All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 1, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:02:10
DON’T FALL FOR THIS! Meta & TikTok “INTERROGATED” Over Online Safety - Stay Free #297
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Alrighty, no more relation to the cucumbers friends.
Maybe they take yourTurn your cent are we gonna nest Krait what to we're gonna do What We're gonna do is go west
Where to where to nest i meant where to nest Courtijo
Like if Krait aren't good at amazement I'm gonna go to the north side of the island and I'm gonna
go to the south side of the island.
I'm gonna go to the south side of the island.
In this video, you're going to see the future.
Hello there you Awakening Wonders, thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
We've got so much to talk to you about today, whether it's the online safety hearing in the United States that seems extraordinarily obviously being leveraged to generate more opportunities for control.
In fact, let me know what you think right now on the rumble stream.
Is this hearing, this inquiry, really about child safety online?
Or is it about more opportunities to implement control?
One, if you think it's about child safety.
Two, if you think it's about the implementation of control.
I'll ask you right now.
What do you think?
We've asked that elsewhere on other platforms and we'll show you those poll results a little later, as well as talking about my experiences on Tucker Carlson recently.
If you're watching us on YouTube, we'll be there for about 15 minutes.
Yeah, none of you are buying it anymore.
No one's buying it!
If you're watching us on YouTube, you have to remember That the WHO regulate many of the guidelines that are on YouTube or specifically they implement the suggestions and regulations from the WHO when it comes to discussion of medical matters and there's a inquiry underway in Australia right now that is going way off track when it comes to the WHO perspective with lawyers and physicians questioning the validity of measures taken in Australia and you know how draconian those measures were
People asking questions like is it right for the state to intervene in your relationship with your private physician?
What happens when doctors start ending their own lives as is happening in Australia?
We'll be showing you a little of that as well as updating you on the global pharma uprising as The people that toil the land to generate food turn against the system.
Remember, download the Rumble app.
You can watch us there, where we stream in order to stream freely.
Not because we want to convey hate speech, but because we want to convey free speech and quite the opposite.
Love is what we believe in.
Unity.
And remember that when you join us in the Rumble chat.
Remember, That whenever you use defamatory language, and I support your free speech, I support your right to say whatever you want, but whenever you use defamatory speech on the basis of someone's identity or religion or race, they love that!
Yes!
We've got them turned against one The minute that we begin to say, I don't care about your identity, I care about your ability to oppose these centralised systems of corruption and they are growing in power.
When the Orwellian language abides, we know we're in trouble.
When we're told that war is the only way of peace, we're in trouble.
When we're told that bombing the Yemen is self-defence, when you are America and you're in America, we know that something serious is going on.
I'm saying hello to you.
MR Awesome.
I'm saying hello to you Tree Burner, Lefarious Monsters in the chat.
You're in for a wild ride.
I want to say hello to all my Awaken Wonders over on Locals.
Those are our supporters who get additional content.
Every single week we make additional content for them.
This week's video is fantastic, as well as going into some detail about what's going on in Australia, which you will love because I'm a Moderna are fretting.
Moderna, this is beautiful.
You see Stéphane Bancel saying, we're making all of these vaccines and nobody wants them.
It's fantastic.
It's extraordinary.
You'll love it.
We also are posting our own conversation with Tucker exclusively on Locals.
It's up there right now.
We've posted it.
Me and Tucker had a conversation, not the one that's already posted everywhere, a private, discreet conversation If you want access to that, you can have a look at it right now.
In fact, let's pull the clip up.
Let me show people a little clip of that.
What number is it on my pad, please?
So I can play it out now.
You lot are going to love this conversation.
So this isn't the one that's already been on X and everywhere.
This is one that we have made privately.
Let's have a look.
Number?
12.
Let's have a look at this.
What's happening, Tucker?
What happens here tends to act as a preview for what's about to happen in the rest of the West.
Ultimately, the current set of global conflicts, will they be used to legitimize further authoritarianism
and control?
Without question, and the irony is that control... Oh, it looks pretty good, doesn't it?
That conversation is up right now on Locals.
You can watch it, well, don't watch it now, because we're doing this show and it's gonna be a fantastic show.
We're getting up to 10,000 now in the Rumble stream.
I wanna say hello to Kyle Rhine, Kyle Rhino, big friend of this show.
Richie Dupe.
We love all of you!
If you're watching us on YouTube, you're going to have to jump over into the Rumble Stream because it's where we speak freely, it's where we are guaranteed safety, it's where we can develop and cultivate this movement, where we can grow together spiritually, where we can grow together in freedom or the alternative is to imbibe the legacy media trusted news initiative approved pap that they want your mind filled with so that you become numbed off so that you are no longer an awakening node in a system of change.
Let's have a look at this Orwellian language.
When you're bombing the Yemen now it's self-defense.
Do you understand that?
Fox News, the U.S.
has carried out a self-defense strike targeting and destroying multiple projectiles that the Houthis were preparing to launch at commercial ships just in the last hour.
You damn Houthis, you!
Now, this is the 12th time the U.S.
has conducted strikes against the Houthis in Yemen since January 11th, and the second in just under about 24 hours.
Now this is completely separate from the looming response to the drone attack that killed the three soldiers.
It's looming. We've got that war lined up.
So we've got this war in the Middle East, we've got that war in the Middle East, we've got Iran lined up nicely.
And anyone who's been paying attention to things like the new American century and their plans to attack numerous
countries, including Iran, will be aware that first comes the agenda,
attack Iran, then comes the legitimization of attacking Iran.
That's at least how I'm beginning to think it works, but you are the people that educate us.
You are the people that we turn to.
You are the people that are going to be required to awaken.
I know, I'm trying my best.
I'm doing everything I can to awaken.
I'm trying to overcome my own failings, my own limitations.
I'm trying to summon a deep power accessible to all of us, because how is the political space ever going to serve us?
Do you ever wonder if anyone can operate freely in the political space, or do they all eventually get co-opted?
How do you join the Hoofies?
Says StephM1978.
Uselot, that's jokes.
I know that there'll be a serious side to this.
I know commercial ships will be getting attacked, but they are commercial ships that are, I don't know, where are they?
Gulf of Mexico?
Are they up and down the Mississippi?
Are they in the River Thames?
Are they in the Danube in the middle of Europe?
Just geographically, tell me where these commercial ships are right now and then we'll analyse it.
Hey, we knew this moment would come because up till now, Bobby Kennedy and Donald Trump have been playing nicely.
Thanks for the compliments on the shirt.
I appreciate it.
Hoofy and the Blowfish, says ODMLX.
