Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 9, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

59:32

RFK Jr. Drops BOMBSHELL: CIA Behind JFK Assassination?! - #125 - Stay Free With Russell Brand

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This video is not meant to offend anyone. It's just a game.
	I'm just saying. Thank you. I hope you enjoy.
	Thank you for watching.
	In this video, you're going to see the future.
	Hello there, you awakening wonders.
	Thanks.
	No, no.
	What do you mean?
	No, no.
	What?
	I'm a professional.
	Ready.
	Ready for the show.
	You timed that to perfection.
	Did you see that?
	Get your little titty boobs out.
	I'm an old-school broad, baby!
	I was ready on time, doing the old Barney in the monitor.
	There we go, and it's going to be a great show for you today.
	We've got a very, very special show.
	We're talking about democracy, as a matter of fact, and the various ways that the Biden administration shuts down opposition, whether it's on TikTok by booting out Marianne Williamson's successful TikTok videos, or refusing To debate our man RFK, Robert F. Kennedy, who's going to be on the show Friday.
	Big show!
	Schedule it!
	Schedule it!
	Because this is it!
	We've got... We've got... I mean, is it a fox inside the hen house?
	I don't know the right way of saying it is.
	We've got one of us within the establishment.
	We've got someone that is anti-corporation.
	They're saying they're going to disband the CIA.
	That's openly saying that the CIA killed his uncle.
	Allegedly!
	I was thinking, like, when he's on here, like, on the show on Friday, and you've got to tune in, unless you're a member of Locals, like, then, you know, you can join us live, because we're actually doing the conversation straight after this.
	Like, when he says, I believe that it's beyond reasonable doubt that the CIA killed my uncle, do I have to sort of go like that?
	Allegedly.
	Presently, literally, and is the little fart there disrespectful?
	It is a little, yeah.
	But you've still got to do it, because it can't be one rule for one another, can it?
	There you go.
	Principles, Russ.
	Before personalities.
	If the principles and the values are real, they will see you through life.
	We've got a great guest coming on, it's Professor Max Abrams.
	He's going to be telling us about the Kremlin drone strike.
	What's fascinating about this, you'll love this, Yeah, I think so, because on the mainstream news, CNN, all those lot, they go, it's a false flag attack.
	And I was like, hold a minute.
	I didn't think that the normal news said things like false flag attack, because it's always other people saying, oh, is that a false flag attack?
	False flag?
	You lot say false flag, don't you?
	Down there in locals.
	Join that locals community, by the way.
	If you're watching this on YouTube, we're only going to be on YouTube for about 20 minutes, because then it's going to get dicey, dicey, conspiracy.
	We're going to talk about stuff that is free speech stuff, stuff that you can't talk about when you've got people No!
	What one?
	Why do they do it?
	What if that was critical of the establishment?
	Like that.
	Another video demonetised on YouTube for no reason.
	No!
	What one?
	It's back now.
	Why do they do it?
	Well, they just do.
	Our precious monetisations!
	That's what we're in it for, baby!
	We've got to pay for it.
	Do you think that these socks pay for themselves?
	Of course they don't.
	Do you think West Ham send me them for nothing?
	They have done by now.
	We've had them for years.
	They're different ones.
	It's not just the same ones.
	All right, I'll bring in two at once then.
	I'll bring in two at once.
	But while we're on the subject of the saucy little devils that occupy the Tootsie Roll, look at this bit of news.
	Someone's making a terrible mistake over at Hilton Hotels.
	Look at this from the mainstream.
	...to find Neil sucking on his toes.
	He immediately confronted him and recognized him as a member of the hotel staff.
	Neil admitted that he entered the room... Stop!
	Come in!
	Right, that's in there.
	Right, Dan, turn around.
	Defrost the glass.
	Have a look at the team in there.
	Have a look at... He's in trouble.
	Right, defrost it.
	Now, let's see on the monitor.
	Let me see the TX on the monitor so I can see them, please.
	Come on, let's see what you're doing.
	Right.
	Now, who was doing that?
	Put your hand up so we can see.
	Not Phil.
	Phil is a professional.
	And there's a finger, a pointed finger.
	Jamie.
	Actual Jamie.
	Someone who's worked in television, whose own mother dressed Bergerac.
	Right.
	Bergerac's a cop show in the UK.
	It's our version of The Equaliser.
	Yeah, good reference, yeah.
	It's our version of The Equaliser.
	Say that.
	Alright, so listen.
	Let's play that in again.
	This is a news story from The Hill.
	This is the worst thing to have in a hotel since Watergate.
	Let's have a look at it.
	The man reported that he woke up to find Neil sucking on his toes.
	He immediately confronted him and recognized him as a member of the hotel staff.
	Neil admitted that he entered the room, but claimed he did so due to the smell of smoke.
	There was no record of that claim.
	You can't say that the reason you're working at a hotel, what you're doing in here.
	I can smell smoke.
	What, what, did you think my toes were on fire?
	And you're just trying to suck the fire out of my toes?
	You can't do that.
	That's a transgression against the Hotel V guest contract.
	Right.
	Isn't it?
	Yeah, because I don't think smoke has ever come out of anyone's toes.
	Maybe Michael Jackson's when he's moonwalking.
	Nice.
	And how did he come up with those sounds?
	By brawling his own pappy, you said.
	That was in a biopic, a Michael Jackson biopic.
	But that's not what we're here to discuss.
	We're here to discuss important ideas like democracy and how it's slowly being closed down.
	Did you know that when Joe Biden was Vice President, he was accused of taking some bribes?
	I think the accusation comes from earlier when he No, this is going on at the moment.
	So this is like the GOP, what they're saying is the FBI, because of a whistleblower has come forward to say the FBI is a document that is detailing a bribe that Biden took as vice president.
	And what they're saying is release that document, which I think if it was the other way around, I mean, people are saying, oh, this is just the Republicans.
	They're just trying to smear Biden.
	But if it was Trump, you would want that, wouldn't you?
	I don't know, I wouldn't care either way.
	It's probably in his garage.
	Let's have a look at the prosecutors bugging on Hunter Biden.
	What I like about Hunter Biden, right, is he got himself a nice little job at Burisma, a Ukrainian gas fuel.
	He also got himself He also didn't declare the earnings he was making apparently at some of these foreign dealings.
	like yeah I think when you buy a gun you have to go on the form just to check
	you can look after this gun correctly you're not on drugs are you and he put
	no I'm not on drugs but in effect he was actually on drugs so like that's that is
	a badass move isn't it? He also didn't declare the earnings he was making
	apparently some of these foreign dealings so it's another fairly badass
	move. Are you doing anything for work at the moment?
	Not really, just doing some drugs, buying guns, staying out of trouble.
	Oh, also, I've got this job at Burisma, Ukrainian gas firm.
	How did you get it?
	Dunno, just, I know a lot about gas.
	Some of these things are probably allegedly, I would imagine.
	Also, I don't want to criticise Hunter Biden that much, because I feel like, ah, he's trying his best.
