Stay Free - Russel Brand - Shooting RAMPAGE In NYC + Trump HUMILIATES Starmer During UK Visit - SF622

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 29, 2025 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:12:24

Shooting RAMPAGE In NYC + Trump HUMILIATES Starmer During UK Visit - SF622

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Because the challenge is that people have an appetite for freedom and for radical change.
	Trump's visit to the UK has highlighted that.
	Hey, thanks, Tim Cast, for the raid.
	Thanks, Mug Club, for the raid.
	Assuming that we've had one, we'll be with you for the next hour talking about issues that matter to you and as freely and as openly as can only be afforded by Rumble.
	If you're watching us on YouTube or X, join us on Rumble.
	And if you ain't got Rumble Premium yet, get it now.
	So that you get additional content from me, Glenn Green, Wold Crowder, Tim Paul, Kim Iverson, a whole host of people, Dave Rubin.
	And I feel like he goes on a long holiday in August.
	You're right there, beloved Jake?
	I'm doing so good.
	We're going to do a live show later on today at a secret and undisclosed location as we move into a new era ourselves.
	I'm joined also by beloved Isaac.
	You okay?
	Are you all right?
	Everything okay?
	Yeah, good.
	Okay, well, it seems like we're in fine spirits.
	Let's address the issues of the United Kingdom.
	Is the UK officially a police state?
	And how does a police state deal with a figure that some regard as the ultimate authoritarian and others as a symbol of living freedom?
	Let's have a look.
	So the Labour Party support for VPN restrictions after Online Safety Act fail.
	The government in the UK are thinking of banning VPNs.
	Let me know what you think about that.
	Let's have a look at some of the other countries that have banned VPNs over the years.
	North Korea, Belarus, Turkmenistan, Iran and Iraq.
	Hmm.
	Interesting.
	Interesting.
	This is Rob Moore on the UK.
	Britain is now a police state and no one's talking about it.
	The online safety bill is anything but safe.
	It's a Trojan horse for mass surveillance.
	Here's how the UK spies on you right now.
	Every phone call, text and email can be stored under the Investigatory Powers Act.
	Your browsing history is safe for at least a year, even if you've done nothing wrong.
	Your location is constantly tracked by your mobile provider, your mobile phone provider, cell phone in your language.
	Face recognition cameras are everywhere without your consent.
	Smart TVs and devices are listening.
	Your social media posts are scraped, analyzed and fed to algorithms.
	Banks are now being asked to flag unusual transactions.
	Even buying gold or crypto apps like WhatsApp could be forced to break encryption for your protection.
	The government demand access to your private messages without telling you.
	How extraordinary.
	It's the perfect time for Donald Trump to be visiting the UK.
	And it's been an extraordinary, and for the leader of the UK, embarrassing visit.
	Here are some of the highlights of his recent press conference with Keir Starmer, where Trump in customary fashion is able to demonstrate pretty primitive power dynamic moves that are kind of enjoyable for those of us that have got some kind of grievance against Keir Starmer.
	Let's get into it.
	The BBC, of course, the propaganda state-funded, tax-funded media unit within the UK, extracted all of the embarrassing moments that came up during their press conference between Trump and Starma.
	And therefore, I guess it was pretty short.
	Just watch the BBC, says Lee Harris, on X. They left out everything that embarrassed Starmer.
	And my word, there was a lot.
	Some people have noticed that even though Trump is visiting the UK, it somehow seemed like Trump was welcoming Starmer.
	How can that happen?
	Would that have happened under Churchill?
	I very much doubt it.
	He's got bagpipes.
	He's got himself a house.
	Here are some of my favourite moments from the conversation.
	He talks about Sadiq Khan, who's the mayor of London, who previously, a few years ago and when Trump was making a visit, I think during his 2016 presidency term, the term in which he was elected in 2016.
	And I feel like Sadiq Khan participated in protests in which a giant inflatable Trump baby was floated above London as part of a kind of present ridicule device for his visit.
	Now though, crowds have turned up in London to welcome Trump.
	No one's pretending Trump's not a divisive figure and that loads of people in the UK, whether they're from the left or whether they believe in progressive identity politics, despair of Donald Trump.
	You know that my own affection for Donald Trump is born of the fact that he opposes many ideas that I myself and I feel like you are opposed to.
	Manipulative media, centralized control.
	And whilst now we have Trump in power, there are a lot of questions being asked.
	We'll be answering some of them over the course of this conversation.
	And if you want a comparison to clinically trial against Trump, you don't need to look any further than the UK where rampant authoritarianism dressed as concern and compassion is at an all-time high, the online safety bill being but one example.
	In order to protect you, in order to protect children, we're going to monitor you, spy on you and censor you.
	And with people being arrested and even incarcerated for free speech crimes, we know that the UK government are serious on clamping down on freedom, not threats to children.
	Let's have a look at this moment where Trump interrupts Kiostama in a forthright manner.
	You mentioned Canada.
	I think you're trying to find a divide between us that doesn't exist.
	We're the closest of nations and we had very good discussions today, but we didn't know Canada.
	Thank you.
	Please.
	Go ahead.
	Go ahead.
	Yes.
	Well, that's amazing.
	He doesn't like him.
	He sort of personally doesn't like him.
	That was very simian, wasn't it?
	That interjection, that was like apes quarreling over a piece of fruit.
	Let's have a look at this moment here where Kierstalma tries to interject with the claim that Britain is a forbear and bastion of free speech.
	The forms of free speech then?
	Well, free speech is very important.
	I don't know if you're referring to any place in particular.
	Perhaps they are, but we've had free speech For a very, very long time here, so we're very proud of that.
	Nothing to worry about when it comes to little free speech.
	I've been free speaking all morning, I've free speaked my way here, I've been free speaking at the podium, I'll have a little free speech chin wag.
	Trump interjects on the subject of online censorship with particular regard to his own site, Truth Social.
	You have a successful social media site.
	There are new powers here to censor your site, state-mandated.
	I mean, truth.
	Is that okay?
	I don't think he's going to censor my site because they say only good things that you please and censor my sake.
	We're not censoring anyone.
	We've got some measures which are there to protect children.
