Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 22, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:03:55

WOAH…US Military FALLOUT After Asking Unvaccinated Soldiers To Return!! - Stay Free #251

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	uh so
	so so
	We're going to see the kids first.
	In this video, you're going to see the future.
	Wow.
	Hello there, you awakening wonders.
	Thanks for joining us for Stay Free with Russell Brand, you firewalkers, you phoenixes, you discerners of truth, you lovers of freedom.
	We've got an incredible show for you today.
	Yeah, all of you, T-Funk, Joey Dio 360 Addict 70.
	It's good to see you all because in that chat free speech is happening right now and free speech is one of the subjects we're discussing.
	We're talking of course about the US Army calling back unvaccinated soldiers.
	Sorry about those conditions about being vaccinated.
	Turns out there's a lot of wars that we're starting so we're going to lower that threshold.
	Very interesting story.
	We'll talk about that in a minute.
	We're talking about Elon Musk's X Wars and his litigation with Media Matters and we're talking about Media Matters funding.
	Let me know in the chat one of the funders of Media Matters.
	First person will give you a prize.
	It might be a dog treat.
	I've not got any prizes around you.
	First person that can say is there a surprising funder of Media Matters.
	That's one of the things we'll be covering in the conversation.
	Hey, you could be coming to Wake and Wonder if you want.
	You could be joining the chat with Fred Old Git or Deeds 2022.
	Bill Gates, no Dugganoku.
	Close but no cigar, as Bill Clinton used to say.
	Actually, he did provide cigars, as I understand.
	We've got loads of stuff to talk about.
	It's going to be a pretty fantastic show, and you're going to Absolutely love it.
	If we get to 20,000, there'll be all sorts of treat.
	I'm talking about 20,000 of you on the Rumble chat.
	If you're watching this on YouTube, how we love you, you Awakening Wonders.
	How we love your loyalty.
	But as you know now, Rumble is where we have to lead you.
	The promised land of free speech.
	That's right.
	XNeilo said, I hope they said F you to Uncle Sam.
	I think some of them have gone back because I guess these are loyal patriots.
	Let's have a look now at the mainstream media, the legacy media.
	What do you want actually?
	What is this about from you?
	I'm not talking to you, you beloved Awakender Wonders.
	I'm talking to my dog Bear.
	Why are you being like this?
	Why is this happening to us?
	No.
	Have a look at this.
	This is too aggressive.
	You're going to love this.
	This is from Morning Joe.
	It's a show I've been on myself.
	It's an unusual programme.
	Here, Joe... One of the things they say about Trump is he uses too much... Yes!
	Love in action.
	George Soros.
	You got it.
	Well done.
	Well done.
	It's George Soros.
	Like, this bit of morning Joe, it's incredible.
	It's incredible because like one of the things they're always saying about Trump is that
	he's a dude, he's dangerous, he uses too much incendiary rhetoric.
	Check out this for incendiary rhetoric and take your damn dog trick.
	Just because he hasn't done it yet doesn't mean he won't do it.
	Say that about anyone and anything, couldn't you?
	That's what I always think about nuclear wars.
	Like, they go, they think, oh, there won't be a nuclear war because there ain't been one yet.
	Well, there has been a little bit because, you know, tell that to the people of Nagasaki.
	When he gets a chance to do it, and if he is voted into office, then a lot of these people that are talking about literal or figurative or whatever the...
	Literal and figurative are pretty different ideas, aren't they?
	I mean, I know I'm English, and many of you are Americans, and by God, I love you for it.
	I love you in the holy name of our Lord!
	Like, literal and figurative are opposite ends of the linguistic spectrum, aren't they?
	Literal means, to the letter, this is what's happening.
	Figurative means, it's an image, it's a metaphor, it's not happening.
	Hell, they're saying.
	You're gonna look like idiots.
	Because he will do, he will get away with, he will imprison, he will execute.
	Whoa!
	Execute?
	Where you getting that from?
	Where's that come from?
	Like, that would come over a lot better if there weren't more people incarcerated under the Espionage Act under Barack Obama than any other former leader.
	You might need to fact check that.
	But I feel that Barack Obama, he was espionage acting people all over the gaff.
	Whoever he's allowed to imprison, execute, drive from the country.
	Prison, execute, drive from the country, like shoulder barge him across the border.
	Very interesting because this is What is interesting about Legacy Media is they claim to offer a materialistic and rational perspective.
	This is a secular approach, yo.
	They say there is no God, there is no divinity, there is only that which can be measured.
	And yet they use the kind of hysterical zeal that you would anticipate getting from someone in a kind of evangelical trance.
	Just look at his past.
	It's not really hard to read.
	Again, the only thing that stood between him and the destruction of American democracy was the federal judiciary.
	No doubt about it.
	There you go.
	That's the kind of debate that you get over on the legacy media.
	Karine Jean-Pierre made a statement.
	Of course, Karine Jean-Pierre is the press secretary for Joe Biden.
	This is astonishing.
	Look at this.
	Touch this for yourselves using your own consciousness, which I believe to be connected to the divine and a great, powerful resource.
	I would put the president's stamina, President's wisdom, ability to get this done on behalf of the American people against anyone, anyone on any day of the week.
	Anyone!
	Anyone on any day of the week.
	Wednesday and, I don't know, The Rock.
	I think The Rock would do well or Thursday and then like maybe Bert and Ernie.
	I mean there's so many people, there's so many people that I would back above Biden.
	I had a fascinating conversation with Chris Hedges who I reckon you lot will find edifying, informative.
	He said that Joe Biden is intellectually impaired and has always been in the pocket of the military-industrial complex.
	This is a topic where a lot of us need education, and New York City are going to take us to task on this.
	You know that a lot of care workers didn't return to their work after the COVID mandates were revoked.
	You know that, right?
	Now... Oh, sorry, mate.
	Did that hurt?
	I'm so sorry.
	I'm so sorry about that.
	Are you okay?
	Good lad.
	Don't flinch, you peculiar boy.
	Let me give him one more treat.
	Listen, you know, like, yeah, Kathy Hochul, she's the New York governor.
	She's giving on-the-spot lessons to teach us how to spot conspiracy theorists.
	And I bet many of you could spot one with the simple use of a mirror.
	Today I'm directing the Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services to develop media literacy tools for K-12.
	in our public schools.
	This will teach students and even teachers to help understand how to spot conspiracy theories and misinformation, disinformation and online hate.
	Start talking about what we're seeing out there.
	Give the teachers the tools they need to help these conversations in school.
	It's interesting because, of course, in New York City, many children were kept out of school during the pandemic period in spite of the well-understood facts.
	I think I'm safe to say this on YouTube.
	Am I safe to say this?
	That, broadly speaking, the disease did not impact children.
	That they were educationally impaired as a result of those directives.
	I mean, what are the consequences now of that period?
	How impactful was it?
	How negative was it to children?
	And I mean, and it seems like discussing that would be regarded as a conspiracy theory by the governor of that state.
