All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 19, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:05:12
Who KILLED Navalny?! The TRUTH About Putin & DEEP STATE Assassinations - Stay Free #307
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So, I'm going to go ahead and start the video.
So, I'm going to start the video.
Yep.
Brought to you by Pfizer.
In this video, you're going to see the future.
We've got a live shot there.
Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
We've got some incredible stories.
Of course, we're covering Navalny's death and its implications and its immediate exploitation.
We're looking this week at Julian Assange's hearing coming up on Tuesday and Wednesday this week.
We're going to be streaming live and you can join us, of course, because, well, as of yet, it is a free country.
And you can go down the strand and join us there where we will be reporting on that case live.
It's interesting, wait till you find out what cases the judge who is adjudicating this case has previously worked on.
It's like MI6 representing the government and the kind of things that you would anticipate.
When we cross off of YouTube, and you know we love you, you Awaken Wonders, but when we leave YouTube and go exclusively to that stream where freedom is abundant and flowing, we'll be talking about these new French laws that prevent you from getting anyone a question mandated or even suggested medication.
We're taking a deep dive in our item.
Here's the news on the return of Jon Stewart and the impossibility of a figure Like Jon Stewart in the modern cultural landscape because the world has changed so radically since he was last in a position of prominence or at least since he last did the Daily Show.
So we'll be with you for about 15 minutes on YouTube before we cover the new vaccination laws or what they're calling it is the article Pfizer in France.
Before we get to that we'll be leaving YouTube but we'll be here for about 15 minutes.
Just to show you what we get up to.
Remember, if you're watching us on Rumble right now, like TheNerdFarAway and EGBO21986, then give us a little like!
You, BlueNoseBob1874, I see you baby, and you nosy!
Give us a like, subscribe to our channel, and also, if you are an awakened wonder watching us in our locals community, hello to you, DTSPrincess1, JStarC369, Delightfulness, all of you!
And let's have a look at Mark Zuckerberg attending a UFC bout with Alexander Volkanovsky's team during UFC.
You have to question whether or not this is Zuckerberg in his natural environment.
He don't look as comfortable as he looks in, say, that metaverse.
We're not seeing him in that metaverse like we're in a Like, sometimes he's wearing like a wetsuit in there and hanging out with extraterrestrials and stuff.
He looks very at ease.
Let's have a look.
Steephin91, cringy lizard boy trying to be a normal person.
That's in the AwakendWonder chat.
Remember, you can join us monthly.
Remember, you get additional content every single month if you are one of our supporters to help us in our, let's call it a crusade against injustice.
Let's look at Zuckerberg.
When he looks at the poor man, he's both unhappy and, of course, his case.
He puts his hands out a lot of times, that's what I noticed.
Now look, I don't feel any malice towards Mark Zuckerberg.
I feel humanity and sweetness and he's a person that I would love to have on our show at any time to talk to about a number of issues, in particular censorship.
I'd love to know what the relationship Facebook and other meta companies have with some of the nefarious, insidious, shady organizations that act as proxy censors for your government and for my government.
Shutting down free speech, shutting down free discourse, Ensuring that we are unable to form new alliances and new relationships to challenge establishment power.
And I'd also be quite sweet to him.
You saw him on Lex Friedman.
He's BJJ.
JJ's looking pretty good.
And here in another what is I think perhaps doomed to be considered a potential waste of time and money is the New York Police Department dance team.
I don't know if they do police work as well or if they just do dancing.
And given that like in the New York Police Department are spending money on like little
Roman cyborg creatures on the subways and the streets, Orton may be deploying, I don't know, human police officers
for something other than dance.
We call this the tick tock-ification of culture.
Would this be further evidence of the banalization of our world?
I don't know.
Some of you might think it's a pretty positive thing having accessible and human police officers.
Why not?
Why not?
Perhaps it's part of the solution.
In any event there are going to be a lot less deliveries into New York City because truckers that are supportive of Trump are refusing to do deliveries after his 350 million dollar fine.
There's the story there.
I've been on the radio talking to drivers about this for the past hour and I've talked about 10 drivers.
Now what I think is interesting and surprising about this is that truckers generally, one might imagine, would belong to truckers unions.
I'm just guessing here based on what I know about UK politics and Even that's a slim library of information.
But it's pretty surprising, isn't it, that truckers, who would belong perhaps to the Teamsters, have no affiliation with the Democrats.
Let's have a little look at some information about truckers, traditionally at least.
Is that on four?
The International Brotherhood of Teamsters is a Labour Union in the United States.
Now, of course, the Teamsters, when asked about this story, said they couldn't comment on individual members or even groups of members and their politics.
You know that unions, in my country at least, used to block vote for one party or another.
And look, they're the 11th largest campaign contributor in the United States.
They supported Ronald Reagan and Bush in the 80s.
They've begun leaning largely towards Democrats in recent years.
The Teamsters endorsed Obama in 2008, for example.
So it's interesting and surprising now that that movement and that class of people have moved almost exclusively over to support in what you might consider to be right-wing political figures.
Certainly the legacy media would have no trouble in describing them In that manner.
And perhaps it's Clinton's deregulation of the financial industry that has contributed to that.
Or Obama bailing out the banks in 2008.
But what you don't have, and this is one of the great secrets.
Some of you saw our Joe Rogan video, right?
About Joe Rogan saying the left has gone crazy.
Is there's a sense that there is no political movement that represents ordinary working people.
That ultimately all political systems have been co-opted by global corporatist systems.
Do you think that?
Let me know in the chat.
Let me know in the rumble chat.
Yes or no?
Let me know in the awakened one.
Now let's get into one of our main stories today.
The death in prison of Alexei Navalny.
He died on Friday and let's have a look at how Western leaders have responded to it.
Now this is of course a sad story.
It's the death of a human being.
In custody.
But what we're interested in is the utility of the story.
How is this story being used?
What are you being told as a result of this story?
And what are you not being told?
Is there any evidence of conspiracy?
Can you think of anybody, for example, who's in prison in a Western nation because of, for example, anti-establishment behavior or the revelation of data that could be harmful to global elites?
I'm of course referring to Let me know in the chat.
We'll send you a mug, dammit.
The first person to tell us who I'm referring to, we'll send a little mug your way.
Let's have a look now, first of all, at Western leaders suddenly caring a great deal about Alexei Navalny.
Now, where outrage is growing following the death of Alexei Navalny, the staunch Putin critic who Russian authorities say died suddenly Friday in a Siberian prison.
The death of Alexei Navalny yesterday was a reminder of the extraordinary brutality.
We have a 77 AVA Julian Assange and it's a point that Caitlin Johnston made as well.
We'll show you that still in a minute but let's carry on watching this piece of
legacy media reporting. All of you Julian Assange, Julian Assange, Julian Assange,
whose hearing is this week, who exposed war crimes of the West, who exposed hypocrisy
and corruption and is still incarcerated without trial.
