“Go Back To South Africa” Feud REIGNITES As Trump THREATENS To Use DOGE To Investigate Musk! - SF606
|
Time
Text
Ladies and gentlemen, Russell Brand Action.
Confidential conspiracy theory.
Trying to bring real journalism to the American people.
Hello, you Awakening Wonders.
Thanks so much for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
So much to discuss.
Musk-Trump war of words reignited, the big, beautiful bill, seeming to drive an irreconcilable wedge between them.
Musk saying he will support candidates that want to reduce the American deficit in primaries.
Trump saying he will oppose him.
Let me know in the comments and chat right now which side of this divide you fall upon.
Are you an Elon Musk American or a Donald Trump American?
Can you even conceptualize trillions of dollars of debt?
Can you hold that in your mind?
I'm going to level with you.
I cannot.
I can't.
I actually don't understand debt at all.
Or money.
Or in some days, basic morality.
But thankfully, I don't have to understand it.
All I have to do is surrender to God.
We've got a lot of things to talk about, man.
I've got a brilliant clip of Peter Thill talking about global government as the Antichrist.
In my country, BlackRock are trying to take over farming.
Women are planning to have sex with robots is what I'm hearing.
I mean, there's a lot going on, guys.
There's a lot.
It's been an incredible 24 hours for Donald Trump.
Wherever you're watching this, X YouTube.
This is the kind of stuff we'll be discussing.
So if you're watching us on YouTube, click the link in the description.
This is really our only chance to oppose globalism and the centralization of extraordinary authority.
X-Man, whatever you think of Elon Musk, he's done a fantastic job of ensuring that one platform at least remained a free speech bastion.
And we can tell you with personal experience and great authority granted to us that Rumble cares a lot about free speech.
So join us over on Rumble and get Rumble Premium.
Thanks, Timcast, for the raid.
If you're over here from Tim Cast, tell us what you want to talk about, guys.
We're talking about globalization and a new level of surveillance and demonic authority being asserted through technology that Peter Thiel himself is talking about.
We got that coming up.
Listen to this post on X-ray from someone called Ron Filipowski.
In the past 24 hours, Trump's friend Elon Musk, Thomas Massey, Japan, a judge in Israel, the CEO of AT ⁇ T, Jerome Powell, Canada, Tom Tillis, a Forbes reporter, Harvard, and migrants with being eaten by Burmese pythons in the Everglades, while releasing a new line of colognes.
And we'll be talking about those colognes.
Smelling a Trump.
Smelling a Trump a little later.
Big Beautiful Bill passed.
Chuck Schumer is a douchebag.
I'm a Christian nationalist.
Trump's too cozy with Israel.
So they're solid steel.
Dean, SNJ, just having a back and forth row with someone.
If you're watching us over on locals, hello, my beloved darlings.
If you're watching us on X, get over to Rumble.
If you're watching us on YouTube, get over to Rumble and be with us in our cozy little revolutionary radical environment.
Let's have a look at these colognes.
Look at that.
A glorious gold statue of your man.
Victory 45-47 because they're all about winning, strength, success for men and women.
Get yourself a bottle and don't forget to get one for your loved ones too.
Enjoy, have fun and keep winning.
Have we ever had a sitting president releasing aromas?
Obviously, Joe Biden was releasing them pretty regularly from his anus, but not as a product, more as a mistake.
Barack Obama waited till he left office before doing them sort of apocalyptic Netflix documentaries.
How do you feel about a sitting president engaged in commerce?
Do you care?
Do you not really care?
Let's have a look at this.
This is a bit of promo for you.
Fragrances are here.
They make a great Christmas present.
I've named them Fight, Fight, Fight because they represent winning.
We all want to be winning.
We have to win as a nation.
We want to win as a family.
This fragrance is...
Jake, would you like some of that aroma bottled up, squirted at you, right into the beard?
I'm not a big cologne person, but I think it's amazing.
He has colognes.
Why not?
Have colognes.
Have colognes.
What's the other thing?
There's them trainers, sneakers in your language.
You like to douse yourself in a gorgeous Trump cologne, Isaac?
I don't think so.
I don't really wear colognes.
I prefer to let loose the old foreign pheromones themselves.
Let them do their work out there.
If you were out here, if you were in this glorious redneck Riviera with Us, you'd be able to smell the sweetness of just three men toiling to bring you free speech.
The UK and the US are the best of friends on a good day.
What's going on in my crazy nation?
Who's the greatest living Englishman?
Let me know in the comments and chat.
Say me, otherwise, I'll be offended.
Here, Piers, Piers Morgan, the British journalist and broadcaster, has chatted to your very own Jake Paul.
And it seems they have some kind of set too.
Paul Schober, all Russell needs is his natural musk.
That natural musk has got me into a lot of trouble.
I was releasing them spores and pheromones throughout the world, thinking I was a giddy representative of a pagan and hedonistic age, but it turns out the wind changes.
And if you speak too freely, and if you explicitly state that no global authority, no national authority, no commercial or corporate authority should ever be placed ahead of God, that no one should be subjugated and that there is a path for all of us to redemption through Christ.
You start saying that stuff, my word, they'll load up against you.
Let's have a look at Jake Paul and Piers Morgan getting it on.
Fragrances are here.
They make a great Christmas present.
I just can't stop advertising this.
I'm going to get some.
I won't wear it.
My mate Joe, beloved Joe, he likes a fragrance.
A lot of chauffeurs will wear a musk because I think it's because they've got someone climbing into their environment.
They've got someone literally around the back of them, hanging out the back of them.
And I don't think people like it.
I think they like to have a nice aroma on them.
It makes the nostrils burn a little bit, you know, sometimes if it's too...
I don't like to have the snout invaded.
Let me know what you guys think.
I reckon that that trump aroma, what's it going to smell of?
You know, when you're sort of like in a sports locker room, a sort of a potent nut bag, Steve Coco says, it smells like Bigfoot's dick.
That's an anchorman quote right there.
White male platypus.
Oh, Tommy, Tommy.
Tommy, Tommy, Tommy, Tommy Robinson.
If ever a man in the UK should have a fragrance, it's Tommy Robinson.
Tommy, come on the show, mate.
We want to talk.
I'm really keen to talk about, this is the conversation I want to have.
With all of the great work Tommy Robinson's done pushing for this inquiry into rape gangs in the UK, how do we reconcile the fact that right now the UK has a strong Muslim population, the vast majority of whom are great British people who deserve to be treated with respect?
Even if you don't like the religion of Islam, even if you don't, then, you know, I mean, you've got to find a way to get these communities to come together.
