All Episodes
June 8, 2016 - Sean Hannity Show
01:24:41
Presidential Temperament - 6.8

Hillary Clinton has apparently won the Democratic presidential nomination and she's already criticizing Donald Trump for his temperament.  Sean throws some cold water on the notion that Hillary is somehow more "presidential" than Donald Trump.   The Sean Hannity Show is live Monday through Friday from 3pm - 6pm ET. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is an iHeart podcast.
Let not your heart be troubled.
You are listening to the Sean Hannity Radio Show Podcast.
You know, attention to detail is critical when you own your own business, so use legalzoom.com for the legal details.
Now, their network of independent attorneys licensed in 48 states.
Well, they know local laws and can provide answers to your legal questions.
LegalZoom.com is not a law firm, so you won't pay by the hour.
Just use Hannity One when you check out and save even more.
LegalZoom.com.
I made this case and that we had to go forward.
We had no choice anymore but to go for a special counsel.
And man, she has jumped down my throat.
It was fierce and chilly.
She kind of belittled him in front of everybody.
And anybody that stood up and tried to say this is a bad idea, was you know, smashed down and belittled good personally.
Did you ever throw a lamp at your husband?
No, I didn't.
Did you ever throw a Bible at your husband?
No, I didn't.
Do you have a terrible temper?
No, but I do get angry about things, so I'm not going to deny that.
If you go to the go to the end of the line, okay.
Why don't you go to the end of the line?
The fact is, we had four dead Americans.
Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans?
What difference at this point does it make?
You want me to tell you what my husband thinks?
My husband is not the Secretary of State.
I am.
So you ask my opinion, I will tell you my opinion.
I'm not going to be channeling my husband.
This woman, this little soft-spoken, pardon me for the phrase, dowdy woman, that was seemed very unassertive, took a hold of my hand and squeezed it and said, Do you understand everything that you do?
I could have passed out at that moment.
And she held on to my hand and she said, Do you understand everything that you do?
I mean, cold chills went up my spine.
That's the first time I became afraid of that woman.
I'm so sick.
I am so sick of the Sanders Damme lying about me.
I'm sick of this.
And I also think we'd be a lot better off if we actually talked to each other instead of yelling at each other.
I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic and we should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration.
Ah, we're going to question people's temperament for the job of being president of the United States.
So we just got that's just the beginning of the tape we have.
Let me play again the beginning of this because you might not have recognized the voices.
The first one is George Stephanopoulos talking about Hillary who jumps down people's throats.
That is absolutely fierce and chilling with her explosive temper.
The second voice is Dee Dee Myers talking about how Hillary smashes people down and belittles people.
Oh, shocking.
Who doesn't have the temperament for the job?
I made this case and then we had to go forward and we had no choice anymore but to go for a special counsel.
And man, she has jumped down my throat.
You know, basically, you know, you never believed in us.
You never stood for us.
You know, we were all alone in New Hampshire and it was fierce and chilly.
She kind of belittled him in front of everybody and, you know, I thought he took, he took, he took it.
I couldn't believe that she really believed.
I didn't believe that she really believed it.
And anybody that stood up and tried to say this is a bad idea, Lucille smashed down and belittled very personally.
Smashed down, belittled, jumping down throats, fierce, chilling, vicious temper.
They're describing their friend, Hillary Clinton.
You know, I want you, and keep this in mind when Gary Byrne, the Secret Service agent, comes out with his book in about, well, less than a month now, about two weeks or so.
I know we haven't booked for TV.
We also have him booked for radio.
And I'm looking forward to doing some of the first interviews with him and getting a copy of the book.
Do you know when we're actually going to get a physical copy next week?
Okay.
Looking forward to that.
I bet you the Clinton people would pay me $100,000 for the early copy of that book so they can feed it to Media Matters and Podesta and Brock and all the rest of them so they can do their hatchet job for them like they did poor Gary Aldrich years ago.
They do it again, just like they did to Juanita and Kathleen and Paula and Dolly Kyle and Jennifer Flowers.
You know, this is their M.O.
This is what they do.
You know, send James Carville out there.
Oh, you drag a dollar through a trailer park.
Now, do you remember when I said before the beginning of this year, I said, buckle up.
It's going to be a rocky road.
It's going to be a lot of ups and downs.
There's always an ebb and flow to political cycles.
And I said, by the time you go from Iowa, which was February 1, to where we went last night, it's going to be a long road, but it's going to go quickly.
Well, let me remind you on this 8th of June between now and the conventions, July 18th is the Republican convention.
July 25th is the Democratic convention.
Let me warn you that November and then the presidential debates and vice presidential debate, it's going to go very, very, very quickly.
Time is going to fly, and you'll see.
So we now have a battle set.
The battle, the prize is the presidency of the United States of America, the biggest, most important job in the world, and it's going to be Hillary Clinton versus Donald Trump.
Now, every election is usually determined by a lot of things.
First and foremost, I always say this peace and prosperity.
I think the fact that we have an additional 12.5 million people on food stamps, an additional 10 million in poverty, and tens and tens of millions out of the labor force is going to have a big impact.
The slowing of the economy is having a big impact.
There's an interesting article.
I wonder if it's true.
The May jobs number of 38,000, some think that it might be tied to Obama wanting a particularly low number to prevent quantitative easing in the Fed from raising interest rates in June so they can keep the economy artificially inflated, at least till November, because they know it's on the brink of a collapse because we never really got out of the recession.
But anyway, but a lot of things determine elections.
You know, at the end of the day, I can tell you right now what states matter the most.
And don't take offense if your state is not mentioned here, but obviously Ohio and Florida.
And then you got Iowa is going to matter.
Michigan's going to matter.
Nevada's going to matter.
New Hampshire is going to matter.
North Carolina is going to matter.
Pennsylvania is going to matter.
Virginia, that's why Terry McAuliffe wants all those convicted felons to vote.
That's going to matter.
Wisconsin's going to matter.
And then maybe there's a state or two in there that maybe could get put in play.
Like, I don't know.
Maybe a state like New Jersey, possibly.
Maybe that could be put in play.
If that's put in play, that's great.
But there are going to be tons of things that are going to determine people's decision in this election.
I think this is a classic choice election.
Either want to continue Obama's failed economic policies, record debt deficit, the largest number of people out of the labor force that we've ever faced, 50 million Americans in poverty, 45 million Americans on food stamps.
You want to continue that, or you want to continue Obamacare or you want to replace it.
You either want to expand coal mining and drilling and nuclear technology and fracking and other technologies, or you want to remain dependent on foreign oil, the countries that hate us.
You either want a president that's going to fix the VA or not fix the VA, a president that sees the need to put America first, and that means militarily, and negotiate better trade deals and build a wall and send education back to local communities and municipalities, or you don't.
That's what this choice election's about.
Who is Hillary going to pick for the Supreme Court?
Who would Trump pick?
That's now what it's all come down to.
Now, there's going to be other things.
You know, the campaign's outreach, their discipline, their ground game, how the conventions are run, the people they choose to put around them, the debates.
Then there's a whole bunch of other factors.
Does Hillary get a criminal referral?
Does Hillary get indicted?
Other unscripted moments, you know, like Joe the Plumber, stuff like that, other outside events, maybe some type of economic calamity, maybe some type of, you know, international crisis that we face.
Maybe revelations about the candidates that we don't know.
Maybe it's just the skill level of the candidates as candidates.
I don't think Hillary's a particularly good candidate.
And it goes on and on.
But one thing that each campaign is going to pay special attention to is what is known, what we call a narrative.
By the way, the AP says nine people were hurt in an attack in Tel Aviv.
Just had a friend of mine in from Israel today that I was talking to about what's going on there.
Recently, Israel struck, and it got very little news, both Syria and Hezbollah.
I'm not surprised.
Anyway, so each campaign is going to watch what the narrative is.
In other words, the storyline, what the media is talking about.
You know, in other words, the campaign should have a message of the day, and the campaign's going to want to present their message and also how they portray the other candidate.
Now, Hillary Clinton, as evidenced in her foreign policy speech the other day, she wants to portray Donald Trump as temperamentally unfit for office.
Meanwhile, I just debunked that narrative.
I would take the tapes of George Stephanopoulos and Dee Dee Myers and her screaming and yelling and absolutely unhinged and I would put that out there because she wants the voters to think he's an existential threat to America.
Well, it's just ridiculous.
