All Episodes
July 8, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:09:25
WHAT’S HAPPENING IN EUROPE!? | French Right-Wing DEFEAT, Is UK Voting Fair? & Globalists! - SF 402
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I'm going to go ahead and make that.
In this video, you're going to see the future.
I'm good.
Oh In this video, you're going to see the future.
Hey you Awakening Wonders, thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
Across the world we are forced to question how electoral democracies are managed and what the function of democracy is now, how its mechanics operate.
I'm asking that question I suppose on the basis that in two countries You would have, I'm talking about France and the UK, clear victories for particular parties.
In the case of the United Kingdom, Keir Starmer's Labour Party.
And in France, this extraordinary conglomeration of multi-layered alliance that has led for a victory for the French left.
And there are aspects of that alliance that are pretty interesting.
There are sort of anti-war components, there are some pretty awakened movements that emerged, I assume, from that Gilets Jaunes moment in France.
But what you're left with, I think, when you analyse the results as best as I can using my mind and this pen, you're left with the idea that potentially the results are not all they initially seem. Nevertheless, here is a
bit of celebratory footage and a people of France, some pretty good looking people, but one
person who's clearly been selected because of his potentially antagonistic resemblance
to Che Guevara. This is footage from Rebel News.
We've got love, we've got party, we've got joy.
You've got hate.
We're too strong.
We're too strong.
You lost, sorry.
I'm racist!
That's cool.
I can't let them get fucked!
That's it!
That's it!
You've lost!
There you go.
Being against racism, of course, is a very, very good thing.
Good to not be racist, but are we sure that we understand precisely what's taken place in France?
I'm not sure that I understand, of course, but what I do know is that Macron is still and will remain president and that 200 candidates Dropped out of the race in an attempt to, a successful attempt, to strategize and tactically beat the Rallye Nationale.
They're usually called the far-right participants.
So listen, let's have a little look at that.
Yeah, that's right, mate.
Let's have a look at this.
Because what's interesting about this alliance is The sum of the parties are like environmental.
Some of them are far left.
There's like nine communists, actual old-school communists.
And the guy that's most prominent at the moment, the person they're gonna have to bury, I think.
What's he called?
Mélenchon.
Mélenchon, I think is his name.
This dude they're going to have to bury because he's going to be a massive pain in the arse.
Now first we'll look at this, we'll look at the results of the French election, the way that these results were achieved and we'll compare it to the UK election and how those results were achieved.
It's much more institutional in our country.
The UK proportional representation favours the two major parties but in France there's been some extraordinary sort of in real time gerrymandering, deals being done, people dropping out of the race in order to prevent the far right.
Now, I wonder if ultimately there will be a mandate for the kind of people that are celebrating who appear to be, on the basis of this, anti-racist and anti-war.
And I reckon we're all anti-racist and anti-war.
I mean, if you're watching us on YouTube, we'll be there for about another 15 minutes, then we'll be streaming exclusively on Rumble.
And to those awakened wonders, let me know what you thought of my five favourite things that I just can't live without.
I'm going to show you a little bit of that in a minute.
It's a delightful little conglomerate.
Here's some analysis now so we can look at what this new composition that makes up the French government is in fact made up of.
All four parties said they'd made concessions.
The NFP, that's the new alliance program, is heavily influenced, or the sort of largest part of it, influenced by that of the radical left LFI, including pledges that would significantly increase France's already high public spending.
It promises to reverse Emmanuel Macron's controversial changes to pensions, And return the retirement age to its pre-2010 level of 60, raise public sector wages, link salaries to inflation, boost housing and youth benefit, cut income tax and social security for low earners, and introduce a wealth tax for the rich.
All pretty good ideas so far, you would think, wouldn't you?
Pretty good?
So listen to this, NFP also aims to raise the minimum wage, fine, fund 500,000 childcare places, why not, cap prices for essential foods, electricity, gas and petrol, boost green measures including legislating for carbon neutrality by 2050, and overhaul the EU's common agriculture policy.
You know how controversial agricultural policy, particularly coming out of the EU, has been in the last 5-10 years, and of course carbon neutrality is an idea that's spoken about and causes a lot of controversy In this space.
What I'd be interested in is if the measures spoken of here, most notably the environmental ones, will lead to restrictions and legislation on individual freedom, rather than the, for example, tempering and controlling the profits and activities of international global corporations, including and most obviously energy corporations.
On foreign affairs, the alliance has said it would demand an immediate ceasefire in Gaza.
What do you reckon to that in the chat?
Recognise Palestine?
Okay.
Halt Moscow's war of aggression in Ukraine, keep supplying arms to Kiev, and unfailingly defend the sovereignty and freedom of the Ukrainian people.
But the dude that's Melenchon, not Melenchon, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, who's currently the leader of the LFI, the largest part of one aspect of this alliance, because the alliance is Macron's bunch, this little bunch called the NFP, which itself is made up of a cluster of organisations, meaning that France is likely to be pretty unstable, and doubly unstable I suppose, because the whole conglomeration has been put together
To prevent the ascent of the right.
That was the sort of function of it.
But then you wonder where all of that energy goes.
It's comparable to what will happen in the UK when reform have 800,000 people behind every seat in Parliament.
They've got five seats in Parliament.
And Labour have 30,000 people behind every seat in Parliament.
And Nigel Farage has come right out of the block saying immigration is going to be the issue that I'm going to fight on.
It's always the issue that Nigel Farage fights on.
How will Starmer deal with that?
How will these victories, ultimately for centrists, although many people have pointed out how are they victories for centrists if they've had to form alliances with parties and groups of the left, question mark, How will they govern from what seems to be a precarious position?
It's pretty interesting because in this sort of cooperative that's been formed here, for example, there are a variety of views on pretty significant issues.
For example, Gaza.
And I wonder how they're going to manage this in government.
It's going to be pretty interesting, I would think, and will likely lead to fissures and maybe even chaos.
There's been a lot of instability in France.
In fact, this snap election was an attempt to mitigate control and bring down That chaos.
Same in the UK, because why did the Conservative Party call an election that was inevitable that they were going to lose and significantly lose?
Presumably, it's part of a overall agenda to maintain some semblance of control.
And the more cynical among you would say, you know, would simply cite the Who's song, Meet the New Boss, same as the old boss indeed.
I think that's what PJW did on his video analysing it.
So, uh, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, 72.
