Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 23, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:09:58

Musk Just REVEALED Why The Legacy Media Want To DESTROY HIM - Stay Free #290

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	so so
	so In this video, you're going to see the future.
	We are getting to Birkini, we've got a lot of stuff there.
	Hey you Awakening Wanderers, thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
	While many in this world of legacy media corruption and centralised state distraction may want you to be like larvae, wasting away, atrophying in their hive of corruption and control, we pray for your freedom.
	Whoever you are, wherever you're from, whatever your beliefs, we believe that we are the opposition.
	We believe that the solution lies within your consciousness.
	We believe that no matter if you are pro-Israel, pro-Palestine, Republican, Democrat, Labour, Conservative, no matter what divisive tag may have been placed around your neck, there is a stream, a unitary stream, Running through all of us and we can oppose their globalist agenda through our individual awakening.
	This is the time where we must awaken.
	This is the moment.
	They are becoming fiercer.
	They are becoming more dangerous.
	They are trying to intoxicate you with corruption and lies all the more ferociously and yet we become more powerful By the day.
	Why, you only need glance at their ludicrous automated measures and their evident failure to see.
	In a minute I'm going to show you one of the robots that we ultimately use to serve the globalist agenda struggling in the snow and human beings innocently helping it.
	We've got so many stories to cover today.
	If you're watching us on YouTube, you glorious awakening wonder you, there's a link in the description.
	You'll have to come over and join us in that stream of freedom where we can speak freely.
	Not hate speech, but the very speech they fear the most.
	Speech to bring about unity.
	Speech to empower you.
	Where we will be discussing Elon Musk and Shapiro.
	That's going to be a good conversation.
	My favorite bit is when Elon Musk says the reason the legacy media attack X is because X is an opponent.
	And I must say, when I myself was personally subject to numerous ongoing attacks,
	it was never correctly covered that they've got skin in the game.
	They are opponents. They want independent media to fail.
	They want independent thought to fail.
	They do not want your awakening. They fear your awakening.
	You've always known there was something wrong.
	And now we're finally beginning to understand it.
	We've got some fantastic stories for you.
	Things that will blow your socks off and melt your mind.
	Who would have imagined that one day, in plain sight, openly, we'd be saying they were developing bioweapons.
	They were developing bioweapons with government money and potentially that's what caused recent events.
	I cannot believe it.
	The people on the outer peripheries, the vanguard, were closer to the truth than people now on state or corporate funded media.
	I'm talking about media that's either funded by big pharma advertising or funded by you.
	Those organizations, Those are the misinformation peddlers.
	Those are the people that are dangerous.
	Those are the institutions that you cannot trust.
	Now, we'll be on YouTube for about 15 minutes, then over on Rumble.
	If you download the app, that'll be better for us, because then we can tell you whenever we're broadcasting.
	We'll be telling you... Well, God, we've got so much stuff coming up.
	We've got a Glenn Greenwald show that we'll give early access to you for, plus exclusive content will remain on Locals if you're on Awake and Wonder.
	Remember there's an exclusive video for our locals community that's up right now talking about the mysterious increase of 8% in child fatalities, child deaths in the last couple of years.
	I wonder if the legacy media will be investigating thoroughly what caused that with the same vigour that they investigate dissenting voices that could affect their bottom line.
	We're going to be talking about Why the legacy media require Trump, why they continue to loathe him, and how when Trump fails, they fail.
	We'll also, as I've told you, be talking about globalism.
	We'll be talking about George Soros' lad.
	We'll be seeing him stammering in Davos.
	But first of all, Like, if ever you doubt human beings and our capacity for grace and love, for great service, the power that's in us all, have a look at this.
	This robot has probably been designed to ultimately change the page thing on the stream deck.
	Thanks guys.
	This is a robot that's probably ultimately going to be used to corral us into various institutions of compliance.
	But look what happens when it gets stuck in the snow.
	Everyone comes along to help this little robot.
	Humans come to help the robot.
	It's like a pixel film.
	I've lost my mommy!
	Come on, little guy.
	You'll be okay.
	Just come through here.
	Adorable.
	Humanity, our kindness, our compassion, and our vulnerability are our greatest assets.
	If we can access that, there is a limitless power.
	They know that power is there, and by God, do they fear it.
	You'll be familiar by now with the fact that Elon Musk and Ben Shapiro have met in Auschwitz to talk about the legacy media and how the legacy media are threatened by X. This is an interesting conversation from our perspective because of course we're interested in the legacy media and their agenda of destruction.
	Did you see our recent content on the new revelations that Moderna have been tracking and surveilling many dissenting voices.
	I am included in the peculiar group of government-funded agencies that are hell-bent on shutting down dissent.
	They've been tracking Jay Bhattacharya, Alex Berenson, Michael Schellenberger, Anyone that's critical of the big pharma agenda.
	Extraordinary.
	Have a look at that.
	It's up on Rumble right now.
	You do not want to miss that.
	You will be better informed.
	You also see how the legacy media report on important stories like excess death.
	This is how they report excess death.
	Something mysterious is happening.
	We don't know what's causing it.
	What is causing more people... It's almost like a couple of years ago, something happened that caused more people than ever before to die.
	But we don't know what it is and we simply don't have the time to investigate it.
	Let's have a look at Elon Musk talking about Legacy Media with Ben Shapiro in Auschwitz.
	Legacy Media has spent an awful lot of ink on you.
	There's been a lot of attempts to paint you as anti-semitic or paint X as anti-semitic.
	Where do you think that's coming from?
	Why does the Legacy Media seem to have you, particularly in the last year and a half, in the crosshairs so much?
	Well, I mean, the reality is that X is competition for the Legacy Media.
	So, You know, X is where people go to get the most current news and learn about the world.
	So the legacy media is our direct competitors.
	So they're really going to find every angle to try to cancel X.
	So, in a sense, what Elon Musk is saying, and let me know if you think this is true, the legacy media cannot be trusted, probably at all, on any subject, particularly after how they behaved during the pandemic.
	They were the people that were advocating for certain measures.
	They were the people that were amplifying the cries for lockdown.
	They were the people that were inaccurate in their reporting on the origins of this virus.
	They are the people that refuse to look into excess deaths, adverse events.
	They are essentially the mouthpiece of the powerful, amplifying and normalising their narratives, ensuring that we remain at least dependent, but potentially enslaved.
	So of course, whenever legacy media talk about independent media, you have to be deeply cynical and sceptical about what they're saying.
	In short, you cannot trust them.
	You cannot trust them at all.
	I mean, if you want to know why things are happening, look at the incentives.
	And legacy media has had a tough time with respect to usage.
	The numbers I saw was that the sort of traditional print cable television viewership went down something like 20-30% last year.
	On the other hand, X went up roughly the same, roughly 20-30%.
	So it's a direct competition for people's attention.
	So if there's some attack they can levy against me.
	Okay, well that's a pretty interesting aspect of the conversation.
	Obviously many of you have very strong views about events in the Middle East and I must say it's difficult to blame you for it is a unique and complex and agonizing conflict.
	Part, it seems to me, of a geopolitical nexus that is designed or at least delivers forever wars and it seems to me that after the two trillion dollars squandered in Afghanistan, although I'm Not sure who in particular benefited from it, so maybe it wasn't entirely squandered.
	I'm sure Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Boeing benefited, but it doesn't seem to me to have been a useful expenditure of your resources.
	But, you know, who's asking you?
	Who's asking you where your money should be spent?
	One of the things I like that Elon Musk said during that conversation was that world leaders should do their own posts.
	We asked you earlier whether or not, who you'd most like to see posts from.
	Can we put that up now?
