Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 18, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:03:47

Mainstream or Misinformation - What’s The Difference? - #061 - Stay Free With Russell Brand

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	So, I'm going to go ahead and get started.
	In this video, you're going to see the future.
	Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
	Thanks for joining me on Stay Free with Russell Brand.
	Remember to hit rumble.
	It helps me in ways that I can't begin to explain to you.
	We're talking about disinformation.
	Because you don't know.
	Yeah, I don't know what it means.
	I don't know how you benefit from that.
	But do it, because I understand from people who know more than me, and God knows there's enough of them, that it's of incredible value to us.
	We're talking about disinformation and WEF.
	It's WEF week, as you know.
	No wait, I've got something for this.
	♪ Alma Mater ♪ Yeah?
	We'll be talking about the Ukraine war and NATO and all that kind of stuff.
	And frankly, it's come to our attention that in spite of consistent promises that NATO aren't involved in this conflict and that there isn't an agenda to make Ukraine a member of NATO, that actually the Ukraine defence minister said We're a de facto member of NATO and what that kind of does is suggest that there is a proxy war between America and Russia.
	Let me know what you think about this in the comments and chat.
	And Joe Biden himself said we couldn't have a proxy war between America and Russia because that might lead us to the precipice of global Armageddon.
	So I don't know about you lot.
	A little bit worried?
	I'd be worried.
	I like living here on Earth.
	I've got children, I've got pets and everything.
	Lots of those.
	Too many, probably.
	You could actually blow a few of those up.
	We could afford to lose a few cats.
	If it's like, I'm afraid there's been a nuclear attack, 70% of your cats have been killed, I'd go, so I've still got... Not 25.
	25 cats, that's enough, really.
	We'll rebuild.
	We can rebuild from this.
	You can use Blackrock.
	Black Rock have been involved.
	We're getting a lot of investment from Black Rock so we probably have loads of cats.
	We'd probably be better off in the first place than we were even before this.
	More western cats.
	Them cats that we had before, them was communist cats.
	Cool.
	We've got a cardiologist coming on the show, Dr Asim Malhotra.
	You might know him from the mainstream media where he inadvertently was able to convey a little too much truth.
	If you're watching this on YouTube, remember to click over to Rumble.
	We cut the YouTube stream when the truth starts flowing, yo.
	That's what we have to do because we say things that are simply unacceptable.
	We ain't generating hate.
	We ain't generating conflict.
	We're conveying necessary truth to you because we believe that the relationship between the media and you, our audience, ought to be one of trust, openness, and transparency.
	And I believe that parentalism, paternalism, and even downright propaganda has taken over.
	Also, as well as Dr. Asim Malhotra, who's a cardiologist who talks about the potential link between certain medications and myocarditis and strokes and stuff.
	As well as him, you're going to love him being on the show.
	I've actually got this at the ready because when he starts talking, he don't stop.
	This is my, this is how I'm going to stop him talking.
	Like, if he starts being too, like, chatting too much, or even if he says stuff I don't agree with, what if he starts, like, just talking about, like, if he strays too far away from wacky conspiracy theories.
	Why have you got that in the first place?
	I always keep one of these for, I'm not prepared to talk to you about my private relationship.
	With Captain Bobby.
	He's always got that finger up whenever I see it.
	Well, sometimes he doesn't.
	Sometimes he has several.
	And anyway, it's not... That's my private life!
	So, sorry.
	The humongous beeswax copper.
	Also on the show is Whitney Webb, author of One Nation Under Blackmail.
	She's going to be talking...
	about Jeffrey Epstein and how the deep state controls it.
	I mean, I've watched some of Whitney Webb's other interviews.
	It's a bit frightening to see how deeply involved Jeffrey Epstein is, according to her, with some pretty entrenched, powerful interests.
	I can't Actually, believe it, this bit, we will not be talking about that on YouTube, and I'm scared about talking about it at all, because it seems mad stuff happens to people that talk about this, but hey, we've got to take the risks, haven't we?
	And also, we will be sharing with you, before all of that, before we get into the war in Ukraine, before we get into the medications and the adverse reactions, before we... and excess deaths, before we get into... What are you tiptoeing around?
	Yeah, I'm tippity-toeing.
	I'm tiptoeing.
	Oh, I'll tiptoe, baby!
