All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 26, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
48:08
HIGH ALERT! Biden Delivers WARMONGERING RANT At The UN, RAMPS UP WW3 With Russia & China – SF461
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So, um, I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm going
to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that.
I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go
ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm
going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go
ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm
going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go
ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm
going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go
ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm
going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go
ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm going to go ahead and do that. I'm
going to go ahead and do that.
to be. It can in wonders. Thanks for joining me today for stay free with Russell Brand.
It's a giddy and extraordinary world that we are living in.
Prepare for peculiar times, they tell me.
Already you can feel the rising of the tides of chaos as the campaigning reaches a near hysterical level.
Outrageous claims are being made.
The information space is being controlled.
If you're watching this, Anywhere other than Rumble will only be available there for the first 15 minutes.
YouTube, of course, is a curtailed, controlled, and curated space that yields to corporatism because it must, because it has to, because as George Carlin says, the interests converge.
interests of government and big tech converge at exactly that point. You will notice that
it's harder and harder, let me know in the comments and chat if you agree, to find information
that's anything other than blind obedience and blind fealty to systems of control and
government that seem clearly to be atrophying before our very eyes, running out of ideas.
I'm talking about the Democrats' campaign.
That's why it's vital that you participate, if you can, in the Rescue the Republic event that's taking place this Sunday.
Join me there along with the other merry Inhabitants and occupants of that dinghy, here they are in a little more detail.
We will all be participating in this Rescue the Republic event in Washington.
Of course, I will also be in Florida, Fort Lauderdale specifically, with Tucker Carlson to participate in one of his events.
If you are an awakened wonder, I'm looking at the screen there where I see your comments, you get the opportunity to win pairs of tickets.
We've already asked you a question, we asked our locals community Yesterday, what was the war that Tucker regrets supporting?
And three of you answered that question correctly, and you will of course be given tickets as we've already agreed and administrated.
The campaign continues, but even CNN are finding it hard to be supportive when it comes to the Czar's most difficult issue, the border.
The Vice President has a long history, a well-documented history, of really being an ally to these immigrant communities.
She has two chapters in her book, I Say We Fight and We Are Better Than This, where she really makes a robust case for undocumented immigrants.
During the Trump administration, she talked about a climate of fear.
She dismissed the border wall as ineffective and a waste of resources.
And so, and even her guest at the joint session of Congress was a DACA recipient, was a dreamer.
And so for her to go down there and characterize herself as tough on the border, it, to me, it isn't consistent with a lot of the policy positions that she previously has espoused.
Look at them sitting around trying their absolute best to be obedient, to not become cynical, as all around them the deception becomes unveiled.
Surely this is a time of revelation.
Many of you will have witnessed the ubiquitously available conversation between Kamala Harris and Oprah Winfrey, attended by a pantheon.
Pantheon?
Panoply?
Is that what you want to say?
Of stars?
Here she is being asked about border security plans.
Hopefully it's a cogent and reliable response.
What would be specific steps to strengthening the border?
So it's a wonderful and important question.
You know my background as a prosecutor and I was also the elected Attorney General for two terms of a border state.
So this is not a theoretical issue for me.
This is something I've actually worked on.
I have prosecuted transnational criminal organizations for the trafficking of guns, drugs, and human beings.
I take very seriously the importance of having a secure border and ensuring the safety of the American people.
I take it pretty seriously as well.
That's why I recommend you unhook your consciousness from these vile machines of toxicity, bad information.
Bad food, bad ideas.
That's why you will love our conversation with Marty Makary, who was so instructive in helping us to understand the degree to which we're being fed bad food, almost deliberately, in order to facilitate and expedite the necessity for bad medicine.
It's a fantastic conversation, if you're on Awake and Wonder.
That will be available to you already.
Thank you for subscribing.
We appreciate your support.
We love your support.
We need your support, particularly as we come into this.
Extraordinary part of the year, where MSNBC and the legacy media will go to any lengths to ensure that the framing of a story is favorable to their audience and their overlords' intentions.
In this instance, I'm talking about a recent town hall in Michigan, where workers don't seem to care too much about Jan 6.
They seem to be refusing to accept the narrative that this was the worst event in human history.
Let's have a look.
Talk to me about your level of interest in the criminal charges and so forth.
February 6th.
January 6th.
So I remember that day.
February 6th, I didn't even know what day it was.
I know he was the standing president.
I'm not familiar with the charges that are being brought against him for that.
I don't, I'm not following that charge.
There's multiple court cases going on.
