Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 12, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:08:00

Hunter Biden FAKE TRIAL!? Biden Crime Family COVER-UP?!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	So, So,
	So, In this video, you're going to see the future.
	Hello there you Awakening Wanderers.
	Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
	And what an exciting day it is because we've got pretty important questions to ask, haven't we, about the nature of justice, whether or not we do have institutions that can be relied upon to be objective and fair, or whether or not the Hunter Biden trial and verdict is being used simultaneously as a smoke screen.
	Is it being used to legitimise the idea that we can in fact rely on the judiciary?
	Trump's going to go to jail, Hunter Biden's guilty of firearm possession while on drugs.
	You see, the system works.
	The system works while negating these significant facts.
	There were significant charges pertaining to taxes that have been omitted as part of the sweetheart deal that Hunter Biden was offered and indeed granted.
	And significantly, do you not remember way back in 2020 when the stories emerged about Hunter Biden's laptop?
	Do you remember how widely the idea that this was Russian disinformation was disseminated?
	How that idea was conveyed widely and broadly?
	So far from this being an indication that you can rely on the justice system, it might be the exact opposite.
	We'll be looking at that story in detail to see how we can use it as a tool to diagnose the true state of our systems.
	Are they more corrupt than we'd ever dare to dream previously?
	We'll also be talking to my beloved friend, my new colleague, and I'm going to call him hair twin, Viva Frey!
	That is who I'm going to be talking to!
	Viva Frey!
	Viva!
	Give us a hand over here gal!
	So um yeah that's what we've got all of that, we've got all of that coming up in the next We're going to be talking a little bit too about the hysteria surrounding the incarceration of Donald Trump and who will be next to be incarcerated.
	AOC is pretty concerned that she might be going down.
	Rachel Maddow's concerned that she might be going down.
	All of these people that are concerned that they might be imprisoned seem pretty keen To imprison Donald Trump.
	Yeah, we have got amazing guests coming on the show.
	We've got Gina Carano coming on.
	I may not pronounce their names correctly, but by God, that doesn't mean that I don't adore them.
	If you're watching us on Rumble like MarineCPL1985 or Pile4G99, welcome!
	If you are an awakened wonder, Welcome to the show.
	We're doing some extra stuff on locals today.
	Did you guys know about that?
	We're going to answer your legal problems and your legal challenges with Viva Frye a little later on the show.
	So stay with us for that.
	We'll do some extra stuff.
	Because this is an important time to talk about what we're calling lawfare, isn't it?
	Because Has the judiciary become essentially another weapon of the establishment?
	Think of the number of people now that have extraordinary trials to contend with.
	It's out of control, isn't it?
	I mean, can you rely on the objectivity of these systems?
	How is the gun range?
	I've not been to the gun range yet.
	I'm going on Friday.
	So, yeah.
	Let me know.
	The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.
	That's what they're talking about in the Awaken Wonder chat.
	Let me know if you know what film that's from.
	There's nearly 6,000 of you watching us now on Rumble.
	If you're watching this on YouTube, we'll be there for about another 10 minutes, then we'll be exclusively available in that sweet stream of freedom that we call Rumble.
	We asked you earlier whether or not you thought Bea Hunter Biden was guilty.
	You said that you think he should go to jail, actually.
	Maybe that's, oh, is that the solution?
	I'm not sure that it is the solution.
	Have a look at how the legacy media, in a minute, we'll do that story in depth in a minute.
	Before we get to the Hunter Biden story, just want to spool through a few things that give you a sense that, well, for a start, Joe Biden simply cannot be running the world when he cannot run his own neurological systems correctly.
	Check out, this is Joe Biden I would say somewhat less than rhythmic at Juneteenth
	celebrations.
	If you had to like, if you just showed that line up to people that were not apprised
	with current affairs, you said which one of those people is in charge of the United States of America.
	I mean, I think I'd consider the man there in the sequined gown, Kamala Harris's husband, maybe Kamala herself.
	The black geyser in the glass.
	Joe Biden's maybe the last person I'd put in charge.
	just the sort of on the basis of their his ability to coordinate bodily movement
	yeah they gotta stop sending him to these public events Edward Snowden points out that this public error, we'll show you in a second.
	The interesting thing about this clip, the one coming up, is that he's not merely stumbling on a word or misspeaking, which is normal.
	It happens to everybody.
	This is something different.
	Why I like this is because Edward Snowden's one of the significant voices in helping us to understand the The degree to which we were being surveilled.
	The amount of collaboration that takes place between big tech and communication companies and our government.
	And even Edward Snowden's a little taken aback by this.
	He's like, no, that's not normal.
	This is not normal cognitive decline.
	This is something to be concerned about.
	And think of the things that Edward Snowden's been exposed to.
	She knows so long as she's denied, our freedom can never be secured.
	Because normally, like, in the word search of Joe Biden's communication, you can pick out what's actually being said, but there, in this one, I don't actually know, I don't know, like, if that was directions of how to get somewhere, you wouldn't be able to follow it, would you?
	Let's just try once more.
	She knows so long as she's denied, her freedom can never be secured.
	Just once more.
	If you play it from the gallery, that's how it works.
	She knows so long as she's denied, our freedom can never be secured.
	She's not lost.
	She can't be denied.
	Our freedom will never be secured.
	That's abstract.
	It's at best abstract.
	But on Morning Joe, the confidence remains high that Joe Biden is effective, potent, sharp as a tack and it is indeed Donald Trump who is not well or mentally capable.
	We're not going to be talking about this for much longer because we're going to talk about the Hunter Biden verdict and how it is being used as a media asset to demonstrate the reliability of the judicial system while simultaneously Obfuscating the fact that the most serious charges were omitted and that it amounts to a tacit acknowledgement that the laptop was always real and that all of the big tech and in particular social media organizations that participated in the censorship of that story were essentially engaging in election interference due to the sensitive time that it emerged.
	Now a lot of you are saying You feel sorry for Joe Biden and I appreciate that actually.
	I suppose don't you think that ultimately if human beings are eternal via virtue of the nature of our souls then our moral and spiritual principles have to supersede our political convictions.
	So we've got to look at this from a spiritual perspective More than a political one.
	And from that perspective, you think, man, this is ridiculous.
	What's going on now?
	Donald Trump's on trial.
	Hunter Biden's being convicted.
	Joe Biden doesn't look capable of even sort of If he was your grandfather, you wouldn't say to him, listen, I'm going out now, I want you to make a lasagna and remember to set the burglar alarm before you go out and make sure that our gun cupboard is fastened and secured because you know what Hunter's like, he'll get on it and he'll be in that gun cupboard.
