All Episodes
May 29, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:59:30
You were RIGHT all along! | Vaccine Clots, Trudeau Hate Speech, Farmers Targeted- Stay Free 375
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
you you
brought to you by by
in this video you're going to see the cube surface let's measure it
our target is breaking news we've got a live shot there
there.
you you
Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
Thanks for joining us for a very special show today.
Conspiracy Theory to Conspiracy Fact.
Is there anything we revel in more than being proven right?
Than the obvious demonstration that what we've been told by the legacy media amounts to little more than propaganda, sets of stories organized to prompt us into realities that are beneficial to them and punitive for us.
If you're watching this on YouTube, you better believe it, that's a place where you will be corralled.
into wrong think in all sorts of extraordinary ways then we'll be with you for the first 15 minutes then we'll be exclusively on rumble consider rumble like a glorious glimmering shimmering emerald in the sky beaming truth towards you 2024 conspiracy theories to conspiracy facts was a Pretty common journey.
Farmers being paid not to produce food is an interesting indicator when it comes to the edicts and agenda potentially of centralised agricultural forces that want to maybe control food in the event of another potential forthcoming crisis.
What about the idea that Trump's FBI documentations have revelations in them that are closer to the conspiratorial side of reality than what the mainstream media would have you believe?
How about the numerous stories about vaccine, vaccine efficiency, adverse events and excess deaths that coalesce beautifully, or perhaps I should say clot, around the AstraZeneca vaccine stories and Canada's hate crime laws.
Could this be another piece of architecture that moves us towards the prison planet that they want us to inhabit?
First part will be on YouTube then we'll be exclusively on Rumble.
Let's start our journey into conspiracy fact From conspiracy theory in the wonderful world of food and agriculture, Jeremy Clarkson, who's a very popular figure on TV, not just in our country, but around the world due to his numerous shows about cars like Top Gear and the one he'd done on Amazon.
One thing that's extraordinary about this is that the whole thing is on Amazon.
He has a show where he talks about farming and indeed runs a farm, and that's the basis for him talking about it.
And while doing that, he's encountered all sorts of extraordinary bureaucracy and legislation that's presumably Brought about his perspective that the farming industry is not really about food, which seems odd really because that is why our species started farming.
Let's have a look at that story now.
Now farming is a pretty important subject if you, I don't know, eat food.
Do you eat food?
Are you a human?
Do you require calories?
Do you need to swallow nutrients in order to not die?
Yes, well then surely you want all of your food sources controlled by sexualists, narcissists, psychopaths, Lunatics who are telling you that they're helping you while acquiring vast tracts of farmland, while shutting down your ability to eat fresh food, while telling you that their every action is conducted in the sweet and holy name of preventing climate change, while flying avocados hither and yon, while growing laboratory meat,
And telling us to eat bugs.
Needlessly attacking and destroying the livelihood and lives of farmers.
Do you know how many Indian farmers took their own lives in the last 10 years?
They were the early adapters.
They were the harbingers.
They were the canary in the cage.
They were the first victims of globalism and a globalist plot to control food that is now beginning to affect American farmers, Dutch farmers, German farmers, British farmers, farmers everywhere.
Do you not ever get curious, why are farmers all over the world pissed off and blocking roads and setting stuff on fire?
Why could that be?
Well, it's obvious, isn't it?
They've all gone right wing!
They've all gone right-wing from all of their right-wing activity.
Ah, you know, I've been running this farm for a while.
My father, he bought me up on farming, using mostly the fascism of Mussolini.
We sprinkle a little bit of Mussolini over the crops, and then we're over there And it's a little bit of gerbils over there onto the maize.
It makes it grow up beautifully.
So what the hell is going on in farming?
In our country, Jeremy Clarkson, who's a very important, significant media figure, has a show called Clarkson's Farm.
But even this mainstream product, proliferated by Amazon, the brand that perhaps, above all others, represents globalist consumerism, Even his show, which is made by Amazon, has become a kind of anti-globalist commodity because he's talking about how his farming practices are restricted by ridiculous regulation and legislation.
And if you're a farmer, you know already the moves they're making.
They're making your fuel impossible to purchase.
They're making your fertilizer illegal somehow.
They're making your price structure Not make sense.
They are endlessly facilitating giant globalist corporations like Walmart or whatever supermarkets prevalent in your country have too much purchase power and all the while no one is telling us that it just makes common sense that all of us should be eating food that's grown or reared in the area that we're living in.
That we should have as much control as possible over our food.
As much awareness as possible of what's going into our mouths.
As much control over seeds, or livestock, or whatever you want to call it, as possible.
And yet the trend is in the opposite direction.
Let's get into it.
As usual, one man stands as a colossus across the world.
It's the universe's favourite nerd.
It's the real-life Dr. Evil himself.
It's the living paperclip.
It's Bill Gates.
And he's buying your farm.
Bill Gates has been snatching up 242,000 acres of farmland across the U.S., enough to make him the top private farmland owner in America.
According to the Land Report, the tech billionaire has been purchasing agricultural land for years, building a massive portfolio of farmland in 18 states.
His largest holdings are more than 69,000 acres in Louisiana, almost 48,000 acres in Arkansas,
and about 20,500 acres in Nebraska. Additionally, he has a stake in 25,750 acres of traditional
land in Phoenix, Arizona, which is being developed as a new suburb.
Why don't you just trust Bill?
What have you got against Bill?
He's trying to help you.
He's tried to help you through the pandemic.
He's trying to help you now.
He's trying to help the people of various African nations.
He's trying to help the people of India.
It's just Chinese best to help you.
Why don't you want Bill Gates's help?
I'm sure he's got a perfectly legitimate reason for acquiring all of this food and farmland.
And I'm sure it has nothing to do with the centralisation of resources to facilitate, in an instant, starvation for populations that become non-compliant.
Because occasionally don't you get a glimpse of a second kingdom?
The real kingdom?
The fact that, like the lilies of the field or the birds, you could become free, that you are taken care of, that if you are able to peel away the layers of corruption and control, you might be able to participate in entirely different systems, and then quick enough...
The record scratches and their authority is re-imposed.
I wonder if there's any connection between this acquisition of farmland, measures that seem designed to control and shut down farmers, and bio-engineered food appearing in our supermarkets without so much as a murmur.
They say Aussie fresh.
But their salads?
Contained bioengineered food ingredients.
They're bagels.
Contained bioengineered food ingredients.
Not so fresh.
No artificial flavors.
Peace.
But it contains bioengineered food ingredients.
Once they start sticking the insects down our throats, we'll be very grateful for the glory days of simple bioengineered natural treats.
Oh, I remember when we didn't have to crunch our way for a big fistful of locusts as a lunchtime snack.
