All Episodes
April 29, 2025 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:09:28
IT’S WAR! Canada Elects GLOBALIST, As PM Vows To “FIGHT” Donald Trump – SF574
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
*sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
*sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
*sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
*sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
*sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
*sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
*sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
*sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
*sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
*sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
*sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music*
music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad music* *sad
Brought to you by Pfizer.
In this video, you're going to see the future.
We'll see you next time.
you
Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brown.
If you want to inoculate yourself against a warring world where there is disruption, despair, craziness and chaos, jump into that rumble chat because you will empower yourself to handle conflict like a kind of inuring.
In Christianity and maybe other faiths too, the idea of becoming inured, iron against iron, strengthens you.
Pressure makes diamonds is...
Common discourse.
Get in that Rumble chat if you're watching this on YouTube or X. Join us on Rumble and toughen yourself right up.
Or you could be a member of our locals community.
A lot more gentle there.
A lot more maha than MAGA over in those circles.
We've got a fantastic show today because for one thing, we're talking about, well, in a sense...
The global war is escalating.
Mark Carney is now the Prime Minister of Canada.
It went liberal.
What a turnaround.
We've had Trump's first 100 days.
Let me know in the comments and chat what you think about the deportations, particularly as it pertains to free speech.
Candace Owens is now on record as saying she regrets voting for Trump.
Yeah, good old boo cocky.
Iron sharpens iron.
We've got to get stronger together.
You know, even if you are a full-on MAGA person, you've got to know that people that operate in elite political spheres ultimately aren't going to save you.
We have to recognise that we have to awaken ourselves that there is only one saviour upon whom we can rely.
We've got an amazing show today because the mainstream are going for RFK.
Fellow Englishman and brilliant comedian John Oliver says that...
RFK should be sacked.
Let me know what you think about that.
In the comments and chat, we're going to start off with the Canada election.
We're going to be talking about power outages over Europe.
Now, look, Paul Schober, Buddy1205 in the Rumble chat, or my friend Zyfer2000 and SensitiveHearts in the local chat.
Tell me what you think about this.
When I saw that, power outages, I thought, we will look back at this era, the 2019 perhaps to around 2030 is my prediction, and we will recognise together that this was a period of...
Global imperialism.
And conflict.
First the pandemic came, then the outages.
Do you think the next global event will be power outages?
I've got a sense that there's something in this.
Like something like 90% of Spain and Portugal, they don't have access to electricity.
You know, like often I've heard spoken of in the kind of media spheres that I dwell within, watching Joe Rogan say that it will take but a single solar flare to castrate all power.
We'll be huddled again, Stone Age, around some campfire, quivering.
You must be familiar with Einstein's famous maxim, I don't know how World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
It's something like that, isn't it?
Something like that, like, you know, we will bring about our end.
I saw you didn't like the Stevie Wonder Raven 001.
I like these sunglasses.
These are my new...
Favourite sunglasses.
Wit1812.
John Oliver is a daft wanker.
I actually know him.
Not anymore.
Of course not.
I occupy her.
I'm a thousand worlds away.
But I remember doing stand-up comedy with John Oliver in the UK.
This is something I think we've got to find together.
He's a person of integrity.
You might disagree with him.
You might hate him.
But the stand-up he was doing when I was doing stand-up back in the UK, he was saying...
More or less what he's saying now.
He's like, he's a progressive, liberal guy from a working class background.
He's a Liverpool football fan.
I've got a soft spot for people to support Liverpool.
Aren't all wankers daft?
No, no.
Well, yeah, well, yeah, you've heard me going on about football.
Don't get me into the pornography again.
I don't want to be thumping that tub.
Forgive the foul image.
No, what I want to say is this is, you know, like so many people will be in despair right now.
And I don't even mean the kind of people that were Anti-Trump or Trump hysteria syndrome folks or Trump derangement syndrome folks or maggots as they are now known in these quarters.
I mean people that are pro-Trump.
People will be concerned, I reckon, about the deportations, particularly some of the deportations that pertain to free speech.
Again, wherever you think about Israel, you might be pro-Israel, you might be a Zionist, or you might believe that what's happening in Gaza now is an incomparable genocide.
What we have to have, I think, It's an open dialogue where you trust that the participants are acting in good faith and that the participants are not...
Chaotic, changing their principles conveniently in order to suit their circumstances.
I'm referring, of course, to Michelle Obama, who on a conversation with my friend Jay Shetty said that what keeps her up these days is the deportations.
And if you're familiar with the Obama administration, who is the great deporter?
It was Barack Obama.
He...
We've deported more people than Trump.
But we've got so much to cover.
We're going to be looking at Canada.
Canada goes globalist once more.
How did your man there, your conservative fella, throw the fire?
How did he manage to balls that up?
We're going to be talking about Trump's first 100 days.
We've got some interesting stories on COVID.
All of this and much, much more.
But before we get into that, wherever you're watching us, X, YouTube, Rumble, Locals, Rumble Premium.
Let's have a little bit of fun before we delve into the despondency and dystopia.
Let's see.
What's going on in the UK?
Michael, no!
The UK could run out of clean drinking water in ten years, as Minister warns of rationing, if infrastructure not revamped.
I'm going to take me a bottle of Mountain Dew or two for my trip to London coming up soon.
What else is happening in the UK?
World of wonder.
Island penitentiary.
This is a local radio station saying that there are a hundred...
150 stabbings per day in the UK.
And you know in the UK what they say about you lot.
You've got to get rid of them guns.
In the whole of England and Wales, it's 150 stabbings a day now.
And it's risen 90% on a 10-year period.
That's the whole of the UK.
150 a day.
46...
Let me know in the comments and chat, do you even trust any reporting, even around something as verifiable and as obvious as statistics?
Do you think information gets amplified or ignored, depending on the agenda of the news vessel or vassal?
For example, in a minute later in the show, we'll be talking about John Oliver's condemnation of RFK.
And you know me, I love Bobby Kennedy.
And you've just heard what I said about John Oliver.
I respect him.
Do you think that John Oliver's line when it comes to autism, John Oliver's going to say and does say on the show, I believe, not watched it yet, that RFK's rhetoric around autism is deliberately misleading.
And there hasn't been a significant escalation in autism.
There's just been an increase in testing.
Now, I'm well aware that clinical trials can be misleading.
We all know that.
But I strongly, strongly believe that Bobby Kennedy is a straight-up good-faith...