Did you like the French accent?
It was a pretty good attempt at it, I thought, and I don't think I overdid it.
I didn't go like Mélenchon.
I didn't try to make it overly sexy.
Had promised to take a back seat.
This guy, I think, is going to be funny.
Keep your eye on this guy.
Had promised to take a back seat in the NFP, but has been unable to do so, demanding on Sunday that France's next Prime Minister come from the Alliance and implement our manifesto and only our manifesto.
Power's got near him.
The elixir of power.
It turns people crazy.
People, when managing the business of politics, people make whatever compromises they have to make.
That's why you've heard Keir Starmer say, I'd never work with a son.
I'm working with a son.
I prefer Davos to Westminster.
People will drop whatever they need to drop, acquire whatever they need to acquire to get into power, and then people change.
Once it's extraordinary power, it's mercurial magic is unleashed on the mind, people start, because I suppose, Maybe because there aren't sufficient virtues and principles that are beyond the remit of selfhood that ultimately motivate people.
Maybe that's why we get in trouble.
What I'm saying, not to be opaque, is if all of us were dedicated to a project of salvation and redemption, If all of us were individually contributing to the common good, although I recognise there are people in the world that are doing that naturally, and not all of them are Christian, I'm not suggesting that for a second, then we would have different systems, wouldn't we?
Representative of a higher set of values.
We're gonna see a chaotic period in France, we're gonna see a chaotic period in the UK.
Because there are these escalating wars.
There is the necessity to implement further and further authoritarianism.
More and more censorship.
Because otherwise, what's happening in France, this fragmentation and fracture, would happen everywhere.
You can't achieve consensus.
You can't achieve cohesive and continual control of a narrative.
Because, you know, as that book said, Here comes everyone.
We're all piping up from the sidelines.
That's not true.
Keir Starmer didn't support Assange when he was in opposition.
Why not?
But when he was head of the CPS, why was he not looking for ways to get Assange out of Belmarsh?
We can all see that.
Hey, we've got footage of Keir Starmer saying, you know, they can't maintain control in the good old days of CNN and BBC and centralised authority, the pre-communications miracle era.
meant that centralised control was plausible.
It's not plausible anymore.
Back to Jean-Luc Mélenchon.
He's even suggested he'd quite like the job himself, having said, look, I don't want any power.
Now that the power's come near, like the ring, the ring's gotten him.
He suggested he would quite like the job himself, but his frequent outbursts of rage, love that, Petty attacks on opponents.
He's petty.
Reflexive anti-US stance.
Europhobia.
And before Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, frequent Moscow-friendly remarks have made him too toxic.
So this dude, they're not going to be pushing for him.
Melanchon has also faced accusations of anti-Semitism.
Recently describing the attendees of a demonstration against antisemitism as the friends of unconditional support of the Gaza massacre and appearing to minimize antisemitism in France by describing it as residual.
He denies these accusations.
Many of Mélenchon's fellow NFP, that's the new alliance that teamed up with Macron's crew to win this election, cannot stand him.
They don't like the dude.
Now remember that prior to Kirstarma in the UK, the Labour Party was run by Jeremy Corbyn
and that guy had to be exorcised, booted out of the party along with any allies or even
remnants of him.
So now we've got the extraordinary situation where it seems to me a Corbyn-like politician,
i.e. an old-school leftist, has ascended to a position of power and is having to make
deals with the new sort of globalist WF types, of which Macron is one of the OGs.
If there was a Klaus Schwab boy band, you better believe that Macron, next to Trudeau
and now Starmer, would be front and centre and the drool from Schwab's pouches, his significant
hamster pouch cheeks, would be glazing them.
It would be, they would be glazed in glory.
Many of Mélenchon's fellow NFP members can't stand him and LFI defectors who have abandoned the party over his bullying tactics.
He's a bully!
And they are now independent left-wing MPs.
They talk of him as an obstacle to the left.
So there you go.
That's...
Yeah, it's going to be tricky for that little bunch.
And what's happening in... I suppose you'll want to see a little bit of analysis of what the centrists actually represent.
But before that, I just want to show you how this is comparable to what is happening in the UK.
Mostly what I mean by that is the phenomena of liberalism as authoritarianism.
We'll head to that in a second.
Because the UK, similarly, even though on the surface of it It's an out-and-out landslide.
The Labour Party have got 411 or 12 seats, and the Tory Party, their opponents have been decimated.
On the surface of it, that seems to be the case, but with a little bit of analysis, we showed you this last week, you see that Reform got 4 million votes and only 4 seats, 5 eventually, Lib Dems got 3.4, I think it ended up being 3.7 and 69 seats, I think they ended up with 71 perhaps, and Labour won two-thirds of the seats with only one-third of the national vote.
Now, the reason I'm interested in that is to show yet another disjunct between the electoral systems and the results of the elections.
Now, in your country, the United States of America, there are quibbles and quarrels enough around voting machines and voter ID and mailing votes that what we're talking about here is the mechanic of democracy itself.
And while we're all sort of trying to understand how these maneuvers take place.
200 French candidates dropping out, 80 from Macron's party,
and 129, no it's the reverse isn't it, of this new alliance.
They dropped out to make way for one another, to ensure that they won tactically.
I wonder what you think the ethics of that are, because that's not flat out representation
of the will of the people.
It might be necessary.
It might be, you might even call it a necessary evil, the same way as accepting donations from corporations, from big pharma, from big tech, from the military.
That's described as a necessary evil.
But once you take on all these necessary evils, what you've necessarily gotten left with is evil.
An evil system that can only mask its evilness through Through banality, not even through the pretense of good.
Although perhaps a beautiful way to describe wokeness would be the pretense of good.
Because none of you surely are making an argument that we should be discriminating against people on the basis of race or their sexual preferences.
Surely any awakened and enlightened person knows that our first duty is non-judgment.
Surely we know that our ultimate duty is to live in a state of love.
But the problem with wokeness is that it It cannot live by the virtues it espouses.
It uses them but as a veneer to mask the globalist corporatism that we're all describing.
Otherwise, if you were truly woke, it was like, I believe in the rights of these religions or these minorities or, you know, insert whatever, whatever idiom or synecdoche is required to complete that sentence, you wouldn't be pro-war, would you?
You wouldn't be pro the jailing of Assange.
You wouldn't be pro global institutions that do not respond to the electorate at all, like the WHO or the WEF or the World Bank or NATO.
