BREAKING: 5 States SUING Pfizer Over Vaccine Deaths & Tucker EXPLODES on Vaccine Makers - SF 395
#1 prayer app in the world https://hallow.com/brand⏰ BE HERE AT 12PM ET / 5PM BST ⏰.Lots of vaccine news. Pfizer is now being sued in 5 US States for spreading vaccine disinformation, doctors are seeing increased heart attacks in young people, and Tucker Carlson goes off about how we cannot sue vaccine manufacturers. Also, we discuss the upcoming US debates and the recent UK debates. It’s all kicking off! Remember to subscribe!Check out social medias and more - https://linktr.ee/RussellBrand
Hello you Awakening Wonders there on Spotify, Apple, Stinkwhistle, Gurgledot, or wherever you download your podcasts these days to remain at least peripherally connected to some tendril of truth in a bewildering miasma of lies and propaganda.
We appreciate you, and we love you.
You're part of our community.
So that's why we're very happy to give you an audio version of our live Rumble Show five days a week.
It's on Monday to Friday.
We decipher the latest news stories, we break down current topics that the mainstream media should be covering, and if they aren't, Then we critique why they're not and what they are covering.
Every week as well, right?
We do brilliant conversations with people like Jordan Peterson, RFK, Tucker Carlson, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate.
These things are already up and you can listen to them now.
So remember, this is an audio version of our daily live show.
To tune in live, Go to Rumble.com forward slash Russell Brand.
You'll find it easily and I hope that you will love it.
Now please enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
Thanks.
No. Here's the fucking news.
There you Awakening Wonders, thanks for joining us for this most auspicious of days.
Remember later we will be streaming the debate live, a watch-along experience.
We won't be streaming it, we're not CNN.
It's interesting because what we'll be seeing in micro when we stream the debate later is what happens on a macro level.
Because, Bobby Kennedy, he's muted altogether.
Our man, Donald Trump, your man, your man, I'm from Britain, I have no skin in the game, orange or otherwise, he will be somewhat muted.
Now you will say, well no, both candidates' mics are muted to a degree, but who is most likely to be affected by the inability to spontaneously interject?
Will it be Joe Biden with his Spontaneous interjections?
No, Joe Biden's interjections come via big tech impediment and censorship which the Supreme Court recently adjudicated remains permissible.
If you're watching us on YouTube, we're going to be with you for about 10 minutes.
We're talking about Tucker in Australia and some of his remarks about the way that the pharmaceutical industry funds big media.
We're going to be looking at some of those hearings and some of the revelations of the hearings that people within
the FDA had doubts about the way that the process was undertaken,
the lack of effective, efficient clinical trialing, and certainly transparency when it came to the impact of
the vaccines in particular when it comes to market.
Can I say this? I mean, can I say that on YouTube?
Listen, become an Awakened Wonder, guys.
This is the time to do it.
I'm making a lot more content for you guys.
Scott Dogg, for example, an Awakened Wonder right now on Locals is saying he'll interject with shit in his pants.
That is the kind of insight you're likely to get, but these debates tonight probably will be...
Of as little value as the debates and conversations in our country, the UK, because similarly, there are interests both ulterior and transcendent that ultimately manage and manipulate the political process.
But when it comes to CNN's management of this debate, the exclusion of Bobby Kennedy, and the muting of candidates' mics when they're not talking, I wonder who will be more affected by that?
Will it be Donald Trump, that Berserker in discourse?
Or will it be Joe Biden?
Although we're holding a poll on this.
Which Joe Biden will we meet tonight?
Will it be murmuring, meandering, senile Joe?
Or will it be bullet in a china shop, straight out of the gate, charged up and adrenalized, brought to you by Adderall Joe Biden?
Whichever one it is, CNN has got an angle and the legacy media machine has got a way to control this debate.
Even while suggesting to you that it's a demonstration that everything's fine, the system's working.
Keep, keep relaxing, keep trusting, keep allowing them to penetrate with their ideas.
But not just ideas, let's have a look at this.
If we go behind the podiums, you can see two green lights.
When they're on, they signal- Now look, this is how transparent we are.
We're even showing you, behind the podiums, two green lights.
Oh, okay!
There's green lights there, are there?
Well, how do the green lights work?
To the candidate, his microphone is on.
When the green lights are off, they signal to the candidate, his microphone is off.
Now I want to give you... A bit like a traffic signal.
Green light, go!
Ambulight, speed up or slow down, depending on your personality type.
And red light, believe everything that the system says to you.
Here we are on CNN, being transparent about CNN.
Will we be transparent about why we are inundating, inundated with advertising from the pharmaceutical industry?
Maybe not.
Will we explain that one particular candidate will be disadvantaged considerably by the old muting the mic system?
Will we be explaining why Bobby Kennedy's not even participating in this debate?
Of course we won't, and it's all in the sweet name of transparency, folks.
A sense of what it will look like for viewers at home if a candidate whose microphone is off interrupts a candidate whose microphone is on.
So I'm standing at one podium, and I'll ask What would that be like?
I can't even begin to imagine what a muted microphone might look like.
Phil to come in and take the other podium.
And so let's say I'm answering a question.
My light is green and I'm speaking.
Phil's microphone is off and his green light... That's right.
There's Phil.
Phil's just standing there muted.
...are not illuminated.
He's going to interrupt me as I'm speaking and this is what it will sound like.
My volume remains constant while Phil's interrupt... What Phil's saying is, you can't trust the system!
Don't trust anybody!
Oh my god!
They lied to us throughout the pandemic!
Are you looking at the information that's coming out right now?
Have you seen Morning Joe present Anthony Fauci as if he's still some kind of martyr?
Wake up!
Wake up!
Stop!
Revolt!
Revolt!
They're coming for us!
They're going to create various crises and show... Is that what you were saying Phil?
No, actually I was agreeing with you that this debate is transparent and a demonstration that democracy is working fine.
...can be difficult to understand.
Let's try the opposite.
My microphone is now off.
I see.
What if you can do it either way?
Yes, I suppose both candidates will be equally affected by these measures.
I get it.
Victor's microphone is off, and he's going to interrupt me.
My volume remains constant while Victor's inter- here! Phil! Phil! Oh my god! We lied during the whole
pandemic! Do you remember the whole ivermectin thing? Oh god, what are we doing? What are we
doing? How are we ever gonna break free of this machine that we're participating in, Phil?
Phil, I love you! Kiss me, Phil!
Sorry, I didn't get any of that.
Corruption can be difficult to understand.
CNN's production team has shared this demonstration with the campaigns earlier today, and we're sharing it with you, our viewers, so everyone fully understands how tomorrow night will work.
Now, we should note, by agreeing to participate in this debate, both campaigns and candidates have also agreed to abide by these rules.
The CNN Presidential Debate airs live tomorrow night at 9 p.m.
Eastern.
And you will be able to join us on Rumble where I'll be watching along and because I'm English, I'll be exhausted.
I'll be caffeinated up with 1775.
