All Episodes
Jan. 31, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:03:13
Taylor Swift Government Psyop?! Corporate Media MELTDOWN Over “Conspiracy Theory” - Stay Free #296
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So, I'm going to go ahead and do that.
Brought to you by Pfizer.
In this video, you're going to see the future.
you Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand, where we get to, if we choose, awaken together in the spirit of love and unity.
Far from the globalist propaganda that says that free stream services such as this one are about propagating hate speech.
Always vague with what the word hate might mean when it comes to legislating against it.
We want to unify people.
We want to see a stream on Rumble full of love because every time we turn against one another with invective and rhetoric that is full of loathing, they benefit.
They want us divided.
The thing they fear most of all is us uniting against them.
Cheers!
So, we've got a lot to talk about today.
We're going to touch on the... Well, I'm not going to touch on it, actually.
We're going to scrutinise the ongoing... Is it a theory?
Is it an idea?
Is it a whimsical notion that Taylor Swift is a Psy-Op?
I remember that I met Taylor Swift when, years and years ago, I wasn't sure whether it was a Psy-Op, even though she seemed like a very nice human being, as a matter of fact.
But, The fact is we know that the CIA have departments and tendrils within Hollywood, not suggesting that Taylor Swift is a psy-op, but we do know that celebrities offer endorsements to particular political movements, and we do know that there are curious relationships between deep state agencies and entertainment figures.
Hey, what was the Epstein story all about?
So maybe it's not a ridiculous conspiracy theory, even though my personal view is that Taylor Swift is not a psy-op.
But let's have a look at that idea and let's have a look at the legacy media reporting on it as well.
War with Iran seems to be a popular idea if you believe the military-industrial complex.
Certainly Joe Biden seems pretty excited about it.
If you're watching us on YouTube we will be available there.
for 15 minutes then we will be exclusively available on the free stream that is Rumble.
Consider becoming AwakendWonder so you can see our content first you get exclusive content like tomorrow we're posting an exclusive additional interview between me and Tucker Carlson that will only be available for AwakendWonders and just now I was talking to Michael Schellenberger on the same site for our AwakendWonders for our supporters It was a brilliant conversation because he unpacked how the, uh, the pipe bomb idea.
Have you heard that stuff?
The January 6 conspiracy theory?
You've heard this stuff?
It's an extraordinary conversation.
You will love it.
But let's focus now on the, uh, main story.
Well, certainly it should be the main story if you're concerned in, I don't know, your own life.
This is the escalation of tensions in the Middle East that might lead to all-out war.
Biden has to deal with a second war he didn't want.
His task is to contain it.
If you don't want it, stop advocating for it.
Stop spending so much money on it.
Stop Bloody well provoking it.
Let's have a look at Joe Biden saying that this was all caused by Trump.
And if you are in the rumble chat, let me know who would you rather have handling a global crisis right now?
This adorable gentleman pictured here, Joe Biden, that's number one.
Or number two, your former love, Donald Trump.
Let's have a look at Biden on what's causing this escalating crisis in the region.
Ah, he says, make no mistake, it's Donald Trump's fault.
Let's have a look at what he said, though, in 2020.
The world has changed because of what Trump has done.
The American people, including independents and some Republicans, know how bad he is, know how much he's misrepresented, know how he's getting close to getting us in a war.
I said, as the walls close in on this man, I'm worried he's going to get us to war in Iran.
Unfortunately, I may have been right.
The fact of the matter is there's a lot at stake in this election.
He was a lot more cogent then, wasn't he?
Just a few years ago.
My God, that's incredible.
A lot of you saying RFK in the chat.
That's pretty fascinating.
Well done getting involved, you guys.
Well done speaking so respectfully with one another in that chat.
If you're watching this on YouTube, we'll be available there for another 10 minutes.
Then we will be exclusively discussing a wide variety of subjects over in Rumble.
And thanks for your kind comments about the interview with Tucker, if you haven't watched it yet.
Give it a watch and remember if you become an Awakened Wonder Over on Locals you can see our additional conversation.
Now this Taylor Swift psy-op conspiracy theory is gaining traction and I suppose the idea that there are now sort of celebrities that solely exist to support the agenda of a particular administration might be an exaggeration and might even be slightly ludicrous because I've Existed within Hollywood, haven't I?
I've been within those circles.
I guess it's a little more diffuse and amorphous than that.
As far as I know, there aren't people that are literally kind of CIA operatives.
But let's have a look.
Is this the Legacy Media button for?
Let's have a look at the Legacy Media reporting on this.
Is that it?
Is this the Legacy Media bit, yeah?
Have you heard the latest conspiracy theory making the rounds?
Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce in the NFL and the Democratic Party are in cahoots to get Joe Biden re-elected.
But stay with me.
Prominent right-wing figures are speculating that her relationship with Travis Kelce is made up and that the Super Bowl will be rigged for Kelce and the Kansas City Chiefs.
And the endgame is Swift endorsing Biden after the big game.
Here are some of the messages, I'm trying not to laugh, circulating on social media.
Vivek Ramaswamy, I wonder who's going to win the Super Bowl next month.
Podcast host Mike Crispy, the NFL is totally rigged for the Kansas City Chiefs.
Taylor Swift, I wonder if it is possible to rig sporting events.
Do you think that's ever happened in history?
I suppose it probably has.
Does the advocacy of certain celebrities influence the outcome of elections?
Certainly political parties seem pretty keen to get the endorsement of celebrities.
And one of the things we learned, I think, from the Epstein case, because I was much more interested on the Epstein list In the the people that have been to that island that were prominent political figures or deep state operatives and indeed the theory that now can we do it so that we stay on the we're at 142 on this CNN story right now i'm going to jump to the like this Epstein's thing let's have a look uh like look Jeffrey Epstein ran sex blackmail operation for intelligence agencies new evidence suggests newly unsealed documents include powerful new evidence that Epstein and Maxwell were running what's known as a honeypot a honey trap so that
You know, there were a lot of pretty famous people went to that island, it appears, and I suppose that needn't necessarily mean they were involved in things that were absolutely nefarious or even illegal, but a CIA asset having connections with famous people and the blackmail operation thing?
That's not ludicrous.
Check out this as well.
Like, you know, like the brilliant film Top Gun Maverick.
You enjoyed that, right?
It was real hoot.
It was a laugh.
Who didn't enjoy it?
They received support from the Department of Defense in the form of equipment, including jets and aircraft carriers and personnel and tech.
So, in a sense, that's one connection or another connection between the entertainment industry and the government.
And have a look at this!
A year after the CIA was formed, the Pentagon established the position of an Entertainment Liaison Officer.
The CIA already had similar departments in operation.
