Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 2, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:06:23

ELECTION FRAUD! Dems CAUGHT Ballot Stuffing!! - Stay Free #237

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a walkthrough of the game. I'm going to be playing it on my PC. So, I'm
	So, I'm going to be playing it on my PC.
	going to be playing it on my PC.
	So, I'm going to be playing it on my PC.
	In this video, you're going to see the future.
	Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
	Thanks for joining me for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
	We stream in a variety of places that we may speak freely.
	Due to new restrictions, I have to not tell you where we are primarily available.
	It's complicated, but we've got some fantastic stuff.
	An analysis of recent changes to our content on YouTube and how that intersects with ideas of monopolization.
	And free speech.
	Also, I'm very excited to speak to Dr Peter McCulloch about sudden deaths and vaccines, and we've got a variety of stories around that subject that I know you're going to enjoy.
	We will be available for 15 minutes on YouTube, then you'll have to intuit for yourselves whether or not we're available anywhere else.
	Yes, Carl Reino on Rumble.
	Thank you for that comment.
	Thank you, LimbicBeauty, all of you.
	And if you want to support our content, there's a red button that you can click to become an awakened wonder.
	But first, let's talk about free speech right now and how it's functioning.
	You are aware that we are living in a state of increased global tension, that we are lurching from one crisis to another.
	And these crises, appalling crises, with Death and despair spilling out immeasurably everywhere appear always to legitimize either more centralized authoritarianism or the ability to profit by very powerful interests and also extraordinary prevarications from people that previously you would have thought were absolutely aligned with important democratic principles.
	Have a look at John Fettman who I really thought was a guy who believed in freedom.
	Certainly he's Shorts and attire, generally suggested.
	He was a guy who was up for letting it all hang out.
	Now he wants everybody thrown out.
	Actually, guys, this isn't on the stream deck here.
	So I'm unable to show that.
	So why don't you run the clip of Jon Fetterman and then make sure this gets switched on.
	Let's go, guys.
	Thanks.
	Can you play that?
	If you guys, if I'm talking, hello there, if you stay with us, we use a lot of rumble, all five and a half thousand of you.
	I voted for him, I'm sorry, this isn't democracy.
	It absolutely is.
	Yeah, yeah, but kind of, sort of.
	Why?
	10,000 people in Gaza have been killed.
	Half are children.
	The Pope's calling for a ceasefire.
	The UN has called for it.
	I'm just asking you.
	You're a good guy.
	I voted for you.
	I know you're a nice guy.
	This is important.
	Here, can I give you a card?
	I'll tell you what we're gonna do Why don't we speak to Dr. Peter McCulloch right now and we will sort out this stuff immediately.
	Why don't we take this where it has to go?
	And those of you that are saying we're an hour late, what happened is the clocks changed in the UK.
	We in Britain have abandoned summertime and now accepted fully Now is the winter of our discontent and not May's glorious summer.
	It literally just is the winter of our discontent.
	So we're not an hour late, but we were a bit late.
	And for that, we apologize.
	We're not going to be streaming on YouTube anymore because we are welcoming Dr. Peter McCulloch.
	You'll have to, for yourselves, work out whether or not you can watch us elsewhere.
	We've got so much fantastic content for you.
	You are going to love it.
	Please try and follow.
	We're like the A-team now.
	If you have a problem, Like you're living in an authoritarian system that wants to censor you and seems to be implementing some peculiar measures to prevent any kind of uprising or consensus or movement of opposition.
	If you want some help and if you can find us, maybe you can join the Stay Free movement.
	I can't even tell you where we're going, but have a look at this set.
	I think there are indications of where you might find us and where you might find free speech and where you might find a conversation with Dr Peter McCulloch, who I'm going to be speaking to right now.
	Peter, thank you so much for Thank you for joining us.
	It's a pleasure to finally meet you.
	Sorry for keeping you waiting.
	Thanks for having me.
	Peter, can you tell us about the recent study that suggests there's a potential link between the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and sudden cardiac deaths?
	And can I just check we're off YouTube before Peter answers that?
	Fantastic.
	Yeah, so can you tell us what about this new study?
	Sure, I think this is a little too strong for YouTube, so the science here is very disturbing.
	Schreckenberg and colleagues from Germany showed that when Pfizer and Moderna is directly applied to heart muscle cells, they start to have very abnormal function and electrical currents within about 48 hours.
	I mean, this is evidence of direct cardiac toxicity.
	Separately, Crosson and colleagues from Harvard showed the messenger RNA is physically stuck in the human heart in people who are dying.
	After the vaccine and now Nakahara and colleagues in a big study, 700 people took the vaccine, 300 who didn't.
	Their cardiac PET scans or positron emission tomography heart scans are very abnormal in those who took the vaccine.
	There's a shift towards the abnormal uptake of what's called fluorodeoxyglucose in positron emission tomography.
	This is basically a sick heart pattern on PET scanning.
	And the astonishing finding was that virtually everybody who took the shot has an abnormal cardiac PET scan.
	Those with sore arms as a sign of inflammation or potentially even potential dose of messenger RNA have worsened cardiac findings.
	So what we've learned now is that it's possible to actually have cardiac dysfunction, maybe even a cardiac arrest, without myocarditis.
	Peter, that sounds terrifying and so beyond the official and heavily propagated narrative that it was impossible to gainsay for such a long time that it is difficult for me to accept, primed even though I've been with all manner of complex and contrary information over the last year.
	Does this represent a significant shift?
	How How do you think this will be publicly addressed and does this amount to a yet more significant failure of the vaccine itself and the surrounding cultural paraphernalia?
	Are we now at the point where we have to acknowledge that that vaccine has caused more harm than good?
	Information's converging for sure.
	I've led the largest autopsy study now.
	Over 300 autopsies.
	People have died after the vaccine.
	We've extracted all the data from the individual case reports, individually adjudicated all of them, and determined that 73.9% of all the deaths that are occurring, you know, assessed by autopsy after the vaccine, in fact the vaccine has caused the death, When we believe it's a cardiac abnormality in a separate paper, first off, there's full sharing colleagues, 100% are actually due to the vaccine.
	So, what we found is the COVID-19 vaccine is the clear cause of cardiac arrest and sudden death in people who have no obvious other explanation.
	This is very important.
	Normally, when someone dies, The cause is known heart disease or known cancer or other problems like a motor vehicle accident, homicide, suicide, drug overdose, but very rarely is death ever a mystery.
	So these cases that are reporting in death, no obvious cause, now the first thing we think of is did they take a COVID-19 vaccine?
	Yes, in fact, it's true, isn't it, that Edward Dowd's information attests that 60,000 young people died from causes unknown.
	The cause was not Covid and He as he phrases it there was a you know over the 12-year period of the Vietnam War 60,000 American young people died and that many people have died Presumably I suppose in the manner that you've described is that what you are you saying that when we were all culturally and anecdotally Experiencing athletes or famous people or young people elsewhere dying that what we were this is what was behind it scientifically This is the explanation
	That's what we're piecing together.