	So, yeah, brainwash them early.
	Gem0698234 in the chat.
	Extraordinary.
	Extraordinary.
	And by teaching younger New Yorkers about how to discern between digital fact and digital fiction... Who now doesn't know that the terms misinformation, malinformation, disinformation simply mean information that is inconvenient to the interests of the powerful?
	Are any of you in any doubt about what that term or those terms mean anymore. It's become completely
	free, completely clear.
	Blessed old bird in the locals chat looks like Botox to me.
	Are you talking about the governor there or me or bear? True nature's child.
	Social isolation for kids isn't good. I agree with you. Oh, no Dugganoku, they're
	talking about Botox with the your governor there if you're in New York
	City. Welcome to the chat. IceWendigo, Tokindave, XNilo.
	If you want to join the rumble chat, you will never see free speech like it.
	The free speech in the rumble chat is not like free speech I've witnessed anywhere else.
	Katharine says good evening from Denmark.
	Electric Steve's answering the Soros question there.
	And yeah, there's all sorts of stuff up there.
	Okay, let's have a little look now at the Army's choice to invite back many of the military personnel that they expelled after they refused mandates.
	Where is that?
	In the meantime, the U.S.
	Army facing repercussions of its COVID-era policy.
	It says its cuts over vaccine mandates have weakened the size of its force and are now calling on them to come on back to service.
	Mike Emanuel's got that story live in Washington for us, Mike.
	Bill, good morning.
	The Army kicked out more than 1,900 soldiers for refusing a COVID vaccine.
	At least 19 of them have now been welcomed back to active duty.
	A letter signed by Brigadier General Hope Rampe, Army Director of Personnel Management, says, quote, as a result of the rescission of all current COVID-19 vaccination requirements, You know there's wars coming when the word rescission has to be introduced to your vocabulary.
	Former soldiers who were involuntarily separated for their refusal to receive the COVID-19.
	I'm just going to involuntarily separate you from the army.
	I'm just going to involuntarily separate you from your own reproductive organs.
	Involuntarily separate.
	That is an interesting piece of bureaucratic jargon for kicking someone out of the army.
	Isn't it curious the way that military personnel make up such a significant portion of your country's homeless population?
	Isn't it significant to discover that many people that are still serving in the army are unable to support themselves and use food banks?
	Isn't it significant that patriotic rhetoric can be deployed but the kind of principles that that patriotism would demand so seldom is applied?
	Is this, let me know in the chat, yes or no or Y or N?
	Simply to save time.
	Do you think that this is another example of the exploitation of ordinary Americans?
	Do you think that this is another example of poor treatment of military personnel?
	Vaccination may request a correction of their military records.
	The Army is struggling when it comes to meeting its recruiting goals.
	Active duty has dropped from 485,000 in 2021 to about 452,000.
	Its goals for fiscal 2023, which ended at the end of September, was 65,000 new recruits.
	about 452,000.
	Its goals for fiscal 2023, which ended at the end of September,
	was 65,000 new recruits.
	The Army came up 10,000 short, so Army leadership is outselling service.
	Wow, they're pitching service.
	They need people.
	And I increasingly feel, and I wonder if you agree, let me know if you do, that so often these foreign escapades, these expeditions abroad, are not In pursuit of American interests, but the interests of the establishment elite that are masked behind the language of patriotism.
	Just think of the current conflicts in this world.
	How is it benefiting ordinary American people to continue to fund this war between Ukraine and Russia?
	I'm not suggesting that Ukrainian people don't have rights, I'm suggesting that diplomacy should always be on the table.
	Shouldn't it?
	Is the American project, the American military project, about supporting ordinary Americans?
	Or is it protecting ordinary Americans?
	Or do you think it's about generating profit for the military-industrial complex who require perpetual war in order for their business model to operate?
	One, for its patriotism.
	Two, for profit.
	We're looking for more, you know, a call to service to come into our ranks and I think it will accelerate their life.
	So we'd love to talk about the opportunities to be in the Army or any of the services.
	They've also enlisted some VIP help with Dwayne the Rock Johnson visiting the Pentagon.
	Now there's a guy who should run for president.
	The talk recruiting last week.
	It is critical as Pentagon brass expects the army to play a significant role if there's conflict in Asia.
	That is mad how many things are regarded as commodities now.
	Do you remember like the sort of the peddling of the medical solutions during the pandemic and now war itself?
	and military enlistment.
	You should know that I have so much respect for people that serve in the military, for people that serve in the police force, firefighters, nurses, teachers, people that commit themselves to public service, holding the world together through dedication and devotion.
	That's why it's particularly painful when they are exploited and used essentially to service the agenda of the establishment elites.
	Remember, In a little bit we're going to be covering Elon Musk's legal battle with Media Matters.
	You've correctly guessed that they are funded by George Soros in part.
	But what you may not know is that Media Matters are part of a kind of a Democrat Party machine that ensures that many people with countervailing views are shut down and censored.
	You may not know that.
	I tend to think that the Army will have a huge supporting role for the joint force in the Indo-Pacific.
	And in that regard, what do I mean by that?
	I think the Army will play a core role in establishing and protecting staging bases for our air forces, for our maritime forces.
	If they're bringing out the rock, it means the war with China is almost certain.
	The propaganda machine is stepping up.
	Musk must prevail, says CBOB1 in the Awakened Wonder chat over on Locals, and the rock is Receiving some spicy commentary over in the Rumble chat.
	If you're watching us on YouTube, remember, come over and join us on Rumble, because in a minute, our content gets a little more contentious.
	We showed you, for example, just yesterday, that the WF has been posting its solution to homelessness.
	It's pods.
	Why don't you just live in a pod then, if you're homeless?
	Why don't you, like in the literal film The Matrix, climb into a plastic egg, And cover yourself in pink goop.
	Well, it's not a plastic egg and there is no pink goop.
	It's more like a sort of shed.
	Kind of a coffin for the living, if you will.
	🎵Music🎵 What is this bright and breezy music, no?
	Well, it's bright and breezy as we have sort of marched into the various forms of sales that they're proposing.
	But this is only for homeless people.
	It's only for homeless people.
	They experiment on homeless people.
	then you know what happens next.
	🎵 🎵
	🎵 A lot of people, there's that 666, the famous 666.
	666 the famous A lot of people saying, who farted?
	You or the dog?
	You press one if you think it was the dog, two if you think it was me, three if you think it's Gareth, who's running the show from behind the scenes there.
	Take another glance at the 666 in the World Economic Forum.
	I'm sure that's not deliberate, but someone said the other day, it's a 666 and a smiley face.
	So they smile their way through the satanic agenda.
	But that pod life that's being proposed as a solution to homelessness, Good, good.
	It's going the way I'd like it to go in terms of the vote for who did that fart.
	Like, it's now being sold to everybody.
