All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 11, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:17:27
“HE’S BACK!!” Musk RESTORES Alex Jones On X… - Stay Free #264
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
you you
you over a billion, $300 million.
Trump just talks the talks.
over a billion four years and I'm sorry.
Over a billion three.
Over a billion three hundred.
Over a billion three.
Over a billion three hundred.
Brought to you by Pfizer.
In this video, you're going to see the future.
Wakey wakey it's time to acknowledge that we've been deceived and we've been living in an illusion and this is the time for mutual awakening together that there is a divine light within you that is bursting forth from behind your eyes and we can find a unity that will pierce their lies and we're finding it together today thank you for joining me you awakened wonders what a show we've got for you This Monday live, hello Robbo69show, hello HuckFed, hello IcyCold, GladysLee.
I'm talking to all of our friends in the Rumble chat right now.
MadhouseBronson, JHaas44, Rando Member, DustInfinity.
I'm talking to the Awaken Wonders in the local stream.
They're supporters of our movement.
They know the world's gonna change.
They know that the power to change the world is awakening in you right now.
We just have to direct it.
Who would have imagined that Twitter, as it was once known, would be taken over by a person that would say things like, F the advertisers.
Who knew that Twitter Spaces, or X Spaces as it's now known, would become a new peculiar parlor where people from around the world, the world's banned and censored, accumulate together.
Here you go, bear.
Have a snack, why don't you?
To talk?
Well, let me know.
Did you think that was a fantastic seance?
Did you think it was a glorious seminar?
Did you hear Vivek go pee-pee?
Did you hear Alex Jones there?
Did you hear Alex Jones?
Did you hear him rumbling, grinding along, almost turning into Elvis, almost turning into Bill Hicks?
All of those moments.
Fantastic stuff.
I'm sure you enjoyed it.
It was an extraordinary cultural moment, already iconic, and we will, of course, be talking about that, as well as talking about what Is extremism now?
Is extremism the new populist language and the new political movements appearing across the world that appear to have common traits and trends among them?
Or is there a necessary anti-establishmentism on the rise as the bureaucracies of the neoliberal centralist liars and deniers that have kept us depressed who had their hands shown in the pandemic period?
Is it Up to us, we the people, to oppose them en masse.
Is that tyranny now?
Because I heard some pretty, pretty extreme language out of that lady Jacinda, the Prime Minister of New Zealand, and we'll be looking at that extremism a little bit later.
I've heard some extreme things said about the conflict in Ukraine that If we don't stop Putin now, he might start invading NATO.
Stop trying to control our minds with hand gestures, says AbsurdBeats.
Okay, what do you want me to do?
What, just lay them listlessly there?
Just lay them on the table?
I don't like it.
I feel nude.
I feel naked.
GalacticCore88, we have to abolish the cabal. I am Steve Reno. Chill Magichode.
You're chatting to each other on the thing. Tucker's had a word with Elon, says MaryRose1979.
Before we get into that already iconic chat there on X Spaces, we're gonna have a little look at some of
Biden's blunders and we're gonna have a look at the new extremism. I've seen Trump compared to
Hitler and to Putin and to various dictators of the past without ever mentioned that all those
dictators were military and came into power in their 30s or 40s. If you're watching us on YouTube,
if you're watching us on Facebook, if you're watching us reflected in the mirror of an
interdimensional mind.
Know that the whole show will be available on Rumble.
You should download the app now and join an extraordinary chat.
More hands, say people in the chat.
Not less.
That's thanks, Kate, in the chat.
So do you see Man, if we can come together in that stream and find some commonality, maybe, maybe we can create a unified yet decentralized movement that will bring this demon down, that will take the head off this establishment serpent that wants to control us all.
Hello from Adelaide, says CP6XH.
Hello, mate.
3.40 in the morning.
You gotta be high!
I don't have to be watching that right now, but are you as high as Joe Biden?
He's been boasting about his billion, 300 million, trillion, 300 million dollar infrastructure plan.
We got how many viewers we got?
We got 11,000 cows and diddly diddly shows and viewers.
We got to get to 20,000.
We got to get to the numbers that only exist in Joe Biden's mind.
Is this guy a shaman?
Has he invented some new kind of mathematics?
Is he Oppenheimer, Einstein and Tesla rolled into Over a billion, three hundred million, trillion, three hundred million dollars, Trump.
This talks the talk.
I got a billion three hundred million trilly diddly diddly that's a sort of like a poem
is this Eminem?
It talks the talk we walk the walk.
That's an inconvenient phrase he what He talks the talk.
We walk the walk.
That weren't talking the talk.
You can't even say regular numbers.
And actually, I think that, actually, Donald Trump is quite good at walking.
But let's have a look at him saying trilly-milly-dilly again.
Over a billion, three hundred million, trillion, three hundred million dollars.
Don't say that Trump ain't walking the walk when this is how the dude enters into a room these days.
He's not only walking the walk, he's dancing the dance.
I know a lot of you love him over there in that rumble chat.
Let me know, is he the answer?
Yes or no?
Is Trump the answer?
Or do we need to change the system radically?
Do we need to radically re-evaluate those institutions of government all the way from the FBI?
C-I-A, the N-I-H, all of that stuff.
Sorry about my dog, he's wandering around here.
Alex Jones is an American hero, someone's saying in the chat.
And someone just posts fart a lot.
That's not helpful, is it?
That's not, can you stop that?
That's not, that's not helpful.
That's, hey, can I be in a wake and wonder if I don't believe in God?
Yes, you can.
Although in my view, God is real.
That's why you want to become an Awakened Wonder, so we can chat about the Holy Scriptures together, so we can chat about the Gita together, so we can advance the world together.
Is it progress that Alex Jones has been allowed back on X?
Yes or no?
Do a Y or an N. Let me know what you think about that, guys.
And let's have a listen.
Is this the first one?
Is this, uh... Elon Musk.
Oh, this is the legacy media reporting about it.
Let me know what you guys think.
That's what he is.
A right-wing conspiracy theorist, Alec Jones.
I'm only going to have one of it.
She can't even get to the end of his name without doing some misinformation.
This morning, he marked his return with a repost.
Jones was banned in 2018 for breaking rules against harassment and hate.
This was before Musk took over.
Musk posted a poll on his ex-account yesterday asking if Jones should be reinstated.
70% of the 2 million people who responded voted yes.
Musk wrote today, the people have spoken, so it shall be.
There you go.
That must mean that... So do we like democracy?
Is democracy okay?
Or do you not like democracy?
Do you like democracy to verify the agenda of a globalist elite that will use any information that they can to amplify their agenda and advance their trajectory by any information that's inconvenient?
That's censored.
It's misinformation.
That laptop is not convenient.
Those business deals, they are not convenient.
We're sliding into a dictatorship.
We're not sliding into one, baby.
We're already there.
I can tell you who's sliding into the lavatory during that iconic conversation.
Vivek Ramaswamy, guest of the show, like Alex.
I think he went for a quick... Did he go for a... Have we had this confirmed?
Is this misinformation or is Vivek Ramaswamy in the lavatory?
It's sad not to have children.
That's all I'm saying.
Elon Musk is promoting an optimistic pro-human future that the science and evidence shows is real and that we need.
Gentlemen, I have to go.
I just want to be clear about my position.
I'm super pro-human.
And I mean all humans.
Humans in America, humans in Africa, Asia.
Somebody's got their phone open in the bathroom.
Vivek, that's your phone, Vivek.
phone open in the bathroom.