But anyway, that's her narrative and that he's impulsive and could trigger us into a war.
Well, she didn't do too good in Libya.
She didn't do too good in Iraq.
She didn't do too well with the Iranian nuclear deal.
Anyway, and she wants to do in 2016 what Democrats did to Barry Goldwater in 1964, and that scare Americans, appeal to their fears, and that's what the plan is.
There was an infamous advertisement in 64.
It's a little girl standing in a meadow.
You hear birds chirping.
She's picking petals of a daisy, counting different numbers.
After she reaches nine, she pauses as if trying to remember the next number.
And then a male voice is heard saying, 10, 10.
And at the start of a missile launch countdown, the countdown continues.
A zoom of the video focuses on the girl's right eye until her pupil fills with the screen and eventually blacking it out as the countdown simultaneously reaches zero.
The blackness is replaced by a bright flash and the sound of a nuclear explosion and the footage of a nuclear detonation.
And you see the footage of a mushroom cloud.
So that's what Hillary's trying to do.
And the Trump people should understand it.
Now, I think what Donald Trump is laying out is what the narrative he's revealing, I think, came out last night.
And there were some policy differences, which I think is important.
I think you always got to point out the differences because she is basically running as a third term of Obama.
Anyway, so he mentioned a lot of those things, opposing, you know, bad trade deals and the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
By the way, Hillary actually took that out of her paperback edition of her book, what she had said about TPP.
I thought that was interesting, or the fact that her husband supported NAFTA.
Anyway, he mentioned other issues, energy taxes, putting America first.
I think putting America first is important right now because America's in decline.
I'm going to be America's champion.
You know, the election isn't about Republican or Democrat.
It's about who runs the country, the special interests or the people, you know, the special interest or the American people.
Every election year, politicians promise change.
Obama promised change, and it didn't work out too well, and every year they failed to deliver.
Why would politicians want to change a system that is totally rigged in order to keep them in power?
Because that's what they're doing.
Why would politicians want to change a system that's made them and their friends very, very wealthy?
Let's see, Podesta, Brock, you know, all the Clinton sycophants, Sid Vicious Blumenthal.
I beat a rigged system, said Trump, by winning the overwhelming support of the people.
The only way you could have done it.
And after years of disappointment, there's one thing we've learned.
We can't fix the rigged system by relying on the very people who rigged it.
They rigged it, and they'll do whatever they think.
They're not going to do anything differently, and we can't solve problems by counting on the politicians who created the problems.
It's a pretty good narrative to me.
And then he added, the Clintons have turned their politics of personal enrichment into an art form for themselves.
That's true, too.
Hundreds of millions of dollars selling access, selling favors, selling government contracts, hundreds of millions of dollars.
The State Department, he said, she turned into a private hedge fund.
The Russians, the Saudis, the Chinese all gave money to Bill and Hillary and got favorable treatment.
And it's sad when a sad day for this country when foreign governments with deep pockets have more influence in our own country than our great citizens.
So Trump is going after Clintons, being insiders, being corrupt, a particular kind of corruption linked to a rigged political system.
And Trump during this, you know, anti-political, anti-establishment, anti-Washington year is clearly portraying Hillary as the embodiment of everything that is corrupt in our system.
And he's portraying himself as the agent of change, an outsider, and a guy who's going to take a wrecking ball to the ruling class.
I actually think he'll do it, too.
In other words, he's trying to tap into the pre-existing off-the-charts anger that all of us justifiably feel.
I think that's a pretty successful strategy.
I've got a lot of other news we've got to get to here today.
We'll get it all in, I promise, including Hillary's temper that we'll talk about.
We'll talk where our pollsters on the program today as we now begin the Trump versus Hillary countdown and much, much more.
Oh, so Bernie, where's Bernie's supporters going to go?
We have a pretty good indication a lot of them may go to Trump.
They're so angry at being betrayed and having this election stolen from them in a rigged system.
I don't blame, if I'm a Bernie supporter, I'm pissed off.
I would never vote for Hillary.
You need to take control of your family and assets.
Now it sounds like common sense, but too many people procrastinate instead of getting an estate plan before it's too late.
Now with LegalZoom.com, there's no reason to put it off any longer.
Now you don't have to figure out on your own whether you need a will or a living trust and what's best for you.
Instead, you work with an independent attorney, now available in 48 states.
Now they'll walk you through your options and recommend an estate plan that offers the best solution to fit your needs.
And since LegalZoom is not a law firm, well, you can count on efficiency and value.
Everything is on your schedule, your terms, plus you know what your estate plan bundle costs up front instead of worrying about high hourly rates.
Now that's how LegalZoom has become the leader in helping families with their legal needs.
You get the legal help and you walk away feeling great about it.
So don't leave the most important decisions that you can make in the hands of other people.
Take control of your family's future with an estate plan bundle at legalzoom.com today.
Just use Hannity One when you check out and save even more.
LegalZoom.com.
I don't feel no ways tired.
I come too far from where I started from.
Nobody told me that the road would be easy.
I am woman.
Here me roll in this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president.
Because I've been it all before.
Well, you have to be a little bit crazy to run for president.
I think I'm probably the most transparent person in public life.
Words about me will continue to fill many archives and warehouses across the world.
I don't throw anything away.
I'm like two steps short of a hoarder.
Are you keeping a diary?
You're keeping good notes of what's happening?
Heavens no.
Get subpoenaed.
I can't write anything down.
To bend the nail break, because it only serves to make me more determined to achieve my final goal.
The fact is, we had four dead Americans.
Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans?
What difference at this point does it make?
Go to the end of the line.
Why don't you go to the end of the line?
If you have no reason to remember, but we came out of the White House not only dead broke, but in debt.
I remember landing under sniper fire.
There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles.
No, wait, that's what I said when I was sleep deprived.
You can read my book and I said something very different.
I am woman.
Watch me grow.
My loving arms across the land.
And that means we gotta be kinder.
Wait, you want me to tell you what my husband thinks?
My husband is not the Secretary of State.
I am.
And we have to be more compassionate and empathetic and put ourselves mindful.
Thank you.
You ask my opinion, I will tell you my opinion.
I'm not going to be channeling my husband.
Even here at home, we have to stand up for women's rights and reject efforts to marginalize any one of us.
I am invincible.
Don't you someday want to see a woman president of the United States of America?
Well, but I am all about new beginnings.
Another new hairstyle, a new email account.
I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic and we should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration.
Yeah, there's the temperament to be president.
Anyway, 24 now to the top of the hour.
Toll-free telephone numbers, 800-941 Sean.
All right, so we got an update on the Tel Aviv shooting.
Two gunmen open fire at crowds at a popular Sirona market.
Terrorists are shot.
Police are searching for other suspects.
And apparently they were both shot, disarmed by security forces.
One of the gunmen reportedly fled the scene, shot and neutralized.
And you always have to admire the ability of the Israeli police defenses and IDF forces to get the job done.
Sad, though, that it keeps coming.
The threat is never ending in Israel.
By the way, this is a shocking poll.
I've never seen this before.
Hillary is leading Donald Trump 88% to 1%.
The biggest gap in any poll ever taken.
Oh, that's right.
The poll was taken in Mexico.
Sorry.
New presidential poll taken in the world's top 25 nations shows enormous support for the socialist Hillary.
Of course, all the socialist countries want America in decline.
Why wouldn't they?
Did you see Hillary wore a $12,495 Armani jacket during her speech about inequality?
Oops.
Wow.
Remember Sarah Palin?
They gave her clothes and everyone had a fit.
Oh, my gosh, what a double standard.
Let's see.
The former Clinton aide, I keep saying, remember the name Brian Pagliano.
Well, because he's now got a plea deal.
I'm going to get to that in a second.
We'll stay right there.
Anyway, I just want to finish this one thought about the election because I think this is really important.
So Donald Trump is going to be the outsider.
He's going to leverage everything to his advantage.
And he's not going to apologize for not having political experience as Mrs. Clinton does.
He's going to exploit it.
He's going to say in so many words, I'm not a politician, and I'm damn proud of it.
And his argument is they have wrecked the system and millions of Americans are suffering.
Now, this to me is, all right, when you go down, if this is what I think it's going to be, this is going to be a compare and contrast election.
Trump says he'll balance the budget, Hillary.
It's more of the same as Obama.
Eliminate Obamacare, not eliminate Obamacare.
