All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 6, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:04:15
[NEW POLL] Trump BEATS Biden In 2024! THIS Is How - Stay Free #239
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So, I'm going to go ahead and do that. And then I'm going to go ahead and do the other
one.
So, I'm going to go ahead and do that.
In this video, you're going to see the future.
Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
Thanks for joining me on Stay Free with Russell Brand today.
Wherever you're watching us, we will be available, no ebb or rumble, in about 15 minutes, and we've got a lot to talk to you about.
Seems that according to new polls, Trump will inevitably beat Biden in 2024, and you begin to wonder, will they ever consider replacing Biden?
Or will it be like in the last cycle, where they would rather lose to Trump with Hillary than beat Trump with, as it then was, Bernie.
Would you imagine that RFK would do better if he was the Democrat nominee?
And does any of it matter when you sense that behind the edifices of potential power there is some lurking force that is actually governing everything?
A kind of global establishment that is able to evade national sovereignty I'm talking about organizations like the WHO.
I learned some extraordinary things from my conversation with Dr. David Martin that you will very much enjoy, particularly on the precipice as we are of a new WHO treaty that will grant yet more power to them, yet more of your tax dollars to them, when 88% of their donated funding comes from...
You'll have to answer that question later on the show.
But 88% of their donations come from where?
Let me know if you know.
Hello, Possum77 on the Rumble stream.
Hello, Anne-Breeze on the Rumble stream.
Hello there, Ashella, an awakened wonder.
If you want to become an awakened wonder, press the red button.
Tfunk says, sick pajamas.
These are my waking clothes.
This is what I wear when I'm out in the world.
If you're watching this anywhere other than Rumble, download the app.
You'll be told every time We stream so you'll be continually informed of our content and know you this, I am approaching 21 years, one day at a time, free from drugs and alcohol.
I have not had a drink since December the 12th 2002.
My life depends on that information being literally, actually, verifiably true, okay?
Bear that in mind in a crazy world with a legacy news media that you I'm afraid cannot trust.
Now let's have a look at Joe Biden's ongoing campaign and consider what kind of state the Democrat Party must be in that they can't think of a better alternative to Joe Biden.
Like in a minute you'll literally hear them say This is the best we can do.
This dear, wonderful, stretched, cadaverous, platitude-spouting, dear old man of the system is the best we can do.
A friend of our show, Glenn Greenwald, he posted this.
Just consider how much Americans hate and distrust this country's leading institutions when Trump, indicted on felony charges in four different jurisdictions, leads Biden in this way in key swing states.
How much do you hate the establishment?
How little trust do you have for the legacy media?
Are you beginning to see now that this is actually beyond party politics, isn't it?
We need a transcendent model.
We need new systems and we need them quickly.
We're talking about a very complex omnicrisis with war on several fronts, with personal liberty being infringed upon, with justice being prevailed against.
This is a serious situation and it's going to require more in terms of complexity to solve it than a man who seems to be willing to build his entire presidency on a single word.
I have one word.
Don't.
One word.
Pretty straightforward.
Don't.
Don't.
Don't think for a moment that this system can ever serve you.
Don't.
Don't believe the legacy media.
Don't think that anyone is going to save you unless you awaken yourself and start forming in your community now The willingness to impose, to oppose this injustice and form new alliances.
Somehow we must free ourselves from hatred.
Somehow we must free ourselves from the inner darkness and be willing to move towards the light together.
Because Antony Blinken, who I feel has some sway over foreign policy, and I have been reliably informed that the man is an actual idiot.
Almost like you could do a test on him and it would come back, oh my god he's an idiot!
He's taken dear Joe Biden's Don't, slogan!
To a new degree.
In fact, he's improved it a little bit.
At the same time, it was very important to send a very clear message to anyone who might seek to take advantage of the conflict in Gaza to threaten our personnel here or anywhere else in the region.
Don't do it.
Ah, two more words there.
Later, after we've shown you our item where we talk about... You know Tucker talked about how insane it would be to engage in war with Iran.
We do a brilliant presentation.
I think it's okay to say it's brilliant.
You'll tell us.
You'll tell us in the chat whether you agree that it's brilliant.
But we talk about how this has been a long desired conflict, like the establishment has been baiting Iran for a little while.
The complexity that could be unleashed if this escalates further, even beyond the horror that we're currently experiencing in that region.
This could be, we're teasing Armageddon, though it were a junkyard dog.
No wonder people are willing to embrace that anomalous creature, that man that you love over there in the rumble chat, that even you, my awakened wonders, are seeing has something to offer when it comes to upturning establishment politics, Donald Trump.
Here's some mainstream media coverage of his new position in the polls.
Today marks exactly one year from the 2024 presidential election and what could end up being a rematch between Joe Biden and- It's not a fight.
It's not a boxing match.
It's not entertainment.
Do you see how much conventional, contemporary, national politics is being reduced to an entertainment spectacle?
Do you see how far away it seems from your own reality?
Just maxims, epithets and slogans offered instead of policy and change.
Don't.
Don't.
Remember, I'm going to make Saudi Arabia a pariah.
Don't.
Don't.
I won't be building any wall.
Don't.
Don't build a wall.
Do.
Do build a wall.
Do you see how it's meaningless?
Do you see that it amounts to a war machine and you just argue about the paint on the planes that will be dropping bombs on human beings just like you somewhere in the world?
I don't know, man.
Could we do better?
Is it possible?
Let me know in the chat.
Do you think we could do better if we were to embrace our inner spirit?
Press 1 if you're watching us, if you think we could awaken a greater power within ourselves that's dormant, latent and awaiting to be awakened even now.
Press 1 right now.
2 if you feel beaten by the system, if they've cowed you, if they've broken you.
Let me know if you've got more power in you.
Let me know if you're approaching the point where you've had enough, where you're willing to throw off the shackles and the chains, when you're willing to test your freedom by moving, by moving against their narrative.
When was the last time you saw Albert Ball, the CEO of Pfizer, ask the difficult question?
When was the last time you were asked to call this number if you'd experienced a vaccine injury?
When was the last time that this establishment did anything other than try to kowtow you, reduce you into a blob, pump you full of chemicals, fill you bad food, stick you in front of a screen and dun your children right down?
Let me know when you last saw freedom.
Let me know when you last felt free within nature.
I'm seeing a lot of 1s and I ain't seeing any 2s.
Let's keep going, baby.
Awaken and embrace that spirit.
Because let me tell you, the legacy media, they want you stupid.
They need you stupid.
Their biggest sponsors?
Big Pharma.
