Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 28, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:05:44

He’s F*CKED Now! - The End Of Biden - Stay Free #314

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I'm going to go ahead and get the camera.
	you're going to see In this video, you're going to see the future.
	Hello there, you awakened wonder.
	Thanks for joining us for Stay Free with Russell Brand today.
	Thanks for being a firewalker.
	Thanks for being willing to confront this issue.
	At a time where the establishment seems pretty committed to dominating us, we are proving them wrong by showing up and starting this show on time for the second day running.
	I see you guys commenting in the chat there, thehardin0172, loving the truth experience.
	Whatever time of day it is where you are watching this live stream, this is one thing that cannot be denied.
	This is the time for us to collectively awaken.
	And today we've got so many fantastic stories that demonstrate to you how the media manipulate in real time our perception of reality.
	That could be something as simple as the results in the Michigan primary.
	i.e.
	Trump's triumph over Nikki Haley is unremarkable and the fact that Joe Biden received 100,000 non-committed votes is not worthy of comment.
	In fact what is becoming evident is that there is a crisis of meaning and a crisis of faith in the neoliberal establishment full stop.
	Even the people that they have spent the last four, eight, maybe even 30 years attempting to control and appeal to are rejecting them.
	And many mainstream media pieces that we will show you demonstrate that.
	Thank you so much for being with us today.
	For about the first 15 minutes we'll be streaming Widely.
	Think of Ghostbusters.
	Those guys, they're streaming willy-nilly, aren't they?
	They don't cross the streams.
	That they never do.
	We all know that.
	It's one of the main things we know about life in general.
	It's the one thing I've learned from my whole childhood.
	Don't cross the streams.
	But, after a while, we will only stream freely in that place that we call home.
	Why?
	Because we want to speak absolute truth as best as we understand it.
	And we're covering so many fantastic stories today.
	We're talking about a medical regulator in our country, the UK, that appears to be as corrupt.
	I don't want to make sort of brash remarks about the FDA but it does seem that they are open to sanctioning products that may down the line have turned out to be less than perfect.
	We're going to be talking about that.
	We're going to be talking a bit about Kid Rock and Joe Rogan and the level of diplomacy conveyed and expressed by Joe Rogan and how In a sense, how evolved it is when compared to the stance of many people charged with actually legitimizing, authenticating, starting global conflict.
	So that's one of the things we'll be getting into.
	If you are an Awake and Wonderer already, like Firegirl2020, remember Get your questions for Rand Paul who we're talking to tomorrow in there.
	You know, we don't have to ask the questions, so if you ask something like, oh someone did in the rumble chat yesterday, would you like a cage fight with Anthony Fauci?
	You know, I think I'd need a hundred of you to ask that question for me to pass it on to Rand Paul, and if you want to join us live for our conversation with Rand Paul, Gotta become an Awakened One though.
	It'll be our show on Friday here on Rumble.
	But you're going to want to be there to ask the questions, aren't you?
	So download that Rumble app if you haven't already and subscribe to our community to support this movement because we are pretty committed to opposing the problem as we see it.
	Centralised authoritarianism being practised on a global scale, legitimised by a compliant media who normalise and amplify the message of the powerful so that we become bewildered.
	Now, Donald Trump won his primary against Nikki Haley.
	I don't know what Nikki Haley's... I mean, does Nikki Haley... What's she there for at this point?
	But of course, Biden's victory against, you know, people that you basically haven't heard of, except for, you know, Marianne Williamson, who seems like a lovely human being to me.
	I've met her and she is lovely, actually.
	And that guy, Dean Phillips, who seems perfectly Reasonable.
	They didn't achieve as many votes as uncommitted.
	The concept of not liking Joe Biden.
	Let's have a look at CNN reporting on this and is it me or our legacy media losing their funding as trust reaches a record low because their graphics department isn't as good as ours?
	And you know the trouble we've had with our graphics department.
	I'm talking about bad graphics Jack.
	I hope he's out there somewhere.
	Possibly bad graphics Jack.
	He's over at CNN right now.
	It certainly looks like he might be.
	Have a look at CNN.
	Not only are they struggling with truth, they're struggling now with graphics.
	Bad graphics, Jack.
	Come back.
	All's forgiven.
	This is what Joe Biden received.
	Again, forgive me.
	1,141 votes.
	1,141 votes.
	Dean Phillips.
	Look at the nose.
	It's rubbish!
	Look at the state of news!
	Right, okay, and I can write that down there.
	Look at his number four!
	Look at that number four!
	I've got a five-year-old, a seven-year-old and a six-month-old baby, and if any one of them represented the number four like that, I would invite them to leave our premises.
	54 votes.
	We're watching a man write numbers on a board and this is... Here you go, democracy is intact and the legacy media can be relied on.
	There's nothing to question on a global scale.
	We're altering mathematics itself in order to repress excess deaths and I can write the number 54 look!
	Committed.
	Make sure I get this right.
	You better, because you're in the news!
	You won't want to be going on there lying, saying stuff like, Ivermectin is a horse pace, rather than a Nobel Prize winning medicine.
	3,703 votes.
	So that's a wow, if you look at it this way.
	Ted is actually quite pleased with himself that he's done that.
	So there, I've done that now.
	So that's all of the numbers.
	There, you can look at that.
	And if you want to see a cock and balls, I can do that as well.
	And no one can stop me, because I'm on CNN.
	This is 23%.
	He's doing percentages.
	I can't sit and watch this bloke.
	This is almost as bad as watching a man commenting on what many have called, certainly Aaron Bushnell, sorry in these terms, when he set himself on fire, tragically and sadly, commenting on an ongoing genocide while licking an ice cream.
	Now firstly I want you to I'm talking about Joe Biden.
	Joe Biden addressed the ongoing, you might call it a war, it depends on your perspective, it depends on your conditioning, about events in Gaza, let's favourably refer to them as that for a moment at least, while licking upon an ice cream What does an ice cream represent to you as a food?
	It's a frivolous food, isn't it?
	It's not one of the major food groups.
	It's not necessary for survival.
	It's eccentric.
	It's unnecessary.
	And Joe Biden obviously thinks it's adorable that he eats ice cream.
	It's the thing that I've identified as, do you know what people like?
	They like those aviator shades and they like the ice cream.
	They're not so fond on the support of various aggressive military regimes around the world if the 100,000 non-committed's anything to go by, but CNN have got that covered in their Sesame Street-style numeracy.
	We'll just focus on eaten ice creams and being glib and dismissive about the deaths of thousands and thousands of people.
	This is a crisis era where war is fully immersive, where you don't get to vote on whether or not to perpetuate The war between Ukraine and Russia that you are funding, the war in the Middle East that you are supporting that may yet escalate, the escalating tensions in the South Pacific that could lead to a war with China.
	What you get to do is look at a very old man licking upon an ice cream.
	And that doesn't seem to me to be the dream of the founding fathers, unless I missed something.
	Oh no, that's not them.
	Where is he?
	Can you give us a sense of when you think that ceasefire will start, sir?
	Well, I hope by the beginning of the weekend.
	I mean the end of the weekend.
	At least my national security advisor tells me that we're close.
	We're close.
	It's not done yet.
	And as well, so Seth Meyers, he's also having an ice cream.