Allow drilling and fracking and coal mine expansion and nuclear technology or don't.
Send education back to the states or not.
Build the wall or not.
Fix the VA or not.
Build up our military or not.
So it's going to be a choice election.
And so last night, Donald Trump went after the political establishment.
This is an anti-Washington, anti-establishment year by every objective, and it seems like a pretty smart strategy.
Hillary Clinton is the embodiment of this corrupt political system.
She has benefited and her husband have benefited more than anybody else.
That's why she's never going to release those Wall Street speeches that she got paid $250,000 a clip for.
Her and her husband making $50 million in just a two-year period of time.
They're not going to release all the monies that were given to them by foreign entities, even those that practice Sharia law and have abysmal human rights records, especially towards women.
She is going to try and act as though that Donald Trump doesn't have the temperament.
That's basically going to be her argument.
She doesn't have the temperament.
And Trump will portray himself as a real agent of change, an outsider who wants to, as I said, take a wrecking ball to the ruling class.
And he'll tap into this already existing, off-the-charts, anger and frustration that the American people have towards Washington.
Now, I think what's pretty interesting about this is, and I don't know who's going to win.
I can't tell you.
There's too many variables between now and November.
I'll tell you, it's going to go fast, and we're going to have a new president.
And whether or not Trump can pull this off, it's impossible to know right now.
I hope so.
I don't think he had a particularly good week.
I did like seeing him reading from a teleprompter last night.
He doesn't always have to read from a teleprompter, but he should have notes before him.
I think he's got to understand that this race is now at a different level than it was during the primary.
And my guess is he's starting to sketch out the best attack lines against Hillary Clinton.
And he's got to understand Obama's going to get into this.
And I think that the Trump people better understand that they need to be disciplined and stick with it, not go down every rabbit hole that shows up in their path.
And Hillary is not going to be placid and just take the pounding.
Clintons are notorious for firing back.
They'll fire back hard.
This is going to be a brutal campaign.
And if there's anybody out there that you're listening to on radio or television that is telling you what the outcome is going to be, they don't know what the hell they're talking about.
There's too many unknowns.
I would say this to the Trump people.
They better pay attention to this.
Hillary Clinton has 21 press aides.
She has a communications director, a lead press secretary, a day-to-day spokesperson, a traveling press secretary, a rapid response director, a rapid response spokesperson, and a variety of other handlers dedicated to certain regions and specialized outlets and topics.
I think that's what it takes to drive a coherent national message.
And I think that this latest issue with the whole judge issue shouldn't take five days for the Trump people to figure out.
And let CNN last night, poor Jeffrey Lord, I mean, it was unwatchable what they did to this poor guy.
Seven people, eight people lining up against him.
The whole hour is discussing Donald Trump's a racist.
You know, of course, you have Van Jones and David Axelrod and Michael Smirkanish.
Whatever happened to Michael Smirkanish, once started out as a conservative.
It's just, it became unwatchable.
S.E. Cup was a disappointment.
It was horrible.
I always liked her.
I don't know what happened to her.
She's probably, you know what happened?
She went to CNN.
That's what happened.
Joe Scarborough spending days on this.
You know, he's another one.
He just wants to be liked by the mainstream media.
It's just so obvious.
He wants to be respected and liked.
Anyway, but that's not going to determine this election.
I'm just saying that what you've got to do, I would say that I would look closely at what the Wall Street Journal pointed out as it relates to Clinton's press operation, and I duplicate it in whatever way you can.
Look at this.
The State Department says they need 75 years to gather up Hillary's emails.
The RNC FOIA request that you guys say it's going to take 75 years to complete.
And I actually did a little digging on this.
And I mean, that is an incredible number.
But 75 years.
Comment specifically because it's a matter of ongoing litigation, but I would ask you guys to look at the court filings.
They do provide that.
75 years.
All right, enough.
That's what we get the point.
By the way, I keep telling you that there's this guy that could be the John Dean of our error.
His name is Brian Pagliano.
How many times have I told you, remember that name?
Hannity said it a bunch.
I know that name.
You're going to seem smart to all your friends when you go out drinking.
Anyway, Brian Pagliano, the John Dean of the email gate scandal.
Anyway, his lawyer now says that his client has provided the FBI with the evidence that they would need to recommend a prosecution to the Justice Department.
It's not clear whether the evidence incriminates others targeted by the investigation or just Pagliano.
But anyway, lawyers for Pagliano, who was the State Department Information Technology Specialist, he's the guy that put Hillary's email server together.
Anyway, he provided new details in a federal lawsuit on Tuesday about an immunity agreement with the Justice Department.
They also argued that Pagliano should be allowed to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights pending a deposition with Judicial Watch because he has information that could, quote, furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute.
This is getting very interesting.
I just, I don't know what to make of it, though.
Here's another thing.
Obama's resettlement program for Syrian refugees.
Well, they're spending $1.8 billion in your money to help support the refugees.
By the way, you know what that means?
That's $20,000 per refugee that you're paying.
And Donald Trump says, put America first.
I'm kind of saying, yeah, that's a good idea.
Let's put America first.
That would be a good change of pace.
Angry Bernie supporters on a Facebook post, almost 450 members are venting their anger at Hillary Clinton and the so-called victory she had.
Now, if you look at the numbers, to get the Democratic nomination, if you want to get that as a Democrat, remember, what was the magic number?
1237 for the Republicans.
All right.
For a Democrat, the magic number was 2,382.
Well, Hillary only won 2,184, including last night's contest.
The only one remaining, there's only 25 delegates, 20 delegates left, is in D.C.
So she fell short of winning the nomination outright.
The reason she's going to be the nominee is because 571 superdelegates went to her, and only 48 went to Bernie.
No wonder these Bernie people are so mad.
And Bernie supporters are now threatening retaliation against reporters and Hillary Clinton.
And they're saying in large numbers that they're going to vote for Donald Trump, and I don't blame them.
By the way, that's not the only good news for Trump.
Fox News Latino points out the new polling analysis data compiled over 30 days as of June 1st.
Trump has 37% positive view in the Hispanic community.
And by the way, that's 10% higher than what Mitt Romney got.
That's a pretty good sign.
Also, public policy polling shows that Trump now is in the lead over Hillary in the state of Florida.
It's close, but he's in the lead.
And then you still have these other people like Scott Walker.
You know, what's going on in the Republican Party, as I said the other day, is a disgrace.
Paul Ryan has become such a huge, massive disappointment.
Well, now Scott Walker, this whole, you know, Lindsey Graham community has gotten out of control.
Paul Ryan kicked it off yesterday.
Now we have Scott Walker.
I thought Scott Walker was a smarter guy than this.
And he said this morning, if Trump doesn't apologize about the La Rossa judge comments, that he might not support Trump at the convention.
When do these people that all lost?
What are they getting?
You know, I just, the ability for Republicans to create a circular firing squad and self-destruct never ends.
I saw my friend Hugh Hewitt yesterday apparently called the Republican Party to change their convention rules and drop Donald Trump.
Well, why did we all vote?
What was the point of all that?
Why did we caucus?
He got 1.4 million more votes than any other Republican nominee in history.
Good grief.
So tired of people.
It's all about them, how they look.
We all want an economy with more opportunity and less inequality, where Wall Street can never wreck Main Street again.
We all want a government that listens to the people, not the power brokers, which means getting unaccountable money out of politics.
And we all want a society that is tolerant, inclusive, and fair.
We all believe that America succeeds when more people share in our prosperity, when more people have a voice in our political system, when more people can contribute to their communities.
We believe that cooperation is better than conflict.
Unity is better than division.
Empowerment is better than resentment.
And bridges are better than walls.
The Clintons have turned the politics of personal enrichment into an art form for themselves.
They've made hundreds of millions of dollars selling access, selling favors, selling government contracts, and I mean hundreds of millions of dollars.
Secretary Clinton even did all of the work on a totally illegal private server.
Something that how she's getting away with this, folks, nobody understands.
Designed to keep her corrupt dealings out of the public record, putting the security of the entire country at risk, and a president in a corrupt system is totally protecting her.
Not right.
I am going to give a major speech on probably Monday of next week, and we're going to be discussing all of the things that have taken place with the Clintons.
I think you're going to find it very informative and very, very interesting.
I wonder if the press will want to attend.
Who knows?
All right, now the table is set.
Glad you're with us.
Our two Sean Hannity show, write down our toll-free telephone number.