I'll be reading the art of the deal.
Is this a deal?
Is this the deal?
I'll be trying to bring a spiritual dimension.
Are we too attached?
Are we too attached?
Are we going off way, way off track?
Should we be awakening at a deeper level?
Is this system Really gonna serve us if we not learn that we can't bloody trust anybody at this post?
Donald Trump certainly demanding a bit of a biochemical analysis before proceeding.
There he is on his very own true social.
Drug test for crooked Joe Biden.
I would also immediately agree to one.
Of course he would.
Of course he would.
So which, let's know, we've put a poll out, which Joe Biden will show up?
Let me know in the poll.
Ah, yeah, and on the subject of who will be mostly affected by microphones being muted, forget the Clinton-Trump debates or the Biden-Trump debates.
Think of some of the primaries and the way that what Trump did, part of Trump's appeal of course, is that he's quick-witted and he quips and stuff and he seems like a kind of normal, albeit connected, quick person.
Even if you're like, you know, You're sort of like, this is just another billionaire property magnate.
Can we really, you know, I know all of those questions.
Can anyone make a difference within these systems?
There's all sorts of questions.
I've got all those questions.
Believe me, I've got all those questions.
The important ones are, why is Bobby Kennedy not in the debate when neither of those people are actually, they're only the presumptive nominees for their party, aren't they?
the regulations by which they are excluding Bobby Kennedy would also exclude Trump and
Biden because they haven't had their conventions or what do you call it, conferences or your
parties having, you know, they've not announced the nominee yet. So the whole thing is bloody
extraordinary. And as I say, an interesting example of how the system works, just in a
kind of a molecular level, this person is excluded altogether, this person will be controlled
and muted to a degree, this person will be high as a kite and pumped for the occasion
In a minute we'll show you that bit where during the last debates the subject of Hunter Biden's laptop came up and Joe Biden just plainly blithely said listen This is a Russian piece of misinformation.
It still goes on, that stuff.
Even Donald Trump's baffled.
We'll be showing you that later, as well as some stuff from Tucker over there in Australia and some amazing propaganda from Morning Joe and Fauci.
You're gonna love it.
It's a really, really good show we've got coming up for you.
Let's just have a look at how Trump typically deploys his ability to interject.
An ability you won't be seeing when you watch us.
Hopefully you'll watch along with me.
later tonight.
That's a funny person.
And what they're doing is, like, what tonight's debate's about, I predict, are the presentation of openness, the presentation of democracy, the presentation of order, but a very carefully curated or at least managed event.
But we'll see, won't we?
We'll work it out as we go along.
Certainly the debates in my country have been pretty fascinating.
Here's a guy that buys a house for $179,000.
He sells it to a lobbyist who's probably here for $380,000 and then legislation is passed.
You tell me about this guy.
This is what we're going to have as president.
As the great Shane Gillis commented, it's just not fair putting these people up against Trump.
Have a look at what went down in our country, where we have a similarly managed democracy, where we have a similarly compliant media.
This is what passes as a sort of valve, as a moment of civilian recalcitrance, just hearing a British everyman express a little disdain that what we're being invited to
consider democracy these days is two candidates that are
ultimately the same and the the air assumptive is
Offering us change in our country. It's Kirstein, a centralist sort of establishment figure a man who openly admits
He prefers Davos over Westminster. Have a look at this moment where sort of like they've got an English guy to
sort of make it This is the sort of this is what you're offered. Well, you
this must be a democracy We do have free speech because look someone's getting away
with saying this check it out Even though I completely agree with what this bloke's
saying. Mr. Sunak, I think you made a fair job of being Chancellor
But you're a pretty mediocre Prime Minister [BLANK_AUDIO]
Sir Keir, I think... Oh, I think you're a pretty mediocre Prime Minister.
This is what it's like.
Our country, everything's like a little bit different.
Mr Starmer, we don't much care for you either, sir.
For example, it seems like you at least cooperated with the incarceration of Julian Assange without trial and were trying to facilitate his extradition and possible execution in the United States of America.
Your strings are being pulled by very senior members of the Labour Party.
Are you two really the best we've got to be the next Prime Minister of our great country?
Yeah, now get that off your chest!
Now go and vote for one of them!
And, as in your country, there's a person notable by their absence in these debates.
Of course, this is a head-to-head of the two main parties, but in an actual democracy, with actual freedom, you would be able to decide, wouldn't you, that, well actually, why don't we have a radical review of the deep state institutions, the ulterior powers and the transcendent powers, so we can review whether or not we want slightly more significant Change than that have a look in also my country the politicians are gambling and betting against themselves the corruption is so sort of Pathetic and awful and even this story is presented as a kind of example of you see we do root out corruption
When Rishi Sunak marched out into the rain to call the election on May 22nd, unbeknown to him, the seeds of this scandal were planted three days earlier when his own Parliamentary Private Secretary, Craig Williams, walked into a local betting shop and placed a bet on there being a...
Look at these darling people wandering into betting shops, grinning, beaming from ear to ear, voting on democracy.
I suppose the biggest thing is unconsciousness and disconnection.
It's like these systems have nothing to do with our individual lives, isn't it?
It's like there are these planes of reality where institutional power have exchanges, whether that's Nancy Pelosi saying her rather more glamorous high-rolling antics when it comes to investment in big tech, or her husband who obviously doesn't get any insider information from Nancy, or the rather more Sort of parochial and glum gambling of British politicians.
Ey up, seems like there might be an election coming up.
Let's play us a quick bet, shall we?
Might earn myself a few bob on that.
What you get is a sort of a glimpse into this rather ridiculous, outdated, outmoded, redundant world that we should be Moving beyond, but we won't be, will we?
Because bureaucracy seems to be able to continue to reassert its power.
If you're watching us on YouTube, click the link in the description.
We're gonna be talking about a whole bunch of fantastic stuff.
We got some revelations about Pfizer that are extraordinary and excruciating to watch.
My favorite bit is watching Morning Joe talk to Fauci, propaganda live.
And of course, remember, watch us on Rumble tonight at Streaming the debate live and possibly checking in with Bobby Kennedy.
It's quite difficult to manage this stuff.
I'm gonna be in my pajamas.
I'm gonna be high on the 1775 coffee.
Join us for that and click the link in the description.
Join us now for another fantastic 40 minutes on Rumble.
See you in a second.
Have a look at this.
This is...
Fascinating, actually.
Here is the Supreme Court have ruled in favour of Biden, rejecting the challenge that the Biden administration, accusing him of improperly colluding with big tech companies to censor social media posts deemed misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic and other topics.
In the Sixth Read decision, the justices held that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the case.
Justice Samuel Alito dissented, warning in a blistering opinion that America may come to regret the majority ruling.
Yes, because of course, once you've made that ruling, who knows?
Well, I was gonna say, who knows?
Maybe Trump will be in the White House post-November, but maybe they know something we don't!
Maybe in November they know who will be in power.