	That's just two men having an ice cream, discussing like a war ending by the weekend, like it's planned for a trip to Six Flags.
	Now also, how can Seth Meyers, I did SNL one time, do you remember?
	I was famous once, can I have an ice cream?
	Seth Meyers, like he's a good guy, I'm not criticizing Seth Meyers, but like how can he Objectively assess the military policy of Joe Biden while licking on an ice cream with Joe Biden and discussing an appalling, devastating conflict that ought
	Or end.
	Or end immediately.
	Let's just watch the last four seconds of the president of the, not only the United States, but the free world, the military-industrial complexes man, the pharmaceutical industries man, the financial elite man, the globalist elites man eating an ice cream talking about war.
	My hope is by next Monday we'll have a ceasefire.
	Okay, so fingers crossed.
	Enjoy your lollipop.
	Let's have a look at the Michigan primary vote breakdown.
	But you know where Donald Trump stands.
	This is good actually.
	You'll like this bit.
	What I think is a clear indication that the system is breaking down.
	You'll love this.
	You guys watching this on YouTube, which we have to be careful on because it's still regulated by, let's call it globalist interests, whether that's the WHO when it comes to medical matters or prioritising BBC, CNN, trusted news initiative organisations that want you misinformed, malinformed, disinformed, distracted, dumb and docile.
	What do you think this indicates about the state of the establishment when even Democrat voters, so that's a subset of a subset, are cynical, circumspect, doubtful about the abilities of the current administration?
	Have a look at this and also note that this doesn't take place in a neutral environment.
	It's clear that there's an attempt to coach this on-screen participant in propaganda into saying Donald Trump is worse than an ongoing war in an issue that I'm ideologically and presumably culturally connected to.
	Let's have a look at this.
	If you're on AwakendWonder right now, hi guys, Kennison60, I'm sending you love.
	...on these issues.
	If sitting out and not voting for Biden means that you may be helping Donald Trump get elected, is that... Does that not worry you?
	You could be helping Donald Trump get elected.
	Why don't you vote for Joe Biden?
	How many more times do we have to tell you that Donald Trump is the worst thing that could ever happen?
	Well, I don't know, man.
	I'm looking at all these wars everywhere.
	I'm looking at fuel prices.
	I'm experiencing the despair in this country.
	I'm experiencing the decay of our infrastructure.
	And while I'm watching you say, hey, standards of living are Better than ever, we've found a new way of assessing excess deaths that makes it look less bad!
	I still am unable to be controlled by the demon of Trump that you hold up instead of having any policies of your own, any integrity of your own, just trying to create a continual climate of fear using a boogeyman who seems increasingly appealing.
	I mean, have you seen him dance to YMCA?
	A risk worth taking.
	I mean, that's the question that I put back on the president.
	You know, I didn't get us to this point.
	Biden did.
	And that might come down to us experiencing short-term pain with Trump in office for long-term gain, where we have to have a Democratic Party that actually stands on its values.
	Short-term pain for long-term gain.
	So you're willing to sit out in November, even if it means Donald Trump wins, to send Democrats a message?
	Absolutely.
	Democrats for Trump everyone!
	Democrats for Trump!
	Now I know a lot of you love Donald Trump and you know where I stand on this issue.
	I believe in decentralized but unified anti-establishment movements across the globe opposing corrupt political systems so that we can run our own communities and be granted our individual sovereignty at the most local level possible.
	But let's have a look at the poll we offered you earlier.
	Who should be president?
	72% of you said Donald Trump.
	67,000 votes there.
	Donald Trump, you said.
	That's nearly as many people who are non-committed to Joe Biden.
	2% of you, Joe Biden.
	And 27% of you would rather have Joe Biden's ice cream as the President of the United States.
	Although, in all fairness, it does look delicious.
	Now, if you want to see some people right now in the polls, like over in the rumble chat, Uncommitted ice cream right there.
	It's not even fully committed to being one.
	A lot of you in the chat are saying that you would like to have that ice cream.
	You're looking like you're enjoying it.
	I want to ask you now, in this chat here right now, do you think that what we're witnessing, yes or no, Y or N, is this a crisis moment in the legacy media?
	Are they starting to recognize when you get like, you know, that young woman, she's like, obviously, I'm assuming culturally affiliated or religiously affiliated with the issues in the Middle East.
	She's saying she'd rather have Trump than Biden.
	Is that a crisis?
	Yes or no?
	Are they going to address this or are they just going to, you know, double down on trying to put Trump behind the door, behind the bars?
	It's a crisis.
	What a photograph.
	Let's have a look at this moment now.
	Watch this because there are about 10 moments where the legacy media show their true colours in this conversation.
	Look at their comments about Bernie.
	They're trying to make what happened in Michigan to Joe Biden look like it weren't that bad and maybe even was good.
	They tried to change the subject to being about Donald Trump as bloody usual.
	They say, well, this was a territory that normally comes out strong for Bernie Sanders, who, by the way, when he was in the ascendancy, it's now been revealed, repressed, controlled and crushed.
	And you guys may like Bernie Sanders, you may not like Bernie Sanders.
	That ain't the issue.
	I'm talking about corruption within the Democratic Party.
	You can see how RFK is polling right now.
	They don't want that guy anywhere near their party.
	The Democrat Party are a party of elites, and you look at how they respond to that charge, or even that conversation point, even within this item.
	It's astonishing.
	This is everything that's wrong with legacy media.
	This is why trust in media is at a record low, and you're gonna love it.
	But also, Chris, we have to remember, I mean, let's look at the Ann Arbor numbers.
	Joe Biden didn't win Ann Arbor.
	Bernie Sanders won.
	So it's not that bad because Bernie Sanders won.
	Where's Bernie Sanders right now?
	What did you do about Bernie Sanders?
	How did you handle that situation?
	You pushed Hillary Clinton on an unwilling party because you believe more in the establishment than you do in your voters.
	He's no different in our country.
	Left party moved away from populism and nixed away a leader that was doing relatively well in order to put forward yet another centralist Blairite candidate.
	Globalism is the issue.
	One global agenda being disseminated to political parties that are basically indistinguishable.
	They all support the war machine.
	So some of these areas have never been Biden country.
	They have been really many more people that were further left and didn't like the idea
	of a moderate carrying the flag of our party.
	If you're the elites of the Democratic Party, you're going to be able to do it.
	Elites!
	Not that there are elites.
	Let's watch how she handles it.
	I think you've got traditional Republicans that no way they will vote for Joe Biden and no way they will vote for Donald Trump.
	So there's going to be some people that are going to hold their nose and vote, and then there's going to be people that just stay home.
	The question is, will the Biden campaign be able, and by the way, there are no elites in our party.
	I meant to pick you up on this, Sarah.
	Yes, sorry.
	No elites.
	There are no elites.
	There are no elites.
	Say it again, say it loud and repeat and repeat until you believe it.
	There are no elites.
	There's not an establishment elite that's controlling the media, that's controlling the trajectory of global politics.
	Let me know, do you guys in the chat, on Rumble I'm talking to you, do you think Bernie Sanders is a sellout?
	Yes or no?
	Y or N?
	Bernie Sanders sellout?
	What do you think about Bernie Sanders?
	Just a Y or N in the chat there and afterwards I'm going to ask you some questions about RFK.
