All Episodes
Previous Next
June 20, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:10:51
BREAKING: Hunter Biden Pleads GUILTY! All The Reaction - #150 - Stay Free With Russell Brand
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
**birds chirping** **music**
Brought to you by Pfizer.
**music** In this video, you're going to see the future.
It's Tuesday.
What a beautiful day to be free on Stay Free with Russell Brand exclusively on Rumble after 15 minutes.
Why?
Because we're the home of free speech.
We'll get you a little bit upfront on YouTube, but after 15 minutes, we have to go exclusively onto the Rumble platform in order to speak to...
An Australian mainstream broadcaster who's gone so deep into this extraterrestrial stuff that he may not find his way out.
Before that, though, we've got to talk about Hunter Biden breaking news.
Hunter Biden pleads guilty.
We've got to talk about Trump's exclusive interview with Fox News.
And what do you think's the main story?
Let me know in the chat, by the way.
If you're watching us on Rumble now, press that red button and join us on Locals.
I can see your chat right now.
Katie Beth, hello, she says.
Maximize Russell, are you the best broadcaster in the world?
Some would say yes.
What a lovely compliment, right in the middle of that night.
This is my on-screen assistant, Gareth Roy.
in the gallery.
Assistant.
No, it's a comment there.
This is my on-screen assistant, Gareth Roy.
We're going to be getting through the news that matters to you together today because
it's only us that's going to break this stuff down for you.
RFK, he's heard the good news about Rumble.
He's going to be joining us, the first Democrat presidential candidate to join us here on the home of free speech.
Welcome, RFK, to a place where you can speak freely, baby.
What do you think about the Elon Musk, Joe Rogan, Peter Hortense debate?
Which side of it are you on?
Are they ganging up on him a little bit?
Did you see him wearing a bow tie?
Did you feel a bit sorry for him? You can't bully someone wearing a bow tie, can you?
No, no.
Isn't a bow tie the sartorial equivalent of not being able to get an erection?
I don't know, isn't it? Would you ever wear a bow tie? I want to know, in human history,
has anyone with a dicky bow had a stiffy dicky? That's just a question I want to put out there
I'm not saying they're necessarily equivalents, but it's possible, isn't it?
We're going to be talking first about Hunter Biden, then we're going to move into Trump, then we're going to move into this Australian mainstream journalist, Ross Coulthard, a man that's certainly priapic when it comes to the matter of extra dimensional beings.
When he spoke to David Grush, he was all over the show.
Get on that red button, press it now.
I love says true chimera what do you love about him you're out of
control who who wears them that you think can viably get what I just mentioned
them I thought you're talking about the Wuhan George Gale says it how does the
bowtie in terms of empathy why it's all your comment in so much it's difficult
to keep up let's get into the hunter Biden pleading guilty story man this
thing's getting out of control is this gonna we get all the way to the
White House is it is it Is it possible because it started off there is no Hunter
Biden laptop. All right the laptop story All right, there is a Hunter Biden laptop story.
Oh, well, there's no tax implications or gun implications.
At the moment, these are just charges.
Charges to which I think he's pleaded guilty.
Is that right?
Yeah, he's taken a plea deal, basically.
He's taken a plea.
He's plea bargaining.
He's plea bargaining with your life, with your very livelihoods on the line.
OK, let's see how the mainstream media report on this.
The death throes, the death rattle of a dying machine.
They know you're right.
They know we're winning.
On this very summer solstice, they can feel the new light coming through.
Let's look at CNN.
Watch them.
Watch them flounder and collapse.
Biden, let's get right to Cara Scannell for details on this.
Cara, I understand there is a plea agreement.
What have you learned?
Yeah, John, this five-year-long investigation now coming to a head.
We have learned from new court filings at the U.S.
District Court here in Wilmington, Delaware, that Hunter Biden has agreed to plead guilty to multiple criminal charges.
I'm going to walk you through this.
One of these charges involves, these are two counts of failing to file tax returns in a timely fashion.
Those are misdemeanors.
He's also going to plead guilty to a charge of a firearm offense.
This is the possession of a firearm while you are addicted to a controlled substance.
Now, the firearm offense is going to be diverted, and what that means is that if he meets certain conditions, that charge will go away.
This will be over a set period of time.
Otherwise, it's the tax misdemeanor charges that he has been charged with.
I've never mentioned this before, but I'm an addict in recovery from the horrors of addiction.
That's why it's not my business nor place to condemn anyone that's had struggles with substances and the associated and affiliated behaviours.
I'm not interested in the misdemeanours, I mean social, cultural misdemeanours of Hunter Biden, but I'm interested in that tax stuff.
And of course what we're really interested in is the Burisma affiliation, that Ukrainian energy company that made mysterious payments to Hunter and some people... Allegedly!
Believe that Joe Biden was involved in brokering that deal.
Now, with these new potential FBI charges that Hunter Biden took bribes of up to five million dollars, isn't it harder to maintain?
And let me just let me know where you stand on this.
The Democrats and the establishment, the elite establishment's position on Trump's and his little boxes of secrets is about corruption, Rather than wrangling him right out of the presidential race.
And also, riddle me this, you sweet children of the Lord.
Why are we obsessing over the character of Donald Trump, which, you know, some of you love and some of you loathe, and people seem to be split, well, almost exactly down the middle, depending on which voting machines you use.
We all know Dominion voting machines.
They're the best voting machines that money can buy.
We certainly can't afford to criticise them, can we baby?
750?
That's a bit rich for my blood.
And yet why are we discussing the peripheral issues when corruption itself is doubtlessly essential to these systems of corruption?
And if indeed inside Trump's magical boxes are plans to go to war with Iran, isn't that more significant?
Let me know in the chat.
Press the red button right now.
Let us know what you think.
Who cares what I think?
Professors wear bowties, says Achela.
James Bond said, wow, I need 10952.
This bowtie story has captured the soul of the nation.
And we're talking about Peter... Hotez.
Hotez, yeah.
He's the dicky bow wearing man who says, who won't debate RFK.
And God, what a place to debate RFK now.
Rumble, the perfect platform for a debate of that nature.
The perfect time, the perfect place.
So look you just you know with the what you just mentioned about Burisma I think that's where this all links and you know what they're talking about is Hunter Biden for two years earned in excess of one and a half million dollars a year and he didn't pay income tax on that and so that's what these two charges in this plea deal are about.
That money came at a time when he was a board member of Burisma making millions of dollars So, which came at a time when Joe Biden, his father, was in charge of Ukrainian affairs as Vice President of the United States.
I don't know what you're trying to suggest.
When Hunter Biden has done a hard day's work at Burisma, why should he?
Let me know in the chat.
Why should he hand over that money to the state?
They'll probably only waste the money on weapons anyway.
It all goes to Raytheon and Lockheed Martin.
The point that you made about the gun issue and relating to him being an addict and things, I think it's about following the money here.
When you get a situation where someone's earning millions of dollars through a job that they seem to have got when their father was Vice President of the United States and in charge of Ukrainian affairs, that's the real thing that should be investigated at this point, surely.
Corrupt to an extent, maybe not legally.
Is it morally corrupt?
Is it nepotism?
That's just in.
Hitler is dead.
What the hell is inside Trump's boxes?
This is an amazing story.
Are there plans for a US invasion of Iran?
What I love about this, what I love about this moment with the emergence of independent
media is the possibility that we can track in real time how these issues unfold.
This would have been impossible 50 years ago.
We all condemn social media for the way that it's hypnotised us and turned us into a bunch
of numb, dumb dullards staring at a screen being marketed at perpetually.
But what it has enabled us to do is communicate instantaneously like you can right now pressing that red button at the bottom of your screen and joining us on locals and to convey counter narratives immediately.