	What Dowd has done is he's made the case that all-cause mortality is rising across data systems.
	Our Center for National Health Statistics in the United States has reported in a report by Hoyart, disturbingly, that maternal mortality, women who are pregnant and then 42 days after delivery, maternal mortality is at an all-time high Since the 1960s and that was for the 2021 calendar year, now the CDC reported just a few days ago that infant mortality has started to turn upwards.
	This is the first upward turn we've seen in 20 years.
	So from adults, pregnant women, infants None of it looks good.
	Public health officials should be having an all-hands-on-deck investigation into why mortality is going up.
	The only new thing introduced now is the COVID-19 mass vaccination program.
	That's terrifying.
	It seems that the way that the information is being released is incrementally.
	Like you'll hear that, oh yeah, it does cause myocarditis in this demographic.
	Oh, there are traces to be found in the milk of breastfeeding mothers.
	And then you start to realise that there's an increase in infant mortality and then perhaps you'll learn that miscarriages increased.
	Peter, perhaps this is beyond even your vast wheelhouse, but it doesn't seem to me likely that such an extraordinary error could have occurred without... I don't know.
	How could something of this scale have happened when there are meant to be so many agencies, both national and global and international, that are meant to be safeguarding, regulating and examining and preventing a travesty of this scale taking place?
	I was the only person in the public view in August of 2020.
	On August 17, 2020, I published In the Hill, which is a widely read journal for the House, the Senate, White House, people in Washington, people all over the country.
	The title of the op-ed was The Great Gamble of the COVID-19 Vaccine Program.
	You know, I was the only public figure and the only person in academic medicine to question these COVID-19 vaccines.
	Everybody had basically fallen into a trance of thinking the vaccines were going to save the world, that they were, you know, presumed to be safe and effective.
	The reason why this should be questioned from the very beginning is the vaccines are the genetic code for the spike protein.
	The spike protein is the spine on the surface of the virus.
	It's the lethal part of SARS-CoV-2.
	So the genetic code, which we have no ability to shut off, was injected into people's bodies.
	And once the genetic code started to produce the spike protein in some people, it was going to be too much for too long, and it was going to be fatal.
	Now we've learned in a paper by Brogna and colleagues that the vaccine spike protein is circulating in the bloodstream for six months or longer after people take these shots.
	I can tell you having a foreign protein whose genetic code and engineering occurred in a Chinese biosecurity lab floating around in the bloodstream of billions of people who took the vaccine, you know, this is a reality now that's mind-blowing.
	As a doctor I can't possibly even conceived this happened, and now we're seeing disasters, including the tsunami of cardiac arrests, blood clots, strokes, immunologic problems, and now even signals that cancer is on the way up.
	Wow.
	Thank you for your extraordinary bravery right at the advent.
	I suppose to you it felt like duty.
	How were you treated at the commencement of this pandemic period when you were making these proclamations, offering a counter narrative and indeed information, vitally, to back up your perspective?
	How do you feel you were treated by the scientific community and their partners in media, Peter?
	I put it all in a book called Courage to Face COVID-19, which is a five-star bestseller on Amazon.
	Interestingly, that book just suffered about two weeks of censorship on Amazon.
	Our book joined just a half-dozen books that was banned from Amazon, including one by Adolf Hitler.
	For no reason.
	They said our book had offensive content.
	We appealed multiple times.
	It took a lot of public pressure.
	Now our book is restored.
	Courage to Face COVID-19 is back on Amazon.
	But I put it all in the book because it was such an extraordinary story.
	I wasn't just being a critic or a skeptic.
	I was offering solutions.
	I had basically devised the first early treatment protocol for COVID-19, had it published in a very high-level journal, the American Journal of Medicine.
	It became the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Home Treatment Guide.
	I testified in the U.S.
	Senate very early in November 19th of 2020 that we had a solution to treat patients and prevent complications.
	By December 2020, I kept working in the medical literature.
	We had Clear and convincing evidence early treatment worked.
	What I was shocked with is that my junior colleagues didn't follow along, that they didn't step in and help people get through the illness all over the world.
	It was astonishing.
	So at this point in time, you know, what I've experienced is not a warm welcome, but in fact, just a vehement wave of antipathy.
	And it's come from the American Board of Internal Medicine, as well as, you know, general pundits out there.
	No, I've never had somebody of my stature, like a chief of medicine, a dean, division chief, ever face me face to face and tell me they disagree with the principles of early treatment or The issues of vaccine safety.
	Never.
	And when I've testified three times in the U.S.
	Senate, we've been invited ahead of time with plenty of advance notice.
	Anthony Fauci, Rochelle Lewinsky, Ashish Jha, Murthy, you know, all the public health officials, none of them have showed up to face me or people in my circles.
	That's terrifying.
	A vehement wave of antipathy, you say.
	Your book was banned from Amazon.
	Your protocols that were demonstrably effective were not only not taken up, but in some cases discredited.
	And now that only 3% of Americans are taking the most recent COVID booster, it seems that, generally speaking, the mistrust of the vaccines has reached a tipping point.
	I wonder what you think about the story that Anthony Fauci was supporting a project that was collaborating with the Wuhan virus some months or even years prior to this outbreak.
	That, taken in conjunction with how long it's taking the truth to be broadly conveyed or even discussed, the obvious and evident censorship that took place during the pandemic, the challenges you've just described with both the book that you've published and your protocols, what do you feel that suggests?
	It suggests that the US, as well as many other Western countries, were deep into biological threat development.
	A paper by Leilani and colleagues, British Medical Journal, indicates the United States has been in messenger RNA development since 1985.
	It's put tens of billions of dollars into this.
	DARPA, our research unit of the military, in 2012, it's still on the website, has a program.
	It's called the ADEPT P3 program.
	It has the aspiration of ending pandemics in 60 days using messenger RNA.
	Now a paper by Lee and colleagues indicate there's over 9,000 patents on messenger RNA.
	So no single person invented it.
	Obviously 9,000 patents.
	The lead patent assignees are Sanofi, CureVac, BioNTech, Moderna, and the U.S.
	government.
	So the U.S.
	is deeply involved in this.
	Fauci and his division at the NIH worked with Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Peter Daszak at the EcoHealth Alliance, Dr. Xingling Li at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, And they actually created this chimeric virus.
	They published it in 2015 and 2016.
	Nature Medicine and Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.
	They basically showed the world they created SARS-CoV-2 in 2016 and it gets out of the lab in 2019.
	Now all this is coming out in the U.S.
	House of Representatives Select Committee for Coronavirus Investigation led by Dr. Bren Wenstrup.
	So Fauci is deeply involved in the creation of SARS-CoV-2 and in the cover-up where he pretends as if this came out of nature and it coordinated a deceptive program to mislead the world.
	I was about to sort of say, will there ever be a kind of reckoning now that it seems that there is sufficient evidence to warrant one?
	And whilst you yourself have participated in Senate hearings and here in our country, there is a kind of rather gentle partisan inquiry into COVID that will likely lead to the conclusion that but one half of our political system ought be damned in favour of the other all too similar half.