	Or do you guys want to?
	What do you lot think in the chat?
	We don't know.
	We don't want to patronise you.
	Hey, so what I think is more important, you tell me, we're interested in what you think, No.
	is that Biden won't debate democratic rivals because I suppose he ain't obliged to undertake
	a primary process. But wouldn't you feel reassured to know that Joe Biden's willing to take on
	all comers like Friday's guest on the show, RFK, or Marianne Williamson, people that are
	coming out of left field. But let's face it, if we're going to change the world, what are
	you gonna have more of the same more career politicians that have allegedly been taking
	bribes their whole lives? Or do you want people that are radical that understand emotions
	that are willing to talk out against the establishment in the figure of RFK, a person that's won
	incredible cases against corporate giants like Monsanto, who from an environmental perspective,
	should be a hero of the left has been taken down prefix of anti-vaxxer.
	I can't wait to talk to this geezer on Friday, because I'm going to say, how are they going to come for you?
	What are they going to smear you as?
	How are they going to shut you down?
	Will it just be with the anti-vaxxer stuff?
	It's going to be cool, isn't it?
	Also, I'm going to be asking, well, asking whatever questions you lot ask.
	That's why it's worth joining Locals, because you can watch us live straight after this show, talking to RFK, which will form the body of the Friday show here on Rumble.
	If you're watching us on YouTube, take that journey, man.
	You've got to just keep getting deeper and deeper and deeper.
	It's crazy, isn't it?
	What I'm going to be saying to him is, are you serious about disbanding the CIA?
	Are you serious in your claim that it's beyond reasonable doubt, and we'll be doing that story in more detail in a minute, that the CIA murdered JFK?
	I mean, that's sort of like a heavy thing that we've all talked about.
	I mean, how many conspiracy... There ain't gonna be no conspiracy theories left.
	Aliens?
	Yep, we've had them ages.
	JFK killed?
	Yep, done it ages ago.
	The other one about the old cold with the PR campaign?
	You know, there's so many now, isn't there?
	It's amazing.
	So we're gonna have a good conversation with him.
	Anyway, I think that, you know, if I was being the old... If I was president of America, and I think we'd all love that, I would debate all comers to show people how confident I was.
	Yeah, I mean, I think that's the argument at the moment.
	I think it's not just Biden.
	The last four presidents haven't done it because, as you say, they're not obliged to do it.
	But the very fact is that there's been a poll by Newsweek and the very people that voted for Biden, I think it's like 74% of them, want him to debate other candidates.
	So this is, by its very nature, anti-democratic.
	If what people are saying is, we want to see you come up against other democratic candidates.
	We'll get to that in a second.
	Let's have a look at the mainstream media talking about how right on it is to not have any democracy in the Democratic Party.
	like calling your newspaper The Independent when it's funded by the Saudi Arabian state
	to the tune of 50% and then criticising old Russ who's one of the last true darlings,
	I would say. I'd say that. Also it's not just expunging debate from the Democratic Party
	process but it's beyond that on TikTok and stuff. We'll get to that in a second. Let's
	have a look at the mainstream media talking about how right on it is to not have any democracy
	in the Democratic Party. Check it.
	Bobby Kennedy Jr.
	Doing well.
	He's at 19%.
	Has a real... He looks like Matthew Perry from Friends, doesn't he?
	And she looks like that lady that was on that show where I was on.
	Well, she is the lady.
	Right.
	It's all starting to make sense.
	He's gotten that much out there.
	I mean... He's Joe.
	In jail, yeah.
	This lady, I've seen her before on MSNBC.
	She was the one with Jen Psaki last week.
	Oh yeah, we covered that.
	When they were talking about how brilliant the White House press conference dinner is, how democratic it all is.
	Oh yeah, so democratic, people can come and have a little giggle about stuff in parliamentary politics.
	She's Simone Sanders, former spokesperson for Kamala Harris.
	Who actually, you could say, does need a spokesperson.
	Goo goo on your old job back, mate.
	Because Kamala Harris, whenever she talks, she sort of says things like, I like Venn diagrams, though, didn't I once?
	She says that a lot.
	She's on a crazy trip, particularly about Venn diagrams in particular, so go get your job back.
	But we were saying, weren't we, that Jen Psaki and the last who does it now, Jean-Pierre or whatever, they all go from MSNBC, CNN, then back again.
	It's It's a sort of crazy old world.
	That's why you need something like RFK getting amongst it saying we're going to end those kind of the donation culture.
	We're going to end perhaps the pro... like the things I'm going to ask you about is will you end people in Congress owning stocks and shares in companies they're meant to regulate?
	You're going to shut the CIA down.
	What are you going to do about Big Pharma?
	What are you going to do about like... Surveillance is one of his big ones as well.
	Is he big on surveillance?
	Yeah, big on shutting down the surveillance that's going on at the moment.
	But you're never going to hear him do this in a debate.
	There should be debates.
	There's no right... let's do a...
	Let's do a goddamn poll.
	We could do a poll.
	Like, we want to, like, tell us whether or not you think there should be a debate while we have a look at them saying that there should be a debate and there don't need to be.
	And I'm starting to hear more and more talk about him.
	Are we going to actually have a challenge here?
	I'm trying not to laugh, Joe.
	There's not going to be- Can I stop you for a second?
	Do you know how many people said the same thing about Donald Trump in 2015 on this show?
	Except I will note- Said the same exact thing.
	Yes, because there was going to be a Republican primary.
	But I really think that the mealy-mouthed Democrats, as I like to call them, and some of my progressive friends who would like to live in a fantasy land, they need to come back to reality.
	And the reality is this.
	The sitting president of the United States of America is a Democrat.
	A Democrat that would like to run for re-election, so much so that he has declared a re-election campaign.
	In that case, the Democratic National Committee will not facilitate Kamala Harris should get her back.
	She's confident.
	Yeah, definitely.
	When you see Kamala Harris chatting, I can't focus on what she's doing.
	This woman is amazing.
	She's a good talker.
	She's very, very strong.
	But I think what they're fundamentally saying is there's no requirement to have one.
	So why would you have one?
	Joe Biden would not fare well in a debate against really anyone.
	Well, anyone.
	I mean when there was a lot of questions about how he would fare mentally moving forward anyway, I think, I mean this isn't me speaking, this is American people, 34% are, that's the only kind of confidence they have in him.
	When he debates himself, right, which is just, I would say, a speech, right, there's no one there opposing him.
	He's sort of like doing a speech and he's got to say, for example, some numbers.
	He gets all confused and then he argues back at himself about the numbers, then he gets all confused about it.
	So it's not just like within the accepted circles of the Democratic Party process where he is under no obligation,
	he's just been deftly described to have a debate.
	It's even in the less official spheres of TikTok.
	And we are thinking that they're trying to, you know, like they're like,
	oh, TikTok, got to bring TikTok down, even though all the things that TikTok do, other social media sites also do.
	Nevertheless, look, Biden's recruiting a TikTok army.
