So, I'm going to go ahead and do that. So, I'm going to go ahead and do that. So, I'm
going to go ahead and do that.
So, I'm going to go ahead and do that.
In this video, you're going to see the future.
We are getting some breaking news.
We've got a live shot there.
Hello there, you awakening wonders.
Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand, where finally we come together to oppose the censorship industrial complex, where finally we unite against the global elites that want you in constant cultural conflict.
And we report openly and honestly on the stories that the legacy media will always utilize to keep you distracted and terrified.
For example, war with Iran.
War.
What is it good for?
Answer that question in the rumble chat.
VickyIsAwake or Ravenfire or DeluxeGFunk or Hayley Bailey or you AwakendWonders on Locals, our supporter community.
How we thank you.
How we love you.
What is war good for?
You know the answers to that question.
Neuralink.
Would you do it?
Elon Musk has put it in the mind of a human.
Well, I suppose not the mind of a human being.
That's the abstraction.
That's the abstract conscious space.
The brain of a human being.
We'll also be looking at the Slovakian COVID inquiry.
It takes those bastions of democracy in Slovakia to finally hold a proper inquiry where things like excess deaths, vaccine injury are investigated by a government.
Astonishing.
Absolutely nothing.
Say it again.
Hey, I want to thank the person that gave us this delightful mat.
It's Susan Brubeck from Martinsville.
Look at that craft.
Look at that art.
Look at the folk culture.
Look at what we're capable of.
Isn't it glorious to experience joinery or metalwork or textiles made by the hands of a human?
Isn't it good to be close to nature?
Isn't it glorious to feel God coursing through you?
What are you but God?
We'll be answering that question over the course of the hour as well.
Now, the first part of our show is available on YouTube.
After all, we love you Awaken Wonders.
Even in spite of the fact that YouTube responded to MP, that's Member of Parliament, Caroline Dinegy's plea to demonetize our content because we do this for so much more than money.
We do it for love.
We do it for revolution.
We do it for a thousand reasons.
Reasons that they'll never understand.
Imprisoned as they are within the veil of Maya.
Working as they potentially are for demonic forces that want you ignorant and dumb.
And indeed, there's...
One second, I nearly choked on my own glory.
Let us take a moment to celebrate the fact that we're... My God, look at the numbers on Rumble escalating.
Do you know we generally get 25,000 people a day?
Why is Russell dressed like a 1960s Terminator?
Someone said in Rumble, Oi!
I happen to look extremely... My name says I look handsome!
20,000 people!
25,000 people!
Let's just take a moment to celebrate that.
Shall we, Gal?
Shall we take a moment to celebrate?
Shall we, Liam?
Shall we take a moment to celebrate that people are coming here in record numbers?
People are coming here from Denmark!
Denmark, of all places, to glory with us.
So, let's do the first story.
Joe Biden, he, astonishing though it is to contemplate, is the most powerful man in the world and he said the US will respond
after the tragic deaths of free US service personnel, free troops who gave
their lives, free troops who are willing to die for their country, who believe in
values like security, honesty, patriotism and now as a result of decisions that
we will scrutinize have lost their lives. Let's have a look.
Thank you very much.
Peace.
Can't even that don't even make sense. We had a tough day last night in the middle. Who are you the Beatles?
It's been a hard day's night Interesting use of the word souls
A secular society using spiritual language to legitimize what has to amount to, at this point, the sacrifice.
The sacrifice of these lives.
The sacrifice of these lives.
I do like the silence, though.
I like the silence when he did the silence.
Remember that from when we chatted about it earlier in the day, guys?
I wanted that bit where there's the silence.
Because what I like to remark on is when people go, let's have a moment's silence, then they continue in the same vein.
So maybe we have to sign off those clips to ensure that we get them.
Another person who could do with a little more preparation is Corinne Jean-Pierre.
Listen to this response.
As well as saying that these soldiers died for the administration, which is extraordinarily partisan, ludicrous even, she sort of fumbles words, says words like folk and stuff.
It's extraordinary.
Let's have a look.
See if we can get the pause for the back of the show so we can do that.
What I will say, our deepest, obviously our deepest condolences go out and our heartfelt condolences go out to the families who lost three, three brave, three brave, three brave, three folks who are free, free, free, free, free, free, free, who are military folks, who are brave, who are always fighting, who are fighting, always fighting.
They were all waiting for me morning, noon and night!
I'll tell you why this is difficult.
It's because it's not sincere or heartfelt.
It is what's known as phatic language.
That means language that needn't be stated.
Or a sat language.
That's imitative language that's copying something.
Extraordinary, really.
Three, three, three.
They were always fighting for this administration.
Really, what we are now experiencing, it seems, and we'll be looking at this in more detail over the course of the week, even tomorrow, Gal, will that be up?
What do you think?
We're looking at how there has been a long-term plan to go to war with Iran, and what we're experiencing now are the sort of pieces being laid out.
And let me know if you're aware of that.
Let me know if you're aware that already battleships have been deployed in the Middle East, and that once you've deployed battleships ostensibly to provide support for Israel in their war against Hamas, when Hamas doesn't have a navy, it's already an extraordinary move.
Don't you think?
So, we'll be looking at this story in some detail.
Is this hawkish warmongering good for ordinary Americans?
Is it good for the people of the world?
Or is it good for American imperialist interests, most notably military-industrial complex?
Carrie and Jean-Pierre.
I've got nothing against Carrie Jean Pierre or any of the people that work for the White
House for a while, then go on to get their own shows on MSNBC.
I'm not going to be on behalf of this administration, of the American people, obviously more so,
more importantly.
We lost those souls.
I'm not going to be on behalf of this administration, obviously more so, more importantly.
Yeah, have a look at that.
Tell me what bit we missed.
No sound.
It was going on for a while.
Give me confirmation that that's been resolved.
One second.
I'll be back in a moment.
We'll just resolve the issue.
It won't take long.
No audio, no sound.
We're back now.
Are you good?
We're back.
Did we know about it before we read about it in the comments?
Or did it take the comments for us to know?
Was there a local indicator of it?
Okay.
Alright, good.
So if that happens again, let's make sure we stay on top of it because I've got some pretty important things to say.
Like this.
The Pentagon have literally got no evidence that there are any connections between these drone strikes in Jordan that have killed free US service personnel and Iran.
No evidence.
No actual evidence.
But that is not going to stop Billions of dollars being spent.
That's not going to stop lives being lost, both Iranian lives.
That's not going to stop lives being lost, the lives of American personnel being lost.
Already three are dead.
How many more must die before the truth is revealed?
A rhetorical question in this instance, but let me know what you think.
Matrice96, Johnny Depp, Ravenfire, Trish McLeod, Cruising Buns, all of you.
What I will say, our deepest, obviously our deepest condolences go out and our heartfelt condolences.
We've had enough out of you, thank you.
Just to follow up, you said Iran was behind the attack.
What does that mean?
Have you seen evidence of...?
Can any of you see that there's a little tiny Pentagon on the front of the stage in the corner?
Is that the actual Pentagon?
I mean, it's a miracle that it was struck by that vehicle way, way back a few years ago.
Financing or directing, anything specific to this attack?
Not just generally, but specifically?
So that journalist there doing their job and saying, is there any evidence that it was Iran that were involved in that attack?
Maybe I need to clarify further from what Lita had mentioned.
We know that Iran funds these groups like Kitab Hezbollah.
