Donald Trump is under fire for comments he made toward Hillary Clinton. This time, the liberal media is claiming Trump insinuated that Clinton should be assassinated. This is obviously a ridiculous claim. If it were true, the Secret Service should be investigating...but they're not. Why? Because they know it's ridiculous also. The Sean Hannity Show is live Monday through Friday from 3pm - 6pm ET on iHeart Radio and Hannity.com. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
You are listening to the Sean Hannity Radio Show Podcast.
All right, this portion of the Sean Hannity podcast is sponsored by Audible.
Now, by signing up for a 30-day trial with Audible, you'll be able to get that audio book you've always wanted to read for free.
Now, discover where Audible audiobooks can take you.
To get started, just go to audible.com/slash Hannity.
That's audible.com/slash Hannity.
All right, glad you're with us.
Sean Hannity Show.
Write down our toll-free telephone number.
You want to be a part of this extravaganza.
It is 800-94-1 Sean.
If you want to join us today, and so much to talk about.
I've got to tell you, I don't even know where to begin.
Let me start with the controversy over Donald Trump, these comments that he made that if you listen to liberals, oh my God, he's calling for Hillary Clinton to be assassinated.
Listen.
Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish the Second Amendment.
By the way, and if she gets to pick.
If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks.
Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don't know.
But I'll tell you what, that will be a horrible day if Hillary gets to put her judges.
Right now, we're tied.
You see what's going on?
We're tied because Galia, this was not supposed to happen.
Justice Galia was going to be around for 10 more years at least.
And this is what happens.
All right.
So do you understand the narrative?
He's saying, yeah, unless everyone understands that is pro-Second Amendment and you see all the millions of guns.
What is it like?
300 million guns that have been sold since Obama's been president because everybody thinks the Second Amendment rights are going away.
He's talking about a massive, massive political movement to get out the vote.
But that's not the way the left-wing media is going to cover something like this.
Hillary, like the campaign is spinning the narrative.
Wow.
Donald Trump is threatening Hillary Clinton.
Well, if that's the case, then I've got to say that probably the Secret Service ought to be investigating it, but they're not going to because everybody understood what he said and they're just trying to manipulate this for political gain.
Forbes said that the gun industry is growing 158% under Obama.
Feminists are now claiming that Donald Trump was threatening to do this to Hillary because she is a woman.
Well, I've got a montage of people like John Kerry threatening to kill President Bush on Bill Maher's show.
And we have during the 2008 race where Hillary Clinton said, well, you know, Robert Kennedy was killed in June.
And in his race, you never know anything can happen.
The media used to joke about assassinating Bush all the time.
And remember when Dan Quay, oh, they're giving orders that if President Bush, anything happens to him to shoot Quay.
Remember that comment?
That was a big deal, too.
Ted Strickland was bragging earlier yesterday that, well, what great timing.
Justice Galia died.
Oh, thank God.
Here's the tape.
Talk to your neighbors.
I want you to talk to them whether they're independent or whether they are Republican.
I want you to argue with them and get in their faith.
We talk to these folks because they potentially have the best answers, so I know who's asked to kick.
We're going to punish our enemies, and we're going to reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us.
I might have to put Mr. Burgess on Fox News.
I'll put Mr. Burgess up against Sean Hannity.
He'll tear him up.
This is unprecedented in history.
I don't understand it.
And, you know, between my opponent and his camp and some in the media, there has been this urgency to end this.
And, you know, historically that makes no sense.
So I find it a bit of a mystery.
You don't buy the party unity argument.
I don't, because, again, I've been around long enough.
Now, my husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June.
Right?
We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.
Yeah, wow.
Maybe if you're not sure if you know, I just don't understand it.
And, you know, there's lots of speculation about why it is.
What's your speculation?
I don't, you know, I don't know.
We ran away to a wonderful retreat in Vermont, and that was our getaway.
You could have went to New Hampshire and killed two birds with one stone.
Could have gone to 69 of Pennsylvania and killed the real bird with one stone.
In about three and a half months, we'll make a decision about who occupies the executive branch, what party controls the Senate, and growing out of those two decisions will be the future of the United States Supreme Court.
And my friends, a lot of average citizens out there don't understand the importance of that court.
I mean, the death of Scalia saved labor from a terrible decision.
And I don't wish anyone ill.
It happened at a good time.
Because once that decision had been made, it would have been tough to reverse it.
All right, so there you hear for yourself.
I mean, you know, Obama's out there saying, you know, we got to punish our enemies.
Well, the IRS, I guess, did a pretty good job of that for him.
And, you know, we got to know who's asked to kick.
And if they bring a knife, we're bringing a gun.
Oh, talking about Republicans.
We're going to send this guy, Mr. Burgess, over to Fox News to tear up Sean Hannity.
Nobody from law enforcement ever came to me and said, do you feel that you were threatened?
No, I'm actually pretty sure that I can handle myself.
And, you know, this happens all the time.
By the way, if you go back to May of 08, you know, my husband didn't wrap up the nomination in 92 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June.
Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June.
Geez.
Anyway, people have been trying to push me out of this race since Iowa, she went on to say.
Now, Bill Burton at the time, who was the Obama campaign spokesman, rebuked Hillary and her remarks, saying it was unfortunate has no place in this campaign.
Al Sharpton expressed his anger towards Hillary at the National Action Network.
Everybody's Secret Service protection was given to Obama earlier than it had ever been authorized for a presidential candidate.
Robert Kennedy was killed.
Was she suggesting that maybe somebody might want to infer here take out Obama?
After all, they did it to Bobby Kennedy.
Is that how you're going to interpret that?
Is that how the media interpreted that?
I don't think so.
So the only thing I'm saying to you is it's obvious what they're doing here.
Now, if you want to just look at the pure coverage of all of this, our friends at Newsbusters did some analysis, and what they find is the press corps really outdid themselves last night.
Finally, late in the middle, towards the end of my TV show last night, maybe it was around 10.45 Eastern time, finally Hillary Clinton's campaign, they did denounce the father of the Orlando shooter, a guy that supports the Taliban, a guy that made anti-gay slurs that, you know, Allah was doing this to get rid of the gays or whatever other ignorant thing that he said.
She's still never been asked about the money she takes from countries that kill gays and lesbians.
She's never been asked about taking money from the countries that abuse women and tell them how to dress and they can't drive or go to school or go to work and, of course, persecute Christians and Jews.
You can't worship freely and build a temple or a Christian church anywhere.
Nobody ever asks about any of these things with her.
So, you see, we're dealing with, and Trump's going to have to realize this: it is an abusively biased news media.
The narrative for Trump this week should have been and should continue to be the speech he gave on the economy.
The narrative in this campaign should be the very things that we talk about on a fairly regular basis, and that is the differences in their opinions.
Now, with all that said, there was a poll out yesterday that had Trump only down by four.
We had on Sunday a Reuters poll showing Hillary leading Trump by three points, 42 to 39, margin of error within the margin of error.
You got a Bloomberg poll today that has Hillary leading by just two points.
Only the mainstream media is not reporting on that poll, in spite of all of this negative nonstop coverage of Trump.
And what I find fascinating about this is, in spite of all of this media bias, I mean, newsbusters in their analysis pointed out that the three networks, if you look at Mateen's father in Orlando standing right behind Hillary, a Taliban supporter, a guy that is anti-gay, a guy that supports Sharia, apparently.
You look at all of that right behind her, and they wouldn't even denounce the guy.
If it was Trump and it was the Klan and it was David Duke, he would be asked again and again and again and again and again, denounce it, denounce it.
You know, imagine Dylan Roof's parents behind Trump, where just imagine what the outrage would be.
Anyway, ABC, CBS, and NBC, forget CNN.
They are now the Clinton news network.
They're so in the tank for Hillary.
And forget NBC.
They're gone.
But anyway, the three major networks alone, they gave five times more coverage to Donald Trump's remarks already than they did this guy, the father of this terrorist, standing right behind Hillary.
They gave the Trump story 25 minutes and 35 seconds.
They gave the terrorist father sitting behind Hillary four minutes and 41 seconds.
You know, CBS said that Trump's comment, maybe Second Amendment people can do something about Clinton's judges, highlighted the story for 14 minutes and 24 seconds on Tuesday night and Wednesday morning.
Now, in contrast, the evening news with CBS and the CBS's morning show allowed only 59 seconds on Siddique Mateen, the father of a guy that killed 49 people in Orlando and injured another 53 Americans.
And it's pretty unbelievable, but that's the reality of this campaign and the way this campaign is going.
And Ted Strickland can start cheering the timing of the death of Anthony and Scalia, Supreme Court justice.
I want to go to this story.
There are new emails out today, and I want to get into this with you because what it shows in all its ugly, despicable detail is that Hillary Clinton had a pay-to-play scandal as it relates to the Clinton Foundation while she was Secretary of State.
Now, this new batch of emails that was released thanks to Judicial Watch and a Freedom of Information Act, and again, emails that should have been disclosed a long time ago, that sometimes the overlapping interest, the New York Times puts it, between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department when Hillary served as Secretary of State.
The Times goes on, hardly members of the right-wing conspiracy.
The document raises new questions about whether the charitable foundation worked to reward its donors with access and influence at the State Department.