	Before we get to Jeffrey Epstein and his pals and his wacky old hobbies on Naughty Boy Island, we're going to give you our item, The System Is Fine So Don't Collapse Into Existential Despair.
	Because an Amazon driver has fallen into raw sewage.
	And as you know, Amazon treat their workers incredibly well, allowing them to unionize, paying them well and offering toilet breaks whenever is necessary.
	Let's have a look at this.
	What a disgusting mess this Amazon driver finds himself in.
	I just fell into a septic tank.
	He's trapped in- Why is this being commented on by the person from the Honey Badger YouTuber?
	Oh my god, what a disgusting mess.
	Look at this Amazon driver.
	Like Brian Stelzer as well.
	Oh god, look at you falling into that poopy doopy doo!
	Now you're gonna get that from out under your fingernails, buddy boy!
	That's not the way a news report should start, is it?
	Is it, there's an Amazon delivery driver today, did this, he starts off by going, what is this?
	It's disgusting, buddy, what are you seeing?
	You make me sick!
	What are you doing in that tub of my guts, you I walked by it and the ground came out underneath me.
	YouTube, did you see me self-centering?
	That's what they do to us, Karam.
	Why, why did you make of me this way, Lord?
	Come on, let's get some more mainstream down our necks.
	Empty raw sewage.
	I walked by it and the ground came out underneath me.
	I'm standing in knee deep sludge.
	F*ing b**.
	Those beeped words.
	Things like poo-poopy-doo.
	Stuff like that, huh?
	There he is.
	I mean, this guy's working for Amazon.
	He's a grafter.
	That would have been the longest break he's had all day.
	He's, like, really enjoying that, actually.
	Might have a little sleep.
	This one's a floater.
	I can use it as a pillow.
	This Amazon driver was walking up to a home to deliver a package when the ground swallowed him up.
	I'm like six feet down, and I tried using these roots around me to get out.
	It's never gonna work, it's a ridiculous scheme.
	Pull up that Honey Badger video, guys, on another stream, because we'll show you.
	It's like, look at the Honey Badger!
	And Brian Stoer is on the show, because Brian Stoer is at Davos right now.
	Ironically enough, talking about misinformation and disinformation and all that stuff.
	See if you can get the Honey Badger ready, because this newscaster is speaking in the Honey Badger voice, isn't he, Gal?
	And they just pulled more dirt on top of me.
	He's surprisingly calm, even though he realizes how dangerous the situation is.
	I really do not want to die.
	Even though he realizes, he's getting into the inner life now of the Amazon Jack.
	You don't know what's going on in his mind.
	He's paused briefly to reflect on his wife and his children at home before thinking, oh look at me, up to the knees, and poo-poo-pee-doo baby.
	And somebody's...
	Why are they sending someone out?
	When the fire department got there, they quickly...
	That was excrement.
	That's human feces.
	I don't know if there's many a word for it.
	...assessed the situation and told him not to make a move.
	They put a ladder over the hole so that it kind of stabilized the ground and then they...
	Why are they sending someone out?
	Like they've got the person in the studio, they've got the footage from the Amazon person
	and it seems like they've sent out a broadcaster to be on the scene for this.
	It's very covering.
	Why don't they cover, actually, the fact that most of the time Amazon workers are living in... They're not saying anything about Amazon, yeah.
	Also, yeah, this is the most rest, recuperation and joy that Amazon drivers add all day, is to take advantage of the situation while he can.
	...going down to him, and he actually self-extricated.
	He got himself out.
	And talk about a dedicated worker.
	Once he was out of the pit, he drove home, took a shower, and back to work he went.
	He had about 100 packages to deliver, all in a day's work.
	I just fell into a septic tank.
	That Amazon driver has since been fired for taking too long of a break.
	We've just heard that.
	Yeah, that isn't the news, is it?
	To say and talk about a dedicated worker.
	The news should be.
	And do you know what?
	Amazon made him go back to work because of their dreadful labour practices.
	Yeah.
	To celebrate the fact that he's up against it.
	It's a good way of getting into the rights of ordinary workers across the world, the inability of the Amazon worker class to form unions, the way that they bought in union busters, the appalling conditions, the record profits and how big tech generally benefit from situations that normally send other ordinary people spiralling into decline.
	We found the honey badger clip.
	Loads of you will know this is such a fantastic YouTube clip.
	Have a look and listen.
	I think it's the same news reporter.
	Listen. Stop.
	Recheck the audio.