Putin and his government.
Whatever story they tell, let us be clear, Russia is responsible.
We should be clear about what has happened here.
Putin's Russia imprisoned him, trumped up charges against him.
Does that sound right?
In fact, David Cameron here, he's a globalist and former prime minister of this country.
He serves in the cabinet currently.
He was essentially a kind of a response to Blair in our Conservative Party or our Republican Party if you want me to make sort of Clumsy comparisons between these political institutions that you know already operate on behalf of global elites.
If you know everything he's saying here about Navalny could be said.
Yeah, we've covered Gonzalo Lira.
We've covered that.
Thanks for reminding us in the chat.
Of course, Gonzalo Lira died in prison in Ukraine for being critical of Ukrainian democracy.
If you have principles, then Julian Assange's rights and Gonzalo Lira's rights and Navalny's rights would all be considered as, I would say, covered by the same set of principles.
Now, note that anything that Cameron's saying here about Navalny could be said about Assange.
Poisoned him, sent him to a Arctic... Well, maybe it didn't poison him, but the CIA did have a plot to murder Julian Assange, right?
That's a matter of public record.
Penal colony, and now he's tragically died.
and we should hold Putin accountable for this and no one should be in any doubt
about the dreadful nature of Putin's regime in Russia.
You know like millions of people around the world I'm literally both not surprised and outraged by the news.
We'll be covering this in more depth later this week because as you know this week we are covering Julian Assange's
hearing.
We'll be down at the Strand.
Join us there to provide support for the campaign.
Stella Assange will be there.
We'll be talking to members of the legal team and, in all likelihood, Julian Assange will not be granted the right to appeal.
That's what this hearing is about.
It's very unlikely, for example, that he'll be allowed out of Belmarsh Prison To attend it, and it's even possible that there won't be a conclusion offered over the two day period.
But what this is an opportunity to highlight, particularly in light of Navalny's death, is that there are prisoners of conscience in our nation.
So if we care about that, if we care about someone being imprisoned because of their political views, if we care about someone who's, even like Navalny was at points called the Julian Assange of Russia because of data releases that were detrimental to the Russian oligarchy.
And remember, You can handle this complex idea.
This is why we, what we believe in in Stay Free, that we are able to say that yes, of course, Putin has people killed.
It's likely that he had Navalny killed, even if not proven yet.
It's likely that Russia's invasion of Ukraine was criminal, even though it was provoked by complex geopolitical issues and interventionist imperialist In measures such as the involvement of the US and CIA in the 2014 coup in Ukraine.
What we're saying here is not, isn't Putin fantastic?
Wouldn't it be better if we all just went and lived in Russia?
Of course, what we say on channels like this will be reduced to that so they can be dismissed.
But what we are pointing out is hegemony and imperialism in the US and UK are at least comparable.
Reported death of Alexei Navalny.
and imperialism in Russia.
Seems pretty reasonable to say, doesn't it?
But here is Joe Biden suddenly caring a great deal about Navalny.
We'll be covering this in more detail, as I say, in the coming days.
Reported death of Alexei Navalny.
He bravely stood up to the corruption, the violence, and all the bad things that the Putin government was doing.
That's what Julian Assange did.
That is what Julian Assange did.
He revealed war crimes.
He didn't commit any crimes.
In response, Putin had him poisoned.
He had him arrested.
He had him prosecuted for fabricated crimes.
He sentenced him to prison.
He was held in isolation.
Let me know who was president when Assange was charged with the Espionage Act.
Let me know in the rumble chat.
And you're going to have to question some of your own affiliations when you're answering that question.
Now, Biden has just pointed out that Navalny was held in isolation.
Julian Assange is being held in isolation.
Even all that didn't stop him from calling out his lies.
Even in prison, he was a powerful voice for the truth, which is kind of amazing when you think about it.
And he could have lived safely in exile after... Some people saying Bush, some people saying Obama, some people saying Trump, some people saying Bush, too.
Google it, guys.
...the assassination attempt on him in 2020, which nearly killed him, I might add.
But he was traveling outside the country at the time.
Instead, he returned to Russia.
Returned to Russia, knowing he'd likely be imprisoned or even killed if he continued his work.
But he did it anyway.
Because he believes so deeply in his country, in Russia.
Russian authorities are going to tell their own story.
So you can see that in a minute he hasn't yet said that's why we have to pass this bill in order to continue to fund this war that's unlikely to be able to be won without considerable escalation that could even lead to nuclear conflict.
In a minute he's about to connect this death to a plea for further funding.
And someone pointed out in the Awaken Wonder chat, you go duck go rather than Google.
You're right, see?
They've commandeered even my language!
No mistake.
Make no mistake.
Putin is responsible for Navalny's death.
Putin is responsible.
What has happened to Navalny is yet more proof of Putin's brutality.
No one should be fooled.
Not in Russia, not at home, not anywhere in the world.
Putin does not only target his citizens of other countries, As we've seen what's going on in Ukraine right now.
He also inflicts terrible crimes on his own people.
This tragedy reminds us of the stakes of this moment.
Go on.
We have to provide the funding so Ukraine can keep defending itself against Putin's vicious onslaughts and war crimes.
See, so finally after a pretty long pitch, we get to the tax dollars.
Let's have a look at what Caitlin Johnston posted about this matter.
Is that song seven, is it?
Crocodile tears over Navalny while ignoring Assange.
We'll be looking at that story with more detail and creating some comparisons, not creating them, drawing attention to them.
If you're in a country whose government has had a hand in the persecution of Julian Assange, you can go ahead and... She uses the F word here, but Caitlin is a passionate journalist.
Shut up about Navalny.
Hey, listen, we've got some interesting coverage of this story.
Is it on?
Let me pull it out.
Can you take me to the next page on my... Oh, yeah, I can do that myself.
16.
Thanks.
So yes, let me talk you through this.
The entire Western political media class are currently rending their garments about the prison death of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny and they're being joined by the propaganda adult citizenry of the Western Empire.
Meanwhile Julian Assange's last Why are the legacy media not covering this vital issue?
Navalny's past release of confidential documents from the Russian government and state-run energy companies had drawn comparison to Assange's work at Wikileaks which exposed 1.
US war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as international corruption.
Assange, as you lot know, is currently languishing in a maximum security prison in London, awaiting
a hearing next week.
Remember, we'll be streaming live tomorrow and the next day from that hearing that will
determine whether or not he can appeal his extradition to the United States.
Stella Assange warned Thursday that her husband will die if extradited.
Whenever I see people screaming about the persecution of journalists and political prisoners
in other countries when they themselves live in a nation whose government is persecuting
Julian Assange, I can't help but think of Matthew chapter 7, verses 4 to 5.
How can you say to your brother, let me take the speck out of your eye when all the time there is a plank in your own eye, you hypocrite.
First take the plank out of your own eye and you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.