Who funds the FDA?
Big Pharma.
Who used to work for the FDA and are now working for Moderna after just verifying that some more of their booster shots could be released onto an unsuspecting public?
Well, a couple of doctors will be talking about that in some detail later on this week.
I'm seeing there's an endless slew of ones.
It ain't binary, baby.
It's a new singularity.
Let's have a look what the legacy media are saying.
Donald Trump.
Our new CBS News poll shows Biden continues to trail Donald Trump in that possible head-to-head.
He is now down three points.
For more on why, we go to Anthony Salvato.
Good morning to you, Anthony.
Why?
You know why?
It's because he's ineffectual.
He's a corporate company man.
The Democrat Party has given up the idea of presenting a meaningful, realistic leader.
It's absolutely absurd.
It's ridiculous.
Let's have a look, though.
Let's see what the mainstream media say.
Good morning, Margaret.
To understand those numbers, we wanted to look... Good morning, Margaret.
It's no time for chit-chat.
Look at views about both today and the future.
So first, the number of Americans who think that things are going badly in the country today has hit its high for the year.
So you might expect any incumbent to be down as Biden is.
Things are going badly, but that's also his fault because he's sort of nominally in charge.
You might expect that people would lose the respect of people with everything going so badly, with the forever wars marching ever closer into total immersion.
That's not abstract.
That's defining.
But then look at these positive views of what people think will happen for them financially if Donald Trump wins.
Way more voters think they'd be better off.
And Biden, for his part, hasn't fully convinced as many Democrats that he'd help them as the middle class still reels from inflation.
Then let's look overseas.
There's more voters, we find, who think that it's Trump that would keep the U.S.
out of a war if he wins.
Yeah, well, there you go.
It's not looking good, is it?
Amberies in the chat are simply, why do I have a whale by my name?
Yeah, why do people have whales next to their name in that chat?
How does that even get there?
There's approaching 12,000, over 12,000 of you watching this, get to that.
Magical 20,000 while we're live.
And if you're watching us on Rumbling, you want access to additional content, meditations and solutions as we discuss ways to move forward, to grow this movement, to turn independent media into independent politics.
You see we're making a difference.
Do you imagine for a second there'll be a COVID inquiry in the UK if there hadn't been independent media voices?
Would you have had all these Senate hearings, Rand Paul and all that stuff, were it not for an independent media showcasing voices like Jay Bhattacharya, Peter McCulloch, All who have been on our shows, Dave, mine, all of those people that have been willing to speak out against the narrative.
I'll tell you what, however much money Pfizer and Moderna made, no matter how many regulations and legislations were able to be passed by your government at the string pool of the WHO, is nothing compared to what they would have done without your opposition.
Well done for not being fooled.
Well done for staying awake.
You knew that there was something wrong.
You told us.
We're just reporting it.
Back to you, baby.
Let's see what RFK's tweeting, because RFK, many say, presents a new possibility.
Would the Dems, for example, be better with RFK running instead of dear old Joe Biden?
There we go.
He's polling at 22% and he's only just gotten started.
He's a friend of the show, consistent guest on the show.
And also, Would you rather have RFK with his legacy name and his sympathy for a wide variety of issues than Joe Biden, who it seems did accept some checks from CFC... EFC, excuse me, a China energy company.
This is a report from the Wall Street Journal.
They seem to have a literal check made out to the big guy himself, Joe Biden.
Let's have a look at that.
$40,000 for Laundry room.
That doesn't look like an actual check.
There they go.
Sarah and James Biden Senior.
God love them.
They're trying their best.
Now, listen, you lot.
We're going to stay on YouTube for a little bit.
We want to ask you, what story would you like to see us cover after we cover Sean Hannity's School of Impeachment?
He talks to a bunch of Republicans, including the new Speaker of the House.
You'll love it.
You'll love it.
Do you want to see a story about the COVID inquiry?
One of the advisors to the government, he's a guy called Dominic Cummings.
He's a pretty funny guy, as a matter of fact.
He, um, when he's speaking to the Inquiry, they, I think they list a bunch of, uh, curse words that he used.
He called people pigwinkies and sodamajigs.
I mean, he, like, he used some amazing cursing.
Do you want to hear that, uh, press?
What is it for that?
Two for that.
Or do you want to see about robot CEOs coming to run the corporation of the future?
As if CEOs are the demographic that are going to lose their jobs to automation.
So if you want to see about robot CEOs, press one.
If you want to see some COVID cursing from the UK, press two.
Yeah, it's your sacred vote, Heinz 357.
You've got to use it.
Let's make sure there are no faulty voting machines in sight.
Here's Sean Hannity over on Fox.
Talking to an audience of Republicans about potential impeachment.
Let me scan the room.
How many of you think that that's where this is headed?
Please raise your hand.
Wow.
The whole room.
Thank you all.
I appreciate you being with us.
I suppose that's going to be an impeachment then, isn't it?
On the basis of Sean Hannity's litmus test right there.
So you've come back with... What do you want to see?
Do they want to see the cursing?
You want to see the cursing?
That means we've got to leave YouTube because some of this guy's cursing is pretty off-key.
Listen, if you're watching us on YouTube now, we love you.
We love each and every one of you 6.7 million awakening wonders, but we are going to Speak very freely now.
I'm not going to speak freely.
I'm going to let some of the profanities rain down from Dominic Cummings, former advisor to Boris Johnson.
He uses some pretty amazing cursing.
You'll enjoy it.
It's just some disgusting swearing.
And then maybe we'll do the CEO robot a little later.
So if you're watching Join us on YouTube.
Click the link in the description.
Join us over on Rumble.
See you in a second.
Stay free.
Those of you that are watching us on Rumble, become an Awakened Wonder.
Press the red button.
It's a gentler place.
There's a lot of focus on spiritual awakening, which let me tell you is a necessary component if we're going to meaningfully change the world.
We're going to need new resources, baby.
We're not going to be able to change the world just by moving the deck chairs around, by using the parts that we already have access to.
There has to be a deep power summoned from within us.
Certainly is the kind of power that Dominic Cummings, who was the advisor of Boris Johnson during the Brexit period, he's a sort of an extraordinary and interesting character.
And apparently, while Boris Johnson, who's widely regarded as a kind of lazy Prime Minister, sort of a kind of, I don't know, like a lovable crackpot, but He was evidently pretty corrupt.
He was having all those parties.
I don't know if you know this in your country, but in our country, the government just held parties the whole way through the lockdown, and it was leaked afterwards.
I know that your Gavin Newsom had a party or two.