	It seems that the scale of the reckoning that is required is such that it would amount to a dismantling of such powerful institutions and economic interests, a kind of unravelling of deep relationships between the media, big pharma and the state, that the system itself would be challenged.
	Therefore, Peter, it seems unlikely that that reckoning can ever take place, particularly given that A few, if any, lessons appear to have been learned from this period.
	I don't mean from there are now cultural groups that will never trust the government again, never trust the media again, but because there is a doubling down on the crushing of dissent and escalation of censorship and even sort of attempts by the FDA to shut down over-the-counter drugs and measures that amount to trying to create Further tyranny and dominion over the pharmaceutical solutions to relatively ordinary or common viruses like colds and flus, it suggests that this agenda is continuing.
	So do you feel that there will ever be a reckoning?
	And do you feel that the agenda that brought us the pandemic and its problems is still at work?
	I think you summarized it very well.
	In my book, we call it a biopharmaceutical complex, a powerful syndicate with non-governmental organizations, governmental regulatory agencies.
	They're all working together.
	The one thing that's clear about the complex, you know what they want?
	A single solution for every problem, and that's a vaccine.
	It's a vaccine-only strategy.
	And it's working to try to reduce medicinal opportunities for people.
	It's clearly undermined all our efforts on early treatment from nasal sprays and gargles to over-the-counter vitamin supplements, other things we can use to treat illness.
	It's clearly a plan, and the best plan to read is actually the business plan by CEPI, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, And that was put together by Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum in 2017.
	CEPI says there will be a wave of pandemics, and there will be only one solution each time, and that is a vaccine.
	We've already had two of them now.
	We've had SARS-CoV-2, and don't forget monkeypox.
	The World Health Organization declared monkeypox a worldwide emergency.
	Get ready for another one.
	I don't think people are going to fall for it.
	People didn't fall for monkeypox, and they're going to start to follow people who they can trust, who are bringing solutions, and that is prevention and treatment of these illnesses as opposed to a vaccine.
	Covid was very much the Beatles.
	Monkey Pox was the monkeys.
	It was a poor imitation.
	It's never going to take off.
	Do you know Monkey Pox didn't even write its own mRNA?
	It had it written elsewhere.
	Hey, Dr. Peter, I'm sort of terrified.
	By all of this.
	How is it possible for you to keep your head in these spaces with your evident and obvious scientific understanding and enormous integrity and not fall into total despair?
	How is it possible for you to be able to identify figures like Bill Gates, who are still deified
	in certain portions of the media and presented as kind of liberal titans and heroes before
	whom we all hurl ourselves down in front of in worship?
	How are you coping with this?
	And how do we deal with the fact that so many things that were regarded as conspiracies
	I still remember the talk shows where people were singing Andy Fauci's name and wearing
	t-shirts and pencil cases and badges like he was the anti-Trump and that he was some
	kind of a science messiah.
	In fact, messianically he declared, Christ-like, that he was science.
	He was the epitome that the only way to science is through me, like a latter-day secular pharmacological Christ.
	How are you coping with this, Peter?
	And how are we going to freely convey this information to enough people to generate the kind of uprising that such disturbing truths would seemingly warrant?
	You know, I was over in the UK in September and your picture was all over the tabloids.
	And so I can tell you, Russell, I must be like you, that we're bold and relentless.
	We know that the truth will prevail.
	The truth is far more powerful than the false narrative.
	We're not conspiracy theorists.
	We're rational theorists, meaning we're interpreting what's going on and we have a rational approach.
	To our understanding, we can debate and talk about these issues.
	We know the other side, this biopharmaceutical complex, they cannot have any face-to-face discussion on any of this.
	Early treatment of COVID, vaccine safety and efficacy, the false declaration of a monkeypox emergency, and we can continue to find this.
	They seem to believe That by manipulation of people through the major media and through social media, that they can actually change human thought.
	And we know this because there's a very important case.
	It's called Missouri versus Biden.
	And the U.S.
	government is knee deep in manipulating human thought through social media.
	And the Biden administration is fighting desperately to continue to have government agents turning the levers in social media.
	Australia, the same thing.
	Australia is going to have the first of this year a very draconian new law go into place where people will not be able to challenge the government false narrative in social media in Australia.
	Rumble is, by the way, not available in France right now.
	So we can see this going on all over.
	It's a global totalitarian takeover.
	The only way we will prevail is to continue to bring people the truth.
	And you know what?
	They gravitate to us because they know we're on the right side of history.
	Yes, I pray to God that you are right.
	A lot of people are pointing out that Fauci could be a literal antichrist and pointing out that they love Jesus Christ.
	I share that love with you and I certainly share concerns about some sort of Anti-rapture going on in the world of Big Pharma.
	But Peter, surely this hysteria is unwarranted.
	It's not like the WHO are putting together a treaty that means that they will be able to bypass national sovereignty in the event of another pandemic and that this treaty is so carooming and open that even climate change under its auspices could be regarded as a kind of pandemic.
	Is it, Peter?
	Yes, it's all true.
	The WHO aspires to have complete dominion over all plants, animals, and humans with authority binding by international law to declare pandemics, to declare emergency countermeasures, to have lockdowns, forced vaccinations, all of it.
	And to influence our livestock, farming, management of energy.
	It's a giant overreach, and people are opposing this.
	I testified in the European Parliament on September 13th, 2023, and I told the EU, pull out of the WHO.
	Trump's instincts were right.
	Pull out of the WHO.
	He says if he gets back in the office, that's going to be job one.
	Pull the US out.
	We don't want to get tied up in international court.
	As a doctor, Russell, I'm not going to follow anything the WHO says.
	I'm going to follow my medical judgment and do the right thing for patients.
	This seems to be the kind of solution that more people should be pursuing.
	Individual freedom, community freedom, an end to these peculiar International Global Goliaths that seek to impose new legislation and order on free individuals and formerly free nations.
	Peter, I want to thank you so much for joining us and I want to thank you for your great work and your bravery at a time when many people were afraid to speak out.
	You kind of did so automatically and it had great impact and the truth has borne out and thank you for your great work.
	It's a real honor and privilege to meet you.
	Thank you.
	Thanks for having me.
	Follow me on my website, PeterMcCullochMD.com.
	We're going to post the link in the description, PeterMcCullochMD.com.
	Also, Peter is on Substack, and if you want to be ahead of where things are apparently, even now, gravitating, then Dr. Peter McCulloch is one of the voices that you should be listening to and one of the men you should be following.
	Thank you very much, sir.
	Thank you.
	There you go, guys.
	We've just had a couple of doses of truth.
	I've had my booster shot there, and I feel resistant to deception and lies like never before.
	I just hope that spike protein don't get loose and migrate right to the midst of my tender, tender heart.
	Now, listen, before we brought Peter on, because he's a busy man, he's a doctor.
	Do you think the interview's too short, says Mitch Mitch Mitch over on the Rumble chat?
	Yeah, Goliath, I said, un-come-undone.