Once again, We are returned to the point of principle.
There's 15,000 of you watching us in the Rumble chat right now, and I'd love you to subscribe to the channel and give us a like.
We are still going to be streaming for a couple of minutes on YouTube, but remember, you've got to join us over in the sweet stream of freedom.
And if it's within your means, become a supporter of our work on Locals.
We do additional content every single week, as well as giving you the ability to join us live for conversations With real journalists where you can put questions to them.
For Real says, that was my grandma's favorite verse.
It's a very beautiful verse and all of us are of course culpable at times of focusing on the flaws of others because it ain't easy to look at your own flaws, is it?
It's a challenge, it's a challenge.
Now, as you know, Tucker Carlson's facing a lot of criticism over his interview with Putin.
People saying it's propaganda, it was propagandist.
In particular, I think people, the supermarket stuff.
Blew people's minds, didn't it?
I mean, like, he really went for it in that supermarket and the subway.
And his subsequent comments that every leader kills people following the death of Navalny, that too has drawn a little ire.
But I believe that Tucker Carlson is doing precisely what journalists ought to do, provoke difficult conversations, act from a place of principle, and I'm beginning to think that people objecting to Tucker Carlson is a It's kind of extraordinary, isn't it?
Like, he couldn't have known that Navalny was about to lose his life in prison.
He did know that Gonzalo Lira had lost his life in Ukraine.
He does care deeply.
He's visited Assange in prison, hasn't he, of course?
Let's have a look at Tucker's response.
He was at that weird world government thing.
15,000 of you watching us now on Rumble.
Let's get more of you over.
Can you hear us?
Jberg78, you got a problem with the audio?
I think we're all good.
I think that's just you, mate.
I think it's just you.
Read my lips.
Let's have a look at Tucker at this World Government thing.
Now, if you're watching us on YouTube, we're going to leave in a moment because we have to.
Wade, dance and frolic in that free speech stream that is Rumble, where we'll be talking about new laws in France that would prevent you from even commenting or objecting to certain medical measures.
Now, like, It seems like it's something that's become quite common lately, hasn't it?
People have had some issues with medical measures lately.
But like, I don't know, 10 years ago, 15 years ago, there were a lot of people saying, don't use them asthma inhalers!
They're lethal!
You gotta watch out for them band-aids!
Oh, they're enough!
when you pull them off don't they? It's a recent problem and I've suggested that the
legislation is similarly innovative and designed with one thing in mind, shutting down dissent.
It's a globalist measure that will be coming to a nation near you. Gonna be extraordinary.
Let's have a look at Tucker's response and we won't be able to stay with you on YouTube
for that much longer guys so get ready to click that link in the description and join
us over on Stay Free Where Freedom Reigns Supreme.
You didn't talk about freedom of speech in Russia.
You did not talk about Navalny, about assassinations, about the restrictions on opposition in the coming elections.
I didn't talk about the things that every other American media outlet talks about.
Why?
Because those are covered and because I have spent my life talking to people who run countries in various countries and have concluded the following.
That every leader kills people, including my leader.
Every leader kills people.
Some kill more than others.
Leadership requires killing people, sorry.
It does, doesn't it?
I mean, I suppose Saddam Hussein, he was doing his level best to run Iraq, and then eventually it was no longer convenient, even though there were no weapons of mass destruction, even there was no...
No demonstrable connection at all to the tragic events of 9-11.
Saddam Hussein was deemed to have transgressed and was executed.
Similarly, Colonel Gaddafi of Libya, who was an ally of the West, ultimately jostled to an undignified death in the back of a Jeep like a scene from Weekend at Bernie's.
Nary had I seen nothing so cadaverous until your own Joe Biden ascended to the White House and he looks now like he's puppeted through his entire damned career.
Hey!
Also, President's Day today, we're going to be looking at just how sharp Joe Biden is.
We're not even going to be showing any of his errors or glitches or Max Headroom-like stutters because he, like everyone, whether it's Zuckerberg, whoever it is, is worthy of our love.
And surely in this period of Lent we should be looking to become more reliant on God and better people and the Lord alone knows it's a struggle and we shouldn't just be sat here criticizing people because we disagree with their agenda or consider them to be puppets of a globalist agenda.
We've got to find ways to love one another, haven't we?
Haven't we?
Isn't that our job here?
Aren't we supposed to become better?
But we do have to acknowledge that it's not just Vladimir Putin who kills political opponents, it's not just Russia who jails dissidents, it's not Just our enemies whose morality we have to question, but the governments we ourselves fund through our taxes and who we support through the ballot box.
I mean, isn't that an important conversation to have?
Now, if you're watching this on YouTube, let's start the countdown now, guys.
We're going to be with you for another 30 seconds, but when we go, we're going to finish this Tucker thing.
Then, we're going to be talking about the obvious connections between Navalny and Julian Assange, because it's Assange Week here.
Tomorrow, we are going to be reporting live from the Strand while Assange's hearing takes place.
After this, we're going to be talking about the new laws being passed in France to prevent you being critical of certain medical measures.
So if you're watching us on YouTube, we love you.
Click that link in the description.
Join us in the sweet stream of freedom, and we will communicate.
We will read out your comments, like you, Warrior of God for Life, or Amy Booger.
See you later!
I love you.
Okay, now then, uh, yeah, we're still in the middle of the, uh, the Tucker thing.
If I just press play, that'll take us back to it, will it, guys?
Okay, let's do that, and then we'll do the, then we'll do the France stuff.
That's why I wouldn't want to be a leader.
Um, that press restriction is universal in the United States, I know because I've lived it.
I've, you know, asked my former, you know, I've had a lot of jobs.
Um, And I've done this for 34 years, and I know how it works.
And there's more censorship in Russia than there is in the United States, but there's a great deal in the United States.
And so, you know, at a certain point, it's like people can decide whether they think, you know, what countries they think are better, what systems they think are better.
I just want to know what he thinks.
That was the whole point.
Yeah, I actually don't have a problem with that.
I'm starting to be concerned about what the left's problem is with Tucker.
Do you know what it is that they think that he's racist?
Okay, let's have a look at the poll result.
We asked you who benefits most from Alexei Navalny's death.
It's a bit of a stupid question, really.
Is it Tucker?
Of course it isn't.
Is it Putin?
Of course it is.
Is it the NYPD dancers?
42% of you said that.
Is it truckers?
A few of you said that.
I have to acknowledge to you now that I came up with that question and while I was coming up with it I wasn't really even sure what I was thinking.
It's pretty clear that Putin benefits in some way from Navalny's death and is likely behind it but that's not important unless you are watching us from Russia right now and if you are, welcome!
Because you are a human being like me and we are all involved in the same struggle here.
Let's have a look at some of the comparisons between Julian Assange And our man there.
Oh sorry, is it on 11?
Or is that pause that I'm pressing?