Yeah, we ain't gonna take the news seriously.
The news is just the TV program, you know, just because they sit there going, Hello, this news has happened.
Sit quietly in your home.
Don't go anywhere.
Don't say anything.
Don't talk to anyone.
Do as you're told.
Take whatever medicine we say you're gonna take.
Have a chip inserted onto your skin.
They're not doing that yet, are they?
So let's be fair.
They're not doing that yet.
So RFK and Donald Trump are in a spat.
Have a look at this.
This is on Truth Social.
Look, of course, Donald Trump, he's by far the most radical left person running for office maybe ever.
Look at his environmental program and close up the USA.
Pretty fascinating.
And then Bobby Kennedy comes back.
Now, we have this.
Radically shutting down the country with no due process.
He's talking about the pandemic.
Pushing operation warp speed on an experimental pharmaceutical product and giving Dr. Fauci, who now admits social distancing wasn't based on science, a presidential commendation.
I look forward to debating our records in San Marcos on September the 16th.
Is that happening?
Is that really going to happen?
Is that happening in San Marcos on September the 16th?
That sounds Oh, well, he's saying that that will be the presidential showdown.
Explain to me what that means, because that seems cool.
Are you going to be talking about James O'Keefe today?
It says, eh, what now, mum?
Indeed we are.
James O'Keefe, I would call him journalist and master of disguise.
James O'Keefe has gone very, very deep, and you are going to love that.
You're going to love watching James O'Keefe going deeper, guys.
So, like, he's gone deep, deep into disguise.
So, Peter McCulloch, this is pretty interesting because one of the things I wonder, and I want to know what you lot say, because I know that there's a significant number of you love Donald Trump, you see Donald Trump as the answer.
What do you feel when RFK hits him on the pandemic record?
How do you feel about that?
How do you think the pandemic was handled by Trump?
This is interesting because Peter McCulloch, who's been on this show before, many of you will be aware of Peter McCulloch because of his uh views uh you know he's a legit doctor man he came out hard during the pandemic he was one of the first people saying don't uh vaccinate during a pandemic he was saying things like spike proteins won't remain in the site shouldn't be called a vaccine to gene therapy i mean we're still on youtube so we'll be careful but uh these are things he said which are
Plainly conspiracy theories, the lunatic!
Anyway, he's come out now saying that demographically, the issue of the pandemic, and in particular vaccines, could affect the outcome of the election.
Now, I don't know what you guys think about that, but have a look.
You might find this an interesting insight.
I'm looking at you, Awakened Wonders, RiversEd, USA Now, Rational Anarchy.
Whoever is running for president better figure this out pretty quick, because only 60% of people vote That's it.
That's all you're going to get.
60% even in the biggest election.
So out of the 60% we're talking 40 plus.
This is a hot issue.
Do you know many candidates can't even articulate where they stand on this?
Interesting.
Do you think it could be a defining issue?
Would you vote for someone that, say if someone says the pandemic was handled brilliantly, I support Big Pharma.
Would you vote for him?
Y or N in the rumble chat, if that was their position.
Or would you, you know, prefer... I'll just let me know.
That's that question for now.
That question.
Hey, you know, did you see them sort of photographs of Trump with his hand with either a golf injury or red ink on it or what some people suggested?
Because I think I saw in some legacy media spaces that it was like an indication of I don't know, gonorrhea?
I mean, people made some pretty outrageous claims, even in the apparently rational and legitimate news space.
A news space that is running scared.
A news space that exists primarily to amplify the interests of the powerful.
Here's Donald Trump addressing... Yeah, no one would vote for him.
No one would vote for a candidate that was not honest about the pandemic period, that didn't support the legitimate and genuine inquiry, and indeed, beyond inquiry, reckoning that is required in this situation.
What was the information we were given?
What were the assurances we were offered around those medications?
What is going on with Exist?
There's a lot of questions and there are questions that we'll be answering in full over on the Rumble stream.
So remember, if you're watching us on YouTube, join us on Rumble and you, you Awakened Wonders, you glorious members of our community, we love you and we appreciate you.
Let's have a look at Donald Trump addressing the red hand stuff.
It looks like it's better now, man.
Yeah, remember what happened the other day?
What was wrong with him?
Nothing.
the photos coming out of Trump Tower? No. Okay. What was wrong with them? The other one.
You want to tell us what happened with them? Nothing. Maybe it's AI.
Well, you know, they can do pretty impressive things these days.
Now, the main thing that we want to talk to you about today is the inquiry into online child safety.
Did you see yet TikTok CEO Xu Zhiqiu was repeatedly asked if he was a member of the Chinese Communist Party.
Those of you old enough or Well-informed enough, or well-educated enough, or just maybe you've picked it up.
When McCarthyism was a pretty big thing in your country in the 1950s, are you a member of the Communist Party, was a pretty well-repeated refrain.
It was a time of terror.
It was a time where freedom of speech and freedom of ideas was closed down.
Having a look at this conversation, this inquiry between these various senators, in this case it's Tom Cotton and the head of TikTok, is redolent of those times.
Our friend over here on Rumble, the Pulitzer Prize-winning conspiracy theorist Glenn Greenwood posted this.
Tom Cotton is a complete imbecile, as this clip vividly demonstrates, and both parties fear-mongering Over TikTok is grounded in diminuendo.
There's far more evidence that they're censoring for the US government than China.
This is all about government control over social media.
We've already asked you what do you think these hearings are about?
Do you think it's about protecting children or do you think it is about control?
These are one of the kinds of questions that have to be asked regularly when you're involved in a discourse with a government.
What is the relationship between the state and the population?
Are they supposed to be like parents?
Are they supposed to be like sovereigns?
Are they supposed to be like jailers?
Remember at the advent of the pandemic period where it was indeed the sanctity and sacredness of human life that encouraged many of us to be compliant.
We are all sacred.
Everybody has the right to live.
We should protect one another.
Therefore, if it's suggested that we should remain within our homes, even if that's just going to be beneficial to the most vulnerable members of our society, then we should do it.
If we should take this medication because it will stop the spread, because it will prevent more vulnerable people, people with comorbidities, who seem to be the people that were dying, then we will take it.
Over time, it seemed that we were, to a degree, misinformed.
Over time, it became clear That our previous assumptions about the nature of our relationship with the government had to be looked at, highlighted, remembered.
Hold on a second!
The government aren't particularly interested in protecting vulnerable people.
The government are interested in control.
Big Pharma aren't especially interested in helping people, unless helping people is an inadvertent by-product of the pursuit of profit.
They are interested in the pursuit of profit.
