All Episodes
July 17, 2025 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:20:01
Royal Cover-Up? The Final Chapter of Diana’s Death - SF616
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen, Russell Brand and Russell Conspiracy Theorist.
Trying to bring real journalism to the American people.
Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
Thanks for joining us today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
Watch along.
Yeah, and I ain't been well, darling.
I'm strapped up to an IV.
I can't face the British judicially in my condition.
You can't rely on them.
They've abandoned jury trials.
Today we'll be doing a watch along for the rest of our video about dear old Princess Diana, God rest her eternal soul, and the Keith Allen documentary that seems to suggest, well, that the verdict of the Royal Courts of Justice was unlawful killing.
What went on there?
And if the deep state can assassinate someone as powerful and as influential as Princess Diana, who knows what else they are capable of here with us to discuss this on Rumble and Rumble Premium.
If you ain't got Rumble Premium yet, get it now.
You get additional content from us as well as an ad-free experience of Glenn Greenwald, Crowder Tim Cast.
Thanks, you guys, for the raid and everyone.
Jake Smith's joining us.
All right, Jake?
Yeah, they did it.
Yeah, they did it all right.
They did it.
Plain as day, representing the chosen people.
Isaac, how's it going?
Shalom.
Shalom.
We've got Luke who's as Christian as they come.
Are you right, darling?
I'm doing beautiful over here, baby.
Praise the Lord.
Massey, what was that?
What the hell was that look on your face?
Just thinking about Diana, mate, thinking about how sad it is that she's gone and how hot she was even to this day.
Disgusting.
Okay, let's get back into the documentary, shall we?
Now, remember, Luke had never heard of Princess Diana before, I don't think.
I think he thought mostly it was a Michael Jackson lyric.
Do you feel a little more inclined towards her having watched the first 10-15 minutes, Luke?
I feel significantly more educated.
I knew the name, but I didn't know where in the tier of Princess Queen what she was relevant about.
So now I feel like I know quite a bit more.
The talk.
That's a shame.
That's a shame.
Is that like me saying it to you, like, oh, babe Roof, what was she like a sort of sexy woman called Roof?
Baby Roof.
Yeah, baby Ruth.
That's really offensive.
Okay, listen, New Lot.
All right, should we get into it then?
Because we have to have justice.
Remember, if you're watching us on YouTube, it is corrupt.
You can't trust it.
Click the link, get over to Rumble.
They support us.
They support free speech.
If you're watching it on X, well, we can't criticize them in quite the same way because of Elon Musk and that and the great work done there in the post usual ordinary Twitter era, you know, revealing a bunch of stuff, being generally supportive, but X aren't giving us no money.
Rumble are, get over there.
Okay, let's have a look at what button do I have to press?
Just play.
The triangle one pointing to the future, that little guy.
Let's do it.
The worldwide movement to ban anti-personnel landmines gathered speed during 1996.
To everyone's surprise, even the world's most powerful politician was Simbae.
To everyone's surprise, even the world's most powerful politician was sympathetic to the ban.
To end this carnage, the United States will seek a worldwide agreement as soon as possible to end the use of all anti-personnel landmines.
I'd like to get that lady, Diana, to Epstein Island.
I'll blow that up.
I'll blow land mine up there.
Oh, yeah, I'll give her a blast, man.
Diana.
who needs landmines when you've got drones took up the cause of the vengeance in january 1997 she visited angola resulting in the greatest photo op Go on.
That's foreshadowing.
Foreshadowing.
COVID.
All my kids had to wear those kind of welder ones.
That was like you could wear those at school.
They had it in Pittsburgh.
Foreshadowing.
Double mask.
Jesus.
Oh, God, that's ridiculous.
I mean, I think it's excessive for a landmine.
Imagine sneezing into that.
Yeah, it would look disgusting inside.
Like a magic eye picture.
Also, though, I don't think that would work if a landmine went off.
I mean, that would provide some protection from Charles and Camilla's antics going on in the very next hotel room.
But for a landmine, oh, no.
Resulting in the greatest photo opportunity that the landmine campaign had ever had.
One million people.
Farring.
Her involvement caused huge anger amongst governments.
In Britain, Government Defence Minister Earl Howd denounced her.
Two newspapers this morning quoting Um their minister described as a loose cannon.
Simone Simmons was with Diana in February 1997 when a government defence minister.
How many times is Simone Simmons going to sit down in that chair?
She's already contributed.
Where has she been?
The bathroom?
Simmons was with Diana in February 1997 when a government defence minister made a threatening phone call warning the princess to end her involvement with the campaign, otherwise accidents could happen.
The phone went in her little lounge and she picked it up and then called me over and there was a voice that was in the middle of conversation saying, don't meddle in things you know nothing about.
Accidents can happen.
She went a bit pale.
She took it as a threat.
That lady, she's kind of like, that is an unusual stare.
She's entrancing.
She's entrancing.
She went a bit pale.
She took it as a threat.
And she said that was Nicholas Soames.
Grandson of Winston Churchill.
I'm getting a bit of blacklock black.
Where's Nurse Nicky?
Because...
Nurse!
I'm feeling vulnerable!
Nicholas Soames is on the screen!
Soames.
I don't know his voice.
It was very, very plummy.
No, I don't know.
But if you want someone that sounds like a plum, this was either, well, a plum, apricot, peach, something like that.
Or the only other alternative is it was Soames himself.
Look at him there, like an engine driver.
Look at him there, the fat controller, the top-hatted bubble of a man.
Very plummy.
And she actually used a derogatory term.
She said, doesn't he sound like he's talking with a cock in his mouth?
Days before she died, Diana made another visit to landmine victims, this time in Bosnia.
Do you know about the rumours of like, do you like Americans know or care about like people say that Prince Harry's dad was not Charles?
Do you know about that kind of thing?
Tell us more.
People say like it was.
Who do they say it was?
Massey?
Hewitt.
Yeah, Ginger Good.
Yeah, Hewitt.
Good picture of them both.
They look exactly the same.
Exactly the same.
Yeah.
And that fellow that was just in the car there, he was her butler.
He used to crop up a lot and stuff.
He had a go as well, didn't he?
Don't say that about Diana.
Died.
Diana made another visit to landmine victims, this time in Bosnia.
Yeah.
Again, there was global press coverage, which made Bosnia, remember that place?
Yeah, I remember that's when there was the war that we all forgot and got over.
What happened to Bosnia?
Don't hear about it no more.
Slobodan Milosevic.
Where's he gone?
Milosevic.
It was a big deal.
Slobodan Milosevic.
Isaac.
Oh.
Obviously, of course they were.
It looks like the leather seats of Parliament.
Yes, it does.
It's a very identifiable shade of Imperial green there, British racing green.
Tapped by the British Secret Services.
Every time she'd hear a click, she used to say, boys, time to change the tape.
We now know that her calls were also being...
This was before the digital revolution.
Nurse Nikki!
People who wanted Diana and her Muslim lover dead.
It's weird that at a time when you know the establishment can think of nothing worse.
Nurse, is it natural, are you okay, mate?
Is it natural that there should be what I'd call feedback?
I just expressed some strong opinions about Princess Diana and the potential murder of her by the state, and then I noticed it come out.
It's just it, though, if you want, if that makes you feel better.
No.
It should know.
Maybe up, can we up the flow?
You know, let's start hitting it a bit harder.
This is a watch along.
If you're watching us on Rumble, consider getting Rumble Premium if you're watching YouTube.
Click the link in the description.
You can see that I'm in full health.
I'm not considering taking my own life.
In fact, I'm better than, I don't think I've ever felt better.
Is everything going okay with the veins?
No infiltration or anything.