This doesn't this stymie any potential future of military aggression against Iran, the fact that we're publicly
talking about it because of our man, what's his name, Branko Markatic on Jacobin, which I've got
to tell you, that's a left-wing, that's a left-wing publication, a left-wing organisation.
What we're beginning to see, and this is what's so exciting about the time we're so
fortunate and blessed to be alive in, is that both the left and the right are attacking the
elite establishment and the establishment is doubling down on censorship and
surveillance.
That's why me, Shellenberger, and Matt Taibbi are appearing in London.
You can join us for this, but we'll be broadcasting it exclusively on Rumble as well.
So you won't miss out, even if you can't get a ticket.
God knows they're hard to get out of!
They're rare as rocking horse muck!
Mate, they're tricky!
Get a hold of them!
You won't be able to get a hold of them.
We are now building a movement to oppose this.
This is it.
I know you've felt down.
I know it's been a difficult time for you, but we're coming back.
We're coming back stronger than ever during this solstice period.
Let's have a little laugh at dear old Donald Trump.
We love this clip because Donald's talking about what he's talking about here.
This is about the contents of the boxes.
What's in those boxes now, the first bit.
You know when you move house or whatever and you've got to do all them cardboard boxes.
Maybe you go down to the supermarket to get some.
Maybe you buy some special.
Hopefully you list by room the contents of the boxes.
This is the stuff out of the bedroom.
This is stuff out of the bathroom.
Not Donald Trump.
He's got military secrets mixed up with the paraphernalia and trinkets of his hobbies.
Have a look.
And why not just hand them over them?
Because I had boxes.
I want to go through the boxes and get all my personal things out.
I don't want to hand that over to Narriette.
And I was very busy, as you've sort of seen.
Yeah, but according to the indictment, you then tell this aide to move to other locations after telling your lawyers to say you'd fully complied with the subpoena when you hadn't.
But before I send boxes over, I have to take all of my things out.
These boxes were All of my things.
He's just a normal man.
The idea that Trump's trying to get over that he would be going through all those boxes individually himself.
What have I got in here?
Oh, I forgot about that.
What about this one?
Donald, come and do all these boxes!
I feel like Donald gets some assistance when it comes to moving out.
Like regular people, you get like some people with a van or a truck to come and help you.
I mean, Donald Trump doing it himself.
I'm busy, I'm very busy, I can't go through all my boxes.
We're interspersed with all sorts of things.
Golf shirts, clothing, pants, shoes.
There were many things.
I was- Golf shirts and golf clubs and golf tees and golf stuff in
a box with plans for a potential invasion of Iran.
Is it possibly a spelling error around the word golf?
No, that's golf with an O, not golf with a U. Yeah?
Not that I know of, but not that I know of, but everything was declassified and Biden didn't have the right to do that because he wasn't president.
Nor did Mike Pence, by the way, have the right to do that because he wasn't president.
International concern.
Something that's taking place on a global stage when it's conveyed rhetorically comes down to the sort of conversations you'd have when you're a kid.
He was doing it.
He's already done it.
Those are my boxes.
I ain't got time to go for all my boxes.
It's so sort of quotidian.
It's so ordinary and everyday.
Also he's given the opportunity there to mention the invasion of Iran and he doesn't even take it.
I won't need, let's go in the chat, because I know like loads of you really really love Donald Trump and I think he's funny in a hundred different ways.
Why is it that he's not going, this bunch of stuff about invading Iran, they were pressuring me to invade Iran.
We're taking a deeper look at this over the course of the week, based somewhat on Branko Marković's brilliant article in Jacobin, he believes that therefore, was it Mike Milley, the former head of, what is he?
Someone saying that they were pressuring Trump while in office to push forward and invade Iran and Trump kept these papers in order to deny that.
That's not something that we...
That's based on Branko's research over there at Jacobin.
This is a fantastic piece of... This is vintage Trump.
If you're a Trump fan, and I know a lot of you are, this is fantastic because you hear a list of inserts.
Is that going to be contained within 10 seconds?
You hear a list of... It's just the setup.
This is just the set-up, is it?
Listen to all of the things that Trump's been called, like all disses and heavy cusses that Donald Trump's been subject to.
And then after that, it's Trump's criticisms of his former colleagues.
This is so wonderful.
You're going to love this.
Let's look at the first bit.
You said that.
I'm going to surround myself with only the best and most serious people.
Well, I did do that.
We had tremendous luck.
We had the best economy we've ever had.
The world has ever seen.
No, the first bit is the list of them getting condemned.
Let's have a look at that.
Vice President Mike Pence is running against you.
Your Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, she's running against you.
Your former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said he's not supporting you.
You mentioned National Security Advisor John Bolton, he's not supporting you either.
You mentioned Attorney General Bill Barr, says you shouldn't be president again.
Calls you a consummate narcissist and troubled man.
You recently called Barr a gutless pig.
Cutless pig.
He's pretty good at laying into people.
A searing and abusive maxim forever on the edge of his lips.
Your second defense secretary is not supporting you.
Called you irresponsible.
This week you and your White House, called your White House chief of staff John Kelly weak and ineffective.
This hymn.
So this is Trump's abuse of others.
And the end, the second end, which was discussed in some detail in the pre-production meeting, but we'll go into that in the post-production meeting now.
So this is all of, listen to his escalating criticisms of his colleagues.
It's wonderful.
And born with a very small brain.
I was born with a small brain.
That's baby's brains.
It would be weirder to be born with a great big massive one like an alien.
You called your acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney a born loser.
You called your first secretary of state Rex Tillerson dumb as a rock.
It's funny they found that photo of him just smiling.
He's dumb as a rock.
Look at him doing that speech.
He's literally a mineral.
And your first defence secretary, James Mattis, the world's most overrated general.
Terrible looking bunch of guys, aren't they?
They're such denizens of the Addams family.
There's a league table of overrated generals.
He's top of it.
Overrated.
You called your White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany milquetoast and multiple times.
That's an amazing set of terms.
Multiple times you've referred to your Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao as Mitch McConnell's China-loving wife.
So, why did you hire all of them in the first place?
Because I hired ten to one that were fantastic.
That's fantastic stuff.
What an incredible piece of rhetoric from Donald Trump.
That's the sort of thing that makes some people absolutely despise him and other people adore him.
Let me know in the chat where you stand.
Does that make you like Trump more or does it make you like Trump less?
Press the red button and join us in that conversation.
If he was ever short of money, Trump, he could start a service where he creates nicknames where you pay an amount and then he gives you someone a nickname.
What are the qualities of an individual?
I don't know, they're sort of a bit nervous and jittery.
Call him the little Jitterbug Dickward.
He's really good at coming up with fantastically reductive, but the kind of nicknames that are going to kind of stick.
Oh, no, don't say that.
Crooked Hillary.
I mean, it's amazing.
It's brilliant.
Little Marco.
All of them, they really sort of resonate.
Sleepy Joe.
Oh dear.
What does he say?
Low energy, jeb.
There's sort of something very weird and captivating.
He's a person that understands the small brain some people are commenting on.
Yeah, Rocketman was good.
That was a good one.
Yeah, he's brilliant.
He's brilliant.
He's coming for Dumbledore.
Hmm, okay.
Shakespeare for insults, I shall just say.
I mean, dissentimonious.
I mean, wow.
Desanctimonious is some... That's good punning, baby.
That's good punning.
Shall we move on?
You lot have been really captured by the Bowtie stuff.
We're still on YouTube now.
So let's have a look at the media attacks and the spat between... This is... No, not that.
Let's go move on to the RFK, Rogan and Elon stuff.
Have we got that clip of our man there?
Because Mehdi Hussain spoke to... We don't have that.
YouTube deletes it.
Oh right, YouTube has deleted it.
We can pull that up though maybe.
YouTube have deleted another RFK Jr.
interview, this time with Dr. Jordan Peterson.