It's 800-941 Sean, if you want to be a part of the program.
It's going to be interesting to see how this speech goes on Monday for Mr. Trump.
I'd actually recommend it's sort of like what Newt Gingrich is saying.
I would recommend that he stick with the big ideas and compare and contrast what America would be like with Hillary, a continuation of Obama's policies and record debt, endless spending, redistribution, as she even referred to numerous times in her speech last night, a continuation of Obamacare, which has resulted in premiums going up over 40% nationwide under Obama, where Trump would repeal and replace it.
You know, shutting down coal and drilling and oil and fracking like Hillary wants to do versus creating millions of jobs, high-paying and becoming energy independent, fixing our VA, building up our military, building the wall.
Yeah, I think we need a wall.
We can build new bridges, but we also need a wall.
So I think that would be a far better way to go through it.
I don't know if he means, you know, does that mean that he's going to go through every issue from Whitewater to Filegate to removing the files from Vince Foster's office or the lost Rose law firm billing records that magically reappeared years later in the White House or the Commerce Department's pay-to-play junkets or renting the Lincoln bedroom or John Wong or Charlie Tree or Johnny Chung.
You guys remember any of this or no controlling legal authority comments like Al Gore once made about the telephone calls from the White House soliciting contributions or Monica Lewinsky and impeachment or pardon gate or the Bosnia airport sniper lie?
I was just tired.
I thought it was bullets and it was really flowers they gave me.
Or what happened in Benghazi or this whole email scandal or the speaking fees or the Clinton Foundation.
I'm just going off my memory.
I'm not sure if there's going to be a laundry list Monday or what.
But it certainly would be interesting.
Frank Luntz is with us, founder of Luntz Global, and Doug Schoen is back with us.
Doug, I know you just saw a good friend of mine, a mutual friend of ours.
How are you?
I did.
I did.
What's happening?
Well, I think that Donald Trump had a pretty rough week.
It sounded to me from that sound bike that he's moving in the direction of making the issue about not exogenous and extraneous forces like a Mexican judge in Indiana, but Secretary Clinton and his vision for the country.
I think that's good for Trump.
But I think Hillary starts this race probably five to ten points ahead because of her big win and because of Donald Trump having a rough week last week.
I don't know.
You know, she's running on the issue of temperament.
Let me just play a little bit for you.
Let me play just, and I have a long, long montage that I've been playing on the program today, but let me just start with the words of George Stephanopoulos talking about how Hillary jumps down people's throats and is fierce and chilling in her temper.
And Dee Dee Myers talking about how she smashes people down and belittles people.
I made this case and we had to go forward and we had no choice anymore but to go for a special counsel.
And man, she has jumped down my throat.
You know, basically, you know, you never believe in us.
You never stood for us.
You know, we were all alone in New Hampshire, and it was fierce and chilling.
She kind of belittled him in front of everybody.
And, you know, I thought he took it.
I couldn't believe that she really believed it.
I didn't believe that she really believed it.
And anybody that stood up and tried to say this is a bad idea was, you know, smashed down and belittled very personally.
You know, Frank Luntz, I think that could be a pretty good TV ad.
What do you think?
Well, the problem is that you're going back in time.
And what we have learned is that there are three areas.
Well, the problem is you didn't hear the whole montage because I start back in time and I come up to the present with her screaming and yelling and getting angry.
But that's not, Sean, if you really want to beat her, you start with integrity because it's the number one value, the number one attribute that undecided voters want in their president, someone who says what they mean and means what they say.
Second is you move to someone who really understands them, who understands the challenges of hardworking Americans.
And here's someone who hasn't driven a car in decades, someone who flies private, someone who only stays at the best suites at the best hotels, and someone who really doesn't understand what it is to live paycheck to paycheck, struggling to get by.
Frank, are you talking about Trump or Clinton?
And then number three is that you want someone who over time has demonstrated a career outside politics.
Now, in all three of those cases, she's got a problem.
In all three of those cases, and by the way, Sean, that's in order of what matters to people.
So that, if you really want to beat her, those are the areas that you focus on.
You know, I don't disagree with any of that.
And I also think that this is a real-choice election for America.
You know, on issues of the economy, you've got a continuation of what Obama started.
Trump wants to actually balance the budget on health care.
Do you want to keep Obamacare?
Do you want to replace it?
On energy?
Do you want to drill?
Do you want coal mining?
Do you want nuclear power?
Do you want fracking or not?
On education?
Do you think the government ought to be ramming it down people's throats through Common Core?
Or do you want the states to decide and local districts to decide?
Do you want the border built or not?
Do you want the VA fixed or not?
Do you want the military built up or not?
Can I make it?
On Supreme Court justices, what kind do you want?
Allow me to edit that just in one way, which is that you're seeing it from the perspective of what you want the government to do.
The way the public sees it is what do we want to receive ourselves?
Do we want schools that work, or do you want to continue to graduate our own kids who cannot read the diplomas that they just received?
Do you want a job that you can count on?
Do you want a career rather than just a job, something that's rewarding for you?
But it's a little deeper than that.
Because here's the problem.
You've got one in five American families that don't have a single member of their family in the workforce.
You've got 95 million Americans out of the labor force.
You've got one in six young men 18 to 34 either in jail or out of work.
And then you add to that 12.5 million more Americans on food stamps, 10 million more Americans in poverty.
This is the legacy of what she supports and says she's going to do.
Those are real people, real suffering, real government failure at a very high level.
But it has to come from the perspective, and I'll be curious if Doug agrees or disagrees, for either candidate.
The candidate that addresses this not from the perspective of the government towards the public, but addresses it from the perspective of the public, of the people themselves, to individualize and personalize these issues and humanize them from the American people back to the government.
Doug, what do you think?
I think Frank is exactly right.
And Trump has to make it less about him than what he's going to for the American people.
Now, the big issue to me is jobs and the economy, because the statistics you read, Sean, given the jobs report last Friday, suggest huge problems with Obama's economic record.
That's where I think he should be going.
I think that's as important, if not more important, than the list of scandals that you've read out and that he now started to talk about.
Here's one interesting demographic number that I got today that I want to share with you.
Fox News Latino reports that 37 percent in their latest polls, they did it for over a period of 30 days, shows that 37 percent of Hispanic voters back Donald Trump.
And they've been talking so much about the La Rossa judge, you think, oh, this has been a disaster, but that is 10 points higher, a full 10 points higher than the Latino vote that Mitt Romney won.
And it would be just seven points less than what George W. Bush got, 44 percent in 2004, which was the high watermark for Latinos backing a Republican presidential candidate.
How do you analyze that once?
Well, he's got to do better.
And let's be specific.
It doesn't matter how either candidate does nationwide.
What matters is how they're doing in Florida, Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Iowa, New Hampshire, Colorado.
So any polling that is done in any other state is not relevant to determining who wins this election.
It's all an electoral college focus.
I agree.
And look, there are really 11 states that are going to determine the next president.
We know the main ones, Florida, Ohio, but that also includes Colorado, Iowa, New Hampshire, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia.
Those are the states that are going to determine this election.
I think every other state is predictable.
And in those states, it's the specific demographic groups, and I would be more concerned, and I'm trying to prioritize for your listeners, I'd be more concerned about how Trump is doing among women 30 to 49 because they make up a significant segment of the voter poll.
Well, wait a minute, but recent polls show that Hillary is doing worse than men than Trump is doing with women.
What do you make of that?
But I agree with Doug.
I think she starts with an advantage.
And as the Bernie Sanders people finally come home, I think she really will have a five, I'll go five to seven point advantage as this campaign begins.
Well, there was a great article today in the UK Telegraph about this very topic, and I'll throw this to Doug.
And it's that in the wake of Hillary's victory last night, and I think this is likely to change, but anyway, as of last night, a major political party choosing a possible criminal suspect or a criminal suspect to be their presidential nominee.
That's how I refer to it.
But anyway, all these angry Bernie supporters, they're furious, and I don't blame them.
And they've now taken to the internet to plan their next steps.
And some are saying very publicly they're voting for Trump over Hillary Clinton.
Now, in one of the most popular pro-Sanders Facebook groups, which has about 450,000 members, people were venting their anger at Clinton's so-called win and posting how they plan to move forward.
Now, Doug, if I'm a Bernie Sanders supporter today, I'm a pretty angry person.
And you know why?
Because it's simple math.