Since 1947, they've assisted and funded the production of 60 film and television shows.
That's really surprising and it's not nothing.
And again, I'm not suggesting that Taylor Swift is a psyop.
It's just when you look at some of the speculation, it's astonishing because at a time where you have Biden openly advocating for further, for more war, while you have People coming on Legacy Media in our country saying that conscription is a real possibility and suggesting that the Defence Department in the UK ought to receive additional tax funding.
Having kind of light, fluffy stories in affiliation with popular, credible, and I know a lot of people, we've talked to people in the office, a lot of people really, really like Taylor Swift.
It's not, you know, I'm not part of that demographic, I acknowledge that, but You know, obviously an endorsement from a celebrity is a significant thing in ensuring that the agenda of the powerful remains a kind of cozy and attractive thing rather than something that we increasingly regard as outright, explicitly, observably and overtly nefarious.
That's increasingly how we regard the establishment and their agenda.
Isn't that right?
Isn't that how we see things?
All right, let's go back now to that CNN video.
What number is it?
Have you heard the latest?
That's cool.
Yeah, cool.
Right, 1-4-7.
We're on 1-4-7.
Swift, Mr. Pfizer, Travis Kelsey, Lara Loomer, a self-described Islamophobe who has been embraced and promoted by Trump.
They are going to use Taylor Swift as the poster child for their pro-abortion GOTV campaign.
Right-wing media personality Benny Johnson said Taylor Swift is an op.
CNN's Oliver Darcy joins me to break all these very bogus claims down and we're going to highlight that, underscore it, bogus claims.
What you'll like about this piece of CNN reporting, even though I agree with the idea that Taylor Swift is not a psyop, that's fundamentally what I'd say, I would say that the use of celebrities does make certain political administrations and even particular ideologies more appealing, it softens them, it's called soft propaganda, you're all familiar with that.
What we're interested in here is the kind of haughtiness of this conversation, the superciliousness, the presumption of pomposity, the general condescending tone when people talk about these types of ideas, when we already now know that even if this particular idea is not true, these types of things happen all the time.
Let's have a look.
But it is happening.
Take it away, Oliver.
Yeah, Dan, I mean, they're absurd claims, outrageous claims, but they are coming from some of the most prominent voices in right-wing media.
And so, while us, in reality, consuming credible news information... See that?
Us, in reality, consuming credible news information on CNN, which I think we now know gets less viewers than, like, a Western broadcasting TV channel.
Like that, CNN is dying.
And CNN is...
deservedly entering into this terminal state on account of its negligent reporting during the pandemic period, its propagandizing, its advocacy for war, their constant platforming of military industrial complex pundits who don't declare their affiliation and association while positing pro-war stances.
It's when I do little sentences like that, that's when I think I could do a Ben Shapiro style rap with that dude Tom McDonald, who did, he reached out, I think, on X saying, oh, you'd want to do one?
And I'm certainly, you know, I don't want to get into some sort of this thing.
That is not the direction I'm going in.
I'm all about peace, but man, do I enjoy rhythmic, lyrical, rhetoric and orating, high paced, lyrically clashing interconsonants and rolling with the vowels right now.
Is that the sort of thing?
Would that do?
Could we do that?
Let's have a look at how this CNN propaganda unfolds.
Laugh at them because they are so ridiculous and outlandish.
The people who rely and kind of are swimming in this polluted right-wing information space,
you know, you could see how they might apparently be or, you know,
it's NG67 in the Rumble chat.
Don't do it, Russ.
Yeah, no, that's good advice.
I won't.
I won't.
I'm English.
Attracted to some of these ideas because they're being inundated by them from some of the most prominent voices.
You know, it's not just those right-wing internet influencers who are now peddling this stuff.
Jesse Watters, a Fox News host, earlier this month did a whole segment asking whether Taylor Swift is a Pentagon asset.
I mean, you can't make this stuff up, but it's out there and it really is ...going to end up influencing a lot of people who rely on these outlets and figures for information.
Do you reckon both sides of the political conversation enjoy a story like this?
That CNN enjoy the haughtiness of being able to say, how ridiculous!
Another conspiracy theory!
But do you think people on the other side sort of got, like, enjoy the idea that high-profile figures might be shilling for the Democrat Party?
Well, you know where we live.
We believe in new, emergent, independent politics.
What we require, I believe, and let me know if you agree with this in the chat, is a unified but decentralized response to globalism.
Precisely like the farmers movement across the world where ordinary people, working people, are coming together to oppose a globalist agenda and as usual are immediately condemned for being racist or Nazi or whatever it is this week that shuts down the right of ordinary people to have When Taylor Swift encouraged her fans last fall to vote, more than 35,000 signed up.
And with 690 million followers on her social media, if Taylor Swift were to get behind one of the presidential candidates, nearly one in five people say they'd likely vote for her pick.
I don't know which pop star I would vote in alignment with.
Let me know in the chat if there are any pop stars that could influence your vote.
Maybe Jimi Hendrix, could he sway me?
Just the fact that he was talking from beyond the grave.
Is there anyone?
Is there anyone?
I'm not sure.
Like, really, the position I'm in now is, let's have something worth voting for.
Hey, I hope you've seen my conversation with Tucker Carlson that I did with him.
It's up in a variety of places now.
Love Tucker, you know that.
But our conversation that we recorded with him will be exclusively available On locals, that's our AwakendWonder community at 4 p.m.
GMT, 11 a.m.
ET.
You gotta sign up for that stuff.
We'll show bits of it elsewhere.
We'll stream it and stuff, bits of it.
But to get total access to it, join our AwakendWonder community.
We just had a brilliant conversation there with Michael Schellenberger and numerous members of our community.
I'm talking like He Will Love Light and GMFC and Miss Molly and 4Real and Alpine Suite.
Many of them posed questions to Michael Schellenberger and they're brilliant questions about, well, in a sense, Like, while they're saying that it's ridiculous, puerile, infantile, to talk about Taylor Swift being a psyop, it's increasingly becoming clear that there's been a lot of media manipulation, to say the very least, around January 6th.
And you will love that aspect of the conversation that John Lennon, that conversation with Schellenberger, and that'll be up tomorrow as well in the Awaken Wonder community.
Yeah, John Lennon, that is a... Yeah, I would vote in accordance with John Lennon.
There's no question about that.
Here's Tucker Carlson talking about conscription.
Let's have a look at that.
We have a right to be mad.
At least, and let me just again say...
Oh yeah, this is from us.
This is our Awaken Wonder chat.
Oh, this is good, this stuff.
Have a look.
...speak for Americans, middle-aged Americans, which is what I am.
I've got four draft-aged children.
So if you're playing recklessly, fast and loose with their lives, then I have a right to despise you.