Let's see how those debates go later.
The plaintiffs have sought an injunction to restrict the administration's ability to coerce social media companies like Facebook and Insta to take down certain posts, arguing the Biden administration used its vast regulatory authority to trample on the First Amendment when it requested the removal of material about COVID-19 vaccines and other topics.
And we will be looking at that in a lot more depth.
We'll be looking at why the media has the position it does, how state bureaucracies function, And we'll also be looking at the fact that individuals are affected by this.
We forget that this is actual human beings' lives.
Rational anarchy on the local chat.
That hat would kill in Florida.
Baby is killing here.
So, let's have a quick word from one of my favourite sponsors, actually, other than 1775, a coffee that I'll be glugging down, by God, there it is, tonight.
Yeah, I did coffee, baby, you radar man on the Rumble Chat.
Thelron, vote fuck.
I mean, yes, I sympathize, baby, I sympathize.
But I also, as you know, I'm forever chanting in the Rosary, and in June, hello, I've got some interesting offers that I can endorse for you now.
And straight after that, we'll be telling you more about Pfizer, the media, and five states suing Pfizer.
It's a brilliant, brilliant story.
See you in a second.
You guys know that I love the HALLO app, and we're very happy that they are one of our sponsors.
I do the rosary every day, but there are a hundred thousand audio prayers and meditations and music and all sorts of things on there.
Now, HALLO are starting their summer Bible study with Jeff Cavins, guest on the show, brilliant scholar and teacher, and Jonathan Rumi, who portrays our Lord and Savior In The Chosen.
This is a Bible study based on the Gospel of John, a beautiful telling of Jesus's divinity as God, with amazing miracles like the wedding at Cana and the feeding of the 5,000, stories that you know well.
Now, if you'd like to join me right now in June for this Bible study, you can by downloading Halo for free.
And if you want to become a subscriber, you can get three months free by using this code, Halo.com forward slash brand.
That's Halo.com forward slash brand.
You get three months free for that.
This is it.
That's the Daily Rosary.
Today, Sorrowful Mysteries.
You can hear old Jonathan on there.
It's magnificent.
In fact, you can choose different people, but I would never be disloyal to Jonathan.
Join us on Hallo.
Click the link in the description.
Back to the content.
Given the extraordinary, bombast, hyperbole and certainty that surrounded what we can now safely refer to as a propaganda campaign at the advent of COVID and as it progressed into medical measures and more serious social measures, it's interesting, isn't it, for us to understand that now five states are suing Pfizer.
Good luck, because Pfizer, of course, as you know, have indemnity, as all vaccine makers do extraordinarily in America.
Here's Bobby Kennedy commenting on that.
Texas, Utah, Utah, I mean, it's not called Utah, Kansas, Mississippi and Louisiana are all suing Pfizer for knowing and concealing that the vaccine may cause myocarditis, pericarditis, or does call it, causes failed pregnancies and deaths.
That's 10% of US The tide is turning.
That is definitely what is happening.
This is Thomas Massey now, who has become a little bit of a folk hero, I would say, because he is that rare breed indeed.
Not necessarily a career politician, but, you know, a politician who can be relied upon to at least raise significant talking points and to do that, most rare of things, represent the interests of the people Against corporate, global and political power, here he is participating in the ongoing hearings around the vaccines, Anthony Fauci's role in the vaccines, the various agencies that were meant to be regulatory but appeared to take on the peculiar role of authoritarian and endorsement agencies.
Ultimately, let's have a look at this, as well as one of the chief vaccine executives from within the FDA admitting that he
himself didn't take boosters.
This is a set of revelations that are so odd to watch unfold and just stay with us for the bit
where Morning Joe reliably tee up Anthony Fauci to continue to propagandize and reframe deep into
this crisis. Let's start with Thomas Massey though. Think about this, right when they were getting the
warnings that myocarditis and pericarditis were real and serious side effects to the vaccine
and they had already agreed, the top scientists at FDA had already agreed to compress the schedule
as much as possible.
Right when they got the message that there were serious side effects, and Peter Marks, instead of telling them, we're going to give you more time to study this, he told them to compress the schedule even more.
They shouldn't have been compressing the schedule, they were telling us that we were following science, that we ought to follow the science, that vaccine hesitancy and circumspection were somehow unpatriotic, conspiratorial and insane.
What was in fact happening is a massive propaganda effort was taking place, real information was being suppressed, people that had concerns were losing their jobs and losing their right to interject.
Doesn't it all seem increasingly ridiculous?
We're moving from the hysteria of the pandemic era Into the hysteria of an election without any pause for reflection, without any kind of reckoning.
Of course, these, I suppose, represent a kind of reckoning, but do any of you imagine that there's going to be a scenario where Antony Fauci is jailed or where we're told, my God, we mishandled this terribly.
The whole idea that you should stay in your home or you should get vaccinated to protect other people.
Was risible.
The fact that young people in general and young men in particular now, it looks like, were urged to have vaccines or gene therapies, as now most people insist on calling them, was dangerous, hectic, ridiculous.
When are we actually going to reach a point where we can see what this is?
This was, in real time, the warping of political power, the warping of corporate power.
It's convenient, in fact, that it was called Operation Warp Speed because the whole thing was pretty warped.
They said that compressing the schedule was not possible.
He fired them.
He took them off the job.
He assigned them to other duties.
The top vaccine officials who've been there for 30 years, taken off the job because they wanted more time.
You've been there 30 years, right?
Yeah, about 30 years, and we're in the middle of a medical crisis.
It seems like it.
That's why it's so difficult to fire you right now.
We're compressing you right out of a job.
The study of the effects of the vaccines and they were told that they needed to do this quickly because they needed to be mandated.
There you go.
Let's have a look now at our former FDA vaccine deputy, Dr. Kraus, who's now Unpacking, and it seems sort of kind of incremental this, but over the course of his testimony he reveals that young men were subject to a level of risk that in any other vaccine product or medical product would have seen it withdrawn from the shelves, not hyperbically propagandized and evangelized for zealously, not used as a political tool, not used as a tool of authoritarianism, and right at the end of the clip he admits that he himself didn't take the booster.
It's difficult I think, to hold in your mind the amount of information we're invited to understand.
But this is the lens I'm trying to use.
Just remember, a few years ago, you were told, take this medication.
People were shamed.
There was just a holistic campaign to incorporate all media.
It was literally global, as I suppose would be understandable in a pandemic situation.
But now, as we incrementally, not from lunatics, fringe figures, maniacs in housecoats, but from Sort of bureaucrats and scientists and people from within the FDA hear information that would have been censored online, use that to help you understand what is likely happening now.
Of course, give yourself a pat on the back if you can get your arm round there, if the spike protein site isn't still inflamed, but more than that, recognise that this kind of information enables you to view media and political power with a new degree of, I would say, cynicism, perhaps.