All of those things, all of those things that are functionally giants now, giants among us, indefatigable, unbeatable entities that can't be controlled by ordinary people.
A true leader would surely oppose those things.
Now, you will know who your elected representative truly represents when you see them in action.
And it seems that Keir Starmer, like Tony Blair before him, that uber-globalist, is strongly affiliated to the globalist project that similarly has in its palm Emmanuel Macron, still the president of France, and I think he will remain for another couple of years at least.
Our country needs a bigger reset.
We need a great reset.
Are you surprised that your Prime Minister didn't show up to Davos?
Yes, I think our Prime Minister should have showed up to Davos.
I absolutely do.
And one of the things that's been impressed on me since I've been here is the absence of the United Kingdom and that's why it's really important that I'm here and that our Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves is here as a statement of intent that should there be a change of government, and I hope there will be, Doesn't that sort of seem like a middle management mob figure showing up to pay tribute to the heads of the five families?
You know, we're here to show you that when we're elected, we bloody well will come.
And I'd invite you not to look at the backdrop and the 666 configuration that runs through the O's in the words World Economic Forum.
Ah!
The beast is risen!
And who's dull?
The United Kingdom will play its part on the global stage in a way I think it probably hasn't in recent years.
Play its part?
The UK will play its part on the global stage?
What does that mean?
Does that mean to be the recipients of migrants?
Does that mean to participate in wars?
Does that mean to participate in the plunder of vulnerable nations?
It seems to me a new consensus is emerging around the subject of migration.
That most countries now want individual sovereignty, want the control of their borders, don't want to be involved in international wars, and are no longer willing to support globalist, corporatist projects That rely on their flags and their names and their tax dollars but enrich only an elite that stands ahead, above and beyond of all nations.
Corporate elites that find ways of avoiding paying taxes, find ways of navigating the bureaucracies of nations that they use as to... We can't avoid them.
Bureaucracy is basically what I'm saying.
You try to avoid paying taxes.
What we are very proud of now as a young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, President of Argentina and so on, is that we penetrate the cabinets.
They're penetrating the cabinets, baby.
They're penetrating this cabinet.
There you have it, baby.
He's a chip off the old block.
But actually, let's do this Macron thing now.
Have a look at this.
So, the idea of authoritarianism and liberalism ought be oxymoronic.
Authoritarianism being the opposite of liberty, and therefore liberalism.
But, Emmanuel Macron, still president of France, manoeuvreur in elections, now stands as the most obvious example, and perhaps the most powerful example, of authoritarian liberalism.
You can certainly make the case that in your country, the Democrats, while using a recognisable rhetoric around the culture wars and ...pretending to be progressive are similarly an authoritarian liberal movement.
What I mean by that is, do they give you a choice as to whether or not there are going to be wars?
Do they give you a real choice around the sovereignty of your nation's borders?
Do they give you a real choice as to how to respond to health crises?
Are these the kind of things that you were invited to participate in?
Was there a set of referenda, I wonder?
Well, this might help us to understand what is meant by the phrase authoritarian liberalism.
It certainly helped me to understand it.
The shift towards security is perhaps the most striking aspect of macronism.
How do you justify authority?
We're protecting you.
Why have we got to stay in our homes?
We're protecting you.
Why have you got to take these injections?
Well, you have to take them because we're protecting you and your grandma.
Have you done clinical trials?
Stop asking questions.
We're protecting you from the answers of those questions.
Macron replaced liberty with security and made this the cornerstone of his regime.
So remember we saw those young people celebrating at the beginning of this section.
What are those people celebrating really?
They're celebrating rhetoric.
They're celebrating idols.
They're not celebrating policy because Macron's still in power and Macron is a globalist.
Macron ain't gonna do nothing to help those young people and their various ideals.
Pretty soon they will be spilled and adrift in the streets of Paris, lost and bewildered, inadvertent flaneurs, looking for something, going nowhere.
That's sort of my prediction because this kind of authoritarianism is anti-human.
You don't want to be protected by the state.
That's not the job of the state.
Minimal protections, I'm sure, a little bit of regulation, not these kind of Odd forays into idealism.
He replaced Libby with security and made this the cornerstone of his regime.
Even before COVID-19, Macron had securitized the French state against internal threats.
Inheriting a state of emergency imposed by his predecessor, Francois Hollande, after the 2015 Paris attacks, Macron passed many emergency powers into ordinary law.
Remember, that was the last version of this.
To protect you from terror, or as George W. Bush used to call it, terror, Remember?
He wouldn't pronounce all the syllables, would he?
Not all of the vowels, just... Like that.
It was slightly like someone who'd had a stroke trying to say.
It was terror that we were being protected from.
It was terror that meant that we had to give access to... had to give the state access to private information.
And remember that the Patriot Act that was passed in the aftermath of 9-11 is still operative.
You are still spied on by your state.
Why?
Because they're protecting you.
So Macron is merely one observable symptom of a global phenomena of authoritarianism that masks itself as liberalism.
That's why it's significant.
Okay, effectively, into ordinary law, effectively making the state of emergency permanent.
Permanent emergency is another one of the themes of authoritarian liberalism.
Those powers meant to curb the threat of terrorism were then used against the Gilets Jaunes, a social movement with a broader popular base and appeal.
Now you'd think that some of these left-wing parties that are part of this new alliance
would have derived some of their support from the Gilets Jaunes movement.
Remember those protests on the steps of Black Rock and Vanguard.
They were anti-corporate.
The French people were pissed off that they were having their pensions reduced and were
being asked to work for additional years.
They were having their sort of French culture altered before their eyes.
Try I pray that you can look beyond what seems to be the most significant issue to most of
you based on comments and stuff, the important issue of migration, immigration and cultural
And notice too, that you have won the argument on the subject of migration.
The Labour Party, even parties from the left, everyone says you have to at least pay lip service to the idea of border security and border control.
That argument's been won, at least, you know, at the level of the public dialectic, the public discourse.
But!
Who's carrying the argument for anti-globalism and global corporatism?
And let me know in the chat, God I'd actually love to know, what do you think is a bigger threat to your country?
Immigration or the power of globalist elites?
What do you think?
What do you think is going to affect your life?
Now of course you'll be more directly aware of bloody hell wages are lower because of migration, can't get doctor's appointments because of migration.