	You wouldn't trust him with ordinary domestic duty.
	Because of the requirement for, you know, he needs compassion and he clearly needs guidance.
	Let's have a look at Morning Joe though.
	Let's have a look at how the legacy media continue to frame these evident disparities favourably for the interests that they so vociferously support.
	That's why I suppose it's important that we remain as best as we can objective.
	Again, it's just like the way we started this show.
	Trump is literally crazy on stage, and I say it not in a good way.
	Not well.
	Not fit.
	Not mentally capable of holding together a sentence when his prompter goes down.
	And yet Biden is constantly covered for being old, but yet travels onto the world stage doing speeches, dinners, important ceremonies.
	This isn't actually what we should be discussing, is it?
	Like, who is in most radical cognitive decline?
	You know that my perspective is we need significant systemic and institutional change, radical decentralisation, unifying only to oppose the corporate globalist giants that oppress us at every turn, that dominate our systems of Parliament, Government and Congress, Through financial coercion, through lobbying, through donation.
	If we're not going to address those problems, the personalities that are in charge of our nations are not going to be significant.
	Perhaps the world won't meaningfully change regardless of who you vote for in 2024.
	Those are the conversations that perhaps we have to have.
	These are the institutions that we have to address.
	The idea that we're still talking about the personalities and the degree to which the potential leaders of the free world are experiencing senility suggests that we're living in little paddocks of sanctioned conversation and ignoring vast planes of possibility and potential radical change.
	Recognising people who suffered and survived D-Day That D-Day was a catastrophe, wasn't it?
	There's the bit where he was honouring people that were in the wrong direction.
	Didn't he leave a little too early?
	I know that was our Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak.
	It's a catastrophe, isn't it?
	It's an absolute catastrophe of leadership.
	This is what I want to see, this kind of objectivity.
	Joe Biden's not in a good state.
	I don't know why the Democrats aren't putting forward a different candidate.
	I don't know why they didn't embrace RFK.
	It's ridiculous that that guy had to leave the Democrat Party in order to run as an independent.
	I suppose it's an obvious revelation that this institution, the Democrat Party, is entirely owned by financial interests, by the military-industrial complex, by Big Pharma.
	Damn it!
	We're in a lot of trouble.
	We're in a lot of serious trouble.
	And I suppose the evident decline, senescence and senility of Joe Biden is the perfect metaphor for the state of our nation and the state of these institutions.
	And if we don't embrace radical change, we're all in a lot of trouble.
	They're not going to say that, are they?
	Dear old... There's two things Morning Joe spends his personal time on.
	That's ensuring that his hair looks fantastic, and it does, and ensuring that he Fills the air with bombast around Joe Biden's faculties and capabilities, which he also does.
	You see it all on video, except if you go to these places or you talk to those Republicans, you see the one time where he couldn't find his chair.
	But even that was a lie.
	It's disinformation.
	This is where we are right now.
	It's lies versus the truth.
	It really is.
	And let Republicans keep lying about Joe Biden.
	It's only going to help him in the end.
	It's only going to lower expectations so much that he's going to come out and do what he does at every State of the Union address.
	He's going to outperform because of all the lies that are told about him.
	I love that wolf and sheep meme that's being shared in the Awake and Wonder chat, this time by Shaman711.
	It's a wolf preaching to a congregation of sheep saying, once elected I will be vegetarian.
	Maybe we need to be considering more radical change.
	Maybe we need to consider accessing within ourselves great and potent powers that will allow us to discern Whether or not we are being righteously governed.
	Let me know what you think in the chat over on rumble.
	Let me know what you think awakened wonders like blessed old bird and mrs cms and you strong gas in the rumble chat or pariah siege all of you we care what you think even if you're watching this on youtube right now remember to remain subscribed to our channels but also to acknowledge that there's a link in your description right now and we'll be talking about the truth behind the hunter biden verdict in a few minutes as well as talking to viva fry about the emergence Hey!
	Do you know who's supporting us today?
	now that we can say for certainty that the legal system is just another weapon
	in the establishment's armory. What saturnine times we live within when such
	things can be deployed without question. How we cry out for a pollucid revolution
	where we can see the effulgence of the Lord emerge. Hey do you know who's
	supporting us today? It's one of my great friends and partners Stickermule!
	Sticker Mule, do you want a sticker?
	You better believe I want a sticker!
	Sticker Mule is the internet's favourite place to make money online.
	How?
	They've just launched commissions where you can refer friends to Sticker Mule and earn cash on their purchases.
	All you gotta do is sign up at stickermule.com forward slash commissions and verify your ID to get your referral link.
	You already love Sticker Mule, right?
	You can get your own stickers.
	Earnings are deposited in your wallet each month.
	We all work for Sticker Mule now.
	Surely we should be able to vote Sticker Mule into office in your country or in mine.
	So go to stickermule.com forward slash commissions to start earning cash for yourself.
	Post the link on YouTube.
	Post the link in the Awaken Wonder chat.
	Post the link on Rumble.
	Why don't we all work for Sticker Mule?
	Maybe Sticker... I reckon Sticker Mule, if you were to have Sticker Mule embodied at a Juneteenth celebration, They would be able to bop rhythmically and in tune.
	Okay, listen guys, we're going to leave YouTube now before we start the Hunter Biden story.
	Become an awakened wonder to join us live when we are at the gun range on Friday.
	We'll be streaming live from there this Friday.
	You'll be seeing me firing off a few rounds and seeing Why you guys are so connected to these beautiful tools?
	It's just a tool.
	A firearm is a tool.
	So become an awakened wonder for that.
	And indeed, to see a little extra conversation with Viva Frye, who'll be joining me in a minute to talk about the rise of lawfare.
	We're first of all going to start with a Hunter Biden story and what he tells us about the state of your nation.
	Click the link.
	Join us over there.
	OK, let's have a look at this.
	Now, firstly, we'll look at how the legacy media reports on this.
	Let me, for full disclosure, Let me make this plain declaration.
	Hunter Biden is a drug addict in recovery.
	All of us are flawed.
	All of us, I believe as a Christian, are saved not through our own virtue, but because we have been redeemed by the ultimate act of sacrifice.
	None of us are in a position to judge or condemn anybody else.
	We are all imperfect.
	We are all failing.
	I know what it's like to have various institutions and systems align, collaborate, conspire and combine to attack you.
	I know what that is like.
	We are living at a time where we're questioning whether or not we can rely on the judiciary.
	Can we?
	When Donald Trump is found guilty, how do you feel?