	I know you didn't mean that.
	That doesn't exist.
	But the question is, can Biden draw the kind of contrast around some issues like guns and abortion?
	Look at that!
	They're trying to, again, reframe it around incendiary issues like guns and abortion.
	As long as you're on one side of the abortion and gun line, you can't focus on a significant issue like war.
	Everything you need to know about media takes place right here in this clip.
	They deny the existence of elites.
	They tacitly acknowledge that Bernie Sanders was crushed because he wasn't a hierarchically approved politician.
	They try to mitigate Joe Biden's obvious losses and how that relates to Democrat-endorsed war hawk policies.
	They then go on to try to distract you and terrify you with Trump, then try and bring your attention to the issues around gun ownership and gun laws and abortions, things where people find it hard to think straight because they're emotive and difficult subjects.
	What we need, what's playing to me, yet more ability to control their own community and the
	ability to honor our own individual sovereignty. That's what's being lost, your
	individual freedom, your right to be you. For all this talk of diversity, they want
	a homogenized blob to be the nation.
	...autocracy and what Trump is saying he's gonna do.
	He's gonna tear up every North.
	Dictator on day one.
	I saw that.
	I saw him say that and it was a joke.
	It was an actual joke.
	He said, I'll make myself dictator for a day, you know, just to build the wall.
	He was mucking around.
	The fact they've got no sense of humour is another one of the problems.
	And the biggest problem of all for the Democrat Party is that they're perceived as the party of the elites.
	They're perceived as the party of the establishment.
	Is there any of you left in the chat that think that the Democrat Party cares about ordinary Americans and ordinary America?
	When are they going to... Yes or no?
	Y or N?
	Do any of you think, oh the party that's like looking out for Ordinary Joes.
	Regular working people.
	Is it the key workers and medical professionals that they persecuted throughout the pandemic era?
	Is it the people that they dismiss as a basket of deplorables?
	No, none of you believe it.
	United Hangout.
	Kyle Rhino, maybe.
	But he's a contrarian.
	He is a deplorable!
	Fake mental... Yeah, exactly.
	No matter who wins.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	The ends are flying by, baby.
	I've never seen it.
	R.I.P.
	Aaron Bushnell.
	Indeed.
	Indeed.
	Of course, trust in media is now at a record low.
	Hardly surprising.
	I've been on the wrong end of the legacy media.
	I've operated within the legacy media.
	You cannot trust this machine.
	You cannot trust this propagandist tool.
	Let's have a look.
	Americans' trust in media plummets to a historic low.
	Thank God.
	Cher, who said they have made a I have a great deal or fair amount of trust in mass media.
	Oh look, it's just plummeted.
	Here's Glenn Greenwald, fellow Rumbler, friend of the show.
	He posted, Remember when Western media outlets actually tried to convince people that Putin blew up his own pipeline?
	Yep, I remember that.
	That's how dumb and propagandistic corporate media outlets are, and how much contempt those who control them have for people's intelligence.
	Do you feel like the legacy media has contempt for you?
	Is that what you feel?
	That you've... I mean, it's obviously yes, isn't it?
	Is it yes?
	Because, like, they think that if they can just show you an elderly man licking an ice cream, advocating for ongoing war, or at least prevaricating on the subject, that should be enough.
	That we should sell that.
	As democracy, and it's not just your country, it's everywhere.
	Remember the whole argument for sustaining and perpetuating the war between Ukraine and Russia that you're funding, that I'm funding.
	They're not funding it.
	They've not got business on the side.
	They've not got a side hustle that they're funding that war on.
	You're paying for it.
	A significant portion of your working day goes towards Pentagon expenditure that they cannot pass an audit for.
	Why?
	Why?
	For Ukrainian democracy.
	Well, what does Ukrainian democracy look like when they are freezing the bank accounts?
	We'll talk to you about this more.
	People that refuse to be conscripted into the army in Ukraine, they're freezing their bank accounts.
	Where have we seen that idea before?
	Canada.
	with the truckers. Here's your friend and mine, Justin Trudeau, living ice cream on
	the subject of democracy. Lick him Joe.
	I'm not going to talk about internal European dynamics, but I will say that in all of our
	democracies, in every democracy around the world, we are seeing a rising movements of
	either authoritarian populism or skepticism about...
	Yeah, but what like evoking the Emergency Act because there's a protest against COVID
	mandates that kind of authoritarianism.
	The evocation of an emergency act that's subsequently by your own government deemed to be illegal.
	The freezing of bank accounts of protesters.
	How do you guys feel about Canada and its liberal pose?
	Guys, if you're on YouTube watching this right now, before we get into the Ukraine freezing bank accounts, before we bring you the rest of Justin Trudeau's propaganda, we've got to leave you now.
	Let's start the countdown.
	Remember, Ron Paul's on the show tomorrow.
	Become an awakened wonder.
	Join us.
	Get your questions.
	Not Ron Paul, Rand Paul.
	Ron Paul, I mean, he's very much yesterday's man.
	Rand Paul is cut over here to promote his new book, Deception.
	Get on and pose your questions to him.
	Remember, we make additional content every single week and I want you to join us for it.
	We're also talking about mandates and the ongoing revelations around the pandemic period.
	We've got some lovely stuff about Nancy Pelosi and Trump.
	Click the link in the description.
	Get over here to rumble.
	Taste the freedom.
	We'll see you in a second.
	Okay, guys, let's get back to Justin Trudeau and his gentle propaganda.
	What does he put on his hair?
	Democracy itself.
	And we all need to recommit ourselves to standing up, not just for Ukraine, but through standing up for Ukraine to the very principles that make our countries strong and free.
	What are these principles that make your country strong and free?
	Remember during that pandemic period when he was bobbing about in a private jet?
	Remember when he's talking about diversity and respect for ethnic distinction while we know what he fancy dresses himself right up?
	And we cannot forget this evocation of an emergency act and we cannot forget that all what we are told is this is a humanitarian crisis because of Russia's unprovoked attack which seems increasingly provoked because we now know there were CIA bases in Ukraine for 10 years, and the legacy media are trying to make that look good, even.
	So how can this war, that seems to have been a provoked and designed war, that you could even say began in 2014?
	Let's have it right, and I know you guys are going crazy about Fidel Castro.
	If you're in the Awakened Wonder chat right now, guys, all there is, is pictures of Fidel Castro.
	That guy, that guy is Fidel Castro's son!
	They've got similar noses.
	I will give you that, but do you think anyone could get a thread of that hair?
	Do you think you could get hold of a hair and do a DNA test?
	Trudeau must be removed, says Kay Chips.
	Um, oh my god.
	Yeah, well, do you know what?
	Gareth, who many of you are crying for like babes, is reminding me of that mad euthanasia bill.
	Did you see that?
	When, like, Canada are killing people for being poor and upset in a country that is tyrannical and pretending that it isn't.
	It's known as the MADE Act.
	I'm glad that you like my hat.
	Thank you.
	And I'm glad that none of you have mentioned this.
	Spot on the end of my nose that's been exacerbated by BJJ.
	Let's have a look at the rest of Trudeau's propaganda.
	It's a time where citizens cannot take their democracies for granted.
	You better believe it, baby!