	Hey, you lot, if you're watching us on Rumble, why don't you become a member of our locals community?
	Then you get access to our early interviews.
	For example, and we are 20, oh my god, we're over 20,000.
	Yesterday, we promised you a festive pukka special.
	If you're Christian, you can regard it as a Do you want to regard it as a Christmas special?
	Because you can.
	Christmas with Tucker.
	I mean, we are going to bring him to you.
	It's already agreed.
	It's happening.
	So that's what, you know, you guys make a demand and we immediately try to fulfill you.
	Russell has nice teeth, says SmallMouthSlayer603.
	Thanks for that, mate.
	Thanks for that.
	Dr. Peter McCulloch, he hits you with some pretty hard home truths, doesn't he?
	I mean, how do you feel, guys, after that?
	Do you trust Dr. Peter McCulloch or Dr. Anthony Fauci?
	If it's Dr. Peter McCulloch, can you put one in the chat for me now?
	And if it's Anthony Fauci, can you put two?
	I'm planning, I'm guessing we're not going to see a whole lot of twos.
	So there are good people out there.
	There are legitimate medics.
	There are experts that we can trust.
	There are people in positions of authority.
	Worthy of that name.
	It's just those people tend to be crushed by a system that wants you ignorant and disempowered.
	One person did press two, but I think you were being cheeky, weren't you?
	Because you're anti-establishment.
	Okay, I'll tell you one thing you won't get away with.
	If you ever Turn up to one of Hillary Clinton's lectures, and I can tell you now, they're worth attending.
	Do not mention Epstein Island, because that is not a popular topic there, I tell you that.
	In fact, you might be asked to leave.
	In fact, not asked to leave, you might be dragged out aggressively.
	Then you want somebody who's going to get up every day.
	Hey Hillary, why is your husband in the empty island 26 times?
	I sort of like the atmosphere of that guy.
	He's doing it in a very sort of, like, fun way, isn't he?
	Hey, Hillary, why's your husband going to Epstein Island 23 times?
	He's sort of kind of jolly about it.
	It's like he doesn't realise that that's going to be contentious.
	He's sort of saying it in good faith, like he was expecting that Hillary might go, look, the first 20 times were holidays, and the last three, he happened to leave some stuff there.
	I'm not going to tell you what type of stuff it was, but it's kind of like what he left on Monica's dress.
	I tell ya, man, there's a lot of things you can't say.
	I mean, like, if you want a scandal, check out that island, man.
	I hope that guy's gonna be okay.
	There's not a long history of people with connections to the Clinton Foundation, you know, turning up.
	Well, I'll allow you to finish that stuff in the chat.
	SHEILA!
	SHEILA Is this really necessary?
	Is this really necessary, guys?
	Is this really necessary?
	Who's saying is that really necessary?
	Is that the guy?
	He's enjoying it.
	The guy, check out his little face.
	He's like, hey, I'm being dragged out.
	I'm having a, I'm in a theme park and it's my own t-shirt.
	Hey, one thing you guys should make sure that you never get involved in is election fraud, because people hate that.
	As you know, Donald Trump, under a deluge of attacks from every direction, is accused of election meddling out there in Georgia, I believe, currently.
	But election fraud is pretty popular in a number of places, not least Bridgeport election.
	Bridgeport, in Bridgeport, in the Bridgeport election.
	This is, I think, a mayoral campaign rather than, I don't know, a state or federal one.
	I don't know all of your political words, I've just got an overview.
	Let's have a look at this particular piece of election fraud, see if you can spot it.
	First, election fraud has been thrown around way too many times in the past few years without any serious evidence to back up those claims.
	But tonight, an election for mayor has just been thrown out by a judge who concluded that fraud did impact a recent vote and ordered a new election.
	And it was based on absentee ballots.
	Happened in Bridgeport, Connecticut, where a state superior court judge has just ordered a new election between incumbent mayor Joe Gannon and his mayoral primary opponent, John Gomez, after Gomez successfully argued that he was the victim of absentee ballot fraud.
	Stunning video put out by the Gomez campaign appeared to show a Bridgeport City employee and local Democratic Party official walking up to a drop box in the early hours of the morning of September 5th and making multiple deposits of absentee ballots.
	You can see a woman who the Gomez campaign identifies as Bridgeport City Hall employee Wanda Jeter-Patiki Walking up to the drop box and placing multiple ballots inside.
	And a few seconds later, she comes back, does it again.
	That could still be democracy, though.
	She maybe just really thinks that person should be mayor.
	So good, I voted a hundred times!
	This campaign posted this on social media as part of a three-minute compilation showing irregularities in the vote.
	That woman was questioned during a court hearing challenging the election results and pleaded the fifth.
	Were you paid for any of your work on the Gannon campaign?
	I would object at this point.
	And it wasn't just her.
	The Gomez campaign played in court nine different people, making 24 drops of apparently multiple ballots into absentee ballot boxes.
	Well, there you go.
	Democracy's broken.
	Doesn't work.
	Whole thing.
	We need an entirely new system.
	Now, if you saw our conversation just now with Peter McCulloch and the whole thing, we'll be up, of course, on Rumble.
	And we're just on Rumble now.
	Because the other thing is now on YouTube, we can't say Rumble.
	Do you know about this?
	We can't even say it.
	It's gone totally crazy.
	We talked briefly with McCulloch a second ago about the Anthony Fauci-run lab in Montana that experimented with coronaviruses shipped in from Wuhan a year before the Covid pandemic began.
	Is this true?
	Let's have a look at the story.
	Antony Fauci... U.S.
	taxpayer money, also if you're an American and you funded this, U.S.
	taxpayer money was used to experiment with coronaviruses from a Chinese lab thought to be the source of the COVID pandemic more than a year before the global outbreak and investigation was found.
	The National Institutes of Health, NIH, under Dr. Antony Fauci's leadership, infected 12 Egyptian fruit bats with... What is their issue with bats?
	Is it that the Batman franchise has really got to them?
	Fruit bats with a SARS-like virus called WIVI.
	W-I-V-I.
	That would never caught on.
	Coronavirus.
	It's catchy.
	I mean, you know, it is catchy.
	In Montana in 2018.
	The W1V1 coronavirus was shipped from the Wuhan lab the FBI believes caused the COVID pandemic.
	It's good the FBI putting a shift in because Lately, remember we had those couple of guys from the FBI on the show, those whistleblowers, that say January 6th was investigated in a peculiar way.
	Okay, so they're doing some good investigations right now.
	They believe that it was shipped in from the Wuhan lab, the FBI say, excuse me, that caused the Covid pandemic and was tested on bats.
	Acquired from a roadside?
	Mary Lanzu, that's not how you get bats.
	What kind of lab are you running out doing deals for bats like junkies scoring bats in a street?
	The research revealed this week by a campaign group is more evidence of ties between the US government and the Wuhan lab as well as the funding of dangerous virus research across the globe.
	Well, There's credit Bobby Kennedy, where it's due.
	He's been telling us about this stuff for a long, long time.