	Is it on my screen?
	Let's have a look.
	And you guys said that you would like to see Rishi Sunak, 2% of you, he's our Prime Minister, affiliated with the WF.
	Joe Biden, he's your President, receives a lot of funding from the financial industry.
	Kim Jong-Un.
	That dude, he's very much furrowing his own plow, or plowing his own furrow.
	In any event, there's a trench and he's in it alone.
	And Justin Trudeau, 40%.
	But most of you want to see Joe Biden's unexpurgated posting and Yeah, I think it will be interesting.
	If what happens when he types is what happens when he speaks, we'd be in for some accidental poetry, I tell you.
	Let's have a look at Elon Musk talking about leaders posting for himself.
	But it's only me doing these posts, ever.
	I don't have a team or anything.
	In fact, I generally would recommend for leaders of the world to just literally post your own stuff.
	Although, Elon Musk, let's face it, has got into some trouble.
	He's about to say he's got into some trouble.
	While you make a mistake, don't worry about it.
	It's a very forgiving culture we live in, no doubt about that.
	Hey, let us know in the rumble chat, eat my chode, maybe a bot, maybe a human being, certainly posting the word fart a lot.
	Why don't you vote 1 if you want us to mute him or 2 if you are free speech absolutists.
	We'll do whatever you say because, you know, free speech is free speech.
	Or do you want to control your community?
	It's up to you.
	Or do you want a sort of a kind of ever-mutating ongoing discourse about the nature of censorship and free speech?
	I can't remember which numbers I said so you'll have to tell me.
	Some of you are saying mute him.
	1 is mute.
	Was 1 mute?
	Some of you are saying mute.
	I think he's going to get a little muting.
	You're going to get muted.
	He's muted.
	Hey, that's how democracy works, guys.
	Seems pretty simple to me.
	So yeah, if you're watching this on YouTube, we're just going to do a little more here.
	We're talking briefly about the primaries, but I recognize that a lot of you feel that internal domestic politics are all contained within a paradigm that is ultimately controlled by the same interests.
	Although I similarly recognize that Vivek and Trump Our two figures much admired in the libertarian anti-establishment world.
	Let's have a look at a little bit of Trump and Vivek.
	They're campaigning together and there's a sense that Trump is getting some of his policies from Vivek.
	Like it's like Trump's young person.
	That's what it sounds like.
	Vivek's been telling me about CBDCs and meth.
	I mean, I don't know what else they've been discussing, but have a look at that.
	I say that old Choate dude's getting muted for a little while now, based on democracy.
	Baroque, for example, says mute the c-word.
	Very strong views on democracy right there.
	Let's have a look how that plays out, and let's have a look at Trump with his consultant young person, Vivek Ramaswamy.
	He's not with him.
	I think he's sort of citing him.
	And this I do for Vivek, because he's very big into it.
	I happen to agree with him, but he said, could you mention this?
	I will never.
	He said, I love Vivek.
	I love him too now.
	I didn't love him when he was running, but I like him now.
	It's amazing the way you can like somebody when you win, right?
	Donald Trump there, he understands comedy, he understands the button.
	Hey, so we've been talking about globalism, we've been talking about when people say, oh, what do you mean global establishment?
	What is this power that NATO, the WHO, the WEF, what is this power that the financial industry through the World Bank or the IMF, how is it that it works?
	How does the politics of debt operate?
	How do you go into a nation, get them heavily into debt?
	Exercise and leverage control using these, what we might term, globalist methods.
	Well, one evident observable facet of globalism is this WHO treaty.
	This is a post from a really good journalist, I figure, James Melville.
	The UK government has just confirmed its commitment to the WHO pandemic treaty.
	This is an affront to democracy and risks handing over significant components of public health policy to the World Health Organization.
	So, I think there is a petition you can sign.
	Although, someone else is posting fart now.
	I like the way it works.
	Machine health.
	Funny.
	That's pretty funny.
	Why no RFK on XRussell?
	What about, oh, why don't we vote for him?
	Yeah, no, I like that dude.
	So, hey, listen, so let's post in the chat, why don't we post the petition against the WHO treaty in the UK and the petition in the US, if there is one, in the Rumble chat and the Locals chat, because if you are an Awakened Wonder over there in Locals, we make additional content for you Every single week we're doing a farming, agricultural, global revolution story tomorrow, which is pretty damn fantastic.
	Mute for annoyance is not a free speech issue.
	Interesting.
	Interesting.
	Nice.
	Nice.
	And we've got the 8% excess deaths of children in the UK story to cover.
	Um, so yeah, let's post that, and you should probably sign that, because that WHO treaty, if you don't know, means 5% of your country's health budget will go to the WHO, and in the event of another pandemic, the seemingly inevitable event, I'm just using their language, they're saying disease X is likely and inevitable, I'm not saying it's inevitable, it's them that's saying it's inevitable.
	In that inevitable event, then 5% of your nation's budget, and any measures that they propose, that could include things like mandated vaccines, perhaps, or lockdowns, your nation will have no democratic Purchase, control, or even conversation over.
	Hey and on that subject, let's have a look at Fauci and how he truly feels about medical measures.
	We've got a story later this week about DARPA that you're gonna Like, you know, DARPA.
	You remember DARPA?
	They were involved in the beginning of the pandemic.
	They were connected to the Wuhan Institute of Virology through the EcoHealth Alliance.
	They were funding research that seems, now at this point, to likely have been dual-purpose research, i.e.
	bioweapon research potentially was connected to events in Wuhan.
	While we're still on YouTube, I'll be careful about how I term that, but a man who uses language very confidently and deftly is Anthony Fauci.
	Spitting truths, y'all!
	Once people feel empowered and protected legally, you are going to have schools, universities, and colleges are going to say, you want to come to this college, buddy?
	You're going to get vaccinated.
	It's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bull**** and they get vaccinated.
	You will lose your ideological bull****.
	I mean, I won't swear while we're on YouTube.
	And you will get vaccinated.
	Do you notice how directive a lot of this language is?
	How instructive it is?
	You will know nothing and you will be happy.
	You will get vaccinated.
	You will drop... The term ideological BS in this instance means freedom, personal autonomy, liberty, things that are enshrined in documents such as the Magna Carta, the US Constitution, the Holy Bible, the idea of your personal freedom.
	Is, according to Anthony Fauci, BS.
	So, tell me, who should be indicted?
	Donald Trump or Anthony Fauci?
	One for Trump, two for Fauci.
	Is that a person you would like to see answer some difficult questions?
	Let me know.
	If you're watching us on YouTube right now, we'll be there for another couple of minutes before exclusively available on Rumble, speaking freely.
	And if you want to support our work and get additional content, here's a link in the description now showing you how you can do that.
	Sometimes We run a little bit over.
	It's twos.
	It's all twos.
	I've never seen so many number twos since I went down the sewage works.
	I was only there asking questions for a friend.
	If you want to support our work, you might want to go over to locals, where we do a lot of additional content.
	For example, our entire Whitney Webb conversation is up there.
	And why I love Whitney Webb is she talks about the financial component of global corruption so that you can understand it and corroborate it in ways that aren't dependent just on your strong emotional sense that corruption is taking place.
	She legitimizes it through what you might call journalistic integrity and research.
	So, meanwhile, over at Davos, which has come to an end and we've learned some pretty powerful messages from that, Alex Soros, son of George, has been participating.
	I don't know if you're fans of the show Succession, but it's difficult to keep the image of the Succession children out of your mind while watching Alex Soros talking at Davos.
	How did you get that job, Alex?
	Is any nepotism involved in this stuff?
	Or did you climb to the top of your papi's socks and just roll into Davos like these lyrics roll off of your tongue?
