific questions.
	Dr. Lunder, for example, if somebody does have a history of blood clots, and there's a question as to whether or not it was a flashlight, a diazepam-pen, I don't really know, but certainly, and then when you couple that with that sort of twitching motion that seemed uncontrollable for a number of seconds with her, could that be an indication to you that that's a neurological event?
	Could be, could be low blood sugar, could be anxiety, and diazepam is used for anxiety more than anything else.
	It's used for sleep as well.
	So I don't, actually, I wouldn't be using that for seizures.
	I'd be using phenobarbital if I was worried about seizures.
	So I don't agree that that's what it would be carried for.
	Dr. Umberto has a pen, a diazepam pen isn't used for insomnia.
	And they wouldn't carry it around while she's in a public event for an acute episode of insomnia.
	You're right.
	There are a number of options for seizures, but a pen in that instance is almost never prescribed for anxiety.
	The pen is for seizures.
	In other words, if it was for anxiety or sleep, it would be given in the form of a pill, not a pen.
	Right, which only makes perfect, I would say, more sense, even for the team, is you would rather carry pills around, something that she could take with food or water, but wouldn't it require the process of a sort?
	Could it be for a mild form of an anxiety disorder, or is this something that people would need to be concerned about?
	If it was a mild form of anxiety, you would use pills or other types of medicines, SSRIs, or.
	Well, let me ask this: if a person is prone to anxiety like this and there is a major national security crisis, would we have to worry about such a person maybe not being able to handle the stress?
	You know, I would be curious, and I'll, in full disclosure, plead ignorance here to what the military rules would be for a similar situation for the captain of a vessel or submarine.
	But when the flight surgeon declares a captain or general unfit for duty based on a medical illness, there's probably a protocol there.
	There's a whole lot of conjecture here, though.
	Can I ask you, Dr. Dr. London, I do have a specific question for you.
	Let me play, and there's been a number of these long, long, long coughing fits.
	I want to play one for you and then get your reaction to it.
	We're going to connect every home to high-speed broadband so they can get into the global marketplace.
	And we're going to fight climate change by making America the clean energy superpower of the 21st century.
	We do talk a lot in this campaign.
	Excuse me, just one second here.
	A loss of one.
	AJ, but you talk.
	And they go on and on and on for minutes and minutes at a time.
	Dr. London, what does that tell you?
	That could be from asthma, it could be from allergies.
	I get that all the time from something going down the wrong way.
	But it happens all the time.
	It's really concerning.
	You really get a long, long coughing fit that goes on for minutes and minutes on end.
	I've never had that.
	I have absolutely had that.
	If I swallowed something the wrong way, I get it from inhaling the pollen up here now that I've moved to Maine.
	You moved to Maine.
	We had a lot more pollen than we had in New York City.
	That's pretty funny.
	Well, Dr. Umberto.
	Yes, the most common cause is post-nasal drainage from allergies, then viruses, then heartburn.
	But for as long as she's had that cough, I guarantee you her medical team has investigated things more complex than heartburn and allergies.
	I'm sure she's not.
	there were probably it would have been a trap if i'm going to be worried we don't know that it's not going to be a lot more worried about somebody who turned around and had to get If she had a form of cancer that's causing the blood thinners, say that again, Dr. Umber, I interrupted you.
	Go ahead.
	Well, if she had a form of cancer, a lung cancer causing a cough, which is very possible, and again, asking for it.
	We know, but that would put a cancer like that would put her at more risk for seizures or something.
	Are you saying that in the sense that I know from my uncle, by the way, God forbid anyone gets lung cancer?
	Well, what happens, I know with my uncle, is that he had lung cancer.
	This was horrible.
	You'd never wish this on anybody.
	And then he ended up getting lesions in the brain.
	You know it, Josh.
	Come on.
	That's a med student question.
	Having cancer puts you at risk for blood clots.
	And so what about the anticoagulants?
	Let me ask Dr. London.
	She's dying to get in here to bash Trump.
	Go ahead.
	But what about the anticoagulants?
	I'm just asking medical questions, Dr. London.
	There's so many reasons people go on anticoagulants, from atrial fibrillation, from minor things like atrial fibrillation to having had a previous blood clot to just having hypercoagulable state to having inheritable defect in the blood cascading disorder.
	So many, many, many reasons.
