“973% Increase In HEART FAILURE!” What’s REALLY Causing THIS In The Military?! - Stay Free #256
|
Time
Text
so so
In this video, you're going to see the future.
Hey!
Hello there, you awakened wonders, you fire walkers, you glorious souls.
Keep your heart open in spite of the constant enticement to dumb down and become one of their fools, one of their drones.
I'm talking to you, Slappy T. Stay awake!
I'm talking to you, KRG0516, out in our Rumble chat right now, talking about Armishness, curiously enough.
Hey Joey Yodo and Token Robot, I'm chatting to you all, Mr Red Fox, and over in our Awakened Wonder chat in Locals, I'm saying hello to Homegrown27.
They love the dog.
He's such a good boy.
He's such a good boy.
Obviously, we're going to be talking about the Ireland riots and what it reveals about the corporate globalist agenda and the rhetoric of Well, I suppose the rhetoric of calling people far right if they dissent, if they stray from your prescribed narratives.
We'll be talking a little bit about the Wuhan lab leak being more openly discussed in certain contexts, but not others.
And we're talking too about Liz Cheney's new book and Watch how Jake Tapper on... Is he CNN or MSNBC?
CNN, you know Jake Tapper, don't you?
He's one of the... I don't know, he might be a beautiful human being for all I know, but generally when I see him, he is amplifying the agenda of the Dominator culture.
Him sort of chuckling at the idea that Trump might be depressed.
I cannot imagine a depressed Trump.
We'll be broadcasting, or streaming at least, on YouTube for the first 15 minutes, so you can be an awakened wonder there.
Join us there.
Watch what you say in that chat, though, because if you stray away from WHO guidelines, you will automatically be impinging upon YouTube's edicts.
Eventually, you'll have to join us over on Rumble because the speech is going to get so free.
For example, we'll be talking about a military insider who's asking why so many military personnel are suddenly getting curious heart disease.
Let us know in the chat why you think it might be.
It's Christmas time.
What you don't need are peculiar symbols and signs.
Not if you're superstitious.
You don't want to see a Christmas tree tumbling down like the walls of Jericho.
...near the White House.
The National Park Service, okay, they told us just within the last 15 minutes that a big gust of wind knocked over the National... A big gust of wind... Christmas tree.
It's all set for a big tree like...
Knocked over our ideology, I mean Christmas tree.
It's very dispiriting to see that Christmas tree laying there dormant, passive, inactive, rather like the president that it's a symbol of.
We know that the National Park Service is assessing the damage.
It's very dispiriting to see that Christmas tree laying there, dormant, passive, inactive,
rather like the president that it's a symbol of.
What can you see from your vantage point?
Unfortunately we can't see a whole lot.
We did circle around the ellipse for some time, but we can see this massive crane that they brought in, and that crane is working very carefully to try to upright that.
Gotta upright that tree, gotta upright this administration, gotta upright our faith in the system, when deep down we're beginning to recognize that it's an absolute illusion held together by corporate interests and propaganda.
This tree functioning as a symbol, if you will, of our falling and failing administration.
Only if it were Joe Biden himself, draped in fairy lights, taking a tumble, could it be more Abbasite.
This is fantastic.
In a minute we'll show you some legacy media reporting on escalating tensions between the United States and China and how it continually casts US military-industrial complex interests as being in the right, even when it sometimes seems like they're the aggressor.
You'll love that.
Because remember the weather balloon?
Remember that Chinese weather balloon when we were all sort of excited about that?
It's really interesting to contrast this warship with that weather balloon and also to posit and to ponder what is the most significant event?
Is it this warship in Chinese waters or international waters?
It depends on whose analysis you believe.
Or the APEC meeting between Xi And Biden in San Francisco where they cleansed the streets of the homeless in a kind of purge, a pogrom of homelessness in order that Xi had a better visit and so that various CEOs including Larry Fink could meet up with Xi.
What is real?
The military crisis that's escalating or the Or the kind of corporate unity and financial togetherness as demonstrated at APEC.
Which reality do you think is more significant?
Say, put one in the chat if you think the military reality will determine Chinese and American relations.
Or two, if you think it will be economically and financially determined.
Someone says in the chat, not a program.
You're right, because I think that means execution doesn't emerge.
A long time listening to how they said that.
Thank you for giving me a little bit of a steer there.
Hey, let's have a look at this.
A top US health official, oh this is an amazing story, has admitted that he, and potentially everyone's favourite, yeah two, you guys think that's two.
Do you think it's the economic and financial then, huh?
That's interesting, we'll continue to discuss it.
A top official has revealed that they deliberately chose to downplay, at minimum downplay, the potential origins of coronavirus in a lab.
We're still on YouTube so we'll Top US health official has admitted he, and a team of other leading scientists, deliberately chose to downplay suggestions the COVID-19 pandemic originated in a Chinese lab leak.
well if you don't be careful what medication you take.
A top US health official has admitted he and a team of other leading scientists deliberately
chose to downplay suggestions the COVID-19 pandemic originated in a Chinese lab leak.
Robert Kadlec explained why in a Bombshell Sky News documentary.
What we were trying to do was trying to make sure that politically that you would not get
into a situation where people would make accusations or allegations.
But quite honestly, what happened was the exact opposite.
It did happen.
The opposite did happen because you can't trust those institutions if they try to control information.
I saw a fascinating conversation on Irish TV about the riots and the origins of the riots.
People are saying that you shouldn't report that the violence was conducted by a migrant because it's incendiary to reveal that information and suddenly you're in a position where you have to decide do you want the legacy media to be the gatekeepers of what information you gain actually?
Don't give them that information!
That might make them misbehave.
It's extraordinary to me that what is assumed is a parental relationship between you and the state.
The state are essentially the adults and we're kind of children and the legacy media amplify their messaging that we're supposed to think it's kind of normal that they contain and control the information that we gain access to.
In the chat over on Rumble, Woodski says he sounds like a South Park character.
I think he means the whistleblower but he He could mean me.
You and Fauci in those discussions just wanted to turn the rhetoric down.
Is that correct?
That was it.
The doco, what really happened in Wuhan, the next chapter, also exposes extensive attempts to make the public think it was a natural virus.
Joining us now is the journalist behind the investigation, Sky News host Shari Markson.
Good morning to you.
You've been following this for years and most of it, it's not new is it, the theory that it was a conspiracy.
Why are these bombshells coming out now?
I've been investigating this for three and a half years now.
I've written a book.
Yeah, we've been investigating it.
We've all been investigating it.
What's interesting is in our country, there's a COVID inquiry, a government inquiry that's been sort of conducted very publicly.
But whenever, during the inquiry, they go near any really important information that implies or infers that this is a complex and necessarily global problem, because it was a pandemic.
It was global, I suppose, by its very nature.
They shut that down pretty fast.
I'm going to show you my incredible powers of prescience now and tell you that the conclusion of the Covid inquiry will be, oh there are one or two bad apples within the government, these mistakes were made, and no one will say, do you know what happened?
This situation was exploited to legitimise regulation and authoritarianism that elsewise would have been rejected out of hand.
It's extraordinary the way that our culture was amended.
It was kind of like social engineering.