	Meanwhile, they're expunging Marianne Williamson TikTok successes.
	Let's have a look at that.
	Look, she's taking it over, but also she's getting banned.
	Have we got something about that?
	Yeah, look at that.
	TikTok moderators have banned at least two Marianne Williamson supporter accounts.
	So of course, Marianne Williamson, she's doing pretty well on there.
	Yeah, she's doing big numbers on TikTok.
	Guests on the show.
	So these are Biden supporters who've mass reported these accounts, but these accounts haven't done anything.
	Do you think that really happens?
	Do you think that what happens is there's a coordinated attempt to manipulate these accounts?
	We've just seen that Biden's campaign is significantly investing in online influencers.
	The Biden administration literally are getting this so-called army of TikTok influencers together.
	So there's a movement towards it.
	And as you say, the irony is that in one part of congressional hearings, they're trying to shut down TikTok.
	And the other part, they're like, we'll use it to our benefit and then censor the people who are our competitors.
	That is hypocrisy, if you are asking me.
	Let's have a look at one of those TikTok influencers right now.
	Or do you think that this is just a lad expressing his genuine self?
	Or do you think he's... He says he's not getting any money from this, he's just enthusiastic.
	So we can't say who he is.
	We don't know what kind of favours they get down the road either, you know.
	We don't know what kind of deals they're getting.
	What, like you might get a little sweet now?
	Well, yeah, I mean, apparently they're going to get their own briefing room or something at the White House, these TikTok influencers.
	They're going to get a briefing room?
	I'd like that.
	All right, let's have a look at what he's doing.
	What Republicans don't understand about Gen Z is that we're here to stay and we're only getting more powerful.
	In 2020, President Biden won because of young voters.
	In 2022, Democrats expanded their majority in the Senate because of young voters.
	In 2023, Wisconsin now has a liberal Supreme Court because of young voters.
	And we're going to do it again in 2024, and that should terrify the Republican Party.
	Certainly terrified me, just that level of enthusiasm.
	It is very.
	That's like you at very high energy, you.
	Yeah, yeah, I do that sometimes.
	But, like, he's got youth on his side, hasn't he, that youngster?
	He's very plucky.
	Well done, mate.
	Listen, so we've got a climate where Biden's investing in it.
	Marianne Williamson's being expunged from it.
	Also, Tulsi there, Tulsi Gabbard, also been on the show.
	Marianne Williamson, been on the show.
	RFK, coming on the show later.
	If you're a member on Locals, just join Locals.
	You can watch the show live.
	You can put your questions to RFK.
	She's been criticizing Joe Biden for his plan to expand CIA surveillance.
	And while Biden is saying that he wants to expand the CIA, one man with a great legacy name, one man from a dynasty, is saying that the CIA should be, well, that the CIA are guilty of murdering his uncle, JFK.
	If that's true, that's not something we can talk about over here on YouTube.
	If you're watching us on YouTube now, There's a link in the description.
	Make the short trip across your phone.
	I mean, you've only got to use your fingers.
	Sometimes I think what a mad world it is now that people actually find difficult to move from one app to another app.
	It's not that hard, is it?
	No.
	I'm always moved from one app to another app.
	One minute, take a photo.
	Next minute.
	Well, maybe I'll send a text.
	I don't know.
	Look, I do stuff in the world is what I'm saying.
	Now join us because we're going to get into some conspiracy theories, plus we're going to be having a look at what's gone on this week in history, plus we're going to have Max Abrams on the show who's going to tell us that the Kremlin did not bomb themselves in their own...
	Castle, what do you call the Kremlin?
	Drone themselves, yeah.
	Why would you drone yourself? Stop droning yourself!
	Well, if they're always doing it, the Russians, you know that they're always doing it.
	They're blowing up their own pipelines, they're droning themselves in their own Kremlin.
	There's no need to have a proxy war with Russia, just leave them on their own.
	They'll beat themselves eventually.
	Oh no, we've blown up a pipeline! Oh no, we've blown up our Kremlin!
	Right, so what are we going to say about JFK?
	Oh, we've got a news report of him saying this stuff.
	This is amazing.
	I love this guy.
	This person doing the news looks like they've just dragged him off the street to do the news from Toy Story or something.
	He's so innocent and sweet.
	Listen to his tone when he says, I'm hearing that maybe the CIA killed JFK.
	He's a fella called Alex.
	We're going to find him.
	Let's get him on the show.
	I'd love to.
	I want to see more of his news.
	If you can find any clips, post them in the chat.
	He talks about it like such a thing could never... Where you been, mate?
	Where you been?
	You do the news!
	Oh my god, there's been a robbery downtown!
	Oh no!
	Like, look how innocent he is.
	This world was never meant for one as beautiful as you.
	Let's check him.
	Democratic White House contender Robert Kennedy Jr.
	blaming the CIA for assassinating his uncle, former President John F. Kennedy.
	What?
	No.
	I'm surprised by that.
	Yeah, there's been a film about it.
	Everyone knows that the CIA for murdering, it couldn't have been Lee Harvey, what?
	No, wait a minute.
	Magic bullet, what?
	How did it get, wait a minute, that doesn't make sense.
	Hold on a minute.
	Both parties fundamentally support the same ideals and the pharmacy Hey, there was a wealth transfer during the pandemic!
	No way!
	Hang on a minute!
	What happened to Building 7?
	Castro kept... Hold on a second!
	We're watching him.
	I know you like to say red pill, don't you?
	You like saying red pill, don't you?
	Don't you like saying red pill?
	For us, that's just neurofence.
	But for you, it's the Matrix.
	It's a movement.
	He's getting red-pilled right on the telly.
	He's also got... I like him.
	He's a floppy-haired darling.
	Let's have a look at this report and, you know, significantly, RFK saying that the CIA murdered JFK beyond a reasonable doubt.
	And if they did do that, then no wonder he wants to disband them.
	Should he disband them?
	Do we need a CIA?
	What are they doing?
	They've got a lot of good PR, don't they?
	There's always some hunky actor playing someone from the CIA.
	It's what Tim Robbins said when he was on here.
	Right.
	That's how they do it.
	Propaganda.
	Yeah, get hunky actors on.
	Right.
	Kennedy, back on November 22nd, 1963.
	There's a 60-year cover-up.
	You know, the Warren Commission was run by Alan Dulles, who was the head of the CIA, who my uncle fired.
	Congress found that, yeah, it was a plot.
	It was a conspiracy.
	There were multiple people involved.
	JFK Jr.
	adding there is overwhelming evidence that the CIA was involved in his murder.
	I think it's beyond a reasonable doubt at this point.
	The CIA, of course, calls claims the agency was involved in the assassination.
	Can you see the figure of Abraham Lincoln just in the back of shot trying to warn JFK about presidential assassinations from beyond the grave?
	Wow.
	That's so exclusive today.
	Ghost warning.
	JFK a lie.
	Now Kennedy is citing James Douglas' book, JFK and the Unspeakable, as having the most evidence.