As time goes on, what mindset serves you better?
Obedience or skepticism?
Compliance or disobedience?
Let's have a look at the CEO of TikTok.
He handles this real well and he seems to be, I would say, operating on a higher intellectual plane than dear Tom Cotton, although I don't know either of them.
You let me know who you find yourself affiliated with, even though ultimately we're talking about someone that runs a massive platform and Someone that's a senator.
Let's check it.
I think they then had a lawsuit and it was overturned.
I can't remember.
No, no.
It's another company.
It was the Biden administration that reversed those sanctions, just like, by the way, they reversed the terrorist designation on the Houthis in Yemen.
How's that working out for them?
But it was sanctioned as a Chinese communist military company.
So you said today, as you often say, that you live in Singapore.
He's really obsessed with this Singapore thing.
Now of course a Chinese company that comes out of the Chinese state likely is affiliated with and to a degree controlled by the Chinese Communist Party.
I imagine that's kind of how it works out there.
I get it.
Them guys don't play.
But what is this inquiry interested in?
Is it interested in protecting your children or is it interested in controlling you?
Are you a citizen?
Singapore.
Are you a citizen of any other nation?
No, Senator.
Have you ever applied for Chinese citizenship?
Senator, I served my nation in Singapore.
No, I did not.
Do you have a Singaporean passport?
Yes.
That's my senator.
He waffles so much I get sick of him.
Singapore's awesome, says her husband.
Yes, and I served my military for two and a half years in Singapore.
Do you have any other passports from any other nation?
No, Senator.
Your wife is an American citizen.
Your children are American citizens.
That's correct.
Have you ever applied for American citizenship?
No, not yet.
Okay.
Have you ever been a member of the Chinese Communist Party?
Yeah, what about that?
Senator, I'm Singaporean.
No.
Have you ever been associated or affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party?
No, Senator.
Again, I'm Singaporean.
Let me ask you some hopefully simple questions.
You said earlier, in response to your question, that what happened at Tiananmen Square in June of 1989 was a massive protest.
Did anything else happen in Tiananmen Square?
It's really interesting that we're going into Tiananmen Square now because everyone knows what happened in Tiananmen Square.
It was a massacre.
It was a terrible event.
We've all got the image of the dude with the carrier bags confronting a tank as a painful and beautiful reminder that even a single individual can stand up To the might of tyranny.
And perhaps we need greater reminders that we as individuals matter.
That your individual sovereignty, your individual connection to God, or what you use as a value system if you don't believe in God, is your sanctuary, and is sanctified, and is vital, and is important.
What is taking place in this inquiry is anti-democratic, is tyrannical.
It's not about how do we protect your children.
If it was, why the hell are we talking about Tiananmen Square?
Why are we talking about the Chinese Communist Party?
Is he suggesting that the TikTok is to a degree an asset of the Chinese Communist Party?
I imagine if you live in China, what you see on TikTok is not at odds.
With the preferences of the Chinese Communist Party.
I reckon that's spot on.
But we live in anglophonic nations.
Most of us, let us know where you live.
As a matter of fact, I'm interested in all of you.
What I'm saying is, is this dude here, dear old Tom Cotton, is interested in a certain control over a platform that at the moment can be used in some territories to freely exchange data.
And they want that control over TikTok.
They want that control over Facebook.
They want that control over Meta.
They want that control to be ubiquitous and uninterrupted.
Yes, I think it's well documented.
There was a massacre.
There was an indiscriminate slaughter of hundreds or thousands of Chinese citizens.
Do you agree with the Trump administration and the Biden administration that the Chinese government is committing genocide against the Uyghur people?
Senator, I've said this before.
I think it's really important that anyone who cares about this topic or any topic can freely express themselves on TikTok.
That's pretty interesting because at the moment you can freely discuss it on TikTok.
Listen, if you're watching this on YouTube, we're going to leave right now.
Start the counter.
But before we leave you, before we leave you, I've got some important information.
Move it up, guys.
That's right.
Well done.
Well done.
Have you ever felt like your office software is spying on you?
It probably is.
You're not alone.
That's why trulyoffice.com offers something different and now with 30% off for our viewers and listeners, you should take advantage of this operation and opportunity.
Imagine working with a suite that ensures your privacy without any ads.
How much more could you achieve?
Say no to Big Tech and Big Brother watching your every move.
Best of all, no more subscriptions for bloatware from Microsoft or Google.
Buy once, use forever.
Are you ready to reclaim your digital space?
Just go to trulyoffice.com forward slash russell and enter RUMBLE30 for 30% off.
Isn't it time your office software respected your privacy?
Okay, let's have a look.
Can I see the countdown on the screen?
So, Click the link in the description and join us now over on Rumble.
We're going to do some more on this inquiry.
I'm going to talk to you a little bit about Tucker.
Remember, become an Awakened Wonder.
You can see our conversation with Tucker right now.
It's up already, but I'd advise you to stay with us because we've got some fantastic additional content to discuss with you.
John Podesta, when did you last hear that dude's name?
The Moderna CEOs have been making some interesting omissions.
So much more.
Click the link.
Get over onto Rumble with us.
See you there.
Stay free.
Okay, guys.
Let's get back into this stuff.
Where were we now in the order?
Back to where we were.
Nice work.
That's the spirit.
Okay.
So, oh yeah.
I want to watch the rest of that.
So, I'm going to show you a little bit of information and we're going to jump back into the TikTok thing.
So, check where we were on the timeline with the TikTok CEO because I just want to show you this before I go back.
So, 41 seconds.
So, like, if what the government is interested in is protecting children, 3.6 million cases of child abuse reported in the US, approximately 2.5 million children are homeless, more than 30 million people faced hunger in 2022, and how much of that do you imagine might be as a result of relationships between big food and the state, and the decay of infrastructure, the widespread Decay of infrastructure because of the amount of expenditure on foreign wars and the advocacy for endless perpetuation of Potentially needless conflict.
Let's go back to the CEO.
Do you want to play in from there?
We were at 47 seconds or 41 seconds.
So if you just just press play and you'll do that.
I think they then had been that what happens of Chinese citizens Do you agree?
It's a very simple question that unites both parties in our country and governments around the world.
Is the Chinese government committing genocide against the Uyghur people?
This is when they go full on in pretending to care about the Uyghurs.
Exploitation, murder, incarceration and potential genocide against the Uyghur people in China is disgusting and appalling.
The only thing I can think of that's more disgusting and appalling than that is exploiting it to legitimize potential measures of control and furthering the advance of the censorship industrial complex.