	I think in San Francisco, where President Xi recently visited and Gavin Newsom, in spite of all of his liberal rhetoric, rolled out the red carpet, and that red carpet Wallpapered over homelessness, the homeless people were ousted to the periphery.
	Where's the compassionate language then?
	Where's the, hey, we have to help everybody stuff?
	Then, when they're welcoming a dictator, that if Trump expressed admiration for that dictator, they would say, oh, look, see, you know, Trump, he loves dictators because he wants to be a dictator.
	More hysteria, more madness.
	Let's have a look at this pod life story.
	We've got a brilliant speech from Trump and a little bit of Cardi B in a minute.
	Rents across America have skyrocketed.
	Nowhere more so than in the San Francisco Bay Area.
	Affordable housing extremely hard to find unless you're cool with pod life.
	CNBC's Kate Rogers on small-scale living in Silicon Valley.
	So this is the main...
	Normalization of the agenda of the powerful.
	Remember that?
	That's another function of the legacy media, to normalize innovation and advances that we will ultimately be ushered into.
	So this is, I would say, sort of fits under that.
	You know, throughout the pandemic period, vaccine passports, all that stuff became, like, you know, it became normalized, didn't it, through sort of conversation.
	Now, the idea that we should live in little pods is becoming sort of Presented through soft propaganda.
	That's what I think.
	Let me know if you agree with that, yes or no, in the chat.
	Inside this house... I have my fake plants and another hanging organ.
	It's being presented as aspirational.
	It's an attractive young person, things hanging up, plants and stuff like that.
	Hey, this will be cool.
	It's like going... It's like going... Youth hosteling.
	It's like traveling on a train, but forever.
	You guys are right here.
	People are living on top of each other, literally.
	It's my own- Literally on top of each other, it's desirable.
	A stack of humans like a little short stack of pancakes.
	Personal space, so I can close the curtain.
	Ah, sweet personal space, just behind this drape.
	And it's- And I can just eat my bugs in privacy and silence.
	More private.
	The rest of the house, pure communal living.
	Fourteen people share this kitchen.
	And then there's also shared cabinets.
	Yeah, people like to generally come out here and they chill.
	The rent, $800 a month.
	The utilities are included, as well as internet.
	That's all they have to worry about.
	No security deposit or anything like that.
	Oh, I should think not, given that you've been put in a kind of coffin for life.
	Each pod is decked out with a mattress, a privacy curtain, light, and even air conditioning.
	What was that?
	Decked out.
	Ooh, look at that, you got your privacy curtain.
	I mean, any flatulence, a single fart, in any one of those units, you could take out the entire place.
	What about coronavirus?
	You can't get two meters distant.
	I thought that's what we're supposed to be doing.
	You're living in a mask.
	You can set your temperature and then it cools it down until it reaches that temperature.
	They're normalizing it!
	It's an agenda!
	They're normalizing it! It's an agenda! AHHHHH!
	...to jump through the typical hoops. Application, background check, but also the question, would they be a
	good fit?
	We ask people to tell a story, and you can tell a lot about a person based on what they're willing to share.
	I'll tell you a story. How centralized authority is seeking to delegitimize national democracy,
	is normalizing authoritarianism, is introducing medical measures that may not be beneficial to ordinary people,
	is militarizing police forces, making protest illegal, and making freedom a kind of crime.
	Okay, you can have the part next to mine, but no farting!
	Chair in their story.
	An important story for James and Christina also.
	They're not just running the company.
	So this is my pod.
	They also call these pods home.
	Come on over to my pod.
	My pod, I pod.
	You can't just call things pods and expect people to live happily in a bloody coffin.
	I'd resent being in that thing when I was stone dead.
	Hey, what story do you want to see next?
	Do you want to see one, Cardi B raging at foreign policy?
	Two, the IMF chief confirming that CBDCs are on their way?
	Or three, Trump dismantling Biden's appearance At the apex, which amounts to sort of a stand-up performance actually.
	So one, two or three.
	I'll just look at the first 10 or 20 and we'll make a decision.
	We're at 16,000 people on the rumble chat now.
	As you know, we like to do something special in the celebratory when we get to 20,000 for no real reason at all, to be honest.
	Mio Zien says, Russell, thanks from Alberta, Canada.
	You've opened the eyes of a lot of people in this area and at no personal cost.
	Thank you for showing everyone I wasn't crazy during COVID.
	Baby, you've never been crazy.
	Ashela talking about Podlife from our Awake and Wonder community.
	God, I feel sick to my stomach when I hear that WEF soundtrack.
	Yeah, they make everything sanitary and clean, don't they?
	That's what it's like.
	I've said it before and I'll say it again.
	We're used to authoritarianism looking like depictions of George Orwell's 1984.
	Grey, grim, glum, sort of communist versions of a dystopia where people sort of march in single file.
	Or militarised dictatorships such as we experienced under, not we, they experienced under Nazism.
	But now what I feel that we live in is a kind of sanitized, bureaucratized, digital version of authoritarianism.
	Go back to your pod.
	Are you happy in your pod?
	No, I'm not.
	Okay, we're just going to give you, we're just going to de-life you.
	You know, like, everything's hides behind sort of neutral and bureaucratic language.
	Bookwench says, I want to see Klaus Schwab live in a pod before I get in one.
	Oh, I like it very much in my pod.
	I can get my cat in here.
	One of the problems with my pod is that a lot of my drool fills up the edges of the pod.
	But I can use that as a kind of amniotic fluid, like Neo had.
	I just sloosh myself around in my own saliva, in my sweet, sweet pod.
	Pod life!
	Predictably, you want to see Trump, obviously.
	Of course you do, because you love Trump, don't you?
	Let's face it, and this ain't gonna make you love him any less, him being hilarious about Biden.
	Check it out.
	This week, Crooked Joe Biden was in San Francisco for a summit with China, looking like he had absolutely no idea where he was, what was happening, what the hell he was supposed to do.
	He walked up with a man who looks like a piece of granite, right?
	He's strong like granite.
	He's strong.
	I know him very well.
	President Xi of China.
	And he's standing there, you know, he's a fierce, he's a fierce person.
	Now the press doesn't like it when I say good things about, but you know, what can I say?
	He runs 1.4 billion people with an iron hand.
	runs from funny and they say oh he said good things about him now he happens to be a very
	smart person if i say a certain leader is smart that's controlling a big part of the world
	the press gets upset that i say swap because that's a good thing no no
	very smart people these are very smart people but they're dealing with very stupid people
	our leader our leader is a stupid person our leader her leader is a stupid person
	our leader can't get off this stage You see this stage?
	When he's finished with a speech, by the time whatever it is he's taken wears off, and he's... he's looking... It's a good joke.
	Okay, thank you.
	Thank you.
	How do I leave?
	We've never had that, have we?
	A political figure that does actual impersonations of an opponent, that are good impersonations.
	Really very strange That's what happened
	This is the guy we have keeping us out of nuclear war.
	And by the way, I've been indicted more times than Alphonse Capone.