Hillary Clinton needed 2,382 delegates to win the nomination.
You know what she has after last night?
2,184.
She's 200 short, 198 short of what she needs.
And the only way she wins is because she has 571 superdelegates, and Bernie only has 48.
If I'm Bernie, I'm saying, whoa, why are they all going with her?
Because the fix was in from the beginning.
And that's what he will argue.
I don't think, and Frank, I'm curious, your view, I don't think Bernie's going to get out because of the administrations of President Obama.
I think he'll go to the convention.
And I think a large part of the answer to Sean's question turns on what happens at the convention, what role Bernie plays, if any, going forward, and whether there are demonstrations, whether they be inside or outside the convention hall, and how the platform comes out.
I think that goes a long way to seeing what the Sanders voters will do.
And this is not.
Doug, I absolutely agree.
I was at the event in Santa Monica last night.
I wanted to see how the Sanders people reacted because, frankly, I thought that he might be getting out.
And these are people who are bitter because they believe that they've been robbed, that they believe that the whole rules and the system was set up against them.
But here's the challenge.
Bernie spent his opening demonizing Donald Trump, making it clear that Trump was the enemy.
If he had been a little more subtle, if he had pushed that further into the speech, I would have thought maybe Trump could get up to 25% of them.
He's going to need 15% of them to rob Clinton of her base.
I think that's doable.
But, Sean, the one thing that I'm going to try to do, and I've heard Doug do this.
Real quick, we're out of time.
Is I want to tell the truth.
And I don't want people to believe that this is going to be easy.
I don't want them to think that Trump is ahead.
I think it's important to go step by step between now and November, giving them the facts.
I don't think any of this is easy.
I'm predicting that this is going to be a close race in every respect.
But there are a lot of things that are going to happen between now and November that will impact the race.
Maybe like Hillary will get indicted.
Or maybe there'll be a criminal referral.
I'm going to spend $2 billion trashing Donald Trump.
Maybe.
And maybe they'll spend $2 billion trashing her.
That's pretty easy, too.
It's tit for tat.
All right.
Thank you both for being with us.
Want to go back to the beginning again?
I can't play this enough.
It's George Stephanopoulos, and it's Dee Dee Myers describing the temper, the viciousness of Hillary Clinton.
Listen.
I made this case, and we had to go forward, and we had no choice anymore but to go for a special counsel.
And man, she has jumped down my throat was fierce and chilling.
She kind of belittled him in front of everybody.
And anybody that stood up and tried to say this is a bad idea, who's, you know, smashed down and belittled very personally.
Did you ever throw a lamp at your husband?
No, I didn't.
Did you ever throw a Bible at your husband?
No, I didn't.
Do you have a terrible temper?
No, but I do get angry about things.
I'm not going to deny that.
This is pretty fascinating.
Jump down my throat.
Fierce, chilling.
That's how George Stephanopoulos describes Hillary Clinton.
Dee Dee Myers, smashed down, belittle.
Oh, so maybe the Secret Service agent, maybe he's not so wrong in this book that is highly anticipated.
As he tells the story, she's not fit.
She doesn't have the temperament to be the president of the United States.
800-941 Sean, if you want to be a part of the program, let's go to Lois is in Spokane in Washington next on the Sean Hannity Show.
How are you?
Good morning, Sean.
I'm fine.
Thank you very much for taking my call.
What's going on?
I'm glad you called.
I'm a Republic, Reagan Republican, and conservatives, we're mad.
We are mad at the establishment career Republicans.
We gave them the House, like they asked, they did nothing.
We gave them the Senate.
They did nothing.
We want the presidency.
We want to take it for us, not them.
We want Trump.
Well, I think, listen, I think what he's, if Trump followed through on building the wall, fixing the VA, gave us conservative judges, made us energy independent, eliminated Obamacare, put education back to the states, you know, got us on a balanced budget plan, all the things he talks about, I think the country is infinitely better off.
Putting America first.
Absolutely.
I think it would be, I like the agenda.
It is bolder than anything I'm hearing from anybody else in Washington.
And frankly, it echoes a lot of what I've been saying about the Conservative Solution Caucus since 2013.
So if he does all those things, we're going to be in much better shape.
But first, he's got to get elected.
He made a bad call.
You know, the judge on his private case on the civil suit released court documents, correct, before the trial.
Right.
What America, what American that's ever been in a courtroom or thinks they may be in a courtroom would want the court documents released before the trial?
Where is that American?
I think the other big, egregious error, there's a couple of them here about this judge.
Number one, the judge appointing, you know, obviously a politically connected law firm to represent the plaintiffs.
There's no incentive for any of them to ever settle a case, which is what you want to have happen.
Ideally, a good judge is going to say, all right, both sides get in a room, hammer this out.
I don't need to be involved here.
That is the ideal situation.
All the time.
Listen, our courts are bogged down.
One of the other things that needs to happen to our legal system, and this is part of tort reform, is that you've got to set up a system where loser pays.
You know, I've had frivolous lawsuits brought against me.
I'll give you an example.
About a year and a half ago, I got sued by Lindsay Lohand and her mother.
And you know what?
I had to hire attorneys.
I had to pay money.
And I'm like Trump.
I don't settle.
I will never settle.
I'm never, ever, ever, ever going to settle a suit, a nuisance suit that if you pay 50 grand, it goes away and you end up paying more in legal fees.
I'm not doing it.
Exactly.
We have tried.
We have dignity.
And what the courts need to do is make the attorney that brings the case, he needs to pay both sides.
Because the people that are bringing the case, they're victims also.
Because in most cases, they don't realize they don't have a case.
They have an attorney that wants money because they're going to get their fees.
They want publicity, and that's why they're bringing the case for them.
Well, I love the idea.
They have this concept in Great Britain.
It's called loser pace.
I think it works.
Anyway, 800-941 Sean, you want to be a part of this extravaganza.
Stephen is in Providence, Rhode Island.
HJJ, what's up, Stephen?
How are you?
Glad you called.
Hey, I just wanted to talk about the rule or Trump's comments on the judge.
Okay.
I was a supporter of him.
I totally disagreed with that, what he said about that.
And I just think it's petty.
I think it's stupid.
I don't think it's a good political move.
I don't think he had any reason or any need to make those comments when Hillary Clinton, I mean, you think this has any comparison to the legal things that she's going to be facing?
I think you should have sat back, taken it with a man, and then dealt with it.
You know what I mean?
And not had stooped to her level.
Look, I said myself, number one, it was inarticulate.
Number two, it focused on heritage.
It should have focused on the politics, which is what I think he meant to do.
And again, I don't think he thought it through.
He speaks from the cuff, and it ended up being a five-day story.
So he paid a big price for it.
I don't know if I would, I mean, I know we all say that he speaks off the cuff and he doesn't think he's not an experienced politician yet.
I think he's a very, very, very smart man.
And I think he thinks.
He's a smart man, but the art of the deal.
Let me just tell you something.
The art of the deal and the art of politics is very differently.
It's very different.
They're two different worlds.
Mastering in less than a year to have come as far as he has come in the political arena is frankly somewhat miraculous.
But, you know, I'm not surprised that these mistakes are being made, but they better stop if he wants to win.
If he wants to win, he's got to be smarter.
You know, I sent out a note to some friends of mine this morning.
There was a Wall Street Journal article that caught my attention this morning, and I thought it was worth really spending some time and paying attention to it all because I thought it really captured where we are in terms of the moment.
But, you know, Hillary Clinton has 21 press aides, a communications director, a lead press secretary, a day-to-day spokesperson, a traveling press secretary, a rapid response director.
She has a rapid response spokesperson and a variety of handlers that are literally dedicated to regional and specialized media outlets.
To me, you know, Trump has two people.
And that's got to change.
And that's why what should have been a two-hour story became a five-day story.
So and that's, I think, a fundamental difference between the two campaigns.
That's where professional politics usurps maybe natural instincts of an individual that got him this far.
There's a very big difference between fighting in a primary and what he's now involved in, which is a general election campaign.
Anyway, appreciate the call.
Thank you.
800-941-Sean, you want to be a part of the program?
Phoenix, K-F-Y-I, Eric is next on the Sean Hannity show.
What's up, Eric?
How are you?
Hey, real good, Sean.
Glad to have the chance to talk to you.
I was calling in basically for the Trump thing, but you guys have covered it to depth.