	We've got measures.
	They're there to protect children.
	You've got to protect them.
	Kids are going on Truth Social day and night, being confronted with pictures of winky woos, bottoms, titty boobs.
	I think I saw a dick bird there last Wednesday.
	We've got to protect these poor children.
	And in order to protect children, you've got to flood the place with undocumented migrants.
	You've got to arrest everyone.
	You've got to allow water companies to pollute the very water that they're charged with regulating and providing to the British public.
	All these things are required to protect children.
	Also, an injunction that I've placed on the British media.
	That's to protect children as well.
	And it's got nothing, and I can't say this clearly enough, nothing to do with Ukrainian models that firebomb my house.
	Why do people keep talking about those Ukrainian models that firebomb my house?
	I'll firebomb you.
	Do you want a tough guy?
	I'll firebomb you up.
	The Jax Jones, I will.
	I'll firebomb you up of your pip squeaks.
	You'll get what's coming to you, Trumpkin.
	In particular, from sites like suicide sites.
	We've had too many cases in the United Kingdom of young children taking their own lives.
	And when you look through their social media, they've been accessing.
	Do you know how this works?
	This is how it works.
	They have to legitimize new online safety measures or control measures.
	They need the ability to censor.
	And this kind of conversation will take place.
	Wow.
	How are we going to legitimize censoring people when the technology affords immediate, instantaneous, global communication?
	Which is a massive problem for us because control of information and power equate to the same thing.
	If you can't control information, you can't consolidate power unless you are governing truly by consent and you have an electorate or population that broadly supports you.
	We don't have that in the UK.
	We need to control information.
	How are we going to legitimately do that?
	What if we tell people it's to protect children?
	No, they won't be stupid enough to believe that.
	No, come on.
	What we'll do is we'll have a spate of media stories seeded by our compliant partners in media about child suicide, child pornography or anything to do with the protection of children.
	And then what we'll do is we'll exploit people's natural tendency to want to protect children in order to get them to bow down to our power.
	Do you not see the ingenuity of it?
	We don't have to tell them we're doing it to consolidate power that you would never consent to if you understood its true corrupt nature.
	If they found that out, they would disobey.
	They would rise up.
	Let's tell them that if they don't agree with this bill, it's tantamount to not protecting their children.
	We can turn those instincts against them.
	Don't you see the ingenuity?
	These conversations take place.
	That's why marketing trends alter in alignment with political trends and cultural trends.
	You know, I prefer an advertisement for American Eagle that has Sidney Sweeney in it than one that doesn't.
	But I won't make the mistake of thinking that American Eagle or any other corporation are my friend, they exist to sell you a product and they'll sell you a product any way they can.
	You might consider that less nefarious than a government selling you an idea that is detrimental to your well-being and your understanding of reality.
	And you would be right.
	Of course, the UK government selling you an online safety act inverting commas when in fact it's a censorship bill is much worse than any number of corporations that will one minute have a gay flag on their logo, one minute have a Black Lives Matter logo, another minute support Ukraine, another moment support Palestine, another minute support Israel.
	They don't care about any of it.
	Why should they care about any of it though?
	They're not governments.
	They're selling products.
	And it's our obligation and duty to separate our loyalty and fealty from people and places that we actually love, from a bunch of brands that are selling us products and a bunch of governments that are there to simply control you.
	They don't care if you live or die.
	All they care about is whether or not they can control you.
	That's just what I think though.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
	And this is another example of why I prefer Donald Trump over other politicians while acknowledging that Donald Trump is pretty far from perfect and as long as he's existing within corrupt institutions and systems, he'll continue to ultimately follow the flow and patterns of other powerful patriarchal figures and political leaders.
	The reason I like him is because you're not going to get Joe Biden or Kamala Harris going and digging Keir Starmer out live on your TV set for perfect amusement.
	You're not going to get your X feed lit up with moments of like Keir Starmer squirming around like someone who's got some sort of hemorrhoid condition induced by Lord alone knows what.
	Let's get back to it.
	Sites which talk about suicide and you know encouraging, if you like, children down that road.
	And that is what we want to stop.
	Nothing about censoring free speech.
	Joining us from Mud Club, welcome.
	Thanks Stephen Crowder and all you guys over at Mud Club.
	If you're watching us anywhere other than Rumble, make your way over.
	We're speaking freely about what the encounter between Trump and Keir Starmer demonstrates.
	Firstly, what it demonstrates is Kier Starmer is not a person that should be in a position of leadership unless you think people in positions of leadership should be utterly malleable servants of global imperialist systems of total control that ultimately don't care about democratic sovereignty.
	He is not the prime minister of the UK.
	He is a WEF, WHO, NATO, UN, even EU in spite of Brexit stooge.
	That's just what I think though.
	Let me know what you think in the comments.
	That treats all adults like that.
	This country isn't proud.
	That can treat all adults like that.
	Free speech in this country has been for a very long time.
	We're very, very proud of it.
	We've got so much free speech.
	How many times do I have to tell you we've got free speech?
	Why are these people keep getting jailed for saying stuff like I'm concerned about migration?
	Because that's not bloody well very free at all, is it?
	Like you are free to say anything that falls within the parameters and paradigm of their preferences.
	If you start talking outside of that, if you start communicating ideas that are detrimental to the hegemony of these systems of power in the UK, you will learn fast that your speech ain't free.
	And they'll do whatever it takes to prohibit, inhibit, and delete your ability to openly communicate.
	I know this from some personal experience.
	And we're very, very proud of it.
	We will protect it forever.
	But at the same time, I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers.
	And that's what it usually is from things.
	I want to protect the old young teenagers.
	I see myself a young teenager just earlier.
	I thought I'd better protect it.
	Here it goes.
	Look, it might fall in the ditch.
	Oh no.
	Oh, Christ, it's going to kill itself, that poor little young teenager.
	Who among us, after living through COVID, or the phony wars, or the constant taxation, or the manipulative and mind-dulling media, believes that these people have anything other than their own concerns, front and center, like a ridiculous erection that they ludicrously worship?
	They don't care about you.
	You know that.
	How can you keep, how can we keep entering into their ludicrous illusions?
	We can't get it.