	He's going back.
	This is material now.
	He's back on material.
	That riff's gone well.
	So he's like, now I'm going to do a bit of stand-up.
	Now I'm going to hit him.
	I'm going to hit him with some of my A-grade material.
	He's the most vicious of all gangsters.
	If he took you to dinner and if you didn't look proper, if you laughed a little bit, he might think you're laughing at him.
	It's dangerous to laugh.
	He'd kill you immediately.
	I'd kill you immediately.
	He was indicted one time.
	I was indicted four times.
	Once I got indicted the first time, though, I said, now the gloves are off.
	Because out of respect for the office of the presidency, very important, I never hit him this hard.
	But now I say it.
	He's the most incompetent president we've ever had.
	He's the worst president we've ever had.
	He's a total crook.
	Total crook.
	Amazing.
	Extraordinary.
	Extraordinary.
	Incredible.
	Is this another, that's it for our Trump stuff, is it?
	Listen, if you're watching us on YouTube, in a minute, we've got a few things to cover.
	We're gonna be covering Elon's fight with Media Matters, which are funded by George Soros.
	I don't know if that means anything to you.
	We're gonna be covering that, and we're like, and what he's gonna, how's this gonna shake down?
	How are you gonna un-person Elon Musk?
	Because that's clearly what's happening, isn't it?
	They're coming for the money.
	Once they come for the money, you know it's getting heavy.
	I've had these things happen.
	You know that.
	And on that note, if you're watching us on YouTube, we love you.
	That's why we put content up there.
	We love you and we want you to join us on Rumble.
	There's a link in the description.
	In a minute, we're going to cover a story about Peter McCulloch.
	You know Peter McCulloch.
	Without Peter McCulloch... Without Peter McCulloch, we wouldn't know many of the things.
	I contest this.
	We wouldn't know many of the things we know.
	about the pandemic, the inefficiency of lockdown and the let's say some of the complicated aspects of that certain medical solution that was rather heavily promoted.
	He's recently testified on a recent analysis showing that 99% of people dying from COVID are 100% fully vaccinated.
	That's obviously not a story we can cover on YouTube.
	Click the link in the description.
	Join us over there.
	We'll see you in a second, you awakened wonder.
	We love you.
	We're on Rumble now.
	We're exclusively on Rumble.
	I'll hold off on the fully free speech till I know that we're absolutely and exclusively here in Rumble, land of the free.
	You know, soon we're going to be doing... Are we doing Bible readings today after the show or is that on another day?
	Because that is one of the things we do in our community.
	We read the great scriptural books To awaken.
	We're doing it today.
	So yeah, you can stay for a little bit extra and do a little bit of Bible reading with us if you wanna.
	Biden is an old horse that should be put out to pasture.
	Yeah, I wonder if that's the right thing to do.
	Will he find the pasture?
	Will he get lost on his way to the pasture?
	Okay, so yeah, have we got the Peter McCulloch story now?
	Is there a clip for that?
	Let's have a look.
	I'm at the bottom here.
	So, okay, let's have a look at that.
	Did I understand you to say that most who had died from COVID were the vaccinated, not the unvaccinated, or did I mishear what you said?
	In the UK, Australia, South Africa, where they have good data systems, you know, the contemporary, let's say late 2021 and 2022, the majority who have been hospitalized and died are fully vaccinated.
	So right now, New South Wales just put out their data.
	Australia is interesting because they had pre-vaccinated the whole country and then COVID got there late.
	So Australia was the real test of whether or not the vaccines would work, and they failed colossally.
	So, the most recent analysis, 99% of people hospitalized and died are fully vaccinated.
	United States, our CDC tracked these breakthrough infections.
	People reported to CDC, May 1st of 2021, the CDC was overwhelmed with fully vaccinated Americans who were being hospitalized and died.
	They gave up.
	They put a notice on their website.
	They said, we gave up.
	We cannot track breakthrough infections.
	The vaccine was failing so badly.
	Oh no!
	It never worked!
	Hello there, Crust Life!
	Hello there, Honigbar!
	If you've just joined us from YouTube, say hello in the chat!
	Yeah, StatelessCiasis, where's NefariousMonster?
	It's actually LeFariousMonster, and you better believe that I miss LeFariousMonster when I'm not subject to the profanity and filth that presumably he fills the chat up with.
	Hey, SlideDog!
	Hey, MelvinsOne!
	Hi, all of you!
	Join us!
	Join us!
	The free speech is flowing.
	We can discuss whatever we want to here.
	Here we are free.
	The sweet taste of inner freedom.
	A freedom emanating from within you.
	That's your spirit.
	That's your soul.
	That's the very thing they are trying to take from you.
	That's the thing they're trying to destroy.
	They will not rest till they have colonized your consciousness.
	Till you can be directed like a checker piece on a checkerboard.
	But we will not allow it.
	Together Unified but decentralized.
	We are more powerful than them.
	They are realizing that victory is imminent for us and they are terrified.
	That's why they're coming for dissenting voices.
	I know because I've been on the end of it.
	And now Elon Musk.
	How can you take down Elon Musk though?
	How can you?
	Too many resources.
	Too much power.
	Too much support.
	His own social media platform.
	And if it comes to the worst, a rocket ship.
	Although they don't seem to be 100% reliable.
	But those Fire torch things he's got.
	They seem pretty good.
	He could use those, couldn't he?
	So, they've been coming for Elon for a while, and now they're coming for the money.
	Let us know in the chat what stories you want us to cover.
	If you get to that 20,000, you know what you've got in store.
	Yeah, that's right.
	I'm bringing them back one last time.
	Let us know what stories you want us to cover in the chat.
	Provide a link if you want us to cover it properly.
	Nothing too crazy.
	Well, no, you can actually do what you want.
	It's a free speech platform, but it's stuff that, you know, that makes sense.
	Also, tell us what you think of the story.
	So, this is a brilliant bit of coverage on the Elon Musk legacy battle.
	If you're new and you've just joined us from YouTube, get involved in the chat.
	Consider becoming an Awakened Wonder over there.
	You'll love it.
	You get all sorts of mad extra stuff.
	You'll get early access, for example, to our new conversation with Tucker Carlson.
	You will love that, let me tell you.
	All right, let's get into this Elon Musk story.
	They're coming for him.
	He's in a legacy media war.
	Here's the news.
	No, here's the effing news.
	No, here's the fucking news!
	Attacks on Elon Musk have been escalating since his acquisition of X, but now it's reaching its zenith.
	So who and what are behind the war on Elon Musk?
	Why, all of a sudden, is Elon Musk being attacked where it really matters?
	Right in the money hole.
	Is that the right way to say that?
	Advertisers are withdrawing from X and even though high profile figures are saying they will replace that advertising revenue, we have to think that this is part of a concerted and deliberate attack to bring down Elon Musk.
	Is Elon Musk unassailable due to his incredible wealth and influence?
