Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 19, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:11:45

Elon Musk vs Don Lemon Gets HEATED! FULL INTERVIEW Released - Stay Free - #328

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I'm gonna watch that.
	you Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
	Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
	I'm enjoying the rumble comments enormously.
	Mamma Tears.
	Russell's probably spending time with his family, certainly a lot more polite than some of the other speculations, and frankly, insults that adorn that wall of free speech.
	Hello too to Ashella and Topher Chris and Shaman711 in the Awakened Wonder chat.
	Those are the people that have put their money where my mouth is.
	The fight for freedom.
	That's a good Like, not in a literal way.
	They're not putting money in my mouth like some warped strip joint.
	I'm saying, yeah, we'll get Kate Williams on.
	It's not easy to get Kat Williams on.
	Negligent banana.
	Pink hat, pink hat, pink hat.
	Did you know?
	Oh, yeah.
	You want merch?
	I'll give you merch.
	Don't panic.
	It's not gonna be another story.
	I'm just showing you a t-shirt.
	It's alright that I do this.
	It's okay.
	Hey, check it out.
	What's happening?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, boy!
	Can you do that in frame, yeah?
	Move the mic.
	Is that better?
	Yeah, we're in.
	Check that out!
	Merchandise available now.
	Vision Mixing is being done by our CEO today, so it could be pretty crazy.
	Ours mum, hope you get well soon mate.
	You can support us by getting some amazing merch, because we need to make a freedom movement.
	Why?
	Well mostly because we're on the precipice of World War Three.
	The New York Times are almost trying to normalize the idea of the apocalypse.
	We asked you what story did you want us to cover and I'm so proud of you.
	I'm so proud that we are part of a community when people are offered the opportunity to see either social media censorship stories Or Elon Musk vs. Lemon, a sort of culture war spat.
	Or ongoing rumors about Kate Middleton's appearance and disappearance and reappearance.
	And my close family member, shall I say, is pretty convinced that even the latest footage of Kate is not legitimate and real.
	I'm so glad.
	Let's have a look at those poll results.
	Actually, let me pull them up.
	I can do this.
	I'm in charge of the buttons.
	Look at that.
	That was, God, a few hours ago.
	You were well into Joe Biden's social media censorship.
	So that's about the Supreme Court now are evaluating whether or not the government can continue to put pressure on social media to censor stories as they were proven to have been doing during the COVID era.
	Russell Crowe, Shit, yeah, you'll have to see that.
	I++ goes, wait, does this mean this is Russell Crow merch?
	It does, but I don't want you ever to say that again, because that is confusing for our branding.
	Yes, I'm called Russell, and yes, that is a crow, but I don't want you under any circumstances to put those two words together in your minds.
	Do not use your minds to make decisions for yourselves.
	Be obedient.
	Obey the system.
	Obey the system.
	And if this system wants you to think that Houthis, who you'd not heard of like literally a week ago, are the worst people in the world, then you better believe it, because the Houthis have declared war on the environment.
	The Green Movement must speak out about pollution from Red Sea Maritime Terrorism, which would devastate livelihoods in the ocean.
	I love that!
	I love that story.
	That's how determined the neoliberals are to hate Houthis.
	Like, they'd be freedom fighters if they were doing something that was somehow convenient to the agenda of the globalist elite.
	The Houthis, that's like hating the Ewoks in Return of the Jedi, ain't it?
	It's like watching Return of the Jedi and going, oh, that little Chief Chirper, he should get it.
	Or even the cute, cute one that was like a child.
	You know, like the child Ewok that didn't eat... I can't remember if he was called Wiccan or something.
	I feel like he was called Wicket.
	Now I watch those films.
	Okay, now one of the things that's going to be a problem for Joe Biden is as he continues to use his Irish heritage to glean populist appeal, he'll have to acknowledge that continuing to supply arms in military conflicts that contradict Ireland's historic support of Palestine is gonna be awkward.
	As you know, the Irish people are deeply troubled about the catastrophe that's unfolding before our eyes in Gaza.
	Well, stop sending weapons then, Joe, if you love Ireland so much.
	It's complicated, complicated to be in the world when the priority must remain the agenda of the military-industrial complex and forces of global authoritarianism that will use the culture war, that will use any war to increase control of the domestic population and increase the profits of the military-industrial complex.
	On most days I wouldn't want to be in Joe Biden's shoes, but today I particularly don't want to be in Joe Biden's shoes.
	I'm more worried about Joe Biden's upper body.
	him with some anklet support for his little wee anklets.
	Many observers couldn't help but notice his footwear.
	Are those sneakers?
	Yep, they're so-called...
	I'm more worried about Joe Biden's upper body.
	I think that's where he needs the support.
	Look, I wouldn't normally critique the posture of an octogenarian, but the simple fact is,
	is his torso is rigid.
	Rigid!
	He needs some thoracic movement, you know?
	I would say, if I was a hippie, and hey, look at me, that he needs to open up that heart chakra.
	He looks like a wardrobe on a roller skate being wheeled through the grounds of the White House.
	Lifestyle sneakers made by Hoka, designed for maximum comfort and support.
	I don't know why a Frankenstein having it off with a vampire would create a werewolf.
	Frankenstein one from the monsters. While walking or hiking.
	I don't know why a Frankenstein having it off with a vampire would create a werewolf. That ain't
	good genetics. They have a wide soul, no doubt great for stability and the president does have a...
	Advertise those shoes on our TV show.
	We got enough merch!
	Check out the merch!
	Let's see that graphic go!
	There's Vision Mix like it's 1990!
	Check it out!
	Let me know which of these t-shirts you like.
	And if you get one of those t-shirts, right, and customize it and send it back here, we will give you a hundred dollars worth of merch.
	And indeed, if you can answer this question, I'll send you a signed t-shirt right now.
	Who is it that is provoking Putin into a nuclear conflict?
	Is it NATO?
	Is it the Ewoks or is it the Hoothies?
	To answer that question if you answer it on Rumble we'll send you that t-shirt.
	We've already got your email if you're an awakened wonder.
	Let us know.
	First couple to get it right we'll send you this signed t-shirt and I'll put your handle in it too to let you know I love you.
	Now we asked you what story you wanted to hear about and you told us The main story should be Biden's attempt to continue to impose censorship and regulation over big tech in a way that you might imagine would not be afforded over ordinary legacy media outlets.
	But you also have to bear in mind that the legacy media from its inception has been in the service of the state and the powerful.
	You need only look at that New York Times story about the CIA bases in Ukraine to understand that.
	We'll be getting to that story a little later.
	While we're still on YouTube, we're gonna cover this Don Lemon-y Elon Musk thing, you know.
	It's interesting, I suppose, because Lemon, for a minute, as you know, was gonna be on X, and I suppose that made many people think that liberal voices would not only be afforded free speech, On X, because Musk has always been clear, free speech is for everyone, it's going to function as a town square.
	That don't mean though that he's got to fund it through sort of media contracts, like I guess he has relationships with content makers on X, which of course is part of his business, part of the model, totally legit.
	But when you see how Don Lemon, that's how we say in England, was talking to Elon Musk, you feel like, yeah, he was like agitating him, you know, like it was a very provocative, I would say, Haughty, supercilious, condescending way of communicating.
	That's what I'd say.
	Me, um, like my various roles, I've worked on MTV and shows like that.
	I've interviewed like, wow, Tom Cruise, Sandler, uh, Christina Aguilera, them ones, Britney Spears, all them type of pop stars and everything.
	You're nice to them, innit?
	Like that's what you do.
	You don't sort of like go, Now lookie here Christina Aguilera and start like like mugging her off you gotta be nice to her like Elon Musk he is very wealthy and powerful so you can ask him questions but you shouldn't I suppose be confronting him with a CNN agenda on a
	Independent media space and X is about independent media.
	Would you say that?
	Let me know what you think in rumble.
	Let.
	Me.
	Know.
	Uh, hey Russell, I noticed Google in top news said vitamin D is bad for you.