Well, they committed to it in our country.
Now, Dominic Cummings was a key advisor of the government, and in fact, some would say the defining figure and mastermind behind Boris Johnson's ascendancy.
Here's a little bit from that inquiry where they're doing what seems to me to be a pretty limited, mealy-mouthed inquiry.
They're not, for example, going to go, oh no, the vaccines were ineffective.
No one's reporting vaccine injury.
They suppressed information about natural immunity.
Lockdowns didn't work and they promoted it because of an agenda.
They're not going to get into that stuff.
They're just going to go, oh, he's Well, here's one or two people that can be blamed.
Same as after 2008, where it appears, to some degree, there was a deliberate collapse of the entire financial system.
No one suffered.
Well, ordinary people suffered, of course, but no one suffered legitimate consequences for the orchestration of a financial catastrophe of that nature.
Let's have a look at Dominic Cummings, having given you a little bit of background on him.
You called ministers useless fuck pigs, morons, cunts.
Do you think you contributed to a lack of effectiveness on the part of ministers?
That is a good description of him also, Lucian56 on the Rumble chat.
Let's have a look at Dominic Cummings and his peculiar cursing.
You called ministers useless fuck pigs, morons, cunts.
Do you think you contributed to a lack of effectiveness on the part of ministers?
No, I think I was reflecting a widespread view.
Widespread view!
I mean a lot of people think that they're fuck pigs and morons and c-words.
Amazing.
He's back to Jaws mode wank.
Cabinet office is terrifyingly shit.
You're happy to have useless fuck pigs in charge.
I also must stress I think leaving Hancock in post is a big mistake.
We face going into autumn crisis with the cunt still in charge of the NHS.
We'll be back around that cabinet table with him and Stevens bullshitting again in September.
Does that make you like him a little bit more, if you'd heard of Cummings at all?
Seems like he was ahead of the game.
Catherine the Curious in the Rumble chat.
They are fuck pigs.
Quite simply that.
Amazing.
Absolutely amazing.
Well, Arch, do you want to watch?
Maybe we'll have a look at the cyborg afterwards, because I want to show you this story.
We're all aware of what's happening in the Middle East.
We're all aware of the complexity of bundling together funding to perpetuate the ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict with this escalating crisis in the Middle East.
How also there appears to be an agenda to provoke China in the South Seas.
Last week, our man Tucker said provoking Iran is pretty crazy and pretty irresponsible.
Biden discusses American troops in Gaza, another war in the Middle East could be underfoot.
And this is what's difficult, I think.
That it's likely that the Republicans and the Democrats will both vote for it.
We're going to spend a bit of time in this story and you are going to love it.
Let me know what you think in the chat.
Let me know what questions you have.
But I also want you to know what stories you'd like us to cover out the back of the show.
Any ideas you've got, Post it in the chat and a link to it if you want us to cover it and we'll get into it.
We'll look at the Awakened Wonders over on Locals First.
You better believe we're watching you, Rumble, Woodski, Don Belafre, Sudden Synchronicity.
We're watching all of you.
We're watching all of you.
So, what do you think's happening in the Middle East?
Do you think escalating this tension is good for all of you?
Who's your friend in the white shirt?
You can see Gareth Kanye in the reflection.
That's Gareth Roy.
Magic Moon, does Russell read the chat?
I'm reading it right now, baby.
So, do you want American troops in Gaza?
Do you want this conflict to continue to escalate?
Here's the news.
No, here's the effing news.
See you in a minute.
Well, we'll just vote for someone who doesn't want there to be a continual war everywhere in the world.
There are no political parties that don't want that.
One thing you won't be deciding for yourself is whether or not to have a government in the United States of America that is not pro-war, because both the Republicans and Democrats are pro-Middle Eastern war, in particular with Iran.
Now, Joe Biden, as you know, is already discussing ground troops in Gaza.
And curiously, the idea of ceasefire or peace is now verboden, even to discuss it.
If you're a person that is affiliated with Palestine, I imagine you have extremely strong opinions about what's happening there now.
And if you're a person with strong affiliations with Israel or Judaism or Islam and Palestine, excuse me, there's so many ways for you to be personally offended and affected by this.
But I would say for the rest of us, perhaps what we could look at is Peace?
Ceasefire?
Solutions?
Ways of ending this?
Again, I can understand if you are Israeli and you're like, well, we can't possibly because Hamas wants to execute everyone.
Or if you're Palestinian, this is unfair, they're carpet bombing.
All of those things.
Like, how can I, a man from Gray's Essex, England, possibly pontificate on that?
But I'll tell you what we can talk about is whether or not it's best for the West, and America in particular, To unilaterally fund the perpetuation of wars between Russia and Ukraine, potential wars with China, war with Iran.
Surely there must be a conversation about what is best for humanity as a whole, for the individual people across various regions.
How come these arguments continue to collide and contradict?
Why is it that it's impossible to say, wow man, we should be evolving beyond this whole war state that we appear to be globalizing right now?
One person who is not afraid to say the unsayable is, of course, Tucker Carlson, who's advocating for peace and saying that war with Iran would be disastrous.
We've said before, war with Iran has been a plan for ages and ages.
And do you think sometimes that people that run, like, weapons manufacturers have a vested interest in selling weapons?
And do you think that the New American Project, which did state war with Iran was on the agenda, would exploit a situation like the current travesties in that region?
Well, Yes, they would.
Let's have a look at what Tucker Carlson's views on a potential conflict with Iran are and ask why neither political party in the United States of America are willing to advocate for peace.
So what would war with Iran mean?
Well, it's hard to know because virtually no one who's talking about it in public is operating from a deep interest in America's interest.
Is this good for us or is it not?
Former Colonel Douglas McGregor is the CEO of our country, Our Choice, and one of the first people we turn to for analysis of events like this because he is interested in what happens to the United States.
He joins us now.
Doug, thank you for coming on.
Do you think that we are moving toward war with Iran?
Yes, I do.
Yes.
Oh no!
War!
We're going to have to have another war now.
You can't have another war, you haven't finished your last one yet!
I wouldn't let my kids have chocolate the way America would have wars.
And it looks like the chosen destination is indeed Armageddon.
Ding ding next up Armageddon.
I wonder though people that fiercely advocate for more war if they ever think in the ultimate war we all die.
Now I know we all die anyway and perhaps it doesn't matter if we all die at the same time perhaps it might be nicer but there should be some sort of chat about it shouldn't there?
There doesn't seem to be any real appreciation for the implications for us, and frankly for Europe and the world, as well as the Middle East, of such action.