And in one email exchange, for example, an executive at the Clinton Foundation in 2009 sought to put a billionaire in touch with the United States ambassador in Lebanon because of the donor's financial interest there.
In another email, the foundation appeared to push aides to Mrs. Clinton to help find a job for a Clinton Foundation associate.
Her aids indicated that the department was working on the request.
Well, doesn't that sound like pay-to-play?
Doesn't that sound like buying access?
Isn't that the corruption that we're all supposed to be angry and upset about?
And the State Department turned over the new emails over to the group Judicial Watch, 44 emails that were not part of the 55,000 pages that Hillary Clinton always brags about that had been given to the State Department that she said were all work-related.
Anyway, they point out that Hillary actually hid the documents from the public because they contradict her official pledge in 2009 to remove herself from the Clinton Foundation and its business while being in charge of the State Department.
And these documents prove that the State Department and the Clinton Foundation were working hand in hand in terms of policy and allowing donors access and accommodation because of the money that they were given to the Clintons.
And literally, it was contrary to everything that she said she would do.
It's called a conflict of interest.
You know, for example, in one case, you got in 2009, a guy by the name of Douglas Band.
He led the Clintons Global Initiative, emailed Uma Abedeen, Mrs. Anthony Weiner, Cheryl Mills, another top advisor to Mrs. Clinton, for help with a donor.
Mr. Band wrote that he needed to contact this guy from the Lebanese Nigerian billionaire who was one of the top foundation donors.
In other words, Clinton Foundation with someone at the State Department.
Why?
Because he wanted to talk about his financial interests in Lebanon.
It's Jeff Feltman, Ms. Abedeen answered, referring to Jeffrey Eltman, who was the American ambassador to Lebanon at the time.
I'm sure he knows him.
I'll talk to Jeff.
Oh, I wonder if you'd get the same kind of access if you called the State Department because you had financial interest in a country.
Mr. Band asked to call this guy immediately if possible.
This is very important.
And in a separate email exchange, Band passed along to Abedeen and Mills a request, quote, for a favor from an associate who had recently been on a Clinton Foundation trip to Haiti.
He also was seeking work at the State Department.
So he writes and he gets answers.
And Abedine writes back: we all have him on our radar.
Personnel is sending him options for a job.
Oh, great.
You get a job, too, if you donate to the Clinton Foundation.
I mean, it is a pathetic joke.
You know, the Clinton campaign suggesting that he was acting in the capacity of former President Bill Clinton's personal assistant, not his role overseeing the Clinton Global Initiative.
What an embarrassment, but media's not going to pay attention to that.
They're too concerned about manufacturing an intent for a Donald Trump statement where the intent never matters.
You know, this is a vulnerability in this election.
And that's something I'm going to discuss when we get back for all these Republicans that really are aiding and abetting and assisting Hillary in her campaign by sabotaging Trump.
We got to get back into that.
All right, 800-94-1 Sean or Tollfree telephone number.
Also, get your calls in this hour if you want to be a part of the program.
800-941-Sean.
You want to be part of this.
You know, when a book just really hooks you and you just can't put it down?
Well, with Audible, well, you don't have to.
Discover where Audible audiobooks can take you.
Now, maybe it's a book you've been wanting to read for a long time.
Now, Audible has something special for everyone.
So, download your books or shows on your mobile device and listen anytime, anywhere.
And with an unmatched selection of audiobooks, original audio shows, news, comedy, Audible is your best source for everyday entertainment.
The Audible app makes listening a breeze with features like chapter navigation and narration speed control.
So, access your books, your shows, anytime, anywhere, right from your smartphone or your tablet.
Join Audible today and explore the world's leading provider of audio books, all beautifully performed by talented actors and narrators.
Now, you can start a 30-day trial and download your first audiobook for free.
Just go to audible.com/slash Hannity to get started.
That's audible.com/slash Hannity for a 30-day trial and audiobook.
WikiLeaks founder, this has been the front cover of Drudge for a big part of the day, Julian Assange is suggesting there could be, he's now suggested it a number of times, a huge October surprise for Hillary Clinton.
Well, anyway, now he's suggesting, he was doing a Dutch interview, that a DNC staffer who was inexplicably murdered on the eve of the Democratic National Convention, he's suggesting, hinting he was a source of leaked emails that exposed a conspiracy to steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders.
And this is getting bizarre.
Now, do I think this is going to be the defining issue of the campaign?
No.
Do I know that this happened?
No.
Do I think that I don't know what happened to this guy?
Anyway, the guy, this 27-year-old staffer, his name is Seth Conrad Rich.
He was murdered in D.C.
They left his watch.
They left his wallet.
They left his money.
So it wasn't about robbery.
His phone was there.
His father said if it was a robbery, it failed because he still has his watch.
He still has his money.
He still has his credit card.
He still had his phone.
So it was a wasted effort, except we lost a life.
Anyway, so WikiLeaks is now offered a $20,000 reward for information on the murder of the DNC staffer.
And Julian Assange seems to suggest on Dutch television, we'll play for you later in the program today, that Seth Rich was the source of the WikiLeaks exposed DNC emails.
And he said, quote, whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks.
And he even mentions a 27-year-old who worked for the DNC was shot in the back, murdered just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington.
Now, the interview says, well, that was just a robbery, I believe, wasn't it?
And he said, no, there's no finding.
I'm suggesting that our sources take risks.
Pretty interesting.
So he's kind of suggesting that the murdered DNC staffer was a WikiLeaks source.
Quote, we have to understand how high the stakes are in the United States.
Pretty fascinating.
I mean, do I think I have no idea.
That's my answer.
It wasn't the Russians, though, right?
Assange keeps telling us.
So who was it?
All right, I want to take you back in time.
I want to take you back to a case.
This was broken by, I first saw this in June of 2014, and I remember discussing it at the time.
Remember playing the tapes both here and on TV at the time.
They were new audio recordings of Hillary Clinton from the early 80s, including, you know, a pretty frank assessment of what was the most significant criminal case of her legal career defending this guy that had been accused of raping a 12-year-old girl.
Anyway, she was agreed to be a court-appointed attorney for this guy by the name of Thomas Alfred Taylor, who is 41 years old, accused of raping the child after luring this kid into a car.
Now, the recordings had never been reported before, including Hillary Clinton suggesting that she knew that Taylor was guilty at the time.
And she used the legal technicality to plead for her client who was facing 30 years in prison and got it down to a lesser charge.
Well, anyway, Alana Goodman's column links to the audios and audio, and again, we played it at the time.
But anyway, the story of Taylor does call into question the entire Clinton narrative that in her early years, married to Bill, and Bill was suggesting this at the DNC convention as well as he went through their wonderful love story, except leaving out at least 19 or 20 years of this love story.
Anyway, as a devoted woman and children's right advocate in Arkansas, that's the narrative that she advanced.
Anyway, so the comments on the rape trial, it's more than five hours.
They were previously, before 2014, unpublished.
It was conducted by then Arkansas reporter, a guy by the name of Roy Reed, when Bill Clinton and his wife, when she was the first lady of Arkansas and he was the governor of Arkansas.
You can, you know, when you listen to the tapes, and I'll play some of it here in a minute.
You know, she had just moved to Fayetteville.
She was, you know, a newly formed legal aid clinic she was working at.
She got a call from a prosecutor.
The prosecutor, she said, called me a few years ago.
A guy had been accused of rape.
The guy wanted a woman lawyer.
She said, would I do him a favor?
She said the case was not easy.
She's kind of bragging about it.
And it had to do with a 12-year-old girl who said that she was raped, telling police officers in Arkansas in Springdale.
Anyway, the suspect was identified as Thomas Alfred Taylor, a 41-year-old factory worker, friend of the girl's family.
And though the former first lady mentioned the ethical difficulties a little bit in her book, Living History, you know, what she actually describes in these audio tapes, the author of this column writes, the author of this story writes, some three decades later, is short on details and has a far different tone than the tapes.
In other words, she gave the cleaned-up version in her book.
Quote, it's fascinating, she said.
This is Hillary on tape.
It was an interesting case, a fascinating case.
This guy was accused of raping a 12-year-old, and of course, he claimed he didn't do it and all that stuff.
And describing the events almost a decade after they occurred, Clinton struck a pretty casual, complacent attitude towards her client.
I had him take a polygraph.
Listen to this, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs, she says with a laugh.
We have this all on tape.
I went back and called Baylor Gibson, but I had to mention that they cut out who's who, and I've done all this stuff.
I had to mail it.
I said, well, I'm just getting ready to talk to New York this miscarriage of justice.
We were going to plea about it.
So I went before Maufin Cummins presented the police.
And Moffin said, What is this?
I found myself.
I was first to be raised.
But dropping the charge of dropping my career.
So Mauffin has his eye.
Well, he was supposed to determine whether the rail action was important.
Moffat asked me to leave the room while he examined my client up to the fire of the spectrum sports.
He said, I can't believe this boy.
Oh, God.
Really?
That was Mauffin.
She's laughing.
What's so funny about this?
Laughing a lot during this entire interview, bragging about what she did.
You know, by the way, disclosing the results of your client's polygraph, you know, could be a violation of attorney-client privilege, just putting that aside.
She's heard laughing at several points when discussing the crime lab's accidental destruction of the DNA evidence that tied this guy Taylor to the crime.