Yeah, in my day, we had bioengineered food.
But then because of our bloody fascist farmers, the mad right-wing lunatics
saluting Pol Pot and whatnot, now we've got to eat these bugs.
Even their granola bars or fruit bars contains bioengineered food ingredients.
Thanks.
Thank you.
you What's going on with our farms and our farmers?
What is being imposed?
And how come a figure like Jeremy Clarkson, who's a very popular and successful broadcaster in our country, is pointing out that there are nonsense laws across the UK?
We already know that everywhere, whether it's as a result of EU or UN edicts or various other legislative or bureaucratic bodies across India, Sri Lanka, elsewhere, who knows where these ideas are coming from but I figure there's something to do with these crazy acreage acquiring lunatics that are always trying to help us.
Why is it that the fuel for farmers is becoming expensive?
Why is it that fertilizers are getting banned?
Why is it we're being continually told that cows are Nazis now?
What on earth is going on and why is it that Jeremy Clarkson, who appeared to start a farm as little more than part of a TV show, is now pointing out that due to bureaucracy and peculiar regulation, it's cheaper to stop growing food.
And wait for there's a moment in this, this is extraordinary piece in this article, where a British agricultural official says, we do acknowledge that the main point of farming is to produce food.
That's the only point in farming.
Well, no.
The main point of farming is, of course, fascism.
But after that, it's food.
...food in three fields.
They're good for the soil, and they're good for my bank balance, but it means I'll be growing stuff that people can't eat.
I know one chap who's taken 60% of his farm out of food production, and he's not alone.
So yippee.
All that stored carbon, and all of that fixed in nitrogen.
But what if you want some bread?
You'll have to get a loaf made from wheat that was grown abroad, and potentially, that was genetically engineered.
Do you feel that this is about control. Do you feel that there's an
attempt to control food? That in a sense this legislation is being brought about precisely
because it will destabilise, debilitate, impoverish and make farming impossible? Let me
know if you are a farmer. Let us know what you are experiencing. Let us know if you're
participating in these protests. Let us know why you think the legacy media aren't covering
these protests correctly.
And how's that good for global warming? He continues. Under the SFI, farmers can receive
money for turning their arable and horticultural fields into bee-friendly wildflower meadows,
grassland or planting species that can feed winter birds.
Now look, I'm a bit of a hippie and all those things sound pretty fantastic, but I believe
that what you should have is localised power for farmers and incentives to ensure that
the produce they generate is, broadly speaking, traded and contained as locally as possible.
An entirely different, decentralised model where the community and the farmers interact
Farming Minister Mark Spencer, whose name is much too much like Marks and Spencers, which is a type of shop we have here in the UK, said, That's like saying ejaculation is the primary purpose of masturbating.
What other reason is there for it?
Well, part of this will warm me up.
I'll be nice and warm and as a side effect there will be some... Food production is the sole purpose of farming and we are taking action to clarify this principle.
That's when you know bureaucracy's got out of control.
That's when you know that minds that are not connected to truth, reason, the land and the people have taken control of our hearts and minds.
When a farming minister has to come out and say, food production is the primary purpose of farming, one of many, there's loads of reasons for farming really.
I farm really as sort of just as a hobby.
I farm really to keep myself warm.
I farm really just to get my toes in the soil.
There's no other reason to farm.
We'll be taking action to clarify this principle.
We don't need to clarify a principle of pragmatism.
You don't need to clarify the idea that food is for eating.
You don't need to clarify the idea that this is plainly about control and centralising food and the ability to distribute food and impecuniate and farmers so they don't have no power the same way that industry has been crippled in the previous century so that every facet of working life The working people that you have to represent but absolutely loathe, whose taxes you use to destroy them, the legacy media that you use to continually vilify them, whose movements you undermine, whose leaders you attack, whose movements you continually undermine, whose causes you claim are far-right.
All of these principles require clarification, but you ain't gonna get it from a corrupt government minister.
The government has received more than 15,000 applications and used over 14,000 agreement offers and said the vast majority of land in the scheme continues to produce food in a more sustainable, resilient way that's good for food production and the environment.
In an interview with The Telegraph this week, Caleb Cooper, Clarkson's farm manager, and if you watch Clarkson's show, Caleb's like a comedy character.
Like, I'm guessing obviously he's a legit farmer as well.
But like, this guy's like a normal guy.
And check out what he's saying.
He's pointing out the absolute fact of the matter.
Now, you know, if you watch the show, and I've not watched it yet, but I will watch it actually, because it seems like it's pretty much on the nose when it comes to some of the issues we're facing around food production and therefore freedom.
This is what he said.
He warned that there was too much reliance on cheap imports and not enough support for growers.
How does that feel?
If you're a farmer, if you're involved in agriculture, does that sound true?
He argued that if Britain continues to fail to produce sufficient food, it could lead to internal conflicts should there be another pandemic or global war.
This guy's got his finger on the pulse.
I mean, I suppose all they'd have to do now is say there's another pandemic or a climate change emergency and then we wouldn't have enough food and then they'd be able to control us and lock us in our homes and tell us that we had to take this medicine and that anyone who questioned it was like a fascist or far-right.
That's enough now, Caleb!
Get out there and plant some fucking rhubarb, you little fascist!
What happens?
England at war with itself, he said.
What an extraordinary image.
This guy, Caleb, is some kind of savant, isn't he?
The government said it was committed to British farmers producing at least 60% of the food eaten in the country.
Get out of our lives, you lot.
Get out of our lives, you corrupt psychopaths.
When it comes to fresh produce, the UK imports almost half of its vegetables and around 80% of its fruit each year.
We should all be organising our diet around what's available, what can be grown.
We should be supporting our farmers.
We should have interconnected communities.
We should have absolute representative, localised democracies wherever possible.
We should be freeing ourselves from the influence of these globalist psychopaths, these farmland acquiring lunatics that hate you, that want you starved and desperate and lost and alone.
Whatever it takes to forge new pathways of freedom, we should be willing to undertake together.
Look at this.
Another bizarre story.
English farmers are being offered exit payments of up to £100,000 so that they would retire, allowing, oh, centralisation of farming.
The government will buy the land.
English farmers wishing to retire from the agricultural industry are being offered exit payments of £100,000 under a defra scheme.
I guess that's some centralised organisation.
The lump sum exit scheme is designed to help farmers.
We're going to help you farmers who wish to retire or leave the industry, but found it difficult to do so for financial reasons.
I know similar plans are underfoot across the Netherlands.
The second largest creator or grower of food in the world.
Second largest exporter of food after your country, the United States of America.
What's happening to farmers in your country?
What's happening to farmers in my country?