I've been in contact with Jordan Peterson.
We communicate pretty regularly, and he's talking about he's got some interesting stuff that he's developing, but I was very surprised to see that this was pulled down and censored.
Really?
I don't know, man.
I didn't sort of watch it, but like, I guess, do you feel that, and let me know what you think
guys, I mean particularly if you're watching this on Rumble, we have to be careful on
YouTube.
Do you think censorship's increasing, and do you think censorship is part of the answer?
And are you able to appreciate that if you grant the authority to some centralized organization
to censor information, that they may one day censor information that's favorable to you?
Is authoritarianism the answer, or is more liberty the answer?
Censorship is predicated on the idea that you can't trust people, that's the undergirding
idea isn't it?
You cannot trust people.
People are bad and stupid, and the only way to prevent inevitable chaos is through centralised control authority.
There isn't any other argument, is there?
So what does Sam Healbilly say?
YouTube is 100% controlled by government and pharma.
Everyone needs to leave the platform.
That's in your views.
I think we're still on them.
The censorship has been incredibly blatant and blunt.
It's clear there's an agenda.
Probably should come off.
Should we come off now?
Let's get over.
Listen, we're going to leave YouTube so that we can get a little deeper into this conversation, as well as delving into the story that RFK has joined us on Rumble.
And I know you lot are really interested in the Twitter spat that's emerging around RFK and the potential debate between him and Peter Hortes, the bowtie model, and in a way advocate for some Interesting anti-pattern ideas in the vaccine world that are certainly worth looking at.
So listen, there's a link in the description.
We're going to get a bit deeper now.
We're going to get into some pretty free speech.
We're going to talk about some ideas that are, I hope, inclusive.
I hope are anti-establishment.
I hope will equip you with the kind of knowledge to be able to go toe-to-toe with any of the acolytes of the state that have downloaded their propaganda and present it as their own.
You know who I'm talking about.
The people that roll their eyes and call you a conspiracy theorist and a alt-right advocate. We believe in new political movements,
new alliances, love, tolerance, absolute freedom, new unity, access to divine forces that
will help us to shift the paradigm once and for all and the only way to participate in this
movement, at least as far as we're concerned and it's interesting, but more and more.
more people that are plainly not right-wing. RFK, he's not right-wing, right? You can't make that
claim. He's in the Democrat Party. This is John F. Kennedy's nephew. This is the son of Bobby Kennedy.
He's on Rumble now because that's where free speech lives.
Join us there immediately. Click the link in the description. See you over there in a second.
Are we off now? Because I'm starting, I'm going to get him free. I'm going to get free speech.
Are you relaxing now? Just about.
The shoulders are loosening. My shoulders are loosening. I can feel the free speech surging
RFK, welcome to Rumble.
Let me be the first to say, on behalf of all those Rumblers everywhere, and if you're watching us now on Rumble, give us a rumble!
It really helps us when you rumble us right hard, right in the middle bit of us.
Rumble us right up the bracket, won't you?
I can say what I want now.
If I want to say fuck, I can.
Oh my word.
Shit, bollocks, motherfucker, all of that!
I mean, that's not why we've come here.
Sir!
I'm offended!
People are saying welcome to RFK, we've got fans out now.
YouTube have taken down the Jordan Peterson interview with RFK.
What did Jordan say?
Let's see what he said to me over here.
Whilst you're getting that, I'll just let you know, YouTube have remained silent on which exact segments of the Terms of Service were deemed transgressed.
This is what it's like dealing with YouTube.
You know, like, that we got in trouble once.
It wasn't our fault.
It was young Putin in the gallery.
He put up something about Ivermectin, where he said that they'd already trialed Ivermectin, but they're in the process of trialing Ivermectin, and they hadn't received the results.
But you know that Ivermectin, like, that's like saying Beetlejuice or something on YouTube.
It gets them right randy, doesn't it?
They get real little stiffies if you say anything like that.
They're obviously not bow tie wearers.
Over there because they get solid solid as a rock when they're at the very mention of the word He says here vaccine misinformation and the Matt Walsh one hate speech and insight and insight and violence That's what JP saying that's straight from the horse's mouth over there and not the takes horse paste Although, you know, there are certain circumstances where horse paste can be pretty reliable Certainly, it seems as reliable as some of the other medicines that are heavily advocated That is the issue though, isn't it?
The fact that you can't tell which parts of the terms of service were deemed transgressed.
That is the issue.
Because that comes down to, and Michael Schellenberger was on yesterday, but this whole disinformation, misinformation, if you keep people In a constant state of not knowing what they're able to even say anymore, and then they get punished for not even knowing what they said has been wrong.
You're keeping the public in a state of fear.
That's what you're supposed to do!
There's the escalation and elevation of fear, there's the promotion of constant desire, there's endless provocation of conflagration, constant tension, and as you point out, Gareth, a literally Kafkaesque obfuscation of the law and the rules and the regulations.
Can someone pull up a little bit of actual Kafka here?
Find out, like, so get like the first page of the trial by Kafka up.
And are you lot, are you familiar with Kafka? If you're watching us on Rumble now, press the red button. Now he's
talking sexy.
What, since I've said that? Pride faults.
Yeah, like, if you get the first page of Kafka's, the trial, someone must have been telling lies about Joseph K.
Like, like he's arrested the protagonist of the trial and he, no one will tell him what he's being arrested for.
Yeah, there you go.
That's exactly what's happening.
And, in a sense, we suffer, I think, from a crisis of imagination because, in a way, our personal mythology equates authoritarianism with fascism and the tropes of fascism and the paraphernalia and the semiotics and the, what do I want to say, the pageantry of fascism.
We think that fascism is going to be militaristic, built around red, black and white emblems.
It's going to be nationalistic.
But there definitely appears to be an emergent authoritarianism.
I won't use the lazy word fascism, but it's about control.
It's about censorship.
It's about surveillance.
It's about shutting down conversation.
It's about censoring and controlling people without telling them what the rules are.
Here we go.
Chapter one.
Arrest.
Conversation with Mrs. Grubach, then Mrs. Bernster.
Someone must have been telling lies about Joseph K. He knew he'd done nothing wrong, but one morning he was arrested.
Every day at eight in the morning, he was brought in his breakfast by Mrs. Grubach's cook.
Mrs. Grubach was his landlady, but today she didn't come.
That had never happened before.
Kay waited a little while, and looked from his pillow at the old woman who lived opposite, who was watching him with inquisitiveness quite unusual for her.
And finally, both hungry and disconcerted, rang the bell.
There was immediately a knock at the door, and a man entered.
He'd never seen the man in this house before.
He was slim, but firmly built.
His clothes were black and close-fitting, with many folds and pockets, buckles and buttons.
And a belt, all of which gave the impression of being very practical, but without making it very clear what they were actually for.
Who are you?
Asked Casey in half upright in his bed.
The man, however, ignored the question as if his arrival simply had to be accepted.
Amelia replied, you rang?
Can you already appreciate the genius of Kafka, who worked in Czechoslovakia, I believe, in a bureaucracy, who went to his grave not recognizing his own genius, and actually was one of those that threw his manuscript in the bin.
Oh, it's rubbish!
Throw it in the bin!
Throw it properly in the bin!
Don't leave it for someone else to find!
Look, I've just left this work of potential genius on the edge of the bin.
We ain't put any eggshells on it or nothing.
You've kept it pretty clean.
But what he's done is he's captured how creeping bureaucracy is being used to regulate us.
Let us know if you feel the same thing in your own life once they start censoring you.
Like, didn't you used to be allowed to be wrong?
say like, oh, I don't want to take vaccines, it's not for me, without that being a life-defining
issue. One of the things we did when we were on YouTube throughout the pandemic is we tried
to talk openly about it, in particular because we had different perspectives, and when I
say we, I mean me and Gareth in particular, had very different perspectives on it, but
we both believe in autonomy, independence, freedom.