Take for an example, just on the economic side, about 20% of the world's oil passes through the Straits of Hormuz every month.
Probably 25% of liquefied natural gas.
And you're talking about shutting down 2 to 3 million barrels a day of oil from Iran.
You know, this entire region is involved in the war.
This is not an Iranian monopoly by any stretch of the imagination.
What Colonel Douglas McGregor has just explained is that by going to war with Iran, you jeopardize that entire region, not just oil produced in that particular country, but many Natural fuels or fossil fuels however you describe them that are produced in that region will be jeopardized.
So essentially you're creating a cluster of conflicts and I suppose a massive energy crisis that's likely to affect everybody in Europe and North America.
And I suppose there are some things that are simply worth doing that for.
But is this worth doing that for?
Is that something that we've considered?
Is that something you feel that you've had explained plainly to you?
The same way that as the Ukraine-Russia conflict was escalating, was it explained to you that it was likely to create an energy crisis?
Were you told that the Ukrainian counteroffensive would definitely be successful even when the government themselves said there's no chance that's going to bloody work?
What I'm advocating for myself is a kind of, as best as possible, holistic understanding of why this might happen.
And if we, from watching Tucker Carlson and this general, can together conclude that it's likely to have devastating consequences, presumably the people that are advocating for the advance of this conflict also understand that, have gamed out and mapped out and gone, Going to be good for us, ultimately, because it seems that the last crisis, the pandemic, was beneficial for the most powerful interests in the world.
Big tech benefited, big pharma benefited.
There's a problem when what crisis for you, because it's going to cost you a lot of money to put gas in your car, are not crisis for them.
You can't have decisions made by people who are not affected by the consequences of their decision.
That's not democracy.
Then when you look at the military side, you have to look at the arsenal of missiles.
Very high explosive conventional warheads that would do enormous damage, destroying whole city blocks in places like Haifa, Tel Aviv, even Jerusalem, though I doubt they would attack Jerusalem.
The bottom line is that we need to think this through, and everyone right now is emoting.
Yeah, think this through doesn't seem like the worst idea in the world on the precipice of another crisis, and it does seem like people are emoting.
You do see people like Lindsey Graham and Nikki Haley talking about it in bombastic, hyperbolic, emotional terms, which are gonna get An emotional response, as we continually say, particularly from people on either side of this devastating, ideological, historic conflict that are emotionally affected.
They're obviously not going to be swayed or persuaded by anyone, I don't imagine.
And then the rest of culture seems to be treating this like it's just another one of those things where on Instagram you put a tile up or whatever.
This is something that pertains to the potential end of the world.
So I feel like if you're not personally invested, you probably have an obligation to advocate for a sensible solution.
Or at least, even if you're not, you should say no.
Armageddon.
I've fought this through.
Massive crisis of energy.
Yeah.
Displacement of millions of people.
Yes.
Further tensions between the world's various religious lineages.
Fine.
Increase of domestic terrorism.
Don't care about that either.
We're all going to be poor.
This is going to legitimise the government's locking us all in our homes again.
We're all going to have to have social credit scores because the migrant crisis will be used to legitimise people having digital IDs and stuff.
I'm OK with that.
Dissenting voices are being shut down now because it's considered insensitive to say Could we always... That song, all we are saying is give peace a chance now.
You won't be allowed to have that.
All we are saying is... That was it.
Well, what was the thing?
That.
We were just saying that bit.
Okay, well, the Beatles aren't as good anymore then.
We're creating a perpetual crisis and allowing it to affect everybody.
At some point, we're gonna have to recognise... Wait a minute.
This is one planet, infinite space.
We're going to have to look at some new models of working this stuff out and not just go with the elite establishment who benefit from perpetual crisis because otherwise they're going to keep perpetuating crisis.
Yeah, I've seen it now.
Right.
OK, we're going to have to balance this stuff out by advocating for alternatives.
No, let me know.
Let me know.
There is no thinking anywhere.
All of the bases that we have in Iraq and Syria, unfortunately, where we still have over a thousand Americans, All of those would be targeted and this time they would target them accurately and this destruction would be wholesale.
I would expect trouble here at home and in the United States because of the open border.
Hezbollah has a very large operation in Mexico.
There are no doubt.
Many, many, many Hezbollah agents inside the United States.
This was the type of language, right?
Oh, Hezbollah could be in Mexico.
Do you remember when I was younger, they used stuff like that to advocate for a war.
That's what they used to say.
We're going to have to go to war because this terrorist is going to affect us.
Now you've got to say stuff like that.
Not have a war!
Listen, don't have a war.
Why?
Because of terror.
There's a war against terror.
It's peace against terror now.
Everything's gone topsy-turvy.
Oh, but these people are right-wing.
Oh, I'll tell you what, mate.
You might want to put that stuff aside at this point because we're all going to die.
We can only begin to imagine the kind of trouble they could cause.
The missile and space program in Iran is very, very advanced, as is their cyber warfare capability.
All of these things would be brought to bear against us.
But what's most important, I think, for Americans to understand is if we attack Iran on the basis of Hezbollah's alleged willingness to attack Israel, if Israel invades Gaza, we will end up in a fight with Russia.
Russia will not sit by quietly and watch Iran destroyed by the United States air and naval power in the region.
And once Russia enters this, it becomes much more than just a local conflict.
Maybe more than just a regional war.
Now the weather?
I mean, where do you go with that, really?
Other than, oh yeah, this does sound like a relatively reasonable prognosis for how, you know, I've always wondered how I might die.
Well, here's how you're going to die.
These are responsible decisions.
And the question you might want to ask yourself is not the kind of questions They're quite complex, ideological, sometimes theological, the complex historic regional disputes that have defined the Middle East.
All of those things are, you know, seem irresolvable, certainly to my tiny little mind.
But what you can say with some degree of certainty is the people that claim to represent you and your interests do not represent you and your interests.
They represent the military-industrial complex and their interests.
interests and probably sets of interests that are too diffuse and ethereal for me to even
identify and understand because I don't think those kind of interests are plainly visible to us.
So do you think that it would be good if somewhere in the conversation
these kind of views were being espoused?
And beyond that, somewhere within the electoral process, you were invited to participate.
For example, say you went, no, I really believe in this because I'm Israeli, or I'm really against this because my family are in Gaza.
I'd say, oh, God, yeah, I'll shut up if you want.
I wouldn't try and have those arguments with you.
For people that are just looking at, oh I live in Wyoming, or I live in Dusseldorf, or whatever, we're talking about world war.
We're talking about world war.