	It's from things like suicide sites.
	I don't see that as a free speech issue.
	I see that as a child protection.
	We actually passed a bill in Congress headed up by my wife, actually, which was to pull bad stuff out having to do with children because it is a problem.
	But I cannot imagine him censoring the truth.
	So this is very political and it's been a very big success.
	It's not going to happen.
	And I only say good things about him and his country, so if they censor me, you're making a mistake.
	Give my ambassador the job, make sure it's not successful.
	I had imagine his little sweaty bottom as he just sits in that armchair, squirming and a sweating, fretting and a panicking, knowing that the truth is coming for him.
	How would you deal with it?
	What's your advice on dealing with a small boat crisis in this country?
	The small boats crisis coming over the channel, so we're taking a lot of action to stop people coming over the channel who should taking a lot of action to stop people coming over the channel.
	Look at the dynamic.
	Look at how ultimately the true dynamic has asserted itself.
	Starmer, bureaucrat, middle management figure, apparently rather impressive when he was head of the CPS, although they didn't do a great deal to help Jimmy.
	They didn't do a great deal to protect Julian Assange and they didn't do a great deal to prosecute Jimmy Savile, the rampant, paedophile, and apparent servant of the elite.
	Extraordinary that that took place under Keir Starmer's watch.
	Here, he is returned to his rightful position as a kind of acolyte and underling of someone like Trump who, whether you like him or not, emanates a kind of chief power.
	The child who shouldn't be here, stopping them coming in the first place.
	Well, immigration is a big factor.
	And I think, frankly, if they're coming from other countries and you don't know who they are, are they coming from prisons?
	We have them where they came in from prisons.
	We're moving them all out.
	We had a border last June, just recent, you know, last month.
	We had zero people come into the country, zero, other than come in through legal means.
	The subject of immigration remains a contentious one because arguments can certainly be made that as one global human family we have an obligation to care for and love one another.
	I think it's ridiculous that that claim is made though by governments that plainly exist in order to control and exploit and perpetuate their own power, which they'll do however they can.
	What's not contentious is that you need food to live and in order to have food you need farmers unless we of course kowtow to Bill Gates who would have us eaten near plastic lab grown flesh.
	But for now at least we need farmers to feed ourselves and across Europe and across the world there seems to be an attempt to centralize control over agriculture and to break the spirits of the farming community in my country I'm talking about and to destroy their ability to operate through various taxation methods and apparent climate change control initiatives that don't seem to do a great deal to protect or preserve or help the planet but do a lot to disempower farmers.
	That subject came up as well during Star Martin Trump's set of public appearances that accompany his visit to the UK.
	What's fascinating about this is the same way that during the Canadian trucker protests we were invited to assume that truck drivers in Canada had all become mad, giddy, hopeless, Nazi racists.
	In the UK at the moment we have to engineer our internal feelings of hatred against farmers not to acknowledge that what's happening is part of a globalist decree to control food.
	It's important I reckon that we are able to keep a macro perspective on these geopolitical and global themes like control, centralized bureaucratic control and distraction from the efforts to achieve that control, as well as the sort of more amusing dynamics between Trump and Starma.
	Here the subject of agriculture and the agricultural protests come up.
	Let's have a look.
	We have a lot of unhappy.
	Who are you with?
	Because you're asking such nice question.
	GB News, Bev Turner from GB News.
	We have a lot of unhappy farmers in this country at the moment and I'm sure the Prime Minister won't thank me for raising this.
	We've had changes to inheritance tax which means a lot of farmers feel they're going to lose their farms when they die or their father dies.
	How important are farmers to a country?
	They're going to lose the farm because of the state taxes.
	Correct.
	So when they die pay so much the cash for what they have to pay for.
	A lot of people I like the more conservative.
	So I did something that I don't know if you can do, but it was great.
	I love our farms.
	As you know, in our tax bill, we have a clause that's very important.
	Somebody, please ask Jar Rule.
	That's good.
	That's a comment in the Rumble chat.
	If you're watching this anywhere other than Rumble, join us over on Rumble if you're an ex or if you're on YouTube, we're looking at Donald Trump's visit to my country, the UK, and the embarrassing collision of ideas that has emerged.
	How do you feel about nativism, patriotism, America first, UK first?
	Certainly there's a resurgence in national pride and patriotism that I suppose is an understandable response to globalism and the kind of boring, tedious bureaucratic tyranny that it engendered all the while they're telling you that they care about you, that they're here to protect you, whether that's the online safety bill or the way they handled COVID or the way they handle migration.
	Increasingly, people are rejecting those ideas, thankfully.
	One of the most interesting moments to emerge from these set of public appearances was their discussion about Sadiq Khan, who's the current mayor of London, who Kiestama says is a personal friend of his, which is interesting actually.
	Donald Trump, though, he didn't like Sadiq Khan because Sidiq Khan participated in a bunch of protests last time Trump was in office.
	So that subject came up.
	Here's how they handled it.
	Let's check it out.
	Will you visit London during the state business?
	I will.
	I'm not a fan of your mayor.
	Why not?
	I think he's done a terrible job.
	The mayor of London, but the nasty person.
	I think he's a friend of mine, Russian.
	No, I think he's done a terrible job.
	But I would certainly visit London.
	Oh, dear.
	It's so awkward and embarrassing.
	It's difficult not to feel some compassion for Keir Starmer when you see his ineptitude and inability to deal with the easy intensity of Donald Trump.
	Keir Starmer, I suppose, the reason that I feel not animosity towards him, but steep cynicism, is because I know that while he was at the CPS, he could have intervened when it came to the various forms of incarceration pertaining to Julian Assange there, who was holed up in an embassy for five years and then Belmarsh for five years without trial, simply because he revealed embarrassing secrets about both the United States government and the UK government.
	And always, really, it comes down to the machinery behind what we regard as power, a mere edifice with interchangeable figures like Keir Starmer at their forefront.
	And it's interesting for me to see Kiostama exposed to the awkwardness that comes when you're around someone who handles power rather than rather better than he does.
	Ceno Frias, do you feel like he's a WEF puppet?
	You're asking that about Kierstama, of course.