And I do.
So if you're Nikki Haley, who's running for president, or Ben Shapiro, or half the people I see on television casually mentioning the possibility of nuclear war, or sending Americans to fight in the Middle East, or in any way involving us in a war that has nothing to do with Prosperity and peace at home.
Nothing in other words to do with us Americans.
Then I have a right to call you out and be really offended because it's my family.
They live here.
It's not a joke to me.
It's nothing abstract about it.
And that is the difference between what's happening in the Middle East from what's happening in Ukraine about which I had very strong feelings, but I didn't think there was a realistic possibility that my kids could be enmeshed in it.
Now there is.
If you want to see that whole conversation, it'll be up tomorrow.
We've posted the link in the description right now.
Now, if you're watching us on YouTube, regulated by the WHO, is it a globalist asset at this point?
Is it censored?
Is it part of the Trusted News Initiative?
A cartel of media organisations that cooperate together to ensure that independent media is choked.
That's what the Trusted News Initiative say their purpose in life is.
And anyone who uses Trusted in their name has got to be investigated.
I'm just telling you guys, if you're watching us on YouTube, we're going to leave now because we're going to be talking about the WHO and that community is still regulated.
But before we go, let's post in the YouTube chat this treaty, this petition that opposes the World Health Organization's treaty.
This is for the UK one, so I guess you should be a UK resident to sign it.
If it gets to 100,000 signatures, They'll debate it in Parliament and jeez if you've got my kind of perspective on UK parliamentary democracy you'll already know that I consider it to be a closed book, a facade, a kind of bagatelle, a game that can't be won.
But sign that petition if you are a UK resident because surely we must oppose this WHO treaty.
Click the link Join us on Rumble now so we can speak freely together, destroying hate and creating love.
OK, so let's have a look at this WHO treaty.
The head of the WHO has been speaking about conspiracy theories related to the pandemic treaty.
Let's have a look.
You know, this is fake news, lies and conspiracy theories.
You know, these claims are completely false.
You know that the agreement will give WHO no such powers.
Because you are writing it.
We cannot allow this historic agreement, this milestone in global health, to be sabotaged by those who spread lies, either deliberately or unknowingly.
Can you tolerate it anymore?
Oh my god this wicked man says Grammy Onion.
I think he seems in some ways pretty sweet but what I will say is the World Health Organization at this point has to be held accountable for some policies they suggested during the pandemic period.
They surely should be inquired of As to whether it's wise to accept so much funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation when he plainly has a vested interest, and certainly a financial interest, in the development of vaccines.
It's one of the things he invests in most heavily.
Surely this is the time for the World Health Organization to look into the subject of excess deaths, isn't it?
Is that crazy?
Or adverse injuries?
These are conversations that the World Health Organization should be Having?
So the World Health Organization talking about misinformation?
Are you not astonished that misinformation is a term that everyone appears to be using?
Do you still at this point think that censorship is for your protection rather than controlling you?
Our freedom is their problem.
Your spiritual sovereignty is their problem.
It's extraordinary to me to believe or to attempt to even believe for a second that there are people that trust these kind of organizations at this point.
Counter these lies by speaking up at home and telling your citizens that this agreement and an amended IHR will not and cannot cede sovereignty to WHO and that it belongs to the member states.
The reality is quite the opposite.
You're safeguarding national sovereignty while strengthening global health security.
Those two things are not mutually exclusive.
It's not a zero-sum game.
You know what we're going to hear increasingly?
Exchange your liberty and freedom for security.
This means it's likely that there will be more crisis.
I suppose crisis is inevitable.
It's part of life.
But what the response to crisis typically includes are measures that restrict freedom.
Have you noticed that?
Let's post that WHO petition in the chat on Rumble, on Locals, wherever.
We can post it to see if it has any kind of impact at all.
So listen, this is an interesting globalist story.
We'll cover this after our Here's the News.
Tony Blair's like the globalist czar.
Tony Blair wants to sell private health data and we'll be talking about that in a minute after this.
First of all, I want to talk to you about our this war with Iran that's being vociferously advocated for
globally.
It seems that war is on everybody's lips.
And again, it's a familiar paradigm to any of us that keep our eyes open,
that whenever there's a crisis, an opportunity emerges and tensions are escalating in the Middle East.
Biden and neocons from both sides of the aisle are seizing upon the tragic deaths of troops in Jordan
to justify an escalation against Iran that may not be beneficial for you,
for your loved ones, for the world at large.
Stay with us.
We'll be talking more about the globalist project.
We'll be talking a little about Nancy Pelosi.
We'll be talking about the global farmers movement.
We'll be showing you a little more of our conversation with Tucker, the one that's there for the Awakened Wonder community.
But first, here's the news.
No, here's the effing news.
Joe Biden told us that one of the biggest threats posed by Donald Trump was a potential war with
So why are we continually being told at the moment that there will not be a war with Iran while provoking a war with Iran?
You've got Republican politicians telling you, we've got to have a war with Iran.
You've got the president saying, we've got to respond to these three deaths.
You're being told from every conceivable angle that there's an inevitability of war with Iran.
Yet when people are directly asked, should there be a war with Iran?
They seem to deny it.
This morning, the Biden administration vowing to take all necessary action.
It's necessary.
After an unmanned drone strike sent, it said, by Iran backed militant groups.
President Biden yesterday leading a moment of silence and promising an American response.
We had a tough day last night in Belize.
Even that sentence isn't good.
We had a tough day last night in the Middle East and may I say that I find it rather appalling when politicians hold public silences when it's their actions and decisions that have led to their tragic deaths of those service personnel and that his subsequent actions will likely lead to the deaths of more service personnel.
If you're going to have a moment's silence it should be a moment of reflection where we look at our aims and our objectives and our politics and the decisions that we make and the consequences of escalating war and tension not just here's a minute's silence Now let's carry on ensuring that loads of people unnecessarily
die.
Some people might question why there are 45,000 American service personnel stationed in the
Some people might be curious as to why 1 million people in that region have died in the last decade or so as a result of US interventionism in that region.
And who might be responsible for that?
Let me say this again.
Not in America, it's over somewhere else, the Middle East.
There's 45,000, a small town's worth, of service personnel and sometimes, occasionally, those people die, which I think is wrong and appalling.
I also would like to make clear that I think the people who serve in the military are extremely brave and ought be honoured and I also think they ought be led better and decisions ought be made that don't escalate the likelihood of their unnecessary deaths.
With America already locked in an escalating confrontation with the Houthis in Yemen over the group's continued attacks on global shipping.
Ah, those Houthis there at it again.