	Need to continue to be there, to lean in, not just on being worried about their daily challenges, which are significant everywhere around the world right now, but making sure we are building Peace, stability and prosperity for future generations as well.
	And that means standing up unequivocally for the international rules-based order.
	The international rules-based order!
	That's what they're calling globalism, isn't it?
	The international rules-based order.
	Now they are talking about the spot on my nose.
	One of the reasons I like that guy Mike Benz, who's coming on the show next week.
	Did you see him on Tucker?
	Is because he says what we are calling democracy now is not the system elections and democracy voting for I'd like this person to
	be in government I prefer this policy I'd like my community run this way no it's
	a set of institutions sometimes national sometimes global that are
	being protected by your tax dollars and our tax pounds in order
	to perpetuate what he calls a global rules-based order a set of institutions
	that are participating right now in your exploitation right now this
	second standing for democracy against authoritarianism against
	illegal invasions of another country's sovereignty oh you don't you
	dare invade me on my sovereignty these are principles that are
	under discussion in every country
	There's some other discussions going on, Trudeau.
	Let me tell you what they are.
	The idea that neoliberal fascistic politicians who freeze bank accounts kill people because they're poor, which seems like population control to me, are presenting themselves as somehow gracious carriers of morality and ethics when it seems to me that this is the very kind of tyranny we should most fear.
	And I know that the two of us are standing unequivocally alongside so many others in favour of the peace and prosperity that ensures a better future for everyone.
	It's a better future for everyone.
	And this democracy that we're supporting seems to include freezing bank accounts.
	The Ukrainian parliament has passed the first reading of a bill to tighten mobilisation
	rules and force people to war.
	If approved, these rules will allow the government to freeze bank accounts and people's assets
	when caught dodging the draft.
	Remember they've not held elections in Ukraine for three years, they have shut down all non-state
	controlled media, they've done deals with BlackRock to rebuild the nation in the event
	that there ever is a post-war era.
	I understand they are a nation in crisis.
	I understand they are a nation under threat.
	But it has now become clear that that war, whatever it is, it was not unprovoked.
	Whether that's NATO continually impinging upon former Soviet Union territories or CIA bases across Ukraine, this was a war that potentially began as early as 2014 and even those revelations in the New York Times are being spun now as if it was somehow a positive thing.
	This is astonishing.
	Have I got 11 on this board, guys?
	Have a look.
	Thanks, mate.
	They have a special relationship that was reported in the New York Times just the other day.
	It is again how legacy media propaganda works.
	One organisation reports something, then another organisation, CNN, both of them members of the Trusted News Initiative, report on the story of the other state asset and use that as verification of the veracity of the original reporting.
	Doubling down on a lie don't make it true, does it?
	Is that how truth works these days?
	It's very similar when it comes to this extraordinary thing.
	You will love this.
	In our country, the United Kingdom, they've changed the way of evaluating and assessing excess deaths because the number was too high.
	There were 30,000 excess deaths.
	They've created a little bit of government propaganda saying, we've changed the way that we Count excess deaths now.
	Let me, let me guess.
	Is it a lower number with the new way?
	Yeah, and it makes it look like nothing that bad's happened.
	It's happening in your country.
	It's happening in my country.
	It's happening all around the world.
	That is why what we have to be is somehow unified but decentralized.
	Globalism is bad, but us having a vision to oppose this corruption is vital and having the power to exactly... Let's get back into this little piece of filthy propaganda.
	with the CIA. They also have relationships with the other US intelligence agencies where they're providing very
	unique insights.
	So this is basically an investment not only in the relationship with Ukraine, but also in our ability to
	secure NATO's eastern flank.
	Yeah, people's NATO's eastern flank, that right now is war rhetoric, isn't it?
	To secure NATO's eastern flank.
	You may have seen Victoria Nuland yesterday saying, look all of these billions that are being passed in various bills to perpetuate this war isn't money lost at all, it's money that's supporting the American military-industrial complex.
	But even that was presented not as if it was some establishment corporative, poor corporatist con, But a scheme to create jobs?
	Well, I know many of you watching right now are benefiting from that trickle-down effect in the arms industry.
	What an astonishing piece of propaganda it is.
	This piece is a little bit longer, but I want to tell you That we've got an interesting story about the legacy media and the Ukraine war.
	We want to go a little bit deeper into this.
	New York Times has now demolished the narrative of an unprovoked war in Ukraine by revealing that there were CIA bases operating there for 10 years engaging in acts that are so provocative.
	Some of the things, like I want you to, while you're watching this, I want you to think about what you know about Vladimir Putin and what he might consider to be provocative and some of the things that these CIA sponsored groups were doing in Ukraine for the last 10 years!
	Not to mention NATO's actions, which they knew would lead, like inviting Ukraine to join NATO.
	Putin said it was a red line for a long, long time.
	So, is this an unprovoked war?
	Or is it a war that has been provoked?
	And if the legacy media, and listen carefully, The New York Times have known about these CIA bases.
	They admit to it and have held back their information because you're too stupid to understand it and appreciate it.
	But now, now is the time where they're willing to reveal it.
	Why?
	Because they want to generate further funding to continue to perpetuate this war.
	This is an amazing story.
	We'll be back with yet more.
	Paradigm-shattering chit-chat between us.
	So stay with us throughout this.
	Consider becoming an awakened wonder.
	Remember, we've got Rand Paul tomorrow.
	You better believe I'm reading my Bible, Norma Chain.
	What are we going to do now?
	We need to summons up the power of the Almighty, because we're going to need a lot to overcome this globalist force.
	Here's the news.
	No, here's the effort news.
	news. See you in a few seconds.
	If the CIA have had secret spy bases in Ukraine for the last 10
	years and have been engaged in a shadow war, then whatever Putin's invasion of Ukraine is, it ain't unprovoked, is it?
	So why the New York Times changing the story now?
	The New York Times have now admitted, acknowledged that there are CIA bases inside Ukraine and have been for the last 10 years.
	And they've been waging a shadow war on Russia from within Ukraine.
	And essentially, deep state interests have been in control of Ukraine for the last 10 years, which is, oh, since that 2014 coup, which we've been talking about in independent media, but they've not been talking about in legacy media.
	And that's before we talk about NATO's role in exacerbating these conditions and the escalation of conflicts between Russia And Ukraine.
	So why are the New York Times telling us now that there are CIA bases in Ukraine and probably biolabs and all the sorts of things that we've been discussing in these spaces for a while and were of course called conspiracy theorists for discussing?
	It's evidently true.
	So what's the agenda of the legacy media?
	Is it as simple as ensuring that funding can continue?
	And is it clear now that the legacy media are starting to acknowledge that you cannot completely suppress truth?
	You can employ agencies like Logically AI You can have government agencies using proxies to crush dissent and censor, but ultimately, and this is actually pretty good and exciting news, we are too powerful now to be controlled.
	I don't mean we, just me and literally you.
	I mean the people that occupy these spaces, all of your various resources that you use to formulate your understanding of reality so that you are not subject to the reality that Google and Google AI and the establishment would have you
	live with him.
	Because remember, it's not that long ago that they told you pretty repetitively
	and with absolute determination that this was an unprovoked war. But because
	of their odd peculiar amnesia of our times, you may have forgotten that, but
	they did do that. Have a look.
	The Russian military has begun a brutal assault on the people of Ukraine.