Fuck your king of Jewish wholesalers in the ass.
Oh my God.
Oh my God.
I'm not going to read any more of Polish's comments out.
I don't even fully understand that.
It was so offensive.
It was very, very offensive.
Let's have a look at it.
Come on, I want to see Jake Paul walking out of an interview with Piers Morgan.
I'm the killer.
I get in the ring with the best people.
It's interesting that he's elected to wear that sombrero for the interview, isn't it?
Like Jake Paul, I bet Jake, I mean, he looks pretty good at fighting.
Whenever I've seen him fight, he looks, I mean, didn't he?
He beat up an albeit, you know, elderly.
A little bit older.
Mike Tyson.
A little bit older.
He likes to fight the older people.
The elderly.
Fight the elderly.
What about when Shane Gillis said that Joe Biden's the only president you could punch assassinate?
Jake Paul could punch assassinate Biden.
And what kind of Musk would he release?
Russell reads more troll comments than real people comments.
No, I don't.
I try and keep a good balance.
Best people.
And you get in the ring with a guy who's 50.
He's literally nearly as old as me.
The only proper boxer you fought was Tommy Fury, and he beat you.
Fought multiple boxers with professional records, including Mike Tyson himself.
Peak Tyson, you wouldn't have lasted 10 seconds.
And you versus going to the gym, you're still a fat ass.
We can make up hypotheticals.
should go to the gym.
Oh, if you went to the gym, you would...
I don't think I can beat Mike Tyson.
I don't think you go to the gym.
I think you're a great YouTuber.
You think that your opinion matters.
Well, why are you doing my show if it doesn't?
Oh, I'm just taking your audience to sell pay-per-views.
I don't give a fuck about your show.
You dumbass.
This is a fucking business enterprise.
Cheers, Jake.
Really enjoyed that.
Well, I don't know that that was the best example of human interaction that I've ever seen.
Independent media in general, I think, is pretty fantastic.
It gives a voice to so many new communities and ensures that the centralized control of legacy media has been punctured and is maybe even fatally wounded.
But do we have a responsibility to ensure that love and beauty is a significant part of what we stream?
Let me know in the comments and chat.
We've got some brilliant stuff coming up.
Charlie Kirk debates fundamental differences between men and women.
I'm really interested to look at that in a few seconds.
We're going to be looking in depth at the Trump Musk spat.
We're looking at Florida Alligator Alcatraz.
Alligator Alcatraz.
Do you know about that, you guys?
You're nodding enthusiastically.
Oh, yeah.
Alligator Alcatraz.
We're going to be looking at that.
And we're going to be looking at Benny Johnson's AOC digs.
He's saying that she ain't just Alexandra from the Bronx.
You know, it's going to be pretty good.
All right.
Let me have a look at this, though.
First of all, Pedro Pascal might be a homosexual.
I don't know.
I mean, this is things that people are saying.
Would that make you love me?
you There you go.
There you go.
Is that for a cologne?
Is that a cologne commercial?
It could be, couldn't it?
Everything's a cologne commercial.
Everything is a total commodification.
Everything is some sort of aroma that you could splash on your nut bag.
They never asked you to do one of those?
Like how like, you know, those like real intense cologne commercials where you swim in the water and stuff?
No, it's a shame because I could do it now.
Now that I've got through the pressure diet.
We need an ad.
We need to make an ad.
Does anyone want to advertise cologne on our show?
Let's see.
Let's see.
I say that we make our own colognes in our own gonads.
Now, let's have a look at Charlie Kirk.
He's debating feminists about the fundamental differences between men and women.
The main story we'll be talking about today will be the Musk-Trump spat, the true nature of power, whether this whole thing is an engineered and orchestrated ruse to distract people, a kind of bait and switch, or, did you see the way I see it?
Through the cubrician lens of Dr. Strangelove, that human beings are flawed and fallible, broken, that no one individual, whether it's a tech billionaire, genius, or a president made for times like these that needs a rhino hide and an entrepreneurial mind, still, nevertheless, is a human being flawed, fallen, broken, in need of salvation.
We'll be looking a little later at Peter Thiel's recent interview with the New York Times, where he says he fears the Antichrist.
And by his reckoning and mine, the Antichrist will come in the form of a one-world government.
Is the Antichrist on his presumably here's the Antichrist?
Is the Antichrist going to have a penis?
I'm assuming a scaly, evil, translucent one.
Let's have a look at Charlie Kirk dating the all-important differences between men and women.
I think with some feminists, check it out.
If I sit down with men, what do they always talk about?
Oh, that's not feminist.
Hey, this pause on the tape.
That's not a feminist.
God lover.
She's wearing a First World War sort of German.
I'll call that a kind of Kaiser Wilkelm style bonnet there.
see what goes on with these two.
They talk about macro concepts, big things, stock market, sports, you know, things that I don't know if you cast aspersions, but I'm assessing from the cleavage that these women are not in academia.
Sports, you know, things that are very, you know, like, let's just say bigger than individual.
Women, if you sit down, they'll talk a lot about conversations.
He's on a podcast called Whatever, that's like a young women's podcast where they talk about whatever.
Join us on whatever this week, where we'll be talking to Charlie Kirk.
Conversations or relationships, they're kids, very micro.
One of the reasons why men and women brains are different and they continue to be different is there's different skill sets.
And I think we can all acknowledge that.
The way that you frame it is like, oh, women are awesome at like small talk and like sewing or whatever, and then men are just awesome at like the stock market and being CHAPTER.
If you're going to talk about like representation being the thing that lets you know that, oh, men are obviously smarter.
I never said smarter.
I never said smarter.
I said different.
My wife does things with my child that I can't even dream of doing, such as having an intuition, compassion, empathy.
She can operate on 30 minutes of sleep.
I need eight hours.
Women have a different giftedness, I believe, given by God, that is completely different.
I never said smarter.
In fact, a woman's intuition is far better than my intuition.
I trust my wife's gut when it comes to people, when it comes to relationships, and she leans on me for, you know, investments or politics.
We are given different gifting.
Now, with that being said, some women have a gifting in that direction.
Those are the exception, though.
That's very interesting from Charlie Kirk.
Let me know what you think in the Rumble comments.
Do you think that the distinctions between men and women are as clear and as obvious as Charlie Kirk points out?
He said towards the end of it that there's a bell curve, that some women have those abilities, but those women are the exception.
What I would say when it comes to matters of raw political power is that that political power is not from Eden.
In a recent sermon that I attended, the pastor said, we were made for Eden, that we live in exile here.
