Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 27, 2025 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:07:57

5 Years Late: NYT Admits We Were Lied to About COVID! – SF556

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
	Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand on Rumble.
	If you've got Rumble Premium, you can participate in our new live lineup.
	And thank you, Tim Pool and Timcast.
	For the raid.
	Whether you're watching us on X or YouTube, ultimately you've got to make your way to Rumble where we can speak freely and openly about the issues that matter.
	For example, did you know that even the New York Times are willing to admit that we were badly misled about the event that changed our lives, the pandemic?
	Yeah, we were badly misled.
	By the New York Times, it seems that the legacy media are finally catching up to where we were some time ago.
	We've got some great stories.
	USAID is still the gift that keeps on giving.
	So whether you're watching us on Locals, hello you guys over there, or on Rumble Premium, or if you're on X or YouTube, if you're on YouTube, you're going to have to make your way out of that citadel of stinking corruption sooner or later.
	You can rely on us to tell you the truth about the stories that matter to you.
	Even Bill Maher, and I quite like Bill Maher as a...
	As a matter of fact, even Bill Maher is now having conversations about the British government's deception during that integral time.
	And of course, I don't know if you know this about me, I'm a British citizen.
	The British government and British intelligence knew that we were being lied to about the pandemic as early as 2020.
	Let's have a look at Andrew Sullivan and Bill Maher discussing that.
	Questions. Andrew, what do you think of news that British intelligence knew Covid was a lab leak in 2020 and officially ignored their report?
	Not just knew, 80 to 95 percent certainty.
	Same with the German intelligence service.
	March 2020.
	I was reading it this last couple of weeks, and the core paper that killed off any idea that this was a lab leak in China, the Proximal Origin paper, which was produced with Fauci and Collins,
	the NIH and NIAID, helping it along was a lie, a conscious lie, that the people who looked at it, we now have their emails, are saying in the very first days of looking at the virus, this looks very man-made to us.
	It was a control operation, it was a manipulation.
	Can you see, did you know that the CDC is pulling $11 billion worth of funding?
	It seems like they're...
	This gig is truly up for them.
	Isn't it curious to watch the legacy media scrambling to get on board as jobs are lost in legacy media, as advertising revenue falls in legacy media, more and more people are starting to realise, oh no, we should have told the truth during the COVID pandemic.
	Is it too late for me to get a job on the Daily Wire?
	Will Rumble take us on board?
	Elon, please save us!
	This is so friggin' obvious this is man-made.
	Well, so friggin obvious one of them said, and then they wrote the report saying there is no evidence that this was made in a lab.
	The question is why?
	Why would they lie to us about that?
	And they did.
	Well, I can give you one answer, the New York Times.
	The New York Times said any questioning of this being from a lab was racist, which always struck me as odd because it seems much more racist to go, wow, these people are eating bats.
	I know.
	I mean, it's just one example, but a good example of why people lost faith in the left, because they do stupid things like that.
	Not to begin, I told you so, but from the very beginning, I was saying, this shouldn't even be political, but it's at least a 50-50 came from the lab, and that in 50 years, I can't imagine people going, wait, you mean in 2020, there was this thing that escaped from a lab in Wuhan, that started in Wuhan?
	I wonder how long it'll be before Legacy Media...
	Outright, flat out, without any kind of sophistry or mitigation, admit that they participated in a global deception.
	Let me know what you think about that in the comments and chat.
	Let's go back to it.
	It started in Wuhan, and there was a lab in Wuhan that was studying it, and they didn't think that was connected, and they blamed it on bats, really?
	It just doesn't make any sense.
	It makes a little bit more sense.
	It can gaslight people so easily.
	I don't think the Democrats are so much as Ford as scientists who went along with this, knowing better.
	It's their integrity.
	The scientists were responding to political and financial pressure.
	It's not like the scientists are the powerful ones.
	The problem is that we regarded science as the objective appraisal of information based on evidence, because that's what science should be, when in fact science has become a new orthodoxy because only the questions that are funded are getting asked and only the answers that are favourable are being...
	Published. It's their integrity I'm concerned about to actually lie and distort what they could see with their own eyes because they were afraid of politics.
	The other question is this.
	This lab was a gain of function.
	That means they were creating viruses.
	Right. Dangerous.
	Is there anyone in the world who don't know what gain-of-function means at this point?
	We're all so well-educated in this stuff.
	I know that there was a signature at a molecular level that demonstrated that this had been interfered with in a laboratory because of Bobby Kennedy, now head of the HHS.
	Praise Jesus.
	I knew what Anthony Fauci's involvement was in the HIV pandemic.
	And because of the boldness and bravery of figures like Bobby Kennedy, we now have Jay Bhattacharya as head of the NIH.
	We'll be covering that story a little later.
	And also, because of this revolutionary moment, and let me know in the comments and chat if you agree with this, I truly believe the pandemic was a revolutionary moment.
	We are more informed when it comes to reporting on stories like Ukraine and Russia, more informed when it comes to what's happening in the Middle East, and certainly we better understand cryptocurrencies now, and whether or not particular cryptocurrencies are oriented towards centralized power, i.e. Bitcoin cannot be controlled, but this new digital European...
	The main currency that's coming can be controlled.
	That's why we have to be cynical about it.
	Viruses. Right.
	Dangerous viruses to figure out how to protect you from them.
	This gain of function research was always dangerous.
	Everyone knew it was dangerous.
	Long time ago, you go back to 2015, you will find a big meeting in London where they say there's one lab in the world most likely to have a problem with this.
	Wuhan. Do you know who was the biggest supporter of gain-of-function research for the last 30 years?
	Anthony Fauci.
	Anthony Fauci.
	Now, remember that name.
	There's a reason he was given a...
	Well, we will remember the name because Legacy Media presented him as a hero in an unending hagiography, whether it was late night shows or the songs or turned him into a sex symbol.
	This is a wonderful moment.
	Don't miss how significant this is.
	This is the Legacy Media, New York Times, HBO, all of the organisations that are part of a nexus of power.
	They include Big Pharma, various regulatory bodies now blessedly taken over by people with common sense like Bhattacharya, Martin Makary, et al.
	as a result of Dr.
	Oz and Bobby Kennedy getting into positions of power.
	That is the one part of the post-2024 experiment that I'm totally without doubt about.
	Those guys are reliable, I believe, in those people.
	I know them.
	They're good people.
	We're going to be okay there.
	But what's interesting is to watch how various institutions of power broadcast corruption, in particular media ones, are starting to...
	No, man.
	People have been advocating for compliance, obedience, trust Big Pharma.
	You were told to be ashamed of yourselves if you didn't take vaccines like I didn't, like maybe you didn't.
	What an extraordinary time.
	What a fantastic awakening.
	How... This is such a gift to anyone who's been skeptical of government power for a long time.
	It was such a revolutionary and revelatory new era.
	He was given a pardon back to 2014.
	There is something very wrong going on here.
	I also don't think he did it for nefarious reasons.