So the whole way through, if you go back and watch the content we were making at the time, where we were questioning the regulations, we were questioning the mandates, we were questioning 34,000 key workers in New York losing their jobs, we were questioning the propaganda and condemnation and shaming of people that were unvaccinated.
We both had different perspectives, different opinions, literally opposing views, but both of us believe in freedom.
We have different political opinions right throughout our organisation and right throughout our office.
That's why I'm willing to have conversations with Jordan Peterson, or Ben Shapiro, or Yanis Varoufakis, or Vandana Shiva.
Because I believe in humanity.
I believe, actually, in diversity.
The ultimate diversity being our individuality.
But beyond that diversity, there is a new universalism.
You don't have to be afraid of people that don't believe the same stuff as you.
You have to be afraid of people who want to censor you, who want to surveil you, who don't think you have the right to be you, who don't believe in either your traditional values or your progressive values, who don't believe in your right to have your sexuality or your identity.
If all of us are willing to put aside cultural opposition, we become an indefatigable, undefeatable force.
And that's what we're here to do.
We're not over here to escalate hate speech.
There's no time for hate.
You can't build anything from hatred.
You can only build things from love.
We believe in freedom of speech.
We believe in free speech.
Don't we, Gail?
We do.
And I think obviously that's why RFK has come over and his announcement statement.
He said, when I announced for the presidency, I said that if you give me a piece of ground from which to fight, I will take back this country from these corporate powers that seek to divide us.
And I think, you know, that's one of the things we learned a lot about when speaking to him.
Well, you spoke to him about the kind of corporate element of this.
And yet when it comes to, for example, his recent episode of Joe Rogan, what the media have done is attacked it.
They've said to Spotify, remove the episode.
You know, so they don't concentrate on anything else.
They box him into one perspective that they've reached about him.
And that's it.
A bit like what with YouTube.
We're not going to tell you why, but that's it.
You're gone to us.
If you're Donald Trump, you're too far right.
If you're RFK, you're too far left.
Oh, so how big is this box that we've got existing when you're talking about diversity and individual freedom and the right to be who you are?
You can be whoever you want to be within this framework.
The only way that we can defuse this situation, the only remedy that we have, is a personal willingness to completely let go of the right to judge other people for being who they are.
To try and establish some universal principles and one of them is free speech.
Give people the right to be wrong.
Don't be so afraid of the truth.
I think it's ridiculous that MSNBC said we won't show Trump's post-arraignment speech because we realise we're the news.
This is Rachel Maddow.
Rachel Maddow, we've covered this this week, the stuff that she said about take a vaccine and the virus stops with you.
They'd never clinically trialled it.
They never released the information that demonstrates That if you're asymptomatic in 96% of cases, you can't spread it.
That means if you're asymptomatic, get out of the house, go where you want to go.
It should have always been from the beginning.
If you want to wear a mask, wear a mask.
If you're concerned about your health and you should shield, stay at home and shield.
Everyone else, get on with your lives.
If you want to take this vaccine, it might help you, take it.
If you don't want to, don't.
But curiously, they took a very different stance.
Now what is it on RFK?
What's so dangerous in the conversation between Joe Rogan and RFK?
This is what's dangerous.
Joe Rogan's got a powerful, potent, cultural voice.
He brings people together.
He reaches blue-collar Americans that can't be reached by the mainstream media anymore because the mainstream media patronize them and don't like them.
And I'm talking to you because I know that you're watching us as well and I'm grateful to you for watching us.
They think you're stupid.
They think you can't make decisions for yourself.
They don't think you're capable of handling complex, nuanced arguments, bringing together data from a variety of sources, and recognizing that many of the institutions that we've been taught, trained, conditioned to rely on, are corrupt and not fit for purpose.
That's what I reckon anyway.
The other danger is his rising poll numbers.
That's the other danger.
It's a very literal, clear and present danger.
The Democratic Party could become hollowed out, usurped and overthrown by someone who believes in horror of horrors, democracy.
Press the red button, join us in the chat if you believe in free speech and if you want to participate in it.
I believe in freedom.
I believe in free speech.
And where free speech, freedom and speech meet, you get freech.
That's the catchphrase, isn't it?
Let's have a look.
We've got, we've got, we've got... Freech.
Where freedom... FREEDOM!
and speech.
You get Freak.
That's Jack.
You can tell Jack because what he's done is he's allowed that laborious dead air to be in the middle of a jingle.
Like the function of a jingle is to sort of delineate space.
It's ceremonial.
It's like ringing a bell.
Like ringing a bell indicates this is the beginning of an item.
Now some troubled amateur at home was so like almost like someone who's had a love of graphics sent in this sequence like they've not been paid they've not even been asked but it just troubled them watching it and they sent in this so let's compare uh the admittedly handsome bad graphics jacks Bloathsome, appalling, laboured, dead air reddened effort with this to send in by a perfect show.
I've not watched this yet.
I'm excited to see it.
Let's face it, it couldn't be any worse.
Let's have a look.
No, let me do, let me intro properly.
Right, imagine this was an item.
Imagine we're mainstream.
We're mainstream media now.
This is Don Lemon.
This is, um, like, who is it?
The guy, Anderson Cooper.
I'm Anderson Cooper.
Right, this is it.
Where freedom and speech meet, you get freach.
I mean, it's like a fucking masterpiece.
It's not bad, is it?
It's unbelievable, that.
That's incredible.
That's award-winning, isn't it?
That is award-winning.
Look at that.
I mean, you've gone crazy in the chat.
It makes me feel things.
I actually was aroused by that graphic.
Me too.
I think we can change the world after seeing a graphic like that.
That's really inspired me.
If we had more of that in this organisation.
Do you know what that is?
That's the Martin Luther King's, I have a dream speech of graphics.
It's definitely better, says Troke.
Nice job, says others.
We all love Jack.
Jack does a variety of things.
He finds context.
I want you to know that I do love Jack.
I'm not mindlessly, needlessly bullying a younger team member.
I'm doing it simply as an entertaining trope, but to do a degree based on the quality of this stranger's work is somewhat legitimate.
Let's have a look at your free speech, though.
Where are those free speech comments?
Here they are.
Are they?
Where the hell are they?
Is this them?
Oh, thanks, darling.
Right.
OK, so everyone said this is on the Rachel Maddow story the other day.
Mr. Majestic, unlike her claim for the vaccine, Rachel Maddow is neither safe or effective.
I like Rachel Maddow.
Blessed old bird said, I'll show you my boxes if you show me yours.
Perhaps the contents would be unveiled live on TV.
That would be brilliant.
Like those things where they get a lock up where things have been put in storage.
Yeah.
Let's just open Trump's boxes live on the telly and just read them out.
Wouldn't it be, what's that game show?
Oh yeah, Deal or No Deal.
What's in this box?
Oh, it's a war against Iran!
Oh, it's the golf club!
I'll take the golf club.
Do you want to gamble the golf club?
We're going to bomb a nuclear reactor in Tehran?
Oh no, I'll just take them golf clubs.
I'm not trying to be facetious, but I've not given one thought as to what's in those boxes.
We don't need to.
There's golf shirts, confusingly.
You've seen the way those boxes were strewn across these lavvy in Mar-a-Lago.
They're everywhere.
It's a chaotic way to pack.
Liz underscore P. The law is being used against honest citizens.
Citizens that don't agree with totalitarian ideology.
Yeah, join us on Locals.
We believe in your free speech.
You've seen the graphic.
This is on our Schellenberger interview.
If you've... Me and Schellenberger and Tayibi are doing a... We're starting... He's got very grand plans for it, isn't he, Schellenberger?
The Anti-Censorship Industrial Complex Movement.
He's got a website called censorshipindustrialcomplex.com.