	And what happens when a culture war that's become very adept at taking out individuals It's just mentioned Media Matters, of course, who Elon Musk is suing.
	We'll look at their funding and how they operate.
	And also, just in passing, Reuters.
	And we always assume a kind of neutrality about Reuters.
	Elsewhere in our content, we've talked about the Trusted News Initiative, and we've talked about how Reuters were established.
	We'll be talking about some of these ideas later.
	Later in the week.
	Apple, IBM, Lionsgate, Paramount and ABC News parent company Disney pulled ads from Musk-owned X, formerly Twitter.
	Musk appeared to backtrack, pinning a post to his account that says,
	anyone advocating the genocide of any group will be suspended from this platform.
	Later, amid accusations he's anti-Semitic, Musk tweeted nothing could be further from the truth.
	In a blog post, X said the report completely misrepresented the real user experience to undermine freedom of speech and mislead advertisers.
	A spokesman for the company called the report contrived, saying Media Matters deliberately followed pro-Nazi accounts to get advertising to appear.
	Musk went further, threatening to file a thermonuclear lawsuit against Media Matters and all those who colluded in this fraudulent attack on our company.
	In a statement, Media Matters called Musk a bully who threatens meritless lawsuits.
	The White House has condemned Elon Musk for endorsing what it called a hideous anti-semitic conspiracy theory.
	This is extraordinary, isn't it?
	Thermonuclear lawsuits from a man who's able to prevent thermonuclear war through refusing to allow Starlink to be utilized to administer attacks on Russia.
	I mean, this is extraordinary where we find ourselves now.
	So how will this unfold?
	Of course, the times we live in, there'll be some people that watch this and just say, oh, Elon Musk, yeah, I'm sure that he is everything that he's accused of being.
	And other people will just say, well, this is plainly an establishment attack on a figure who opposes many preferred establishment narratives.
	Let's find out where we land when we look at some reporting and facts.
	On Thursday, Media Matters for America published an article alleging that the social media platform X has been placing ads for major companies next to pro-Nazi content.
	What I've noticed about how the legacy media behaves is they phrase things in the worst possible way, in the worst possible light, placing ads next to neo-Nazi content.
	Now it's sort of understood that social media sites are used by a wide
	variety of people and to police them to the point of purity would mean there would be nobody on them. Saying
	that ads are placed next to neo-nazi sites might just say that on X
	there is a whole bunch of content including people with affiliations to Nazis. In a sense
	conceptualizing social media platforms is difficult for us because it's such a relatively new piece of technology.
	Do you envisage it the same way as you would envisage geography that has a variety of inhabitants cohabiting together with a wide variety of views?
	What is the responsibility of the people that own the platform?
	Specifically, how important is it that from the moment he acquired Twitter, as it was then, ex as it is now, Elon Musk has been revealing deep state involvement, revealing the censorship of true information, opposing legacy media and establishment narrative.
	Do you think that this attack is entirely separate from that, or do you think there's a connection?
	I.e., do you think sometimes there's a figure in public life that there's an appetite to destroy and then certain interests come together to work out how can we destroy this figure?
	And even if it's not as particular and hooded as that, there's obviously a convergence of interests, a set of ideological and economic and political interests that come together loosely, as George Carlin would say, you don't need conspiracy when interests converge.
	And are there a lot of convergent interests that see dissenting voices and go, take them down?
	As ex-owner Elon Musk continues his descent into white nationalist and anti-semitic conspiracy theories, wrote Media Matters reporter Eric Hanernocki, his social media platform has been placing ads for major brands like I see, you could kind of make it happen by following particular people, by clicking on particular posts.
	next to content that touts Adolf Hitler and his Nazi party.
	However, according to the X safety team, Media Matter's report was done by making a fake X account,
	then curating posts and ads to manipulate the account's timeline.
	These contrived experiences could be applied to any platform, X argues.
	I see, you could kind of make it happen by following particular people,
	by clicking on particular posts.
	I guess that makes sense, doesn't it?
	Like, if you're a YouTube user or a Rumble user, you'll notice that if you watch, like, a long video on meditation, then you get a bunch of meditation stuff, and you're like, oh, I don't want to do that all the time.
	You know, so perhaps it's like that.
	X's analytics suggest that Media Matters repeatedly refreshed the timeline of the account it created
	to cause X to generate ads near hateful posts.
	The account, X says, saw 13 times the number of ads a median X user sees.
	So in a sense, it's a constructed narrative with an intention.
	Intention is extremely important.
	If you have the intention to destroy somebody, you can create a particular narrative.
	You can keep refreshing the screen.
	You can follow particular accounts.
	You can reframe events.
	You can suggest a particular perspective.
	It's easy to do.
	It's possible to do.
	This isn't a neutral investigation, is it?
	It's like, oh, we were just Media Matters.
	Let's look at Media Matters.
	Do they have an intention?
	Do they have a particular financing model?
	We'll get into that.
	Do they have an agenda?
	It's not like the mind of God was surveying reality and noticed, oh, this is malevolent, this is benign.
	No, there's an intention.
	There's an intention to destroy Elon Musk.
	There's an intention to take out a lot of dissenting voices, I know, because I'm one of them.
	And when you find yourself in that position, then pieces can be moved around on a chessboard to destroy you.
	And people go, oh, well, you know, it's not... But there are so many ways you can manipulate information.
	Look at what's just happened in the last three years.
	According to X, in at least one instance, For instance, the Media Matters author was the only user to see a specific ad placement.
	Of the 5.5 billion ad impressions on X that day, less than 50 total ad impressions were served against all the organic content featured in the Media Matters article X Safety wrote.
	We should not blindly trust X's defense of its ad policy.
	X obviously had a bias in how it measures its trust and safety, and so Public attempted to reproduce Media Matters methods to see if we found ads next to the content in question.
	We created an account and followed 11 of the neo-Nazi accounts in Media Matters reports, starting yesterday, November the 19th.
	After refreshing both X's 4U page and following page more than 10 times and scrolling through the timeline each time, we did not observe ads next to white nationalist or pro-Nazi content.
	We followed more extremist accounts and repeated this process after following 30 accounts.
	Still, we did not find ads on the timeline.
	We also opened each account's page and did not observe ads there.
	Nor did we find ads under the replies to their posts.
	Media Matters did not respond to our inquiry about the exact methods it used for its report.
	But it sounds like there was an intention, because obviously Public and Schellenberger and those guys are a little more objective.
	Of course, all of us have our biases, but what it appears like is that they approached this somewhat in good faith, rather than, how can we make this seem as bad as possible?
	Also it's extraordinary to note the power still of commerce.
	That ultimately, if you live in a world driven by commodity and commercial interests, you can use that power to manipulate free speech.
	You can use that power to shut down dissenting figures.
	You can de-platform, de-monetise, control, shut down any individual you want to using these interests.
	Disney and NBC or whoever else, they're not gods, they're not deities, they're not moral organisations.