	Vitamin D is not bad for you.
	It's really good for you.
	Definitely do take vitamin D. That's propaganda.
	That's mad, crazy propaganda.
	So if you fall down on the side of mmm lemon, put L in the chat.
	If you fall down on the side of musk, put M in the chat as we get into this topic.
	We'll be on YouTube For about another 10 or 15 minutes then we'll be exclusively on that sweet stream of freedom that is Rumble and I'll be telling you how you can change your cloud services over to Rumble 2 and get an incredible discount.
	Why should you have Microsoft, Amazon or Google in charge of your information?
	Information that they would definitely share with the state if you became an undesirable.
	There's more M&Ms in that chat than...
	I was going to say something like a party at Brian Stelzner's house.
	I don't know, I was going to say, I was trying to have some image about M&M's, but I was thinking, I was sort of suggesting that the M&M's was in someone's bum.
	That didn't seem like a right thing to say.
	It's not favourable.
	It's not a nice thing to say about people.
	It can't be proven in any way.
	Let's have a look at the Also, if you ain't on AwakendWonder yet, we're doing a new deal where you can get one month free on locals, you know, where we house our AwakendWonder community, where we do an additional video every single week.
	Chemtrails next week.
	Kate Middleton.
	This week, and when we do interviews with like Charlie Kirk or we've got Roseanne coming up, we've got George Galloway coming up soon, then you can join us for those conversations and put questions on occasions.
	We've got some other great interviews coming up with other Rumble content creators as well.
	Okay, let's get into this mmm lemon story right away.
	Yeah, Jim, it's a window into who Elon Musk is and how he thinks.
	And I think... Weird way to describe an interview already, isn't it?
	Yeah, Jim, it's a window into Elon Musk and how he is and how he thinks.
	Well, like it's like a sort of a transparent pain inside of his mind.
	What the big takeaway is, is you're seeing really how radicalized by the right wing Elon Musk, one of the most consequential people living on Earth, He's one of the most consequential people living on earth.
	This person talks unusual.
	Has become.
	I mean, during this interview, he attacks the news media.
	He misleads on diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
	Does he really do that?
	Is that what Elon Musk is doing?
	Or is Elon Musk not supporting a centralized authoritarian agenda?
	And I'll tell you, if you're... I know some of you guys, you're watching this in Ireland, right?
	We've got such an amazing report coming up on the Ireland referendum.
	You know, the sort of cultural bill that's just gone through Ireland, like whether you wanted to change the constitutional wording around women and family, which has been just fully, fully rejected.
	So, in a sense, what Musk is, is independent of the centralised authoritarian agenda.
	He's rejecting that stuff.
	And watch the... Can I invent a word here?
	The Trumpification of Musk.
	Anyone who's powerful enough to stand up to the agenda receives what I would call the Trump treatment.
	They are demonized.
	They are vilified.
	They attack the person.
	In a little UK way, I've even had a dose of it myself, but Tucker gets it big time.
	Musk gets it big time.
	He equates moderating hate speech, really vicious hate speech, on the X platform to censorship.
	He lashes out against advertisers who left the platform Following his anti-semitic endorsement which he only walked back after he had lost effectively a lot of money when those advertisers left.
	So there's CNN's take and I guess Don Lemon is still a CNN insider and when it comes to the subject of censorship there's literally at the moment a supreme Court case inquiry going on into whether or not the Biden administration applied undue pressure to social media platforms.
	So after they found that they did, they applied undue pressure, then the government pushed back, you know?
	So, like, it's not like Musk is inventing the idea that there is censorship.
	We all know you lot have experienced censorship online, haven't you?
	Let's have a look at Don Lemon's intro, and you can understand why Musk might be agitated by it.
	If you're watching this on YouTube, we'll be there for a few more minutes, then we'll be Exclusively in that sweet stream of freedom.
	Welcome to the Don Lemon Show, everyone.
	We're still here.
	In a minute, I'm gonna... We're overcoming the odds.
	Bring you my conversation with Elon Musk.
	The one that everyone is talking about.
	But first, let me tell you a bit about the show.
	Contrary to what you might have heard, we weren't cancelled by X. Yes, after months of begging me, wooing me to offer some exclusive content on his platform, Elon Musk decided to scrap the deal.
	But our plan is, and always has been, to release this show everywhere.
	On YouTube, on Spotify, on iHeartRadio.
	just about any...
	I don't reckon Elon Musk was begging him.
	Do you think so?
	Let me know if you can envisage in your mind, particularly if you've seen any of the footage from Don
	Lemon's pretty awkward interview, whether or not you can envisage Elon Musk sort of in a
	position of, what do I want to say, sort of supplicant and begging dear Don Lemon there.
	Placing stream content.
	Now for my conversation with Elon.
	As with all my interviews, no restrictions, no ground rules, nothing off limits or out of bounds.
	That is until the interview ended.
	So what went wrong?
	I don't know.
	But my whole...
	Nothing off limits or out of bounds.
	Do you remember when Don Lemon was still on CNN?
	Was it him that literally said, people should be shamed?
	And like they wouldn't, you weren't allowed to say ivermectin.
	And when Joe Rogan treated his own coronavirus, somewhat successfully, using unsanctioned
	and non-profitable medications.
	Don Lemon was one of the chief cheerleaders, right?
	You remember that?
	Hope is that you learned something about both Elon and me.
	Two people who come from completely different vantage points on almost every single issue.
	Me and Elon are just a couple of guys, a couple of cops, in a way.
	It's like a lethal weapon.
	And I challenge you, Elon, to watch the whole interview.
	And tell the world why this isn't what you claim you want on X. Yeah, okay, that's interesting.
	I can imagine what may have been objectionable, because, as I say, when you do interviews, there's got to be some congeniality, some conviviality.
	I've had loads of conversations with people I strongly disagree with.
	Of course I have.
	Why wouldn't you?
	But there has to be, I would say, a degree of civility.
	And I would also suggest, one of my main problems with the neo-liberal legacy media is the assumption that they're talking down to you.
	When you see those shows like Morning Joe or Jen Psaki or whatever, there's this kind of what I call rational hysteria.
	A kind of religious zeal masked in the language of materialism.
	Attacks on values that many people hold sacred and hold dear as if they're somehow out-of-date superstitions.
	While amplifying imaginary threats.
	While attacking a way of life that's been very important for a lot of people for a long time.
	And above all else, a kind of superciliousness.
	Yeah, my chat is fast.
	Haffo Hedge in the chat.
	A kind of condemnation.
	of blue-collar working-class Christian people or Muslim people or Jewish people just a general condescension to the ordinary working people who, let's face it, the genie's out of the bottle now.
	They want to just shut up.
	When they say democracy, they mean vote for Joe Biden.
	That's what democracy means.
	Democracy is you vote for the person we tell you to.
	And I know those of you in America will say, now it's not a democracy, it's a constitutional republic.
	And I don't mind what you call it.
	Why would I?
	What I'm saying is, is truly the principle is this.
	Individual sovereignty, community freedom, the right to have our voice, the right to have our tradition, the right to be different, surely.
	They don't want you having any of those rights.
	Have a look at this conversation where Don Lemon is the sort of living rec You don't think it's okay for them not to advertise with or have their content or their advertisement next to something that is anti-semitic?
	That is a different question.
	You can absolutely choose next to which content do you want your advertiser to appear.
	Absolutely, of course.
	And we have, I think, very good ad placement controls in this regard.
	So you said if they kill the company, it's them.
	But doesn't the buck stop with you?
	I have to say, choose your question carefully.
	There's five minutes left.
	Okay, but so... Oh, that made me feel edgy, that bit.
	Choose your question carefully, there's five minutes left.
	Have you had moments like that in your life?
	I don't like that sort of stuff, do you?
	Do you enjoy it or do you feel sort of bad when that kind of thing happens?
	See those moments of awkwardness?
	Can you even through prayer envisage a world where we might all get along better?
	Where there may be hope?
	Where we don't double down on our dislike for certain avatars of certain cultural values?