	I'm not going to ding someone for that.
	I mean, such a huge portion of the population around that.
	How does it impact AFib or irregular heartbeat?
	Atrial fibrillation means that your heart does not work quite right.
	So you take an anticoagulant for that?
	Yes, because you form blood clots in the heart and they can get thrown to the ground.
	What about it?
	We don't want that to happen.
	Now, she does have this history of blood clots and blood clotting, and we all know that that could...
	Okay, but we all know that it also can lead to...
	Or you can have a clotting disorder.
	Well, we know it can kill you, too.
	It can lead to a heart attack or a stroke.
	This is a serious medical condition, wouldn't you both agree?
	We put you on blood thinners, so that does not happen.
	Right.
	We're pretty much.
	We reduce the risk of it.
	But now you have other risks from being on the blood thinners.
	But that alone wouldn't explain the rest of her symptoms.
	But by the way, if her heart's not beating properly, I have a friend of mine that has AFib.
	I mean, that's a scary condition.
	Isn't that a dangerous condition?
	And if she's got a previous risk of blood clots, then that explains her blood thinners, and it's not AFib.
	So I'm not going to go conjecture that she has something else wrong with her.
	And I think if she had a serious medical problem, we would know about it.
	So I'm not all that concerned.
	I'm more concerned about that.
	Why would you say Trump's tax determined?
	I'm happy to see her health records.
	All right, but I know you want to bash Trump, but that's not what this segment's about.
	We'll bring you back another day, and you can bash him on MSNBC.
	They'll invite you on as a guest.
	I'm just trying to get medical information here because it seems, and you seem to feel that we'd know about it already, but look at the condition, for example, of JFK.
	It was hidden from the public.
	Or look at the condition of previous presidents.
	I don't think if I had a medical condition, I don't think I'd want the public to know if a lot of the public is going to be afraid that that person is going to, God forbid, ever have an incident in office.
	That's a problem for the entire country.
	Conversation we had about Dick Cheney.
	Everybody, you know, there was an equal cry from the other side of the aisle that Dick Cheney wasn't fit for the position.
	And if he had a pacemaker, what if someone hacked a pacemaker?
	And they had all these questions regarding his health.
	So this isn't anybody in particular being overbearing on Hillary.
	is part of a frequent conversation about our leaders and their health.
	And we probably don't have a good answer to that now.
	Where's the line of privacy end and the beginning of a right to know start when we're talking about some of the most powerful people on the planet?
	You know, and I know that.
	I certainly haven't seen anything in her demeanor that wouldn't be explained by the stress of being on the road.
	Well, wait a minute.
	I have a pretty stressful...
	We're not talking about the simplest explanation for it.
	We're talking about the concerning explanation for it, because that's more of a problem than, well, yes, we agree.
	Anxiety could cause all these things, but the anxiety of running is nowhere near the anxiety of actually having the office.
	And if it's purely that, we have a right to know.
	I think.
	I think that's true for both of the candidates.
	Yeah, I think, and I understand, Dr. London, that your disdain for you don't like Donald Trump and you're supporting Hillary, and I understand that, but this is a far bigger issue than tax returns being released, and a far bigger issue than Hillary releasing a Wall Street speeches, which I would like to also see.
	I think this really goes to the heart of whether or not somebody's up to, and you're raising a lot of issues, both of you, that I think are very deeply concerning about what could possibly be wrong or causing this condition of Hillary Clinton.
	And from my perspective, it's not even political at this point as much as it is, you know, is she up to the job of being president?
	And I think for me, although you both seem to dismiss it more than I do, I think that weird twitching reaction the other night was a little bit just bizarre to me.
	I've never seen that before.
	Anyway.
	And I haven't seen behavior like I've seen from Mr. Trump.
	What's your point?
	Okay, I got it.
	But I get it.
	You're an anti-Trump.
	I've never seen political.
	By the way, you're from Maine.
	I understand it.
	You're living in Maine now.
	You've totally gone hardcore left-wing, Bernie Sanders, radical leftists.
	I got it.
	I understand that.
	I'm pretty right-wing here.
	Look at our governor.
	I don't think you're right-wing, though.
	I think you're pretty left-wing.
	I think you're pretty radical-left-wing, aren't you?
	You know me very well.
	Who did you vote for in the primary, Hillary or Bernie?