	Is it possible that the guilty verdict given in the case of Hunter Biden is used to verify the veracity of the Trump conviction?
	See?
	Justice is blind.
	Donald Trump's guilty.
	Hunter Biden's guilty.
	But what is Hunter Biden guilty of?
	Given the nature of the conviction, he is guilty of being on drugs while in possession of a hired firearm.
	You will remember in 2020 when the laptop story was being censored as a conspiracy.
	The thing that was most interesting is the fact that Hunter Biden was likely using his access to then Vice President Joe Biden to get a job at Burisma,
	a Ukrainian gas company.
	There were serious concerns about his tax mismanagement.
	Many people believe that what's happened here is that Hunter Biden has been offered a
	sweetheart deal and that Hunter Biden is taking a hit for plausible, feasible charges. You
	know, he was in he was in possession of a firearm while high, while not addressing the
	significant other charges that point to mass corruption, exploitation of the office of the White
	House, the fact that he got a job at Burisma that he had no business taking. The peculiar
	fact that Burisma seems to have unusual and ulterior relationships with various agencies
	within your country.
	I feel like what we have to look at and what we're going to look at is does this conviction show us that justice is blind or the opposite?
	Is this a distraction from the more serious charges that seem to have been omitted and is the fact that ever The evidence from the laptop has been used by the prosecution in this trial.
	A further endorsement of the idea that the censorship of that story was election interfering.
	Was it election interfering?
	Let me know what you think in the rumble chat.
	I want to hear what you think Johnny Marine and Something Funny 2 and Skyrider 7 and Plants Heal.
	Hunter Biden could make millions from Ukraine and share it with the big guy in order to project and justify gun control.
	He was always going to be found guilty.
	That's not my words.
	Uga Booga's considered opinion and I thank you for it over in the Awakened Wonder trial.
	Someone is saying just a couple of posts back, it simply shows us how conniving and manipulative they are.
	That's negligent banana.
	Let's have a look though at how the legacy media report on this story.
	Again, I'm very sympathetic to the idea that Hunter Biden's an addict in recovery, all addicts in recovery.
	should have the opportunity for redemption and the opportunity to change.
	But is this really about that?
	Or is this about what he's not being convicted of or even charged with?
	Because those charges would lead us all the way to the White House and into a fair analysis of the degree of corruption within those institutions.
	Let's have a look at the legacy media reporting first of all.
	Dr. Biden is now a convicted felon.
	It took a Delaware jury less than three hours to find the president's son guilty, guilty, guilty on all three felony gun charges, deciding he violated laws meant to prevent those who use and are addicted to illegal drugs from owning firearms.
	Multiple jurors spoke to CNN in the moments after they left court, including juror number 10, who told CNN that the jury had been evenly split last night when they wrapped for the day with six guilty, six not guilty.
	But this morning, jurors went count by count and unanimously decided Hunter Biden was, in fact, guilty on all three counts.
	Hunter Biden responded to the verdict in a written statement, saying, quote, I am more grateful today for the love and support I experienced this last week from his wife, Melissa, my family, my friends, and my community than I am disappointed by the outcome.
	Recovery is possible by the grace of God, and I am blessed to experience that gift one day at a time, unquote.
	Hunter Biden now faces, theoretically, up to 25 years in prison.
	So the rhetoric around recovery is encouraging to hear but over here in the Awaken Wonder chat a lot of people are talking about human trafficking, a lot of you were talking about election interference, a lot of you were talking about the censorship that took place in 2020.
	Censoring this story at a time where people were making up their mind as to whether or not they could trust Joe Biden, whether or not Joe Biden was indeed, as he was proclaiming at the time, an adult that was going to reboot American democracy, that was going to reset what were regarded and reported to be the travesties of the Trump administration.
	If we now are to assume, as this case seems to verify, that that laptop Let's have a look at this.
	When Mark Zuckerberg was on Joe Rogan, he talked about the degree to which they censored the laptop story.
	Here are the things we have to consider.
	the laptop story which happened at large was if not just plain corruption, potentially election
	interference. Let's have a look at this. When Mark Zuckerberg was on Joe Rogan, he talked about
	the degree to which they censored the laptop story. Here are the things we have to consider.
	How important was the laptop story, Hunter Biden's exploitation of his relationship with his father,
	the fact that it seems to indicate that Joe Biden had business interests and potential kickbacks
	that are pretty peculiar, pretty off book, pretty dark.
	How significant is that?
	How easy does it make it to believe that he's an authentic and reliable, safe pair of hands president, particularly when you see him now, when you see him in the state of decline that he's in?
	And how important was it that that story was censored?
	And then we'll look at some of the charges that are not included, the fact that this might be regarded more as a smokescreen than a victory for justice.
	The distribution on Facebook was decreased, but people were still allowed to share it.
	So you could still share it, you could still consume it.
	So when you say the distribution has decreased, how does that work?
	Basically, the ranking in News Feed was a little bit less.
	So fewer people saw it than would have otherwise.
	By what percentage?
	I don't know off the top of my head, but it's meaningful.
	But basically, a lot of people were still able to share it.
	We got a lot of complaints that that was the case.
	You know, obviously this is a hyper-political issue, so depending on what side of the political spectrum you either think we didn't censor it enough or censored it way too much, but we weren't sort of as black and white about it as Twitter.
	We just kind of thought, hey, look, if the FBI, which I still view as a legitimate institution in this country, it's a very professional law enforcement, they come to us and tell us that we need to be on guard about something, then I want to take that seriously.
	Did they specifically say you need to be on guard about that story?
	No, I don't remember if it was that specifically, but it basically fit the pattern.
	The sense I get from looking at this is that the hunt of Biden matter, the laptop, the various charges, the charges that have been pursued to conviction and the charges that have been dropped and ignored as part of a sweetheart deal are a good way of diagnosing the state of the institutions that make up an apparent democracy.
	It's a clear indication that We're living in times of widespread censorship and widespread corruption.
	The idea that this is put before us as an example of how we can rely on the judiciary is pretty ridiculous.
	Let's have a look at this post from Greg Price.
	Hunter Biden being convicted of a firearms charge is the ultimate red herring of red herrings.
	The DOJ allowed the statute of limitations to expire in his most serious tax charges, buried evidence of the Biden's foreign bribery allegations and attempted to give Hunter a sweetheart deal with broad immunity.
	David Weiss wouldn't go after him on the serious tax charges, Or on Farah because all of that would lead back to the shady business dealings involving his father.
	Instead they went after him on a much lesser charge where the evidence was way too insurmountable to ignore.
	So they can all scream nobody is above the law when they put President Trump in jail.