	Well, he did say that he preferred Davos, the home of the WEF, to Westminster, the home of the British government.
	And we're in a really unique and interesting moment in British power and British politics because we have an unpopular government with no election coming, not for a couple of years, unless they call a snap, urgent or early one.
	We have the rise of Nigel Farage and reform.
	I think more importantly than that, we have a sense in the UK that neither of these political movements, the left or right, are going to lead to anything other than the further ossification of old establishment power.
	People want something new.
	And peculiarly, that might mean something arcane, something deep and old, a return to God, a return to Christ.
	Certainly there's signs of a revival in the UK, people going to Roman Catholic churches and Pentecostal churches and abandoning the false belief that worldliness can fulfill you.
	In a way, I always felt that Trump was a kind of figure that was born out of the tides of time.
	He showed us where American culture is.
	He showed us that the collision of entertainment and politics and commerce was always going to create someone that had chops in all three of those areas, a perfect orator and creature for his time.
	Similarly, Keir Starmer, this grey and somewhat tepid bureaucratic figure, tells you where British power is and where British politics are.
	Having crushed Jeremy Corbyn and a left-wing movement that was somewhat populist and certainly authentic, the left doesn't know what it is other than a bureaucratic servant of global imperial power.
	The right under Boris Johnson fell apart while in office and will likely ultimately end up being claimed by Nigel Farage.
	I presume Reform and the Conservative Party will align and mesh at some point, I guess.
	I mean, I don't know.
	I'm no expert in this.
	But whatever outcome we receive through the current conduits of power, it will amount to more of the same unless we're willing to confront the systems and institutions of power themselves.
	I wonder how you, my beloved friends here in America, feel about the ongoing cynicism from the left and media institutions about Trump and how that is facilitated further by the failure to release the Epstein files or the ongoing wars or what seems to be a kind of inertia in global politics that's very difficult to interrupt.
	We'll be talking about that in more length later, but for now, on Trump's visit to the UK, it's pretty clear that what it does is exposes the unpopularity of Keir Starmer, the failure of contemporary bureaucracies when it comes to dealing with the complexity of migration, new media and censorship, and ultimately that the British people need at least an election and potentially a revolution.
	But that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
	Before we proceed with the terrible shooting story in New York, we're going to have a quick word from one of our partners.
	See you in a second.
	The world is divided socially, politically, culturally, economically, maybe even in your own genitalia.
	If you're Bruce de Mac Quran, we need to understand the financial markets.
	We've been lied to.
	We've been distracted.
	We've been controlled.
	If you know me, you know I don't understand finance, Bitcoin.
	I don't understand cryptocurrencies.
	I don't understand the Federal Reserve.
	I don't understand the deficit.
	I didn't understand the 2008 global crash where they bundled together subprime mortgages to exploit the ordinary people of America.
	A crime that has still not seen anybody arrested or charged.
	What I do know, though, is that there are ways that Robin Hood organizations can get together to empower you to make sensible investment now.
	And that's where Allio Capital comes in.
	Wouldn't it be great if there was an investment app that was designed by people that understand a macro perspective and how global events affect your finances?
	Yes, please.
	Now you can have the power in the palm of your hand with the Allio Capital app powered by Altitude AI, which identifies shifts in inflation, interest rates, and global risk, then adapts portfolios in real time.
	Alio is designed for hands-on or hands-off investors.
	Macro investing for people who want to understand the big picture.
	Download their app in the app store or at Google Play or text my name, Russell.
	This is the simplest one.
	If you're like me and you don't understand technology and you want to be stinking rich and you want to take advantage of Alio app, text my name, that's Russell, R-U-S-E-L-L.
	See it now on the screen, to 511511.
	Download the Alio app or text Russell to 511-511 today.
	Investing involves risks.
	Of course it does.
	Everything involves risks, including the potential loss of printable.
	What?
	You won't catch me losing mine, baby.
	Past performance does not guarantee results.
	See terms and conditions.
	Tax fees may apply.
	This is a paid advertisement for Alio Capital.
	Alio Capital, making investment easy for people like me who just don't have the time to be a George Soros or a Warren Buffett or any of them guys, but would still like to be stinking rich.
	So text my name to 511-511 and join the Alio Revolution.
	All right, you lot.
	Let's tackle this rather challenging and sad story about these murders in New York.
	Let's have a look at what the legacy media are saying about it.
	Shimoni, you hear John's reporting that they do know what he looks like.
	Male, possibly white, mustache, sunglasses in that building, isolated to, they believe, to various locations, including upper floors is where they're focused.
	What are you learning, Simone?
	Okay, some people are comparing it to the Mangioni, Luigi Mangioni murders in that it seems to be an ideologically motivated and targeted attempt at terror rather than the old school sort of mass shootings, sadly often take place often at schools.
	The gunman was apparently targeting the NFL offices and went to the wrong location, some people are saying.
	Although I thought that where he ended up had a bunch of like sort of global corporate entities in it.
	Let's have a look at, yeah, I guess you lot are interested because it's just talking about race.
	And you've noticed probably that the legacy media don't report on the racial identity of an assailant if he's not white.
	Let's get into that.
	Let's have a look at this piece of legacy media reporting.
	Back to that national news as the investigation into the deadly shooting continues in New York City.
	Yeah, police say four people, including an NYPD officer, were shot and killed.
	Another was hurt when a man opened fire inside of a Manhattan office building.
	CBS News correspondent Bradley Blackburn joining us live now from the scene.
	It's actually, we should say Bradley Whiteburn because, you know, it's racist otherwise.
	Live now from the scene.
	Bradley, we've seen videos now of police in Las Vegas searching the suspect's home.
	Since we last talked to you, are we hearing anything new about a possible motive?
	Alona Jacob, we know from New York City's mayor that this suspect, this shooter, was found with a note yesterday where he blamed the attack on his belief that he had CTE, the brain condition that we have seen in some NFL players.
	He claimed he was suffering from that and that he blamed the NFL for it.
	The NFL, one of the companies headquartered in this Midtown building, there is evidence that this shooter was a standout high school player, but no evidence that he ever attempted to play for the NFL or had an NFL career.
	But certainly authorities are looking at all the details here to get a more complete picture of why this shooter came here and what was driving him.