	Tonight, RFK Jr.
	calling on President Biden to release all the documents about his uncle's death and follow through.
	I wonder why they won't release those documents.
	Right.
	Why won't they?
	What?
	Because those documents contain plans for a surprise party for your birthday and you've ruined it!
	You're just like your father and your uncle who we also assassinated as well as Martin Luther King and Malcolm X and basically anyone who ever stood up for the values of ordinary people against the deep state corporate machine which is at this point taken over completely.
	If you want to watch me chat to JFK you can!
	Live!
	Oh, yeah, because from beyond the ground... No, that's disrespectful.
	I can't do that.
	I'm not like Abraham Lincoln's ghost lurking in the background, baby.
	No, that's a reason to subscribe.
	I have mastered talking to the dead, finally, at last, after much...
	Drug use.
	Finally, I've reached another transcendent realm where I can chat to people from beyond the grave.
	Now, RFK, which is a bloody good interview, in a minute.
	So join us over on Locals.
	Become a member of our community.
	I do weekly meditations there, which are absolutely fantastic.
	I was doing one earlier with Arizona.
	I can't remember how to say her name.
	It was a complicated name.
	But anyway, we've done a good meditation.
	She's training to be a doctor, and now she's got to do doctor exams.
	I was a lot of assistance to her.
	Does she feel more confident about them now?
	She's going to breeze through them exams.
	There's no question, Gareth.
	So anyway, join us over on Locals.
	Be part of our community.
	Be part of our movement.
	You don't want to be sloshing around there in the world with all nutbags.
	You want to be with us.
	And then when we start making proper communities, then we'll be ready.
	Also, Community Live, that's in mid-July.
	If you haven't got your tickets yet, get them now.
	Meet Vandana Shiva.
	Meet me.
	Meet Wim Hof.
	Meditate.
	Transcend.
	Don't do... Well, you can do drugs if you want.
	It's not up to me.
	It's none of my business, I suppose, is it?
	Um, no.
	I'm not the police.
	No, it isn't.
	Am I?
	No, it isn't.
	But as we talked about earlier, there's obviously a lot of calls at the moment for the decriminalization of drugs anyway.
	You're so professional.
	Right, okay.
	Are you pleased with yourself for that?
	Yeah.
	You handsome nitwit.
	Right, now listen, let's have a look at what we're going to do now is have a bit of fun by looking at how, you know,
	our old friend history.
	That's simply stuff that's happened already. This week in history, many things have happened.
	We asked you to vote for your favourite graphic sequence so we can see, you know, I don't know, we're just doing it for
	a laugh really, but look at the graphic sequence created by our team.
	You voted for this and now you've got it. Have a look at, what do we call it this week in history? Is that what it's
	called?
	I think so, yeah.
	Back to the Future, something like that. Have a look at the sequence.
	There you go.
	So, listen, this week, May 1947, for some reason NASA were experimenting on whether or not cats would float.
	Now, often we get that guy on here, don't we?
	What's he called?
	Andrzejewski.
	Andrzejewski, yeah.
	He runs an organisation called Open the Books where he makes government organisations reveal their expenditure on loopy stuff.
	He comes on in a little dickie bowtie and gets Russell, would you believe they spent two million dollars getting mice to put high heels on and parade around like little sluts?
	They coke them up to the nut bag, then watch them shit on a table!
	It cost millions of bucks!
	He's never said that.
	Allegedly!
	He never said that.
	But, like, look at this stuff where they're taking cats into space like a literal Schrödinger's cat.
	Like, that's the experiment, isn't it?
	Where the cat is simultaneously alive and dead until you open the box, which is just a metaphor used to explain the double-slit theory that wave and particles appear to collapse into one identity under observation.
	Well, you know, that's crazy enough for one year, baby.
	Wow, there you go.
	Check it out.
	But look at this cat.
	Like, look what they're doing to this cat.
	Though I've got so many cats, I'd like to send a couple up to space.
	Let's have a look at this.
	Go on, play it.
	In these experiments, you can see the disorientation resulting when an animal is suddenly placed in a weightless state.
	Cats, when dropped under normal conditions, will invariably...
	What is this?
	Also it says under normal conditions. There aren't normal conditions where cats should be picked up and dropped to
	the floor like that, are there?
	Of course, normally when you take a cat on a spaceship and drop it at normal gravity, those little guys twist like chubby
	checker and land on their little padded feet.
	Well I like to spread their paws and pick my teeth with their claws.
	They normally don't mind. What is this, science for perverts?
	They rotate their bodies longitudinally in midair and land on their feet.
	This automatic reflex action is almost completely lost under weightlessness.
	That's... I hope that weren't expensive.
	Right.
	Doing that cat gravity stuff.
	Look at it all.
	How did they get rid of that abuse?
	Says Tonebird.
	No, it's not right that they've done that.
	I also don't really get what it's for.
	Like, we already know how gravity works, don't we?
	Wait a minute!
	But what does it do to a cat?
	Yeah, he's gonna do the same thing!
	Okay, and now a fried egg!
	And now my penis!
	Like, what are you... Gravity just... You know what weightlessness is.
	You've just got garage against cats.
	Right.
	That's what's going on here.
	I think someone just fancied it was like non-uniform day or something.
	Just like, you get to do whatever you want today.
	Can we take a car out there, son?
	Yeah, going in!
	Yeah.
	I also like the name Gravity Cats.
	It's a nice sound.
	And we are, you know, we're starting a community and we've got to have something like Mug Club, like Crowder's got.
	We're thinking of calling ours.
	Could it be?
	Sorry, Crows Nest, Gravity Cats, or... I can't think of any others.
	What were the others?
	Those are the two best you've got.
	Yeah, that's all I've got.
	I'm not pleased with either of them.
	I'm not pleased with them.
	So why don't you come up with something?
	That's a good idea.
	You come up with it.
	Why have I got to do everything?
	You think I'm not under enough pressure?
	I've got kids and everything.
	All right, so that's Cat Gravity.
	Did you know that in May 1950, L. Ron Hubbard published Dianetics, or is it called Dianetics?
	I thought it was Dianetics.
	Dianetics.
	Dianetics.
	The Modern Science of Mental Health, which was, you know, sort of Scientology, a new muck religion.
	Not if you are a Scientologist, I don't mean to disrespect your religion, but it's a modern religion and ideology.
	It's quite a controversial one, let's face it, but all religions are in some ways a bit unusual.
	I'm making this worse, aren't I?
	Let's get into, uh, let's have a look at their mad video thing.
	That isn't mad, but interesting.
	Do you know someone who has never fully recovered from a serious loss in life?
	Or a traumatic experience?
	That is a bad one, that.
	I wouldn't, that's a rough one.
	So what Scientology has always done is gone for trauma.
	Trauma, it's interesting because I belong to groups that deal with trauma with a fusion of spirituality and psychiatry, but psychiatry only from an analytical perspective, because Scientology, they're double against psychiatry, aren't they?
	It's one of the things I don't like.