Yeah, that's Vivek. That's your phone, Vivek. I'm not able to mute you.
That's bad when that happens like on a Zoom call, isn't it?
Like, that alone.
I think, look, there's 2.3 million people listening to Vivek Ramaswamy.
Vivek?
Sorry about that.
Sorry about that.
Well, I hope you feel better.
I feel great, thank you.
Sorry about that, guys.
I'm assuming it was just a pee.
Now, these are the kind of conversations I think that the legacy media can no longer compete with.
What would the legacy media do that's equivalent to this?
Is there a movie star in the world?
Is there a politician in the world that you would prefer to listen to on some talk show couch, maybe participating in a number to recommend a new medication?
Or would you like to hear advocates of free speech?
Even if you don't agree with everything they say politically, maybe what you agree with It's democracy.
Maybe what you agree with is the sanctity of the individual.
Maybe what you agree with is democracy as close to the people affected by it as possible.
Not dislocated democracy taking place way, way, way, way, way at the WEF, WHO levels and you get whatever mandates trickle down to you like Vivek's wee-wee.
That ain't good enough, baby!
It's democracy for me every single day.
Is this the bit where Elon's saying that he would do bird, as we say in the UK?
He would do jail time.
He would get behind the door in order to advocate for free speech.
And without free speech, what do you got?
All you've got is...
Strategic censorship?
Oh, I don't agree with that person.
This is a war that I happen to think is illegitimate.
We'll amplify that agenda.
Oh, this is a war that I'm against, so we better shut that down.
Oh, this is an ideology that I'm pro.
Very extraordinary.
Play the call where Tucker and Alex prank call.
I didn't see that.
Where they prank call Brian Stelter.
Oh, I'd like to see that.
That's a good post in the Rumble chat.
Did that happen, Gal?
Did you know about that?
What?
Alex Jones and Tucker?
Hello?
Who is this?
That sounds like Tucker Carlson!
You better get off the line, you son of a gun!
Hey, how come people aren't watching my show anymore?
Yeah, I do want to see that.
See if you can find that.
We'll do that exclusively on Rumble.
And I do think you're right.
People just saying fart in the chat there.
That's of no value to us.
That doesn't help us, does it?
Let's have a look at Elon saying that free speech is the fundamental right and that he would do jail for it.
Yeah, and frankly, if I think a government agency is breaking the law in their demands on the platform, I would be prepared to go to prison personally if I think they are the ones breaking the law.
Sorry for eating.
Sounds like we've got a hero.
Sounds like we've got someone who's up to make personal sacrifices in order to advance the world.
Do you think that's true?
Let me know in the chat.
Is he a hero?
Yes or no?
Just a Y or N, guys.
Let us know.
I mean, look, I feel like it sounds to me like Elon Musk is a vital and significant figure in the war against globalism.
But let's face it, he is a very, very powerful billionaire.
What am I eating?
I'm eating these kind of Noodles.
I got really, really hungry.
I'm so sorry.
I've been working all day just for freedom, baby.
I've been fighting so hard for democracy, I ain't had time to eat.
Jeterix Jones says Vivek is staying well hydrated.
And the bejesus, when the Karen's flail their hands, it's terrifying.
When Russell fails, it's like being wrapped in a blanket with a cup of cocoa.
Thank you for endorsing my flailing.
Tinebo73, it's my 50th.
Happy 50th birthday.
Thanks for being a member of our community.
We love you.
You're welcome here.
So, here we go.
You know how they have Shark Week?
It's Shark Week!
On the legacy media, it's Dictator Month.
Another day, another comparison to another dictator for Donald Trump, but no acknowledgement.
That when you have pre-bunking, i.e.
the legacy media agrees to propagate CIA data, for example, around the Hunter Biden laptop, when you have Floridian primaries cancelled because Joe Biden can't face opposition, when you have debates cancelled, when you have the Democrat Party purge their own candidates, when you have a political establishment that says that if you don't vote for them, you're voting for a dictatorship, you already have a dictatorship.
I'm going to put this to you.
There are two great British perspicacious writers which offered us dystopian visions and you already know what I'm going to say.
Is it going to be the boot-stamping on the face that George Orwell predicted?
Or is it Aldous Huxley's soma-soaked A banalised reality where we sit in our little pods, consuming and dumb, incapable of running our own lives, detached from our own nature and our own power, unable to access the deep divinity within us all.
We're already sliding into a dictatorship.
We have to awaken now.
And the only way we can awaken is by finding the deep love within us all.
We have to be willing to overlook the kind of opposition and conflict that may have defined our life up till now.
And we have to be willing to be discerning when it comes to legacy media narratives like this one.
Currently, Trump's a dictator.
If he gets in, he'll stay in power forever.
Miles Driver agreeing with media disorders.
Huxley, Cynthia Hart saying it's 1984.
Good morning to you.
It's Sunday, December the 10th.
I'm Ali Velshi.
We begin this hour with the Republican Party's slow march into autocracy, led by Donald Trump, the one-day dictator wannabe.
In a speech last night at the New York Young Republicans Club Gala, the GOP frontrunner did not back down from his comment last week that he would only be dictator on day one of a possible second term in office.
Firstly, where did this guy come from?
I've never seen him before.
Have you?
And it's like he's been doing it for ages.
He's very confident.
If he did just start his job, he's gotten into it very, very quickly.
Secondly, did you see when Trump was on Hannity and he said, just dictator for a day, just for a day?
He was joking.
We've got a brilliant piece later.
Written by Martin Goury.
If you've not read his book Revolt of the Public yet, read it now.
He says, and this guy, and I'm going to tell you this honestly because I know a lot of you love Trump and you think Trump is the answer.
This guy don't think Trump is the answer, but he says that the legacy media are being hysterical.
The dictators tend to be in their 30s and 40s, come from a military background, or have control over a paramilitary unit.
And this hysteria from the legacy media, from the neoliberal globalist machine, saying everything that they're opposing is tyranny, saying that January 6th was an insurgency or an insurrection, excuse me.
There's never been an unarmed insurrection.
You can't have insurrections without Armed insurrectionists.
You can't have people wandering around with flags in baseball hats like, right, okay, we're taking over.
Which job do you want?
I'll do them.
I'll be the Ministry of Defense.
What that was, was hijinks.
No, someone died.
Someone lost their life when... how did she die again?
Remember?
Remind me?
It's in our video, which is on a little bit later.
Let's watch the legacy media.
telling us that we have to be aware of Trump's hyperbole while spreading the exact kind of
hyperbole and histrionics that they claim to oppose.
In this case, this guy who's come out and, I mean, where did he come from?
Did you ever see him before?
Let me know who he is.
Instead he doubled down on it.
Baker today in the New York Times, he said that I want to be a dictator.
I didn't say that.
I said I want to be a dictator for one day.
But the New York Times said, and you know why I wanted to be a dictator?
Because I want a wall.
Right?
I want a wall.
And I want to drill, drill, drill.
For all the lying that he does, there's no reason not to believe him when he says he wants to be dictator for one day, but what is unbelievable about it is that Trump, who's not known for his restraint or his self-discipline, would only want to be dictator for a day.
It's a significant and disturbing escalation of rhetoric, even for Donald Trump, because of how bluntly and openly...
Firstly, he was responding to a bunch of hysterical accusations on Legacy Media.
If Donald Trump gets in in 2024, he will exile people.
He'll execute people.
I watched this myself on MSNBC.
He will execute people.
He'll make himself president for life, even though he didn't do that last time.
Then Trump responds to that with a joke.