	Do you think that's a pretty fair assessment of what's happening?
	Let me know in the Awaken Wonder chat.
	Let me know in the rumble chat.
	Did you see this from Glenn Greenwald on the subject?
	A major prong of Hunter's prosecution were the docs from his laptop, the one the New York Post used to report on Biden's sketchy deals and Ukraine in China.
	Thus the jury accepted their obvious authenticity, yet look at the lies the US media spread about those in 2020 to protect Biden.
	So here are the things I'm starting to take from this.
	They knew that laptop was authentic and censored it in 2020 because they knew that it would unfavorably impact the election.
	Two, the most serious offenses have been extracted.
	Three, they're using this to try to legitimize the idea that the justice system is reliable.
	If, because this seems to be a phenomena of recent times, you've already forgotten how hysterical the legacy media reporting was at that time.
	The laptop story was Russian misinformation.
	We were pre-bunked.
	That story was pre-bunked and we were prepped to discredit the idea of the Hunter Biden laptop, which we now know Was authentic, was always authentic, so what we can discern from that, what we can extrapolate from that, is that censoring that story in 2020 was meaningful and significant.
	Even Mark Zuckerberg used the word meaningful, that they They repressed Shadowband, controlled that story in a meaningful way.
	What is the meaning?
	The meaning is it prevented people from having a fair ability to assess Hunter Biden's business dealings, his relationship with Joe Biden.
	Let's have a look at how that was reported on at the time.
	Because sometimes, as with COVID, we forget how much propaganda we're subjected to.
	Let's have a look.
	Tonight, the Trump campaign is accusing Twitter and Facebook of censorship after the social media companies blocked the spread of an unverified story about former Vice President Joe Biden's son and the laptop allegedly full of his old emails.
	It's a story raising concerns about whether it's real or just designed to sow confusion in the final weeks of the election.
	Experts say it has all the hallmarks of information laundering.
	This looks like your classic disinformation campaign.
	Eric O'Neill is a former FBI operative.
	Steal the information with a cyber attack, get the emails from Hunter Biden's account, and then put them on these laptops that are left at a repair store, and that's how the information is now laundered into the public.
	Who do you think is behind this?
	Well, the Russians would be my number one guess.
	Social media outlets were quick to limit the spread of the story.
	Twitter briefly suspending the accounts of the Trump campaign and White House Press Secretary after they tried to share it.
	Twitter and Facebook have limited the distribution of that Hunter Biden story.
	And last night, Twitter appeared to suspend the Twitter account of White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany when she tried to share that story.
	Damn.
	You know a story is shady when Facebook is saying, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
	Maybe people shouldn't see this.
	For a long time, Giuliani has been... So there you have it.
	You may live in times of deluge and times of flood, but there is nothing like the flood of misinformation that the legacy media will willingly convey to manipulate the sphere of consciousness within which we all live.
	The Hunter Biden laptop story has always been a diagnostic tool to help us understand The flow of power and the flow of information.
	It seems likely that the guilty verdict will ultimately be used to authenticate the judicial process.
	Well, look, they found Hunter Biden guilty.
	Justice truly is blind.
	They found Donald Trump guilty.
	He should go to jail.
	When you see dear Joe Biden frozen in a rictus moment, immobile and staring at a Juneteenth celebration, you are being told everything you need to know.
	That this system is no longer progressing.
	It is stagnating.
	It is in senescence and it is deep within decline.
	This story, the Hunter Biden conviction, will be used as a Smoke screen and a distraction.
	The questions that we have to continually ask is why were the tax charges not pursued?
	Why were the business dealings not investigated further?
	And the obvious answer to those questions would seem to be is that those lines of investigation Reveal a deeper type of corruption.
	Corruption that leads to the heart of power.
	That Joe Biden, perhaps when he was vice president, was capable of serious corruption.
	Capable of hypocrisy, when now he seems capable of very little.
	So is the Hunter Biden guilty verdict an indication that we can rely on the judicial system?
	No, it's the opposite.
	That the judiciary, like the media, like various other institutions are simply an arsenal of weaponry deployed to meet the objectives of the powerful.
	But that's just what I think.
	Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
	Let me know what you think, Scrooge McDuck 99.
	Let me know what you think, Joe Yodo and Muppet Boy 3 and Froggy Croak and Javi Nectar.
	And you, awakened wonders like Coletta Ratti and Mrs. CMS.
	Remember, we've got a fantastic guest coming up who's an expert on law and lawfare.
	A man who went from being Just a plucky YouTuber really just trying to have a little fun out there in sweet lady Canada to being dragged into politics as Trudeau's Canada became more dystopic and authoritarian.
	I'm talking of course about the great rumbler that is Viva Fry.
	And if you are an awakened wonder we're going to stay behind and we're going to answer your lawfare and legal questions personally.
	Before that though, here's a brief message from some of our sponsors.
	I'll be back with Viva Fry in a matter of seconds.
	Hey, this is exciting.
	We've got a great partner today.
	It's Rumble.
	But beyond Rumble, it's Rumble's latest venture.
	Let me ask you first, are you a Sleepy Joe type character with zero cognitive performance struggling to muster focus and brain power for basic things like running the United States of America?
	You've got to stop drinking woke, liberal coffee that hates you and your way of life and start your day by drinking Rumble's very own 1775 coffee.
	This is going to be the best tasting coffee you've ever had.
	Seriously good, ethically sourced, from a family farm in the high altitude mountains of Bolivia.
	Not in the Bolivian lowlands, run not by a family but by a single man, still living with a pe- NO!
	Instead of waking up and drinking your big corporation-owned woke ideology coffee that's probably making you sick from the pesticides it's sprayed with, try Rumbles!
	1775 Revolutionary Coffee.
	Support freedom of speech.
	Build a parallel economy that actually values you and loves you.
	My favourite?
	It's dark, of course.
	I've always found the lure of the dark irresistible.
	I'm sorry, how can I stay mad at you?
	You're just going to have to wait over there for a little while.
	Level up your morning routine with a 1775 coffee.
	Sleep all night knowing your hard-earned dollary dues are going towards supporting freedom-loving creators, like me, on Rumble.
	Visit 1775coffee.com now, pick up your first bag, use the code BRAND to save 10% on your first order.
	Oh, come on.
	Why choose, you know?
	Okay, back to the content.
	Okay, so we're going to be doing a little bit of a demo here.
	I'm going to be showing you how to do the game.
	Hello there, you awake and wonder.
	Thanks for joining us for this interview.
	And welcome, Viva!
	Viva.
	Well, my real name is David Freiheit.