So good.
We're looking good.
Thanks, Nurse Nikki.
Hey, your son did well on the show when he came on last week.
That was Gabe.
I adore him.
He's such a lovely lad.
What them things I'm supposed to take are his?
Them little patches?
Life wave?
I might stick some of them on now.
Do you think I should?
I mean, now I've got a dedicated professional.
I mean, how many sort of different medications can we take at once?
I wouldn't mind.
Let's have a look at a young, cut-and-thrust and fresh-faced Piers Morgan claiming that he believed it more likely than not that Princess Diana's death is suspicious and that there are deep state interests involved.
When you know the establishment can think of nothing worse than Dodi Fayed, son of Muhammad, marrying and possibly impregnating Diana.
where are we going so this is like What is it?
Yeah, what is that?
It is a phototherapy patch.
So it uses your body's own light signature to refract light at a different ray.
So it's called photo biomodulation.
That seems like a sort of crazy thing we should be promoting on this show, doesn't it?
Photo.
Why not try photobiomodulation?
I do it every single day and so does Chuck Norris.
And neither of us have ever been healthy.
Watch out for parasites!
That she's conducting a major international offensive against landmines with all the crippling economic problems that would bring for the British establishment again.
And America.
And America.
If you add all these to the mix, then if you were ever going to do something dodgy to Dinah, that's the time you would do it.
She'd become trouble, as she used to say to me.
I'm trouble to them.
I won't go away.
I won't go quietly.
I won't go quietly.
Presidents have been killed for less.
I think it was an opportunist killing.
They had until September the 19th.
Why?
Until then?
Because that was when the conference was going to take place in Oslo on landmine.
Less than three weeks after the crash, the key Oslo meeting began.
With Diana out of the way, most of the world's press didn't even bother to attend.
When they killed Diana on the 31st of August, 19 days later, Bill Clinton was the only Western leader who voted against a ban on landmines.
Something he would never have done had he had to look in Diana's eyes.
Many investigators believe that this was the real reason Diana was killed.
Yet, the coroner barely raised the issue.
Why would the coroner raise the issue about landmines?
Yeah, go on, I see.
Why would the, like, I get that, I don't quite get the landmine thing, but the point that Alan just made, then he goes, the coroner never brought it up.
Like, you're asking him what happened to the body.
He's not going to say, I think this is to do with landmines.
He's not going to stop pontificating on the conspiracy.
He's just going to say, this is what happened to her body.
Yeah, she smashed into the wall.
She's dead.
I think it's landmines, though.
Like, it's none of his business.
She wasn't wearing her shield.
Her face shield.
That face shield.
That could have given her a vital few moments.
You're right.
That's not a coroner's duty.
Keith Allen.
Nurse, what?
I'm feeling vulnerable.
Very vulnerable.
Knowledge is power.
In the years before Princess Dinah was killed, she told many people that the British establishment was planning to eliminate her.
Killed.
But I think one of the things Keith Allen points out is that even the verdict was unlawful killing.
Planning to eliminate her.
Oh, of course, Diana was bumped off.
She knew she was going to be bumped off.
She always said she's not going to make old bones.
Diana had left a note saying that she thought that somebody was going to kill her and that it would be in a car accident.
Diana asked her lawyer.
Simone Simmons, Kitty Kelly, who are these contributors?
These are real people.
They don't look or seem or sound real and they're raising some unusual.
She said she wouldn't make old bones.
Why didn't the coroner mention that she had Lego in her pocket?
Told him that she had my mate Kev on.
Not getting Kev on.
Not having Kev Massey.
Kev's contributions have been overplayed already.
Kev's been cited as a source too many times, I think.
And we've got a slide here of what Kev reckons is on the Epstein list.
I told him that she had from a very confidential source in the palace, Prince Philip, planning to get rid of her in a car accident.
She wrote this letter to her butler, Paul Burrell, telling him that the royal family were planning her death.
Diana said the same thing to her lawyer, Lord Mishkin, who made a note of her prediction.
This old British establishment lawyer realized that the note could have devastating consequences for the royal family.
So three weeks after her death, he handed it to Britain's chief policeman, Lord Condon.
Everyone's got ridiculous names in this whole thing, haven't they?
She wrote a letter to her butler, who himself handed it over to the police chief, Lord Condon.
did it to Britain's chief policeman, Lord Condon.
The police chief also...
We don't need to anymore.
It'll be all right.
Did it to Britain's chief policeman, Lord Condon?
The police chief also realized its significance.
So he's been replaced now by Lady Femidon.
It's progress, they call it.
So he concealed it and kept it secret for three years.
The first question, and Andrew have agreed, is, is there a leader?
Michael Mansfield.
Yeah.
Tim M. Yeah.
MM, SS, KK.
Are these real names?
Well, actually, Michael Mansfield is.
Yeah, I remember him.
He used to be on the TV a bunch.
He was sort of like became a kind of celebrity lawyer.
Maybe after this.
He was dashing.
Like a silver fox figure.
I mean, I don't know.
I don't know what's real anymore.
Possibly that's Nurse Nikki.
Nurse Nikki.
Wait, what?
Everything's alliterative.
Kitty Keller, Nurse Nikki, Michael Maga.
Who's next?
The first question.
What's Kev's surname?
Kevin Kendall.
Get it.
Fair enough.
Good.
The first question, and you've agreed, is, is there a legal obligation to hand over potentially relevant material?
There's an unequivocal answer to that, which is yes.
Agree?
Yes, I do.
That was Britain's top policeman, admitting that he broke the law by concealing this devastating evidence.
You cannot rely on Condon.
Admitting that he broke the law by concealing this devastating evidence.
Right.
I'm going to make it very plain to you, Lord Condon, that the reason...
This is Princess Diana.
We actually, and some of us aren't over that deaf yet.
Right.
And I've got to make it very plain to you, Lord Condon, that the reason why potentially relevant material was not handed over to the coroner is because you were sitting on it, knowing that something had gone wrong in Paris linked to the activities of British state agents.
You are suggesting, are you?
That Lord Condom was part of a criminal conspiracy.
Are you suggesting we can't trust Lord Condom?
What about Sir Prophylactic?
Oh, indeed, Supreme Justice Johnny.
But I'm suggesting, yes, that he's part of an agreed.
So British.
One of the most serious allegations.
It's so British that it's difficult to take it seriously, isn't it?
Like, even if it's the murder of Princess.
Guys, imagine them wearing wigs.
Because that's what they do.
They wear wigs in magistrates' court.
Nuts.
Exactly.
And Crown Court.
I happen to know from personal experience.
Let's see.
A Crown Court is where the wigs are.
That is one of the most serious allegations that could ever be made of someone in my position.
And I unequivocally, totally refute it as a blatant lie.
He's infuriated by that.
Yeah, you can't talk like that and not be serious.
No, no way.
I trust him.
I trust him.
He was very angry, wasn't he?
No, yeah.
He's alright.
As a blatant lie.
If in September 1997 this information had gone public, nobody would have spoken anymore about the paparazzi, about Henry Paul.
The only thing the whole world would have focused on would have been Diana's fear.
Who's this French monkey-faced ashen-haired part bin Ben Wisher, part chimp individual?
Jubris dumbest.
That's another made-up name.
Yeah.
He looks a little like Brigitte Macron, is what I would say, potentially.
How can we trust anything coming out of France?
No one's even honest about their genitals.
Fears.
Diana's predictions on how she would be killed by the British establishment.
In 1995, Diana summarized her fears in a phone call to a producer of this film.
If you're a strong woman in my environment, you're a problem.
I have a hell of a problem.
I don't have time, an awful lot of time for hobbies, but keeping alive.