Open-hearted, legit politician and the kind of leader that the world needs right now.
We'll get into that.
El Diddy 857 in the Rumble chat.
I wonder why the stabbings are so high.
Hmm.
Question mark, question mark, question mark, question mark.
Gwyn Jones 75. You give too much grace to scumbags, Russell.
Look, I'll tell you, like anyone that's been through storms, that anyone who's known struggles, and I guess that means all of us, right?
You know, I recognize now that...
All of us live by the good grace of an almighty saviour.
I recognise now that I'm in no position to condemn or judge anyone and I know what I am taught and what I am told.
Is that my priority is for us to love one another as we have been loved.
And how we have been loved is all the way to sacrifice.
Now, it's real easy for me.
I like, like you, I'm a comedian.
I like judging people.
I like criticising people.
I feel that impulse all the time.
You wouldn't believe how many things every single day I don't say out loud because it would be mean or cruel or critical.
Thankfully, I'm a comic, so some of this stuff I can get away with and say, particularly in the company of people that I know know that I'm good-hearted and not mean.
But when I operate in this space with you, I'm trying my best to stay true, to walk the line, to stay in the fidelity of open-mindedness and authenticity.
But what I am learning is that the world is a very, very complicated place, and we've got to find a new pathway.
Polar tension of hate.
We can't.
You know, say, look, we're going to be talking about Canada in a second.
And what's happened, presumably, is Canadian nationalism or Canada's identity, which appears to be on the basis of this election victory.
Tending towards liberalism and globalism has been bolstered by the adjacent threat of Trump and MAGA populism.
It seems that the conservative leader wasn't able to galvanize and maximize growing nationalist sentiment around the world, the kind of populism that could have emerged from the trucker movement, for example, the truckers that during the COVID era and the draconian measures deployed by Trudeau in particular became a strong and powerful movement and exposed the liberalism in Canada,
at least.
It was somewhat authoritarian.
That's what it is, isn't it?
When you call people Nazis, when you freeze bank accounts, all the stuff that went on in Canada.
But we are in a time, I believe, where we're going to have to find a new way.
And I don't think we're going to find it from political leaders, ultimately.
Political leaders are administrators, managers, sometimes ingenious and entrepreneurial and rhetorical stars that capture and understand the moment.
Indeed, many of your great presidents, or even many of your recent presidents, have been exactly that.
Bill Clinton, spirit of the time.
Barack Obama, spirit of the time.
Even George W. Bush in his weird way and with reference to 9-11, spirit of the time.
Trump, evidently that.
You know when you've got a kind of placeholder president, Jimmy Carter's and the name Bush, the first Bush, the one-termers, you know?
We've got to find our way, I suppose, to some place transcendent of political tribalism if we're going to navigate our way out of this potential hell.
I want to thank you, Timcast, for the raid.
Or Mug Club for the raid, assuming that we've had such a thing.
If you're not on Rumble yet, get on Rumble now.
We have a line-up every single day.
Crowder, me, Tim Paul, Dave Rubin's on every day.
Kim Iverson, great people.
Great people, beautiful people on both sides.
Great people on both sides.
Here's my homeboy, Winston.
Winston Marshall, formerly of Mumford& Son, who's got a brilliant podcast and channel in the UK.
You should check him out on, well, I wouldn't check out YouTube, you know, it's a globalist nightmare, but follow his content.
Winston Marshall is excellent.
Here he is, taking advantage of the new press conference credentials being given to independent media to ask if people in the UK that are arrested for social media posts should be given political asylum.
Let's have a look at this.
In Britain, we have had a quarter of a million people issued non-crime hate incidents.
As we speak, there are people in prison for quite literally reposting memes.
We have extensive prison sentences for tweets, social media posts, and general free speech issues.
Would the Trump administration consider political asylum for British citizens in such a situation?
Well, to your latter question, it's a very good one.
I have not heard that proposed to the president, nor have I spoken to him about that idea.
But I certainly can and talk to our national security team and see if it's some
Yes, please.
Yes!
Take us in!
People are fleeing the UK.
You can't even get a sip of water or post the F word on Facebook without potentially being banged up, jailed and detained.
Fascinating stuff.
Let me know in the comments and chat what you think about that.
Here's a lovely moment when former Tory Chief Secretary Simon Clarke, that's a right-wing political figure in my country, the United Kingdom, wrestles with and attempts to tackle the complexity around trans issues.
And I suppose what he means by this, and let me know in the comments and chat what you think, that if anybody that is male can identify as female, what do we do with these categories?
One of the moments where I fought in particular around sport and the separate categories for men's sports and women's sports made sense was when Marco Rubio, of all people, said, why have women's sports there?
Why not have just sport?
Just have sport.
And then we don't need to worry about any of this stuff.
This is interesting because my understanding is he's live in the clip.
The guy sort of realises the complexity of his position.
If trans men then have to use women's toilets, that's going to make women less safe because how are you going to stop a man, a normal man, going into a woman's toilets and saying, I'm a trans man.
And so I think we have to look at...
I just follow that logic.
Why?
The point is that we're saying that people who are biologically men shouldn't be using women's toilets.
That's the point of this ruling, among other things.
But a trans man is biologically a woman.
Someone who's transitioning from being a woman to a man.
And so they would then have to use women's toilets.
so they would then have to use women's toilets.
I think this...
Thank you.
It's a complicated world we live in, baby.
It's complicated.
If human beings are in charge and we can all manipulate, manage and manoeuvre what's right, what's wrong, what virtues and principles we want to abide by, we're going to end up in chaos.
That seems to be the case right now.
Ah, do you remember Kamala Harris?
Remember her?
Remember the dancing?
Remember the peculiar announcements?
Remember the Venn diagrams?
Well, Kamala Harris is planning to, I understand, attack...
Trump.
Kamala Harris plans pointed critique of Trump in first major speech since leaving office.
I think, in a way, Kamala Harris is a perfect example of someone that didn't capture the spirit of the times.
You know, the Democrat Party could have run under Bobby Kennedy, could have had Tulsi Gabbard as a leader, could have gone in a hundred different directions, didn't do it.
Looked like they're shaping up now for an AOC Bernie Sanders super ticket for 2028, but Eric Trump says it's going to be Trump.
Let me know what you think about that in the comments and chat, and let me know what you think about Trump's first hundred days.
We're going to be covering all of that a little later.
What do you think about the deportations?
What do you think about the wars?