Australian Prime Minister Antony Orbanese has stepped in saying enough is enough and he's calling on the US and the UK to release him and return him to Australia.
That's right.
We've seen unprecedented political support shown in the Australian Parliament this week.
It's been a position of this Prime Minister since coming to government that enough is enough.
This case ought to be brought to an end.
And Julian Assange ought to be permitted to go home to Australia.
But this week we saw a resolution passed in the Parliament, passed by two-thirds of the Australian Parliament, which is a reflection of the public support for Julian Assange at home in Australia, but also the support calling on the UK and the US to drop this case and to allow him to go home.
So politically, there's a lot of political pressure.
The Australian Government has made representations to the US to drop the case and continues to do so, and we're working with them to try to seek a political resolution.
That would be lovely, wouldn't it?
Let's have a look at who's judging this case.
The judge set the rule on the Assange extradition case was previously paid to represent the interests of MI6 and the Ministry of Defence whose activities WikiLeaks has exposed.
So what you'll get there is the kind of Unbiased, neutral, like the point of all the paraphernalia in our country of the wigs and the robes is to signify to you, to let you know that there isn't a human being there, that there is a representative of an institution and a representative of the judiciary.
The principles themselves are deciding.
In the same way that we might ask ourselves to be voided of ego, a long journey for some of us I speak from experience, that the Lord's light might shine through, a judge while dressed in the appurtenances and trinkets of the judiciary can be seen to be the voice of justice itself.
Is that likely to happen?
If previously when acting as a public prosecutor, I guess, they represent or defend, I can't let me work that out, the interests of the MI6 and the Ministry of Defence.
Will Julian Assange get a fair trial?
Y or N in the Awaken Wonders chat and in the Rumble chat.
Let me know what you think.
We will be streaming live tomorrow from the Strand.
No, yeah, Rabfan on the locals chat powers like, no, we're not going to get a fair chat.
Yeah, Griffith, no, no.
He's not going to get a fair trial, is he?
We already know this.
So what are we going to do?
If we can't rely on our institutions, whether they are media, apparently democratic or judicial, what does that mean we have to do?
What is required?
You tell me what you think is required.
And you tell me how you think we can individually and collectively contribute.
Or do we just wait and waste and atrophy here?
Is there nothing we can do?
Is it over already?
Or must we rise up?
In collective and shared disobedience.
These are just questions.
These are just questions.
Here's to get you in the mood.
To get your gander up.
To stir in you the spirit of rebellion.
Here is our trailer for our two days of content streamed from the Assange hearing in what we're calling Assange Week.
🎵 Julian will be put in a hole if he is extradited.
I don't think I'll ever see him again.
Because we're going to stream live from the royal courts on Tuesday and Wednesday.
Any of you that are watching, it would be fantastic if you could join us.
This generation being born now is the last free generation.
You were born and either immediately or within say a year, you're known globally.
It's very airy.
That trailer was cut by Young Al.
Let us know what you think of Al's work.
Good trailer.
Do you think it was a good trailer?
I'm very impressed with it myself.
Now, we told you we were going to cover this new legislation being passed in France.
Let's have a look.
This is a post from Brett Weinstein.
France has now criminalised objections to the MRNA platform, exposing those targeted to ruinous fines.
I think it's €45,000 and imprisonment.
It's obvious lunacy and that it's happening in a western nation should alarm us all.
This madness must be defeated.
In France, at the WHO, everywhere it arises.
Now one of the things that was interesting when I thought about Tucker's interview with Putin is when Putin was talking about the possibility of a peace treaty, it struck me that Even though I wouldn't want to live in Russia in that moment with regard to that issue.
And perhaps this is the same if you're a Ukrainian person also.
Our interests are more aligned with one of the leaders of the apparent opposition, an enemy indeed, than with our own leaders.
For surely peace must be the aim.
Well done Al, says Ashera in the Awaken Wonder chat.
Now, when it comes to, when you look at what's being put, the law being passed in France right now, you can see that whether you are watching us in, I don't know, Sweden, in Canada, in Wyoming, wherever you are in the world, you have more in common with the population of France than you do your own government.
Can you now see, do, are we, are those that say we need a unified but decentralized opposition to globalism, are they right?
Is that what we need in every election in the world?
Candidates that stand against globalism, where there may be cultural, even religious differences.
And yet we stand united against globalism in all its forms, in particular its statist and corporatist forms.
Is that what we have to do?
Is that what's required?
Must we become vessels of the divine light?
Someone in the rumble chat, KRG0516, get the pitchforks!
Light the torches!
Is not the right direction.
Although there are plainly people in Scotland, as framed and platformed by GB News, that think that's the way to go.
Globalist Stooge and current UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak ...gave an ill-advised symposium on various subjects but all ended up getting questioned about the pandemic period in the UK.
In the audience was a man who himself, he claims, well I'm on Rumble, he experienced adverse events.
Listen to his confrontation with Rishi Sunak and see the madness of what's happening in France.
Are these conversations necessary or should they be shut down and censored?
Even if you disagree with this Scottish gentleman, do you think that he has the right to express this opinion?
Y or N in the Rumble chat.
Y or N in the Awaken Wonders chat.
Let me know and let's have a look at this wonderful confrontation with Rishi Sunak as basically a hedge funder that fought his way to the top.
Just a plucky hedge funder with a dream that invested in Moderna, then got a lucky break and became the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.
Just some dreamer kid.
He was not ready for a contemporary Braveheart, let me tell you that.
In this country, I want you to look into my eyes, Rishi Sunak, and I want you to look at the pain.
I mean right away that level of intimacy Rishi Sunak's not gonna be ready for.
He's been in systemic politics for like the last five years.
Before that he was working in finance.
You better look in my eyes pal.
Okay, Rosso, those were the two of them.
The middle one, that's the snout hole is it?
How's your sense of smell working?
Don't know what's gone wrong with that.
The trauma and the regret I have in my eyes.
Why have I had to set up a support group in Scotland to look after the people of the... I've had to set up my support, it's getting there, innit, now?
Like, he's reaching for the glass of water, Rishi Sunak, you know?
Oh no, they didn't tell me there'd be Scottish people in here!
...affected by that Covid-19... GB News!
Great Britain!
That's the whole country!
Wow!
Doesn't that show you how Congress and Parliament and all the institutions in your country are not representative at all?
When was the last time you saw someone get up in the supposed seat of your country's democracy
and said to your leader, now listen to me, what have I had to set up a support group?
I have to put out chairs at 8pm. We sit there in a circle.
Some of the people's vaccine injuries ain't even that bad but I have to listen to them. You're
kidding what I'm sitting here?
I'll be over it you rishis soon that. I'll be over it you.
30,000 people have had an adverse reaction to that vaccine.
and do all the deaths.
John, thank you very much indeed for your question.
Now that's enough, John.
We may be GB News but we're still the media, okay?
That will do!
Don't clap, you'll encourage him!