What's happening to farmers around the world?
And do you think there's something extraordinary going on when our food sources are being controlled?
Well, we're being propagandised and told that eating this food is racist and eating that food is crazy and even looking at that food is far right.
Do you think that something extraordinary is happening when it seems that farmers are being systematically impoverished and put out of business, that their land is being forcibly purchased by the government in the Netherlands and in Germany?
When Bill Gates is acquiring farmland at a rate of extraordinary acreage, something unusual is going on.
I don't understand all of it but what I do know is that it's not being done to help you.
It's not being done to feed you.
One of the things that happened in the pandemic period is we awoke from the illusion of their care and their concern.
We saw how their treaties operate.
We saw how their relationships with Big Pharma and the media interconnect to generate conditions of compliance,
ignorance, sending us all either asleep or leaving us supine and vulnerable. They don't want you
strong, they don't want you awake, they don't want you activated, intercommunicated, growing
your own food, communicating freely with farmers, believing in a vision. No, they want you to
believe that Biden's your papi, Kamala's your mama, that Trump is the devil and that you should shut your
mouth and that there is no alternative Well, we're here to tell you that there is an alternative, that you are that alternative and that you are participating in the revolution just through your disobedience, just through your refusal to consume their lies and to consume their bugs.
But that's just what I think.
Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
We are gonna leave you now, if you're watching us on YouTube, because our home is Rumble, a place where we can speak freely about a variety of subjects that, let me tell you, with absolutely no doubt at all, the most powerful interest in the world would rather you did not know about, that you did not communicate openly about.
We'll be talking about the AstraZeneca vaccine, Canadian hate crime, and first of all, we'll be talking about Trump and those FBI documents and what they reveal.
See you later.
Click the link in the description.
Join us over on Rumble.
Now the FBI have been accused of altering and manipulating Trump's Mar-a-Lago classified documents to make them have information in them that I suppose would legitimize some of their activity.
It was recently revealed that they were allowed to use lethal force, whether you think that's standard or not.
It does at least indicate that the establishment potentially uses its infrastructure To punish its opponents.
Conspiracy fact or conspiracy theory?
Let's get into it.
Did you see Robert De Niro saying he feels that when he's having conversations with people that were Holocaust survivors, he feels like the potential ascent of Trump once again is comparable to the rise of Hitler?
I'm sure all of us admire Robert De Niro as an actor, right?
Who doesn't love Meet the Parents?
Who doesn't love Raging Bull?
Who doesn't love Taxi Driver, Goodfellas, some of the best movies in modern cinema history?
But some of these perspectives have got to be looked at.
Let's have a look.
We always hear about people from Eastern Europe, the Jews from other parts of Eastern Europe,
from Western Europe coming over, look what happened with France, with the Nazis and so
on.
And they come over and you hear these, and when I was a kid, they'd say, you don't really
appreciate this country.
You don't really appreciate what we know from experience.
Imagine what those people went through.
I'm just starting to see it.
You know, as a kid I said, Hitler, it's a nightmare that never would happen.
But now I see that it's possible.
And what those people, and sometimes I run into some people who are close to my age who
are from Eastern European countries or even Nazi Germany, you know, you understand it.
So what De Niro is describing is his personal fear that a second Trump term will lead to Nazism, to pogroms, to the execution of religious minorities and Robert De Niro is not alone in believing that and in fact there's a clear reason for those, I would say, I'm gonna say hysterical views.
That hysteria is deliberately generated by the legacy media.
You see it every day.
Bloodbath, bloodbath, bloodbath.
When he said bloodbath, there's no way he was just using a popular phrase.
He's talking about a bath all with blood in it.
We have seen hysteria continually around the subject of Donald Trump and now we are beginning to see the fruits of that hysteria.
People claiming that a second Trump term would be akin to the rise of Adolf Hitler.
But my concerns are more in alignment with the concerns of that great American political figure and orator, JFK.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covet means for expanding its sphere of influence.
On infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.
It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not
published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not
praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.
JFK was describing the deep state, the blob, the globalist projects, the
attempts to cut off and sever the relationship between the American people and
their government.
A relationship that fundamentally is supposed to mean that through representation and through the will of the people, Government is organised.
And he's saying this in 1960.
We've just been through Nazism.
In fact, some of the best Nazi scientists have been brought on board!
Come to Cape Canaveral, Fritz!
We're gonna need some of that expertise!
Right?
Maybe power operates in ways that are a little more insidious.
Then we have been led to believe.
Maybe it's possible that the same kind of authoritarian centralized forces that we have long feared are able to migrate and manipulate in exactly the manner that JFK was describing.
In short, my personal fears are bureaucracy Tyranny through technology.
I think that the forces that truly control the world would not be so dumb to present us with something as cartoonishly garish, ridiculous and plainly evil as Adolf Hitler with his murder of innocent people, industrialized racism and execution.
We have surely learned those lessons.
We can't make this content without the support of our glorious partners.
Here's a message from now.
Today's sponsors are American Financing.
Are you trapped in a cycle of debt from monthly expenses and high credit card interest rates?
I'm sick of it!
American Financing, a trusted partner of ours and potentially yours now in helping people achieve financial freedom.
They help homeowners tap into equity and on average their customers save, wait for it, $854 a month.
That's equivalent to receiving $10,000 in an annual rise or perhaps being given it by some sort of fairy or goblin.
It's a straightforward process.
You could close your loan in just 10 days.
By acting today, you might not even have to pay your next mortgage payment.
That sounds good if you're under a lot of pressure.
To regain control of your finances is a too significant aim to simply ignore.
This opportunity costs nothing.
Cool!
866-574-2500.
That's 866-574-2500.
Or visit AmericanFinancing.net slash Russell.
That's 866-574-2500 or visit AmericanFinancing.net slash Russell.
It's only available for Americans.
Let's have a look at how the FBI, a deep state power, was able to stage the claims that were made
against Donald Trump and the apparently, what's that word?
Classified.
That's that word I've been groping around for.
Classified documents that Donald Trump is being indicted for being in possession of.
In terms of the classified documents case, I remember the infamous picture that the FBI took of all those classified documents that they said that they took from Mar-a-Lago.
Specifically, tell me about what you're saying that, what evidence was tampered with, and did the FBI tamper with this?
Yeah, so that famous photograph, what we have now learned, and the government has had, Jack Smith and his prosecutors have had to admit, is that that was staged and those top secret classified
sheets that all the public saw and said, oh my God, look at those top secret
documents.
Those were placed there by the FBI.
And what Jack Smith admitted in court this week was that in his words, they
mishandled the classified documents and misrepresented those to the court.