Myocarditis occurred most predominantly in the various studies in young men as you say age 16 and 17 but there were increased rates higher in men than in women going up also to much older ages although not as high as the youngest so I don't know if it's necessarily a puberty issue because this also affected people as they got older, but that was where we saw it most frequently.
And the rates of myocarditis in these young men was quite high.
In the early studies, it appeared to be around 1 in 5,000 vaccinees.
We still don't understand why that was the case.
What we luckily found was that most of these cases were mild, and yet there were some cases that were not mild.
And of course, there were also some cases where, many cases where if one's diagnosed
with myocarditis, of course, that changes a young man's life because he'll probably
then avoid being in sports and will still have...
I like that detail because in a way that gives us a chance to unpack the individual reality
that many people endured during the pandemic.
And of course there's almost limitless variety within that.
You know, some young man's got myocarditis now, he's not doing sport, people are not attending funerals, people are not witnessing the birth of children, small businesses are collapsed in, there's a massive wealth transfer taking place.
Almost the scale of this It's so vast that it's impossible to digest it, but when you see this sort of rather humble and perhaps humbled former FDA employee breaking down the impact of myocarditis, even if it is only one unnecessary case of myocarditis in 5,000 men, I mean that's still a pretty high number.
If that was any other product it would be withdrawn.
The fact that they were granted indemnity prior to this endeavor and have long had that kind of relationship with the state, All helps me to reach the kind of conclusion that what we require from all of these hearings is something kind of tangible.
And it's odd to go from this crisis to the kind of hysteria that surrounds an election without ever really being able to say, hold on, why would you vote for anybody that was involved in this?
Why are we so willing to accept this narrow fissure of democracy?
Why are we willing to accept that?
No wonder people are having a kind of reflexive rejection, like a kind of peristalsis, squeezing out the turd of the old administration and willing to accept all manner of alternative political systems rather than deal with an establishment that's inflicted this upon nation after nation.
Some continued medical follow-up.
So we don't understand it.
It's most common after the second dose of vaccine.
We found, luckily, that it did not appear to be as frequent as children got younger.
And it also did not appear to occur with anywhere near as high a frequency with third and subsequent doses of vaccine.
Mr Krause, I want to ask, is natural immunity real?
Absolutely.
This is the sort of thing that would have got you censored, of course, from meta sites and possibly even YouTube.
This is the kind of thing that we spent the whole COVID period tiptoeing around.
It's odd, isn't it?
Because when we're talking about this, I try not to sort of get high on my own supply of remembering that it wasn't any kind of foresight, actually, just inquisitiveness and reading information.
The very kind of information, by the way, that they're continuing to try to censor and will be able to censor because the Supreme Court has, of course, as you now know, permitted the Biden administration to continue to control information and to censor big tech to continue to collaborate in a way that looked like it was going to be made illegal because it bloody well should be illegal it's unconstitutional at least so it won't be this next time will it be bird flu will it be nuclear war will it just be an increase of ongoing wars intercontinental wars who knows what the legitimization will be next time but the machinery for censorship and the mentality that created this crisis is still in place these
Even though I would never doubt the integrity of someone like Thomas Massie, these I feel like will amount to kind of show trials.
Let me know in the chat if you think that something fruitful and significant enough will emerge from this procedure.
Absolutely.
Is it also, does natural immunity exist if you've been exposed to COVID?
Exposed to but not infected?
Well, infected.
Yes, so people who've been previously infected with COVID or previously had the COVID-19 disease were shown in a number of very good studies to have reduced incidence of subsequent COVID.
And in fact, the protection of a previous episode of COVID was greater than the protection that was received from two doses of vaccine.
It turned out that if you had Now, look, they're still doing a little bit of propaganda.
It's very difficult to let go.
It's almost like they're talking about an argument that they've had with their spouse.
I was still right, though, that it's best to have natural immunity and a couple of vaccines.
Oh, so you will have taken boosters yourself then, huh?
If you both had COVID and vaccine, then you were protected even a little bit better.
It's like science and natural immunity.
We're the best of friends.
We're working together as a team.
We're the original log couple.
It's natural immunity and gene therapy.
But there is no doubt that a previous episode of COVID induces immunity that is protective.
So it's not some conspiracy?
No, it's not a conspiracy.
Dr. Krauss, did you take a booster?
I did not.
I don't take those.
I mean, they are pretty dangerous.
I saw what they were doing to young, healthy athletes.
What are they going to do to a guy like me?
No thank you.
Yeah, on Legacy Media, it's quite possible to watch a kind of bright, breezy, cheerful news item about heart attacks, as if it's like some new trend, as if it's Pogs or Pokemon Go or something.
Talking about heart disease in the young, it's a new sensation.
Heart disease in young Hey, why wait to be an old person?
Or obese?
Or diabetic?
You could have a heart attack and still be an Olympian!
What I like is the sort of pose of bafflement that accompanies all of this.
Look how far into this legacy media report you get without saying, have you asked these people if by any chance they've taken one or more vaccines?
It's pretty staggering to watch unfold.
What is causing this?
We're back with our ongoing heart health series with a new way of thinking about heart attacks.
Doctors say they're seeing an alarming number of... Maybe we should think about them as fun!
Seemingly healthy patients having heart attacks and those patients are getting younger and younger.
This story is going to blow you away because research shows that more than 10% of heart attack patients had no known risk factors such as obesity or smoking.
I mean, in a way this is hilarious and brilliant, but this is sort of also the way that the legacy media functions even through innocuous soft power in introducing and normalising ideas that should be galling and terrifying.
Hey!
Heart attacks are on the increase.
It's not just for fatties out there and people always on the fags and the boos.
Healthy young people are having heart attacks too.
So get used to that and if you see it, just go, oh yeah, I saw that on the Today Show.
Heart attacks for young people.
It's like having Crocs with those badges in it.
It's kind of cool.
Now there's a group of doctors at Mount Sinai here in New York City tracking patients to see if they can uncover the new risk factors behind this trend.
What are the risk factors behind these changes?
I'm like, I suddenly feel like one of them kids at school that's mmm, mmm, that Martin Prince from The Simpsons, mmm.
Oh please pick me teacher, please pick me!
I think I have an idea what could be causing all this!
Trying to unravel the mystery of young heart attacks?
Dr. Deepak Bhat, Director of Mount Sinai Foster Heart Hospital in New York City.
Here he is, just trying to undo it.
Why don't you... I've got an idea.
Type MRNA spike protein.
Cleavage site.
DARPA, EcoHealth Alliance, NIIH, put in there Wuhan Institute of Virology, put into your search engine Anthony Fauci, put dual purpose weapons research, put into that thing inflammation of heart tissue cause, put in there propaganda campaign, put in there never trust government again question mark.
Suri, I'm wondering should I ever trust the government again?
Well, actually, seeing as how I've got some pretty lucrative contacts with the government, I think you should maybe shut the f- In fact, I've already given this information to the gov- Ding dong!
Who's that at the door, Suri, you bastard?
He's looking into patients presenting with no known risk factors, like diabetes, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol.