	Were we broadcasting that audio or not?
	Sorry about this, guys.
	We're doing that on the fly.
	They didn't know that we were going to make that comparison.
	Look at that.
	You should put that up on the screen.
	Look what we're doing.
	Speakers.
	You see people going into little sidebars and drop-down menus and all sorts of stuff.
	The honey badger has been referred to by the Guinness Book of World Records as the most fearless animal in all the animal kingdom.
	It really doesn't give a shit.
	If it's hungry, it's hungry.
	Ew, what's that in its mouth?
	Oh, it's got a cobra?
	Oh, it runs backwards?
	All right, all right, you get the idea.
	All right, so let's go over to Davos.
	Look at this, the World Economic Forum tweeted earlier today, don't miss Tony Blair's masterclass on regional destabilisation and national destruction.
	Are they taking the actual piss there?
	For example, what you could do is say a country's got weapons of mass destruction, then bomb them back into the Stone Age and then move in Halliburton and take it over.
	Oh yeah, no, that would work.
	Those are very good ideas, Tony, but would they work in practice?
	Well, we did actually do it once or twice in the late 90s.
	It certainly was a masterclass when he pulled it off as well.
	That's well good.
	Also, I want to be thanked for it and paid and have a foundation and everyone say what a great guy I am and then grow up minosphero here.
	Also at WEF, our friend from this channel, Brian Stelter, he is there doing A bloody, what's he doing, a talk on misinformation, disinformation?
	The need to never ever tell untruths in public and particularly not to do it deliberately.
	Here he is.
	Hope you're just getting started.
	Your point about, you know, uncomfortable truths being mislabeled as disinformation sticks with me.
	This is a complicated term and there's so much between a clear, verifiable fact and a clear, verifiable lie.
	There's so much Yes, I mean, we all remember the sort of horse-paced Ivermectin era.
	We remember his outrage at Joe Rogan for having garnered an audience outside of the mainstream.
	And in particular, the now proven to be disinformation, Russiagate scandal.
	And if you don't remember, Brian Steller once or twice mentioned collusion between Trump and Russia.
	Just once or twice though, a little bit, little bit.
	Have a look.
	On the Robert Mueller Russia investigation.
	Mueller investigation.
	The Russia investigation.
	Trump's Russia ties.
	And Robert Mueller.
	The real Russia story.
	Russia probe.
	The ongoing Russia probe.
	Russia probe.
	The Russia investigation.
	But Mueller and the Russia probe.
	Russia synergies.
	They wonder if Russia has compromising information on the president.
	What is the source for the president's claim that they have found no collusion with Russia?
	He misspelled collusion.
	Every day we're trying to keep track of the drip, drip, drip of the Russia investigation.
	Drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, Now in the chat or the comments, if you think what they mean by misinformation and disinformation is information that may or may not be true, but it's certainly inconvenient to the agenda of the establishment and their mainstream media partners, this is from the Garden newspaper.
	The Mueller report did not find Trump campaign conspired with Russia, Attorney General says.
	So like all of that, all of that, the amount of time that was spent on that.
	And again, with the story we're seeing now about Joe Biden's confidential docs, when compared to the reporting and coverage of the Trump docs, you know me, I don't care about either.
	I think that we need systemic change at a profound level, but it just demonstrates the way that the media relays this information is in accordance with their own agenda, not simple conveying of facts.
	Yeah, also, you know, coming back to the situation in Ukraine, there's a piece here, I think it's from The Intercept, as documented in a Pulitzer Prize winning series in 2008, so probably a conspiracy theorist now.
	Yeah, will be by now.
	Pulitzer Prize in 2008, banned from the telly in 2020.
	The Pentagon orchestrated the commentary of 75 former officers who served as radio and TV analysts, turning them into message force multipliers for the administration's point of view.
	Many of the retired officers who appeared on TV, i.e.
	the mainstream media that Brian Stetler used to work for, worked for the companies that counted on military contracts, creating a building conflict that news organizations don't mention when introducing the analysts.
	So when we're talking about misinformation especially, With regard, we've mentioned Trump, but with regard to Ukraine at the moment, they literally never mention that.
	They never mention that the people they get on, mainstream media, to talk about foreign policy are being paid for or have connections to the Middle East industrial complex.
	We've been aware of that for a while and we've talked about it a lot on this channel.