Those things will be more visceral and there's no question that there are cultural issues that are arising in certain parts of Europe and as I understand America as a result of that.
But where do you think real power is?
And what do you think Macron, Biden, Starmer, Even if this is not what they're doing at the level of their subjective experience, whose interests do they work for?
As Chomsky once said, if you didn't work for those interests, you wouldn't be sitting in that chair.
By the time you've been through the law schools or the universities or whatever party political machinery they put you through, Who knows what skullduggery, chicanery, and blackmail, Epstein Islandry, you have to also pass through the archipelago of sin that creates these creatures.
By the time you get there, you better believe your interests, and Vanguard's interests, and BlackRock's interests, and NATO's interests, are pretty fucking tightly aligned.
Because otherwise, you won't make it through the maze, right?
So what's more important?
Migration leads to globalism.
It's a contributory factor in the ways that I've just listed.
But remember, don't switch off.
Don't switch off, you lot.
Come on.
Macron reinforced this security regime during COVID, giving prefects, state-appointed regional departmental representatives, extraordinary powers, including the power to ban individuals from entire regions.
I read that even Napoleon was not so tyrannical in his implementation of the use of those prefects.
Excuse me.
The securitisation of French society culminated in a law against separatism, allowing for more state control over non-governmental organisations, including mosques, but also secular civil society associations.
In a minute, right, I'm going to leave you there for a second.
If you're watching this on YouTube, let's start the countdown.
We're going to be exclusively available on YouTube.
Not on YouTube, bloody hell, those bastards, what they've done to us.
Give their money back!
Damn you, Dainich!
Damn you, Caroline!
No, we'll be on Rumble and we'll be talking about Biden's comeback tour.
He's back, baby!
And he's more demented than ever.
We'll be showing his appearance on ABC and we'll be breaking down globalism and look who's come back from the tomb.
Why, it's Tony Blair himself to support his new project.
Click the link in the description.
Get on over here.
Now, Do you know that your bowel is a disgrace?
Well, I invite you.
Why not place your finger gently into your own bottom?
And you will discover there, my good man, or woman, a stench that will shock you to the very core of your being.
Unless you are participating in the great project of Dr. Schultz, who will not rest till your bowel is like Disney World.
And I don't mean corrupt with a network of tunnels under it where you see sort of Mickey Mouse with his head off and like a dead body being sort of ushered around.
No!
I mean sanitized, clean, and lovely.
Have a look at this.
It's a message from our sponsors.
That's basically what's happening here.
Did you know that Americans are absolutely full of excretia?
And Americans have more colon-rectal disease than any other human group anywhere on the planet.
That is because you don't eat enough fiber.
You're glugging down the milk.
You're glugging down the meats.
You're not getting no fiber in your diet.
Yoga, weights, cardio, every exercise and sport are negatively impacted.
That is why you need Dr. Schultz's Intestinal formula number one.
Do you know what it does?
It promotes regular bowel movement.
Dr. Schultz is going to make your poop into your dupe, your rube.
You will be in control.
You've got to take Dr. Schultz's intestinal formula number one.
Visit HerbDoc.com forward slash brand for 25% off the product.
You'll be better at sport.
You'll be sleeping better.
Visit HerbDoc.com forward slash brand.
25% off.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to kiss the sky.
That won't work.
Let's do a good one.
Mrs. CMS in the Awakened Wonder chat.
Hello down there.
Estavi, how's it going?
Pridefolds.
Not regular, but emergency bowel movements.
Your bowels are in great shape.
Did you guys enjoy it when I was showing you the five things I couldn't live without?
Did you like that stuff?
Was you well into it?
You know the five things I couldn't live without.
What were they again?
One of them was this sweet little guy, wasn't it?
And one of them was... Oh, do you remember when we were talking about... Should we show them?
Dare we?
Have a look at this.
This is one of the things we do on the Awaken Wonder community on Locals.
We were talking about Bear and how I can't live without him.
And Massey, who works for us, he cuts a lot of the content and helps us with the comedy.
He put this together.
Let me know what you think about this.
It's one of the things we do over on the Locals community.
Have a look.
Oh no, I've got to press it.
No, I'm in charge.
Bear!
Is another thing I cannot live without.
And if there's something you cannot live without that you will have to live without, then I suppose you will have to address what that deficit is and what that symbol or relationship.
Relationship, what that relationship represents for you.
It represents fealty, loyalty, connection, intimacy, deep intimacy.
It represents duty.
I'm dutiful towards Bear.
It represents a kind of simplicity that is transcendent of my externally applied identity and a connection to my essential identity.
It ain't no different as if I was seven-year-old boy.
and met Bear.
Like when I was seven all I wanted was a good dog and I have one now you know and that's sort of a very simple thing in me.
Think of the many threads or strings on the harp of your being plucked in an endless symphony of performance where you try to make yourself fit with the tunes around you.
well that note that i find in bear he's very like that's who i am
son of a bitch messy You son of a bitch!
You goddamn nearly made me cry about my own dog!
You nearly made me cry about my own bear!
God, I love that dog.
Post that everywhere.
That's really good.
Post it with, like, um... I don't know.
We'll think of what to post.
It's good though, that.
Post that.
Post that around.
People will love that.
That's gonna move people.
Did I finish it?
Did I finish it?
Are you moved? You didn't tell me whether you think migration or corporatism is more important.
Did ya? Did you tell me that? Why don't you tell me, Wake and Wonder?
Synchronicity 525, Claude, Sissy Calendar.
I need to know. Can we just finish off that thing I was saying?
Can we go back to the early numbers? I just want to finish that thing about Macron.
Did I finish it? Did I finish it? The, um, I don't know if I did.
The rise of this security state, yeah?
Yeah.
Were we up to there?
It was about there, wasn't we?
We'd finished that page, or did I stop in the middle of the other page?
We were there, thanks.
The rise of the security state, so this is back, look, I want you to understand global corporatism.
Of course it is.
Why do you think migration?
What do you think it...
I think that if you say migration, it means that you think that you don't, you can't ever control your community, your state, your space, your land.
Because I recognise that it, like I was listening to Tommy Robinson talking about Luton.
I was on Jordan Peterson, did you see that?
And he was talking about what it was like to grow up in Luton and how he was like, there was never a kind of racial division.
He's from sort of football fan culture by his own admission.