Something that's clear from scripture, but I just heard it in a sermon recently and it kind of really landed on me.
Why is it we feel so uncomfortable, so restless, so helpless, so hopeless and homeless here?
It's because we are in exile that we were made for Eden.
And so men having adapted to these systems, which I regard as actually primarily satanic, can't be an expression of our nature unless men evolve.
And I would say that that's probably at odds with Charlie Kirk, who like Charlie Kirk's perspective.
I'm assuming Charlie Kirk, you know, I know Charlie Kirk is a Christian and a very well-informed and educated Christian.
What I feel is that we want to live in a world, in a culture that's an expression of our higher nature.
We can only achieve and access our higher nature through Christ, through owning and acknowledging our fallenness and turning to him.
Let me know what you guys think in the comments and chat about that.
I'm appearing at Turning Point, Charlie Kirk's event.
He started that Turning Point, huh?
I'm going there.
And let me know what you guys think or if you're going to that.
Turning point's obviously a Republican and right-wing organisation, but I'm going because I want to hang out with these people, see what's going on, learn a little bit about it.
Okay, you lot.
This is an interesting story.
A bunch of fifth-grade girls were arrested for plotting to murder a little boy and making it look like he took his own life.
I mean, I'm terrified to look at that story.
We'll be looking at it a moment, but in a moment, excuse me.
Before that, though, if you don't have Rumble Premium yet, get Rumble Premium now.
And here's a quick message from one of our partners.
Free speech is under attack, Jack, but Rumble refuses to take it lying down.
Rumble is farting out the fierce cock of authoritarianism and clamping shut the butt cheeks of free speech, baby.
We've always believed in empowering voices, no matter how unpopular.
And now we're taking that fight to the next level.
When major advertisers conspired to pull their dollary dues, even brands like Dunking Donuts turned their back, claiming Rumble had a right-wing culture.
But we're not here to fit a mold.
We're here to defend free expression.
How dare you?
How dare you?
Just look at some of these comments.
Keep it going, Russell.
Great stuff.
That is from Benito Mussolini.
Well done, Russell.
Magnificent.
I loved your take on Israel.
And that's from Mr. Goebbels.
You know, there is no right-wing culture Here on Rumble.
To strengthen this mission, we're excited to offer Rumble Premium a completely ad-free experience.
Except ironically, sometimes I do record the ads on Rumble Premium, but you get a behind-the-scenes glimpse.
Give us a glimpse, give us a glimpse, give us a glimpse, give us a glimpse, give us a glimpse, give us a glimpse, give us a glimpse.
A completely ad-free experience with exclusive benefits.
We're friends, but with benefits.
Not benefits like that, Gritta Tunberg.
If that's your real name.
Griffetunberg.
Which I doubt.
Content from creators like Russell Brand.
Yo, I'm that dude.
Doctor Disrespect.
Are you even a real doctor?
Timcast and the Muck Club with Crowder.
It's more than a subscription.
It's a stand for free speech.
Your voice matters.
For a limited time, you can get $10 off an annual plan using the Rumble code BRAND.
Now, I do want you to do that because my contract is up for renewal and it would really help me.
So go get it right now.
Visit rumble.com forward slash premium forward slash brand and claim your discount today.
Together we can turn the tide whether you join Rumble Premium or simply keep watching.
Your support helps keep free speech alive and with free speech we can be free together.
Subscribe to Rumble now.
Yay!
Okay then, so this is it guys.
Are we going to just let the world fall apart around us?
Do we even have any authority or power to prevent such a thing happening if it's the will of God?
Are we going to intervene in a spat between the world's most important and powerful men?
Would you even agree with that assessment?
Are Trump and Musk the most important and powerful men in the world?
Do we even have to make a choice?
Is there a choice emerging that goes beyond the worship of false idols and the acceptance of our current systems?
Is there a possibility that the technology that's currently being used to create an anti-Christ global system of domination could be inverted, flipped to grant us maximal personal sovereignty, excuse me, under him, under God?
This is stuff that we're going to be discussing over the next hour.
If you ain't got Rumble Premium yet, get Rumble Premium now.
Because the world needs the change fast.
And in order to achieve that, we need to have open, free, clear conversations.
Because a world in which little girls plot scooby-doo style, but like a weird, nefarious, and evil Scooby-Doo, to kill a boy and make it look like suicide is a world in need of radical change.
New details about a murder plot thought up by fifth grade girls at a West Valley school.
The girls accused of planning to stab their classmate and to try to make it look like a suicide.
12 news journalist Gabriella Bakery is live in Surprise with the latest on this case.
This is just unbelievable, Gabriella.
It is Chairman Troy, and according to the Surprise Police report, one of the suspects allegedly had just broken up with the boy they were targeting.
Some of the suspects told officers they didn't think they were going to go through with this plan, and they were too scared to tell an adult what was going on.
A conversation between four fifth-grade girls at recess turned into a criminal investigation.
According to a newly obtained police report, the girls are accused of plotting to kill their classmate at Legacy Traditional School in West Surprise by luring him into an outside bathroom and stabbing him in the stomach.
Quote, just end him is what they allegedly agreed upon while sitting at a lunch table on October 1st, 2024.
Each of the girls had a role in the plan, which included wearing gloves to hide fingerprints, forging a suicide note, and having lookouts.
The plan didn't pan out because another classmate overheard their conversation and told her.
So there'll be loads of reasons why that plan didn't pan out because they're little children.
It's not going to just be fingerprints that's the issue.
The suicide note's going to be ineligible.
It's going to be in the wrong handwriting.
I don't know.
Probably these are the kind of stories.
It's a bit like that Tommy Robinson documentary, in fact, that we're doing in our watch along.
You should watch the second part of that with us this Thursday.
Let me know in the comments and chat if you were one of the thousands of people that joined us for that watch-along.
Amazing.
It's one of the reasons why I'm so keen to get Tommy Robinson on this podcast, in fact, because he's had such an impact on the rape gang inquiry in the UK.
And it shows how malleable politics is, that they have to respond to us when we unite and unify.
Obviously, my personal interest is ensuring that Britain doesn't descend into a climate of hatred, race baiting, and constant conflict.
Although many would argue that's what's happening right now.
Anyway, his documentary centered on a playground spat where like a Syrian refugee lad and a British indigenous white lad had a fight and it got turned into an international incident and exploited by various sources on the right and left.
That happens all the time.
We're all used to that.
Yesterday when we were talking about Glastonbury, if you had a look at our video on that event yesterday when Bob Villen, a kind of drill punk artist from the UK said, kill the IDF.