Like, if they care about the Uyghurs, don't have the leader of China come over to San Francisco for a conference.
If you care so much about the Uyghurs, Fully investigate whether or not Apple are employing Uyghur workers, potentially even incarcerated Uyghur workers in the manufacture of Apple.
How about some embargoes, some trade embargoes, so that Apple can't practice or sell phones in China?
It's extraordinary moral morass that we're being invited to enter.
You know, you can come and talk about this topic on any topic that matters to you.
You are a worldly, cosmopolitan, well-educated man who's expressed many opinions on many topics.
Is the Chinese government committing genocide against the Uyghur people?
Actually, Senator, I talk amazingly about my company, and I'm here to talk about what TikTok does.
Yes or no, you're here to give testimony that's truthful and honest and complete.
Let me ask you this, Joe Biden last year said that Xi Jinping was a dictator.
Do you agree with Joe Biden that Xi Jinping is a dictator?
Senator, I'm not going to comment on any world leaders.
I feel about that inquiry... Can you leave it up for us?
Leave it up.
I feel about that inquiry the same way as that guy sitting behind Tom Cotton feels.
Suspicious.
I'm checked out.
I'm checked out of the inquiry because I don't trust it.
Did you see the bit where Mark Zuckerberg had to stand up and apologize to families who've been impacted by child exploitation on meta platforms?
There's no doubt that social media sites can be pretty unpleasant places.
There's no doubt that all of us Place and prize our children's welfare above all else.
There's also very little doubt that this is a staged media event.
I say this with all respect to people who have had children that have self-harmed or ended their own life or been impacted by bullying as a result of activity on social media.
So this is obviously a very important issue.
What I'm suggesting is not that that isn't important, but this is an exploitative campaign that will be used to leverage further censorship measures in a terrain that increasingly the government are finding difficult to control.
As dissenting voices grow, as disobedience grows, as more and more of us become yet more mistrustful of systems of dominion that we've now known for some time we can't rely on.
Let's have a look at Zuckerberg there having to sort of apologize like he's actually at school.
It's pretty amazing.
A stunning moment.
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg faced a withering grilling over allegations his company is failing to protect children on social media.
There's families of victims here today.
Have you apologized to the victims?
Would you like to do so now?
They're here.
You're on national television.
Would you like now to apologize to the victims who have been harmed by your product?
Show them the pictures.
Zuckerberg stood and turned to address the hearing room filled with the families.
Obviously that's been planned in advance because everyone's had those photos distributed among them
and indeed drawing attention to online bullying or sites that encourage suicide or self-harm.
I can see that there's obviously a value in that and anyone that's been negatively impacted by that,
of course you have my sympathy.
But let's remember what Mark Zuckerberg wrote to Anthony Fauci during the pandemic period.
We're at 1 minute 17 on this one.
Have a look.
I'm pressing button 11 to have a look at the Jimmy Dore post.
On March 15th, Mark Zuckerberg privately contacted Fauci saying, I also wanted to share a few ideas of ways we could help you get your message out.
Zuckerberg then censored scientists, professors, doctors, nurses, and citizens from criticizing Fauci's recommendations.
So there was a period When social media was being pretty well aligned with the agenda of the government.
That's interesting, isn't it?
So that, in a sense, shows you what the appetite is truly for.
Brilliant post by Jimmy Dore here.
Facebook classified mRNA vaccine injuries as mal-information, meaning information that's likely true but should still be censored to prevent doubts about the experimental mRNA vaccines.
Numerous Facebook mRNA vaccine injury support groups with hundreds of thousands of members were banned.
So, Facebook were pretty compliant.
They were pretty compliant when it came to the pandemic period.
It's extraordinary, isn't it?
Let's go back to the Mark Zuckerberg thing, hopefully where we were.
Let's have a look.
Yeah, let's have a look there.
Thanks, guys.
Zuckerberg stood and turned to address the hearing room filled with the families.
Many held signs with photos of loved ones who they say have suffered because of social media.
And this is why we invested so much and are going to continue doing extremely big efforts to make sure that no one has to go through the types of things that your families have had to suffer.
Wow.
That moment is something that I believe that we are going to be looking back on and talking about for quite some time.
This is the one issue we are putting party aside and saying, no, this will not happen to America's children.
That's right.
That and Uyghurs.
Those are the two things we're all united on.
We really care about Uyghurs and we really care about America's children and there's certainly not an agenda to censor social media spaces to stop popular dissent spreading.
The Red says, these are some of your comments, Tom Cotton clearly has some in his ears.
Does he know anything about Singapore?
Says River Deep, Mount Ahai, Rattlesnake Haven.
I just saw you, Tucker.
You were brilliant.
Oh, thanks, mate.
I appreciate that.
Plus, thanks for the $10.
Lovely.
Thanks a lot, you guys.
Let's have a look at the rest of this.
Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri continued to blast the billionaire.
Shouldn't you be held accountable personally?
You're a billionaire.
Will you set up a victim's compensation fund with your money?
The money you made on... All this phony, performative, theatrical nonsense, the pretense of adversity between the government and social media when plainly they are willing to work in alignment with one another to primarily ensure that ordinary people, and we're all ordinary, We'll have a look at that story in some more detail later, as well as the numerous independent media reporters that are starting to stand up when it comes to the pandemic period.
And John Podesta's back in the news.
Let me know if you remember Last time you heard the name John Podesta.
Now obviously I went on Tucker Carlson a couple of days ago to talk about recent events and the way that it unfolded.
Here is a part of that conversation as well as a more detailed account on some of the agencies and organizations that participated in some pretty extraordinary events over the last couple of years.
Here's the news.
No, here's the effing news.
See you in a few seconds guys.
No.
So, I went on Tucker Carlson, the program, not the person, to talk about recent attacks and how a whole story is beginning to unravel.
Of course, you may already have seen the conversation I had on Tucker Carlson's network.
Likely you saw it on X or wherever you saw it.
It was an interesting conversation.
Let's have a look at it together and allow me to give you some additional information and show you how the timeline unfolded in a little more detail.
Back in September, media outlets around the world, almost all of them here in the West and the English-speaking world, ran headlines that shocked a lot of readers and viewers.
Russell Brand, the movie star, the comedian, now the podcaster, was a sex criminal.
A bad man!
A sex criminal!
A lot of people pointed out at the time, you're not in any mainstream movies, you're not on the TV, you're not in the media, you're a marginal figure.
How extraordinary this amount of time and attention is being spent.
It was astonishing, really.
Also, many journalists I respect asked, who do you think's behind this?
The military-industrial complex?
The pharmaceutical industry?