Yes, it's the Houthis that you'd never heard of before, all over your news cycle, getting Lindsey Graham into a frenzy, saying something like, we have to kill all Houthis, otherwise we can't look ourselves in the mirror and say, there is Lindsey Graham.
Now Republicans demanding a more forceful response from the US.
Senator Lindsey Graham writing, I am calling on the Biden administration to strike targets of significance inside Iran.
Hit Iran now.
Hit them hard.
I find it kind of personally appalling that people that operate in institutions of bureaucracy are willing to use the language of war so casually when so seldom are they directly affected by the consequences of that language.
But at least we're 100% certain that Iran are definitely involved and it's not essentially a guess, a hunch, a suspicion, a whiff, a convenient assumption that Iran are involved.
This is the press secretary of the Pentagon publicly admitting they don't even know if it's anything to do with Iran.
Just to follow up, you said Iran was behind the attack.
What does that mean?
Have you seen evidence of...
Good bit of journalism there.
directing anything specific to this attack, not just generally, but specifically.
Good bit of journalism there.
Have you got any specific evidence that Iran are in any way involved?
We're doing an intelligence assessment.
We don't have, I can't give you today that.
that Iran funds these groups like Qatar Hezbollah and other groups that have
attacked our forces but I don't have more to share on as a general matter
yes in general it's the sort of thing that Iran might do if that kind of
general assumption were made in cultural life it would be referred to as racism
you can't just generalize like that Well, when it comes to wars, we can.
Not saying stuff though.
Don't you dare generalise with stuff you say.
What about people you bomb?
Oh yeah, generalise with that.
Just generalise away, really.
Now, many progressive folk might condemn Marjorie Taylor Greene as a harpy, a hysteric, a lunatic and extremist.
Here is Marjorie Taylor Greene saying, you shouldn't have wars, which seems to me to be a sensible thing to say.
What I have to say to Lindsey Graham and others that are just madly calling for war is they sound psychotic.
Absolutely psychotic.
War is very serious and if the President is planning to go to war with Iran, he needs to come to Congress and ask permission and this is something that Congress has to give approval for.
Lunatic Marjorie Taylor Greene there saying that Congress should be consulted before embarking on war.
I mean, I think it's part of the Constitution.
Now, that rational, sensible, heroic politician Nancy Pelosi claiming that anyone protesting against war is a Putin-apologist.
See how it works?
Marjorie Taylor Greene, she's crazy.
Nancy Pelosi, she's a hero.
Glass ceiling smashing, yeah!
First female speaker of the house!
What have you got to say, first female speaker of the house?
Well, anyone protesting against war, yeah, yeah, is a hero.
It's part of the civil rights movement that led to even the opportunities that you're enjoying.
Oh no, I'm saying they're liars and that they're funded by Putin.
For them to call for a ceasefire is Mr. Putin's message.
Mr. Putin's message.
Make no mistake, this is directly connected to what he would like to see.
Same thing with Ukraine.
It's about Putin's message.
I think some of these protesters are spontaneous and organic and sincere.
Some, I think, are connected to Russia.
She may have the delicate features of a cartoon mouse, but she has the cruel heart of a tyrant.
And I say that having...
Looked at this for a long time now, as you know.
You think some of these protests are Russian plants?
Do you see how the legacy media participates in the construction of myths while simultaneously saying, you gotta watch independent media, they're always purveying conspiracy theories.
So you're saying that these protests are made up of Russian plants?
How about asking, have you got evidence for this?
Wait a second, you're making some pretty outrageous claims there, Nancy Pelosi.
Also, where the hell have you got these hundreds of millions from when you earn a couple of hundred grand a year?
Instead of that, just tee up an opportunity for Nancy Pelosi to convey propaganda.
See, there are plans.
I think some financing should be investigated.
And I want to ask the FBI to investigate that.
If anyone's finances should be investigated, it's Nancy Pelosi's and Paul Pelosi's.
Although, no, they're entirely separate, aren't they?
Nancy Pelosi's over here, earning 200 grand a year, and then there's Paul Pelosi, curiously and coincidentally, investing in big tech companies.
And Nancy Pelosi, though, they've got something to talk about at home, but not in an unprofessional way, because she actually regulates big tech companies.
So it's good.
It's good for the small talk, but they don't let it get involved in the business strategy or their love life.
Tucker Carlson, who's consistently anti-war, posted this on X, quite a succinct response to the dogs of war and their hawkish proclamations.
Now though, because we don't want to associate too heavily, right kids, with a right-wing extremist like Tucker Carlson and his right-wing advocacy for peace and harmony, so let's get some perspectives from those other right-wing fascists at World Socialist Organization.
And you'll note how frequently you agree with everything they're saying, almost as if there's this weird new movement at the center of global politics that's not really right or left in the conventional sense, but I don't know, totalitarian?
Let me know in the chat how you'd describe it.
Calls for President Joe Biden to take direct military action against Iran are ratcheting up following this weekend's drone attack in Jordan that killed three U.S.
service members and wounded over 30 others.
The United States can and must respond to this brazen attack, said Democrat Senator Mark Warner in a post on X. This attack on U.S.
and coalition troops in Jordan, our steadfast regional partner.
Colonised it.
You bloody how dare you!
It's extraordinary really the normalisation of colonisation.
Again, my support for individuals that are brave enough to serve in the army.
Boundless.
But the exploitation and rhetoric around this and the obvious attempt to exploit an opportunity to go to war, which I would say probably is part of a broader project that includes profiteering and projects of dominion, are considered to be an insult to the bravery of those people who have lost their lives.
I support President Biden in a deliberate and proportionate response, added Senator
Ben Cardin, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Go democracy, guys.
Some Republican hawks, many of whom are longtime advocates of regime change,
who have been calling for an aggressive response against Iran since October
7th, went a step further, calling for a direct confrontation with Iran.
The only answer to these attacks must be devastating military
retaliation against Iran's terrorist forces, both in Iran and across the Middle
East, added Senator Tom Cotton.
This is a really peculiar moment, actually, because they're saying terrorist
forces in Iraq.
But like almost the definition of terrorism previously was that it was separate from a sovereign state, i.e.
ISIS, they're terrorists.
Al-Qaeda, they're terrorists.
IRA, even, they're terrorists.
If it's directly connected to Iran, then you can't have both.
Either they're terrorists or they're Iranian forces.
Not Iranian terrorist forces.
You can't have all of it.
Iranian terrorist Covid Kanye Wests!
Are attacking our troops!
The Biden administration claimed the attacks were carried out by Kataib Hezbollah, a militia group the US asserts is backed by Iran.
Iran has denied any links to the attacks.
Now we get into some interesting, bigger picture, geopolitical facts.
More than 45,000 troops are deployed in the Middle East associated with decades of US wars throughout the region that have collectively killed over 1 million people.