What do you think about the relationships with big business?
What do you think about the tariffs?
What do you think about the comments, particularly if you are a pro-Trump MAGA person?
Are you, like Candace Owens, disappointed?
Or do you believe this is a new golden age for America, America better forever, better than ever?
We're going to be covering the results of the Canadian election in a minute.
A few more things to...
John Kerry bristles.
As MSNBC host points out that Russia took...
Crimea under Obama.
We talk, don't we, often about the details and particulars of the conflict between Ukraine and Russia, how it escalated and maybe why it escalated the role of NATO, the role of the CIA, the laboratories, the bases, the Medan coup, all of the many nuances that the legacy media would obfuscate or otherwise ignore.
Here's John Kerry realising perhaps for the first time that Crimea was taken by Putin.
Under the presidency of Barack Obama.
You were Secretary of State when Russia annexed Crimea.
And I want to ask you...
When they stated, they were...
They stated, yeah.
We did not allow them to annex it.
Right.
And we stood up against it and called it against international law.
Yeah, they said it.
But that doesn't...
Can I ask you about...
Under international law, that does not make it theirs.
Can I ask you what...
Everyone's caught up in partisan balderdash, aren't they?
Everyone's just trying to defend their own position.
As a follower of Christ, I relinquish my own position.
My position is irrelevant.
Like you, I am dust on the wind of history.
I will expire.
Other than that, I may know eternal life through him.
If all I want to worship is my Russell-ness, me, me and what I want and what I think, it's ridiculous.
I want to ascend to the place that Thomas Merton, somewhat Buddhist, but ultimately Catholic preacher and speaker, Who declares that pleasure and pain will ultimately become irrelevant, superficial,
stimulants.
If we are in God and God is in us, who cares about this stuff, man?
We live in the continual worship of false idols.
That's how you can achieve this perpetual...
Polarity is because people, all of us, are overly stimulated by, oh, that's good news.
Oh, I don't like that.
Oh, that's good.
Oh, an ice cream.
Oh, no, a punch in the face.
We have to transcend it.
If we don't transcend it, we'll be stick and carroted through the pathways and mazes set out for us by the institutions of power.
That's just what I think, though.
Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
Here's Chuck Todd.
Having a meltdown over right-wing virtue signalers.
Oh, this is lovely.
I love this.
We covered this somewhat yesterday.
Did you see at the White House press conference dinner the geezer that was winning an award from like Axios or something going, you know, we were misled there by the government.
They told us that Joe Biden was not in a state of senescence and mental decline and fools we were, we believed him.
We should have done better.
You're damn right you should have done better.
I've never seen anyone more supultural and decrepit.
Poor old dear Joe Biden, nearly dead, weakened at Bernese's way through the entire campaign.
That ridiculous debate where he stood there, sort of like a mop with a bucket on it, running as president.
Just a near inanimate scarecrow figure.
It wasn't like the government was feeding false information to the media.
The media was actively participating.
Remember?
Don't you remember Rachel Maddow going, Joe Biden, you know, he's older but he's smarter.
This is the best version of Joe Biden.
Don't you remember mourning Joe Scarborough?
He's as sharp as a tack.
Don't you remember that spate of headlines and clips of everyone going...
Joe Biden, he may look old to the untrained eye, but if you hone in under binoculars, you'll see he's got a firm and mighty rampant cock like Genghis Khan!
I don't know, man!
I can't see it.
I'm seeing an old guy, baffled, talking about corn pop and sniffing a child on the head.
What are you guys all watching?
Let's get into it.
This is not a media failure.
This is a failure of the Democratic Party.
And I just saw sort of the virtue signaling that some people have done to try to say that the media missed this story.
They didn't miss this story.
David Ignatius wrote, I just refuse to accept this stupid premise because it's a right-wing, manufactured right-wing premise in order to...
To stain the media.
The media's got plenty of things to attack them for, and there are MSNBC and CNN and pundits that absolutely carried water for Joe Biden, but they're not journalists.
They're former strategists that carried water for Joe Biden.
The journalist, David Ignatius, wrote a very high-profile column in October of 23, saying, is he really running again?
This doesn't seem like a good idea.
People like me were...
Promoting Dean Phillips' campaign because he was running a campaign that made a lot of coverage.
So, you know, it's not like this.
This isn't WMDs, where the White House worked with the mainstream media to manufacture a story that did not exist.
That was a press failure.
Massive press failure.
This was not that failure.
This is an attempt by some to virtue signal, and it's this horrible sort of pitting different news organizations against each other, when ultimately the people at fault are Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Jill Biden, Joe Biden,
Kamala Harris, every elected member of Congress.
There you go.
What a breakthrough.
Let me know in the comments in the chat what you think about that.
Wherever you're watching us, X or YouTube, stay with us.
We've got some fantastic stories.
Are Canada leading a global liberal comeback?
Is this the return of globalist liberalism in the shape of Mark Carney?
And we'll be looking at Trump's 100 days in office.
Are you satisfied?
Are you not entertained?
In an interview with The Atlantic, Trump said...
I run the world.
Who runs the world?
Trump runs the world.
We'll be talking about that when we come back.
Here's a quick message, though, from one of our partners.
I don't go anywhere without a sweet bag of this stuff, and if I have to force it into an internal body cavity, I'll do it.
1775, that's the sweet taste of revolution.
The naughtiest of the beans.
The darkest of the beans.
But why should we be penalised for drinking coffee?
We shouldn't.
Why not have a coffee that could reverse time?
Not like Marty McFly, going back time, just to touch up his own mum.
No, Marty.
Oh man, Biff.
Come on, Biff.
Biff, cut me some slack, Biff.
I don't think I could take that kind of rejection.
What Marty McFly, what George McFly, what Biff, and all of the McFlys needed was 1775.
As we peel back the layers of our foreskin, sorry, I mean news media, like a modern illusion, corporate narratives, media manipulation.
Foreskin.
Government's playing God.
We come to a simple realisation.
Everything they sell you is designed to keep you weak.
Your food.
Your news.
Your medicine.
Your coffee.
Everything.
And that's because a fully awakened version of you would be a threat to the system.
Become a threat to the system with Sweet Lady 1775.
Revolution juice, I call it.
And I'm not talking about my semen.
So what happens when you start asking questions?
When you say, actually, no, I won't start my day with a chemical cocktail brewed by the same boardroom that funds censorship and pharma ads.
You look elsewhere.