	You can find plenty of things to say about You think you can't think of things to say about Apple and Apple's practices abroad?
	You think you can't think of things to say about Disney and Disney's practices?
	Who the hell are they to be judging anybody?
	Who the hell are the legacy media to be judging anybody?
	Who puts these people in these positions?
	They put themselves in there.
	Hello, we're moral arbiters.
	Don't look over there.
	Don't look at how we make our product.
	Don't look at our relationship with China.
	Don't look at what we're willing to do.
	Don't look at our past.
	Don't look at our depictions of racial minorities in the 30s or 40s.
	Pick any individual and go...
	This person.
	No one has any faith in our judicial, political or media institutions, quite rightly, because they're demonstrably corrupt.
	And this is another story that shows that.
	I'm not saying that Elon Musk or X or me or anybody is perfect.
	Of course not.
	I'm saying who do you suggest as the arbiter other than some sort of decentralised, unbiased democracy between us?
	We can't have these legacy media organisations anymore nominating who gets destroyed and arbitrating who's right and who's wrong, who lives, who dies.
	What then is going on here exactly?
	Why is Media Matters leading a disinformation campaign and advertiser boycott against Elon Musk's ex?
	Who is Media Matters exactly and what's its real agenda?
	In 2004, David Brock created Media Matters to push corporate news media to the left by framing it as right-wing, attacking Fox News and smearing people who appeared on it.
	MediaMaths for 20 years has argued against false balance, which is the inclusion of conservative, Republican or other non-liberal voices in articles on climate change, race, gender issues and COVID.
	It convinced a generation of liberal news journalists to reject the idea of objectivity, to stop seeking alternative viewpoints and only to quote liberal and left-wing voices on a range of issues.
	When you include COVID along with climate change, race and gender issues, it shows you Authoritarianism is leveraged in a space that otherwise seems like it's about social equality.
	We all know there are narratives around race and gender and climate change that are undergirded by compassion and similarly the Covid arguments initially used compassion.
	Hey we have to lock everyone up, you have to take this medication because we have to be compassionate and responsible towards one another.
	But do you notice how all of these ideas lead to Centralised authoritarianism.
	Racism, gender, climate change, all are subjects you could legitimately make arguments for, but do you notice how the trajectory of these arguments is always towards more control?
	It's never towards compassionate discourse towards people, it's always towards censorship, it's always towards the assumption of guilt, and Covid legitimises yet more centralised authoritarianism.
	It seems that while these arguments, and indeed this whole mindset, like to portray itself as being about compassion, it's ultimately, it seems to me, about control.
	Let me know in the chat and the comments if you agree.
	Is it about compassion or is it about control?
	Media matters does this by demonising and discrediting its opponents.
	First it seeks to demonise disfavoured voices, including many liberal ones, by mischaracterising their views to make them sound more extreme.
	The goal is to stop mainstream news organizations from quoting these individuals.
	Then after Media Matters has done this, it attacks the same voices as Right Wing when they go on Fox News or appear in publications like the New York Post.
	So in a sense, it excludes them from the legacy media.
	Then when they try to use other areas to continue the discourse, it says they're Right Wing.
	I've actually had all of those things happen to me personally.
	Because of the way the media's evolved, those initial attacks didn't work.
	So they just left it alone, really, and I was allowed to get on with my life.
	Wait!
	Other examples though are Glenn Greenwald, Tybee, Schellenberger himself, all figures that seemed to be perfectly liberal, legitimate journalists pursuing pretty ideologically well-rounded arguments and pretty cool objectives around censorship and free speech and all stuff that just used to be considered normal.
	Suddenly, some line crossed them and they were un-person, called right-wing, suddenly they're appearing before congressional hearings and being disparaged and the tax status is questioned.
	Clearly, something very unusual is going on, isn't it?
	During the pandemic, media mads smeared me, at Marty Makary, and other scientists for the crime of appearing on Fox News, wrote Stanford professor of medicine, Jay Bhattacharya, on X over the weekend.
	I told the American people that closing schools was useless for COVID and harmed children.
	The Media Matters business model is defamation of its perceived enemies.
	Before Media Matters used this strategy on Bhattacharya, it used this strategy on disfavored liberal voices on climate change like Roger Pielke Jr.
	and Bjorn Lomberg.
	This is not a coincidence.
	Rather, this is the Media Matters business model.
	As such, Media Matters exists to make progressivism more dogmatic, more tribal, and more punishing of dissident liberals.
	It can be difficult to take all this in.
	That is why you need to stay healthy.
	How?
	Fielder Greens.
	Because there is a FielderGreens.com Black Friday sale.
	It's on now and it's incredible.
	Right now you can get up to 30% off Fielder Greens when you use the code VIP.
	Listen, you know me.
	I love greens.
	And like you, I'm seeing incredible results.
	You can survive almost anything.
	You might be under attack like Elon.
	You might be under attack like me.
	If you got Field of Greens, you're gonna be like some sort of brick house, which will make sense to you at some point, for perhaps the first time.
	You're gonna have more energy throughout the day, your skin's gonna look healthier, your digestion's gonna be incredible, like your flatulence will be sweeter and whine.
	Since I've been taking Field of Greens, my hair and nails, which were always growing suspiciously fast, have grown even quicker and healthier than ever before.
	I promise you, this will be one of the best things you can add to your life for better health.
	Don't miss this massive sale.
	You'll get 30% off your order.
	Just visit BrickHouseRussell.
	Yeah, I told you it'd make sense.
	Visit BrickHouseRussell.com and use promo code VIP for up to 30% off.
	That's BrickHouseRussell.com and the promo code is VIP for 30% off.
	All right, let's get back to Elon.
	And Media Matters isn't the only institution that does this.
	Media Matters works hand-in-glove with the Center for American Progress, a Democratic Party-aligned think tank that John Podesta founded the same year as Media Matters.
	Media Matters promotes CAP-approved experts while demanding that media not quote conservative or disfavored liberal experts.
	The money comes from the same people who give to the Democratic Party.
	George Soros gave a million dollars to Media Matters and gave three million dollars to CAP.
	Soros gives these donations as part of his broader support for Democrats.
	He gave $80 million to the Democratic Party in 2020 and $125 million in 2022.
	Soros was the largest donor to the Democratic Party in 2022.
	As such, Media Matters and CAP have always been Democratic Party front groups aimed at deciding what mainstream corporate news media outlets cover.
	They have successfully pushed the news media further to the left over the last 20 years since the two organisations were founded.
	It was Podesta, upon the defeat of Hillary Clinton, whose presidential campaign he chaired, who helped orchestrate the Russia hoax, which involved the illegal abuse of Department of Justice, FBI and Department of Homeland Security powers.
	I'm curious how many organisations are often involved in these campaigns.
	And I imagine if we were to scrutinise media matters further, and what's happening currently with Elon Musk, you'd find a congregation of interests that were recognisable, and probably include the deep state, but plainly include Democrat party figures like George Soros, even demonstrably in terms of his funding, already.