We know that these IRGC backed militias are the ones responsible for attacks on our troops in Iraq and Syria.
Beyond that, we're doing an intelligence assessment.
We don't have, I can't give you today that Russell, have you texted me on Telegram or is it a scam?
Says Bruff6045.
No, there will be no text.
That is definitely a scam, mate.
I'm sorry to tell you.
We communicate this way, through Rumble.
We communicate through these channels.
Now, what's astonishing about this is that the Pentagon's press secretary, therefore presumably the Pentagon, are happy to use generalizations when it comes to, you know, we generally know that Iran backed these groups.
We generally know When it comes to generalizations in culture, using generalizations around racial discourse or rhetoric, this is obviously something that's unacceptable.
But generalizations when it comes to bombing people and ending their lives, generally we assume it's Iran.
Generally it would be economically viable and profitable and expedient to go to war.
If generalizations are bad, don't go to war on the basis of a generalization.
We just know that Iran funds these groups like Qatar Hezbollah and other groups that have attacked our forces, but I don't have more to share on As a general matter, yes.
Okay, so it's just a general thing.
Hey, you know when the legacy media leave their mics live and accidentally let you know what their genuine perspective is on war?
By now you've seen Joy Reid saying that F in war is another F in war.
It's interesting we're talking about the border crisis.
We asked you a little bit earlier about the migrant crisis and whether you believe there's an inherent connection between not only war but also globalism generally.
And migrant crisis, i.e.
if there are imperialist projects in foreign nations that destabilize those nations, does that exacerbate migrant crisis?
Let's have a look at that.
What number is that on, please?
The poll and survey results.
We asked you that question.
If countries are involved in foreign war, should they expect foreign migrants?
But not only that.
Not only that, if they're involved in globalist projects abroad, does that exacerbate the conditions that lead to migrant crisis?
And a lot of you, 60% of you over on YouTube, I think is where we conducted that one, we also put the poll up on X, believe that that is the case.
Now here is Joy Reid, almost instinctively and impulsively expressing a connection between the migrant crisis and war. And what's interesting as well, you'll notice this
a lot in legacy media, people feel a lot more natural when they're, when they don't
know they're being listened to, which is not the case with independent media. You get utter
transparency. Let's have a look at Joy Reid. Over the weekend, President Biden said he's ready to
take action if Congress is serious about solving the border issue. If that bill were the law today,
I'd shut down the border right now and fix it quickly.
And Congress needs to get it done.
Startin' another fuckin' war.
I sort of like that because it shows that Joy Reid has a kind of... that's where Joy Reid stands.
Starting another fucking war, that's sort of where it is.
Sorry for swearing there on YouTube.
Hey, we're going to be available for a few more minutes on YouTube and you are going to want to stay with us because we're discussing a variety of things.
We'll talk a little about Neuralink.
We're talking about Marjorie Taylor Greene right next about escalating tensions in the Middle East and whether or not We should be lightly and unconsciously wandering towards war.
You'll notice that Marjorie Taylor Greene is often conveyed as a lunatic, as a harpy, as a hysteric.
But here, she seems to be saying simply, don't go to war lightly.
Wars are pretty heavy things to get involved with.
In a minute, we'll be looking at Nancy Pelosi saying that even Russian pro- Are we looking at that today?
Is that today?
Or did we already do that already?
Oh, we did that already.
You know, when I'm talking about- I guess we did it earlier this week.
When Nancy Pelosi suggested that anti-war protests are Putin propaganda and even Russian funded CNN, of course, endorsing that view.
And Nancy Pelosi is always conveyed and presented as a kind of triumph of progressive politics, i.e.
Nancy Pelosi.
She's the first female Speaker of the House.
I think I saw a hagiographic documentary celebrating the achievements of Nancy Pelosi.
And indeed, it is an achievement when anybody overcomes the odds to rise to the top in politics.
And nowhere are her achievements More evident than in a bank account where $200 million has been curiously accrued on a $200,000 a year taxpayer salary.
Let's have a look at Marjorie Taylor Greene, regularly vilified, advocating for peace.
What are your thoughts on some of the folks, including Lindsey Graham in the Senate, who in light of these three American service members who united over the weekend calling for strikes inside of Iran right now?
Well, first I just want to say that my heartfelt prayers are with them and their families.
Those three servicemen were from Georgia.
They are reservists.
And so all of Georgia right now is really, really lifting them up in prayer.
These are lives that should have never been lost.
What I have to say to Lindsey Graham and others that are just madly calling for war is they sound psychotic.
Absolutely psychotic.
War is very serious and if the president is planning to go to war with Iran, he needs to come to Congress and ask permission and this is something that Congress has to give approval for.
Astonishing isn't it really because the recent bombing of Yemen hasn't gone through Congress.
It seems that it's acceptable, normal even, to embark on foreign military activity without the backing of the American people or even the legal administrative backing of Congress itself.
That is by its nature illegal, criminal even.
I'm looking at the rumble chat, I'm looking at you cleanse, I'm looking at plants, Poop.
Oxygen.
I'm looking at you, D-Spell.
And I want to remind you people that we have absolute free speech on Rumble.
That is why we are on Rumble for free speech.
And I'll remind you lot in the chat that whatever your religious affiliations are, you are welcome.
And I will remind you that when the globe is to delete, see you hating on one another.
They know they're winning.
They know that's one we can chalk off.
That's another one that won't be uniting against our scheme for centralised authoritarianism against the globe.
So, drown them in your love.
Drown them in your tolerance.
Drown them in your peace.
Unify against this corruption.
We got some fantastic sponsors today.
Charlize A fantastic product that has been helping me enormously.
I want to tell you as well that we have got fantastic exclusive content available for our Awakened Wonder supporters on Locals.
Do you know every single week we make an additional exclusive video?
You will love it.
Now when you come back from looking at this clip, you're going to be thinking, that man looks a hell of a lot...
Oh, it's so beautiful to be sprayed in the face.
Grow the hell up!
And that is because of Apple stem cells.
Let's have a look at this exclusive clip that is from our Awakened Wonder community.
Check this out.
We make additional videos every week.
Can you imagine?
Have a quick look at it.
Let's have a look at that now, our exclusive clip.
Can you guys... ...idea that populists and the new parties of the right across Europe Happy to exploit.
So why is that language always being used?
I don't think them farmers are all there at the Brandenburg Gate going, do you know what I'm sick and tired of?
Dual use toilets!
Amazing!
Absolutely astonishing!
That's an extra video that will be exclusively available for our Awaken Wonders.
Let's post the link for that in the rumble chat.
Let's post the link for that in the YouTube chat as part of our goodbye.
And I'll be telling you a little bit more about us.
Do I look younger?
Is it me?
Do I look a little younger already?
Hey, are you guys going to watch me on Tucker a little later?
It's a conversation with Tucker on Tucker's show.
And also, in a couple of days, we'll be putting our own conversation, Tucker, with Tucker, excuse me, exclusively up for our AwakendWonder community.
You guys over there will be watching it very soon.
Okay, if you're watching us on YouTube, it's time to join us over on Rumble.
Start that 30 seconds.
We've got loads coming up for you.
We've got that funny thing where Trump said, I could live to 200.
We're going to be talking about the Slovakian COVID inquiry.
What's amazing about that is it's a proper inquiry.