It's confusing, that.
Because it sounds like it's pro-it.
That that is it.
Sounds like they like you.
Like, go to it if you want to know more.
What?
You know?
You can't type that here.
Who are you?
Who do you think you are?
What is this image?
Is that just an image of Schellenberger?
Yeah, I think so.
That's just a still.
Why did you choose that one?
It looks up to you, doesn't it?
Jack chose that, I bet.
Don't you think?
Yeah, probably.
Schellenberger.
Oh, this is on him.
Great interview, says Boise.
So good you didn't have a chance to ask Michael if he'd tattooed a stick man onto his body, as he promised last week.
Quite right.
Because that community, in fact, can someone remind the community people, we've got to have a tattoo artist tattooing stick people at our live Festival for Freedom community this year, Hay On Why, July the 14th to July the 17th.
Everyone can have a stick figure tattoo.
It doesn't have to be on a reproductive... Oh, it doesn't have to.
I prefer it.
Doesn't have to be, though.
That's good of you.
You can put it wherever you want.
Hey, it's a freedom festival.
Your festival, you can do whatever you want, really.
Can you have a freedom festival, then demand that people get tattoos on their... I mean, it doesn't seem like freedom, does it?
It seems like the actual opposite.
Schellenberg on UFOs.
Averone says, Russell, please get David Grush for an extended interview.
He's the whistleblower we need.
I want Grush on this show.
Today, though, we've got Ross Coulthard, the Australian host who did that Mind-bending interview with David Grush.
And we think he was really sort of flirting, I'd say.
Now listen, are you saying people were murdered?
I'm not comfortable with that.
He took the whole UFO phenomenon so... Primal Colour 2, I'd have it on my genitals but my tattoo would look tiny.
And DoCo says, if Russell pays for my ticket, I'll tattoo stick figures on anyone's nuts.
Are you a tattooist though, mate?
Because that's a weird claim to make.
It used to be all graphs of rust-worn bodies and now it's the figure.
Yeah, we're moving to that now.
We're moving to that.
Are we going to go to Ross Coulthard talking about UFOs and whistleblowers?
Hmm.
I've got some... I mean, I've heard some interesting information about UFOs now and extraterrestrial beings and like diplomatic relationships between extraterrestrial nations and the United States and the Chinese government and the Russians.
I mean, it's really blowing up this stuff.
I actually, when we spoke to Jeremy Corbell, he says they don't want these leaks.
even if they are trying to use it as a distraction, it's, they're pissed off that these leaks are being made.
So let us know in the chat.
Now, but what do we know, really, when it comes to these revelations?
We are not Ross Coulthard, the best-selling author of In Plain Sight,
exploring the mystery of unidentified flying objects, and the Newsmax journalist who conducted,
this is just to wet your whistle, this is just to get your gander up,
because we're very excited to have Ross Coulthard here, because we think he's part Jim Robinson, Neighbours star,
if you're not familiar with Australian TV, Alan Dale, I think was the actor,
and part Ma, Andrew Ma, who's a British investigative journalist,
so he's got like a wonderful visual credentials, but look at how he's handling David Grush,
and look at how sort of intimate he is.
I'm gonna interview him the way he interviewed Grush.
Have a look at this.
Have human beings been hurt, Or killed by a non-human intelligence?
Well, I can't get into the specifics because that would reveal certain US classified operations.
I was briefed by a few individuals on the program that there were malevolent events like that.
No, I'm scared.
People have just heard you say non-humans may well have murdered human beings.
That seems to be the case at one point, yeah.
Ross.
Ross, are you, through your rhetorical style, through your cadence, through your leaning in, dramatising this subject?
Please welcome Ross Coulthard to the show.
Hello, Ross.
Hey Russell, how are you mate?
I don't think it needs any dramatisation.
It's real.
The phenomenon is real.
What Dave Grush is saying is real.
And the mainstream media, you are a rare exception.
Thank God somebody like you is doing a show because we are being ignored.
There is an attempt to cover this up.
Bury it back in a box for another 80 years, and the simple fact is David Grush is telling the truth, backed by other whistleblowers who are ready to come forward.
This is going to come out.
Even the astonishing and captivating revelations contained within your interview are just the tip, and I mean just the tip, Ross, of the iceberg, and by God, it's a hell of an iceberg, because I know, because I can tell, Ross, I can see the way that you're conducting that interview, you know a great deal more than you're able to publicly say.
Now, I've heard off the record, and I won't name my sources because I'm a professional journalist, I'm the best, some say, I've heard recently that there are diplomatic relationships between the US government and extraterrestrial nations, that have gone all the way back to Roswell, that Roswell was real, that they have live extraterrestrials, that there are different extraterrestrial nations that the governments of the world have been in touch with for 50, 60 years, that this is the mind-blowing, epochal, paradigm-shifting story the world's been waiting for.
Now, you've written about this subject, Ross.
So you've got to know a lot more than you're letting on.
What revelations, I'm scared as well Ross, what revelations are you prepared to give us here?
OK, well, I mean, the simple fact is what you just what you just detailed there, Russell, is what David Grush alleged to me in the News Nation interview.
The simple fact is that there is a defence office pre-publication security review approval for Dave Grush's interview, a DOD approved document where Dave Grush set out what he wanted to talk about.
And in that document he talked about non-human intelligences engaging with this planet, about agreements implicitly between those NHIs and the human race, about crash retrievals, recoveries, reverse engineering programs.
Now, the simple fact of that so-called DOPSA document, the fact that there's a Defence Department approval, doesn't mean the DoD saying what Grush is saying is true.
But I know that what Grush is saying has verification from multiple other sources.
People like me, I'm a professional journalist, I'm an old-fashioned journo who goes out and develops sources and builds up networks of people who help me with information.
When I was writing my book, In Plain Sight, I started to get calls from people who were giving me information from within the Legacy Crash Retrieval Program.
And I can't say definitively, I know it's true, because I haven't yet seen these craft.
I haven't seen the secret documents that David Grush has seen.
But what he's done, what this incredibly brave man has done, is he's come forward,
not only to the Inspector General of the Defense Department and the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community,
he's also testified under oath to the Congress, to the two oversight committees,
the House Intelligence Committee and the Senate Intelligence Committee.
If he's lying, send him to jail, prove it and send him to jail.
If he's not lying, then that's the test.
I know he's not lying.
I know he's telling the truth.
And what really gives me the, it pisses me off, Russell, because I'm a journo who has spent much of my life
in mainstream media, and I'm seeing newspapers like the New York Times, the Washington Post,
the London Times, all of these papers are suppressing this story.
Not because they're being told to by the intelligence community, because they don't have the capacity anymore for critical thinking like you do, and like so many other shows that are starting to develop online do.
The simple fact is mainstream media is failing to cover this issue, and I've never in my long career as a journalist been so shocked And confronted by the fact that what we're looking at here is we're seeing unfold at the moment the biggest story in human history.
This is the story of non-human intelligences engaging with this planet.
And I've heard this from US intelligence officials, defence department officials, scientists who have literally touched the side of these craft.
It's real, as best as I can tell.
And a man like Grush deserves to be embraced by your audience and supported.
And I really applaud you for doing what you're doing and having the independence of thought and the critical thinking to engage with this subject.
Ross, that's so fantastic.
You've really raised the temperature.
You're obviously a credible journalist yourself, not prone to hysteria, even if you do sometimes lean in dramatically to your subjects.
You've raised the temperature so much, I've undone another button on my shirt to celebrate.
Now, one of the revelations I'd like us to discuss, and this is an opportunity for us to use our unique platform here on Rumble, particularly on Locals, and if you're watching us on Rumble, join us on Locals now.
Press that red button on your screen.
Why don't you collectively use Google Earth?
Why don't we use Alphabet's utilities for good?