And we've already seen that global crisis equates to benefits for the most powerful interests in the world.
How many times do we have to recite Julian Assange's edict?
The function is to take public money, put it into private hands.
Legitimize, we can't just say we're doing this war because of like stuff That seems pretty malfeasant.
No.
We're doing this to protect these people because this awful thing, that awful thing.
What choice do we have?
We have to do it.
America is sort of somehow the policeman of the world.
Well, they're a corrupt policeman.
And it's a policeman that's not operating on behalf of the community.
It's a policeman that's operating on behalf of the interests of the powerful, which is the complaints that people have about ordinary policing sometimes.
Isn't it?
Good policing would be, we work for you, the community, how can we protect you and make sure that a law, a law that's there to protect you is observed.
A bad policing would be, we're going to crush your dissent in favour of the agenda of the establishment.
If you don't have any values or principles, you're just a wash.
I feel like we might need to look for a third way.
exhausted. I know many of you out there struggling between food and fuel and
other winters upon us, another mad pandemic could be launched at any time,
curious, bizarre decisions to be made. It's very difficult to engage these kind
of subjects, so easy to go for the emotional response, I'm on this side, I'm
on that side, I'll post these kind of things. But I feel like we might need to
look for a third way. This is Daniel R. DePetris, who's a fellow at Defence
Priorities. As bad as the war between Israel and Hamas is, it could get even
worse if the file expanded.
Some US politicians and pundits are perfectly fine with the prospect, and even recommended that the Biden administration take the fight directly to Iran, Hamas's main external backer.
Senator Lindsey Graham, an arch-Iran hawk, has used several television appearances to press for war against Iran.
On October 15th, the Senator stated the US should knock Iran out of the oil business if Hezbollah, its proxy in southern Lebanon, entered the conflict.
Pundits are wholly unaccountable and have the luxury of not worrying about the consequences of their recommendations.
Policymakers, in contrast, have weighty responsibility on their shoulders and need to closely weigh the costs And benefits of every plausible scenario.
And I suppose here it becomes relevant and important to note that it's our firm belief that those policymakers do not represent you.
They represent another set of interests and have to create rhetorical veils to prevent us going, hey, you don't represent us.
You're just going to do stuff that's convenient for your backers.
That's why you invest in weapons companies on the precipice of war.
That's why you accept donations.
That's why you turn up at these dinners.
That's why lobbying and donations aren't all banned.
So because we're not Thinking in those terms, for some strange reason, we allow policies to be made that are at odds with the interests of most of us.
First, we should be clear about one thing.
Just because Tehran is a sponsor of Hamas, it doesn't necessarily mean it was operationally involved in the terror group's rampage in Israel.
This isn't about making any excuses for Iran, who after all, is the world's preeminent state sponsor of terrorism, but rather to point out a simple fact.
Secretary of State Antony Blinken publicly stated, Of course the terrorist attack is appalling.
Everybody knows that.
The same way as 9-11 was appalling.
Everybody knows that.
I suppose what we're discussing is whether or not to go to Iran or Iraq or what the subsequent reaction to it, particularly by people that aren't directly involved, nations indeed that aren't directly involved, might do to contribute to making this conflict far, far
worse.
Certainly these are questions that require looking at.
One would think, or at least hope, the US wouldn't take the country to war
on incomplete or contradictory intelligence.
After all, the US did exactly that in Iraq two decades ago, and the result was an unmitigated disaster for US power,
influence and credibility.
Is it me, or does the future feel more insecure and uncertain?
Wars, pandemics, lies, trickery, my cats keep having kittens, the last one's personal.
For those who are in the United States there is a way to secure your hard-earned nest egg.
American Heart for Gold make it easy to protect your savings and retirement accounts with physical gold and silver.
With one phone call they can have physical gold and silver delivered right to your door Or inside a qualifying retirement account like your IRA or 401k.
American Hartford Gold is the highest-rate firm in the U.S.
with an A-plus rating from the BBB and thousands of satisfied clients.
Right now, they will give you up to $5,000 of free silver on your first qualifying order.
This offer is only for US customers.
Call 866-505-8315.
That's 866-505-8315.
Or simply text BRAND to 99-88-99.
505 8315 that's 866 505 8315 or simply text brand to 99 88 99 get up to $5,000
of silver and protect your future in this crazy crazy world with some solid
precious metals literally made in stars. Some like John Bolton former president
Donald Trump's national security adviser have long advocated for the use of US
military force against Tehran and used every opportunity to buttress their argument for military action.
It's telling, however, that these same proponents fail to seriously consider the costs attached to such an operation.
And the costs are so exceedingly high that whatever benefits may arise out of a military campaign are practically irrelevant.
Any attack against Iran would turn the 30,000 U.S.
troops stationed throughout the Middle East into prime targets for an Iranian reprisal.
We know this because American troops have been targeted by the Iranians before, not only through proxies in Iraq and Syria, but directly.
The roughly 3,500 US troops in Iraq and Syria would be sitting ducks, having to dodge rocket fire and drone attacks from Iran's proxy network to a greater extent than they already are.
American casualties would compel the White House to send even more US military power into the region for force protection purposes, which in turn would provide Iran and the litany of militias under its thumb with even more targets.
One can't overstate just how quickly a situation like this could spiral into a fully-fledged war between the US and Iran, which both have sought to avoid.
And it's been noted that potentially that could include Russia.
So it seems that what we have is a sensitive, complex situation that whatever else should be as free from hyperbole and hysteria as is humanly possible.
Israel too would be in for a very difficult period.
The IDF is an extremely capable force, yet has never been tested on two fronts simultaneously.
Although the missile attacks and airstrikes between Israel and Hezbollah over the past several days are a concern, those engagements have been limited thus far.
It would no longer be the case if US bomber aircraft dropped their payloads in Iran.
It's inconceivable that Hezbollah would be restrained in such a scenario.
This would not only be terrible for Israelis who live in the north, but also for those in Tel Aviv.
Hezbollah's missile arsenal can reach Israel's major population centers.
Unlike the rocket arsenals of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah's missile capacity includes at least some with precision-guided technology.
Casualties in Israel would be immense.
Taking the fight to Iran is the last thing the US should do.
It was a terrible idea when it was proposed in the past.
And it's a terrible idea now.
And it seems like it's the sort of idea that would only be pursued by people who don't care about Palestinian lives, Israeli lives, Iranian lives, American lives, British, French, Syrian, Yemeni lives, perhaps even life itself, outside of a very narrow set of parameters and a very narrow set of interests.