Did you guys think that?
Put a Y in the chat if you think so.
Sticker Mule ate my baby, says Terence on Snaker.
I tell you what, Sticker Mule are good guys.
They would not eat a baby, not under any circumstances.
We did a first documentary two years ago, this new documentary that aired last night on Sky News.
For it, as you just saw, we had one of the insiders who worked with Anthony Fauci He reveals that they decided to deliberately downplay the notion that this came from a lab that then became a conspiracy theory.
He now says he feels obligated to speak out because it looks like, he believes, based on his investigation, that it did eventuate from genetic engineering at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
These are quite amazing revelations.
Absolutely.
So US Chief Medical Officer Anthony Fauci, at the time of course, what did he stand to gain by covering it up?
Well, his agency had been among several United States agencies that were funding the research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Oh no!
It's such a terrible mess, isn't it?
Can you see the kind of reckoning that needs to take place?
Any legitimate inquiry into what happened in the last three years would involve, I suppose, looking at the FDA, the NIH, the CDC, the CIA, the British government, the WHO, in a sense the entire complex would quake if you were to look at this assiduously, if you were to look at it diligently, because what was revealed
Well, the aperture that opened in that period was, ah, there are a set of globalist interests whose interests converge, both economically and in terms of political power, and we're witnessing it right now.
Slowly, incrementally, you'll get this information, but I wonder if you'll get the change that is required if you read into the degree of information that's now becoming available.
So Robert Cadlick, that health official, told us last night that Fauci would have been concerned for his own reputation and Trump looking at Fauci.
No, no, don't like this guy.
And that of his institute if it eventuated that his agency had funded the very research that sparked this pandemic.
And that is a live possibility.
So this affected everyone across the world, right?
So downplaying it at the very beginning, how damaging was that?
Look, 7 million people or more have died as a result of COVID-19.
It still affects all of our lives.
Economies were shut down.
But it's not just about justice for the millions of people who have died, why we need to know how this pandemic began, but it's to prevent another one.
And if we don't learn the lessons, if we don't Well luckily there's no gain-of-function research going on anywhere in the world right now and certainly no biolabs in Ukraine and no curious relationships between Ukrainian energy companies and the Biden family.
Now in a completely unrelated video, a Navy medical officer called Lieutenant Ted Macy has revealed a rise in
heart issues in active naval officers. I don't... let me know in the chat
if you've got any theories as to what could be causing this sharp spike in
heart disease in the military. Not you, we've seen enough of your propaganda,
here he is.
So in July, Undersecretary Cisneros acknowledged the DMET data, the database
working properly and also acknowledged things such as myocarditis rising 151%.
So what I did, I went in today.
I'm doing the same thing.
Five-year average.
However, I'm comparing it to 2022.
And I only am using fixed-wing pilots and helicopter pilots.
Active duty.
So we've got hypertensive disease.
Kyle Rhino says it's being caused by white supremacy.
Let's look into that!
36%.
Ischemic heart disease, 69%.
Ischemic heart disease, 69%.
Pulmonary heart disease, 62%.
Leferius Monster, I'm not going to be reading your answers until you return to the
scriptural and religious aspect of your nature.
Heart failure, 973%.
Other forms of heart disease, 63%.
Cardiomyopathy, 152%.
There you go.
It's a pretty extraordinary set of circumstances there.
Heart disease, what's that?
in 152 percent.
There you go, it's a pretty extraordinary set of circumstances there.
Heart disease, what's that?
It's a 973 percent rise.
That's a pretty significant rise.
What's causing all of this stuff?
We need an inquiry!
A proper inquiry.
Have a listen to this.
This is Liz Cheney appearing on Jake... It's not Liz Cheney, actually.
They're discussing Liz Cheney's new book on Jake Tapper's television programme on the legacy media.
They get really excited with the idea that Trump is depressed.
Let me know in the chat, can you imagine, whether you like Trump or not, can you imagine him becoming depressed?
I just can't imagine him having depression as part of his psychological makeup.
In our politics lead, former Republican Congresswoman Liz Cheney of Wyoming delivering a devastating, devastating portrait.
Devastating.
Of the Republican Party and former President Donald Trump.
It's part of her new memoir due out next week.
It's called Oath and Honor.
CNN exclusively obtained a copy of the book.
Can I see what that book looks like though?
So blatant advertising.
CNN special correspondent Jamie Gangel is here with all the juicy details.
And Jamie, you tell me that Liz Cheney does not hold back.
She does not.
She names names.
She has emails, text messages.
I think the book is extraordinary because it goes behind the scenes.
And for the first time, you're hearing details about her Republican colleagues.
About the Republican Party and really their cowardice is the word she uses in their support of Donald Trump.
And here's just from one excerpt of the book.
She says that McCarthy told her that he had just spoken to Trump and that McCarthy says, quote, he knows it's over.
He just needs to go through all the stages of grief.
Cheney then writes that it's... Trump won't go through normal stages of grief like denial and anger and acceptance.
It will just be sort of full-on Trump confidence, enthusiasm, upbeat ignorance... For a wry sense of humour that the stages of grief also apparently... JPW 2730.
Do not give your dog treats when he begs for them.
You are rewarding begging.
You've stopped!
We're trying to talk about the power dynamics in American politics.
We're trying to talk about MSNBC, CNN and other mainstream media outlets' inability to convey honest, authentic news, to hold power to account, and you're worried that I'm not feeding...
You're probably right though.
It is rewarding begging, isn't it?
You're right.
I need to amend the way I'm treating that dog.
The reason I think this is interesting is there's such an ongoing appetite on MSNBC and CNN and those kind of outlets to condemn Trump without ever addressing the kind of emotion that led to Trump's success in the first place.
A total loss of faith in the various institutions that govern American political life, whether those are state or corporate.
just a complete sort of inner loss of faith in the direction of the country, a loss of
spiritual connection.
And it never ever is able to address, but somehow he has a kind of appeal precisely
because he doesn't ever seem to get depressed or comfort eat.
But that's not what Liz Cheney claims later in the book.
Have a look at this.
You included tweeting in all cap letters.
But Jake, there's also another sort of stunning anecdote about Kevin McCarthy.
We all remember the photograph when just three weeks after January 6th, there it is, Kevin
McCarthy goes.
running down to Mar-a-Lago. He's afraid he can't raise money anymore.
And just to, I'm sorry to interrupt, but this is a lifeline.
Everyone thought that the Republican Party was going to rid itself of Donald Trump.
Everybody had spoken negatively about him.
But then McCarthy does this and it basically...
But January 6th, pretty complex, isn't it?
I think we're all beginning to recognise that it was exploited, that a lot of the reporting was extraordinary, that there were the presence of a number of agencies that day, that it's been used to legitimise the militarisation of the police force, additional expenditure on the capital, police, vilification of political opponents, that it's been referred to as an insurrection, although video footage seems not to reveal that.
And these are the kind of details that are sort of continually brushed over, but That's a very fine Mar-a-Lago photograph.
He's like Phoenix from the ashes.
Donald Trump has renewed.
Correct.
And nobody knows this trip is happening.
And Cheney writes, actually when she saw that photo, she thought it was a fake.