	There's an argument to be made.
	There's an actual intellectual debate to be had.
	Should gain-of-function research be done?
	We want to get ahead of viruses.
	No! Don't do it.
	Stop doing it immediately.
	It's plainly motivated by corrupt motives like the pursuit of profit because the very people that caused this pandemic benefited from it and profited from it.
	There is no debate to be had about gain-of-function research.
	It should be banned immediately right now.
	Or... How about this?
	How about some kind of referendum?
	How about a little thing called democracy?
	How about putting it before the very public that fund it and asking you, do you want it to continue?
	Let me know in the comments and chat.
	Are you happy for your tax dollars to go on funding USAID-style projects?
	Are you happy for your tax dollars to go on funding mRNA-style projects?
	It's you that pays for it.
	You are the quarry.
	You are the thing they're controlling and lashing their parasitical tubes onto.
	To channel your energy, your money, your attention continually.
	If you haven't learned that lesson in the pandemic, then, you know, pay attention because we'll learn it now.
	The head of viruses.
	The other answer is, the other response would be, it's too dangerous.
	Because if it gets out...
	It's going to be bad, and that's what happened.
	But I don't think he's an evil guy, like some people do, who was trying to get rich off this.
	No, no.
	Okay, he just made the wrong call.
	No, he knew from the get-go that the Wuhan lab had security levels that were the average of a dentist's office.
	They should have been at the highest level imaginable.
	He knew that.
	Not only that, he, the NIH and NID, had helped fund it.
	Right. So you don't want to go down in history as the person who helped develop the virus that killed millions of people.
	You want to go down as the one who saved millions of people.
	That was at stake, a reputational matter.
	A piece of a lot of this that seems insane to me is we are now, years after, whether man-made or not, one of the worst disasters in human history.
	And we are genuinely less prepared for the next one than the last one.
	It's not one of the worst disasters in human history.
	I could name a hundred worse ones.
	Fair enough.
	But it was bad.
	I didn't enjoy it.
	I can't watch these people anymore, can you?
	I can't take them seriously anymore.
	I can't watch them trying to exculpate themselves from messages they participated in by amplifying messaging that should have been questioned from the beginning.
	Here is CNN pundit.
	Dr. Lina Wen admitting some of the worst conspiracy theories were actually true.
	But I could see how people may feel as if they cannot ask them, because maybe they did ask them.
	And what came back, what they got back, not from their physicians, but from somebody else, was, oh, well, this is a conspiracy theory, rather than addressing the question head on.
	And I know that...
	Is this exhausting for you to just hear things that you were saying at the time happening?
	What I'd resent is the general tone.
	Oh, if only we'd known.
	We did know.
	We were talking about this.
	You can watch the videos of me.
	At the point that they're discussing this, talking with you about it.
	Not with, like, a kind of rabid certainty of a madman, but with a kind of inquiry of, this don't seem right.
	And that should always have been the tone.
	It should always have been, there's this vaccine available, it might work, might not, probably don't need it if you're a healthy young person.
	I remember Joe Rogan saying that at the time, being shut down for it.
	We might look into ivermectin just because it's white-labelled now and not so profitable.
	That don't mean we should ignore the possibility.
	I don't think we can ever trust...
	Now, that might seem pretty sweeping, but I'd say that their model is so dependent on advertising dollars and that their ownership models are so sort of intertwined with corporatism that you've just got to strike them from the record.
	Whether that's the government-funded, state-funded, license-funded, BBC, that should be banned.
	New York Times, shut it down.
	What we learned in that period is these legacy media titles should be stamped out.
	Let me know in the comments and chat if you agree with that.
	From my patients, I got asked questions specifically about the vaccine that they had heard from somewhere that were important to address and that there was some truth behind.
	For example, people were concerned about the impact of the vaccines on women were concerned about the impact of the vaccines on their menstrual periods.
	Well, as it turns out, there have been studies that have shown that there may be some changes to the menstrual period in the short term.
	But addressing that is not a conspiracy theory.
	It's addressing this question and then saying, here's the research that we know around this.
	Or I know that for some time, for the first couple of years, the questions around natural immunity from the immunity that you get from infection, those questions were all dismissed because, yes, it is true that we didn't want people to just go out and have chicken box parties and get infected all at once.
	But it's also true that you do have immunity after not lifelong immunity, but you do get some degree of pretty good immunity after having infection.
	So I think that addressing those nuances And being clear with people about what we know and what we don't know and what we believe is the case based on ongoing research, but this could change.
	I think that leaning into the nuances rather than backing away and just saying, well, you're wrong and I'm right.
	And I think that that may be a lesson that we learn, especially because...
	We also know that if people keep on hearing that their questions are being dismissed, they're much more likely to go to the source, as you were saying, like an RFK junior, who will say, well, let's ask this question.
	And you know what?
	If we can ask this question, why not also this question?
	If you think they're lying to you about this, then maybe they're also lying to you about X, Y, and Z. Naomi Wolf had her entire career cancelled for asking exactly that question.
	She's a lifelong Democrat.
	She said that there was evidence that it's affecting women's menstrual cycles, that it's contributing to complications during birth.
	And for that, she was cancelled, kicked out of a tent.
	What I would say this tells us is we can never trust the establishment again.
	That's it.
	Full stop.
	Now, never trust don't mean, you know, line people up, get them into death camps.
	A kind of skepticism.
	Okay, that's what you're saying.
	Is it possible you're saying that to assert control?
	Because while you're saying you're doing that to protect us or for humanitarian or philanthropic reasons, I'm going to bear in mind what I know about you guys, that you generally use care and concern, like you did in the pandemic, to assert control.
	That's what I thought then.
	That's what I think now.
	But that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
	If you're watching this on X, if you're watching this on YouTube, join us now on Rumble and get Rumble Premium if you want additional content from us and the rest of Rumble's fantastic free speech lineup.
	Here's a quick message.
	Rumble! Rumble!
	Rumble! Do you hear the chant across the world?
	That's the sound of people waking up to the necessity of free speech in China, Russia, France, Brazil.
	All of us want to be united by the sweet stream of freedom that is Rumble.
	Like taking a nice wee-wee after having a kidney stone removed, I assume.
	I've never had one.
	It's not my problem.
	I eat well.
	Get the Rumble app now and experience content like never before.
	Available on Android and iOS, which I suppose is just an iPhone.
	Don't get confused.
	And you can take Rumble with you wherever you go when you're on the move or just relaxing at home.
	Or maybe you're putting your hand in your butt crack and wiping it on a Cybertruck because you're mental.
	You've gone mad.
	You can listen to Rumble while you're doing that.
	Want to enjoy it on a big screen?
	No problem.
	Rumble's available on Apple TV, Roku, which pushes porn.
	Remember you told me that.
	Amazon Fire, LG Smart TVs, and Samsung TV apps, all giving you the power of Rumble at your fingertips.
	Although you might have put your finger up your butt in a protest against a Cybertruck.