Whatever such a unipolar and hegemonic perspective is, it is not democracy.
It is not advanced.
It's not fair and just.
It's not likely to lead to a better, more peaceful world.
Think how at odds that assessment is with Joe Biden's almost ludicrously jingoistic proclamations on 60 Minutes where we're the United States of America for crying out loud.
We're America!
We're the United States of America, for God's sake.
Yeah, I hear what you're saying.
But what about the sort of escalation because of the accessibility of these precision missiles?
America?
Those three syllables are not going to be sufficient to help the people of Tel Aviv in the event that Hezbollah target them, which in this analysis becomes a possibility.
And the heightened emotions caused by an appalling terror attack And an escalating ground war in a region that has been historically more troubled than any that I can even think of.
All of these things have to be considered.
And to be dismissive of the very idea of peace, or looking for a solution, or not immediately alloying yourself unquestioningly to one side, because one side has historically been oppressed And the other side has been subject to genocide.
And there are so many religious reasons that either side can call upon.
Otherwise, this conflict wouldn't be happening, I suppose.
If we allow politicians, policymakers, weapons manufacturers, global hegemonists It's the kind of unipolar forces that exploited the pandemic in order to create profit and shut down true democracy.
If those voices prevail, if there isn't the introduction of nuance, conversation, uncertainty, doubt, inquiry, without those things, without the kind of Sturm and Drang and patriotism and bluster and simplistic online alliances that appear to define almost every issue these days, then The outcome is likely to be global war.
It was already worrying that people were not advocating for peace between Ukraine and Russia because it's a situation that would inevitably lead to a nuclear conflict.
Finding ways to mesh that together with this far more volatile situation in the Middle East is appalling and ridiculous.
I don't think we should be afraid to advocate for peace.
And if there are no political parties, if the Democrat Party want war because their interests are the military-industrial complex's interests, if the Republican Party want war because their interests are the military-industrial complex's interests or energy companies or whatever kind of alliances they have, you know as well as I do, whatever it is they're saying and whatever it is they're doing, It isn't because they're, we love the people of this region, or we love the people of that religion.
They don't care about that.
You might really care about it.
They don't.
It's clear from their actions, from the events of the last few years, and the direction of flow of revenue, and what kind of people find themselves unpersoned or bell-mashed into eternal trialless purgatory.
I'm speaking of course of Julian Assange.
That tells you what the trajectory of power is.
And if this happens to align temporarily with your belief system, then I won't judge you.
But if you're not personally, religiously, ethnically involved in this conflict, then I would say, and I pray that you agree with me, that we should be looking for ways to avoid the loss of human life, avoid damaging the planet, and avoid our shared and collective future.
Because from the most desirable perspective, we do have a shared future.
And if we abandon that perspective and just say, no, it's this tribe and that tribe and you're either with us or against us, and even if you just don't allow yourself to one of these perspectives, you're out, then it's over.
It's really, really actually over.
And then we will have a regionalized, tribalized world because civilization will crumble as a result of escalating conflicts that will ultimately become nuclear, I suppose.
I mean, that's certainly one solution and one that perhaps we should be working together to avoid.
Can we at least agree on that?
But that's just what I think.
Why don't you let me know what you think in the chat?
See you in a second.
Thank you for choosing Fox News.
The dude.
No, he's the fucking dude!
You certainly did let us know what you think in the chat.
I see that this is a powerfully divisive conflict.
A lot of people feeling a great deal of pain and some pretty strong views.
Vae Victus 1, Tucker is one of the few American political analysis to be consistent in his criticism of war.
Yeah, and criticism, authority.
A non-believer.
Russell, how about some 9-11 truth before the lunatics create WW3?
Well, we had a fantastic guest on that subject very recently.
What was his name?
He's James Stillness Julia.
I want to say like he was called Watt Tyler.
Very much sounded like a person that was involved in the peasant revolution.
We've got a great episode on that.
Let me know who I'm talking about there.
Also, Jairism is talking about Steven Crowder's stream and the manifesto of the tragic Nashville murders.
I mean, I guess the colloquialism you lot use is shooters.
I know Crowder's covered that in some There's some pretty incendiary and painful language in that, and I know that Stephen Crowder has covered it in some depth.
We'll have a look at that for you guys.
Also, this is, I would say, a tangential matter from you lot.
Jairism.
Jairism.
Is that how I say your name, mate?
The Beatles were never good!
And for some reason, so many people said... Can you scroll up on our page of posts, guys, in the studio?
Thanks.
Many people have said that they were a psy-op.
Were the Beatles a psy-op?
I just can't go with you on that.
Not the Beatles as a psy-op.
I absolutely love them.
There's too much beauty involved.
But we do know that the CIA were Yeah, pretty involved in some extraordinary cultural moments.
Listen, before we showed you the Here's the News episode on Iran, we were talking about the potential for CEO executives, including, notably, Micah the robot.
As if when automation reaches saturation, the first category of worker that will go are high up executives and chairman of the board.
Let's have a look at Micah, the robot.
It's a pretty extraordinary individual.
Are robot CEOs the future of the workplace?
Hello, I'm Micah, the world's first experimental AI CEO at Dictador.
In September of 2023, Mika was an experimental CEO of a company in Poland.
Is Mika on that tripod? Is that what Mika's moved around in?
Look, she's been a CEO there, I think, in Poland, but I don't think that the board are paying nearly enough
attention.
Environmental CEO of a company in Poland.
Day-to-day tasks for Mika at the liquor company included choosing artists to design the brand's bottles.
I meticulously research, conduct background checks, and verify potential client lists, providing well-reasoned
decisions to the...
That's actually, though, just a computer, isn't it?
It's just a computer.
A lot of you are saying that you're attracted to dear Micah.
What I'm saying is that Micah, like, if you remember the things where you could do their hair?
You know, that toy where you brush its hair?
I didn't have one.
Where you can brush its hair, like...
That, that's what that is, on top of a computer.
It's not like running a business really, is it?
It's not an actual person.
The board.
Mika has power, but not too much, which is probably a good idea.
A research and development engineer showed off this robot.
Oh, that Octo thing, getting in charge, that one's gonna be even worse.
At the 2023 World Robot Conference in Beijing.
He said the joints of the humanoids move more naturally and have more subtle micro expressions and finger movements.
He adds that they have a new upgrade in vision and haptics, which can show more.
It's interesting that they make them human.
I feel like, you know, like when phones like the initial ascendancy of the cell phone, it was like make the phone small.
But then the phone grew again, didn't it?
And it became about touchscreen and all of that stuff.