Why is that in there?
Don't have a lot of time for hobbies.
I think I'm going to be murdered.
They might cut the brake cables.
They're having an affair.
It's the landmine campaign.
Once in a while, I like to settle down for a game of Twister.
Time for hobbies, but Keeping alive, one of them.
Keeping alive, keeping alive, keeping alive, keeping alive.
I do not like the echo message.
That's a bit cheap.
Unnecessary drama.
Yeah, a little bit.
Keeping alive.
Keeping alive.
They need saxophone.
They do need some nocturnal, sexy.
Fabrice dumbest on the saxophone.
Keeping alive.
Keeping alive.
Sadly, she signally failed in this quest.
Lord Condom wasn't the only senior police quest.
She failed in her quest at stroke hobby to keep alive.
That's a terrible, terrible link.
It's terrible.
Yeah, it's too dismissive.
She wasn't very good at her hobby.
Good work at keeping alive.
Where are you now?
Down in the ground in the deadpan with the worms.
Nearly failed in this quest.
Lord Condon wasn't the only senior policeman to hide the lawyer's note.
Lord Stevens, his successor as police chief...
Thank God, some of a sensible name.
Good old Lord Stevens.
Lord Stevens, his successor as police chief, concealed it for a further three years.
Both men broke the law, but both men were made lords by the Queen.
I'd like to be a queen of people's hearts, in people's hearts.
But I don't see myself being queen of this country.
Do you see they've changed the Royal Courts of Justice to title chapters?
A very peculiar autopsy is the chapter in that.
I like that.
It's actually maybe a bit too subtle.
They should have zoomed in or come out from it.
Don't you think?
Have you been noticing it every time?
I haven't noticed it.
I know it's a very good thing.
Very peculiar autopsy.
I've been doing it every time.
It's a British thing.
It is British.
Like Lord Condon.
That's the name of the building, is it, Jay?
Yeah.
Yeah, I thought those were subbrills.
That's a good thing.
Very peculiar autopsy.
Oh, that was kind of fun.
Oh, my God.
So you're down the peculiar autopsy for a pint?
Diana died soon after arrival at the hospital, and although she had been stripped of her royal status in life, in death, her corpse mysteriously became royal property.
Within hours, royal representatives had given orders for her body to be partially embalmed, a process that conveniently made it impossible for anyone to tell if she had been pregnant.
Attention then turned to the body of the driver on to the body of the driver Henri Paul.
It's not what blood tests had even been completed.
Made it conveniently impossible to tell if she's been pregnant.
Before blood tests had even been completed, the French authorities were already insisting that he was drunk as a pig.
Although the only alcohol drunk as a pig, also, they made up that phrase.
Because that's not what we associate with pigs, is it?
Yeah, all the pigs were like, well, speak for yourself.
Not drunk as a pig.
Authorities were already insisting that he was.
I mean, actually, I would assume that any average French person's more likely to be drunk than a pig.
Henri Paul, minutes before the fatal crash.
Far from looking drunk as a pig, he seems to be sober as a judge.
An autopsy was carried out on Henri Paul's body by Professor Dominique Leconte, a doctor who is notorious in France.
Another stupid bloody name.
Dominique Leconte.
On Henri Paul's body by Professor Dominique Leconte, a doctor who is notorious in France for covering up medical evidence that France for covering up medical evidence that is likely to embarrass the state.
If her own account is to be believed, she conducted the world's worst autopsy on the corpse of Henri Paul.
She looks like a honor.
...at least 58 basic errors.
Every medical expert at the inquest agreed that her results were not...
I see he had a good joke.
Go on, my scene.
Okay.
What did I say?
Oh, she looks like a Le Comte.
Very good.
Just when I saw her, that's what she looked like.
Nice.
It's good.
That's good.
Medical expert at the inquest agreed that her results were not only inept, but biologically inexplicable too.
And that her report...
She's got nine legs, she's 25 foot tall, and she's pregnant, but it's Franceborn inexplicable too.
And that her report was untruthful.
We have Professor LeComte giving an account of events, which, on the face of it, cannot be true.
So you are pushing at an open door.
There are clear inconsistencies.
It's really making me feel nostalgic for the UK.
So you are pushing at an open door.
You are the Comte.
Now, let's go back to Lord Condon.
It's like a really anachronistic, sort of Dickensian world where everyone's name tells you what kind of character they're going to be.
Let's go there.
Well, I actually have to.
Cannot be true.
So you are pushing at an open door.
There are clear inconsistencies.
This is what I call my bottom.
Cannot be true.
So you are pushing at an open door.
There are clear inconsistencies in Professor LeComte's account.
The blood tests carried out by Dr. Pepin were equally unbelievable.
Come on, Craver.
Unbelievable.
We are all agreed that the explanation offered by Dr. Pepin and Professor Le Comte together with a delicious drink of Dr. Pepal because we couldn't get that coke.
Professor Le Comte together for kaboxyhemoglobin concentrations in the blood samples is implausible and can be discounted.
Yes, so one is left with either analytical error or a mystery.
Suspicions grew at the inquest that the blood tested by LeComte and Papin had not come from Henri Paul at- Oh my god, but listen, if you're watching this on YouTube, click the link in the description.
Join us over on Rumble and Rumble Premium.
Here's a quick message from one of our partners.
What if your coffee didn't just wake you up, but actually awakened you to new realms of consciousness?
That's what's being promised by 1775 Peaberry.
Why are you drinking stinking, jaded, lukewarm, dirty, filthy grey coffee beans when you could be having vibrant, revolutionary coffee like this one?
It's an elixir of pure innocence.
It's a glorious and awakening drink.
Peaberries are the outliers, the lone wolves, the beans that grow solo on the branch.
No twins, no compromise, no hangers-on, no hemorrhoids.
Just one dense, round, flavour-packed powerhouse that tastes like it's been preparing for this cup its entire life.
Let me take a sip of it now.
Oh holy beverage, we salute you.
Less than 5% of all beans can become pea berries.
They're the navy seals of coffee beans.
Some of them just can't take hell week.
Which basically means your morning brew is rarer than a mainstream journalist telling the truth.
Jake Tapper, you must have seen that Joe Biden was old.
He was obviously old.
I think you have absolutely standing to diagnose somebody's cognitive decline.
It's grown high in the Bolivian mountains where the air is thin, the vibes are thick, and the beans basically whisper ancient truths to the winds.
No acidic afterburn, no synthetic weirdness, and none of the lingering shame that tastes like the hotel mini bar after a three-day bender with all the snow.
Hey, I played that guy in a couple of movies.
I've lived that film.
I was that film.
But this coffee doesn't leave you hung over in a feather bubber or speaking fluent nonsense.
Just bold, smooth, consciousness activating coffee with clean energy and antioxidants so potent I drank it and remembered three of my past lives.
Go to 7075coffee.com, use the code brand and get 15% off.
Peaberry Wonder, Hallucinations, Glory, Psychedelic Wonder, all available here.
Use the link, get the discount, get the free shipping, benefit from an awakening beam.
You lunatic you.
You are joining us for our Rumble show Stay Free with Russell Brand.
We're watching a documentary about the mysterious death of Princess Diana and the extraordinary number of peculiarly named individuals that seem to be involved in a cover-up stroke investigation, which amount to the same thing because this is the investigation and it's really pretty weird, isn't it?
It's unusual stuff.
Let's go inside.
Projected by LeConte and Papin had not come from Henri Paul at all, not least because it contained lethally high levels of carbon monoxide.
The professor, you said you found it astonishing the similarity.
He's overacting the guy being the charge, isn't he?
That's not normal.
Professor!
That's like a movie, right?