	It seems to me to be an irresponsible way to report news, particularly with regard to such contentious and potentially globally cataclysmic matter as the conflict between Ukraine and Russia, which is consistently It's been consistently denied that it's a proxy war, that it hasn't been caused by NATO infringement on former Soviet territories, and increasingly it seems like these are major contributory factors to the current condition and that it could get a little bit out of hand.
	Listen, if you're watching us on YouTube, thank you!
	You are a welcome awakening wonder.
	We're about to switch off the YouTube stream and broadcast only on Rumble for reasons that will become clear when I tell you the fantastic guests that we've got coming up.
	We've got Dr Asim Malhotra, Who inadvertently got onto the mainstream media and started talking about connections between certain medication and adverse effects.
	So you're going to want to stay with us for that conversation.
	Also we're talking to Whitney Webb, who I've seen talking about Epstein and Epstein's relationship with the deep state and senior, significant, notorious, globally famous establishment figures and it's Just astonishing and unbelievable.
	So it's all stuff that can't be broadcast on YouTube.
	That's the reason that we do this show on Rumble, is because we're allowed to speak freely.
	And I believe that freedom of speech ought be used to bring people together.
	We have guests from left, right, people from the edges, people from the extremes, yes, but also people from the centre.
	What we're interested in is bringing people together.
	Because I believe we have more in common with one another than the centralized elites that dominate our culture and our system.
	So please, switch over to Rumble right now for more of our fantastic content and these beautiful conversations.
	I see Malhotra.
	I've got the finger ready because that guy can chat.
	He was on before and he would not be quiet, would he?
	He just kept going on.
	So I've got the finger ready to control him if I can.
	See you later, YouTube.
	Now, this story about Ukraine being a de facto member of NATO.
	We're going to be taking a deeper look at that later in the week in our presentation.
	Here's the news.
	No, here's the effing news.
	And by the way, we've got so many guests on today, we don't have time for one of those presentations.
	Are we posting a link to do that?
	Or are we going to just put it up tomorrow?
	Tomorrow.
	It's going to be up tomorrow.
	But we're going to be talking about this, the Ukrainian defence minister's revelation that Ukraine operably, I think that's what this phrase they used, are NATO members in terms of the military equipment they're using, the communications that they're using.
	And it could be We have a lot of modern NATO standard weaponry.
	going to have a look at that clip or are we going to read this out? Are we able to see
	him? This is him just saying it, just so you know this isn't propaganda, check it.
	We have a lot of modern NATO standard weaponry. It means that Ukraine as country and the armed
	forces of Ukraine or our sector of security and defence became the member of NATO de facto.
	Okay, there you are.
	That's the Ukrainian Defense Minister saying they're a de facto NATO member.
	We're going to be talking about that later in the week in more depth.
	We'll just mention that people are saying now that Ukraine has become a testbed for Western weapons and battlefield innovation.
	So I guess what we're contesting on our show, and we'll be looking at this in more detail later this week and next week.
	Sorry about that.
	It is.
	Essentially, the erroneous claim that this war is simply a matter of a brutal invasion by Russia, and it is brutal, and sure, it's criminal, and of course it's wrong that Ukrainian people are suffering, and their humanitarian effort is an important one, and Ukrainian people ought to be treasured, cherished, protected.
	But it's becoming clear that whether it's the military industrial complex, Black Rock, or now the ability to test weapons, and not to mention a broader unipolar agenda to drain Russia of their resources in an attempt to create a sort of a singular global narrative.
	There are clearly other stories at play that we're simply not being told for obvious reasons.
	We'll be diving into that in depth, but now it's time for me to do what the BBC, the mainstream media outlet, should nary have done and introduce friend of the show, man who requires a finger to control him, Dr. Asim Malhotra, cardiologist, public health campaigner.
	Welcome, Dr. Asim.
	Thanks for joining us.
	Great to see you again, Russell.
	You're seeming a bit serious.
	What's going on over there?
	I'm the same old.
	Sometimes serious, sometimes not so serious.
	These days.
	Very famous.
	That's what we're talking about.
	I've seen you on Tucker.
	I've seen you on the BBC.
	How did you feel about that?
	And did you know ahead of time, just to catch our audience up to speed, you were booked on the BBC to talk about statins being ubiquitously and universally prescribed to people of a certain age, which is of course a heart medication, but you pivoted to excess deaths and the potential effects of COVID vaccines.
	I mean, you explicitly said that COVID vaccines are causing myocarditis, strokes.