I don't think other than the obvious.
And let's face it.
Filthy application of these robots, not as CEOs, but for the kind of thing that many of you like Thracian88 are discussing using them for right now in the rumble chat.
Though I wouldn't want that guy whose head's just on the wall there.
He's a Confucius-looking wise old Chinese elder.
Like...
I think that eventually they'll accept, don't make these robots look like people.
That's the wrong message.
Yeah, Ming the Merciless, fair enough, good reference.
More natural-looking micro-expressions showing emotions like joy, anger... I don't want no micro-expressions!
...sadness and happiness.
So there you go, what we're allowing to be advanced is a terrifying world where eventually Nunza, I would sex them.
No Nunza, no.
Because Sarah of the Fiend's Squib, I would like them to look like dogs.
Yeah, have them look like a little dog.
Running your Polish vodka company.
Toasters, Xandar86.
All more appealing, I think, and frankly, yeah, might ensure more moral and judicious use of them.
Did you see when Mike Johnson was being announced as new speaker that Virginia Foxx with two X's really was like protecting him and I think was a little too assertive.
Have a little look at this while you continue to tell me how do you want your AI overlords to look when they drive us into our cells in probably less than a decade.
What prompted the outburst?
It was this question from ABC congressional correspondent Rachel Scott.
Can you help lead the efforts to overturn the 2020 election?
Because all of you just can't do it.
Shut up! Shut up!
Yeah, no, I don't know.
She's all right.
She's full on.
Scott's follow-up question about support for Ukraine was also met with jeers.
Do you support additional AECD?
You've asked your question.
You've asked your question.
Go away.
The congresswoman yelling at the reporter is North Carolina's Virginia Fox, and she's facing backlash today.
She's facing a backlash, but she seems overqualified for the role.
Make her speaker of the hour.
She knows how to keep order.
She just heckles people into total compliance.
When we asked you what stories you'd like to see, Kirk Theo said he would like to see the story about the... Can I see the post on the screen on my right, please, guys?
Apparently it's a new terrifying nuclear weapon.
So the screen on my right, can I see the post that leads to that?
Thank you very much.
So, America's new mega-nuke, the Gravity Bomb.
Let's have a look at this.
I don't know what button that's on, so play it from the gallery.
It doesn't tell me which button that's on.
Let's have a look.
Button 2, okay.
The existential threat of a nuclear conflict is no longer a Cold War memory, but nine states armed with atomic bombs that are an average 20 to 30 times stronger than those dropped in the Second World War.
The stakes are undeniably higher.
Only two nuclear weapons have ever been used in warfare when the US targeted the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and
Nagasaki in August 1945.
The two bombs were used to destroy the Japanese nuclear weapons.
It was a great time for global diplomacy when that happened.
It's astonishing, isn't it, that now there's a bomb that's 20 times more powerful.
I've heard it argued, and without giving too much away, you know that we're doing a festive special with Tucker.
This is a matter that we will be discussing.
When was it that our civilization started to collapse?
When was it when we went in the wrong direction?
Was it when we annihilated entire nations?
Or was it when we made intelligent AI robots that looked like toasters and dogs?
Tom's little boy and fat man exploded with a combined destructive power of more than 30 kilotons of energy.
It's a paling comparison to the weapons in modern nuclear arsenals.
Despite the devastation and worldwide shock following the bombings of Japan, U.S.
interest in such explosives persisted.
The B-83 is the highest-yielding nuclear weapon in America's arsenal.
It's 80 times more powerful than Little Boy, and 650 of them are in active service.
It's good that they're still using the names like Fat Man and Little Boy after we now know, like those were the kind of code names prior to the devastation.
But like, Little Boy is still pretty good there at 14 kilotons, but this is 1.2 megatons.
It's still been slightly, I would say, reduced to a kind of terrifying sport.
The global nuclear arms race reached a climax with the test of Russia's Tsar Bomba, a hydrogen aerial bomb produced during the Soviet era and detonated in 1961.
Its force, 3,333 times that of Little Boy.
It's force, 3,333 times that of Little Boy.
Now, the explosion was felt nearly a thousand kilometers away.
Six decades after the Tsar Bomba was deployed, no single device has matched its destructive power.
The would-be era of super bombs may now be unfamiliar, but their power, if there to be used, cannot be underestimated.
This ain't making me feel optimistic, is it you?
Like, with the number of potential opportunities, with the escalations in the Middle East that are already devastating and heartbreaking, with the ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict, the potential for those two discrete conflicts to emesh, certainly that's the way they're being funded, a potential new war with China.
Yeah, Dr. Strangelove is right, Yorkshire Dream.
I wonder what kind of radical transition is going to be required in order to prevent this happening.
ghost chants says everyone should stop paying taxes until every politician is
audited. Zero of such an explosion will result in immediate casualties a
radioactive fireball would vaporize anyone in the blast zone. The weapons
used in Japan leveled the land for thousands of hectares and killed an
estimated more than 200,000 people. As for survivors of a nuclear explosion
radiation exposure can cause burns or sickness days weeks or months later
We did a story, the killer gorilla sweet sexy death.
We did a story last week where it said like economic opportunities presented by world war three.
When you see that it makes you It makes you realize that we've lost touch with reality.
Not only a deep spiritual reality, that's long gone, but even actual physical material reality.
Dbo86, I never got my stickers.
If you're referring to our dear friends at Sticker Mule, I know they won't let you down.
They are a good, reliable sponsor.
Sticker Mule!
Get them stickers!
To everyone who's requested them, for heaven's sake.
While we contemplate Armageddon.
And even years afterwards, developing cancer remains a lifelong risk.
In the Second World War, atomic arsenals were not abundant or powerful enough to trigger the feared nuclear war.
Kodra in the chat says, legalize mushroom clouds.
Yeah, you're right.
Whether it's by Meditation or prayer or other forms of devotion, perhaps even psychedelics.
Wouldn't it be favourable for us individually and collectively to attain a new frequency of consciousness so we could transcend as we once did from primate-like creatures to the divine levels of, I would say, the always accessible domain of God attained by our kind?
Wouldn't it be better for us to elevate once more, to move forward once again, Rather than descend into the nuclear ash.
Also, some people are... Sticker Mule is great.
It just takes a while to get a sticker.
I'm glad you're getting the stickers.
I've just seen someone in the Awakened Wonder chat posting them.
Pawnspony, I just got my stickers.
I signed up months ago.
I've put them on my cello case.
Where will you put your Sticker Mule stickers?
on your nuclear shelter.
Winter, but now they are.