Only for a day.
Drill, drill, drill.
Make a wall, make a wall, make a wall.
And then they say, aha!
He admits it!
Also, look at that little rhetorical trick just then.
Trump, you can't believe him.
You can't believe anything he says.
Except this thing, actually, because it's convenient to my narrative.
How often do you see information mobilized and weaponized in this manner?
Let me know in the chat.
Do you trust the legacy media anymore?
Do you trust them at all?
Look, I'll level with you.
I think we need radical change and that kind of change has got to come from within us.
We have to be willing to completely re-evaluate all of our institutions, to occupy them with new The vitality of us, of we, the people, truly, the stuff that's in your constitution, the stuff that's in our Magna Carta, the ideas are there, they're enshrined, they're just not being utilised because we have centralised dystopia.
No, no, no, people are saying in the chat, but I think they're responding to the idea about our man there.
Let's have a look at the end of this bit of propaganda.
He is telling us all about his autocratic plans for a second term.
Yep, you don't trust him, I don't trust him.
Nobody trusts them.
And perhaps one of the reasons we don't trust them is because it's pretty clear that they look at even war, the sort of apex or nadir, depending on how you regard it, of all of our human challenges, as an opportunity for profit.
Lay down, bear.
Lay down.
Don't be weird.
He's putting his head through the curtain.
It's weird.
It's like it's Kubrickian, you know, like when Jack puts his head through that door.
Lay down.
Don't be unusual.
Sorry about him.
I'm so sorry about him.
This is Antony Blinken.
Saying that the Ukraine-Russia war should continue to be funded by your taxpayer dollars because actually the money's going back into America, creating jobs in America, because those jobs trickle down, remember?
We all remember trickle-down economics.
It's working so well.
It's trickling down onto the streets of San Francisco.
It's trickling down to all of those tents all over Los Angeles.
It's trickling down into that sense of nihilism you feel in your belly when you see these fools on your TV lying to you.
He says that... I mean, he actually says what I think is the conspiracy theory.
Don't worry about spending all this money in Ukraine because it's all coming back to America anyway via the military-industrial complex.
I mean, am I misinterpreting this?
Let me know in the chat.
Is he just admitting one of the things that we call conspiracy theories?
Let the dog be!
Let the dog be, people are saying in the chat.
Bear seeks fame.
Yes, he does.
We love Bear.
Here's Johnny.
There's been extraordinary success by Ukraine.
Extraordinary strategic failure by Russia.
Was that extraordinary success?
Yeah, by what metric?
Because I think people are dying at extraordinary rates, the country's getting annihilated.
We did a piece earlier today about Klitschko, the mayor of Kiev and former heavyweight champion of the world, says Ukraine's getting more and more like Russia every single day.
Many of the weapons that were tagged to go to Ukraine, all sorts of extraordinary places like
Mexican drug cartels.
How is this a success for Ukraine?
Was the counter offensive a success?
No it wasn't.
Has their attempt to join NATO been successful?
Well not really if you consider the loss of Ukrainian life to be a metric worth measuring
and you know, Andy Blinken, he doesn't seem to.
It's in our interest to make sure that both endure with regard to Ukraine and the best
way to do that is to sustain our support.
One other footnote on this, and this is more for the American audience.
If you look at the investments that we've made in Ukraine's defense to deal with this aggression, 90% of the security assistance we've provided has actually been spent here in the United States with our manufacturers, with our production, and that's produced more American jobs, more growth in our own economy.
So this has also been a win-win that we need to continue.
Only when you experience state establishment propaganda will you hear a loss-loss described as a win-win.
How's it a win-win?
All of these Ukrainian people are dying, the American taxpayer is being ripped off.
I know, that's a win-win for Raytheon, they're winning, and Lockheed Martin, They're winning, and there's Northrop Grumman.
They're winning, and Joe Biden.
He's winning.
Win, win, win, win, win, win, win.
That's not win, win, win.
That's lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie.
That's propaganda, propaganda.
As well as admitting and acknowledging that 90% of the military aid that we're being told is going to help Ukrainian people.
Do you remember at the beginning it was like, sort of like it was meant to be blankets and stuff?
Like you got the idea that what your taxpayer dollars were going towards was actual aid of Ukrainian people.
Then they kind of invented the term lethal aid.
Now they're acknowledging that it's not even leaving the country.
Occasionally it might drift off into Mexico if some reports are to be believed.
But it's staying there for manufacture.
And the idea that the American economy is sustainable through perpetual war,
and that's a reliable model, What, should we just go around the world provoking endless wars because it creates manufacturing jobs?
I don't think that's... I don't think that's...
I've studied this book.
Not as much as I should, and not as much as I will, but I've studied it.
And nowhere in it does it say, why don't we engage in perpetual war in order to create jobs in the military-industrial complex.
I feel that Christ may have had a better vision!
I don't know, I'm not a theologian, but I feel he may have done.
And yet, Chris Murphy, the Senator, is saying, is amplifying this threat yet further.
Where is Christ?
Let's have a look, let's have a look.
Republicans would argue, many of them, they're not calling to completely shut down the border, but as you say, to make it tougher to get through.
If you look at the poll numbers, the latest Wall Street Journal poll shows a whopping 64% of people disapprove of President Biden's handling of the border.
Does that add pressure on you, on Democrats, to get something done here?
Well, I'm not paying attention to the politics here.
What I know is that the future of the world is at stake.
If we fail, if Republicans don't get reasonable in the next 24 to 48 hours, Russia is going to march into Ukraine.
China is going to be given a green light to invade Taiwan.
The world for my children is fundamentally different under that scenario.
The United States security is at risk.
So I am just beside myself.
The Republicans are playing games with the security of the world.
Amazing.
The Republicans are playing games with the security of the world.
And that may be true.
And I do not see the Republican Party as any kind of solution at all.
But what this dude, Chris Murphy, is advocating for here is Arm the world in order to protect your children, in order to protect my children.
That doesn't make sense, does it?
Russell needs moderators, someone's saying in the chat.
I've got moderators.
Gareth Roy's there, just out shot, and he moderating hard.
I am being moderated.
Now listen.
If you're watching us on YouTube, let's start the countdown.
Let's start the countdown right now.
We're going to leave you on YouTube or Facebook or wherever you are watching this so that we can speak freely.
Take a chance, take a chance, take a chance and join the Rumble Chat where there is so much free speech you would wish That someone would step in and moderate it but nobody will.
Or better yet, become an awakened wonder.
Press the red button.
Support our work.
Transcend to the next level together.
There is a light within you, a glorious light, and it is this light that will oppose their tyranny now.
You don't trust their media.
You don't trust the state.
Join us.
Join us now against them.
See you over there.
Okay, guys, we're just on Rumble now.
Thank you so much for staying with you.
Bill Hicks says the world is a dangerous place.
Yeah, quit arming the world, you fuckers.
Yeah, that's a great quote of Bill Hicks' right there.
I'm looking at Blessed Old Bird and Roadkill Dinner in the Awaken chat, as well as Beth in Wonderland.
Can we bring Phreak back?
Yeah, Phreak was good.
Do you guys miss bad graphics, Jack?
Do you miss that guy?
Anyone who wants to moderate this channel, go cry in your own beer.
Yeah, we cannot be moderated.
Venus Siren, ABBA, what a Monday this is.
Guys, we've been talking a lot about dictatorship.
If you're joining us for the first time, sign in, get onto the chat, download the Rumble app, become a member of this movement with us.