And, you know, then she goes on to say, you know, a lot of different things that are unbelievable here.
Anyway, there was a 2008 Newsday story, as Colin points out, on Clinton's legal strategy for attacking the credibility of the 12-year-old victim.
Now, this girl had joined Taylor and two male acquaintances, including a 15-year-old boy that she liked that she had a crush on, and a late-night trip.
They went to a bowling alley, Newsday reported.
Taylor drove the group around in his truck, pouring the girl whiskey and Coke on the way.
The group later drove to a weedy Ravine near the highway where Taylor then raped this 12-year-old girl.
And then around 4 a.m., the girl and her mother went to the hospital where she was given medical tests, reported that she had been raped.
He was arrested on May 13th of 1975.
The original court-appointed public defender was to serve as his attorney, but he insisted on a female lawyer, and he ended up with Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
And according to the court documents, the prosecution's case was based on testimony from the 12-year-old girl, the two male witnesses, as well as a pair of men's undershorts taken from the defendant.
Anyway, in an affidavit in 1975, Clinton wrote that she had been informed that the young girl was emotionally unstable, had a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing.
Wow.
I want to talk about blaming the victim.
I've also been told by an expert in child psychology that children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences, and that adolescents in disorganized families such as the complainants are even more prone to exaggerate behavior.
Clinton then said the child had, in the past, made false accusations about persons claiming they had attacked her body, and the girl exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she doesn't get her way.
Wow.
The interview revealed that an error by the prosecution would render unnecessary all these attacks.
You know, so you're getting the picture here.
Pretty unbelievable.
And Clinton told this guy in this interview that, you know, what's sad about it was that the prosecutor had evidence, among which was Taylor's underwear, which was bloody.
Now, she writes a different story, as I said in her book, Living History, that she was able to win a plea deal for her client after she obtained forensic testimony that cast doubt on the evidentiary value of the semen in the blood samples collected by the sheriff's office.
In other words, a technicality.
She did that by seizing on a missing link in the chain of evidence.
Wow.
So they got this guy dead to straight, dead to rights here.
They just got him.
Dead to rights.
And she's getting this person off.
But I know, don't worry.
You want to talk about Donald Trump.
We can talk a lot about Donald Trump.
How many have you heard this in the media?
This whole story.
The crime lab took the pair of underpants, neatly cut, part they were going to test.
They tested it.
It came back with the result of what kind of blood it was and what it was mixed with.
Then they sent the pants back in the hole into evidence to hold an evidence.
Of course, the crime lab had thrown away the piece they cut out.
And Clinton said she got permission from the court to take the underwear to a renowned forensics expert in New York City to see if he could confirm that the evidence had been invalidated.
And the story through the grapevine was: if you get this investigator interested in the case, you had the foremost expert in the world willing to testify, so maybe it came out the way you wanted to come out, she said.
She's conspiring to literally get this rapist off of a 12-year-old girl and bragging and laughing about it, bragging about it, and admitting, I gave him a polygraph.
It showed he was being honest.
That forever changed my view on polygraphs.
I don't believe them.
Investigator examined the cut-up underwear and told her there was not enough blood on it to test.
When Clinton returned to Arkansas, she gave the prosecutor a clipping of the New York Forensic Investigator's Who's Who.
I handed it to him.
Well, this guy's ready to come up, come from New York to prevent this miscarriage of justice.
She says that, breaking into laughter.
So we're going to plea bargain, she continued.
And when she went before the judge to present the plea, he asked her to leave the room while he interrogated her client.
I said, Judge, I can't leave the room.
I'm his lawyer.
Laughing.
He said, I know, but I don't want to talk about this in front of you.
Well, that was the judge.
We had a lot of fun with that judge.
And Reed asked what happened to the rapist.
And, oh, he plea bargained, got him off with time served in a county jail, and he'd been in the county jail for about two months.
When asked why Taylor wanted a female lawyer, she responded, who knows?
Probably saw a TV show.
He just wanted one.
Taylor pled guilty to unlawful fondling of a child, sentenced to one year in prison, two months reduced for time served.
He died in 1992.
Now, this is something that she talks about differently in her book.
Well, for the first time, this woman, 40 years later, has now spoken out, calling Hillary Clinton a liar, who defended her rapists by smearing her, blocking evidence, and callously laughing that she knew her client was guilty.
I don't think Clinton's for women or girls.
I think she's lying.
I think she will say anything to get in the campaign and win.
If she was, she wouldn't have done that to me when I was 12 years old.
She didn't mention that she was laughing and saying Taylor was guilty.
I guess as a lawyer, it's your responsibility to defend someone, she said.
But if she's for women and children, why would you defend someone knowing that a 12-year-old girl got raped?
The woman's name, by the way, is Kathy Shelton.
She was the 12-year-old raped at the time.
Now she's speaking out.
And it goes on to give the case and everything that was made in this.
It got so bad, I told my mom I wasn't going back, and whatever happened happened.
Sad that a 12-year-old had to go through what I had to go through because I cried for days and days and days and days and days.
Hillary Clinton did that, the champion of women's rights, the same woman who takes money from countries that abuse women, that tell women how to dress, that tell women they can't drive a car, that tell women whether they can go to work or school, for women to go outside their house, they need a male relative.
He takes nearly $25 million for the Clinton Foundation, $10 million for the Clinton Library.
Never criticizes the country's practices, not only towards women, but gays and lesbians that get killed for being gay or lesbian, that persecute Christian and Jews.
You can't build the temple and you can't build the church.
Hillary Clinton, imagine, this is my only comment.
If this story was about Donald Trump, You tell me the media is fair in this country?
No.
We'll do this tonight on Hannity.
Nobody else will do it.
We'll do it.
Just like we did in 07 and 08, we'll tell you the truth.
And all you Republicans out there that are weak and timid in sabotaging Trump when Hillary appoints somebody to the Supreme Court, when she won't use the term radical Islam, she keeps these horrible economic policies and open borders.
And when she has a 550% increase in unvetted refugees, just remember you helped.
Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish the Second Amendment.
By the way, and if she gets to pick.
If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks.
Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don't know.
But I'll tell you what, that will be a horrible day.
If Hillary gets to put her judges, right now we're tied.
You see what's going on?
We're tied because Galia, this was not supposed to happen.
Justice Galia was going to be around for 10 more years at least.
And this is what happens.
Talk to your neighbors.
I want you to talk to them whether they're independent or whether they are Republican.
I want you to argue with them and get in their faith.
We talk to these folks because they potentially have the best answers, so I know who's asked to kick.
We've got to punish our enemies, and we're going to reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us.
I might have to put Mr. Burgess on Fox News.
I'll put Mr. Burgess up against Sean Hannity.
He'll tear him up.
It's unprecedented in history.
I don't understand it.
And, you know, between my opponent and his camp and some in the media, there has been this urgency to end this.
And, you know, historically, that makes no sense.
So I find it a bit of a mystery.
You don't buy the party unity argument.
I don't, because, again, I've been around long enough.
You know, my husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June.
June, right?
We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.
You know, I just, I don't understand it.
And, you know, there's lots of speculation about why it is, but what's your speculation?
I don't, you know, I don't know.
We ran away to a wonderful retreat in Vermont, and that was our getaway.
You could have gone to New Hampshire and killed two birds with one stone.
I could have gone to 69 Pennsylvania and killed the real bird with one stone.
All right, second hour Sean Hannity show.
Glad you are with us.
Write down our toll-free telephone number.
You want to be a part of the program, Hillary Clinton campaign, trying to spin Donald Trump's Second Amendment comments as a direct threat to Hillary Clinton.
But of course, there's no context.
John Kerry, those were comments he made about threatening to kill President Bush.
I could kill two with one stone, a real bird with one stone.
Ha ha ha.
On with Bill Maher.
And of course, Obama, they bring a knife, we bring a gun.
I'll send Mr. Burgess.
He'll tear up Sean Hannity.
Was that a threat against my life?
Oh my God, I'm so scared.
I'm so terrified.
He told somebody to come beat me up and kill me.
You know, the media love to joke about killing George W. Bush and CBS, by the way, and Craig Kilbourne.
And, you know, they made comments about this.
Feminists, by the way, Trump threatened to assassinate Hillary because she's a woman.
That's why he made it, because she's a woman.
Well, that's a great spin.
This is a very dishonest media.
We have Ted Strickland talking about the great timing yesterday of the death of Anthony Scalia.
About three and a half months will make a decision about who occupies the executive branch, what party controls the Senate, and growing out of those two decisions will be the future of the United States Supreme Court.
And my friends, a lot of average citizens out there don't understand the importance of that court.
I mean, the death of Scalia saved labor from a terrible recession.
And I don't wish anyone ill, but it's going to happen.
It happened at a good time.
Because once that decision had been made, it would have been tough to reverse it.
He died at the perfect time.
This is great.
It's so good.
He died.
I mean, Scalia's dead.
Oh, okay.
Now, here's what's interesting about all of this: in this media, the number one donors to the Democratic Party claiming that Trump's poll's gone off the cliff.
And by the way, they now have gotten closer with the two polls I mentioned today, one within two and one within four, claiming that one in five Republicans are refusing to back Trump, et cetera, et cetera.
But here's what's interesting: because both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have been forced to deal with issues this week.