The inquiry that's held in the UK seems to be peculiarly parametered to ensure that no one asks any questions about dual purpose research, no questions about lab leak origin, no questions about adverse events or excess of deaths or popular uprising against the establishment and total disobedience.
If you're watching on YouTube, click the link.
Join us on Rumble now for real news right now.
You guys on Rumble, I've got to tell you about our sponsors.
I've got to tell you about our partners over at Charlize.
I've got to tell you that I have never felt younger.
Have you ever noticed bananas?
Of course you have.
They're everywhere.
Have you noticed how bananas and peaches shrivel up?
Disgusting things.
Just a glance at them can make you vomit.
Yet apples...
They look young forever.
That's because of apple stem cells.
Swiss scientists noticed apples were delicious and vibrant for months.
Apple stem cells like human stem cells except they live and rejuvenate for longer, even than humans.
Maybe that's why the apple crops up in the Garden of Eden.
Maybe that's why the apple pops up in Snow White.
They can fight the signs of aging, can these apple stem cells.
They're a secret weapon.
Not in a weapons of mass destruction way that will be deployed in order to facilitate war.
No, but in a way that can help us.
These Swiss scientists gave apple stem cells to their customers, or to their patients, shall we call it, subjects to use at night.
And 80% of the subjects reported by the morning they looked younger, that they were electrifying.
100% of them woke up with glowing complexion.
After four weeks, wrinkles, fine lines, and crow's feet decreased by 15% while not irritating skin.
The Charlize skincare, and I mention these because these are our partners today, they don't use toxins.
It's a toxic-free luxury skincare line delivered to your door in high vibrational Italian glass.
I mean, Can you hear that vibration?
Are you getting that high vibration?
They never use plastic.
They're fantastic.
This is the Charlize toner.
It works with your body chemistry to improve your serotonin levels.
Does that even seem possible?
It makes you look younger and feel better.
The Charlize skincare line is 100% toxic free, wild harvested and made in your country, the United States.
And you can get 25% off by going to charlize.beauty and using the promo code brand.
Support us, support our partners, support your loved ones by going to charlize.beauty Right now.
We'll post the link in both of the descriptions.
Go there, get that stuff.
Okay, now we were talking about Marjorie Taylor Greene, weren't we?
Let's get into that.
This is where she makes an interesting connection between the bombing of Iran and how to be extremely cautious about it and moves into the subject of migration.
So let's begin the video again where we left off.
Shall I just press play?
That starts where we left off, will it?
If I do that, I'm going to do it.
So you start it where we left off, guys.
You play in there.
How about some organic food sponsors, Russell?
Isn't it enough that we have toxin-free people?
How far away can we get that on there?
What are your thoughts on some of the folks, including Lindsey Graham and the Senate?
That's the next stuff, isn't it?
Let's get that spooled up for where we were.
Let's go to the next clip now.
Thank you very much.
We've done the poll results already.
So, oh man, this is fantastic.
This is Nikki Haley.
Let's do the Nikki Haley first.
This is her on the news.
Is this her on the news, first of all?
Or bombing?
Which one's where she's on the news?
Number seven, the first one.
Check out this.
This is Nikki Haley on the news calling for the bombing of the leadership of Iran and saying that she will prevent war.
You have to be tough.
That doesn't mean starting a war.
That actually means preventing war.
But when countries see that you're tough and you're serious, they back off.
By nature, they back off.
Isn't that literally the information we give to school kids?
Isn't there a little more to international diplomacy than schoolyard tactics?
Isn't there?
Isn't there?
Bloody their snout and they'll never bother you again.
Isn't there a little more to international diplomacy than schoolyard tactics?
Isn't there? Isn't there? Is Nikki Haley right about that?
...knows they can't beat America. They've always...
Also, it's helpful when confronting bullies to be funded by Raytheon and Lockheed Martin.
Although I don't actually specifically know which military industrial complex organizations sponsor Nikki Haley, I just know it's some of them.
And seemingly, I'm not alone in understanding that because people at a rally recognize it also.
But let's have a look at the end of this little... This is quite an interesting verbal rampage from Nikki Haley.
Horrible image.
Governor Haley, I want to thank you for coming by today.
Thanks so much.
Go to NikkiHaley.com.
We're going to finish this.
It's great.
What do you mean?
Humanity?
Here she is at a rally being confronted.
I'm starting to wonder if anyone at Nikki Haley rallies actually wants to be there.
She's getting voted for by Democrats.
Isn't that the case?
It's Democrats that are primarily voting for her in the New Hampshire primary.
Whenever I see a clip from one of her speeches, it's someone going, Hey, I want to marry you, Nikki!
I love Donald Trump!
Or, like, in this case, someone's saying, who funds you?
Who funds you?
Remember, love in the chat, you beautiful people.
If you can love one another, you can stop anything.
The only way we will get that done... None of us want new wars.
None of us want new wars.
Interesting really though, because some of us do want new wars, particularly people that take lobbying money and donations from Raytheon, Lockheed Martin and the Military-Industrial Complex.
And isn't it fascinating, let me know in the chat, isn't it great that people know this language now?
Like the term like Military-Industrial Complex, which I think I first heard Bill Hicks use, so it's probably Late 90s?
I don't remember.
When did we lose the great Bill Hicks, one of your great comedians?
I remember him.
So the military-industrial complex in that famous bit of stand-up where he talked about Iraq arming the world and then attacking them once they were armed.
Beautiful piece of stand-up comedy.
Now all of us, thanks to independent media like this, are familiar with this terminology.
Thanks to that, people just stand up at the middle of Nikki Haley rallies, fully informed.
Some part due to Vivek Ramaswamy's interesting rhetoric.
that she is funded in that peculiar way and can, you know, we're armed with the facts we become viable opponents, wouldn't you say?
Let's have a look at how this unfolds.
We're going to play an all-new late game.
We're going to remind ourselves that they eat dogs.
And we're sticking the warrants from America First.
Whether it's versus the United States of America or the British.
Dogs.
And our money's right here.
Nice dinner.
See you all later.
All right.
Free speech, everyone.
Free speech.
Don't you always feel, though, a little pang of humanity when you see that?
Kennedy warned us about the military-industrial complex and was killed two weeks later.
Says, cleansing the rumble chat.
Good point, rumble chat.
A lot of love for the great Bill Hicks.
Annika Ellison tagging his name.
Too funny.
All of a sudden, Biden doesn't have a pen.
They only abide... Oh, I missed that one.
It was a good comment.
Guys, there's some fantastic chat going, right?
Good chat.
Streaming through the rumble stream.
Good work all of you.
Fantastic stuff.
Keep the love high.
Keep the love high.
You know your history.
A lot of people saying Eisenhower warned us.
It's the latest part of the 19th century!
The world is gonna be a better place!
Will Russell Reid...
Of course I will.
I'm easily manipulated, and that's even without having an implant in my mind and consciousness.
Now, Elon Musk is a divisive figure on platforms like this.
Many of you love how he has advocated for free speech.
Many of you love the way that X has been reclaimed as a platform that people can communicate on, though I've even seen people say that there are interesting new observationary methods and techniques being deployed there.
Personally, I am pro Elon.
I think he's a force for good in the world and I think it'll be a weird day when you find a person you 100% agree with on every single subject.
How do you lot feel about Neuralink?
How do you feel about the transhumanism project?
Of course what Elon says is this will ultimately be useful for people that have experienced paralysis and it's easy to see how in many instances technology is valuable.
Let's see how the legacy media reports on this story.