	Without provocation, without justification.
	On Russia's unprovoked and unjustified attack on Ukraine.
	The prayers of the entire world are with the people of Ukraine tonight as they suffer an unprovoked and unjustified
	attack.
	Imagine if those announcements, just the ones you've heard already included,
	we do have CIA bases within Ukraine and have been waging on a shadow war and as you know NATO have been provoking
	Russia for years by inviting Ukraine to join NATO since 2008,
	knowing that that's a red line for Putin.
	That can no longer be called an unprovoked attack.
	It's a provoked attack.
	It's still terrible for the people of Ukraine.
	I'm aware and I pray that Ukrainian people are watching this and I pray that they're safe.
	Obviously not within Ukraine, I'm assuming, you know, elsewhere as refugees due to this terrible war that could be prevented because I bet you wouldn't be so willing to spend your tax dollars funding the perpetuation of a war that is provoked rather rather than unprovoked.
	We'll get into looking at why the legacy media have changed their tune right now, but for
	this moment we can double down on the fact that we can't trust them, we could never trust
	them, why would you ever trust them?
	What do you think they are about?
	Let's have a look.
	Russia commenced its full scale unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.
	President Putin has launched a horrific unprovoked attack on their country.
	That image, so full of pointlessness and lies, is essentially an artwork at this point.
	These masks don't work.
	We know they don't work.
	This war is completely illegitimate.
	I shouldn't even really be prime minister.
	I'm pretending to be all nice and I'm evoking emergency.
	I mean, the whole thing.
	You could literally go to Broadway in New York City and watch a show and be hit with more truth than watching the news.
	We are united in condemning the Kremlin's unprovoked aggression.
	And he also actually knows, because that's Jens Stoltenberg from NATO, who's directly been in contact with Putin.
	So what will you do if we... Yeah, that would be a war with it.
	Fuck them.
	No justification apart from the fact that he is a warmonger that wanted to build an empire.
	You can't call someone a warmonger when you've done what that man is purported to have done with a piggy.
	Putin is the aggressor.
	Putin chose this war.
	I'm really looking forward to seeing the sign language lady have to sort of retract all of that complete lie.
	Goodbye!
	Okay, let's get into some analysis of why the New York Times have chosen this moment to seed a different story.
	And by my reckoning, this is comparable to the recent study on coronavirus that does indeed reveal, oh yeah, there are adverse injuries.
	Oh, there are peculiar cerebral conditions.
	Oh, we should have perhaps looked at whether or not we need to vaccinate this community or that community.
	All stuff that could have been discussed years ago.
	Curiously, before they made all the money. It's very interesting that the
	most censored events in history are the most lied about events in history
	and they're not being lied about by conspiracy theorists, they're being
	lied about by the establishment and their legacy media attack dogs. Let's get
	into the story.
	For the past two years nearly every reference in the US media to the February
	2022 invasion of Ukraine by Russia has been preceded with an obligatory word
	unprovoked.
	The public was told that this was a war without cause, that Ukraine was blameless and that the invasion was to be explained entirely in terms of the intentions and psychology of one man, Russian President Vladimir Putin.
	Of course, that's why there was so much hysteria about the now Famous Tucker Carlson interview, because then you can watch him with your own eyes, and you can make your own evaluations about Russian propaganda versus US propaganda, and you can make decisions about your own tax dollars, and your own family, and your own military, and your own community, and your own nation.
	But they don't want you making any of those calculations.
	However, on the weekend of the second anniversary of the war, the New York Times has published a lengthy article revealing that the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24th, 2022 was instigated by a systematic and widespread campaign of military intelligence aggression by the United States.
	The article details long-standing Central Intelligence Agency, CIA of course, operations in Ukraine, in which the agency sponsored and built up the Ukrainian Military Intelligence Agency, HER, using it as a weapon of spying, assassinations and other provocations directed against Russia for more than a decade.
	Why are the New York Times writing this piece Now, why are the New York Times, which are a mouthpiece and an amplifier of the establishment agenda, choosing this moment to reveal that the CIA did indeed have bases and assets and engage in provocative activity inside Ukraine, which means that it can't any longer be referred to as an unprovoked attack.
	A provoked attack doesn't mean that, you know, that the Kremlin is Disneyland and that Putin's a great guy or that Ukrainian people aren't being brutalized.
	It just means that we have to have an adult conversation rather than propaganda.
	The Times writes, towards the end of 2021, according to a senior European official, Mr Putin was weighing whether to launch his full-scale invasion when he met with the head of one of Russia's main spy services, who told him that the CIA together with Britain's MI6 were controlling Ukraine and turning it into a beachhead for operations against Moscow.
	Does that make sense to you?
	The idea that British and American intelligence agencies essentially had control of Ukraine?
	Does that sort of Ring a bell of truth somewhere in your belly?
	Or do you think that Zelensky is some sort of military genius cum activist campaigner who is Churchill-like leading the charge against Russia, the indefatigable yet evil enemy?
	Or do you reckon that what happens is countries like the United States and the UK puppet various nations in order to either win resource or strategic global wars to fulfil an agenda where it wouldn't be popular to go to face-to-face good old-fashioned gloves-off wars with Russia and China and And much like the wars that took place in Vietnam and Korea and Afghanistan and basically all of all the wars that have happened since the end of the Second World War, proxy conflicts are being fought for military-industrial complex reasons or strategic reasons and we're just given a narrative up front that stops us going, uh, how do we benefit from this?
	Who's funding this stuff?
	Am I paying for this war?
	Is this unwinnable?
	Hey, ain't they a nuclear superpower?
	So that those questions are all sort of lost in the miasma of total lies, the New York Times et al.
	propagandize us with images of brutality and suffering in Ukraine, which we should of course be aware of and doing everything we can to prevent, so that they could just get on and get a bunch of funding for Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Norfolk Grumman and Boeing.
	The Times report demonstrates that this Russian intelligence assessment was absolutely true.
	For more than a decade, dating back to 2014, the CIA was building up training and arming Ukrainian intelligence and paramilitary forces that were engaging in assassinations and other provocations against pro-Russian forces in eastern Ukraine, against Russian forces in Crimea, and across the border into Russia itself.
	Huh, so that's sort of like there's been a war going on for ages anyway, and all that's really happened is they've just reframed what's happening and increased funding.
	In a critical passage, the Times writes, as the partnership deepened after 2016,
	the Ukrainians became impatient with what they considered Washington's undue caution and began staging assassinations
	and other lethal operations which violated the terms the White House thought the Ukrainians had agreed to.
	Infuriated, officials in Washington threatened to cut off support, but they never did.
	In other words, the Ukrainian paramilitary forces, armed, funded, and led by the United States and NATO,
	were systematically assassinating forces supporting closer relations with Russia.
	Ukraine have their own autonomy, they have their own dignity, and of course they have their own sovereignty.
