Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 4, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:09:31

Texas Officials SUE PFIZER Over COVID-19 Vaccine LIES - Stay Free #259

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	So, I'm going to show you how to get to the top of the mountain.
	So, In this video, you're going to see the future.
	We've got a live shot there.
	Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
	Thanks for joining me for Stay Free with Russell Brand today.
	We are looking at a variety of stories that are going to tell you that your intuition is a lot more reliable than globalist elite mainstream media narratives that function essentially as propaganda Right now, PalG99.
	Hello, ManosInformation.
	Chaos, CaptainChaos02.
	Welcome.
	Welcome to all of you.
	GreenT369.
	And can you move that chat along there in the gallery, because that's it.
	Thank you so much.
	Hi, all of you.
	Freehassan, some of you are saying.
	Hey, buddy.
	It's good to see all of you.
	So, yeah, we'll be with you for 15 minutes, and then we'll be only available on Rumble.
	Let me scroll it forward, guys.
	I can't see the first thing we're going to.
	That's it.
	Thank you very much.
	Keep going, keep going, keep going to the content.
	Thank you so much.
	So, listen, you know what is taking place right now is the COP28 event.
	You know the COP28 event is sort of like Davos, i.e.
	an event where people get the opportunity to network and pretend to care about global issues without ever, crucially, making any personal or economic sacrifices.
	It's Davos in Dubai.
	CEOs typically travel there in their private jets to talk about global warming, which we know is, or at least carbon, is primarily the responsibility of the richest 1%.
	And I know yous lot want to have a conversation about global warming, and you won't be having it on YouTube, not for much longer.
	So listen, have a look at this.
	This is the reason that many CEOs couldn't travel to the COP28 event in order to discuss global warming.
	and it's a visual image that tells you a lot about hypocrisy and a good deal about irony.
	The private jets are frozen, which I suppose, I mean, you can, you know, they do try and call it
	climate change now don't they?
	I guess so that when their private jets are frozen on their way to a theatrical, phatic, hollow simulacrum that's not About changing anything, just an opportunity to ensure that things stay the same.
	Very much like the COVID inquiry, which in our country, the UK, which we'll be talking about later, when inadvertently they come near... Russell, you look great.
	Thanks, Belby.
	I appreciate that.
	When they inadvertently come near to a topic that actually could change the world.
	Like, oh my God, we've got this bit of BBC propaganda where Where Fauci talks to a BBC journalist as if you're going to get the truth from state-funded media.
	You know the BBC is funded by taxpayer money.
	Should that be continuing when they're clearly a propagandist tool of the system?
	I don't know.
	Any of you that are British, you might have a view on that.
	And you have Charles Fauci, just the questions that he's served up, the sort of softball, puff piece, fluffy questions, they could wrap him in meringue and dust him with sugar and it wouldn't be any more of a puff piece because here is some interesting information about the degree of vaccine censorship and misinformation and how the Biden administration pushed for a cover-up.
	You knew this anyway, right?
	I mean, like, are we able to show this on YouTube?
	If you're one of the awakened wonders watching this on YouTube right now, this is the kind of content that we go into in great depth when we're speaking a little more freely.
	But let's have a look at this story now.
	All right, back with the Fox Business exclusive.
	House Judiciary Republicans obtaining internal documents from YouTube's parent company.
	They show that Biden White House pushed to censor matters relating to vaccine misinformation.
	Hilary Vonn is live at the Capitol with the details.
	Hilary.
	Hi, Brian.
	Well, these documents that we've exclusively obtained are the latest example of how the Biden White House tried to browbeat Big Tech to get them to censor COVID vaccine content that they did not like.
	Documents we obtained show that the White House staff did not care if content was right or wrong.
	If it wasn't pro-vaccine, they wanted...
	Did not care if it was right or wrong.
	Does anything tell you the state we're in more completely and wholly than that statement?
	We've come a long way from truth.
	We've come a long way from clear communication.
	They don't care if the information is right or wrong.
	They just want to show But convenient information for their own agenda.
	The BBC's gone downhill since Monty Python was cancelled, says Baron Liberty.
	This story, of course, was first revealed by independent media.
	The independent media that they go to incredibly, incredible lengths to continue to censor.
	You maybe saw Schellenberger and Matt Taibbi, friends of our show, up before Congress talking about how this is precisely not a conspiracy theory.
	GR rocks, yep, BBC is funded by threats and malice.
	Yeah, I feel you, baby.
	I feel you right now.
	Yeah, that funding, it's an important conversation to look at the way these organizations are funded.
	Elon spoke, didn't he, about state-funded media a little while ago.
	Let's have a little look at this and then I think I'll probably want to go to Fauci
	before the Texas thing.
	It's taken down and Google's YouTube was eager to keep the peace with the White House as
	the president's team turned up the pressure on the platform.
	Documents show that Biden's director of digital strategy, Rob Flaherty, pushed YouTube to
	take more action.
	In an email exchange, Flaherty asked about a tweet that claimed YouTube's algorithm was pushing anti-vax content next to breaking bad clips, emailing Google's team this, You see the gentle menace?
	I'm curious.
	I saw this tweet.
	I think we had a pretty extensive talk about the degree to which you're recommending anti-vaccination content.
	What have we discovered in the meantime that there should be a conversation?
	MrRedFox asks, have you spoke to Elon?
	I'm embarrassed to tell you that I've text and I've not had a text back yet and I really hate being in that position, don't you?
	Particularly when it's sort of like one of the world's most sort of powerful people.
	You feel like, oh no, what am I going to do?
	The double text?
	Do I do the double text?
	If you want me to do the double text, put Y in the chat or N in the chat if you say no, Russell.
	Your dignity.
	Gareth is shaking his head.
	So those of you that value Gareth should know that by saying no, you're protecting my fragile dignity.
	So look, That's yet more evidence that tells you that the Biden White House and the deep state infiltrators on social media platforms censored true information about the pandemic period.
	Let's have a look.
	This is really interesting.
	Have a look at RB is more powerful.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	But that is a lone voice in a sea of lies.
	And there's some no's as well, Gal.
	Okay, let's have a look at Fauci.
	We will go back to this sort of Texas of suing Pfizer.
	Is that true?
	Could that possibly be true?
	Perhaps suing Pfizer because Pfizer didn't ever test for transmission because Pfizer said It's going to be 95% effective, the medication, I'm saying.
	And have a look at this.
	It's only a little extract, but this is what happens when the state media talks to a very rich, powerful government official about an important issue.
	Just think for a moment about the online funerals you watched.
	Think about the times you stayed in your home.
	Think about medications you may have taken.
	Think about the questions that could be asked, and then look at the questions that are asked, and then ask yourself, What is the function of the legacy media?
	What is the function of it?
	What does it do?
	How does it work?
	Who does it support?
	Who's in power?
	Is it button five guys for Fauci?
	Have you figured out how to puncture the balloon of misinformation?
	I don't know how to... What you could do is stop talking.
	The BBC could ask questions like, is it true that some funding for the Wuhan Institute of Virology came from the NIH?
	Is it true that dual-purpose research was taking place?