	That was pretty bad, that kid getting biffed around the bont.
	And also what the person was saying.
	DON'T YOU EVER!
	Like that.
	Yeah, these are very specific, all of these examples.
	What you start to think is if you had all of these things, I mean, they're appealing to an increasingly specific
	market.
	In your own day-to-day life, do you sometimes experience self-doubts, negative thoughts?
	I would throw cats into the air and just see what happens.
	Yeah, I was doing that for NASA, just be like, wait a minute, Scientology!
	That, my god, I've been in the Cape Canaveral like a dick, I could have been joining Scientology!
	But do you ever try to compose a guitar solo?
	It's gone from like real, sort of quite aggressive, like, you, don't you ever!
	Oh, but it's gonna fucking come out of a nice riff.
	It's like, that's not traumatic, that's just time consuming.
	Unreasonable fears, upsets, or irrational behavior?
	People lashing out.
	Why?
	For no good reason.
	Why's he done that?
	He actually just lashed at that man's hand.
	Yeah.
	There's no justification.
	Get that, I'd say float those guys back in space for half an hour.
	Get them relaxed.
	The painful experiences of our past clearly have an effect upon our present day.
	Do you ever jitter down the street much too quick?
	Out of focus?
	All blurry?
	But to what degree and why?
	What causes the mind to depart from ration?
	That isn't even the same guy, that was someone else who was playing that same stratocaster.
	What's the guitar thing?
	Right, now let me know, did you ever get your guitar thrown out the window?
	Although, when I was younger, when I'd have to move out of a girl, a friend's house, I can remember when they'd throw a bin bag of his stuff.
	You've had one of those moments, have you?
	It wasn't a guitar though, it was just a bin bag of stuff and my mum's lasagna dish.
	That is not a euphemism.
	Your thought or behaviour.
	Oh my god!
	That is the subject.
	Is the trauma him or her?
	Who's getting traumatized?
	Her?
	Like, I'm sick of you.
	I think she is.
	But it's too close to the guy who couldn't get the guitar riff.
	Because it is guitar!
	So it looks like she's annoyed that he couldn't get a good enough guitar solo together.
	It sounds like Led Zeppelin!
	I'm not listening to this anymore!
	I went through this with my last boyfriend!
	It's like the guitar is like the littlest hobo.
	Right.
	Moving from one problem to another.
	Different scenario.
	The other voice keeps on calling me.
	Get that bloody thing out of here!
	Dianetics.
	Every moment of your life, your mind is recording everything that's happening to you.
	Every sight.
	Every sound.
	No!
	That's not dramatic, having to get a taxi either.
	No.
	Also, she looks very confident at this point, because I think our focus here is not the car or the man, it's the woman.
	That woman.
	She's just recording all of these items.
	Every taste.
	Smell.
	Pain.
	I hated that though, didn't you?
	Oh, there it goes!
	She's rolled over the ankle!
	Uh-oh.
	I hate that.
	Time to join.
	It's time to share all of my shameful secrets with people who certainly won't use them against me in any way in the future.
	Thinking I might leave Scientology now?
	Really?
	Well, did you?
	I'm gonna take you back to Christmas Day, 1998.
	A lot of incidents with guitars.
	What about when you threw that Stratocaster out the window?
	I was angry!
	We was in a breakup!
	And that lasagna dish?
	It's a snitch's creed.
	Emotion.
	Touch everything.
	These recordings form what is called the time track, a consecutive record of all the experiences accumulated throughout your existence.
	So maybe it is good, I don't know, Scientology, why not?
	It's got something for everyone.
	Hang on, what made you suddenly think, was it because that's like a film reel now?
	You suddenly think it's good?
	I like it.
	I remember they tried to get me, well no actually they didn't try to get me.
	No, you went in is what happened.
	You were bored one day, I don't know, seeking attention or something down Tottenham Court Road.
	They asked me to get out.
	Get out of here!
	We don't want you in our religion.
	You're ruining it for us.
	And also, when I did a film with Tom Cruise, I was trying to see if I could get him to say, do you want to be in it?
	I know.
	And he was like, no man, we don't want you in Scientology.
	You can use the trailer for exercise, then get out.
	The monkey's busy in there.
	That little monkey.
	That was on a film called Rock of Ages.
	I'd done with him, Alec Baldwin, loads of people in it.
	It was a good film.
	Listen, what about Skittles?
	What about them?
	Oh, right.
	What do you want?
	Skittles or Churchill?
	Decide, you lot in the chat.
	Do you want to see us analysing from this week in history, Skittles or Churchill?
	Skittles or Churchill?
	Are you going to be analysing actual Skittles?
	Churchill.
	Everyone's well up for Churchill.
	OK, look at how this week in history, Churchill declared an end of war in Europe.
	And notice how media has evolved, and yet there is still some subterfuge and direction.
	You'll notice when he starts to look in his pocket before he's taken his glasses off, because it's been stage directed.
	And the grandiosity and pomp that's here in the semiotics of the opening sequence still is retained by news media to this day.
	Remember, news is just a TV programme that frames and presents arguments that are beneficial to established power.
	It's not actually, I'm the news, so you better take me seriously.
	Like, school.
	It's just a load of old bollocks, isn't it?
	Don't have to take it seriously if you don't want to, just walk out the back, have a fag.
	Better off on your tod, I say.
	Now, what I meant by that was cigarette.
	You're better off alone.
	Because I've lapsed into all sorts of euphemisms.
	Let's see.
	No, we can't have Churchill eating Skittles.
	It's not a deepfake.
	This is actual news.
	We're trying our best.
	Let's have a look at Churchill announcing the end of the war.
	Note the grandiosity.
	Note Churchill's easy charisma, but notice how lacking in production it is.
	I think they should push in a little bit tighter.
	I'd want a bit more eyeball out of Churchill.
	Wouldn't you?
	Well, have a look.
	Have a look.
	Great issues still lie ahead.
	And at this time, it is fitting that the British nation should listen once again to the words of Mr Churchill.
	Five years ago, I promised you blood, toil, tears, and sweat.
	Oh, sounds like a lovely weekend.
	And your untiring response brought us, in the end, victory over Germany.
	Today, we still have tears.
	Not so many, thank God.
	But the conquest of Japan Hand in hand with our American allies is a formidable undertaking.
	We haven't yet bombed Nagasaki in Hiroshima.
	I suppose what's a joy at looking at old media is of course we have the benefit of hindsight.
	A statesman like Churchill, condemned by many as a war monger, in particular because of the bombing of Dresden that was subsequently regarded as superfluous, surfeit, egregious.
	You also, I don't know man, I find it hard, because we've been propagandised, haven't we?
	Even when I see him and it's not, it's not quite what you think it's going to be, it's sort of a bit higher in the nose and a little more stilted, I've still been sort of coached to see him as magnificent.
	And the grand sweeping narratives of history seem simpler.
	When we had, like, say we have Aaron Maté on, and like, you know, he's someone that's so kind of, he's such a brilliant journalist about, what would I say, assiduously anti-war, meticulous in his analysis.