And I still feel, as I said on Tucker, it seems sort of grandiose to go Oh, yeah, the system's out to get me because it sort of seems somehow preposterous.
And in fact, it's beyond that.
In a way, these systems, as we are learning, are about data and information.
They don't care about an individual.
They just observe trends online.
This is information that we don't want talked about.
Deamplify that.
This is information we do want talked about.
And if you happen to be associated with one set of data, you are in serious trouble.
Now, none of the outlets ran the names of the accusers.
who had been sexually abused by Russell Brand, that was conspicuously absent.
But the judgment was overwhelming.
This is a very bad man, and he needs to be taken out of public view for the sake of the rest of us.
What was interesting about this is that, in fact, it was the final scene in a long movie that had been playing out for the preceding couple of years outside of public view.
This was an attempt to make Russell Brand shut up.
Russell Brand has views that diverge from those of most Western governments on big issues, not small things, big issues, questions of economic policy and war and peace.
And they decided we have to make this man be quiet.
Why Russell Brand?
Well, because in contrast to a lot of us who give our opinions for a living, Russell Brand had the capacity to win people over from the other side.
He hadn't spent a life identified with the far right, just the opposite.
Russell Brand was a man of the left, and to most people, a cultural figure.
Everyone knows who Russell Brand is.
And so he had the power, the capacity to persuade, and that was the threat.
So here's some additional information from our own internal research facilities.
March 2022, UK government organisation Coda Story publishes a story on its anti-disinformation newsletter linking Russell Brand broadcasts on Ukraine with pro-China propaganda.
The organisation is funded by the National Endowment for Democracy, the non-profit under the State Department that was spun out of CIA initiatives in the 1980s.
You can go back and look at the content we were making in March 22.
A lot of it stands up pretty well actually.
We were asking questions about the handling of the pandemic worldwide.
We were also questioning the legitimacy of Western funding of the conflict between Ukraine and Russia and its potential to escalate out of control.
Look at what's happened in the meantime.
It is extraordinary, isn't it, to see the UK government, CIA-inspired organisations, accusing an online public commentator of spreading Chinese propaganda.
To this day, I don't know what that might even mean.
I don't have strong views about China.
I certainly don't advocate for China's political policy or cultural policy.
I'm sort of a bit interested in Buddhism and ninjas.
That's about it.
September 2022.
Logically, AI is hired and paid $3.2 million by the Department of Digital Culture, Media and Sport.
Logically AI disputes Brown's criticism of the central bank digital currency and claims such concerns are just conspiracy theories without evidence.
Ironically providing us with some evidence that many of these theories have some validity.
We would have been talking about central currencies and their potential to be manipulated and to facilitate social credit score type systems where in conjunction potentially with passports for certain medical measures they could be used to for example Freeze people's bank accounts, as has happened already in China.
Or people who haven't taken certain medications could be refused access to certain venues, as has happened across the world already.
Or people applying for universities might not be permitted to get into that university, as recommended by Anthony Fauci when talking about universities and said when people are told they won't be able to join a certain university they'll lose their ideological bullshit.
So many of these stories, all of these stories in fact, are either based on publicly available content, the views of academics, and admittedly when it came to the pandemic, often the views of academics who themselves have been censored.
And much of the reporting that we've looked at indicates that I'm not alone in this kind of censorship, I'm just one of the more public and visible figures conveying information that is widely available.
Indeed, in the comments under here, many of you will be going You're going, I've known this for ages, won't you?
I knew this years ago, what took you so long to catch up?
When it comes to the Ukraine war, or the CIA, or Project Paperclip, or disinformation, or malinformation, or misinformation, there's no claim that this information is exclusively available here, just that clearly it must have caught the attention of people that care about it, and indeed we've made Freedom of Information Act a request to many of these organisations, and it's astonishing when you do it, they really drag their heels, they do not want to hand over the information about how extensively they've been spying on you, surveilling you.
Our concern about CBDCs to be dismissed as a conspiracy theory is yet more ridiculous when we know that during the trucker protest people did have their bank accounts frozen and it's since been decreed that that was illegal activity.
We were simply pointing out that CBDCs would make it even easier for governments to shut down private citizens' personal finances Then it already is.
We already know that many tech sites that handle finance and funding will cooperate with governments and we commented some years ago, I mean the comment ends up, you can go and look at it yourselves, we simply commented that this would be vulnerable to exploitation and I think that's pretty legitimate.
Indeed many of the stories that we cover are centrally about the transference of individual personal sovereignty To state or corporate interests, and often significantly partnerships between corporate and state interests, which is precisely what's happening here.
Groups like Logically AI or many of the other agencies that seem to be involved in just this story receive government funding, that's taxpayer funding, that's your pounds and dollars in taxes in order to spy on you, surveil you, and clearly, as you'll hear later, publicly attack you.
November 2022.
Think Tank, the Institute for Strategic Dialogue hired by the Department of Digital Culture, Media and Sport.
You've heard that name a couple of times now, and that is the department that Caroline Dynadge MP runs.
Caroline Dynadge is of course the Member of Parliament that petitioned X, Rumble, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram to demonetize, censor and control our content.
And in the case of YouTube, they responded positively.
This is the department that was receiving government funding to carry out this type of operation.
November 2022.
Think Tank, the Institute for Strategic Dialogue hired by the Department of Digital Culture, Media and Sport, targets Russell Brand as a conspirituality influencer that promotes anti-climate narratives.
Multiple UK newspaper articles, from newspapers including the Times, Telegraph and Independent, label Russell Brand a conspiracy theorist for his videos regarding big pharma vaccines and US government foreign policy and the military-industrial complex, although there were pieces also in the New York Times, the Atlantic and numerous other legacy media sites.
We also have reported somewhat extensively on the Trusted News Initiative, which are a conglomerate or cartel The days of legacy media companies competing with one another for scoops are long gone.
They are competing against independent media and essentially, as they themselves explicitly admit, attempting to choke out control and destroy independent media, usually through misinformation and malinformation type angles.
August 2023.
Public Good Partnerships, a content moderation non-profit funded by a lobby group for Pfizer and Moderna, repeatedly targets Brand as a conspiracy theorist for pointing out revolving door corruption in the UK and for discussing evidence that the US government misled the public about the justification for vaccine mandates.
Now, I know you're a well-informed audience, so you know how well undergirded those arguments are.
I also know that you are aware of that actual revolving door and you can actually see the faces and know the names of some of the people in that revolving door.
Jonathan Van Tam, who was significant in this country for advising people to take vaccines, now works at Moderna.