The tech billionaire Elon Musk is saying his Neuralink company has successfully implanted one of its wireless brain chips in a human for the first time.
He made the announcement on X, his social media platform, saying the procedure happened on Sunday.
He says the subject is recovering well and that initial results show a promising neuron spike detection.
Mr. Musk says the product has been given the name telepathy and the plan is for it to enable control of a phone, computer or almost any linked device just by thinking about them.
Several rival companies have already implanted what are known as brain-computer interface systems in humans after tests were carried out initially on monkeys.
If you would have it in, press one.
If you wouldn't, press two.
Paul the String says Elon will be the new Oppenheimer.
What an amazing reference, because if you see that movie, you know that what Oppenheimer was, was a genius who was ideologically motivated, a polymath, and a brilliant man who made choices that We are still debating to this day.
There are still people that say it was necessary to bomb Nagasaki and Hiroshima because it ended the war more quickly.
Yet there are other people who say, well, no, that was a catastrophe.
And in a sense, the beginning of a type of imperialism from the perhaps preempted or facilitated the ending of the American people being represented by their government and perhaps the beginning of them being You, if you are American, tyrannised by your own government.
It's an interesting moment in history.
Great reference, that.
Really, really interesting.
A lot of you saying that you would not put that in.
Yeah, I'd be pretty doubtful, but, you know, I guess he's a genius, right?
He's a genius.
Let's see how this plays out, guys.
With more, here's our North America correspondent, Peter Bowes.
What Elon Musk's Neuralink is trying to do is what a number of other companies have been attempting for quite a while now, and that is essentially to create a brain-computer interface that will allow a human being to carry out an action through thought alone.
It's interesting to imagine that people are able to track neurological energy to the degree that it could become utilised, that responsive.
It's a level of ingenuity that's difficult to ponder.
I would love to.
This is why we want Elon Musk on, so that we can have these kind of conversations.
Directly with him, but I suppose when you see the over-technologization of our culture and where it's generally led, I suppose it's that famous adage that a tool can be used for good or for ill.
The problem has been, I feel like since the Industrial Age, it may be since the advent of agriculture itself, these systems of control have generally created elites, always backed by the promise
that it would be beneficial somehow to the population at large or in particular the vulnerable.
Let's just take a sort of a pretty phatic example, and again I wish we had the opportunity to
talk to Elon Musk about this directly, like white goods, the washing machine, the
dishwasher. This will mean you have more time for pursuing leisure activities.
But that's not what happens, is it?
You're not pursuing leisure activities.
We're caught in a constant cycle of consuming.
We're no longer citizens.
We're no longer engaged by nature or connected to nature.
How seldom we are sent a hand-woven bath mat.
By a beloved member of our community like Susan Brubeck from Martinsville.
We are all locked into cycles of dependency and it's not difficult to envisage the exploitation of Neuralink.
Who would be regulating it?
Who would be controlling it?
So many things to ponder.
What makes me feel a lot more optimistic is the rise of the farmer protests.
People coming together.
People unified in a common cause together.
What terrifies me is the emergence of these new agencies that provide the cartilage between private corporations and governments.
In particular because I have been a victim Of these new, and no I don't want to use the word victim, I've been subject to some of their machinations.
Certainly we've been observed by an organization called Logically AI.
In today's deep dive we look at Logically AI and a number of other organizations that are operating on behalf of governments to crush dissent.
During the pandemic there was censorship that was extraordinary and unprecedented, you know that right?
Now these public-private partnerships are about suppressing dissenting voices.
Jay Bhattacharya, my voice.
And these public-private partnerships are now being used to observe the forthcoming elections in your country.
And the Pentagon is using these logically AI techniques to presumably shut down dissent.
Maybe control the conversation around the elections?
Certainly these organisations were deeply exploitative during the pandemic period.
Shutting down free speech, controlling conversations and even creating bots that can instantaneously respond.
There may even be bots right now in this channel responding to our content.
It's tinfoil hat time!
Except there are evidence and receipts.
This is based on the great reporting of Li Fang.
You should follow him on Substack if you can.
Here's the news.
No, here's the F in news.
Thank you for using Fox News.
Good day.
No, here's the F in news.
By now you know what the censorship industrial complex is.
It's governments crushing dissent by proxy on a variety of issues like January 6th, the pandemic, dissent against war, trucker protests, All of these issues have been controlled by public-private partnerships where the governments crush dissent.
And if that wasn't enough, they're starting to do that stuff against me, as well as putting these agencies in place for forthcoming elections and controlling Pentagon data.
But it's me I'm really bothered about.
It's going global.
Farmers, truckers, everywhere, people are rejecting centralized authority.
People no longer trust the media, and with good reason, because there are numerous agencies that are being deployed to crush dissent when it comes to important issues like, well, public protests for one thing, dissent against war for another, the whole handling of the pandemic, and we've got vital information based on the reporting of Li Fang, you should follow him on Substack, Who has exposed the involvement of numerous agencies when it comes to shutting down dissent.
One in particular called Logically has been particularly vociferous and aggressive against me.
We're going to look at who they've been controlling this year.
And we're also going to look at how the legacy media and mainstream benefit from being able to control narratives and how it is their job to normalize and amplify the agenda of the powerful.
So remember, support our content if you can.
There's a link in the description and we need your support.
Now, more than ever, this is nothing short of a war for freedom.
Not the kind of war that your governments are advocating for, of course, where they're talking about introducing conscription in actual European countries now, literally like this one, but intellectual freedom, spiritual freedom, personal sovereignty.
That's why it's so interesting to see someone like Barack Obama, an elder statesman of the establishment now, someone who swept into power under words like change and hope, but governed from a position of total control, bailing out the bankers, giving BlackRock unprecedented power.
Check it out and look into it when it came to that financial crash.
Let's look at Barack Obama now.
talking about misinformation and disinformation is astonishing the way
that he actually inverts truth. We got shut down independent media, they muddy
the water on important issues. But who really muddies the water? Who really
obfuscates facts and truth? Who really benefits from controlling your attention
and private personal consciousness? Plainly it's the establishment. Let's get
into it. Understand it's not necessary for people to believe this information
in order to weaken democratic institutions. So he's saying that
Misinformation is dangerous even if you don't believe it.
That's to stop you saying, well, I'm able to watch content myself and decide for myself whether or not I think something's true.
If I see something that's plainly ludicrous, some outlandish theory, I'm able to discern and decide using my intellect, my relationships, my understanding, whether it's true.
Barack Obama is saying, no, it isn't.
You are not able to make that decision.
That's authoritarian.
He stands there at Stanford University, ironically, one of the institutions who suffered greatly
during the pandemic, for example, Jay Bhattacharya works out of Stanford University,
had much of his information, notably the famous Barrington Declaration,
shut down by the very establishment that Barack Obama is standing there advocating for right
now.
You just have to flood a country's public square with enough raw sewage.
As a side note, if Donald Trump used incendiary language and evocative imagery, like free speech being compared to raw sewage, liberals would say, oh my god, I can't believe that Donald Trump compared free speech to raw sewage.
But there's Barack Obama doing it, but he's at Stanford and he's, you know, got a documentary on Netflix, so it's all cool.
You just have to raise enough questions, spread enough dirt, plant enough Conspiracy theorizing.