	And the NFL overnight said they are stepping up security, even though officials say that this was a lone wolf attack and there's no ongoing threat to the public.
	Wow, and he drove cross-country to get there, too.
	Okay, Bradley, what do we know about the victims of the shooting?
	We are learning more about these four victims, including one who is a Blackstone employee.
	That company confirming that this morning.
	And we're also learning more about the NYPD officer who was shot and killed, Officer Diderel Islam.
	He's a 36-year-old man, a three-and-a-half-year veteran of the force, Jacob.
	And the mayor praised him overnight, said he was defending the city when this happened.
	And we have learned that he was a married father of two young boys, and his wife is now expecting their third child.
	So she is among the many families that are grieving this morning, Jacob.
	Wow.
	Heartbreaking to hear those details.
	And Bradley, earlier this morning you told us that, you know, this morning, of course, it's New York.
	We see everybody going about their business as usual.
	Some employees were returning to office buildings there in Midtown.
	Did they seem at all concerned about returning to work today?
	Ilona, it's striking that just around here it's business as usual in some senses.
	There's a lot of traffic on the streets.
	The sidewalks are open.
	People are returning to the office buildings here.
	But we also know that it wasn't just this building that was affected yesterday.
	Multiple buildings in this area were locked down for hours.
	So this was a traumatic experience for thousands and thousands of Midtown office workers.
	This is one of the busiest office sectors in the entire country.
	And we know that in some cases companies are telling their employees to work from home or take the day off today as this whole city grapples with this tragic event.
	We can only imagine.
	Thank you so much.
	Okay, well we don't really want to contribute to the politicization of this sad shooting.
	Unheard have commented that already the tragedy is being used to discredit Mamdani's mayoral beard.
	Can somebody in Uganda please wake Zoran up?
	A copy is dead, tweeted the Fox News writer David Marcus, referring to Mamdani's trip to his land of birth to celebrate his wedding in 2020.
	Mamdani called for the defunding of the police.
	All right, let's have a look at, I suppose, for a minute, let's pay attention to the ongoing and potentially pivotal Epstein files.
	You know, in spite of Trump's entreaty that we forget about it and it don't matter, people are still pretty interested, as we've said on this show before, because it forms a kind of locus of how deep state power might operate.
	Are there sets of individuals that have been blackmailed, shamed, I suppose is the word, through sexual conduct that's been recorded or otherwise documented that subsequently used against them?
	I guess that's what most people think that the Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case refers to and points to, and unless we find a way of dealing with our shame, our sin, and brokenness, these kind of levers will be used against corrupted and corruptible human beings who are all fallen and broken, if you ask me.
	Trump's answered a bunch of questions on the subject, but I'm pretty interested to see that Joe Rogan said that he knew that Cash Patel was lying on the subject of Epstein when he was on the Joe Rogan podcast.
	Let's have a look at Rogan's testimony, give the word, here, and then we'll look at what Trump said in a recent conversation where he answered a load of questions on the subject.
	The Epstein stuff is so crazy because when Cash Patel was on here and he was like, there's nothing.
	And I was like, what are you talking about?
	I didn't even know what to say.
	My thought was, and people are like, why didn't you push back more?
	My thought was like, I'm just going to put this out there and let the internet do its work because there's nothing I could.
	The guy's saying there's no tapes, there's no video.
	That doesn't make any sense.
	Everyone knows it doesn't make any sense.
	Let's just, and then he didn't know about the Michael Badden stuff, the autopsy stuff, where it showed that he had three broken bones in his neck, which never happens when you hang yourself.
	Even when you like leap from somewhere with a rope around your neck and it snaps your neck, you never have three broken bones.
	He's not launching himself off the first floor balcony.
	Okay, let's see what.
	So like Joe Rogan continues to point out that there are pretty glaring inconsistencies when it comes to this Epstein case.
	And I often feel like when something don't make sense is because there's a concealed iceberg of data that without the revelation thereof, it will continue to be a sort of a blunt, sort of a muddled and confusing story.
	I remember there's a bunch of high-profile stories, in fact, all of them.
	That whole category of conspiracy theory stories, whether it's 9-11, the murder of JFK, the handling of COVID, UFOs, the Clintons and all the suicides, the reason there are these anomalies is because there's a big concealed set of facts that were they revealed, oh, it would all make sense.
	And I guess that's the case in this, the sort of conspiracy theory de l'éjour, the defining conspiracy theory of the Trump era.
	And the reason it's become so important is because it suggests that whether or not you vote for a populist and powerful and well-supported leader like Donald Trump, you still have an avenue of institutional powers that you cannot access.
	And I think that's really frustrating for a lot of people.
	All the more so after how, like, you know, we covered the Bongino story the other day when you get sort of weird cryptic posts where someone like Bongino has lived in both worlds.
	This world of spread stay free, free speech, contemporary independent media, and now is within them institutions of power, and he seemingly is stymied by the same interests and limitations.
	And I suppose what that does is it makes you wonder if the appointment of Dan Bongino was a kind of tactical appointment, you know, precisely for that reason.
	Let's have a look, you know, because he's credible.
	Let's have a look at Trump building a bunch of questions.
	If you're watching this on YouTube, click the link in the description.
	We can't speak this freely on YouTube, who are themselves avowed members of the trusted news initiative organisation that are align when it comes to reporting on a story.
	Whenever you see a news story reported on in unison by a variety of outlets, it's likely been through that filter.
	Facebook, YouTube, the BBC, the New York Times, they're all part of this kind of cartel of media outlets that have definitely got skin in the game when it comes to reporting on independent media.
	Of course, they want more censorship because it will benefit them because the rise of independent media is in part as a result of the unwillingness of central media organisations to report openly on complex news stories, indeed, like the Epstein files.
	So if you've been paying attention to someone like Whitney Webb, who has been honest and candid and intrepid, reporting with brilliant detail, speaking to witnesses and victims, then you'll be well informed when it comes to the Epstein files.
	And you'll know that there's a requirement for independent media and there's a requirement to oppose censorship in all its forms.
	CNO3, I trust only you, Russell.
	Thank you very much.