The three networks, however, only treat the Republicans problem as a huge gaffe or mistake worthy of coverage, and ABC and CBS and NBC deluging their viewers with more than five times more coverage,
a total of 25 minutes and 35 seconds, versus just four minutes and 41 seconds to Trump's Second Amendment people remark versus what Hillary Clinton, she has the father of the ISIS-inspired terrorist who killed 49 and injured 43, and a guy that supports the Taliban and a guy that supports Sharia and a lot of other controversial positions and made gay slurs.
He's sitting right behind Hillary Clinton and took them two days to say, oh, maybe we should denounce what he stands for and we don't want his support.
And I'm not even adding into this the Clinton News Network or MSNBC, the Obama network.
Anyway, here to go over all of this, Jeff Lord, former associate political director in the Reagan administration.
He wrote the book, What America Needs, The Case for Trump, Leslie Marshall, a rare New York appearance, a Fox News contributor, and she brought her beautiful daughter with her today.
How old is she?
Eight.
Okay, now I want to tell everybody, just before we get started, you were letting your daughter play with her phone.
And I said to her, Don't you want your own phone?
Yes, you did.
And she goes, my mom, and she points, she won't get me one.
And I said, and then I said, well, I'll tell you how to get a phone.
I said, when you go home to California, I said, I know your dad.
I want you to go up to your dad.
Daddy, I missed you so much.
I love you.
Throw your arms around and kiss him, kiss him, kiss him, kiss him, kiss him.
Daddy, mommy won't let me have a phone.
Will you get me one, please?
I love you so much, Daddy.
You're my favorite.
That'll work.
It will.
That's my point.
I tell my husband he's whipped by her.
Ouch.
I don't know if that's exactly the word.
And she's listening.
She's listening.
I mean, you know, all day on TV, she was looking at the phone and not looking up, paying attention.
Now that we're talking about her, she's looking up and paying attention.
All right, so here's the question I have for you, Leslie.
So Geraldo Rivera was on Hannity last night.
We're discussing this very same issue.
And I said, Raldo, did you know what Trump meant?
He goes, yeah, I understood what he said.
100%.
Do you think Trump was calling for the assassination of Hillary Clinton?
He goes, absolutely not.
But there was a mistake anyway.
I'm like, okay, if you understand it, and I understand it, and our other panelists understand it, are you saying that the American people are too stupid to understand that Donald Trump is not going to call for the assassination of a presidential candidate?
Did you know what he meant?
I thought there was an inference.
And I'm not stupid, but I thought there was an inference.
This is why.
This is a guy who talks about punching Bloomberg in the face.
This is a guy who talks about paying for the legal representation of somebody who is assaulting an individual at a Trump rally who happens to be anti-Trump and African American.
And those are just two examples.
So because of his style and because of his rhetoric, I wouldn't put it past him.
Do I think he was specifically saying, hey, people out there in the NRA with guns, you know, go out and take this woman out?
No.
But I do think the inference was, I think the inference could be made based on historical statements by Trump.
All right.
I think that's ridiculous.
Jeffrey Lord, I think everybody knows that this was not intended to be.
Well, the Second Amendment guys can stop her and shoot her.
And, you know, the funny thing about this is, you know, now you got Ted Strickland bragging about the timing of Scalia's death.
You have the comments of people like John Kerry.
You had other Democrats talking about going on a quail hunt to get Dan Quayle.
This is actually something that has come up numerous times over the years.
Then you got, of course, feminists saying, well, the only reason Trump said it is because she is a woman.
You know, so, or Obama said, they bring a knife, we bring a gun.
Then hiring Mr. Burgess to come kill me.
You know, Sean, two things.
Number one, this is bizarre.
This is so over the top, I'll use the word stupid, that it is beyond belief.
And I'm so glad you played all those clips.
I mean, the one that I realized right away was the Bobby Kennedy quote.
I mean, I am clearly no Hillary Clinton fan, but does anybody seriously believe Hillary Clinton was calling for the assassination of Barack Obama?
I don't think so.
And yet they're applying those standards to Donald Trump.
They either defend Hillary, they go after Trump.
But here's what I think is the more important point about this.
When Donald Trump was here in Pennsylvania the other day, and I was there with him, somewhere in that speech of his, he said, the biggest problem we have is the media.
And he stopped right there.
The crowd went crazy.
It was the longest, loudest, biggest applause of the night or anything.
He finally, he couldn't speak.
They were cheering so loud.
They turned around on their own, not prodded by him, to the risers in the back with all the television cameras and started bullying them and yelling at them.
My point here is: I think that they understand clearly that the media is out to take down Donald Trump, and they are not going to let it happen.
And the media is going to go on in its usual way and do overreach.
And I think this is massive overreach right here.
I'd like to respond.
Jeffrey, I don't totally disagree with you on this.
Don't faint.
I have a master's in broadcast journalism, and journalists are supposed to report the facts.
Somebody who is hosting an opinion show, like Sean does here on television as well, can opine, as I opine as a talk show host myself.
But to, first of all, if the media is really trying to take down Trump, then every time he holds a press conference, you wouldn't have every single network left or right.
You wouldn't have every single paper, every single blogger out there.
They do it and they cover it.
Why?
Because he's good for ratings.
And you know, a lot of people on the right are concerned and hold their breath every time he opens his mouth because he seems to put his foot in it.
And like I said to Sean off the air, he's the gift that keeps on giving for Democrats.
But in addition to that, you know, Donald Trump's numbers and the real clear politics that I saw, you know, taking the various average show him, although dropping, still eight percentage points behind Hillary.
So if the media is trying to take down Trump, as you say, and I don't think the media is trying to, if so, they're not very successful because they're pretty much neck and neck.
The reason his numbers drop, I believe, is because of the negative press coverage.
Well, if that's the case, then that could also be said for Hillary.
And that could be said for Hillary prior to her having the Democratic nomination when Senator Sanders was still a possibility.
I do think she got her bump.
And I certainly think, I mean, this is still August here.
I don't think we're going to see any really reliable polls until Labor Day weekend.
I agree with you.
I agree with you there, but I disagree.
It's the negative press.
He brings his own negative press by making irresponsible statements.
And I think attacking Captain Khan's father really hurt him because most Americans, regardless of their ideology, know the sacrifices that our military makes.
Let me go to another issue with you guys.
I think we've kind of beat this to death.
I don't think we're going to get any further on this.
I agree with Jeffrey, but that's not a surprise.
There were audio recordings in 2014 of Hillary Clinton from the early 80s of a very frank and detailed assessment of the most significant criminal case of her entire legal career, and that was defending a man that was accused of raping a 12-year-old little girl.
Now, the same year that she married Bill, Clinton agreed to serve as the court-appointed attorney for this guy by the name of Thomas Alfred Taylor, 41-year-old, accused of raping this 12-year-old girl after luring this girl into a car.
I mean, a horrible story.
Now, the recordings had never been reported prior to 2014, and she actually includes her suggestion that she knew that Taylor was guilty at the time, which I think is very significant.
And she brags about using a legal technicality to plead her client who faced 30 years' life in prison down to a lesser charge.
Well, now the woman, who 40 years later, is speaking up, the child rape victim, and called Hillary a liar who defended her rapist by, quote, smearing her, blocking evidence, laughing that she knew he was guilty.
In other words, the tapes that are referred to.
Let's play the tapes of Hillary where she does this.
Prosecutor called me years ago that he had a guy who was just rape on the guy line of woman lawyer.
One of his favorite, you know.
That's really awesome.
You know that case where I recommended that guy?
It was a fascinating case.
It was a really interesting case.
This guy was raised 12 years old.
He was the daughter of a family he was with Springfield with in a side track.
And the guy was green for family still had a little fine.
He was one of these ruthless folks who wasn't going to make a living on the land police around.
Ended up his breakout room.
All right, now here's.
I don't have time to play Kathy Shelton, but we do have tape of her as well.
But, you know, would you ever defend if you thought as an attorney, I mean, everybody has a right to a defense.
There's always an attorney for somebody.
I couldn't defend somebody that I thought was guilty of raping a 12-year-old little girl.
I couldn't defend that person if I thought they were guilty.
I couldn't work on getting them off on a technicality.
My conscience would forbid that.
What about yours?
It's interesting you say that because there was a time I was going to be a lawyer.
And there was a moot court case when I was looking into being a lawyer that involved this very subject.
It was a father who was raping his daughter.
And actually, it turned my stomach so much that I didn't go into law because I too could not defend this individual.
However, every person is entitled to a defense.
And there are numerous defense attorneys out there who know the truth after they take the case.
Prior to?
Prior to or after?
Prior to.
She was bragging how she got him off on a technicality.
But she was already his attorney.
But she was also saying that she knew he was guilty.
When?
She was explaining that when you have taken.
Well, wait a minute.
You don't have to stay on a case if you're a court-appointed lawyer.
You can literally recuse yourself.
Correct.
But then, of course, how many times would court-appointed lawyers be accusing?
And how many times would individuals have a defense?
Jeffrey, real quick, I got a break.
Could you defend that person?
I couldn't.
What this reminds me of is Wanita Broderick.
In theory, she's got a whole set of ideological views on rape.
In practice, whether it's Wanita Broderick or this child, her actions are totally different.