	And like, of course, he is a Jewish man.
	And like, he's been quite critical of, for example, Israel's occupation of Palestine, that kind of thing.
	And I go to Muntz when he was on.
	He was just against all wars, mate.
	Like, what if, like, the Second World War, during the Second World War, would you be going, oh, Britain, they're out of order, and the US shouldn't have done it.
	And he's like, no, that was, like, a pretty serious conflict, and it was different, and it was necessary.
	And I think that some people, you know, because we all exist in these silos and enclaves in places like Rumble, where, because the free speech aspect is so important, sometimes you recognize that you are Prioritizing certain types of information, particularly me, my biases now are I do not trust the mainstream media.
	I do not trust the establishment at all.
	And I think I feel somewhat vindicated in that.
	But when, like, I hear friends of mine that are part of the more conventional liberal establishment or old school sort of liberal leanings, and they say, no, this war against Russia is like that.
	Right.
	It's like that kind of a war.
	Do you ever have like doubts about it?
	Think no maybe this is a just war and like you know like because of course we're sympathetic to Ukrainian people and it's a terrible and all that you know we've talked about it all the time of course but do you ever have doubts about it?
	Well we'll have Max Abrams on soon discussing this very fact and I mean all the stuff that has been uncovered about the situation in Ukraine the the way in which You know, people obviously call it a proxy war, the way in which the war's been sustained, the money that's been spent.
	I mean, we have the information now.
	Right, we have the information.
	I do think it's really interesting watching this and comparing it.
	I mean, at the time, you know, my grandad would have been probably not watching it because he was in the war at the time, but the public watched this and this was at a point where they looked to Churchill.
	You know, this was their leader.
	And someone who's obviously revered and is every word, you know, people listen to.
	I just think it's amazing to compare that to now.
	And what we, the way we think of our leaders, every time one of them does a speech and we immediately think, well, that's a lie and that's rubbish.
	And that's just propaganda.
	And that's the, it's just incredible.
	Obviously I'm not suggesting like to be so reductive that these kinds of things didn't go on in this time, but the way in which it's changed and the way in which we feel about our leaders is massively changed.
	Yeah, he notoriously blundered in part of the campaign around Norway.
	There is the bombing of Dresden.
	He was a depressive.
	He was an alcoholic.
	But I suppose, you know, iconoclasm aside, human beings are flawed.
	One time when I was participating in a riot, in one of those May Day riots that you have in London years ago, when they put that green strip of turf on the Churchill statue, I was sort of there at that bit, like Zellig or Forrest Gump.
	I remember I was there at various points.
	They smashed in a McDonald's window and stuff like that, and I was sort of like watching that.
	I was probably, I was still on drugs, I was probably about 24.
	And like, I remember feeling like that there are some people who even if you disagree with them, you have to somehow honour that they exemplify something.
	You can sort of iconoclise, if that's indeed a word, like yourself out of heroes.
	Oh, well, this person did that, that person did that, and start to recognise.
	Maybe with someone like Churchill, let us know in the chat.
	Sometimes you feel like these people did believe in what they were doing.
	They exemplified something and of course on the other side you've got literal Hitler.
	Literal Hitler.
	Hitler is dead.
	So it seems like a sort of a more legitimate conflict due to the freight of the enemy, the atrocities conducted under the Third Reich, their genocide, the persecution, the murder, the sort of, where would that have ended? And of
	course, you know, a lot of people argue that, and in some ways, it's sort of literally you
	can trace how Nazi scientists, for example, were blatantly employed, allegedly, like
	within sort of American institutions.
	Some people feel like it goes like, a little bit beyond that, don't they? Yeah, certainly.
	Should we get an actual, should we get an actual, excuse me, are we getting an actual
	expert on it? Do you want to see here, this is the news?
	Yeah, we could look at some...
	Later on, we've got Max Abrams, as Gareth said, who will not be speculating wildly over
	this week in history, or war, and what causes war, and who benefits from the Ukraine-Russia
	He'll be giving us hard facts.
	In particular, Was that a false flag attack on the Kremlin, as the American media said, or was it actually an attack on the Kremlin?
	We'll be talking to Max Abrams about that.
	Now it's time for our in-depth analysis into the Ukraine Oh, this is brilliant.
	You're going to love this.
	This is fantastic.
	Why is it that in public, the American government and media machine are saying one thing, it's a winnable war, the Ukrainian people are brave, no one's disputing that, it's only a matter of time, whilst in private, as revealed by the Pentagon Papers Part Deux, they have significant and real doubts about the outcome of that war.
	Here's the news.
	No!
	Here's the mother-effing news.
	Here's the fucking news!
	American taxpayers, I need you to pay for this car.
	It's gonna go all the way over there for hundreds and hundreds of miles.
	It's not really gonna go for hundreds and hundreds of miles.
	It will only go a couple of miles.
	Imagine if instead of talking about a car, I was talking about a war, but I still wanted you to fund it.
	Would that be more important or less important?
	It's more important, isn't it?
	Don't lie about wars!
	One thing they will not tell you is this.
	That war that you're funding between Ukraine and Russia and participating in is privately believed to be ultimately unwinnable.
	So why are top brass from the military lying under oath that there is a plan, that it can be won?
	Is that not perjury and lying?
	And why can't the Pentagon pass any audits?
	What exactly is going on over there?
	Why are we not focusing on the fact that you're being asked to pay for a war that even the people that advocate for it publicly do not believe can be won?
	Hopefully, though, one of the political parties and its representatives will give you an oppositional view.
	Let's start with Kevin McCarthy, Republican Speaker of the House.
	See what he's got to say.
	Yes, sir.
	We know that you don't support the current unlimited and uncontrolled supplies of weaponry and aid to Ukraine.
	Yeah, I'm not sure.
	The sound here is not good.
	Did he say I don't support aid to Ukraine?
	No, I vote for aid for Ukraine.
	I support aid for Ukraine.
	I do not support what your country has done to Ukraine.
	I do not support your killing of the children either.
	And I don't think it's right.
	And we will continue to support because the rest of the world sees it just as it is.
	Well, killing children is bad.
	Presumably that means all children.
	Let's see if we can get another perspective on financially supporting through your tax dollars via the military-industrial complex, the war, from Karine Jean-Pierre on behalf of the Democrats.
	Look, we're glad to hear that Speaker McCarthy agrees it is vital to keep supporting Ukraine.
	I would say it's the military-industrial complex that they're ultimately supporting.
	There are a lot of variables, but who will definitely, definitely benefit, continue to benefit because they're benefiting already, is the military-industrial complex.
	Let me know what you think in the chat and the comments.
	The widespread bipartisan support that we've seen in Congress for Ukraine has received,
	has been critical to those efforts and we agree that it is important for that support
	to continue and we're glad to hear that coming from Speaker McCarthy for sure.
	When it comes to war, it's great that both parties completely agree with one another.