	Let's have a look.
	You know, so, you know, so, you know, but when I see this, you know, when I look at this, you know, you know, more globally regarding, regarding, you know, regarding democracy, I also say to myself, when was this great time?
	Good.
	Everybody got along so well and, you know, things were going so... This is the kind of sort of miserabilist condemnation of the history of humanity that's common in rational and materialist circles.
	Things aren't getting any worse.
	Things have always been bad.
	There's always been war.
	As a matter of fact, things are improving.
	There are more people that are not affected by poverty than any ever before.
	Do you know the Life expectancy in some countries, not America actually, but in some countries is actually going up and things are better than ever before.
	You may feel like you're in a state of existential despair, but actually things are great.
	There's something wrong with you.
	Maybe you didn't go to university.
	Maybe that's the problem.
	Maybe you're not part of our globalist elite.
	Maybe that's the problem.
	You just don't see things correctly.
	This kind of discourse is becoming all too common in the rational circles exemplified by the WEF, and I know you guys are spotting that 666 in the World Economic Forum logo like an unconscious message being transmitted and transmuted from some deep unitary force.
	But, hey, Listen, it seems to me that that guy got where he is today through evident loquacious abilities and in a great capacity for truth-telling.
	Did you ask Russell about Fort Detrick, says Paul the Strings, like you said you would?
	Actually, I didn't, but we did get a lot of stuff on sort of like biolabs and that.
	You'll love it.
	You'll love it, man.
	You'll love it.
	Have a look at Alex Soros's ankles and listen to what he's saying, for heaven's sake.
	Oh, great.
	I mean, I think, you know, I think that we really have to be careful here in this nostalgia
	for a time past, because a lot of the reactions we're seeing in society are actually reactions
	to positive things, like equality for women, and greater diversity.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	The cultural agenda being used once again to legitimise further enhancing the agenda of the powerful, the most brilliant distraction they've ever yet come up with.
	The CIA using logos for the LGBTQ plus communities that they evidently and purportedly support.
	You're fine to be whatever you want to be as long as you ain't free.
	You can have whatever faith or religion or ideology or sexuality you want to have as long as you ain't free.
	You can say in your own mind that you are whoever you want to say you are in your mind as long as you're not free.
	As long as you stay corralled within the parameters that we've lain out for you and that we openly discuss here at the World Economic Forum, where they're even coming for your coffee now!
	Can you believe?
	Are you ready for this?
	Because if they come for my... Listen.
	If you want me to take medicine or stay in my house all year long, I'll do it.
	If you want us to go engaging forever wars with poor people around the world of a variety of colours and sexualities and tell us you're doing it for diversity, sure, take my taxes.
	But when you come for my caffeine, you cross a line that I ain't ready to have crossed, baby.
	We'll be having our coffee before the session, and you raised the coffee example.
	I'd love just to give you the chance to expand on that.
	Basically, the coffee that we all drink emits between 15 and 20 tonnes of CO2 per tonne of coffee.
	So, we should all know that.
	This is every time we drink coffee, we are basically putting CO2 into the atmosphere.
	And one of the reasons is because most of the coffee plantations, or most of the coffee is produced through monoculture.
	Even when they say the word plantation, it gives you an indication of where their morality and their ethos ultimately lies.
	Who do you think the global elites were during the time of slavery?
	Who do you think they were?
	What do you think they said then?
	What do you think they say when they have to repackage their working model?
	How do they Effortlessly moved from a situation of slavery to a situation of dependency.
	Why would we trust these elites now?
	Especially if they want me... You will pride the coffee from my cold dead fingers, is what they're saying in the Awaken Wonder chat over there on locals.
	Shaman711, coming for the coffee, revolution time.
	Yep.
	When they came for our phones, we said nothing.
	When they came for our free speech, we said nothing.
	When they came for our coffee, it's like, actually we're not having that.
	We're gonna rise up against it.
	Hey, so listen, you know Marianne Williamson?
	She's a spiritualist, would you call her, and now politician.
	She's running for the candidacy in the Democrat Party, but she ain't getting a lot of support from the DNC, the regulatory body and I suppose steering committee of the Democrat Party.
	In fact, The Democrats seem pretty certain that there's only one man that can reliably run that thing.
	It's, oh right, 666 for Google Chrome logo.
	That's very good, well done.
	I like it when you spot all that stuff.
	There's some really good logo analysis going on in the Awake and Wonder chat.
	Let's have a look at Marianne Williamson grappling with the corruption within the Democratic Party.
	Hey, you know me.
	I don't trust either of them.
	I say that we need entirely new systems, representative democracy, decentralization, unified but decentralized, individual freedom, community freedom, the maximum amount of democracy possible.
	But let's have a look at what Marianne Williamson is saying.
	Marianne, if you were able to speak with Joe Biden for, let's say, 60 seconds, what would you want to say to the President?
	I would tell him that with all due respect that you should be ashamed of yourself, sir, because this the way that you and your administration and the DNC has suppressed other candidates opposing candidates in this in this primary season has been undemocratic and should not happen.
	And Dean Phillips, myself and others, when you have Democratic voters, 70 percent of whom have said they'd like to hear.
	from other candidates, we should have had the right.
	And hopefully the Democratic voters and other independent voters, it's an open primary here.
	We'll see through that and we'll- For all of their hysteria around Donald Trump and how
	Donald Trump, in a second term of Trump, will turn America into a
	dictatorship, it's going to be worse than Pol Pot.
	It's going to be worse than Hitler.
	The fact is that what we have in lieu of democracy right now under this establishment is already a threat to freedom.
	You've just got to decide what you think is worse, I suppose, and that's Marianne Williamson from within the party, the party that RFK had to leave in order to be heard.
	Hey, have you seen our friend Tucker Carlson's going to Canada and he's Got some ominous warnings for Justin Trudeau.
	We're going to be talking in a minute about Nikki Haley's ties to the military.
	We've got a fantastic story about legacy media hysteria when it comes to the subject of Trump, a man that they need for their economic model to work.
	Which way will they go?
	So much content to come.
	Let's have a look at Tucker talking about the Canadians.
	Thank you for your call, you have reached the media line.
	For all urgent requests, please send your request by email.
	Merci pour votre appel, vous avez attendu la ligne médiatique.
	Merci beaucoup.
	Yes, hi, I couldn't understand the French part, but it's Tucker Carlson calling from the United States.
	And I'd be grateful if you pass a message on to the Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau.
	We are coming to liberate Canada.
	We are coming to liberate Canada.
	And we'll be there soon.
	Merci!
	Mercy.
	God love him.
	Extraordinary there.
	Doubtless will be some interesting stuff there.
	I like the mercy ending.
	Pretty good.
	Hey, keep watching Tucker.
	What are Nikki Haley's military ties to the industrial complex?
	Are you interested about that?
	It's pretty extraordinary.
	Let's have a look.
	I would like coffee right now.
	No, I don't think I should have some, it's too late in the day.
	Allied defence LLC. If the mainstream press were doing their decisions, Allied defence...
	I would like coffee right now. No, I don't think I should have some, it's too late in the day.
	But I would like coffee right now. And can you imagine the WEF would stand in the way
	of our beloved coffee? Will they do, will they allow decentralised agriculture?
	Will they allow more freedom for farmers?
	Will they allow us to control our own food sources?
	Fence should have to disclose who their clients are.
	I did something that normal business people don't do.
	I've put up 20 years of my tax records.
	Personal tax filings.
	She should put up 20 years of her personal tax filings and put up the clients of Allied Defense LLC.
	If you're running for U.S.