	The fact that they have their their own attitude to their relationship with Russia. And
	the fact that they took advantage of an opportunity to escalate
	tensions, knowing they were backed by a military superpower is hardly surprising, but it is concerning because it's led
	to this conflict. But I suppose ultimately, the United States
	elite have an agenda to drain and destabilize Russia. And don't you imagine that the increasing hostility in the
	South Pacific are about draining and destabilizing China? And isn't
	it becoming increasingly clear that the country of America is
	one thing, you, you people, your culture, your country, your
	beliefs, your values, your Christianity, your tolerance of other religions, all of that stuff is there down here, then
	over here are this set of interests controlling to some degree or another, both political parties and ensuring
	that they can maintain the forever wars that are their lifeblood, but sadly, the death of
	of literally every other territory in the world and a good many of your own citizens if this mentality continues for much longer.
	The newspaper's account begins with the maiden coup of February 2014 when right-wing and neo-Nazi forces backed by the US and European Union overthrew a pro-Russian president and installed a pro-imperialist regime headed by the billionaire Petro Poroshenko.
	In a way, there could have been an entirely different trajectory, couldn't there?
	There could have been sort of an easier, if still somewhat tense, relationship between Russia and Ukraine that didn't really involve the United States and therefore didn't require siloing of weapons that were now no longer needed in Afghanistan into this new territory.
	A new paradigm was possible and it seems like it was prevented.
	Furthermore, neo-Nazi and right-wing, I mean, if our culture is defining itself by one thing, it's opposition to, oh, these bloody right-wing fascists.
	I mean, there's Barely a mainstream media news program ends about some new person being called a neo-Nazi or a right-wing fascist, when it comes to actual people who come out and tell you, do you know what I am?
	Please, tell us!
	I'm a neo-Nazi.
	I'm a new one.
	Now, can I have some money to go to war against other people?
	Yes, you can, because we don't care about anything except our own agenda.
	And yet we will talk about how much we hate Nazis when it's someone like, off the news, who wears a tie, who's basically a Christian, who doesn't think about race that much, because they live in America and they're American!
	This coup was the culmination of two decades of imperialist inroads into the former Soviet bloc with the expansion of NATO to include virtually all of Eastern Europe in violation of pledges made to the leaders of the former Soviet Union.
	The Times is silent on this earlier history as well as on the role of the CIA in the maiden events.
	Why are they silent on those important facts?
	Maiden set the stage for a massive escalation of the CIA intervention as detailed in the Times report.
	The intelligence agency played a central role in fueling conflict between Ukraine and Russia, first as a low-level war against pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine, then as a full-scale war after the Russian invasion in February 2022.
	Three US administrations were involved, first Obama, Then Trump, now Biden.
	I'm sure you know by now that what I suppose that indicates is that whoever you vote for, when it comes to significant issues like perpetuating forever wars, you don't really have the right to vote.
	That's why independent candidates like Robert Kennedy, who say they will end these wars, and I pray they mean by that all of these wars, ought to be taken very seriously.
	According to the Times' account, CIA operations included not only widespread spying but assisting direct provocations like the assassination of pro-Russian politicians in eastern Ukraine and paramilitary attacks on Russian forces in Crimea.
	The Times reported that a Ukrainian unit, the 5th Directorate, was tasked with conducting assassinations, including one in 2016.
	The Times writes, A mysterious explosion in the Russian-occupied city of Donetsk in eastern Ukraine ripped through an elevator carrying a senior Russian separatist commander named Arsen Pavlov, known by his nom de guerre, Motorola.
	What?
	After the phones?
	So in the end, it was television that killed him.
	Yep.
	Very good, that.
	Have you got a battery for an Ericsson?
	The CIA soon learned that the assassins were members of the 5th Directorate, the spy group that received CIA training.
	Ukraine's Domestic Intelligence Agency had even handed out commemorative patches to those involved, each one stitched with the word LIFT, the British term for an elevator.
	Oh, as long as you're all having fun, guys, now we're in this massive, expensive, mad war that you keep lying about and simplifying so you can keep funding it and people still going, oh, it's really terrible this is happening.
	Here, have a patch with LIFT, because we blew out that person, didn't we, in an elevator.
	That was a lot of fun.
	You guys called it a lift?
	We got so much in common!
	Why don't we bomb some new countries?
	Yeah!
	Okay then, old chap.
	Cheers!
	The report describes another such operation.
	A team of Ukrainian agents set up an unmanned shoulder-fired rocket launcher in a building in the occupied territories.
	It was directly across from the office of a rebel commander named Mikhail Tolstik, better known as GV.
	Using a remote trigger, they fired the launcher as soon as GV entered his office, killing him, according to US and Ukrainian officials.
	I mean, it's quite provocative, isn't it?
	It's not unprovoked.
	Anything that happens after that, again, like Putin, illegal war, terrible, children dying, buildings destroyed, tragedy, devastation, it should stop as soon as possible.
	But this is going to annoy someone like Putin, all of this, isn't it?
	Since the outbreak of full-scale war, the Ukrainian Hurs extended these assassination operations to the whole territory of Russia.
	Again, that's pretty provocative.
	Including the killing of Darya Dugina, a leading pro-Putin polemicist in the Russian media and Russian government and military officials.
	I mean, seems like designed to irritate him into a bellicose state, which it eventually did with the ongoing attempt to recruit Ukraine into NATO.
	The CIA found its Ukrainian allies very useful in collecting vast amounts of data on Russian military and intelligence activity, so much that the Hurt itself could not process it and had to forward the raw data to CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia for analysis.
	An earlier, less detailed report on this intelligence collaboration in the Washington Post cited a Ukrainian intelligence official's estimate that 250,000 to 300,000 Russian military intelligence messages were being collected each day.
	So, they were spying on Russia to an extraordinary degree.
	More funding, more spying, more transgression, more provocation.
	So, again, we just watched the news, unprovoked, unprovoked.
	Were you spying on us, Frasier?
	Yeah.
	Did you blow up a geyser who was really nice about us on the news?
	Yeah.
	Did you get a load of badges done celebrating the brutal assassination of someone with Lyft on it?
	We did do that, yes.
	We all thought it was jolly good fun back at the office, didn't we?
	Yes, we did.
	This data was not just related to Ukraine, but concerned Russian intelligence activity all over the world.
	We can't make this content without your love and support, and without the support of our sponsors, who we always select on the basis of effective products.
	Like today's.
	Have you noticed that recently clusters of respiratory illnesses in northern China and what's been referred to as white lung syndrome in the United States are scattered across the headlines?
	There's hashtag white lung.
	They're drawing attention, I believe, to the importance of being prepared for medical emergencies.
	With close to 90% of pharmaceuticals in the US being produced outside of the country, what will happen when the inevitable next global crisis strikes?
	Countries will clamp down on exports.
	They'll stockpile, the price of drugs will rise, and the pharmacy shelves in America, they say, will empty.
	Is it already starting to happen?
	Well, the wellness company's medical emergency kit has got you covered for times like this.
	The wellness company is home to Dr. Peter McCulloch and Dr. Drew Pinsky.
	They've both been guests on our show.
	They're truth-telling doctors who are empowering you to take control of your health.
	40% of Americans say they would avoid a doctor or hospital unless it was a catastrophic situation.
	The Wellness Company's Medical Emergency Kit provides a solution.
	This handy little kit includes eight potentially life-saving medications for you, along with a guidebook for safe use.
	Emergency antibiotics, antivirals, and anti-parasitics to keep you and your family safe in the face of natural disasters, supply chain shortages, or medical emergencies like Whiteland.
	Go to TWC.health forward slash brand and grab your medical emergency kit right now.