	Is it true that you had concerns about that laboratory up to six years, maybe even ten years prior there were safety concerns?
	This isn't getting anywhere near where some of you peripheral voices in the rumble chat are going.
	These are just ordinary journalist questions that a state-funded organisation should be asking.
	Notice where they put their attention.
	Notice where they put their effort.
	Amplifying the message of the powerful.
	Destroying dissenting voices.
	Should that be funded by an involuntary, mandatory tax?
	Or should that process be immediately curtailed?
	Let me know what you think about that in the chat.
	Is it the function, if you're going to have a state-funded media, to support the people?
	Or is it their function, of course, to amplify the agenda of the powerful?
	And here's Fauci, who spent his career making some very, very curious decisions Here he is, just gently, I would say, marinating in some very simple questions.
	How to bring conspiracy theorists or vaccine sceptics over to what you're thinking?
	Do you think you've gained any insight that would be useful for everybody on that?
	It's very, very difficult.
	I'm trying to figure out what the best way is, what kind of commonalities that you have when you have people who are of the bent that are absolutely convinced that the election was stolen.
	When you use that to make very, very poor decisions when it comes to your health, is really disturbing.
	So I don't know how to crack that nut.
	Extraordinary to make those connections.
	Now, I know that many of you have serious questions about electoral democracy in the
	United States of America, whose interest it serves, who funds those parties, whose agenda
	is being fulfilled.
	But by suggesting that there are no legitimate inquiries that could be made into the safety
	of the Wuhan laboratory, the efficacy of the mandated, in some cases, medications, adverse
	effects, excess deaths.
	Where are those questions?
	Where are those questions?
	Why are they never being asked?
	Let's have a look at Texas suing Pfizer, perhaps for legitimate reasons.
	Let me know if you know of any legitimate reasons for suing Pfizer, Moderna, any of those organizations.
	Let's check out what's happening in Texas.
	New at 4, Attorney General Ken Paxton suing drug maker Pfizer.
	Paxton posted about it to social media, accusing the company of misrepresenting the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine and conspiring to censor public discourse.
	Now, a press release from Paxton's office says Pfizer made unsupported claims in violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
	Paxton says the pharmaceutical company's representation that the vaccine was 95% effective was highly misleading.
	Paxton also wrote that Pfizer did not test if the vaccine protected against transmission, but it still touted the vaccine as a necessary measure to protect loved ones.
	Extraordinary!
	Just those two facts, touted as 99% effective, How effective was it against transmission?
	How effective was it in preventing the people that took it from getting coronavirus?
	How legitimate was the entire endeavour?
	What is going on with COVID-related vaccines being patented many, many years?
	There are so many inquiries and questions.
	I can't ask all of them.
	While I'm on YouTube, or whether you're watching this, and we love you AwakendWonders, but we can't remain here indefinitely, simply because we need to speak freely.
	11serious22dream33, can you interview Kanye West?
	I bet I could.
	I bet I could.
	How would I get... I used to have his number as well, but I'm not... That's another double text I don't want to be making.
	I'll text Kanye once and Once only, let me tell you.
	So, is there another one, Fauci number four?
	What's this?
	Fauci on Wuhan.
	Oh, you're going to like it.
	Oh, this is Fauci, you'll like this story.
	Six years, I just mentioned it in passing because we were looking at this earlier, Fauci was warned about the shoddy safety measures at the Wuhan Institute of Virology six years ago.
	Just imagine that one thing, like imagine that during when like on talk shows people were dressing up as vaccines and dancing and all of that and Fauci was being lauded as the voice of science, a title he's given himself.
	I am the science.
	I am science, isn't it?
	He said that thing.
	Now, this is a person who not only is purported that went to numerous agencies to ensure that the Wuhan lab leak theory was repressed.
	Remember how that was censored?
	That's some of the true information that the White House ensured was censored.
	Additionally, six years ago, Fauci was warned that that Wuhan Institute were trying to reverse engineer Ebola.
	What the hell are they doing over there at the Wuhan Institute of Virology?
	It's like the Monster Mash.
	Bill Hemmer, good morning at home.
	We're now learning a U.S.
	health official working for Dr. Fauci raised serious safety concerns six years ago in 2017 after taking a tour of the lab in Wuhan, China's first ever Level 4 biosafety lab for handling dangerous pathogens.
	The U.S.
	official was shocked and alarmed after learning the lab was considering plans to reverse engineer the deadly Ebola virus.
	But when she told superiors before writing her report, she was ordered to delete any reference to Ebola.
	Well, more on this.
	Rich Edson follows it up on what they knew and why they might want to hide that critical information.
	Rich, hello to you.
	Good morning.
	Good morning, Bill.
	This U.S.
	health worker toured the Wuhan Institute of Virology just as it was about to open its most secure lab.
	Chinese officials were admitting they needed more expertise to operate it.
	This is the same facility that some believe U.S.
	officials started COVID-19 with an accidental lab leak.
	The U.S.
	health official touring the lab.
	It was a graveyard smash.
	Someone there, is that Mr Red Fox saying you're having struggles with your Step 9?
	That's the sort of thing we talk about over on Locals if you want some help with your recovery.
	Step 9 is about making amends and indeed it is a very difficult process.
	Some people saying that Fauci's daughter worked at Twitter.
	I think that is true.
	I feel like that, is that true?
	Is it true or is it conspiracy?
	Let me know if you can verify that before we broadcast it because even though we're told continually what Rumble is about is hate speech, I believe that some of the most important voices on this platform are about having open conversations That our fundamental, our prize, our explicit goal is to bring people together.
	Wherever you stand on some of the most important geopolitical and global issues that define our time, you are welcome here.
	We are going to find new alliances.
	We're going to need to find new alliances if we're ever, ever, ever Going to, uh, change the world.
	Otherwise, we're just gonna be a subject class.
	There's no doubt about it.
	Lab worked for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
	That's part of the National Institutes of Health, or NIH.
	In emails obtained by Fox, she wrote to other NIH officials that, during her- That's good.
	Akaya Tananda.
	They did the Vax.
	They did the Fauci Vax.
	They did the Vax.
	It was a graveyard smash!
	It was an adverse reaction smash!
	That's very good.
	Well done.
	You should get a prize for that.
	In fact, we'll start doing merchandise again, just so we can give you a t-shirt.
	Unless you're one of the people in the chat that would be satisfied with the merest glimpses of Gareth when we get to 20,000.
	I know that's a considerable community.
	A technician at the Wuhan lab complained it was illegal to import Ebola to China to study it.
	The NIH worker then wrote to other department officials, quote, I remember he said that since they don't have the Ebola virus, they had, quote, considered using reverse genetics to create the virus.
	I was shocked to hear what he said that.
	I also worry the reaction of people in Washington when they read this.
	The technician is only a worker, not a decision maker, nor a PI.
	Principal... Only a worker.
	To hell with him then.
	Later on, we'll be talking to a man that was only a worker, Christian Smalls, Amazon leader, about how unity can create power.
	And indeed, whoever said in the chat...
	That Fauci's daughter worked at Twitter.
	That is true.
	That's been verified.
	That's verified information.