	President, tell us who the damn clients are of the military contractor that you started, presumably using your connections from the U.N.
	Starts the military contracting firm.
	Starts, again, then serving on the board of Boeing.
	Ends up giving secretive speaking fees from foreign actors while also running Extraordinary stuff there.
	Nikki Haley, who seems to be the establishment choice for the candidacy of the Republican Party, of course, is in New Hampshire tonight.
	Well, let's see how that all goes.
	Is she doing all right so far?
	How's it looking?
	Interesting.
	Is it going to go?
	Or is it a foregone conclusion for your fella?
	Interesting stuff.
	Listen, if you watch this on YouTube, we are going to leave right now.
	We've got some extraordinary stuff coming up.
	Firstly, we're talking about the legacy media's infatuation with Donald Trump and their dual-purpose requirement to bring down Trump and yet elevate Trump, to continually amplify the threat of Trump while they acknowledge that they need Trump.
	It's astonishing.
	We're going to be talking to you a little bit about the revelation that we're doing in more depth later this week that Bioweapon research likely took place in Wuhan, that there is literally scientific microbial evidence that that is the case, that bioweapon research potentially contributed to the lab leak, and that this research is continuing.
	We've got a fantastic story for you.
	Join us in a few seconds over on Rumble, you awakened wonders.
	Thank you for being in this stream of sweet freedom with us.
	Remember, If you join us over on Locals, let's post the link to Locals right now.
	We'll probably do another 10 minutes at the end of the show tonight.
	We do meditations, we do biblical readings, we give you one exclusive video a week.
	The 8% rise, for example, in child deaths in the UK, which I'm now free to say.
	Russell, did you get permission from Tricky and Run DMC to use that song?
	Yeah, we did, but we messed up somehow in a way that meant we could only use it exclusively on one platform.
	It really Bugs me as a matter of fact that we can only play it silently.
	So we'll do a bit extra on locals but we've still got plenty more time as well as a fantastic deep dive exploration into the legacy media and their complex relationship with Donald Trump.
	Let's have a look.
	Welcome one another in the stream you awakened wonders, you glorious individuals.
	Would the elites controlling this go to the video if that's alright?
	Okay, so it's the New Hampshire primary later today.
	Are the legacy media the defenders of democracy that they cast themselves as or the participants in a circus that leads to the Trump bump and a return to the skyrocketing corporate media profits that they had during the years of the first Trump campaign and presidency?
	Here's the news.
	No, here's the effing news.
	We'll be back in a second.
	See you in a minute.
	Thanks for watching Fox News.
	Here's the news.
	No, here's the fucking news.
	With Trump rinsing it in the primaries and expected to win New Hampshire tonight, are
	even Trump's worst enemies in the legacy media secretly rooting for him because what they
	really care about is ratings and money?
	Hello there you Awakening Wonders, thanks for joining us on this voyage to truth and freedom.
	Remember, every week we make an exclusive video that's available to our supporters by clicking the link in the description.
	This week's was about excess deaths and the surprising, and let's face it, mortifying,
	8% rise in child deaths in the UK and possibly beyond that.
	We did an exclusive video covering John Campbell's content and look at what could be causing
	these excess deaths across the world.
	Certainly the legacy media are never going to tell you about it, so support our content
	so we can grow this movement together.
	Because out there in the legacy media space is a complicated world, even those that claim
	to hate Donald Trump more than Satan.
	More than Beelzebub.
	More than the darkest imaginable realms seem to be secretly rooting for him because when Trump's out of office and out of the picture, they have to lay off legacy media workers.
	Their advertising revenue slumps.
	So, is it possible that the reason the hysteria and amplification of the anti-Trump narrative continues to abide and even increases because the legacy media need Trump Now Trump is expected to win New Hampshire tonight and of course he rinsed it in Iowa.
	But there was a rush to announce his victory, perhaps preemptively, because legacy media outlets wanted to be the first to unveil the information.
	Let's have a look at some legacy media reporting around Trump and see if we can see where the hypocrisy emerges.
	Well, we don't know the number yet, Julie Fine.
	Thank you so much.
	But the Associated Press has officially called it, Donald Trump wins the Iowa Republican Caucuses.
	That is 32 minutes after they began.
	We have this race called, at least in terms Of number one?
	There's a reason the news looks how it does.
	There's a reason it's often a male and a female in suits in front of important institutional buildings.
	It's in order to suggest that the news is something other than a television program.
	But it is editorialized.
	That means they select information to amplify, they select information to ignore, and significantly they are funded by their partners in marketing.
	In this case, in talking about cable news, overwhelmingly by Big Pharma.
	Have you noticed any news stories in the last couple of years that were biased towards outcomes that might be favourable to Big Pharma?
	Let me know in the chat and the comments.
	So when it comes to covering Donald Trump, they are massively compromised because clearly, ideologically, they do not like Donald Trump.
	He is a populist.
	He is a candidate that that blue collar workers tend to flock towards.
	He is anti-elite, anti-establishment.
	Those are just a few of the things about Trump they loathe and despise.
	And yet Trump for them is ratings gold.
	So how do legacy media organizations that are dependent on advertising revenue
	support in an unbiased way on Donald Trump?
	The simple truth is they are unable to.
	We have to get the, we'll get to the Hitler stuff in a second.
	I mean, I think that story's been covered.
	He was a really bad, genocidal lunatic that used folk myth, the music of Wagner, even Hindu symbolism and Roman pageantry to revivify a dormant German nation that had been crushed by the First World War.
	We don't need to get back into, oh, you're going to say that Trump's here.
	No, that is news.
	But let's start, though, with I'll make a chart.
	The fact that Donald Trump... Mike is making a chart.
	They're making the news up.
	I'll do a chart.
	Is this chart going to be reasons that Donald Trump is like Hitler?
	Firstly, haircuts.
	They both had unusual haircuts.
	It's not well.
	We know this.
	But this guy, he's looking so old, he's shuffling around.
	They act as if it's ethically incorrect as well to condemn Biden on the basis of his physical appearance and his age, but they do it for Trump because they've got no principles at all, have they?
	All the while they're talking about this, they're thinking, we need Donald Trump.
	Without Donald Trump, pretty soon it's going to be, Micah, oh, sorry, you don't have Micah.
	We had to make her redundant because Biden is doing another term, basically at this point, like an ash cloud from a crypt, and we can't afford to pay Micah's wages.
	He's going through this thing and then about why he should have total immunity, total immunity even when he crosses the line.
	It is pure, sheer authoritarianism and tyranny.
	If that is your depiction and understanding of authoritarianism and tyranny, I'd love to see how they're handling the numerous stories around Hunter Biden, his business interests and their potential connection to Joe Biden, whether that's the Burisma stuff in Ukraine, these potential Chinese deals, of course the report in that was censored during the time of the election, because it If something is corrupt and tyrannical then it has to be corrupt and tyrannical whichever side does it.
	Otherwise you're simply advocating for a particular ideology while simultaneously amplifying the threat of Trump in order to have a powerful demon and opponent in their preferred media space so they can continually agitate for advertising.
	So we have that part of it.
	Trump at his most dangerous, but also Trump at his most detached from reality.
	He's really losing it.
	We've been getting glimpses now of him shuffling around and looking lost.
	Have they covered Joe Biden in that bike shop?
	Look at this.
	So there you go.
	There's a good degree of hysteria there and agitation.
	So it would be surprising to learn, wouldn't it, that during the periods where Trump was not in office and not in the news cycle, their figures and revenue suffered.
	We'll get into that in a moment.
	Let's have a look at some more MSNBC hysteria.
	Donald Trump supporters are right there with him.