	Yeah, Ooga Booga, that was a warning shot, wasn't it?
	Is this the question you want to ask?
	The same question is, you said that they are killing the company, but you're the head of the company.
	But does it stop with you?
	I acquired X in order to preserve freedom of speech in America, the First Amendment.
	Thank you.
	And I'm going to stick to that.
	And if that means making less money, so be it.
	Hey!
	Oh, just remember that competition.
	Who is provoking Putin into a nuclear conflict?
	Is it NATO, the Ewoks or the Hoofies?
	On Rumble, the winner is Farquhar.
	Farquhar, give us your email so we can send you this signed t-shirt.
	And over in our AwakendWonder locals community, John the Cyclist, we already know how to communicate with you because you've given us your email already when you became a member of our community.
	Mwah!
	This blessed t-shirt, this holy shroud is on its way to each of you.
	We'll create another one.
	Well, not create.
	I mean, we're not... It's not alchemy.
	We'll get another one using the...
	Typical techniques.
	Now, let's have a look at how Don Lemon put his case over on that bastion of debate that's known as The View.
	I've been on that view.
	My favourite person ever on The View, I feel like, was Norm.
	When I see Norm on The View, that was my favourite one.
	Alright, let's have a look at Don Lemon on The View.
	I went into this with my eyes open, and look, this is just an old saying in the South, and they say, you knew I was a snake before you picked me up.
	Yeah.
	I'm not saying he's a snake, but I'm just saying that... It's a weird thing to say.
	It's a weird thing to say, isn't it, already?
	You knew I was a snake... It's an old saying in the South, you knew I was a snake before you picked me up.
	I'm not saying he was a snake.
	What do you think about that?
	That's not very nice.
	It's relative to this.
	So I went into this with my eyes open, but truly, I went into it with the best of intentions.
	I heard your conversation just briefly about independence.
	I am an independent, regardless of what people think.
	Elon Musk thinks I'm on the left or what have you.
	I'm an independent.
	I believe in free- Sean Kean, if you don't like America, get the fuck out.
	People say that, so that's really amazing to me.
	I love it.
	I love it.
	I know you're not talking to me.
	I'm obviously not in America.
	It's funny.
	Russell needs a cup of coffee.
	How agitated do you guys want me, man?
	How, like, on it do I need to be for you?
	Look, this show is an hour long.
	We've got a long way to go.
	Don't leave it all in the gym.
	Don't lose it all in the first 15.
	You've got to keep moving, baby.
	Speech.
	I believe that people have the right to say whatever they want to say, but you suffer the consequences for it when you say it.
	I took them at their word.
	They courted me for months.
	Yeah.
	So what happened?
	They're talking about free speech right now, but after all that, shame them!
	Shame them!
	And remember, then they found out that a lot of people that were not taking that medication were people from working communities, a lot of African-American people wouldn't take the shot, a lot of people from religious communities wouldn't take the shot, and then people are like, no listen, when you're saying shame them, guess who you're saying that to?
	You're saying that to people that we pretend that we care about, so that we can create further division and pretend to have some values.
	It was just uncomfortable for him to sit in front of someone and actually have to answer questions, to be held accountable.
	Right.
	To really, you know, instead of being in a friendly, usually for the most part, his interviews are with a friendly crowd.
	Did he not ever see you on television?
	Yeah.
	That's what I didn't understand.
	Yeah.
	Yes, but I would be... Well, he thought because he was paying you... He thought he bought you.
	...you were supposed to kneel at the altar.
	He must have.
	But that's not what journalists do.
	Right.
	I know that.
	Brother, I think getting fired by Elon Musk is something you should wear as a badge of honor.
	Yes.
	Thank you.
	Thank you, ladies.
	Thank you.
	All right that's enough about that isn't it?
	Should we get on with it?
	Do you want to see the... right we're talking about free speech there and in a sense what's happening is that at the moment Don Lemon's being used in a porn... as a porn in... not in porn... as a porn... in porn... as a porn in a game where it's claimed that X in spite of a lot of free speech grandstanding are censorial but that's, in my view, not what's happened.
	It's that a deal has been cancelled because of, I guess, a difference of opinion.
	Where free speech is really in jeopardy is in the story that you voted for Biden's attempt to overturn the ruling that they were needlessly and overly censorial.
	When it came to their control over social media, in particular during the pandemic period.
	Let's have a look at Biden's social media control and how the Supreme Court is responding to it.
	Just this morning, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a high-stakes case that could
	set new standards for free speech in this country. And at the center of this case is just how far the
	government can go in pushing social media companies to take down misinformation, especially on hot
	button topics. That's already an interesting framing.
	How far the government can go in pressuring social medias to take down misinformation.
	Now remember during the pandemic it wasn't misinformation that was taken down, it was true information that was unfavorable.
	Remember that.
	Remember that they censored Jay Bhattacharya, they censored people saying that you can't vaccinate at the height of a pandemic, that lockdowns may not be effective.
	It was true information that was censored.
	That Mark Zuckerberg admits that they took down information that was true but that the government wanted them to take down.
	So we're not already, the legacy media in the form of MSNBC, are framing this story in a manner that's favourable to the agenda of the powerful.
	This is the sort of stuff we have to learn to spot, I guess, or just flat out ignore.
	Like COVID-19 and election security.
	States like Louisiana and Missouri are accusing the Biden administration of illegally targeting conservative opinion content on social media platforms.
	It's the most important free speech case in our lifetime.
	The justices heard arguments this morning at Missouri, Louisiana, and a group of social media users complained the administration's push for tech companies to remove posts about COVID amounted to government coercion.
	It's treating Facebook and these other platforms like they're subordinates.
	Would you do that to the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal or the Associated Press or any other big newspaper or wire service?
	I think we can assume at this point that there is a good degree of control that's practiced through conventional and legacy media outlets and you lot know about Project Mockingbird and the degree to which the deep state have infiltrated and control legacy media and even when there isn't tacit or explicit control Being practiced, you know, between those two poles, what there is, is a shared agenda.
	As your George Carlin says, when the agenda is the same, no... Can you do the quote for me in the chat?
	It's like, when the agenda is the same, conspiracy isn't necessary.
	Can you remind me of what that is?
	Someone post the proper thing in the chat.
	I'm mangling up George Carlin's quote.
	I'm so sorry.
	...problem if the government is engaged in coercion, but if it stays on the persuasion side of the line and all we're talking about is government speech, then there's no state action.
	The justices seem skeptical of the idea that by alerting social media companies to disinformation, the government was somehow coercing them.
	They didn't see the evidence for that, and they said there should be a place for government officials to go to platforms and talk about harmful content, as long as they weren't, again, using their powers to coerce these companies, because that would violate the First Amendment.
	But the justices weren't seeing that.
	We're doing that having just having a conversation.
	We're here from the government and we're here to help you like literally in a Ronald Reagan way.
	That they're there to just, oh we're just checking out what you're posting, what you're not posting at the moment.
	We've already had the Twitter files that revealed that there was an explicit agenda at play throughout the pandemic and we know that the current Ukraine-Russia war is subject to incredible censorship.
	We know that these are the two most censored events in history in fact.
	It's also been revealed elsewhere That Google have been interfering in elections in your country.
	Do you know about that?
	If you're watching this on YouTube, you gotta click the link in the description.
	Let's start the countdown right now.
	You're gonna love this story, guys.
	By the way, I want to tell you before we go, put up my reminders, guys.
	Well done, Nick, as well as my reminders.
	Is that possible to have those things?
	Because this is when I most need the reminders, is when we're Leaving YouTube excellent as long as the countdown still going right so you get one month free on locals with the code God is great There's exclusive videos available for you there over the course of the rest of the show.
	We're talking about the escalation into war and about Google Interfering in elections.
	We've got some really amusing stuff from Senator Lindsey Graham sort of demanding that Ukraine keep wildly fighting wars gal We let me know we've got five seconds to go.
	We've got a Hey listen, you gotta click the link in the description.
	We've got so much more.