	There's credit Peter McCulloch, where it's due.
	You know, there have been people trying to tell us this stuff for a long, long while.
	Were you listening?
	You awakened wonders?
	Were you across this stuff?
	Were you well aware of the extent of this?
	Because some people were telling a very different story.
	I'll tell you one, and I know you guys love him, because why wouldn't you?
	He's got great hair.
	He's a friend of democracy.
	He's Justin Trudeau.
	He's always been very consistent on vaccines and, you know, your body, your choice.
	Let's have a look.
	Misinformation and disinformation is carrying people to believe things that are untrue.
	Vaccinations is a perfect example of it.
	Any vaccine we distribute to Canadians will be safe for Canadians.
	There are people who've probably gotten very sick from vaccinations.
	Every vaccine that is approved is safe for Canadians, is uncompromising.
	Individuals are allowed to make their own choices.
	There may be all sorts of different reasons why someone is hesitant to get vaccinated.
	There's no more excuses to not get your shot.
	And therefore, while not forcing anyone To get vaccinated.
	Enforcement measures in place will make sure that everyone is vaccinated.
	I chose to make sure that all the incentives.
	Travelers across the country need to be fully vaccinated.
	People coming into the country need to be fully vaccinated.
	were there. Don't get to work in the public service, don't get to go to movie theatres or
	gyms or restaurants to encourage Canadians to get vaccinated and that's exactly what they did. We got
	vaccinated to a higher level than just about any other of our peer countries. Unknown causes was
	the leading cause of death in Alberta last year. Oh no!
	Well done Milk Bar TV, whoever you are for that piece of, that's a beautiful piece of content and that's terrifying because what that's presented to all of us is what liberalism is supposed to mean, the kind of tone and timbre of tolerance, the nomenclature of inclusivity.
	But meanwhile, round the back, what's that?
	Tyranny!
	What is it?
	Evocation of emergency laws.
	What is it?
	Shutting down of bank accounts.
	What is it?
	New legislature that prevents people from speaking freely.
	New censorship.
	New censorship laws across Canada.
	What an extraordinary time we are living in.
	We are going to need radical change.
	Listen, we're going to show you our main story.
	In a minute.
	It's a good one because it's us talking about how YouTube are promoting legacy media content and shutting down alternative media and monopolizing.
	But before we watch that, I'm going to give you a little choice.
	What would you like to see first?
	Let's go back to that WEF thing, guys.
	And we're going to show you that in a second.
	Is it the WEF discussing how only rich people will be allowed to travel?
	Oh, That's interesting.
	Oh my god.
	So press W1 if you want to... not W1, just 1.
	You can't press W1.
	That's that new coronavirus that we're going to be getting any day now.
	Press 1 if you want to see a story about the WEF discussing how only rich people will be allowed to travel or 2 if you want to see a story about Pfizer's new Covid flu combo vaccine stroke risks.
	I want number 1, don't you?
	So tell me what you're putting.
	Yeah, most of you are down with 1.
	Let me just wait for the rumble stream.
	To catch up our Awaken Wonders on locals there who get first access to our content like our Jordan Peterson interview, our Tucker Carlson interview, chat we just had with Brett Weinstein just then.
	Like you can watch that stuff first if you are an Awaken Wonder.
	Plus you can support us as we try to change the world by creating a political movement that opposes this sort of tyranny.
	One has won or what we call W1 now.
	It's catchy!
	It's the new coronavirus.
	So let's see, let's have a look at the WF saying that Surely only rich people will be able to travel, which is sort of what happened during the last pandemic anyway, remember?
	Sorry, that's uh... Which button's that on, guys?
	Six, is it?
	Six.
	Two of the countries which were most successful in getting good coverage of vaccination...
	...based this, not at all, on getting their citizens to try and understand... It's not that, I don't know who she is.
	Is it, it's on 7.
	Okay, 7.
	There's going to be people, um, of means who are going to travel.
	He seems like a nice sort of a guy anyway.
	I love that, W. I've seen it in the chat right now, the 666 thing.
	I can't believe I didn't spot that.
	use an Oculus or a Magic Leap or some other kind of device to travel to the same place.
	I love that W. I've seen it in the chat right now, the 666 thing. I can't believe I didn't
	spot that. You use us some good, hot conspiracy theorists in this chat.
	Like, you've noticed that the O's in World Economic Forum are bifurcated by that curve, which is the connection, I suppose.
	Like, semiotically, that represents the world is going to be held in a sort of forum.
	And it's economics.
	And according to this, the bifurcated O's, it's a 666 satanic... That is...
	That is a good spot, that.
	That's got to get out there.
	That's mother's milk to a conspiracy theorist, and I just hope that mother didn't take any vaccines.
	From their own couch.
	So they say the rich shall inherit the earth.
	There you go.
	Well, naked evil!
	There it is.
	Four people use headsets.
	Four people use headsets?
	God help us.
	What, they can do a virtual?
	Well there you go, you're going to be forced into some sort of metaverse.
	That seems to be the way that it's going.
	Guys, I'll tell you, I'm so glad that you're here with us.
	I'm so glad that you're a member of this community.
	I'm so glad that you support us.
	It means the world.
	It's very, very important.
	Now this story is amazing.
	Tomorrow we've got Bret Weinstein on the show.
	We're going to be talking about just the loss of meaning, the limitations of rationalism,
	the omni-crisis and the way that it's controlling us and shutting us down.
	I want you to have a look at, in a minute, our story, Here's the News Now, Here's the
	Effing News.
	We cover what's going on on YouTube, how they are promoting legacy media and how they're
	looking for, it seems to me, to find new ways to shut down independent voices and to ensure
	that people like Peter McCulloch, for example, who years ago, literally, were telling you,
	hey, I'm concerned about this vaccine, that those voices can't get out there.
	They realise now That there is a movement, that there is a resistance, that there is hope and there is possibilities.
	I want to thank those of you that are supporting us like MGP99, AyersRobin, KeepRusbyFree, Tom997 and RoneyMalone16.
	You have become awakened wonders and it means the world to us.
	Keep Supporting us.
	Remain with us.
	We are determined to grow this movement.
	Now you know we've been demonetized on YouTube after the British government stepped in and asked for that.
	Well now they're also restricting our ability to link to other platforms.
	Free speech platforms like this one because I suppose they'll say there's hate speech in here.
	That's why I prefer if you didn't do any hate speech in that chat because I'd like them to be wrong.
	It's also intensifying its efforts to boost news content from what it calls credible sources.
	But we know what they mean by credible sources.
	They mean the kind of media that amplify the interests of the powerful.
	Amplify and normalize the interests of the powerful.
	You saw what legacy media did during the pandemic.
	Well, everyone's got to take these vaccines.
	You saw how Trudeau has changed from then to now.
	It's astonishing and incredible.
	Well, there's going to be a lot more of it unless we bind together like never before.
	Here's the news.
	No, here's the effing news.
	Thank you for choosing Fox News.
	You're just the dude.
	No, here's the fucking news.
	YouTube are continuing to censor our channel while promoting legacy media outlets on their platform.