You'll be aware that at least two FDA officials now work The fact that there are financial ties and relationships between private corporations, in particular big pharma, military industrial complex, the financial industry, the energy industry and the state, is hardly a conspiracy theory.
You can observe that, you can track that, it's visible, it's understood, it's evident, it's obvious.
Nowhere in his reports on Bran did Moderna highlight any incorrect information, but the reports noted that they monitored Bran because he has a large platform with over 6.6... 6.7.
That's misinformation.
6.7 million YouTube subscribers and over 21 million followers across multiple social media platforms.
Moreover, his videos are widely circulated in anti-vaccine spaces, where he's viewed as a truth-teller and a threat to authority, and that Bran maintains support from Tucker Carlson and Elon Musk.
These are just a few of the peculiar investigations and operations involving the government, deep state, former employees, deep state inspired agency, big pharma funded organisations prior to the legacy media attacks in September.
September 2023.
Brand is subject to an investigation by the Times, the Sunday Times, and Channel 4's dispatches.
Themselves, legacy media organisations, cooperating in a shared endeavour.
YouTube demonetises Brand's channel without there being any content violations on the platform.
This is the first time a content creator has been financially punished by the company for reasons other than the videos published on the site.
Joe Ondrak, Logically AI's investigations head, provided different quotes to nearly half a dozen news outlets, including Vice, Wired, the BBC, And two separate articles in the Times that depicted Brand as a dangerous purveyor of misinformation who had finally been held to account.
So Joe Ondrak, Logically's head of investigation, is essentially a government funded proxy whose funding comes from you, the taxpayer, telling you that we convey dangerous information without ever telling you that you fund him telling you that via the government who plainly have an agenda.
I mean an agenda perhaps is a pejorative term because governments have to have policies, they have to have ideas, you have to decide whether or not you trust them, their ideas, their policies or agenda.
Logically claims that social media accounts trotting out the innocent until proven guilty refrain were among those perpetuating common myths about sexual assault.
The site published a follow-up video reiterating the claim that those seeking the presumption of innocence for brand, a principle dating back to the Magna Carta, were spreading a dangerous myth.
It's difficult for me to be objective on a subject that so plainly includes me and in this instance is about me.
But what I can safely say is not about me is the Magna Carta and the presumption of innocence.
Those are principles that have been valued since the dawn of civilization of this nature.
The idea that a government-funded agency, paid proxies that exist solely to crush dissent, would start to invite us to challenge some of our deepest-held beliefs about the judiciary, about democracy, about civilization, about sovereign individual rights, about the Magna Carta itself, shows you that what's being attempted is some kind of cultural reset that will play out way beyond this individual story.
For me, this is part of that Orwellian doublespeak trend that we're seeing everywhere.
When you see Jens Stoltenberg saying, we have to continue with the war, It's the only way to get peace.
That the meaning of language is being flipped before our very eyes.
A kind of psy-op against an entire population.
A kind of berserker principle, designed to leave us all collectively bewildered about what right and wrong are anymore.
I know you increasingly feel like you're not able to speak or open your mouth in case you say the wrong thing, that the rules might have changed.
Well, the rules are changing.
Now, innocent until proven guilty is being trotted out as a myth.
The Magna Carta, a foundational principle, a keystone of most democracies, along with the American Constitution and many other semi-sacred, if secular, pieces of documentation, are being regarded as ideas that can be dispensed with.
To what end?
To what purpose?
Ultimately, what it seems to me, is to legitimize control, to shut down dissent, to create a censorship industrial complex, that's already been created, but to ensure that the power So I didn't know any I just want to say I didn't know any of this and I was I experienced you because I didn't know you as a viewer and I remember thinking boy that is one of the most articulate critiques of the brand new war in Ukraine I had ever seen.
I saw one of your videos on the war in Ukraine and this was in the winter of 2022, two years ago,
and you were making kind of a remarkable case, not against the Ukrainian people and certainly not in favor
of Russia, but that there might be real implications for the West
if we get involved in a war that is not our own.
And you, I thought, said it so well.
Tucker Carlson himself had a very particular role in the culture up until recently.
He's someone that's worked on MSNBC.
He's also famously worked on Fox, becoming a phenomena on that channel.
And I, belonging to the cultural groups that you might assume I belong to, always was somewhat suspicious about Fox anchors.
Indeed, you can look on YouTube right now and see us deliberately riling Bill O'Reilly and deliberately trolling Fox as an institution and getting into it on a variety of subjects like war in the Middle East, the nature of their funding, their conservatism, all sorts of, I would say, anti-establishment attacks.
I've remained anti-establishment for many, many years.
Clearly Tucker Carlson is a person who's always had a particular perspective in the culture, but the culture has kind of moved around this outspoken pundit.
Tucker Carlson was kicked out of Fox News for a bunch of reasons that are still quite clandestine and ill-understood.
No one really knows why Tucker Carlson was sacked from Fox, but some people think it's because he became increasingly outspoken around war, specifically anti-war narratives.
And I'm still struck that claim the mantle of progressive or liberal don't identify that Tucker Carlson is perhaps one of the most outspoken critics of war, all war, And for me, the position of peace, of diplomacy, of ending war wherever possible ought to be a principle that wherever you are in the political spectrum, you aspire to.
The idea now that war is becoming normalized as a kind of progressive perspective shows us once again how meaning is being flipped and inverted.
War is good now.
War is peaceful.
War is progressive.
War is necessary.
In a sense, this conversation is a product of a cultural shift.
Figures that used to exist within the media mainstream are drifting into new spaces, and we're not alone in that.
Chris Hedges, a journalist who was once a prominent New York Times reporter and Pulitzer Prize winner, has been sort of cast out into the wilderness because of his anti-war views.
Glenn Greenwald, one of the most influential news reporters of our time, now only works in online spaces.
Essentially what happens, if you ask me, is legacy media spaces are entirely co-opted and essentially exist to amplify and normalize the message of the establishment.
Independent media can be representative of a wide variety of views.
Left, right, different cultural groups, Muslim, Judaic, Christian, secular, atheistic, materialistic, rational, all racial groups, different types of ideology.
What is emerging, if you ask me, is a kind of alliance on the periphery and a distrust of centralized organizations, whether they are state, corporate, or deep state.
And it's very interesting to see all of these organizations coalesce, stories that particularly relate to free speech.
Because as is often said, free speech is a fundamental principle.
Because if you can control the conversation, you can control ideas around war, you can control ideas around profit, you can control All ideas!
If people can't speak freely, for example around issues during the pandemic, then you achieve a consensus and you shut down the idea even that there are alternative perspectives and points of view.