	We're gonna go for another 40 minutes.
	You'll love it.
	Okay, let's have a look at this Google interfering in elections story.
	It's pretty, it's pretty dope.
	So, Google interfered in US elections at least 41 times since 2008.
	So, the implications of the report could be far-reaching for the integrity of elections.
	According to the Media Research Center, researchers compiled a report of 41 different times that Google interfered in elections beginning in 2008.
	This pan intensified in 2016 and is continuing into the 2024 election.
	In the 2016 election, Google used its algorithm and partners to push Clinton over the edge to beat former President Donald Trump.
	This included excluding autofill results for Clinton that would reflect poorly on the politician with regard to alleged crimes against her, During the 2020 primaries, Google disabled Tulsi Gabbard's Google Ads account as she was being searched the most among any Democratic candidate.
	During the lead-up to the 2024 election, Google has already started to interfere.
	According to MRC, the tech giant has buried Robert F. Kennedy Jr.' 's campaign page as well as any other Democrat challenger in the search results.
	So when you couple the Biden administration's pressuring of the Supreme Court In order to continue to be able to interfere with social media in order to impose censorship, couple that with what you can presume Google's intentions are, based on the nature of censorship and promotion that you're seeing on the basis of this report, we're living almost in an entirely curated reality, where the information that you receive, unless you seek out
	Information sources like this, other people on this platform like Glenn Greenwald, obviously people like Joe Rogan, you can name all of your own people that support your perspective, you know, whether it's Alex Jones or whether it's people on the left.
	I think from across the political spectrum there are independent media sources that are interested in attacking the establishment and what an establishment they are attacking now.
	Because as technological capacity reaches this immersive point, on one hand we have the potential for enormous freedom, enormous communication.
	Mooseman18 says 41.
	You think there's more than that?
	I'm sure there are.
	Russell, can you post Biden one of your pink hats?
	It's in the post.
	We are sending him it.
	We're not even going to charge for it.
	He can have one for each foot.
	He can put them on over his little kicky boots that he's got on himself.
	What we're living in now is a curated media reality.
	We're living in the quaking and the shaking of a world that can no longer impose the same sort of centralised control that it once could.
	That's what the panic and the flapping's about.
	Even a story, in fact, like the Kate Middleton story, shows you how old institutions of power don't understand the new environment they're operating in.
	Once there was a time where they could say, Kate Middleton, there's nothing going on, look in the other direction.
	Now they put out a moody or bogus or adapted, excuse the colloquialism, photograph and people can immediately discern that it has been doctored.
	They don't understand the space they're operating in.
	They don't understand your agility, your dexterity, the speed at which you communicate, the ability that you have to break down false information.
	So they are grappling now to impose new systems of control and we're watching it take place.
	Whether it's this Google story or what's happening in the Supreme Court now, Regarding Biden's interference with social media platforms during the pandemic period.
	We're watching the war of information.
	So Alex Jones was indeed prescient to call his channel that some years ago, let's face it.
	So before we get to the Kate Middleton story, let's have a look at Well, the ongoing provocation of Russia into a nuclear conflict that no one can really benefit from unless, and I don't even like really saying this out loud, unless there is some sort of plan for a post-nuclear world.
	And in the same way that you will have noticed that in the pandemic period there was a class of people that just kind of carried on, whether it was Gavin Newsom with his parties or our government here in the UK with their parties, They're going to be partying in a post-apocalyptic world, because they don't seem to be considering the genuine possibility that there could be a nuclear conflict.
	In fact, actually, I'm wrong there.
	They are considering the possibility there could be a nuclear war.
	In fact, they started considering that in 2022, when Ukraine's offensive started to go off the rails.
	And they thought, well, but indeed, if Ukraine is successful, where does this shit go?
	Let's have a look at Senator Graham's demands for Ukraine.
	Many of you will comment, I'm sure, that people that don't know the taste, the smell, the horror of war should maybe back off a little bit when it comes to demanding that other nations fight to the last man.
	Let's have a look at this story.
	So this is from antiwar.com.
	Senator Lindsey Graham visited Ukraine on Monday and demanded that Ukrainians keep fighting against Russia despite the bleak situation on the battlefield and urged Kiev to pass a new mobilization law.
	I find it slightly ridiculous that people from Reified and rarefied spaces, demand of boots on the ground, struggling Ukrainians that they fight a war that's ultimately one being fought as a vassal state.
	Many detractors of Putin and Russia say that they see Ukraine as a vassal that should be part of the Russian Empire.
	Well, how do you think NATO regards Ukraine?
	Do you really think they're doing this for humanitarian reasons?
	Graham sharply criticizes Ukraine's current draft laws which exempt men under the age of 27 from being forcibly mobilized for combat.
	Although under martial law men aged 18 to 60 can't leave the country, so they're obviously getting ready to mobilize them.
	Ukraine's parliament passed a bill last year to lower the mobilisation age to 25.
	And that's interesting because they're not having elections in Ukraine at the moment, and all media has been centralised in Ukraine at the moment.
	So when we're fighting and spending money for Ukrainian democracy, have a look at what that democracy looks like.
	And many of you will, at the moment I'm sure, be reaching for the name Gonzalo Lira, God rest his soul, who died while detained in Ukraine.
	A journalist who is reporting many argue truthfully On the complexity of that conflict.
	So Ukrainian lawmakers are now debating a plan to mobilize 500,000 fresh troops, although it's unclear if they can conscript that many people.
	And the idea is very unpopular within Ukraine as war fatigue is setting in.
	I can't believe it's at 27, Graham said according to the Washington Post.
	You're in a fight for your life, so you should be serving, not at 25 or 27.
	We need more people in the line.
	Are you offering yourself up, Lindsay?
	Ukrainians should continue to fight regardless of how much report they're receiving from the West.
	No matter what we do, you should be fighting.
	I'm actually astonished that that kind of rhetoric has a place in 2024.
	I know that he's a person of the right.
	I know he's a hawkish representative of a kind of neoliberal, neocon class.
	But those distinctions melt away, don't they, when you're in a foreign land urging that their young people should cast their lives before Russian guns?
	In the early days of the war, Graham said Ukraine should fight to the last Ukrainian.
	Two years later, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians have been killed and wounded, and there's no prospect of victory on the battlefield.
	But Graham and other hawks in the US are still pushing for the war to continue, rather than calling for diplomacy.
	Meanwhile, Putin's position remains clear.
	He says that this continuing escalation and these additional troops, like Macron, is demanding that France's strength will be lent to the NATO efforts.
	Macron claimed there could be no peace without Ukraine taking Crimea, which is a red line to Putin.
	So where are we heading?
	Where are we heading?
	Well, Vladimir Putin makes it pretty clear after his election in Russia that where we're heading could be somewhere literally apocalyptic.
	Macron keeps saying about possibility of sending French, European troops to Ukraine.
	How do you think the full-fledged conflict between Russia and NATO, is it possible?
	And how probable is it?
	Well, I think everything is possible in the modern world and as I said before, and it is clear to everyone, That this will be one step away from a full-fledged World War III.
	I do not think anyone is interested in this.
	I wouldn't want to see France playing this role of exacerbating, escalating, provoking the conflict.
	I would like to see it more discussing possible peaceful solutions, but I would like to end with the words of gratitude to the Russian people, to the Russian voters.
	Once again, I would like to emphasize, we will do everything in our power to accomplish the goals of the national development in all areas.
	Thank you.
	Goodbye.
	I love the way that dude leaves the stage.
	Thank you.
	He's already gone.
	Bye!
	Joe Biden will still be there for another five minutes working out what direction to walk off in.
	Now, of course, I'm well aware of Putin's war crimes and what Vladimir Putin represents.
	I also feel like I'm capable of making a distinction between two unfavourable potential alternatives.
	One is the perceived capitulation of Ukraine coming to a diplomatic solution, which in the end will be inevitable and was a couple of years ago on the table Revoked by it seems members of your administration and in particular our Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
	We're not choosing between perfection and slight abomination.