	I'm beginning to think they've got an agenda and that they're out to get me.
	Or rather, they're out to get you.
	And I'm just in the way.
	I'm telling you this because we've just received an email from YouTube telling us that they're going to further
	impede, control, shut down and censor our channel.
	As you know, a month or so ago, the government reached out to all social media sites demanding that I be demonetized and many, including YouTube, complied.
	Of course, Rumble, which is our home, opposed it and notably Elon Musk and ex Stood up to the establishment and I'm very grateful for that.
	This censorship is being amplified now while they simultaneously continue to promote legacy media outlets on their platform.
	You will have noticed it's become increasingly difficult to oppose, for example, war and military action.
	It's become increasingly difficult to criticize big companies and And also, generally, we're living in a more and more fractured space.
	I would say we need more decentralization, more ability to freely communicate, more opportunity to form new alliances against the establishment interests that are plainly trying to control us.
	They're not interested in relatively insignificant figures like me.
	They are interested in total control of the population.
	And they're heading in the right direction, because you know that legislation is being passed all around the world that allows them to penalise social media companies that promote or platform content that they don't like.
	Of course it always starts with hate speech, because they know, generally speaking, we are opposed to hate.
	But it always ends up advancing the interests of the powerful.
	Firstly, we'll talk through the email that we've received and how it affects us and our ability to communicate freely with you.
	Let's get into it where it affects me and then let's move on to the rest of the world.
	That's the way I think.
	So here's the email sent to our channel.
	To help keep our community safe, we limit some of our more powerful features to channels who have built and maintained a positive channel history or who have provided verification.
	As of now, your channel doesn't have sufficient channel history.
	This is the kind of Kafkaesque bureaucratic language that fascinates me.
	Where did history go?
	We burnt it.
	We got rid of history.
	Why?
	We didn't agree with it.
	Don't you notice again and again this kind of peculiar, banal, anodyne bureaucratic language being used to prevent people communicating, to prevent people being It's for your safety, it's for your convenience.
	Have you noticed an amplification in the police state?
	Have you noticed police having more powers to enter your property, to prevent you from leaving your home, to persecute you for something you've said online?
	Have you noticed that?
	Meanwhile, it appears that other types of crime are escalating.
	Often, this is masked by this kind of bureaucratic language.
	Again, we're not grandiose about our importance or impact, although some recent events made me think, God, you must be making some sort of difference for people to spend this amount of time on you.
	But when you see an enormous, unprecedentedly large organisation like Google going to such trouble to shut down independent voices, and you look at the wider content, again, the legislation that's being passed globally, then you realise something important is happening.
	You know that, don't you?
	You know this is a significant moment.
	Here's more evidence.
	It has lost access to advanced features.
	This may have happened because your channel did not follow our community guidelines.
	I can imagine this in a sort of AI voice.
	This may have happened because your channel did not follow our community guidelines.
	It doesn't even tell you that it did happen.
	Who are you talking to at this point?
	Do you remember the prisoner?
	Isn't this Patrick McKeown territory?
	Who is number one?
	Who is it?
	I am not a number!
	I am a free man!
	No one is willing to say this is the person that's in a position of authority, this is why they've made that decision, if you want to refute that decision here is how you do it.
	It's too vast.
	The great criticism, one of, other than the genocides, of communism was that it created vast centralized bureaucracies where ordinary people were irrelevant and could be controlled.
	Well look at what you've got now.
	You've got vast Centralised bureaucracies!
	Who is it that I'm arguing with?
	This has happened in real life as well.
	This has happened notably with the Grenfell situation.
	That's a tower block that burned down in this country.
	When you try and see whose fault it is, oh this person subcontracted to that person, that firm subcontracted to that firm.
	It's very difficult to say who's causing this?
	Who's behind this?
	Where is power?
	Who's in control?
	There are these vast, invisible, bureaucratic organisations where you can't actually access or purchase power.
	You can't say, well hold on a minute, what are these community guidelines?
	Who do we talk to?
	What did we do wrong?
	Tell us so that we can amend it.
	That's literally Cathco-esque.
	Someone must have been telling lies about Joseph K, because he was arrested one morning.
	That's, like, how, of course, the book The Trial starts.
	Who said it?
	What am I supposed to have done?
	I'm afraid we can't tell you that.
	What have I done?
	We can't tell you that.
	How this impacts your channel.
	You won't be able to do things like...
	Get higher daily limits for live streams, shorts and video uploads, embed live streams, pin comments, add external links to your video descriptions.
	That obviously prevents us making revenue through advertisements, which is obviously important to our business, but also prevents us linking to any external site like Rumble.
	And you might think, well, it's competition, but it's only competition in the same way.
	This is not McDonald's versus Burger King.
	This is McDonald's versus your mum making you a burger because you didn't want to go to school that day.
	This is Monopolisation.
	The more monopolisation you have, the more centralised authority you have.
	And if you have a monopoly that does what a government asks it to do, you have... How did Mussolini describe that?
	Fascism.
	When corporations and the state are in lockstep together, that is truly what fascism is.
	There are other inflections, there are other exorcisations of that power.
	There are potentially minority groups that are persecuted.
	That is of course one of the worst aspects.
	There are new rules that are undemocratically brought about.
	But what we What we are seeing, I believe, is an advance towards centralised authoritarianism being oddly legitimised as protecting people and helping people and protecting a community.
	What community?
	Any of you that saw our interview with Dr Robert Epstein will know that Google have an incredible amount of power when it comes to managing media spaces.
	news narratives. His work is incredible. He showed how, for example, Google can
	promote stories that could change the outcome of an election. Of course, if
	whenever you Google something, what comes up is favorable to one political party
	or one political movement, say, obviously that's going to influence the reality
	that people live within. Now, Google don't want anyone else doing that. Google
	don't want anyone else offering an alternative version of reality, an
	alternative narrative. For example, a decentralized world where the individual
	is sacred, where community is sacred, where we have the maximum amount of
	ability to control our own communities through democracy, debate, discussion. The
	fact is that due to technologies, miraculous technologies like this, that
	have to a degree come about as a result of competition and capitalism, but also
	have received significant funding from, for example, the CIA in the early days of
	some of those organizations. Those are stories you are familiar with. They don't
	want anyone rising up now to give alternative versions of reality. For
	example, Rumble, our home. They don't want that happening and here's further
	evidence of that fact. In a significant event leading up to the Republican
	presidential primary debate in August, Rumble was granted exclusive rights to
	provide a free online broadcast.
	However, it became apparent that Google search had buried references to Rumble's stream of the debate.
	Users searching for the debate stream on Google were ushered to links from YouTube, Fox News, and various news reports instead of Rumble.
	Remember, Rumble was streaming the presidential primaries for free, whereas Fox News was charging.
	So even if you just reduce yourself to a consumer, and believe me, they've reduced you to that.
	You're getting a worse deal even from that narrow and limiting perspective.
	This incident holds significant implications for digital free speech and competition in the online sphere.