	You voted for Bernie, didn't you?
	Oh, God, no.
	No, you voted for Hillary?
	You don't understand.
	Josh and I are both direct primary careers.
	Last question.
	You don't know me very well.
	Last question.
	Last question.
	Is Hillary an honest person or does she lie, Dr. London?
	Last question.
	I think she's actually, PolitiFact is already answering.
	I'm not asking that.
	I'm asking you, is she honest or does she lie a lot?
	I think all politicians are liars.
	So you're saying Hillary's a liar?
	I think all politicians are liars.
	You can't say it, can you?
	It's too hard.
	I got it.
	All right, thank you.
	800-941, Sean.
	If you want to be a part of the program.
	All right.
	When we come back, wide open telephones, if you want to join us.
	800-941, Sean, if you want to be a part of this extravaganza.
	This issue is getting more traction every day.
	Bianca is in Florida next on the Sean Hannity show.
	Hey, Bianca, how are you?
	Hi, good.
	Thanks.
	How are you?
	I'm good.
	What's going on?
	Listen, I loved, loved, loved your monologue last night.
	I agree with absolutely everything you say, except I would have to say this.
	I find the GOP to be more of a threat to our national security than Donald Trump and the terrorists combined, because they are going to be the cause of our having another 9-11 if Hillary Clinton becomes president.
	Listen, I'm proud of that monologue, and it's gotten a lot of reaction.
	If you think you like last night's monologue, wait till tonight's monologue.
	I've been writing it in the breaks during today's show.
	I loved it, and I just have one other comment about Hillary Clinton about her health.
	My mother quickly had atrial effibulation.
	She flatlined for five seconds.
	Bottom line, if she had not had a pacemaker and a double ablation procedure, she would be dead.
	Thank God that your mom was saved.
	It's a very scary condition.
	I actually have a member of my family that has a form of AFib and is on beta blockers and some other things.
	And I will tell you that it's a very scary condition for people.
	And, you know, I'll never forget when Dick Cheney was on the heart monitor machine.
	And he thought it was funny.
	He'd pull out the wire and go, beep, beep.
	I'm like, put that back in, please.
	Please.
	It was unbelievable.
	And we've come a long way with our ability to save people's lives and extend their lives.
	And I just hope and pray that, you know, listen, everyone's not going to believe me.
	I don't wish anybody ill.
	I just have major political differences.
	And what I was saying in my monologue last night is stand by.
	If you're one of these Republicans that is undermining Trump every step of the way, that if Hillary got elected, I'm holding you accountable because you're doing incredible damage and creating doubt in people's minds.
	And that means if Hillary selects the next Supreme Court nominee, I blame you.
	If she has a 550% increase in unvetted refugees, you're partly responsible for that.
	If people come across the border because we don't secure it, which Hillary will not do, and something happens, well, you can thank yourself for that.
	You can blame yourself for that.
	If she continues these horrible economic policies and Americans can't get jobs, then, you know, look in the mirror.
	If we are dependent on foreign oil in four years and we don't make any moves towards becoming energy independent, then that's your fault.
	If Obamacare stole the law of the land or some form of it, that's your fault too.
	So I go straight through the list of why it is that I am proudly voting for Donald Trump.
	Why are you voting for Trump, Hannity?
	For all those reasons.
	I like what he says he's going to do on the Supreme Court alone.
	That ought to be enough for everybody, but whatever.
	It's not my job here to make people vote the way I want them to vote.
	I'm just giving you my opinion.
	Can I just say that as a woman, Hillary Clinton, with her dealings with different terrorist groups and different countries that support Sharia law, which Kazir Khan, by the way, I can't believe people are still talking about it.
	He has no right to hold up the Constitution because he abides by Sharia law and not our law.
	But Hillary Clinton does not have a woman's best interest in mind because if Sharia law is, if it replaces the Constitution, which could happen with the amount of Muslims she wants to bring into this country or Syrian refugees, then a woman's right are all the left does not understand what the caliphate is all about.
	And that's a big problem.
	And for her to take money from countries that treat women that horribly, that kill gays and lesbians, she says she's the champion of gay and lesbian rights.
	You know, who's a bigger champion of gay and lesbian rights?
	Sean Hannity.
	Because Sean Hannity speaks out every day on the issues of how gays and lesbians are put to death in countries that practice Sharia.