	We're choosing between an ongoing war that Russia will eventually win Unless NATO forces and in particular America get so involved that the conflict becomes nuclear and in the event of that happening we're all going to suffer.
	Now we could take this in a number of directions now guys.
	Which way do you want to go?
	Do you want stories on long COVID or do you want to have a look at Kate Middleton?
	Put KM in the chat on Rumble or put LC for long COVID.
	Let me know which way you want to go.
	That's for you in the Awaken Wonders chat.
	KM for Kate Middleton or LC for Long Covid.
	Meanwhile, it's easy to endorse this incredible product because it's a product coming right at you from Rumble.
	You see that QR code up on the screen right now?
	This is a cloud service that can free you from the horrors of Amazon, Microsoft, and Google, who you know in an instant would share your information and compromise your business if the government came a-calling.
	That's why Rumble is planning to do for clouds what it's already done for video streaming.
	This is a cloud that is for the parallel economy.
	Our pricing model is going to blow away Big tech clouds.
	You're going to make big savings for your business.
	You're going to be able to budget predictably.
	Not to mention, let me give you a one-word warning.
	Parler.
	Remember when Parler was perceived to be an advocate for events on January 6th?
	They took Parler down.
	How?
	Because they could shut down their cloud hosting.
	So if you want your business to innovate and grow, you want to join our Rumble crowd.
	Cloud, cloud, not and crowd.
	Join the whole thing.
	Get fully involved.
	We've got a deal for you here.
	You can get 30% off if you sign up as a friend of Rumble.
	Sign up today at friends.rumble.cloud and receive 30% off the first three months of your Cloud Compute subscription, which will be available for purchase later this quarter.
	Can you see that QR code on the screen?
	Go to rumble, go to friends.rumble.cloud and sign up today.
	See that little QR code?
	I really think about those QR codes whenever I see them, do you?
	I think they only have to be a little slightly bit different.
	Like if we put a little black bit on there.
	It would send you somewhere else.
	So join up.
	Now, I can see, what do you want?
	KMLRC.
	Which way do you think it's going?
	Brandstatter, tell me.
	Where are we going on this thing?
	So join up for that.
	30% off for the next three months.
	Support Rumble.
	Support our growth.
	What do you want to learn about?
	Long COVID or Kate Middleton?
	Where do you want to go next?
	You want Kate Middleton?
	We will give you Kate Middleton.
	Now, this is extraordinary.
	As I've told you before, Old institutional power do not understand the modern media world, and there's no better example of old institutional power than the royal family.
	For a minute, think about the absolute ridiculousness of having a royal family.
	I say this as an Englishman, and I'm certainly not advocating for an end of the monarchy, even though it seemed when Queen Elizabeth II, God rest her eternal soul, died, it was a perfect moment for us to assess our nation's future.
	Because what a royal family does is it tells you that hierarchies are normal, that historic land grabs are gonna stand for all history, because you show me a crown and I'll show you a murderer.
	That's basically how it all started.
	Where do you think this power was ultimately derived from?
	In the modern world, any royal has a ridiculous job.
	They have to represent tradition and they have to remain modern.
	They have to remain traditional to legitimise their ongoing existence, and yet they have to be modern enough for us to say, it's good that we've got a royal family.
	These are modern royals.
	They're just like us.
	Look at them with a baby carriage coming out of a hospital.
	Well, something plainly crazy is going on within that family.
	That photograph that was released was ridiculous, risible and laughable, and the fact that they didn't know that they wouldn't get away with releasing a doctored photograph into today's social media space, Shows that they don't know the audience that they're dealing with.
	Something is plainly going on.
	Now it could be a personal medical matter.
	She's a relatively young female.
	It could be something that's specific to her femininity or it could be something that is embarrassing.
	The rumors go from she's in a coma, she's dead, her husband's having an affair, there seems to be some Legitimacy to that claim and even people say oh is this person Rose something something you know like that's the person that he's been having an affair with but because we know that because it's been popularized and indeed turned into a soap opera these days that the royal family have weird histories when it comes to marriage the current king
	Is married to someone who was for a long time his mistress.
	There were some weird inquiries that went on around the death of Diana.
	MI5 were involved certainly in the inquiry and that's as far as I'm willing to go on that.
	That's a matter of public record already.
	So essentially the royal family cannot exist as a modern entity and what we're experiencing now is its collapse.
	In the same way as when Trump says bloodbath and it's taken out of context by the media, the entire royal family is being taken out of context now because there is no context in which you would rationally keep one.
	They don't pay taxes.
	They own land.
	It doesn't make sense.
	It's an extraordinary entity.
	So it's being held together by sort of deception.
	Now we've got some CNN reporting.
	We've got some footage which people in my family think Ain't legit.
	Anyway, I mean, let's start with the footage.
	This is the footage that's, you know, to give you some context here, is at a farm shop that's on a royal estate.
	Now, if you like a conspiracy theory, and I love one, I love corroboration more because I think if we're going to win this war, we're going to win them with facts and with passion and with true spirit.
	But I like a conspiracy theory as well.
	So this farm shop is on a royal estate.
	So let me just give you a scenario.
	They could control that situation if they wanted to.
	They could close that.
	What you'd need to do is look and see if in the last week, two weeks, whatever, there was a point where that farm shop wasn't open in daylight hours so they could rig it up with sort of bystanders.
	And oh man, this is so like, in a minute I'm going to show you this fantastic story.
	Like The Sun, which is an establishment newspaper, in our country have sort of printed a little bit of
	propaganda around this apparent appearance and all of the comments, this is what I love about social
	media, every single comment is like that's not really her, this is bullshit, this is propaganda,
	it's fascinating. Let's have a look first of all at the bit of footage because it does look,
	well I don't know you tell me for yourself but I know people are saying that this isn't her,
	check it.
	So if it is her, she's lost a lot of weight and if she has had surgery should she be carrying those
	bags and it's taking place on a piece of royal property so it'll be easy for them to control it.
	But We got the image of the looky likey because there's a looky likey.
	I mean, I suppose any lookalike is going to look like her.
	No way that's her, says Johnny Freedom.
	Not her, says something funny in our chat.
	Now, this was a post that the Sun newspaper, they're a sort of a legacy media propaganda tool.
	They posted this on one of their social media outlets earlier, like the photograph.
	Princess Kate and William seemed like a normal couple.
	Yeah, albeit backed by hundreds of billions of pounds of public money.
	All the conspiracy theories are nonsense, says Bystander.
	Look at the amazing comments that appear under this post.
	It's very funny.
	Sava.es goes, always trust the Bystander, uh, Maharix.
	Ah yes, the good old bystander, uh, Tom Romford, 6113.
	They're insulting our intelligence.
	First thoughts, there's another person.
	That's not her.
	Coming from The Sun, that's pretty funny.
	The Sun, who are on the institution's payroll.
	The Sun, again, gives us a premier demonstration of what Gaslight means.
	These are all, by the way, this is just when I checked out that post earlier.
	These are not, we've not selected these, we've not selected these comments.
	Why this story is fascinating to me is because it shows in microcosm what's happening at large.
	They can't control it anymore.
	Even with a piece of propaganda, whether this is Kate Middleton or not Kate Middleton, whether she's had a medical procedure that's embarrassing and they don't want to talk about it or it's some extramarital activity or something more concerning than that.
	What this demonstrates is their inability to control the narrative and our unwillingness to accept the narrative.
	Also, the kind of good-spirited, dismissive way that it's carried out.
	Like, look at SteakEater4018.
	We found a bystander on the street to give us a hot take.
	Wow, what incredible journalism and sourcing we are so fortunate to have.
	And then ChrisPinner85.
	Hmm, almost looks like a body double.
	We are becoming too aware, too discerning, Too switched on, too awakened, impossible to control.
	So while you might think this is a frivolous story, and to a degree I hope it's a frivolous story, I hope there isn't anything terrifying or terrible happening to this ultimately young human female that's sort of fallen into the royal family.