	Dirty pigs, yeah.
	Rumble's the platform that gives you the freedom to watch what you want, when you want.
	Download the Rumble app today.
	Make sure to follow my channel to receive live locations.
	Follow me!
	Follow me!
	I'll ultimately follow him.
	And use Rumble!
	Rumble! And don't put your own hand up your butt and wipe it aside.
	That's... I can't tell you how that undermines your protest.
	When is a cryptocurrency a good thing?
	When the government or a form of government can control it.
	This is the news, of course, that in October, which is not that long away, there will be a new Europe-wide...
	Digital currency.
	What? I thought Bitcoin was evil.
	I thought that these things led to silk roads and condemnation and crime.
	Well, let's have a look at how Simon Goddick is reporting on the new ECB digital euro being launched in October.
	So, here's how it could operate.
	There could be real-time transaction tracking, potential for payment blocking.
	Oh, like in the Canadian trucker protest.
	Automatic tax deductions.
	Oh, less freedom.
	Restrictions on cash withdrawals.
	Did you see that amazing clip of that bloke?
	Having to justify how he was withdrawing his own money.
	That was ridiculous.
	Programmable money with expiration dates.
	They couldn't convince us voluntarily, so now they're using fear and most likely a new crisis to enforce this system upon us.
	This is nothing but a financial great reset.
	Total control over what you buy, where you go, and even what you eat.
	Well, who among us is surprised to see that kind of gambit playing out after the COVID era, which we've been discussing on the show today, where we learned that the fundamental aim of globalization is maximal control while masquerading as maximal concern.
	Let's learn a little more about this new crypto control currency.
	On your second point, I tend to share your views.
	Nature doesn't like vacuum.
	Nature like Christian Lagarde.
	Head of the European Bank.
	Nature like control.
	Nature like my scarf.
	Nature like me.
	And we started working on the digital euro way back.
	Actually, when I started my term five and a half years ago.
	And I'm not claiming, you know, parental parentality on the digital euro because my colleague Benoit Coré.
	Had already committed a speech on this matter before I arrived, but I certainly carried on with that project.
	And subsequently, Fabio Panetta on the board and then Pierrot Cipollone, who has replaced Fabio, have taken the lead together with a very, very good team, which is focused on accelerating the pace.
	And hopefully...
	Campaigning enough with all the stakeholders, meaning European Parliament, meaning European Council, meaning European Commission, so that we can eventually, you know, not put to bed, but put to reality this digital euro.
	The deadline for us is going to be October of 25, and we are getting ready for that deadline, but we will not be able to move Unless the other parties, the stakeholders, as I call them, Commission, Council and Parliament, actually complete the legislative process without which we will not be able to move.
	And I think it is critically important.
	And it seems to the agnostic or the skeptics, it seems to be more relevant and more of an imperative now than ever before.
	Both on the wholesale and on the retail level.
	Both. Obviously, when you look at that, you can see how nefarious it is, particularly if you've looked at Simon Godek's post before.
	All of the possibilities for control that this new Europe-wide digital currency will grant.
	Let's have a look at the propaganda that they've used to lubricate our minds for the pelvic thrust of this new digital currency.
	Do you want to know more about the digital euro?
	Yeah, I want to know why you're doing it and how you're going to use it to control us and jail us.
	Digital euro?
	Let's find out more.
	Evelyn, in 20 seconds, can you answer our questions?
	Why do we need that?
	It's a euro.
	Why should we even trust you?
	Why should we ever trust another bureaucrat like you ever again?
	Why do you keep leading us into wars?
	Why did you spend so much money on those vaccines?
	How can we ever rely on our media institutions and bureaucratic institutions ever again after the pandemic era?
	I thought that cryptocurrencies were evil and bad and using too much energy and were an environmental threat.
	Does that mean that your entire ecological argument is as bogus as your claim to be wanting to protect people?
	What about migration?
	when you say that migration is in order to protect and preserve life of refugees that have been displaced as a result of imperialist activity.
	Is that a lie as well?
	Are you just trying to dissolve all of our sense of identity and connection to land and to tribe?
	You've got 20 seconds to answer that.
	Well, our currency needs to keep up with how we want to pay.
	So currently, more than half of the people prefer to pay digitally and there is not one single European way to do so.
	The digital euro would fill that gap.
	What would a day in the life of the Europeans look like with a digital euro?
	It would look a bit like being in a concentration camp, because that's the ultimate aim.
	The aim is for us to turn the world into a kind of airport, where using security we can legitimize control, where we can tell you to sit down, shut up, take your shoes off, take your hat off, take your phone out of your pocket, keep perfectly still.
	We will not rest until the world is like an airport.
	Of course, you won't accept that unless we can tell you that it's better for you or your safety is under threat.
	And that's why we're doing both of those things.
	Well, Europeans would be able to pay with the digital euro alongside cash.
	And they can trust that they can pay everywhere in the euro area.
	They can trust that they can pay digitally while their privacy is secure.
	And last but not least they can pay offline when there's no electricity connection or when there is no internet connection.
	So, what's next?
	Well, as the word-She can't even do it within 20 seconds, even that was a lie!
	Well, as the word goes digitally, show should our currency.
	So that's why we are designing a digital euro to offer a seamless payment experience across Europe.
	But we need a strong legislation.
	That's why we're supporting European lawmakers, because they are deciding on the legislation needed.
	Together we can bring European payments into the digital age.
	you Reject it, don't use it.
	It's filthy propaganda and control, as it always will be when it comes out of those mouths, that kind of bonket seat, in those kind of cheesy graphics, and particularly that kind of electric blue suit.
	Here's a quick word from one of us, but that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
	Let's have a quick word now from one of our partners.
	1775! It ain't easy for me as an Englishman to say 7075!
	It was a tough time for us and the redcoats, but 7075 coffee is a revolution that we can all participate in.
	You wake up every morning, you're like a cripple, aren't you?
	You're like Stephen Hawking without the brains.
	You're just a shuffling, wretched cripple.
	Well... What if I were to tell you that 1775, don't just put pep in your step, it's the fountain of youth.
	It's the literal fountain of youth, reversing time.
	It actually made you younger.
	Like reversing, I want to use these exact words, the ticking time bomb of existence itself.
	That's a pretty bold claim.
	The ticking time bomb of existence itself.
	That's a Faustian pact you're making there.
	Well, apparently 1775 coffee went full alchemist and brewed up rejuvenate.
	Don't panic in the comments.
	It's spelled J-U, rejuvenate.
	Not. You know, none of that stuff.
	It's got C-A-A-K-G, an ingredient scientifically proven to fight ageing at the cellular level.
	Great. Because who the hell wants to just exist when you can flip the bird to ageing along with every single cup?
	That Mephistopheles?
	Read Goethe.
	And it's still all the good stuff you'd expect from 1775.
	Single origin beans.
	Can you hear the word bean without thinking of a clitoris?
	I can't.
	Small batch roasting.