Listen, we've been talking about tyranny.
We've been talking about dictatorships.
And, of course, it's very easy to pinpoint demagoguery and great orators as the problem.
We're seeing the rise of populism across the world.
What is it... Johnny Death, you lured me here again, Russell.
Johnny Death, welcome.
Welcome.
I'm so glad that you're here.
What's up, Brand?
Ender38340.
Yeah, I'm good.
I'm good.
Miss Gareth.
He's just there.
He's just there.
Gareth has to be held in your heart like the Holy Ghost.
You know, you can't always see the flesh of Gareth, but Gareth's there.
DirtyDiana78, she says hi, Gareth, as well.
Now listen, we're talking now about different forms of tyranny.
Remember, we've asked you earlier, do you think it's going to be a type of Orwellian dictatorship that we descend into, or a kind of a Huxleyan dictatorship?
What's interesting about this question, if you ask me, is we're continually told, we've just seen clips Right now saying like Donald Trump's a totalitarian, people comparing him to Hitler, Putin and in fact there's I've seen a montage of him being compared to like Mao and all sorts of dictators.
Well we got a brilliant piece of journalism here from Martin Goury who's wrote the book Revolt of the Public which you should read if you haven't read it yet.
an excellent and informative book that tells us that the world is changing so fast the
elite establishment can't keep up and that is why they need to censor and control.
We've been continually told by the legacy media that a Trump 2024 win will mean that
we will descend into an authoritarian state.
But I tell you this, I believe we're already living in an authoritarian state.
We're already living in a globalist establishment, elitist dystopia.
Look at the even the impending WHO treaty that will take yet more democratic purchase
away from you and your nation.
So, what does tyranny and dictatorship look like in 2023?
Does it look like this?
Or does it look like, oh, I can't really do a Joe Biden impression.
No one can, can they?
It's just, what do you do?
You just shiver and shake.
Anyway, here's the news.
No, here's the effing news.
See you after.
Hit us up in the comments.
Stay with us.
We've got some great content for you coming up.
Here's the news.
Here's the news.
Here's the fucking news.
The legacy media propaganda machine is going into overdrive to convince us that Donald
Trump is the next Hitler and if he wins in 24 we will slide into authoritarianism.
But is that actually true?
And if it isn't, what will they accuse him of next?
Look at Vivek Ramaswamy's performance at the Republican Party primaries.
Someone that says January 6th was a conspiracy, maybe even 9-11 was a conspiracy.
Conversation that even two to five years ago existed on the margins of the internet would be conversations that you'd have to go to Alex Jones for.
I believe that independent media has meant that conversations, talking points from the periphery have entered into the centre and the establishment cannot Deal with it.
Donald Trump epitomises this trend more than anybody.
I know some of you absolutely love Donald Trump and think he's the solution to America's problems.
There will of course be people that think that Trump is a populist and a demagogue.
So what is it really that Donald Trump is doing to the establishment and who better to turn to than the writer of the book The Revolt of the Public, Martin Goury, who ahead of everyone said the arguments of left and right are collapsing, The communications miracle means that politics is going to change forever.
The old elites are dying and new elites haven't been born yet to take their places.
This is a time of chaos.
Martin Gurry was ahead of the curve.
Believe me, he wrote this book way, way before other people were talking about this stuff.
And he's written a new article about Donald Trump and the hysteria in the neoliberal establishment.
We want to look at the rise of populism across the world.
We want to look at the rise of independent media.
We are looking at a world where the establishment can no longer maintain control over the minds of the public.
The more Donald Trump is indicted, the more popular he gets.
People hate the establishment.
So much that we are going to see resurgent populist movements and figures across the world.
It's been happening probably since 2008, but it's reaching a critical tipping point now.
And extraordinarily, Donald Trump is still at the forefront of it.
Firstly, let's have a look at the legacy media hysterically claiming that Trump is like Hitler, Trump is like Putin, Trump is like Mussolini, Trump is like Mao.
He will exile people.
He will execute people.
And is there a real argument for that?
And if there isn't a real argument, why are they doing it?
Overnight during a tape town hall in Iowa, former President Trump mocking questions about turning the presidency into a dictatorship.
He says, you're not going to be a dictator, are you?
I said, no, no, no, other than day one.
We're closing the border, and we're drilling, drilling, drilling.
After that, I'm not a dictator.
That, in a sense, tells you what the entire problem is.
Donald Trump is joking, he's mucking around, he's personable.
will do if he's re-elected and tonight he said he will be a dictator on day one.
That in a sense tells you what the entire problem is.
Donald Trump is joking, he's mucking around, he's personable. The Biden-Harris
administration are pious and And they're at a loss.
And perhaps more significant than their piety and their inability to communicate effectively with the public that they have left behind and they have abandoned is the fact that it is their policy.
It's their lack of regard for ordinary Americans.
It's the fact that for a long time now many of us have suspected that the political class don't work for ordinary Americans.
He said, I know the system is rigged, because I use it.
but for the corporate interests who essentially make large donations,
who they own stocks and shares in, who lobby them in Congress.
People have worked out what the game is now and rhetoric like that doesn't work.
Someone like Donald Trump has been, and I'm pretty late to this party,
refreshing because as Dave Chappelle first pointed out, He said, I know the system is rigged because I use it.
I said, God damn!
And then he said, if you want me to pay my taxes, then change the tax code.
But I know you won't, because your friends and your donors enjoy the same tax breaks that I do.
Bill Burr also hit the nail on the head when he says that liberal hysteria is continuing to fuel the Trump phenomena.
Liberals are so f***ing stupid, the way that they handle Trump, you know?
What do you mean?
You should shut up!
You think he'd go away if we stopped?
You know what I think he was?
I think he was a one-hit wonder.
Uh-huh.
Right?
He wrote the twist.
Uh-huh.
And then that was it.
He was on the casino circuit, and then you idiot liberals wrote him twist again when you indicted him.
Yeah.
And now he's a martyr.
And now he's got the peppermint twist.
He's coming back, Jimmy!
He's back, yeah.
He's coming back!
It's going to be great for In addition to the fact, and I would say this is an important addition, that they are unwilling to alter their policies that ultimately allow them to service elite interests rather than democratically serve ordinary Americans.
We all know now that the Democrat Party works for the military-industrial complex, works for Big Pharma, in cahoots with legacy media, that the deep state is penetrating social media, that they are unable to go, do you know what?
You'll be better off if you voted for our party because we will ensure investment in American infrastructure less foreign wars, will curtail corruption in Congress,
will ban policies of donation and lobbying.
Because they will never do that, as you can see within the Democrat Party establishment, Bernie Sanders, no thank you.
What we're witnessing now is the end, I believe, of a certain type of democracy.
We are moving towards authoritarianism, but not the kind of populist demagoguery that they believe Trump represents,
but a kind of autocratic, technocratic, digital, technological dictatorship
where the establishment claims that it's protecting you and the vulnerable, but ultimately it is restricting freedom.
And I could point to You've said we're sort of sleepwalking into dictatorship in the United States.
Dictatorship.
9-11 but haven't been rescinded and many many new censorship laws not only in the
United States but across the world that point to this as well as the ongoing
empowerment of globalist and corporate interests that are inaccessible to
ordinary democratic process. That's the real problem I believe.
You've said we are sort of sleepwalking into dictatorship in the United States.
Dictatorship. Is that what we would have if we re-elect Donald Trump?
I think it's it's a very very real threat and concern.
And I don't say any of that lightly.