Really?
And then she confronts Kevin McCarthy about it and she writes, get ready, Cheney, Mar-a-Lago?
What the hell, Kevin?
Kevin McCarthy.
They're really worried.
Trump's not eating.
So they asked me to come see him.
Cheney.
What?
You went to Mar-a-Lago because Trump's not eating?
McCarthy, yeah, he's really depressed.
A really joyful chuckle.
Oh, depressed, not eating.
It's extraordinary because elsewhere in their content, they claim to deeply care about mental health and
depression.
Me show there in the chat.
Day 23 of Russell keeping me awake in my wage cage.
Literally, stay awake, stay awake Misho.
Rational Anarchy says, read Punished by Rewards by Alfie Kohn.
I will read that Rational Anarchy.
I will give it a look.
And Carl Ryan says simply, Gareth gives my heart palpitations.
Gareth, have you been anywhere near the US Navy?
Because there's a lot of extraordinary and otherwise inexplicable heart disease going on within that fine institution.
Let me tell you.
She also reveals that, look, she was not the only one.
She talks about other Republicans were, quote, angry and disgusted that McCarthy had gone running back to Trump.
And there's a text that's going around and she writes that her Republican colleagues, quote, Some mocked him, circulating that Trump-McCarthy photo along with, get ready, the clip from the movie Jerry Maguire, where Tom Cruise tells Renee Zellweger, you complete me.
Very good clip, very good film.
More what I think about is when he does the memo and everyone's like, oh that's a great memo!
How long you give him?
Six days?
He'll be gone by the end of the week.
This is a good bit of propaganda as well by MSNBC.
Here they are fear-mongering about hints that Trump has dropped in his speeches that he would use the military to control protests.
Now what I think is interesting about this, and you tell me in the chat Whether or not you'd be concerned about this.
It sounds like, you know, Trump talks about maybe the army would be mobilized if there were acts of public protest.
Have a listen to that and tell me genuinely what you think.
But bear in mind what happened when, you know, liberal politicians like Trudeau shut down bank accounts of people that donated to those trucker protests.
Think about January the 6th Where I feel like there's one guy, this troops been in prison for 22 years, he weren't even there that day.
And what about, what's it like, dude, Dougie Mackay or Mackey Dougie or Mackey Dougie, the guy that's doing like, I think, seven months for making a meme.
You can't attack people for authoritarian language when you run an authoritarian regime, particularly not when it's Trump free and easy at the pulpit.
It's extraordinary, this is.
But let me know where you guys stand, because I know there'll be a variety of opinions.
...with a disturbing report on Trump's plans to deploy the military to push his MAGA agenda, while cracking down on domestic opponents in a potential second term.
It would be an extraordinary power grab, and it's alarming non-partisan experts.
Today, the Associated Press detailing Trump's repeated hints of an expanded role for the... Hints!
Hints, you can't build a story on hints.
Suggestions, a whiff of, the essence of, like the perfume of military.
Military, and the lack of guardrails to restrain him.
As Trump and his advisers quote, suggest they would have wide latitude to call up military units for action inside US borders.
And just in case people weren't paying attention, Trump making his intentions very clear.
For example, on the campaign trail, Trump complaining that he was blocked from using the military to quell protests in Democrat cities in his first term.
New York City is a crime den.
Chicago is a crime den.
One of the other things I'll do, because you know you're supposed to not be involved in that, you just have to be asked by the governor or the mayor to come in.
The next time I'm not waiting.
Huck fed in our chat simply posted the word Waco.
Presidential candidates say a lot of things and then don't do them right.
Remember when Biden said he wouldn't build a wall?
There's a wall being built.
Remember when he said Saudi Arabia would be made a pariah?
There are deals being done.
Let's have a look at Chris Christie now.
He seems like a jolly sort of a guy to me.
He's saying that Donald Trump will be a convicted felon in 2024.
We've got 15,000 of you watching us now on Rumble.
We'll do a couple more minutes on YouTube, then we're going to invite you to join us in the free speech paradise that is Rumble.
Trump isn't hiding the ball here.
We want to have a look. Chris Christie right now. Let's have a look.
Are you convinced that he will be convicted of something in all of this?
He's going to be convicted this spring in Washington on the January 6th stuff.
And so here we have a criminal enterprise going on at the White House and we want to send this back?
I mean, it doesn't make any sense to me at all.
And the only reason that there's even context for this conversation is because so many people are also dissatisfied with Joe Biden.
You've got two people, both of whom, in my opinion, quite frankly, are too old for the job, who show signs every day.
That they're not up to the job every day.
And so the American people sit there and say, look, what are we going to do with this choice?
And that's why I'm out here fighting for this.
It's not that I had nothing else to do.
I had some pretty nice gigs I was doing that were very enjoyable.
What were they?
What were you up to, you soppy sausage?
Hey, a lot of you, I can see where you guys are going in the chat.
He's not getting a lot of love there, is he?
Dear Chris Christie.
God love him.
There's a few things that we can show you now.
We can show you that the founder of BLM, Black Lives Matter, is endorsing Trump now. Or we can have a look at this story.
Let's start with this and then we'll show you the... No, I tell you what, you guys will
love this. Trudeau and Trudeau's opposite number, the leader of the opposition, vying for
who loves Ukraine more. This is extraordinary. Justin Trudeau, it looks like someone
pretending to be a politician in a film about politicians.
And you can sort of see him almost twitching with glee at how well he thinks this speech is going.
It's really, really exciting.
Have a look at Justin Trudeau.
Let me know what you think about this guy.
But indeed, Mr. Speaker, there are a lot of factors that deliver higher food prices, not just for Canadians, for people around the world.
One of the key ones is Russia's continued illegal invasion of Ukraine, Mr. Speaker.
My God!
Again, it's Putin's fault.
But there is a food crisis around the world.
There is an energy crisis, or at least everything's becoming more expensive.
But their ability to alloy it to the issue of the day is exemplary.
Mr. Speaker, on this side of the House, we can affirm clearly that we will stand with Ukraine with everything necessary for as long as necessary.
As we saw last week, no Conservative politician can say the same Really exciting.
I think he's made his own admittably lovely hair stand on end at the back of his neck when he's reckoning, oh, they're standing up, they're standing up.
But then have a look at the opponent's party.
They're into it as well.
The Honourable Leader of the Opposition.
Actually, we are the only party that has stood with Ukraine, Mr. Speaker.
I don't think there's a lot of room for complexity in Canadian politics except for when they,
like, invite a Nazi in there to celebrate, which they extraordinarily do do once in a
Remember that.
Let's have a look at a little more rhetoric from Trudeau.
He gets really excited here.
16,000 of you guys watching us.
If you're watching us on YouTube, let's leave YouTube now.
Let's leave YouTube now before we report on this China thing.
Listen, you Awakened Wonders, how we love you.
Join our movement.
over on Rumble. We can speak freely. We're going to be talking about the Ireland protests, how they
are analysing it reductively in order to maintain the kind of globalist tropes that are required
to shut down any proletariat uprising. Of course, we disavow all violence in our free speech movement,
but it's very interesting the way that the legitimate concerns of ordinary people are
continually shut down and how in a nation like Ireland you can't use the kind of imperialist
rhetoric that would be used to condemn say for example American people or British people for
being racist because Ireland has been historically an oppressed nation.