	Mmm. Speciality grade coffee.
	Mmm. Small farms that probably have goats with PhDs in them, bean picking.
	Don't like hearing bean picking after I've just made it a clitoris.
	But now every cup is cranked up to superhuman levels, boosting energy, firing up metabolism, repairing muscles, and allegedly turning back the clock by up to eight years in seven months.
	And yes, actual science, back this up, not some capitalist scam.
	Rejuvenate officially launches April 15th, but you can pre-order it right now like a proper rebel against the inevitability of entropy.
	Head over to 1775coffee.com, use the promo code BRAND for 15% off, and start drinking your age of eight.
	I mean, because normally drinking exacerbates the conditions of ageing.
	But not this time.
	Oh, and every dollar you spend entitles you to win a cursed cyber truck that damn near ruined our lives.
	And $30,000 cash.
	A cyber truck that could be a Trojan horse which contains spiritual warfare.
	And $30,000.
	Thank the Lord for small blessings.
	Two such blessings are Jay Bhattacharya and Marty Makkari, two outspoken advocates for common sense during the pandemic.
	...
	era whose voices were blessedly heard.
	We know that Jay Bhattacharya, a friend of the show, experienced smears and attacks like anyone outspoken will experience from the legacy media and the centralised institutions of control.
	Well, thankfully now, his integrity has been rewarded with a high-ranking position in government.
	As head of the NIH, he will decide what experiments and clinical trials get done, how they're funded, and what the conditions will be.
	And I can say from knowing him, he's a beautiful human being, and this is one of the great blessings of...
	Of the 2024 election victory for the Maga Maha movement and Trump in general.
	Let's have a look now at the confirmation of the positions of Marty Makari and Bhattacharya.
	Pretty good news.
	Four years ago, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya was on a COVID blacklist on Twitter.
	The day he was confirmed for the director...
	Of the NIH.
	Turns out that actually, democracy can do some pretty positive things.
	Extraordinary. Now, here's Robert Malone, friend of the show.
	Bhattacharya was confirmed as the director of the NIH today, and not a single Democrat voted to confirm him.
	The rot in the Democratic Party is festered to the point where they can no longer vote on qualifications, only along party lines.
	Shame on them.
	difficult to argue with Robert Malone's position there, particularly if, like me, you've had a look at the Senate confirmation hearing to see your friend of mine, Bernie Sanders, struggling through principles that he once claimed to believe in and refusing to confirm Bacharya, and actually maybe not even On this vote the yeas are 53, the nays are 46. The motion is agreed to.
	The clerk will report the nomination.
	Nomination. Get his name right.
	And for professor physician who specializes in this stuff, seems like he'd be the last person you'd censor, correct?
	Here's Bhattacharya talking to Tucker at the height of the pandemic and telling the truth in a way that...
	Actually makes his ascent to power something to applaud.
	You need censor correct?
	I mean, the key thing here, Tucker, that I think folks need to know, what they wanted to do, and this I think is government actors and also old media, old owners of Twitter, they wanted to create this illusion of consensus about science that didn't actually exist.
	They wanted to fool people into thinking that we were following the science, when in fact there was a robust debate among scientists about what the right thing to do was.
	And the consequence is, schools closed, businesses closed, Unvaccinated people lost their jobs because of mandates, even though none of the persuasive science actually supported any of those positions.
	People suffered as a consequence of this censorship.
	And of course, it's an abstract violation of my civil rights, my First Amendment rights, but that's not the important thing.
	The important thing is that...
	American people were denied a debate, an honest debate, and I believe that had that honest debate taken place, none of those policies would have been put in place and all of that suffering could have been avoided.
	This may be a crazy and divisive time, but with men like Marty Makari and Jay Bhattacharya rising to significant positions of power, the area of American health, and human services at least, I believe will radically improve.
	The same can be said, of course, of a figure like Bobby Kennedy, a brave, bold, outspoken man who, as a result of sticking to his principles, has been rewarded with control over the biggest governmental department on the planet.
	Did you know that?
	It's even bigger than...
	Various military departments.
	Pretty extraordinary and exciting times.
	We may have lost Dan Bongino!
	To the FBI, but we've gained many, many viewers, and we've gained a great health and human services organization.
	But that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
	Here's a quick word from one of our sponsors.
	We've always believed in empowering voices, no matter how unpopular, and now we're taking the fight to the next level.
	When major advertisers conspired, yeah, conspired, to pull their dollary-do's, even brands like Dirty Dunkin' Donuts, which I think of as being a bit like the Dunkin' Donut of that Tesla guy, I mean, look at just some of these comments.
	Rumble does not have a right-wing culture.
	We are doing our very best to include everyone.
	That's from Mr. A. Hitler.
	Look at this one.
	Rumble is my favourite site.
	I love it.
	I listen to it every night by Firelight.
	That's from Mr. Koo.
	Clucks. Like, how can anyone have a problem with Rumble, one of the great stations?
	We're not here to fit a mold.
	We're here to defend free expression.
	That is the milk of free speech coming out of the tit.
	Or just a tit, really.
	To strengthen this mission, we're excited to offer you Rumble Premium, a completely ad-free experience with exclusive benefits for viewers and creators.
	You'll find exclusive content from creators like Russell Brand.
	Hey, I'm him.
	Doctor Disrespect.
	That's my actual doctor.
	It's more than a subscription.
	It's a stand for free speech.
	You're subscribing to freedom.
	Your voice matters.
	Join Rumble Premium for a very limited time.
	You can get $20 off the annual plan using the code RUMBLELIVE.
	Visit rumble.com forward slash premium and claim your special sale discount today.
	Together, we can turn the tide.
	Whether you join Rumble Premium or simply keep watching, your support helps keep free speech alive.
	Join Rumble Premium and help keep free speech alive, baby.
	Trapped in me, there's an African child.
	There's a little African child trapped in me.
	Can I use USAID to get it out?
	Or would that just not work?
	USAID was a blag.
	Always a blag.
	You horrible racist!
	Here is a former African Union ambassador explaining to Al Jazeera why USAID was a massive con.
	This should blow AOC's mind right out of the water.
	This should knock Kamala Harris's pants right down.
	This should make Joe Biden sit up straight and say, Hunter!
	Because it exposes to my former lefty, liberal, progressive cronies that they're living in planet bullshit, which might be a nice place to live if you don't mind the smell of bullshit, but they can't force the rest of us to live.
	Bill Gates, one of their heroes who Katie Couric lines up to offer hagiographies to, is of course the chief avatar, almost the Nebuchadnezzar of bullshit.
	And here he sits...
	Proud and pompous with a picture of himself on the cover of his biography telling us why we should all give him money.
	Well, here, check this out.
	Africa don't want Bill Gates' help.
	This is from 2022, where an open letter had to be written to him to ask him to get his dirty little digits that probably still smell of a lifeguard on Epstein Island out of Africa's affairs.
	So have a look at these two brilliant videos.
	One, this African ambassador.