You do say it quite lightly, because you can't really trust Liz Cheney unless she were willing to address the institutional and systemic abuses of power that currently exist, or just spent five minutes talking about how her father generated the conditions for the Iraq war and exploited it personally, financially.
How can you trust Liz Cheney until she's offered a complete mea culpa for the Cheney family on that subject?
Dictatorship in the United States.
That is a strong warning.
To many, that word, that concept, that idea evokes something that is viewed as external to the US.
Look though, look at these dictators.
Mussolini, Mao.
And I actually think that this is a legitimate point.
We do think of dictatorships as belonging to the last century.
We do think of them as being militarized.
I think we're unable to conceive of what a global bureaucratic technological dictatorship might look like.
Although we shouldn't struggle because we've just been through a piloting programme, I believe, in the last three years where the legitimisation of authoritative measures was experimentally trialled.
I don't mean that in a conspiracy theory way.
Even if you just say the best thing to do in the event of a pandemic is to lock everyone in their homes.
The best thing to do in the event of a pandemic is to get everyone to carry digital passports.
The best thing to do in the event of a pandemic is to shut down all oppositional discourse
and close down all dissenting voices.
What that shows you is what dictatorship will look like now.
It's not going to be like jackboots and badges and medallions and flags.
It's just going to be a gentle squeezing of your rights.
15 minutes it is, no traveling.
Donald Trump, I don't think has a vision for old school Mussolini and Mao style dictatorship.
But I think the neoliberal establishment is very keen to look for opportunities to assert
control and regulate whether it's the result of climate change or pandemics or protecting
people or censoring free speech.
That is what dictatorship is.
Let me know in the chat what you think is the biggest threat to democracy right now, Trump, or this kind of neoliberalist, centralist authoritarianism that we've all seen in the last few years.
Of leaders somewhere else, or in some other time, some other era.
That habit of thinking is wrong.
It's why there are entire books about how it can, quote, happen here.
One thing about Mussolini is you can't take your eyes off him.
He's such a compelling figure.
If he'd told me to vote for him, I would.
Now, hmm.
To push Americans to understand the threat and the way both democracies and dictatorships operate.
It's why historians are now comparing It's weird that they're just rotating those... Mussolini mouth, Mussolini mouth, Mussolini mouth, it's Trump now.
It's why historians are now comparing what Donald Trump is saying in public on the campaign trail to dictators like Mussolini when he dehumanizes our fellow citizens in this country as, quote, vermin.
But hysterical rhetoric is a two-way street, and hysterical rhetoric is literally taking place in this very news segment.
He's a bit like Mussolini.
He's a bit like Mao.
He used the word vermin.
Look at the words they used.
Deprogramming, basket of deplorables, MAGA, extremist.
January 6th was an insurrection when we now know that it was infiltrated by all sorts of deep state agencies and that there were certainly provocative events indeed.
Vivek Ramaswamy is now using independent media rhetoric able to say that on a wide stage, on a big platform.
And that kind of rhetoric is appealing because it's True.
Not for any other reason, because now the mainstream discourse can't be managed in the way that it used to be.
You can't say, the Ukraine war is good, shut up, just get on with it.
You now have to face a barrage of questions, which means that the process of controlling a population is impeded.
You can't just say, we want more and more tax dollars for that war, there's going to be boots on the ground.
There are too many opportunities for oppositionism.
And Cheney, who staked her career on this, is saying this threat is now here.
She is carefully and precisely warning how she views Donald Trump as a would-be dictator.
You never ever hear them say, although we should have been a bit more gentle when we said that people that like Trump are MAGA extremists, we probably overdid it when people didn't want to get vaccinated and we shamed them and said they shouldn't get hospital treatment.
The media, legacy media in particular, are prone to hysterical discourse on both sides.
They are hysterical about Trump and then condemning him for grandiose rhetoric.
So unless they're able to acknowledge that they are participating in that polemicism, you can't take them seriously and you certainly can't trust them.
Like Mussolini or Mao.
That if he does win next year, based on everything she's learned, and remember the high level of the Republican Party that she reached, she is now certain, based on the evidence, he would try to then stay in power forever.
Forever!
One of the problems with the idea of saying he's got to stay in power forever is forever is quite a long time and Donald Trump is relatively elderly.
It's like, at worst, got to be about 10 years.
Do you believe if Donald Trump were elected next year that he would try to stay in office beyond a second term?
That he would never leave office?
There's no question.
Never leave office.
They're actually defying the laws of physics.
So they're comparing him to Mussolini and Mao and Putin and Hitler and sort of Jesus.
Like he's not gonna die.
He lives forever.
He will continue to abide like literal Mephistopheles.
But that is hysterical when you're actually building miracles into your propaganda campaign.
He could have an army of 5,000 MAGA extremists.
He could feed them every day just using two fish and loaves, I believe.
You're making him sound too much like Jesus.
I know, that's the nickname we give him.
You realize Jesus is pretty popular.
Goddammit, we've done it again!
Why don't we bomb Iraq and give all of the energy deals to Hallie Burton?
That's my girl!
I firmly believe, knowing Donald Trump, that if you said to Donald Trump, Mr. Trump, in order to become Putin, in order to stay in office forever, in order to loot this country, you have to do X. He is capable of doing wherever your mind can take you for X. A thousand percent.
I mean, that's extreme!
Wherever your mind can take you, the limits of your imagination, wherever you can imagine, Trump is capable of doing that.
And the response?
A thousand percent.
You can't get a thousand percent.
We all know that.
Absolutely.
Michael Cohen said it.
You know, he is an autocrat in his mind.
He wants to be president.
I want to start using the word fascist.
Yeah, he's a fascist.
What kind of pre-show conversation do you think they have before they do this?
Is it like, let's just say the maddest, wildest things we can about Donald Trump.
Whatever you can imagine, he'll do that.
A thousand percent.
He's a fascist.
Yeah, he's a fascist.
Worse than Hitler.
Well, in a way, yeah.
I mean, like, there's nothing that I don't know if he's as bad as that.
And of course, you have to recognise that people are pretty disenchanted with
contemporary politics anyway because of the many pledges Biden made on the campaign trial and then didn't fulfill
and of course Barack Obama we all felt very optimistic about him and then he sort of yielded to the banks after a
financial crash. I think people feel generally now like maybe this is a time where America doesn't have to have
that international role getting engaged in wars and all that kind of stuff. Perhaps this is a time where we have to
Or we could say that Trump's like an evil Jesus.
Hitler-Jesus?
Yeah!
Hitler-Jesus!
as a species and make some real changes and not changes that always seem to be beneficial
to the elites and punitive to ordinary people but maybe the other way around. Maybe we have
to have a radical look at America and giving people as much power as possible, decentralized
power, you know, use the federalism that America was built upon to empower individual states.
Yeah we could do that or we could say that Trump's like an evil Jesus. Hitler Jesus?
Yeah, Hitler Jesus, that's right.
The tendencies, many, many tendencies like Adolf Hitler. I said it, throw me off the air.
Okay so whether you like Trump or you don't like Trump, the fact is he has a
form of communication that many people like and I can understand why.
He's amusing, he has already been president and he did leave office, he's complained about it, but the Democrats complained about it when they left office as well.
Russia gay, P-gay, all of that stuff.
So what's Trump doing that's so bad?
And why are the neoliberal establishment media condemning Trump with such fierce rhetoric and not acknowledging their own failings?
This is an article by Martin Goury, who probably more than any author I think about when I'm trying to understand the dynamics of contemporary politics and how it relates to technology and communications as opposed to ideology and how those things are in a sense inextricably linked.
