Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 26, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

59:01

Is Free Speech Under Threat? Australia’s U16 Social Media Ban, & Maddow vs Jay Bhattacharya – SF501

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	sad music
	sad music In this video, you're going to see the future.
	Hello there, you awakening wonders.
	Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
	And what a day it is to be free.
	I tell you who else is free.
	Trump!
	Jack Smith drops election case.
	DOJ ends classified docs probe.
	So, that's a significant change.
	We'll be talking about that a little later.
	I'll be telling you about that, Trucker Hershey, in ways that it's going to knock your socks off.
	DH Harding, I'm talking to you.
	All of you in the Rumble stream, are you happy that Dr Disrespect has joined Rumble about this gaming deal?
	Is that important, guys?
	Remember, I'm not like a gamer, am I? Look at me.
	This is not the look of a gamer, is it?
	Is this the look of a gamer?
	Hello, Awakened Wonders in the locals chat.
	Like Roger Russell.
	Is that Roger Russell?
	Is that a verb or a noun?
	Blessed Old Bird, Trish McLeod, Freedom Within 28. I'm feeling pretty good.
	Hey, A Miller, 1214. I've got a little bit of a sore throat, but you should be able to hear me adequately.
	I'm feeling pretty fantastic and it's going to be a great show.
	If you're watching us on YouTube, remember that we'll just be there for about 15 minutes and then we'll be exclusively streaming on Rumble, where our free speech is guaranteed.
	Free speech, one of the subjects, topics that's likely to define the way our planet, and certainly your nation, is run for the next four years.
	They'll be talking about that if you're watching in Ireland.
	Let me know if you're in Ireland.
	They'll be talking about that if you're watching in the Netherlands.
	Let me know if you're watching in the Netherlands or in the UK. The Prison Isle from Ray Liotta's No Escape from the Penal Colony.
	Certainly people will be talking about free speech, and we'll be talking about free speech in the UK in particular.
	G Brit says, British government is full of cowards.
	No, there's got to be some brave people, hasn't there?
	There's got to be good men and women in government somewhere.
	Hasn't there?
	Hasn't there?
	Not the look of a gamer, but Hollywood-level grooming on display here.
	Do you mean, like, that I look well-groomed or grooming in the way that you feel that maybe Nickelodeon TV stars are getting groomed?
	Ray Liotta did die.
	Heavenly Father, we ask that you embrace the soul of Ray Liotta.
	In particular, we thank you, Lord, for giving him the ability to play Henry Hill so amazingly in Goodfellas.
	Let's face it, the role with which he'll always be associated.
	This we ask in your name.
	Amen.
	There's no saints in politics, I'll tell you that, but there's that organisation, Saint, that we're going to be doing a deal with, and Rootbrand, just giving a shout out to some of our sponsors.
	Okay, should we get into some of the content?
	Are you guys ready?
	Let me know in the comments and chat what you want to see me talking about, because there's going to be a variety of things that we'll be discussing.
	Occasionally, we'll glance over at X. I mean, just go into X right now.
	Let's have a look and, like, split-screen me with this content.
	Look at this.
	That's what's happening in Wales.
	Look at Britain.
	That's people trying to get rid of the deluge of deception and treachery under Keir Starmer's government.
	What a wreck.
	That's the New York Times doing a bit of reporting right there.
	Absolute recklessness and chaos.
	Our friends Luke and Alex are with us watching on the line now.
	Luke will be doing some social media posts from this.
	Luke, you tell me, baby, what you think is good.
	Alex, you tell me how we're going to optimize and get better and how we're going to create better thumbnails and create a world where we can fuse together spiritual principles with political insights in a way that's going to help people.
	Isaac's over there running the deck.
	Tyler's over there watching out and producing outside in the corridors where we're filming by the good graces of Rumble at the local studios.
	But we're going to be talking to you a lot more about Rumble Premium.
	That is like the new Rumble offering where it will be ad-free, except for the ads that I read myself, of course.
	There's no way around that.
	If you're not on Awaken Wonder yet, but come on, then you can join me for my conversation with Jonathan Pagiao.
	Jonathan Pagiao is a Canadian academic and theologian who is good mates with Jordan Peterson.
	Jordan Peterson reckons that he's like the brightest and most brilliant mind when it comes to Analysis of semiotics, that means the meaning behind signs.
	He reckons he's good with deep iconography.
	Jesusquid606, do you have any contact with your ex-wife, Katie?
	Not really.
	The people often, if you've not got kids, you don't really talk to exes very much, do you?
	She was a Christian once, says Jesusquid606.
	Yeah, of course, because I knew her family, of course, because they were my in-laws for a little while.
	Alright guys, let's get into our gear.
	25 minutes after the show, that's at 125 EST and 625 GMT. Yeah.
	And 1025 PST. I'll be with Jonathan Pagiot.
	If you've got any questions you want to ask us, what's going to be interesting is that guy understands icons and signs at depth.
	You will love it.
	You will love it.
	It's worth becoming a member of our community for.
	Mr. Galway, you love it, don't you?
	Remember, if you're a member of our community, when I start doing live work again...
	Right?
	You'll be out, come check me.
	I'm going to be doing a bunch of live work.
	I'm going to be touring mostly this country, America, doing live, live work, baptizing people, I reckon, reading the Holy Word, bringing my testimony and talking to interesting people so that we can be in the service of this great revival that's taking place even now.
	You feel...
	What are we talking about today?
	We're going to be talking about Rachel Maddow giving her take on Jay Bhattacharya.
	Let me know if you've seen our interview with Jay Bhattacharya.
	Let me know if you saw Jay Bhattacharya doing our oracle content.
	Did he do our oracle content with us?
	I talk to Jay Bhattacharya a lot.
	Hey, Esco man who's donated a dollar.
	I went to that meeting that night.
	Well done!
	Well done.
	That's a person, one of my brothers in recovery there, who saw me speaking at a church in Jupiter with my man Talion.
	You can see that little conversation up online.
	In fact, we should post a link to that, Luke, in the chat right now.
	In fact, right, see this, Tyler, from Talion here.
	Can you forward this stuff?
	In fact, look, he's calling me right now.
	Can you forward that stuff to Luke and ask Luke if he thinks we should repost it?
	I think we should, but...
	See what Luke thinks about it and just forward it to him in WhatsApp now.
	Thanks very much.
	Tyler is very much the new Jamie.
	Not the new Jamie, because Jamie firstly still exists and never had anything to do with us being as he's the geezer of Joe Rogan.
	But we're doing this stuff now.
	Okay, let's have a look at Rachel Maddow criticizing Jay Bhattacharya, who I've met and spoken to a couple of times.