If you have a look at Area 51 now in Nevada, you'll see a mountain in that region which many claim has visible entrances and exits that are currently being used by these UFOs, by these NIHs.
I'm not sure what acronym to use anymore, but we can do this research right now ourselves.
You lot in the chat have a look at our production company.
Bad Graphics Jack could have a little poke around.
I mean it seems to me that in some cases it's almost ludicrously ordinary that these interactions have been going on for a long time, there are sort of bureaucratic diplomatic agreements, there have been conversations, there have been trade agreements almost, there are the rights to access certain territories, legitimized exchanges of human life, stuff that the mainstream media will Understandably, to a degree, Ross, treat as ludicrous, because given the conditioning we've received up to now, it seems implausible to discuss it until you increase the size of your frame to include the evident reality that the cosmos is without limitation, both temporally and spatially, and within that framing, a more advanced species, whether that's extraterrestrial or interdimensional,
It is a literal inevitability, and the likelihood of exchanges increases exponentially on that basis.
And then the idea that, oh, why haven't they landed on the White House lawn?
Well, it seems like every time that there is credible evidence, it's suppressed, it's undermined, it's reframed, it's rephrased, whether it's footage.
Oh, look, we're looking for that mountainscape now.
There's really good footage of that.
So do you think that, in a sense, Ross, that what this challenges us to do, as both recipients and creators of media, is to responsibly broaden out our framing.
Absolutely.
I mean, just to give you an example of just how absurd this is, that this story is being overlooked, Russell.
Your and my mate Jeremy Cordell, with his colleague George Knapp, broke a story in the last 12 hours about a document that I've known about for some months.
And in that document, a Canadian MP, a Member of Parliament in Canada called Larry Maguire, writes to the Canadian Defence Minister and reveals that he has investigated and discovered a secret Canadian collaboration with the US on UAP crash retrievals.
The Canadians have been allegedly working on non-human technology in collaboration with the US government.
And it's really interesting, you know, at the moment my government in Australia is about to spend $400 billion on nuclear attack submarines from the United States.
I think it's an important political and economic issue as a journalist that our government, at a time when it's being encouraged to spend $400 billion, It's part of a secret Five Eyes agreement called the Foreign Material Exploitation Program where they are literally recovering, according to this letter from this Canadian MP, craft from another world and involved in attempts to back engineer and reverse engineer that.
And frankly, I appreciate that for a lot of people in this forum here, hearing this, they might think, well, Christ, that sounds crazy.
That sounds impossible.
What a load of bollocks.
The truth is, the ontological shock of that shouldn't deter them from pushing for this to be investigated.
Because what the White House, what the Pentagon, what the intelligence community is relying on is your audience, not As Jeremy says, weaponizing their curiosity.
They need to indulge their curiosity and start asking questions.
It's like, you know, it's funny actually, listening to your show, I hear so often things that make me wonder as a journalist, has society lost its capacity for critical thinking?
Just because a bunch of experts or pompous twats in Washington say something, why should we necessarily believe it?
We should test it.
We should always challenge claims.
And the thing that really shocks me at the moment is we are lurching towards a new kind of authoritarianism in media, where this kind of group of lumpenproletariat journalists basically make the decisions about what we're all meant to think.
And there's an absence now.
There's a disconnect between critical thinking and what's put into our papers and to our media.
We really do need to test this UAP subject.
And what David Grush has done, and what Larry Maguire in Canada has done with the letter that he's written to his defence minister, is open the argument.
Let's call David Grush's bluff.
Let's go to the Pentagon.
Let's go to the Defense Department.
Let's ask Joe Biden.
What's the truth of this?
If it's a lie, they're all going to jail because they've lied under oath.
If it's not a lie, it means this is the biggest story in human history.
That's an extraordinary piece of analysis.
Of course, your countryman Julian Assange is currently in His Majesty's Belmarsh without trial for making similarly important revelations.
I certainly agree with you that the media are controlling this space in curious ways.
Blit up the chat there.
Many people just can't get their heads around the idea that this kind of story is on the mainstream at all, or on CNN.
They feel that these stories are being used as a distraction.
They still want more reliable footage.
They still want plain evidence.
But remember, I've been in this conversation for a long time now.
So, like, I read all the Eric Von Daniken stuff, and all of the Timothy Goode stuff, and I've always felt that The way the architecture of our systems of governance and our understanding of reality has always precluded and prevented the incorporation of non-terrestrial life because it asks so many questions of our power structures.
It blows the paradigm apart.
It means that it's pointless, senseless, having geographical conflicts with other human tribes.
It becomes plain, necessary to accept the reality that in a sense we're one people,
not with one government, with decentralized, localized, collectivized democracies that
acknowledge that we need to have access to our systems of control and that to place power
in the hands of one establishment elite is ridiculous.
Also above all else, it demonstrates that they've been lying.
Ross, thank you so much for joining us.
I know it's late at night there in the Antipodes.
You've done such a fantastic performance.
I didn't think you would be capable of doing live what you do so beautifully in your fantastic interview there with David Grosh.
Thanks for coming on and advocating for us and thank you for your kind words as well.
Thank you, mate, and thank you for your show.
Get to see you again soon, Ross.
Come on again.
And when I'm in Australia in February, I'd love to come and see you and do something with you.
Please do.
And once we're in the same physical space, then we can really get some chemistry rocking.
I want those lean.
Now I'm scared.
I want those kind of moments, Ross.
That's what I demand.
Ross's book In Plain Sight is out now.
We'll post a link to that in the chat.
Now, there's a hell of a lot to discuss.
You guys know that we are interested in conveying to you the most important stories We're interested in revealing to you the deepest truth.
We're interested in uncovering the most profound conspiracies.
This, even though I struggle to convey this bit of information to you, and you know me Gareth, I don't usually struggle to like stop whatever things I do.
Do you like it?
Did you enjoy Ross Coulthard there?
I thought it was absolutely wonderful.
I thought it was fantastic.
What a brilliant contribution there from Ross.
I understand, I appreciate what you're saying guys.
A lot of you think, oh no man, they're propagandizing this issue.
But I tell you, it fascinates me.
I've just heard some interesting stuff, some interesting stuff.
And this is yet another fascinating revelation.
During the time when we were discussing the Covid origins and we were told that it's, you know, it's begun naturally, this is something that's emerged from nature, it definitely didn't come from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, one thing that seemed almost impossible to contemplate is that we, and in the case of our American brothers and sisters over there, you, Literally, through your labour, through your toil, through your sweat, through your taxes, you funded gain-of-function research.
Now, we've been talking about elsewhere Bill Gates' involvement.
We're going to go deeper into some of the things that Rand Paul has said about Bill Gates' involvement in funding of the WHO and various vaccine enterprises.
But for now, we're going to focus on your funding of gain-of-function on our item.
Here's the news.
No!
Here's the fucking news.
Here's the fucking news!
Credible evidence suggests that the first people that got coronavirus worked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
And a new report tells us that US taxpayers funded it.
So in a way, we, if you're a US taxpayer, caused and funded the whole pandemic.
Thanks a lot, us.
The first people that contracted coronavirus worked, by coincidence, at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Now there's no evidence that tells us that they hadn't just been in a bat cave for their own reason, brushing up against bats, sniffing bats, maybe even licking bats.
But that, coupled with the fact that US taxpayers funded that research, starts to demonstrate perhaps why particular narratives were amplified and others were undermined, withdrawn and shut down.
This is an important conversation about power.
It involves some of the most influential institutions in the world.
What can we learn from this?
How can we prevent it happening again?
And I don't just mean more pandemics.
I mean more global corruption.
Details on the origins of the coronavirus suggest that the virus escaped from a Chinese lab in Wuhan.
Of course it did!
It's so strange, isn't it, the way that this has unfolded.
Let me know in the chat if you already have a kind of fatigue around this, if you've stopped concentrating on it.