Maria, that's a kind way of saying we tampered with the evidence and then we
lied to the court about it.
And they got caught when president Trump's lawyers and the other
co-defendants raised this issue and said, look, the documents here don't match up.
The documents that were presented to us don't match the digitally scanned records of when they were taken from Mar-a-Lago.
And Jack Smith, not only did they tamper with that and lie to the court about it, but he's now admitted to the court that he doesn't know how that happened.
happened. He's only offered a number of possible explanations for how that could
have happened. So he's absolutely blown the chain of custody. This reeks of
crossfire hurricane when the Obama-Biden administration fabricated evidence
before the FISA court, lied to the court about it to pursue Donald Trump.
And now we're seeing it again in this classified documents case.
The judge could dismiss this case at any point in time, Maria.
I think the only reason that she hasn't is she wants to document this publicly so that the public can see just how this case is being prosecuted, how unfairly Donald Trump has been persecuted in this matter by Joe Biden's Department of Justice.
That is extraordinary.
Again, remember JFK's words.
Deep state interests that act as guerrillas by night, not warfare through the day.
Do you think that this is the judiciary being used to target Donald Trump?
Or do you think there are genuine and legitimate concerns that he used campaign money in the incorrect way?
That there are a variety of allegations about his personal life?
It's very inconvenient, if that is the perspective that is being peddled, that the FBI tampered with evidence.
So like De Niro, I am afraid.
And you are afraid too, aren't you?
That power is making insidious moves behind the scenes in exactly the way that JFK described that power is coming, centralizing, authoritarianism is on the rise.
My fear is not that Donald Trump is the greatest threat that faces America.
My fear is the forces that marshal Joe Biden, those that pull the strings, are the greatest fear.
And in our country, the forces that are behind the Labour Party, Globalist powers not defined, as far as we know, by any ideology other than the acquisition of power and dominion.
This is not some covert description of any group or minority or religion or ideology.
There is no time for racism of any kind.
There is no time for hatred of any kind.
There is time only for immediate awakening before the threat we face is real.
Robert De Niro fears that Trump is some repurposed, reversioned Attempt at the militaristic dictatorships of the 20th century.
But what you and I rightly fear is that Orwell, Huxley and Kafka were right.
That it is bureaucracies and anonymous power, the removal of charismatic leaders actually, and their replacement with cadaverous avatars.
That's the real fear.
The real powerful individuals and institutions, we don't know their names.
You know that and I know that.
Remember, it really helps us if you like and subscribe wherever you're watching this.
Click the like button, subscribe to our content.
Now, nothing has given us more delight than learning that innocent people have got lethal blood clots as a result of medical mandates that were passed during the 2020s and the early part of This decade.
Of course, being ridiculous and sarcastic, the fact is that the AstraZeneca vaccine had to be pulled after they legally acknowledged that their product causes blood clots.
Is this the tip of the iceberg?
I think that's very, very likely, but it's difficult to prove.
But one conspiracy theory that's a conspiracy fact is now that AstraZeneca have had to withdraw their COVID vaccine worldwide.
Let's have a look at that.
Today's headline story is a pretty significant one.
AstraZeneca have been forced to admit that their product does, did, perhaps has always caused blood clots.
It's been admitted publicly, it's unavoidable, it's evident, it's obvious, and it's pretty astonishing for us to have to confront that reality.
AstraZeneca, as a result of the legal acknowledgement that their product causes blood clots, in very rare Very rare cases have been forced to globally withdraw it.
Now I want you to look at this, because this is an extraordinarily revelatory piece of propaganda.
This shows you how, when a global organization, remember AstraZeneca is worth 75 billion dollars, is one of the biggest companies in my country, the United Kingdom.
You may run the world now, but we got the accent still.
We still got The accent.
75 billion dollars it's worth.
AstraZeneca have clearly been forced to acknowledge legally, in a legal context, that their product in rare cases, very rare cases, causes blood clots.
Notice how they handle what amounts to a press release in The Telegraph.
That's a British legacy media organisation.
Notice how they're able to frame this information in the most favourable manner conceivable.
Almost as if by the end of it you think, I like AstraZeneca and those people that got blood clots kind of deserved it.
Have a look at this.
The Oxford AstraZeneca Covid vaccine is being withdrawn worldwide months after the pharmaceutical giant admitted for the first time in court documents that it can cause rare and dangerous side effects.
Or it says here a rare and dangerous side effects.
It's emphasized the word rare and it's used the singular to describe the nature of adverse events.
Let me know how that tallies with your experiences of vaccines in the chat guys.
Remember it was Bobby Kennedy who recently said 25% of Americans believe that they know someone who's died as a result of taking the vaccines.
That's a belief?
That doesn't mean it's an absolute fact but it's, you know, it doesn't sound like a very rare side effect does it?
There's 25% of Americans who believe that they know somebody who was killed by a COVID vaccine.
AstraZeneca said the vaccine was being removed from markets for commercial reasons.
It's just commercial reasons!
What's the commercial reason?
Well, when you sell a product to people, they stop liking it and buying it.
They said the vaccine was no longer being manufactured or supplied, having been superseded by updated vaccines that tackle new variants.
What it is, we're only withdrawing this vaccine not because we've admitted in court documents that it causes side effects, no, because we've got even better vaccines now.
Why aren't you taking them by the way?
What do you know what we don't know?
Vaxzevera, which sounds like a baddie in a Marvel movie and fundamentally acts like one, has come under intense scrutiny in recent months over a very rare side effect which causes blood clots.
Very rare, again very rare, it's very rare, we just want to stress it's Very, very rare.
Which causes blood clots and low blood platelet counts.
AstraZeneca admitted in court documents lodged with the High Court in February that the vaccine can in very, very... Are you not getting the message?
This is so rare!
Oh, it's so rare.
If you have one, put it in a zoo.
It's like a giant panda.
If you could find two people with AstraZeneca vaccine injuries, if you could get them to breed, you could sell them to zoos around the world.
They're like the Loch Ness Monster of injuries.
Well, Definitely then there won't be people registering adverse events all over the world.
There certainly won't be an explosion in excess deaths so significant that insurance companies have had to alter their premiums to accommodate the extraordinary number of people dying that aren't supposed to or at least predicted to be at risk of dying.
Vaxsevera!
Vaxsevera!
It can in rare cases cause, I would love that spelt out, thrombocytopenia syndrome.
Let's have a look at the next page.
But AstraZeneca has insisted the decision to withdraw the vaccine is not linked to the court case or its admission that it can cause TTS.
It said the timing was pure coincidence.
Pure coincidence!
Well, over here, we've been forced to legally admit that our product does, in very rare, very rare case, like a hummingbird landing on your finger, in very rare cases, it does kill people.