	Okay, Hannity, you don't agree with us on gay marriage.
	So what?
	So what?
	It's none of my business how people live in their bedroom.
	I don't care.
	None of my business.
	I don't care one, one, I don't care one iota about it.
	Not even a little bit.
	And on top of all the real problems we have, this is like, this doesn't make the top 1 million and shouldn't make the top 1 million in anybody's life.
	Anyway, if you like, thank you, Bianca.
	If you liked last night's monologue, tonight's going to be about an abusively biased news media in America.
	And we'll make our points.
	Devin is in Clinton, New Jersey, listening to the all-new 710, W-O-R.
	Hi.
	How you doing, Sean?
	It's an honor to speak to you today.
	Yeah, the honor is all mine.
	My comment was just the fact that the liberal media, I have a 17, a 16, and a 14-year-old at home.
	They watched the news, and they actually cannot believe the difference between two outlets interpreting the same thing that was said that you agree on and I agree upon was the Second Amendment that Donald Trump mentioned.
	My daughter actually said, why are they saying that that?
	He never said that.
	And you have a 14-year-old who can interpret it the way I do it, the way you do, and the way every other conservative saw it is amazing.
	And they take it and switch it and twist it.
	And it's just amazing, the fact that this is the way society is and the way the liberal media put everything out there.
	I'm going to make my point tonight when we start the show at 10 o'clock.
	And you know what?
	I love the fact that I'm calling everybody out.
	I have absolutely zero fear because everything is in play in terms of the direction of our country is tipping in the balance here.
	And the differences could not be more clear in terms of where Trump would take the country and where Clinton would take the country.
	So, you know, there's a lot at stake here, which, by the way, really is, you know, it makes it even that much more despicable that Republicans are helping her.
	Cheryl in California next.
	Cheryl, how are you?
	Glad you called.
	Hi, Sean.
	It's an honor to speak to you.
	I have a 15-year-old.
	My mom's a Holocaust survivor.
	And without you, I don't think there'd be any trustworthiness or truth in media and Fox News.
	So thank you so much.
	Thank you.
	I just wanted to say that we have the spoilers, the Johnson, the Stein, the McMullens, and we also have the saboteurs.
	And that's basically what you've been talking about with all the Republicans.
	And I want to encourage everybody to do what I've been doing, which is I've been calling every single person and calling their offices in D.C. and basically saying that they are sabotaging not just Mr. Trump, but they're basically sabotaging America.
	It's a choice between losing the Supreme Court.
	It's a choice between socialism versus what our founding fathers gave to us.
	And I think it was John Adams who had that quote about posterity.
	You know, we did so much for you to preserve your freedom.
	You know, don't make me be sorry when I'm in heaven.
	And it's just, we also have the people who are the Sean superstars.
	Like you've got people like Antonio Sabato Jr., who speaks and gets blacklisted.
	This is happening to my students on social media.
	I'm a part-time professor.
	It's happening to me.
	I got blacklisted because if you're a Republican, you're being like marginalized in terms of freedom of speech of what you can say.
	You say you're for Mr. Trump right away.
	You're a racist, whatever.
	And when people make the Hitler comparison, it is such a demonization of Mr. Trump.
	It's so inappropriate.
	And when you hear that come out of people who are Republican mouths, especially because my mom's a Holocaust survivor, it just demeans the memory of all those people.
	And I just want to say, instead of these people making sure that Mr. Trump is so prepared to go in front of somebody who's a seasoned liar at the debate, sit with him, help him, get him ready, because well, they're going to do.
	I have to go.
	But I can tell you that your concerns are being relayed by very smart people on a regular basis.
	Yes.
	Okay?
	So, you know, a lot of it's going to be up to Mr. Trump.
	I can't control him, and I can only offer my friendly advice if people want to listen.
	With that said, this election is far from over.
	It just isn't.
	And everyone that's in their panic mode all the time, I'm not there.
	And I'm not getting there, and I'm not going there.
	And I'm just hoping that the American people don't want more of what they've had the last eight years.
	If they decide that they want to continue America's decline, I can't stop them.
	If I could have stopped them eight years ago, I would have done so.
	I did everything I could.
	And I'm trying to warn America again that it's going to continue.
	All right, let's get back to our busy telephones if we can.
	Obi is in Johnson City, Tennessee.
	Obi, how are you?