All right, I got to leave it there.
Leslie, I gave that round to Jeffrey Lord and me.
And good luck with Hillary defending that.
800-941 Sean is our number.
It's been the lead most of the day on the Drudge Report.
Actually, fairly interesting story.
I don't think it's going to impact the election a whole lot, but this whole comment of Julian Assange actually raising questions about why this DNC staffer died and other things as well.
So we'll get to all of that.
Now, before we get to that, all right, so Hillary had another mental brain fart hiccup, whatever you want to call it, today, and these seem to be happening with more and more, I don't know, just happened more and more frequently.
Listen to this one.
About health care.
We need to make what we've got work really well and improve it and get the costs out of an upward spiral.
Happening a lot lately between that and coughing fit.
So I'm just thinking, now what, if I were to imagine what was actually going through Hillary's mind at that moment, this would probably be what we would hear.
About health care.
We need to make what we've got work really well and improve it and get the costs out of it.
Just imagine what it would be.
Yeah, crickets.
All right, to our phones we go.
800-941, Sean, we'll get to the Julian Assange comments about the mysterious death of this DNC person.
Let's go to, let me see, Tracy and Katie Texas.
Let's start with a liberal.
Hey, Tracy, how are you?
Glad you called.
Hey, Sean, I'm doing great.
How are you, sir?
I'm good.
What's going on?
You know what?
Look, I mean, I've been analyzing Trump, and honestly, you know, in some respects, I'm independent.
I'm more likely going to vote for Hillary, but I feel Donald Trump is intentionally bringing the party down.
I like the Conservative Party.
As an independent, there's certain elements of the things that the Republican Party say or what the things they stand for, I like.
But I've been analyzing Trump, and the Second Amendment comment, we're not even going into it.
That's just the latest slap.
The economy, he said the economy needs to hurry up and fall so he won't be blamed.
Obama didn't say nothing like that.
Then there was the Khan fiasco.
And I'm looking at it and saying, right now, the polls are dropping.
Well, listen, I've said when I gave my little monologue on TV last week and my advice for Donald Trump, not that he's going to listen to me, but I would say he should be talking about two people, and that is Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and three things.
And the third thing you ought to be talking about is how to get America to be great again and what his plan is to accomplish that.
Sean, you know who's a better candidate?
Who would really let me just flow the theory out there and you tell me how far off it is.
To be totally honest, if Donald Trump cannot stop himself, the only chance the Republican Party I see would really have a really good chance is if Donald Trump does a exit stage left.
Okay, you know, Tracy, listen, listen.
I know 89 or 90 days now until Election Day.
I understand that there is, look, he gave a great economic speech this week.
My recommendation to him is, you know what, there's a reason that politicians stay on message, and there's a reason why they use teleprompters because, you know, sometimes you speak extemporaneously, which I admire, but we live in a society and the media double standard is so glaring and so obnoxious that Hillary Clinton doesn't have to answer questions about taking money from the Saudis that abuse women and gays and Christians and Jews.
And the media's never asked that question.
She gets away nearly a year without giving a press conference.
Hillary Clinton doesn't have to answer questions about the DOJ blocking the Clinton Foundation probe and how she was basically selling access to donors through the State Department, which, by the way, would be illegal.
And then, of course, the whole lying about Benghazi, the whole lying about the email server.
You know, she never gives, she just lies to us.
James Comey admits she lies to us.
Then she denies James Comey said she lied about us.
And then she said she had a short circuit.
So it's a little frustrating, but this is just the reality, the hand that we're dealt.
We don't have the ability to change the entire media.
So I think the best thing that he can do is stay on message.
There's way too much game to be played now for anyone to make any sensible prediction.
And I know people want to make a prediction a day.
I mean, it's almost been entertaining watching this guy, Nate Silver, bounce around like a jumping bean all over the place.
Trump, 25% chance to win, 58% chance to win, 30% chance to win.
It's just, it's hilarious.
You cannot make that prediction now.
Anybody that tells you that just is not being honest with you.
You know, now, Trump has another added problem, and that is that you've got an entire establishment, a group of Republicans that are sabotaging him, undermining him, a whole other group of Republicans that I guess they have made the decision that they would rather have Hillary Clinton choose Supreme Court nominees.
They would rather have Hillary Clinton continue Obamacare.
They would rather Hillary continue Obama's failed economic policies.
They want another president that won't mention radical Islam.
I guess these people want open borders.
I guess these people want a 550% increase in unvetted refugees.
I guess they like our dilapidated military that is falling apart, that needs to be rebuilt.
I guess they like top-down Common Core education where we pay more per capita per student with our results being in the 33 to 35 on the list, the countries in terms of success or no success.
I guess that's where they are.
I am, you know, it's going to be what it's going to be.
But those that are undermining and those that vote for Hillary, you will get the government you deserve.
When the Supreme Court choice is made by Hillary, good luck with that.
And Republicans put another radical, leftist, activist judge on the court.
Live with it.
You helped.
I'm not helping in that regard.
I am extraordinarily at peace with my decision and enthusiastic about the agenda that I went over with Trump again last night in detail.
Specifically, I basically took a culmination of my many interviews with him and I said, you're going to do this on national defense.
You're going to do this on refugees.
You're going to do this on the border.
You're going to do this with energy.
You're going to do this with health care.
This with the economy.
This is how you'll challenge ISIS.
This is the type of Supreme Court justice you'll pick.
I asked them all that stuff.
Anyway, appreciate it.
800-941 Sean, you want to be a part of the program.
Jeannie is in Florida.
Jeannie, hi, how are you?
What part of Florida are you in?
I'm in Turpin Springs, Sean.
And I just want to make three very quick comments.
Number one, I am a gun owner, and Donald Trump did not recommend that I take my gun and go and shoot Hillary.
Really?
And that is beyond ridiculous.
Number two, anytime you're in a public speaking engagement, especially of this magnitude, you're going to check who's sitting behind you in the audience because when you're in that close of a proximity, you don't need somebody to jump on stage and grab the person.
So they obviously know.
Listen, I know for a fact, because remember, I did these town halls.
Remember, I had people behind me and behind the different candidates that I was interviewing.
So I think I have better knowledge of this than anybody else.
Well, first of all, there are Secret Service people in that crowd that you don't know, won't identify.
That's number one.
Number two, yeah, they know the campaign usually picks and chooses who is behind them.
Now, interestingly, one campaign that never was picking and choosing was the Trump campaign.
They'd give it to whoever showed up.
But Hillary Clinton is not like that.
There's nothing that is not orchestrated and manipulated by her and her team.
This is all theater for them, all image making.
So, you know, I just, from my perspective, I just have some knowledge about how these things work.
Absolutely.
And the third thing I want to say is: I was a caregiver for my mother for four years.
Okay.
She was diagnosed early stages of Alzheimer's.
She lived with me the whole time.
And what your neurologists want to look at, not an MRI, but an MRA.
I had never heard of it.
And what it does is it tracks the blood flow through the brain.
When I told my mother's doctor, she's having TIAs, and the doctor said, no, no.
I said, look, I'm not a doctor, but I see her 24-7.
She is having them.
And until we did the MRA, that's when the doctor said, oh, my God, your mother is having him.
I said, yes, I know.
This is what I've been trying to do.
All of that is true.
But if somebody did, let's say, have a stroke, you're right, you're 100% right on all of that.
But a stroke would show up on an MRI.
So if she had, yes, your test would be 100% accurate, and an MRI would show if she had had any type of stroke and what area of the brain was impacted by it.
But the thing is, it is really important for the public to know Hillary's health because of this reason.
Because these TIAs can happen at any given time.
And you can, my mother may have been experiencing them for years, and they did not know that.
And this is what led to the dementia.
But the thing is, is when the doctor kept saying she's not having him, she's not having him, she's not having him.
And I said, she is.
I am physically seeing this.
And then you finally, when you got that test, it proved it.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
100%.
All right.
Thank you, Jeannie.
Good call.
800-941-Sean, if you want to be a part of the program.
Alex is in Miami, News Radio 600, W-I-O-D.
What's up, Alex?
How are you, sir?
I'm doing good.
I'm a Trump.
Yeah, I want to make a Trump supporter, and I'm just very frustrated.
And this is what I'm frustrated about.
And Sean Hannity, I love your show.
I've respected you for many years.
I love listening to your show.
I know there's a but coming, but that's okay.
Go ahead.
No, actually, there's no but.
This is where I'm frustrated.
The people that are respected by Trump, that Trump listens to, that he goes to for guidance, that help him, people like you that have a lot more say with him than us everyday people, that the most we can support him with is a vote.
I'm frustrated that I'm not hearing that level people, you and others, at least even in an interview, even ask them, don't you think you need to tone it down a little bit?
There's a lot at stake here, like you mentioned, everyday Sean.
And we cannot continue with these mess-ups.
You've got campaign managers.
Are they overpaid?
What are they doing?
Look, all I can say, I don't want to suggest to anybody that I have influence with Mr. Trump.
I do have a relationship with him.
I do believe that the media bias is so dramatic, the standard is so much higher for him that he has to be aware of it.
There's not a single person.
Let me put it this way to you, Alex.
I'll say I have conveyed this message.
Listen, my discussions with people that are friends of mine are between me and them.