	This is what I can tell you about Jay Bhattacharya.
	He was one of the signatories and creators of the Barrington Declaration, where right at the beginning of the pandemic, they went, don't vaccinate during the pandemic.
	Be careful with these vaccines.
	If you've clinically trialled them, you're being a bit enthusiastic, aren't you?
	Are you sure these lockdowns are going to work?
	He properly went out there.
	He was attacked.
	They said lies about him.
	That's what they do.
	If you are an outspoken opponent of the interests of the powerful, if they can't attack what you're saying, they'll attack you personally.
	And, as Stalin's right-hand man, the torturer used to say, show me the man and I'll show you the crime.
	So, like, if, for example, you were super promiscuous in the past, they'd go, that guy's going to be vulnerable, let's find a way of conjuring that up.
	Or if you're Jay Bhattacharya, they'll discredit you and smear you.
	He was attacked all over the place, but Bhattacharya is a great man.
	When I met him, I was like, this guy...
	I didn't say run in the NIH because I didn't know what the NIH was properly, but now I know that the NIH is the part of the American healthcare system that determines who gets to conduct what clinical trials.
	Not how it's financed, but probably over that regulation to some degree, but what...
	You know, is anyone doing clinical trials for breath work or vitamin D or herd immunity?
	Or is anyone doing clinical trials for anything that's not profitable to Merck, Pfizer, Moderna and the network of ulterior agencies that ensure their message is the message that reaches you so that you don't become awakened, unhook yourself from this disgusting matrix and become an opponent of corruption?
	And our job is to evangelize you into awakening so that we can be together in one awakened family and that there is only the power of God and no one comes between you and the Almighty.
	That's your private personal connection and surely Lord we will create communities.
	In your name, opposing those guys.
	Let's have a look at Rachel Maddow, though, who used to be a person who defined herself on the basis of integrity and journalism, but I would say ever since we saw her participating in that Raytheon-sponsored event, I bet you can find that, Taylor.
	Excuse me, Tyler.
	Like, that Rachel Maddow, she appeared at an event, and it was totally sponsored by Lockheed Martin, Boeing, one of those guys.
	If we put Rachel Maddow event sponsored by Military Industrial Complex, You know, that's when I started to think, we can't trust them.
	We cannot trust the legacy media.
	Take everything they're telling you, whether it's the BBC, whether it's the New York Times, and know this, they're part of the Trusted News Initiative.
	Do you know what the Trusted News Initiative is yet?
	Let me know in the comments in the chat, Mally J and Second Chance and Trooper Buddy, if you want us to spend some time explaining to you the nature of the Trusted News Initiative.
	That's an amalgam, or union as it were, Of media organisations that work in conjunction together to ensure that there is harmonics when it comes to matters of media reporting.
	If you've ever noticed a media story where all the legacy media titles are saying the exact same thing, Joe Rogan, look how yellow he is, he's been taking ivermectin, watch out!
	Whenever they're all singing from the same hymn sheet, you know that ain't the holy word, but quite the opposite.
	Here's Rachel Maddow giving her take on Jay Bhattacharya becoming NIH On the heels of Donald Trump picking him to run Medicare.
	Right, now I'm not an expert in semiotics.
	Jonathan Pajow is.
	He'll be on the show in a minute.
	But I would say when you have a duck dressed as a doctor, as the logo, you're not about to get some unbiased reporting.
	I would say that the implication is that Jay Bacharya is a quack.
	Instead of a scientist with integrity who stood up to his opponents at Stanford University that regularly conduct clinical trials funded by a big pharma.
	Of course they do.
	That's how the game works because the game is rigged.
	He is the opposite of a quack.
	He is a scientist and a man of integrity and dignity.
	And if you can't recognize that, it's because it isn't present in you to recognize.
	Medicare and Medicaid in this country.
	We also got news on other health care picks around the CDC. Donald Trump picked a former Republican congressman who for years has crusaded on the false claim that vaccines must be the cause of autism.
	To lead the National Institute of Health, Trump's top candidate endorsed herd immunity.
	As the best way to address the COVID pandemic.
	Just a fancy way of saying, let's get everybody sick and see what happens.
	Call the weak.
	Call the elderly.
	Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person.
	A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus.
	The virus does not infect them.
	I've watched that so many times now.
	It might as well be choreography from the one that I want at the end of Grease.
	You know, like when Rachel Maddow goes, it stops with you.
	I got chills!
	They're multiplying!
	It's probably an adverse event in reaction to that mRNA shot.
	Calling Jay Bhattacharya a quack after you've publicly said that once you get the shot, it stops with you when it was never clinically trialed for transmission.
	Means that the biggest duck out there that's quacking is you and the other MSNBC propaganda amplifiers.
	The virus does not infect them.
	The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else.
	It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people.
	That means the vaccines will get us to the end of this.
	Okay, so let's have a look at this.
	Let's split-screen this article here.
	Progressive Rep Jamie Raskin.
	Alright, let me see this.
	MSNBC host Rachel Maddow is an outspoken critic of the bloated defence budget and the MAGA wing of the Republican Party.
	Next month, though, both Raskin and Maddow will headline an event sponsored by defence industry giant.
	Go split-screen.
	I'm reading it off her laptop.
	Sprit will headline an event sponsored by defence industry giant Lockheed Martin and Palantir, a $26 billion defence contractor founded and chaired by Peter Thiel, the polarising billionaire and mega-donor to Donald Trump.
	Now, I know Peter Thiel is an investor in Rumble, so man, even I've got skin in the game here.
	When I saw Peter Thiel on Joe Rogan, I thought he was pretty good.
	But let's see how this plays out.
	The appearances by Raskin and Maddow will come as part of Trucon.
	The conference at a Democratic Party-aligned Truman Center, which runs from blah blah blah blah blah, describes the conference, opportunity to see leaders across government.
	Mark Thompson, a national security analyst at the project on government oversight, says the big question for Raskin and Maddow is whether they hold their tough positions against defence contractors.
	If they don't speak out, Thompson said, it would indicate The sponsors can buy the silence of their outspoken critics.
	Now we know there's been a lot of complexity over at The Intercept.
	Glenn Greenwald left when they started to try and censor him.
	I think in the early part of the pandemic, although I might be wrong about that, Glenn Greenwald is another Rumble creator and we can ask him directly about that.
	But one thing I would say is certain is if you're going to call Jay Bhattacharya a quack, you better make sure that when you look There's not footage of you saying that when you take the vax, it stops with you.
	Then flipping back like Olivia Newton-John confronted with Travolta.
	And there's some stories there, let me tell you.
	But that's just what I think.
	Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
	And yo, Alex and Luke, if you're looking for a short, there's one there.