I'm just not familiar with it.
I mean, that doesn't sound like it's going to be a factor in deciding who to vote for.
No.
Okay.
So when I, when I say January 6th, what do you think?
Oh, I just remember seeing it on the news, like all the riots and stuff.
Don't really know what it was about or what happened though.
Did it, I mean, how did it make you feel when you saw it?
Oh, I don't know.
I don't really feel any way about it.
I don't, I mean, People showed their emotion, I guess.
Probably in the wrong way, but it happened.
That's amazing, isn't it?
To watch them, almost like extraterrestrial observers on their own planet, encounter ordinary people, and it's an indication of how deeply distinct and separate these information communities or ideological communities have become.
If you consume the media that the reporter is pushing, you would go, yeah, Jan 6th, that's the worst thing that's happened since Pearl Harbor, it's the worst attack since 9-11, people died, it's disgusting.
And then if you don't, like...
The thing is, with the saturation of all forms of media now, remember when people were astonished that CNN was a 24-hour news channel?
I can still remember that, I'm old enough.
Now we live in this immersive media environment.
The truth is, most people don't care about what's happening on TikTok.
Most people don't care about what's happening in mainstream media.
Most people care Would you agree?
Let me know in the comments and chat about our own lives.
However much you care about the Diddy case and its salaciousness and how its tendrils appear to reach into every corner of Hollywood and the entertainment industry exposing it for what it plainly is.
Do you care about it as much as like your own kids and your own family and your own ability to feed yourself or is it just some sort of Glistening, glucose-covered, stinking spectacle laying across the surface of your reality.
Certainly, based on what we just saw there, people don't care much about it.
We just will not think what they want us to think.
They want to replace our thoughts.
That's what I'm noticing.
Here's CNN baffled by the perspective of a potential voter on Donald
Trump.
And Donald Trump, he plays golf with Bryson DeChambeau, he goes on Theovon, he talks about
Zinz, and you know, Democrats, I'm sorry, like, they haven't had a cool guy candidate in a while.
And like, with all due respect to Tim Walz, like, Tim Walz appeals to a lot of people.
lot of men. He also appeals to that guy Bruce. Yeah. Jeff's package. She's wearing a
futurist female shirt. Yeah. Like that guy in Madison, Wisconsin is already
gonna vote Democrat. I'm sorry. How do you reach the young men?
I wonder how you do. It doesn't seem like further berating the participants in
January the 6th or telling people they were crazy to have concerns about
Think of the numerous anomalies and hypocrisies packed into that.
The fact that most people that were vaccine hesitant, excuse me, weren't Republicans.
They were, in fact, if you were to look at various categories, For example, ethnicity.
Significantly drawn from African-Americans or non-white Americans.
Think of how the Democratic Party has to sort of tiptoe around that and continually reframe that.
Wait a minute, aren't we supposed to be the party that's standing up for minorities and against white supremacy and stuff, and yet we're pushing this idea, this medicine, these mandates, this control, this sense of I fear this necessity of a vaccine program, this necessity for ubiquitous lockdowns, this necessity for citizen management, however it can be augured and promoted.
It just doesn't make sense.
Here is food activist Alex Clark talking about the vaccine agenda at a recent roundtable event hosted by Ron Johnson.
Let's have a look at that agenda.
In 1985, newborn millennials had to follow a schedule of just a handful of vaccines.
Today, a child following the recommended vaccine schedule will receive up to 70 shots by the time they turn 18, including 27 before he or she turns 2, and as many as 6 shots in a single visit.
Are all these shots producing healthier kids?
According to the data, no.
Are we allowed to even ask?
Also, no.
I'll handle this one.
Yes, they are.
And you are allowed to ask.
Everything's fine.
Carry on.
Some parents who've asked too many questions about the recommended vaccine schedule can find themselves reported to Child Protection Services.
Or they will get kicked out of their pediatrician's office for not being compliant.
This is America, the land of the free.
Parents are being held hostage.
They did not sign up to co-parent with the government.
We want a divorce!
Good speech, good punchline, divorce, people love that kind of thing.
Also, I like watching the unfolding of the slow pressure of a standing ovation.
You know, if you're out at an event and like someone near you does a standing ovation, oh, we're doing a standing ovation.
By the end, even the people participating in the round table, Bobby Kennedy, oh, it looks like we're doing a...
Standard ovation!
Gotta do a standard ovation.
But, you know, it does warrant one.