I don't feel that I have an obligation to bring every personal private discussion that I have with people on the air.
And I can tell you, I have relayed to people in the campaign at the highest levels what people tell me about Mr. Trump when they see me.
And more than any other thing that anybody says is this.
Please, Sean, if you see Mr. Trump, we love him.
We're voting for him.
We want him to be president, but please tell him to tone it down and shut up.
That's what more people say.
And, you know, I understand it.
I've conveyed that.
I convey to them what people say.
They listen to this radio show.
They're going to hear what you just said.
There are people on the campaign that are following the show every day.
Now, I do think it's unfair for Mr. Trump.
Like, for example, I don't think what he said about the Second Amendment could be interpreted any other way than the way he meant it, which is, wow, this is a big voting block.
And, hey, we've got to get them mobilized.
Maybe they can do it because there's so many of them that are motivated by the fear that she's going to take away their guns because she basically says she wants more gun control every day.
So it's a legitimate point that they're making.
But, you know, the media is not going to be fair to him, and he has to factor that in.
It has to be a part of their strategy.
Does that make sense?
I thank you for what you're sharing.
But I'll tell you, I wish his campaign managers, at least, they get paid to catch that before they let him slip like that.
Yeah, no, listen.
Understand, but Donald Trump is not your ordinary candidate.
Every other candidate would be on a teleprompter.
He chooses not to be.
I would advise him, if I was there, if he asked my advice, I'd say, stick with the teleprompter.
Stick to the message.
Don't go off script.
That's what I would say to him.
But you know what?
I would have told him that in the primary, too, and he did pretty well in the primary without doing it that way.
Does that make sense, too?
Yep.
I appreciate your time.
All right, my friend.
Listen, 90 days to go.
I know a lot of people are worried and panicked.
And you know what?
It's kind of getting time to start being concerned.
This is now real.
You don't get a do-over in 90 days if it doesn't go out the way you want.
We have three debates, one vice presidential debate we've got to get through.
I know Trump has a series of speeches that he's giving on very specific topics like he did on the economy.
Now, he's going to talk more about ISIS and foreign policy and national security and protecting the homeland and immigration and Syrian refugees.
All that's coming.
And I hope at the end of the day, though, that it comes down to a choice.
I hope at the end of the day that people recognize what a liar Hillary is, how she has sold out her office the way that I mentioned earlier today.
And these emails now shed light on.
I mean, it's, you know, for example, when it came out today that new emails released proved that the State Department was colluding with the Clinton Foundation during her tenure and they're selling access, she basically put a for sale sign right out in front of her State Department.
You want to talk about pay to play or Hillary's big payment scheme that she had or pay-to-play shock?
I don't know what else you do.
I know if I did this, I'd be in jail.
I know if you did this, most of you would be in jail.
She seems to get away from all of this, get away with all of this.
Anyway, appreciate it.
800-941-Sean is our toll-free telephone number.
We got a lot coming up.
All right, Julian Assange suggesting that this DNC staffer that mysteriously died in a series of others, he's now suggesting, in fact, that this is interesting to me, that maybe he was one of the WikiLeaks leakers.
And then the guy died, and there's no explanation, and it wasn't a robbery.
In the American political lexicon, there's such a thing as the October surprise.
The stuff that you're sitting on, is an October surprise in there?
Do you even know what you're sitting on?
Will Keelix never sits on material?
Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks.
There's a 27-year-old that works for the DNC who was shot in the back, murdered just two weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington.
That was just a robbery, I believe, wasn't it?
No, there's no finding.
What are you suggesting?
I'm suggesting that our sources take risks and they become concerned to see things occurring like that.
But was he one of your sources then?
We don't comment on who our sources.
Why do you make the suggestion about a young guy being shot in the streets of Washington?
Because we have to understand how high the stakes are in the United States and that our sources are, you know, our sources face serious risks.
That's why they come to us so we can protect their anonymity.
But it's quite something to suggest a murder.
That's basically what you're doing.
Well, others have suggested that.
We are investigating to understand what happened in that situation with Seth Rich.
I think it is a concerning situation.
There's not a conclusion yet.
We wouldn't be willing to state a conclusion, but we are concerned about it.
And more importantly, a variety of WikiLeaks sources are concerned when that kind of thing happens.
Washington, D.C., Sunday morning.
If it was a robbery, it failed because he still had his watch.
He still had his money.
He still had his credit cards.
He still had his phone.
So it was a wasted effort, except we lost a life.
All right, news roundup and information overload hour on the Sean Hannity show.
So it's been, for most of the day, the lead on the Drudge Report.
It wasn't the Russians.
Julian Assange fingers murdered DNC staffer.
Now, the first part of that was an interview on Dutch television with Julian Assange actually going out there and suggesting that a guy by the name of Seth Conrad Rich, he's 27 years old.
He was a DNC staffer, and he was murdered in Washington, D.C.
The killer, killers, took nothing from their victim.
That's the second cut that you heard was from his father, Joel Rich.
He said if it was robbery, it failed because he still has his watch.
He still has his money.
He still has all his credit cards, still had his phone.
So it was a wasted effort except for a lost life.
So shortly after the killing, anyway, social media users were, quote, pursuing a lead and saying that Rich was en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to special agents.
Jim Hoff has a great write-up about all of this on Gateway Pundin today.
And anyway, Wikileaks has now offered a $20,000 reward for information on the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.
And he suggested that Seth Rich was a Wikileaks informant, although he wouldn't fully and completely say that.
And he said whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material, often very significant risks to themselves.
And as a 27-year-old works for the DNC, shot in the back, murdered a few weeks ago for an unknown reason, just walking down the street, and it wasn't a robbery.
So I'm suggesting, Assange says, that our sources take risks, clearly trying to at least insinuate that this is true.
Anyway, joining us to get into more of this, we have Rachel Alexander.
She's a senior editor at The Stream.
She did a piece on the oddity of deaths happening within the Democratic Party.
One after another in recent weeks, young staffers, affiliates of the Clintons, have been found dead.
So what exactly is happening?
What is Assange saying here?
By the way, I'll say up front, am I insinuating in any way, shape, matter, or form that Hillary Clinton or the Clinton campaign or the DNC is responsible?
No, but the DNC emails were leaked a few weeks ago, et cetera, et cetera.
And anyway, there are questions that people are raising.
So we're just asking what this is all about, considering it's been the lead all over the place on the web today.
And to put this into context, we have joining us now Rachel Alexander and also Jim Hoff of Gateway Pundit.
Welcome both of you.
Rachel, how are you?
I'm doing great.
Thanks for having me on, Sean.
All right, so I read your piece at Town Hall, Clinton Body Count or Left Wing Conspiracy, Three With Ties to the DNC Mysteriously Dies.
So what's happening beyond Seth Rich?
Yeah, there's a couple other people with ties to the DNC who also showed up dead under odd circumstances.
You know, one was a former head leader at the UN, and the other one was a young guy who was a process server who was serving the DNC with a complaint from Bernie Sanders supporters.
And they both died from medical reasons, but the medical reasons just seemed a little bit odd.
And, you know, I'm a former prosecutor, and so when I see things like that, I just feel like we need to investigate them and look at them thoroughly and not just, you know, say what Snope says.
You know, this is false.
You know, the police haven't even finished their investigations in all three of these interesting, I don't, you know, curious deaths.
I'm not saying, you know, that there's anything that's wrongdoing going on.
I don't know, and nobody can make any conclusions until the police.
So Seth was 27.
How old was Sean Lucas?
You know, I tried to find his age and I couldn't, but he looks pretty young.
I would guess maybe 35.
And what can you tell us about John Ashe?
John Ash was about 61 years old, and he was about to testify and be prosecuted.
He died apparently from dropping a barbell on his own throat while working out.
Correct.
And the weird thing is, is the UN came out immediately and said that he had died of a heart attack.
And then they had to go back and retract it.
Yeah.
Now, he was supposed to testify against this Chinese real estate developer who was implicated in the China Gate scandal for funneling money to the DNC for Bill Clinton through Charlie Tree years ago, right?
That's right.
And so, you know, you've got the whole connection to the DNC going back then.
And, you know, there were people insinuating that a lot of damaging information was going to come out about the Clintons when he testified.
And so that's the speculation, you know, why somebody would have...
I don't want to get too deep into conspiracy theories.
Let me make sure I tell my audience this, that I don't think this has any is going to have any impact on the campaign.
This is not the advice I'd give Donald Trump to ever talk about.
This is just fascinating based, especially with somebody like Julian Assange, who's claiming that he has information that would be an October surprise that would derail Hillary Clinton's attempt to get to the presidency.
Now, you know, she also has a track record that's pretty abominable.
I mean, she defended a 41-year-old man who had raped a 12-year-old on the side of an Arkansas road.
This person just spoke out recently to the Daily Mail when four men died in Benghazi.
On her watch, what difference does it make?
She lied to the families right in front of the caskets of their dead loved ones when a young interim is being the conquest of her husband.
She wasn't there fighting for women's rights.
She stood by her man.
And when other women spoke out, well, all these reports that she was a part of the effort to smear and slander and besmirch.
What is your take on all of this, Jim Hoft?
Hi, Sean.
Well, obviously this interview that Julian Assange did is making great waves on the internet today.
It's still the lead on the drudge report.