	I am, like you, a broken person, doing my best.
	You can rely on me when I'm in Christ, when I'm outside of Christ.
	I'm just a poor, reckless, selfish sinner.
	Let's have a look at Donald Trump answering these questions about Epstein.
	The whole thing is nuts.
	And then he's like, well, we have a film.
	Wait a minute.
	Or your name has not appeared in the Epstein files.
	But doesn't the AG have to tell you if your name is appearing.
	Well, I haven't been overly interested in it.
	You know, it's something, it's a hoax that's been built up way beyond proportion.
	I can say this.
	Those files were run by the worst scum on earth.
	They were run by Comey.
	They were run by Garland.
	They were run by Biden and all of the people that actually ran the government, including the Autopen.
	Those files were run for four years by those people.
	If they had anything, I assume they would have released it.
	The whole thing is a hoax.
	They ran the files.
	I was running against somebody that ran the files.
	If they had something, they would have released.
	Now, they can easily put something in the files that's a phony.
	Like, as an example, Christopher Steele, a person you know well, happens to be from your country.
	But Christopher Steele, as an example, wrote a book, a dossier.
	We call it the fake news dossier.
	And the whole thing was a fake.
	The whole thing was a fake.
	They can put things in the file that are fake.
	But those files were run by bad, sick people.
	If they had anything, why didn't they use it when I was killing Joe and that he gave out because he was 25 points down?
	And then I got somebody new.
	Nobody even knew anything about her.
	She was a horrible vice president.
	She was a border czar, but she never went to the border.
	She never once called the border patrol agent to find out how we're done.
	But she was the border czar.
	Her name was Kamala.
	Nobody knows her last name.
	It was Harris.
	But nobody knew her last name.
	So I ended up, how would you like to end up in a race where you're killing somebody?
	You're beating them.
	And then they say, all right, well, take him out.
	He's not worth it.
	What does he say?
	Like, Kamala Harris's name's not Kamala Harris.
	It's just the way that he says stuff is so funny.
	he's also changed the subject.
	We're talking about the border now.
	Kamala Harris's surname.
	It's pretty funny.
	No one like him.
	No one like him.
	He's, yeah, this is the communicator and leader of our time.
	Take him out.
	He's not working.
	Let's put somebody else.
	And then she had a six-week honeymoon.
	It was amazing.
	They predicted she will have a six-week honeymoon, and she did.
	And then she got slaughtered.
	But think of it.
	Those files were run by these people.
	They were run by my enemy.
	If there was anything in there, they would have used them for the election.
	Yeah.
	That sort of makes sense, unless it was also so detrimental to them, because you've got to assume, you know, some of them legacy names from the Democrats are going to be all over it.
	What do you reckon?
	Tell us.
	I personally feel like Donal Trump probably had sex with loads and loads of women.
	I think paedophiles are pretty rare.
	It's pretty niche to be down with underage sex.
	And it seems more likely that the people that pose as morally unimpeachable are the ones that you want to look at when it comes to the filthy, nefarious, devil-worshipping paedophilians.
	Just what I think, though.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
	Certainly, if you're in the UK, you are going to be protected to within an inch of your life because new elite police squads are being set up to protect you.
	What from?
	Them?
	No, not them.
	From, I don't know, paedophiles and to protect your children.
	Hmm, odd that we need this cartel of paedophiles to protect us from paedophiles.
	Extraordinary.
	Let's get into it.
	But first, a quick message from one of our partners.
	Whoever you are, you might consider yourself a businessman or woman or person, or I don't know, maybe you don't have a gender or don't want one.
	That's not the key issue here, though.
	The key issue is 1775, a delicious coffee.
	Let's be honest, most coffee, all it does is it helps you to organize a stool in that inward back pocket you call the butt.
	What does it also do?
	It leaves you feeling all down, jittery, foggy, and needing another cup of coffee.
	You can only trust 1775, the one true coffee of revolution.
	Rejuvenate coffee is science-backed coffee.
	Coffee backed by science.
	And not Anthony Fauci's sad.
	Oh, I made up some sad stuff.
	I was giving people AIDS.
	Oh, I've got a beagle in a cage.
	I put my fingers up their butt.
	That is something Anthony Fauci has admitted to.
	Have you read the real Anthony Fauci by Bobby Kennedy?
	It's understood that Anthony Fauci.
	He keeps beagles in his yard and he puts stuff up their butt, makes shit all over the cage.
	Fauci doesn't care.
	He makes them wallow in it.
	Anthony Fauci cannot be trusted, but rejuvenate science-backed coffee can.
	It's real Arabica beads.
	Araba cadabra, I say, because it makes me feel absolutely magic.
	It's infused with C-A-A-K-G, which is kind of like a rifle, you know, like an assault rifle, but it's assault in your central nervous system with delicious beans, Bebe.
	A compound shown to support cellular energy, metabolism, and even healthy aging.
	You don't want to sit deteriorating in a chair, shitting yourself, drinking Starbucks.
	You need rejuvenation.
	It's built for people who take their health seriously, who want to show up with focus and strength every single day, like me.
	If you care about how you feel now and how you'll feel 10 years from now, this is your coffee.
	Go to soundnycetafacoffee.com forward slash me probably and order rejuvenate coffee today.
	Fuel your body, protect your future, rejuvenate you sick perverts.
	Well, the UK has lapsed into tyranny.
	Freedom, as your founding father said, has to be fought for generation by generation.
	If you're watching us on X, click the link in the description.
	Join us over on Rumble, where we'll be talking about how the UK has become a police state and how it legitimizes that, of course, by claiming that authoritarian measures are for your benefit rather than simply put in place in order to control you.
	We're highlighting this, of course, because Trump's visit has shown Starma for the kind of leader he is.
	A little bit of a milk sop, a bit of a moon calf, a bit of a soppy soddle, sat there squirming in his own bottom sweat.
	Sad little occasion, really, in many ways.
	Let's talk, though, about the important issues behind these peculiar characters.
	Vivid and lucid in the case of dear Donald Trump and somewhat insipid in the case of Starmer.
	It's the laws themselves that matter.
	Here are the legacy media reporting on the protests and some would say riots in the UK that have risen up this summer over the issue of migration.