	Yeah, someone says, look at this in our chat now, it's the same quality as a Bigfoot video from the 1980s.
	You hear me?
	People aren't buying it anymore.
	Now, you can map that onto the Ukraine war, you can map it onto the coronavirus pandemic, all the while they're going, hello, this thing's gonna kill you!
	Putin's evil!
	Whatever they're telling us, they've got to immediately face a wave of dissent.
	That's why the category of misinformation has been created, to shut down an independent movement that continually is opposing them.
	Here is the image of the looky-likey.
	Hmm...
	So who is it?
	She's a good lookalike.
	If someone showed me that I'd say yeah that's Kate Middleton.
	So there you go.
	Let me know what you guys think about it.
	Okay so my god have we got a story for you now.
	It's gonna bend your bones and knock your bandy.
	Elon John Musk was one of the first to object to the use of the phrase bloodbath but we saw it for what it was.
	It's similar to this Kate Middleton story.
	They took an extract of a speech by Donald Trump where he said plainly that if the car industry isn't regulated by tariffs between the United States and China there will be an economic bloodbath within the American manufacturing industry.
	What MSNBC did, what Morning Joe did, is they took the word bloodbath and created propaganda from it Live.
	This is another perfect story of how your awakening, your awakening is changing the world.
	You're becoming too nimble, too agile, too quick, too fast, too brilliant for them to control now.
	I want to welcome those of you that have joined us today.
	All of our new members that are welcome aboard this glorious new movement.
	Let's have a look at the names of those new people that I'm referring to now.
	Let's find them.
	Oh, there they are.
	They're all of your names across the bottom of the screen right now as we move on.
	And hopefully we'll be watching this on RumbleCloud any day soon.
	Let's move on to our story about the bloodbath.
	Elon knows it's crazy.
	You know it's crazy.
	The legacy media are still trying to turn every word that Trump says into an opportunity to manipulate, to control, and to wage lawfare against a candidate that they know they cannot beat at the ballot box.
	So when Trump says bloodbath, what did Trump mean?
	Say our names, Russell.
	Say our names.
	Clyde, I'm saying your name.
	Matkin, I'm saying your name.
	Orange Tosh, Glen Dean, Green Pilferi, Dragons Third, Nina Benitez, Celtic Fairy, Sabramovitz, all of y'all.
	I love each and every single one of you.
	Let's have a deeper dive into this.
	Here's the news.
	No, here's the effing news.
	Thanks for accusing Fox News.
	The news.
	No, here's the fucking news.
	Bloodbath!
	There's going to be a bloodbath and I mean that in a literal way.
	A bath all full of blood and anyone who's ever said bloodbath must literally mean bath full of blood and therefore you can only elect one person and that's Joe Biden and still call it a democracy.
	Bloodbath!
	Bloodbath!
	There's a little thing in this world called context.
	The bloodbath backlash is an extraordinary story.
	Trump used the phrase, the idiom, bloodbath, in a speech.
	Of course by now you will be aware the way he was talking about is the impact of car manufacturing and certain tariffs and if they move their manufacturer to this country.
	It's It's essentially a very particular use of the phrase.
	Admittedly, it is an evocative word, bloodbath, but you'll note, and we'll show you, that bloodbath is not the first time the phrase has ever been used, and it's been used politically and relatively consistently.
	What I'm interested in most of all is how hysteria poses as rationalism these days.
	He said bloodbath!
	We told you he's planning to execute everybody the day after the election!
	What's extraordinary is we're being told that we're living in a democracy in which you can only vote for one person.
	How is that a democracy?
	And indeed, what is the greater threat to our freedom?
	Is it Donald Trump and his colourful rhetoric and populist posturing?
	Or is it a liberal media that is so determined to manage the outcome?
	Because we're adults and this isn't MSNBC, let's have a look at Trump's speech and then for ourselves decide, was he talking about tariffs that he might impose on China if they put their manufacturing in Mexico?
	Or was he saying, right I'm gonna Bathe everybody in blood, their own blood, the day after the election.
	Then let's look at the hysterical reaction of the legacy media and determine what that tells us about this establishment.
	Mexico has taken over a period of 30 years 34% of the automobile manufacturing business in our country, think of it, went to Mexico.
	China now is building a couple of massive plants where they're going to build the cars in Mexico And think they think that they're going to sell those cars into the United States with no tax at the border.
	Let me tell you something to China.
	If you're listening, President Xi and you and I are friends, but he understands the way I deal.
	Those big monster car manufacturing plants that you're building in Mexico right now And you think you're going to get that?
	You're going to not hire Americans and you're going to sell the cars to us?
	No, we're going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line.
	And you're not going to be able to sell those guys.
	If I get elected.
	Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a bloodbath.
	Right.
	So there you go.
	That's a person speaking off the cuff about actually trade tariffs and imposing tariffs on China that would make the efficacy of manufacturing in Mexico somewhat redundant.
	So it's actually quite a dull.
	That's the subject, which Donald Trump is in his usual rhetorical style, making illustrative and entertaining and captivating his working class blue-collar audience who would likely prefer to have jobs in manufacturing, the kind of jobs that have migrated overseas in countries like yours and countries like mine.
	Another president of the United States who imposed harsh tariffs was Bill Clinton, who imposed such harsh tariffs on Haiti, it made their own rice agriculture redundant.
	We did a video on that.
	We'll throw to it at the end of this.
	It's brilliant.
	You'll love it.
	So essentially Donald Trump is posturing and saying don't build factories south of the border thinking that you can make a bunch of money because we want manufacturing industry in this country.
	So to take from that bloodbath what he means by that is plainly that there are going to be armed militia on the street.
	Forget that there are armed militia on the street in the democrat-run New York City right now on the pretenses of protecting rights.
	Ignore that fact.
	Forget that in Gaza right now there is a, what one might say, as close to a literal bloodbath as it's possible to imagine being supported by the Democrat Party.
	Forget that hundreds of billions are being spent of your taxpayer dollars to sustain what I consider to be, and I think you do, an unwinnable war against the nuclear-armed Newly elected Vladimir Putin.
	Forget all of those very real bloodbaths and let's focus on this metaphorical bloodbath used by a person when talking about trade tariffs.
	How desperate are they?
	How out of touch are they?
	How unwilling to present us with real democratic or constitutional republican alternatives are they that this is what they will resort to?
	For the whole, that's going to be the least of it.
	It's going to be a bloodbath for the country.
	That'll be the least of it.
	Okay, so let's see how the legacy media responded to that.
	You all know how you respond.
	I mean, for me, I wouldn't even notice that.
	Like, if I was watching and I was just going, you know, that seems like a good idea, right?
	Yeah, if you're trying to build up manufacturing.
	If you know part of your appeal and part of your function is to reach blue-collar Americans who are concerned about their jobs and that metropolitan elites are running America under the Democrats and that they're being left behind.
	Yeah, that's a sensible thing to say.
	Let's see how the legacy media have run with it.
	We begin tonight with the race for the White House and former President Trump's campaign now on the defensive after his fiery rhetoric at a rally in Dayton, Ohio on Saturday night.
	Trump warning while discussing the economy that there would be a, quote, bloodbath if he is not reelected in November.
	That's amazing.
	So if you only watch that type of news, what you think Donald Trump said, if I don't win in November, There will be a bloodbath, i.e.
	I will transcend democracy, and there will be an armed militia.
	Like, that's literally what we're being presented with.
	But those of us that have seen the speech, and that will now be a considerable audience, know that they're lying.
	And we know why they are lying.
	Tonight, Republicans forced to defend former President Donald Trump's controversial comments that there would be a bloodbath if he lost the 2024 election.
	I want to start by getting your reaction to Donald Trump's comments about a bloodbath.
	And made a dire prediction of what would happen if he is not.
	Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a bloodbath.
	But if they weren't maliciously using it, they would show the context, wouldn't they?
	They'd go, well, he's talking about the car industry, actually, but perhaps he's somewhat evasively and peculiarly referring to armed militia.
	No, they don't.
	They go, cut that bit out where he's talking about the car industry.