What's interesting is I got an email this morning then from a DC consultant, an operative for the DNC.
He works now, he says, for the family of the rich, the rich family.
And he asked me to put up an update on my post.
The family says they welcome any information that could lead to the identification of the killer or killers.
But then the statement goes on to say that they don't want to publicize or politicize this tragedy.
I thought some strange statements considering we don't know who killed their son.
They don't know who killed their son.
There's still an investigation.
As far as I know, there are no suspects.
You would think they would want as much information as they can rather than just start limiting what should be said on the internet about the death of their son Seth.
Let me ask both of you this question because you're right.
It's all over the internet.
I mean, anybody that gets any news from the internet sees this, and there's all sorts of speculation.
Do both of you agree with me this is not going to be a defining issue in the campaign.
Rachel, do you agree with that?
Most likely not.
I don't think it'll be a defining issue for the most part because 70% of Democrats say they would vote for Hillary even if she was indicted.
However, the October surprise could change things depending on how devastating it is.
Yeah.
What do you think, Jim?
What's your thoughts on it?
I agree completely with your other guest.
I think it depends on just how much more they have.
We know that Julian Assange has made a few promises now to release some more information.
It could be devastating, Sean.
We don't know what he's holding.
I think that's the big story.
I think to me, what got my attention the most in this is that Julian Assange keeps hinting that there's information out there that he has that apparently would really severely implicate Hillary Clinton.
Now, that to me is the most fascinating aspect of this.
And certainly, you know, if a 27-year-old is killed and he's not robbed, you need the answer to that question.
It would be reckless and irresponsible to suggest the Clintons or the DNC had anything to do with it.
But I think that, from my perspective, is getting all the revelations out, I think, is amazing.
Now, we do have this other case of this Kathy Shelton, the 12-year-old who got raped, and Hillary Clinton's conduct in that case.
Have you been following that, Jim?
Yeah, I have.
I thought I'd heard the audio probably from your show months ago.
And then, you know, if you hear that this woman finally can't step forward and speaking out against Hillary Clinton, you know, let me play the audio that you're referring to here.
He had a guy who was used to rape on the guy like a woman warrior.
Wow.
And that's really his favorite team.
That's really awesome.
Remember that case where I'd recommend that guy?
It was...
It was a fascinating case.
It was really an interesting case.
This guy was grade 12 years ago.
He was the daughter of a family he was with at the Spring Road, other side of the track.
And the guy was reinforced because his family still had a little fond.
He was one of these ruthless folks who wasn't going to make a living on the land one time around.
Ended up in Spring Government.
Of course, he climbed and did all this stuff.
He took a lot of testimonials.
I had his power, which he passed forever.
He's driving up the holograms.
But, you know, what was said about it was that the prosecutors had evidence, among which was his underwear.
His underwear, which was what sat down as a crime lab, or deference to his former crime lab.
Well, just a pair of underpants, neatly cut out the part that they were going to test.
Came back with the results of what kind of flood it was, what was mixed in with it.
And sent the pants back with the hollow evidence.
So I got ordered to see the evidence.
The prosecutor didn't want me to see the evidence.
I had to go off and colour Mr. Boston that, yes, indeed, I had a right to see the evidence before it was done.
They presented the editor at Waholin.
I said, huh?
What kind of evidence is that?
You know, I said, well, Holland.
Where's the crime lab?
It's thrown away.
Oh, the case that they cut out.
It was really odd.
I bargained it down because they didn't have any.
It turned out they didn't have any evidence.
All right, so there's Hillary Clinton explaining how she got this guy off.
Now, the woman that's raped is named Kathy Shelton.
Mediaite had an interview that she had done talking about when she was 12 years old being raped in 1975, and Hillary Clinton represented the rapists.
Listen to her comments.
If I ever had to meet her in person, it would be very hard for me not to walk up and smack her.
I know that sounds amended.
I mean, she put me through a lot at 12 years old.
I mean, I had to go look through this window and I knew these guys.
I just want to know, you got a daughter and a grandbaby.
What happens if that daughter of yours, if that would have been her, and they pulled you in at that time to do that?
What would you have done?
You would have protected her.
Where you don't know me, so I'm piece of crap to you.
You know, who cares about me as long as you can win your first case as an attorney?
And that was her first case ever.
All right.
What is, we have one more.
You know, Hillary Clinton said bragging pretty much.
Oh, I got him off in one year.
What is your reaction to that, Rachel?
Well, I mean, I think it's abhorrent behavior, but I've said all along about the only thing that's going to derail Clinton's campaign is going to be, you know, there really will have to be a murder or something.
I mean, everything else seems to bounce off of her.
And this poor woman who was raped reminds me of these other women that would come forward about Bill Clinton with these horrible stories.
And nothing ever happens.
The Clintons just keep going on doing their thing.
Yeah.
All right.
Unbelievable.
And what's your reaction, Jim?
Oh, yeah, it's an awful story.
It makes you want to cry listening to that woman today, what she went through.
And I just, I don't know how Hillary can laugh about that in an interview.
It's disgusting.
Yeah, it really is, isn't it?
It's not funny.
All right, guys, thank you both for being with us.
We really appreciate it.
As we were sleeping in bed, and one of my children knocked on our door and said, you know, Mom, Pop, someone's ringing the doorbell.
I come downstairs and I can see this huge orange glow outside the window.
I'm like, oh, my God, you know, my sign is on fire.
I come outside the people who rang my doorbell in the driveway, and I come and take a look.
And it looks like a big Ku Klux KKK cross burning in my own.
This piece was 8 feet by 12 feet, but it will be 12 feet by 16 feet by tomorrow at 3 o'clock.
So you're going to rebuild it?
Yes, we're going to rebuild it.
All right, 25 now until the top of the hour.
We'll get to your calls here in a second.
800-941.
Sean, you want to be a part of the program?
First, I wanted to talk to Trump's supporter, the owner of one of these signs.
He walked out of his Staten Island home in New York early Sunday.
He found a giant sign dedicated to Trump in flames on his front lawn.
And Sam Pirazzolo is with us, as well as conservative Staten Island artist, a guy by the name of Scott Lobedo, is here.
And anyway, what the heck went on here, Sam, at your house?
Sean, thank you very much.
I mean, it's really a pleasure and an honor to be able to speak with you.
I truly appreciate it.
Yes, sir.
I mean, I can't believe it looked like a cross was being burned on your lawn.
So basically what happened, you know, as we heard, I came downstairs and I could see the orange glow.
The first thing I did when I went outside was to make sure that, you know, my family and home would be safe, that it wouldn't fall in.
So, you know, I immediately called the fire department.
And when I went to take a picture and I brought the camera up to the frame, that's exactly the first thing that came across my mind.
Wow.
That's so scary.
How high-reaching were the flames?
It was up in the air like that.
So to be honest, I mean, Scott is a brilliant artist.
He's also a genius.
The entire thing was built out of flame-retardant materials.
So I guess the reason I saw the big glow is because of what's now been confirmed as an arson and intentionally set.
Whatever accelerant that was on there was really burning.
And then as we were standing there, it was kind of starting to go out when the fire department came.
I'd like to thank the NY fire department for doing such a great job.
Listen, those guys at the NYFD, they're unbelievable.
I've known, I have a lot of friends that have been on that job.
I give them a lot of hell because of their work hours because they have the best schedule on earth.
But, Scott, let's talk about it.
So, this was made out of flame-retardant materials, so they had to use an accelerant, as Sam is pointing out here.
Yeah, absolutely.
Well, first, let me clear the air here.
And this is a big part of this whole freedom of speech thing.
It's actually not a sign.
People keep calling it a sign as if it was a Trump sign that you can get at a printer.
This is a work of art.
It is my expression, my free speech expression.
And that's where it also comes in.
The first thing I was devastated when I heard, I was just worried about Sam's house and his family.
Once that passed.
By the way, this is an important point.
Lonel, I don't want you to stop.
I don't want to stop here, but if you have a picture of the Virgin Mary with elephant dung put on it in a museum that's funded in part by taxpayers, or you have a bull's whip coming out of somebody's backside, and you find out that NEA dollars go to fund this particular artist, if you complain, you're against art.
So you did this big artistic project.
Tell us what it was.
I came up with the concept, Sean, because as a Trump supporter, and I've been an artist, pro-American activist for so many, so many years.
And this election just got out of control.
And the violence that I'm breaking up.
Yeah.
It just drove me crazy, and I had to figure out to come up with some kind of idea.
So I came up with a subtle tea, a patriotic tea.
I put it on shirts, and people started to wear it because it was a shame that they had to get bullied violently.
So then I decided, Sam, let me use your yard to put up this big T and show our support and express myself with the freedom that I love thanks to those men and women, those veterans and the military that give this crazy civilian artist my right to express my free speech.
And, you know, maybe they're just looking at it.
Yeah.
To burn it, to burn.
But that's right.
Liberals will have taxpayer dollars spent on American flags in the toilet.
They'll have American flags that people can stomp on as part of a participatory.
You know firsthand what it's like for me to be a conservative artist in New York City.
I love this city, but the art world treats me like a leper.
And I love it.
You know, I have an artist friend of mine, John McNaughton.
He's got great work.
He lives in Utah.
I know well of him, another conservative.
Yeah, and you know what?
He does really, really impressive work.