It's a pure coincidence.
That's what it is, a pure coincidence.
It's the only thing about their product that is pure.
is a pure coincidence.
A unique new strain of coincidence.
A coincidence as if from the heavens.
A coincidence bubbling up from a brook.
In a statement the company said, we're incredibly proud of the role
Vaxzeviria played in ending the global pandemic.
Are you?
According to independent estimates, I'd like to query the phrase independent estimates, over 6.5 million lives were saved in the first year of use alone.
6.5 million?
Well that's extraordinary because if it saved that many lives, I wonder why there are so many excess deaths?
Because you would have to counter the...
Deaths that have subsequently been happening against the 6.5 million people that are apparently alive now that wouldn't be alive.
Maybe these people are people that benefit from blood clots in some way.
Like superheroes, I suppose.
I'm blood clot man!
What's your special power?
Hemorrhaging.
Millions were saved in the first year of use alone.
Over 3 billion doses were supplied globally.
It's very rare!
Our efforts have been recognized by governments around the world and are widely regarded as being a critical component of ending the global pandemic.
Recognized by governments around the world?
Are you beginning to understand how I am beginning to understand that there are a nexus of power interests that include the media, governments, private corporations that act In cohesion with one another to create almost impenetrable realities.
And if you happen to be one of the people, those very rare people who got blood clots, you better be able to afford the legal bills.
You better be willing to withstand their shaming.
I mean, do you remember, for example, that Justin Trudeau went out of his way to say that you should take AstraZeneca?
Do you remember that moment?
Do you remember that he had no hesitation in publicly stating that if all you're offered is AstraZeneca You better take your medicine like my mama takes on Fidel.
For the Prime Minister, if you could just please talk to me about the AstraZeneca vaccine.
We're hearing about people showing up to their appointments in Montreal.
When they hear it's AstraZeneca, they don't want to get it.
What's your message to people who are worried about getting this vaccine?
Health Canada and our experts and scientists have spent an awful lot of time making sure that every vaccine approved in Canada is both safe and effective.
Safe?
And effective.
Do you remember how many times you heard that?
Do you remember how many times your reluctance, your hesitancy, your circumspection, your individual freedom, your bodily autonomy, your ability to make choices for yourself, your perfectly natural conjecture that there'd been no time to trial over a decent time frame, the efficacy and side effects of these vaccines were all seen as a kind of heresy?
As a kind of opposition to a religious dogma suddenly concocted the main liturgical requirement of which was your obedience, your compliance.
Do you think that's a coincidence?
Do you think that your compliance and obedience is just another adverse side effect?
A side effect at all?
Or is it the main event?
Are they trying to create a culture of obedient, docile, supine citizens that do not question, that take their medicine and shut our Therefore the best vaccine for you to take is the very first one that is offered to you.
That is how we get through this as quickly as possible and as safely as possible.
The very first vaccine.
Vaccines!
Get your vaccines!
Just snatch them off the floor!
Extraordinary wasn't it that these vaccines where you should just take the first one available to you were not
made available in the continent of Africa And they did not grant licenses for their manufacture in
that continent because you know people in Africa wouldn't be able to manage it
Almost as if there was some kind of profit motive and perhaps motives even more nefarious than that
we certainly now know that dual-purpose research is at least part of the history of the advent and
Invention of these curious products which many people believe don't even warrant the use of the word vaccine
Look how far behind you the legacy media are.
The reason that they're far behind you is because they are reaching out to grab you, to smother you, to shut you down and prevent your awakening and your advance.
It's not a coincidence.
As multiple variant COVID-19 vaccines have since been developed, there is a surplus of available updated vaccines.
So that's why we're doing this.
This has led to a decline in demand for Vaxzeviria, which is no longer being manufactured or supplied.
AstraZeneca has therefore taken the decision to initiate withdrawal of the marketing authorizations for Vaxzeviria within Europe.
We will now work with regulators, who we also fund, And our partners, who are the same people as the regulators, to align on a clear path forward to conclude this chapter.
And significant contribution to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Almost Churchillian now in their statesmanly approach to this issue.
Remember, notice how the media partner them in the constant reiteration of the words, very rare, very rare, you're almost lucky to have been vaccine injured.
Oh you lucky, lucky bastard!
What wouldn't I give to be vaccine injured?
I sometimes lie here in bed at night with my myocarditis thanking my lucky stars!
The UK government largely stopped using the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine by the autumn of 2021, by which time it supplied about 50 million doses in the UK.
It was replaced in the UK with Pfizer.
OK, remember their legal indemnity.
Moderna.
Many people that work at Moderna now that previously worked for the UK government.
In time for the winter booster campaign at the end of 2021.
AstraZeneca has always insisted that patient safety is our highest priority.
Thanks for that.
Patient safety is their highest priority.
Everything else is after that.
They arrive at AstraZeneca every morning.
Are the patients safe?
Are the patients safe?
Make sure that you can ensure that none of this information gets out there.
The company has said, from the body of evidence in clinical trials and real world data, the AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine has continuously been shown to have an acceptable, acceptable safety profile and regulators around the world consistently state that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of extremely rare.
Can we just say again?
This is extremely rare.
Do you want to play extremely rare bingo?
Do you want to take a drink every time they remind you that it's extremely rare and end up like Mickey Rourke?
Lost and alone somewhere in some extremely rare rehab because of the constant bombardment of the term.
But!
There's a human side to this, unfortunately.
Kate Scott, whose husband Jamie was left with permanent brain injury after having the vaccine, and who was the first person in the UK to bring a legal action, said AstraZeneca's COVID vaccine no longer being used in the UK or Europe, and soon the rest of the world, means no one else will suffer from this awful adverse reaction.
Kate, I know that your husband's had this terrible brain injury, but could you just say very rare?
A couple of times, but it's not rare in our house.
It's 100%.
Yeah, I know, but it's just good for the article if you'd say very rare.
Very rare.
How often, Kate, is it that you see the Loch Ness Monster?
Very rare?
Right, just cut the first bit and the bit after.
We'll use that very rare.
They say it's for commercial reasons, but maybe it's because it can no longer be seen as being within the acceptable safety parameters.
Let me know in the chat.
Is it for commercial reasons?
Or is it because it's no longer within the acceptable safety parameters?
Families whose loved ones died after taking the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine have abandoned attempts to sue the pharmaceutical giant after being told that they were likely to use.
Remember that the UK government are undergirding AstraZeneca's legal fees and payouts themselves with your taxpayer dollar, or in our case pounds.
You pay for the vaccine, you pay for the indemnity, you pay for the court cases when the product kills people, Do you see now the system?