	When Trump was elected, Cap fully embraced the so-called resistance, which didn't just disagree with Trump's policies, but also promoted the conspiracy theory that Trump had not been legitimately elected.
	Media matters also.
	It was and is one of the single biggest drivers of Trump-Russia nonsense, wrote Matt Taibbi on X, a story which stank of Brock from the beginning.
	The attacks on X make clear that the real concern of Democratic Party elites is their lack of control over the public conversation.
	From 1996 to 2016, Democrats felt they controlled the elite policy and political conversation through the news media.
	After that appeared to fall apart in 2016 and as Democrats, including Podesta, blamed social media for Clinton's loss, they stepped up their effort to take control over Twitter and Facebook, which they did, demanding and winning the censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop and de-platforming Trump.
	In fact, that That was an incredible period of success, which already seems crazy, doesn't it?
	That that story was totally suppressed and we were told it was conspiracy theory and it wasn't, and a legitimate political figure, because he's not to everybody's taste, was de-platformed in a way that's pretty unprecedented.
	And again, this story seems like the kind of thing that you could construct If you wanted to.
	We all know that ISIS and stuff have social media accounts, that across the world there are all sorts of people that have social media accounts and you could, if you wanted, create the coordinate to make an attack.
	But no one's going to do that on Facebook because Facebook is part of the machine.
	No one's going to do that on other compliant legacy media conduits because they are part of the system.
	Elon Musk has become a figure like Trump who you have to revise your perspective of because it becomes clear that the establishment has a real strong view on And that, for me, is always an indication that something interesting is happening.
	Let me know if you agree with that in the chat.
	The strategy of Democratic party leaders, including Clinton, Podesta, and Obama, has
	been since 2016 to label Trump's supporting Republicans as racists, Nazis, and anti-Semites.
	The attacks on Elon Musk's ex must be taken in this context.
	The real agenda behind the Media Matters attack on X is the same as the one behind the Democrats' attack on Trump and the Republicans.
	Democrats want to control the conversation.
	Without censorship, voters can see the border is a disaster, the Ukraine war was a tragic failure, and that the Democrats have been censoring them.
	Independent media is vital.
	You have to find ways of shutting down independent media, of controlling the conversation.
	Unique in this space is Elon Musk and platforms like Rumble, Where people say, no, no, we're free speech, absolutely.
	We're going to allow the conversation to take place.
	What's often inferred from that is these people must have particular political views because they're favouring, essentially, our opponents.
	But if not censoring the opponent is favouring the opponent, it makes you wonder where the real problem is, doesn't it?
	Media matters is having an impact.
	Advertisers are fleeing and it's unclear if or when they'll return.
	Musk has announced lawsuits but there is no guarantee they'll win.
	This is all dangerous because X must remain a free speech platform given that after a similar advertiser boycott against Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg gave up and decided to effectively let the US government censor often true content on Meta.
	There is offensive content on X including racism, antisemitism, misogyny and other forms of hate.
	Hate speech, while inflammatory and objectionable, is not harassment or a direct incitement of violence, which is already banned on the platform.
	As much as we may dislike it, censoring hate speech is often counterproductive.
	As we experienced under Twitter's previous leadership, censorship of hate speech often leads to censorship of political speech.
	And since hate and prejudice are based on ignorance, attacking the assumptions behind them publicly, not censoring them, is the best way to overcome them.
	I personally feel the very same way.
	We stream every day on Rumble, and I'm interacting with the stream live in the show.
	That's the point of our show.
	And I see many, many things that I disagree with, and sometimes personal attacks.
	But we have to allow it to take place, unless it's criminal.
	And if it's criminal, there's already a process for that.
	This is hardly a new argument, and the only reason we need to make it again today is because the Democrats, legacy media and civil society groups are opposed to the freer expression Musk is allowing on X compared to Twitter a year ago.
	Putting pressure on advertisers is a way for journalists and censorship advocates to force companies to remove content they don't like.
	There are other things we must do as free speech lovers.
	The public, voters and media consumers should be more sceptical of mainstream news outlets which today spread disinformation on many issues of public importance from Ukraine and Israel to Covid and climate change to race and gender issues.
	It was the news media that demanded that the White House demand censorship by Facebook of true stories of vaccine side effects.
	I suppose the initial position we have to take is one of mistrust when it comes to the legacy media, and one of awareness and deep scrutiny at the way that these organisations interact, the obvious potential for corporate, state and media interests to align because of their obvious financial ties and the convergence of interests beyond that.
	This story, for me, is an objective example of what happens if you make a stand against their interests.
	And even if that stand is as simple as, we are going to allow free speech, you will be vilified and they will use every tool at their disposal, starting with the withdrawal of finances, conspiracy theorists, your right wing.
	But in my experience, this will escalate into ad hominem attacks and then beyond in an attempt to just silence any dissent or any potential to present a narrative outside of the one that means that they can completely control the public sphere.
	And even your own psychological space.
	I think that the end point is they want total control of every individual's consciousness.
	That's what it seems like it's heading towards.
	The Media Matters disinformation against X makes clear that giant corporate advertisers, the news media, and progressive activist groups like Media Matters and CAP want to control the information the public receives to control America's political institutions.
	For that to change, we must become less dependent on the content created and provided by everyone from the New York Times and Washington Post to Disney, Warner Brothers, and Comcast.
	And we must have great control over the content we receive through social media platforms.
	And we must no longer trust the news media, a trend which is already well underway, including increasingly among Democrats.
	Plainly, that's what they are already anticipating.
	They are sensing a drift away from legacy media institutions and even entertainment oriented corporations such as the ones listed there.
	They're anticipating that change.
	So finding ways to control the space and ensure that they retain control over online spaces, media spaces, And indeed, ultimately, the consciousness of the individuals that are the end goal of this.
	You remember at the advent of the internet, you would just use it in ways that seem inconceivable now.
	Downloading free music, communicating in ways that even for someone my age is sort of difficult to comprehend.
	I was not an early adapter in those spaces.
	Now, the online world has been tiled over by corporate logos.
	Unless you're particularly adept at internet use, you'll go through Google, you'll go through Facebook, you'll go through Apple or Amazon.
	These spaces have now been marshaled, parametered, and are indeed controlled by economic interests.
	Initially there was a sort of a sense of libertarianism because they had to, by their nature, contain a diverse group of necessarily opposing opinions.
	But as they became siphoned off into various channels and communities, it became clear that certain corporate interests and commercial interests could manage the overall impact of that space.
	We saw outlier events like Brexit or the rise of populist politicians and this is continuing across the world because people are ultimately, it seems to me, opposed to globalism.
	So globalism has to continually alloy its agenda to supposed issues that are significant to people around gender, identity, race, climate change, important ideas where there are important conversations that could take place.
	But those conversations can't be turbocharged by corporate, financial and state interests that seem to have only one aim in mind.
	Control.