	I mean, tell us, how did you feel when you did that?
	What's the blowback been like?
	You know, talk for about 20 minutes till the old wooden finger appears.
	I've got 20 minutes.
	Brilliant.
	That's exactly what I need.
	You know that.
	No, thanks, Russell.
	So, you know, for me, I've done a lot of work over the years as a public health activist.
	And I know that if you get an issue major media attention, that often is much more effective than private advocacy if you want to introduce important policy changes.
	And of course, The big elephant in the room that we've been discussing on the show before and many people are talking about, you know, through alternative media, is the fact that why is there not a big discussion going on through the mainstream around the links between vaccine harms and potential links with excess deaths and excess cardiovascular deaths.
	So, for me, when the opportunity came to talk about statins, of something which I have expertise in, I've written a book called Statin Free Life, it was the last book I wrote, In 2021, the BBC contacted me as an expert to talk about that.
	And actually, I felt it was relevant to bring in the issue of the vaccine because only a few weeks earlier, Russell, Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer, had suggested that the reason that we are having this so-called unexplained excess cardiovascular deaths could well be because people weren't taking their statin pills during the pandemic.
	And in fact, as an expert in statins, I knew that didn't make sense because statins don't really have that much of an impact over such a short period of time.
	And then Carl Hennigan, The director of the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine in Oxford, his own analysis only a few days earlier revealed that there wasn't a reduction in static prescriptions.
	So it's very unlikely that to be the case.
	And that was really my opportunity to bring in my view, say, well, hold on a minute.
	We've got something where there's very clear data on the best available evidence of harms
	pointing to the mRNA vaccines likely causing increased heart attacks and cardiac arrests,
	and therefore is likely to be a contributory factor in this discussion.
	Dr. Haseem, why is there such unwillingness to acknowledge the possibility, let alone the likelihood,
	that these medications are contributing to excess deaths?
	And further to that, have you found that your credibility garnered over years of study, practice and research has been attacked as a result of your unwillingness to toe what appears to be a mainstream line on this subject?
	Well, if you'll allow me to answer your second question first, Russell.
	You know, over the years I've advocated and come out with statements in mainstream media based upon things I've published, mainly in medical journals.
	Whether it's been sugar and it's linked to heart disease, whether it's been busting the myth of saturated fat, i.e.
	you can eat butter again, whether statins are over-prescribed, whether low-carb diets are the best way forward to improve our metabolic health.
	And every time I've done that, I've been attacked.
	And that's something I expected.
	I see it as a sign of progress.
	And the reason I say that, one of the lessons from public health advocacy is as soon as your work threatens an industry or an ideological cabal, you will be attacked, sometimes unrelentingly and viciously.
	So you have to grow a rhinoceros hide, Russell.
	You've got to have a thick skin.
	For me, when this happened, the blowback was expected, and it's a sign of progress.
	I mean, without going off too much on a tangent, one of my inspirations as a big advocate for highlighting injustice is Mahatma Gandhi.
	He said, first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you.
	Then you win.
	So I see that now we're in the fight stage.
	I mean, they shoot you.
	Then they shoot you.
	Like, yeah, no, I hear you, man.
	Hopefully that won't happen, but you know, so be it.
	If it happens, it happens.
	Yeah, please, God.
	Please, God.
	Yeah, it's interesting.
	You've said elephant in the room.
	You've said rhinoceros hide.
	A lot of big mammals are getting mentioned in this conversation.
	I myself, I'm actually an incredibly sensitive person, but still operate in these kind of
	conversations and I feel that what's important is whether you're talking about something
	like statins, where it seems like the BBC at least had an appetite to have a conversation,
	or these medications, opposing views ought be framed and presented as part of the public
	debate and also as a part of the clinical processes.
	We were reading Dr. Marty Makary's work yesterday and they were saying that since the NIH denied
	funding to things like vitamin D and its impact on COVID and vaccine particles being in breast
	milk and the positive impact on steroids and COVID, all of which have been proven, and
	also natural immunity, thank you Gareth, all of which have been proven to be effective,
	I would say.
	After it seemed cynically, one might imagine that these kind of studies only took place when enough profit had been extracted from the situation.
	And it seems that from your experience in other areas that these are financially motivated arguments.
	Absolutely, Russell.
	In fact, you can explain all of this quite rationally.
	So you've got to think about what's the root cause of the problem.