Conspiracy theories like, for example, the virus emerged from a laboratory, it's possibly the result of bioweapon research, that lockdowns may not have been effective, that NATO may have participated in the escalation of the conflict between Ukraine and Russia by allowing Ukraine to join or flirting with Ukraine and inviting them to join, that the Nord Stream pipeline was not blown up by Russia but by allied NATO interests.
All of these conspiracy theories are, as you know by now, let me know in the comments, true.
And that doesn't mean that there's not a Wikipedia pop-up or some warning pop-up under there, because the establishment, of course, does not benefit from you being awakened and tuned in.
It benefits from you being dozy, sleepy, slumbering, and tuned out, and that's how they want to maintain you.
That citizens no longer know what to believe.
Once they lose trust in their leaders, In mainstream media, in political institutions.
Like, you're just listing this stuff.
But of course we've lost trust in our leaders.
Barack Obama himself, after saying he would govern in peace, did more drone strikes in Syria than anyone else.
During the 2008 financial crisis, bailed out the banks when he could have bailed out
ordinary American families.
When it comes to the legacy media, they reported a bunch of lies
throughout the entire pandemic period.
And other government institutions, pick one, and I'll give you a reason not to trust them.
In each other, in the possibility of truth.
Thank you.
The game's won.
So that is Barack Obama, statesperson for the establishment, mouthpiece for establishment interest.
I'm not judging Barack Obama on anything other than his record while in office.
The drone strikes, the 2008 crash, how he responded to it and what he does now.
We have some excellent reporting here from Lee Fang that explains to us exactly how the government is able to create a censorship industrial complex through the deployment and employment of peculiar non-government agencies that essentially function as the cartilage between corporations And national government and how the two of them work together to shut down dissenting voices.
I'm particularly passionate about this because I'm one of those voices.
Only one of many.
And of course, I recognize that the real important thing is you, your attention, your consciousness, your compliance or disobedience, depending on what stories you pay attention to.
This is fascinating.
Brian Murphy, a former FBI agent who once led the intelligence wing of the Department of Homeland Security, reflected last summer on the failures of the Disinformation Governments Board, the panel formed to actively police misinformation.
The board, which was proposed in April 2022 after he left DHS, was quickly shelved by the Biden administration in a few short months in the face of criticism that it would be an Orwellian, state-sponsored Ministry of Truth.
In a July podcast, Murphy said that the threat of state-sponsored disinformation meant the executive branch has an ethical responsibility to rein in the social media companies.
American citizens, he said, must give up some of your freedoms that you need and deserve so that you get your security back.
You will hear this offering many times.
We have to give up some freedom in order to get security.
We all know there's going to be some sort of cyber event coming, I would imagine, in the coming months or at most years, that will be used to legitimise new measures to prevent ongoing encryption.
This is not my information.
Whitney Webb knows a lot more about this stuff than I do.
You can see our interview together by clicking the link in the description, following our content there.
The legal problems and public backlash to the Disinformation Governments Board also demonstrated to him that the government has a major role to play, but they cannot be out in front.
The government recognises that they have to censor, otherwise they will lose respect and they will lose, therefore, control.
But the job of censorship has to be done.
This is how they've solved this problem.
By appointing groups like Logically, who have been involved in everything from shutting down dissent around the pandemic, true dissent, Dissent around the war?
True dissent, and are going to be used in your forthcoming election to shut down your conversation.
You might take an educated guess right now which side they'll be batting for.
Hmm, I wonder.
Murphy, who made headlines late in the Trump administration for improperly building dossiers on journalists, has spent the last few years trying to help the government find ways to suppress and censor speech it doesn't like, without being so out in front that it runs afoul of the Constitution.
If only we could be out in front, but this damn Constitution, could we Burn it?
Or defecate on it?
Well, you basically have been.
He has proposed that law enforcement and intelligence agencies formalize the process of sharing tips with private sector actors, a hybrid constellation including the press, academia, researchers, non-partisan organizations, and social media companies to dismantle misinformation campaigns before they take hold.
Generally, I have to say, they are more interested in misinformation that happens to be true than misinformation that is false.
Because misinformation that's true is what's likely to mobilize and galvanize you and to make you disobedient and awakened.
To make you recognize that we are now at a pivotal moment where we're talking about potential world wars and total control of the individual.
More recently, Murphy has worked to make his vision of countering misinformation a reality by joining United Kingdom-based tech firm Logically AI, whose eponymous product identifies and removes content from social media.
Since joining the firm, Murphy has met with military and other government officials in the US, many of whom have gone on to contract or pilot Logically's platform.
Logically says it uses artificial intelligence to keep tabs on over 1 million conversations.
That's astonishing, isn't it?
They're keeping tabs on a million conversations.
That's surveillance.
That's the kind of thing that Edward Snowden revealed to us, and Julian Assange, who are of course exiled and imprisoned, respectively.
The situation has gotten worse, not better, since those revelations.
That's why those brave heroes are being punished, because the government has no intention of stopping those actions.
Indeed, they are increasing it.
It also maintains a public-facing editorial team that produces viral content and liaisons with the traditional news media.
The traditional news media and government have a pact together, as perhaps best enshrined by the Trusted News Initiative, which we've reported on before, which amounts to a relationship between legacy media organisations, some corporate and some state, that work together to oppose and crush independent media.
Why?
Because they are allied with one another.
They are allied with the Globalist Project.
It differs from others in this industry by actively deploying what they call countermeasures to dispute or remove problematic content from social media platforms.
So they actively censor and shut down private information.
Free speech, essentially.
The businesses even experiment in with natural language models according to one corporate discovery.
disclosure to generate effective counter speech output that can be leveraged to deliver novel
solutions for content moderation and fact checking. Meaning that your comments would
have stuff like, hey that's not true, that's not actually true, let me know in the comments
and chat if the bots are already busily at work. Because if this is what we know, imagine
what we don't know. Imagine what is masked and veiled under the auspices of top secret
and other legislative measures that are used to control the information you've got access
to because of course you're too stupid to think for yourself and speak for yourself.
You've just heard Barack Obama explain that to you, right?
Raw sewage.
In other words, artificial intelligence powered bots that produce, in real time, original arguments to dispute content labeled as misinformation.
How terrifying.
So straight away you'll say something, that is true, but the government wish wasn't, and a flood of comments will appear.
I wonder if any of you have noticed anything like that already?
In many respects, Logically is fulfilling the role Murphy has articulated for a vast public-private partnership to shape social media content decisions.
Its technology has already become a key player in a much larger movement that seeks to clamp down on what the government and others deem misinformation or disinformation.
A raft of developing evidence, including the Twitter files, the Moderna reports, the proposed government disinformation panel, and other reports, has shown how governments and industry are determined to monitor, delegitimize, and sometimes censor protected speech.
The story of Logically AI illustrates how sophisticated this effort has become in its global reach.
The use of its technology in Britain and Canada raises red flags as it seeks a stronger foothold in the United States.
As is often the case, they pilot in countries like Canada, and our beloved country, And Australia, before introducing measures in the US.
Look at how aggressive during the pandemic Australia were, and Canada.
And don't you remember how surprised you were?
Like, whoever in Canada was sort of cool and relaxed.
Or Australia.
I thought those people were relaxed about everything.
Wow.
Seems that there was some kind of authoritarian experiment being played out.
Doesn't it?
Logically now has broad contracts across Europe and India and has worked closely with Microsoft, Google, PwC, TikTok and other major firms.