I don't remember inviting the state to intervene when it comes to matters tending to my family, regarding my intellectual and ideological perspective.
The state seems pretty determined to replace God While telling you that there is no such thing as God, or at least when it's convenient to tell you that, certainly it seems like a pretty godless way to run a country and indeed a planet.
You know we can't continue to provide this content without the participation of our partners and sponsors.
Here's a message from one of them now.
Senolytics are the biggest discovery for promoting healthy aging.
The aging process obviously isn't our friend, unless I suppose, you know, there's eternal life.
But while we're here, we want to be energetic and productive.
That's why I use qualia senolytic with science-backed ingredients that have helped me feel, I would say, 15 years younger in a matter of just months.
Everyone accumulates senescent cells.
Known as zombie cells, these senescent cells are old and worn out and not fulfilling a useful function for our health, but they take up space and nutrients for our healthy cells.
Qualia Senolytic remove zombie cells and allow healthy cells to thrive.
Resist aging at the cellular level.
Try Qualia Senolytic.
Go to Q-U-A-L-I-A-L-I-C-E.
Life.com slash brand for up to, get this, 50% off and use the code brand at the checkout for an additional 15% off.
Try it now!
Qualia Sennalytic is also available at select GNC locations near you.
Take it!
Just two days a month.
There's a link in the description.
Who don't want to feel 15 years younger and get rid of dem zombie cells?
Now, if you're watching us anywhere other than Rumble, you're going to have to click the link in the description right now.
That's why that banner's appearing at the bottom of the screen, to tell you that you've only got a matter of seconds left, and you are not going to want to miss this conversation.
Let me tell you, we've got some fantastic stuff.
I'm most excited to tell you about how Bill Gates is managing the free speech conversation, telling you that what you're discussing is crazy stuff.
He knows better than you.
We're seeing now that Telegram have changed their terms and conditions to allow them to give the government additional information.
And we're watching a lovely Biden pro-Zelensky, pro-war speech.
Click the link in the description.
Right guys, let's get right into this.
The First Amendment.
It's a cherished artifact of American culture.
It's one of the great achievements of your Republic.
Let's have a look what Elon Musk has to say on the matter.
They want to take away your right to freedom of speech.
The First Amendment is out of control.
I've been reading a lot of stories about this.
Have you?
Have you seen a lot of stories talking about, like, maybe the Constitution is nefarious?
Probably because it alludes too much to supreme values, to a kind of universal intelligence, a set of principles and ideals that can't just be manoeuvred and manipulated by humankind, as this one is, as this one is.
Here's Bill Gates, one of the demigods and semi-gods that wanders the earth now, telling us how to think, why to think, why seeds should be patentable, why all information should be controlled by him or some facility that he funds, why he is able to fund the WHO in the same way the country would, or at least his Foundation used to be the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
It's just their Bill Gates Foundation now.
Melinda Gates.
She found reasons to back out of that.
Let's have a look at Bill Gates on how to balance free speech.
It's a complicated issue.
Balance free speech, but still protect and control us.
It's a challenge.
And I mean, you can definitely see the benefits of AI, but I think all of us kind of have a fear of it as well.
So it was interesting because some of the experts in the episode said, we don't even know how it figures out what it does sometimes, which is kind of scary.
So do you think companies that are creating these technologies are doing enough to safeguard Well, there's certainly a lot of discussion about how it should be regulated, and the companies are saying yes.
The government needs to understand our work and needs to look at the right regulations.
At the same time, you know, people are saying, okay, the U.S.
wants to stay ahead.
So whenever we talk about, oh, can we slow it down, they're like, well, don't slow it down yet.
And, uh, so it's going to be the most, uh, the biggest change agent in the next 10 years.
Mostly good stuff.
Mostly.
But will we get it right?
You know, social media, we're still arguing about, hey, we shouldn't have let young kids use it as much.
Right.
And how do you balance free speech and versus crazy stuff that, you know, got people not to take vaccines, for example.
Right, exactly.
Yeah, that crazy stuff that made people a little more circumspect before agreeing to take a medicine that was not correctly clinically trialled, that potentially affects the menstrual cycle of women, proven to cause myocarditis, has caused adverse events, observable and reported, in as many as 1 in 50 people that took it, that was used to legitimise censorship and control of information, and is still being used in precisely that way by Bill Gates just there.
If you take a moment to reflect on what's happening at a deeper level, what you will see is that Bill Gates wants everything to be regarded from a rational and materialistic purview.
Everything is measurable.
If it cannot be measured, it is not there.