Now why don't you get on and vote for one of these two globalists and shut your mouth!
Families have pulled out of a high court case after being told that they'll be unlikely to succeed with their claims because a leaflet issued at the height of the pandemic warned of a rare side effect associated with the vaccine.
So when Kate Scott comforts her children at night because their father has a brain injury, Or when the many, broken families, left in grief, bereavement and giddiness because of deaths caused by this product, seek to console each other, remember the leaflet.
Remember the leaflet.
Do you see another tenet of the bureaucracy we live within is as long as they've warned you, as long as you sign something, as long as they have indemnity, there's no requirement for honesty, there's no requirement for decency, there's no requirement for integrity or transparency or clarity and perhaps when you're grieving or weeping you can use that leaflet to wipe away your tears and And the tears of the children left behind by these irresponsible deaths that were known about prior to action being taken.
But did you get a leaflet though?
You did get a leaflet.
Legal experts believe that this could potentially protect the pharmaceutical firm against cases brought by families whose relatives were given a dose supplied after April the 7th 2021.
Well, let's face it, that's the actual reason that all of that happened.
The health secretary orders vaccine compensation scheme review as claims soar.
Oh look, the government step in to protect corporations, how astonishing.
The UK health secretary has ordered a review of the vaccine compensation scheme after a surge in claims following the pandemic.
Do you ever remember seeing on social media they're going to have legal hell to pay when the chickens come home to roost?
Do you remember that?
Do you remember those conversations?
Do you remember that those conversations were censored and shut down?
Do you remember that people were banned and shadow banned?
Do you remember that Moderna and Pfizer spent money to track independent journalists and pundits that were speaking about all of this?
And now...
Victoria Atkins has asked officials in her department to draw up options for reforming the vaccine damage payment scheme which campaigners have said is no longer fit for purpose.
It comes amid concern that the scheme is struggling to cope after becoming overwhelmed by a huge volume of claims from those suffering side effects after Covid vaccines.
But those people are hysterical.
Those people should be shamed.
When it comes to this and the vaccine saying, oh you can't shame them, you can't call them stupid, you can't call them silly, yes they are.
Those people Canada!
A soft and gentle and loving place, isn't it?
Or is it a kind of liberal and coiffured planet prison pilot place?
Here's Justin Trudeau proposing a new law that would grant the ability to arrest and detain people for crimes that they haven't even done yet, but might do if they had the opportunity.
Conspiracy fact or conspiracy theory?
Started as a theory, looking like a fact now.
Canada have found yet another way to censor you.
Just when you think Trudeau can't get any more Orwellian, he finds a new way to censor the future.
To use the past to criminalize you.
To make the mind of Philip K. Dick seem not like sci-fi dystopic future visions, just a blueprint for a better Canada.
What is Trudeau trying to prove over there?
And what is he trying to control?
Let's have a look at how the legacy media report on this story in Canada before we break down how these hate laws and apparent child protection laws will actually be used.
First of all, we'll start with some propaganda from the Canadian state.
Here we go.
The Liberal government has taken a second go at tackling harmful online content.
The new legislation tabled just this afternoon seeks to better protect both children and adults on the internet.
You've got to protect children and adults on the internet.
You're an adult or you're a child.
You could be either.
You're on the internet.
You are at risk.
You could see a word like f***.
For example, God knows what that would do to you.
I mean, as a child, Lord alone knows.
Is it not beginning to become clear that what they do is reverse engineer the circumstances under which anyone would become compliant to further authoritarianism?
An example being, well, free speech, that's a principle we all believe in.
Yeah, but you don't agree with free speech, do you, if it was about abusing children and exploiting children or hateful racist rhetoric?
Hmm, I suppose, no, I don't.
Good!
That means then that we will have to look at all information everywhere all over the time and control whatever information we want to control and censor whatever we want to censor.
Proposes establishing a digital safety commission, a five-person panel tasked with enforcing new rules around harmful content.
A five-person panel?
Who's this panel?
How's it going to be funded?
What are their intentions?
How will it be deployed?
As well as a new digital safety ombuds person.
I am the new Digital Safety Ombudsperson.
We're like Oompa Loompas in a way.
We come from a crazy, far-off land and we like to censor you.
Ba-doop-ba-doop-a-dee-doop.
The Ombudsman's coming to get you.
The bill also seeks to amend the criminal code to crack down harder on hate crimes.
We gotta crack down on the hate crimes, baby!
Let's see what Elon Musk is saying.
Remember that it's important that platforms like this one, Rumble, under the stewardship of Chris Pavlovsky, and X, under Musk, are willing to take a stand against this increasing censorship, against demands for surveillance, which will become increasingly risky.
He says, this sounds insane, if accurate, in response to Camus.
The Trudeau regime has introduced an Orwellian new law called the Online Harms Bill C63 which will give police the power to retroactively search the internet for hate speech violations and arrest offenders even if the offence occurred before the law existed.
That is pretty astonishing.
Let's get into the details of this bill as relayed through a British media organisation.
The CE63 legislation authorizes house arrest and electronic tagging for a person considered likely to commit a future crime.
When you see our conversation with Dave Martin, he talks about how the pandemic was an opportunity to legitimize and normalize the house arrest of your opponents and dissidents.
Note how often dissenters are smeared.
Notice how often dissidents are shut down.
Notice the increasing encroachment of state authority and the normalization of incarceration outside of penal institutions.
We're gonna have to lock you in your homes because it's too hot, too cold, too much cough, too much cough, danger cough, danger cough, too much trucker.
I saw a Huthi.
He was about yay high.
That son of a bitch, get in your homes.
A Huthi.
When you were a boy on Facebook, you said the f*** word.
You better get in your house, you f*** wording son of a bitch, you.
You're no better than a trucker.
I'll freeze your bank account so hard.
I'll tag your anklets so good.
I will Trudeau you till you wish you was in Cuba, baby.
If a judge believes there are reasonable grounds, to fear a future hate crime.
Look at how vague their language is.
Reasonable grounds to fear a future hate crime.
Do you ever experience fear?
I'm going to level you.
I experience fear because I've now, as a result of some of the work we do actually, experienced The astonishing and devastating power of the state, in particular when they work with corporations, in particular when they work with NGOs and peculiar shady online surveillance firms, often funded by the government and Big Pharma, that observe your online content, that compile your data, that find ways to shadow ban you using AI.
I know fear.
Fear.
Reasonable grounds to fear a future hate crime is not a basis for legislation.
This is the legitimization of further centralized authority.
Whether you are a conservative, a libertarian, a person of the right, a Muslim, a Jew, a Christian, an atheist, a transsexual, bisexual, non-binary person, I can't tell you how irrelevant all of that stuff is.