	Even as his rhetoric has become more blatantly fascist, they want what he wants.
	Like, if you're going to scrutinise rhetoric right down to the sort of colloquial idiosyncrasies, what about the moment where Joe Biden says, no, the bombing of the Yemen isn't working in so much that it isn't impacting the Houthis, but we're going to continue with it?
	That actually goes beyond fascism.
	That's into the kind of Orwellian dystopianism of the reversal of the meaning of language.
	And of course, many of you will be saying right now, and perhaps even typing in the comments, the goal is not to end wars.
	The goal is forever wars.
	Don't you think that these kind of deeply cynical globalist issues are more significant than the tribal polemicism and fanfare that surrounds either of these two candidates?
	Frankly, in short, if they are indeed legitimately concerned about Donald Trump, Why are they not analysing and scrutinising corruption, hypocrisy and authoritarianism within the party that they support?
	In the past year, Trump has called for the termination of the Constitution, said he wants to be dictator for a day.
	That was a joke.
	I watched that.
	He said that on, I think, Glenn Beck or Sean Hannity, wasn't it?
	And he said, for a day I'll be dictator, build the wall.
	I know about these legacy media tactics because I know how I personally have been victim to it.
	it as if it's serious shows you that they are kind of tweaking the dials.
	Well what if that wasn't a joke? What if we portray that in its worst possible light?
	I know about these legacy media tactics because I know how I personally have been victim to it.
	They take something that was out in the open and clear and explicit, for example my promiscuity,
	dial it up, amplify it, make it look as awful as possible and then present it to you as news.
	What do the legacy media report on and what do they ignore?
	They ignore things that could be detrimental to the interests of the powerful and they celebrate and amplify stories that are antithetical to your personal and particular interests.
	Trump has fundamentally transformed the Republican Party to the point that the party itself has taken on his grievances and the agenda of vengeance that he's openly planning if he wins a second term.
	Aside from agenda of vengeance sounding like a bit of a Sith sequel from an overly franchised Star Wars movie, Doesn't it seem to you that there is a bit of an agenda of vengeance against Trump himself as he deals with indictment after indictment after they continually pursue him through various courts?
	It seems to me somewhat politically motivated rather than, we must have justice for all of these various diffuse frauds.
	As Tom Nichols wrote in The Atlantic this week, quote, these voters now want to get even with their fellow citizens, not for what's been done to Trump, but for what they feel has been done to them.
	They were certain that 2016 would finally bring them the recognition and respect they craved.
	Instead, Trump set them up for a steady diet of ego-bruising rebukes from other voters.
	Ego bruising, rebukes from other voters.
	It's an interesting piece of analysis and you would think, given the nature of that invective, that these news organisations would legitimately be opposed to Trump.
	But are they?
	Here we go again.
	About 30 minutes into counting the first votes of the Iowa caucus, the Associated Press, CNN, NBC and various other news networks called it for Donald Trump.
	Donald Trump wins the Iowa Republican caucuses.
	That is 32 minutes after they began.
	There was little doubt that the former president would easily dominate the rural state, but the rush to declare him the victor in violation of policies that prohibit such calls before the polls close was a blatant attempt to soak up the election night audience.
	It is difficult because of course they have an agenda beyond conveying information.
	This followed another departure from traditional editorial practices when MSNBC and CNN refused to screen Trump's victory speech MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, casting herself and her network as defenders of the Republic, justified the unusual decision with typical exaggerated commentary.
	Maddow said her network would suffer by knowingly broadcasting untrue things, which is an extraordinary claim to present themselves as gatekeepers.
	And that is why you cannot trust the legacy media.
	That's why you should consider supporting our channel, where right now you can watch an exclusive video for our supporters on The Iowa primary heralded democracy falling to an authoritarian and potentially fascist form of government.
	For his part, Jake Tapper of CNN suggested his network had to shield viewers from anti-immigrant rhetoric.
	I suppose there has to be a continual amplification of the hysteria simply to provide a sense of narrative.
	It's pretty clear they don't like Donald Trump.
	It's pretty clear that what they want is neoliberal authoritarianism with strong globalist ties.
	An America that is run by the agenda of NATO, the WHO, the WEF.
	Defined and confined by cultural war issues.
	It's pretty clear that that is the agenda.
	You don't need to every single day keep bloody well telling everybody that.
	Trump responded in kind.
	NBC and CNN refused to air my victory speech he said at a rally in New Hampshire the following day.
	Think of it because they are crooked, they're dishonest and frankly they should have their
	licenses or whatever they have taken away.
	Ha ha ha, their licenses or whatever they have.
	Typically dismissive.
	If you watched Trump's victory speech in Iowa, it was full of just sort of politeness.
	And I think that one of the mistakes they're making is by portraying Trump as this incredibly
	intoxicating and charismatic leader who they can't even broadcast.
	Makes him somewhat more appealing, particularly when understandably trust in the media is
	at an all-time high.
	time deserved an understandable low. Their refusal to even platform Donald Trump, I think,
	and let me know if you agree with this in the chat and the comments, makes Trump seem
	more legitimate. And with that, election season has started, along with the outrage cycle
	from which both Trump and legacy media reap mutual benefit.
	The more media outlets lean into partisan anti-Trump coverage, the more gleefully he
	campaigns against the media as a biased institution. You know how much we value your
	dedication, your time, your attention, and we similarly value our partners that help to keep the
	lights on and help to keep us Now a word from our sponsors at Brickhouse.
	Read their product, Lean.
	Now, stress may be why you can't lose weight.
	There could be other reasons.
	Could be stress.
	Do you have moderate to high stress?
	We got this new doctor formulated weight loss supplement called Lean.
	It could be your solution.
	These are fantastic medics.
	Now, as you know, over the course of my life, I've had difficulties with food and eating, and you've got to be careful and healthy when it comes to diet.
	But if you think your problems with diet are to do with stress, this could be a very useful product for you as part of a healthy, conscientious and focused approach to your own wellness.
	Chronic stress wreaks havoc on blood sugar, which can cause your body to store excess fat.
	Stress can also slow your metabolism, which of course, as you know already, fuels weight gain.
	And you all know about stress eating and sugar cravings.
	I get that stuff.
	This is the good news.
	The studied ingredients in lean have been shown to help maintain healthy blood sugar levels, help optimize metabolism, and help keep your appetite under control.
	Could be a very useful product.
	If your life is a bit stressful and you want to lose weight, add lean to a healthy diet and exercise lifestyle.
	Remember, you gotta eat healthy and exercise well.
	It's not a miracle, but it could be the difference.
	Plus, we can get you 15% off and free shipping at TakeLean.com if you enter brand15.
	That's the promo code, brand15.
	Enter that at TakeLean.com.
	And that's promo code brand15 at TakeLean.com.
	TakeLean.com.
	Statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
	This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease, and is not a substitute or alternative for care from a healthcare provider.
	Okay, let's get back to our content.
	Thanks for staying with us.
	It's a pattern that first took shape nine years ago when Trump launched his campaign with a series of inflammatory statements.
	Mexican migrants are rapists, ban all Muslim immigration, why can't I call women fat pigs,
	slobs and disgusting animals?
	The extreme remarks rolled on.
	In response, the media abandoned objectivity.
	Journalists inserted themselves into the story, often challenging Trump directly and darkly
	warning readers to oppose him.
	The New York Times and Washington Post broke tradition and used the words lie and liar on their splash to describe a presidential candidate.
	The media used any opportunity to present Trump in a negative light.
	MSNBC, despite its supposed rule against broadcasting falsehoods, reported salacious stories casting
	Trump as a Russian intelligence asset, of course referring to Russiagate, which Rachel
	Maddow and MSNBC et al all enthusiastically reported, even though it's been proven to
	be untrue since then.