Loads of people like on the left will jump on it.
Loads of people on the right will jump on it.
We just live in this continual blizzard of opinion now.
And that's why I believe we have to turn away from contemporary reflection and opining and to the deep truths of scripture.
Recognize the fundamental fact that we survive by grace, that we require faith and that we have to repent.
But if you make this world your God, this world will fail you and you will fail.
This is a chance for radical reevaluation and redemption.
Let me know what you think about that in the comments and chat.
Let's have a look at the rest of this crazy thing.
And told her parent and the school resource officer.
The arresting officer notes three of the girls and their families appeared remorseful and apologized, but one girl smiled, laughed, and made excuses.
In fifth grade, you're starting to really put a lot of emphasis and care about what your peers think about you.
Child and adolescent psychiatrist Dr. Mark Anderson tells me this time in a child's life can be difficult as they're susceptible to challenges of peer pressure and they still don't fully know right from wrong.
Pay attention to potential warning signs.
And if you're seeing that there might be an issue, then you don't know what to do.
There are doctors like myself.
There are a lot of people in the community that are here to help parents, to help families, and to help the kids.
And a spokesperson for Legacy Traditional Schools Tells me the safety and well-being of their students is their top priority and that they acted immediately and appropriate with the help of law enforcement on this matter from last year.
I also talked to the Maricopa County Attorney's Office, who tells me misdemeanor charges were referred to them last year, and this case has since been adjudicated.
Live in surprise, Gabriella Becura, 12 News.
Okay, well for me, that's just the amplification and exaggeration of a schoolyard spat, but it does provide you with a bit of a window and an insight into the failure of our culture.
Now, on the front line, the top of the bill, the main bout, it's Musk v.
Trump.
When they came together, it was Moida.
It was exciting.
It changed the political landscape.
In retrospect, how significant was the alliance between Musk and Trump for Trump's second election as 47?
Was it more important than Vivek Ramaswamy or Tulsi Gabbard or RFK or the endorsement of Tucker Carlson or the interview with Joe Rogan?
There were so many factors that came together.
Is the fact that JD Vance, a sort of a fine, self-made, alto-didactual, although Harvard-educated Catholic, is his VP?
Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
What seems to be happening now is the breakdown, not just of that alliance, but the breakdown of the optimism that took Trump into office, the belief that everything will be okay if you just have the right person in the Oval Office.
You know what I think, and it's maybe similar what you think.
The systems and institutions themselves are in need of such a radical re-evaluation that it don't matter how you rearrange the furniture within them.
Later in the show, we'll be talking about AOC and her self-mythologizing.
We'll be talking about the Democrat Party, how it's falling apart and devouring itself.
We'll talk about the emergence of figures like Bamdani, the resurgent communist threat, are alive and well in New York City.
What I'd like you to focus on here is the fact that Trump and Musk are opposing each other within existing political institutions.
Trump saying he's going to back people that are pro the Big Beautiful Bill against anyone that resists it.
Musk saying the reverse.
Both of them claiming that they have the American population on their side.
If you're watching us on YouTube, click the link in the description.
Join us over on Rumble right now to talk about this.
If you're on locals, let me know what you think about this story and what side in general you fall down, not fall down upon, land upon.
And let me know in the X chat as well.
We'll be with you if you're watching us on X for a little while, but we want you ultimately to join us over on Rumble.
Let's see what Trump's posting about this conversation.
This is Musk's post.
Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their heads in shame.
And they will lose their primary next year if it's the last thing I do on this earth.
Them's big words.
That's pretty extraordinary, isn't it?
Now, what I suppose is the aspect of the big, beautiful bill that Musk most opposes is, as he says there, the increase in debt, which was, and therefore the increase in the American deficit.
America, by Musk's reckoning, is a bankrupt nation.
Now, look, I don't understand global finance.
I don't understand many things as a matter of fact.
But let me know whether you think this is personal or ideological.
Let's have a look at Musk saying that he's going to support Thomas Massey.
Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government, oh, there it is, please support Thomas Massey.
The establishment is working to primary him because he's a genuine fiscal conservative and opposes the big bloated scam.
Musk says there publicly, I will.
Now, Thomas Massey is a politician that we've followed for a long time.
He was pretty open during the COVID pandemic, that he didn't trust the media, that he didn't trust the government's response.
He's been pretty honest and open during war.
Most of his interviews are informative, whether it was on Tucker Carlson a little while ago where he talked about AIPAC.
I certainly learned a great deal there.
Or recently, he's been on Theo Vaughn.
Thomas Massey might be the kind of independent leader that will become more and more significant if the technology that we have now has what I believe will be its best possible use, which is the service of decentralization.
If Peter Thiel is right that the Antichrist is a one-world government, then is it a simple matter of obvious truth that the best thing for us to do is decentralize wherever possible, that we should have the maximum amount of control in our own lives, the maximum amount of influence in our own communities, and the maximum impact in our own families?
Let me know what you think in the comments and chat about that.
Here, Thomas Massey and Theo Vaughan talk about, well, actually, it's that big, beautiful bill, which I still don't fully understand.
I can't get beyond the name.
It's a big, beautiful bill.
Inside of that big, beautiful bill is a provision for artificial intelligence corporations that says no for 10 years, no state or locality can regulate them.
And then it talks about zoning and routing, which if you, you know, some of your listeners may have seen this, like locally, somebody's, some big corporation wants to put a data center in your backyard.
Well, that's what Congress is trying to do.
They're trying to say that these corporations can override local zoning laws, that the local zoning board should take a back seat and let this big information center show up in your backyard that uses all kinds of water and all kinds of power and puts out all kinds of RF and has, you know, oh yeah, your fucking cousin's going to be walking down the street just fucking, you know, just fucking screaming out Amazon orders.
You know, it's going to be, what is happening, man?
So that's in the big, beautiful bill.
Okay.
And you can know that's evil.
You can know that's bad.
And Trump never campaigned on that.
But also in that bill is to enforce our borders, okay, to finish the wall.
Right.
So if you're a Republican and you vote for that bill, okay, you supported enforcing the border, but you also let AI basically take over your local and state governments.
Okay.
And then if you vote against it, well, then you're against the AI provision, but oh my gosh, you're for open borders.
You don't want to support the military.
There was $100 billion in there for the military.
There was, oh, you want to tax seniors.
There was a tax cut for seniors.
So you can't win for losing.
And so I don't blame a lot of my colleagues.
They come to Congress.
They have the best intentions.