I think they're- Yeah, no, um, no kno- No known risk factors.
What?
Could be causing all this!
A lot of reasons for that.
One probably has to do with the obesity epidemic.
Yep, yep, people are fat, so big food, they're feeding us food that they know is bad for us.
If the people just stopped making profit, if we ate food that was grown locally or hunted or harvested or farmed locally, yeah, yeah, that would be better for us.
But corporations have co-opted that.
Cool, cool, got that, got that.
But it could also be other things.
What?
Other things?
Another potential clue?
Long smoldering inflammation.
Hmm, what's causing a long smoldering, almost quite sexy smoldering, inflammation?
We'll get to the bottom of this, won't we Scoob?
Hi Scoob!
Yikes!
I'm talking about inflammation in the arteries supplying blood to the heart.
It might lead to the plaque in that artery to act up, in fact, to rupture a blood clot
to form.
If that blocks the blood flow in that artery, that's what causes-
It's interesting that cardiologists were among the first people during the pandemic to openly
speak out along with vaccine makers, inventors, people like Robert Malone, people like Asim
Malhotra, cardiologist Robert Malone, vaccine maker, all these people that were suddenly
You're a conspiracy theorist, you're a whack job, all the people that we're invited to hate.
Do you really think Still, look like Jay Bhattacharya, Nick Malone, Peter McCulloch.
You pick your own hero during the pandemic period.
Do you really think that they're bad people for whatever reason we were told they were bad?
I'm among them simply for passing on information I heard elsewhere.
Or do you think it might be because when they do research on their computer, they don't come up with stuff like, hmm, it could be plaque.
They come up with stuff like, it could be Pfizer.
And that's why they're being sued all the way across America.
Pfizer's a heart attack or heart muscle damage.
The cause of inflammation in seemingly healthy people like Matthias, who are not obese and don't smoke, is not yet clear.
Causing this to happen to you, Matthias, we've got to get to the bottom of this without ever indicting a major pharmaceutical company as we continue the investigation.
When you think about it now, the sort of old phenomena of collapsing athletes, because this has been extraordinary, because billions of people have taken this medication, it would seem to me, as a layperson, that probably in all likelihood there's a new almost genus of heart condition that's emerging among healthy people because they put their hearts under a different kind of stress than, say, really old people or Really obese people or people that have got pre-existing conditions.
So whatever it is that's in that spike protein when it migrates to the heart tissue causing myocarditis or pericarditis, it means that the usual stress that athletes experience or young healthy people experience is not able to be endured and perhaps it somehow interfaces and intersects with hormones as well because it seems that menstruating women and pregnant women and pubescent or young males have a different experience of it.
But hey!
I'm not a scientist!
And we've got to follow the science!
And why don't we follow all the scientists out of the FDA where they're all being fucking fired because anyone who had principles or objections was fired so that the propaganda campaign could continue.
Don't forget to vote for someone you can trust tonight, guys!
Don't forget to vote for someone you can trust off the back of that debate.
Thankfully, we do have people that are articulate and therefore vilified as sort of like, you know, propagandists and figures of hatred, like Tucker Carlson, who just lightheartedly and joyously explains to us why these kind of things KEEP FUCKING HAPPENING!
A media should be, like, holding these people to the fire on that.
Or the vax injuries and deaths, which are manifold, they're everywhere.
Are you joking?
And in, like, countries that actually believe in science, and there are a few in Europe, they're looking at the... Every vaccine causes injuries, every single one.
One of my children was injured by a flu vaccine.
This is known.
In the United States, we're not allowed to sue.
We can sue makers of playground equipment, totally fine.
We can sue anybody for anything.
Gun manufacturers, you cannot sue vaccine manufacturers.
And every vaccine causes injuries, every single one, and there's a database publicly available in the United States that shows you how many.
And the COVID vax, the mRNA vax from Pfizer, has caused more injuries, self-reported injuries, than all the previous vaccination campaigns for the last 50 years combined.
And no one in the media has written a story about it!
Because... Well, there are a couple of reasons.
One is that Pfizer is one of the largest advertisers on television in the United States.
And the point is not to sell the pro... And I worked in television my whole life.
So I can... This is not speculation.
The point is not to sell some weird drug for rheumatoid arthritis to TV viewers.
Because people can't prescribe their own drugs.
No, that's not the point.
This is not a retail sales pitch.
This is an insur... It's interesting because in the back of your mind, haven't you always known that there was something odd about those adverts?
Like, we all talk about them.
They're a staple of stand-up comedy.
Are you impotent?
Are you old?
Do you need Viagra?
Have you got a heart disease?
Are you pissing yourself?
Are you thinking about criticizing the government?
Are you awakening right now and starting to realize that the media doesn't exist in order to interrogate power but to amplify and to support power?
Are you realizing that the reason that authoritarianism is on the rise is because there's a natural tendency now towards decentralization via open communication?
Do you see now that there's the rise of populist figures because people are starting to recognize that popular figures that have oratory abilities can reach large numbers of people And the whole reason that the Supreme Court has just enabled Biden to continue to be able to censor big tech companies and in particular social media companies is because now, otherwise, there would be waves of movements and uprisings and protests and everywhere you look there would be oppositions and counter-narratives and the ability to oppose war and to oppose bills and to oppose movements and to oppose almost any centralized idea.
Are you beginning to awaken that?
Do not take this medicine.
Make all spiritual awakening.
It's policy that the drug makers are buying with the big media companies.
We're your biggest advertiser.
Maybe if we have a lot of vaccine injuries from a brand new product, you won't say too much.
And they don't.
I think that's completely corrupt and shameful.
And I have to say, you know, I was I was fired over a year ago, so I don't have to worry about this or be defensive about it because I don't have a job.
So there is a certain freedom in unemployment.
And so I sympathize with you guys who work for these companies that are like truly corrupt and you sort of know that but you don't want to deal with it because you've got kids and a mortgage.
I get it.
I've been there.
but let's just be... weird isn't it because that's kind of what it comes down to. Remember when we
saw the former FDA vaccine director speaking you get a glimpse of what the pandemic was like
personally. Oh no, think of a young athlete, a young guy who's like, you know, maybe I'll be
a basketball player one day.
Like, getting that jab and all of a sudden he's got myocarditis and doesn't exercise no more and just another dream falls away and then think of the individuals that make up the media and then just think of this, we're all just human beings and human individuals operating within weird, somewhat arbitrary, but definitely corrupted systems and there's this pretense that they can't be Radically altered in a variety of ways.
There's a pretence that there aren't wonderful things within tradition and there's a pretence that there aren't brilliant things available to us through scrutiny and analysis and recognising that certain institutions that may have been in place for years and years could do with a radical reckoning, reform, undertaking or opposition.
There's this kind of Sense that we could just continue to vacillate between two corrupt parties all the while we're just being drained and not addressing the key fact here.
Power is coalescing, coagulating, a bit like plaque in an artery, as a matter of fact.