	Otherwise it will be perfectly plain, even to an imbecile, that what he's talking about is that the Democrats wouldn't impose any such tariffs and industry will suffer further and more blue-collar people will be without work.
	Now, I don't know what Trump's economic policies are.
	You could look up what happened when he was president for four years if you wanted to know the type of policies he would implement.
	That would be an interesting way of ascertaining the reality of a Trump presidency, you know, looking at what happened when he was president before.
	Was there a bloodbath then?
	And of course, the full context is that this is much bigger than one single speech.
	Jen Psaki, she knows the game, huh?
	She's been a White House press correspondent before, so she knows.
	Rewind 10 seconds.
	Hmm, yeah, but Trump is always saying stuff a bit like this.
	No, he's not always saying stuff a bit like this.
	He says stuff that's sort of colourful and florid and casual
	and idiomatic and the argo of ordinary people, which basically the legacy media and the Democrat Party
	have forgotten how to speak, because they hate ordinary people, in my view.
	But what there are is a bunch of examples of I'd make myself dictator for a day.
	Other similarly repurposed, rebooted, cut and shut pieces of language
	that have been pieced together to create a jigsaw of deception.
	Now you know where I stand on this.
	If I had to vote for someone, I'd vote for Bobby Kennedy.
	But I'm not American and I won't be voting for anybody because I believe in massive institutional change and decentralization of power and that's the conversation that I'd like to have.
	But an important conversation to have is Trump's popularity continues to rise because of the deception of the establishment and here's another example of it.
	We all know by now that Trump's allusions to political violence are not merely rhetorical.
	His supporters take them literally.
	That's part of the big problem here.
	Also, look at that casual dismissal.
	His supporters, 51%, he's polling at 52% this guy.
	His supporters, all of those people, your loved ones, your families, your neighbors, they're all idiots.
	Let's just dismiss them as idiots.
	Let's turn them into terrorists.
	They used to say stuff like that about Muslim people.
	people. Oh the problem with Muslim people is they take the Quran too literally, you'll
	still find people that will say stuff like that. Legzi media have stopped doing that
	because they've pivoted now to being superficially at least supportive of people from minority
	cultural groups and attacking blue collar people.
	And he knows that too. So no, we did not miss the full context.
	This was not some meandering off-message comment.
	This is his message.
	What do you think that he was talking very specifically, like where he went, President Xi, if you're watching, he knows who I am, all of his like normal Trump stuff, then talks about tariffs and manufacture of the car industry, presumably in a place where manufacturing cars is significant.
	Ohio, wasn't it?
	I don't know enough about their economy to identify how significant that is there.
	But what he wasn't doing is now And now, that's the end of that message.
	Bloodbath.
	Now unless you think he's using literal neuro-linguistic programming and manipulative techniques, you know, and I don't think he is.
	I'll tell you who is using that.
	The legacy media.
	They're saying, right, God, Jesus, we've got the word bloodbath.
	Brilliant.
	This is brilliant.
	He said bloodbath.
	Okay, let's escalate this.
	You know, they're not applying that kind of forensic analysis, are they?
	To the wars they're supporting in the Middle East.
	They're not applying that kind of analysis to the ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict.
	They don't want to talk about that at all.
	They don't want to talk about language.
	They just want to fund it.
	They don't want to audit the Pentagon.
	The Pentagon, they passed an audit in the last six years.
	Trillions of dollars.
	No reckoning for Iraq.
	No reckoning for Afghanistan.
	No understanding of the complexity of what's happening between Ukraine and Russia.
	No recognition of the futility, desperation, and awfulness of what's happening in Gaza.
	No recognition of the ridiculousness of amplifying tensions with China.
	I thought for a moment it might be bloodbath.
	Oh, it might escalate a war against China.
	He's talking about a bloodbath for America.
	It's laid out in the terms of it.
	The guy's show is called Morning Joe.
	powers they want to do a nuclear war with and that's what we're voting for these days.
	Who do you want to die the hands of? China? Boo! We prefer to die at the hands of Russia
	in a nuclear war. That's because we're progressive. He's talking about a blood bath for America.
	It's laid out in the terms of it. The guy's show is called Morning Joe. You'd think by now
	he'd fucking wake up. And these idiots on Twitter, these idiots on cable news, these
	idiots on Sunday shows going, where are you? We're president.
	You know, he was talking only about the auto industry and this is one more... It's just bullshit.
	This news space has become so hysterical that they've become parodies.
	Odd, inverted parodies of everything they used to loathe.
	I bet I could tell you what that dude would think about Rush Limbaugh.
	He'd go, oh Rush Limbaugh, hate speaker.
	He was a ridiculous figure.
	But he's like doing voices and saying people are idiots and cursing.
	Live on the television.
	What are they becoming?
	What is their platform now?
	From where are they talking down to us?
	They're not coming down from Mount Sinai with tablets telling us stuff anymore.
	They're hysterics.
	They're Cassandras.
	They're lunatics lying live on television because they know in the old days they would have got away with that because there wouldn't be footage everywhere of Donald Trump saying, you know, it's specific to the car industry.
	And now they can't handle it anymore.
	Their viewers are declining.
	Trust in them is declining.
	The advertising revenue is down.
	It's Over.
	All they've got left is, don't vote for this guy!
	He's crazy!
	And the more they do it, the more it seems like, how crazy?
	How much worse can he be than these warmongers that you're telling us are so fantastic?
	Let me say that at 6 15 a.m.
	It's just bullshit.
	He knew what he was doing.
	We're not stupid.
	Americans aren't stupid.
	He was talking about a bloodbath.
	Sometimes a bloodbath means a bloodbath.
	And when he finishes by saying, and that's just going to be the least of it.
	Seriously, these people may be stupid.
	We're not.
	I think they sort of are stupid and I think they think that we're stupid.
	I think they're desperate.
	I think everyone should just like loosen their ties and relax a little bit and go like, what is it that we need to do to live in this country together?
	Or should we look at an entirely different model?
	Or are we going to try to perpetuate this odd system that requires endless war and the supplication of an entire population indefinitely just because there is a liberal class that can get fat on the spoils?
	He's even predicting a bloodbath.
	Here's Nancy Pelosi with a new haircut, but the same old Nancy.
	What does that mean?
	He's going to exact a bloodbath?
	There's something wrong here.
	How, um, respectful I am of the American people and their goodness.
	But how much more do they have to see from him to understand that this isn't what our country is about?
	Praising Hitler.
	Praising the Russians.
	He said, what's wrong with Russia?
	They defeated Hitler.
	This is a political class that thinks it's enough to wear a shamrock on your lapel because it's near St.
	Patrick's Day.
	I can't ever get beyond that.
	blue bangle because of the Ukraine war and never ever mention that she sits on committees
	that preside over the regulation of the technological industry and is married to someone who's made
	millions and millions of dollars from investing in the technological industry. I can't ever
	get beyond that. I can't believe in her rhetoric any more than I can believe in her hair colour.
	What about the millions of Americans who risked or gave their lives?
	One of the things we've become aware of recently is the way that Google facilitates particular news stories.
	We spoke to Robert Epstein about this story.
	That Google is used to manipulate news narratives to ensure that we're given particular perspectives.
	And this is a lovely demonstration of that.
	So if you google the phrase Trump bloodbath, look at what you get back.
	Almost as if the legacy media is one corresponding entity regulated by the trusted news initiative that immediately pounce if they see an opportunity, taking down dissenting voices, and I've been on the wrong end of that of course, and using stories like this to facilitate a pre-existing agenda.
	Bloodbath also is a pretty evocative image, you know, a bath full of blood or whatever, people bathed in blood, but again to remind you that there are wars all over the world now, some of which can't rightly be called wars because of the dynamics between the two fighting forces that's euphemistically referred to them as, involved, where there is blood, where 30,000 people have been killed in a matter of months, that would not be possible without the tacit and sometimes explicit support of the American government and your taxpayer dollars.
	But the word bloodbath is It's a metaphor that's been used consistently.