	And if you're looking for a thumbnail that don't have me in it, get that quack.
	Maddow and Jay Bhattacharya.
	That's your thumbnail title.
	Who's the quack?
	Something like that.
	Try that.
	Bam!
	That's that one done.
	Okay, who's next?
	Bill Clinton.
	Even the patriarchs of the Democratic Party don't believe in the possibility of their candidate.
	And it's understandable, really, looking back at Kamala Harris.
	What was everyone doing?
	What was everyone believing in?
	Do you remember?
	Russell is constantly holding himself back from rapping.
	You'd know Killer Gorilla, wouldn't you?
	Because that is a good MC name right there.
	If you're watching this on YouTube, we'll just be there for another couple of minutes.
	Remember, we can't make our content without the support of our partners and sponsors.
	Now, 1775 coffee may be named after an era in British life that was somewhat humiliating, the American Revolution, but it's a damn fine coffee.
	Here's a message from them now.
	Let's be honest, most K-cup pods are serving you mouldy, pesticide-laden rubbish.
	Trains like Dunkin', they're stinking the place out with their stale coffee and expecting the USA cheers.
	1775 Coffee makes sure you don't have to drink a chemical soup when you want a caffeine lift.
	1775 Coffee steps in to slap the mediocrity right out of the competition.
	Their K-cup pods are filled with single-origin, high-altitude beans, hand-picked by people who know what flavour actually is.
	It's coffee that will slap your brain Fast awake.
	Faster, in fact, than a government scandal.
	Who doesn't need an injection of this new caffeine inflection?
	Kamala Biden?
	Get this stuff down here.
	You've got a choice of medium roast, dark roast, and mushroom blend.
	Yeah, actual mushrooms like lion's mane and reishi to boost your brain power as well as giving you an immediate lift.
	Because let's be honest, if your coffee isn't strong enough to overthrow a small government, what's the point?
	This coffee is for people who don't want a participation trophy.
	This is coffee for winners.
	Go to 1775coffee.com, grab your 24-pack and tell Corporate Coffee to take a hike.
	That's go to 1775coffee.com, grab your 24-pack and tell Corporate Coffee to take a hike.
	Caffeine that will help you overthrow the powerful.
	Hey, you're awake and wonders.
	If you're watching us on YouTube, well, oh man, we're going to leave your platform in just a second and you're going to want to join us because we're talking about free speech.
	Is free speech an important principle?
	Or when you say free speech, do you mean I want the right to say whatever I want while simultaneously censoring people that I disagree with?
	Start the countdown, guys.
	We're going to leave YouTube now.
	Click the link in the description.
	Get over to Rumble with Brown Town Express and Lemon Mermaid and Angry We Jorby and Dean SNJ chatting away in Rumble.
	Or get over to Locals and Join Affection and Ashela who will be joining us for our conversation straight after this almost with Jonathan Pagio.
	For the rest of this show we're going to be talking about media censorship and Prison Planet Breakdown.
	The UK now is literally, not literally, but sort of metaphorically, a kind of penitentiary.
	Click the link.
	Get on over to here.
	And Isaac, remember, you don't have to click off till I've finished talking.
	Like, the 30-second, that's just drama, really.
	When I sort of finish my click the link now, that's your out.
	Like, you know, I'm basically using that as a device, but just so you know.
	Just click it when I do it.
	Like, just go.
	Even if that was 31 seconds, it would never be 32 seconds.
	But don't click according to the countdown.
	Click according to what I say, you know?
	Alright.
	No, I know, but like, that's not my point, it's not the delay.
	My point is, I might not always exactly align it with 30 seconds.
	I might, the 30 seconds might run out, and I might still be talking.
	So click the link in the description.
	Take that as your cue.
	Take me as the cue, not as the thing.
	I'm using the 30 seconds.
	You use me.
	We'll have a show on our hands in no time at all.
	I'm telling you that, baby.
	Alright, let's keep rocking along.
	Now...
	One of the key inflection points, surely, and let me know in the comments and chat if you agree with this, was the acquisition of Twitter by kitchen sink-wielding billionaire and autistic Ironman Elon Musk.
	Once he got hold of X, the outcome of the election became less predictable because up to that point, the Biden administration had Facebook meta and Google alphabet all sewn up.
	Indeed, even with my own brushes with centralized authority, on the very day that the TNI trusted news initiative media conglomerates all attacked me at once in a glorious concert of reputational attack, a British government minister who's married to someone who runs a deep state law Rumble
	said no dice.
	X said get on out of here.
	YouTube said, how high?
	How much would you like us to demonetize that guy?
	How much do you want us to do deals with CNN, New York Times, push propagandist products and popular messaging that prevents people from awakening?
	It's obvious, isn't it, really?
	Whose side do you think the legacy media are on?
	Yours, you, who if you were awakened would rise up against these centralized systems of corruption, if you knew how loved you were, if you knew how beautiful you were, if you knew for a moment you didn't need to be tethered to consumerism and bad ideas, that you could be free, that you were created to be free.
	Well, they can't ever let you realise that stuff the same way as me.
	They wanted me tied into their systems.
	I'm not suggesting I'm more awakened than you.
	I'm a pretty slow learner.
	I have to wander through this world, getting slapped in the face every five seconds to take on pretty basic principles.
	But, thanks to our Lord and Saviour, I'm awakened now.
	Let's have a look at how CNN are saying she's concerned about free speech under Trump.
	Right?
	That's the first point.
	Then...
	Sex and rumble and platforms like you enjoy because of your independent voice and your ability to communicate should be censored.
	And then, finally, she says billionaires shouldn't be able to buy media companies at all.
	They like their own billionaires to own media companies, not your billionaires.
	Maybe you could say billionaire is a category that in itself detaches them from the general population.
	Let me know in the comments and chat how you think about that, how you break that stuff down in your own mind.
	What I would argue for is your right to decide for yourself using your intelligence, because I'm wrong all the time about things.
	I'm so certain about stuff.
	Yeah, this will happen, then that will happen, and I'm like, oh no, right, that's not how it's going at all.
	Do you know what I mean?
	Collectively, there is a glory in us because we were made for relationship.
	We were made for love.
	Let's get into that stuff instead of tearing one another apart.
	This has got to be a time of love, a time of joy, a time of awakening.
	And do you think CNN's Carrie Champion is going to deliver that unto us?
	X, and you said in some ways, always.
	I feel like X, I don't know if anyone is on it in any capacity.
	I don't know if you're on it.
	You're the only one?
	You're on it?
	You all are on it?
	I don't know if you've heard of the internet.
	Have you heard of the internet?
	You know the internet.
	You can go on there.
	You can buy yourself some sneakers.
	Maybe you can find it.