Meta contracts with Logically to help the company fact check content on all of its platforms, WhatsApp, Instagram and Facebook.
So they're not independent at all.
You've got the government And private social media firms working together with a private organization that has the ability to demonetize, criticize, condemn, shut down, control, shadow ban your content, as well as, if it ever became relevant, providing a vast army of bots to dispute content that you were creating, whether it was true or not.
Remember, malinformation, even by their own diagnosis and analysis, is information that's true, but not convenient.
The close ties to Silicon Valley provide unusual reach.
When Logically Rates a piece of content as false, Facebook will significantly reduce its distribution so that fewer people see it, apply a warning label to let people know that the content has been rated false, and notify people who try to share it.
Meta and Logically announced in a 2021 press release on the partnership.
Have a look right now under this piece of content.
During the 2021 local elections in the UK, Logically monitored up to 1 million pieces of harmful content, some of which they relayed to government officials, according to a document reviewed by Real Clear Investigations.
The firm claimed to spot coordinated activity to manipulate narratives around the election, information they reported to tech giants for takedowns.
Remember, Logically are going to be working in your country coming up to 2024.
I wonder what type of information they'll be amplifying.
I wonder what kind of information they'll be controlling and censoring.
Let me know in the comment and chat who you think Logically will be working for in the forthcoming election in your country.
The following year, the state of Oregon negotiated with Logically for a wide-ranging effort to monitor campaign-related content during the 2022 midterm elections.
In a redacted proposal for the project, Logically noted that it would check claims against its single source of truth database, which relied on government data, and would also crack down on malinformation.
A term of art that refers to accurate information that fuels dangerous narratives.
Accurate information that fuels dangerous narratives.
Let me give you what my take on that is.
If you knew the truth, you'd stop cooperating.
So you have to be lied to.
You have to be prevented from receiving the truth.
Because if you knew it, you would change.
You would awaken.
You would not cooperate.
You would disobey.
You would realize a new world is possible.
Because the more of this stuff I'm exposed to, the more I feel that way.
And I reckon you do too, do you?
The firm similarly sold Oregon on its ability to pressure social media platforms for content removal, so they told them that's what they're going to be doing.
Logically's reach into the U.S.
market is quickly growing.
The company has piloted programs for the Chicago Police Department, and Pentagon records show that the firm is a subcontractor to a program run by the U.S.
Army's Elite Special Operations Command for work conducted in 2022 and 2023.
Questions swirl over the methods and reach of the firm as it entrenches itself into American life, especially as Logically angles to play a prominent role in the 2024 presidential election.
Extraordinary.
So look at the power that this organisation has, look at the funding that it's receiving, look at its apparent goals, shutting down true but inconvenient information, and think about how that may play out in the next election in your country.
The reason that the reporters know so much about Logically is because of the way they behaved in our country during the Covid pandemic.
Let's have a look at that.
In March 2020, as Britain confronted the spread of COVID-19, the government convened a new task force, the Counter Disinformation Unit.
The secretive task force was created with little fanfare, but was advertised as a public health measure to protect against dangerous misinformation.
Caroline Dynidge, a Member of Parliament overseeing media issues, later explained that the unit's purpose was to provide authoritative sources of information and to take action to remove misinformation relating to misleading narratives related to COVID-19.
It's of course Caroline Dynage that spoke to YouTube asking if they would be demonetizing our content after that curious scandal and attack era a couple of months back.
Caroline Dynage also sits on a committee that regulates social media and she also proposed the online safety bill which ultimately amounts to censorship on the auspices of, you guessed it, protecting children.
The CDU, it later emerged, had largely outsourced its work to private contractors such as Logically, which received a total of roughly 3.2 million dollars.
That's taxpayer money, of course.
Taxpayer money.
To censor free speech.
That money went into far-reaching surveillance that monitored journalists, activists and lawmakers who criticized pandemic policies.
Logically was also involved in pandemic work that blurred the line
with traditional fact-checking operations.
In India, the firm helped actively persuade patients to take the vaccine.
In 2021, Jain, the founder and CEO of the company, said in an interview with an Indian news outlet
that his company worked closely with communities that are today vaccine-hesitant.
Remember now what we know about vaccine hesitancy, given some of the things we've subsequently learned
about AstraZeneca and potential fatalities, Johnson & Johnson and blood clots, Pfizer and myocarditis,
potential effects on pregnancy.
There's certainly reasons for hesitancy.
But that's the kind of information that, presumably, Logically were involved in censoring and shutting down.
The company, he said, recruited advocates and evangelists to shape local opinion.
In 2022, Logically used its technology on behalf of Canadian law enforcement to target the trucker-led Freedom Convoy against COVID-19 mandates, according to government records.
Now you know how the government felt during that period.
They illegally evoked an emergency act.
They called those truckers Nazis.
It seems wherever you find dissent in voices, wherever you find the potential for people to come together and oppose state globalist power, you will find organizations like Logically deamplifying the information, creating evangelists and advocates to blur and confuse the conversation in precisely the way, actually, that Barack Obama said independent media do.
But it seems to me that while misinformation could take place in any community, the independent media's problem is not that it's dishonest, but that it's honest, that it's truthful, that it treats the audience as a member of a community, that it's interested in conveying information that is not helpful to what seems to be a globalist agenda.
Logically's team floated theories that the truckers were likely influenced by foreign adversaries.
A widely repeated claim used to denigrate the protests as inauthentic.
You will see Nancy Pelosi right now this week saying that anti-war protesters are probably funded by Putin and it should be looked into.
If anyone's funding needs looking into, it's Nancy Pelosi's.
In some cases, Logically has piled onto news stories to help discredit voices of dissent.
Last September, the anti-misinformation site leapt into action after British news outlets published reports about the sexual misconduct allegations surrounding comedian and online broadcaster Russell Brand.
Hey!
One of the outspoken critics of government policy in Britain.
Brand, a vocal opponent of pandemic policies, had been targeted biologically in the past for airing opinions critical of the US and UK response to the virus outbreak and in other moments for criticizing new laws in the European Union that compel social media platforms to take down content.
Specifically because I believe these censorship laws are not about protecting us, but about controlling us.
That these censorship laws are about pushing legacy media outlets that amplify and normalise the narratives of the powerful and shutting down dissenting voices.
And it seems that I'm right.
Indeed, logically, in all their snooping and spying and surveilling and censoring and shutting down, that nothing that had been said on this channel was untrue.
But the site took dramatic action when the sexual allegations, none of which have been proved in court, were published in the media.
Joe Ondrak, Logically's investigations head, provided different quotes to nearly half a dozen news outlets, including Vice, Wired, the BBC, and two separate articles in the Times that depicted Brand as a dangerous purveyor of misinformation.
who had finally been held to account.
This is where you have to look at the content for yourself and decide for yourself.
And again, that's one of the ideas that's being conveyed as conspiratorial and alt-right.
Do your own research, that's fascist and right-wing.
Trucker protests, they're fascist and right-wing.
Farmer protests, they're fascist and right-wing.
Vandana Shiva, the Indian activist, even she's fascist and right-wing.
It seems that so many people are included in fascist and right-wing that it's the most inclusive and diverse group on the planet.
Ironically.
This is the person that works for Logic League, government funded, that employs people from the FBI and Deep State.
This is his statement about me and this content.
He follows a lot of the ostensibly health yoga retreat, kind of left-leaning, anti-capitalist figures who really got suckered into Covid scepticism.