And you get there and you're like, oh, my gosh, this whole game is rigged.
How am I going to play it?
Am I going to call it out?
Will that be the best for my constituents who elected me?
Or should I play along?
And most of them choose to play along.
Seems like the chat's pretty divided on Thomas Massey.
Many people saying that he's a man of great integrity.
Other people thinking that he's little more than a fraud.
I tend to fall on the side of those of you that think he's an authentic and important voice in the political forum.
Indeed, disagreement and conflict is going to be necessary in this time of radical transition and transformation.
indeed that's what we're about to embark on now elon musk's primary concern is a financial one and that's understandable isn't it given that his remit within your government briefly as the head of doge was to find route out and expose unnecessary expenditure and government waste.
Musk has a few important things to say.
One, he says that both parties are the same when it comes to matters of debt and expenditure, which seems pretty sort of striking and extraordinary.
And he's also suggesting there should be a new party.
Let me know in the comments and chat if you would vote for a new party.
This is a time of transformation and transition.
It happened in Europe for a while.
In Spain, there were new emergent parties like what were they called?
There was a Podemos, a popular party.
In Greece, there was the party Saritsa.
All these things started to happen.
Did you see that weird flash?
When the 2008 crash happened.
The 2008 crash was an indication that the system itself of global capital, global finance and global debt was collapsing.
Barack Obama bailed out the banks.
He gave birth through this action to the national populist movement that has Trump as its head.
Remember, because of the miracle of immediate communication through social media, the world's changing real fast.
In the Arab Spring that was near contemporaneous to that, there was a revolution in Egypt.
Egypt was changing real quick.
It could have gone any number of directions.
But what happened was that the Islamic Brotherhood were there and ready with an idea.
So in a liminal time, in a time of transition, they were able to step in.
You could argue that nationalism, patriotism, populism has a similar role in Western democracies.
Where there ain't a new and emergent idea yet, people revert to the last thing that works, attempt to reboot the last political and ideological movement or motion or notion that was successful for them.
I believe we have to find eternal truth, that we have to return to our Lord.
That might have all sorts of expressions politically and socially, of course it will.
But certainly there will be principles that are irrefutable because they don't come from man.
They come from God.
Now let's have a look at this transitional and extraordinary moment that's playing out.
These great popular, unique political figures, these unique cultural figures like Trump and Musk seem to be, whether consciously or not, delivering us to a point of change and transition.
Musk saying publicly that America needs a new or third party.
My country, the UK, is having its own sort of Trump moment as Nigel Farage, who's been an important political figure for a long time now, leads reform, which is kind of MAGA UK, really.
But because you are a little further along in your country, you're having your MAGA moment right now.
We can see that nationalism and patriotism, although those ideas and notions are to some degree understandable and valid to a point, are unlikely to deliver the solutions that we require.
Let's have a look at these couple of posts from Musk.
Here he is saying that there is a uniparty that's in charge.
And I suppose this graph sort of demonstrates ascending debt over time.
He's reposted an account called Rabbit Hole.
Debt under Democrats going up, debt under Republicans going up.
Neither of the major parties has been successful in addressing this issue.
And I suppose that Musk, in particular, was hoping to address it through Doge.
So that's an interesting little visual representation of his perspective.
He says, it's obvious with the insane spending on this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record $5 trillion, that we live in a one-pie country.
The Porky Pig Party.
That's pretty funny.
The Porky Pig.
I didn't think he was going to come up for a while.
I didn't think in my mind I'd be thinking about Porky Pig.
Like he does that, doesn't he?
I didn't think Porky Pig would be on my mind, but here he is.
Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people.
Well, that's a sentiment that it's difficult to disagree with.
Certainly, we need radical political change.
Even those of you that love Trump, and I love aspects of Trump, I've got to be honest, what I love about him is that he's confrontational, that he's explicit, that he's open in his attacks on corrupt institutions.
They'll go on the news and say to this day stuff like, you think we don't do the same things as China?
We'll be looking at that clip a little later.
There are a lot of things to admire about Trump.
I'm not sure how I feel about the colognes.
I'm not sure how I feel about the sneakers.
I'm not sure how I feel about him opposing people like Thomas Massey, who I believe are the kind of political figures that we need to support, whether you like him or not.
Surely if you agree with freedom of speech, if you agree with the principles upon which your country is founded, you want open conversation and debate.
Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
Now, here is Elon Musk underlining and laying out his perspective on debt and the fact, the significant fact that your interest repayments are larger than the Pentagon budget.
Let me make sure that I've got that correct.
Just the interest payments on the national debt exceed the Defense Department budget.
Let's have a look at that.
Now, if that's true, and I suppose it is because Zelon Musk wouldn't just say stuff that weren't true, let me know in the comments and chat.
We stand on the Epstein files moment from a couple of weeks ago.
If that's true, then it's something that's got to be addressed.
Let me know, baby.
Let me know.
If you're watching us on X, we'll be with you for a couple more minutes.
Then you've got to join us on Rumble and get Rumble Premium.
You get additional content from me, from Crowder, from Paul, from Greenworld.
Some of the greats there.
Let's have a look at Elon Musk's description of the debt situation.
America is also going bankrupt extremely quickly.
And everyone seems to be sort of Whistling past the graveyard on this one.
You know, the Defense Department budget is a very big budget.
Okay, it's a trillion dollars a year, DOD intel.
It's a trillion dollars.
And interest payments on the national debt just exceeded the Defense Department budget.
They're over a trillion dollars a year, just in interest and rising.
We're adding a trillion dollars to our debt, which our kids and grandkids are going to have to pay somehow every three months.
And then students are going to be every two months, and then every month.
And then the only thing we'll be able to pay is interest.
And it's just like a person at scale that has racked up too much credit card debt.
This does not have a good ending.
And so we have to reduce the spending.
Whenever I see Trump or Musk communicating, it becomes clear to me what their great abilities are.
They have authenticity, both of them.
They are both obviously extremely intelligent people, and it's not an accident that they've risen to these positions of power.
I have some sympathy for people that believe that there are institutions and occult interests that transcend the power of even significantly potent individuals like Trump and Musk.
But just to see him outlie and describe the problem like that is a further reminder of the brilliance of the man, I would say.
Now, when Musk and Trump relined, that power, that combined power, was sufficient to lead Trump into office.
I wonder if Trump and Musk in opposition will be enough to disrupt the Trump presidency.
Here, Donald Trump threatens Musk with an EV mandate.
Check this out.
Elon Musk knew long before he so strongly endorsed me for president that I was strongly against the EV mandate.