	It's kind of like a telephone directory, but it's made out of binary.
	I don't know if you've heard of it.
	Anyone here?
	Is X even relevant anymore?
	Shouldn't we all be on Blue Sky Now?
	X for pedophiles.
	You're on it?
	You all are on it?
	Okay.
	I've actually decided to take a rest of peace because...
	Shouldn't we be on threads?
	Threads, the ditty list in Epstein Island of social media accounts.
	...to take a rest of peace because it is not a peaceful place for me.
	And I know if, in fact, you don't agree with this current administration, most people can say that it's not a peaceful place.
	I would not...
	We, in order to achieve peace, what we need to do is censor free speech.
	There is information available on how to achieve peace, and it's one of the few things that I can tell you.
	There is a reiterated phrase in the New Testament, the peace that pass of all understanding.
	What that indicates to me is that your rational mind can only take you so far.
	Beyond the realm that you can comprehend, because of the limitations of human neurology, is a deep serenity accessible to those who surrender to God.
	In the same way as you would accept your sensory instruments have limitations, you can't see all light, can you?
	You can't hear all noise, can you?
	Well, surely it's the same with all data.
	We don't have the receptacle to understand or the instruments to receive true knowledge, the knowledge of God.
	The peace that you will one day access will therefore be as a result of faith, of surrender.
	Now, they want your faith to be directed at their institutions.
	Just have faith.
	That our politicians and our leaders and our billionaires and our instincts about what speech should be free is trusted.
	In short, shut up.
	I can say that it's not a peaceful place.
	I wouldn't be surprised if there was an actual bid made to take on MSNBC, but the fact that it just can't happen.
	It's not even realistic in real life, but I do believe that media, everyone sitting here at this table, if you don't agree, we are in for some tough years ahead.
	I do believe that we are not going to be able to be as safe or say what we want to.
	I don't think free speech is going to be as free.
	Now, Scott, I want to bring you in here because this kind of link to Orban...
	Scott Jennings, man, he was going to let him have it there.
	He's the voice of reason on CNN, isn't he?
	The person that was like, the people that voted for Bill Clinton are now voting for Donald Trump.
	Something must have changed.
	What is it?
	But she continues, I reckon, talking about regulation of X. Platforms are not regulated right now.
	Hold on, is that...
	Oh, right, this is the same chat or a different chat?
	Platforms are not regulated right now, which gives them...
	Carte Blanche to whatever they want right now.
	Elon is not someone who likes to be rude.
	It's not actual Carte Blanche because they're always doing this.
	There are laws in place.
	You know, free speech, does that mean the free speech to shout fire in a crowded building?
	No, that's literally incendiary.
	There are already laws to prevent you inciting violence, inciting crimes.
	Those laws already exist.
	In fact, whenever you see anyone advocating for a law that's already there, You know that what they really want is power and control.
	And that's exactly what's happening in the UK right now under Keir Starmer.
	They're advocating for legislation when there is no requirement for further legislation because legislation that covers the thing they're talking about already exists.
	So what people are trying to do is naturalise their power.
	Naturalise it so you don't even see it as power.
	Do you agree with me, Flower Power 678?
	Do you agree with me, Oinka Space?
	Do you agree with me, Ashela, over there on the Awaken Wonder chat?
	Right now...
	Elon is not someone who likes to be regulated, and so...
	He does not like to be regulated, except in his bowel movements.
	Then every morning, 9.30, a perfect space-age stool, not like the poops of you or I, a perfect white poo that turns on its own air conditioning when it wants to and parks itself in the toilet bowl.
	And so, to buy MSN, he would go under some federal regulations.
	Who's regulating CNN right now?
	The FCC? We're not a broadcast.
	It's cable.
	I mean, I don't really think cable stations are under the same regulatory structure.
	You mean to say no one's regulating this conversation right now?
	Like, I could say anything I wanted to.
	Shit.
	Bugger.
	Poo butt.
	And regulatory structure that broadcast is.
	It's definitely regulated more than Facebook and Twitter.
	What she's saying is that there's still a litmus test of journalism that you have to pass.
	That you don't have on platform.
	You gotta pass a litmus test.
	Who pays for that litmus test?
	Bill Gates.
	That you have to pass.
	You can't come on TV and just make up things and say things.
	That happens on X.
	Please don't give me the eyebrow furrow as if you don't know what I'm talking about.
	It happens often on X.
	I can go and say the color is...
	People will have to use their own intelligence to determine whether or not that cat can play a piano.
	X is full of misinformation.
	Put centralized authority in charge.
	Centralized authority that's owned by the military industrial complex and pharma and has permanent deep state operatives.
	That's the only way that I can see, because I'm paid to believe this, that I can see to solve this problem.
	It happens often on X. I can go and say the color is blue and I will be met with so many disrespectful remarks.
	No one's regulating.
	I disagree.
	That's indigo.
	How could you call it blue?
	It's royal blue.
	It's sky blue.
	I'd say it's violet.
	I'd say it's lavender.
	I can't live like this!
	The n-word, no one's regulating.
	The criticism, no one is regulating how people are treated.
	How much government regulation of the First Amendment are you for?
	Let me tell you something.
	If I came on here and I just started calling you all kind of names, do you think the bosses would let me continue to do that?
	I mean, it happens to me occasionally.
	I don't know if you watch the show.
	Regulate me!
	Why won't you regulate me?
	Well, it doesn't happen to you, but it doesn't happen for me.
	And I know that I wouldn't be able to do that.
	There's a level of professionalism in what we do here, because we are journalists, and we adhere to something, at least morally.
	And there is no moral compass on this thing called...
	We're also having a...
	There is no moral compass on this thing called X. We need regulation when it comes to life and sex.
	I mean having sex, not what sex is biologically, because in that condition it can be whatever you say that it can be.
	A man can be a woman, a woman can be a man, and you over there on X, you can be whatever I say you can.
	Don't start arguing about indigo, blue or fuchsia or violet you see, because whatever colour you live in, it's the colour that I determine it should be, because I work for the system, I work for the government, I don't even open my eyes without first checking their sentiment on whether I should look around or whether I can feel that sound or whether I should agree with you or what the hell that I should do.
	And when I start my day again, I look right out my window and I say, would this be on CNN or is it just too full of sin though?
	And when I know that Bill Gates pays, then I finally comply.
	And every single night I fall asleep and I ask God, why, why, God, did we kill you in order to replace you with these hideous, insidious Luciferian models?
	And the answer to that is, I'm not sure, but let me know in the comments and chat if you think that there might be A better way through this nightmare.
	Here, she's talking about journalists having journalistic integrity.
	No, we already watched that.
	Let's talk about billionaires, baby.