You've made a really strong point, John.
Prime Minister.
John Bullock, I'm very sorry to hear about... You may give us myocarditis, but you'll never take our freedom!
Your personal circumstances, and you said someone over here, also seems to have suffered by a similar thing.
Right, okay, this is difficult, this is legally complex.
Right, let me tiptoe through this mind, bearing in mind my relationship with Pfizer and my historic relationship with Moderna, who I invested heavily in when I was at the Thelene Partners hedge fund immediately before entering into government.
Okay, bloody hell, why didn't they tell me there'd be Scots in here?
Now, obviously I don't know about the individual situation that you're in.
So there is a vaccine compensation scheme that's...
Even though the vaccine's 100% safe and effective, right?
We did have a compensation scheme set up, but if it's 100% effective, why do you need a compensation scheme?
Hmm in places you alluded to in the NHS obviously everyone individually will work through their cases
It's difficult for me to comment on anyone's individual case. I'm sure you'll appreciate that
I'm very well you do appreciate it because you are an operative of the state
Happy to go and look at the cases and I'm sure you'll get them to the team here.
I mean I'm very saddened and shocked to hear that you've been silenced by anybody that is.
Even though we invest heavily in groups like Logically AI that literally de-amplify and censor information.
The Department of Culture for example gave 1.2 million pound of taxpayer money Too logically AI, specifically to censor information.
You know that Moderna was censoring, deamplifying, criticizing, shutting down descent of platforms like this one and other critics of the vaccine.
Even when the information being conveyed was true, it was called malinformation or disinformation or whatever prefix you've got to put in front of information to prevent people getting educated and agitated enough to rise up for the day surely is coming.
Admittedly we are deliberately censoring it and we've been censoring it for a while.
Even though it's 100% safe and effective.
to speak about your experience, what's happened to you.
We, admittedly, we are deliberately censoring it and we've been censoring it for a while.
And as I said, we have a compensation scheme in place for that.
And it's 100% safe and effective.
I'll make sure that we're working through that.
Obviously, I think you'll appreciate it's hard for me to comment on your specific circumstances,
just not knowing them and those things.
Knowing how much money I have made from Moderna, although that hasn't been revealed and
can see generally what our attitude is.
We've only paid 20% tax this year.
and I and my wife's father's company Infosys is one of the sponsors of the WEF. You can look that
up on DuckDuckGo, not Google baby. Forgive me sir, we haven't got a microphone on you so our viewers and
listeners won't be able to hear what you say. I think the last thing I'd say is, you know, we went through a
pandemic like everyone else. Some people went through a worse pandemic given that there was a massive
wealth transfer given that Rishi Sunak attended some of the parties that took place in this
country while you were watching funerals on YouTube.
At the points when it came to the vaccine, those decisions were always taken on the basis of medical advice from our medical experts to tell us, as politicians who are obviously not doctors, about Although there are many medical experts that have said in various inquiries around the world that politicians led using sociological reasoning and computer modelling rather than actual scientific or epidemiological data the political decisions around for example lockdowns you know now that Andy Fauci said that six foot social distancing they basically pulled out of their little
Buttholes!
Best to roll out the vaccine, what was in the public health interest, the priority order, how that should be done, who should be eligible.
That was something that the doctors recommended on and that's something that we followed.
Now obviously if there are individual circumstances which haven't worked out then that's why we have the compensation scheme in place and I'll make sure that we follow up on your cases.
Sorry about all that.
We've got a compensation scheme.
I've certainly got a compensation scheme.
I was investing in Moderna before this whole thing happened.
What an extraordinary world we're living in.
You've got to look after your own health and that's why I'm happy to give you this message from our sponsors today, BiOptimizers.
Do you know if you get enough magnesium?
Because a lot of us ain't getting enough magnesium.
Particularly Americans apparently.
One study said four out of five of you ain't and that's a big problem because magnesium is involved in more than 300 biochemical reactions In your body.
You could be magnesium deficient.
Do you suffer from anxiety, insomnia, muscle cramps or twitches?
Of course you do.
Have you got high blood pressure?
No doubt, baby.
Constipation?
Dozens of symptoms of magnesium deficiency.
Get this, magnesium.
Although some supplements cannot be absorbed.
That's why I, Ol' Russ, your friend here at Stay Free, exclusively recommend Magnesium Breakthrough.
It's the only full-spectrum magnesium supplement with seven unique forms of magnesium that your body can actually use and absorb.
Now, all Bioptimizer supplements are great.
Full refund, that's how you know you can trust them, with no questions asked, within a year.
If you don't like the supplement, just get in touch with Bioptimizers, use the internet, we promise we won't censor it and go, give me my money back, will ya?
Just go to, if you want to get some of this lovely magnesium supplement, go to BioOptimizers.com forward slash brand and you'll get 10% off if you use the promo code brand.
You can get gifts with your purchase, up to two travel size bottles of magnesium.
Be careful taking that through an airport.
Act fast, this is a limited time offer.
So go to BioOptimizers.com forward slash brand and using that thing, it makes us look good.
So do use that code, you'll get a discount and everything.
Now, remember when the world was a fairer place?
No, not really.
I'm delirious.
I can't remember anything.
Well, it did apparently used to be fairer.
Now, when Jon Stewart used to be in the Daily Show in 2015, the media and culture environment was different.
On the left, it was possible to criticize your own.
The left has since then become a weird organization, it seems, or movement or cult.
Joe Rogan's been ostracized and Jon Stewart might be about to learn some interesting lessons.
Can Jon Stewart's return to the Daily Show be used as a kind of gauge to work out how the culture has changed?
That's certainly the argument we're offering on Here's the News, No Baby, Here's the Effing News.
Stay with us for so much more.
See you in a second.
No.
Here's the fucking news!
Jon Stewart is back, and he's excellent.
But the world has changed since Jon Stewart was last on TV.
It has become broken, sensorial, and unable to withstand criticism of centre-left figures.
So, is Jon Stewart a litmus test for how broken our culture's become?
When Jon Stewart was last on The Daily Show, he showed how current affairs could be handled comedically and more intelligently than the actual news.
It was a common trope at the time.
People were watching The Daily Show to get their news.
Now Jon Stewart is back and I would say brilliant and Perhaps even better than ever.
But what's marked, observable and challenging is the world has changed since Jon Stewart used to last be on TV.
Now you're either for the establishment or you're against the establishment.
And the establishment figures from the left have been facing more and more criticism.
Remember, I was associated with the left for a long time because I believe in Liberalism and freedom and be who you are and leave me alone and that kind of stuff, which I know a lot of you in the comments will say, those are conservative ideas.
But anti-establishmentism, when you have corporatist leaders, previously was always assumed to be coming from the cultural left, shall we say.
Well, now that very same cultural set can't tolerate or accommodate criticisms of Joe Biden for being old, which seems like a pretty high threshold, given that Joe Biden is pretty old.