	Last name is freedom in German, verbatim.
	Nice!
	Viva Frei was an easy... You're so free, you're actually named after it.
	Nice hair.
	Thank you very much.
	Nice natural root lift.
	I brushed it yesterday and, you know, when it gets dirty and greasy then the locks start looking, you know, a little better.
	Now it's the after wash, after brush fro, so.
	Looks pretty fantastic.
	Couple days it'll be peak, peak appearance.
	Before we get into talking about your journey from being a... but in a sense what fascinates me is how all of us get dragged into politics, how everything that you do becomes ultimately politicised because there doesn't seem to be any institution or even cultural artefact that is free from the insidious influence of modern power and how it is asserted.
	I wanted to just ask you how you think these stories now can be used as a litmus test for where the current judiciary is, whether it's the Hunter Biden story, the Donald Trump verdict, or the various times where we see the law used in ways that don't seem objective.
	It's clearly lawfare.
	The only question is, in what sense now?
	You touched on it.
	Greg Price, I think, has it nailed.
	You know, I'm trying to think of a way to phrase the thought.
	It's not because a clearly guilty man is convicted that it's evidence that the system works.
	It's not even because a clearly guilty man is acquitted that it's evidence that the system is broken.
	It's when a clearly innocent person is convicted that it's evidence that the system is broken.
	You can get guilty people off on legit legal means.
	But when you use lawfare to then go after people who prima facie, and even after all the evidence is in, are clearly innocent, and it's not biased that I'm saying this for Trump in the New York Trump case, It's that Hunter Biden, dead to rights, and he was convicted.
	I actually predicted he was going to get acquitted because if you had followed the Michael Sussman case, remember the DNC attorney who met with the FBI to slip them the Steele dossier?
	Yeah.
	And he said he didn't do it for and on behalf of a client, that he was charged with lying to the FBI.
	And he said, oh, I didn't do it for and on behalf of a client, except he actually billed Hillary Clinton and the DNC for the very meeting where he fed them the Steele dossier.
	He was acquitted in D.C.
	So yeah, a guilty man being acquitted could be evidence of a broken system, but it really is when you have someone who clearly should never have been under the prosecutorial regime getting convicted that you know the system is broken.
	Are you referring to the fact that the law was changed a couple of years prior to that trial, that various misdemeanors were put together to create kind of an amalgam felony?
	Is that what you're referring to?
	That's how they got from what would otherwise be a misdemeanor charge of business falsification of records by classifying something improperly to a 34 count felony, because they said it would otherwise be a misdemeanor that would have been time barred in Trump's case, in the New York Alvin Bragg prosecution.
	And the way they got around that was by saying, well, it was to cover up a federal crime, although we couldn't specify which one, so take your pick at any one of the three, is what the judge said to the jury.
	So they got around the statute of limitations for a misdemeanor, prosecuted Trump for something that no one would have ever been prosecuted for, but for the fact that they wanted to go after Trump.
	Other prosecutors had declined it.
	Alvin Bragg himself had declined it.
	And they basically twisted the entire system to go after him, falsify this, take the case in a politically prejudiced jurisdiction, no different than the racially prejudiced jurisdictions of 50 years ago, where they knew he would get convicted for whatever the reason.
	That's abuse of the process.
	That is weaponizing lawfare.
	The fact that Hunter Biden, dead to rights, gets convicted does not legitimize the Trump conviction.
	It actually, I think, delegitimizes it and shows how they're using the system to basically take anybody and convict because, like Laverne Tabaria said, find me the man and I'll show you the crime.
	That's what they did with Trump.
	But when Hunter's case, you know, he showed us the crime himself.
	What's that quote?
	So they say, we want to convict this person of something.
	What are we convicting him of?
	Let me just have a look at this guy.
	I would say financial impropriety.
	So like, do you think that what we're experiencing now is an aberration and a kind of a perversion?
	Or do you think that the system has always been deployed to advance the interests of the powerful?
	It's an interesting thing.
	This is, when we talk about this topic, and it's new to me, like, I'm relatively new to this world.
	There's another good one.
	I forget who it was.
	It's a Greek philosopher.
	He says, just because you don't take an interest in politics doesn't mean it's not going to take an interest in you.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And, you know, so I'm like, this is terrible.
	This is an outrage.
	And everyone's like, this has been going on for decades.
	It just hasn't been weaponized politically against rich and powerful people who could expose the system.
	But the criminal system has been broken for decades.
	I mean, that's why up until the weaponization to go after Trump, The left had typically been about criminal justice reform.
	You know, don't throw the book at people for paper crimes.
	Don't lock people up for years for non-violent crimes.
	You know, don't lock them up period because reform is better than incarceration.
	So this has been going on forever and it's really only now been exposed thanks to the fact that they went after the biggest person on earth with the biggest bullhorn on earth.
	Yes I see so in a sense we're just it's just like they say in story development it's a revelation of it's a revelation of of a condition that was previously concealed which is in a way how Viva I regard the period of Covid.
	The institutional corruption that had always been present became apparent because of the scale of the event.
	The pharmaceutical industry has always exploited its ability to control its apparent regulator.
	The state has always looked for opportunity to regulate.
	There has always been a tendency to exploit crisis in order to generate profit and further control.
	But because this was unprecedented, all of those phenomena were Uniquely and candidly exposed.
	Well, absolutely.
	This is where, you know, Alex Jones just wrote the book, The Great Awakening, where this awoke up a lot of people who, you know, you had your your inkling to it.
	Everybody had talked about ideological capture, political capture, industry capture.
	But if anybody was not yet aware of this, those who lived through the AIDS crisis back when Fauci was first around, this would not have been news to them.
	They might have been the ones who were ahead of the curve in terms of seeing where this was going.
	Did you read RFK Jr.' 's The Real Anthony Fauci?
	Well, not all of it, because the letters were very, very little.
	And it was very, very big.
	It was very dense.
	When I was reading it, this is what I got.
	Even from the footnotes and his diligence in providing sources, I was like, oh, no, man.
	This dual-purpose research is true.
	Oh, no.
	Fauci's got dark history.
	But could you tell us just plainly What was Fauci's... Why is Fauci implicated in the mishandling of the AIDS epidemic and HIV?
	Apply everything that we lived through under the COVID pandemic, and I'll put it in quotes, to the AIDS pandemic in the mid-80s, and Fauci was at the helm.
	Everything that we went through here, the... I won't say over-fearmongering.
	But, fear-mongering in terms of contagion.
	You know, Fauci infamously said, you could actually catch it sitting watching television in your living room, or your mother could give it to you through the kitchen.