That defies, decries, undermines the mystical, the divine, the sublime, and the unknowable.
Not, though, to replace the idea of an all-powerful deity with a more sanguine, judicious, and more malleable entity.
No, but to replace exactly the power that's being opposed, at least ideologically by them, with a state That bears those traits.
It will be the state that tells you what you can say, not God.
It will be the state that tells you what is apostasy.
It will be the state that tells you what is heresy.
I'm sure a well-informed and awakened audience like you can think of examples of each of the bullet points I'm running through.
What's a heresy these days?
What are the things you're not allowed to say?
What are the things you're not allowed to criticize?
What is the general trajectory?
Would you say that what they crave is omniscience?
The ability to see all through surveillance.
Omnipotence.
The ability to control information.
To citizen manage.
Wouldn't it be great if people just did exactly what we told them?
Can't you feel in the nerdish linguistics of Bill Gates an appeal for us to just do as he tells us?
After all, Didn't he give us windows?
After all, didn't he give us great programs across the continent of Africa to address malaria and starvation?
After all, won't all of his programs, if heavily scrutinized, stand up to the test of veracity?
What I mean to say is, how effective were some of those programs he did in Africa?
Do you think people are still happy with what went on under the auspices of CARE, under Bill Gates' endeavor?
How does Vandana Shiva feel about some of the agricultural programs backed by Bill Gates in India?
How do you feel, knowing that the WHO is still trying to manipulate and maneuver a treaty into place that would demand not only that you are taxed, but that you are censored, that your information is controlled?
And that at the level of the WHO, at a global level, not some sovereign government, far less some community government, far, far less, your individual freedom will determine whether or not in the future you'll have to take some sort of shot or medicine or stay indoors a lot or stop exercising or ignore the efficacy of natural immunity or either mectin or vitamin D or whatever they name on that particular day.
As long as it comes from the mind of Bill Gates, a man who's likely in his position for reasons that are difficult for us to understand but likely Have connections to geopolitical movements that are subcutaneous for a while and allow people that are abreast of movements to invest and assess and benefit from information.
Like, for example, if you knew that there was going to be a war between Ukraine and Russia a few years before it started, do you imagine that you might have been able to make financial investments around shale gas and even in currencies that would be beneficial to you?
Might you have been able to pre-empt the availability of wheat And so, what I'm saying is, is these people, they have the designs after becoming like gods, they have information that allows them to act like gods, and like the worst aspects of the most condemned version of a tyrannical deity, they see you as disposable and expendable.
But that's just what I think.
Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
If you're watching this anywhere other than Rumble, get over to Rumble.
Right now where we can speak freely because the time is coming where other platforms are demonstrably unable to convey free speech.
That's the subject we're talking about, your ability to speak freely consistently.
Remember to like and subscribe and to turn on the notification bell because otherwise they simply won't tell you about our content.
And remember, I'll be appearing at Rescue the West any day now, and I would love you
to come and join me there if you are able to.
Here's a quick look at that little poster to refresh your memory.
Now let's have a look at the rest of this Bill Gates conversation, which I recall as
being asset 22.
So if I press that again, it should come up.
The toothpaste is out of the tube, it seems like, on social media.
I want to just follow up on what you said there.
How can lawmakers regulate AI, or regulate social media for that matter, when it seems as if most of them don't really understand it?
Well, they can, you know, create liability.
You know, say your AI is giving health advice, they can say, okay, if you make a mistake there, you're going to be financially responsible.
And so, You know, if it's discriminatory, you can make them responsible.
Because it's happening so fast, writing the rules is a bit of a challenge.
And so we're trying to encourage the people in government themselves to be users, so they understand, wow, this is where it's incredibly good.
This is where it sometimes goes nuts.
I don't think it's actually evil.
You know, you try to study their eyes while they're talking.
I don't think it's, like, evil.
I think it's... Bill Gates seriously believes that what he's doing is right.
That's what I think.
I don't know.
Let me know what you think.
It's pretty confusing.
Let's have a quick message now from one of our partners.
It's them, after all, that, along with you, allow us to keep talking freely here on Rumble.
Here's their message.
Everybody's talking about weight loss injections because the results are so dramatic, and who doesn't love drama?
What if you need to lose weight, but you don't like injections?
Doctors created a weight loss supplement called Lean, and the results are remarkable.
The studied ingredients in Lean are shown to lower blood sugar, that's good, burn fat by converting it into Energy and curb your appetite and cravings so you're not as hungry.