It is ridiculous and was also a major part of my campaign.
Electric cars are fine, but not everyone should be forced to own one.
Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa.
No more rocket launches, satellites, or electric car production, and our country would save a fortune.
Perhaps we should have Doge take a good, hard look at this.
Big money to be saved.
So Doge being potentially turned on Elon Musk now.
Gosh, that's terrifying, isn't it?
That's like a Frankenstein's monster moment where your own creation turns against you.
Now, here is a video of that claim being reiterated by Trump.
We'll look at that before wrapping up this subject.
What we're looking at, really, is two supremely powerful individuals that have risen to a degree of power and potency that exceeds the abilities of the systems and institutions that currently contains them because those systems and institutions are what in fact needs to change.
Let me know what you think about that in the comments and chat.
Let me know what you think about the idea of a third party and let me know if you agree with me that this is an indication that these institutions are going to have to be radically revised and re-evaluated.
That this is not just an American phenomenon, although that these are particularly American individuals, even though as Trump reminds us there, Elon Musk is a South African.
He's American in the sense that he's part of this American age, the entrepreneurialism, the avant-gardism, and the sort of robust bombast of Americana in the contemporary age.
Let's see what Trump is.
Are you going to afford Elon Musk?
I don't know.
I mean, we'll have to take a look.
We might have to put Joe John Elon.
You know?
You know what Joe Jesus?
Joja's the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon.
Wouldn't that be terrible?
He gets a lot of subsidies, Peter.
But Elon's very upset that the EV mandate is going to be terminated.
And you know what?
When you look at it, who wants, not everybody wants an electric car.
I don't want an electric car.
I want to have maybe gasoline, maybe electric, maybe a hybrid.
Maybe someday a high-dunction.
If you have a high-diving car, it has one problem.
It blows up, you know?
So I'm going to give that one to Peter.
I'm going to let Peter test it off.
Could this entire spat be as simple as that, a squabble about electric vehicles?
Or is this an ideological crisis that could change the course of American history?
Are we witnessing in the form of a showdown between these two figures the end of the idea that MAGA populism via this immersive and omniscient technology can deliver the political results that it for a moment promised?
Are we, like Elon Musk suggests, going to require a new political pathway?
Will Trump continue to preside to the end of his term?
Certainly the idea of a third Trump term, which will be anti-constitutional, seems ever more unlikely.
How will all of this play out?
What will be the global ramifications?
And will we at last pick up the mantle and chalice required of all of us to openly, directly, explicitly and consciously accept the power we have been granted?
The power to repent, the power to achieve by faith what cannot be achieved by work, and to recognize that this kingdom is fallen and even the greatest and most celebrated individuals will ultimately fall and fail, for it is our nature.
That's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
We'll be back in a few seconds talking about AOC.
Is she who she claims to be?
Will she be part of this changing political landscape?
Before any of that, though, here's a quick message from one of our partners.
1775, baby!
1775!
You want a revolution?
You need a revolution.
What are you doing?
Drinking coffee that looks like it's been fired out of the ass of Grutter Dunberg?
Give a tunbe.
I've just had a cup of 1775 and now I'm vibrating on such a high frequency that Terence McKenna's machine elves are telling me how to do this advert.
Man, it's completely possible that these entities and beings are interfacing with us right now.
This isn't your nan's free dried sadness in a tin.
This isn't the dregs of a wrung-out sanitary product.
This is real coffee.
You don't sip it, you experience it.
I had a cup this morning and accidentally started a new religion.
It doesn't Whisper, it breaks into your subconscious like a caffeinated raccoon rifling through the flaming garbage and screams, Rise, you beautiful dumpster wizard!
History isn't going to rewrite itself.
1775 coffee is single origin, high attitude, organic, small batch roasted beans.
What does that mean in normal personal terms?
It means like Lady Liberty herself is French kissing your taste buds while bald eagles harmonize in the background.
Go, AI, let's see that image.
This coffee makes you feel seen, makes you feel alive, makes you feel like charging into Parliament on horseback with a scroll of forbidden knowledge and a cinnamon stick.
I declare myself the new leader of these islands.
1775, the revolution is coming into you, baby.
Only available in America.
So if you're drinking something brewed for equity, packaged for compliance and roasted for softness, spit it out.
Get yourself a proper brew, Bonnie Blue.
Spit it out fast.
Go at 1775coffee.com slash brand and lock in on their start kit with free coffee and merch.
This coffee could bring Trump and Musk back together.
This coffee could give Keir Starmer a hard-on that could beat down the gates of parliament.
This coffee could make It's good coffee.
That's enough.
Drink it, you sick paedophiles, before we release Epstein's list on you.
We're going to leave X now.
You're going to want to click the link and get over on Rumble.
I'll tell you why.
We're talking about Alligator Alcatraz.
We're talking about Mamdani.
We're talking about that New York potential mayor Mamdani and what he suggests about political change.
We're talking about RFK on Tucker and the rise in autism as a result of just one vaccine.
We are talking about...
I'm pretty excited about that.
So if you watch us on X right now, click the link.
Come over to Rumble where we can speak freely.
I mean, look at what some of these people are saying.
You nuts, says CNO3.
Stop pointing.
Colorado Watch.
Anybody with principal supports Massey?
Look at that.
There's some brilliant conversations.
Someone's talking about my nipples.
It's all happening over there right now.
Okay, guys, thanks for joining us.
Now, I want to look at this AOC thing.
I keep talking about it because I love things where people talk about their backgrounds.
Now, I always thought that AOC was a former waitress from the Bronx.
And whether you like her or not, she's certainly attractive.
She looks attractive.
She speaks in an attractive way.
And I find it attractive and appealing when people that aren't from within academia and political institutions step into politics.
I think that's what politics should be.
Politics should be all of us practicing the principles of community and family and organization together in love.
So when someone that's a bartender or waitress or whatever steps up, I like it.
So let's see what Benny Johnson's saying.
Apparently, he's conducted some sort of investigation that reveals that she ain't telling the truth about her background.
Let's have a look.
AOC reflexively repeats that she's from the Bronx and a Bronx girl.
I speak like a girl from the block.
And again, I grew up first generation in the Bronx.
And again, girls from the Bronx are welcome everywhere.
So often that it's almost a pathology.
In fact, AOC just pulled the Bronx girl card again this week, responding to President Trump saying she would eat a Queens boy like Donald Trump for breakfast.
I don't think he knows how to deal with a girl from the Bronx.
Something's very wrong here.
What functional adult repeats where they're from this often?