He's loving it.
I think Keith Allen should have told him to wind it in a bit.
1.73, 1.74, 1.75.
What are you suggesting there?
That suggests to you that the results have been cooked or what?
That would be my interpretation.
You mentioned that one explanation is that the blood samples didn't in fact come from Henri Paul.
That's the most obvious explanation, that it isn't actually only Paul's blood we're looking at.
The idea of a classic switcheroo may...
Mm-hmm.
The idea of a classic switcheroo may sound far-fetched, but every scientist involved in the inquest signed a joint statement saying that the blood test results for Henri Paul were biologically inexplicable.
Professor Lecon and Dr. Pepin refused to attend the inquest, even though as citizens of the European Union, they were legally obliged to.
They were protected by the French government, who publicly cited reasons of public order for the refusal.
However, it has since emerged that the real reason was the protection of state secrets and the essential interests of the nation.
This is the law the Ministry of Justice has used to help and protect Professor Auleconte and Dr. Opépin.
So the fact, the legal fact, is that there are state secrets that are protected and that Professor Auleconte and Dr. Opépin know about.
In 2006, a team of scientists offered to carry out DNA analysis on some of the samples to determine if the blood really was on repairs.
They were told by the French authorities that the samples no longer exist.
Well, my husband's eye were very busy stopping me.
Diana was unstable.
They decided that was the problem.
The inquest spent weeks examining Diana's love life in minute detail and considering whether she was pregnant when she died.
But why?
Whether Diana was pregnant or not, or whether she was actually going to marry Dodie Fayed or not, is not important.
It's whether the establishment believed she was pregnant or believed she was going to marry Dodie.
That's important.
And there's no doubt at that moment, the majority of them did believe both those things.
What did become clear was that within hours of Diana's death, her body was pumped full of embalming fluid, so no pregnancy tests were possible.
And soon after, she had her reproductive organs removed under the watchful eye of the royal coroner.
There is a trip, you know, the trip from Paris to 145.
How can you embalm a body and very short distance of travel?
Why do you think they embalmed her to hide the pregnancy?
Because they had to corrupt the body, because she was pregnant.
She had to take all her guts.
So, was Diana pregnant at the time of her death?
We'll never know for sure, because the French and British authorities destroyed the evidence.
And the blood tests, which were taken when she arrived at the hospital, and which could have confirmed if she had just become pregnant, have mysteriously vanished.
But ask yourself this.
Would the British establishment have allowed Muslim blood to enter the royal lineage?
And how far would they be prepared to go to stop it happening?
Muslim blood.
But like, wasn't she not married anymore?
She wasn't married anymore.
So then how would the kid be a free agent?
Would he not?
Be a stepbrother of the king.
Too close.
Racists.
Yeah.
It's not good.
Stop it happening.
Deep down, we see them now as an establishment that are capable of murder, which is quite serious.
Squishy.
Squishy.
And get what you deserve, perhaps.
Squishy.
There is no doubt that the entire inquest was skillfully manipulated by powerful unelected forces to the advantage of the royal family.
This could only happen because Britain is, in essence, a monarchy, not a democracy.
Much of Britain still operates on a system of unelected power.
And at its center are the Windsors, the old aristocracy, and their vast wealth.
Just as in medieval times, the royal family live a life of unfettered privilege, with British taxpayers funding their lavish existence.
It's kind of cool.
Yeah, amazing.
What a beautiful place.
It's pretty, it's a great palace.
With British taxpayers funding their lavish existence.
Where do we get off on this argument?
Only one family.
And by the way, a highly unrepresentative family has the right to a seat to the head.
If Alan's going through a lot of looks while making this.
I keep getting confused by who's like an actor portraying somebody and who's a real person.
Because I know that's a real person, but his voice sounds like he's acting.
Now listen here.
Something unusual's going.
My Tommy Gan.
You've been saying Reconstruction.
Oh, so okay.
Maybe they are good actors.
The British Channel.
a seat to the head of stateship of our country.
Now, I think that is a...
It's proof that the British do use salt.
That was racist.
To a seat to the head of stateship of our country.
Now, I think that is a fundamentally flawed argument, and I don't know how it can be used in the modern world.
The idea of a hereditary ruler is as absurd as the idea of a hereditary mathematician.
Officially, the royal family costs British taxpayers £40 million a year, but that's just the tip of a very large iceberg.
The royal palaces are maintained by the taxpayer.
£40 million?
What's that?
£40 million?
Well, is that what they're getting?
It is.
It said costs the taxpayers £40 million a year.
That's pretty reasonable.
But even private ones, such as Bal Moral.
Windsor Castle is theirs too, except, of course, when it burnt down, when the bill for rebuilding it also fell on the public purse.
Their wealth includes the vast royal art collection, which is worth billions of pounds and belongs to the British people.
Yet the people aren't allowed to see it.
In return, the royal family refused to obey many British laws, such as the 1968 Race Relations Act.
As can be seen from this footage, there are very few non-whites in the royal household.
Indeed, it is ironic that the ritual ceremony we are now watching is called Trooping the Colour, because as you can observe, there's barely a non-white face to be seen.
Hold on a minute.
I mean, where are we going with this, Keith?
A minute ago, as we've killed Princess Diana, now it's like, you know, there's not enough coloured folks in the kitchen.
What about there was one fella at a limp just then in the archive and doing their best.
White face to be seen.
The royal family are notorious for their racism.
I need context, just an old lady's face.
It's the queen mother.
Yeah, her teeth are coloured.
That's got to count for something.
Does that count as the end of the end of what she said?
I just said something else.
I'm going to get canceled.
I'd say so.
It was pretty close.
British way of saying it, ain't it?
These phrases have all been said by the royals in public, so God alone knows what they say in private.
This racism is nothing new.
There was a close relationship.
There's Hitler, look.
I mean, that guy was right.
We know about him.
I think we don't need any further information on that little troublemaker.
This racism is nothing new.
There was a close relationship between the British royal family and the Nazis during the 1930s, details of which remain a closely guarded secret.
Were you surprised when you started to find out about, specifically, the relationship with high-ranking Nazis?
I mean, Philip's especially?
I was very surprised when I found out about Philip's sisters and their connection to Hitler.
The fact that the Queen Mother and her husband were inclined more towards Hitler in the beginning.
So why does Britain still tolerate its racist royal family?
The only serious argument that defenders of the monarchy can muster nowadays is that the royals are good for tourism, and even that is suspect.
They're not good for tourism.
That's what they say.
Whenever someone says that, I always think, right, so countries that don't have a royal family then, like Ireland or France or America, no tourists ever go there then.
Oh, what a ridiculous monarchy it is.
It's not a bad view, but the lack of a monarch spoils it somehow.
Despite presenting itself as a charming and picturesque relic of the past, the royal family retains a ruthless grip on power in 21st century Britain.
It presides over a corrupt and corrosive honours system that keeps tens of thousands of public officials in permanent obedience to the monarchy, all hoping for a knighthood or an OBE in return for a lifetime's loyal service.
These are the people who operate Britain's system of government.
Judges, coroners, civil servants, police chiefs, permanent private secretaries, members of the secret services and privy councillors.
When I became a cabinet minister, I was made a privy councillor.
You swear that you will protect the Queen from all foreign prelates, potentates and powers, and you will report on colleagues if they're disloyal and so on.
And they read it to me, and I said at the end, I didn't say it, I didn't agree.
And they said, you don't have to agree.
So I said, what do you mean?
They said, we've administered the oath.
Now, that phrase, the administration of oaths, which people would have heard, means you're injected with the oath.
I've been injected with an oath.
The royals don't only use honours and oaths of allegiance to preserve their power.