	Good billionaires and bad billionaires.
	When is a billionaire a bad billionaire?
	When it's not saying what you want it to say.
	Also, I heard what you're saying about X. I saw a survey this week.
	It's now the most ideologically balanced Oh, come on.
	User platform?
	Scott, stop.
	Stop.
	It's too early.
	I just sat down.
	I've only been here for two minutes.
	You're going to be embarrassed what I tweeted after the show, but it's true.
	You cannot say that.
	Who is the source?
	Who is the source of that?
	We've reported it on this network.
	It's not accurate, and you know it.
	Okay.
	Scott, can I reframe it a different way?
	Because the site changed radically, right?
	So whether you think the voices, it is somehow more balanced now, that's fine.
	But no doubt, Musk's influence is profound in that you open it up and now you're there with his opinion and he is now part of this administration.
	So does anyone else think that there should be this greater concern about billionaires purchasing media companies?
	Would you be worried if Bill Gates controlled MSNBC? No, because he's sane.
	No, because he does.
	And that means I'd be worried right now.
	At least he makes significant donations.
	And that MS at the beginning of MSNBC literally stands for Microsoft.
	And anyone that thinks that Bill Gates being the second biggest donor to the WHO just behind Germany is some kind of problem clearly hasn't been.
	...beaten into submission with enough vehemence and vigour.
	But we will beat you down every single day unless our media operation starts failing and falling apart and you start getting people saying that they could be bought up by Elon Musk.
	Oh no!
	We picked the wrong billionaire!
	Well, there is no human power that can relieve you of your dilemma.
	There is no condition or situation or person that is more powerful than God.
	We gave up that idea.
	Now we're paying the price, but guess what?
	We're forgiven and there's a way back.
	Take it.
	Take it.
	That's the offering.
	I've taken that way back and...
	Sweet freedom.
	That's just what I think, though.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
	If you're watching this on YouTube, let me know if the thumbnail was alluring enough, and let me know what it would take for you to click on the next video, and let me know what it would take for you to subscribe and turn on the notification bell, because we want you over here on Rumble, where we can speak freely.
	And in particular, we want you to participate in Rumble Premium.
	Why is that, though?
	Because of this!
	I can't say I was surprised.
	Oh, sorry, I thought I was queuing it.
	You queue it, you queue it, you queue it.
	The war against free speech is in full swing.
	We are the Vanguard, bravely fighting back.
	Rumble's the home of this channel, Stay Free, and a leader in defending the fundamental human right of free speech.
	They've joined X to sue a cartel of advertisers and ad agencies who conspire to block ad revenue from going to the platforms.
	Recently, they've launched Rumble Premium.
	This, I think, is going to be a game changer for all of us.
	It's an ad-free viewing experience with great perks for viewers and creators.
	Rumble Premium will give you the ability to dive into your favourite content on your mobile or desktop or smart TV and savour every uninterrupted second of my content.
	Why don't you upgrade to Rumble Premium today?
	Support my free speech and the free speech of other content creators on this platform.
	Please go to Rumble now, rumble.com forward slash premium.
	And if you use the code brand, you'll save $10 and Rumble will be aware that our stream is creating great converts.
	So that's rumble.com forward slash premium.
	And do use the code brand to save $10.
	Anyway, there's a link there at the bottom of the screen now.
	We're posting it in the chat.
	Join us.
	OK, baby, OK, now what's going to happen in the middle of this mental breakdown that we're in the midst of?
	I'm English.
	Did you know that about me?
	I come from England.
	Churchill, Shakespeare, Maggie Fatcher, The Beatles.
	Well, is it under the auspices of woke liberalism and Keir Starmer that the UK is going to go from being one of the furnaces and crucibles of democracy to just the latest colony on the prison planet?
	Keir Starmer, Starmageddon, two-tier Keir, appears to be trying to augment exactly that.
	But the people are turning against him.
	Just months after this WEF stooge erupted into power, apparently after a free and fair election, and I'm sure it was, other than the way that it's systematically designed to ensure that only a certain number of people can ever be elected into positions of power, and if anyone radical does ever truly rise up, they...
	We work pretty hard to make sure those people lose their ability to open their bank accounts or communicate openly and they're demonized and are ruined.
	I mean, that country is going to the dogs.
	All of the institutions that we were once proud of, the NHS carved up and sold, the BBC, state propaganda now, all of it requires a radical reckoning.
	Let me know in the comments in the chat if you agree with that.
	Keir Starmer now is claiming that democracies don't work in accordance with the will of the people, which is literally how democracies are supposed to work, but they work instead on the basis of what he wants.
	What he's of course referring to is this petition that's changing the world.
	This has been seen obviously by 39 million people.
	It's Elon Musk.
	Talking about this new petition where people are demanding a general election.
	His popularity has dropped to an incredibly low 26 points.
	He's only just gotten into power and he is absolutely loathed.
	Here is Keir Starmer, democracy harmer, talking, being confronted with the fact of his own unpopularity.
	Are you now feeling the pressure?
	Because I think there's a petition that's currently online.
	Your approval ratings have dropped.
	1.9 people who want the election to go again.
	Is it 2 million now?
	It's now just over 2 million.
	Do you feel the pressure?
	Look, I remind myself that very many people didn't vote Labour at the last election.
	I'm not surprised that many of them want a rerun.
	That isn't how our system works.
	You're not surprised by that.
	You're not surprised, but you should be terrified, alarmed, and in absolute dread.
	Just so you know, that when he was the head of the CPS, Keir Starmer, after there were riots in our country, opened 24-hour courts and ensured that crown courts were used instead of magistrate courts, so that people that He was rioted.
	It was, you know, a pretty dodgy time of social disturbance.
	But what he showed in his handling of it was authoritarianism.
	He was head of the CPS and head of the opposition, you know, this is prior to he was in government over a series of years, while Julian Assange was first in the Ecuadorian embassy in the UK and then in Belmarsh prison without trial.
	Now, surely, if you were the leader of the opposition and you were the former head of the CPS, you would see what was happening to Julian Assange Who revealed to us the extent of war crimes in Iraq, corruption in the Democrat Party, and how various nations collaborate when it comes to oppressing and censoring free speech voices.
	It's known as the Five Eyes Nations.
	It's one of the things that Rachel Maddow is concerned that Trump will break down.
	That's the Anglophonic countries, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, etc.
	All give one another each other's domestic data to bypass laws that prevent governments spying on their domestic population.
	Assange revealed all of this to us with some credit due to Chelsea Manning and to Edward Snowden.
	Those people were jailed or exiled.
	Now, you want to know what side Keir Starmer is on?
	When asked whether he believed in Westminster, that's our parliament or our congress or Davos, he without hesitation said Davos, this politician is an authoritarian masquerading as a liberal.