But there's one thing I haven't heard, and it's the implications that what's possible if they don't get this thing tossed out.
If they let the case go forward without the major litigant in it and continue to do this, it could sell.
Well, they actually replaced the major litigant.
And the reason that the original plaintiff, remember, this is the judge that allowed it to become a class action suit.
That's number one.
Number two, they allowed the main plaintiff in the case to be replaced because that main plaintiff was on record as actually giving very high grades to Trump University.
As a matter of fact, Trump put out an email yesterday.
They have a website where you can see the reviews.
I don't see such a website with Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton and Laureate University, but it doesn't really matter.
This is not what the election is really going to be about.
And I think that's important to remember.
This is not going to do.
But there's a precedent that could be set here because if it's allowed to go forward, even if it's settled in a very minimal way, it could open the opportunity for someone who is unhappy because they had to drop out of college to fire a lawsuit.
And it's not going to be just one lawsuit.
It's going to be two.
They could fire a lawsuit or do a lawsuit against the university and then another one against the government for the loans.
Listen, I got to be honest.
It could go on in perpetuity, but there is a strategy that I actually agree with that Trump is involved in here, and that is that, you know, for the vast majority, the 99% that give them excellent grades for a good experience and they learned a lot, and then to have one or two percent of people try and use it and now leverage the political campaign is a very tough position to be put in.
Anyway, I appreciate the call.
Thank you.
Back to our phones.
Let's say hi to John in Kansas City, Missouri.
John, hi, how are you?
We're glad you called.
I'm good.
Thanks for taking my call, and thanks for your show.
Thank you.
My comment is I was kind of disappointed in Trump's response to everybody wanting his tax returns and his veterans donations.
His response should have been, I thought, was, okay, I will release those items next Wednesday at 1 o'clock if Hillary releases her speech transcripts at the same time and Mr. Obama releases his college transcripts at the same time.
Well, they might be able to.
I think that would be a great idea.
Because they're never going to release it, and then that kind of sets the bar.
Look, that's another tough legal call.
Now, imagine if you're one of these guys that has money and that you're every single year you file your taxes, the IRS is breathing down your neck.
I know people who go through this every single solitary year.
Now, I can tell you why I don't go through it every year is because I overpay.
And number one, and number two, you know, I'm paid through companies.
So it's not as complicated as, say, Donald Trump's 400,000 businesses.
It's not 5,000 pages of stuff to go through.
So I don't have the level of deductions.
I have some deductions like everybody, but I know people that are in business that go through this nightmare and pay all of these legal fees and all of these accounting fees every single year.
And usually the IRS ends up finding nothing.
But they're not going to repay the money.
I run a business and I did a charitable donation and I claimed it.
Well, they audited me and then after through it all, they owed me $36.
Yeah.
All right.
Look, but how much time?
You know, time is money for a lot of business people.
How much time?
How much effort?
How much energy?
I don't know what your lawyer charges an hour.
I know mine charges a lot, and it's not cheap.
It's a pain in the, you know what?
All right, I appreciate it.
Thanks for being with us.
I made this case, and then we had to go forward, and we had no choice anymore but to go for a special counsel.
And man, she has jumped down my throat.
It was fierce and chilling.
She kind of belittled him in front of everybody.
And anybody that stood up and tried to say this is a bad idea, who seems smashed down and belittled very personally.
Did you ever throw a lamp at your husband?
No, I didn't.
Did you ever throw a Bible at your husband?
No, I didn't.
Do you have a terrible temper?
No, but I do get angry about things.
I'm not going to deny that.
Go to the end of the line.
Okay.
Why don't you go to the end of the line?
The fact is, we had four dead Americans.
Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans?
What difference at this point does it make?
You want me to tell you what my husband thinks?
My husband is not the Secretary of State.
I am.
So you ask my opinion.
I will tell you my opinion.
I'm not going to be channeling my husband.
This woman, this little soft-spoken, pardon me for the phrase, dowdy woman, that was seen very unassertive, took a hold of my hand and squeezed it and said, do you understand everything that you do?
I could have passed out at that moment.
And she held on to my hand and she said, do you understand everything that you do?
I mean, cold chills went up my spine.
That's the first time I became afraid of that woman.
I had some sense of the Sanders here being lying about me.
And I also think we'd be a lot better off if we actually talk to each other instead of yelling at each other.
I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic and we should stand up and say, we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration.
All right, so here we go.
Final hour of free-for-all.
It is our news roundup information overload hour.
And there it is, Hillary Clinton at the beginning of that tape, as I pointed out earlier.
The person saying she jumped down my throat and is fierce and chilling.
Well, that's George Stephanopoulos.
And Dee Dee Myers was saying she'd smash people down and belittle people.
And then you hear a very angry woman all throughout the years.
Now we've got a Secret Service book coming out that alleges that, yeah, Hillary Clinton did in fact throw a vase at her husband, did in fact give him a big shiner, and that the Secret Service had to ascertain whether or not protection needed to be given to Bill Clinton because of violence from Hillary Clinton.
But I'm sure they'll smear, slander, besmirch Gary Byrne, who is the Secret Service agent, when his book comes out.
I'm sure those plans are already in the works.
Well, that doesn't sound like she has the temperament to be the president of the United States.
Joining us now, Leslie Marshall, Fox News contributor, host of the Leslie Marshall Show, and Jeffrey Lord.
God, I felt sorry for you last night.
It was like eight to one.
I survived.
You know, I mean, you did a great job.
I couldn't watch it anymore.
It was unwatchable.
I mean, you were the only thing that I'm like sitting there saying, oh, my gosh.
Can any more people pile on poor Jeff?
Yeah, yeah.
It's unbelievable.
It's happened before, and you know, I mean, that's just the way it is.
You spent an entire hour on this stupid thing, and it's unwatchable to me.
I couldn't watch it.
Anyway, former associate political director for the Reagan administration, he's the author of the brand new book, What America Needs, The Case with Donald Trump, and he, of course, writes for the American Spectator.
Leslie, when George Stephanopoulos talks about Hillary Clinton having a vicious temper out of control, jumping down people's throats, her being fierce and it's chilling, and Dee Dee Myers saying she loves to smash people down and belittle people, and then you hear the audio of her losing her temper time and time and time and time again.
Does that not concern you about her temperament?
Not at all.
Not at all.
So that's fine with you.
If I were married to a man who cheated on me, and he did with Jennifer Flowers and admitted to that, and of course we know what happened with Monica Lewinsky, I might throw something at my husband as well, Sean, and it wouldn't mean that I'm not fit to hold office.
Really?
So you would not hold back committing domestic violence against your husband.
Is that what you're saying?
Oh, domestic violence.
Throwing a vase across the room at somebody is domestic violence.
Well, it actually doesn't matter at all.
Excuse me.
That's not what the story is, though.
Excuse me.
Let me correct a record.
But the story is that the Secret Service say she hit him with the vase, and he had a massive black eye.
Now, I see on the cover, I think it was People Magazine, what is his name?
Johnny Depp's girlfriend.
I don't even, what's that girl's name?
Amber Heard.
Amber Heard.
Yeah.
She has a black eye, and everyone's talking about, well, did Johnny Depp do this?
Did he commit domestic violence against this woman?
And if so.
That's a good point that you make, Sean, because if you notice, the woman that Johnny Depp has children with, Vanessa Paradise, and a couple of other women that have been in relationships with him state that he was never ever violent toward them.
So in other words, just because somebody says somebody did something, it doesn't mean it's necessarily true.
And in that case, that you decided as an example.
Yeah, Jeffrey Lord, she sounds like a very angry woman.
And when you have people as close as George Stephanopoulos was to her and people like Dee Dee Myers, and they're saying these awful things about her, I think people should pay attention and listen.
Well, they should.
And I'll tell you, one of the things that comes out of all of these things, let's recall that famous episode where she sat down on the Today Show and said that the real story was the vast right-wing conspiracy that's been after her husband since the day he declared for president or whatever.
The point here is that not only does she have the temper problems, and she who's making an issue of Donald Trump's temperament, but she, in fact, when a problem arises, she tends to shift it off immediately to somebody else.
In other words, it wasn't Bill Clinton that was the problem.
It was the vast right-wing conspiracy that was the problem.
What difference does it make, she says, about the folks in Benghazi?
Well, she lied to the families.
When she won her nomination votes there, she said, among other things, I have your back.