Let's have a look at Jon Stewart's return and some of the criticisms of it before analyzing what's changed in our culture that means that Jon Stewart is now more controversial than ever.
These two candidates, they are both similarly challenged.
And it is not crazy to think that the oldest people in the history of the country to ever run for president might have some of these challenges.
Now Democrats will say that any criticism like this especially of Biden is unfair.
That's weird because he's saying this before the criticism has happened and indeed that is precisely the criticism that has happened.
I don't know how you feel in particular about the senility and decay of Joe Biden.
I've always taken it to be an observable and evident symbol of Well, the decay of the system itself and evidence that he can't be in a pivotal executive position because he wouldn't be capable of that.
And it seems ludicrous and ridiculous to see a paracheek after a paracheek come out and claim that Joe Biden is sharp as a whip, he's lightning fast.
It seems preposterous and inconceivable that that's true.
What's interesting to me is to see Jon Stewart with his same cadence and same meter and now suddenly the left, his old allies, can't deal with it.
One thing I think is important about Jon Stewart to remember is that after 9-11 he was right in there with first responders, supporting them.
It's a cause that's very close to him.
And what I'm saying is that Jon Stewart represents a political category that's starting to disappear.
People of the left that are connected to blue-collar working people.
That in particular is the change that the establishment elite have undertaken.
An evident loathing of ordinary working people is why a lot of people don't feel at home in what was once regarded as the left.
Because you just don't know Biden like they know Biden.
President Biden, who I've been around numerous times just in this last year, is sharp, he's focused, he's bright.
He is sharp, intensely probing, and detail-oriented and focused.
That one was really funny.
And focus there.
And focus.
I got all my points in that I was told to get in before I did this TV show.
And focus.
We've all become more media savvy in the intervening years since Jon Stewart's departure from the Daily Show.
We all know now there's a relationship between the legacy media and the government.
We all know now because of the release of the Twitter files that deep state operatives are controlling portions of what's accessible and permittable on social media.
We've all become Better educated.
We all see a montage like that now and understand that it's not a coincidence that they're all using the same terms and the same words.
In a sense, Jon Stewart, to a degree, participated in the creation of this landscape.
Critiques of legacy media, critiques of the political class.
Of course, Jon Stewart isn't the creator of satire, but this kind of fast-paced anti-establishment quick thinking, aggressive style of comedy was very much pioneered
or made more popular certainly by Jon Stewart. The problem is now the culture has changed
and it is forbidden, oddly, on the authoritarian left to attack a leader like Joe Biden as if
it's Stalin or something, where if you criticize him it's like, oh my god, you're gonna die.
Of course now it would mean more a digital death or a cultural death or not being permitted to
participate in the spoils of the establishment elite. And I think what's most interesting
about Jon Stewart's return is we can see now that the culture has radically altered since
Jon Stewart was part of the mainstream.
The culture no longer permits Criticism of the powerful.
There are prescribed tropes that are permitted and that's it.
You might have seen some talk show hosts talking about Tucker's interview with Putin and it was kind of lukewarm satire and that's what's become normal now.
The aggressive attack of the powerful, that exists on online platforms now.
The mainstream has extracted that from its discourse.
It can no longer tolerate it because the legacy media exists to amplify and support the establishment, not to attack it.
This is a man who is sharp, who is on top of his game, who knows what's going on.
He's smart.
He's on his game.
I was in almost every meeting with the president.
Yeah, a lot of people have got doubts about you and all, mate.
And the president was in front of and on top of it all, coordinating And directing.
What is the standard you expect of the President of the United States?
It's not like an elderly person who's participating in the community as a member of the Rotary Club.
This is a person that's across geopolitical issues, numerous world wars, arms deals, pandemics.
That standard isn't high enough.
Leaders who are in charge of America's national security, not to mention our allies around the globe.
Did anyone film that?
LAUGHTER I even wonder if the audience laughter is somewhat nervous.
We've been so coached during the pandemic period to recognise this is what we're allowed to laugh at, we're not allowed to laugh at this, and part of cancel culture and part of the what you used to call political correctness but has now become far more extreme means that we don't live in the same sort of convivial and
easy comedic atmosphere that we once did.
Are we allowed to laugh at Joe Biden?
It's not laughing at him because he's elderly, of course.
There is an equivalency between age and experience and therefore perhaps wisdom.
This is not laughing at an old person.
This is questioning the cognitive capacity of a person in a position of great power
and querying whether or not this is at odds with what our expectations of the leader of the free world ought be.
Because if you're telling us behind the scenes, he is sharp and full of energy and on top of it really in
control and leading, you should film that.
I'm sorry.
Of course, when it comes to Republicans, they've got a different strategy for their 77-year-old candidate.
Jon Stewart goes on to attack Donald Trump.
And Jon Stewart always used to attack both sides, used to attack the establishment broadly.
Now, the Democrats have been very critical of Jon Stewart's attacks, as they perceive them, on Biden.
But the right haven't mentioned anything about Donald Trump.
And it's odd.
First of all, Donald Trump is not an old man.
this tendency towards censorship, this inability to accommodate open conversation or humor,
or even pointing out the obvious in the case of Joe Biden's cognitive decline,
is an indicator of a new cultural climate where there is a sense of pervasive oppression,
where there's certain things you're just not allowed to say, and that is perhaps the biggest
shift that's taken place since Jon Stewart was last on the air.
Well first of all, Donald Trump is not an old man.
He's an old man! He is objectively an old man, on a human scale.
We have two candidates who are chronologically outside the norm of anyone who has run for the presidency in this country, in the history of this country.
They are the oldest people ever to run for president, breaking by only four years the record that they set!
The last time they ran!
Jon Stewart appears to be skewering an important flaw of our political age.
Our political class are not retiring.
Perhaps because of the donations and financial support and ability to rake in cash, invest in companies that will benefit from laws that they're passing.
People like Nancy Pelosi or that other old lady that needed to be given advice.
Vote for the war!
War is good now?
Yeah, times have changed.
War is good now.
Yeah, just say aye.
Okay, just...
Aye.
All these people are elderly and don't you see in that a kind of visual demonstration of what's wrong with the system?
It has become corrupted.
It has become occupied by incumbents that are no longer appropriate.
It needs to alter.
It needs to radically change.
During the 2020 election, Wasn't it kind of ridiculous that we were talking about progress and change and people of colour and Joe Biden was the monolith that was presented to us as, here, this elderly white gentleman for a new brave world.
It shows you that there are no real values or principles within that system, that it's actually governed by peculiar hierarchies, odd systemic relationships and financial partnerships between financial systems and big tech and the military-industrial complex, and it's all just sort of papered over by By language and verbosity.
This is a brave new world.
I'm the only person that can oppose Donald Trump.
When, in effect, what is happening, as Jon Stewart observes, is elderly people are retaining their power, retaining their positions, while claiming that the world is progressing.