	Many people frustrated that guest houses and hotels are being apportioned and paid for by British taxpayers in order to handle the flow of illegal migration into the UK.
	In a country that truly has free speech, people would be free, of course, wouldn't they, to voice their concerns about these subjects.
	And in a real democracy, you would have a referenda on that subject.
	If you had a government that were truly responsive to their population, they would govern in accordance with the will of the people.
	And it's pretty clear that the people are concerned about migration, want to reduce it, eliminate it, reverse it even.
	And whether you agree with that or not, in a democracy, you would have to, of course, govern in accordance with the will of the people.
	Therefore, if that's what the people want, you'd have to do it.
	Let's have a look at how the legacy media are tackling the idea that Britain has got a very particular position on migration right now, and that the way that that problem is being tackled is by censoring the views of people that are concerned about migration rather than dealing with the issue about which they are concerned, migration itself.
	Let's get into it.
	The rain has really dampened things down.
	Until a short time ago, there were hundreds and hundreds of people here protesting outside the Brook Hotel.
	We're on the outskirts of Norwich, very much against the fact that asylum seekers are being put up inside that hotel.
	Then on the other side of the road, on the other side of the roundabout, was a group of people very much in support of those people who've come to this country, many of them on small boats.
	They actually left already.
	That was a planned ending at 3.15 before the rain really began.
	But actually, it had been going pretty peacefully.
	They were separated by the main road until, according to reports, someone from those supporting those inside the hotel crossed the road.
	They had their face apparently covered in a balaclava and that caused an enormous surge of fury with the protesters.
	Interestingly, people to some degree appear to require leadership and government.
	Every so often, there's a flashpoint incident that tests the tension between the governed and the governing.
	We want authority, don't we?
	When there's a medical crisis in our lives, don't you want competent doctors to step in and help you with your children?
	Or if you're in a legal situation that's complicated, don't you want competent, well-informed lawyers to handle your deal, your scenario?
	Generally, though, you want to be left alone, don't you?
	You don't want to feel the encroachment of government in your life.
	COVID was interesting because it showed me that some people clearly like authoritarianism, like being told to wear a mask or get in their house or take medication or wherever it is.
	And other people strongly resist it.
	When there's an issue like migration, detest the very idea of what a nation is.
	If you're going to have a nation, you're going to have borders.
	You're going to have a flag.
	You're going to have an anthem.
	You're going to have something resembling a constitution.
	You're going to have an in-group and an out-group.
	You can't have a nation without that.
	That's what it is.
	You can't have a football team if both the teams playing are the same team and you both have the same agenda, right?
	I suppose that's just a very reductive way of describing it.
	This migration issue has become a testing point because people are dissatisfied.
	And whether it's as a result of migration or not, people sense and feel that it is.
	I believe in general, both ends of the political spectrum benefit from people focusing on migration as the central issue.
	Because my personal belief is migrants are a group that are somewhat dispossessed and don't have a great deal of power.
	If you don't have a great deal of power, how can you possibly be significantly impacting power itself?
	You can't be, not by my reckoning at least.
	That's not to say that powerful interests don't benefit from the tensions that arise from mass migration and that replacement theory might be a thing and just causing disruption and social tension by importing people from different cultures might possibly be a tactic of those that benefit from globalization more broadly, social and social discontent.
	Where this story gets, in my view, less contentious is when it comes to how it's being handled online, how reporting on it is being censored, how people discussing it is being censored.
	And indeed, this is the hub and nexus of our story today because an elite team of police officers have been set up to monitor social media reporting and even conversation on the subject of migration.
	So not just independent media figures like say Tommy Robinson, who's coming on the show later this week, who's been subject to not only censorship, but actual incarceration for contempt of court, which is an illegal thing.
	It's not like a construction.
	But most people sense that Tommy Robinson is being maligned because he's disruptive and problematic.
	Indeed, would there, let me know in the comments and chat, be a rape gang inquiry in the UK were it not for Tommy Robinson's documentary and Elon Musk's posting of that documentary on X?
	The answer is no.
	They tried to shut that down.
	Social media is a new means of communication and communication is a way of creating consensus and power.
	It's a way of creating new constituencies.
	The government, rather than responding to the will of the people, are trying to shut down the people's ability to communicate.
	This is some reporting from the Telegraph newspaper.
	An elite team of police officers in the UK are monitoring social media for anti-migrant sentiment amid fears of summer riots.
	I had some conversations with the police myself recently.
	You'll be aware of that.
	And off the record, we talked about a sense of tension across the UK, social unrest.
	It's pretty inevitable that there will be riots in the UK, particularly when you look not just at the migration issue, but the agricultural issue that we touch on sometimes, the general inherited despair from the COVID period.
	The tensions and concerns around migration are sort of paramount.
	But in general, people feel hugely dissatisfied in that country.
	The division assembled by the Home Office will aim to maximise social media intelligence gathering after police forces were criticised over their response to last year's riots.
	It comes amid growing concerns that Britain is facing another summer of disorder as protests outside asylum hotels spread.
	On Saturday, crowds gathered in towns and cities, including Norwich, Lees and Bournemouth, to demand action, with more protests planned for Sunday.
	But critics on Saturday night branded the social media plans disturbing and raised concerns over whether they would lead to restrictions of free speech.
	Chris Phelp, the Shadow Home Secretary, said, Tuti Akir can't police the streets, so he's trying to police opinions instead.
	They're setting up a central team to monitor what you post, what you share, what you think, because deep down they know the public don't buy what they're selling.
	Let me know what you think about that in the comments and chat.
	Labour have stopped pretending to fix Britain and they've started trying to mute it.
	This is a prime minister who's happy to turn Britain into a surveillance state, but won't deport foreign criminals, won't patrol high streets, won't fund frontline policing.
	Nigel is scared of the pub.
	Labour are scared of the public.
	Labour don't trust the public.
	Labor don't even know the public, Nigel Farage, the reform UK leader, said.
	This is the beginning of state-controlled free speech.
	It's sinister, dangerous, and must be fought.
	It's a further sign of dissent over the government's approach to social media.