	This is the dangerous game that we're playing across the globe when we yield to the haircut politicians like Trudeau or that woman that was in charge of New Zealand for a bit, which he called Jacinda or something.
	I don't know who's running stuff.
	In Australia now, but I know in every nation in the world right now, they're saying, we need to protect you, so we have to censor you.
	We need to protect you, so we have to throw people in jail because of stuff they've said in the internet.
	You'll be aware that this is happening across my country, in part because of the excellent reporting of Winston Marshall out of Mumford& Sons.
	But you may not know that people right now are in jail in the UK, whether that's Alison Pearson, who's been investigated by the Essex police for a year-old tweet deemed offensive.
	These people are all jailed, yeah?
	That's the specific word I'm using here.
	Lucy Connelly, excuse me, sentenced to 31 months in prison for a social media post calling for hotels, housing asylum seekers to be settled.
	That is actually pretty insane.
	Julie Sweeney received a 15-month prison sentence for posting blow-up mosques.
	I mean, these are actually incredibly incendiary comments, but I suppose saying stuff has to be regarded as different from doing stuff.
	I would say this could have done with a bit more chewing before you put that in front of me, my friend.
	And also, perhaps most notably, Tommy Robinson, who's still in prison for contempt of court, but Elon Musk has started posting about that, right?
	And I believe I've got some information to tell you about that now.
	But firstly, let's have a look at Keir Starmer.
	And a story also from legacy media, so be careful how much you trust it, when it comes to these calls for a new election, because people are so dissatisfied.
	I want to go to the UK. We've been talking here about farmers speaking out against these inheritance taxes, or basically death taxes.
	They say it could threaten food security and the sector.
	But Michael, what's interesting here, there's been a petition.
	Now, Under UK parliamentary rules, if 100,000 people sign a petition, that petition has to be debated on the floor of the Commons.
	This is a petition that says you must call a general election and it's got 2.5 million signatures.
	I don't think we've ever seen a government start so poorly, have we?
	Never.
	I think charging older people on the edge of winter more for their heating is a sign of a Labor Party that's gone mad and lost its touch with reality.
	Now, this petition will result in nothing.
	They've got a huge majority of over 400. Doesn't force them to an election, but does get them a debate.
	And it confronts us all, Peter, with the issue of ISFIC's Are terms of parliament in the UK five years, in Victoria's case four years, a good thing, or would it be better to go back to the old system of more flexible terms?
	Yeah, I'm not in love with fixed terms.
	I'm happy with a four-year term.
	I think three's too short.
	I think five's too long, but I don't like fixed.
	Coach Agata, what's interesting here, I mean, he's up against Kevin Badnock, and at the dispatch box, she's pretty strong.
	She is.
	You know, he hasn't come on top of the problem with the policies.
	He's And everything else, his communication as well isn't exactly inspirational.
	And I think coming up against her, that's another deficit for him.
	And his approval rating has dropped 43 points from the high with which he came in.
	So he's swimming upstream.
	But for now, I think he's dodging the bullet a little bit with the petition not being enough to call an election.
	But he's not trending in the right direction.
	I'll just make a point to my viewers.
	We will be back on air from about the 13th of January.
	Certainly Peter Credlin will in the show.
	People are concerned that there are custodial sentences being dealt out for stuff that people said on the Internet.
	People are concerned that legislation is being created that enables people to jail political opponents, create laws that are useful to the powerful.
	If what they cared about most of all was the welfare and well-being of ordinary people, surely they'd be interested to see that there is so much disdain and disgust rising up across the nation.
	And perhaps they'd be willing to have an honest, open conversation, and whisper it, referendum on what most people think about immigration.
	You know, I might not agree with people's views on migration into the UK or your country, but I do agree with the principle of free speech.
	And I do agree with the principle of democracy.
	So I don't need to do any more thinking on those subjects.
	All I have to do is hand it over to those institutions and hope that those institutions are reliable.
	Pulling the strings is talking about Tommy Robinson.
	Now some of you are saying, why is the EDL now the JDL? I don't know about that.
	I do know that Elon Musk has been posting a lot, and let's go on to X now, about Tommy Robinson's case.
	Tommy Robinson's a British activist, journalist and nationalist who, no question, when it comes to the subject of Islam, has some pretty, I would say, entrenched views that become perhaps understandable if you watch him on Jordan Peterson with him and Tammy Peterson, talking about his particular entrenched views that become perhaps understandable if you watch him on Jordan Peterson with him and Tammy
	They're certainly not views that I myself endorse, because I really, truly believe in the possibility of working people to find ways of aligning and allying against real power and real corruption.
	But as I've said to you before, above all else, and perhaps not above all else, but certainly these are principles that I would be willing to die for.
	I believe in free speech and I believe in people's right to self-determination and governance And when you say that, that means you're going to hear stuff you don't agree with and you're going to end up with systems that don't behave in accordance with your will.
	Now, what I suppose all of the censorship and free speech stuff is about is, oh no, if we let people have access to all information, they're going to start making decisions that we don't want them to make.
	That could be because they love us so much in these positions of Institutionalized corruption and globalized government, or it could be because they've got an agenda and a trajectory, even if that's not something as nefarious as a new world order where they're trying to maximally introduce measures of system management through passport control, digital ID, digital currencies, mandated medications and medicines, 15-minute cities.
	Absolute control is what I believe to be the agenda.
	And whenever a piece of legislation is introduced that facilitates that, you should be really alert to the fact that control is likely the goal.
	Now, if control is the goal, they can't just tell you, we want to control you.
	They have to legitimately find ways, like, surely you and I can agree that racism is wrong.
	Surely you and I can agree that everyone should be spoken to kindly and with love and though we all fail and falter in those areas, those are the principles that we should be aspiring towards.
	Why?
	Because we're one all-human family and that love is how we make ourselves like our Creator and we should behave lovingly.
	Now once you get God out of the way, people tend to pick and choose who it's okay to love and be kind to.
	Be lovely to these people because it's convenient to me personally or it suits and fits my agenda.
	What we've found ourselves living in is a culture voided of real values.
	That's what these autocratic, technocratic leaders are all about.
	Voided of meaning.
	Often compromised in a variety of ways.
	Let me know in the comments and chat if you're aware of the ways that certain political leaders are compromised.
	There's always stuff on them they don't want getting out there.
	Why do you think all this Epstein and Diddy stuff is so powerful?
	Because there's people out there...
	That you think are like super together and with it or moralizing and vanilla and then turns out that at party time things go a little bit awry and even if it's not involved in what appears to be institutionalized deception and corruption Just on the lower level of their personal lives, there's often stuff they'd rather you didn't know.