There's something very odd about that.
Unpredictably, mainstream media cultural institutions responded unfavourably to Jon Stewart's nuanced attack on both candidates.
Because remember, he attacked Trump, he attacked Biden.
I don't see anybody on the right going, you can't say that about Donald Trump.
He's trying his hardest with his hair and his skin tone.
I love that Jon Stewart is back, but what's so offensive to me is there's a difference between age and intelligence.
There's a difference between age and vitality.
There's a difference between age and really being up on things and having that quickness of wit that Joy has.
We're talking about Joe Biden, who sometimes doesn't look very well, or like he fully understands the magnitude of what he's dealing with in these numerous incendiary wars.
Different to, like, go and do The View.
I'd let Joe Biden go and do The View.
Yeah, go and do The View.
Don't matter how people are watching it or they won't watch it.
Let's decide whether or not to escalate a war with Russia and China and Iran simultaneously.
That's not the same as beyond The View.
Let me just tell you that Martha Stewart's 82.
She's still cooking in front of people.
Yeah, but she's just cooking.
She's not decided whether or not we're going to war with Russia.
Also, she did have to go to jail.
Robert De Niro and Al Pacino are getting it in.
They're actors.
They're just pretending to be gangsters.
Joe Biden is running the free world.
They've got babies in their 80s, okay?
Jay Fonda, 86.
Representative Maxine Waters, 85.
Yeah, part of the problem.
Nancy Pelosi, 83.
Part of the problem.
I don't know.
They look like they know what they're doing.
No.
No.
Maybe they know what they're doing.
They're exploiting us.
They have the wisdom, they have the history.
The problem with this country... This is distinct.
From revering elders and a culture that respects people's experience and we're able to turn to them and honour them.
Those are really important values.
This isn't a, let's honour Joe Biden by ignoring his evident senility.
That's not what this is about.
This person, who seems like might be a corrupt career politician, is leading us into various wars that appear to be in the interest of financial institutions and institutions of dominion.
Rather than representative of the will of the American people.
I was taught to respect my elders, and when they want to lead us into a global holy war, I bloody well get on with it.
It's called respect.
Called Armageddon.
Is that we don't value people with their wisdom.
We don't value seniors.
We don't value entrepreneurs.
Okay, and I'm sick of this ageism.
It says it about both of them, didn't it Jon Stewart?
That didn't warrant that response at all, did it?
Let's have a look at some cultural analysis about the changing landscape between when Jon Stewart was previously on The Daily Show to present day and why the culture has changed so radically and let me know in the comments what you think has changed.
Jon Stewart left the Daily Show in August 2015, which was not all that long ago, but was a vastly different media and cultural environment.
Celebrity apprentice host and celebrity billionaire Donald Trump had taken his golden escalator ride down for his presidential announcement less than two months earlier, and the tidal wave of societal change was a mere ripple.
I remember at that point, the idea that Donald Trump would become president, I thought at least, was ridiculous.
This was before the primaries, this was before he proved himself to be basically hilarious.
This is a tough business to run for president.
Oh, I know.
You're a tough guy, G. I buy that.
And we need to have a leader.
And before it became pretty plain that about 50% of the American voting public are so annoyed they are willing to vote for a renegade.
Stewart is a political comedy star from an era that has completely disappeared.
Ever since large portions of the American media became hopelessly addicted to the drug that is Donald Trump, obsessed with their perceived existential fight with the former and potentially future president.
Stuart's Daily Show reign went from 1999 to 2015, spanning the full scope of the Bush and Obama years.
Divisiveness in our politics and culture was rampant then, but Americans also were being served by media that valued objectivity, basic fairness and intellectual consistency.
Although in retrospect, the difference between the Obama and Bush era doesn't look as significant as perhaps it seemed at the time.
Ultimately, in retrospect and subsequently, those two men have been able to form a pretty decent relationship with one another, and generally speaking I would see them as representatives of the same financial interests, wouldn't you?
Obama, George Bush, they belong to the same clubs, they'll both accept money from Raytheon, they're both turn up after dinner speeches, not even saying this is a criticism of Bush or Obama, but they are institutional politicians.
Donald Trump, a weird renegade, isn't he?
An odd outlier, the kind of first beneficiary of fervid anti-establishment feeling that was clearly present but has peaked in the interim years.
In the years since Trump rose to power, objectivity has become seen as a sign of ignorance, or worse, there are hysterical screams of false equivalency and both-side-ism and what-about-ism, because if you're not focused solely on Trump alone, you're simply part of the problem.
Former New York Times journalist Amy Chozik said, there's a new generation of young journalists who believe objectivity is akin to white supremacy.
We've said many times on this show that Pulitzer Prize winning journalists like Chris Hedges and Glenn Greenwald and Brilliant up-and-coming journalists like Matt Taibbi or Whitney Webb or Schellenberg or Lee Fang.
They're now sort of maligned and marginalized.
I swear, in the Jon Stewart era one, those people would be at like New York Times, rolling stone, getting scoops, attacking the establishment.
Now it's like, you lot...
Shut up, you right-wing fascists!
And if you know those people, as I do, you can tell they're anti-establishment journalists with real integrity that are attacking corruption and hypocrisy.
Now the New York Times won't do that.
Rolling Stone won't do that.
They are no longer radical organisations.
They are about supporting the establishment, accepting cultural areas that ultimately do not affect the main thrust of power, I would argue.
Let me know if you agree with that.
Stuart's daily show made a regular practice of criticising his own side.
He'd go after the hypocrisy of the left, seeming to relish making his audience uncomfortable at times.
Stuart was occasionally masterful at exposing the ridiculous contortions we perform to defend powerful figures we support.
And he did so not by attacking the people, but by attacking the powerful.
In 2024 and since 2017, the Daily Show oeuvre and the corporate media apparatus has been the opposite.
It wasn't enough to simply attack Trump or his administration.
No, the target was the deplorables who put him there in the first place.
This is something we've commented on a lot.
The left used to be, as I understood it, the party of working people.
To ensure that working people, either through trade unions or in a more disparate way, could oppose and confront the corporate world and its ability to manipulate politics, the left arose to represent those interests.
Now, the left isn't that anymore.
And it was most evident to me, I suppose, and I'm just a casual observer of these things, in the era of Clinton and Blair where legislative changes took place and the left became about, we'll just be a slightly nicer version of the right.
That's what we'll do.
Now I'm an anti-establishment person.
I don't think that the right or the left are the solution to our problems.
I believe, as I think you know by now, in decentralisation so that we don't have to argue about culture anymore.
We just say, this community is going to be run in this way, this community is going to be run in that way, and our cultures can be personal matters or community matters or matters for us to determine for ourselves.
This idea that 50% of the population is at war with the other half, where does that end, I suppose?
What?
Which brings us to Monday night and Stuart returning with a manifesto of sorts tackling the Biden-Trump rematch that nobody wants.