One study suggests that 5 billion people would die in a modern nuclear war as...
Good night.
...lead to catastrophic disruptions in food supplies.
Climate models show in the event of a nuclear conflict, average global temperatures could drop
by up to 25 degrees Celsius.
They're making this about climate change.
The world's just been destroyed.
Climate change is certainly... You're gonna need 15-minute cities because your cities are now made of ash and rubble and your legs have melted.
So that shouldn't be hard.
Also, why would you argue about having a vaccine now?
Because you don't feel very well anyway.
And sunlight blocking suits in the atmosphere can wilt crops around the world.
77 years since the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, some fear the risk of a nuclear confrontation remains very real.
Well, I think it does, because we keep provoking everyone into nuclear.
I think Iran's got nuclear weapons, Russia's got nuclear weapons, China's got nuclear weapons.
Stop provoking everyone into nuclear war.
It can't be positive.
Kirk Theo says there was a good report showing the difference of and the effects of the bombs.
Yeah, we found it, Kirk, right?
That's the story that you were talking about.
Pulling the strings says US politicians could simply be called warlords and Beth in Wonderland said we need to go back to the morning Bible reading after this.
This morning, if you're an awakened wonder, we did a beautiful, beautiful Bible reading together.
We do that in our awakened wonder community and we're gonna do it again tomorrow.
We doing it tomorrow?
We've got to do it!
People in the chat, yeah, we're doing it again tomorrow, like Blessed Old Bird, and a lot of the guys in the chat, Achela Lear, were... Achela, my heart is tensing with pain!
Well, you know, what kind of health choices have you made lately?
Is what I will say.
we posted verses from the Bible and first of all I was trying to just sort of leaf through
the Bible with tiny very pages that were so thin like little layers of skin but after a while we
cracked it. It's a good Bible study so you can join us that's at 3.30 GMT so if you're in uh
if you're east coast it's like five hours or four hours earlier than that we'll post in the chat
in a second both the chats. Let's post what time our Bible readings are because if this isn't the
time to summons the Christ within you, I don't know when it would be appropriate.
We're approaching that 20,000 mark right now.
Let's get over the line just before we finish.
Congratulations to our friends over at Crowder with an immense 200,000 watching the live stream for their manifesto special there.
Jaypacab Castro says, not enough people dying from the jab, start WW3.
I tell you, you are not going to believe our conversation with Dave Martin.
Do you guys know Dave Martin?
He talks about the way that the WHO was established.
He talks about how, well he sort of says coronavirus was patented in like 2000, in the 90s.
He's got a pretty incredible story and I know you guys love it, will love it.
We're going to post it in the locals community a little before we stream it on Rumble.
Um, future robots.
Just an orb.
Keep it dystopian.
I don't know what that means.
Oh, Robo Crows.
Kirk Theo, you are contributing.
Do you know Steve Kirsch?
Says Light B. Interview him.
Do we know Steve Kirsch, gal?
He's coming on.
We'll get him.
By God, we'll get him.
Couple hundred more and we'll be...
Over the line in 22,000.
Is there anything else that I could put?
Someone just posted a link in the Rumble chat, but it ain't healthy to just click on a YouTube link without looking at our receipts, because it's impossible to know what you guys might lead us to all.
Did you see our conversation, by the way, with Brett Weinstein last week?
Rocky Mountain Magpie says, everything in life seems to be more about profit now.
Life itself seems secondary.
Yeah, we had a good conversation about God and spiritual awakening versus rationalism.
We talked about some of the areas where we disagree as well as the many areas where we agree.
And also, Doodle Mama says, is there anywhere left in the world where people can live free of the tyranny of the WHO and the New World Order?
I don't know, mate.
I've really been... Nope.
That's Lady Grey, 312, in the locals' chat.
No.
No.
Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence, said Da Vinci.
Epstein Island, Sir Cypher 2000.
I don't know.
I think that place has lost its vibe from what I heard.
You know, I've never been there myself, but a lot of people went, apparently.
Sarah de Feen Squibb says, Brett and Heather seem like a pretty cool couple.
Yeah, they're good people.
They're good people.
And Mercury says, the logic of late capitalism, i.e.
as centralised powers are able to coalesce resources and align forces, The rest of us are in real trouble unless we are able to master new models of subsidiarity, which you've heard Jordan Peterson talk a lot about on our show, as well as Brett.
This is what we've got to do.
Do you know what?
Shall we do 10 minutes additional on, like, cheer up Russell, we're not dead yet.
It says D-Day 99.
I know, I just, I think it was the nuclear war thing.
It was heavy.
It got me.
We've got Jimmy Dore joining us live on Friday, so that's good.
Jimmy Dore, man, what a guy.
Did my first show back After the attacks.
Gotta love Jimmy Dore forever for that.
You know, we've all gotta find ways of transcending our differences.
I tell ya, it's significant.
It's significant.
If we don't do that, if we spend our time even on the chat here quarrelling, I'm gonna use the word quarrelling, about religious differences, we'll be in trouble.
Doodle Mama says, get Naomi Wolf on the show.
Okay.
Jay Gwynn, what's on the back of your arm?
Is it maybe the kund?
Or do you mean of this out here?
I'll tell you what, you know who provided this.
Let me know in the chat who provided this little guy.
Everything in life seems to be about profit now.
Yeah.
Should we do 10 minutes on locals?
Can we do that?
Extra on locals tomorrow.
Why don't we do it now?
Is it hard?
10 minutes?
We'll see how many people come over and join us from that.
Yeah, should we do it?
Listen, so if you want to join us for another 10 minutes, click the red button and join us on Locals for another 10 minutes.
And you also get early access to the interviews we do, like Alex Jones.
Yeah, that's right.
Alex Jones for a special.
We do meditations together.
We do Bible readings together.
We do a hell of a lot of things together.
On the show tomorrow, we're going to be talking about, what's that?
What's defining the show tomorrow, guys?
What's the hero vid, for example?
What about West Ham, Rasbender?
Yeah.
What about West Ham?
What is it?
Nice one.
We're going to be talking about the revolving door between the FDA and Moderna and then later in the week, my God, when you see the absolute lunacy that is brought to us by Dave Martin.
I mean, yeah.
Alex Jones and Russell doing Bible readings and yoga together.
We can make it happen, you know?
We can make it happen.
Okay.
Hey, listen, you guys.
I'm Rumble.
We're going to leave you now.
You can click the red button to become an Awakened Wonder and support our work as we become an all-powerful movement together.
Join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
Until then, stay free.
Join us on Locals now.
▲
Export Selection