Would it be sensible to divorce this attack and this escalation, even the current war in Gaza and all events in the Middle East, from this fact?
There are 45,000 troops stationed there and a million people have been killed in that region.
Would you say that's relevant or Irrelevant.
The legacy media will tell you that's irrelevant.
They won't report on it.
They won't responsibly explain it.
They won't investigate it.
They'll just sort of go, oh, you know, Houthis now is the problem and let's escalate tensions.
To me, these are relevant details.
The attack on US troops deployed on the other side of the world is being used to justify long-planned military escalations.
Long-planned.
Over the past two months, US imperialism has provoked a regional war in the Middle East, having already launched multiple attacks on Iraq, Syria, And Yemen.
And Yemen, that actually sounds like a real country.
Now the US military is threatening to directly attack Iran, which would engulf the entire region in a bloodbath.
Nice.
The Biden administration is playing with fire, creating the conditions for a catastrophe.
It has systematically provided funding, logistical support and political cover for Israel's war in Gaza.
Knowing full well that this would provoke retaliation against US forces deployed throughout the region whose deaths would be used as a pretense for further military escalation.
Many people at the beginning of this conflict said it is a volatile situation and would likely lead to further conflict and those people are now looking like they were accurate in their appraisal as events appear to be becoming more conflagratory and more intense, I would say.
In response to all criticism of its provocative actions, the Biden administration has responded by declaring that it has no intention of waging war against the countries it is militarily encircling.
Stop militarily encircling them then?
Oh no no, we militarily encircle people as Part of a dance of love!
And it's one of our proudest traditions!
Asked repeatedly at Monday's press briefing whether the US government is actively considering potential attacks inside Iran, White House National Security Spokesman John Kirby repeatedly replied, Huh.
But this is sort of a war, isn't it?
Notably on January 12th, Kirby used the exact same language with regard to Yemen, declaring, We're not interested in a war with Yemen.
And yet the United States has carried out dozens of missile strikes inside Yemen over the past three weeks, on over half a dozen separate days.
Funny way of showing you're not interested in a war, And as a further declaration of our peaceful intentions, here's some missiles, here's some attacks, here's a wedding ruined.
Bloody hell, I'm glad they don't want a war if this is what they do to achieve peace.
It seems the best predictor of what country the US military will illegally bomb next is the one the US government declares it has absolutely no intention to wage war against.
The most ridiculous version of this argument was presented in a White House press briefing on January the 16th.
Let's have a listen to that now.
And then just going back to something you said about the Houthis, how we're not looking to expand this conflict, How do you square that with the mission of degrading their capabilities?
I mean, how is that not expanding this conflict?
Yeah, how is bombing someone not sort of a war?
Oh, this is friendly bombing, kindly bombing, love bombs, bath bombs.
So on the second question, I mean, by It's a very simple equation.
It can't be that simple because I think bombing is an act of war.
It's at best going to be Orwellian doublespeak and potentially absolute nonsense.
And I can only assume that these people either think we're stupid or don't think very much at all about anything.
By removing military capability from the Houthis, we are making it harder for them to conduct these attacks.
These attacks have been escalatory.
These attacks have been dangerous.
These attacks have affected Merchant shipping in the Red Sea, one of the most important international waterways around the world.
We're just doing this to help the international waterways, in a sense.
Consider us to be like coast guards, in a way, just ensuring that the waterways are protected.
Oh no, look, there's a heron, an ibis.
We must look after the precious marshland.
It's extraordinary that we're invited to accept that an escalation of military action is the best way to get to peace.
This is the curious logic of the tyrant, and it's more obvious when you see, like, someone like Stalin adorned with medals and a mad moustache say out loud and outright, if you knew what I know, then you'd do what I tell you, but I haven't got time to explain all this to you, but let me tell you this, if we didn't kill all these people, more people would die down the line, so it's off to the gulags for them.
That's essentially what's being said here by John Kirby with none of Joe Stalin's panache or Georgian chutzpah, is that if the hoofies are not killed, things are going to get worse.
They're going to escalate their attacks on these vital shipping lanes and marshlands and precious little reed warblers.
They simply have to step in.
But it seems to me that what's more likely is there's an agenda in the Middle East, that there's long been an agenda in the Middle East, that's why there's 45,000 troops stationed there, that's why a million people have been killed there, that's why your legacy media is advocating for war, that's why Nancy Pelosi is not being asked any difficult questions, that's why dear old lazy old sloppy old soppy horrific dozy Joe Biden is Having a minute's silence and saying there must be retaliation and reaction because it's part of a broader plan.
Now, I know geopolitics is complicated, but what is plain and simple and obvious is that there are imperialist projects that relate to the military-industrial complex, American expansionism, and a general agenda of total global control.
So you, I suppose, have to ask yourself, what is this?
Is the military-industrial complex just responding to random stimuli and arbitrary events, or is this part of a concerted effort?
Just, you know, cast your mind back.
Have you ever heard anywhere people saying there's a long-term project to go to war with Iran?
Has that ever come up as part of the new American century?
Was it one of the things that was supposed to be in the boxes that Trump took out of the White House?
Just use your memory!
So the very act of taking these strikes, knocking out their capability, in some cases before they could use it, That is, by definition, taking the tensions down.
You're taking the ability for them to conduct these attacks off the table.
Well, that's literally the plot of Minority Report.
In this Orwellian language, any US attack on military forces of any country is an act of de-escalation.
And if the United States military were to attempt to destroy China and Russia's military capacity by attacking all of their bases with nuclear weapons, that would be the most de-escalatory act of all.
Seems like an extreme statement, but based on the logic that we've just heard, that's...
Actually, what is being proposed?
By destroying them, we're making things better down the line.
In fact, actually, people do literally use that argument about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, don't they?
Whole Japan would never have surrendered.
Kindest thing, the kindest thing we could have done was to bomb them into oblivion.
And in fact, you know, Japan built back better.
I like that phrase, built back better.
The absurd verbal gymnastics are an attempt to cover up the White House's far-reaching plans for military escalation from the American population, which overwhelmingly opposes further US military intervention in the Middle East.
Yeah, like increasingly I think people don't want to be in a war in some faraway place.
Say if your family are in the services or you yourself are in the services, don't you Well, shouldn't we be doing stuff that's really connected to our purpose as a nation and as a people and as a tribe?
But, you know, we could be domestically dealing with stuff.
We could be preventing threats.
All of these assumptions that also leads to imperial goals and financial goals being met.
Oh, probably they're going to do this, and then they'll do that, so your sons and daughters should get out there and die.
That doesn't seem like something that's very popular anymore, so they have to keep presenting it to us as somehow necessary, inevitable, beyond our choice.