	And if you think it's just a sort of a MAGA Trump phrase, well, here's Rachel Maddow using it.
	But as Politico.com reports tonight on the, quote, bloodbath at the RNC, headlines calling it a, quote, bloodbath.
	Yeah, bloodbath.
	Not only is it going to be a bloodbath, but after they leave New Hampshire, it's a bloodbath on her home turf.
	She's actually saying bloodbath so much, I don't know what she's talking about.
	I don't know if she's saying her own name too much.
	Russell, Russell, Russell.
	I've glitched.
	I've gone through the matrix.
	That's really tough.
	Trump has left a lot of corpses in his wake.
	I mean we can count the bodies.
	As part of the quote MAGA drive to take over Maricopa County and the headline refers to it as an impending bloodbath.
	Charles Blow has a new piece for the New York Times entitled a Biden bloodbath.
	We can't make this content without your love and support and without the support of our sponsors who we always select on the basis of effective products.
	Like today's.
	Have you noticed that recently clusters of respiratory illnesses in northern China and what's been referred to as white lung syndrome in the United States are scattered across the headlines?
	There's hashtag white lung.
	They're drawing attention, I believe, to the importance of being prepared for medical emergencies.
	With close to 90% of pharmaceuticals in the US being produced outside of the country, what will happen when the inevitable next global crisis strikes?
	Countries will clamp down on exports, they'll stockpile, the price of drugs will rise, and the pharmacy shelves in America, they say, will empty.
	Is it already starting to happen?
	Well, the wellness company's medical emergency kit has got you covered for times like this.
	The wellness company is home to Dr. Peter McCulloch and Dr. Drew Pinsky.
	They've both been guests on our show.
	They're truth-telling doctors who are empowering you to take control of your health.
	40% of Americans say they would avoid a doctor or hospital unless it was a catastrophic situation.
	The Wellness Company's Medical Emergency Kit provides a solution.
	This handy little kit includes eight potentially life-saving medications for you, along with a guidebook for safe use.
	Emergency antibiotics, antivirals, and antiparasitics to keep you and your family safe in the face of natural disasters, supply chain shortages, or medical emergencies like Whiteland or COVID.
	Go to twc.health forward slash brand and grab your Medical Emergency Kit right now.
	That's twc.health forward slash brand, code brand, saves you 10% at checkout.
	So if you use the co-brand, you get 10% off.
	Don't wait until it's too late.
	Take control of your health with the Wellness Company's Medical Emergency Kit.
	Thank you.
	Now, let's get into this.
	2018 midterms, you can bet that they 100% are fearing a slaughter.
	In fact, the word bloodbath and massacre come up frequently.
	The Republican Party will be destroyed.
	It's going to be a bloodbath.
	There's going to be a bloodbath one way or the other.
	Changing context and changing the meaning of words is, I think, almost a fingerprint of fascism.
	It's a way that we can identify new forms of tyranny.
	When people start to say, this word means this now, this population is this, we have to control that, that's hate speech, this is hate speech, this is what a terrorist is, I think these are great early indicators that we're already in A tyranny.
	I wouldn't be at all surprised if in the next couple of years there isn't some event that legitimized further authoritarianism.
	I think we all feel it, don't we?
	And these peculiar montages are indications of something quite insidious and pervasive that's happening now.
	Bloodbath for Bernie Sanders.
	It's been a bloodbath.
	They're shaping up to be a bloodbath.
	Head off a bloodbath and next year's crucial midterm.
	Off-year elections are often a bloodbath.
	This week's bloodbath for Democrats, a bloodbath at the ballot box.
	There could be a Republican bloodbath.
	We'll talk about a bloodbath.
	Okay, so there we go, bloodbath.
	Oh, I'm starting now.
	Bloodbath, bloodbath, bloodbath.
	It doesn't mean anything.
	One of the problems that the propagandist establishment machine has now is that one of its prime assets, the platform X, is owned by Elon Musk and there are emergent platforms like Rumble where, stay free, our daily show is housed.
	Musk has come out with an NPC meme, easy to tell who's a NPC today.
	On Sunday, X owner Elon Musk criticized those who have posted the fake media narrative that former President Donald Trump called for a bloodbath if he's not elected in November.
	During a rally in Ohio on Saturday, former President Trump said there would be a bloodbath for the auto industry if he was not elected.
	In context, he was referring to how many jobs would be lost to China if President Joe Biden were to be re-elected.
	However, the liberal media cut out the part about the auto industry and spread it as though he was making a violent threat.
	And we saw that that is what they did.
	How can they expect us to trust them?
	Headlines from Politico, Mediate, Independent, as well as a post from the official Biden HQ campaign page suggested that Trump was making violent threats.
	So here is that post from the Biden-Harris HQ.
	Again, obviously they cut out the context as ALX remarked.
	Another example is a now deleted post from NBC's Joe Scarborough that showed an image from January the 6th, 2021 and said, Donald Trump's America, and he is proud of it, promised another bloodbath if he loses again.
	They really run with this, haven't they?
	Another example is a now-deleted post from NBC's Joe Scarborough that showed an image from January the 6th, 2021, and said,
	Donald Trump's America, and he's proud of it, promised another bloodbath if he loses again.
	He deleted the tweet after Musk responded with, January 6th was not a bloodbath by any definition,
	and Trump was referring to job losses in the auto industry Your post is extremely misleading.
	Oh, that must have been a terrible word.
	Delete!
	Elon doesn't like it!
	Delete!
	Delete!
	Many left-wing influencers also posted the clip out of context.
	Political commentator Keith Olbermann posted, This is a terrorist threat.
	FBI, detain him as he leaves the stage.
	After which, America doesn't give a shit where you keep him.
	Astonishing.
	They have become deranged.
	And almost willingly so.
	You can see when watching the dude off Morning Joe.
	Or many of the other commentators that they are kind of infected by an almost religious fervour.
	When I say religious, I don't mean in a positive way connected to a divine reality, but connected to a set of beliefs that are in a sense not housed in the rationalism that they elsewhere claim is the way forward.
	Their whole ideology is built on progressivism, progressive technology, progressive values, progressive economy, improvement, All the time, everything getting better and better.
	But because that's plainly not true in so many ways, and it doesn't matter how many rationalist books or think-tank pieces emerge that tell me that, well, people used to live on a dollar a day, we can't avoid the fact that there is a burgeoning sense of decline and decay and implosion and despair and war.
	And these subjects are not reported on.
	When you live in an age where an actual bloodbath is ignored and deliberately censored and the word bloodbath is amplified into some sort of glorious festival of verbal carnage, you know you are living in strange days indeed.
	And I believe we can see the DNA of their deception in the inversion of the meaning of terms in their attempts to demonize a figure that some people like a great deal and some people loathe a great deal.
	But it is in my view ultimately an indicator of failing institutions that need to be radically reformed, remedied and replaced at the level of FDA, FBI, NATO.
	We're talking about significant change required and because that can never be addressed by these people who are actually pretty cozy in their metropolitan professional class jobs condemning, loathing, and despising ordinary blue-collar Americans.
	All they will do is attack blue-collar Americans through the figure of Trump.
	The irony that what he was talking about is a return of manufacture to America rather than outsourcing manufacture through a sort of odd nexus of relationships between Mexico and China is, I believe, somewhat significant and telling.
	Whether it's true or not, a significant number of people believe that Donald Trump acts on their behalf and they don't like the establishment and they don't trust the legacy media.
	And after that fiasco, I have to say, they're right.
	But that's just what I think.
	Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and chat.
	Remember, have a look at our Haiti video and you'll see how tariffs are regularly used.
	Bill Clinton destroyed Haiti using tariffs.
	It's a brilliant story, particularly if you've got your suspicions about the Clintons and I do.
	Remember, click the link in the description if you want to become a member of our community.
	We make content like this all the time and we make additional videos.
	This week, Chemtrails, which you will love.
	It's going to be juicy and we need your support for our movement to grow.
	Stay free.

▲