	Control of consciousness.
	Control of conversation.
	Control of your ability to dissent.
	Control of your ability to oppose or come together in communities that have an identity That's outside of what they're prescribing to you.
	A figure like Elon Musk is a danger.
	I don't know where this will head, but it seems that in Elon Musk they have an opponent that can fight them in courts, that can fight them in the public sphere, that can fight them on social media platforms.
	Who knows where this will lead?
	But I agree with what Schellenberger proposes here.
	We have to support independent media.
	We have to be cynical, sceptical, discerning, doubtful about the legacy media.
	We have to recognize that there are now no reliable moral authorities at the heart of public life.
	You can't trust the legacy media.
	You can't trust the government.
	You can't trust the corporations that fund them.
	They have an agenda and the agenda is control.
	And their control is antithetical to your freedom.
	But that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the chat.
	See you in a second.
	Thanks for choosing Fox News.
	The dude.
	No, he's the fucking dude!
	CCB21.
	Most definitely an attack on Elon's presence in general, because he's breaking things down like Russell.
	EOD Ghost.
	The irony of a company called Media Matters.
	Elon is like John Wayne toilet paper.
	He's don't change it when I'm reading it guys Rough tough and won't take shit off.
	Nobody.
	That's keg 84 DOA Love in action.
	I think the establishment is gonna have a very hard time de-platforming Or taking down Musk.
	Yeah, we've got to unite.
	Hey, people are saying release the nips.
	I ain't releasing no nips until I see 20,000.
	At the moment, we're at 19,916.
	Aaron James, 001.
	My flatulence is sweeter than wine.
	Am I envisioned with that, by the way, or is that the output?
	Am I envisioned, or is it totally the comments envisioned?
	Nice.
	Just learning.
	It's a new technique.
	Put it back full screen for me, actually, because it's very convenient to read it there.
	Cheers.
	I was just checking.
	Steve Milton, 72.
	My farts would wipe out the entire pod community.
	Yeah, I think that the pod community is not considered farts, have they?
	Show us your tattoos, says Bukwench over in the locals chat.
	Just a waste of air time, the nip talk, says Pride Faults.
	Hey, come on, it's part of our culture.
	Uh oh, we've hit that 20,000 mark.
	What is with the nipple fixation?
	Let's have a quick vote now.
	Do you want to see them or not?
	If you say yes, Y for yes, N for no.
	I don't, you know what I mean?
	I don't get anything out of it.
	You know me, I'm dealing with a lot of stuff at the moment.
	Frankly, I don't need this kind of pressure.
	Why Kweb48?
	Why aren't you talking about the pneumonia outbreak in Chinese schools?
	Because I didn't know about there being a pneumonia outbreak in Chinese schools.
	I'm pretty interested.
	No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
	This is just an absolute hard no in the locals community.
	No one wants it.
	No one wants it.
	I think it's a no, guys.
	I think it's an actual no, which I'm...
	Offended by, but I will abide by.
	Hunter Thompson was right about the press.
	Yes, he was.
	What did Hunter S Thompson say about the press?
	Is there a famous quote?
	I feel like I can... I sort of can half remember it.
	R2D2.
	Orange man bad, musk man scary.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, that's what's going on.
	Hey, remember...
	We've got a few things to cover, first of all, but I want to let you know what we're doing tomorrow.
	You see how January 6th was posited as an insurrection?
	I always thought it was a little fanciful.
	I thought it was, at best, a guided tour gone awry.
	That's what I thought it would look like.
	People look kind of gentle, don't they, when they're wandering?
	I know there was violence and even a death, of course.
	But what I feel like is that there's a lot of hysterical rhetoric around January the 6th and it's used to conflate the, let's call it the MAGA right, which I think is essentially a populist movement, to paint them as a kind of a fascistic organisation.
	We've got loads of examples of MSNBC pundits and CNN pundits and Clinton etc.
	comparing Donald Trump to Hitler.
	So we've got a great story on that tomorrow.
	Here's a little excerpt.
	It says this.
	Elites in the Democratic Party and in the mainstream media, through their efforts to subdue a populist backlash,
	have amended, have eroded, excuse me, First Amendment rights
	and have politicized the FBI and the Department of Justice.
	Democrats became everything they once said they feared.
	they feared in Trump, censorial, totalitarian and corrupt.
	Their years-long clampdown on dissent and criminalization of political opposition
	was a systematic attack on liberal democracy.
	Worse, they became everything that liberals during the 20th century warned Americans about.
	You excited to see that story tomorrow?
	Because I think it's going to be brilliant.
	Also, this week, we've got Lee Fang coming on the show, talking about his report on Moderna
	spying on independent voices.
	And we might also cover the story about the various figures that are affiliated with the left
	being censored and controlled.
	We've got a lot of interesting information to show you.
	Guys, Lefarious Monster.
	I'm sorry for the lack of bigotry today.
	I just wasn't feeling it.
	Lefarious Monster's a complex person.
	We're always... We missed you, actually.
	I'll be honest with you.
	Like, when I looked there and I didn't see any of your glory hole stuff, I was like, oh, where's Lefarious Monster?
	No, at least you're a human.
	We thought you might be a bot.
	We're glad that you're human.
	We love to have real, genuine humans.
	It don't matter how different we are.
	In fact, that's part of what we're celebrating.
	Listen, guys, I'm going to go on to locals now.
	You don't have to necessarily pay for this first bit, do they?
	It's only for paid supporters.
	But what we're going to do is a Bible reading.
	Yeah!
	A little bit of Bhagavad Gita and also we're going to look at rice resonance and what happens when frequencies played through water to demonstrate that there's an ulterior reality that we can access in our consciousness.
	So you've just got to press the red button on your screen and join us there over in the Awaken Wonder community.
	We do Bible readings, we discuss how this movement is going to grow and how we're going to not necessarily take over the world because we don't agree with globalism.
	What we want is a decentralized unified movement to challenge Globalism.
	That's what we want, and by God, we're going to get one.
	And people that have joined this movement lately, App Sarah 2, welcome.
	El Halo, thank you.
	100lb Owl, Cora, Coleman Cubbage, Cubbage or Cubbage, you're all welcome.
	I'm glad you're in our community together.
	So we're going to, like all of you guys that are watching us on Rumble, we love you.
	We're back tomorrow with Lee Fang for another fantastic show, and this January the 6th story, which I know you're going to watch.
	If you want a little bit more from us, Hop over to Locals, press the red button where I'll be reading the holy words of the Lord, as well as the Bhagavad Gita.
	And oh, merchandise!
	We're going to have merchandise relaunched soon.
	So, you know, stay tuned for that.
	Someone asked for that conveniently and helpfully in the chat a minute ago.
	So join us on Locals for a talk about spirituality, ulterior realms, and how we're going to awaken a great power within ourselves.
	Otherwise, I'll see you tomorrow.
	Not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
	Until then, if you can, God knows I love you, stay free.

▲