And he was saying about how like, You know, like the white kids and the black kids around Luton would hang out and even the Sikh kids, all the different, you know, even kids that had a religious affinity outside of Islam, but there was a kind of a natural division.
And it was very good to hear this account from someone who grew up in those communities and he was talking about the connection, at least his personal experience.
I'm only recounting his personal experience as I understand it.
Between the gangs in Luton that sold drugs.
Now I used to, when I was a heroin addict, I lived in East London, I used to, like some of the people I bought drugs off were Muslim guys that were in religious dress.
And I used to sometimes go into like the estates where they were to get heroin.
And I was always sort of struck by how they are, surely I thought their religious principles would not permit the sale of heroin, but there they were selling heroin.
And I suppose what the kind of old school patriotism and nationalism of the likes of Tommy Robinson is about is about the sense of kind of preservation, conservatism, connection to the land, or sort of the sense that your community is under some kind of threat.
Do you believe it's possible for different cultures to live harmoniously together?
Do you think that there's a certain number of different communities?
Do you think there has to be a balance?
Do you think it's a racial or cultural dynamic?
I'm very interested in what you lot Think about all that kind of stuff, man.
Because when I was watching Tommy Robinson, I suppose what I felt was, yeah, this dude is obviously a conduit for an experience a lot of people are having.
You know, a lot of people... It chimes with a lot of people.
Me, personally, I wouldn't like any person to feel excluded from my love on the basis of their race, their religion, their sexual identity, their gender identity.
I don't think Christ would want that.
I don't think Christ would want anyone unloved.
The Old Testament God, he's a bit more... Listen, I told you what to do, you didn't do it.
BAM!
Smite in!
You're getting smoked!
I'm gonna smoke you!
But our Lord and Saviour Jesus, very, very much on the... Let's get to love, let's get to love, let's get to love.
I know that someone will... I bet you right now, I'll be looking to sort of go... What about the moneylenders at the temple?
Everyone loves the moneylenders at the temple bit, because...
You know, like, see our Lord whipping, or as my man, my mate Jonathan Rumi, what did he call it?
Jesus?
Indiana Jones?
Indiana?
I can't remember.
He came up with some Indiana Jones thing.
Anyway, look, I want to get back to this Macron thing.
I got sidetracked there.
Clearly, clearly.
Tommy Robinson for... Well, look, everyone's divided, but you've got, yeah, there's some division.
There's some division.
Tommy's mission of really...
Let us, for heaven's sake, find some love.
Alright, so listen, Emmanuel Macron.
The rise of the security state has been a constant feature of Macron's rule, and it will continue.
It's been reflected in the growth of the police budget.
That's a good way of watching this stuff, isn't it?
I like this kind of analysis.
This is out of Spike.
They've looked at where's the money getting spent.
If you're spending a lot of money on the police state, then we can assume that you're authoritarian.
Now there may be a right-wing appraisal of that would be, oh no, it's to implement social control because of the uprising of all these, you know, who knows, you tell me what you think.
This has led to more officers on the streets, an increase in riot police units and the militarisation of their equipment.
This is a global phenomena.
Remember, some of the budgets that were put aside for Covid protections ended up going towards the militarisation of police vehicles in numerous states in America.
A lot of Covid budget in our country ended up being used for surveillance.
I think I'm telling the truth, aren't I, Gareth?
I think all those things actually happen.
So, the militarisation of the police is actually a global phenomenon.
So, if you're talking about globalism, and we talk about it a lot here, it's like, what things are happening everywhere, regardless, like, how come the same, why are there agricultural protests everywhere?
What's going on?
Why are farmers in Sri Lanka and farmers in the Netherlands, that bunch of bastards, the Dutch, how we loathe them now, why are they experiencing the same problem?
Because presumably there's a global centralised agenda to implement measures on farmers everywhere to get centralised control of food, right?
That's what we're sort of guessing, or what people like David Icke or That's what Alex Jones would have been telling us for ages and saying that doesn't mean I agree with everything David Icke or everything that Alex Jones or everything that Tommy Robinson or everything that Noam Chomsky says.
Like you, other than my Christianity, I'm trying to piece together some sense based on what is in front of me.
No?
Is that not what you're trying to do?
This, in turn, has prompted an increase in police violence.
Did you know that had been happening in France?
The process of securitisation is a core feature of neoliberalism, unlike liberalism, its 19th century parent.
Neoliberalism is not concerned with reducing the size and reach of the state.
Hmm.
On the contrary, neoliberals fully embrace the state in order to use its powers to regulate and create the conditions for markets and a modern capitalist economy more broadly.
Where old-school liberals believe markets are natural, neoliberals know that the conditions for the market to exist depend largely on strong enforcement by the state.
Regulatory bodies, anti-union laws, more flexible work contracts, a strong justice system, a repressive police force, probably a lot of migration, by the way, you could add to that, couldn't you?
Because that's gonna lower the... that's gonna...
Impede the ability of workers to demand a higher wage.
We'd say that, right, wouldn't you?
A repressive police force are all essential to enforce the needs of the market and fashion a labour force at the mercy of employers.
And now we have true globalism.
They are conflating and curating the conditions across a vast and literally global terrain.
These resources are coming from this part of Africa.
These call centres in this part of the world are being utilised.
We're manipulating the cost of the stocks and shares here.
We're investing... They're playing a rigged game in one strata of society.
The political class is the managerial class.
They're not actually really where true power abides.
Look at them.
They're idiots.
You can sort of tell when you look at them.
Don't you think?
Don't you think?
That's what I think, baby.
Yeah?
I think that with politics, you're dealing with the managerial bureaucrat class, who do get a share of the spoils.
All these people go off and get fantastic jobs afterwards, don't they?
But they're not ideologues.
They're not the kind of genii that are sat at a global level, moving chess pieces over time.
I think of someone like Rupert Murdoch as being a bit more like that.
Some of you might think he's just some sort of hacky billionaire dude.
But I think, no, that guy, he's like Mephistopheles.
He's playing chess over centuries.
I'll buy that up.
Then I'll buy that up.
Fuck you.
I'll marry this lady.
Fuck her.
Oh, she's fucked Tony Blair.
I'll marry this lady.
Ah, fuck her.
I'm gonna do it.
I'll have Jerry High.
Fuck it.
You know, look at him.
Just sort of kept alive by tubes.
Dick's pulling the strings of a global tune.
Don't you think?
This process of securitisation, we've told you that.