	You don't want dissent, interrogation, inquiry, clarification, a Pentagon that can pass audits, weapons that can be tracked all the way to their destination.
	All those things are, I don't know, boring.
	Here's Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin under oath.
	Oh god, I nearly forgot to mention it.
	He used to work for Raytheon who make weapons.
	That's probably not right, isn't it?
	Ukrainians have inflicted significant casualties on the Russians, and they have depleted their inventory
	of armored vehicles in a way that no one would have ever imagined.
	And so now we see Russia reaching for T-54s and T-55 tanks because of the level of damage
	that the Ukrainians have inflicted on them.
	Based upon the things that we've done and continue to do, I think Ukraine will have a real good chance.
	Great!
	There they are, publicly declaring that Ukraine has a real good chance.
	Well, let's hope that there isn't another perspective that's being concealed from the public, because remember, all these billions of dollars of aid, 50% of which goes to the military-industrial complex, is coming from you.
	So I guess you have a right to know.
	Or do you not have a right to know the truth?
	Can you not handle it?
	Is it a bit too much?
	Let me know in the chat, in the comments, how much truth you can handle.
	Get ready for some truth right now.
	It's time for the Biden administration to level with the American people about the Ukraine war.
	For more than a year, the White House has painted for the public a rosy picture of battlefield and strategic success.
	Ukraine will never be a victory for Russia, President Biden proclaimed during his visit to Kiev in February.
	We believe that we can win.
	They, the Ukrainians, can win if they have the right equipment, the right support, said Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin.
	Changing it from we to they, because of course, as you know, and remind me in the comments, it's not a proxy war.
	Oh no you didn't!
	Secretary of State Tony Blinken has repeatedly insisted that the war will be a strategic defeat for Russia that will leave it weakened and incapable of future aggression.
	Even the administration's most sober-minded observer of the war, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mark Milley, has asserted that Ukraine has the leadership and morale to beat Russia.
	Driven by these optimistic pronouncements, Biden officials have insisted that justice must prevail in the war.
	They say that Putin and other Russian officials must be tried for war crimes.
	But don't talk to the ICC, the International Criminal Court, about that because you might find that that literally means that America is similarly guilty for war crimes.
	So even the war crimes that Russia are guilty of, and by the way, they are, cannot be reported through the ICC channels because it would demonstrate a precedent by which the Americans would similarly be convicted.
	Ah, the corruption!
	They insist, as the victim of unprovoked Russian aggression, Ukraine alone has the right to determine whether to seek a settlement or concede territory.
	The bottom line from the White House has been that American resolve will not waver and that the war will result in a uniformly happy ending for the United States and its allies.
	Don't be childish.
	A democratic, independent, sovereign and prosperous Ukraine has chastened and defanged Russia in a peaceful and stable Europe and all can and will be achieved without committing US troops to fight against Russia and risking what Biden has called World War 3.
	Quite a lot of mad things in there, really.
	Democratic, independent, look at what BlackRock and Vanguard will be doing after.
	Let's check and see if any other major global corporations in the field of energy, for example, will be profiting from events subsequent to a conclusion to this conflict.
	And are there already US troops in there?
	And what are the revelations of buddy boy Jack Texera?
	Let's get into all of that.
	The purported Pentagon leaks of classified documents, officially unconfirmed but covered widely in Western media, raise profound questions about this narrative.
	If these press reports are accurate, they suggest the United States is tiptoeing much closer to a direct war with Russia than the Biden team has acknowledged.
	They also allege that as of March, there were a small number of undisclosed American special forces personnel on the ground in Ukraine, raising the question of what Washington would do should Russians intentionally or unintentionally strike them.
	Moreover, the reports paint a much bleaker picture of Kiev's prospects in the war than the White House has acknowledged.
	Ukraine's challenges in massing troops, ammunition and equipment could cause its military to fall well short of Kiev's original goals for an anticipated counter-offensive aimed at retaking Russian-occupied areas this spring.
	The bleak assessment from early February warns of significant force generation and sustainment shortfalls and the likelihood that such an operation will result in only modest territorial gains.
	is a marked departure from the Biden administration's public statements about the fatality of Ukraine's military and is likely to embolden critics who feel the United States and NATO should do more to push for a negotiated settlement to the conflict.
	Under what circumstances would a negotiated settlement be worse?
	In the end, that is what you will get.
	And it's difficult not to imagine at this point that part of the motivation for prolonging this conflict is that it's profitable.
	We all know what power is imposed upon Washington through lobbying, through donations,
	the fact that both parties parrot the same line when it comes to this issue that even law...
	Is it me or does the future feel more insecure and uncertain?
	Wars, pandemics, lies, trickery.
	My cats keep having kittens.
	The last one's personal.
	For those who are in the United States, there is a way to secure your hard-earned nest egg.
	American Heart for Gold make it easy to protect your savings and retirement accounts with physical gold and silver.
	With one phone call, they can have physical gold and silver delivered right to your door or inside a qualifying retirement account like your IRA or 401k.
	American Hartford Gold is the highest-rated firm in the U.S.
	with an A-plus rating from the BBB and thousands of satisfied clients.
	Right now, they will give you up to $5,000 of free silver on your first qualifying order.
	This offer is only for U.S.
	customers.
	866-505-8315.
	That's 866-505-8315.
	Or simply text BRAND to 99-88-99.
	Get up to $5,000 of silver and protect your future in this crazy, crazy world with some solid, precious metals literally made in stars.
	Stay free with Russell Brand.
	See it first on Rumble.
	Hey, look at this.
	Poppy Xavier, the Ukraine government is corrupt as the US government.
	Well, I'm afraid yes, there is some evidence to suggest you're right.
	Astrotutuch says, let's not forget that Russian kids were killed too, you know, and benefits from, well, actually the military-industrial complex do benefit.
	From War.
	Remember, if you're watching us on Locals right now, and I suggest you do, just press the red button on your screen.
	You can join us straight after this for our live Locals conversation with RFK.
	Put your questions for RFK in the chat and I will pass those questions on to him in our live conversation, which will be broadcast on Rumble this Friday.
	Putin says a real war is being waged against Russia in Victory Day speech.
	And of course, you'll be well aware of the drone strike on the Kremlin that the West declared was a false flag story.
	In fact, let's have a look at that before we go to our guest, Max Abrams.
	Here are the mainstream media making that claim right now.
	Check it.
	This really does smell like a false flag operation on the part of the Russians, a diversion, if you will.
	Well, there you are.
	Why don't we have a little conversation now with Max Abrams, expert in international security, specialising in terrorism, counter-terrorism and US foreign policy.
	Thanks for coming on, Max.
	Yeah, thanks for having me.
	Max, the term false flag is one that's used a lot in these circles.
	What in particular makes you feel that the recent attack on the Kremlin was a legitimate attack rather than a false flag one?
	Well, I don't want to pretend that I have any sort of inside information about this, but what I will say is a few things.
	There are sometimes false flag attacks.
	We've seen them, for example, the Gulf of Tonkin.