What is relevant is there is an Extraordinary force accruing that I believe to be... Hmm.
I don't like to even describe it in rational terms, although you can understand it in rational terms.
Legitimizing further authority at every single opportunity, always with the claim that they are protecting you.
Protecting us from what?
You need protection from them more than anything else in this world.
Is that becoming clear to you now?
Let me know in the chat if you fear anything more than these apparently liberal, extremely suave, lovely hair, lovely little face when they get the boot polish off it, politicians like Trudeau that claim to be protecting you, but seem to be protecting you by putting an ankle bracelet on you and shutting you in your house.
The as yet innocent party can be sentenced to house arrest, complete with electronic tagging, mandatory drug testing and communication bans.
Failure to cooperate nets you an additional year in jail.
Do you see?
They're creating pathways for condemnation.
Pathways for criminalization.
Do you see how organizations, often government-funded, that were deployed to fight the war against terror, to fight insurgents in Iraq because that war went so bloody well, turning the Middle East into what I heard one pundit call the Harvard of terrorism.
Organizations that had to be set up to countenance that terror are now domestically deployed.
You don't need me to tell you that.
Edward Snowden told you that.
You don't need me to tell you that.
Julian Assange told you that.
And that's why to this day they're celebrated as great heroes of Australia and of America.
When is it Edward Snowden day?
Is that in a couple of days now?
Oh no, he's in exile in Russia and Julian Assange is still in prison without trial awaiting extradition to America when they've just about Fingers crossed no comeback said they won't execute the guy under an espionage law that's been used more by Barack Obama than anybody else and successive presidents, whichever one you choose, that president didn't choose to pardon Julian Assange.
Without our partners, we can't bring you this kind of content.
Take a moment to hear what they're offering.
We can't continue to bring you this awakening and hopefully enjoyable content without the support of our partners.
That's why I've got to ask you, and I'm glad to ask you, are you struggling with back taxes or unfiled returns?
The IRS is escalating collections, adding, get this, 20,000 new agents and sending over 5 million collection letters to kick off 2024 to spend on things that you probably don't agree with like wars and measures and a total lack of infrastructure.
In these challenging times your best defense is Tax Network USA.
Don't let the IRS take advantage of you.
With over 14 years of experience, Tax Network USA have saved their clients over $1 billion in back taxes.
No matter the size of your tax issue, their expertise is your advantage.
They specialize in negotiating with the IRS, aiming to significantly reduce your debt.
Tax Network USA doesn't just negotiate, they also protect your assets from IRS seizures and manage your yearly returns for ongoing compliance.
Importantly, they are licensed to help you with all state tax issues, regardless of where you live in the United States.
The clock is ticking.
Don't wait as the IRS steps up its game.
Seize control of your financial future now.
Contact Tax Network USA for immediate relief and expert guidance.
Call 1-800-245-6000 or visit taxnetworkusa.com forward slash brand.
Don't let tax issues overpower you.
Turn to Tax Network USA and find your path to financial peace of mind.
All right, let's get back to this content.
What is a hate crime?
Yeah, what is a hate crime though?
Whatever a bloody Justin Trudeau says it is.
According to the bill, it's a communication expressing detestation or vilification.
But, clarified the government, this is not the same as disdain or dislike or speech that discredits, humiliates, hurts or offends.
Unfortunately, the government didn't think to include a graduated scheme setting out the relative acceptability of the words offend, hurt, humiliate, discredit, dislike, disdain, detest and vilify.
Who wants a government creating some spectra Of offensiveness, getting into etymology and semiotics and semantics.
Areas that I don't think they're qualified to be dabbling in when every single law they pass is just a further legitimization of authority.
If they can make you a criminal somehow...
Metastasizing the past, making claims about the future, then they will do it.
Remember when we were saying, but what is a terrorist though?
Oh, I don't know.
Check their hat.
Check their skin color.
Well, now you're a terrorist.
They don't call it a terrorist anymore.
You're a future hate criminal.
And if wearing a tiny hat ever becomes a crime, I'm in a serious, serious amount of trouble.
Under Bill C-63, you can be put away for life for a crime whose legal existence hangs on the distinction between dislike and detest.
Now, I just want to say that that was more like a detesting than a disliking, so I'm afraid that's gonna have to be good old life imprisonment for you.
These are decisions getting made by what's her name?
Chrystia Freeland and Justin Trudeau and people that you can't trust to run kindergartens, let alone countries.
People that you can't trust to participate in piano side songs without making you want to vomit.
You can't let these people run countries.
When did that happen?
Can't you tell by looking at them?
Can't you feel it?
When did we forget to understand, to discern, to determine heroes from villains?
When did we start to allow these weak fools, these lunatics, these no marks, these nearly people to be in positions of power over us?
When did it happen?
The legislation appears to apply retroactively, meaning you can be hauled up before the Human Rights Tribunal for any material you've left online, regardless of its posting date.
Anonymous accusations and secret testimony are permitted.
That's the kind of thing that they need.
Anonymous accusations, secret testimony.
This is how justice works now.
The judiciary is a tool of authority.
The media is a tool of the authority.
When these two things come together, watch as surely as if it were two of the four horsemen of the apocalypse, because power is on the move.
They are aware of the power that's accruing around open communication.
They're aware of the power that accrues as taxonomies and categories melt away, as we no longer think in terms of left or right.
As we individually and communally spiritually awaken, they have to prepare a counter-offensive.
And their counter-offensive will be much stronger than any of the Ukrainian counter-offensives that you are funding against the nuclear superpower, Russia, that we're supposed to imagine will one day just go, OK, we give up or we give up.
This Zelensky, he reminds me of Churchill, who was an ally of Russia, incidentally, during that war against evil, who, by the way, the Nazis literally get applauded in the Canadian Parliament.
You saw that story, right?
Don't forget!
Use your eyes!
Trust yourself!
As the great American comedian Bill Hicks said, you are right!
You are right!
Not those people who are trying to tell you how to think.
You're right!
Don't forget!
Stay awake!
You're right!
You're right!
Not those fuckers who want to tell you how to think!
You're fucking right!
Secret testimony is permitted at the tribunal's discretion.
I'll thank god it's at the tribunal's discretion.
Complaints are free to file and an accuser, if successful, can hope to reap up to a $20,000 payout.
They're rewarding people for anonymous accusations!
This is amazing!
With up to another $50,000 going for the government.
It's a win-win situation.
You take $20,000, we'll take $50,000, we'll freeze their bank accounts, and they're all going to prison.
What does all this have to do with protecting children online?
Yeah, difficult to see that, isn't it?
And if there is one community, one social class, one group, who seem to have a peculiar predication when it comes towards probation of children, it's these people!