He set the table on 2024 by describing in detail the threat of Trump, but also spent significant time calling out the obvious cognitive decline and mental fitness of President Biden, including those Democratic defenders who are spinning a full story after the damning special counsel report.
He referred to Biden as chocolate chip cookie guy and mocked Biden's awkward TikTok debut.
This was capital U unacceptable for some in the press.
Centrist Democrats were appalled at what they saw as a betrayal by one of their own, wrote Rolling Stone.
Stuart's main segment was classic both-sidersm, wrote Slate.
Those organizations, of course, being now ultimately mouthpieces of the establishment.
Jon Stewart is about to learn a hard truth about the current media and cultural environment.
His brand isn't welcome anymore.
He probably already knows that after he was kicked off Apple for talking about China.
And now here we are.
Jon Stewart has appalled the left because of his betrayal for daring to state the obvious about Joe Biden.
What's fascinating about the return of Jon Stewart is it allows us as independent observers to recognise that indeed the culture has changed, that it is more sensorial, that it is more authoritarian, that it has become more tribalised.
But within that, It does demonstrate to me also the possibility for new alliances.
Those of us that may not agree with one another on everything culturally or religiously or ideologically and that would surely include basically all of us because if you drilled into it for long enough you'd find fissures in all of our relationships because ultimately the sovereignty of the individual and the value of the community and the family or whatever group you identify with and want to belong to has to be at the forefront of our lives.
There is no reason for us to defer our personal power and our sacred connection to whatever ulterior realms you might experience either religiously or intellectually, to subjugate those connections in order to appeal to centralized cultural forces that it's become increasingly clear do not care about us, that ultimately just want to marshal and wrangle us around on the chessboard of their reality, when it seems, as I pointed out with the Bush and Obama era, that their affiliation with one another is far stronger with their affiliation with any supposed distinct cultural group.
So perhaps the return of John Stewart will be a positive thing, because it will show us that authoritarianism and censorship are on the rise, that people have become blinkered when it comes to their ability to criticise their own side, and that most of all perhaps, when criticising elderly leaders of the only two parties that a person might vote for, for us all to take a moment to observe, the system itself is in radical need of revision.
And whichever one of those parties you vote for, you're likely to end up with the same types of institution and the same type of challenges.
Well that's just what I think, let me know what you think in the chat!
See you in a second!
Thank you for joining us for this free stream jamboree A lot of you are pretty anti-Jon Stewart, I notice.
Like that you feel like he's not trustworthy and stuff like that.
Jon Stewart may have seen the light.
It says, Truth Puppet Carl Reino.
Stewart's a funny dude with fame.
He speaks truth to power.
Does anyone deserve attention?
I don't know, but he has it.
But a lot of you not at all down with Jon Stewart.
I feel you.
Me, personally, I feel like Jon Stewart's a pretty damn good broadcaster.
Think about his attitude, for example, to the first responders.
I've always been very moved by how he supported people in the fire service and all that stuff.
Did Russell make small girl say, here's the fucking news?
It's actually my daughter that says that, and she's very proud of that piece of work, as am I. Hey, so it's President's Day in your country, you beautiful people.
It's President's Day.
Let's celebrate the President of the United States, who I believe is, what is the main catchphrase?
Sharp and effective.
Sharp and effective.
He's like a razor.
Let's have a look at you.
In celebration of President's Day, in celebration of freedom, let us look at your president, Joe Biden.
I can see someone's bought them those golden Trump booties.
Who's going to get some of them Trump booties?
Lucy1001.
Russell, are you vaccinated?
What do you think?
He is sharp, intensely probing, and detailed.
Intensely probing is not a good quality in a president.
Oriented and focused.
This is a man who is sharp, who is on top of his game, who... Sharp is the word there, right?
They've been told to say sharp, aren't they?
And fit.
Knows what's going on.
This guy's tough, he's smart, he's on his game.
His mental acuity is great.
This is a very sharp president.
He's the kind of man who, no matter what stocks and shares he invests in, he always comes out on top.
And even though he regulates Apple and Meta and all those companies, he would never tell his husband, Paul Pelosi, and... Oh no, wait, that's me.
This is a man that's on his game.
President Biden is absolutely fit.
There's not a problem.
He's sharp, he's fit, he's always answering questions.
If you love us much, why don't you marry him then?
He is on the ball.
He was sharper than anyone I've spoken to.
He is sharp.
You keep saying sharp.
Will you say that he's sharp a lot to the point where the word sharp loses its meaning?
He's on top of things.
There's no doubt in my mind that the president is mentally fit for office.
Biden has proven himself to have a strong memory.
He's completely mentally sharp.
I'm getting a lot of pushback on the idea that Joe Biden is anything other than senile.
So if you could all learn this phrase, he's sharp, he's fit.
Could I add probing?
No, don't say probing.
That sounds weird.
That's too odd and peculiar and priapic and intrusive.
I'm going to say it anyway.
You don't control me.
He's at the top of his game.
Well, there you go.
It's democracy, baby.
Or republicanism, whatever you guys are into right now.
What a show it's been, and what a way to start Assange Week.
Tomorrow, of course, we will be covering the Assange hearing.
Day one, we'll be talking, I think, to Stella Assange.
We'll be talking to, hopefully, members of the legal team.
If you're watching us on Rumble, become an Awakened Wonder to get access to additional content, to join us for our readings of the great books of the world, to join us for an adventure into spirituality, and to be part of our community.
We also do an additional Here's the News every single week.
Join us tomorrow where we will be streaming live From the hearing of Julian Assange to see whether or not he can have an appeal.
My god, what a laborious process.
But this is what is left to us in, instead of democracy, instead of freedom, instead of clarity and transparency, we have the ability to attend hearings that will be adjudicated by some of Julian Assange's declared and explicit enemies, i.e.
the judge was one of the, is it defendants?
Defendants or prosecutors?
I can't work out how that case went.
In any event, by someone who operated on behalf of MICX, listen, I want to say hello to our new members like Jeff100, HoldOntoMe, TeaPartyMan, SixStringGunslinger, AdogTX, as well as Firegirl2020, and Pawpaw7, and Ashella, and SensitiveHoss, and all of our friends!
You, Claude!
You, Kazo!
You, Nodugunoku!
We love you!
Thanks for supporting us!
Jamie Jam, how's it going?
Listen, if you want to come and join us tomorrow for our free Assange movement, we would love to see you there.
I'll be there in person.
We will all be there.
We love you.
Thanks for being with us today.
Join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
Until then, if you can... Oh, hold on!
Before you go, who's won this?
Competition winner is Steerfen91.
You'll be getting a stay-free mug for saying that Julian Assange is someone who's been imprisoned for opposing global power.
A little bit like Nalvani, but in a country where it ain't so convenient to exploit his tragic death, or in this case incarceration.
Stay free.
▲
Export Selection