You find something different.
Like 1775's Rejuvenate Coffee.
Not made in a lab.
Not cooked up by an algorithm.
But roasted.
Weekly.
In Miami.
Like Don Johnson and the other lad.
Crockett and Tubbs.
That was it.
This is from Crockett and Tubbs.
The only powder out of Miami you can rely on and trust.
When you get that white powder, you best be careful.
You know what goes on in Miamski.
This is brewed weekly in Miamski.
With real beans, real principles and CA AKG.
A compound studied for its ability to support energy, recovery and healthy aging at the cellular level.
Some studies even suggest it could reverse biological age.
Here it is.
Look at this stuff.
Delicious.
Right in the throat.
Delicious stuff.
Making me feel better already.
Just the corner of the box went in my larynx and I feel like a nine-year-old boy.
Not in a Joe Biden way.
Not in an Epstein Island way.
I feel like I am the nine-year-old boy.
Not like I want to dress him up and take him out to dinner.
That's some sort of...
What's wrong with these people?
Imagine aging backwards while screaming into the void.
Imagine reversing down the tunnel of time with your anus completely relaxed by these naughty beans.
What could be better than that?
It's single origin, mould free, toxin free and woke free, made by people who actually believe in things like bodily sovereignty, free speech and the radical idea that your coffee shouldn't come with a lecture.
Although that was a lecture, that just got a weird.
I mean, if this was at a university in modern America, they'd fucking leave me out and deport me right now, wouldn't they?
Go to 1775coffee.com, use the code BRAND, and get 15% off.
Rejuvenate your body, resist the machines, and wake up on your terms.
1775, get younger now, baby.
You know, buy the coffee.
That was an unusual advert by anyone's reckoning, wasn't it?
What's going on in there?
Dear old Massey, who's our producer in charge of post-production, expressing himself through them edits, and I thank him and applaud him for his great and creative work there.
Great use of clips.
Get some of that 1775 coffee.
Great sponsors.
Great work.
Some weird, weird moments.
The nine-year-old boy thing, that was weird.
the whole thing.
I was just actually watching that in a state of near bafflement.
Wherever you're watching us, X, YouTube,
We do additional content most days.
You know, we stream Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and you get to participate in the additional content of all of Rumble's premium content creators, Greenwald.
Crowder, Tim Paul, all of them guys.
Alright, let's get into this.
Our first main story of today.
Who runs the world?
Girls run the world.
Is that right?
No, Trump.
I run the world.
The country and the world, says Trump.
Trump believes he's invincible, but the cracks are beginning to show.
Now, that's what we'd expect from a publication like The Atlantic.
But even Fox News are saying that maybe Trump's popularity is in decline.
We'll be covering that a little later.
Now, though...
Canadian Revolution.
The maple syrup comeback.
This is it.
Mark Carney.
Liberal.
An...
Almost inconceivable turnaround in Canadian politics.
The Liberals were like 25 points behind.
Pierre Poliev, conservative, pugnacious dude, peculiarly took the move of saying that he was anti-Trump, I suppose, because Canada has a curious relationship with the United States of America and they can't just accept, can they, that 51st state rhetoric that Trump was playing.
Let's have a look at the surprising victory of Mark Carney and discuss together...
What it means for the world.
Is this a liberal comeback?
Let's get into it.
Here we go.
As I've been warning for months, America wants our land.
This is the victory speech of Mark Carney, your new leader, Canada.
Trudeau was unpopular, somewhat ridiculous, a little too Castro, a little too haircut, a little too black-faced.
He's yesterday's man.
He's gone and will soon be forgotten.
What does Mark Carney represent?
Let's pay close attention to this victory speech.
These are moments where one can take the temperature of a political figure.
They're moments of...
Victory, and then moments of departure.
Often when you see a departing politician give their departure speech, it's like they've been unplugged from the Matrix, and they're suddenly like, it was crazy in there!
And I think, wow, where was this guy?
Where was this person?
I can rely on this person, I can trust him.
But this is Mark Carney on the way in.
Let's pay close attention to what he's saying.
After this, we'll be looking at Trump's first 100 days, and we'll be looking at some of the lies around clinical trials and vaccines.
Fantastic stuff.
Let's do this first.
wants our land, our resources, our water, our country.
Never. But these are not idle threats.
President Trump is trying to break us so that America can own us.
It's standard political practice to emphasize an external threat in order to galvanize and mobilize a vote.
Whether you're Adolf Hitler Galvanising the German people against the Jews and the various other groups that were penalised and executed under Nazism, or the common and popular rhetoric around migrants these days, it is very easy to or...
Effective to galvanize a voter base by emphasizing an external threat.
Remember, we've lived through the era of the Cold War, Islamic terrorism, and you can question and evaluate the legitimacy of each of those threats yourself.
For example, now we are looking at a tripolar geopolitical world where China, Russia, and the United States of America vie for global supremacy.
Beyond that, it has seemed to me for some time that there are sets of imperialist and bureaucratic powers that were using neoliberal and progressive politics to assert control over sets of nations that were ultimately coordinated by bureaucracies like the WHO,
WF, World Bank, etc.
to present you a kind of progressive vision of the world that led to...
In the reckoning and rhetoric of Klaus Schwab as owning nothing and being happy.
The rise of nationalism and populism is a prophylactic and bulwark against that, but it comes, of course, with its own problems.
Othering of outside groups.
Sometimes it comes with reductivism when it comes to complex social issues and even, as we're seeing in the United States right now, free speech issues.
But liberalism, I believe we identified together during the pandemic, presented a unique type of threat because there's nothing more terrifying than when someone is claiming power in order to protect you.
We saw in the pandemic era the general trend of give us authority and...
We will save you.
Take your vaccination.
We will protect you.
Get into your house.
Wear your mask.
Stay six feet apart and you will be safe.
No longer are there barbarians at the gate.
There are germs in the air.
Once the threat becomes microbial, the measures are limitless.
The threats and legislation that can be deployed in order to protect you if it's the air that you breathe that you need to be afraid of are almost without scale and without limit.
That's why for some time, I have been more concerned about socially progressive, inverted commas, liberalism than nativism and populism.
Served as a barrier against all pervasive globalism, which I believe was the great threat of our time.
And like you, probably, it seemed to me that the pandemic was some kind of dress rehearsal for a global takeover.
Even these blackouts in Portugal and Spain, to me, bear the intuitive hallmark of rehearsals.