	The press pitted itself against the candidate.
	While popular on cable television, this approach is very much divorced from journalism that seeks to understand why voters were attracted to his message on trade, his unorthodox opposition to foreign military interventions, or the anger he mobilised against establishment elites.
	For his part, Trump I think the political press is among the most dishonest people that I've ever met, Trump would say, to be met with uproarious applause.
	Undoubtedly, Trump's instincts around elitism, the establishment, neoliberal, globalist politics are Pretty acute, astute and well observed.
	The fact is Trump cannot rise to prominence and ongoing success unless there is an appetite for Trump.
	And a big part of that appetite, I believe, is the antipathy that the government, legacy media, corporatism, globalism are all collectively held in.
	Whether or not you believe Trump has delivered on the promises and rhetoric that he's delivered in his previous presidential campaign and whether or not he will deliver on the rhetoric during this one, there is no question that the more the legacy media says that they hate Donald Trump, the more other people regard him as a populist icon and an anti-establishment figure.
	What's baffling about all of this is there's never a time of atonement or a reckoning.
	You never see Morning Joe and all them others sat around the table and going, you know what, we should probably talk about the corruption within the Biden family.
	We should probably talk about the lack of infrastructure in American life.
	We should probably talk about why all of these people feel so unheard and angry.
	Unless you're willing to campaign along the lines of, listen, we don't think Donald Trump's a very good political figure for these reasons.
	But we recognise that what he's tapped into in you is a kind of rage and anger and despair and a desire for a different type of America.
	All they've ever really offered is, you slot must be racist.
	And so much of it doesn't make sense when you find out that the Democrat Party has already lost the white working class vote of its own former supporters and is well on the way to losing non-white, black, Hispanic voters.
	One of the things he was most condemned for was the cages.
	The children at the border in cages.
	Then you learn Barack Obama built those cages.
	Or the wall.
	The typical Donald Trump policy.
	thing I know where to do is build. All of that stuff and then you discover that
	Joe Biden is continuing to build the wall. Similarly the campaign pledges
	offered by Joe Biden. I will make Saudi Arabia a pariah.
	Make them in fact the pariah that they are. Then he does a series of arms deals
	and energy deals with Saudi Arabia. Their inability to address the problem
	leaves us open to the rhetoric charisma and phenomena of Donald Trump. They
	can never directly address it because to directly address it you would have to
	acknowledge the culpability of the system itself.
	You'd have to say, this system doesn't work.
	It's probably at an end now.
	We're resisting that change because we won't let someone like Robert F. Kennedy even debate our current candidate.
	We won't send Biden into the debate, Marianne Williamson.
	And because of that, because Joe Biden is a symbol of the establishment, he is a symbol of that party, elderly, perhaps once efficient, but certainly not anymore.
	Because of these failings, All they can do is sort of marvel at and fetishise Donald Trump, and even that's not working.
	Unless their agenda is simply to increase news and advertising revenue, then it's working pretty well, actually.
	All decorum gone, the clashes drove record viewership and unprecedented profits for media corporations.
	Meanwhile, the endless anti-Trump headlines in the liberal media only made his point about bias while also keeping him right at the heart of every story.
	The profit dynamic was significant.
	In 2015, Les Moonves, then chief of CBS News, was giddy with the Trump-driven audience.
	Looking ahead, he told investors, the presidential election is right around the corner and thank God the rancor has already begun.
	So there's an obvious compromise there.
	They're ultimately, like all for-profit organizations, the bottom line is the line that matters most.
	At the moment, they can appeal to their audience by continually condemning Trump.
	out there he chuckled, according to a recording.
	So there's an obvious compromise there.
	There, ultimately, like all for-profit organisations, the bottom line is the line that matters most.
	At the moment, they can appeal to their audience by continually condemning Trump.
	It seems to work.
	But if it gets proven at some point that by amplifying Trump,
	by showing Trump, by finding the right line, oh, what we'll do is we'll talk about Trump,
	If they can't continue this delicate dance around the issue of Trump, their model is doomed.
	And perhaps with the rise of independent media anyway, their model is no longer effective.
	What we're watching, I think, is a bunch of institutions falling apart, doubling down on hysteria and authoritarianism in order to resist what seems to me to be the inevitable decentralization of many of their models.
	Let me know what you think in the chat.
	The Washington Post and New Yorker enjoyed record circulation.
	MSNBC and CNN also claimed unprecedented viewership, finally outflanking Fox News as each network competed for an audience hungry for Trump controversies, some of which, like the Steele dossier, were outright fabrications.
	A story we've covered, the Clinton campaign funded lies that made it all the way onto legacy media shows, and they've never really acknowledged that.
	They certainly don't ever acknowledge it when they talk about lack of trust in the media or the rise in Trump's popularity.
	Another one of the things they just don't cover.
	The heightened political climate continues to benefit CNN, John Martin, head of Turner, told the Financial Times.
	Even the New York Times boasted about its Trump bump.
	Mark Thompson, then the Times' chief executive, celebrated a continued revenue spike well after the campaign ended, as coverage of exceptional news events, including the firing of James Comey, helped add 109,000 new digital customers.
	Ultimately it's a business model that needs to alter and amend and it needs to exist in these type of spaces.
	I believe that's why these kind of spaces are under significant attack because they represent the emergence of entirely new perspectives or old perspectives re-heard and it's an enormous threat to the media unless they can start penetrating these spaces.
	But with Biden came the Trump slump.
	The Washington Post lost nearly a third of its digital audience and last October announced large cutbacks to its workforce.
	Viewership rates are down at all the major cable and television networks with NBC and MSNBC just earlier this month reporting yet another round of layoffs.
	When do you consider that the Democrat Party essentially exiled RFK rather than have a candidate that could stand up against Trump?
	And wouldn't even let Bernie Sanders run as a candidate, preferring Hillary Clinton inexplicably.
	How do you imagine the legacy media, the propagandist arm of the same establishment interests, feels when it comes to a decision between we're going to have to cut our own workforce and make less money with Biden in office, Or we can continue to contribute to this hysteria around Trump, even knowing that potentially we increase his chances of being elected, but also keep our advertising revenue and subsidies nice and high.
	How do you think they might respond to that internally, knowing what we know about their ethics?
	No wonder then that the anti-Trump narrative is rearing its head again.
	The Iowa coverage already points to what lies ahead, as Trump is described as a psychopathic criminal.
	That's extreme, isn't it?
	Like, not just a criminal.
	Not just a psychopath, but a psychopathic criminal.
	The worst thing anyone can be.
	And his entire base built on a cult of personality.
	The media will again do battle in an attempt to prevent the former president from returning to the White House.
	Paradoxically though, this is bound to help not hinder Trump's campaign.
	In 2016, journalists were so distracted by the latest Trump tweet that they paid no heed to the electorate.
	It's deep frustration at the establishment and it's longing for a change agent.
	But such are the incentives and outlets are bound to overplay their hand again.
	The professional and financial advantages are such that non-partisan journalism is forgotten.
	The media will cast themselves as defenders of democracy and joust with Trump and his campaign,
	little realising that their crusade may well lead him straight back into office.
	I suppose the question we're left with is, is that exactly where they want him?
	What an extraordinary time we live in where our trust in media is so low,
	we can't even trust them in their own evident passion and enthusiasm
	when it comes to ultimately what matters most to them, ongoing profits.
	When we know how their model is funded, when we know what their affiliations are when it comes to corporatism, when we saw during the pandemic period how they advocate and align in particular with the interests of the pharmaceutical industry, which is why we want you to subscribe and watch our 8% excess death in children video if you can because I believe
	strongly the legacy media model is finished.