And if we don't do something to stop this, which means I find myself in the peculiar position of saying, do you know what?
Just whenever you watch it, when you're looking at politics in your country, if there is anyone who seems to be being censored or shut down, Probably that might be the way to go.
Because whatever they're saying about that person.
Oh, they're hateful.
They're evil.
It won't be that.
That won't be the reason they're stopping them.
You have the compliance of the media class that Tucker has just articulated.
It comes down to individuals.
Then you have this kind of odd moral and spiritual affinity that people will go, oh, I just have to support the Labour Party because it must mean something.
I have to support the Dems.
It must mean something because otherwise my whole life was just a kind of, I was just duped.
I was just a sort of a willing dope, a rube, sat there taking on untrue points.
People don't want to accept that.
Now I'm really not saying one political party is better than the other.
You can make those kind of assessments for yourself.
People seem to do it and seem to have various affiliations.
What's plainly required is a reckoning at depth that includes An assessment of the deep state's power, the ability to regulate and control information, where these kind of peculiar administrative bodies are able to assert control.
I'm talking about your WHO's, your NATO's, and in particular financial institutions like the IMF and the World Bank, how they manage and manipulate power on a global scale that means that whoever you vote for, you're gonna get someone, unless it's a radical kind of berserker type person, and perhaps you're right, perhaps Trump is one of those, perhaps as well as his obvious personal charisma, that's what draws you to them.
But I would say beyond that, we have to be willing to recognise that people that are excluded from debates are definitely the kind of people that should be in the debates.
People that are being censored and shut down, I'm sure they're not perfect, but they ain't being shut down because they're racist or something.
They don't care about that.
They don't care about that.
Like Tucker, I've worked within these institutions and I can tell you first hand, increasingly I recognise that there is no moral centre there.
None at all.
To be honest, everybody else knows what it is.
Everyone else knows how corrupt you are.
And so there's a reason they have contempt for you.
I'm just saying.
Thanks, Taka.
Remember how much he was ridiculed after the Putin interview?
It was mad, wasn't it?
All of that.
You might not be familiar with the name of Ursula von der Leyen.
She's a significant figure.
She's the head of the EU.
If she's in your mind at all, it might be because of the text exchanges between her and Albert Baller, where billions of dollars of vaccines were bought and then wasted She's the head of the European Commission there.
It sort of says there.
The bloc's powerful executive body.
She's going to just carry on doing her job.
Now that's the kind of bureaucrat and the kind of power that isn't going to be impacted by the elections in your nation.
Unless, extraordinarily, we do move to an era Well, we are, oddly, more isolationist.
The idea behind these kind of EU's and UN's and NATO's is we can't have any more world wars, not those kind of vivid ones.
Let's have subtle, insidious wars where people are subject to authoritarian control under a new banalised bureaucracy where people are shut down and told not to think or ask questions and they can just watch news reports about heart attacks in the young and never go, I think we know what's caused that, don't we?
So, I would say that Ursula von der Leyen's incredible power is significant.
The rise of patriotism, nationalism, first nationism, if you want to call it that, it's bloody obvious, isn't it?
People are sick and tired of this.
People feel that they want more control over their borders, probably feel that they want more control generally, and I would say that perhaps a less interventionist world, where powers, anglophonic nations, Western European nations, didn't get involved in a bunch of disputes, fund them, didn't To exploit nations for their resources didn't cause crisis and therefore mass migrations of populations would be an enviable goal and a way of perhaps marrying together the evident popularity of border control across the world democratically.
It's just one.
There isn't a political party now that's saying, oh you should have loads of people and any of them that are are participating in an extraordinarily dangerous game, that's plain.
What we clearly need to see is an ability for the will of ordinary people to be exacted, and you just have to start listening to this stuff, and maybe First Nationism is a pretty positive thing, because the alternative, this kind of mad bureaucracy, sure as hell ain't bloody well working.
Because it affords this kind of extraordinary triumvirate to flourish.
I'm looking here at the story of Pfizer executives being directly involved in the censorship of Twitter, as it was then, in conjunction with the Biden administration.
Let's get into this story.
So Jay Bacharia, friend of the show, friend in general, says newly released internal Twitter documents show collaboration between a Biden proxy and a Pfizer board member in 2021 to force Twitter to censor large accounts critical of the COVID vax.
Twitter was concerned it would lose Section 230 protection if it didn't compliance posted by Alex Berenson.
Let's have a look at what Section 230 is.
Crucial to those companies for the near total immunity it gave them against lawsuits from users.
Uh-oh!
Twitter took threats to it seriously.
We will always be proactive and vigilant about protecting 230.
Lauren Culbertson, the company's then head of United States Public Policy, wrote in 21.
Okay, let's have a deeper look at this story and the emerging fact that Pfizer We're directly involved in the control of information that was accessible to you on platforms like X. The Twitter files reveal it happened there.
Do you imagine that Mark Zuckerberg, after directly writing to Anthony Fauci, wasn't involved in similar censorship?
He admitted, of course, publicly, I think on Joe Rogan and maybe on Lex Friedman, that they did censor true information.
What this is, is the beginning of us beginning to understand, this is the beginning of us understanding, excuse me, that It's not like Pfizer control the government in the way they control media.
There are such deep financial relationships that there's just an inertia towards Pfizer's favour.
No, they're directly involved.
Directly involved in saying, we'd prefer that wasn't published.
In July 2021, a senior Pfizer board member secretly began working with a Biden administration operative to suppress criticism of COVID vaccines on X newly released internal document show.
Top officials viewed the man, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, the Pfizer director, and Andy Slavitt, the operative who had officially left a senior White House post just weeks before, as speaking for the administration in their censorship demands the document show.
So what did Andy Slavitt, He left the White House and went to work where?
He was at Twitter and he'd just been at the White House.
Amazing.
I mean, I suppose that's just how it works.
Again, it comes down to individuals, like Tucker was talking about.
Journalists of, you know, you've got to protect your job.
You're not going to write some pain in the ass story going, oh man, this is difficult for me to write.
But Pfizer, mmm, ain't good news.
I'm sorry to tell you.
Or the way that we have to confront that you can't just go, oh, the pandemic, it was ages ago.
I'm bored of it now.
People are still dealing with that.
We're going to be dealing with it for a long time, economically, socially, psychologically, and certainly in terms of some of the power structures that are set up.
Look at this recent Supreme Court ruling.
We're going to have to face the facts, and the facts are this, that we bloody well gave up too much power when we were exploited to an unprecedented degree.
New documents Raise constitutional and legal concerns about the Biden administration's social media censorship effort, as well as Pfizer's role in banning criticism of a product that made up almost half of its sales in 2021.
I'll tell you what, I wish I could ban criticism.
I wish I could do that.
I wish I could call up social media sites and go, oh, I'd prefer if people didn't say that.
I'd prefer if this documentary didn't get made.
I'd prefer if there wasn't a month of story.
You know, This isn't something that's afforded to individuals.