Yeah, that means that during Covid, my attitude towards Covid and the measures altered based on information and science.
Before, I was just sort of like, yeah, yoga, quite left-leaning, a bit anti-capitalist because I'm worried about sort of issues of control and power.
Then, hang on a minute, is this some sort of massive weird scam that's generating a wealth transfer where Big Pharma are getting richer and richer where people that work for regulatory bodies are taking jobs in Big Pharma.
There's legitimizing state authoritarianism where true information is being shut down.
That sort of thing does make a person a bit cynical.
Covid denialism and anti-vax and then spat out of the Great Reset at the other end.
Ondrak told Wired, look into the Great Reset and it's a little truer than people like Joe Ondrak would like.
In one of the articles published by the Times, Ondrak aired frustration on the obstacles of demonetizing Brand from the Rumble streaming network.
In an interview with the BBC, funded by taxpayer money, Ondrak, funded by taxpayer money, gave a curious condemnation, noting Brand stopped short of airing any actual conspiracy theories or falsehoods, but is guilty of giving audiences the ingredients to make the disinformation themselves.
What?
Like the truth is a cake that you make yourself.
Look, I don't trust the state.
I don't trust big corporations.
During the pandemic period, I've seen a lot of lying and censorship of true information, ironically.
During the trucker protests, I noticed a tendency to vilify the participants in a protest movement, probably, I reckon, to shut down the potential of future protest movements.
I'm very cynical about the way that farmer protests are being reported on and not reported on and being claimed to be racist.
During the reporting around the war and the escalation of tensions between Ukraine and Russia, while I'm sympathetic to Ukrainian people, I'm noticing that there's a lack of reporting on why Russia might be involved in this conflict due to the complexities of regional disputes in the area.
Once part of the Soviet Union, the Nord Street Pipeline story seems to be a bit ridiculous.
It's unlikely that Russia blew that up themselves.
All of which I think is kind of spot-on actually true.
All of which was undertaken in a participatory investigative inquiring and interrogative spirit, rather than this is the truth, stop thinking, do as you're told, forever.
Which seems to be the agenda of these organisations.
Dinehitch, the Member of Parliament who spearheaded the CDU anti-misinformation push with Logically during the pandemic, also leapt into action in the immediate aftermath of the scandal.
She sent nearly identical letters to Rumble, TikTok and Meta to demand that the platforms follow YouTube's lead in demonetizing brand.
Logically's editorial team went a step further.
In its report on the brand allegations published on Logically Facts, it claimed that social media accounts trotting out the innocent until proven guilty refrain for the comedian were among those perpetuating common myths.
Innocent until proven guilty is not a common myth.
That's in the Magna Carta.
That's presumably in the American Constitution.
It's one of the cornerstones of justice.
It's one of the cornerstones of our shared faith in one another.
Talking about innocent until proven guilty is a sort of dubious conspiracy theory.
Oh, the old innocent till proven guilty trick.
What's next?
The earth is flat, the moon landings never happened, the queen was a lizard, and we provoked Russia into the war.
The last one might be true.
Oh, fair enough.
The site published a follow-up video reiterating the claim that those seeking the presumption of innocence for brand, a principle dating back to the Magna Carta, were spreading a dangerous myth.
Innocent till proven guilty is being presented as a dangerous myth.
What kind of cyber mind, what kind of AI, what kind of globalist agenda would conceive of such a notion?
Is this yet another example of the Orwellian inversion?
War is good now.
That's the only way to get peace.
Innocence is bad now.
You're all presumed guilty.
In the same way they were all presumed stupid.
That's what Barack Obama's position is.
You aren't able to look at some information and decide for yourself what's true.
You need to be told what to do, told what is true, kept from access to information that is true, that might make you think for yourself, using the ingredients of truth to create disobedience and dissent.
And most of all, you need to be kept compliant.
and told that a choice between either this party or this party is all that we can offer you in 2024
on the precipice of new global war. I would say that innocent until proven guilty is a pretty
important principle. The unusual advocacy campaign against Brand represented a typical approach for
a company that has long touted itself as a hammer against spreaders of misinformation. The opportunity
to remove Brand from the media ecosystem meant throwing as much at him as possible despite any
clear misinformation or disinformation angle in the sexual assault allegations.
Rather, he was a leading critic of government censorship and pandemic policy, so the scandal represented a weakness to be exploited.
And of course, it was at a time when Caroline Dynadge is advocating for, lobbying for, the introduction of new, unprecedented censorship laws in this country.
And new, unprecedented censorship laws are being asked for in the EU.
And new, unprecedented laws, i.e.
the driver's license for the internet, is being advocated for in your country, a Patriot Act, but for the internet.
Because of this event, coming soon, we have to take these measures to control you.
Notice now that these agencies work in a raft of countries.
Notice now that they have incredible power.
Notice now that dissenting voices and your individual sovereignty, your freedom of thought, forget your freedom of speech, is their enemy.
So what can we do?
Be discerning.
Disobey.
Be ready to dissent.
Never trust anything you hear from those organizations.
And be ready to oppose them vehemently from this moment forward.
Well that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the chat.
See you in a second!
Let's have some of your comments. Bookwench says they don't want us questioning anything.
Teta or conspiracy theories are just critical thinking and questioning. Why wouldn't that be
a good thing? Why wouldn't we want conversation freedom for me? Question absolutely everything.
Don't trust verifiers, they say.
And centralized digital currencies are being exploited now.
It's sensible, isn't it?
Jamie Jam, they earned the distrust.
Hey Jamie Jam in the Awaken Wonder chat, I love you lot.
I love you dearly.
Maximum Titus 444.
Damn, I guess I'll just cover my head and my ears.
Warrantless surveillance is already here.
Indeed, guys, check out this from the COVID inquiry in the UK.
You're going to love this.
This is from a An epidemiologist said that much of the data was misrepresented in order to support lockdown.
Are they talking about exaggerating the deaths?
You know, the whole from with argument?
You're gonna love seeing Professor Mark Woolhouse because he's an epidemiologist who's not schooled in political discourse.
I mean, Who is these days?
Who is these days?
But when you hear him talk about what went down in Covid, when we're talking about like lockdowns etc, it's a really refreshing perspective.
Let me know what you think about this, it's exciting.
At the forefront of people's minds, there was a lot of concern about how well people would tolerate lockdown.
How well people will tolerate lockdown.
That language is about sociological responses, isn't it?
Remember people talking about BF Skinner, behaviouralism, nudges, making sure that young people couldn't go to nightclubs or public events.
Not for safety reasons, but because they knew that it would be effective, isn't it extraordinary the information that's
accruing, certainly in Slovakia they are now considering a very, well they're
gonna do a proper inquiry and when I say proper inquiry I mean into excess deaths, I
mean into adverse events, not the kind of inquiry you get in the UK now. Did
Boris Johnson govern this country while having a silly haircut or the kind of
inquiry you get in your country, United States, all secret behind closed
doors?
Now, Anthony Fauci, are you trying your level best to do a good job?
Yes, I'd say I'm trying my best.
Well, there's no more questions.
You know, what's starting to happen now, and this is, let me know if you're sensing this, Is information is coming out that's likely to legitimise opposition, that's likely to legitimise disobedience.
Is that what's happening now?
True disobedience, true opposition to establishment power.
But that was an unknown.
But I felt that discussion was more in the vein of, well, how long and severe a lockdown could we get away with?