You're going to love the bit of content we've made about that and indeed Conor McGregor's potential involvement in an emergent Irish populist movement.
So if you're watching us on YouTube, click the link in the description.
Get on over here.
We're going to have a little bit more of a chuckle at what Canada calls democracy, and then we're going to show you how the legacy media is reporting on escalating tensions between China and the United States, which seems to me to be...
Terrifying, obviously.
And then we'll show you some of this island stuff.
You're going to love the lot.
And you might want to... See you later, people on YouTube.
We love you, AwakendWonders.
Join us.
If you're watching us on Rumble, you might want to become an AwakendWonder, like LoveInAction and SunnySweetSpot and SMH56.
They're in there chatting away beautifully to one another.
They're forming relationships and friendship and joy over here in the Rumble chat.
There's the likes of Connie Sax and I'm Fat Mike.
LimbicBeauty, Moomin82.
It's a wonderful, glorious community speaking freely with one another.
Join us, join us.
Let's see what Canadian democracy looks like right now.
The Right Honourable Prime Minister.
He is so desperate to try and score partisan points that he actually refused to stand in support of something Volodymyr Zelensky asked us for in this House.
How is the Leader of the Opposition explaining to Ukrainian Canadians right across the country that he no...
We like Ukraine more than you.
No, we like Ukraine more than you.
Why are they arguing about who likes Ukraine more?
Can't we all just like Ukraine together?
Can't we all advocate for saving as many Ukrainian and Russian and Palestinian and Israeli and Chinese and Taiwanese lives as possible by not letting the interests of the world be governed by the military-industrial complex?
No, we can't do that.
That's complicated stuff.
...no longer stands with Ukraine on things that they need right now to win this war against Russia.
Yeah!
Hey, you know there was those chats recently in San Francisco which meant that the homeless had to be swept away like human detritus so that President Xi could come over and shake hands with Larry Fink of BlackRock and Tim Cook of Apple.
Well, like...
Are things going well between China and the US, or are things going badly?
Because you watch things economically and financially, and you see how homeless people are dispatched, and you think, well, I guess things are going well between the United States and China.
We're welcoming them to San Francisco.
Give San Francisco my regards.
I left my heart there.
Certainly didn't leave it in the Navy.
You leave it there long enough, someone will vaccinate it into a myocardite estate.
Or is it that there are escalating military tensions in the South Seas?
Here's the legacy media reporting on that.
Note the biases.
China calls the United States, quote, the biggest disruptor of regional peace and stability in the world.
This in response to the Pentagon's recent report on Beijing's military buildup.
US Navy is responding Now, after the Chinese military says it drove out an American warship in the disputed South China Sea.
Reuters reports the ship was on a routine freedom of navigation operation and had... Routine freedom!
...rights to be there per international law.
And by the way, this is the first interaction since President Biden and President Xi's high-profile meeting in San Francisco earlier this month.
So what's that meeting about?
Are they getting on okay?
Was that just a front so that I guess Apple's economic relationship with China could continue?
Like one minute you're listening to rhetoric from Nikki Haley condemning TikTok and pro-censorship discourse.
Then we're seeing Larry Fink meeting up with Xi.
They are transcendent of nation.
Do you not think?
The globalist agenda is by its very nature transcendent of nation.
We're all sort of getting all caught up in flags and partisan loyalties.
They're masquerading all over the joint, making deals with one another.
And then the very next week, there's escalation of military tensions in the South China Seas.
What's real?
What layer of the matrix do you want to call home?
China is calling this a security risk creator, but the United States, as you said, is pointing to international law in this case, saying that they have the right to pass through this highly disputed territory.
The Beastie Boys said you've got to fight for your right to pass through this highly disputed territory.
A Chinese military official posted on social media over the weekend that it deployed its air and naval forces to, quote, track, monitor, and warn away an American destroyer, the USS Hopper.
The U.S.
Navy said not only does it have international rights in the South, Mr Red Fox says, I want to be free.
That's all we want, isn't it?
To feel the sacred in our lives again.
To be free to be who we are individually.
To form relationships with one another.
To sense that the state is not intervening in our lives.
That corporate globalist interests don't dominate every aspect of our lives.
From the screens we look at, to the foods we eat, to the medications we encourage them to take.
Hey, what was Dave Rubin saying?
That my head exploded.
Is that what he's saying?
I do love Dave Rubin.
Saying my head exploded.
My head is very much together.
South China Sea.
International law allows that passage without advance approval or notice.
So the U.S.
is rebuffing what it calls China's unlawful restrictions requiring permission to pass.
This comes as two U.S.
allies, Australia and the Philippines, launched their first joint sea and air patrols in the area.
Now, the U.S.
Navy responding to China's accusations over the weekend that it's disrupting peace in the region, saying, quote, the United States upholds freedom of navigation for all nations as a principle.
Freedom of navigation for all nations is a principle.
On this, countries continue to claim and assert limits on rights that exceed their authority
under international law.
The United States will continue to defend the rights and freedoms of the sea guaranteed
to all.
The rights and freedoms of the sea?
You can't go to war on that basis.
There's no reason to escalate tensions between superpowers for something as abstract as the right and freedom of the sea.
What is this?
The Little Mermaid?
What we are watching this morning, Adrienne and Marky, is how the Biden administration will respond, just given that not too long ago, just a few weeks ago, an agreement was reached between the two countries to resume high-level military-to-military communications at that summit in San Francisco with President Xi.
If you want a visual aid that might give you an idea how tensions are being escalated in that region, here is a helpful one.
Have a little look at this.
Right, those are US military bases around China.
I mean, you could do a lovely tour and not be done in six months, couldn't you?
You go to Thailand, that would be a nice one.
There's one in Singapore.
The Marshall Islands, I don't even know what they are.
Sounds like the whole of that is a base.
That seems to me to be something of a threat, wouldn't you imagine?
Wouldn't you imagine that that would make you feel a little antagonised?
Let me see if you can find some common ground right here.
And those of you in the Awakened Wonder chat like HumanFly and BlessedOldBird, we're going to do some Bible readings tomorrow.
We're going to look at the Bhagavad Gita.
We're going to look at the holy books.
We're going to Elevate our consciousness together through scripture.
We're going to find the deep light within us and awaken ourselves through the holy words of numerous scripture.
But now, I want to see if you can find some unity in this.
You're aware of the riots in Ireland.
Are you aware of how they are being utilised, like any crisis or conflagration, to increase centralised control?
More online censorship is being imposed in Ireland.
If we look past the legacy media narratives, which are very quick to condemn the people of Ireland, who have a pretty long history of having affinity with oppressed people, being an oppressed people themselves, as being far right, which is sort of Pretty offensive, I would say.
You start to see that globalist narratives are starting to collapse.
People are rising up together.
They are terrified of your freedom.
Your awakening is the prima materia of revolution.
Our ability to commune and come together, to organize differently, to untether ourselves from their model, is the one thing they fear most.
You know that in the Awaken Wonder chat.