	It also raises important questions about the role and responsibilities of dominant internet platforms in relation to smaller emerging entities.
	When we view this through the lens of censorship, It serves as a poignant reminder of how tech giants can shape what is accessible to users.
	Practices like these could lead to a monopolistic information environment where curiosity choice and access are limited.
	Rumble is currently in discovery regarding legal action against Google, accusing the tech behemoth of Anti-competitive practices Rumble alleges that Google is unfairly promoting its own video platform, YouTube, at the expense of competitors.
	Why does this matter?
	Because it becomes about free speech.
	It becomes about what information you have access to.
	It becomes about who determines what version of reality is promoted and what ...version of reality is de-amplified to the point you're not even aware that it's there.
	Ultimately, because of the ability for these monopolies to form powerful relationships with the state, it creates the possibility for centralization and authoritarianism on an unprecedented scale.
	If that gets underwritten by law, as is currently happening, you'll soon be in a space where you literally can't say anything that's anti-establishment.
	They've already created that principle by saying, these things can never be said.
	You can't say that.
	You can't criticise this.
	You can't criticise that.
	Once you agree around anything, then you've established that principle, haven't you?
	Oh, there are certain things we agree you can't say.
	Yeah, I suppose so.
	You don't want people using racist or hateful language.
	Good.
	Absolutely.
	And also, what about criticising wars?
	What about criticising COVID?
	What about criticising Big Pharma?
	What about criticising the state?
	Watch this space.
	Or rather, watch Rumble.
	The lawsuit, which has drawn significant attention in the tech and legal sectors, claims that Google's algorithms unduly prioritise YouTube content in search results.
	Additionally, Rumble points to the pre-installation of the YouTube app on Android devices as a major competitive disadvantage for other video platforms.
	You literally can't get Rumble on an Android.
	Now, some people might say that's because there is hate speech on rumble or bad language, but you'll find hate speech and bad language wherever you find human beings.
	It's part of being human.
	And using that to delegitimize and shut down what ultimately amounts to an alternative platform that could ultimately house and does ultimately house anti-establishment views is censorship.
	By all means, only watch YouTube, or only watch the BBC, or MSNBC, or whatever it is you're into.
	But you should certainly have the ability to choose, shouldn't you?
	Now it's not just about shutting down alternative platforms, it's about promoting a particular news agenda.
	Remember, we continually tell you, here on our channel, the function of the media is not to give you information.
	Here's some information, make your own choice.
	You might get that from a great journalist like Matt Taibbi, or Glenn Greenwald, or Barry Weiss.
	Here's some information, you work it out for yourself.
	But what you'll get in legacy media is the Amplification of the agenda of the powerful.
	The normalization of the agenda of the powerful.
	Oh, everyone's staying indoors now and wearing masks.
	Okay, are we sure we've done enough tests?
	Yeah, yeah, tests have been done on that.
	Okay, everyone, this is gonna happen now.
	These wars are happening.
	What?
	Have we looked into that?
	Is there a peaceful solution?
	You're not allowed to discuss those things.
	So recognise that it's okay for us to disagree.
	It's alright.
	It's necessary.
	It's part of being human.
	But don't hand over that degree of power to centralised authoritarian regimes and organisations that do not have your best interests at heart because they want you neutralised.
	That's what they primarily want.
	Neutralisation.
	They want you neutered.
	YouTube is intensifying its efforts to boost news content from what it thinks are credible sources.
	Amid an era where people are demonstrating an aversion to traditional mass media outlets.
	Currently, YouTube is launching a revamped user interface designed to enhance the viewing experience by introducing additional news-oriented content suggestions when users are engaged in watching news videos.
	Google, the parent company of YouTube, plans to channel $1.6 million into increasing the volume of news-oriented content on its short-form video feature, Shorts.
	Remember how the news has become more politicised?
	Remember how the culture has become more politicised?
	Notice now that shorts, which used to be make-up tutorials, someone scoring a touchdown or a goal or something, now even that is becoming increasingly politicised and not in an unbiased way, in a way that operates in alliance with their policy.
	Notice how we're seeing legacy media outlets promoted, WHO guidelines accepted, legislation passed that allows control and surveillance.
	This, I believe, is to prohibit the natural human tendency towards the maximum amount of freedom.
	That doesn't mean freedom from responsibility.
	The price of freedom is responsibility.
	But your only responsibility now is to just consume and sit there And if you do not comply, believe me, there will be consequences, particularly if your non-compliance starts to make any kind of difference.
	An example of this new feature entails that a user watching a video about floods in Pakistan published by PBS will be directed towards more related videos about the same event.
	This also includes major news publishers such as the Associated Press.
	Look at how they're funded and regulated.
	CBS Evening News and Sky News.
	You know how they're regulated and funded and who their biggest advertisers are so you know what interests they have.
	You know what they promote and you know what they deny.
	Initial deployment of this improved watch page experience will take place across 40 countries on mobile and will later be extended to desktop and living room interfaces.
	So essentially, your reality is being curated now.
	What you see and don't see will be controlled.
	In a sense, what they're trying to do is return to the previous era, where if you were in America, you're getting your news from CNN or NBC or whatever.
	And if you're in my country, BBC, and if you're in Australia or Canada, do you see what the legislation is doing?
	We're going to just help you and protect you.
	How?
	By controlling you.
	Now, there's obviously a crossover between protection and control.
	Any parent knows that.
	Don't walk into the road, being an example.
	But what type of relationship do you want with the state?
	What type of relationship do you want with these behemoth organizations?
	What do you think their agenda is?
	Do you trust them?
	Besides the interface overhaul, YouTube also intends to invest a substantial $1.6 million to boost the creation of short-form news content on its short service in partnership with 20 organizations across 10 nations.
	This initiative will involve collaboration with news outlets that already generate long-form content on YouTube.
	The essence of digital platforms like YouTube lies in their ability to offer a level playing field for all creators, regardless of their size or affiliation.
	However, with this new venture, YouTube risks alienating a significant portion of its content creator community as it moves to give more real estate to its legacy competitors.
	In a sense, this is just like colonisation.
	Initially, you have this apparently new, uninhabited terrain and territory, and people or corporations or nations, whatever you want to call it, arrive, oh wow, let's prospect for gold, let's get involved in the fur trade.
	Then eventually, it gets piled over.
	The internet for a minute was about miracles like Napster, Or uprisings in the Middle East.
	Now what it's about is how do we tile over that space with the logos, the image of Google, or Facebook, or whoever else is willing to comply with the broader, deeper, harder to observe, elitist, globalist agenda.
	It may also inadvertently stifle the diversity of perspectives essential for a well-rounded public discourse.
	Well, that's not unintentional.
	That's part of the function.
	Which many years ago was seen as one of the digital space's most profound advantages over traditional media outlets.
	Yeah, for you, but not for traditional media outlets.
	They liked having total control, monopoly.
	Of course they did.
	Wouldn't it be lovely if this was the only channel and I was in charge of YouTube?
	Well, yeah, that would be terrific.
	But that's not reality.