	It's a pretty interesting time to be alive, and it also means that a lot of our leaders are compromised and controlled.
	Let me know in the comments and chat on Rumble which politicians you believe to be compromised and controlled by means of this nature.
	That's the sort of stuff you can say on Rumble.
	Good luck saying that anywhere else.
	Well, also X, and they don't want you saying stuff like that.
	Now, me personally, I'm not too interested in...
	People's consensual sex lives are their own business.
	Who can't consent?
	Animals, the mentally ill, children, the dead.
	These are people that cannot consent just for the avoidance of doubt.
	And it seems that some people are massively, massively compromised in ways that are startling and astonishing.
	And if that was to ever get out there...
	I think a lot of people would lose a lot of respect.
	Now, what seems to be happening as a result of that is people that we're voting into positions of political power, and I'm not, by the way, making any particular suggestions about any particular individual, are forced to govern in alignment and compliance with globalist ideals that are always presented as sort of bureaucratic.
	By that I mean...
	That they're managerial choices around safety and convenience.
	Oh, we can't have that information out there.
	Sensor it.
	It's not safe.
	We have to take this medicine.
	It will make you all safe.
	We have to introduce these laws to make you safe.
	But in so doing, they're kind of setting up their institutions as godlike.
	There's no question if you're going to have large societies of 30 million, 50 million, 300 million people, there's going to need to be some consensual government.
	There's going to need to be operations and logistics.
	But what I think we're moving towards is a time where people want to feel that that power is as close to them as possible, that they're governing their own lives and they're governing their own communities.
	Indeed, isn't the culture war just the continual reiteration?
	There are some people that believe in stuff like gender, fluidity.
	There are some people that believe in things like Christianity.
	There are some people that believe in things like Islam.
	And what are we to do with that?
	Spend forever in perpetual war, quibbling about symbols and signs?
	Or are we going to accept now that the idea of centralized national authority has to start to be addressed?
	In fact, that's precisely what this technology affords us.
	You could have, in the same way as you have, taxis centralised and coordinated by Uber and people's bedrooms and homes centralised by Airbnb, of course, because the mindset underneath it is commercial and capitalist.
	These are both, I would say to some degree or another, exploitative systems, particularly Uber.
	I know a lot of Uber drivers that feel pretty exploited.
	Let me know in the comments and chat if you drive for Uber.
	This kind of technology could be used to aggregate information and govern communities.
	We're moving towards a time, blessedly, when it comes to American health where people are saying we should be growing food and rearing food locally and eating it.
	Where it's produced, wherever possible.
	Can you imagine the economic connotations of a system that was biased in that direction?
	It's not going to overnight change, is it?
	You're still going to have industrialised farming and abattoirs.
	You're still going to have fields of monocrops like a chessboard across Nebraska.
	But the mentality, the mindset, the intention would be towards regenerative, organic, localised farming.
	These ideas make sense unless your sole motivation is the centralisation of resources, finance and authority.
	Well, hopefully with people like Kali Means now being listened to and Aaron Seary making big waves in the area of big pharma and potentially big agriculture, although it's outside of the HHS purview, and men like Bobby Kennedy now finally being in positions of leadership, and men like Jim O'Neill rising through the ranks, and Jay Bhattacharya and Marty Makkari, people that are outspoken and bold when it comes to big pharma.
	And opposing centralized authority and its potential for corruption, whether that's state, bureaucratic or corporate, commercial.
	We have new opportunities and new chances, and we mustn't lose those chances.
	We have to oppose the corruption that is becoming fully immersive and 360. But that's just what I think.
	Why don't you let me know what you think.
	In the comments and the chat.
	Now when it comes to posting that on X, make sure we add that list of names there.
	That list of names that I just gave?
	Add that list of names when we post that on X and that will help us is my prayer.
	Alright guys, have we done all of our adverts?
	Let's have a look and see what else we've got to talk about.
	We'll do Australian thing tomorrow and let's see if there's anything on here that will help me get through the next little bit of time.
	Oh yeah, Trump charges drop.
	Remember I asked you yesterday to tell me what we thumbnail and titled around?
	Tell me that at the top of the show.
	Put it on this bit of paper.
	Has that landed this time, my darling man?
	Good.
	So now tell me, what have we found out and told around in case I didn't do it?
	Matto, Batacharya and...
	Okay, but always tell me if you would.
	Let's organize our conversations in that manner.
	Okay, let's have a look at this.
	Donald Trump, all charges dropped against Trump.
	Two years ago, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Jack Smith as special counsel to oversee two criminal investigations into former President Trump.
	Well, today, three weeks after Trump's election victory, Smith is dropping both cases.
	ABC's Karen Travers reports from Washington.
	Special counsel Jack Smith today filed motions to drop all charges against President-elect Donald Trump.
	It involves his alleged effort to overturn his 2020 election defeat and promoting false claims of a stolen election in the lead-up to the January 6th attack.
	Trump was charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction.
	The attack on our nation's capital on January 6th, 2021, was an unprecedented assault on the seat of American democracy.
	It's described in the indictment.
	It was fueled by lies.
	In his filing, Smith said the merits of the prosecution's case has not changed, but the circumstances have.
	Smith saying as a result of the election and DOJ guidelines against prosecuting a sitting president, the case will not go forward.
	More than 1,000 people have been found guilty or pled guilty to participating in the January 6th attack.
	Trump has called them patriots and promised to pardon some of them if he won reelection.
	Smith also removing Trump as a defendant in the classified documents case.
	Trump was accused of mishandling government records, including holding on to classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago and Bedminster, New Jersey properties.
	The judge in the classified documents case, Eileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, dismissed the case this summer on the grounds that Smith was unlawfully appointed as special counsel.
	Smith is now asking to dismiss the appeal of the charges against Trump, but allow the appeal to continue for Trump's two co-defendants.
	Trump said during the campaign he would fire Smith on his first day back in the White House.
	Smith was expected to resign before Trump takes office in January.
	The president-elect's office issued a statement this afternoon calling the decision by the DOJ a major victory for the rule of law.
	Karen Travers, ABC News, Washington.
	I'm smarter than the average bear.
	Do they still talk like that on the news?
	Purple flower in the Awaken Wonder chat.
	Focus on hating others like the media wants isn't the solution.
	It's easy to make conservative people hate people when they're already dooming people to hell and judging, as Christ would frown upon.
	upon.
	For example, telling women who take a Plan B pill there are cats and as bad as murderous.
	What do you think?
	Yeah, don't judge.
	He's like, what are the main things our Lord says on the way up?
	Love each other with all your heart.
	No, love God with all your heart and love thy neighbour.