	Now, what I love about this is this is an African woman sort of going, listen, they're telling you they're helping.
	They ain't helping.
	They're using it as an excuse to take your money and to control you.
	This isn't from Tommy Robinson.
	It's not from Andrew Tate.
	It's not from Donald Trump.
	It's not from Elon Musk.
	It's not from any of the cavalcade of villains that the progressives would conjure up to justify their bullshit.
	It's from a...
	African woman.
	You listen to her.
	She's serious.
	We should get her on the show, man.
	We should get this woman on the show.
	She's absolutely fantastic.
	She's explaining it exactly how it is.
	Watch it.
	Arm yourself.
	Because it is wrong to be racist.
	You should never be racist.
	Racism is disgusting.
	But this woman describes that all of that USAID stuff was never about racism.
	It's about control.
	And then we'll show you Bill Gates, that little ob-gobbling pipsqueak, sitting there simpering like Gollum with his new book with Katie Corey.
	Acting like we need him to help.
	We don't need him to help.
	Get your help out of my arsehole.
	Thanks. We need to understand the real reason why USAID is in Africa.
	And not just USAID, but other NGOs.
	You look at DFID, which is the British equivalent, and many other smaller ones.
	Their sole purpose was to act as if.
	They're coming to rescue Africa.
	They're coming to fill in the gaps in government services, gaps in education, gaps in healthcare, gaps in humanitarian services.
	They're coming in in the guise of addressing issues to do with human rights, issues to do with environmental protection and social justice.
	They are coming in claiming that they are introducing grassroots initiatives that are going to help the people.
	And so they use that as a way to go into the most remote parts of Africa.
	They are talking about government advocacy.
	When you look at it on paper, it all looks really good.
	But they are actually wolf in sheep's clothing.
	They are using that open access sounding humanitarian.
	To constantly destabilize governments.
	I can tell you right now, the majority of African leaders, and not just African leaders, but leaders in the developing world, are celebrating the exit of USID.
	I was listening to a program, I believe it was CNN, and I was jumping up and down.
	It was a government official from Hungary.
	He was echoing the same sentiment.
	He said they are happy USAID is leaving Hungary because they are always supporting opposition.
	Their form of government advocacy is supporting whoever can keep the government in a turmoil.
	So Ambassador, let me just jump in here for a minute.
	This is a message that I don't think many Americans hear.
	I think many Americans believe, not all of them, but many of them believe that AID was essentially set up for philanthropic reasons.
	For dealing with the HIV-AIDS crisis, dealing with the various instabilities in the region, dealing with infrastructure deficits.
	But you're saying that there was something else as part of that package, meddling.
	A major meddling agenda.
	Major meddling agenda.
	The majority of some of the workers, now the average USAID worker may not realize it, but quite a few of them are also operatives.
	Underground, and their major agenda is to destabilize governments, destabilize countries.
	If you think about it, their sole purpose, for example, filling in the gaps in healthcare and education, where is the change?
	Show me one country that USAID was in and education improved.
	Show me what country where USAID was in and healthcare improved.
	The social services they are bringing is peanuts.
	The American taxpayer needs to know the billions of dollars that are being given to USAID.
	A fraction is making it to the people.
	Okay, so have you absorbed that?
	Al Jazeera!
	African Union.
	These are not racist people.
	Al Jazeera is pretty far left, I would say, or is certainly not racist or far right.
	And I don't imagine that woman there, who's an African Union ambassador, is like, is she racist now?
	Is she racist?
	I don't know, man.
	What does it take?
	There's no reason why she's going to be racist.
	Turns out, if you don't agree with them, you're a racist, you're a rapist, you're a something, you're whatever it takes to stop being listened to.
	Here's Bill Gates on Katie Couric.
	Basically saying what Bill Gates is always saying.
	Why don't you listen to me?
	Why don't you just do what I say?
	I invented a type of software.
	I bet he didn't even invent that software.
	I bet it's one of those things, isn't it, where it was a CIA-sponsored thing.
	Anyway, let's listen to the dude trying to flog his autobiography.
	Will you call Elon Musk because as the head of Doge or whatever that agency is...
	Yeah, I don't even know.
	Is it called Doge?
	I don't know.
	I'm too left-wing to know whether it's called Doge or not.
	I don't even take it seriously.
	I'm too busy sitting here next to this wonky bookshelf.
	Look, the bookshelf's wonky.
	Or they ain't framed the shop.
	Either way, something ain't right.
	He's made moves, as you know, to shut down USAID.
	He says, quote, with the blessing of President Trump.
	I better have a drink!
	I better have a drink!
	Think, Bill!
	Think! How can we make this not go round to Epstein Island?
	Think, Bill!
	Think! And on his platform, X, he called the government agency evil and a viper's nest of radical left Marxists who hate America.
	Katie Couric is very happy to say, oh, it's Elon Musk calling it a viper's nest.
	Well, what is Dr. Arikana?
	She... Fuck.
	Look. I'm English.
	Dr. Arikana Chihonbori Kwao from Zimbabwe saying, is she a racist now?
	Does she run a bad platform?
	Do you see they don't focus on that bit of information?
	What we have to do, you and I, is we have to make sure that we absorb as much as we can, and then we can aggregate it to I'm just so happy that I said that woman's name right.
	I've been thinking about that for that last one minute.
	Adding that it was time for it to die.
	We got so many questions, Bill, for you on Threads, my followers.
	Did you?
	Because there's only about five people on Threads.
	Who's on Threads?
	Threads? Threads?
	What are these Threads emerging from?
	They're wispy little a-holes.
	I'm on Threads to protest.
	I'm on Threads.
	I saw something on X that hurt my feelings.
	That's why I'm on Threads.
	If you're on Threads, you're a paedophile.
	And do you think that Elon Musk, or for that matter, Donald Trump, after you all had that three-hour dinner and talked about the important work that organizations like this do, do you think anybody's going to listen?
	I'm very hopeful that the Secretary of State, Mark Rubio, who was in Africa, And saw this great work.
	And President Trump will work to preserve the bulk of what's there.
	Whether that...
	That it, mate.
	That it.
	Well, also, you did a lot of good work, didn't you, on that?
	What was that other country you used to go to a lot?
	I can't remember the names.
	Ireland. Little Ireland.
	Oh, yeah, I remember.
	Epstein Island.
	Same shape as the Nickelodeon logo.
	That named agency stays in place, you know, whether every program does.
	But, you know, an abrupt ending of that work would really put to the test, you know, is it in the value of Americans to take half percent of the budget and keep tens of millions of Africans alive?
	Or have we sort of overnight decided that that half a percent shouldn't be spent that way?
	Go back to Dr. Arakana.
	I can't do the surname again.
	It's too difficult.
	What does she say?
	Who are you going to trust?
	Oh, that's weird.
	Should we trust you, a white man, Bill Gates, over that black African woman?
	Uh-oh.
	We're in the progressive bind.