And attempts to discern new ways to legitimise authority.
The powerful will always legitimise their authority in the terms and language of safety or convenience.
No one's going to just tell you we're taking over because we want to.
They're going to tell you we're taking over to protect you.
That's why I think this is a pretty significant result in Canada.
You have to actually say Trump does run the world in terms of his influence.
Trump says this.
Canada does that.
There's no question that Trump's rhetoric around Canada has influenced the outcome of this election.
Let me know what you think, though, about that in the comments and chat.
We're going to continue with this story.
If you're watching us on YouTube, we're leaving you now, and you're going to want to join us as we make an appraisal of Trump's first 100 days.
We look at what Candace Owens has said about Donald Trump.
She's disappointed.
Are you disappointed?
We're going to look at John Oliver talking about Bobby Kennedy.
He says Bobby Kennedy's a crackpot.
We have to get him out before he makes America sick again.
All of this we're going to discuss, but firstly, we are going to look in detail at the victory of Mark Carney, what it means for the world, and what it means about liberalism versus nativism, the two political ideals that appear to define domestic politics at this time.
Click the link in the description.
And join us.
Let's go back to Mark Carney's victory speech.
That will never.
That will never, ever happen.
But we...
Like, that's sub-Churchill, no?
Never.
You will never take over Canada.
Our mounties and our syrup, our land and our logs will be protected from Trump.
Donald Trump and his grisly gang of MAGA racists may crouch at the border.
Threatening.
I feel like Trump's taking the piss when he says, you know, Governor Trudeau.
I don't think, but hey, I am naive, that Trump is like, right, we're going to take over Canada.
That would be so mad and unprecedented.
Do you remember all the stuff about Greenland and Panama Canal?
I think he just says stuff.
I think he's an intuitive...
Guy that operates on the level almost of the unconscious.
Like the art of the deal tells you that Trump is a person that's discerning moment to moment what he thinks he needs to say in order to get what he wants.
I mean, we all do that to a degree.
But what I'm saying is, although I believe that Trump is the creature of our age, is the president that he's created for times such as these, I don't...
Think that Trump seriously intends to militarily or economically take Canada over.
But, you know, I don't know much about this stuff.
I don't know what the impact of all these tariffs are.
I thought that the tariffs might galvanize American industry, might be an isolationist policy in some ways, but might protect and embolden American workers and American towns and American cities.
Let's learn about it.
Let's get into what Mark Carney's saying.
But we also must recognize...
The reality that our world has fundamentally changed.
I began with humility.
The Canadians are ambitious.
And now, more than ever, it is a time for ambition.
It is a time to be bold, to meet this crisis with overwhelming positive force of a united Canada.
What is the crisis he's referring to?
What is the crisis?
What's the crisis?
What crisis is Canada in?
Do you not imagine for one minute that there were strategic meetings around the campaign of Mark Carney where they went, the opportunity here is to galvanise some kind of peculiar fusion of nationalism and liberalism by positing Trump very helpfully as an external bogeyman,
or boogeyman in your language, because he's doing the work for us by making all these crazy jokes about I'm going to take Canada over.
So they didn't, you know, this is not...
You know now, don't you, that politics is not the business of authentic open discourse with the population.
It's not just like that guy's gone out there and just making this stuff up off the spot without a teleprompter.
He's reading that.
He's reading it.
Someone else wrote it.
Canada.
Because we...
Is he the guy that's literally, like, knows Epstein?
Is he that one?
Is he the guy that literally used to run the Bank of England?
Can you let me know in the chat?
We...
We are going to build...
Build, baby, build.
Throughout our history there have been turning points when the world's fortunes were in the balance.
That was the case at the start of the Second World War.
Dracovic in the rumble chat.
Yes, he is.
So he's the guy that used to run the Bank of England.
So he's deep in global finance, of course.
Obviously, the Bank of England's in the City of London.
The City of London is regulated differently.
Did you know this from the rest of England?
It's exempted from a bunch of tax laws and other regulations.
There's literally weird dragon symbols.
I'm not making this up.
Every point where you can enter into the City of London, there are weird emblems and dragons.
I know this because of the reporting of that marginal, peripheral, shamanic figure, David Icke, who talked about the City of London and how it houses financial power and global power, and that as the British Empire went into decline, the British power no longer was militaristic and explicit, but became
implicit, tacit, clandestine and financial.
Mark Carney worked for, ran the Bank of England.
I believe he was photographed with or friends with Epstein.
Someone let me know.
I mean, if that's true, then I feel like that's worth knowing.
Do you?
Let me know in the comments and chat.
Just as it was at the end of the Cold War.
And each time, Canada chose to step up, to assert ourselves as a free, sovereign and ambitious nation, to lead the path of democracy and freedom.
My friend in the locals chat, Synchronicity525, said, wait, he stole a Trump phrase, build, baby, build.
Ugh, it's drill, baby, drill.
It's interesting, isn't it?
Because they are using the...
So Trump's point, I run the world, is somewhat legitimised by the fact that he defines the terms of the conversation.
Whether it's about Gaza and Israel, whether it's about deportations, whether it's about...
Just a general free market enterprising approach to economics and globalism and nationalism or drill baby drill versus build baby build.
He's providing the vocabulary and the framing of the discourse.
Anyone who's an expert in negotiation will tell you that first of all, you have to create the frame yourself.
And that's really what's going on now.
I mean, we're all engaged in storytelling.
Me, you, all of us.
Mark Carney is right there telling Canada a story about itself.
We're in a crisis.
We're standing up for ourselves.
Canadians, we're plucky people.
We're always overcoming the odds.
That's what he's saying.
But what is a Canadian person?
What is an American person?
What is a British person?
It's a faith-based idea.
There's no such thing as an archetypal Canadian.
We are history, sociology, politics, economics, geology, all bundled up.
Again, if you do not believe in God, then there is only arbitrary faith.
Placed wherever the powerful would have you place it.
This week, we believe in trans issues.
This week, we believe in Black Lives Matter.
This week, we believe in Me Too.
This week, we believe that tariffs are bad.
This week, there's a climate crisis.
This is what paganism induces, a kind of giddy diaspora of ongoing truculence and turbulence, whereas the Lord's ways are straight.
You recognize what is it we're supposed to do?
Love God with all of our hearts.
Love one another as he has loved us.
What am I doing right now?
Am I caught up continually in self and self-preservation?