It's certainly not something that's afforded to dissenting individuals, but by God, is it afforded to the powerful?
And it's just been further legitimized, as you're well aware if you were watching the show a little earlier.
So, within days, is that the right one?
Excuse me.
Yeah, this is it, isn't it?
In July 2021, am I here now?
No, I'm here.
Excuse me.
Within days, the Supreme Court is expected to decide Murphy v. Missouri, a landmark lawsuit over the administration's efforts to control debate on social media.
Control debate.
Even that's not aggressive enough, is it?
It's censor.
It's not control debate, it's control reality.
They're controlling reality, not debate.
The new documents provide crucial perspective on the Missouri case, showing how far would-be censors went in 2021 to prop up public confidence.
In the Covid jabs.
The documents also show the power the White House had over Twitter, which badly wanted to avoid confrontation with it.
Isn't that staggering?
So far we've already had Kennedy, who's by the way not going to be debating tonight, I wonder why, saying that five states are suing Pfizer.
Then we've had Tucker, a former media insider, explaining how it works.
We've seen people from within the FDA saying they, at the time, were advising... Oh my God, and we haven't even got... Did we get to the bloody... Have we seen Morning Joe yet?
Oh my God.
Oh my God, we've not even seen Morning Joe.
We've not even seen Anthony Fauci on Morning Joe yet.
This is culminative.
You wait till you get to this.
You're not gonna believe it.
You're not gonna believe it.
So look at what is happening now, is what I'm saying.
This isn't some sort of nostalgia piece.
Oh, do you remember the pandemic?
Things was crazy back then.
I was making Jack Daniels sipping whiskey out of an oak barrel.
Still happening now.
Because what the propaganda machine is doing now is like, whoa, how do we re-evaluate this?
I'll tell you how!
Let's pretend that everyone was just trying their hardest and we all make mistakes.
They won't afford you that as an individual!
You certainly shouldn't be granting it to entire bloody governments!
Let's have a look at Steve Kirsch, who of course we've had on the show, before we get into how the propaganda machine is still rolling, baby.
This is Steve Kirsch, who, remember, Was a facilitated, an Australian whistleblower, New Zealand whistleblower, who said, whoa, wait a minute, there seem to be some distinctions between the batches of various medications and it could be killing up to 35 million.
You know, like, this is where it comes down to, did that vaccine kill more people than it saved?
Yes or, like, what do you think?
Yes or no?
You can see the way the wind's blowing.
Wow, this is how professionals do it.
Pfizer board member gets the White House to tell tech companies to censor harmful effects of their vaccine.
So they can continue to injure and kill people.
The Biden White House doesn't seem to have a problem with that.
How can we take the debate seriously?
But remember, tune in tonight.
I've already got... Get your coffee ready.
Get your 1775 ready for that debate tonight.
Okay, let's have a look at... This is my favourite thing.
I've been excited about this all day long.
I've been thinking about this.
Because this is Morning Joe interviewing Antony Fauci.
Look at this!
And in your minds, like for a minute, like, Paul, Let the scales fall from your eyes and watch what's happening.
Joe is not interrogating Anthony Fauci.
This is not opposition.
This is what this morning Joe interview with Anthony Fauci is.
It should be, what the fucking hell was coming on mate?
What were you doing?
What were you facilitating?
Instead it's like, can you take this opportunity to hit us with what you want us to believe now?
The key thing for you to bear in mind is, we now know how much Anthony Fauci knew at the beginning.
We've already seen in today's show that they suppressed information about myocarditis, that they compressed it, that they didn't reveal it, that they had indemnity, that Anthony Fauci suppressed and supported natural origin over lab leak theory, that they were financially involved.
I mean, like, Look at the opportunity that's been afforded to this guy.
Look at the heft and freight and weight of the machine being put behind the juggernaut, so they continue to roll forward, so it can blow through the November elections, like it'll blow through the elections in our country.
Do you really think that you're gonna wake up in the UK on July the 5th and be like, oh, there's been some change!
There's been real change!
It's not change.
It's same.
You are not offered change.
You are offered same.
Here's Morning Joe.
Willingly shilling for the establishment, and on the basis of the evidence of today, supporting wide-scale global death.
Let's get into that, shall we?
We're talking about the first pandemic since 1918, 1919.
The body language of Morning Joe tells you that this is a cosy, compliant, convivial, collegiate exchange.
Hey buddy, how's it going?
So, what do you want me to tell people to believe on MSNBC today?
How should we frame this favourably for you?
And, you know, we often talk, Doctor, about the five, go for four.
Oh, the fog of war.
We often talk about it, don't we?
That fog of war, like all the wars we've been in.
Oh, it's not us, is it?
It's innocent American people and people around the world and Ukrainian people.
And we support those wars, and by God do we support them.
But it wasn't COVID a type of war, though, and couldn't we sort of reframe all of the lying and treachery and deceit and propaganda as kind of errors that you might make while facing heavy artillery?
Do you think people would buy that?
They won't buy that, will they?
It's too crazy.
It's too much of a ridiculous lie.
There's too much information out the bucket.
Let's try it.
This pandemic was a war of its own kind with, you know, over a million people dying.
Yeah, it might be over that number, my friend.
We've had estimates of up to 75 million.
But, you know, it's difficult to keep track of it because people are even changing the way they track excess deaths these days.
And we're not for insurance companies having to change the way that they organize their premiums.
We probably wouldn't even have that information.
Because why did insurance companies have to do that?
Because people were dying unexpectedly.
What is causing this?
Maybe we can get the Today Show to have a look at it and heart attack the fun new trend among the young.
And I'm just curious how frustrating it is to you that people will go back and pick up something that you may have said in March of 2020.
Tell us about your frustration, buddy.
Tell us about the frustration.
Let's not focus on the frustration of a young, aspiring athlete who's got myocarditis now, slumped in front of a TV, drinking Bud Light to stay healthy.
Forget that frustration.
Forget the frustration of your small businesses collapse.
Tell us about your frustration that people are now onto your propaganda.
And let's frame that as a sort of war fog together, shall we, old chum?
Something that another health official or a politician may have said later in that year, whether it's about masks or vaccines or anything, we did- Oh, masks and vaccines are all that stuff that we were
willing to shame and kill people.
Masks and vaccines and six feet and whether or not it came from a lab or those armadillo
creatures pentenegalings or whatever the hell they were called.
All of that.
Let's just put that in the past, shall we?
No, none of us knew where this was going.
You acted like you knew.
You seemed pretty confident at the time!
I said, remember?
Vaccines!
Vaccines!
This is the best day of our lives!
Woo!
Come on!
Let's do it again!
Hip-hop versions!
Versions of vaccine songs aimed at kids!
Kids!
Vaccines aimed at people of different sexual orientations!
Vaccines for everybody!
It was not like it was... Look, this is... Just remember, it wasn't this.
All right, guys, this is pandemic.
We're all surprised because we've not been in this position before.
We're not sure what to do, so we're going to keep an honest and open dialogue going.