They use intimidation.
Like that, the oath is administered.
Like, You don't need consent to it.
It's like a sort of a vaccine.
It's just it's in there now.
You've been oathed, mate.
Yeah, I think I want to move there.
You'll like it.
He was Tony Ben.
He was one of the great political figures, they say the best prime minister Britain never had, very left-wing, principled man from the aristocracy that dedicated his entire life to advocating for the rights of ordinary people.
They deserve their power.
They use intimidation too, as Diana found to her cost.
They demand absolute secrecy and loyalty from their subjects, and they stifle dissent.
I think of the establishment, our establishment, as a kind of a legal mafia, whose watchword, really, is the watchword of the real mafia, "Omerta", silence.
That's why many people regard them as gangsters.
Gangsters.
They are gangsters, eh?
I don't know if that's what comes to mind.
These adorable women.
That's not the gangsters that we know.
Yeah, it's not the sopranos.
Gangsters.
Gangsters in tiaras.
And given Prince Philip's Nazi background, is it really so unthinkable that those at the top of the present-day British establishment might go to any lengths to rid themselves?
Let's have a quick message from one of our partners.
Establishment might go to any lengths to rid themselves of a turbulent princess.
Well, anything good I ever did, nobody ever said a thing, never said well done or was it okay.
But if I tripped up, which invariably I did, because I was new at the game, a ton of bricks came down on me.
Free speech is under attack, Jack, but Rumble refuses to take it lying down.
Rumble is farting out the fierce cock of authoritarianism and clamping shut the butt cheeks of free speech, baby.
When major advertisers conspire to pull their dollary dues, even brands like Dunking Donuts turn their back, claiming Rumble had a right-wing culture.
But we're not here to fit a mold.
We're here to defend free expression.
Content from creators like Russell Brand.
Yo, I'm that dude.
Doctor Disrespect.
Timcast and the Muck Club with Crowder.
It's more than a subscription.
It's a stand for free speech.
Your voice matters.
For a limited time, you can get $10 off an annual plan using the Rumble code BRAND.
Visit rumble.com forward slash premium forward slash brand and claim your discount today.
Together we can turn the tide whether you join Rumble Premium or simply keep watching.
Your support helps keep free speech alive and with free speech we can be free together.
Subscribe to Rumble now!
Stell.
This is another reconstruction, Jake, just so you know that's a bit real.
Stell.
Successful producer, Dodie, wasn't he?
I mean, what did he ever produce?
Fuck all.
That's what he produced.
Fuck all.
He produced his inquest by dying, you know, successfully getting himself killed.
It's just a typical rich man's son, you know.
Talentless son of a rich father who then pisses all his dad's money out the wall.
Take a nice stereotype, and that's Dodie.
The media called this the Diana Inquest, forgetting that it was also an inquest into the death of Dodie Fayad.
In life, Dodie was described by the Duke of Edinburgh as an oily bed hopper.
In death, he was dismissed by the press as a worthless playboy.
But the inquest revealed these descriptions to be wholly untrue.
He loved to make movies.
He liked that ability to make movies.
That was his chosen professor.
The other good thing that came out of the inquest, why it was so successful, is that it cleared Dodie's name.
The evidence was overwhelming about the kind of guy he was.
Not a playboy, actually, straightforward, really caring, sensitive, funny man, and not a shit.
He was smart, Dodie.
He understood everything about his father's profession and his profession.
He told me on so many occasions, I want to run a studio.
I want to have a studio of my own.
Dodie first showed his cinematic talent in 1981 as executive producer of the Oscar-winning film Chariots of Fire.
But Charlie Sophia, think of any British movie, have four Oscars in the same time.
So it's ostensibly a film about a Jew taking up the establishment.
That's right.
I mean, the racist, you know, again, and this was unbelievable.
Way of thinking that he had the idea.
Following the crash in 1997, there was an outpouring of grief for Diana in the press, but the media virtually ignored Muhammad Al-Fayed's devastation over the loss of his son, Dodi.
I've seen him crying, telling me how he shared a bed with Dodi every day of his life from 2 to 13 after his mother left.
when you hear things like that you know how close they were the Despite lasting six months and claiming to be an in-depth investigation, the inquest failed to find answers to many basic questions regarding Henri Paul.
If he really was a chronic alcoholic, this would have been diagnosed during the stringent medical examination he underwent three days before the crash while renewing his pilot's license.
But he passed the medical with flying colours.
So why wasn't the doctor who gave him a clean bill of health called to the inquest or ever interviewed by the police?
Why did Britain's top policeman, Lord Stevens, tell Henri Paul's parents in 2006 in front of other policemen who kept a written record of the conversation that their son was definitely not drunk?
He asserted that Henri was not drunk on the evening of the accident and that he was driving at a lower speed than indicated in the French proceedings.
That is totally what Mr. Stevens told us.
Yet six weeks later, Lord Stevens published a report claiming that Henri Paul was drunk.
So, who was lying?
Lord Stevens or Lord Stevens?
After the crash, the police searched Henri Paul's apartment twice.
Two searches were made of Henri Paul's home by the French police.
More alcohol was recorded as discovered on the second search than on the first.
The first time, all the police found was an unopened bottle of champagne and a quarter bottle of martini, which hardly supports the claim that he was an alcoholic.
So the police returned a few days later.
And would you believe it?
This time, they claimed to have found enough alcohol to stock an entire bar.
Beer, wine, recard, bourbon, vodka, port, champagne, cassis, pinot.
There is no obvious explanation for this.
You must consider whether there are any sinister implications.
Some might say that, on the contrary, there is a very obvious explanation, and that its implications are very sinister indeed.
The inquest heard undisputed evidence of Henri Paul's links to the French secret services, the Direction de la Saveillance du Territoire, and to Britain's MI6.
I just remember reading his file and thinking it was interesting that, first of all, they had a Frenchman working for MI6, because it's actually quite rare to find someone who is French, prepared to work for MI6, because they quite often don't.
And secondly, because I'm a pilot myself, I remember this particular person having an interest in flying.
So why did the coroner tell the jury in his summing up that Henri Paul had no links to the security services?
Henri Paul's bank accounts show he received a total of 350,000 French francs of unexplained income during the final months of his life, mostly from cheques.
Why didn't the inquest establish who had written those cheques or examine the transactions made on Henri Paul's five credit cards or allow the jury to seize mobile phone records?
Why did Henri Paul go missing from the hotel for seven minutes at 10.36?
Was he meeting an accomplice in the Place Vende d'Amme?
What about the gesture that Henri Paul made outside the Ritz moments before driving off in the Mercedes?
Was it a signal to an accomplice?
If the inquest had failed to answer one or two of these simple questions, you might put it down to incompetence.
But its failure even to ask many of them can only have happened because the authorities already knew the answers and wanted to keep them hidden.
Henri Paul was not drunk and was working for the secret services on the night that he died.
Day 68 The only senior representative of the royal household to appear at the inquest was Sir Robert Fellows, the Queen's private secretary.
On day 68, while under oath, he had the following interchange with Michael Mansfield.
Were you on holiday at the time?
I was on holiday from early, well, somewhere around the first week of August.
Until the week after the death of the princess and Mr. Alfayed.
And I went back to Bal Moral on the following Sunday, I think, after the funeral.
So, would it be fair to say that you were not, in fact, therefore, at the palace or nearby when all of this was happening?
Well, it's like Savile.
I was at the palace, certainly, until the end of July.
You think they messed up their lines so they had to do that effect?
Lost the footage.
They're just like, you guys.
I had that knock in his voice over.
Yeah, they were like, we've given this way too many takes.
And we've got to move on.