	That's TWC.health forward slash brand code brand saves you 10% at checkout.
	So if you use the code brand, you'll get 10% off.
	Don't wait until it's too late.
	Take control of your health with the Wellness Company's medical emergency kit.
	Thank you.
	Now, let's get into this.
	Long before the Russian invasion, the CIA was seeking to broaden its attack on Moscow.
	The Times reports, So they wanted to establish it everywhere.
	A bit like, I suppose, Russia's concern that Ukraine will join NATO, then other border countries will join NATO, then they'd have secret CIA spying bases in them where they would engage in provocative activity and spying missions in an attempt It seems to me, at least, to create one global government, ultimately, controlled by the interests that currently control the United States, the biggest economy and most powerful nation on earth.
	Replicate that everywhere.
	And the only things that are powerful enough to prevent that at the moment are Russia and China.
	So let's crack on and destroy them.
	Is that basically what's happening?
	The head of Russia House, the CIA department overseeing operations against Russia, organized a secret meeting at The Hague.
	There, representatives from the CIA, Britain's MI6, the HUR, the Dutch service, a critical intelligence ally, and other agencies agreed to start pooling together more of their intelligence on Russia.
	Again, provocation, provocation.
	The result was a secret coalition against Russia, and the Ukrainians were vital members of it.
	All these activities occurred well before the Russian invasion of February 2022, not to mention the 2014 coup, and placing what sounds like a puppet government that was ultimately being controlled by deep state interests.
	I don't know what provocation could be, if not that's some of the most provocative stuff I've ever heard.
	The outbreak of full-scale war led to even more direct CIA engagement in Ukraine.
	CIA agents were the only Americans not covered by the initial evacuation of US government personnel from Ukraine, removing only to Western Ukraine.
	They continually briefed the Ukrainians on Russian military plans, including precise details of operations as they were unfolding.
	This is, just is, and has always been, a proxy war.
	Nomination of Russia's invasion of Ukraine as the start date seems like the type of narrativisation that's favourable to the interest engaged in these years of provocation after sponsoring a coup and insisting that Ukraine join NATO.
	Actions that seem designed to provoke Russia.
	So when Russia invaded Ukraine, killing loads of Ukrainian people, causing all that decimation
	and destruction and all of that criminal and illegal activity, it's because of all of this
	stuff.
	And because temporarily Ukrainian interests align with those interests, they're a convenient
	conduit for the expression of the power of the establishment.
	And when they're no longer a convenient conduit, they will be pretty mercilessly dispatched,
	I'd guess.
	According to the Times, within weeks the CIA had returned to Kiev and the agency sent in
	scores of new officers to help Ukrainians.
	A senior US official said of the CIA's sizeable presence, are they pulling triggers now?
	Now, are you able to pull that trigger yourself?
	Well, I am in the military, so... Okay, well, pull it now and aim it there.
	Well done, that's good.
	Any assistance we can give you in this war we're not involved with, you just ask.
	Could we have some more money?
	Of course you can, yeah.
	Some of the CIA officers were deployed to Ukrainian bases.
	They reviewed lists of potential Russian targets that the Ukrainians were preparing to strike, comparing the information the Ukrainians had with the U.S.
	intelligence to ensure that it was accurate.
	In other words, the CIA was helping direct the war, making the U.S.
	government a full participant, a co-belligerent in a war with nuclear-armed Russia, despite Biden's claim that the United States was only aiding Ukraine from afar.
	And all of this without the American people having the slightest say in the matter.
	Don't you sometimes forget that.
	Don't you sometimes forget that vital detail that America is men-a-bee, your country, was established on those principles.
	And I really now see more clearly than ever Mike Benz, the expert in deep state activities analysis, that when people say we have to protect democracy, what they mean are a set of institutions that preserve oligarchical power, rather than the electoral process by which ordinary people can go, I think I'd like to not be in a nuclear apocalypse, because that kind of democracy isn't happening, is it?
	The Times account also provides an inadvertent indictment of America's media, as it writes, It's written out like it's telling you.
	partnership, many of which are being disclosed by the New York Times for the
	first time, have been a closely guarded secret for a decade.
	It's written out like it's telling you.
	Here's the inside scoop. Taylor Swift's new beauty secrets are avocado on each
	It's not that, is it?
	It's like, we've been using your money to provoke a nuclear superpower into a war, then we've been telling you that it was an unprovoked war.
	Oh my god, no wonder she looks so young and fresh!
	This is propaganda and lying and no doubt the New York Times are only revealing this now because it's convenient to another agenda that we'll be revealing later in this brilliant article.
	This admission means that these secrets were closely guarded by the Times itself.
	So, all the time, hey listen, please don't tell people there have been no clinical trials on this product, just tell them that if they don't use this product, it's irresponsible and kills old people.
	You got it, boss!
	As former editor Bill Keller once observed, freedom of the press means freedom not to publish, and that is a freedom we exercise with some regularity.
	Particularly, we might add, when it comes to the crimes of US imperialism.
	The Times article is not so much an exposure as a controlled release of information.
	Yeah, that's what I figured.
	We're starting to spot that now.
	As independent media becomes more robust and yet more agile, they have to, at points, recognise, look, do you know what?
	People can no longer be expected to believe this was an entirely unprovoked attack.
	There's people going on Joe Rogan, there's Bobby Kennedy out there, people are all the time saying, wait a minute, what about NATO?
	What about that agreement between Gorbachev and Reagan?
	Oh, well, let's just say whataboutism is a thing.
	Yeah, we'll try that for a while.
	You can't do whataboutism!
	Just shut up or you're helping Trump!
	But in the end, we just found out too much.
	Too much accumulative and aggregated information.
	So in order to, to a degree, keep a sliver of credibility, they're sort of acknowledging, okay, yeah, we provoked this war and we've known about it for ages and the deep state's been inside Ukraine for ages.
	But also, there's another agenda to do with getting Republicans to support the ongoing funding of this war rather than withdrawing the funding.
	And that's coming in a second.
	The U.S.
	newspaper Record reports that the two authors of the piece, Adam Entis and Michael Schwartz, conducted more than 200 interviews with current and former officials in Ukraine, elsewhere in Europe, and in the United States.
	This activity could hardly have taken place without the knowledge, permission, and even encouragement of the CIA, as well as the Zelensky regime and Ukrainian intelligence.
	Wow.
	As we've been saying for some time, the legacy media works in conjunction with the establishment and Deep State to maintain a particular This is a brilliant, brilliant, perfect, beautiful example of that.
	In the meantime, a real journalist, Julian Assange, is awaiting the decision on his final appeal against extradition to the United States where he faces 175 years in prison or even a death sentence.
	The crime of Assange and WikiLeaks, which Assange founded, is that they did not obey the rules of bourgeois journalism and did not seek the permission of the military intelligence authorities before publishing their revelations about U.S.
	war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan, the efforts of the U.S.
	State Department to subvert and manipulate governments and the spying activities of the CIA and National Security Agency.
	In short, he released information that was favorable to what you might call the electorate or the citizens or the subjects or the people of nations like yours and of mine.
	in order that we might more discerningly regard our establishment,
	including the legacy media, who lies to us.
	And what happens to people like that is what's happened to Julian Assange.
	But there are other examples of how the establishment behaves
	if you act against their interests.