We cannot allow this to happen.
Look at all the rhetoric at the beginning of this article.
Democrats and Republicans united together against your children's lives.
Asked on Tuesday why the White House has not informed the American people about its war plans or sought consent from Congress, which You'd think of two pretty important ideas.
We're just going to firstly, before we do anything, tell the American people and then have the due process of Congress.
They didn't bother with any of that.
Kirby bristled at the suggestion, declaring the Commander-in-Chief is not looking at polling or considering the electoral calendar.
The United States seized upon Hamas's October 7th attack on Israel.
To immediately surge troops, warships and aircraft into the Middle East in what the US Navy's news publication called the largest mass of US ships in the region in decades.
This massive military build-up was intended to be used in exactly the way it has been, to carry out a widening series of military attacks throughout the region aimed at reorganising the Middle East under US domination.
So once that fleet of ships is out there, it seems that it's possible, and they know that the legacy media will support this, that you just subsequently look, for instance, and go, Aha!
See?
All these incidents in the region?
We'll probably have to go to war with them.
But it is, in fact, perhaps, an act of provocation, even to take all of those warships into that region.
Could it be argued?
Use that simple philosophical trick of imagining it reversed.
If Iran had a bunch of ships in the Gulf of Mexico, do you imagine that people would be opening ice cream stands up on the beach for them?
Or do you think that there could be some conflict in the region?
In less than 10 days after the October 7th attacks, the WSWS warned, the dispatch of an armada of over a dozen warships to the Middle East is not simply to threaten Hamas, which has no navy.
The United States is preparing for a much broader conflict in the Middle East, including war with Iran.
Since then, the United States has bombed Iraq, Syria, and Yemen.
Yeah but just because they've bombed Iraq, Syria and Yemen and Hamas doesn't have a navy, don't see that as a strategic move.
I mean don't imagine that there must have been a conversation somewhere within the Admiralty, military-industrial complex and pentagons and the conglomeration of those organizations where people said right look we're taking all those warships it's obviously going to be seen as an actor of provocation but given that we've got this plan to escalate tensions with Iran anyway there hasn't There hasn't been no conversations, have there?
And we already know that the American people haven't been consulted, you know because you are them, and Congress hasn't been approached because it's listed there.
So by this reckoning, and even by Marjorie Taylor Greene's analysis, this is not a legal escalation.
What they have to do is go, oh shit, we've got all these warships here, thank God, because these provocative hoofy bastards are lunatics!
Look at what they're doing now!
Oh my God, I could barely finish my propaganda without a hoofy catapulting me in the side of the head!
They have to now provide the justification.
You know how this works.
Problem, crisis, solution.
That's the phrase that we've become familiar with.
They exploit these crises continually to fulfil an agenda that was already desired.
The US sees the conflict that has now erupted in the Middle East as a critical component of its existential struggle with Russia and China.
Significantly, the United States, in the words of a recent article in Foreign Affairs, has taken note of China's expanding relationship with Middle Eastern states.
In particular, Beijing's effort to broker a rapprochement between Iran and Saudi Arabia.
So China, China, the monsters that they are, bring about peace between Saudi Arabia and Iran.
What?
What the hell are you doing over there bringing about peace in that region?
We've got a lot of money tied up in that region.
Shut your bloody mouths and let there be escalating tensions, which we can exploit for profit.
On Tuesday, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, a man who publicly admitted that he's been provoking Putin into war with Ukraine, in a meeting with Secretary of State Antony Blinken, obliterated any dividing line between NATO's war against Russia and the US conflict with Iran and China, declaring a Russian victory would embolden Iran.
North Korea and China.
That matters for Europe's security and it matters for America's security.
It's interesting how these facts are narrativised.
I suppose the complexity of modern politics, and perhaps God, even the life of an individual, mean that to a degree we're all narrativising reality, making sets of assumptions.
Certainly the Pentagon are making assumptions.
But the idea that the war between Ukraine and Russia has to be perpetuated, otherwise China are like, Hello there.
What's going on it?
By that reckoning, the defeat by Vietnam of the United States during the 1970s would have caused more problems than it inevitably did.
The lesson of that conflict was not we always have to win wars.
It was stop starting wars in countries that are none of your business.
That's a lesson at least that we could investigate.
The global war that has now been provoked by US imperialism and its allies in London, Berlin and Paris is part of a global counter-revolution in which the imperialist powers are seeking to re-establish direct control over their former colonies.
At the same time, US imperialism, beset by massive internal social contradictions, is attempting to channel these internal tensions towards an external enemy.
These wars also create the framework for continuous attacks on democratic rights and an effort to delegitimize domestic political opposition.
That war does do a lot of jobs, doesn't it?
It creates opportunities for revenue and it generates the opportunities to crush dissent at home, plainly.
I would imagine that over the coming years, if indeed these conflicts do escalate, the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, if it sees the conscription of UK troops, as has been suggested through our legacy media in our country, if we see escalating tensions in the Middle East and even hostility between the US and China, Think of what reality is like.
Well, I'll give you an idea, taken literally from George Orwell.
We're in this state of perpetual war and perpetual fear.
Authoritarianism seems more and more necessary and understandable.
We've already seen in the last couple of years that a significant number of people will just stay indoors if told to do so.
Not necessarily because they're docile and compliant.
I'm not suggesting that, actually.
I'm saying that a lot of people, if we're told there's a social project that we should all be participating in, from a position of love and general goodwill, will comply.
And there's nothing like constantly escalating and threats of death and apocalypse and Armageddon to make
people more obedient.
In fact, that's obviously part of the general dynamic we're being encouraged to participate in.
We've got no choice. They're doing this, they're doing that.
But when you look just briefly at some of the strategic decisions that are being made,
when you just use your memory to recollect, hold on, haven't they been talking about war with Iran for
ages and ages now?
Haven't I heard that New American Century, the boxes that Trump took out?
Then you start to get a different picture.
Who benefits from this situation?
What interests want this war to happen?
Who will likely suffer, both financially, emotionally, and most significantly, of course, will experience loss of life of themselves and their loved ones.
It won't be bloody senators.
Lindsey Graham ain't gonna go there.
Let's go, is he?
He'll use the hawkish rhetoric of war, but he will not use an M16.
So what I would suggest is that we remain united in our opposition to escalating conflict and demand that diplomatic solutions are sought.
And it's a ridiculous demand, really, because we don't have the institutions or personnel in place to seek those kind of conclusions, because this is not an aberration within the system.
This is the system doing what it's supposed to do.
Generate conflicts that generate profit and solicit compliance at home.
But that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the chat.
See you in a second.
Now, here's the fucking news!
Hey, you beautiful people.