	Because if you can't use your tokenism in the way that you have been to shut down the voices and discredit the voices of ordinary Americans because they're racist or rapists or whatever it is this week, then...
	How are you going to bypass the problem of Dr.
	Araucana saying this whole thing's a plan?
	Oh, what is she?
	Was she funded by Hitler?
	Is she?
	Is that Hitler after a sex change after he, she, they fled to Argentina?
	It is a political question.
	You know, I have a clear point of view.
	Why has he got two drinks?
	And it's not just Africa, by the way.
	It's all over the world.
	It is.
	It is.
	It's mostly the benefits of that work of USAID broadly are global.
	The HIV work, because of the nature of the epidemic, is about 80% in Africa.
	And the things USAID...
	What a coincidence!
	They're doing it live.
	They're doing it live.
	There seems to be some crossover between USAID, globalism, pandemics, outbreaks of diseases, and taking American taxpayer dollars to do stuff that the people themselves and their representatives say isn't helping them and they don't want anymore.
	But we know best because we are white.
	With billions of dollars.
	And, you know, I'm very careful to make sure that money is well spent.
	And so I think naively people hear the most random foreign aid things and think, okay, it's all like that.
	So I have a challenge to say to Americans.
	Is it in your value system to keep going to Epstein Island?
	Will you please release the files?
	And we have the files.
	And, you know, does it benefit our security or our moral example to keep these programs going?
	And, you know, I think...
	People of both parties will find this a deeply moral and important thing to keep strong.
	Yep, that's right.
	Well, listen, if I'd have spent as much time dotting around Ireland hopping as dear old Bill...
	Which one is that?
	Gates. I can't get all my bills mixed up.
	Gates, Cosby, Clinton.
	Well, whichever bill it is there that's participating in globalism and vast organised sexual misconduct, allegedly, allegedly innocent till proven guilty, I'd say that I would go with what the people of Africa and their various elected officials and leaders say.
	And according to Dr. Arakana Chihonborikwa, Dr. Arakana Chihonborikwa, sorry for the cut, it's a difficult name to say, According to her, they don't want Bill Gates' Epstein Island fingers in their African affairs.
	So, I reckon I'd rather listen to her on Al Jazeera than Bill Gates on Katie Couric telling us that he needs your tax dollars in order to continue helping them with help they don't really want.
	I hope stuff like that didn't go on on Epstein Island.
	People getting offered help they didn't want.
	But that's just what I think.
	Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
	Join us over on Rumble for our new line-up.
	We stream every day at these times.
	In the meantime, if you can, stay free.
	Bill Burr spoke out against Elon Musk.
	So is Elon Musk the good guy that created Tesla or the bad guy that created Doge?
	Bill Burr, in my opinion, is a fantastic comedian.
	He's up there with Shane Gillis out of the new contemporary comedians.
	And maybe he's not, in my view...
	The absolute top tier.
	Chappelle, Pryor, Hicks.
	But I think he's the next rung down.
	Brilliant, brilliant, excellent comic voice.
	Always funny.
	So, let's have a look at this new version of Bill Burr coming up on The View and criticising figures from the right.
	I think it's the job of comedians to criticise people in power.
	Absolutely. It's a total necessary function.
	But if you ever get a whiff of the idea that a comedian is just a mouthpiece for the establishment, that's a problem.
	So what is it with Bill Burr?
	Is he being true to his comedic roots or has he been captured by the establishment?
	Let's have a look at a couple of media appearances that he's made recently and see which line he's on.
	Just to let you know, I've interviewed Bill Burr a couple of times.
	I think he's pretty great.
	But let's get into it together.
	So Matt Walsh had this to say.
	Imagine if someone told you 10 years ago Bill Burr would appear on The View and instead of roasting them hilarious, So, let's have a look at that appearance on The View and assess it together with me, as a comedian myself, giving my best and most honest assessment.
	of this dialogue.
	I don't know, it's a weird time, but I just feel like someone needs to bring the boiling water down to a simmer Kind of agree with that, don't you?
	We need to calm down a little bit.
	Your country is America.
	Doesn't everyone need to kind of find a way to cohesively get along?
	Or are we in a new secession moment?
	Are we in a moment where it's like, well, why do we need to have a country, United States of America?
	Why don't you break it down into states?
	Do we need a UK?
	Wales want to be Wales.
	Scotland want to be Scotland.
	Even cities in my country, like Newcastle and Liverpool, have a stronger identity for their town and their city than they do for, like, the royal family or whatever.
	So, maybe that's true.
	Maybe what we're experiencing is the breaking down of the nation-state model.
	Is that possible?
	And everybody on both sides.
	Like, if you watch CNN, Fox, you go online, or you listen to politicians, it's all, ah!
	And then you walk out on the street and someone's like, hey, how you doing?
	You're like, good.
	So, I don't think they're living in, like, a reality.
	That's good, but what's ironic?
	I suppose it's Bill Burr is on one of the shows that contributes to that heightening of the temperature.
	The View is a hysterical show.
	Forgive the use of the word hysterical, given that it's primarily a show that uses shrieking female energy to escalate social tensions.
	That's my perspective on The View.
	Not to say that I don't think that Whoopi Goldberg is an amazing actor and a brilliant comic.
	I totally do.
	But I think that The View is a kind of...
	It's a portal into liberal and progressive hysteria that is struggling to accommodate the obvious truths and complexities revealed about globalist imperialism.
	Just take one example, USAID is a joke claiming to be a sort of a philanthropic project.
	And may I say this, and Luke get ready, take out your pen, philanthropy is the lipstick on the whore of corruption.
	Post that motherfucker.
	But is there any particular, anybody getting your eye up these days more than usual?
	Nerds! Can you do a bit about Elon Musk for us please?
	The nerds that own the politician, all these tech nerds that want to build robots because they don't know how to talk to hot women.
	It's an interesting take, isn't it?
	Because I think their view...
	Audience obligingly cheers and the idea that academics and scientists have trouble talking to women.
	By the way, you can add comedians to that list.
	A lot of people become comedians because they're not comfortable in the kind of social engagements that lead to coitus.
	I wonder if Bill Burr's observable discomfort is his own awareness that he, in a way, is a nerd.
	To be a good comedian, you have to be a bit of a nerd because you're continually watching stuff.
	You're not a nerd in a tech sense, but you're a nerd in that you're always trying to watch patterns and language and stuff like that.
	If you watch Bill Burr on Joe Rogan or Bill Burr's stand-up, you've got to judge him by his stand-up primarily, haven't you?
	He's a very, very brilliant comedian.
	He makes excellent observations.
	He's very loyal to his blue-collar working-class.
	Roseanne would say, don't call it blue-collar, call it working-class, working-class roots.
	Here, in this instance, I think he's a little uncomfortable having to align with what he knows is required of his audience.
	I mean, look, you can all day long criticise Bill Burr, but if you go on The View and you have to sit there with them and everything and, like, you know what they want you to say, it can be a bit uncomfortable.
	Presumably he's on there as some sort of obligation to promote something.