Lean is not for the casual dieter with only a few pounds to lose.
Doctors at Brick House Nutrition created lean for frustrated dieters with 10 pounds or more to lose.
That could be me, I could lose 10 pounds.
Get started with 15% off and free rush shipping.
Add lean to your healthy diet and exercise plan.
Do you know what that phrase does?
I mean, don't be like an idiot and just think you can guzzle lean and it's all gonna be okay.
Add it to a healthy exercise plan in order to lose that hard, stubborn to shift 10 pounds.
Even though I believe that you are absolutely beautiful as you are, just lose that 10 pounds because you wanted to.
Visit takelean.com, enter brand15 for your discount.
That's promo code brand15 at takelean.com.
Thank you.
Our fellow content creator over on Rumble, Steve Crowder, continues to benefit us with the fruits of his investigation into former New York City COVID czar, Jay Varma.
Not only did he attend sex parties during a lockdown, which I suppose probably made him even kinkier, He's got some incredible views on monkey pox and why you should be scared of monkey pox right now.
Even though its name is ridiculous and it, let's face it, doesn't affect that many people.
Is that right, Jay?
I don't know.
You tell me.
We're going to address the monkey pox numbers a couple years ago, but it's not going to spread among the general population.
Honestly, in the United States, the risk is very low.
It's only primarily transmitted among gay men.
It basically got into the sexual networks of gay men.
And a lot of gay men have tons and tons of sexual partners, and often don't use condoms.
And so as a result, it spreads more.
What's the drug called?
We also need to keep up people's belief that the drug works, so that's why spinning it in the media is helpful.
So we want the Food and Drug Administration, the FDA, to approve our drugs specifically for monkeypox.
And right now it's only considered experimental.
And they want to prove it based on this stuff.
You can spin them so that people won't dump the stock, thinking that the company's worthless.
World Health Organization did an announcement about a public health emergency.
It's all over the news and stuff.
They could give us something called an emergency authorization.
This is what they did during COVID.
Like the vaccines and everything.
They actually had to submit the data, but they took the preliminary data.
They didn't wait until the data was followed out for three or six months, because it was an emergency.
Because basically what we're trying to get the media to say is, oh the drug didn't work because it was designed the wrong way, so they're gonna do another study and it'll probably work, and in the meantime, you know, people should prescribe it for that reason as an emergency drug.
That's what we want the story to be.
I think the problem is, we're stuck with like, Our drug definitely looks like it works but the people that we need to buy it are not going to be as confident in it because the data doesn't look as strong as it would have if it was designed in a different way.
So sometimes you do a study and nothing works at all or people get really sick from it.
The problem is if you do another study you don't think a year or two to do it because you got to like I mean, is it a money maker, the emergency use?
And is it a money maker, the emergency use?
Well, it depends.
It's not that many patients have the disease, which is why my CEO has to decide is it worth
it.
Because if there's only a few thousand cases in the United States, does it really make
sense to do another study that's going to cost $10 million?
to do, you're not going to make that much money on the other hand.
And so my boss is trying to figure out that she's the money person.
I'm supposed to be the thinker.
It's like on phone calls and work stuff all day.
Have a look at this exclusive clip and you'll get the idea of why we continue to make this content on Locals.
You'll love this.
I know the reporters well.
Because I would love you to join us there and become a subscriber.
Have a look at this exclusive clip and you'll get the idea of why we continue to make this
content on Locals.
You'll love this.
Have a look.
In your film First Do No Farm, how do you demonstrate that health has been commodified
and exploited in the last 20 years.
Why has that happened?
How can you prove it?
And is this a phenomenon that extends beyond America and into a country like ours where we feel that we have better regulation and we're not so steeped in commodity?
For example, in the UK, your Not as likely to find.
And here's the news presented by Pfizer.
That's not like a sort of a British trope.
So the question is, how has health been commodified and exploited in the last two decades?
How can you prove it?
And is it global?
And if it is global, you know, maybe the IPA there, the Indian Press Association, won't be so ebullient as you might anticipate.
Because I feel like India are pretty tied up into the pharmaceutical industry at this point.
But yeah, I'd love to hear your response to that first question, mate.
Yeah, absolutely.
So it is a global issue, Russell.
If I were to summarize it in one line, medical knowledge is under commercial control, but most doctors don't know that.
So we have a pandemic of misinformed doctors and misinformed patients and unwittingly harmed patients based upon a number of factors that are at the roots of why patients are getting information and doctors are getting information From biased and corrupted research.