And I'm thinking to myself, well, you know, I imagine Ambassador Stevens and the Americans who died in Benghazi have a different view of this.
Sean, what I find interesting with respect to temperament is what I heard, and I think we're all watching the same person say the same thing, is she was speaking about Donald Trump's rhetoric about a judge, Donald Trump's rhetoric about Hispanics.
Donald Trump's rhetoric about Muslims.
She wasn't talking about him.
Well, Donald Trump's former first, Mrs. Trump, as well.
Well, as I know it and understand it, I don't know that Donald Trump ever lied to the families of victims that our government didn't help, even though they knew that they were under fire the way that Hillary did.
And we know she lied because while simultaneously telling us that Benghazi was related to a YouTube video, we know she told her own daughter and the Libyan president and the Egyptian prime minister another story, which was this is a terror attack.
We also know that 17 bipartisan investigative committees have found her not to be guilty, not have mishandled the situation as Secretary of State.
No.
There was no cover-up.
We're waiting for the Benghazi report as we speak.
But as politics, as Trey Gowdy said at the beginning of those hearings, that none of them had the relevant information and emails to actually come to a conclusion on the issue of Benghazi.
We're waiting for the final Benghazi report that actually did have access to those things.
And I know that's a talking point.
But I confront you with the issue of Hillary's temper.
You dismiss it.
I confront you with Hillary caught in a bold-faced lie, and you dismiss it.
You know, I'm beginning to think that you're one of the 71% of those people polled in Rasmussen that say even if she's arrested for breaking the law, that you would still want her to keep running.
What are you?
Well, first of all, I don't, there is no indictment, and even if there is, everyone is, and I don't believe there will be, everyone's innocential proven guilty, and she doesn't even have a charge, a criminal or otherwise, or an indictment toward her.
There is an investigation, one, two, everybody has a temper, and everybody lies, whether they're running for president or not, whether they're Democrat or Republican, whether they're female, whether they're male, whether they're a Clinton, they're a Trump.
I, Leslie Marshall, have lost my temper.
I, Leslie Marshall, have lied, unfortunately, and we all have.
Leslie Marshall for president.
Somebody would be unfit to hold office for being human, not a good side of our human behavior.
Do you notice, Jeffrey?
I don't think that's a strong.
Do you notice, Jeffrey, she never addresses the lying.
She never addresses the corruption.
Well, I just said everybody lies.
Here is the problem that I think we're going to see illustrated a lot, thanks to Donald Trump here in the next several months.
You can start with Whitewater and draw a straight line all the way through the entire Clinton administration, all the way through her tenure as Secretary of State, to this moment with the email situation.
And what they all have in common is she doesn't tell the truth.
She has this temper and goes after her critics.
Think of Juanita Broderick, whose voice I recognized in one of those tapes that you had.
This is a constant.
It's not like, you know, you hope with anybody's life that they understand their flaws as they go along and then they don't repeat them.
But what's happened here is that from beginning to this moment, over a decade, it's the same set of flaws that appear all of the time.
This incapacity to tell the truth, this incapacity to have good judgment.
And now she wants to be in charge of the FBI, the CIA, the IRS.
I mean, this is a pretty frightening thought.
Yeah.
Well, I guess, you know, the idea that Hillary Clinton is somehow questioning the temperament of Donald Trump, I think, is somewhat interesting to me because the people that have known her best and the people that are now speaking out about her temperament, they give a very different picture of what she has tried to present publicly.
And I know questions have been raised about Donald Trump's temperament.
I trust his temperament far more than everything that I'm reading and seeing and hearing about Hillary, including from those that were closest to her.
And there's no similar instance.
You know, I've interviewed all the Trump kids.
I've interviewed all the people close to the Trumps.
And I've never heard a single instance where Donald Trump has lost his temper.
Not one.
No, I mean, you've been around the Trump.
I've been around him.
If you interviewed all the Clintons, they would say the same thing.
Nobody's going to throw their daddy, their husband.
Well, do you think if I interviewed George's father-in-law under a bus?
Do you think George Stephanopoulos lied when he said that she had this volcanic?
George Stephanopoulos is not a Clinton.
He's not her child.
No, but he's a Clinton sycophant.
I mean, go watch the movie The War Room and you see him kissing their ass and battling like nobody's business over this.
And he had to bring her bad news one day and she lost her, you know what?
She lost it.
We're talking about two different types of temperament.
If you're talking about temperament and dealing with people and calling out somebody's ethnicity, who is a sitting joke?
What's the difference if she's been in the middle of the moment?
What I am hearing is that.
What is the difference if Dee Dee Meyers says she belittles people, smashes them down, that she jumps down people's throat, that she has a fierce and chilling temper, as George Stephanopoulos said.
What does that say about her?
We're talking about her.
We've talked about the judge issue now for five days.
You're talking about Dee Dee Myers saying something versus Hillary Clinton putting forth rhetoric on an international level that is viewed online and on television by the world.
And that's a very big difference.
The things that Donald Trump is saying and the things that he could encourage one to do in a court of law, for example, I mean, with what he's proposing about a bias from somebody who is Hispanic or somebody who's Muslim.
Well, wait a minute.
Wait a minute, Leslie.
Are you telling me that in the 1960s, for example, when African Americans, freedom riders, and that sort of thing were hauled before white segregationist judges, that the fact that they were white segregationists was not relevant?
Are you honestly, I mean, I'm sure there are African Americans offended by that, Jeffrey.
Are you honestly going to say that Donald Trump is in the same category as somebody in the civil rights movement?
No, no, no, no, no, don't change my words here.
I'm asking you if it's okay for people to suspect white segregationist judges in the 1960s, justifiably, I might add, why is it wrong now to do it with a different judge?
Well, I guess that's a woman who goes out of his way to identify a jury or a male judge.
If you're a Jewish judge or Jewish on the jury and somebody has Arab ethnicity who's standing before you for judgment, that's going to go out.
For crying out loud, how could you even have a criminal justice system with a judge and a jury in such a multicultural society as America today with that type of stimulus and witness tests?
If you are making a big point of your ethnicity on the bench, and this judge, not only was he doing that, but he belonged to a group that was the National Hispanic Bar Association, that a year ago put out a statement saying that they wanted to have a boycott of all of Donald Trump's properties.
Now, you can take a boycott as a good thing or a bad thing, and you can like Donald Trump or not like Donald Trump.
But for the judge to be a member of a group that is calling for a boycott of Donald Trump means he should be disqualified immediately from sitting on the case.
He's got a conflict of interest.
Jeffrey, you know that if you look at the Judicial Code of Conduct and the first being personal bias, that his ethnicity or membership in any of those groups isn't in the case of La Rasa means the race in the San Diego Lawyers La Rossa chapter does link to the national radical La Rasa group on their website.
And they, of course, believe that Astlen is the southwestern United States belonging to Mexico.
I wouldn't link such a website to my website, but you can judge it any way you want.
But I've got to let you both go because we're just out of time.
The California Supreme Court last year ruled that California, the judges in California, cannot belong to the Boy Scouts because they discriminate against gays.
So they do have rules about these kind of things.
Great point.
Jeffrey Lord gets this big star of the day.
Good point.
All right, Velma's standing by.
Velma sends me these nice texts out of nowhere.
She says, I just want you to know that me and the boys, my nephews, I adopted them, miss you.
I just want to say hi.
I just want you to know I'm praying for you.
She sends me these beautiful texts.
Well, Velma, you're so kind to me.
Why?
Because I love you.
You know what?
You're a wonderful man.
And you know what?
That's why I won't let anybody sit up and talk about you.
Well, hang on a second.
Now, all your friends at church don't like me, right?
And your husband doesn't like me.
Well, some of them.
Some of them.
Now, does your husband think that we're getting along?
They don't like you.
They don't agree with what you say.
Now, let me ask you a question.
Your husband doesn't like me.
Does he think like there's some hanky?
Hang on.
I want to ask you a question.
Does he think like there's some hanky-panky going on?
Because we have a very respectful relationship.
Very respectful.
That's why I know.
See, that's why nobody can tell me anything.
Because you've always been good to me.
I've come to some of your functions.
The people are wonderful.
I know, but your husband never comes.
You are a wonderful, wonderful man.
And nobody's going to sit up and, you know, your opinion, I may not agree with a lot of them, but I still love you.
Can I ask a question?
Why does your husband never come and meet me?
Because he just...
What?
That doesn't mean he doesn't care.