	You know, I forget what the exact quote was, but there was demonizing of the contagion.
	There was trying to find a vaccine solution to it.
	There was literally illegalizing over-the-counter or off-label use of medications to treat HIV.
	There was the application of toxic medications for profit.
	Not remdesivir, it was...
	I don't remember what the medicate remdesivir was the one for COVID, but I forget what the
	name was for AIDS for the HIV.
	But the bottom line is that there was suppression of over the counter or off label medications,
	hence the story behind the Dallas Buyers Club.
	There was fear mongering up the wazoo.
	There was a vaccine will be the solution.
	And then there was the financial interest in terms of what research was funded, which
	research was not funded, who got the money that was being controlled by the by Fauci
	himself.
	It's like apply it mutas mutandis to the HIV epidemic.
	And if you had lived through that, you might have seen where this one was going when they
	outlawed HCQ, ivermectin, when they.
	Demonized doctors who spoke out when they came out with their own toxic treatments that were actually killing more people than they were helping, but it was very profitable for those who were involved in the industry.
	And it was industry capture, but Fauci was at the helm.
	And it played out like the version 2.0.
	And when I'm listening to this book, I only listen to books anymore, so it goes much faster.
	I'm like, holy crab apples, this is what happens when you live long enough It's not a question of being smarter than anybody.
	It's just a question of having seen things that repeat in certain iterations over time.
	Because history doesn't repeat, but it tends to rhyme.
	And so, like, COVID was HIV 2.0, and Fauci was at the helm of both.
	It's wild.
	It's worth a listen, if you can get to it.
	Yeah, I mean, because of our ability to communicate and track information and report in real time, we do see, as you say, rhyming templates recurring, and the pandemic again is another great example of that.
	We just have a spate of stories and edicts from the beginning of that period, then we have the ability to refute them, and now we have the A kind of ongoing denial of the truth.
	And then the Hunter Biden story is another one.
	It's not that long ago, because it's only sort of four or five years ago, you can sort of recall and track what's happening almost in real time.
	It's amazing.
	But then you go to 2020, which was the suppression of the Hunter Biden story.
	Go to 2016, when it all makes much more sense in retrospect, where they were talking about how Trump got elected because there wasn't enough suppression of free speech on Facebook.
	And so like, they talked about censoring information in 2016,
	they were deplatforming people in 2016, Alex Jones.
	And nobody cared back then, because, you know, when they went after Jones, it was probably, I want to say,
	2017, 2018, when they were seeking to censor the interwebs,
	everyone's like, well, okay, fine, he's spreading lies and disinformation, so nobody cares.
	And then it comes to the point where they deplatform the sitting president.
	It comes to the point where they censor information that they knew was true, lie about it, and have a determinate impact on the outcome of the election, and then four years later say, oh yeah, it turned out to be true, the dude just got convicted for what we said was Russian disinformation or bore the earmarks of a Russian information campaign.
	Nobody cared about the censorship back when they hated the object of the censorship.
	Then you get into COVID when people are like, why can't I discuss my own medical freedom freely?
	Why am I getting suppressed?
	Why are they censoring stories now that turn out to be more true than not two years later?
	And then it is as though they overplayed their hand and they woke up a little bit too many people because they went a little too hard too fast.
	Where had they just gone a little slower?
	You know, they could have gotten there by 2030, but they might have just put 2030 agenda off to 2050, if ever, because they woke up too many people who said, yeah, I shouldn't have ever gone along with any of this in the first place, regardless of how much I thought I hated Alex Jones or Donald Trump.
	What I've created is more people that are now devout and absolutely, resolutely anti-authoritarian that have, as a starting position, opposition to their Edicts, interests, or verdicts of the powerful.
	that's where we start now I suppose. Now your country Canada is pretty
	fascinating because like if you don't live there five years ago six years ago
	people always thought of Canada as a sort of a bright and breezy liberal
	nation headed up by a man not unlike yourself in that he has a fantastic
	bouffant and wonderful haircut. Oh and and nice socks.
	Justin Trudeau ruined cute like I had these socks forever but I know I feel guilty
	wearing them because it's like very Trudeau-esque. Cute socks are ruined now.
	Absolutely. Another thing tarnished. So can you tell me like how the pandemic period changed your
	perception of the way that your country was governed and prior to that I felt that
	there was this sort of wave like if you just took a passing interest in
	politics particularly in countries that you don't live in it was like oh there's
	this spate of like young leaders with nice haircuts that speak about progressivism
	and liberal values and like I suppose Justin Trudeau in a way was first among
	them how is it that he's come to be regarded as such a villainous figure? He's
	come to be regarded as a villain because he's he's the human scum of
	the earth and as much as I appreciate that you are always open to forgiveness and
	I struggle to get to that point because I loathe the man because he's unapologetically
	villainous but cloaks it in the most superficial of benevolence.
	He was a good-looking young man for anybody who cares about physical appearance.
	He had nice hair.
	He was eloquent.
	He said the right things back in the day.
	But he gave you hints as to where he was going.
	Infamously, in 2015, he said he admires the basic dictatorship of China because they can turn their economy around on a dime.
	And then he just became the most insidious tyrant ever.
	Who said it?
	Behind every liberal is an aspiring fascist.
	I heard something similar going up.
	You realize it.
	They will torment you with the blessing of their own soul because they are morally convinced that what they're doing is right and righteous.
	Trudeau comes in.
	It starts very, you know, subtly.
	It was back when Jordan Peterson was raising the alarms about Bill C-16, which added gender identity and gender expression to aggravating factors for hate crimes under the criminal code.
	And Jordan Peterson was saying back in 2016-17, this is going to result in compelled speech.
	And back when I was a wet-behind-the-ear, short-haired, naive, still optimistic lawyer, I'm like, I can see the argument, but as they say, you know, bad cases make for bad law, and it might be a little bit alarmist.
	Anyways, he's been more prophetic, Jordan Peterson, than anybody could have imagined.
	But we went from Trudeau with Bill C-16.
	Then you get into all of the censorship acts that they're posting online.
	Then you get into the gun restrictions.
	And you realize that Justin Trudeau is, effectively, the most tyrannical of dictators, but has a nice smile when he says it.
	But I think people are getting wise to it.
	The only problem is we don't have anyone better.
	You got Jagmeet Singh from the New Democrat Party, who's equally as fascistic.
	And then you got the conservatives, who you can't trust as far as you can throw them, because they are fair-weather politicians as well.
	So, C63, it appears to be an amplification of the kind of censorship that became, like you said, the emergence of Jordan Peterson and that was kind of his moment.