	In a further sign of dissent, campaigners claimed on Saturday that posts about anti-migrant protests in the past week have been censored because of new online safety laws.
	The new unit called the National Internet Intelligence Investigation Team will work out of the National Police Coordination Centre.
	Extraordinary and interesting, the measures that are taken and the means that the government will undergo to justify these new measures.
	Let's have a look at this report in Modilla.
	With the protesters on this side pushing against the police, shouting, swearing, and then there was a surge maybe 100 meters or so up the road and it appeared that Someone was going to be arrested, and that possibly a decision was made not to do that.
	Since then, we've heard people coming past, beeping their horns in support.
	You can hear that now, but far fewer people here than there were.
	Now, I did have a chance to speak to some people, many reluctant campians, certainly those supporting those in the hotel.
	None of those would speak to us.
	But I did speak to a man named David, a father of an eight-year-old boy.
	He's from a couple of miles away, Cossack in Norwich.
	And he said that he's a veteran.
	He knows a lot of people who are homeless, but they have nowhere to stay.
	He himself cannot get a dentist.
	The people in this hotel are able to get a dentist.
	He said that, as well as the food that they have inside that hotel, they're given meal tickets, he said, to be able to go to the restaurant across the road.
	And he just said that that simply wasn't right.
	He also talked about being on the bus with his eight-year-old son.
	Ah, man, globalism has failed.
	If you feel that in your country, you don't have access to the resources for which you have personally paid and for which your relatives and ancestors have paid and, in some cases, sacrificed their lives, it's going to create social tension.
	The working class in the UK have been maligned for a long while now.
	The Brexit period was what highlighted that most severely is that the professional classes that operate primarily in media, and although this woman and her accent are a welcome change to the normal received pronunciation that defines the airwaves, the vilification of working class people has been a long-standing project.
	And I feel that in my country where you can't get doctor's appointments or dentist's appointments and you hear that migrants are getting access to these things, however significant that is within the overall picture, the overall economic decline and crisis of meaning and cohesion, however important the migration issue is as a portion of it, it impacts people.
	In the same way that when you get the sense that those governing, Kierstarma specifically in this instance, have stronger affiliations with global bureaucratic bodies than they do with the people they're supposed to be governing, that impacts you.
	You can see there's been an attempt to pivot by Kierstarma.
	He's like using the union jack more, talking about nationalism more, but you can't mask what appears to be the insidious ongoing presence of a professional class that hate ordinary people in Britain.
	The Hillary Clinton basket of deplorables moment was the, I suppose, the icon of these sentiments in your country, the United States.
	In my country, class is a more robust and consistently divisive dynamic deployed to enhance separation among ordinary people.
	And again, I believe the focus on migration as the key issue creates more tension that can never hope to resolve.
	In a sense, what we really need to focus on is the values upon which Britain is built.
	And those values are, by my reckoning, Christian, and historically they are Christian as well, because we can sort of get into that in a minute.
	But my point is this, that if people don't feel that they have impact and meaning in their communities, their families and their lives, if they feel that the people that are governing them are interested in only getting them a kowtow and controlling them, shutting down their free speech, importing people to share in resources that they haven't paid for while at the top tier of society,
	there's an endless flow of resources and power to bureaucracies and corporations that don't participate in the building of a nation or the cohesion of a nation.
	In the end, there will be disputes, disobedience, and even rioting.
	There are some, I suppose, aspects of this story that encourage a little bit of optimism.
	There are new political parties emerging in the UK on both the left and the right.
	But my sense is that unless we are willing to form alliances that go beyond the traditional political taxonomies, we're doomed to be controlled in much the manner we have been for decades, for the last few decades.
	That's just what I think, though.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
	Here's Michael Schellenberger.
	It's official.
	The UK is now officially a police state.
	It's become precisely what Orwell warned about.
	Criticise mass migration and you can expect the police to come to your home.
	And judges will give longer sentences for wrongthink than many violent crimes.
	What I think is notable when it comes to referencing George Orwell is George Orwell was perhaps commentating on social democracies.
	The liberal democracies lead to tyranny.
	Not just centralized, explicit state communism, but even when you're told that you're living in a liberal free culture where you can buy what you want, watch what you want, say what you want.
	In fact and in truth, you're being controlled by centralized forces that don't even have the common decency to make you dress in a grey oiler suit and bow down before Stalin.
	It was told to me, explained to me, that Orwell knew about Soviet communism.
	Soviet communism was well underway at the time that Orwell wrote 1984, that his predictions and prognosis pertained to social democracies.
	And if that were the case, it's an interesting theory, if that were the case, he was right because we are now seeing how liberal democracies tend towards centralized control, all apparently for your benefit.
	In order to keep you free and to protect the children, we've seen him say it today.
	We have to control online speech because children are committing suicide.
	No one wants children committing suicide.
	In order to protect you from this virus, we have to lock you in your home.
	In order to protect you from this virus, you have to take these medications.
	We're beginning, aren't we, to understand how these tropes operate.
	In order to protect you, we have to control you.
	So you have to decide whether or not you want to be protected, stroke, controlled by these powerful elites, or whether you would prefer to take your chances with local government, local governance, and most of all, opposition towards the establishment and its centralized power.
	And that you might want more than to change the livery, color, and hue of your tyrant.
	You might want to change the system itself.
	And you will be able to do that with a technology that exists.
	And that's what terrifies them.
	There is no need for the old elites.
	There is no need for the old media.
	There is no need for the old system.
	To distract you from that fact, they are highlighting issues that are emotive, like exploitation of children, migration, national identity.
	In order to overcome it, we have to be sincere in our belief and our faith and willing to sacrifice in order to take back our country.
	But that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
	Thank you very much for joining us today.
	Remember, if you don't have Rumble Premium yet, get Rumble Premium now.
	We make new content every day.
	Tomorrow, Rand Paul will be on the show.
	I've got some interesting things to discuss with Rand Paul.
	And coming up soon, our exclusive interview with Tommy Robinson, where I'll be talking about many of the issues that we've discussed today, as well as how we manage to exist compassionately and in some kind of unity in these divisive times.
	See you soon.
	In the meantime, you know, if you can, I'll see you tomorrow night for more of the same, more of the different.

▲