	I've reiterated them, the old mosaic law there, the aspects of it that he clearly regarded to be most important.
	And me as a Christian, I've got to stay right in that non-judgment because otherwise I start thinking I know better than people.
	Y'all know Russell is not feeling the best.
	Time to give 200%.
	Thanks, John Jork, for caring about me.
	RFK to find out why cancer ain't cured.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Think someone got to him or he gets the lifestyle.
	What are you talking about there?
	Russell, get your act together.
	Act is together.
	What do you mean, Marge P? The act is together.
	What do you mean?
	What are you talking about?
	The act is...
	What in particular do you mean?
	Smith leaving with his tail between his legs.
	These are some of the comments in the Awaken Wonder chat with my beloved friends like Pride Thoughts and True Chimera and Affection and Alpine Sweet and all you guys.
	Bodacious Beavers Eaters, which I consider to be a very cheeky name.
	You should get on over to the Awaken Wonder chat on Locals and so should you, Schmidt, Eric, because we're going to have a brilliant conversation in a minute.
	With Jonathan Pajot, River Deep Mountain High, I said, a while since I've seen you, John 319, and this is the condemnation that light has come into the world and men love darkness rather than the light for their deeds were evil.
	Yeah, I feel ya.
	Alright guys, so listen, we're, you're live Russell, Deus est omnia, God is everywhere, yeah, yeah, God is everywhere, Deus est omnia, that is the truth man, we're never not with God.
	Alright, ooh.
	Bodacious Beaver Eaters, you're into some interesting stuff over there I'm seeing in the chat.
	Alright, you lot, so listen, if you're on Awaken Wonder, in a matter of minutes, and I'll tell you the specific time, 25 minutes after we finish at 1.25 EST, 6.25 GMT, 10.25 PST, We are going to be with Jonathan Paggio, who the introduction that I'll be reading at the start of the show will tell you exactly who he is and what he's done.
	But what I know him as is a man that Jordan Peterson strongly and heavily recommends.
	I've had some amazing conversations with him before about myth.
	If you're into stuff like that, understanding deeper realities, then you're going to love this.
	You are going to love it.
	So join us for that in a minute for Break Bread.
	In fact, where is the asset for Break Bread?
	Does it say on there?
	24. Check this out.
	Get ready.
	Oh, we didn't use the animated one.
	I didn't know if you were good with it.
	Yeah, no, let's give it a try.
	And then let's get them watermarks up and all that stuff as well.
	Let's use that for tomorrow, and then we can improve on that maybe.
	You know, we'll keep on improving, but let's get into it.
	Ready for tomorrow, yeah?
	I'm trying to look at what that criticism was.
	Oh, well, it's...
	I love you, Tony One Tiger, and I love you, Roxy Anne.
	I love, oh yeah, Moolin Tee, says Flower Power.
	You think that's going to be good for me?
	Russell, are you really live, says Wish.com.
	Yes, I am.
	In fact, let's have a look at what's on X right now, as if to prove that simple fact, right?
	So if you look at your X feed, this is mine, right?
	Let's have a look, see what's going on over there.
	This is me live.
	There's one accumulates wealth.
	Their earnings typically shift radically from income to...
	See, that sort of stuff's on there.
	Libs of TikTok kicking away.
	Fox News.
	Texas records first locally transmitted Deng fever case.
	Yeah, get ready for that pandemic.
	I had a really good conversation with...
	You'll see this.
	I spoke to Michaela Fuller.
	That's Jordan Peterson's daughter.
	I spoke to her the other day.
	Thursday or Friday or Monday.
	Don't call that a housecoat.
	Pride, folks.
	It's not a housecoat.
	It's...
	It's my wife's jacket, alright?
	Like Michaela Fuller, come on, we had a brilliant conversation about Christianity.
	I had Robert Redfield, former one of the chief advisors over at the CDC, man, he loves Bobby Kennedy now, and he says he's worried about the next pandemic.
	He's saying it's going to be bird flu all day long.
	Yo, Jordan, let's get some thumbnails ready for that, like Fauci, bird flu, next pandemic, those kind of ideas.
	And when we do options, always include in the options, one that doesn't have my face in it, and one that has, you know, some variety.
	Some variety in them.
	Have a look at what Ruben's doing with these three-minute videos and check out what you can learn from there.
	I sent a specific one.
	Alright, guys.
	Let me have a look at what else is on here.
	Pete Hotez, The Holidays of Respiratory Disease System.
	See?
	Look at this.
	They're getting us ready for respiratory disease system.
	Bongino what's he saying disgust extinction burst and completely eviscerates Jim Van Dyne Axios CI that says X and having a blue check don't make you a journalist Dan Bongino going in hard there like you might imagine a lot of Bongino Our man Bongino.
	Anyone from the Bongino army there in our chat?
	Of course you are.
	Let me see.
	Let me get down to the bottom of that chat.
	Mmm.
	The holidays are coming.
	Holidays are coming.
	Yeah, you're right about that.
	Ain't Bill Gates been playing with mosquitoes?
	There's Kelly H77. Yeah, you're right.
	You know that.
	You know that.
	And lots of adverts.
	Remember, we did say something about an advert.
	That New York Times thing's an advert.
	Yeah, you see that?
	I think it's an advert.
	I don't know.
	It might not be.
	Or The Sun.
	Chilling video shows the consequences of using the phone at the wheel.
	BBC. Evil propaganda.
	Aftermath of Israeli strikes on Beirut.
	Church continues on Tuesday for missing hiker.
	Tim Paul reposting Chenk.
	I'm going to make my boldest prediction yet.
	I think at least half of Trump's base are actual populists and they will challenge him if he goes awry.
	No one on the left will believe me.
	They think everyone in MAGA is in a cult and will follow Trump.
	That's a good point.
	What do you guys think?
	Let me know.
	Let me know, guys.
	Candace Owens there reposting something.
	Picture of a Russian defence system being reposted by BBC. Mental man.
	President-elect Donald Trump may impact investors in these eight market sectors.
	It's weird, isn't it, when you look at this stuff, when you look at propaganda news.
	This is all propaganda.
	Piers Morgan.
	Piers Morgan talking about Trump, calling him.
	Insane stuff.
	All right, you lot.
	So remember, if you are an Awakened Wonder, join us now for the chat with Jonathan Paget.
	I was on a few minutes.
	Click the link that we're just posting in the Rumble chat right now.
	Bear is getting better.
	Miss Bear.
	Miss Bear is in the UK. I've got our new mad dog here.
	All right, guys.
	We're going to be back tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
	Until then, if you can, stay free.
	Many Switching, Switching, Switching Many switching, switch on, switch on.
	Many switching, switch on, switch on.

▲