The way to keep yourself engaged and interested is by reminding yourself about what happened during that two-year period, the way that information was censored, the way that people were ridiculed, the way that certain solutions were quite aggressively pushed, the rhetoric on the news.
People should be shamed.
All of this is just months ago, months ago.
Now being revealed explicitly and plainly is, you were right the whole time.
Fox News Chief Washington Correspondent Mike Emanuel tonight with the new report and the findings on who were the first to be infected.
Not only did we confirm that the virus came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.
Also, just at a glance, it doesn't look safe enough, does it?
It looks too old.
It looks like a terrible high school building.
They're not trying hard enough in there.
They're probably not washing their hands.
They're definitely not more than a meter and a half per side, and I bet they weren't even vaccinated.
A new report on the online platform Substack says scientists at the lab in Wuhan were the first COVID-19 patients in the fall of 2019 while conducting controversial gain-of-function research.
The story names the scientists as Ben Hu, Yu Peng, and Yan Zhu.
Chinese scientists Ben Hu, Ping Yu and Yan Zhu were the first humans to contract COVID-19.
Don't be childish and don't try and do that.
Who's got COVID?
What?
Who's got COVID?
Zhu's got COVID.
It came from a Zhu now?
No, look, one's called Hu and one's called Zhu.
Don't be racist.
That was the problem in the first place.
FBI Director Christopher Wray told Brett Baer the Bureau's theory about COVID's origin back on February 28th.
The FBI has for quite some time now assessed that the origins of the pandemic are most likely a potential lab incident in Wuhan.
Yet the White House Chief Medical Advisor during the pandemic has offered other explanations.
Totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human.
We have an open mind, but it looks very, very much like this was a natural occurrence.
Be good if it was a natural occurrence, because that would mean it wasn't entirely my fault.
Dr. Robert Redfield was CDC director during the pandemic.
I'm very disappointed in how he's responded to this.
Largely, I think it's grounded in his advocacy for gain-of-function research.
Most scientists are exactly that.
People that are interested in facts.
Science can lead to dogma because research and experimentation can lead to temporary conclusions that are then held onto.
But when science becomes commercialized, commodified, institutionalized, when they have financial
relationships with pharmaceutical companies, when they have financial relationships with
other nations, when they fund research that is potentially dangerous because it could
one day be profitable, and I don't mean profitable to our species, profitable commercially.
You know how the pharmaceutical industry is run.
You know how they lobby.
Does the pharmaceutical industry have no interest in mind but for the health and well-being of ordinary human beings?
Of course it doesn't.
It's a commercial enterprise.
If they can heal a few people along the way, that's fantastic.
I'm not being reductive about science.
I am reliant and dependent upon medical experts for the well-being of important members of my family continually.
One of the things that gives me faith in them is knowing that they are not driven by commercial objectives.
Can we say the same about Anthony Fauci at this point?
Can we say the same about the organizations and bureaucracies that surround the pharmaceutical industry that funded this kind of research, that clearly push one narrative, presumably in order to avoid further analysis?
I don't think we can, can we?
Kansas Senator Roger Marshall says these latest revelations make China and Fauci look bad.
That's the news.
Wait a minute.
These revelations make you look bad.
No, that's not very scientific.
Get out of here.
Who?
You.
What?
The nonpartisan Government Accountability Office is out with a new report which found that U.S.
taxpayer dollars flowed to Chinese entities, including the Wuhan lab, ahead of the COVID-19 outbreak.
Just spend a moment reflecting on the fact that during all that time you were watching funerals on YouTube, you were locked in your house, you were worried about whether to wear masks, you were worried about whether or not to take particular medications, you were blaming other people for not taking medications, you were wondering which news sources you could rely on, you were querying conspiracy theories versus facts, you were wondering what information should be safely censored.
The whole time, you were paying for the whole farrago.
You paid for this?
Well, no, you didn't pay for it.
Who paid for it?
No, look, they caused it, but they didn't pay for it.
Phew!
No, phew wasn't involved.
Maybe have risky gain-of-function research at Wuhan Institute of Virology, but could we vote on that?
Wouldn't you like to be invited to participate in those kind of things?
We're about to spend your money on gain-of-function research at a lab that we suspect might be a bit shady about the old window shutting and hand washing.
No, how about a road?
Not an option.
You can bomb Afghanistan again.
All right, bomb Afghanistan then.
Now, we can't fund our important research without money from the NIH and all them other agencies.
In fact, we also need your money, ironically.
What I will say to you is our commercial partners are reliable and the commercials for their products are fun.
Here's one right now.
Stay to the end.
Are we on the verge of an environmental apocalypse?
Is AI gonna destroy all mankind?
Are we powerless to choose peace in the face of military-industrial complex objectives?
And where the heck are my khaki now?
Dealing with questions like those ones is enough to make you exhausted, but thanks to GenuCell skincare, you can still look and feel amazing.
Like me.
You'd never know I care about anything.
Not with this eyelid treatment.
Straight look at that now.
The eyelids have never been better.
GenuCell skincare is a natural line of products for both men and women, whoever you are.
Nothing is tested on animals, so they're completely cruelty-free with natural, high-quality ingredients, and everything is made exclusively in the USA.
And I know exactly what I'm getting with their products, because everything is still formulated to this day from the same pharmacist.
His name's George.
All right, George.
He founded the company over 20 years ago.
You'd not know it, though, because he looked like a nine-year-old boy.
Because of these products.
So if you're invested in your health and personal wellness like I am, then start and end your day with GenuCell.
Their Summer Essentials Package is currently available at an incredible introductory price.
Just go to GenuCell.com forward slash brand and take an extra 10% off your entire order.
That's GenuCell.com forward slash brand.
The gift of eternal life.
The National Institutes of Health and US Agency for International Development, USAID, provided 2.2 million, more or less, in grant funding to the Chinese research institutions between 2014 and 2021, according to the Government Accountability Office.
The report shows 1.4 million in sub-grants allocated by the Manhattan-based EcoHealth Alliance went to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where hazardous research was conducted on bat coronaviruses.
If you're going to do research on bat coronaviruses, it shouldn't be hazardous, should it?
It shouldn't be risky and dangerous.
You might think that 1.4 and 2.2 are relatively low figures, but the fact is, is at the very
beginning, as soon as that bell started ringing and that siren started going off and that
flag started being waved, Andy Fauci, who throughout it was held up as some bastion
of sensible science, oh look at him behind Trump going, oh, and pulling a face, we can
rely on him, why don't we have him in charge?
Well, he could have said, bloody hell, this is a bit inconvenient and embarrassing because
we've been funding the Wuhan Institute of Virology, so if it did come from there, I'm
almost sort of directly responsible or indirectly responsible at very least.
That should have been made clear as soon as they knew it.
And it seems from email exchanges, they were considering the possibility it came from Wuhan
and obviously, one might imagine they knew about their own financial involvement or the
fact that the agencies that they run are involved in the regulation and allocation of grants.
So, the whole way that this has been handled, obviously, involves obfuscation and deceit.
How do you feel about trusting those same bodies, those same organisations, that same system and mindset, with ongoing current issues right now?
The way that you're conveying information on a host of stories, the way that you're taxed on a raft of issues, intersects with these same agencies, and certainly this same mindset.
Today, the GAO confirmed that US taxpayer dollars awarded from the National Institutes of Health and USAID were ultimately used for research by entities in China, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was known to be doing coronavirus research, said House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Mike Turner.
We've long argued that the American people deserve the truth about COVID-19's origin and continue to take concrete actions to declassify intelligence related to the pandemic.
There's a broader argument to assess here, the role that we afford science and particularly corporatized, pharmacological, medical science and the institutions around it.
Of course, throughout the pandemic, they were presented as the solution to the problem.
Whereas this narrative suggests that they are the cause of the problem.