Fellows unequivocally told the inquest that he was on holiday for the entire period before and after Diana's death and did not return to work until after her funeral.
Now let's move to January 2011 and the publication of the diary of Tony Blair's press secretary, Alastair Campbell.
31st August.
At about 4am, I got a flavour of the Royal Establishment's approach when I had a conference call with Robert Fellows.
You know about Diana Deal?
She's dead.
It was all very matter of fact.
1st of September.
Meeting at the Lord Chamberlain's office, attended by Robert Fellows.
2nd of September, 10am.
Fellows and I had a discussion.
4th of September.
Fellows called early.
4th of September.
I had another discussion with Fellows.
5th of September.
Fellows said we had all worked well together.
Far from being on holiday, as he had claimed under oath, Fellows was at the very center of Diana's funeral arrangements, overseeing her burial throughout the week.
Fellows was the man that Diana had described to friends as, one of the three names that I fear.
He hates me.
He will do anything to get me out of the royals.
Sir Robert Fellowes was made a lord in 1998.
What's going on there?
COVID, COVID.
happened This little boy is called Philip.
His full name is Philip Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderberg-Glucksberg, and he grew up in Germany.
He was raised amongst his Nazi in-laws, some of whom later became high-ranking members of the SS.
His Nazi relatives then sent him to this school in southern Germany, where he studied for a while under the Nazi curriculum.
Philip later recalled that there was much heel clicking.
There was a Nazi curriculum.
No, I'm not going to have the Hitler speeches echoing in the background.
Batter being part of the curriculum.
You've got to have at least a passing awareness of what the Führer's views are if you're on the Nazi curriculum.
There was much heel-clicking, and shouts of Heil Hitler were compulsory.
And here's Philip in Darmstadt.
Right.
It's actually a forebearer of Kagné.
One of his big influences was this little bunch.
And here's Philip in Darmstadt, in the heart of Germany, in November 1937, attending a family funeral for some of his Nazi in-laws.
Marching in front of a Siegheiling crowd, this is Philip, next to Christoph, his SS brother-in-law, and Philip, his Nazi stormtrooper brother-in-law.
Imagine if a man with a past like this had somehow ended up marrying into British aristocracy.
Well, he did.
And as we know, he got first prize.
He became the Duke of Edinburgh, also known as Prince Philip, after marrying Princess Elizabeth, the future Queen of England.
British lawyers have warned us of 87 legal issues concerning this film.
Several of those warnings concern the following interview.
I think Prince Philip is somebody who is devoid of any internal sense of right and wrong.
So deep down, he cares nothing about anybody else.
He regards everybody else as potentially a threat.
He is completely selfish.
And that is very like Fred West or any other psychopathic individual.
Oliver James is one of Britain's leading clinical psychologists.
Heavy, Fred West, along with his wife Rose West, murdered quite a lot of young women in, I think, late 80s, early 90s.
The Wests, there are a couple that have picked up sort of vagrant or near-vagrant women and sex workers, murdered and buried him in the garden.
So it's not a favourable comparison there between Fred West and Prince Philip there.
Yet lawyers told us that we could not include his professional diagnosis of Prince Philip.
Fred West wasn't.
So we looked for the current medical definition of psychopathy and discovered that most psychopaths are not convicted criminals but function normally in society.
We also found that psychopaths tend to gravitate towards highly paid professions such as the legal profession and, oh dear, us filmmakers.
Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip have traditionally been presented to the public as role models for the rest of society.
But why?
Certainly.
Philip's been in half the beds of England, including two of his wife's close family.
But who?
Do you want me to say that or not?
Yes, good one.
Princess Margaret and Prince Alexander.
I don't think that she was somebody who was a kind of wouldn't would have wanted to marry a psychopath.
I think she must have got a very nasty shock when she found out quite how unpleasant he is.
But obviously being the sort of person she is.
Yeah, hello Joe.
Yeah, his head is twisting.
He's not comfortable with that.
Or isn't it that way?
You need to untwist your head, mate.
But obviously being the sort of person she is, she said, well, that's it.
You know, I've got to stick with this and da-da-da.
And he's going to shag anything that moves and I can't do anything about that.
That's what they all do anyway, isn't it?
Almost everyone has heard rumours about Prince Philip's innumerable extramarital affairs.
Yet newspapers have never published full reports, whereas they routinely expose the affairs of pop stars, footballers and other celebrities.
Why?
Because in Britain, the media dare not challenge the authority of those at the very top.
I have a friend of mine who was at a party where he was, where he had to observe the disgusting sight of Prince Philip wearing a leather jacket.
Nurse Nikki, we've got to do something about this flow.
I mean, like the show's nearly over.
I've still got half a bag.
Unless do you think I can drive home with this?
Got to figure out his neck.
Yeah, he's got a sort of a toy twist.
Oh, you've got to go.
I've got to soon, but can you step up the pace?
Or what if I drove home with that?
I could take out my own catheter.
I've done it before.
Catheter?
Finish it.
Let's see if you can finish it.
Come on, speed it up.
Speed it up.
Actually, to tell you the truth, Jake, it makes me feel so nauseous when it speeds up.
But do speed it up.
You watch me.
It's tedious and grotesque.
Well, you know, this is the same amount of medication in higher bags, but it's even more diluted than it was last time.
Speed it up.
Maybe we've got faster.
What's the mechanism for speeding out that little dial there?
Just roll it up.
I mean, you told me a lot of stories about your past and things you could do.
So you're going to have medicine and a little bit of vitamins.
It needs to be the best thing.
Let's just see what happens.
It's about the show.
You just throw up over the show.
See.
And twist your neck.
Dancing to a stone song with his hand halfway up the skirt of some young woman.
This is, you know, and that's not an unusual event at all for Prince Philip.
He's done that sort of thing many times.
This isn't a question of morality.
It's a question of media cowardice.
The British press usually love nothing more than exposing the peccadillos of eminent people.
All except senior members of the royal family who are mysteriously exempt.
Funny though.
You may think that we should have given Prince Philip a right of reply in this film.
Well, we did.
But he declined our invitation, as did the entire royal family.
And they are not the only ones.
In fact, if you're wondering why you're not hearing from any members of the British establishment in this film, it's certainly not for want of trying on our part.
We asked all of these pillars of the establishment to take part, and they all refused.
That's not a good way of showing those names.
That was a weird effect.
They were sort of stacking on top of each other.
White and black text on top of each other.
You have to read it on the way in and on the way out.
Like, well, look, this was almost internet before the internet, this.
Like, he made a sort of an online viral film that was getting repressed.
But when was it?
It's like, it's quite old.
It's probably after 2011 because he hadn't made a mention of something that happened in the year.
Yeah, so it's not that old.
Well, it's not that old.
What's it called?
It looks old.
Unlawful killing is something called.
Unlawful killing.
You said 2011.
The story of the time.
Yeah, May 13th, 2011.
So he's all on media cowardice, and it took him 15 years to make this bloody documentary.
Oh, Donnie.
He was trying his hardest.
Come on.
He grew and shaved off a beard five times in production.
I think he's done a good job.
What you are seeing is what the seas...
I know, that's CCTV.
What you are seeing is what the CCTV camera at the entrance to the armour tunnel was recording at the time of the crash.
Nothing because it was switched off even though it was usually switched on 24 hours a day Was that just another coincidence or something more sinister?
I suppose yeah, this is like I bet it's connected to Epstein, you know like that this uh there's an elite strata of folks that at very minimum can cut a minute here or there out of surveillance footage.
Yeah, for some reason CCTV cams just never work.
Yeah, haven't you seen them?
Never working when you want them to work.
Pentagon, Borny.