	They have no authenticity, they have no vitality, they have no real connection to the issues they
	talk about. When you see Micah and Morning Joe and those various other pundits pontificating,
	what I believe you're watching is the No.
	end of a particular type of institution that has no ideas left except the ongoing vilification
	of someone in the figure of Donald Trump who has harnessed a tide of anti-establishment
	zeal and they are completely at a loss as to how to oppose it because to oppose it would
	mean radically altering their entire model and everything that they advocate for.
	But that's just what I think, let me know what you think in the chat.
	See you in a second.
	No, here's the fucking news.
	You beautiful, glorious, awakening individuals.
	What fantastic comments you've sent in.
	There was Pete1844 asking about a Christian theocracy.
	I think any centralised authoritarian government would be a problem for us.
	You know what I believe in.
	Decentralised but unified.
	It's inevitable that we're all going to have cultural beliefs that differ and any centralised form of government is ultimately going to end up oppressing, either visibly and invisibly and implicitly, Marginalized groups or explicitly.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	Who the hell watches MSM still?
	Wake up!
	Wake up your parents and your children and your neighbours and your churches.
	Please, Orange Tosh, there cannot be many people left who actually take the legacy media seriously.
	Matkan.
	Legacy media is just a psyop these days.
	Sabramovic.
	And vaccine mandates aren't tyrannical.
	Jbeb99.
	The campaign trail is difficult.
	Not that Biden would know that.
	WNPLM.
	Oh yeah, Russell, are you going to cover that clip of that British piano player in public having a group of Chinese people demanding he stop filming?
	They tried to send the cops after him and it almost worked.
	Yeah, yeah, I did see that.
	That was pretty interesting.
	Let's have a look at that, in fact.
	Let's have a look at that British guy who's a YouTuber, actually.
	We should give him a little shout out.
	Who's playing the piano in public, and then some Chinese folk who are making TV there, let's say, you've got to stop filming.
	Russell, what do you think of the King Charles and the WEF, says Kristen 1974?
	I think the WEF are soft PR for globalist power, and I think that the monarchy at this point And perhaps at any point is a visible living demonstration of hierarchical systems that need to be abandoned and abolished and replaced.
	Replaced immediately.
	So, you know, that's my view.
	Hey, let's have a look at this bloke playing the piano in public and these Chinese TV journalists trying to shut him down.
	It's pretty interesting.
	I think you'll like it.
	Pretty inoffensive so far, pretty jaunty.
	Can the Chinese Jeffries have a go?
	Oh yeah, of course, of course.
	And they ask, they're asking do they want to have a go.
	Do you want to have a go?
	We can let these Chinese folks have a go.
	This is what British people are ultimately like.
	Friendly, open-hearted.
	Don't lose your optimism.
	Don't lose your belief that people are fundamentally beautiful.
	It's the systems, I believe.
	It's the systems that drag us down.
	You know when they say, oh, there's public interest in these stories?
	No, there isn't.
	No, there isn't.
	Most people want to be left alone.
	Most people want to be free.
	There are a few, it seems, that there are some people that somehow get off on being governed by peculiar authority.
	We can't let that be the flow of life, can we?
	Of course we've got the Chinese here!
	Is that guy filming him though, right then?
	They're saying you can't film us, you can't film us.
	But this dude, luckily he knows the law.
	I don't know, are we allowed?
	We're not allowed.
	Is that guy filming him though?
	They're saying you can't film us, you can't film us.
	But this dude, luckily he knows the law.
	We're not allowed?
	You're not allowed because we're for Chinese TV.
	This is very for Chinese TV.
	Oh, OK.
	This is non-disco.
	It's not disco?
	There's no reason.
	That's our choice.
	That's our rights.
	Oh, so it's not a legal thing?
	It is a legal thing because... Yes, you can.
	Anyone can film because in the UK it's a free country and anyone can film.
	But we have images, right?
	Not in public.
	In China?
	But we're not in China.
	No, no, no.
	I have my choice.
	No, but we are in Britain.
	Great Britain.
	We're not in China.
	I say I'm also British.
	I'm also British, okay?
	She's Great Britain.
	I'm also British.
	I'm also British.
	But I don't want to use my image.
	You've got a Chinese flag there.
	It doesn't matter.
	Show me the Chinese flag.
	Why are you touching her?
	Stop touching her!
	Don't touch her!
	Please!
	That was an escalation.
	Do not touch her!
	Please!
	You are not the same age!
	Please do not touch her!
	Don't touch her!
	Please don't touch her. Please don't touch her.
	I told you to carry out the camera.
	I told you.
	This is not to go on your channel.
	Alright, so the police arrive and you wonder how this will go.
	Now, I'm not in particular interested in the nationality of the participants.
	I'm interested in freedom.
	That dude's just filming some stuff in public, which I don't think is against the law.
	I remember the beginning of it.
	John E. Piano playing.
	Listen, Kelly, we're in a public space.
	I'll just have a conversation with this dude in my place.
	Listen, this is going on your YouTube channel.
	I need to speak to you without this being on your YouTube channel.
	Well, what about what?
	Is this proper in a public space?
	Listen, can I just have a conversation with you please?
	Sure.
	Without your friend video.
	No, because the camera never lies.
	Listen, I've got my camera on and we're just having a conversation.
	OK, so I've got my camera on.
	Let's have a conversation then.
	This is going on your YouTube channel and I don't want it to go on your YouTube channel.
	Well, don't talk to me then, Kerry.
	Listen, listen.
	She said, Kerry, we're in Britain.
	We're in a public space.
	We've got free country.
	Someone makes the point, private shopping mall.
	Yeah, that's what happens with the privatisation of previous public space.
	There was some, like in our country, there was a bill, I think in Georgian Georgian Britain where like common land was taken in a private ownership and from that point on the kind of dynamics of what public life consisted of starts to irrevocably alter and you see this escalated now like the only reason they could move on people that were participating in the Occupy movement was because many of those squares where the protest took place were ultimately privately owned even though you would think as part of your country or our country that they would be publicly owned because they're funded by
	Taxpayers etc.
	But it's extraordinarily easily to legislatively curtail and dominate and I suppose ultimately colonize public space.
	So yeah, you're right.
	Even though it looks to me like that's a train station would be my guess.
	I bet that ultimately through a sort of set of private-public partnerships, which is extraordinary.
	It's one of the things we're looking at at the moment is the curious cartilage between state and corporation.
	And there are groups like, there's a group called Logically, in the UK that we're looking into, because they've been
	looking into me, surveilling me, we've got a, like, we have to go to them and ask for, like,
	for them to hand over all the information, for all the spying they've been doing. It's sort of
	fascinating the way it all rocks along.
	But these kind of think tanks and these NGOs and these public groups, you know, the obvious
	examples are things like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. We're a philanthropic organisation!
	Okay, well, can we see some philanthropy, please?
	No, I said you're waving a communist flag. That's all I said.
	And the hands were meant to be going towards her?
	Were you trying to touch her in that moment?
	I was not trying to touch her.
	That's why I have a camera.
	Right.
	OK.
	That's why I have a camera.
	They've requested that the video where they've approached gets deleted and not used on your channel.
	No.
	Because there's money being made and their works are accompanied and their faces can't be shown on your channel.
	Well, they shouldn't be.
	You're not their private security agent.
	I'm not their private security agent.
	And we're in a free country.
	We're in a free space.
	We're not causing any trouble.
	The problem is not from us, Kerry.
	The problem is they are coming over, telling us what to do, and playing the piano.