Continually terrified that I personally believe myself to be under attack?
Or am I able to relinquish it and let go and recognize that I am in eternity right now and that there are forces outside of matter, time and space that we can access through our consciousness, through worship, through praise, through his holy word.
If I enter into the contract of the latter, the covenant, Yeah, Canada!
Woo!
Canada!
Woo!
What is it?
What do you even mean?
What Canada are you talking about?
Are you talking about the Canada that's basically the northern part of the continent of America that arbitrarily was divided off?
Loggers, lumberjacks, furriers.
What are you talking about?
The native people that were displaced from there in the same way that native people were displaced from this part of the same continent.
What Canada are you talking about?
You're talking about globalist financial interest.
Now, me, as a Brit, Here in your country, the United States, I'm not saying that the answer to everything is native populism, nationalist populism, Magarism.
I, in fact, am making the kind of arguments that were made by liberals and lefties for the last 50, 60 years.
We know we're crap.
We know we're captured by big business and donations.
We know we're not doing what we're supposed to be doing.
But at least we're better than...
Thatcher, Nixon, whoever, they always used to use some sort of right-wing demagogue, disaster, bogeyman figure as the antithesis of what they believed.
All the while, they just ushered in this limp, lukewarm, lousy and insidious form of globalism through bureaucracy.
Mark Carney is one of them.
Mark Carney is one of them.
Keir Starmer is one of them.
Kamala Harris is one of them.
Now, just pointing that out don't mean that I'm simultaneously saying that Donald Trump or Nigel Farage or Javier Miel or the dude in Hungary are the answer.
It's just clear to me that nationalism is a saber and spear tip against globalism.
And globalism, if that succeeds, We're in some serious...
We'll be talking about those blackouts in Spain in a minute.
If you're watching us on X, if you want to see the rest of our reporting on Canada, Trump's first 100 days, and some fantastic stuff on COVID, click the link in the description.
Get on over here and join us.
Let's watch the rest of Mark Carney's speech as we discuss globalism together.
Before we get back into it, here's a quick word from one of our partners.
Free speech is under attack, but Rumble Premium refuses to back down.
I won't back down.
Like Thomas Petty, you know, he won't back...
Actually dead, but we're actually better than Tom Petty.
We've always believed in empowering voices, no matter how unpopular, now we're taking the fight to the next level.
When major advertisers conspired, yeah, conspired to pull their dollary-do's, even brands like Dirty Dunkin' Donuts, which I think of as being a bit like the Dunkin' Donut of that Tesla guy that wiped his hand on his butt.
Remember him, this guy?
Dunkin' Donuts is the donut equivalent of that.
There's free speech hate in pigs.
Claiming that Rumble had a right-wing culture.
How dare they?
I mean, look at just some of these comments.
Rumble does not have a right-wing culture.
We are doing our very best to include everyone.
That's from Mr. A. Hitler.
Look at this one.
Rumble is my favourite site.
I love it.
I listen to it every night by Firelight.
That's from Mr. Ku Klux Klan.
Like, how can anyone have a problem with Rumble?
One of the great stations.
We're not here to fit them old.
We're here to defend free expression.
That is the milk of free speech coming out of the tit.
Or just a tit, really.
To strengthen this mission, we're excited to offer you Rumble Premium, a completely ad-free experience with exclusive benefits for viewers and creators.
You'll find exclusive content from creators like Russell Brand.
Hey, I'm him.
Doctor Disrespect.
That's my actual doctor.
Timcast.
Yeah, Timbo!
The Mug Club.
Yeah, go on, Crowder.
We're going to come there.
We're going to go on that show.
It's more than a subscription.
It's a stand for free speech.
You're subscribing to freedom.
Your voice matters.
Join Rumble Premium.
For a limited time, you can get $10 off an annual plan using the promo code BRAND.
Visit rumble.com forward slash premium promo code BRAND.
Together, we can turn the tide.
Whether you join Rumble Premium or simply keep watching, your support helps keep free speech alive.
Join Rumble Premium and help keep free speech alive, baby.
Hey, welcome.
Those of you that are now on our primary home of Rumble where we can speak freely or those of you in locals like Carl and Sandy who's posted some headlines pertaining to conditions in Gaza.
Out of food and under constant attack.
We Gazans are dying every day.
Contribute.
Out of food and under constant attack.
We Gazans are dying every day.
What is your point with that?
Are you saying that it's not being reported on accurately or it is being reported on accurately?
A lot of people are saying they love that commercial.
A lot of people are saying that they loathe that commercial.
I love that commercial.
I think that's one of our great commercials.
I can't stand the same damn ads.
We'll do another version of that.
Shall we shoot another version of it?
Commercials is one of the ways that we really get very, very creative over here.
Let's continue with Mark Carney's victory speech and our analysis of imperialism versus globalism.
Democracy and freedom.
And because we are Canadian, To do so with compassion and generosity.
We are, we are once again, we are once again at one of those hinge moments of history.
Our old relationship with the United States, a relationship based on steadily increasing integration, is over.
of open global trade, anchored by the United States, a system that Canada has relied on since the Second World War, a system that, while not perfect, has helped deliver prosperity for a country for decades, is over.
These are tragedies, but it's also our new reality.
We are over.
We are over the shock of the American betrayal.
But we should never forget the lessons.
But you're going to take this forward!
We have...
No, wait, actually.
Who's the guy peeping over that sign like that?
What's he doing peeping away?
We have to look out for ourselves.
And above all, we have to take care of each other.
Yay! Thank you.
Thank you.
Fatic and empty platitudes.
We have to take care of each other.
In a sense, we project reality onto the external icons and idols.
It is our faith that makes it so.
If you believe Mark Carney, we have to take care of each other, compassion, then why would you not believe J.D. Vance saying it or Keir Starmer saying it?
When I sit down with President Trump...
It will be to discuss the future economic and security relationship between two sovereign nations.
And it will be with our full knowledge that we have many, many other options than the United States to build prosperity for all Canadians.
We will chart a new path forward.
Because this is Canada and we decide.
I think who I voted for would be the best to take care of Trump.
Because Trump is, I'm sorry to say, an asshole.
And he shouldn't even be President of the United States.
But because he is, we need a strong person so that we can stand strong.
I see.
So that's the messaging and that's the impact that that messaging has had.
We need our own attack dog to confront this external neighboring threat.
Now, one of the big stories here is how did Poliev, Pierre Poliev...