You know that in the Rumble chat.
Let's have a look, without using legacy media narratives, at what's happening in Ireland and why they are so determined to censor free speech and grant the police the right to storm into the homes of Irish people and snatch their devices just on the flimsiest of suspicions.
Here's the news.
No, here's the effing news.
Here's the news.
No, here's the fucking news!
Oh no, everyone in Ireland has suddenly turned right wing!
Either that or people are dissatisfied for a number of complex reasons connected to globalism.
Probably best just to censor everyone and not talk about it ever again.
There have been scenes of great unrest in Dublin, you're aware of that already, but are you aware of how it's being used to legitimise censorship and hate laws, anti-hate speech laws to give them their correct sort of title, that have been proposed for some time now?
Let's have a look at those riots, the causes for those riots, Conor McGregor's curious involvement in them, he spoke out against what's happening in Ireland, the migrant crisis that at least some Irish people believe is taking place, and why there appears to be a global appetite for censorship and unrest all across Europe and much of the world.
Has everyone suddenly turned racist or is there a deeper anti-globalist movement trying to form and an establishment narrative to crush it?
34 people were arrested in a riot in the city's historic center overnight.
Anti-immigrant protesters fought with police after a stabbing incident involving three young children.
Rami Innocencio reports on the violence, apparently fueled by larger concerns about immigration.
Hundreds of police officers faced down a swarm of rioters in central Dublin.
The mob of about 100 setting fire to buses and police vehicles and looting more than a dozen businesses.
Ireland's police commissioner called the violence disgraceful and said far-right groups were responsible.
Far-right groups, of course.
Now, have you noticed with historic, even recent historic riots, Often when looking at matters of civil unrest, this is not to legitimise violence, of course, a diagnosis is offered that later proves to be flimsy, inaccurate or at least incomplete.
In my own lifetime, the Brixton riots related to police brutality, the Toxteth riots related to poverty and the Poltax riots related to very, very unfair taxes.
I wonder if there's a more complex framing available for what's happened in Dublin recently.
We have a complete lunatic hooligan faction Driven by far-right ideology.
Here we're racist now father.
I hear you're a racist now father!
It's very interesting to hear a country like Ireland described using the analysis that would ordinarily be applied in say America or France or the UK.
There's this lunatic fringe, there's these right-wing extremists because Ireland has a very particular history.
Ireland has never been a colonial power.
Ireland is a historically oppressed country.
The British have occupied, oppressed, murdered, some would say enforced starvation in that nation.
You can't say that Ireland are a racist far-right country.
Ireland's ethno-nationalism is a necessary part of their defence against an external oppressor, explicitly the British.
You can't make the argument that Ireland's suddenly gone all right-wing in the same way that you might in other predominantly white nations.
It doesn't make sense in the same way.
So something interesting is taking place.
Sparking the chaos, several stabbings earlier in the day of three young children and a woman who tried to stop their attacker.
It was horrendous and the children screaming and the women screaming.
The sole person of interest, a man in his 40s, in Irish National only for about half that time.
The knifings unleashed rising anti-immigration anger.
This year, Ireland marked record immigration, granting entry to more than 100,000 foreigners.
Just so you know, I'm very sympathetic, as best as I can be without knowing very much about it, to the plight of refugees and even economic migrants from around the world.
But Ireland's a relatively small country with a pretty unique history and a pretty small population.
100,000 migrants in a year, it could be argued, would cause some unrest.
And it's perhaps understandable that if there have been violent events, that it might stoke already present Anti-migrant sentiment.
Although I understand that the person that is alleged to have committed that stabbing has been a resident in the country for 20 years, clearly an event of this nature is a reaction against something.
Is there some deeper problem that's not being addressed?
Is there a burgeoning anti-establishment sentiment that's being felt across the world that people are unable to express without being condemned as far-right lunatics or racists?
Certainly people are being called far-right lunatics and racists pretty consistently across the world if they won't be obedient.
As police in Dublin prepare for a possible second night of violence, the Prime Minister said these scenes should be condemned by all those who believe in the rule of law and democracy.
Whenever there is a crisis, there's usually an appetite to exploit it, introduce legislation and regulation that will be advantageous to the powerful.
I wonder if this situation will be any different.
In addition to that, I think it's now very obvious to anyone who might have doubted it that our incitement hatred legislation is just not up to date.
It's not up to date for the social media age and we need that legislation through and we need it through within a matter of weeks because it's not just the platforms who have a responsibility here, and they do, there's also the individuals who post messages and images That's globalist rhetoric right there from Varadkar.
Whatever you think about the riots, whatever you think about migration, how Varadkar, the Prime Minister I believe of Ireland, has responded is very on message with globalist rhetoric elsewhere.
Whether that's Canada, there's a bid for legislation, in fact a bill's already been passed to censor online content, in particular independent news.
In the UK, you'll remember from recent events that were connected, if tangentially, to me, a new online safety bill to regulate, control online content.
Usually To stop hate speech.
Just so you know, I'm anti-hate speech.
I don't think that any other platform should use it to incite hatred or violence.
I think it should be used to incite togetherness and inquiry about the actions of the powerful.
This type of legislation, as well as, as they claim, being able to shut down hate speech, and in particular in Ireland, grant the police extraordinary powers, will also be used to control all online speech.
There's also the individuals who post messages and images online that stir up hatred and violence, and we need to be able to use laws to go after them individually as well.
This Member of Parliament normalises and legitimises control, just says that it's absolutely necessary to regulate people's behaviour, and uses arguments that sound sort of persuasive if you put yourself in the position of being victimised by bullying or hatred.
But ask yourself this question.
In your recent experience, are the state primarily acting on behalf of victimized people or very powerful interests?
Just think about the last few years.
Who's benefiting?
Very powerful interests or, oh no, the vulnerable.
We better do this because of the vulnerable.
What I have noticed is they often use rhetoric about, for example, we better protect the vulnerable during this pandemic.
Everyone in your houses.
Then there's a massive wealth transfer and we move on.
That's what I've noticed.
When you think about us, All law, all legislation is about the restriction of freedom.
That's exactly what we're doing here, is we are restricting freedom, but we're doing it for the common good.
You will see throughout our constitution, yes you have rights, but they are restricted for the common good.
Everything needs to be balanced.
That makes sense if you trust your legislators, if you trust your government, and in particular if you've voted for the changes that they're implementing.
I believe that it is our job as legislators to restrict those freedoms for the common good.
The problem comes, of course, when most people don't trust the state or the media or the people that are making the choices that will impact significantly the lives of all of us.
So what is the real reason for those riots?
Why is there so much unrest around the world?
Is there a kind of burgeoning anti-globalist movement And why is it that the solution is always, we're going to have to control free speech, we're going to have to censor online platforms?
Why is the solution that's proposed always beneficial to the interests of the powerful?
Why is that?
Let's get into it.
Ireland must pass new legislation to crack down on the online hatred behind the rioting
in Dublin on Thursday, said its Prime Minister, Leo Varadkar, on Friday.
But what triggered the riots were accurate news media reports that the suspect in the
stabbing of multiple individuals, including a five-year-old child, was an Algerian immigrant.