No?
I mean, seems to be pretty high up on their list, based on some of the information that we're acquiring.
All the social media companies are going to be supervised by a brand new government body called the Digital Safety Commission.
Just that perfect line between so boring you can barely hold it in your head, so vague it could do almost anything.
The Digital Safety Commission can, without oversight, require companies to block access to any content, conduct investigations, hold secret hearings.
Hitler would have loved this!
I'm not saying that Canada's like Hitler, I haven't got time to remind you of the Nazis that they saluted, or the fact that Chrystia Freeland, who's the Home Secretary's grandfather, was literally in the Nazi Party, or that bloody Justin Trudeau said, I like the way China does things.
I don't got time to remind you of any of that.
I just want to say the idea that they can have conduct investigations and hold secret... That's power!
That is power!
Where did power go?
When did like big tech become so powerful?
Extraordinary.
This is where power is now.
They require companies to hand over specific content and give all data collected to third-party researchers accredited by the Commission.
All data, any content, no oversight.
Extraordinary.
We have some familiarity with some of these organizations.
We've been observing them.
We've been studying them.
They're extraordinary.
The ostensible purpose of putting the commission and not ordinary police in charge is so that you can act informally and quickly.
Informally?
Hi, listen, I know I'm not your real dad, just want to have a bit of a chat about stuff you've been posting online ever since you was born.
Now, this is not a formal process.
Look at that, I've got my sleeves rolled up.
I'm a bit like a pal.
I'm a bit like a pal, really.
You can trust me, can't you?
You're under arrest and I don't need a warrant.
Quickly, without a warrant, in situations where material victimizing a child could spread quickly across the internet.
What that means, in effect, is that the Digital Safety Commission is not accountable and does not have to justify its actions.
Convenient.
As the Canadian Civil Liberties Association says in its sharply worded critique of the bill, it endows government appointees with vast authority to interpret the law, make up new rules, enforce them, and then serve as judge, jury, and executioner.
You don't think that they would ever... You don't imagine that maybe they wouldn't... You think that, oh, God, no, they would never misuse that, would they?
Yeah, I think maybe they would.
Canada already has a law that criminalizes conspiracy, right?
You've got that law, so you don't need that.
And another law criminalizing threats.
So we're not talking about someone who is planning murder or terrorism.
Is pedophilia legal in Canada?
Have you not got laws for that?
You would assume that's also something that there's legislation for.
Then who are we talking about?
People who read the wrong websites?
People who didn't get vaccinated?
People who criticize the government?
Let me know which of these categories you fall into.
It's Canada, baby.
People who go to church and believe certain types of immorality will send you to hell?
With the online harms bill, as with the reckless invocation of the Emergencies Act and the de-banking...
Making a mockery of the rule of law and the public order they are swarmed to uphold.
Absolutely staggering.
Let's have a look at the glorious near pop star, that swaggering suave beefcake of a man, the Prime Minister of Canada who owes so much more, Justin Trudeau.
Everybody, let's have a look at him.
Facebook has made the decision.
This is great because what he's doing here is claiming to support journalists, but it's really weird.
The way that he supports journalists gives them further power to censor.
It's weird how this keeps happening.
That they shouldn't have to compensate hard-working journalists telling local news stories.
Who's that in the background?
We've gathered together some mostly bald, hard-working journalists.
Look at these poor bastards.
That one over there has worked so hard buttoning up all those buttons and he's not even getting rewarded by MEDA.
Well, we've got to do something about it.
It is a decision by MEDA that makes billions of dollars of profit all around the world, that they have no accountability You know, don't you want to hear some local stories?
Yeah, I'd like to hear some stories.
I'd like to hear why you are legitimising reaching back into the past, imagining the future like some giddy soothsayer, and using these extraordinary powers to potentially lock up, imprison and impede political opponents or even free speech itself.
Actually make sure people are properly informed.
I don't think you want people properly informed, Justin, otherwise they may become quite non-compliant.
And instead make money off of sharing of information without recognising the role they must play.
Do you think for a moment this globalist lunatic believes in a strong independent media, the very kind of media that report on the kind of corruption that's been occurring in Canada, whether it's the evocation of the Emergency Act, whether it's the extraordinary appearance of a Nazi in Parliament.
I just can't let go of that one.
The imprisoning of clergy people, the shutting down of protests, the freezing of bank accounts, and now a bill that claims that it's there to protect the children.
It's always to protect the children.
But would obviously legitimise the opposition to and ultimately censorship and shutting down of all political opposition.
And all done with such a wonderful haircut.
Just focus on their haircut.
That's why he always likes to have a backing band made up of bald people.
This is a test moment.
It is a test moment.
And countries are going to have to.
It is a test moment.
We are being tested.
Do you feel like you're being tested?
Are you feeling, are you starting to work out what the game is yet?
I'm feeling tested, Justin!
Where countries are going to have to realize that either we stand up for journalism and the profession, faced with internet giants that refuse to actually participate in it, or We bow down to them and allow them to make billions more dollars?
Oh, they're gonna make billions.
We can't bow down to them.
So who do you believe in?
Justin Trudeau?
Does Justin Trudeau seem true though to you though?
Or does Justin Trudeau seem like some sort of slick, immaculate, well-oiled, unctuous little blimp ...that operates on behalf of a globalist establishment, a WEF stooge who fawns over Zelensky and his khakis... Hello Vladimir!
...and would censor you to within an inch of your life.
Any of these utterances that are streaming past in the chat or are underneath us right now, Trudeau will be all over that.
You guys are getting braceleted right up the ankle.
If Trudeau has his way, your free speech is their terrorism.
But that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the chat.
Thank you so much for joining me for this show today.
On Friday, we're going to be exposing the deep state like never before.
What is the center of all this power?
Of course, we know it's expressed through global corporatism.
But how is it enacted?
How is it imposed?
It's through the deep state.
Remember, if you want to become an Awakened Wonder, click the red button.
You get early access to interviews.
You become a member of our weekly book club.
We meditate every week.
And we do exclusive Here's the News videos on subjects that, frankly, I wouldn't dare to stream broadly and widely.
We talk about the Red Heifer Prophecy.
We talk about what's going on at CERN.
Some people think that the CERN Hydra Collider project is about opening a hellmouth.
I mean, it's pretty cool actually.
I mean, I don't know, if they're not opening a hellmouth, I don't know why they have Goat people at the ceremonies when they open it.
It's weird, man.
I'd like to welcome some of our new members like Karen Zimpko, Hypnotrix, SexyBLKModrb, Andrew01756 and rbird33.
Join us next Friday, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
Until then, if you can, stay free.
Switch on.
Switch on.
Export Selection