Lose this election after being so far ahead and looking like he was going to be Canada's version of Trump, a kind of nationalist politician.
I feel like he was on Jordan Peterson a bunch and super articulate about Canada and a vision for Canada.
But curiously, he chose perhaps necessarily to speak out against Trump's, you know, I would say pseudo and somewhat sarcastic colonialist talk.
So here's one of his posts.
President Trump, stay out of our election.
The only people who will decide the future of Canada are Canadians at the ballot box.
Canada will always be proud, sovereign and independent.
We will never be the 51st state.
Today, Canadians can vote for change, to be strengthened our country, stand around two feet and stand up to America from a position of strength.
But what does that mean even to be a Canadian?
And what is your relationship?
Here's some old left-wing rhetoric.
The oppressed people of Canada,
Germany and the oppressed people of the United Kingdom have more in common with one another than they do with the elite class in their own nation.
This is socialist left-wing discourse, i.e.
workers of the world unite.
You have nothing to lose but your chains.
So, if you are a Canadian and your affiliation is with your nation, or if you're French, or if you're British, or Sri Lankan, or wherever you are, and you feel a sense of national pride, what is that national pride?
Is it based on the ability of your population to stand up to external threats?
Is it a connection to your land?
What exactly are you deriving your sense of nationhood from?
And if you have, ultimately, a globalist leader who will prioritise global relationships with bureaucracies, such as the ones that I continually list, NATO, the UN, if you're in Europe, the EU, the IMF, Global Financial Institutions and Institutions of Power,
if your leader is ultimately...
For all of the many critiques leveled at Donald Trump, what seems to be true, let me know if you agree with this in the comments and chat, is that he does put America first, or does he?
Do you believe that Donald Trump is similarly owned by whatever interests are able to puppet American government and the American military-industrial complex in order to engage them in conflicts around the world?
Do you think that Trump is owned in that way?
Let me know what you think, guys.
Poliev, and he's, and Poliev, even though he's a conservative, vocal and a Trump rhetoric.
The Post, we saw it in text form just there.
...make them more hostile to us and possibly open the door for China, closer to Canada, and that would really put us in a bind.
The conservative that's running is stupidly no friend of mine.
I don't know him, but he said negative things, so when he says negative things, I couldn't care less.
I think it's easier to deal, actually, with a liberal.
Hmm, okay, and I suppose that makes sense, isn't it?
Because you've got a natural enemy in a liberal.
If you have a conservative politician who's deliberately antagonistic to Trump, then that puts Trump in a curious position.
Here's a graph that demonstrates Poliev's decline right when it mattered.
Pierre Poliev, says Nick Sawyer on X, blew a massive freaking lead as soon as he started shit-talking about Trump.
The rest of the world should keep that in mind.
So maybe, remember how we began this conversation, Trump's claim that he runs the country and the world.
Does that seem legitimate and true?
Not so much that Trump directly makes the decisions that determine the outcome of events in your country, if you're not watching this in the United States of America, but is the world...
To me, it seems pretty obvious that that's the case.
That Canada, and in the form of Mark Carney's success, had positioned the campaign and its policies around Canadian sovereignty against the United States of America, a position that was legitimised by much of Trump's...
In my view, comedic rhetoric.
And indeed, this is the conversation and argument that may define the world for the next, you know, four years.
Presumably, Trump is going to just do one term.
It will be about American populism, America's attempt to retain financial and military power over the world as China continues to ascend and Russia makes extraordinary moves as financial alternatives, both crypto and BRICS, emerge that could destabilize the dollar.
What will happen?
How will Trump's strongman approach and natural, intuitive affinity with the population of America that will adore him no matter what influence global politics?
It's not just going to be unilateral.
Clearly, it's not going to be that every country in the world produces a Javier milieu.
Not every country in the world will bake and put forth its own Trump.
Some...
We'll go in an antithetical and diametrically opposed direction as its nearest neighbour and now rival, Canada, has just done.
But that's just what I think.
Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
We're going to be with you for another nine minutes or so on Rumble.
Then we'll be on Rumble Premium.
If you don't have Rumble Premium yet, get Rumble Premium now.
For a small stipend, you will be able to avoid advertisements and you'll get additional content from me.
And the Rumble free speech community.
Let's have a look at Donald Trump's first hundred days in office.
Fox News have released an internal poll that shows that Trump is losing to himself in a popularity poll.
That the only president that's been less popular than Trump now...
Is Trump then?
Let's have a look.
President talking tariffs in the economy.
If you look at our new Fox News poll at 100 days job approval compared to other presidents, there you see the president at 44 percent and you see his first term at 45 percent at this mark, the 100 day mark.
We have other new polls that are revealing some concerns about the economy.
Let's talk about that.
Hmm, that's pretty interesting, isn't it?
Mostly it's interesting to me because it's coming out of Fox, who are generally predisposed to be supportive of Trump.
What do you make of it?
Do you take polls like that seriously?
Do you feel like it's in itself an attempt to destabilise?
Do you agree with it?
Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
ABC and NBC and other networks have likely contributed to this poll, this low popularity or approval rating, because it seems here that the vast majority, 92%, In fact, their coverage of Trump is negative.
That's sure to have some kind of impact, even in this world where independent media appears to have more power in the space.
Let me know what you think, particularly if you're the kind of person that loaves globalism and imperialism and wouldn't trust Joe Biden if he...
Breathed out his last sepulchral coughing, stinking breath upon you.
If you wouldn't trust Kamala Harris no matter what, if you can see that Mark Carney is a globalist imperialist, if you have your doubts about neoliberalism, social democracy and its tendency towards tyranny and felt that Trump might be the answer, let me know how you feel in the chat, guys.
Bill Maher says that those of you that went out to bat for Trump will not admit how disappointed you are.
Let's have a look at Bill Maher.
It's that time when we talk about the first hundred days, because that's coming up this week.
It's been just glorious.
I think for liberals, it's worse than they even thought when they projected out.
I mean, I did not see this amount of extrajudicial activity this quickly, ignoring the courts, disappearing people, scaring people so much, all this kind of stuff.
Let's talk about what it is for the other side, for the MAGA people, because I think they're disappointed even though they may not say it out loud.
I think they thought when they were voting for Trump that, okay, you know, job losses over the last many decades and wage stagnation, and the system is just corrupt and broken.
So it just needs drastic change.
Just break everything.
Fuck the judges.
Fuck the democracy.