	We can say that without... I'm not going to be showing anyone any nipples.
	I simply won't.
	Thracian88, people have been chosen.
	What's that about globalists?
	Yeah, we've got to be careful, guys.
	We have got to be careful.
	Hey, listen, we're going to get a bit deeper into corruption with That Biden, what your man there, Orange Jesus, as he was recently dubbed in Liz Cheney's biography,
	The Biden crime family.
	There are increasing cries for impeachment because of the sheer number of foreign companies that have made payments to either Joe, James or Hunter Biden.
	And I believe there are affiliates as well.
	Do you know about this?
	I mean, I know you do.
	I know you're Awakened Wonders.
	I know that as well as the political, you've got your eye on the spiritual and however you're approaching it, whether it's through the good book here or whether it's through other scripture, You are making your way to powerful awakening right now.
	And you know that we've been taken over by centralist, authoritarian, establishment, globalist interests.
	And in order to regain any control over our communities, we're going to have to awaken.
	And independent media is such a threat because it allows us to connect.
	Some people awakening right now, right now in the chat.
	Other people making all sorts of extraordinary demands for people for me to text.
	Aspects of my anatomy that I could reveal.
	But God, you know, is it worth it?
	Is it worth anymore?
	Let's have a look at the Biden crime family.
	From 2014 to 2019, Biden family members and their affiliated companies received over $15 million from foreign companies and foreign nationals.
	These are all facts.
	Facts are stubborn things.
	That included Ukraine, Russia, Kazakhstan, Romania, and China.
	Biden business associates received an additional $9 million.
	A couple of those countries are at their actual wars with.
	I mean, this is a really weird set of countries to be getting those energy company payments from.
	Are you disconcerted by that?
	Is that a conflict of interest?
	Who do you think is closer to turning America into a dictatorship?
	Is it the Biden crime family or is it your orange Jesus?
	Which one?
	Which one?
	We have uncovered a lot of facts.
	President Biden has, of course, lied at least 16 times about his involvement in his family's business schemes.
	There are at least 22 examples of Joe Biden speaking with or meeting with Hunter Biden's foreign business associates.
	The Oversight Committee recently released two checks.
	You see the graphics up here today.
	These checks are to Joe Biden.
	One is for $40,000 from China and another is for $200,000 from a now bankrupt health care company that his brother James Biden apparently swindled.
	Listen, this investigation has to continue.
	Very, very interesting.
	It's very, very curious.
	It makes you realise the significance of independent media voices.
	The legacy media does not want the kind of independent thought that you're engaging in right now.
	I'm talking even about Letharious Monster.
	Who moves between some pretty profane announcements and occasional scriptural revelations.
	We are awakening together.
	There in the locals chat, people are awakening.
	I'm talking about Tolson718 and Les Boyle and Blessed Elbert.
	There is so much potential, so much power among us that they want to keep us dumb.
	And when a figure emerges like Tucker Carlson, who on Fox News was, do you think, like towards the end of Tucker's tenure on Fox, He was more and more talking about trans-political issues, i.e.
	issues that were neither Republican or Democrat.
	He was more and more saying, I don't trust anyone within these institutions.
	He was becoming vocally and virulently anti-war, which used to be a left-wing position.
	But now, where do you go if you are anti-war, if you are pro-peace?
	Who is the voice that speaks for you?
	Let me know if you think there's anyone in the chat right now.
	Do you feel that there are enough people advocating for peace?
	Look at this moment on Greg Gutfeld.
	Greg Gutfeld, friend of the show.
	Remember, I went on there pretty recently.
	It's a good show.
	We're going to ask him to come on.
	There's a person I could text.
	I reckon he'd text back.
	Let's have a look at Greg Gutfeld.
	Well, this is good.
	It's a good out.
	Tell me what you guys think of this.
	This is a nice moment.
	The fact is, Musk may be the last man standing between real freedom of speech and the suffocating block of the censorship industrial complex, which is made up of government, media, and tech forces.
	He realizes that advertisers have no spine and can be easily cowed by special interest groups in cahoots with political allies.
	If you don't believe me, I got two words for you.
	Tucker Carlson.
	Woo-hoo!
	Wow!
	Wow!
	Look at that!
	Whoa, whoa.
	Yeah, there you go.
	It's exciting.
	It's exciting.
	Very, very interesting that that's been brought up.
	Have a look at Tucker's conversation with Roseanne.
	Did you see this?
	He talks about his position on Orange Jesus himself, on Donald Trump.
	Let me know what you think of this.
	Roseanne, that's someone we've got to get on the show, surely.
	We do have a great conversation with Tucker, but I've got to get on Tucker's show before we can use this conversation.
	I don't want to get you into the quagmire of how these things work, but we've got a brilliant conversation with Tucker.
	You will see it first if you're one of our supporters.
	Orange Jesus Living Waters 2046 is what Liz Cheney called Donald Trump in her new biography that I'm loathe to promote.
	Let's have a look at Tucker talking about Trump with Roseanne Barr.
	God, the world's crazy now.
	I certainly support Trump, I'll tell you that.
	And I can tell you, I mean, I've always agreed with Trump's policies.
	Always.
	And I lost friends over it.
	And I've never really actively supported anybody, because it's not my job to actively support people.
	I watch, you know?
	I like to watch.
	But I'm a voyeur.
	But I became an active Trump supporter when they raided Mar-a-Lago.
	When you start invading Mar-a-Lago, that is a line in the sand.
	That is one of the best golf courses, stroke, dwelling places in America.
	Would you go to Mar-a-Lago?
	Yes or no?
	Would you like that?
	Would that be a dream holiday destination for you?
	When I saw that picture of Trump with Kevin McCarthy, I thought, Looks good there Mar-a-Lago.
	And I agree with Trump on a lot, but even if I disagree with Trump on a lot, I'd still be a Trump supporter because you cannot allow that.
	You cannot allow the You know, the regime, the President of the United States to use the Justice Department to knock the frontrunner out of the race.
	You can't do that.
	No, you can't do that.
	So it's bigger than Trump.
	It's bigger than Biden.
	It's a question of, you know, do you want to live in a free country with a functioning justice system?
	You know?
	That's exactly right.
	And so I'm voting for Trump.
	And if they convict him, I will send him the max donations and I will lead protests.
	That's how I feel.
	That's how I feel too.
	And by the way, if I thought that he had committed some real crime, I wouldn't feel that way, but he didn't.
	He and Biden are both found with classified documents at home, along with every other former high-level federal official in history, but only Trump is indicted?
	Like, tell me how that works.
	Oh, shut up!
	That's pretty powerful, isn't it?
	All of them had those classified documents, and yet only Trump is indicted.
	Have you seen his stand-up on this stuff?
	Don't panic, this is not Elon.
	Some of you are saying, message Greg Gutfield, he'd be a good guest to get on the show.
	Let me message him now.
	Greg, we're live on the show right now.
	We just watched your Two Words, Tucker Carlson viral clip on our show, and people in the Rumble chat Right now, Greg, I'm saying get Greg on the show.
	So here I am asking on behalf of our mighty community, will you join us on Stay Free with Russell Brand?