	I don't imagine he wants to be on there.
	It's difficult when you go on those shows.
	You know, you go on there because you have to, The View, isn't it?
	Like, no one wants to do that stuff anymore.
	Everyone knows it's empty, hollow, pointless, stupid.
	He's presumably got a book out or a podcast or some ink and he has to go and do these shows.
	They are literally going to replace us.
	We're like beta right now, and they're coming out with, like, the BCR.
	And I think Elon has got the rockets going because they realize there's other Earths out there, and they're going to trash this one, because they don't have any concern for it, and they're going to move on to the next Earth.
	I mean, that's an interesting point, isn't it?
	Because when Elon Musk was Mr. Tesla...
	He was an avatar and totem of progressivism and the significance of transferring away from fossil fuels.
	So what is Elon Musk?
	Is Elon Musk this brilliant genius of Tesla, or is he a sort of a terrible monster?
	You say, well, when he did Tesla, we liked him, and now we don't like him.
	But what is the principle?
	What is the principle that you believe in?
	That's why you need to believe in something that's not transitory and meaningless, like cultural inflections and ever-changing fads.
	They will let you down, man.
	People in the culture will let you down because they're people.
	Even people you really love are going to let you down because we're people.
	We're broken.
	We're hopeless without God.
	And, you know, everybody's me standing down here with your blue and red ties going, wait a minute!
	I was on your side!
	And they're just going to leave.
	Well, you were talking about death and your sin.
	Do they not realize that they're going to die, these people?
	They don't realize that eventually everybody dies.
	Well, I always wanted that about all religions.
	Well, they always talk about a wrathful God and, you know, we'll send you to hell.
	And it's like none of you guys are operating like you fear this, the way you run your religion.
	That's right.
	So I don't get any...
	I don't understand any of that.
	I'm just trying to be, like, chill.
	Somebody holds the door.
	Hey, thank you.
	I think Bill Burr there is actually trying to navigate a difficult situation on The View.
	He's there to promote his stand-up special.
	Is it on something like Netflix?
	If it is, they would have said, we'll give you this amount of money if you do this amount of promo for it.
	And it might even have been explicit about TV performances and appearances.
	I've done deals like that.
	And they'll say, you've got to do this number of broadsheet interviews.
	That means with big newspapers, like the New York Times are saying, you've got to do one magazine where someone gets to spend half a day with you.
	You've got to go on these types of shows.
	And I think that Bill Burr don't look very comfortable there.
	And I think he's trying to do some reconciliatory stand-up.
	And in a way, it's the job of...
	Great comedians, and I believe Bill Burr is a great comedian, to try and create connection and get beyond the prescriptive opinions of a space like The View where it's very tempting to just sit there like a seal balancing a beach ball on the tip of your nose in hope of receiving a flung fish.
	Because them environments like that, where there's a bit sea world of you, and I don't mean because it stinks of fish in there, that would be a deeply misogynistic joke to make, and I'm not going to make that joke, I won't make it, I won't, I won't.
	But what I'm saying is it's very easy to start preaching to the converted in a place like that.
	But the point of a comedian is not to alienate people, but have a look at, say, Norm Macdonald on there.
	Norm Macdonald upset them people.
	Check it out.
	This was when Norm Macdonald went on The View.
	He upset them all.
	He started talking about the Clintons and kill this.
	And that's the job and the function of a comedian.
	And Bill Burr is a great comedian, in my opinion.
	I don't know that he shouldn't go on The View.
	I don't know who he is and what his challenges in life are.
	Other than when I met him, he was pretty lovely.
	What I would say is that show is beneath Bill Burr's level of talent.
	But that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
	Remember, join us on Rumble and Rumble Premium.
	He also appeared on Jimmy Fallon's show.
	Let's have a look at him there.
	What's a positive time, Jimmy?
	Yeah, it really is.
	Billionaires are not happy having a billion dollars.
	Oh, you can never be happy with money because, well, it's in the Bible.
	You can't make yourself happy through material things.
	It's easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than a rich man to enter heaven if you want to be happy.
	Give away all your gear and follow me.
	I'm paraphrasing, but it shouldn't be a mystery that someone that takes a Faustian pact is not happy.
	But in this case, we're not looking at Elon Musk and Elon Musk's psychic or spiritual state.
	We are looking at some somewhat trite observations about Musk from Burr.
	And I wonder, don't you think it would be interesting, like, because Bill Burr goes on Rogan, Musk goes on Rogan, to sort of know how that would all play out?
	Because they're sort of in the same Marvel universe, aren't they?
	laughter Why does Elon Musk dress like he just...
	Joke coming, joke coming.
	Thank you.
	Bill Burr will have to find a way back to that joke.
	It's difficult when you start a joke, then a laugh starts, because now you have to sound like it was an organic fort.
	What I would do there is, like he's already said, why does Elon Musk dress like he's...
	What I would do to mask that is I'd find another way into that sentence.
	Like, the thing is with Elon Musk, I sometimes consider that he looks like, he dresses like, now what would be a good joke, he dresses like...
	Is it going to be sort of like a dad, something like that, and it's sort of like dad dressing?
	What would I say?
	Sometimes he looks a little bit hubby, doesn't he?
	If I was going to do a joke about Elon Musk's physical appearance, I'd probably think about them times where you've seen footage of him on the beach.
	But if you can make jokes about Elon Musk's body, then we're saying it's okay to make jokes about people's bodies, therefore it's okay to make jokes about trans people, because that's just ultimately a joke about bodies.
	So it's really interesting.
	Why does Elon Musk dress like he just got out of a Hot Topic?
	I am so sick of that guy trying to rewrite his origin story like he was Matthew McConaughey pulling into the high school.
	It's like you were a f***ing nerd.
	Nobody banged you.
	Oh, hot topic, that mall store.
	Like, my kids like that store.
	Oh, I get it.
	It's all a bit sort of gothic-y.
	And now you have hair plugs in your laminated face.
	Oh, and every...
	Everybody is afraid of these nerds.
	I don't get it.
	My whole life, feminists were focusing on frat boys and guys with their hats on backwards and they left the nerds alone.
	And now look at them.
	It's interesting.
	I think that actually Bill Burr is trying to make some interesting points and jokes about...
	Various cultural changes where, you know, like this, and that happened in the 80s in your country.
	All the movies were about the nerds are going to inherit the earth.
	It's because technology became so important and powerful.
	The people that are experts in technology obviously elevated to the position of new elites.
	That's the actual answer to that question.
	That's why you've got Bill Gates in the position of incredible power Zuckerberg et al.
	Because technology, those people that can go into that world and understand it, they've got a Mephistophelian power now.
	But... And that's an interesting thing to consider and talk about, but what the audience are laughing at is Elon Musk bad.
	Elon Musk bad.
	They're not laughing about any nuance points because I've been in that cold studio in 30 Rock at Jimmy Fallon, kept there for half an hour, bored out of their minds, watching that band do all that kind of thing.