He turns them off.
They're just always like you get what you need when you need it or you don't get what you don't, you know, it's off.
It's very convenient.
But I remember when this happened, you would have never thought.
I mean, I know there was thoughts like she was killed, but think about how much more believable it is now because of all the crazy stuff that's happened in our world.
Yeah, it's completely plausible.
...the day.
Was that just another coincidence?
Or something more sinister?
Well, you do ask a good question.
You say, how is it that every single traffic camera in that tunnel was switched off for not working?
Even though no cameras recorded the crash, it is beyond doubt that a white Fiat Uno collided with Dodi and Diana's car in the tunnel and contributed to their deaths.
The French police tried to deny its existence at first, but too many eyewitnesses saw it and paintwork from a white Fiat Uno was found on the Mercedes where the two cars had collided.
So, who was driving it?
Suspicions fell on James Andenson, a photographer with connections to the secret services.
He had been following Dodie and Diana earlier in the month during their holiday in the Mediterranean, but he was not amongst the paparazzi who were waiting outside the Paris Ritz on the night of the crash.
Andenson was a millionaire paparazzo, a very well-known member of the paparazzi on the continent, made a great deal of money out of royal pictures, lived in some style in the French countryside.
He told police that he wasn't in Paris on the night of the crash, but gave two completely different accounts of where he had been.
His wife and son also gave him contradictory alibis.
Privately, he told friends that he had been there in the tunnel in Paris that night.
Crucially, Anderson owned a white Fiat Uno.
It was said of this Fiat Uno that it was up on chocks and didn't work.
Well, that appears to be untrue, too.
It was driven many hundreds of miles around the French countryside.
So the whole question of the Fiat Uno and who was driving it, which is of course absolutely crucial, totally crucial to the investigation, has never been resolved.
And you have to say why.
In May 2000, Anderson's body was found in a blazing car in Woodland near Montpellier.
In a Ministry of Defence field, shooting range field, in a car which was burned out and locked, but no keys were in the car or in his pocket.
That's insane.
And the go on.
It's just getting like, I didn't really hear about the theater and no stuff, but this stuff, like, all the cameras were off.
This guy nudged him.
He said he wasn't in the country.
Turns out he was in the country and all this stuff.
And then he was burnt in his car with no keys.
It's just so obviously something happened.
I'm 100% in.
Thanks.
You're on board.
And the police claimed he committed suicide.
They claimed this, even though the fireman who found him says he saw two bullet holes in Anderson's skull.
You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to point out Anderson's skull.
You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to point out that it's difficult for a man to shoot himself twice in the head and then set fire to his own car before dying.
He could have been very depressed.
Sometimes I get very down.
Yeah, it's interesting even actually to talk about conspiracy theorists.
Think about how much the media landscape has changed now.
It's impossible.
There's going to be real interesting ramifications, I reckon, in the coming months around Epstein.
And in a sense, just the accumulative awareness that the way that power is sustained is by maintaining secrets that if you knew the truth, you would become non-compliant.
Think about how much now you could turn everything off remote, like even control cars remote.
They wouldn't even need the Fiat to drive up and tap the bumper.
They could just control it.
Yeah, now, as soon as anyone dies or as soon as anything happens, if it's convenient that who benefits?
If it's sort of like a benefit to someone, you're immediately like going to question whatever you're told, huh?
Shoot himself twice in the head and then set fire to his own car before dying.
I would like a monarchy that has more contact with its people.
By the end of the inquest, so much suspicious evidence had been heard that the establishment coroner could take no chances.
So he prevented the jury even considering murder as an option.
His summing up lasted almost three days, during which he continually distorted the evidence, ignored much of the eyewitness evidence, and tried to convince the jury that the crash was nothing more than an accident.
At the start, I told you it was not necessary to solve every sub-plot in the surrounding.
There are certain matters relating to Henri Paul that simply cannot be resolved with any clarity.
I've not heard in person from Professor LeCompe, Dr. Pepin and others concerned with the analysis of Henri Paul's sample.
In common with most road traffic accidents, this collision did not appear to have a single cause.
The relationship between Diana and Dodie had reached the point where it could no longer be tolerated.
The conspiracy theory has to be minutely examined and shown to be without any substance.
Will you please now retire to consider your verdicts?
But the one thing the establishment and the royal courts couldn't fix was the jury.
Eleven ordinary men and women.
Well, they can now, because in the UK, as you saw in the show yesterday, Jury trials are being phased out.
At least there's an attempt to normalize that idea.
Amazing.
That's where the unpacked from the show yesterday.
If you haven't watched that yet, watch that.
Now was.
Well, not right now, you know, after this.
Was the jury.
11 ordinary men and women who ignored the coroner's one-sided summing up and instead spent almost a week examining the evidence for themselves.
Richard Wiseman, diary entry.
It's day 93 and we're still waiting for the verdict.
Nobody around me can understand why the jury are taking so long.
The hacks all expected a verdict of accidental death to be returned within seconds.
Well, did you see those sandwiches they just took in for the jury?
Yeah, I mean, my worry is they look far too good.
You know, if they'd given them some curled-up shite, you know, they'd agree by two, give the verdict by three, and be owned by four.
Fact is, it's becoming painfully obvious that the jury, unlike the press, bothered to listen to the evidence.
They are now analyzing it very, very carefully.
*Dramatic Music*
A year after the inquest into the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Alfyed, we asked a cross-section of ordinary people what the jury's verdict was.
Accidental death.
Purely accidental.
It was accident.
It was accidental.
Accidental death.
It was an accident.
Accidental death, I believe.
That was an actual accident.
Accidental death.
Accidental deaths.
The answers the public gave us were uniformly inaccurate.
They said the paparazzi didn't.
The paparazzi tracing her.
I think, yes, I saw the paparazzi.
Around the world, people have been massively misled by the British media into believing that the deaths were an accident caused by the paparazzi.
But in reality, the jury did not blame the paparazzi, and they decided that the crash was not a mere accident, but something much more serious.
In the end, the jury delivered the most powerful verdict that the coroner had left open to them.
Unlawful killing is defined in law as homicide or manslaughter.
And the jury blamed the following vehicles, not the paparazzi.
What is also interesting, overlooked, I think, almost totally by the media and commentators, was the wording of the verdict.
Well, the detail of this verdict was such that it was an unlawful killing contributed to by, and one of the factors was, following vehicles, not the paparazzi.
Initially, journalists were confused, but within minutes, the BBC was reporting that the jury had blamed the paparazzi, and the rest of the media followed the example of the British establishment's impartial broadcaster.
Soon, the verdict had been spun by the media into an accident caused by the paparazzi.
And so, a lie got halfway around the world while the truth is still putting its boots on.
The altered verdict was still on the BBC's news website at the time of making this documentary.
Whether it was a case that the commentators in the end wanted it to be the paparazzi and so immediately assumed that and hadn't, and often some of them didn't really follow it on a daily basis, they might read in the odd transcript.
And certainly a change of that kind, which was very important because following vehicles was a much bigger category than just paparazzi because of the reasons I've just given.
That nobody either wanted to understand what that meant, or if they did, weren't prepared to include it in their commentaries.
The media declared that Muhammad al-Fayyed had been defeated.
But in reality, the jury's verdict supported what he'd been saying all along.
Diana and Dodi were unlawfully killed.
2011.
And the British media, after seriously misreporting the verdict, refuse even to discuss what the verdict really means.
Their deafening silence speaks volumes about the deeply troubling outcome.
There was a feeling of openness about it.
And yet at the end of it, I have to say, even as a supposedly educated scientific person, I would still say I don't feel at all confident that it got to the bottom of it.