I know what it's like to be human.
I'm so glad that we are alive together at this time.
Moobsy and Trudeau is retarded.
I mean, look, I appreciate your free speech.
As soon as I start reading you guys' names, I'm like, oh, no, that's not my views.
Pure Leaf, Plants Poop Oxygen, brilliant stuff.
Now, remember, as I continually say to you guys, every time you speak with loathing to one another, the globalist elites enjoy it because they want us hating on one another.
The more we are divided, the better they like it.
They fear our unity.
They fear our shared power.
Blue Nose Bob, excuse me, said, Boeing stock shares are blowing up.
And you know, it's like sort of on your phone when you get sent some involuntary Apple news.
Don't ask for it.
The phone just sends you news.
Like, well, I didn't ask for this stuff.
Just gets sort of sent to you.
But earlier I saw a story went like, Reuters, Ukraine to use new hundred mile Boeing bomb.
It's propaganda.
Just look out for how often news is actual propaganda.
Max Mattias 444 from the Awaken chat.
War is peace, don't you know?
Pointing out that Orwellian lingo, that inversion of meaning, that syntactic trickery that we're becoming used to these days.
Frank Rizzo 1.
Send the senators to Iran.
Send them all now.
For as long as there's been war, we've always thought that, haven't we?
That, like, the people advocating for it should go fight it.
The only war we should be fighting is the one against our overlords.
Hypnicity!
I used to believe that Bush Cheney were the hawks.
The USA is simply a war for profit country.
Have we become the United States of warmongers?
Let me know what you think, guys, in the chat.
And Orange Tosh, those pesky hoofies threatening our democracy from 5,000 miles away.
It's interesting, isn't it?
The way this stuff operates and unfolds.
Easy to smile.
I thought she was replaced in the house and doesn't work there anymore.
Does Nancy still work for the government?
Who does she work for?
And why won't she retire?
Why won't any of these people retire?
Why won't they retire?
Why are they still doing their job?
They look like little sweet mouse people.
Are you wearing the rosary?
Says EON78.
Hail Mary full of Listen, we've got to come together in unity, respect one another's right to be different, respect one another's right to be Jewish or Muslim or Atheist or whatever, because we've got more in common with one another than we have against one another.
Let me tell you that.
Hey, listen, I've got I've got some good news for you.
You know we've got some amazing sponsors that work with us.
And this is a visual presentation.
The apple.
What a great symbol it has always been.
Whether it's in the fairy tale Snow White.
Whether it's been in the holy book itself.
The apple has always been a radiant jewel among the fruits.
Compare it to the saucy banana.
The Warholian banana.
Look at it.
Saucy little devil.
You know what it's thinking.
Look at this one falling apart in our hands.
Now the reason that the humble apple shimmers so, is because of apple stem cells.
And apple stem cells can, it turns out, migrate to the dermis of the human being.
Because today's sponsor, do you know this about me, is Charlize.
Now, I know Charlene, the woman who set up this company.
She used to be a model.
She's a mum right now.
This product is their toner.
It's kept in this high vibrational eye Italian glass from Italy.
And not only does it make you look younger, get ready for this.
This is the shot.
This is what we call the money shot.
In the face, one squirt.
Oh my god, I feel younger already.
That's because this stuff don't use no toxins.
I could drink it.
I won't drink it.
I'm a recovering addict.
I don't think there's alcohol in it, but you could drink it because it's toxin free, unlike most cosmetics.
This thing also boosts your serotonin.
Me and my missus, we've been using it.
We're smiling at one another constantly.
Also, the aroma is so, so sweet.
They tested these apple stem cells that are in this toner in some Swiss lab.
You know the Swiss.
They're either Climbing gold or doing experiments, the sort of stuff they get up to.
Anyway, they found out that apple stem cells are effective on human skin.
I want you, if it's within your means and if it's to your benefit, to consider purchasing the Charlize skincare line.
It's 100% toxic free, wild harvested and made in the USA.
But most importantly, it's effective in fighting the signs of aging.
Am I looking any younger since the little squirt in the boat race?
Right now you can get 25% off by going to charlize.beauty and using the promo code brand.
That's charlize.beauty Beauty promo code brand.
Click the link in the description.
There ain't no loophole, baby.
I'm off the drugs.
I'm 100% 21 years free from all of that stuff.
Now, check out this.
You know Nancy Pelosi was mentioned just now?
That...
Gorgeous, mouse-faced, sweetheart of the capital.
She, um, like, it's really interesting to hear this moment.
There's a moment where I think she literally tells some protesters, and I think they're talking about Palestine, to go back to China.
I mean, that's the new global world for you.
Someone is protesting against the war in the Middle East.
Go back to China!
What?
What is it?
Let's check this out.
I don't fully understand it.
It says button one here, guys, but that's not an accessible button to me.
That's it, guys.
Thank you very much.
The Democrats want the ceasefire.
The Democrats want the ceasefire.
What does that mean?
That's an odd thing for her to say.
Why won't these people... I love that comment.
Why won't these people retire?
Why won't they retire?
Another globalist plutocrat that will not retire.
Another friend to the oligarchs.
One of the kings of globalism.
One of the sovereigns of the new world.
Tony Blair has teamed up with William Hague.
If you're British you know that those two used to pretend to disagree with each other in parliamentary democracy before realising that there's a lot more upon which they agree in the globalist agenda.
Him and William Hague have come together to call for the UK to sell off our private health data.
Our private health data in order to put Britain at the heart of an AI revolution.
Do you feel happy?
Whether you're American, whether you're Canadian, Australian, wherever you're from on our planet, how do you feel about your private health data being sold in order to facilitate a global AI revolution.
Curiously, and this is I'm sure a coincidence, Tony Blair's got a foundation.
You know how all these guys, they love the philanthropy.
Well, Tony Blair's got a philanthropic organization and Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle, who want to be a world leader in digital health data, has given over a hundred million dollars To the Tony Blair Institute.
We asked you in a poll earlier whether or not you felt there was any connection between those two facts.
Have a look at the results of that poll now.
Tell me what I need to press in order to show people the results of that poll.
Guys, the Tony Blair poll.
Is there a connection between Tony Blair supporting those ideas and also accepting that money?
Can we see that, guys?
Is that possible?
Do you know where it is?
You don't have it no more.
Don't worry about it, it's okay, it's not a big deal.
Let's have a look then at, um, let's have a look at this story about Oracle, which are the organisation that are making these donations.
So, Oracle.
I'm sure your viewers and listeners out there are familiar with this company.
Owned by a gentleman called Larry Ellison.
Not owned, he's the CEO.
Oracle have already given $100 million to the Tony Blair Institute.
$100 million.