	That world, by the way, the establishment, the culture, it's evil, it's empty, it's hollow.
	I'm not saying Jimmy Fallon is evil, empty, or hollow.
	When I've met Jimmy Fallon, actually, he's a pretty lovely person, I think, a really kind, sweet, nice man.
	But the culture, It's sort of disgusting and empty and worthless.
	And ironically, that's what they think of places like Rumble, and that's what they say about people like me, apostates, people that were in the culture, but now I denounce it.
	Oh, him, he's a racist, he's a rapist, or whatever.
	They'll just say whatever they want.
	But actually...
	I'm trying to be extremely open about the challenges I've faced, and I've also been very clear about the things that I've never done.
	And I think that we need to find, as Bill Burr was saying on his interview on The View, ways of communicating more respectfully.
	And you're not going to be able to do that if everything's being conducted like a war.
	So maybe there's a reason everything's like a war.
	Maybe things we don't understand yet.
	And if you want to hear what I mean by that, then you have to join me on Rumble, where we stream on these days and get Rumble Premium if you want additional content from some great content creators.
	Join us.
	For our lineup on Rumble at these times.
	In the meantime, if you can, stay free.
	Quit talking about Kennedy, man!
	It was a long time ago!
	Quit talking about Kennedy, man!
	Well, don't bring up Jesus to me, then.
	The JFK files are released.
	Are we any closer to the truth?
	I suppose we must be a little bit.
	Curiously, Ben Shapiro says that the truth is irrelevant and that he's not interested in it, and I'm surprised by that.
	Let's get into it together.
	There's a conspiracy theorizing that's become incredibly popular.
	On the right these days.
	It was popular on the left, and now it's become increasingly popular on the right.
	The kind of, let's just ask questions.
	Who really killed JFK?
	Wink, wink, nod, nod.
	And then you're like, well, do you have any evidence of the thing that you are...
	Well, no, I'm not making any accusations.
	I just know I don't believe the story that I'm being told.
	I know not to trust the authorities.
	Well, that's fine, but do you have any evidence?
	Like evidence, not just supposition.
	I said, well, you're part of it, aren't you?
	You. Yes, you.
	You're part of it.
	The reason that you're so defensive about all this is, I don't care who killed JFK.
	I mean, I do, because it's really interesting.
	But I noticed that the calendar says 2025, and he was killed in 1963.
	And so my opinion about who killed JFK has about as much relevance as who killed William McKinley, or James Garfield, which is to say, not an enormous amount.
	I disagree with Ben Shapiro there because I feel that the murder of JFK might be a pivotal moment where the power behind the throne or the presidency in this instance asserted itself in an attempt to maintain...
	For example, the war machine, and you've heard the theories, don't need me to describe them to you, but the murder of James Garfield and William McKinley, maybe those things are relevant.
	Maybe we should be operating on an eternal timeline where we look at what happens materially and politically down here in the empire as insignificant compared to what takes place in the kingdom.
	But if you care about politics, and Ben Shapiro does certainly more than I do, then you should care about who killed JFK because it's likely an indicator of where...
	True power is located.
	Now, if you're a partisan person and you care only about arguments as they pertain to the left or right, then maybe that doesn't matter.
	Maybe the murder of JFK is important on that basis.
	But I don't believe that the difference between left and right are the significant differences.
	I believe the real difference is people that believe in God, inverted commas God, for the purposes of this, and people that don't, that believe in rationalism and materialism.
	Now, Ben Shapiro, like me, He's a devout believer.
	Now, the reason that I relate that to JFK is...
	I feel like in the 1960s, a lot of important people got assassinated.
	JFK, RFK Sr., Martin Luther King, Malcolm X. And I believe that America was at a pivotal point in its history there.
	Perhaps America's always at a pivotal point because America is the apex of what's possible if you attempt to build a nation.
	On Christian principles, maybe that's what's significant about America, certainly what I believe to be significant about America.
	Now, some people, presumably non-Christians, would say America's not built on Christian principles, it's built on, you know, universal principles, but they are Christian principles, like they're influenced by Thomas Paine, Hobbes, all sorts of literal Christian writers, lots of important and significant...
	Christians set up your nation.
	They all the founding fathers.
	I think all were Christian.
	I don't know for a fact.
	I'm not even from there.
	But why I believe America is important is because it is an opportunity to see what Christianity looks like in government.
	And whilst you have to accept the idea, you know, render unto Christ, render unto God, what is God's, render unto Caesar, what is Caesar's.
	I believe that those events in the 60s were the first time in the modern technological age that we saw how Let's have a look at these posts from Ian Carroll on Ben Shapiro's comments.
	now why would Ben Shapiro have such a blatantly atrocious take on JFK no evidence bro there are mountains of him so it was a conspiracy and cover up this was America's president the rise of the intelligent state to power I wonder why Ben would say this so Ian Carroll is Ian Carroll is, I presume, alluding to the idea that the murder of JFK is connected to Israel.
	Here's Simon Goddard.
	Uncomfortable truth.
	JFK wanted to strip the CIA of its autonomy, force AIPAC, formerly AZC, to register as a foreign agent, block Israel's nuclear ambition, and challenge the Federal Reserve's grip on US currency.
	That's why he was assassinated.
	People use the murder of JFK to highlight the conspiracy theory or sort of geopolitical idea that's most important to them.
	If you watch Oliver Stone's pretty brilliant film where Kevin Costner played the attorney investigating the murder at the time, it's clear that there was potential involvement from Cuba, anti-war, CIA, deep state.
	And I wonder if you guys believe that Israel in particular and specifically warrants and needs further investigation, as Ian Carroll clearly believes.
	I wonder, because when I start to examine Israel, the establishment of settler colonies, the atrocities in Gaza, I do feel like, actually, well, what is the United States?
	What is England?
	If you want to pull the threads of who's allowed to have a country, You might find out that no one's actually allowed to have a country.
	And if you don't want to go down that path and say, well, people are allowed countries.
	Then why are Israel specifically not allowed a country?
	Because it was in the 1940s instead of in 1787.
	What's the name of that coffee?
	1757. Is there a cut-off point to when you're allowed to have a country?
	I don't know, man.
	Again, my position is ultimately, if you don't believe in God, you don't really have a podium upon which to build any arguments that require righteousness and justice.
	As their points and fulcrums.
	But that's just what I think.
	Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
	More important than any of that, if you can, please stay free.
	Well, I hope you enjoyed the show and the costume changes.
	It's now time for us to throw over, in the form of a raid, to Jeremy and the quartering.
	Remember, get Rumble Premium if you want additional content from us.
	We will be back on Monday.
	Not for more of the same, but for more of the different at our new usual time.
	Until then, if you can, stay free.
	Switch on, switch on, switch on.
	switch on, switch on.
	Many switching.
	Switch on.
	Many switching.
	Switch on.
	Many switching.
	Switch on.
	Many switching.
	Switch on.
	Many switching.

▲