	What we would all benefit from is less centralised authority, less monopolies, less government intervention, less legacy media power, less big tech power.
	But the tendency is towards more in each one of those cases because they don't care about you, except in so much as they want to control your ability to make decisions for yourself, and they are creating the conditions where that is inevitable.
	A fair analysis of the 100 most subscribed YouTube news channels worldwide found that the majority of top news channels on the platform are not independent.
	83 of the top 100 YouTube news channels are corporate media, meaning owned and funded by large companies or conglomerates.
	Only 4 of the top 100 news channels are independently run.
	While YouTube offers the possibility for independent sites to reach a wider audience, its most subscribed news channels remain largely reflective of the corporate biases of the global media landscape as a whole.
	What a coincidence!
	Essentially, what was once a space where independent voices could thrive and flourish, and independent voices and independent businesses and independent movements could all come to the fore, of course the monopolistic, elitist establishment goes, we can't have that going on.
	Look at the consequences.
	You can have someone like Robert F. Kennedy just bypassing legacy media and chatting to independent news and having a significant impact.
	You can have the Trump phenomena, you can have Brexit in the UK.
	Now it doesn't matter whether or not you agree with the outcomes of those elections, what you have to observe is populism, or the ability for people to be reached in different ways and be empowered in different ways and to have opinions, sometimes, perhaps you might argue if you are an authoritarian and parental person, for ill.
	I don't think ordinary people should be able to make decisions.
	Well you just have to acknowledge that if you believe that, you don't believe in democracy.
	And a lot of people actually don't believe in democracy.
	A lot of people don't believe in many of the things they claim to.
	Innocent till proven guilty.
	Democracy.
	What they believe in is I want my team to win.
	The two knowable exceptions to Big Tech's willingness to comply with the government were Chris Pavlovsky at Rumble and Elon Musk at X. Those two voices were alone in saying, we're not playing this game.
	And that's a bold move because there's legislation being passed all around the world to punish, persecute, and even in some cases maybe imprison Big Tech platform owners that stand up against this flow towards censorship.
	Demonstrating its commitment to upholding principles of free expression, X recently affirmed that it would continue to financially support comedian Russell Brand.
	Elon Musk has promoted the position of not penalising account holders unless they deviate from the platform's guidelines or violate local laws.
	Detailing its stance in a letter addressed to Dame Carolyn Dainich, who chairs the Commons Culture, Media and Sports Committee and who was widely criticised for asking platforms whether they would allow Brand to earn a living from online platforms.
	Which is a bit like a mob boss asking you if you want your legs broken or not.
	Any words for the mayor?
	Hello, Mayor Quimby.
	I would like to remind you that accidents will happen.
	The company explained that its resolution to allow brands financial pursuits on the platform aligns with its intent to protect free expression.
	It added, we do not take action on accounts where they have not violated our own rules or local laws.
	This is essential to protect free expression on the service.
	In order to ensure that all people can participate in the public conversation freely and safely, all content on X, including monetized content, is subject to our user agreement and the X rules.
	That's called principles.
	Principles that rumble, convey principles that echo.
	X are conveying now.
	The alternative to that is complying with government edicts.
	And of course, you might agree that a certain person should be shut down.
	It might be someone that you don't like.
	But once you've established the principle, then you can do it again.
	Well, remember, we shut people down when we don't like them.
	Remember, we can cancel people for saying that.
	We can cancel people if this happens to them in the public sphere.
	Once you've established that, you can repeat it ad infinitum.
	That's why it's important to remember the context of what's happening.
	And why it's happening.
	And when it's happening.
	And who it's happening to.
	Is it happening to people that are like, this is why you should vote for Joe Biden?
	Is it happening to people that are saying, this is why it's important that we all wear masks and stay indoors?
	Who's it happening to?
	Just notice that.
	Is it happening at a time when a swathe of legislation is being passed across the land to control free speech?
	The answer to that question is simply yes.
	Is that relevant?
	Yes.
	Is that the reason for it?
	Yes.
	Dame Caroline had written to Linda Iaccarino, Twitter chief's executive, saying the committee was concerned that he may be able to profit from his content on the platform.
	She'd also asked if Mr. Muskan intervened in Mr. Brown's case after the social network's billionaire owner appeared to defend him.
	Video site Rumble, where Mr. Brand regularly posts videos, responded to Dame Caroline saying,
	We regard it as deeply inappropriate and dangerous that the UK Parliament would attempt to control
	who is allowed to speak on our platform or to earn a living from doing so.
	It's a very important principle, this.
	It's very important and it includes and involves other principles like innocent until proven guilty.
	It's granting further authority to the government and big tech to deperson, declassify, shut down and remove voices that, in my case I would say, fundamentally disagree with their authority.
	Disagree that what they're doing is democratic.
	Free speech is non-negotiable.
	The alliance between big tech and government, as we are seeing now, between YouTube and the government, is dangerous.
	The legacy media amplify and normalise the agenda of the powerful.
	nations from and it will give you a little further illumination.
	Free speech is non-negotiable. The alliance between big tech and government, as we are
	seeing now, between YouTube and the government, is dangerous. The legacy media amplify and
	normalise the agenda of the powerful. If this model won't even permit mild counter-narrative,
	mild discourse, mild criticism, What does that tell you about their goals and agenda?
	That it's good, it's so good, that no one should ever criticise it?
	Let me know in the comments, let me know in the chat.
	It added, Although it may be politically and socially easier for Rumble
	to join a cancelled culture mob, doing so would be a violation of our company's values and
	mission.
	We emphatically reject the UK Parliament's demands.
	It is extraordinary, isn't it, that what's required is for big tech entrepreneurs and giants
	like Rumble and X and Chris Pavlovsky and Elon Musk to stand up and say
	free speech in order for free speech to be protected.
	You can't rely on the government.
	You can't rely on most big tech platforms.
	Where will that lead?
	Of course I'm interested in myself.
	I am myself.
	But I'm more interested in you.
	I'm more interested in where this leads.
	I'm more interested in what this indicates about what's happening in the culture.
	I'm more interested in what this tells us about the last three years and perhaps the next three years, particularly in the context of all of this new legislature that seems to be about controlling free speech and shutting it down under the auspices and camouflage of protecting us.
	I don't want to be protected by the state and big tech.
	I want to be facilitated.
	I see the state as a servant.
	I see big tech as a tool, just about utility.
	And what should it be serving?
	Free speech.
	Free communication of ideas.
	Maximum creativity.
	Maximum amount of freedom.
	Maximum ability to build new communities.
	Maximum ability to realise your independent free spirit.
	To build new worlds.
	Personal, communal and even global.
	And that will never happen if you grant centralised authoritarian power to this new and horrifying partnership by, other than a few notable exceptions, big tech and the state.
	Even Mussolini knew the word for that.
	But that's just what I think.
	Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments in the chat while you still can.
	Become a member of our community.
	We are under attack.
	We will do everything we can to represent you.
	We will do everything we can to participate in our movement to oppose these forces.
	If not now, it may be never.

▲