	Hit me back here, Greg.
	Hope everything's going well for you.
	And when you consider, Greg, how our relationship began, oh, quarrelling, all sorts of stuff.
	The world, see, it just shows you maybe there is hope for world peace if me and Greg Gutfield can become such firm friends.
	Greg, text us back.
	You're wanted here.
	All right, so we've done that.
	We may not necessarily... We should cut that and we could post it to Greg.
	Also, we love you, Greg, says Stateless CA.
	Yes to Greg, says Sancila1969, Carl Rhino, the classic Greg brag.
	Amazing.
	I wonder about getting...
	Yeah, Elon.
	The double text, man.
	I can't do the double text.
	Have you seen Trump do his Al Capone stand-up yet?
	He's working on it and it's improving.
	This time he includes the word tiddlywinks and I think it's the best version of it. One of my favourite comedians is Bill Hicks
	and there's lots of versions of Bill Hicks doing particular bits of his stand up. I
	think Trump's really getting there now with his Alphonse Capone bit. Let's have a look.
	I got indicted.
	I'd never heard.
	The Wharton School of Finance, they didn't have a subject on you get indicted.
	It wasn't like something you think about, right?
	My father, my mother and father, they're looking down.
	My son got indicted more than Alphonse Capone.
	Don't forget, Al Capone was the toughest, meanest guy.
	If you had dinner with him and if he smiled the wrong way, where he thought you were maybe smiling about him or mocking him, You were dead.
	You were a dead person.
	Scarface, you ever hear of him?
	Al Capone, Scarface.
	That was where the movie came from.
	He had a scar from here to here and he didn't get that scar from playing tiddlywicks, do we agree?
	He got indicted one time, I got indicted four times for nothing, for nothing.
	He's only in that indictment, isn't he?
	He's only in the new one.
	Four, I got indicted four times!
	Amazing stuff.
	So, hey, listen.
	Ousted from Congress recently.
	George Santos.
	Let me know if you agree with that decision and in a minute we're going to dazzle you with the sheer volume and sort of variety and extraordinary type of George Santos lies.
	We're going to leave, are we going to leave Rumble after?
	Not leave Rumble, we'll never leave Rumble.
	Are we going to leave YouTube after George Santos?
	Have a look at this, guys, on YouTube.
	We're going to do this as our last bit.
	Then we'll be going over, we're doing a brilliant story on the COVID inquiry, what it covers and what it doesn't cover, and why it's a little piece of propaganda and theatre in itself.
	We'll be talking to vital leader Christian Smalls later in the show, who has taught us that even when dealing with vast and mighty behemoths such as Amazon, we have an incredible power in our unity.
	Decentralised but Unified!
	Let's have a look at George Santos being ousted from Congress and yeah, hit that thumbs up button.
	Yeah, let's get you guys, if you're watching this in the stream right now, do what Deslod says.
	Hit the thumbs up button, give us a like and remember to subscribe if you haven't downloaded our Rumble app.
	He's out of there today.
	Lying Congressman George Santos was voted out by two-thirds of the House.
	then you'll get informed every time we do a bit of this content.
	Let's have a look at George Santos being kicked out of Congress,
	and then I'll show you some of his best lies.
	He's out of there today lying.
	Congressman George Santos was voted out by two-thirds of the House.
	With coat in hand, Santos made his exit before the gavel was even struck,
	and had some choice words on his way out.
	George Santos was mobbed by reporters as he was kicked out of Congress today.
	He stormed out even before the vote to expel him was officially confirmed.
	Climbing into a waiting car, his final defiant declaration, to hell with this place.
	All the TV networks broke into regular programming with the news of Santos' expulsion.
	We are coming on the air with live pictures of the floor of the House of Representatives, where members have just voted to expel New York Republican George Santos from Congress.
	The vote tally was decisive, with Democrats and Republicans coming together to banish Santos.
	This is my favorite bit.
	We see him sort of with his coat over his shoulders like he's playing Batman in the schoolyard.
	And he's also wearing sneakers in Congress.
	I think he's heartwarming in it.
	Santos.
	He sat all alone as his colleagues cast their votes.
	And when it became clear that his fate was sealed... Just hit 290.
	George Santos is poised to be expelled from Congress.
	Santos came ready for defeat.
	He even brought his overcoat, draping it over his shoulders as he said his goodbyes, shaking hands with his few remaining supporters before... Shooter 928, all politicians are liars.
	Why do we the voters accept this?
	Yeah, when I watch stuff like this, I think these are systemic problems rather than any problem that is derived from individual character flaws, although Lord alone knows we all have them.
	That's why in our Awakened Wonder community, press the red button if you want to join it, We work on cleansing the soul and awaken a deep spiritual power within ourselves.
	Before we leave you, good friends over on YouTube, you glorious Awakening Wonders, here are some of George Santos's lies.
	These are some of my favorite ones.
	He lied about founding an animal charity.
	Yeah, founded an animal charity.
	Don't know why, I just love animals.
	He allegedly swindled a disabled vet.
	Whose dog was dying.
	Oh, a war vet.
	Because I thought that meant like a veterinarian.
	Like a disabled vet.
	Because that person should be able to step in and heal their own dog, really.
	His niece did not get kidnapped.
	He says, yeah, can't come to work today.
	Niece has been kidnapped.
	He's not Jewish.
	Yeah, can't come today.
	It's Yom Kippur.
	He also claimed to produce Spider-Man Turn Off the Dark, the Broadway show, which wasn't an especially successful endeavor.
	I visited that while they were rehearsing it.
	It went on to be one of those things where, like, a lot of Spider-Men kept tumbling out of the sky, didn't they, and injuring themselves and stuff like that.
	Dear old George Santos claimed to have produced it.
	Well, I think those lies make me like him a little bit better, actually, sort of indiscriminately telling extraordinary lies.
	Hey, listen, if you're watching us on YouTube, you awakened 1DU, join us now!
	But do the timer, do the countdown.
	This is a new thing that we've started.
	Let's have a look at that.
	We are going to leave YouTube in, well, as you can see, 28 seconds.
	It's all right, you can leave me on the screen.
	Trish McLeod talking about a glory era when Trudeau is no longer in office.
	Talk quietly in there, you lot.
	When shout, I can hear you.
	Why are there so many instances of Spider-Man?
	Speak for yourself.
	Oh, sometimes I start on a comment and I realize you can't read that in its entirety because by God, are people speaking freely in there?
	If you're watching this on YouTube, we're leaving in five seconds.
	We're going to be talking about the COVID inquiry.
	We're going to be talking about what they still won't reveal about Wuhan.
	See you there!
	That was good.
	I mean, I've actually shocked myself by that countdown.
	Listen, guys, my friends on Rumble, thank you for being part of this community.
	If you're joining us from YouTube, welcome!
	Welcome to a place where I can speak freely, which sometimes means simply swearing, using curse words, but often means Saying stuff like there is an establishment conspiracy.
	There is a centralist neo-liberal establishment.
	Whichever side you vote for, they will prevent you from gaining any democratic purchase over your own community.