In the end what you're left with is one homogenized blob of truth, virulently and vehemently controlled by centralized organizations that are struggling to work out how you can possibly control the narrative and vast populations At a time when we can all independently communicate with one another, exchange ideas, reach consensus, and oppose the establishment.
And that, I believe, is one of the defining, if not the defining, problem of our time.
What I missed, and I'm now seeing, is that in March of 2022, you were denounced by an organization connected directly to the US government as an agent of Chinese propaganda.
For your views on Ukraine, these in my reading of it, isn't it?
And we haven't, by the way, talked about this affair.
But my reading of it is these were the early seeds of a very deceptive plant that flowered more than a year later in September when you were accused of these crimes.
and demonetizing and censored as a result of that.
But looking back, so you were accused by a group called Coda Story.
It published a story on its anti-disinformation newsletter.
Now, Coda Story is connected to the UK government, but it's also connected to the CIA.
How does it make you feel to know that you were in the crosshairs
of two of the most powerful governments in the world, and they're intel agencies?
The UK government censorship that Tucker's referring to was driven by MP Dame Caroline Dainage, the head of the UK Parliament's Culture, Media and Sports Committee.
Dainage's husband was a commander in the British Army's PSYOPS division, the 77th Brigade, who were deployed straight from a tour of the Middle East, implementing behavioural change strategies against ISIS to countering dis- and misinformation during the COVID-19 crisis.
That sounds like such an anomalous jump and peculiar marriage.
Someone that works for the Department of Culture, Sports, Media and Entertainment, but ultimately advocates for censorship.
Indeed, it is she who sponsored the new online safety bill, which is alarmingly similar to numerous censorship bills across the world.
In Brazil, in Ireland, across the EU, United States, Canada's one's already been implemented.
And it's an extraordinary detail that her husband is a military That extraordinary though it sounds is not an anomalous or even particularly unusual journey.
It is very common these days for techniques and ideas that are developed to counter foreign enemies to be utilized with domestic populations.
What essentially appears to be happening is Our independent thought, our freedom, our ability to communicate, our ability to cultivate relationships, develop ideas and importantly oppose authority is being regarded as a type of terrorism, certainly at very least a type of threat.
This is obviously a story that's that's continuing to unfold and that I'm just a small part
of. That's why I'm very grateful to have conversations with people like Jay Bhattacharya
from Stanford who was subject to the same kind of scrutiny from
the same organizations. Journalists like Matt Taibbi and Michael Schellenberger
who report on the censorship industrial complex and why I'm
very keen to cultivate and create relationships with people from across
the political spectrum because I'm beginning to think that spectrum is fracturing
into a new prism of potential new light, of new relationships between
different Let me know what you think in the chat.
ideological factions that previously would have been opposed to one another,
but are increasingly realizing now that we are at a unique tipping point.
And unless we find new ways to resist these globalist forces together,
we are one by one or in vast numbers collectively going to be facing tyranny
such as we have never seen before, all the while being told it's for our convenience and our safety.
But that's just what I think. Let me know what you think in the chat.
See you in a second.
No, here's the fucking news.
Yes, hello there.
Great comments from you lot.
Thanks very much.
Cheers.
Go on, get in there.
Some of the comments I liked.
I saw someone go, um, unflattering sitting position.
That's that low angle, man.
That's that low angle on Tucker's camera.
Then, um, also I like the comment.
Someone said, has anyone got Russell's ear?
You've all got my ear.
We can talk.
We can communicate.
This is it.
We're coming together.
Huckfeed says, malinformation equals inconvenient truths.
You got it, baby.
Starseed3694, the system is not broken.
It's operating exactly as designed.
Do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do, pawpaw7, how can people work to take away our freedoms after all the people that died protecting them?
Yeah, that ain't fair.
I'm thinking of shaving my down, just having a moustache.
What do you think?
Is that a mistake?
Is it a mistake?
I'm thinking about it.
I'm looking at my little friends over there.
I love you, Russell.
Thanks.
I love you as well.
I love all of you lot.
Remember, if you are an Awake and Wonder, you can go straight from this to watching our conversation with Tucker.
It's up now.
As well as fantastic conversations with legit journalists like Michael Schellenberg.
I had a brilliant conversation with him.
I'm not sure if that one's up yet.
It's a beautiful conversation.
I think it's on the show tomorrow and it'll be up on Locals in Fall pretty soon.
It's pretty good.
It's pretty... Mustache.
Yeah, that's right.
Exalted flesh.
I'm thinking about getting a mustache.
No!
Stay exactly as you are.
Spirit of the age.
Corn Pop did nothing wrong.
Fair enough.
Fair enough.
I'm a big fan of Corn Pop myself.
It's on there now.
Schellenberger's up and on there.
Hey, so... Alright, we've got a few things to show you.
There's that Michael O'Keefe thing that's pretty funny.
You know Michael O'Keefe because he did that Black Rock move, didn't he?
Where he... Oh, sorry, James O'Keefe.
Yeah, he did that thing with Black Rock where he sort of got someone that had been working... No, first it was Pfizer, wasn't it?
He got someone at Pfizer to go, yeah, no, we're doing all sorts of crazy stuff.
Now, what's funny about this is he's gone deep cover himself.
By putting on some glasses and talking in a slightly camp accent, and it's very funny.
It's very funny, but I guess he's basically getting people saying, what did he get them to admit to?
It's like spying and surveillance.
Oh, mental decline of your president.
Well, that's a groundbreaking story, because I've seen that Joe Biden, and he looks like he's in pretty good control of his faculties to me, as long as you don't ask him to leave a stage or talk.
So you're pretty high up in the government.
Yeah, I'm fairly high up.
I'm good at keeping secrets, and so I manage two federal agencies, the State Department and USAID.
So when you say security, like you're...
That's James O'Keefe.
All he's doing is wearing some glasses and going, so you're pretty high up.
And I've actually seen James O'Keefe in Oklahoma.
And he's a very good actor and singer.
James, work harder.
He'll come on the show.
He'll come on.
You know?
Where did you get your shirt from?
I can't remember the brand.
I'll show you.
I'll tell you in a minute.
So it's pretty funny.
Let's watch a bit more.
Protecting the networks of the federal agencies.
You look like Tintin!
You give all your information to him.
The mission is to protect information.
Russell, please let people know not everyone in the world is evil.
Most people are truly good.
It's important to remember that.
Most people are beautiful.
I once had a long conversation with Brene Brown and she said that in spite of having once worked as a social worker and seeing levels of depravity and abuse that were heartbreaking, She ultimately, after much contemplation and reflection, determined that everyone was really doing their best.