So, research that's funded because it's likely to be profitable, not beneficial for patients.
You know, bias reporting in the media, bias reporting in medical journals, commercial conflicts of interest, and inability of doctors to really engage in informed consent because they don't understand and then communicate health statistics.
You add it all up, it is an absolute mess.
And what does that mean?
Essentially everything, almost everything invariably that hits The consultation with doctor and patient has been corrupted to the degree where side effects, where safety and benefits of drugs are grossly exaggerated.
And we show that in, you know, through layers through the film.
And at the roots of it, Russell, just to put it in very basic terms, is that we have the interests of big pharma and big food, because we cover a lot of the issue around the food industry too.
Are purely there to make money their legal obligation is to profit for shareholders not to look after your health but the real scandals are that those who have a responsibility to patients and scientific integrity, namely doctors, academic institutions and medical journals, collude with industry for financial gain and the regulators fail to prevent misconduct from industry.
Why is that?
Let me give you some cold hard facts.
Regulator in this country, MHRA, gets 86% of its funding from pharma.
The FDA gets 65% of its funding from pharma.
So those interests which are pathologically self-interested to make money, big corporations, has now infiltrated into the consultation room.
There is no independent verification of data coming from pharma.
And that's one of the low-hanging fruit bits in the movie that comes out, is that if we are to move forward, if we are to fix healthcare, We need to remove commercial distortions of the scientific evidence, and we can do that with one piece of legislation.
From now on, although drug companies can develop drugs, they should no longer be allowed to test them themselves.
They have to be independently evaluated.
And if the drugs are really good, Russell, if they do what they say that they claim to do, then they should have no fear for their drugs being independently evaluated.
And of course, everybody loses because you think, hold on, in the short term, of course, big pharma are making money.
But actually, there is no real innovation going on, if their business model is fraud, and they're not even engaging in developing really good new important drugs.
And we see that, the facts are very clear.
Only about less than 10% of new drugs that have been manufactured in the last two decades are truly clinically significant in terms of better than previous drugs.
Most drugs are copies of old ones, and probably double the amount of drugs, certainly from some data we've seen, that are innovative, are actually proven to be more harmful.
So what is the conclusion Russell?
In my view, very clear, the overall net effect of the pharmaceutical industry on society is a hugely negative one.
Unfortunately, I will say this and it sounds very controversial, most doctors, first and foremost, I believe are well-intentioned and want to do the right thing.
They don't realize the information they're getting is being corrupted.
But I think if you look at global health, if you look at what's going on in the UK, what's going on in the US, it's getting going down the wrong direction.
And that means, for me, the medical profession needs to take a really good look in the mirror and ask themselves, is our net effect on society, as a medical profession, positive or negative?
And unfortunately, Russell, at the moment, the evidence suggests that there's a very strong argument to be made that the overall net effect of the medical establishment on society, unwittingly, is a negative one.
That is pretty shocking stuff.
Additionally, we have Russell Brand's stand up breakdown.
This week, and I can't believe I waited so long to do this, we had a look at the work of George Carlin.
Is anyone more responsible for bringing about an articulate, able population capable of critical thinking?
Have a look at this exclusive clip from our AwakendWonder content.
You have no choice.
You have owners.
They own you.
They own everything.
They own all the important land.
They own and control the corporations.
They've long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the State Houses, the City Halls.
They got the judges in their back pockets.
And they own all the big media companies, so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear.
They got you by the balls!
They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying, lobbying, To get what they want.
Well, we know what they want.
They want more for themselves and less for everybody else.
But I'll tell you what they don't want.
They don't want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking.
They don't want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking.
They're not interested in that.
That doesn't help them.
That's against their interest.
That's right.
They don't want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table and figure out how badly they're getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago.
They don't want that.
You know what they want?
They want obedient workers.
Obedient workers.
People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork, and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime, And the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it.
And now they're coming for your social security money.
They want your fucking retirement money.
They want it back.
So they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street.
And you know something?
They'll get it.
They'll get it all from you sooner or later.
Because they own this fucking place.
It's a big club.
And you ain't in it!
it contains the classic, it's a big club and you ain't in it. Right there from the
beginning, sorry, right there from from the beginning onwards you have a kind of
treaties on how to treat power. It's a big club, you ain't in it. They don't want
you awakened, they want the state, even like, even though George Carlin is
avowedly atheistic, what you can hear there is that he, like a person who has a
spiritual perspective, rejects the idea that the state should be taking a kind
of pseudo-religious role in our lives.