On the contrary, yeah, blah, blah, blah, blah, regulation, the mercy of employers.
Yeah, I think we've explained that pretty well now.
Do you agree with us?
So, in a way, all them left-wing people that are like, yeah, victory, victory!
You fucking idiots!
Why didn't you form some sort of alliance with the right and get the centrists out?
The centrists are the real problem.
What you want are radicalist anti-establishment alliances that regionalise subsequent to their ascent to power and say, listen, We're very pro-migration in our part of it.
Okay, well then you can have that region and you can be pro-migration.
We're very anti-immigration in this part.
Okay, well you don't have to take no migrants in your bit.
You're not worried that it's going to affect Labour, no.
What about our duty as a former colonised and imperialist nation?
You've got to decentralise power to the maximum degree possible, not minimum.
That's got to be the guiding principle.
There, that's as best as I can do for today.
Be on duty.
You're very funny, Russell.
Cheers!
Psychedelics will save the world, says T. Greer.
4-3-2-1.
Yep, I hope so.
I fucking hope so.
I'm trying my best with compuja, baby.
Now, shall we show you, it's 38 minutes in, we've not really talked about the United States of America.
We're just going to show you a couple more things from my country to make sure you've understood the giddying flavour of globalism.
Just to make sure you've understood how these two elections amount to globalist victories.
Then we'll show you a little bit more Of dear old giddy old auntie Joe Biden.
Let's have a look at Asset 49, can I, mate?
Can I have a look at 49?
Yeah, yeah, just... Right.
One of the great things about Tony Blair's return to power, not Tony Blair, Keir Starmer's ascent to power, is the return of Tony Blair.
He be the chuckling puppeteer.
He be the figure whose fingers are probably sort of long and tapered like old church No!
Don't go full Nosferatu, Tony!
We already know you're a member of the undead.
Tony Blair is there to guide Keir Starmer into the upper echelons of global and indeed globalist power.
And here is Tony Blair explaining to us the real threats we face and how he and his friends will protect us from them.
I am constantly saying to my own party, Labour Party, which will probably win this election, you've got to focus on this technology revolution.
It's not an afterthought.
It's the single biggest thing that's happening in the world today of a real world nature that is going to change everything.
Leave aside all the geopolitics.
And the conflicts and war and America, China, all the rest of it.
This revolution is going to change everything about our society, our economy, the way we live, the way we interact with each other.
I think we're living through a period of massive change, right?
This is the biggest technological change since the Industrial Revolution, for sure.
How do you use it to transform healthcare, education, the way government functions?
This dude owns a bunch of shares in a company that's going to buy up health data, sell it, and repackage it.
We'll tell you a little bit more about that tomorrow.
He's always been pro-ID.
He's always been pro-ideas.
You should have ID, you know.
We should be able to look at your ID.
We should be able to look at your stuff.
How will these globalist alliances be affected by BRICS, the new financial alliances that are emerging?
That's one of the questions that's being asked in the rumble chat.
Let's do some stuff on that tomorrow, because I saw some interesting moves being made around that.
Let's get back to old Nosferatu.
How do you help educate the private sector as to how they can embrace AI in order to improve productivity?
I mean, this is a huge agenda for a government, and a really exciting one.
You know, people get a bit depressed about being in politics because you get all this, because of you!
Criticism.
People certainly in the West feel society's not changing fast enough and well enough.
And I say, no, it's a really exciting time to be in politics because you've got this massive revolution that you've got to come to terms with.
Yeah, okay.
Also, you've got, it seems, some pretty peculiar financial interests and giddy-giddy investments.
What an extraordinary time it is to be in politics, whether it's in the United Kingdom or France or the USA.
Certainly this little lad, he's on asset number 11, thanks guys, this little lad...
This little lad is a politician now.
He's like a, this is the equivalent of a congressman.
Look at this little sort of lovely human light bulb that's risen to power as a result of electoral politics.
You graduated from Cambridge University.
You're clearly a bright guy.
A slightly trickier question then.
One of the criticisms of MPs is that they are, you know, many of them don't have real world experience.
You've touched on some of it there, but at 22, can you really offer real-world experience to bring that to the House of Commons?
I always get a little bit frustrated when people mention life experience.
I do.
I get frustrated about that, because I've got the experience of literally, like, look at the size of my shoulders.
It's the size of my head.
Now, I have to hold this bloody thing on.
I've got trap muscles sliced alone, I'll tell you that.
It's because no one has yet been able to explain to me why being older makes you better at the job.
Well, you've got more experience.
I think that's why.
But what kind of experience?
By experience.
Experiences is a very complex word, isn't it?
I've had experiences being in rooms.
My hair follicles, even now, I can expand them.
Even in this moment now, there's neurons firing off like a real-life Megamind.
By definition, over the years, you've gained more experiences, don't you?
But what kind of experience, right?
Well, life experience.
No one's been able to... Well, we're going around in a circle now, aren't we?
Oh, no, good for you.
Come on, we're going in a circle, as I do with my comb every morning.
It's a circumference of the planet Earth.
Good for you, batting back, but, you know, you can talk about all the things you just mentioned of renting, jobs, children, children's services, looking after old people, old elderly relatives, healthcare issues, all the sorts of things that you get over a lifetime.
That's the point.
Yeah, I mean, look, as I said before, I've had a lot of experiences that lots of older MPs won't have had, and... I don't know.
I've been in Cambridge University.
I've been managing budgets.
I've been looking at paneled walls.
I sometimes strum away at my midriff where I have a tendril from the middle of my body and write messages to the future in the white ink of life.
I've done quite a lot for my age as well.
I mean, I've been a councillor for a couple of years and a cabinet member responsible for about £17 million of public money over the last year.
I've been a trustee of a university and I've done a lot of other things that perhaps wouldn't necessarily be typical for someone of my age.
If that wasn't enough to convince you that we don't take politics that seriously in my country, look at this.
This is actually the results of the election being announced in a particular constituency.
Jason Chinnery, the official monster-raving loony party, 230.
Thank you!
Thank you!
That'll do!
Fuck you!
But why should we take it seriously?
Maybe we shouldn't.
Maybe we should ridicule and laugh, assured by the divine comedy that's playing out within us all.
Maybe we should, within ourselves, turn our bodies into temples, turn our minds into conduits for a greater glory, practice the principle of love wherever we may.