Either Varadkar is spreading misinformation by attributing the riots to messages and images,
or he wants to criminalise sharing accurate news stories.
Well, the criminalisation of sharing accurate information has already begun.
Certainly, accurate information was censored during the pandemic era.
We know that now.
But it was a problem.
The Twitter files revealed that, and people said, what?
They were censoring true information.
Mark Zuckerberg admitted that they censored true or debatable information.
Now what they're trying to do is legislate so it's a matter of law and order to control and censor precisely accurate information.
This information is true, but we don't want people to know it.
Why?
Because if they know it, they might reject systems of power, They might become non-compliant.
Haven't you always felt at your heart of hearts that censorship is fundamentally about controlling information that might encourage the population to engage in acts of direct democracy and disobedience?
What do you imagine all these top secret files are full of?
Check out Wikileaks to learn more and look at what happened to Julian Assange when he revealed some of that information.
There's no excuse for the looting and rioting that occurred in Dublin.
And the suspect in the stabbing attack had been in Ireland for 20 years, according to news reports.
And another immigrant, a Brazilian, physically intervened to stop the attacker.
So it's good, isn't it, to know that immigration can be a positive thing.
But it's not straightforward.
It's not necessarily just hordes of migrants running around, stabbing people.
There's more complexity to that.
Certainly, there's a conversation that needs to be had around migration in Ireland, it would seem.
The Dublin riots appeared to have been the work of the same kind of nihilistic young men that engaged in rioting during the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 and in France this summer.
At the same time, many in Ireland felt they have seen a pattern.
A few days before the stabbing, writes Angela Nagel at Compact, a Slovak-Romany immigrant was sentenced for the murder of a young woman, Aisling Murphy.
It was reported that the assailant had been living on disability benefits in a publicly funded council home.
Last year, an Iraqi immigrant murdered two Irish gay men.
In a nation with close-knit, high-trust communities, until recently, this new reality is shocking and alien to Irish people.
Dublin used to be renowned for its warmth, fun and friendliness.
Now everyone talks about how the atmosphere has taken a dark turn.
I think in the post-pandemic period many of us have become aware of a kind of ever-present gloom, despair, angst, economic decline, mistrust, most likely because we feel at scale we've been lied to and exploited.
I don't know, let me know in the comments and chat how you feel in this post-pandemic era.
One of the things I'd have to say as a person that was closely affiliated, albeit perhaps incorrectly, with what you might call Left-wing and liberal politics and now appear to be more associated with conspiracy and right-wing politics, I would say that I've always been incredibly sympathetic to anybody that would have to flee their home nation in order to seek a better life.
In particular because countries like the UK and the US have a long history of destabilizing populations in the Middle East and parts of Africa and it's always felt like part of a kind of contract if you attack and plunder these nations for their resources, then perhaps if it creates refugee and migrant crisis, some of the responsibility ought be borne by someone somewhere.
But I've always felt that it's ordinary working people who generally are most impacted when there are huge demographic shifts, the type that are caused by migration crisis.
And I've always felt that ordinary working people's voices are not heard.
Now, the reason I'm interested in Ireland is because Ireland doesn't have a colonial past.
Ireland is very distinctly and definitely not Britain.
Ireland didn't go marauding around the world, creating diamond mines and slave trading and tea companies and chaos and craziness and wars.
Ireland have a very unique and particular history.
So if the Irish people have an attitude, an opinion, a sensibility around migration, immigration, a policy that they prefer or propose, I guess that's down to the Irish people, isn't it?
and perhaps there could be, I don't know, votes, debates, discussions about whether or not
migration is a level that Irish people are comfortable with.
You can say right-wing conspiracy theory all you want.
And we can say, of course, that crime occurs throughout demographics, and perhaps you could show studies that it's not more likely to occur because of refugees or migrants.
I'm sure that's true.
But what's also true is the people of Ireland should be Self-determined and self-determining.
And if there's an attitude for control or an appetite towards controlling, curtailing, limiting migration, I would say that's probably up to the Irish people themselves.
Certainly they should be able to discuss it.
And the idea that these violent altercations are being used to legitimise legislation that was already waiting in the wings, that amounts to granting the police and the state the ability to come into people's homes, snatch their laptops, if they're in possession of hate speech or hate speech materials, and again, As Matt Taibbi said in a recent conversation I had with him, hate speech isn't the issue.
Who decides what is hate speech is the issue.
Who decides?
These people in Parliament?
These people that are making the decisions to introduce these laws?
These people that plainly hate the vast majority of the people they govern based on the way that they demand that they be controlled like children?
This, I think, is the key problem.
Globalism is causing a backlash.
People don't want their nations governed from abroad and from above.
They want to be involved in their own communities and their own democracies.
And we might not agree with what people's attitudes are to subjects like migration, culture, race, but I guess if you're truly a Democrat, if you truly believe in people's right to self-determination, you're going to have to allow that to take place.
And you're going to have to allow people to disagree.
What's the alternative?
Let me know in the chat.
Let me know in the comments.
But rather than deal with crime, violence and homelessness, the government instead wants to crack down on what people say on social media.
People don't realise how extreme Ireland's hate speech bill is, wrote an Irish commentator on X. Up to 12 months in prison for refusing to give the password to your devices if suspected of committing hate speech.
Twelve months for refusing to allow the state to read messages between you and your spouse.
Don't you feel generally that the state has already got too much power in your life?
How do you feel when you're paying your taxes?
Woohoo!
Taxes!
Brilliant!
Who do you want to bomb now?
Do you want them to have more power?
More control?
Because they know that you don't want them having that control, what they have to do is legitimise these measures.
Like say, you have to grant us the power to control your communication because of hate speech.
This is the trend, this is the tendency, not just in Ireland but in Canada, in the UK, presumably in the United States, all across the EU.
It's what the European bureaucrat Thierry Breton keeps threatening Elon Musk with.
They will respect the law or they will not be able to continue to operate in Europe.
There is an appetite for control because without control, I believe, people are going to start to self-determine, self-organise, reject the system, reject the media, embrace new independent media and new independent politics, look at new ideas.
That's the tendency.
The tendency is towards decentralisation.
So power has to reverse it.
And the way they can reverse it is going, oh, those riots in Ireland, that was far-right and racist.
We all hate far-right racism.
Yeah, of course we do.
That was the last century Hitler.
That was all bad.
We remember that.
That was terrible, terrible stuff.
Right.
So to prevent that, we're going to have to stop you and your spouse texting each other if we suspect there's hateful content.
Well, do you want the state having that power?
What has the state done for you lately that makes you believe for a second that granting them more authority in your life is the answer?
Ireland's government has presented no evidence that any of the riots were caused by messages and images online that stir up hatred, other than accurate news reports.
If the truth makes you protest, then that's the problem, not a need for new censorship.
When the Arab Spring went down, everyone was like, oh, look, they can organise, they can bring down these Arabian nations, oh, woo-hoo.
Now that it's happening here, they're like, uh-oh, censorship laws.
In recent decades, Dublin has seen many incidences of rioting, save Free Speech Island.
These incidents never caused calls for scrapping freedom of speech.