	For example, right now you can see how the Republican Party establishment is marshalling behind Nikki Haley.
	Did you see that speech where one of the Koch brothers said, yeah, this is the person we support.
	We don't support Trump.
	You've seen that already.
	We'll be doing it.
	We'll be covering that A little later, you know that the Biden crumpet, like when they were thinking about Biden as president, didn't they think, should we check out how much money he's received from all sorts of foreign companies?
	It's pretty extraordinary, isn't it?
	That that's not something that was investigated.
	When we get to 20, especially if Bill Gates is funding them, we've got a great story in Bill Gates later this week, how he piloted How he's currently piloting new tech that is extraordinarily similar to social credit score tech over in Africa.
	You'll love it.
	You'll love it.
	We're doing that a little later in the week, I mean.
	And we're going to now talk a bit about the COVID inquiry and information that we're still not able to talk about in Wuhan.
	Hello, On Burger.
	Hello, Swearer.
	Hello, all of you Awaken Wonders in the chat.
	As an awakened wonder, as a member of our Rumble community or our locals community know that increasingly conspiracies become facts.
	They remember that the Wuhan lab leak theory was downplayed.
	Now we realize that they had doubts about its safety.
	They participated in its funding.
	A lot of that research is dual purpose.
	You know that in my country, the UK, they're conducting what is called a COVID inquiry, but accidentally, once in a while, they get near the truth, talking about significant issues.
	The amount of power that was granted to Moderna and Pfizer, the way this was used to expedite a globalist agenda to facilitate authoritarian measures that would never be accepted elsewhere.
	Right?
	Why are these questions not asked in any legitimate inquiry?
	Was lockdown a mistake?
	Did it work?
	Was it worth it?
	Was the price we paid economically, the damage it did to ordinary middle class and working class people whose Because businesses have never recovered.
	Was it worth it?
	Is your life better now?
	Was it worth the impact it had children?
	And are you avoiding talking about this openly?
	Because there is a plan.
	There is a plan right now to introduce yet another pandemic and further lockdowns.
	Here's the news.
	No, here's the effing news baby.
	Thanks for refusing Fox News' new video.
	No, here's the fucking news.
	More and more conspiracy theories are apparently conspiracy facts.
	The Wuhan lab leak was probably real.
	Deep state agencies helped to downplay it and maybe even cover it up.
	The COVID inquiry in the UK only asks questions that are basically irrelevant in an attempt to continue to control the narrative.
	Otherwise, why don't they ask about the lab leak?
	Why don't they ask whether or not lockdowns were successful?
	Is it because they plan to use these techniques, Lockdowns in particular again.
	In the UK, they're conducting a COVID inquiry, but it's a very managed affair.
	Also, there are continuing revelations about Wuhan, the safety in that laboratory, the degree to which US health agencies assisted in downplaying and maybe even covering up information that would ultimately lead to the American public and the global public becoming Disobedient and non-compliant.
	Let me know in the chat in the comments if you think that's what's happened and if you've noticed that when there's inquiries they deliberately only ask questions that lead down blind alleys.
	Of course the Covid inquiry in the UK wouldn't be happening without independent media voices and independent minds like yours.
	That's why the Covid inquiry will be a facade, a charade, limited to just condemning one or two bad actors and one One or two earnest mistakes.
	What's needed is a true reckoning, because as conspiracy theories become conspiracy facts, we're awakening to the role of independent media and independent politics and the necessity for radical change.
	They can't allow that to happen.
	So let's have a look at the most recent revelations around Wuhan and the fact that it's been deliberately downplayed.
	And then we'll have a little look at some episodes from the UK COVID inquiry, and you'll note how muted it is.
	And if they ever get anywhere near the truth, people go, that's not what we're discussing.
	A top US health official has admitted he and a team of other leading scientists deliberately chose to downplay suggestions the COVID-19 pandemic originated in a Chinese lab leak.
	You and Fauci in those discussions just wanted to turn the rhetoric down.
	Is that correct?
	That was it.
	The doco, what really happened in Wuhan, the next chapter, also exposes extensive attempts to make the public think it was a natural virus.
	For a moment, try to recall the passionate enthusiasm around Anthony Fauci at that time.
	The late-night talk show parades, people dressed in vaccine costumes, the, oh, thank God for Fauci because, you know, Trump's such a lunatic.
	When you analyse that news coverage now, there are a lot more questions that emerge.
	If Fauci and the NIH deliberately intervened to suppress and control that information, why was it they were doing that?
	What are the financial ties between the NIH and the pharmaceutical industry?
	What other information is being concealed?
	What health measures at Wuhan were ignored?
	Where does Wuhan get its funding from?
	Why was it so important to control that narrative?
	Why are these questions still not able to be asked?
	That's before we get into the area of adverse injuries and excess deaths and the impact of lockdown and the efficacy of lockdown and how quickly it was understood that lockdown wouldn't work and the voices in science like Peter McCulloch and Jay Bhattacharya that said from the beginning that lockdown would not be effective.
	People like Robert Malone who at the beginning said you can't vaccinate during a pandemic, that mRNA technology will not be effective when deployed in this way.
	All these questions were being asked by some people at the beginning of the pandemic and that information and those questions were censored by the same interests that are right now saying you should be able to censor information because of hate speech in Ireland, you should be able to censor in the UK because of safety, you should be able to censor in the EU because of hate speech or whatever it is.
	They are desperate To prevent these kind of conversations and this kind of connection taking place because it is a threat to their control.
	So the COVID inquiry will be a kind of performance and information will be meted out, dribbled out as slowly as possible so that we as a population, we as people, don't have the chance to organize or properly respond because the information just comes out so slowly, discredited, slowed down, bogged down in controversy.
	Like they did at the beginning of the pandemic.
	Like they're still trying to do.
	Right now.
	So US Chief Medical Officer Anthony Fauci, at the time of course, what did he stand to gain by covering it up?
	Well his agency had been among several United States agencies that were funding the research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
	So Robert Kadlec, that health official, told us last night that Fauci would have been concerned for his own reputation and that of his institute If you'd said that those agencies were involved in the funding of Wuhan and that it was likely that the virus had emerged from the laboratory in early 2020, or midway through 2020, you would have been kicked off the internet.
	You might even have been dragged out of your home.
	If you'd have said, I wonder if these lockdowns work, I wonder if these masks work, that was akin to saying, you might as well fly a confederate flag.
	That's the way that this was conveyed in the mainstream media.
	Now, what they're saying is, that was correct.
	If it eventuated that his agency had funded the very research that sparked this pandemic, and that is a live possibility.
	That was one of the worst conspiracy theories.
	Hey, what if Anthony Fauci is involved in the funding of the very research that led to the outbreak?
	Why on earth would someone go to incredible lengths to cover that up?
	And if we don't learn the lessons, if we don't start to regulate this very risky gain-of-function research in laboratories globally, we could have another pandemic happen again.
	And that's what the experts I speak to in this documentary warn.