Because when you look at the chaos unfolding and the evident corruption, it's difficult to take the world seriously, even when it's not so ridiculously rendered in the two last examples of the madness of British politics.
For example, you see that...
They've been fined 243 million dollars and as John Le Fevre pointed out on X, Donald Trump was fined 350 million dollars for saying Mar-a-Lago was worth more than 20 million dollars to get a loan he repaid on time of interest.
Presumably what they do is they just look...
At the figure of Trump, I think, how do we bring this motherfucker down?
What do we have to do?
What do we have to say?
These are the various ways in which power can be managed.
In France, deals are done.
200 people, 200 candidates from a couple of parties drop out to ease the way for an unusual and potentially precarious coalition.
In the UK, an old first-past-the-post rather than proportional representation system is deployed to ensure that another globalist WEF stooge ascends to power with mentors like Barack Obama, it's a matter of public record, and Tony Blair.
You see how at various stages power can be ushered, guided, and marshalled, and it can be ensured that that that power always remains accessible to the same elite strata.
While we're down here quarrelling and quibbling, they're up there making choices that manoeuvre troops
around the world and ensure that their power and their hegemony
remains unchallenged. But that's just what I think, why don't you let me know what you think
in the comments and the chat. We got a little message now, who's it from Lauren?
Who's the advert for?
1775. Oh, this is a good one.
Now, as you know, I need coffee.
But I need coffee that I believe in, and I need a coffee that believes in me.
You get a deal on 1775 coffee, which I don't like advertising, because as you know, that was the eve.
Loony Party's better than the Uni Party.
Very good, in the Awaken Wonder chat.
Very good, very good.
1775 is a coffee that's rebellious, baby.
It's a rebellious coffee.
Here's me supporting it on behalf of my partners at Rumble.
Have a look.
Stay with us.
Hey, this is exciting.
We've got a great partner today.
It's Rumble.
But beyond Rumble, it's Rumble's latest venture.
Let me ask you first, are you a Sleepy Joe type character with zero cognitive performance, struggling to muster focus and brainpower for basic things like running the United States of America?
You gotta stop drinking woke, liberal coffee that hates you and your way of life and start your day by drinking Rumble's very own.
1775 coffee.
This is going to be the best tasting coffee you've ever had.
Seriously good.
Ethically sourced from a family farm in the high altitude mountains of Bolivia.
Not in the Bolivian lowlands run not by a family, but by a single man still living with a pet.
No!
Instead of waking up and drinking your big corporation owned woke ideology coffee that's probably making you sick from the pesticides it's sprayed with, try Rumbles.
1775 revolutionary coffee.
Support freedom of speech.
Build a parallel economy that actually values you and loves you.
My favourite?
It's dark, of course.
I've always found the lure of the dark irresistible.
I'm sorry, how can I stay mad at you, but you're just gonna have to wait over there for a little while.
Level up your morning routine with a 1775 coffee.
Sleep all night knowing your hard-earned dollary dues are going towards supporting freedom-loving creators like me on Rumble.
Visit 1775coffee.com now, pick up your first bag, use the code BRAND to save 10% on your first order.
Oh, come on.
Why choose, you know?
Okay, back to the content!
The machine has gone into overdrive to ensure that we regard Joe Biden's debate performance simply as a bad night.
In fact he refers to it as being a bad night so many times that the phrase bad night starts to sound like your own name when you say it too many times.
You can be high and you start saying your own name again and again and again you go mad.
Here's Joe Biden on his comeback tour an attempt to recoup some credibility and as usual when watching Joe Biden you may vacillate between those two states.
One of incredible sympathy and empathy for him and a kind of an almost desire
to sort of wrap him up in his swaddling clothes, cradle him in your arm and perhaps breastfeed him like at
the end of uh, and mice and men. I believe that happens in Steinbeck's
great book and I think that is a sort of visual allegory to remind us that it isn't the role of the nursing
mother to feed the decrepit. You let me know what you think Steinbeck meant by that!
In any event, should any of us be tit-feeding by mouth President Joe Biden, the answer to that is yes I was.
Mr. President, thank you for doing this.
Thank you for having me.
Let's start with a debate.
You and your team have said you had a bad night, but you're fit.
I sure did, and that's why I'm smiling about it!
He's been told, smile about it.
Don't take it too seriously.
If you don't look bothered by it, this is the advice you give a bullied kid at school, isn't it?
It's the advice you give a bullied kid.
Find the pickiest Trump supporter and punch them.
And when that one goes over, the whole lot of them will go down.
Nancy Pelosi actually framed the question that I think is on the minds of millions of Americans.
Was this a bad episode or the sign of a more serious condition?
It was a bad episode.
No indication of any serious condition.
I was exhausted.
I didn't listen to my instincts in terms of preparing, and I had a bad night.
You know, you say you were exhausted, and I know you've said that before as well, but you came, and you did have a tough month, but you came home from Europe about 11 or 12 days before the debate.
This is him being on, yeah, you're right, Grapes of Wrath, it was Grapes of Wrath, sorry about that, I was wrong about that, it was Grapes of Wrath where the old man, I don't know why I keep showing him my nipple, I think it's because my little son was on me this morning, and like, my wife went there, and like, he sort of like saw my chest and sort of looked at my nipple and went sort of like, Well, are you of any use?
Could you do anything?
No, I can't do anything, mate.
I've got nothing for you.
I've got nothing, son.
It's Mice and Men.
No, Grapes of Wrath.
It's Grapes of Wrath, where a nursing mother feeds an old man.
And that's, yeah, I don't know why I brought it up, but it sort of seems like, you know, the image of nurturing the decrepit and the frail rather than letting them sort of slowly enter into decrepitude and decline is a sort of an image that Steinbeck was messing with in his Dust Bowl era Americana and literary marvel.
Here, let's just see where our man's going here.
Is it, this is, by the way, just remind yourself in case you've forgotten, this is like, this is, he's going on the TV to go, look, That was a bad night, that.
I'm normally better than that.
It's unfortunate it happened.
It's like when you tell someone to watch a stand-up comedian and then they come and watch him and they're shit that night.
Oh no, he's usually good.
This is Joe Biden trying to reassert his abilities as an orator and communicator.
They spent six days in Camp David.
Why wasn't that enough rest time, enough recovery time?
Because I was sick.
I was feeling terrible.