Someone who's lying.
And here's the dirty little secret.
AOC is not actually from the Bronx.
Since AOC was an infant, her family has lived in a beautiful little hamlet called Yorktown Heights.
This little town is the opposite of AOC's gritty, downtrodden working class persona.
It's clean and beautiful and safe.
The neighborhood that AOC grew up in is well-off, leafy, and manicure.
AOC went to elementary, middle, and high school here.
She graduated from Yorktown High, where she went by the name Sandy Cortez.
And then she graduated Boston University with an economics degree.
Since AOC is about to run for president, we thought it would be important to investigate the town that gave America its most famous communist.
This is not the Bronx.
As you can see here, this is the leafy, beautiful Parkway suburbs.
Is that a golf course?
Oh, it's gorgeous.
What a pleasant and wonderful drive.
I feel like I'm on my way to Pleasantville.
Very much looking forward to finding out where AOC is from.
After a 90-minute drive from New York City, we finally got to Yorktown Heights.
Check out this beautiful entry to the city.
Trees lining the road, some mansions, beautifully manicured lawns, American flags.
This looks like an awesome place to be from.
You get out of the car and you find something like this.
Welcome to the capitalist horrors of AOC's Yorktown Heights Patriot State Park.
You can see here a veterans memorial circle that's been beautifully tended and groomed with a lot of American flags and a lot of honor for our great nation.
Really, just a terrifying place to grow up here.
I hear that there are miles of luscious trails going through the forest here.
Boy, you can understand why you'd become a communist growing up in a hood like this.
Excellent piece of investigation from Benny Johnson there, moving independent journalism a little further forward by maintaining his persona and tone, but doing some more traditional investigation and outside broadcast work.
Why is it that politicians continually claim, let me know what you think in the comments and chat, to be from backgrounds just like us, even I, as an independent journalist and former, you know, I don't know, movie actor and comedian.
I'm still a comedian, baby.
I can't wait to get back on stage.
In fact, we've got to organise that.
I want to do them live things.
We'll talk about that straight after.
I'm going to do some live events soon, actually, and some live podcasts from an environment with an audience present.
I'm going to organise that.
I think we should probably do it next week, actually.
You know, I talk a lot about my background.
Do I talk a lot about my background?
I talk about coming from a normal background.
We've grew up with a single mom, my dad, a brilliant, self-made man from Daghan.
And why do we do it?
I suppose because we want people to know that if you come, if you occupy an apparently elite space, whether that's celebrity or a political position like AOC, that you're able to understand the challenges of people that live lives comparable to the majority.
When I see the town that she's from, it's not like, you know, it's just a normal little town, and it's not like she came from like sort of luxury and privilege.
I'm more concerned about what goes on in my country where people go to institutional universities, go to private schools.
Not that like everyone that goes to those schools ain't good people.
I know loads of people that went to Eton and Harrow and those kind of public schools that are really brilliant, fine, excellent, fantastic, beautiful, glorious individuals.
But actually, all roads lead to Rome for me right now.
What you actually want is to acknowledge that no human being should be granted the amount of power that the office of the American president currently yields, whether it's Donald Trump or AOC or Mandani or Barack Obama or any of the Clintons, which one's it going to be next?
Socks the cat.
What you want is decentralization of power so that you in your own life can have maximum authority.
Think about your country the way you talk about a subject like firearms.
You just want to be able to defend yourself, protect yourself and look after your own family.
There's no reason for you to be taxed as heavily as you are in your country or in mine.
We're essentially paying for systems and institutions that exploit us and control us.
AOC, I reckon, is probably like Thomas Massey, the kind of person you want directly involved in politics, whether she's exaggerated her working class credentials or not.
I would say that the problems that are highlighted now pertain not to the morality, ethics or shortcomings of individuals, because we all have those shortcomings.
You do, I do, AOC does.
There might be, I don't know how sympathetic you are towards this when it comes to like the Clintons and all the Epstein Island stuff, weird occultist things going on.
That's its own category.
I agree with Peter Till that the biggest threat we face is one world global government.
That government could come in the form of state bureaucracies, institutions and organizations, or it could come in the form of global capitalism.
When I was more affiliated with the left and more informed by the left, that was what I was more afraid of, like powerful corporations.
But since this sort of resurgence of nationalism, you can see once again that the real problem is when this, as Mussolini said, when the state and corporations become so combined in their intentions and agenda that it means that there ain't no real freedom for ordinary people, whether they're from the Bronx or Yorktown.
So I would say on the whole that AOC, whether you like her or not, whether you agree with her or not, whether she gives you the heebie-jeebies because she's kind of attractive and you can't deal with it or not, is the kind of political figure that we need.
And in the same way, I would say Mamdani is.
You don't have to vote for him.
In a decentralized democracy, you'd say, in our community, we want to be super Christian, super conservative.
Damn it, we want to be Amish.
Or you might say, we're double, double progressive.
We want to take it in this direction.
In a democracy, you can do that.
In a democracy, you don't have to be afraid by definition of tyranny.
You don't have to be afraid of other people's ideas.
In the false dichotomy of left versus right, an idea that's over now, we're all trapped in the constant polarity of this vote for Kamala, let's vote for Trump, let's vote for Kier Starmer, let's vote for Boris Johnson, let's vote for Justin Trudeau, let's vote for Mark Carney.
Forget these people, forget these institutions.
Believe in yourself.
Believe in your own involvement in community.
You're fallible.
I'm fallible.
They're fallible.
The system is broken.
Decentralize power wherever possible.
Set up parallel economies.
Learn how to embrace new technology.
But don't forget the wisdom of the ages.
Learn how to grow your own food.
Learn how to hunt your own food.
Mend your own clothes.
Prepare your own vehicles.
We have to find a new way through this chaos.
They're finding ways to make the world like something between an airport and a penitentiary where you're continually controlled in order to protect you.
You cannot trust humankind.
You can trust only God.
The aspect of human beings that is most like God is glorious, is beautiful.
The aspect of human beings that is fallen, you have to watch out.
And tell me, do you agree with me that the part of humanity that is prevailing or the aspect rather of humanity that is prevailing is the part that is Luciferian, false light, individual control, counterfeits, led by desire, paganism, worship of false gods, worship of desire, worship of the aversion and avoidance of fear.
Come on, baby.
Seawood 49.
Russell, fund my campaign and I'll run for office.
Get out there and start campaigning.
Make a difference and we'll support you.
Get out there.
Stop looking to other people to solve your problems.
Look only to God.