Of course we can't bring you this unique, earth-shattering, mind-altering content without you, your attention, and without Sticker Meal!
Sticker Mule are our friends and we love them.
That's why we've created this unique limited edition sticker pack.
It's still limited.
I mean, have you got one yet?
There are six stunning designs all held within this beautiful burgundy envelope, including, look at that!
Stay free.
Russell Brand.
This little guy here.
The mule itself.
Sticker Mule has 10,000 of these packs.
That's right, 10,000.
Ready to deliver to your address.
Absolutely free.
You don't want any money.
You don't want anything.
Just go to StickerMule.com forward slash Russell.
Fill out the form.
You'll have stickers.
Put them on your car.
Put them on your shirt.
Put them on your forehead.
Put them on your children.
These are the decisions you can make with your Sticker Mule stickers.
Once you've gone to StickerMule.com forward slash Russell.
Fill in the form.
There's a link in the description.
Right.
Let's get back to fighting for freedom, not that stick-a-meal don't love freedom.
Indeed, Ireland has experienced prolonged periods of low-level civil war in its turbulent past without resorting to such measures.
Organising a riot is a crime, noted one of Ireland's most impactful independent journalists, Ben Scallon of Gripped.
Participating in a riot is a crime.
Arson, attacking police, theft, calling for violence, these are all crimes already.
If anyone tells you that we need new hate speech laws to deal with these things, they're simply lying.
This is a very consistent trick.
Many of the things that are pointed out as a problem in order to legitimise new legislation are, as inventoried here, already crimes for which people can be accused, charged, tried, imprisoned.
What they want is the ability to just seep into your house like a gas and steal your information.
that at scale is already happening between the five IS nations, the anglophonic countries,
Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK, the US. They're changing, exchanging,
stocking, stockpiling data, pooling it all together, using it when necessary already.
What they want is just to legitimise it and to be able to coerce social media platforms
into handing over information and they want to be able to shut down independent oppositional
voices. Why? Because they're anticipating that the true information that's coming down the pipeline
is going to make you very unhappy and very disobedient and they want to get in now and
stop that stuff happening. Veradka appears to view the riots as just what was needed to pass
the new hate speech legislation. Politicians continue to relentlessly demand new powers
for censorship in response to every new crisis from climate change, crime and Covid to Ukraine,
Israel and immigration.
Liberal left politicians around the world, from Varadkar and Macron to Obama and Biden, are demanding censorship of, among other things, the very issues they have long lectured the public as ones for which they are offering to address root causes.
Liberal left governments have sought to use every new crisis as an opportunity to scapegoat their political opponents, and when that stops working, demand censorship.
Since the legitimacy and continued existence of the liberal left hegemony in the West comes from control over information, I think the analysis here is correct.
As sequential populist uprisings succeed, whether you agree with them or not, in Argentina, in the Netherlands, elsewhere in the world, previous incarnations that were much more left-wing were stamped out and reformed into the mainstream, there is a fear now that neoliberalism itself is being rejected because neoliberalism amounts to the national front For globalism.
Hey, we're a global community.
We've got these new sets of values now.
Let us censor you.
Isn't it great?
I've got no strong views about whatever sexuality, race, culture anybody has.
It's not something that interests me.
I believe in absolute unity and absolute autonomy.
The one thing I cannot stand is the establishment and their willingness to legitimize further and further control by saying they're going to hell.
I don't trust them.
You don't trust them.
They know we don't trust them.
They're trying to censor us so we can't We should all come together, whether we happen to be Muslim, or gay, or Christian, or Jewish, or middle class, or working class, and say, hey, even though we've got our differences, are you willing to leave us alone if we leave you alone and we create new types of community that are not utterly reliant on this neo-liberal globalist nightmare?
They know that it's a better idea, they know it's trying to be born, and they're trying to stamp it out.
The way it explains the continuing relentless drive for censorship by leaders around the world doesn't reflect the will of the people so much as the will of elites.
They are making clear that they view a free and open information environment as an existential threat to its ability to wage war, move labour as freely as capital, manage pandemics and control energy supplies.
Liberal and left governments around the world have made social programs, mass immigration and alternatives to policing and incarceration their highest priorities.
The result has been border chaos and violence in the US, increased crime, stabbings and bombings in Europe, resulting in political backlashes from Italy and Sweden to the Netherlands and Spain, with right-wing parties in ascendance across the continent.
And our argument here is right-wing parties is a kind of code for nationalist parties, parties that are about We just want to run the Netherlands, or we just want to run Spain.
We don't want all of these various interests.
Now a lot of that is anti-migrant rhetoric, but what I think is deeper and more significant is the anti-globalist, anti-corporate, anti-neo-liberal tyranny that is masquerading as permissive progressivism in all of the nations listed and is being, I believe, rightly rejected.
Liberal and left governments around the world made climate change and renewables two of their highest priorities, and the result was energy dependence by Europe on Russia, rising energy prices, a return to coal, and support for China's suppression of Uighur Muslims.
And liberal and left Self-governments made pandemic response a central selling point in their agenda and the result was catastrophic learning loss and student absenteeism that continues today.
All of the specific demands for censorship exposed what they really want.
Decisions transferred from parents to government, mass migration, political decision-making on energy, health and the economy transferred to the international level.
More expensive energy from renewables and the ability to begin new wars outside of democratic votes, e.g.
Ukraine.
Liberal left demands for governmental censorship will continue until they cause more harm than benefit to this agenda.
Let me know if you agree.
That's basically the agenda, isn't it?
To move national power to international power so that it's beyond the reach of democracy.
Just think for a moment of that WHO pandemic treaty that's being passed right now.
It will mean that part of each country's budget goes to the WHO.
And if the WHO determine lockdowns, vaccine mandates, your country's got no choice if it's a member state.
That's what globalism means.
Not only do you have no power as an individual, your country has no power as a country.
Power is so far away from you, you don't even know where it is or who's doing it.
Even though there are aspects of nationalism that I personally don't agree with, I can certainly see why people having a vision and an image for a country that reminds them of their grandparents and their recent history would be attractive compared to the banal, desacralizing nightmare being offered to us by neoliberalism.
Heads of state and other elected leaders from liberal left parties believe that the existing political cost of demanding censorship is worth the benefit, and advocates of censorship operate from the same playbook.
Censors can inhibit this backfire effect in various ways, including covering up the censorship, devaluing the target, reinterpreting the action, using official channels, and using intimidation and bribery, wrote two scholars in the history of censorship.
This is what they've done.
In the US, pro-censorship forces attempted to hide their censorship inside of a cyber security agency and subcontract it out to government partners like Stanford Internet Observatory, while European nations take it out of their hands and put it in the hands of EU bureaucrats in Brussels.
Censors around the world seek to devalue their targets as far-right fascists, racists and anti-Semites.
They reinterpret their actions as fighting misinformation and hate rather than as censorship, and they promote official channels from government-funded companies like NPR, PBS, CBC and BBC, or by having government beneficiaries like Pfizer finance pro-government media publicity.
Yeah, that's state-funded media.
We can't trust any of those guys.
It should be defunded.
But if these governments are unable to control their borders, assimilate migrants, and prevent violent crime, it won't matter how much they censor.