Matter of fact, the docs with me, I asked if they did a COVID test because they were trying to figure out what was wrong.
They did a test to see whether or not... COVID wouldn't justify it, would it?
I had COVID a couple of times.
It's not bad, is it?
It's a bit like coffee.
I had some infection, you know, a virus.
I didn't.
I just had a really bad cold.
And did you ever watch the debate afterwards?
I don't think I did, no.
What do you mean?
Don't you know?
Don't you know?
I remember that I watched it.
It was late at night.
I was confused.
I was smoking a cigar in a leopard print dressing gown.
I remember it.
I remember it.
And I wasn't even in it.
What I want to get at is what were you experiencing as you were going through the debate?
Did you know how badly it was going?
I just had a bad night.
I don't know why.
Bad night!
You know, casino, lose a little bit of money, maybe drink a bit too much, make some mistakes.
Not demonstrate to the world that you're incapable of leading the country and in fact can't have been running the country for the last few years and provide people with enough material to make comparisons to your former self to show the evident decline.
To, in a sense, confirm people's fears that the world is run by a global cadre of powerful corporate interests that manoeuvre and manipulate political figures like Joe Biden, who simply got the role of president because it was his turn.
A Democrat party, even with a sort of sensible eye on cynical power, would have said, get a better candidate.
And how quickly did it come to you that you were having that bad night?
Well, Kanye was having a bad night when I realized that even when I was answering a question, even when they turned his mic off, he was still shouting.
He was shouting at me.
That was distracting.
That shouting gave me senile dementia.
I let it distract me.
I'm not blaming him for that.
But I realized that I just wasn't in control.
But part of the other concern is that this seems to have fit into a pattern of decline that has been reported on recently.
New York Times had a headline on July 2nd, Biden's lapses are said to be increasingly common and worrisome.
Are you the same man today that you were when you took office three and a half years ago?
In terms of successes, yes.
I also was... We know they've had these questions in advance, because we now know that's how it rolls, and it's still not a good enough performance, but at points I do, I got that grapes are off feeling, someone needs to suckle that guy right up.
The guy put together a peace plan for the Middle East, that may be coming to fruition.
I was also the guy that expanded NATO, I was also the guy that grew the economy.
I took on big pharma, I beat them.
That didn't happen, did it?
He didn't beat Big Pharma.
A few rudimentary and slightly tepid measures were introduced to control the prices of one or two drugs that weren't significant and were clearly measures that were negotiated in conjunction with Big Pharma countries as to not significantly affect their profits.
I thought I could beat them.
I took on all the things we said we got done.
We're told we couldn't get done.
And part of it is, what I said when I ran, was I wanted to do three things.
Restore some decency to the office.
Restore some support for the middle class instead of trickle-down economics, go from the middle out and the bottom up.
The way the wealthy still do fine, everyone does better.
And unite the country.
But what has all that work over the last three and a half years cost you physically, mentally, emotionally?
Well, I just think it cost me a really bad night.
Because I grew up in a black church, I know exactly how to behave whenever I'm with one.
In one.
Whenever I'm in a black church, what I do is I sit like this, bolt upright, I get the old hands, I place them on the palms, maybe I'll do a bit of drumming to show that I'm familiar with the procedures and protocols of the black church space.
Then what I do is just nervously flip my eyes from side to side, not really even acknowledging when the black pastor to my left moves on.
That's the way you're supposed to behave when you're very, very familiar with the old black church.
How sweet the sound that saved a wretch like me.
Also, though, when they say the word mean, tap the old chest to let the other members of the black congregation
know that you know who you are.
What was that one I live in again?
Who do I live in?
Me.
I once was lost, but now I'm found.
Was blind, but now I see.
Let us stand together, oh, at the cross.
That's one of the moments where I feel that feeling of he needs a good swaddling.
He needs a good swaddling and a good old grapes of roughing.
The burning of my heart, rolled away.
It was there by me.
Oh no!
Joe Biden's not capable of running the country.
Macron's not capable of running France.
Keir Starmer's not capable of running the UK.
Where is the power?
Who's controlling all this?
Who's manipulating this media, judicial and state, global state power play?
Who's in charge?
Whose interests are being served?
Sometimes I think it's helpful, just little facts like they were in that Spike article, for example, telling you that Police expenditure had gone up significantly under Macron.
That's one of the ways of recognising that you're in an authoritarian regime, is the amount of expenditure on policing the population.
Another way is looking at which institutions, groups or corporations benefit or profit.
Have the military, for example, and I mean military industrial complex there rather than military personnel, benefited under the Biden administration?
What groups are benefiting?
If you look at You know what they call it?
Quo bono.
Is that what it is?
Quo bono.
Yeah?
Quid pro quo.
Quid bono.
Quo bono.
Who benefits is what I'm basically trying to say, and I'm trying to use Latin even though I was never taught it.
The simple fact is if you look at who's benefiting, you'll understand where the power actually is.
A lot of you will say, look at who you're not allowed to criticize, won't you?
Look at who you're not allowed to criticize.
That also is an indicator of where power really lays.
My prayer is that a response to the increasing power of globalism, no matter what inflection it bears, whether it's traditional conservative and free market or apparently new emergent neoliberalist models, we The actual people are somehow able to regain purchases of the levers of control.
Regained?
Did we ever really have them?
Did we have them under serfdom?
Did we have them in the industrial age?
And will we have them?
because one thing I agree with Tony Blair on is we're entering into a new phase
defined by technological power which if it falls into the wrong hands and
currently there's nothing to suggest that it won't fall into the wrong hands
will be used for extreme citizen management I imagine in conjunction with
the Omni crises or perpetual crises or ongoing crises each crisis used to
legitimize further authoritarian measures to ultimately incrementally
we're ushered into states where our individual freedom is just at the
periphery of our memory we no longer recall Think of how things were just before COVID.
Think about how things were before 9-11.
If you look at a bit of footage of like France in the 1970s, I'm not talking about demographics and racial mixes here.
I'm talking about the sense of a country and a culture.
I'm talking about the sense of connection that you have prior to the miracles and advances that technology, technology, excuse me, But that's just what I think!
Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
They are there for utility. They do not provide ideology.
Corporations and the state do not provide ideology, principle or purpose.
That has to come from us.
But that's just what I think!
Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
Thank you so much for joining us today, you glorious individuals.
We will be back tomorrow, not with more of the same, but with more of the different.
Export Selection