	The exposure of a decade of CIA operations...
	No.
	Different enemy.
	clearly at the request of the agency itself, appears to be linked to the ongoing conflict
	within the US ruling elite over what policy to adopt in that war, in the wake of the debacle
	suffered by the Zelensky regime in last year's offensive, which gained little and suffered
	colossal losses. Congressional Republicans have blocked further military and financial
	aid to Ukraine, effectively declaring that the US must cut its losses there and concentrate
	on the main enemy, China. Concentrate on peace? No.
	Different enemy. Wow. So this isn't being done in order to, you know, all the news that's fit the
	print.
	This is like all the propaganda that's fit to use to manipulate ongoing forever war so that we can keep the offices open and the lights on.
	Although we convey mostly darkness.
	This is the most important couple of paragraphs I think in the piece.
	Have a listen to this, then you will understand exactly what's going on.
	You can use this to argue with people who still believe propaganda.
	Check it.
	By reporting the virtual control of the Ukrainian regime by the US military intelligence apparatus, the Times is seeking to pressure the Republicans to support the war funding.
	It is arguing that this money is not going to a foreign government, in a foreign war, thousands of miles from US borders, but to a subcontractor of American imperialism, waging an American war, in which US personnel are deeply and directly engaged.
	Although some American service personnel are deeply engaged in opposing these wars,
	as you remember from the sad self-immolation and death of Aaron Bushnell recently.
	In so doing, the Times has revealed its own coverage of the Ukraine war over the past two
	years to have been nothing more than war propaganda aimed at using a fraudulent narrative to dragoon
	the American public to support a predatory, imperialist war of aggression aimed at subjugating
	and dismantling Russia.
	And the only way, I suppose, that you could argue that that's a good thing is if you saw yourself somehow as a subject and ally of this establishment, or at least your own destiny tied to their ongoing success.
	In order to believe that, you would have to be in constant fear that both Russia and China have their own imperialist agenda.
	And if they're not stopped, thwarted, attacked, drained, and covertly and insidiously dismantled, then you and your way of life will be under threat.
	We learned so much from this.
	We learned that the New York Times suppresses information when it wants to, that they support the agenda of the establishment, that they totally believe in lying and omitting information in order to ensure that the establishment agenda can be met even when it's a bloody war that's killing Ukrainian people and Russian people.
	So you can assume that they might employ similar policies when it comes to the wars in the Middle East and the terrible and tragic deaths that are taking place there.
	What this ultimately reveals is that the legacy media is part of the establishment.
	You can't trust anything you read or hear in the legacy media.
	You can assume from the get-go that what they are doing is either trying to distract you, dumb you down, shut down any possible avenues that are challenging to establishment interest and even if that extends to claiming that current
	wars were unprovoked when the truth is they were anything but
	Unprovoked and that's not to mitigate undermine or dilute the tragedy that Ukrainian people are experiencing
	It's just the point out that it's been caused by a greedy Avaricious and tyrannical global establishment that
	requires war to sustain itself, but that's just why I think let me know you think in the chat
	See you in a second Well, you're having a good time over there in the rumble
	comments, aren't you dear old Shelly 107?
	Yes, stay on the Because Too Much Fake Wars, and let's keep it clean, shall we, guys?
	Not too much of the how's your father talk, if you ask me.
	A lot of brilliant comments.
	Sinette1, war is a business and a way of life now.
	CNBW.
	If people knew the truth, they would never have supported the Ukraine war from the beginning.
	The war started two months after the Afghanistan debacle.
	What better destruction?
	Yeah, Astrotooch.
	Yep, just like weapons of mass destruction was a lie.
	Putin was actually provoked for years.
	Yeah, man.
	What's bloody world going on, eh?
	We're getting fibbed to, I tells ya.
	Over there in the Awakened Wonders chat, Ashell is talking about anti-establishment hoaxes, and Sean M. Smith's asking, can anyone see their comments?
	You better believe we can see your comments!
	What is the, uh, you wanted to, Gareth, carry on with the Ukraine thing?
	We're not good at it no more.
	Okay guys, listen, let's have a look at this.
	Yeah, you'll be interested in this.
	We promised you this and I didn't get round to it yet.
	This is a fascinating story about the UK's medicine regulator, like the FDA, are now acknowledging that they are...
	Hang on a minute, that's not right!
	Guys, that's wrong still on button one.
	I want to talk to you guys about their, I think they're called the MDHA.
	We're just going to work out what button it's on, fellas, and then we're going to get into it.
	It's essentially our regulatory body.
	Oh no, it's the right thing, but it's just got a crazy headline.
	That's what it is.
	It's the right text.
	It's just got New York Times demolishes the narrative of the unprovoked war in Ukraine.
	Listen, Maybe the legacy media are just making a lot of mistakes.
	Check out this.
	The UK medical regulator failed to sound the alarm over Covid vaccine side effects and should be investigated, MPs have said.
	That's our equivalent of Congress people.
	Some 25 MPs across four parties have written to the Health Select Committee asking for an urgent investigation.
	There's reason to believe that the MHRA have been aware of post-vaccination heart and clotting issues as early as February 2021 but did not highlight the problem for several months.
	Imagine the number of people that experienced health issues and maybe even death During that period, Denmark and several other European countries suspended the AstraZeneca vaccine over clotting fears in March 2021, but the MHRA, that's our FDA, only published safety advice on April 7th, by which time 24 million people had been vaccinated.
	In a sense, what we're getting is more and more information that suggests That they controlled information even to the detriment of our health.
	It's one thing to make a terrible error.
	It's another thing indeed to subject people to a medical process that is deleterious and maybe even deadly, guys.
	Now remember, become an awakened wonder and pose your questions to Ram Paul.
	If you press the red button on your screen, join us on Locals where we're going to do another 10 minutes now.
	We've got some silly Funny stuff about Nancy Pelosi.
	We'll hang out, we'll have a right laugh together.
	Shelly107, all of you guys, Kyle Rhino, Mark LG, Terrible, Maran, Will Shilove, all of you, get over there to the AwakendWonder chat right now.
	We've got some fantastic content coming up later in the week and we've got some content coming up now that's gonna knock your knickers off.
	You're gonna bloody well love it!
	uh you as well as the fact that we do a meditation every week we do readings together and we're people are sending us real estate listings now for new potential properties for us to start communities together that's right i want to welcome some of our new members like jeff black 757 taylor gp daguerre ngm worldwide corrie girl 0629.
	Thank you for getting on board with us with this new spiritual community.
	This, yeah, the rumble chat's awakened.
	Oh, it's awakened, but we've got to keep awakening.
	We've got to keep awakening, baby.
	All right, guys, so we're going to continue on.
	So you lot like T Turtle and Tammy Bell and all our friends over on Locals, let's post a link over there.
	We're going to, we've got some funny stuff about Nancy Pelosi and some extraordinary stuff.
	We've got Bobby Kennedy coming on the show later this week.
	So if you have questions about his ideas on war in Israel, you can start formulating those questions right now.
	Okay, baby, let's get into it.
	Join us over on Locals immediately.
	We're going to continue over there.
	Join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
	In the meantime, if you can, stay free.
	Stay right where you are, Locals.
	Man he switchin', switch on, switch on.

▲