	Now, the reason I think that this is connected to the COVID inquiry in the UK and the lack
	of significant inquiry within that inquiry is because they are still trying to keep their
	powder dry in a number of ways. One, they don't want to entirely discredit the government,
	which is basically what should happen, not just this party or these few individuals,
	the entire institution. They don't want to entirely discredit the legacy media, which
	is totally what should happen. And they don't want to prevent the opportunity of imposing
	those measures again for a variety of reasons. Because remember, right now, the WHO are pushing
	for a treaty that would enable them to impose those measures on any member country in the
	event of another pandemic. And the description or criteria for what a pandemic could be is
	pretty loose, let me tell you. It would include giving them the ability to tax your country
	or take tax from your country and to impose medical measures like vaccines or what they
	call vaccines. This is not stuff I'm making up.
	This is simply stuff that, in a few years, you might be able to watch on the legacy media, if the legacy media have to report on this stuff because an independent media pushes them.
	If the censorship laws that are currently being pushed are all successful, then the legacy media will not report on this stuff.
	They only report on this stuff because independent media forces it.
	We've narrowed down two scientists in China whose actual research might have started COVID-19.
	We explain in this documentary how it could have been their work.
	One of them, a Chinese military scientist, was working on a vaccine for COVID-19 back in October 2019, and his research could have led to the pandemic.
	He was then believed to be killed by the Chinese People's Liberation Army, so...
	I mean, this is like a few years ago, you'd have to go to Alex Jones or David Icke to get that kind of information.
	This is extraordinary.
	Someone was murdered.
	What are they going to tell us next?
	That it was actually a weapon, that it's actual biotechnology that was being used potentially to create weapons, like in RFK's book that was basically banned.
	And when it was the number one seller in the New York Times, they just went, there is no number one this week.
	We are getting closer.
	Unfortunately, there's been no international inquiry.
	It shouldn't be left up to journalists to investigate this.
	Perhaps this is all a terrible mishap and the Wuhan Institute of Virology just suddenly became a little bit slapdash and it was an error.
	No.
	Apparently, there have been concerns about safety in the Wuhan Institute of Virology for some time that was well reported and well understood, extraordinarily, and suspicions that this research is actually about bio-weaponry.
	Which, when I first heard it a couple of years ago, I was like, oh no, that's a little bit far-fetched.
	We're almost into clichéd conspiratorial territory.
	What's next?
	That UFOs are real and that the government killed JFK?
	What my article uncovers is a almost decade-long trail of warnings issued by the Department of Energy to the National Institutes of Health and other government agencies This is significant because it's a report from Vanity Fair.
	When this stuff was first reported on, it was like just passed around on the periphery of the internet.
	The sort of thing that you would get kicked off of social media for.
	These are the kind of arguments that the misinformation, disinformation bills are based on.
	We can't have all this misinformation around COVID.
	It's going to cost people their lives.
	The misinformation was the stuff that the legacy media was peddling.
	I don't want to be reductive, but I do want to draw your attention to the significance of the repression of the Wuhan lab leak.
	About the risks of what's called dual-use research of concern.
	Remember, we're still not at the point where the legacy media are able to talk about excess deaths and adverse
	events as a result of certain medications.
	So imagine where we're going to get to.
	About the risks of what's called dual use research of concern.
	That biology research that was being funded by the National Institutes of Health overseas could be misappropriated and
	possibly used for harm.
	That's extraordinary, isn't it?
	Dual use.
	Even when we were reporting on UFOs, we noted that the CIA retrieve crashed UFOs and then give them to Lockheed Martin because Lockheed Martin don't have to keep as detailed records as government agencies.
	Look here at this curious relationship between the NIH and foreign research laboratories for dual use products.
	We are already so deep into conspiracy theory territory of 20 months ago that a COVID inquiry in the UK would have to be asking questions like, is this a bioweapon?
	What's going on?
	How much did you know?
	Why are people that work for the government now working for Moderna?
	That's what a serious inquiry would sound like.
	But this is not a serious inquiry.
	This is to aid the transition of power from one political party to another political party and say, well, that's that all dealt with.
	Guess where we'll be in a couple of years.
	But those warnings got even more specific As close to the pandemic as mid-2019, when the Deputy Energy Secretary Dan Brouillette warned an associate and advisor to Dr. Anthony Fauci specifically about the coronavirus research that was being funded at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the concern was that there were basically
	Tools and techniques being used in that research that could be potentially misappropriated for military use or for malign use by the Chinese government.
	So I think what's significant here is that, you know, that research as well as the kind of research being funded was really of contention for almost a decade before the pandemic even began.
	For 10 years prior to the pandemic, people were going, you shouldn't be doing this.
	This is dangerous.
	How then?
	At very best, this shows incredible ineptitude and a connection between the NIH and Anthony Fauci prior to the pandemic and the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
	We also know, it seems as a result of other whistleblowers, that Fauci went round various agencies saying, hey, listen, when you're reporting on this, don't talk about the lab leak theory.
	Why was that?
	It's racist.
	It's racist.
	Do you remember that?
	You've got to say it came from a wet market.
	Extraordinary.
	Look at where we are now and contrast that with the mealy mouth and limited questions that emerge in the inquiry.
	Could that be because ultimately the establishment is one mechanic and And these legacy media interests, state interests, these government agency interests, all align.
	And if people got the actual information that they should be privy to, and when I say people I mean us, we would become non-compliant and disobedient and would demand real change.
	One of the scientists who stood alongside Boris Johnson in those Covid briefings, night after night during the pandemic, has questioned how much the then Prime Minister understood of what was actually going on.
	Chief Scientific Advisor at the time, Sir Patrick Vallance, wrote in his diaries back then that Mr Johnson was bamboozled by the graphs and data.
	Oh, so it's Boris Johnson.
	Boris Johnson.
	He was bamboozled by Grafton.
	Oh, Boris Johnson.
	Well, we've got rid of him now, so everything's OK.
	Currently, we've got a prime minister whose wife has strong connections to the WEF, who happens to have invested in a hedge fund that invested in Moderna.
	So that problem's been dealt with.
	What they're presenting you is a paradigm where it's suggested you can solve this problem by shuffling the individuals within the very system that caused the problem.
	We were not as well prepared as we should have been.
	This is a British politician answering questions in the inquiry.
	A fascinating thing occurs.
	There is a significant body of judgment that believes that the virus itself was man-made.
	And that presents a set of challenges as well.
	Forms no part of the terms of reference that's required to address that.
	Somewhat divisive issue, so we're not going to go there.
	Let's shut that down pretty swiftly because otherwise, hold on a minute, if it was man-made, it's made in a lab, can't trust the pharmaceutical industry, funded by Anthony Fauci, they did the lockdown anyway, we turned that guy into a hero, can't trust the state, can't trust the system, going to need to dismantle the machinery of democracy and have to create new democratic communities that are decentralised.
	No, no, wait!
	Stop!
	Just answer these simple questions and we'll blame one or two bad apples and carry on with what we do best, tyrannizing people with lies and deception.
	So, let's look at how the system maintains control and maintains narratives even while conducting inquiries.
	And I would say that the point of the inquiry is to achieve the impression of inquiry rather than inquiry itself.
	Look at the information that's already available.
	Look at how that information was repressed and controlled.
	Oh yeah, we were trying to help, we were trying to help.