Wouldn't you agree?
That's what the state has become.
It's become a kind of God.
And it can't achieve that status without sort of corporate alliance and corporate partnership, but fortunately it has that.
I would say watching that you can see why that's become one of the most
influential and oft-cited pieces of stand-up ever because it's exactly the
tool, it's exactly the kind of prophecy that we needed.
Now this could be the most important election in history.
Both sides agree on that, at least.
Each side considers their opponent to be, in a sense, a democracy-ending force, or a republic-ending force, depending, I suppose, on their particular perspective.
Isn't it interesting, though, to see Zelensky trotted out, pen in hand, signing missiles?
Isn't it odd to accept the reframing of Joe Biden, still President of the United States, as a sort of inept, avuncular, roaming figure trotted out to give speeches, propagate for war?
Isn't this a very, very confusing time of campaigning?
Here is Biden now.
At the UN, with Zelensky, advocating for yet more war, the consequences of which, God, it seems to me sometimes likely he will benefit from in some tangential, possibly financial way.
It's not an assertion I'm making, it's just the kind of thing that would make sense to me based on what I know about how that world works.
In front of Zelensky, a war that doesn't cost him anything, but costs many people their lives and costs all of us that live in countries like ours a great deal of revenue.
Let's have a look.
For the second year in a row, this gathering dedicated to peaceful resolution of conflicts is darkened by the shadow of war.
An illegal war of conquest brought without provocation by Russia against its neighbor Ukraine.
Like every nation in the world, the United States wants this war to end.
No nation wants this war to end more than Ukraine.
And we strongly support Ukraine and its efforts to bring about a diplomatic resolution that delivers just and lasting peace.
But Russia alone, Russia alone bears responsibility for this war.
Russia alone has the power to end this war immediately.
And it's Russia alone that stands in the way of peace.
Firstly, if the aim was to end that war as quickly as possible, what you could do, I suppose, is stop funding further armament, stop giving Zelensky tours of munitions factories and allowing him to sign weapons that will eventually End the lives of innocent civilians, some of whom will inevitably be children.
Bring them back to the negotiating table.
Not have Boris Johnson come and disrupt that process, as he did prior to the start of real hostility.
Not bomb territory within Russia.
Not sponsor the 2014 maiden coup.
Not sponsor the Azov battalion.
And sit down all participates.
Participants and negotiate an amenable peace.
I know international diplomacy between countries like Ukraine and Russia is hardly easy, but I reckon it'll be a lot easier if you didn't get a strong sense that the military-industrial complex benefit from ongoing conflicts.
This we know from Afghanistan.
It cost 14 trillion dollars.
It didn't really benefit anyone, did it?
It certainly left, well, maybe the Taliban.
They're a lot better armed than they were before the start of that conflict.
What we're able to do now, because of men like Julian Assange, because of information available to us online,
is immediately gainsay this kind of ludicrous hyperbole and sort of muted jingoism that you can get access to at a
UN event broadcast on CNN and present some alternative facts because of men like John
Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs.
We have an alternative history of how the Russia and Ukraine conflict has escalated.
And because perhaps, you know, you tell me, let me know in the comments in the chat, because we're beginning to understand what is meant when you see the celebrification.
of a figure like Zelensky, having turning up in award shows, having turning up signing missiles and bombs, you start to understand the tone deaf amplification of information that's favourable to their agenda being pushed everywhere, oppositional information being shut down, you have to recognise that nothing they say is true.
Everything is worthy of question.
And remember, earlier in the show, you've seen another Advocacy for globalism saying that the First Amendment is a potential problem.
Free speech is a problem.
You can't just have limitless free speech.
Then people might go around opposing wars and opposing globalist projects.
Aren't you now, let me know in the comments and chat, beginning to understand from the outline, from the silhouette of their corruption, what the figure in the dark might resemble?
Because the Russia's price for peace It's Ukraine's capitulation, Ukraine's territory, and Ukraine's children.
Ukraine's children was a specification.
I mean, they said, well, can we have some Ukrainian children?
That's the kind of language that's designed to tug on the old heartstrings and to ensure that the fishing line of the taxpayer dollars can continue to be reeled in.
Russia believes that the world will grow weary and allow it to brutalize Ukraine without
consequence.
But I ask you this, if we abandon the core principles of the United States to appease
an aggressor, can any member state in this body feel confident that they are protected?
It's interesting, isn't it?