Fuck the trading partners.
We have nothing to lose.
And now they found out.
Oh, actually, they've got plenty to lose.
Yeah, I mean, I think that my summary of the first 100 days is that the bad news is it's the worst first 100 days in U.S. presidential history.
I can't think of a presidency that had it worse.
But the good news, I think, for the country is it's the worst first 100 days in U.S. presidential history.
For precisely the reason that you suggest, Bill, which is that a lot of the country that voted for President Trump, because they didn't like the course of the country under his predecessor, because they were mad, because they thought stuff needed to be broken up and disrupted,
are waking up to the reality of just how much worse it can get.
And I'm hearing from so many friends who voted for Trump, who remember the first Trump administration as being an era, at least until COVID, of prosperity, and saying, hang on a second, 100% tariffs?
I'm losing half of my workforce.
I can't afford things.
The price of consumer goods is still going up.
This is not what I voted for.
And that's a relief because if it had been a successful first 100 days, if it had been just a little less bad, people would say, well, what's the problem if we're not observing due process?
Or what's the problem if we're defying the Supreme Court?
That would be even more worrisome than what we have now.
Some people who you certainly couldn't call.
Pinkos include Senator Rand Paul, Steve Bannon and Candace Owens, all of whom have voiced disappointment in the case of Candace Owens, regret that she even voted for Trump.
I'm watching the Rumble chat.
I know that most of you love Trump.
Keep it up, Trump.
I love Trump.
Then there's some people that have got concerns.
Then there's the usual, you know, Zionism and anti-Zionism.
Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia and the general concoctions of extremity that we've learned to love in the rumble chat.
Let's have a look at Senator Rand Paul, who's opposing Trump on a number of issues, speaking about that particularly.
Before we get into Bannon saying that in particular the trillion dollars being given to the Pentagon is...
Against the pledges made while campaigning.
And then we'll look at Candace Owens, who says, flat out, she regrets voting for him.
I am a Republican.
I am a supporter of Donald Trump.
But this is a bipartisan problem.
I don't care if the president is a Republican or a Democrat.
I don't want to live under emergency rule.
I don't want to live where my representatives cannot speak for me and have a check and balance on power.
One person can make a mistake.
And guess what?
Tariffs are a terrible mistake.
They don't work, they will lead to higher prices, they are a tax, and they have historically been bad for our economy.
But even if this were something that was magic and was going to be a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, I wouldn't want to live under emergency rule.
I would want to live in a constitutional republic where there are checks and balances against the excesses of both sides, right or left.
Okay, that's the kind of open rhetoric that democracy demands and requires.
I suppose you want people in the tent that are willing to be openly critical.
But when Steve Bannon, one of the engineers of Trump's early success, is outspoken when it comes to one of Trump's major decisions, perhaps questions have to be asked.
Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
And in this reconciliation, the big beautiful bill, they're going to throw another $150 billion.
That's over a trillion dollars.
And I love Pete Hexeth, but when Pete Hexeth puts out a trillion dollar defense budget, all caps, I'm not feeling good, I'm not feeling like it got
The important thing here is that for America to be safe and to get a defense budget that doesn't drive us into bankruptcy because you are not going to be able to touch social programs until you get cuts in defense.
And people up there right now are selling you a bill of goods.
Candace Owens, one of the most successful commentators and pundits in this space, has explicitly said that she regrets voting for Donald Trump.
Some of you say that you don't follow Candace anymore.
One thing you can say about Candace is that woman, man, she's bold.
I never thought that I would see a day where I would be rooting for a university above Donald J. Trump and his administration.
But I don't recognize his administration right now.
I don't recognize what's happening.
I have a theory.
I do.
We were kicking around some theories earlier, me and the team, and we were going, how could Trump be such a free speech enthusiast and allowing these things to happen?
Going after college universities, trying to...
Suppress speech while pretending that you're not suppressing speech, while pretending that you're fighting DEI.
It's so messy.
It's so obvious.
Everyone knows what you're doing.
People who are still trying to grift, I suppose, are not willing to challenge you on this, which is ridiculous, because when you are out of office, we are going to have to live with these consequences.
Our children are going to have to grow up in this America.
So when you threaten our speech...
It's not worth it so that we can have pom-poms and go hurrah for a couple of years, then go, okay, well, yeah, now it kind of stinks because, oh, we're getting arrested for wrong think.
We've got David Friedman.
Yeah!
Arrest him!
Arrest Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens!
Get him!
I love it!
And if you think it's going to stop with college campuses, you're out of your mind.
So you better buck up and root for Harvard University in this fight.
Hmm, that's an interesting perspective from Candace Owens.
What do you think about these deportations?
Where do you stand on free speech?
And in general, do you recognise the principle that...
In order to have systems of reliable government, you have to have certain principles that are inviolable.
What you can't have is the utilitarian weaponization of every single idea.
I agree with free speech when it suits me.
I agree with deportations when it suits me.
I don't agree with free speech when it doesn't, etc.
We have to find a way, again, of transcending this type of tribalism that seeks to use the Constitution and the law as a kind of weapon and find...
Within ourselves, imminently, and beyond ourselves, transcendently.
An order that can be relied upon, recognizing that we as human beings are fallen, fallible, continually broken.
In our vulnerability and weakness, we may yet find new strength.
If we surrender to God, if we repent of our former lives, if we refuse to bow down and worship at the orders of false idols, we might find an absolute accessible truth.
And we won't be perfect even then.
We'll continue to be broken and fallen, but at least we will know one vital thing.
There is a God and it's not you.
But that's just what I think.
Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
If you're watching us on Rumble, we're going to raid the quarter in now.
Remember, we stream Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday.
Tomorrow's show is going to be fantastic.
We're going to be talking about the WF and globalism.
Does globalism strike back or is it the end of those ideas?
And what has Canada's recent...
What does electoral result mean for the rise and return of the globalists?
If you're on Rumble Premium, if you don't have Rumble Premium, get Rumble Premium right now.
You don't only get me, you get Tim Cash, you get Mug Club.
Well, you don't get Dan Bongino.
He's gone now.
Where is he?
What is he doing right now, Dan Bongino?
You get Glenn Greenwald, though, and you get so much more as well as supporting me and getting an ad-free experience.
We'll be back tomorrow on Rumble.
Not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
We're raiding the quarter in now.
And if you've got Rumble Premium, we're going to continue talking for a little while longer.
See you tomorrow.
Export Selection