I mean, you guys.
Well, no.
Every time I've met you, every time I see my nephews, and I love those, those kids are amazing kids.
They are.
And they're so nice.
They give me a hug.
They love you.
Oh, God, they love you.
I always test them.
I'm like, all right, who's on the $100 bill?
If they get it right, they get $100.
Who's on the 50?
If they get it right, I give them a 50.
I ask him who's on the 20, they get a 20.
Who's on a 10?
Who's on a 5?
Who's on a 1?
Yeah, you question them.
Yeah, that's good.
And that's good, right?
Because I'm trying to help them.
And then I try and remember them at Christmas, right?
Right.
You're wonderful.
What more can I say?
Well, you could say, all right, you know what?
I'm going to vote for Donald Trump.
You can't make my husband do things that he don't want to do.
Who's in charge of that family for crying out loud?
Somebody's got to.
He is.
But you know what?
My husband's just liked her.
He just, he's a little different.
But I love him.
I mean, I adore him because he's a wonderful man, just like you are.
And he's good to me, and he's good to our children.
Yeah.
Well, I'd like to meet him one day.
But there's got to be something because every time I'm there, he doesn't.
I don't agree with a lot of things that you say.
So we don't have to talk about how bad Obama is.
I can tell him how great Trump is.
Look at you.
See, see how you do it.
You'll probably do it and won't even realize you're doing it.
Yeah.
Well.
Velma, we love you.
Kiss the kids.
Tell them their uncle Sean says hello.
All right, Velma.
God bless you.
Don't you think, Linda, that's strange?
I never meet the husband.
He never shows up.
I don't think he likes me.
And Velma.
He doesn't like you.
You think that's what it is?
She's a Christian woman.
She can't say that.
I'll tell you the truth.
But I mean, what does he think?
I mean, Velma's an older woman for crying out loud.
He thinks you're a loud talk radio host who is flirting with his wife and filling her ideas with ideas that she doesn't.
There's no flirting here.
We're just friends.
I just like her.
I didn't say you were flirting.
No, I'm not.
He obviously thinks she's the most wonderful woman in the world, so assumes that any man would.
Just a beautiful woman.
Velma.
Velma.
Larger than life.
Velma.
She's a lovely woman.
You've met her.
Everybody here has met her, but we never meet the husband.
It's almost like a.
The first time I met her, this is how I met her.
We were live on the air.
I get a text.
The text is, I have no idea what she's saying.
So call her.
It's her and her sister and the boys.
So where are you?
Linda, I don't know.
I'm on the avenue.
I'm like, Velma.
There's a lot of avenues.
A lot of avenues.
All I can tell you is it's busy and I just don't know where I am.
I'm like, oh, my God.
So I'm like, just get in a cab.
Well, you remember what I did?
I finally had to get her a driver for the weekend because it was becoming such a problem.
Every time we talked to her, and then she got mad at me because I couldn't go to the Yankee game with them because I had an event with my kids and she started getting mad at me.
But she's over that now.
Yeah, she's over that.
She knows you're super busy.
We love her.
All right.
Gail is in Galloway, New Jersey, listening to the all-new AM710, W-O-R, the Voice of New York and New Jersey.
Hi.
Hi, Sean.
This is Gail.
I heard you were talking about Laureate.
Yeah.
Walden University.
I am a victim of Walden University, and I want the world to hear my story.
Right.
I entered their doctorial program in 2001, got all the way to the dissertation phase, which was five dissertation courses.
They informed me I had no money that I could borrow, so I was just basically done.
I couldn't pay for that on my own, $15,000 just to do the dissertation.
Went away for a few months, came back.
They said, you can come back as a transfer student.
We'll give you nine credits.
Are you kidding me?
$100,000 in debt.
You want to give me nine credits?
And I keep telling them to this day, I'm not going away.
Tried to apply for readmission.
They denied.
Are you going to sue?
You're trying to sue?
I'm part of a group.
We're trying to do a class action suit.
We were involved with a group.
We had an individual representing us.
Case went to court.
From what I understand, it was dismissed.
We were told to sit quiet for a year.
No one ever told us what happened.
No one asked us for our input.
So now we're trying to draw some attention to Walden University and see if someone out there will step up, represent us, and help us get our money back.
I owe them $100,000.
I have a total debt, student-led debt, of $184,000 that I was.
Did you get the education you were promised?
No, I still don't have my Ph.D., and the only way I'll get one now is to go to another school and do another complete program.
Whoa, whoa, what about all the classes you completed?
Well, they've strung me along so long that classes are no good after a period of time.
What do you mean they're no good after a period of time?
You've done the job.
You've got the grade.
That works toward your degree.
A lot of people do degrees in the 10-year period of time because they're working people.
I assume you work, right?
I work, absolutely.
And how many years of your, how many more credits would you really need?
25 to do the dissertation and a two-week residency.
Okay, so you're fairly close to getting it done.
Well, they won't accept me back because they enrolled.
What?
They enrolled me in two dissertation classes, which I did not agree to, never went on the blackboard and participated.
So they gave me two F's, dropped my GPA, told me it was incumbent upon me to prove that I never went on the blackboard because they no longer have the records.
Well, no, it's incumbent upon them to prove that I did.
Oh, my gosh, I can't believe what I'm hearing here.
And I assume you got good grades, so this is not academically related, right?
No, it's because of these.
All right, I'm going to put you on hold.
We're now getting a whole group of these people that were victims.
When did you find out Bill Clinton got paid $16.5 million in four years for Laureate University?
A few days ago.
Wow.
You never knew, did you?
No, I did not.
Yeah.
All right.
Stay on the line, Gail.
Okay?
We're taking names, and we're going to do something with this.
You know why?
Because the mainstream media.
Oh, Trump University.
Trump University.
Well, what about the Clintons?
They're such phony hypocrites.
Oh, the New York Times.
We'll do a big story.
We'll interview Carrie Prayjan.
We'll interview the ex-girlfriend.
And meanwhile, both of them love Donald Trump and say they were misconstrued, purposely taken out of context by the New York Times.
And the same New York Times ignores Juanita and Kathleen and Dolly, Kyle, and Paula Jones.
Unbelievable.
All right.
I'm sorry, Gail.
Nobody should have to go through that.
That's terrible.
Back to our phones.
Emily is in New York, also listening to the all-new AM710 WOR in New York.
Hi.
Hi, Sean.
How are you?
It's such an honor to speak to you.
I watch your show every night.
What's going on?
Sure, listen.
I'm a regular ordinary person.
I'm a mom, a wife, a grandma, a nurse, and watching your show, listening to Hillary, watching Mr. Trump.
I don't know where America has gone.
The world is on fire.
We have ISIS.
We have radical Islam.
We have Barack Hussein making deals with a country that shouts death to America.
Where is the American man?
Where is America to stand up to this?
He's broken all the morals, the values.
He's breaking down spirituality of America with all his evil deeds.
And now we have Hillary saying she's going to continue.
She's going to continue the legacy of Barack Hussein.
Why do I want that as an ordinary person?
I watch him on TV.
He says there's not a smidgen of scandal.
Then I sit there listening and I think to myself, Lois Lerner pleading the fifth, the VA scandal, fast and furious.
And Hillary has the blood of Americans on her hands.
Why don't the liberals see this?
I don't understand.
When I go to work, Sean, I work among all liberals.
I'm one of none of these.
These people, they don't understand it.
Like, I would rather stand by myself, and I tell them this: I would rather stand by myself than stand with Whoopi Goldberg, Black Lives Matter, Michael Moore, Al Sharpton.
I would rather stand by myself for this country, for this America that I love so much.
And the liberals keep spinning, spinning stories.
The only place I hear the truth is from you.
I appreciate your kind words.
Your voice means so much to America.
Your voice means so much.
You have to, you know, I know that it's probably hard for you.
You're, you know, with your family, but your voice, you have to, your love for America.
And I stand with Mr. Trump.
I stand with Mr. McCray.
I got to say this because we're running out of time, but I've got to say this to you.
The only motivation I have here is I want the country to get back on track.
I want people to be able to get jobs.
I want people to be able to buy nice homes, live in safe neighborhoods, have a nice car, take care of their children, and have a nice, happy, safe, productive life.
That's what I'm looking for.
Government is now an obstacle for literally tens and tens and tens of millions of people.
Sad.
Anyway, thank you so much, Emily.
Export Selection