	Now, fair is fair, but you are not their private security guards.
	I never said I was, and I'm having a conversation with you.
	And we're in a free space, in a free country.
	I'm not causing any trouble.
	There's an allegation being made and that's why... What's the allegation?
	Now you told me to stop filming and now you say there's an allegation.
	The camera never lies.
	That's why I film... You've told me to turn off my camera and now you're saying I've got an allegation.
	What's the allegation?
	The reason why I'm asking you not to... It's weird, isn't it?
	And baffling and confusing.
	It seems like the people that are charged with enforcing the law are not even sure what laws they're enforcing.
	ION7, Cops Work for Globalists.
	I know a lot of people that work within police forces that are really good people.
	public servants that got into the police force because they want to serve the public, not because they want to enforce the agenda of the powerful.
	It's a very curious line they've got to walk.
	I'm sure many of you know people that are in service, whether it's people that are firefighters or health professionals or even police officers that are publicly minded.
	This of course comes from the channel of Brendan Cavanagh, who's a British YouTuber.
	You should check out his stuff because he's clearly up for it, but most of the time he's just Playing the old Joanna, tickling the old Ivories without, I'm assuming and I hope, intervention from the police.
	Because I know that you are putting this on your YouTube.
	It doesn't matter where it goes, we're in a free country.
	Sorry?
	We're in a democracy.
	We're not in China.
	And that's not racist, that's the truth.
	That's what our forefathers thought.
	Exactly, but you can't say things like that, can you?
	You can't just say things like that.
	Say what?
	That we're in a free country?
	No, that we're not in China.
	We're Chinese people, exactly.
	Well, they came... Listen, Kerry, if I was over in China and I started laying the law down to Chinese people at the piano, telling them what they cannot do, do you think that's appropriate?
	They came over here, the guy started shouting at me, and he said, you're not allowed to film, you're not allowed... And I said, sorry, we're in Britain and I'm allowed to play.
	And I said, you're waving a communist flag.
	And then he said, you're racist.
	So, if I've done anything wrong, tell me.
	Right?
	This is a free speech issue.
	I'm sorry.
	This is a free speech issue.
	I'm not causing any trouble.
	They are the ones making a fuss.
	He's doing a good job there because he's staying double calm.
	That's fascinating.
	We'll watch the end of this in a second.
	In a way, you have to be able to see the interface between issues like this and other globalist issues that are going to be affecting us, I think, increasingly.
	We're going to be talking more about this later in the week.
	The revelation that indeed the Wuhan Institute of Virology, in conjunction with DARPA, funded by the EcoHealth Alliance, were working on dual-purpose research.
	Dual-purpose research is a long euphemism that ultimately means bioweapons.
	This is a fantastic story, we'll be looking at it in more detail later this week, but I just want to give you a heads up on it because it's pretty important.
	Last year, multiple U.S.
	government officials stated that sources in the U.S.
	government were 100% confident that COVID-19's patient zero worked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and conducted risky gain-of-function experiments there.
	Okay, we're getting somewhere.
	This lab received funding from the National Institutes of Health, you've heard of them, through EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S.-based non-profit.
	Remember, these agencies are significant.
	In 2018, EcoHealth Alliance applied for a grant from the Defence Advanced Research Project Agency, DARPA.
	Let me know in the chat.
	You're going to show the rest of the video?
	Yeah, I'll show the rest of the video.
	You want to know how it ends?
	You want to know if he gets away free?
	We'll check it out.
	We'll check it out.
	The DARPA for a project called Diffuse that would involve Shi Zhengli's lab group at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Ralph Baric's lab at the University of North Carolina.
	So there's a connection between DARPA, EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
	Now U.S.
	Right-to-Know has obtained a full cache of notes and drafts from the DEFUSE grant proposal for a Freedom of Information Act request.
	These documents reveal that the features of SARS-CoV-2 closely resemble the work described in EcoHealth Alliance's proposal.
	That means that they can, at a microscopic level, observe that the proposals that they were looking for grant funding for, DARPA and EcoHealth Alliance, looks a lot like SARS-CoV-2, i.e.
	the research they were applying to be able to do looks like the disease that causes the pandemic.
	Looks like.
	I'm only following the science now, so don't leap to any conclusions.
	SARS-CoV-2's furin cleavage site primed the virus for easy transmissibility among humans and is absent from the closest known relatives of SARS-CoV-2.
	What comes up in this is extraordinary, like literal individuals over in Russia researching biolabs that then subsequently crop up in Wuhan.
	It's a fantastic, fascinating and interesting story.
	We'll be covering it in more depth Over the coming days.
	Did Brangino ever happen?
	We are still working on Brangino, but we're more likely to get Browder at this point with Steve and Crowder.
	Hey, let's watch the end of this video and then we'll go over to Locals.
	Let's post a link.
	You can watch us on Locals for free.
	It's where we have our supporter community, but we'll post a free link for you guys so you can check out what we do on there now.
	Let's have a look at the rest of our man.
	They shouldn't get the police as their private security.
	I think it's a disgrace.
	Nobody said that, have they?
	Who said that?
	And on top of that, Kerry, you told me to stop filming.
	It's good that he's staying calm.
	It's good that he's using her Christian name.
	And then you said there's an allegation.
	Now, if I didn't have my camera, how would I prove my innocence?
	You know what?
	I know they are causing the fuss.
	I am not causing the fuss.
	I'm just standing up for myself, right?
	There's a fuss being caused and I have nothing to do with it.
	I know!
	No, listen!
	Kevin, they're from China.
	Listen, we can't say that.
	What, they're from China?
	They're waiting for you from China.
	I can't say that.
	This has become an interesting and astonishing conversation.
	You can't say that.
	You can't say they've come from China.
	You can see, I suppose, in this exchange how the charge of bigotry is used to shut down communication because I don't think That guy's saying they're from China and are therefore inferior, or they're from China and therefore don't have any rights.
	I think he's saying they're from China.
	Why are they telling us what to do when they're just on holiday making a TV show?
	Isn't that what you're saying?
	They've got a communist... Well, can I just say they're from China?
	Without the F?
	I'm sorry for the F, but they've got... Listen, they are waving a communist flag, and I said you're waving a communist flag.
	Is that racist?
	to say they've got a common use of language.
	They're not listening.
	Look, I've got nothing...
	What TV station are you in?
	I've got nothing to do with it.
	Listen, I'm just playing at the piano.
	They stood by the piano.
	I was filming and then they started laying down the law.
	He says you're from Japan.
	I'm not doing anything.
	That's why the police are getting angry.
	Because it's not your job.
	Listen, you should tell them.
	I'm not telling them anything that you're telling me to tell them.
	OK, get on and play your piano.
	I'll have a discussion with them.
	Tell them we're in a free country.
	That's pretty interesting.
	Are we in a free country anymore though?
	And what will that freedom look like if the WHO treaty comes to pass?
	What will it look like if there's just an ongoing increase of ever more frightening global crises that are used to leverage and legitimise further authoritarianism. Fascinating and extraordinary. We're
	going to cover a few more stories now. If you guys are watching us over there on
	Rumble, let's post a link in the description. We'll do another 10 minutes over on
	locals and I'll tell you a little bit more about what goes on over there. Meditation, scriptural
	reading, access to more Whitney Webb, more Glenn Greenwood, more fantastic content.
	Dr. Drew's coming up on Thursday, Glenn Greenwald on Friday.
	Click the red button to join our Locals community to get early access to all sorts of things.
	I want to welcome JS Katz, Rev0635, Juno4, Chainpup, KMS Brown.
	Join me on Locals now for a little bit more chat and join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
	Until then, if you can, stay free.

▲