	There are more false flag allegations than there are actual false flag attacks.
	Right?
	So you hear the allegation all the time, oh, this attack must be a false flag, but the actual number is much smaller.
	This is particularly true in the case of Russia.
	If someone were to Google, you know, false flag, Ukraine war, they'll see probably dozens of times when these sort of establishment pundits say, this is a false flag, but No empirical evidence ever materializes on this.
	The most notable case is the Nord Stream attack, where Russia was blamed for blowing up its own gas lines.
	And here now, Russia is blamed for attacking the Kremlin.
	And I suspect that we're going to see many, many more allegations of false flags because there are going to be many more Ukrainian attacks inside of Russia.
	We know that from the leaks, from the Pentagon leaks, that Zelensky has instructed his fighters to attack inside of Russia.
	And when the Ukrainians think, or when supporters of the Ukrainians think, that that attack is going to be risky or counterproductive or embarrassing, they will try to distance Ukraine from the attack and blame it on the Russians.
	A lot of my research focuses on militant groups, and we see this in the militant group space as well.
	So, for example, on 9-11, 9-11 in many ways was counterproductive because bin Laden said that he wanted to get the United States out of the Persian Gulf.
	The United States responded by occupying the Persian Gulf.
	So many people concluded and said, no, it couldn't have been bin Laden.
	It had to have been, you know, an inside job.
	With the Oklahoma City attacks in 1995, that was also bad for the patriot movement.
	It was counterproductive for the patriot movement.
	And so a lot of people said, oh, no, it couldn't have been Timothy McVeigh.
	We've seen the same thing in Algeria in the 1990s, where they committed all sorts of stupid attacks against civilian targets.
	And so a lot of conspiracy theories formed, saying that it couldn't have been the G.I.A., it had to have been the The Algerian government.
	Basically, whenever there's an attack inside of Russia, which could reflect badly on the Ukrainians, they're going to blame it on Russia.
	And so, you know, I've studied this sort of more broadly.
	And so based on that, as well as the terrible track record of these establishment pundits, you know, I'm about 70 percent sure that the establishment narrative is not correct.
	Of course the question that people frequently ask when such events, particularly when the events are not easy to discern, when it's not plain whether or not it was a false flag or a legitimate attack, people always ask who benefits?
	And I suppose what you're saying, Max, is that just because the 9-11 attacks led to the ability to invade Iraq, led to the ability to surveil the domestic population, the introduction of new wars.
	You can't automatically conclude from that something as simple as it was, you know, the famous conspiracy theory that 9-11 was an inside job.
	But there are sometimes alignments of interest and sometimes the manipulation of events.
	We had, we were watching clips of Churchill earlier and of course some people believe that an American warship was sunk as a precipitation to US involvement in the war and perhaps these are the idea that there are strategic moves or that things are allowed to take place, you know, even if they aren't directly undertaken by sort of, I don't know, CIA, deep state operatives, even though we're talking about the Nord Stream attack, it feels like Maybe that was undertaken by, you know, special forces from Finland or Norway or whatever.
	Yeah, I mean, the evidence is pointing to that.
	Believe me, if there was any evidence that could publicly link Russia to the attack, we would have seen it, right?
	But the thing is, is that militant groups and national militaries, they do a lot of stupid stuff.
	So the fact that they, you know, attack some target, which is going to be counterproductive for them, that doesn't mean that they didn't do it.
	You know, I expect to see many more Ukrainian attacks inside of Russia, and some of these will, you know, probably rile up the Russian public to be even more supportive of the war.
	It'll help to give Putin more sort of national backing to prosecute this war.
	And depending on the kind of attack, it could even begin to erode some international support if the Ukrainian attack is seen as, you know, being too indiscriminate, for example, or being too risky in terms of pushing the likelihood of nuclear escalation.
	But I do think that this is an important aspect of the Ukrainian war is that
	we are going to watch it expand.
	It is not going to stay simply within Ukraine.
	More and more, I believe it's gonna migrate into Russia.
	And what I'm concerned about, and many people are concerned about,
	is that the war could expand even beyond that.
	That it could involve Poland, that Article 5 of NATO could be invoked.
	And what we'll see is no longer a proxy war inside of Ukraine, but a direct military confrontation between the US, NATO, and against Russia.
	This is my worst fear, and I don't think that it's unreasonable to have it.
	Max, it certainly shows how little faith there is in the US government, in institutions like NATO and the media at large, that none of us feel broadly certain that we can simply take in good faith the narratives we are offered when they so plainly underwrite financial agenda and directives of dominion.
	Thank you very much, Max, for joining us on the show.
	You can read Max's book, Rules for Rebels, The Science of Victory in Militant History, and we'll post a link to that in the chat right now.
	Join us over on Locals for more details.
	Max, thank you very much for coming on the show and illuminating this difficult issue for us.
	Thanks Helen, thanks so much.
	Oh thank you for coming, wasn't he so professional?
	Why can't you be more like Max?
	Why is it that you can't, you must be more?
	Go to become a professor, a professor.
	I don't have the qualifications.
	Right, that's one of the reasons, see.
	So we knew we'd get there, investigation, which is what Max would have done.
	So maybe I'm more like him certainly than you.
	You can join us immediately now on Locals.
	Press the red button on your screen if you're watching this on Rumble, and you have to because it's the only place we broadcast for a number of reasons, and you can join us now.
	We're going to chat to RFK.
	Literally, it's going to be like a five-minute turnaround, right?
	So get onto Locals right now and send us your questions, and the questions will be filtered through to us.
	Remember, So that will be on Rumble.
	The RFK show will be on Friday.
	That'll be our Friday special show.
	Also, we've got Whitney Webb coming on to talk to us about their latest Epstein revelations.
	Before we end the show, we want to pay tribute and offer our condolences to Glenn Greenwald after the loss of his husband, David Miranda.
	We consider Glenn Not only a fantastic journalist and broadcaster but a friend over here at Rumble, a person that helped us to appreciate that this is a place we could come to join the conversation around free speech, anti-establishment values, legitimate journalism and investigation even though we are quite silly occasionally.
	Glenn, we feel your loss and we're all praying for you and offering you our love to you and your whole family, your kids, your dogs and everything and I know how much your husband meant to you and that he was a Good and beautiful man.
	May he rest in peace in God's grace.
	Thank you, Glenn.
	You lot, join us over on Locals.
	We're going to talk to RFK right now.
	Send your questions in the chat and we will pass on those questions to him.
	So if you're with us on Locals right now, join us for the chat with RFK.
	If not, you'll be able to see it on Friday on Rumble.
	Whitney Webb's joining us soon as well.
	We're really going for it now, guys.
	We're going deep, aren't we, baby?
	Why can't you be more like Max Abrams?
	I'll try, I'll try.
	He's just got to go to university.
	I think it's one of the things he'll have to do.
	All right, see you in a minute on Locals, guys, or tomorrow.
	Join us then, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
	Until then, stay free.
	Switch on.

▲