Can we get away with?
Not what's best.
How long a lockdown can we get away?
I'm so angry, I'm going to have to spray myself with some serotonin.
That's what I need at a time like that is.
Apple stem cells from Charlize.
Post the link again.
It's a brilliant gift for a loved one.
We tolerate rather than actually looking at- That's proper science!
Evidence of- I like him because he's like a scientist.
You see what I mean?
He's not like a PR scientist.
Like Fauci, he'd been around, curiously enough, as long as AIDS.
I'm not saying there's a connection, but that's how long Fauci's been around.
This dude, he's like an old-school scientist.
Like, he's not comfortable being on the TV.
Like, if they started putting, like, t-shirts with him, his face on it, old Professor Warhouse, he's not gonna go, Maybe I am a sex symbol!
Maybe I'm... Huss!
Huss!
I'll show you!
I'll duff you up!
He's like a proper scientist.
He decries the attention.
When you talk about outdoor activities, are you... You might want to get indoors, love.
Sounds like you've got Covid.
Are you meaning things like going for a walk in the park?
Or are you talking also about outdoor activities like football matches?
Football matches were on the, on the cusp.
Because a lot of people are gathering, they're going there by public transport.
The fascists.
They might go to a pub together.
Nazis.
All those different variables.
Yes.
Bloody variables coming here.
Still in our jobs.
Um, that would, I mean, you'd need to do a, you know, a fairly detailed public health appraisal of where you drew the line.
Yeah, I think there should be a fairly detailed public health appraisal of where to draw the line because what seems to me is that there was a lean into authoritarianism that was backed up by preferences that were sociologically derived rather than epidemiologically derived and that it was framed to us as these are health measures.
Who was it that was coming up before you?
Was it sociologists or was it scientists?
Like, for example, in our country, Jonathan Van Tam.
He was the scientist that said we should all be taking vaccines.
Now, where is he now?
Doesn't work for the government anymore.
Let me know in the chat if you know where Jonathan Van Tam's working right now.
It's a coincidence.
Come on, we'll give free mug.
This mug, this mug's broken.
What I need is proper Italian glass.
These things.
Let me know if you know where Jonathan Van Tam's working now.
Clue, they also, not Pfizer, but you're getting closer, Kyle Reino.
Moderna, UFO.
Now you've misspelt that, mate.
UFO limited hangout.
You've written Murdener.
Murdener, but it's actually Moderna.
Not Murdener, Moderna.
Not Murdener, Moderna.
Ah, we're going to give you the mug anyway.
Send us your details and we'll send you this mug.
Not this one that's got a...
Rather unpleasant looking napkin, innit?
Hey listen, we'll do the rest of this and then we'll go over and do a little bit extra on locals.
We'll post the link on locals.
We're still free on locals.
That's just we're moving you closer into our organisation.
We're galvanising.
We need you 24,000 awakened wonders to migrate in this direction.
It's fully open borders over here, let me tell you.
We need to unify and unite.
Decentralised but unified.
But let's have a look at a little bit more of this glorious professor's analysis.
That we, in the UK, arrested people for going on solo walks in the mountains.
He's not impressed by that, is he?
Now hold on a minute, I'm a scientist and I don't see any reason to arrest someone for a solo walk in a mountain.
But what?
They could cough on that mountain, so maybe?
That's utterly absurd.
That devalues the whole ...idea of... Democracy?
...of social distancing that anyone can see.
This is nonsense.
Nonsense!
Actual nonsense!
There's a scientist, there's some scientists I'll follow.
Um, but it was done.
Uh, may I?
Absolutely.
Another good example, there was an absolute outcry in the summer of 2020 that people were going to beaches.
There was never, ever an outbreak of COVID-19 anywhere in the world linked to a beach.
We will arrest them on the beaches.
We'll arrest them on the mountains.
We'll arrest them in the streets.
Wherever there is freedom, we will arrest them.
We'll vaccinate them on the landing strips.
We'll vaccinate them in car parks.
We'll say we're building these vast hospitals and then no one will ever see these vast hospitals and we'll all forget that anyone ever said anything about that.
That is the prison we're inheriting.
After all, it's fascism we're fighting.
It was fine.
People could go to the beach.
But, nonetheless, we were very resistant to that.
Yay-o!
Okay, listen guys, we're gonna do a little bit more art.
Before we go, I'm doing a tucker.
That's tonight, 6 p.m.
ET, if you're in America.
Let's have a look at this conversation.
These accusations appeared and then your own government, which you pay for, reached out without telling you to online service providers and media organizations and said, please kick him off and censor him and take his money away.
Is that what you're saying?
Something strange is happening.
Something ulterior is moving.
Something very important is happening.
I believe the threat of authoritarianism is far, far greater.
How strange is it to know that your tax dollars are being used against you?
Tell us how you intersected with pharma and what you think they did to you.
Whole movements will be criminalized.
I don't know that we've seen anything like this before.
This is so painful and so threatening to my family that maybe I just bow out and stop talking.
It seems to me that we are in a time where we lurch from one crisis to another.
War is coming.
Do you sometimes think that there is no choice?
Do you have no choice?
Yes, I do feel that way.
Strongly.
I'll be, so I'll be participating in that conversation with Tucker Carlson at 6 p.m.
Eastern Time, an 11 o'clock British time.
And if you are in Awake and Wonder, our exclusive conversation with Tucker will be posted in the next 48 hours, probably the next 24 hours.
We did a long hour and a half chat with Tucker.
We covered a whole variety of subjects that will be exclusively available for our Awakened Wonders.
We'll post a little bit of that stuff, so that's available.
The conversation with me and Tucker on his show, that's available tonight.
And to get early access to our Tucker show that we recorded, join our Awakened Wonders.
Become a member of our community.
We're talking to Michael Schellenberger, I think tomorrow.
We're talking to Schellenberger tomorrow.
That should be good.
Schellenberger tomorrow, so we'll be talking about the story yesterday, you know, this story that we've just done about the Logically AI and all of these interesting agencies funded by the government working with Big Pharma censoring on big tech platforms.
We'll be talking about that stuff.
You're gonna love it.
Okay, I want to welcome new Awaken Wonders that will be our See That Tucker content.
Not my interview with Tucker, but this one that we've got recorded, which is fantastic.
I want to welcome... Oh, that looks great.
Nice, guys.
Look at them.
There they all are.
Soap W, Waters, 445.
Why don't you join our movement?
Become one of us.
Join us.
Become part of the resistance, part of the opposition.
We don't claim to be alone in this.
Alone we are nothing, but unified we are oh so powerful.
And in fact, post the link.
We're going to do a little bit of extra content for our friends over on Locals right now.
You know that every single week I do a whole bunch of stuff like Well, Mondays, I do a live reading.
We're looking at 1984 at the moment, as well as, like, the Bible.
Wednesdays, we do a live guest.
Thursday, live meditations.
All the times we post this stuff in the Rumble chat, people will love this.
Sundays, we do an exclusive video just for you.
And throughout the week, I just sometimes just pick up my phone and just do one spontaneously.
Oh, my little son.
Hey, so we're going to go on to Locals right now.
Additional content for you Awaken Wonders.
You lot, you're all welcome over there.
Remember our Tucker tonight and become an Awaken Wonder to get additional access to our content.
We love you.
We're going to talk about RFK.
We're going to talk about RFK on media right now on Locals and a little bit more stuff on COVID.