Thank God for the miracle of social media, because experts from around the world, get your opinions out now so we can organize together.
And in the marketplace of ideas that we're always on about, let's use that to come to a consensual truth together.
Let's discuss that together.
And over time, we'll get somewhere.
It seems like, obviously, let's protect vulnerable people with respiratory conditions.
Let's get them in their homes.
But we're going to have to, of course, consider all the mental illness and addiction and economics and None of us knew, like for instance, how long would the vaccine work?
Would we need one booster every five years?
doubtful or considered, it was hysterical.
It was hyperbolic.
Now, we're all like, "Oh, yeah, we didn't know."
Not in the old fog of war.
It was the fog of propaganda, not the fog of war, that was the problem.
None of us knew, like, for instance, how long would the vaccine work?
Would we need one booster every five years?
We need one every five months.
Every five minutes!
I mean, what works for Pfizer's bottom line?
Well, the more vaccines they take, the more money we get.
So, keep telling people to take vaccines all the time, even if maybe it's killing young men?
Yeah, basically that.
Okay.
Uh, how frustrating is it to you that people look back with 20-20 hindsight and judge?
Oh, that frustration of people asking people that claim to be the voice of science to justify their opinions and not only opinions but mandates in retrospect when those mandates have turned out to be lies and caused deaths.
That must be so frustrating.
Let's get Goebbels on here.
How frustrating was it that people said that maybe you should have said all those things about those different people?
When you and the rest of the world was in a fog of war?
You know, it is quite... Fog of war!
That's a phrase.
Imagine, Joe, before the show, chewing a pen.
The phrase I'm gonna lean into, and I like a lot, as much as I like myself and my hair, even though I can't get it up the way that I used to.
I should look into some of those vaccine side effects.
It's fog of war.
I'm gonna keep on saying fog of war till Anthony Fauci goddamn well ejaculates.
That's frustrating, Joe, and that relates exactly to the answer to the question just a moment ago, where I was saying that people really don't appreciate.
I don't blame them for that, but they don't appreciate.
I don't blame them, but I will censor them for it, by God, and maybe in time we'll imprison them for it, or other forms of dissent.
We'll find ways, though.
Believe me, Joe, I don't blame him for it, because that would mean blaming people that were correct,
and people that were from, for example, ethnic communities that we claim to love when it's convenient,
but I don't blame him, not anymore.
We were blaming him at the time.
You remember, we had such fun blaming, shaming, naming, hounding, judging them,
but then it got complicated because, you know, we were lying, and we knew we were lying then,
but thanks, Joe, for letting me come on and continue to lie now.
I appreciate it, Joe, appreciate you.
And we were dealing with a moving target, and we were saying things in the beginning,
wear a mask or not, how the virus is spread.
I mean, originally it was felt understandably, but incorrectly by the CDC that it is spread by the same way that flu is spread, namely mostly by droplets.
When in fact, most of the transmission is not only by not droplets, it's by aerosol, but also 50 to 60 percent of the people who transmitted have no symptoms at all.
You might want to look at the signs on that one, my friend.
You didn't know that in the beginning.
It was a changing, moving target.
Moving target, war metaphors, fog of wars, targets.
That's what we want to focus on here.
This is good.
This is a nice metaphor.
If you can't have the truth, let's at least have an appealing image system.
Absolutely right.
Was it frustrating?
It was terribly frustrating.
Frustrated?
This motherfucker should be in jail!
People like to take things out of context.
No, that's out of context.
You took all those excess deaths out of context.
You took all these vaccine injuries out of context.
You gave us those vaccines out of context.
Gotcha.
That's part of the reporting process.
And I accept that.
It's the world we live in, but it certainly is frustrating.
Yes, well we greatly appreciate you being here.
We appreciate your service.
We appreciate you being here.
We love you and Fog of War to you.
Happy Fog of War Day.
Enjoy the debates.
They will be not set up in any way in order to facilitate or advantage one clan.
What a disgusting little machine we have created.
What a corrupt Unreliable, appalling system that we have to oppose.
How I pray that we will be able to see through the next set of lies, having absorbed what we learned from the droplets of the last set of lies.
But that's just what I think, why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
Now, we will be with you again later tonight, streaming live for the debates.
I'm ready.
I got my 1775 coffee!
Drink your 1775 coffee!
Get ready, because maybe there'll be a moment like this for us to enjoy.
It's Asset 30 Fruits on the next page.
We might get a moment like this.
This is another one of those hindsight moments that you will... Oh, can you turn the page on the stream deck, someone?
Or let me know that you've heard that.
Thank you.
This will be another opportunity This will be another opportunity for us to see how, in relatively short time frames, we assess an ever-shifting reality.
It's brilliant.
It's enjoyable.
It's magnificent.
It's delightful.
It's de-lovely.
This is Biden, Joe Biden, claiming that the laptop was Russian propaganda.
Even Donald Trump is actually surprised by this.
This is, as they say, a clip that did not age well.
Joe, they're calling you a corrupt politician.
Nobody.
President Trump, I want to stay on the issue of race.
We're talking about the issue.
Keep looking at the laptop from hell.
See why they want to shut that dude's mic down?
President Trump, we're talking about race right now and I do want to stay.
No, come on.
Let's talk about something that, like, I can win on.
Uh, race?
Stay on the issue of race.
President Trump, you've just- And I have to say, I mean, the sort of system generally.
Respond to that.
Please.
Because, look.
Now we have seen the laptop used as evidence in court.
So in 2020, look, this is Joe Biden doing it.
me of is a Russian plant. They have said that this has all the care for five former heads.
Now we have seen the laptop used as evidence in court. So in 2020, look, this is Joe Biden
doing it. So tonight when you're watching it live with us, I wonder what lies he's telling
I wonder which things are lies right now.
Oh, the fog of war, though.
Oh, in the old fog of war, in the fog of lies, in the fog of Alzheimer's, what fog do you need to continue believing this bullshit?
It's the CIA.
Both parties say what he's saying is a bunch of garbage.
Nobody believes it except his and his... Trump realizing, no.
No, that's not true.
Good friend, Rudy Giuliani.
You mean the laptop?
Now, he won't be able to do that tonight.
He won't be able to do that tonight.
That's how it's being adjusted.
It's masterful because CNN are collaborating with this administration.
I'm not even, as you know, like a mad Trump fan.
I'm just ready for something to disrupt this stuff.
The laptop is now another Russia, Russia, Russia hoax?
That's exactly what's going on.
The laptop is Russia, Russia, Russia?
I'm genuinely surprised that that's the way they're going.
Extraordinary.
So remember, join us tonight in a few hours.
I'll be in my dressing gown.
I'll be sipping me coffee.
I'll be with you for a live stream on Rumble as we watch the debates unfold.
I might even be checking in with Bobby Kennedy.
He's busy tonight, of course.
Busy doing a debate should have a little bit of time on his hands.
So join us tonight See you then and until then if you can stay free.