If we can, in a Christian way, think of and love our enemies.
All of us love the people we love.
If we can't love our enemies, it's not very Christian, guys.
It's not very Christian.
Glasses like Clark Kent.
Funny you say that.
Funny you say that.
Let's have a look at a bit more of James O'Keefe.
We are like the President's voice when we go into meetings in terms of discussing and promoting the President's priorities.
Is he going to be the nominee?
Yes.
And she will be the Vice President nominee.
There was a debate about removing her from the ticket.
I don't think I could do one of them deep covers because I think I'd feel too bad because like that guy's quite nice isn't he?
Like he's sweet but that guy's going oh my god you're not going to believe what actually what's going on with Kamala Harris.
I think I'd be like oh no oh god I'm actually not even gay I'm wearing these glasses oh They quit on her en masse.
But with him, I mean, he's got dementia.
He's definitely slowing down.
They know that he has those issues.
I think so.
They're not going to say it publicly.
And same thing with Carla Harris.
She's not popular, but you can't remove the person.
So he's a cyber security policy analyst and foreign affairs executive.
Let's get James O'Keefe on again.
He's funny, isn't he, man?
I'm sorry.
I see.
I'm sorry.
How would you spin that?
People would be like, what the fuck?
Like, she's a woman and she's multiracial.
I think that they're really concerned about us.
But they won't say it.
I guess if they say it publicly... Correct.
Can't say it publicly.
I hope this guy doesn't lose his job.
I know that's the sort of thing I think.
I don't want that guy to lose his job.
He's sweet.
They can't say it publicly.
No, no.
They've got to throw the line.
But they won't say it publicly.
Correct.
Can't say it publicly.
Hey, so here are some of the memes that have emerged from that.
🎵 Wait, I knew I recognised you from somewhere.
Hey, I know you lot love this because White House senior advisor John Podesta, whose massive batch of WikiLeaks emails put Hillary Clinton on the back hoof, is replacing John Kerry as Joe Biden's climate czar.
He's back in the big time.
You know when you all heard of that guy.
John Podesta.
The White House senior adviser John Podesta will add international climate policy to his job responsibilities, replacing the special climate envoy John Kerry as the top US official on international climate issues, the White House said on Wednesday.
Kerry announced in mid-January that he would step down from the climate job to work on Joe Biden's re-election campaign.
He would take over Kerry's responsibilities, though not his title, when he departs.
Yeah, that's right.
That's what's happening.
I know what you little think.
Yep, I'm seeing it.
I'm seeing it.
There's a lot of talk about pizza.
Make him say we're Madeleine, Mike.
All right.
Oh, Christ, you little man.
You're mental.
Have a look.
The reason we wanted to show this really is because of that bit when John Kerry was asked about the private jet.
It's one of my favorite.
This is one of my favorite moments of watching a politician confronted with home troops ever, I think.
I just don't agree with your facts, which began with a presentation of one of the most outrageously persistent lies that I hear, which is this private jet.
We don't own a private jet.
I don't own a private jet.
I personally have never owned a private jet.
Pretty clear on the subject of private jets, right?
He's not ambiguous.
He doesn't have one.
He's never owned one.
And obviously, it's pretty stupid to talk about coming in a private jet from the State Department up here.
Mr. Secretary, do you stand by that testimony that you've never owned or... I personally... ...your family, by your family... I personally... Oh, uh-oh!
Personally, yes.
My wife owned a plane and she sold the plane.
You flew on that plane?
Not in a number of years, but I have flown on it, sure.
Oh, God.
Oh, no.
John Kerry's sort of like one of the ones that sort of seems like he might be alright.
He's like, oh, no, no, here we go.
Oh, yeah, no, I do own a private jet.
It's the system.
It's the system itself that needs to be radically changed.
There's no point obsessing...
Over the individuals that occupy it, what's required is radical systemic change and total empowerment for you lot.
I am Stevo, fuck you Lurch.
A more succinct and damning comment there from him.
Hey, you know we did a bunch of stories based on the reporting of Lee Fang about Moderna spying on Me and Jay Bacharia and Michael Schellenberger.
I think Megyn Kelly, well I know Megyn Kelly, was also spied on by Moderna, surveilled, because of her telling, because of, I think she was sharing personal stories about her own experience with the medications.
It's pretty extraordinary, yeah, Moderna, no, I see you, UFO limited hangout, I see you.
Thanks to Lee Fang, who did an investigation, and he has revealed that Moderna was very, very upset, among other things, about the fact that I said on this show that after I had gotten my third COVID shot, my booster, which you needed in order to operate in New York to do anything, I developed a positive on an autoimmune test that my general practitioner gave me, and then I- Mental, because New York, they went for it.
New York, you couldn't go anywhere, it was basically a mandate.
Had to go to a rheumatologist and all this stuff.
I reveal it on the show.
Some people saying that Lee Fang's got better hair than Gareth Roy in the chat.
Lee Fang does have good hair.
Gareth Roy's hair is pretty good as well.
I can see it just above the camera and maybe you should seek him out in the reflection.
I got targeted by Moderna who is very worried that This would add to the growing concern around autoimmune disorders following COVID-19 vaccinations.
They're admitting internally that it's a problem, but they're upset that I am talking about it and Alex Berenson and Russell Brand and Michael Schellenberger and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya are talking about it, Glenn, because they don't want it discussed and the mainstream media outlets were only too happy to comply.
Hey Russ, you and Dan Bongino running the same clip today.
I love Dan Bongino, but I've not had a chance to see his show today, so we do not know.
I didn't know that.
Extraordinary.
Okay, you lot, we've got Schellenberger on the show tomorrow.
Remember, right now, our conversation with Tucker is up on Locals.
You can go over and watch it now.
It's a brilliant conversation.
He talks about war, strong anti-war stance.
You will love it.
Why is Rivers... Glenn Greenwald, FireGirl2020, Teacher Amy...
there's some good people there in that chat. Listen, yeah, so, I'll see you tomorrow for
Michael Schellenberger. You can go to Locals right now and see the Tucker Chat, I'm sending
you all a lot of love. If you become an Awake & Wonder, you get early access to
interviews, you get to join us for a lot of live interviews and put your questions to the
guests here.
Here's some new members.
Have a look at them.
There's Jekup, DaddogRN, Dwarf Nugget, Steven Desmond, Hyakurity.
Thank you all for joining us.
Thanks for supporting us.
Thanks for being part of our community.
We are growing together and awakening into the glorious light, ain't we?
Join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
Until then, if you can, stay free.
▲
Export Selection