Let's get into it.
A giant landfill of words has been dumped out on the subject of Donald Trump.
I hate to add to the pile, but I feel I must.
Unlike most participants in this industrial disaster though, I have no wish to either praise Trump or to bury him.
What I want is clarity.
Is it me, or does the future feel more insecure and uncertain?
Wars, pandemics, lies, trickery, my cats keep having kittens.
The last one's personal.
For those who are in the United States, there is a way to secure your hard-earned nest egg.
American Hartford Gold make it easy to protect your savings and retirement accounts with physical gold and silver.
With one phone call, they can have physical gold and silver delivered right to your door or inside a qualifying retirement account like your IRA or 401k.
American Hartford Gold is the highest-rated firm in the U.S.
with an A-plus rating from the BBB and thousands of satisfied clients.
Right now, they will give you up to $5,000 of free silver on your first qualifying order.
This offer is only for US customers.
Call 866-505-8315.
That's 866-505-8315.
866 505 8315.
That's 866 505 8315.
Or simply text brand to 99 88 99.
Get up to $5,000 of silver and protect your future in this crazy, crazy world with some solid, precious metals
literally made in stars.
The word most often associated with Trump is authoritarian.
From the New York Times, Atlantic, and Economist to the Guardian, Bantifair, and Politico, We are told with ritual repetition that Trump is the second coming of Hitler or Mussolini, an aspiring dictator eager to herd his opponents into the great American gulag.
That, I feel, is in order to not address domestic issues within their own organisations, within our own institutions and systems, they are just amplifying the external threat, in this case Donald Trump, rather than having a reckoning about the state of democracy, the economic crisis, the energy crisis, the increasing demand for censorship, Naturally, people panic.
things are legitimised and certainly of secondary importance to the emergency of some sort of,
well, anti-Christ. He's being portrayed as a kind of anti-Christ, which is an oddly religious
idea for a materialist and secular culture.
Naturally people panic. I want to calm them down.
He's writing this like an adult.
Look, calm down.
You're being actually a bit stupid.
He's not Hitler.
He's not going to live forever.
He's old.
Martin Gurry's operating on a higher level than the rest of us.
Using as few words as possible, I'm going to show that the combination of Trump and authoritarianism is an impossibility.
So you'll be able to just shut up about that.
What's an authoritarian anyway?
The word is squishy.
It can mean someone who likes to have his own way or someone who compels you to do things his way.
Since we're dealing with extreme emotions, I'm going with a hardline definition.
An authoritarian, let's say, is an actual or would-be dictator.
Right.
Thanks, Martin.
If you expect to become an authoritarian, you have to wield absolute control over a key institution of government, such as the military, like Franco, Perón, or Pinochet, or a mass movement with a paramilitary wing, like Lenin, Mussolini, and Mao.
Right.
That's a fact, isn't it?
If you haven't got a paramilitary wing or an army, you can't achieve the kind of coercion that is necessary.
I would say the kind of dictatorship we live in is no longer using that modality, but is instead about cultural and social and psychological conditioning that's so immersive that people don't feel free.
That we're so atomised and despairing and trapped in consumerism that we're controlled in a completely novel way.
That the idea that someone with a paramilitary force is going to, like, kick off.
I don't sort of feel that that's going to happen.
I'm really glad that Martin Goodwin He's starting to relax me on that front.
Neither condition applies to Trump.
Every federal institution is set ferociously against him.
What would happen if Trump ordered the FBI or the 101st Airborne Division
to start shooting Democrats?
Homeric laughter would happen.
And if Trump is training a militia somewhere off the 18th hole at Mar-a-Lago,
not even the Times has heard about it.
That's what you'd have to be doing when you see him go off in his golf bug in that,
listening to James.
He's a man's world!
OK, guys, we're going to need some explosive devices.
He's not doing that, is he?
He's not doing that.
The conservative establishment has on occasion co-opted an authoritarian as a bulwark against the left.
This was Hitler's bridge to power.
But the Republican and Conservative elites here ran shrieking for the door the moment Trump won the nomination in 2016.
They coined the term, Never Trumper.
When it comes to the presidency, they prefer the entire population of the United States ahead of the evil orange man.
What kind of person becomes an authoritarian?
Well, it may look like fun, but authoritarianism is really hard work.
It's exhausting.
Imagine like Mao and Stalin and Hitler, though they do say Hitler needs to get up late, don't they?
It must be absolutely knackering to be an authoritarian.
Trump's not on that tip at all, is he?
You need to be in the prime of life in your 30s or 40s.
Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, Mao, Castro.
Very rarely an exceptional person, such as Caesar, is granted literal dictatorship.
The Romans invented the whole idea in his early fifties.
In a clear case of ageism, however, no septuagenarian has ever been offered the job.
The authoritarian personality favours clever manipulations and conspiracies.
Best in class was Stalin, who held the purely administrative job of first party secretary, but seized total power by seeding loyalists everywhere.
Trump, who is a builder of buildings, a task with a beginning and an end, can scarcely think ahead from breakfast to lunch.
Hmm, what do I have for lunch, mate?
Just get into these eggs.
This is a life playing out of the short attention span theatre.
I think what Martin Gurry is offering us is an alternative lens to view Trump as a character and the reasons why Trump might be popular, which I would offer is Trump's popular because the alternative is so dismal and he doesn't actually Seem like a dictator.
It just seems like if you're not going to alter the conditions that led to Trump, because those are the conditions of our institutionalized and corrupt democracies, you have to escalate using hysteria and rhetoric, the language that condemns Trump.
And that's clearly what's happening, isn't it?
Let me know in the chat.
Still, I know what some political depressives will be thinking, and they're wrong.
January 6th was not an insurgency aiming to install Trump as Chief Authoritarian.
In an insurgency, people with guns shoot at each other and lots of them die.
In the firefight to convert Augusto Pinochet into El Supremo, 3,000 Chileans died.
That's an insurgency.
On January 6th, only one person died, a young woman who was shot by a capital policeman while trying to break through a door into the House chamber.
She was unarmed, As was the rest of the trespassing mob.
There's no such thing as an unarmed insurgency.
Wow.
So in all of the distance between what happened that day and how it's been reported, I think is the real problem.
The real problem is not that there was an insurrection on January the 6th or that Trump is like Hitler.
The real problem is That protests have to be amplified in order to shut down dissent and political opponents who are idiosyncratic and unusual have to be amplified into total malfeasance in order to preserve institutional corruption, deep institutional corruption, that precedes Biden but will carry on with Biden, that preceded Obama but continued with Obama, that was present and prevalent in the W. Bush era and has probably been going on for quite a while.
Maybe it started with Reagan.
Perhaps it's always been present.
Some of the financial changes that took place under Clinton, people say, are hugely significant in losing the ability to regulate the financial industry.
Maybe it was the New Deal was the last time there was good faith governance of America.
I don't know enough about your country's politics to say.
But what seems clear is that at some point there was a sort of a slide towards centralised authoritarianism and technocracy within American government.
It became corrupt and totally co-opted by financial interests.
And they're not willing to change that, because why would they?
And so in order to just preserve it, they'll say anything to keep it together.
At this point even, the problem's gone beyond Trump, because now you have populists like Bobby Kennedy and Vivek Ramaswamy, and they can't be kept down forever.
Like now, what, Bobby Kennedy?
Ah, vaccines!
All right, Vivek Ramaswamy, also a Nazi.
What else can I say to reassure the fretful?