As long as the narrative remains, oh, it just emerges from nature.
What's nature?
It's like saying, this just happened because of luck, circumstance, chance, the way things are.
And science has come in to solve it.
Science has no moral quality.
Science is simply the investigation of data and conclusions drawn from exploration, experimentation, and trial.
But when science is purposed politically and economically, it is no longer science.
It's just a set of tools to serve a political aim and an economic aim.
And what we were arguing throughout the pandemic period is you're calling this science, but it's only an aspect of science.
You're shutting down some voices.
You're elevating other voices.
Now we're reaching the point where it's becoming difficult to ignore the possibility that American taxpayer dollars were ultimately spent at a substandard facility that The funding figure may not reflect the full amount, since sub-awards of fewer than $30,000 don't need to be reported in government records.
It also shows you how bureaucracy is used to mask and conceal facts, that there's one agency, then another agency, and a sub-grant.
It's not clear, is it?
And given that something so significant has happened, it's obviously an opportunity to review the way these funding procedures take place, and whether or not you even want experiments of this nature taking place at all.
A 2017 video aired by Chinese state-run television reportedly shows Hu watching a lab worker handle specimens while neither is wearing protective gear, according to Public.
If they were worried about being infected in the field, they would need full bodysuits with no gaps, said Alina Qian, who co-authored the book Viral, the search for the origin of COVID-19.
She added that scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology conducted their research at a lower biohazard safety level of BSL-2, when we now know that the pandemic virus is even capable of escaping a BSL-3 lab and infecting fully vaccinated young lab workers.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former director of NIH's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, had denied to Congress earlier that year that US funding went to the controversial research project calling it a modest collaboration with very respectable Chinese scientists who were world experts on coronavirus.
Now it looks like clumsy Chinese scientists who weren't wearing the proper lab gear explicitly funded and oh look Anthony Fauci's retired now so he's nicely out of the way.
All of the obscuring obfuscation and doublespeak has led to Something that many people suspected right back in early 2020.
That virus has come from a lab.
That lab takes funding from American interests.
The American government knows about this and they're pushing an agenda and a narrative that it's come from nature in order to To avoid the responsibility for causing this in the first place.
That doesn't mean that the whole thing was a conspiracy, although there are plenty of people out there who believe that it is.
But you can sort of follow a trail from the inception of this disease to enormous profits and expedient actions for government that start to make it look like it was either a colossal mistake that we were lied about or worse than that.
Let me know in the chat in the comments which you think it is.
Fauci, who retired at the end of last year, tangled with Senator Rand Paul, in particular over the research, telling the senator during a May 11th 2021 hearing that he was entirely and completely incorrect that the NIH has not never and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Well, that's a lie under oath, isn't it?
Let me know in the chat.
Fauci has also repeatedly downplayed evidence of a lab leak and argued for the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 occurring naturally.
Well, there's two reasons why he might have argued for a natural emergence.
One being that's because he genuinely believes it's a possibility.
And another reason might be because if he is somehow culpable for the emergence of this virus. It would undermine his entire career, a
career that many people argue has been smeared elsewhere with comparable errors that we can't
go into now on this channel, but that we'd certainly go into on Rumble. The whole idea
that science provided a solution to a problem caused by nature now looks increasingly unreliable.
Increasingly, it looks like scientific experimentation underwritten by a corporate and commercial
and profit-driven agenda has led to a crisis that affected the lives of everybody on the
planet one way or another, and then we charged with coming up with a solution the same
people that caused the problem in the first place, while allowing affiliated organisations to
suggest to us the way that we should all conduct our own lives during that period.
And the fact that we're being asked to just forget about it now, The fact that we shut down opposing voices, that we're trying to present views that we now know to be true, shows you that this can be used as a kind of scalpel to cut apart the corpse of a corrupt and decaying system.
One that clearly is in need of much deeper analysis on the ongoing post-mortem of a system that appears to be dying before our very eyes.
But that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the chat.
See you in a second.
No.
Here's the fucking news!
Apologetic Pest says, I woulda worked in that lab in Wuhan.
It seems like fun.
Does seem like fun.
They're having a whale of a time down there, Woohoo and Zoo, ain't they?
Well, they don't have to wear all the protective gear.
Primal Colin 2 says, it wasn't a lab leak.
How much bat...
And then he says, well, back come, we're on Rumble, we can say that.
How much back come?
Their god is money, their god is... BRB gotta pee.
I don't think they realised how catchy it really was.
I've seen so much stuff with my own eyes, says Ashela.
I know there are extra-dimensional beings.
Oh, she's back on that subject there with our man.
It's stuck in my brain.
How did you even remember that bit?
It's stuck in my brain.
There they go.
You're chatting away.
Oh, sorry.
I got caught up in that.
I got caught up.
It was hypnotic.
God, join us in that chat.
It's a hypnotic and beautiful community.
We are going to go over to locals now for a little bit more of an intimate conversation.
All you've got to do is press the red button on your screen to join us there and get early access to forthcoming interviews like Jack Dorsey, the Twitter co-founder, is coming up.
Elon's going to do the show soon.
Shall I text him again?
No.
JP, Jordan Pearson, we'll do him again soon.
Plus, we do meditations with you about the subjects that you care about.
For example, say you've got a little broke heart or something like that, we'll do a meditation on it.
Did you say you?
Who are you talking about?
The Chinese scientists?
You!
If you feel guilty about who's behaviour in the lab there, spilling all that bat wash name all up the walls, sneezing it up your ooty, you soppy sods, why don't you concentrate down over there in Wuhan?
People talking about my beard seems short.
Yeah, I trimmed it down to see what I look like with a bit of a moustache.
I think I look...
Rather sexy.
But you can tell me in the chat.
John with the wind?
I don't know.
Apparently he had bad breath.
Clark Gable.
That's what they say.
And you definitely don't.
I've got lollipop!
That's why I'm saying it.
Keep the nashes clean.
I used to say, if you're going to be dirty, you've got to be clean, baby.
But these days, I'm married, none of that stuff matters.
Okay, so listen, you can see my stand-up special, Brandemic.
It premieres on the 25th of June on Moment.
Pre-order your tickets now at moment.co forward slash Russell Brand.
On tomorrow's show, we've got Dr. Mark Hyman talking about the medical-industrial complex, the FDA, and Obama.
There he is, just in his kitchen, just with a shelf bifurcating his back of his bonce look near a plant.
Who couldn't trust him?
He weren't disgust.
He never came up in our meetings, did he?
Mark, I first have heard of him.
What's he going to talk about?
What's he got to say for himself?
Who's booked him?
You, James, is it?
You've done that from your set, eh?
Who is it?
What's he done?
He's a kitchen salesman.
I've got a kitchen.
I've got a good one.
No, well, look at that one, though.
Oh, you haven't got an oven like that.
Well, because of that pumice and grindstone or whatever they call it.
What's he going to talk about?
Look at this.
It's lovely.
What?
Use your mic.
Hello.
Medical industrial complex.
Oh, the medical-industrial complex.
There you go.
All right.
So he's coming on, and then, uh, state of a sudden... What an introduction!
That's probably all right, I don't know.
Oh, yeah, it looks nice.
It looks nice.
He's smiling away, look.
Uh, join us, don't be like, but, and also, Amy Golden, maybe?
We've got some good people coming up later this week.
As well as!
Simon Jordan, he's coming on.
Yoga with Adrienne, she coming on.
We've got a lot of staff.
Good gear, that's good gear.
Join us tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
We're on Locals now, so see you on Locals.
Press the red button, join us there.
We're going to do some funny mad stuff about Boris Johnson at Glastonbury.
We're going to talk about Edward Snowden a bit.
We're going to answer your questions.
Press that red button, join us there.
Stay free!
Switch on.
▲
Export Selection