Over the last two weeks, a plurality of voters cast their votes for a far-right anti-immigrant political party in the Netherlands and a far-right laissez-faire presidential candidate in Argentina.
Despite weeks of biased news media coverage against both, the legacy media is losing its power.
It's losing its ability to go, Well, why don't you vote for Joe Biden?
He's great!
He's losing his ability to say, Tony Blair's the answer!
They're losing control, so they have to shut down the dissent because they can't go, well, why is this happening?
Well, because of globalism.
It's because people don't feel they've got any power in their own lives, in their own communities, in their nations, and they've got concerns about immigration.
Hmm.
Well, what if we call them racists and censor everything they say?
Brilliant.
And do it at a global level, then no one can vote against it.
Done.
Having state-sponsored media label them far right was apparently insufficient to destroy them.
At a certain point, the tactics of the regime fail.
Good.
Change may be coming. The government's failure to deal with rising
violence, crime and homelessness has led Conor McGregor, currently under investigation for
hate speech, to flirt with entering politics.
I'm in the process of arranging, he wrote on X, believe me.
I'm way more tactical and I have backing. There will be change in Ireland. Mark my
words.
Oh man, Conor McGregor walking around Irish Parliament doing this stuff.
It's on the cards.
This is the way it's happening.
The rise of populism is the rejection of globalism.
And because they can't ever countenance that, they are unable to ever redress the real problem.
So just more censorship, more militarisation of the police force.
I predict we'll see a lot more of this, as the Kaiser Chiefs nearly said.
The people will not be put down permanently.
The motivation behind the Dublin riot is as old as collective human experience, concludes Angela Nagle.
If a male outsider hurts or kills women and children, a violent response follows.
This principle is overridden by force in imperial systems, where the overarching power strategy of territorial expansion necessitates a universalist moral code.
Rome had one, the Soviet Union had one, and the United States has one.
For a small island nation with no imperial ambitions, this arrangement has to be awkwardly enforced by an administrative and comprador class in exchange for financial and status benefits.
benefits are felt only by an elite, violent retaliation is the predictable
result. There is their conclusion for why Ireland is different. It doesn't have the
same economic, political, strategic model and is therefore not subject to the same
paradigm and will not be seduced, controlled or subjugated by the same
rhetoric. You can't just say, yeah you know everyone in Ireland who have like
universally come out in support with the people of Palestine, they're racists.
That's what that is.
It's just gone all far right.
Everyone's racist now, racist or worse.
But the real crime is speaking out against power.
If you do it long enough and loud enough, they'll find something to say that you are.
In the same way that you can say Canada and Australia have been amazing pilot cases for introducing authoritarianism in a banal and un-evocative way.
People with nice haircuts saying you've got to go in internment camps and be censored and have your money taken out of your bank account and it's all for liberalism.
Ireland is a backlash pilot nation because they are not subject to the same narratives.
This is a strong fight in people who have been oppressed before, who have ethno-nationalism stitched into their nation as a necessary means of survival against an oppressive neighbor, specifically obviously the British, and I am British.
I'm British, but what I recognise here is that an attempt to use globalist language... You're a racist!
You're far right!
It won't work in Ireland.
It's a different country, with different politics, different policies, different attitudes towards community.
A mistake has been made here by the globalists.
They're trying to use a playbook that will not work in that territory.
Not only that, this can serve as inspiration for the rest of us.
They're sick of globalist rhetoric.
They're sick of being called racist and worse.
Sick and tired of being damned and condemned and dogged by bad rhetoric and lies.
Sick and tired of the post-pandemic era feeling heavy and perjurative and punishing.
Sick and tired of watching power and resources flow upwards while ordinary people's lives get worse and worse, while businesses collapse, while children fail, while mental illness increases.
No wonder there's rioting.
I would never advocate for rioting, but disobedience against this kind of corruption, it's almost our duty.
But that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the chat.
See you in a second.
Thank you for choosing Fox Animal.
You're just a dude.
No, he's the fucking loser!
M for Marcell.
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.
That's C.S.
Lewis.
Nice quote.
Liberty Electro.
Far right.
That's what they call you when they are upset.
When you are upset about the way things are being run.
Huckfed.
There's two types of people.
Them and us.
When the world wakes up, says JW55, and realises a small group of elites are behind all this chaos, maybe we can all focus in on them and give them a really bad day.
That's got to be the plan, hasn't it?
And then AB Bougainvillea, citizenship has to mean something or it has no value.
Right, a degree of autonomy and democracy and Yeah.
Free speech.
Glendene.
Hate speech.
That term is the conditioning of censoring the First Amendment.
Hate speech is free speech.
Doesn't mean you have to use it.
You are free to criticise.
I look at the chat here, I see a lot of opposing views, but what I'm encouraged by is more and more growing respect, more and more growing love, an elevation of our mutual consciousness, precisely because, as JW55 said, when we learn to unify, We will become a powerful opponent to the elite establishment indeed.
They want us divided.
They want us distracted.
They want us consuming that kind of dumb content.
Now, listen, what we have to do... Don't be saucy there, Supanwok, I think he said.
Discoduck, hello there.
I'm looking at all of you.
I love all of you.
What we've got to do is find ways to incorporate deep spiritual and scriptural wisdom with our new understanding of how decentralised power might operate.
On the show tomorrow, this is an amazing story.
David Grush is on Joe Rogan, you know, the UFO whistleblower.
Tucker is talking about UFOs and we bring you the extraordinary story of how the CIA are operating as a kind of, well, agency to facilitate Lockheed Martin and Raytheon getting UFO technology, evolving it and I presume selling it for profit.
We haven't got evidence that they're doing that at all but The CIA are giving it to military industrial complex companies.
It's a really beautiful and extraordinary story.
Now listen, if you're watching us on Rumble and you feel like you want to stay and get involved in some more comments, maybe read some holy books, maybe learn a little bit about spiritual life and inward awakening, and also have a laugh about why haven't the Biden family hung up children's stockings on the fireplace this year?
Why haven't they?
Oh, it's a sort of a bit of a sad story, really.
You'll love it.
Later on this week, we've got Matt Taibbi on the UK Files and all sorts of interesting revelations on attacks, and you're going to love that as well.
Join us for that.
Click the red button and you can just join us for an ongoing chat.
You lot over there, SensitiveHearts25, Love in Action, Mia Santee, Kinjoon18, we are going to continue to chat together.
Meme Mentality, TheFairestMonster00007, VoodooRanger, CreateChange, all of you lot are welcome to come over to Locals for our AwakendWonder chat right now.
And I want to welcome those of you that have just joined us and therefore will get access to some of our interviews with like Cali Means and Jonathan Paju, people like Slingshot515, Denishery, CoopTheLoop, MyUSavage, JeezimusPrime, All of you are aboard the Ark.
We're heading towards awakening together.
Join me over on Locals right now.
Press the red button for a bit of a Bible read and a bit of a mutual awakening.
Did that sound right?
The sort of thing that Lefaris Monster would say.
Stay free and join us tomorrow.
Until tomorrow, stay free.
See you later, guys.
See you in Locals in a second if you want to come.