I like Martin Gurry's tone, it's like a game he's doing, like, you idiots, you know this isn't a dictatorship, shut up.
Talking to them like they're children.
Shall we talk about the Trump rhetoric?
To borrow a phrase from Hillary Clinton, Trump should be sent to a re-education camp run by Miss Manners, no question about it.
But we're talking about authoritarianism here.
Now, both as a kid in Cuba and in my professional life, I had the pleasure of sitting through entire Fidel Castro speeches.
I mean, I served freedom by deciphering every cough and mumble that bearded authoritarian could utter in a four-hour tirade.
And say what you will about Trump's rhetoric, you can be sure of this.
He's no Fidel Castro.
Martin Goury is what you might call an old-school advocate for liberal democracy.
He is not a communist and he is not a populist.
I think he's a moderate, and that's...
Such a valuable contribution to our conversation.
You won't hurt Trump by calling him an authoritarian.
He's like one of those bull elephant seals covered with hide, inches thick and full of scars.
Authoritarianism won't even reach his sensory apparatus.
It's just like something getting murmured outside of a space helmet.
But tens of millions of Americans voted for the man.
If you insist that Trump is an authoritarian, if you continue to maintain that he's the greatest threat ever to our democracy, then you're portraying these voters as goose-stepping bigots, and you know full well that they're not.
They're your family, friends, and neighbours.
People in those categories may not be as reliably helpful as, say, a good dog, but only rarely are they involved in overthrowing constitutional norms.
What he's pointing out is the hysterical language became so deracinated, uprooted and untethered from reality that we were invited to accept that 71 million people had gone crazy.
And I think all sides of these current political conversations have to acknowledge that it's no longer a left versus right argument that we're having.
a deep suspicion of the way that our institutions are operating, with one side saying if it was to
fall in the hands of Trump he'll ruin it forever, the other side saying but things are already
ruinous for us, we feel the contempt of elites in our everyday lives, we are unsatisfied. The only
solution it seems to me is already...
And I think that that's what's being resisted here.
political life, decentralize power, as little state interventionism as possible,
have states run in accordance with the democratic will of the people within
that state or boroughs within that state, make democracy as close to the people
affected by it as possible. That is the solution and I think that that's what's
being resisted here and I actually think that what Trump is doing, Trump is a
wrecking ball for the old order and they don't want to change because they're corrupt.
So relax.
Trump is too old, too isolated, and too ADD to have a shot at dictatorship.
And if he tried, the result would be comedy rather than tyranny.
You still want to join the ranks of the anti-Trump resistance?
Hey, that's wonderful.
You want to do battle against authoritarianism?
I'm there with you.
Just don't mix up the two.
I promise it will make you clearer of mind and healthier of body.
And it will free us to begin to call our politicians by those vile names that actually fit.
So I think what Martin Goury has offered us there is an assessment that is reasonable.
He's clearly a discerning person and elsewhere has written that what the real problem is is that our models of governance, our models of media, our models of political funding, our models of censorship are now inept and inadequate for the way that technology has changed the world, specifically the internet and the ability for us all to instantaneously communicate.
I think independent media is a great thing.
I think it's changed the political landscape.
There's no question that a certain type of populism has re-emerged, but we're not at the end of the road.
New things might emerge, and I hope what those new things might be are decentralised social movements closer to the type of tribalism, and I don't mean tribalism as in oppositionalism, I mean local government, localisation, that we evolved with for many, many thousands, hundreds of thousands, maybe even longer, of years.
And now people are trying to corral us together in groups of 300 million or 1.5 billion or 60 million and expecting us to have the same culture, the same ideas and censuring us according to their own whims that seem to be more about preserving their own power rather than, as they continually claim, protecting the vulnerable.
And of course populist nationalist figures are cropping up all over the world because deep down inside us we don't trust the government anymore.
We're right not to.
We don't trust the legacy media anymore.
We're right not to.
And no one's giving us any reasonable alternative.
So we'll take whatever alternative we can, particularly if they're funny and good at communicating in public.
But that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the chat.
See you in a second.
As we grow and rise together, as we awaken from the slumber they induced with their Soma, we feel a new power surging through us.
Remember, if you're watching us in the Rumble chat right now, and it's the only place you can watch us, give us a like and download the app.
Become part of this movement.
Someone goes, man, this chat is wild.
And indeed it is wild.
Magichode, Baby, you ain't no LeFarious Monster.
I'll tell you that.
LeFarious Monster, he mixes his weird trolling with interesting Christian guilt.
It's good stuff.
Mix it up, is what I will say to you.
Elsewhere in the chat, Zamblion, the Democrats are way more of a dictator than Trump will ever be.
That's your view, baby.
Utopia80081, the only way he could become a dictator is if they changed the laws to make it so.
Yes, he would have to command a military, wouldn't he?
Like all other dictators.
Uh, excuse me.
Justin Valentin.
Liberals, my ass.
These media clowns work for the ultra-wealthy, ultra-criminal oligarchs.
That's from Justin Valentin.
Swater36.
Russell, military-industrial complex is much too clinical.
Call them what they are.
War pigs, you're welcome.
And thank Black Sabbath as well.
Aramena, the vermin, are actually many in Congress and the MSN.
Here's the news.
Chip Henson, the powerful have always ruined it for the rest of us.
Poor people didn't own slaves.
Poor people didn't start the Great Depression.
1970s oil crisis.
1980s savings and loan crisis.
2008 mortgage crisis.
Chip Henson, you have nailed it until we have the discipline and the Fortitude to awaken together to overcome our cultural differences.
They will continue to corral us into paddocks of meaningless opposition.
We are well over 22,000 baby.
DSCZ Holden says dogs of war.
There's so many beautiful things coming by in the chat.
Cross Bees Gardens Patriots says simply Patriot.
Russell, don't give the trolls any attention.
You're quite right.
You're quite right.
I shouldn't do that.
I should be talking to Ooga Booga and Mang198T, too.
And Ernie Burley and Drinking Vanilla.
All of you making great contributions.
What kind of dog is it, says Saptarmi?
This is a German Shepherd.
I met one of them, what are they called?
Belgian Malinois the other day.
Great dog.
Very well behaved.
Beautiful dog.
I saw it.
I said, what a beautiful dog.
That's how Shane Gillis says you have to do impressions of Trump.
Okay, now, one of these other liberal dictators is our friend over in New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern.
Just lately, she's been saying it's necessary to curtail free speech.
Why?
For freedom.
Now, you will remember, because you're bright and you've held on to it, because you're awakening right now, that during the pandemic period, she made all sorts of balmy little claims, hey?
Like there would be a two-tiered society.
The society of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.
Now, she was saying that in a good way, that if you were not vaccinated, if you resisted getting the shot, then you would be denied certain social facilities.
How extraordinary!
She's talking about a single source of truth.
So hey, I wanted to see the pandemic stuff first.
So the first thing is called single source of truth.
So I want to see first two classes.
Which order is it guys?
I want to see the two classes and that other thing she said during the pandemic era.
Two classes, two.
Yeah, look at this.
And then was there another one from the pandemic era?
So we've got three.
But the final one should be the free speech stuff.
So here's her talking about two classes.
Check this out.
So bearing in mind, this is someone who wants absolute control over free speech, or at least to find a way to manage free speech.
And this is what her views were during the pandemic period.
And you lot following those New Zealand data capture things from our man that we had on the show, you know what was he called again?
Steve Kirsch came on with the Barry Young data releases.
That stuff was pretty heavy, you know.