	Well, in trying to help, it seems that things were made a lot, lot worse.
	So why is there not a proper interrogation inquiry now?
	We are going to pause that video just there for the majority of you because we got a very special guest now on the show.
	We'll post that video in its entirety just as soon as we finish streaming, unless we do a little bit of time on locals afterwards.
	Just a few of your So when do we move from talking about it to prosecuting Fauci?
	Let me know in the chat if you think that's the answer.
	I don't know if that is within their guidelines.
	WHO can shove their treaty up their arse. I don't know if that is within their guidelines.
	We can check whether or not that would constitute a pandemic.
	Now one thing we know for sure that happened in the pandemic period is the greatest wealth transfer in the history of our kind.
	Ordinary working people from across the globe were subjugated and exploited.
	Notable among the profiteers was the Amazon Corporation.
	We're seeing big tech behemoths emerge across the globe, subjecting ordinary people to the kind of tyrannical power not experienced since the age of Caesar.
	But similarly, There was an uprising of opposition as there always will be.
	Christian Smalls from Staten Island, the one red borough in a sea of blue, led the Amazon revolution.
	Christian Smalls is the leader of the Amazon Labour Union who stood up to these exploitative establishment globalist interests.
	Christian, thanks for joining us today, mate.
	Thank you for having me.
	Glad to be back again.
	Thank you.
	Thank you so much, mate.
	Thanks for coming on again.
	Yeah, it's good to speak to you again, mate.
	You were fantastic last time we spoke.
	One of the things I'm interested in talking with you about is your recent tweet about Joe Biden.
	Joe Biden is one of them leaders that says that he's always going to speak out on behalf of ordinary Americans.
	He's going to support the interests of ordinary Americans.
	In fact, recently he posted, I believe every American worker should have a free and fair choice to join a union.
	You, in spite of having visited the White House, opposed that post.
	Can you tell me what your position is on the Biden administration and how they've supported ordinary Americans?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	You know, I'll be very clear.
	Like you mentioned, you know, I've been to the White House.
	I met the man.
	I met the president and I met pretty much everybody in his administration from the Secretary of Labor to the Vice President Kamala as well.
	And a number of prominent politicians I met as well.
	And when I think about Our victory against Amazon and not only just Amazon with the workers of Starbucks, Trader Joe's, Apple, Google, all these new unions that are forming and joining in the last year or two.
	I'm thinking about the root cause on why it's been so difficult in this country.
	And for me, somebody like me who just started traveling abroad, And learning the different laws that are right over our border in Canada.
	And when I crossed the sea to come to the UK, and I'm seeing all these progressive laws that make it easier and better to organize and also hold corporations accountable.
	I'm wondering, as a new organizer, as a new union, why haven't we gotten the same type of laws on paper in America?
	And when I look at the Biden administration, yes, they have done some good things, progressive things with the NLRB, but the process is very slow.
	I myself was wrongfully fired three and a half years ago from Amazon and I still don't have my job back.
	So instead, the only way I felt to protect myself and protect other workers is by forming a union, which we did.
	Very difficult, by the way, because Amazon spent $14.2 million last year alone trying to stop this worker-led union.
	But there's no accountability, and there's no laws that make it easier for working-class people like myself and other Americans to join these unions.
	And that's what I have an issue with here in this country.
	It feels like the language of supporting ordinary Americans and unifying America and supporting diversity and standing up for oppressed people and standing up for American workers is a big part of the rhetoric of the current administration, but it doesn't seem like it's a big part of the policy.
	Do you think that the ability of a global organization like Amazon to spend $15 million Have you found that to be your experience?
	are met instead of the interests of ordinary Americans is part of the reason that the Biden
	administration will pay lip service to supporting American workers, but when it comes to it,
	will ultimately support the interests of their paymasters.
	Have you found that to be your experience? And what kind of unity from like MAGA Trump
	voters to working people of all cultural and political persuasions is going to be required Christian?
	And is it possible? Because I suppose one of the things that excites me about you is that you
	were just working at Amazon and you took a role of leadership and you've been impactful and
	effective. I know a lot of people like in our rumble chat right now feel that ordinary people don't have
	a chance against the machine against the corporate elites against the state establishment and
	state power. But is Is there anything you can say that can help people to recognize that when we come together there is a great power?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	When people ask me all the time, you know, how was you able to defeat, along with, you know, working class people, how were you able to defeat Amazon, a trillion dollar company with unlimited money and resources?
	Easy.
	People power.
	Bringing people together from all different backgrounds, all different cultures, all different ideologies.
	Didn't matter whether you were left, right, blue, green, yellow.
	It doesn't matter.
	The common enemy will always be Jeff Bezos.
	one of the richest people in the world, and Amazon, one of the most powerful corporations in the world.
	And that's what we kept our focus on and our attention, our messaging, is Staten Island, like you mentioned
	in the beginning, is the only red borough out of the five boroughs of New York City.
	I can't go over there talking about, oh, capitalism and Bernie Sanders and AOC.
	It has to be a common issue that everybody can agree.
	And most of the time, when it comes to wages, I think we all can agree as working class people that everybody deserves a wage, especially when you're being deemed an essential worker.
	So that's how bringing people together, that's how you're able to defeat the establishment, no matter what corporation or what industry, no amount of money in the world can amount to the power of people when we come together.
	Yeah, I'm noticing Christian, a kind kind of populist uprising all over the world. It comes in
	different forms and the establishment are making, are working very hard to ensure that people
	stay divided along cultural lines because when there is a kind of unity that transcends the
	kind of cultural issues that are pushed to the forefront, there exists all of a sudden
	the power to topple regimes.
	I feel that with Amazon alone, there are strikes and actions against Amazon and their elitist practices in over 30 countries.
	Have you noticed that the problems that working people across the world are facing have a kind of, I don't know, sort of some unifying characteristics?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	I mean, the international solidarity is imperative.
	It's a must.
	This is the reason why I travel abroad often to connect these struggles.
	The same thing that's happening in Staten Island is happening right now in Coventry, UK, right now.
	These warehouse workers are subjected to the same working conditions no matter where they are on the planet.
	So we must connect the struggles, we must stay together, and we must build international solidarity because Amazon is an international company.
	It employs over two and a half million people worldwide.
	A million of them in the states alone.
	So we have to understand that when we're talking about accountability and these politicians, like you mentioned, the president can't be talking out of both sides of the mouth.
	He can't say he stands with workers one day and then the same day give Jeff Bezos $10 billion of our tax dollars to fly to space on a penis rocket.
	We cannot accept that anymore.
	He can't say he stands with workers and then break the railroad strike.
	He can't say every worker deserves to be in the union.
	But there's no laws that allow that to happen on a federal level.
	These type of things and these type of rhetoric, these tweaks, these good talking points, we're not going to settle for that anymore.
	And I think the time is now that not just me as a labor leader, but other labor leaders in the world, in the country, speak up and step up and stand up and fight back.
	Because if we don't, we're going to be subjected to what we've been getting, and that hasn't been much.