People will still go on thinking there is something happening here because they know the British establishment.
They know their capacity for cover-ups.
The newspapers in this country really don't want to upset the very top.
Hey, what I think is good about this documentary is that albeit 14 years old, it pre-empts and demonstrates a lot of trends that really expand over the coming years and that are more easily articulated in this new media landscape.
Media compliance, media settling on a narrative, powerful outspoken figures being smeared or in this instance unlawfully killed, manipulation of truth, the potential of the deep state to cover stuff up.
I mean in a sense this is what independent media has become because if the centralized media just report an almost pre-agreed narrative or a narrative that can't present a challenge to existing powers then the whole role or point of independent media becomes to provide counter narratives or to focus on niche issues.
So I think it's actually a really brilliant piece of filmmaking, kind of intrepid.
It deals also with the sort of challenges you deal with in independent media, like sometimes it don't seem so credible and plausible because it's kind of cheaper, graphics, access to good interviews and things like that, you know, like other than the sort of very top tier of people in independent media, you're going to deal with them kind of restrictions.
And it takes a story that you feel like, well, like already someone like sort of substantially younger, like Luke and I guess Isaac would not even be aware of why Princess Diana would be a controversial figure and why she'd be someone that it might be convenient or helpful if she died.
And it's almost actually thinking about it.
She belonged to it in a way that along with the death of Diana and 9-11 I think represent the end of a particular era.
That was a sort of a watershed moment.
After that, media changes, power changes, communication changes, celebrity changes, everything alters.
And I think Keith Hamlet's done a really good job of Telling this story, especially with the things like them reconstructions, man, where it's always at high risk of being a bit cheesy and you know, sort of some of them, right, put it to you type performances and everyone's plummy voices and ridiculous names.
This Lemran, also, it's the first time we've got through an entire one of these.
Tommy Robinson, I still don't know what happened to that guy.
Still curious about the saxophone music that accompanied some, oh yeah, that was Project Mockingbird, wasn't it, or MK Ultras?
What else have we done on here?
What's the very first?
We've done 9-11, Pizzagate, Death of Diana.
Let us know in the comments and chat what else you'd like to see us cover.
We've resolved a lot of conspiracy theories.
I'm thinking we ain't done no extraterrestrial stuff yet.
Or not nearly enough Nazis.
Although the Nazis have found their way even into this, didn't they?
There was a little Nazi moment.
They're always around.
This country really don't want to upset the very top.
The most bizarre thing is that normal people in this country who don't necessarily enjoy conspiracy theories, if you go to a bar, you'll find three people who go, ooh, but the Royals did it, didn't they?
I think most of the British public still believe it was dodgy.
Nurse Nikki left the room.
I've taken total power back on my drip.
It's going in at maximum speed now, okay?
So this is it.
I've got two more minutes to remain conscious.
I believe Muhammad Al-Fayed will always believe it's dodgy.
I believe the establishment want it all to just go away for whatever reason.
And I don't know the answers to these questions.
All I know is that the inquest has probably all I know is that the inquest has probably raised more questions than in the end it answered.
And it answered a lot of questions.
I would still say it was fantastically convenient for the monarchy that this woman died.
Just think what she might be saying now if she hadn't died.
Think what a problem it would have created for Camilla.
Think of it.
It would have created serious constitutional problems.
Even she was perfectly capable of being somebody who started a movement to end the monarchy.
The full facts about Camilla.
Yeah.
Yeah.
What about that, Massey?
Yeah, she could have ended it all.
And we live in a time now where it's even more volatile.
I think that's what we're seeing in sort of Trump's America, that Trump's merely the initial foray into unusual and anomalous political figures.
The next phase could be someone like Musk starts a third party or candidates like Bobby Kennedy, you know, and people always say, oh, it's like Ross Perot type of thing.
Hey, I sped it right up now.
Do I seem different?
I can just have, you're good.
Yeah, I feel unusual.
I'm developing some really unusual opinions about power and power dynamics across the world.
It's really coming in.
Yeah, my mitochondria are on fire.
It's extraterrestrials.
I can feel them.
It's kicking in hard.
The Alma Tunnel crash may never be known, but we do know this for certain.
Dodie and Diana were the victims of an unlawful killing.
And various parts of the establishment, with their unerring instinct for mutual self-preservation, then seem to have rallied around to cover it up.
They covered for each other and suppressed uncomfortable facts, and they think that they have got away with it.
The British establishment think that they have got away with murder.
but then what's new they've been getting away with murder for centuries Since the crash, some curious things have happened.
Charles has married Camilla, as he'd always wanted to.
MI6 now publicly admit that they have been involved in killings.
Diana has been airbrushed out of official royal history.
No action has been taken against the police chiefs who suppressed Diana's sworn statement predicting that the royal family would kill her in a car crash.
Instead, they both now sit in the House of Lords.
Muhammad al-Fayyed was ordered by Prince Philip to take down the royal warrants that had hung for decades outside Harrods.
And shortly before selling the store in 2010, and more in sorrow than in anger, he symbolically burned them inside of his son's grave.
I am destroying this royal crest as a tribute to my son, Dori.
I feel that he is looking down on this today.
There was a clear verdict of unlawful killing.
So why has nobody been arrested?
What is at the core of all this is racism?
Powerful people in this country, my country, don't want to hear me talking about Prince Philip's Nazi background, but I have to because it's just 100% true.
*music*
The weird end to the documentary, or is that just that I've got a lot of good thing?
Fire to them.
Set fire to them during the documentary.
Can you do that?
Come on, set fire to them now.
Yeah, all right.
I will.
They egged him on.
Yeah, prove you don't care about the red.
Fuck the king.
Yeah, do it.
Burn the crest.
Go on, grab them and burn the crests.
Weird ton.
Also, I feel very nervous.
This is not good.
They wouldn't accept me or my son.
They won't accept you now.
They fell in love with Diana.
They murdered them.
Despite obtaining a verdict that vindicates his years of struggle, Muhammad al-Fayyed fights on.
Still grieving for his Son, he has opted for truth rather than happiness.
Legal action is continuing in France against the police chiefs who suppressed vital evidence, and the establishment cover-up is being steadily exposed day by day.
Truth will out, and as more and more people come to understand what the damning inquest verdict really means, we may soon witness what the British establishment fears most.
The end of the monarchy.
Oh, there we go.
So, in a sense, this documentary is a precursor of much of what subsequently happened in independent media, deepening cynicism about the establishment, mistrust of mainstream media, and an ability to tell alternative stories.
Let me know what you thought about it in the comments and chat as well as letting us know what else you would like to see us watch along with you.
We'll be back next week, not for more of the same, but with more of the different, especially given that I've fundamentally altered my consciousness.
Massey, you alright?
You'll join us next time, will you?
Yeah, definitely.
Wordlessly.
I mean, I've entered into a slightly different realm.
It's weird when you do this on camera, especially as a person who doesn't take drugs anymore.
Oh, nurse, step in, would you?
I can't, I don't think I can take these things on.
I should have, what happened was, is I took a risk.
When you stepped out, I sped it up substantially.
It's doing good, though.
You're finally getting to the bottom of it.
Right.
We got to the bottom of this IV at the same time as we got to the bottom of the murder of Diana.
Unlawful killing, unlawful IV.
The whole thing started to make sense.
No, it was, it was a lawful IV, brilliantly administered.
Thank you very much.
I've never felt better.
Barely hold it together.
Thanks for joining us.
Cheers, Luke.
Thanks, Messi.
Cheers, Jake.
Isaac, you're right, mate.
Yes, sir.
All right, see you next week.
Nothing more of the same or different.
Till then, if you can, stay free.
Export Selection