And he goes through the same thing that you do.
Sam, what is the latest?
What are they telling you at the investigation?
So thankfully, Sean, I don't know if you know, but I had wanted this to be investigated as a hate crime, and that wasn't going to happen.
But the fire department has ruled that it was arson, as I said, and that it was deliberately lit.
And one of the things, and again, I'm also very proud of the NYPD, so I'm not upset at the fire department or the police department, but what really does disturb me as an American citizen is that what we have done is we have created individual laws to protect individual classes of people.
So this would have been a hate crime had it been due to a religious reason, had it been to a sexual reason, had it been to a racial reason.
So we spend so much time creating laws to infect, I'm sorry, to protect different types of individuals that we have forgotten about all of society as a whole.
This was a crime.
All crime is a crime.
I'm opposed and upset and saddened that I can't be investigated as a hate crime because my right of free speech was taken away.
Unbelievable.
Well, well, guys, I hope we get to the bottom of it.
Is there any videotape?
And by the way, imagine if anyone did this to Hillary Clinton.
If there's any videotape.
Do we know if anybody had a camera?
Is there any security?
They're still investigating.
They're still investigating, Sean.
But I really think that they're going to really get onto this.
I really, really get it.
I hope so.
I mean, because if it was Hillary, believe me, that you'd have the Secret Service down everybody's throat.
I agree with you, Sean.
Which, by the way, would be the right thing to do.
I want you to know Donald Trump did give a bill to me.
He reached out to me and my family.
Did he really?
We were okay and to see that we were safe.
And Scott and I had an opportunity to talk to him because we were together, and we told him we were putting up a new and bigger tee.
Sean, I told him, Mr. Trump, I'm building a new one.
We're putting it up tomorrow.
It's going to be bigger.
It's going to be huge.
It's going to be huge.
Nobody builds bigger and better art exhibits than Donald Trump, you know.
Nobody.
I mean, he builds the best golf courses, the best buildings.
He's going to build the best wall, and Mexico's going to pay for it.
There you go.
Say it again.
It's exactly, right?
All right, guys.
Sean, listen, if you don't mind, can I take a moment?
I mean, Scott is probably too modest, but if anybody wants one of these t-shirts, they're available at SIPatriots.com, and you would be able to get the same exact t-shirt, and you can show your support for Donald Trump that way.
That's pretty cool.
All right, guys, thank you so much.
I'm sorry you had to live through this.
No problem, Sean.
All right.
800-941.
Sean, if you want to be a part of the program, as we say hi to Rich in Illinois.
Rich, hi, how are you?
Glad you called.
Hi, Sean.
How are you?
I'm good.
I listen to you every day, and I think you do a great job educating your listeners.
I got two quick questions for you.
My first question is, is the media more biased towards Hillary Clinton or towards Obama when he ran?
I think equal.
I think they're doing what they always do, and that is they're taking any, you know, imagine five times more coverage.
Here you've got the father of a terrorist who killed 49 people, made anti-gay slurs and comments.
He's sitting right behind Hillary, 53 other people injured.
Imagine if that was at a Donald Trump rally.
And then they didn't repudiate this guy right away.
They didn't distance themselves.
They tried not to.
And then it's only after media pressure from we conservatives that they were embarrassed into doing it.
Right.
Just like they were embarrassed into putting an American flag on the stage at the DNC.
So it makes me sick.
Anyway, I appreciate it.
Shane is in Ohio.
Hey, Shane, how are you?
Great for taking my call.
I appreciate it.
Yes, sir.
I was listening, and I didn't call it to be confrontational or anything.
It seems like you've been lumping Ted Cruz in with these rhinos lately, and Ted Cruz isn't nothing like none of these rhinos.
No, I agree.
Listen, I actually made that distinction.
I've been on the radio the other day in a good way going, Sean, what are you doing?
All right, no, well, let me correct it because I am mad at all of these guys that made promises, especially those that ran for president.
But now I'm actually going to do a monologue on TV about this tonight.
And I was going through it earlier and writing some notes down.
I don't care if it's Bill Crystal or Governor Romney or Susan Collins, but Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, and John Kasich and Lindsey Graham all made promises.
And I'm mad that they're not keeping their promises.
And what they're doing now, the continuation of all of this, is going to result in Hillary being president, Hillary picking Supreme Court nominees, Hillary keeping Obamacare, Hillary keeping open borders, Hillary continuing this failed economic agenda, another president that can't say radical Islam.
And so I'm a little ticked off.
We're going to have more unvetted refugees coming into the country, a top-down Common Core education that is failing.
And so I'm saying to all of those people that you're standing on your principles, you're now sabotaging Trump.
And I'm saying that if Trump loses, and I hope he doesn't, if he loses, I'm blaming these people when Hillary makes that Supreme Court appointment because they're now aiding and abetting.
Let's just be honest, the election of Hillary.
And I, you know, Ted Cruz is not an establishment guy, and I understand Ted Cruz is pissed.
But you know what?
It's over.
That's what campaigns are.
You want to get into politics, you've got to be able to take a punch.
I'm into martial arts.
I grapple, I box, and I do street fighting martial arts.
And we literally do it against each other.
Now, we bow in if we're using weapons in terms of practicing, either sticks or blades or guns.
You know, by the way, not real guns and not real blades, but we do blade work and we do stick work and we do firearm training and how to defend yourself.
But in the course of us training with each other, we hit each other.
Everyone's given very strict instructions.
They can't hit me in the face because I got to make a living.
But, you know, I know what to expect.
If you're in politics, it's a blood sport.
You're going to get hit.
You're going to get hit hard.
And Ted was not shy in calling out Trump on any and everything that he could.
You know, he bombarded him, too.
So, you know, you got to get over it from my perspective.
Anyway, Walter, Long Island, the all-new AM-710 WOR, The Talk of New York.
Hey, Sean, very pleasure talking to you here, sir.
I am totally disgusted with the Republicans going on, what you were saying on your message there.
I've been a Republican my whole life.
I'm totally disgusted with what they're doing against Mr. Trump.
He has the Democrats against him, the liberals, the media, and he has his own party against him.
It's despicable.
I really'm thinking I'm going to get out of this party.
I don't know where I'm going to go, conservative, but he put a great economic plan out on Monday, and then you have the senator from Maine.
She doesn't want to support him.
I mean, what's the, I mean, Hillary is going to be a disaster compared to Mr. Trump.
That is the focus of my opening monologue on TV tonight.
And I'm going to name names, and I'm pretty ticked off about it.
And what they are doing is they are assisting Hillary Clinton.
And by the way, the Department of Justice blocked this Hillary Clinton Foundation probe.
Gee, big shocker there.
I'm just telling you, they're assisting in her becoming the next president.
So with their assist, just like people that vote for Hillary, you deserve the government that you elect.
Well, similarly, if you undermine a candidate and help the other candidate, you're as guilty in my mind as just voting for them.
Might as well give a donation to them.
I agree.
You know, these people say, well, I'm not endorsing Hillary.
But if you're not endorsing Trump, then you're giving a vote away to Hillary, and it's despicable.
And you're right.
You know, you got hockey games and the playoff games of hockey, and they beat themselves up.
And then at the end of the game, they shake each other's hands, and that's it.
These guys are, it's just, it's not right.
And it's, it's, I don't know what I'm going to do here, Sean.
I am, I'm a lifelong Republican, and at the end of this election, I don't know what's going to happen here.
I'll be honest.
I think there's going to be a split now.
I think if at the end of this process, they think this is, you know, there's a lot of these guys, you know, the Wall Street General, the National Review, Spiel Crystals, weekly standard types.
Listen, they want to show the people that voted for Trump a lesson.
They want him to lose and lose badly.
And they want to be able to stick their finger in your face and say, I told you so.
And meanwhile, they're doing everything they can do to facilitate what they want to have happen so that they can act all superior that they were right the whole time.
Right, right.
All right, man.
Appreciate it.
Thank you.
800.
Don and Lake Ron Concomo.
What's up, Don?
How are you?
Glad you called, sir.
Welcome aboard.
Hey, Captain Handy, permission to come aboard.
Yeah, we got about 35 seconds, though.
It's all yours.
All righty.
I'm just saying that I'm glad you had Donald Trump on to talk about his economic plan last night.
Hillary Clinton said in a speech following his plan that he's going to make this tired old idea sound new.
Well, what is her new plan going to be?
It's just going to be he's for the wealthy, he's for the wealthy, he's for the wealthy, and she's going to just embrace and adopt Obama's fails record.
Yeah, look, I mean, that's the thing, and that's why I put on all those statistics last night.
Yeah.
And that's why I repeat them every day.
50 years, yep.
51 years, lowest home ownership rate.
Worst labor participation rate since the 70s, worst economic recovery.
Exactly.
Since the 40s.
It's already all Obama's.
It's tired.
It's old.
And I really do like Trump's economic plan so far.
It looks good.
You know, and the sad thing is because the media just never wants to focus in on substance, especially Trump's substance, about the taxes and about how to raise revenue and energy independence and job creation and eliminating health care and all the costs that are associated with it that people will benefit from.
No, they want to take his words out of context and ignore that Hillary Clinton had the father of a terrorist that supports Sharia behind her the whole speech and makes anti-gay slurs and supports the telepoc.