If he's right, well... Anyway, let's have a look at Jacinda Ardern talking about two classes.
The class war is the war.
So, you basically said this is going to be like, almost like, you probably don't see it like this, the two different classes of people.
If you're vaccinated or if you're unvaccinated, you have all these rights.
If you are vaccinated... That is what it is.
So, yep.
Yep.
There she goes.
Now, at that time, Jacinda Ardern was the Prime Minister of New Zealand.
Now, is there another one from the pandemic period?
And that is this one.
Right, so this is where she says we're the single source of truth.
Now, if they were the single source of truth, we still wouldn't know about vaccine injury.
We still wouldn't know that the Pfizer vaccine, for example, went from being described as 95% to 98% effective to less than 1% effective.
Less than 1%.
It's the 1%.
Let's have a look at this single source of news announcement from Jacinda Ardern.
We have the most up-to-date information daily. You can trust us as a source of that information.
You can also trust the Director General of Health and the Ministry of Health. For that information,
do feel free to visit at any time to clarify any rumour you may hear. covid19.govt.nz
Right, so check it out.
So she's already said there should be a two-tiered society, the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.
We've heard her say that there should be a single source of truth, you know, early on in this.
Now, Jacinda Ardern was at the UN just recently Saying that we've got to find a way to curtail the free speech of people that we disagree with.
Listen to this.
It's gonna knock you bandy, baby.
This week we launched an initiative alongside companies and non-profits to help improve research and understanding of how a person's online experiences are curated by automated processes.
This will also be important in understanding more about myths and disinformation online, a challenge that we must, as leaders, address.
As leaders, we're rightly concerned that even the most light-touch approaches to disinformation... See what's happening now?
She's moving towards legitimising censorship.
This is the discourse around increasing censorship.
I see some of you got your Sticker Mule stickers.
This information could be misinterpreted as being hostile to the values of free speech that we value so highly.
We do value free speech.
You know that Rumble's been under attack today?
That's what they're saying.
They're saying that people have been disrupting Rumble.
Yep, cyber attacks to bring Rumble down.
Extraordinary.
But while I cannot tell you today what the answer is to this challenge, I can say with complete certainty that we cannot ignore it.
To do so poses an equal threat to the norms we all value.
After all, how do you successfully end a war if people are led to believe the reason for its existence is not only legal but noble?
How do you tackle climate change if people do not believe it exists?
How do you ensure the human rights of others are upheld when they are subjected to hateful and dangerous rhetoric and ideology?
Is it censorship?
Is it censorship that you're in charge of?
Because I'm sensing these are rhetorical questions and the argument and the answer has already been reached.
It's by censoring people we disagree with.
Is that right?
Let me know in the chat.
Do you see this?
Can you see the tricks?
Do you see the way the game work?
By the way, who's disrupting all the peace deals?
There was a peace deal on the table.
You know that, right?
You know that Boris Johnson, the then Prime Minister, I think he was still Prime Minister then, went to Ukraine to stop Zelensky doing a peace deal with dear old Putin.
God love him.
Extraordinary.
Extraordinary.
The reversal of truth.
The reversal of the polarity.
To perpetuate them is often the same.
To cause chaos and reduce the ability of others to defend themselves.
But we have an opportunity here to ensure that these particular weapons of war do not become an established part of warfare.
They've just said free speech is a weapon of war.
A way to do it is don't look at like it as free speech instead.
Look at it as a weapon of war.
You might think you're saying, hey I want to vote for this person or I disagree with that or I differ in some way.
That was a weapon of war what you've just done.
Whereas actual weapons of war...
They're being sold to autocracies all around the world, while actual weapons of war are being paid for by your tax dollars.
You don't get to vote on that.
Luckily, well, I mean, luckily or not, the Senate have just backed that $108 billion deal that was going to be financing wars across the world.
But speech, isn't that extraordinary?
We can't talk about peace.
We can't talk about peace deals.
We can't talk about ceasefires.
And it'll be us requesting that stuff that will be described as weapons of war.
Weapons.
Yeah, weapons.
Weapons.
Weapons.
Weapons of war.
Many battles on many fronts but there is cause for optimism because for every new weapon we face there is a new tool to overcome it.
Weapons is things I don't like.
Tools is things I do like.
Oh, that was a weapon when you were speaking freely.
When we censored you, that was a tool.
Amazing!
You saw just what went on in Ireland, the way that they were live censoring dissent and calling it hate speech.
You know, there is a way.
There is a way through this.
You maximise democracy.
You stay away from free speech.
You allow people to disagree with you.
And you recognise that free speech is going to include speech that you don't like.
You know, you think I don't see things on a daily basis that I disagree with?
You think I don't have to tolerate people saying stuff about me that's not true?
Free speech.
That's what it is.
It's a weapon.
It's a weapon of war.
Our attempt to push the world into chaos is a collective conviction to bring us back to order.
We have the means.
We just need the collective will.
I don't mean the collective will of people established through democracy.
I mean the collective will of bureaucracies that are completely undemocratic and funded by an elite class and funded by NGOs and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Clinton Foundation and then finally we can have our democracy.
This is what dictatorship looks like now.
This is true tyranny.
Digital dictatorships legitimized through compassion and care and we're just going to protect you and we've got to help the vulnerable.
But who?
All of us are the vulnerable at some point.
We're all going to die.
We're only temporarily here.
This is why it is beholden upon us to transcend our individual differences and to fill our environments with love.
This is the only power that will defeat them.
Only then can we become decentralized and unified against their tyranny.
And they'll still accuse us of hatred.
It don't matter if you're using the language of Christianity.
It don't matter if you're using the language of Islam or Judaism or secular humanitarianism.
They don't care.
They just want you divided.
They want you hating one another.
They want you hating your neighbor and your brother.
And as long as you're in that state, you're lifed off.
You've already been placed in a cell.
You can only awaken through love.
And I feel it happening.
I feel the awakening is happening now.
Let's not miss our chance to awaken together.
Because I feel that this form of neoliberalism is the tyranny that we have to fear most.
I don't fear a second Donald Trump term.
I don't think it's going to be the solution to the problems of ordinary Americans.
I'll tell you that right now.
But I do fear this.
This authoritarian technological dictatorship.
Unless we can awaken the God within us.
Unless we can use the holy scriptures and holy books to bring about the great awakening that we so require.
We are in trouble indeed.
Remember, if you're watching us now in the Rumble chat, one of the 22,000 awakened, then why not support us?
Press the red button if you can afford to support us financially, please do.
But we need your attention and your awakening power much, much more than we need your resources.
We need your free speech.
We need your ability to change, transcend and awaken more than we need anything.
Become an awakened wonder if it's within your means, but if not, we're all cool.
So listen guys, that's the end of today's show.
Click the red button and become an awakened wonder to get early access to interviews, to join us in conversations about...
Community.
How are we going to change this?
Are we going to start establishing communities around the world?
What are we going to do?
You tell us what you want.
Is it simply a mug with a crow on it?
Will that do?
Young Vril, you're an awakened wonder now.
Chubsicle, Nanny15, What's It To Ya, Roadkite, they've all joined us.
They're all on board the mothership now.
The movement grows, our power grows, and they quake as they crumble around us.
We've got some great shows coming.
Norman Finkelstein is on the show.
We're talking about Global conflict, and we're talking about global solutions.
Please, Lord, may they awaken within you, may they awaken within me.
See you tomorrow, not for more of the same, we'd never insult you with that, but for more of the different.
▲
Export Selection