They plan, over the next several years, to give up to $375 million.
Now, in 2022, Oracle bought Cerner, which is a medical records company in the United States, for $30 billion.
Oracle and Larry Ellison are fascinated by the digitization of medical records and applications in AI.
And guess what?
Vaccines.
What?
It's happening again.
It's happening again.
What we need is a global uprising from the people that control food.
The farmers themselves.
We gotta back them farmers.
We can't believe all the hate and hype that's being pumped out about these farmers.
The global agriculture movement is continuing to escalate.
French farmers, German farmers, Dutch farmers, British farmers, Scottish farmers, American farmers, Indian farmers, Sri Lankan farmers, all opposing globalist edicts which are surely about disempowering the agricultural movement and ensuring centralised control over food.
let's have a look at that ongoing movement.
I'm so good at farming.
They've actually turned a highway into a farm right there.
Second track Blair is an evil Peter Pan.
Let's have a look at that poll result.
I think he's on number four, is that?
Oh, here you go.
Thanks, guys.
Globalist Tony Blair wants to sell your private area.
Look at that, see?
When you actually deploy democracy, it's curiously at odds with the agenda of globalists, isn't it?
That's why you gotta hate people that are willing to rise up and disobey.
Once we realise that if we put aside our cultural differences in order to unite, to demand decentralised, localised democracy, control over our food, control over our communities, control over our religious and spiritual freedom, control over our identities, give it all up!
Renounce the culture war.
Unify now.
Awaken now.
This is it.
This is the moment you have to awaken.
This is what you've been looking for.
Purpose.
Meaning.
Connection.
Something to believe in.
Now me, I'm English.
I've been taught my whole life not to like French people.
They're over there across the channel.
Twiddling their moustaches.
Apparently being a little bit better than us at everything from football to rugby to lovemaking to winemaking.
Well I support the French and their opposition to the globalist elites who want to control their food.
Presumably because if you control the food you've got huge power.
Let's have a look at the French kicking off as usual.
We know that whatever side of the aisle you may lay on, corruption remains tempting.
We know that most politicians, not most politicians, I have to explain this to my children all the time, my kids ask me, are the government goodies or baddies?
I've told them that they're baddies, but then I have to say, well, there have been heroic figures within government throughout history, whether, you know, even though these reframe these days, Churchill, a heroic figure, you'd have to say that Kennedy, heroic figure, right?
Or are you like full on?
No, it's all been evil since the dawn of time.
I don't know where you got, I'm like, I'm open to learn but you need corroborating evidence surely.
Well right now within Congress there is a yet another scandal that seems to be about using campaign funding to facilitate personal Well, this time it is Cori Bush, a member of the Democrat Party.
There's a legacy media report available on that.
In addition, there is some data available to how her campaign funds have ended up back in her household.
Now, we don't know enough at this point to say for sure that it's absolute out-and-out corruption, but at the moment the suspicion has to be, yeah, I see you M for Marcel, Pelosi is a baddie.
We have to at least be open to the idea that there is a degree of corruption.
Let's have a look.
We're following some breaking news from Capitol Hill.
Missouri Democratic Congresswoman Cori Burdett is retarded.
Churchill was a rich boy.
I know, I know, but we can't fight to remember.
These are the sort of things we can't exclude people.
Churchill was a mega-scientist.
No, guy, look.
I tell you what we have to start looking at is our similarities, not our differences.
Where did these people oppose evil?
What can we learn from them?
The problem with iconoclasm, the pulling down of heroes, is in the end we have no heroic values.
In the end we have no heroes left.
All that's left is a kind of relativist soup in which we all drown.
A kind of a hopelessness rains down upon us.
Of course there are people that were, you know, your forefathers in the light of today's ethics made decisions and said things and engaged in practices and policies that are unacceptable.
And Churchill in his bombing of Dresden, Yeah, is that war crime?
I guess it bloody well is.
But in his galvanizing of the strength of a nation, you don't think there's something we can take from that?
You don't think there's something we can learn from that?
He was scared of Nazis?
I don't know, man.
You should read his writing.
I'm at the moment reading his thoughts and adventures.
Essays prior to the Second World War.
Amazing stuff.
Let's have a look though now at Cori Bush and the Legacy Media reporting on the potential that her campaign funding found its way back into her household via her husband, who I think was doing her security.
Bush has just confirmed that she is being investigated by the Justice Department for misusing campaign funds and spending them on security services.
The Congresswoman says she is fully cooperating.
NBC News Justice and Intelligence Correspondent Ken Delaney is tracking this for us.
Ken, what else do we know about this Department of Justice investigation and what is the Congresswoman saying?
Okay, we know that at least two FEC complaints were filed against Representative Bush last year questioning payments her campaign made for security to a man she later married.
Aha!
Is this the real life bodyguard or is it corruption?
Have we got the data on how those expenses broke down?
Let's check it out.
In addition to federal spending, Cori Bush's Congressional Campaign Committee has also spent three quarters of a million dollars on security since 2020.
It's the biggest campaign expense.
More than adverts, more than wages.
Oh no!
What do you think about that?
Is that corrupt?
I can't tell anymore.
Who do we believe in?
When Tony Blair came into power in our country, he was welcomed as a hero.
This is a new youthful politics.
And I swear, we were swept up in it.
Like when Barack Obama became president of your country, it's like, my God, this is brilliant.
This is going to galvanize and bring America together.
Now we're starting to realize that there are, well you lot, I know you lot know already, that there are ulterior forces that make moves behind the scenes that delegitimize Any of those figures, really.
Like Tony Blair, it's impossible to imagine that that guy was once a hero.
Same with Barack Obama, after you've seen him advocating for yet more censorship because your independent thought is his problem.
If you want to learn about the censorship industrial complex in full, you are going to enjoy my conversation With Michael Schellenberger, one of the great journalists, a legitimate journalist, an educator who will help you to understand how this global censorship complex is gaining yet more power.
We'll be posting that soon and if you want to see my conversation with Tucker, not the one that's up on X, although that's good and I'd love you guys to watch it.
We're putting up an additional conversation between me and Tucker that will only be for our Awakend Wonder community.
If you become a member of our community, you get early access to things like the Tucker Carlson conversation that we're putting up on there, the Michael Schellenberger conversation, plus you can join it live and ask questions.
You will love that stuff and you get an exclusive video every single week.
I'd like to mention our and welcome our new members MKSRB, PBarn77, Heather Underground, Chewy7668 and Clamp1.
Now guys, we're gonna disappear for a while to recuperate and to hopefully garner more power together.
Thank you so much for joining us today.
We will be back tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
Until then, if you can, stay free.
Thank you.
Switch on.
Switch off.
Switch on.
Export Selection