	That's when most people first heard of Jordan Peterson and you're saying that it was incredibly prescient, what he said.
	And again, it was couched in compassion, that people do have the right to identify however they want, we should be kind to each other, we should be polite to one another.
	And throughout the COVID period, the conversation was generally framed in terms of, you know, we've got to protect people, life is sacred.
	How now are these ideas of compassion and care and concern being utilized to centralize further authority?
	Bill C-63 is being dubbed the Online Harms Act, and that is to protect, you know, it's always to protect the children from online bullying, as if laws don't already exist for that.
	To protect the children from online, you know, child pornography, as if laws don't already exist to protect that.
	Bill C-16 added gender identity, gender expression as aggravating factors to the criminal code.
	Some people think there shouldn't be hate crime laws to begin with.
	All crime is a hate crime in its essence.
	And you shouldn't have protected classes because if you have protected classes, that necessarily means you have ignored classes or unprotected classes.
	But the Online Harms Act is the most outrageous, tyrannical piece of legislation you can imagine.
	You know, it seeks to impose potential life in prison for advocating or promoting genocide on the internet or elsewhere.
	I mean, that makes no sense on its face because what does advocating mean?
	What does promoting mean?
	And what does genocide mean?
	And I'm not trying to be glib.
	When people are chanting because, you know, the Israel-Palestinian thing, from the river to the sea, is that promoting genocide?
	If it is, are they prepared to, like, risk potential life in prison for saying it?
	They haven't thought this through.
	What else did they do under that law?
	They wanted to make it illegal to, or they want to criminalize tweets that could, you know, be deemed to be violent of whatever provisions of the law.
	Harassment, gender identity, etc.
	Worse still, they sort of want to retroactively criminalize it because if a tweet is online and it gets republished when the person who tweeted it or published it had the ability to delete it, any republication would count as a violation under that law.
	So what it is, is nothing shy of trying to stifle any form of critical speech online and blur the line between what had hitherto been legitimately regarded as hate speech, to what people now want to weaponize as hate speech, whereas if you misgender someone, which I think is a misnomer, if you gender them properly, it would be hate speech that could be sanctionable under this law.
	And they cloak it in protecting the children.
	All that it is about is consolidating power and making it much more difficult for anyone to challenge that power, because anything they say, if you say, go F yourself, Trudeau, could be deemed to be whatever they want to regard it as under that new law.
	How significant is it, do you suppose, that comparable laws are being passed simultaneously in various different jurisdictions, usually with the same underlying proposal, that it's in order to encourage compassionate discourse and to protect vulnerable people?
	How significant is that?
	Well, I analogize it to what happened in the States.
	When one court went one step further as relates to the prosecution of Trump, it wasn't like the other court said, oh, we better back up, this is getting ridiculous.
	That became the new stepping stone for other courts.
	They say, oh, we gagged Trump in New York, so let's gag him in DC.
	Oh, we gagged him in DC, let's gag him in New York yet again.
	Oh, we took him off the ballot in Colorado, so let's take him off the ballot in Maine.
	Courage is contagious, cowardice is contagious, and corruption is contagious.
	And when you see one country doing it, and all of these Western free democrat societies, they still have the one ultimate goal is to maintain and consolidate their power.
	And when they see the free, polite, democrat country like Canada do this, well, it empowers other countries.
	And Canada looks at Brazil and says, well, Brazil's doing it.
	The UK looks at Canada and says, well, they're doing it.
	So it's this like circle of badness.
	It's a feeding frenzy of politicians who want to consolidate power.
	And when they see one country doing something stupid, they don't take a step back and say, no, they're going too far.
	They say, well, now we can go a little bit further because they've done it.
	I wonder sometimes, Vivo, whether it is centrally orchestrated or whether it is a kind of migratory tendency and sort of spontaneous formation in the manner we might see in nature.
	Mate, the trucker protest was a kind of organic movement that was a chance for us to see that when people, as you say, act courageously, that can be a contagion all of its own.
	But that was handled pretty aggressively.
	The evocation of that emergency act was one of the moments we thought, oh this guy Trudeau, he's full on man.
	A true dictator.
	Yeah, that's what we kind of saw.
	It was pretty extraordinary.
	Elsewhere, I think there's a kind of comparison to be made, Viva, with the various movements around agriculture and what appears to be an attempt to control food production.
	We've seen the process in the Netherlands and in Germany and in France and in our country, in the United States of America.
	Do you feel that there's a possibility for a genuine populist movement that isn't really It's not defined within that old rubric of left versus right, but it's more defined by a kind of desire for, where possible, regionalised control, where people want to be able to control their own food and their own farming, want to be able to control their own transportation, want to be able to control their own individual lives.
	Do you think that there's some sort of fissure, some sort of breaking apart, some potential for new movements?
	I mean, what we're seeing is the populist pushback across the world now.
	The left versus the right distinction, I think, is sort of the false dichotomy.
	I think it's more statist versus free man type thing.
	History not repeating but tending to rhyme and we look back at the history books and say, how could 20 million people have starved to death under the Maoist revolution.
	How could, however, 20 million people have died under Stalin?
	How could they die from starvation?
	And then you see these idiots, I mean, out of the Netherlands, talking about culling meat to preserve the environment, culling cow to preserve the environment.
	You talk about in Canada, they were, I don't know if it's gotten anywhere yet, talking about taxing cow farts.
	I mean, this is the unit of measurement that they want to go into in terms of, we've got to do it for the well-being of the environment.
	We've got to kill food.
	And thus, realistically, possibly bring on our own mass starvation.
	It won't affect the elites like it did back in communist Russia and back in Mao's revolution, but it'll affect the massive amount of the population.
	It's like, oh, having seen politicians propose idiotic proposals like this in real time, with the advent of science and technology and the internet, they still propose idiotic ideas?
	I now have no trouble at all contextualizing how millions and millions of people died of starvation when the state took full control over things that they cannot do as well as the individuals.
	Right, because there was no means for opposition, there was no means for communication.
	Isn't it likely that the real dynamic that defines our time is a tendency towards the
	decentralization of power afforded to us by these communicative means and these technological
	methods but which I mean that it would be totally plausible to have real regional representative
	democracy.
	That power could be slowed down and localized.
	One of the biggest myths, and it's extraordinary to me how explicitly connected it is to our new centers of power, is the idea of progress.
	That science and technology will Provide us with salvation that there is going to be through innovation the creation of utopia.