Anyway, that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
Now, if you've got Rumble Premium, we're going to do a little bit more.
We're going to talk for a while longer.
Before we leave you now, I was on Candice Owens recently.
Did you see my chat?
I went around Candice's house.
I met with her lovely husband and her, saw some of her beautiful children.
I like Candice Owens a great deal.
I think she's a good and brilliant, authentic person.
Like everyone in the world, I disagree with her on a bunch of things, but I disagree with probably Isaac on stuff and Jake on stuff and my own wife and certainly my own children on a bunch of stuff.
But what I do agree with is, you know, her integrity and her bravery and her boldness and to a degree, her craziness.
I like the way she operates that woman.
She's really interesting and cool.
Now, she did tell me madly when I was on there that she'd gotten a personal phone call from Donald Trump saying that he'd been contacted by Emmanuel Macron who'd asked her personally to stop saying that Brigitte Macron,
his wife, had what you might call a cockleberry fin, a downstairs friend, a magical leg finger, a meat and two veg, the last turkey in the shop, Macron's Palace, the naughty macaroon, the flesh pencil, the white ink dispenser.
All of these things were claimed.
Let's have a look at Candice Evans talking about that herself, because now that she's talked about it publicly, I can tell you that she said that.
Yeah, dingle-dongle, like Big Mike.
Let's have a look.
When I call that person back, they tell me something that is even stranger.
They say, look, I again am the messenger here.
What I was told from somebody that's pretty high up at the White House is that Emmanuel Macrone is holding up negotiations to end the Russian and Ukrainian war.
Unless you stop speaking about his wife.
I'm just going, what?
What are you saying?
What are we even speaking about?
What do you mean negotiations between Russia and Ukraine?
I'm just like, you know, looking into a story at my house.
I've got a very small team here.
And you're telling me that somehow negotiations are being held up and it needs to be communicated to me.
They've got to stop talking about Brigitte?
What are we saying?
And then I'm asking myself in my mind, because I hang up this phone and I am in true shock.
Did Emmanuel Macron pretend to fly into DC under the guise of negotiations, the Russia and Ukraine war, and then instruct someone on his entourage to have an off-the-books discussion, a little meeting on the side, maybe somebody, again, like a Susie Wiles, where he made his truer demands?
Like, hey, this is for the pictures.
Me and Trump are talking about you.
We're going to get it done.
And then what really goes on behind the scenes is like, we're not doing anything until that little podcast, her Candace, agrees to shut her mouth.
What?
This is crazy.
This is absolutely insane.
Okay.
So I say, we end the conversation.
I say, I'm going to sleep on this.
It's a lot to process.
I remember I get into bed and I just turn to my husband and I say, no one will ever believe us.
Just something that just arrived at me very suddenly.
I said, no one will ever believe that this just took place.
And my husband's like, yeah, no, this is just very, very strange.
And I promised the individual that I would pray on it, that I would think further about the situation.
What are the implications here?
And I then call him back the next day and I say, look, this is pretty weird.
You have to admit, this is pretty weird.
And you're not really giving me any details.
And I kind of want to know who specifically you spoke to because I think it kind of matters.
Is somebody trying to do a side deal while Trump is doing a different deal?
And at that moment, he's honest and he says, no, President Trump was on the phone too.
And I go, oh, are you kidding me?
You didn't tell me this yesterday that there was some sort of a conference call and President Trump is on the line and you didn't mention it.
I go, did you lie to me yesterday?
Were you trying to pretend that it was like a third-party person?
And he says, no, no, no, I didn't lie to you.
I didn't lie to you.
Like, I got a phone call and I obviously in the background, Trump communicated something to me.
So he was there when the phone call took place.
And I'm going, what the heck is going on?
Literally, what is happening right now?
Loving action in the locals chat.
I watched you and Candice Owens last night.
I was up till 3 a.m. riveted by Russell's brilliance.
I am Russell.
I realize what I miss are complete and comprehensive conversations with depth and clarity.
Russell is genius.
Thanks.
I apologize for my snarky attitude yesterday.
That is the kind of comment we want more of.
Let me know if you enjoy these shorter YouTube videos.
And remember to join us over on Rumble where we stream every day at these times.
Now, Peter Thiel had some interesting stuff to say about our Lord and Saviour, Christ Jesus, as well as the Antichrist and global power.
If you haven't seen Russell Brand Unpacked yet, I suggest you watch it.
Here's an episode of Russell Brand Unpacked where we talk about UK assisted suicide.
And if you're in the UK, maybe it ain't such a bad idea.
Have a look at this, Russell Brand Unpacked on Rumble if you can.
It brings to mind a lot of questions.
Like if you think about it, like what is it that you can measure life in years and days and months?
Well, think about the most beautiful moments in your life, flashes, sudden moments of joy.
Were they the sanctioned occasions of ritual and ceremony?
They might even include funerals, probably marriages, the birth of children, cherished moments with friends, sudden surprises, moments of joy, a glimpse of a dolphin, some scene in nature.
All manner of things might present you with joy.
What this suggests is rationalism has won out over surrender to the divine.
You can probably using the mentality that brings about this bill reason to execute 20, 30, 40% of the population tomorrow because they're all going to be replaced by AI and robotics.
And believe me, this is where this potentially well-intentioned legislation will lead us.
Further legitimacy to the state's role in determining who lives and who dies.
And whilst in this instance it's being presented as a compassionate measure, just remember how they behave.
Remember how they behave around your taxes, around bills they promise that they will pass and then don't pass or promise they will and then don't.
This is the same people.
Or the same institution.
The people are actually irrelevant.
Remember to catch up with Russell Brand Unpacked, where offline I do deeper dives into subjects.
Paul Schober says, assisted suicide.
Assisted suicide?
Do it yourself.
Don't be lazy.
And there's some good comments here.
Talk about St. Paul.
Shirt open.
Is Russell pretending not to sexualize himself?
Hey, you're allowed to sexualize yourself, baby.
Hey, so listen, okay, if you haven't got Rumble Premium yet, get Rumble Premium now.
If you want to continue watching Rumble for free, of course you can.
We are raiding the quartering right now.
If you've got Rumble Premium, though, I'm going to talk about RFK and Scott Gottlieb.
Bobby went on Tucker talking about the CDC cover-ups.
We're going to be covering that right now.
We might talk a little bit more about Mam Darni.
We've got a lot of things to talk about, you little bastards.
So click the link in the description and get on over.
Like, look at this on Locals.
Locals are a lovely platform.
Excuse me, Russell.
But God is in cahoots with Mother Nature and Father Health.