	Good, Sean.
	How are you doing?
	What's going on?
	Not much, man.
	I just want to call in and say, I'm a young gay conservative, and I think that the way the media spins what Trump says and then glides and covers for Hillary is a huge disgrace.
	And back, I think it was last week when the Orlando shooters' father was sitting right behind Hillary, and she acted like she didn't know he was there, and she's a huge champion for gay rights and everything.
	That's totally not true.
	She's not, she's going to have his father supporting him like that.
	I think that's ridiculous.
	You know, I mean, think about what this guy, you know, first of all, 49 people, he was targeting gays and lesbians, all right?
	Killing innocent Americans, you know, young people, 49 dead, 53 injured.
	The father makes comments about supporting the Taliban and saying these outrageous comments, these anti-gay slurs, et cetera.
	You know, I know that, for example, some in the gay and lesbian community don't like me because I'm against gay marriage.
	But I'm the guy that's out there saying she's taking money from countries that are killing innocent people.
	And I'm the guy saying I don't really give a rip what anybody does in the privacy of their bedroom, Obi.
	With all due respect to everybody, whether you're heterosexual, whether you're gay and lesbian, I don't care.
	I have more important things to do than give a rip about what people are doing in their bedroom.
	Absolutely.
	Absolutely.
	And the way that she just tries to portray herself as some strong champion for that is it's so ridiculous.
	It's so ridiculous.
	Who would you want on your side fighting with you?
	Hannity, who's against Sharia, where they're killing gays and lesbians in Iran and Saudi Arabia and all these other countries?
	Or do you want Hillary that is taking money from them but says she's for gay marriage?
	Who's more of a champion?
	You are, Sean.
	I've been watching you for a while and listening to you for a while, too.
	Absolutely.
	I'd rather have you on my side.
	That's no joke.
	I appreciate it.
	Listen, I'm glad you called, and it's sad that it took so long for her to denounce it.
	And it's sad that the media has such a double standard in their coverage.
	Anyway, appreciate it.
	800-941 Sean is a number.
	Let's go to the swing state of Ohio.
	Donna's next.
	Hey, Don, how are you?
	We're glad you called, sir.
	I'm good, Sean.
	How are you?
	I'm good.
	What's going on?
	Thanks for taking the call.
	Hey, I was interested in, I had an idea.
	I'm referring back to Ross Garris being another businessman that was running for president.
	And what got my attention with him was when he took the half hour, did the charts and graphs, explained everything clearly, understood how we got where we are and how he was going to get us out of it.
	And to take that further, I'd like to suggest that you'd use your show and invite Pence and Trump into your show and give them that hour to well.
	It's funny you say that.
	Just stay tuned, is all I can say.
	Okay?
	That's all I can say because there are a lot of people in my business that are a bunch of copycats that don't do much work.
	And then they hear my ideas and they try and duplicate them.
	So just stay tuned.
	I promise you, I'm doing my job and I'm working very hard for you, okay?
	Okay.
	Can I mention one more quick thing?
	Yeah.
	Another thing that's troubling me is the minimum wage proposals.
	No one mentions the back-end tax revenue generated from this by the government.
	That's a good point, too.
	But yeah, you're right.
	But you know, the problem is, what are you going to do with a teenage kid?
	50% of black teenagers can't get a summer job.
	Did you have a summer job when you were a kid?
	Oh, yeah, I worked on farms.
	All right.
	Now, didn't I keep you out of trouble?
	For the most part.
	All right.
	Now, if you didn't have a summer job and I didn't have a summer job, we would have gotten in more trouble than if we didn't have that job.
	We would have gotten in so much more trouble, right?
	Oh, I agree.
	So if you have 50% of kids in any demographic that can't get a summer job because the minimum wage is $15, we're screwed.
	That means these kids have no place to go in the summer.
	Well, but the overall effect, too, is the increased costs from these services.
	So you're going to have to spend an hour to get a cheeseburger for crying out loud because they can't afford to pay $15 an hour.
	Well, correct.
	And the other side of it is, you know, it's going to hurt our retired people.
	100%.
	100%.
	They're going to be all working at McDonald's to supplement their incomes.
	But I got to run only because I'm up on a hard break here, but I do not disagree with a single thing you're saying.
	You're making some great points.
	And stay tuned on what you're looking for.

▲