	Masked within this is a kind of like a more arcane idea that instead of like looking to science to resolve all our problems, not that you would abandon those projects, but you would acknowledge that in certain cases science is a subset of certain commercial interests and establishment interests and that Really, now, we could be using the tools of communication to organise more locally, to have actual diversity, true diversity rather than superficial diversity, masking, ideological homogeneity.
	Is that what's happening?
	That while the tendency is towards the breaking apart of power, The centralised systems of authority are trying to resist that.
	There's like an attempt to contain something.
	Well, there's no question that's an attempt to contain full, consolidated control over the people from what they eat,
	to how they spend their money, to how they keep their money.
	It was, I had Neil Oliver on.
	I love Neil.
	He's amazing.
	And he said, he said something, I'll never forget it.
	And I say it every time I get a chance.
	People often say it gets too big to fail.
	It's like, no, it's going to get too big to remain alive.
	Like it's going to get so big it has to fail.
	And I think that's what we're seeing right now with this.
	I call it a mass power grab or the attempt at least to consolidate all aspects of the minutiae of individual life
	within government.
	We know best, we want to track your money, we want to track your food, we want you to consume the food we want you to consume, and we're getting a pushback across the world.
	And 2024, how many elections are running up this year?
	And we're seeing like a populist global response to what this was, you know, this attempt to take over everyone's individual rights.
	In the states, you know, all things considered, they respect state rights a little bit more than, you know, provincial rights are respected under the federalist system in Canada.
	We are seeing a state pushback, a local level pushback, and I think maybe this is what most people mean when they say I'm an anarchist, which is just decentralizing power or creating the, not mini markets, but a local network of power.
	We're seeing that pushback right now.
	There's some politicians who are getting behind it.
	Food freedom, medical freedom, financial freedom.
	And we're going to see more of it.
	But everything that we've witnessed in the last little while is the government trying to consolidate power to maintain full and irrevocable control over the people.
	Consolidate digital currency, consolidate where the food comes from, have it controlled by four mass producers so that they can come up with some sort of social credit score, make sure you eat the right food, which is actually the wrong food, Not good for you.
	And we're seeing a bit of a pushback.
	I mean, I don't want to get too optimistic because I've gotten very cynical, but we're seeing the movement now.
	But I think that's why this push for full control has gone into absolute hyper overdrive, and which is why the election and this 2024 is going to be the most politically consequential year of humanity.
	You know, I was talking to Chris Pavlovsky, the CEO of Rumble, that interview we are showing on Monday, and he's talking about monopolization and the various antitrust cases that Rumble have.
	Not only do we have the attempts to centralize The control and distribution of food and that's what's causing the sort of agricultural backlash and the farmers movement across the world is from territories as varied and vast as Sri Lanka, India, Germany and the UK.
	But we have the control of information through organizations like Alphabet, Google and Meta that are all too willing to comply with the state when it comes to censorship.
	We have the surveillance capacity of all of our communications network and their willingness to comply and collaborate and corroborate state edicts and objectives.
	And it's a pretty extraordinary time actually, isn't it?
	When you look at it, everywhere the kind of technology that could be used to create freedom and creativity and true diversity is continually being Charged in the direction of centralized control.
	And the only methods they seem to have, it seems, is crisis.
	Induce compliance through crisis, which amounts to fear, terrify people.
	And then to misuse the idea of compassion and care and protection.
	And I was thinking 30 years ago, 40 years ago, the left-right arguments were about If you don't have a powerful state, you won't be able to oppose corporate power.
	It is the function of the state to protect people, to ensure that financial and corporate elites don't dominate populations and nations.
	And now it seems that that process, that the left has been so thoroughly co-opted by corporate interests through, you know, in this country, America, through like donations and lobbying and elsewhere, through God knows what means, that The right that used to be the kind of sovereign dominion of what you might call free market capitalism is somehow a better bet when it comes to liberty because of their commitment to conservatism or individual freedom.
	I still have the same values that I had 20 or 30 years ago.
	I don't like authority, leave me alone, free speech.
	But somehow there's been this weird bait and switch.
	It's like they switched parties.
	It's the joke that the liberals once upon a time used to be anti-big pharma, anti-big government, anti-war.
	The liberals today are trust Pfizer, shut up and let the government surveil you, and send more money to Ukraine.
	The right used to be sort of more pro-censorship.
	It was George Bush's wife who was complaining about the Simpsons, like rock music is going to cause people to hurt themselves.
	And now the right are the ones who are, you know, they're not by any means free speech absolutists, and there's a bit of a uni-party element to this, but certainly more on the right support free speech.
	Well, I mean, it's not really a switching of parties.
	I think it's more like just what happens over time.
	The party that's not in power will always support free speech and the party that attains power will always want to hold it back because that's what's going to be used to challenge their grip.
	But no, we've seen a full switch.
	It's an amazing time.
	The technology that we use to be free, they are certainly trying to use it to coerce submission and to manufacture consent.
	And then when you think just like, you have Twitter doing the censorship for the intelligence that's lying foreign on behalf of the government.
	I mean, that is, call it crony capitalism or call it just fascism in its purest form.
	That's what we're living through and that's what I think people are really starting to recognize.
	You know what, Viva?
	I'm enjoying talking to you, and it seems like you're enjoying talking to me.
	We're having quite a nice little conversation here, aren't we?
	Streaming live, rustling residents in Rumble, live with Viva Frye.
	What we're going to do now is we're going to wrap up here on Rumble, but we are going to continue for our Awakened Wonder community.
	Remember, this week we've got some great guests additionally coming up.
	Gina Carano, we'll be talking to her about her trials with Disney.
	And the support of Elon Musk and what it was like to emotionally go through that.
	That's tomorrow's Thursday show.
	That's what we're doing on Thursday.
	Listen, if you want to stay with me and Viva, we're going to talk about... I'd like to take your questions.
	So if someone come in here and move the local screen to a position where I can see it, then we can respond to your questions and comments.
	But we'll do that while on camera because we are competent, confident people.
	That can continue to communicate once... Ah, Isaac.
	Now, I've been wondering when we were going to see you on camera.
	So, listen, we'll be back tomorrow on Rumble, not with more to say, but more different.
	If you want to join us on Locals, we'll be freely available on Locals for the first five minutes, but then we will only be available to our supporters.
	In a minute, you will see us through an opaque screen.
	You will hear our murmuring voices.
	You will see the silhouettes of our fantastic haircuts.
	But for now, We are leaving the Rumble stream.
	See you tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
	And until then, if you can, stay free.
	See it first on Rumble.
	Many Switches, Switch On, Switch Off Hi
	We love it We're live
	Yeah but, hello, when were we live?
	Were we live when we said we was or not?
	Okay, let's work on our comms.

▲