Because I think the image many of us have who understand the relationship between Ukraine
and for example Black Rock is indeed of a carving up.
What we're talking about is, who is it that has the right to carve up the resources in Ukraine?
Who is it that had a curious relationship with Ukrainian energy companies before the start of this conflict?
Who is it that benefits from having missile bases and CIA bases right on the doorstep of the former Soviet Union?
In direct transgression and denial of treaties, if not treaties, agreements between Gorbachev and Reagan.
What exactly is this we're watching?
When you see Joe Biden, a deposed president, advocating for further war, telling you that he's advocating for further peace, in front of a president that's being propped up, a former showbiz star, comedian and entertainer, And literal penisist, pianist, penisist, there must be some sort of pun available to us there, and are inviting us to glug it all down, swallow it all down with a smile.
Think about the trajectory of this conflict, the Nord Stream Pipeline, Russia did it, oh no, it was obviously some combination of deep state forces from NATO nations.
Do you remember for a minute they tried to Convince us that Poland had been bombed.
Do you remember, do you know that they're still now?
Kamala Harris in her recent DNC conference speech said, oh well, you know, if we don't stop Putin, Poland will be next.
Think about the amount of jingoism and hot, hostile, incendiary invective that's being conveyed by these apparently rational people.
Do you not start to believe that it's just power for power's sake?
That what they actually want is a kind of totalitarian control accompanied by thanks and applause and a, oh we appreciate you helping us, this was all for the children.
A kind of reductivism of moral arguments around good and evil, i.e.
Putin's evil, we're good, that denies the complexity and contradictions of our own eyes.
If you've been paying attention to what's been going on in the last few years, you will
recognize that what Joe Biden is, is a stooge and a cypher of globalist power, and he's
about to be replaced by another one in Kamala Harris.
There are people in our space that would say that both parties offer up cyphers as political
and presidential candidates, but it seems to me just based on the loathing ire and attempts
to control, even talking about the Trump campaign, not to mention the recent alliance with the
likes of Tulsi Gabbard and Bobby Kennedy, that in the MAGA movement you have, if not
a perfect movement.
a flawed movement, a nationalist movement, you have a disruption and an obstacle to the kind
of globalist power that they're trying to achieve. You only have to see that round table at Michigan
to recognize that ordinary people don't care about their talking points anymore. Ordinary people care
about their own lives. Ordinary people are sick and tired of this endless hyperbole and they're
sick and tired of funding wars while they're going hungry.
If you allow Ukraine to be carved up is the independence of any nation secure.
I'd respectfully suggest the answer is no.
We have to stand up to this naked aggression today and deter other would-be aggressors tomorrow.
That's why the United States, together with our allies and partners around the world,
will continue to stand with the brave people of Ukraine as they defend their sovereignty
and territorial integrity and their freedom.
In the figure of Joe Biden and in the spectacle of Vladimir Zelensky, you have the perfect
pairing that helps us to understand the nature of geopolitics and globalism these days.
A celebrity turned leader, a lifelong politician who appears to have some hypocritical and corrupt relationships with international businesses, An interest who's willing to say what's required in order to achieve what's necessary.
Putting a show on the road even though one has been ousted as president and replaced by a younger model who's similarly compliant, pliable, malleable and useful to the establishment interests that require as a business model ongoing war.
A system to whom the signing of a missile that will likely one day kill children is not a visual anomaly And a jarring reminder that we've gotten way off track as a species, that we've departed from God.
But just a necessary and helpful photo opportunity.
Just another part of the spectacle.
It would seem to me that we're at a significant junction now.
There is a significant opportunity to disrupt the kind of interests that benefit from war.
And I wonder, If in November, that opportunity will be taken.
Certainly, I'm doing my own small part, and I'm hardly what you would call a regular Trump supporter, or even perhaps a Trump supporter of any kind, just an opponent of globalism.
That's why I'll be participating in this Rescue the West event.
Join me there if you can, and if you're an awakened wonder, we will be providing the opportunity for a little meet and greet among us.
Consider becoming one now.
Okay, guys, I think that's all we've got time for today.
On the show tomorrow, Vivek Ramaswamy, who doesn't enjoy the opportunity to commune and converse with this upstart interlocutor into the world of politics.
With his slash-and-burn attitude to bureaucracies and his, I would say, rather brilliant way of describing issues that might otherwise seem complex.
It's a brilliant conversation.
I think you're gonna love it.
I'll see you tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
Until then, if you can, stay free.
▲
Export Selection