	One of the reasons, Christian, that many centralist, neoliberal, authoritarian states are beginning to sound the same is perhaps they no longer feel that they have to reach working people, whatever country, whether it's yours or whether it's mine, because the...
	forthcoming AI and automation revolution means that working people are going to have even
	less power.
	It's become more and more likely that people are expendable.
	More and more likely that if people demand to be paid decent wages for hard work, that
	they can easily be dispatched and replaced by increasing automation technology.
	I recently saw a piece in fact about how Amazon are able to stock their shelves using robots and able to handle dispatch and people are talking about drones the whole time.
	Do you feel that conditions will get worse for working people because, you know, because ultimately automation facilitates the powerful?
	Yeah, well that's the model of corporations and billionaires.
	How do we save the company money?
	How do we continue to exploit workers until we no longer need them?
	And that's always been their motto.
	Doesn't matter.
	The future is coming.
	The future is here.
	And AI technology is still a gray area on how that's going to be integrated into our workforce.
	But I can tell you this.
	We as people have the power to stop that.
	And the ability to design how we want to work in our facilities, in our warehouse, in our industries.
	We cannot allow AI technology.
	I love technology, by the way.
	I'm born in the 80s, but I grew up in the 90s and I love technology.
	The problem is I do not like how technology has adapted to our society and how society has adapted to technology.
	And what I mean by that is 10 years ago, I would walk into a store and I'll see everybody at the register.
	Now you walk into a store and you've got to sell kiosks and it's telling you to bag your own items.
	There's no human interaction.
	And when we adapt to that, It really is alarming on how society's adapted.
	I can't even knock on my neighbor's door and borrow sugar because they have an idea of, now I can just click on Amazon.com and have this sugar delivered to my doorsteps without even having human interaction.
	And that is very dangerous when you don't have human interaction.
	I don't want a society like that.
	I think a village needs to stay a village.
	And I think people, community, is important.
	And having people behind technology in a controlled way is how we need to move forward.
	Not just saying, you know what, AI needs to take over for me.
	Robots can replace the work that I do.
	Because that's not the way to go.
	That's only going to take jobs away.
	So we have to, as laborers, as working class people, We have to put our foot down now and let these corporations, these politicians as well, who are in bed with these corporations, let them know that we're not going to accept being replaced by robots.
	I tell you what, I think you are the perfect example of what I mean when we say on this channel, in this movement, that we have to rise up together, that we have to find leaders within our communities that are going to look for novel ways to oppose power, to look beyond the divisions that people continually inflict upon us.
	There are a lot of very powerful, loving statements coming up in the chat and a lot of inquiries about your t-shirt, which I know is an anti-Amazon t-shirt.
	There you go.
	There's the full message, guys.
	That is the full message.
	Union all the way!
	Union all the way!
	Thank you so much for being such a pro-power voice, for recognizing the power, the necessary power, Christian, of community and our sacred power as individuals working together.
	I think it's a very important message to convey.
	I wish you all the best with your fight against Amazon and your fight for rights for working people across America.
	Thank you for joining us today, Christian.
	Thanks for having me.
	Always a pleasure.
	Thank you.
	It's a joy to have you on.
	You can find Christian Smalls on X at at shut underscore down m amazon and we'll post that in the chat shut down amazon with underscore between shut and down and support his movement.
	A fantastic example of what people can achieve when they're willing to step into leadership roles.
	Claire Techcraft says what an inspirational human and very funny.
	Yeah I did like his Jeff Bezos.
	I think you're talking about the Jeff Bezos Penis moment right there.
	Is that what you're talking about?
	Uh, good lad.
	Keep it up, says Grieg.
	Primal Calling 2 in the Awakened Wonders chat says, thank you.
	Well, uh, yeah, someone's talking about the Cisco Rail Union.
	Excellent.
	Well done, all of you guys.
	I really appreciate your time.
	Um, fantastic.
	Okay, so, uh, Joe, Joe's Dog, people power.
	And Moira Lanz, I've always wondered why they seem to have no unions in the US or it seems like a dirty word from what I've seen.
	Well, I suppose it's because one of the ways that people can challenge establishment power is by controlling their labour, I would say.
	And any method that ordinary working people use to challenge the interests of the powerful will be slammed and smeared and shut down.
	That's why Joe Biden will talk wistfully about union power, but when it comes to policy,
	when it comes to action, opposes it.
	22,000 of you watching this right now, many demands being made for Gareth.
	Not all of them, even on a free speech platform, can be read out loud because they are simply
	too appalling.
	And I'm not just talking about the fariest monster with his complex combination of Christian
	theology and quite frankly, advanced sexual requests, I'm going to call them.
	All right, guys, listen, do you want to join us for a little bit longer?
	We're going to spend a little moment in the Awakened Wonder chat.
	Later, we've got Steve Kirsch coming on the show in person to discuss vaccines, the pandemic.
	Southern Excess Deaths.
	We are getting to the heart of it.
	The kind of subjects that will not be covered.
	And what did you guys call it in the chat?
	A kangaroo court inquiry.
	If you want to join the, if you want to support our movement, press the red button.
	You get access to more content.
	You get access to Bible readings.
	You get access to the conversations where we discuss the advancement of this movement, how we can be unified but decentralized, how we can confront the greatest power the world has ever known by confronting, by using the greatest power that has ever been known, the great power within us all that maybe, in my view at least, amounts to God.
	You'll get access to conversations with brilliant geniuses like Jonathan Pageau talking about the true nature of Christianity.
	That's a great conversation we've got coming up.
	Brilliant journalists like Chris Hedges who takes a position on Palestine that I know a lot of you will agree with but a lot of you will not.
	So join this movement, press the red button, become an awakened wonder.
	Thank you so much for joining us.
	I'm talking to you, Dickhead 9.
	I'm talking to you, Marco HPS, Purple Glue 72.
	All of you, FL New, Lefarious Monster, of course, About Mexican.
	I love you all.
	Thank you for joining us.
	And our new members, Momonga1337, Bethana333, Drunktext Troubadour, Nanan, and Tug Mutton.
	Tug Mutton.
	Oh man, some of these names.
	Join us as we Elevate our consciousness and escalate the chances of changing the world radically through a peaceful revolution.
	Join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
	Until then, if you... Oh, by the way, how can I... I can't believe I nearly forgot to tell you this.
	Check this out.
	Wait a minute, I've not listened to it yet.
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	Oh no, that's my one.
	Wait a second.
	No, that's me responding to Greg.
	Like, here we go.
	Here we go.
	Listen.
	Hey Russell, it's Gutfeld.
	Great to hear from you.
	I miss you.
	I'm so glad we became pals.
	Even though you did say my face looked like a collapsed anus.
	Which, in retrospect, it's accurate.
	But I've been working on that.
	I hope you're doing well.
	I'm glad you're doing well.
	Keep up the good fight and hopefully we can join again, once again in person.
	There we go.
	Okay, right.
	That's given me some confidence to do Elon Musk.
	We'll do Elon Musk next time.
	We'll book in Greg Gutfeld.
	This is the way it works here.
	We're doing the whole thing live.
	The whole thing.
	It's fantastic how it's unfolding.
	Join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.

▲