	To answer your first question, why is it not being discussed in mainstream media?
	So there's a framework of actually how big corporations exert their power.
	Primarily driven for the purposes of profit.
	And they do it for a number of mechanisms.
	So they define the dominant narrative.
	They lobby and capture and influence politicians.
	They engage in influencing preference shaping.
	So capture the media.
	capture of the knowledge environment, funding of medical research, medical education,
	in the case of drugs, for example, the legal environment and the extra legal environment.
	And the extra legal environment often means opposition fragmentation.
	So what they do is they will attack or smear or use people to undermine the credibility of those
	that basically call out their manipulations and excesses.
	And what they wanna do is they wanna keep the conflict latent, Russell.
	So conflict between the interests of the powerful and those over whom power is exerted.
	So one of the reasons why mainstream media has been captured through them as well
	is that they know that if this issue gets public media attention,
	then of course the conflict becomes a public health issue Disseminated through, you know, through to millions of people.
	And then the truth ultimately will come out.
	And, you know, for me, sunlight is a very potent disinfectant for malodorous health policy.
	So I knew from a very long time that if we were going to make progress on this whole issue about the vaccine harms, which I've known about for quite some time, it had to get mainstream media attention.
	And I'll tell you something else interesting, which I've not shared anywhere so far, Russell.
	When I published my papers in the Journal of Incidence and Historically, as an activist, when I write something, I write for the purpose of sharing knowledge that I feel everyone needs to know about.
	When I published this, I planned to try and get this in the mainstream media.
	I won't name this particular newspaper in this instance, but one journalist I've worked with for a very long time, I gave him the exclusive.
	He had the paper, certainly the raw paper, before it was finally accepted for publication, a couple of months in advance.
	He was all ready to go, and he pulled out last minute.
	Despite that, three journalists contacted me, mainstream media journalists, and did interviews on my paper.
	One of them was a BBC broadcast journalist who he felt he had been vaccine injured.
	I won't name him to protect his confidentiality.
	He did a 20-minute pre-recorded interview with me And it never aired on his radio station.
	The Times newspaper did a long interview with me, never got published.
	The Daily Mail, again, and it was a very, you know, it was a very pleasant conversation based upon my findings, never got published.
	So I think the journal, a lot of people, we can't really blame journalists here.
	Something's happening at a higher level.
	And I think certainly with the BBC, I think we have to ask the Director General of the BBC what's going on.
	Why is he not allowing the vaccine discussion to take place on their platforms?
	It's certainly interesting that a publicly funded organisation which requires taxpayers' money to stay in the game isn't willing to be impartial and balanced in such an important issue.
	We all know that there are what are commonly regarded as conspiracy theories that accrue
	around this issue, but the demonstrable truth is cause enough for concern.
	The information has been maligned, dissenters have been smeared, the conversation has been
	controlled, meanwhile huge profits have been garnered.
	That to me seems a significant enough set of facts to constitute an argument.
	Our audience have sent some questions for you, Doc.
	Firstly, P.A.
	Hussey says, tell Dr. Asim Malhotra thank you for standing up against the globalists, world governments, mainstream media and corporations.
	He's an outstanding man and his father would be proud of him.
	Respect to God rest his soul.
	I see your father behind you there.
	Starshine Free says, ask him if he's seen any former pro-vaccine colleagues admitting they were wrong.
	Has that happened?
	Well, there are a number of people certainly that have come out of the woodwork and been made public statements.
	John Campbell, Dr. John Campbell, nurse practitioner and academic.
	He was very pro-vaccine.
	He went on his YouTube channel and talked about it.
	He took two jabs.
	And then he came out on a video that I then shared on Twitter as well for his rumble.
	Basically saying the evidence is quite clear, now we need to suspend the vaccine.
	There have been other people, other cardiologists have come out.
	A chap called Dean Patterson is a consultant cardiologist in Jersey.
	He's come out and called for a suspension of the vaccine.
	So I think that more and more people are coming out, and certainly conversations I've had with many doctors, certainly, and I won't name them, and some of these are kind of the very senior NHS leadership roles, they've read my paper, they think it has legitimacy, and they've said to me, I'm going to tell you something.
	I'm not having any further boosters, and I'm going to make sure no other members of my family are doing it.
	The only problem is they're afraid to speak out.
	And I think that they fear that they're going to be, you know, labeled anti-vaxxer.
	They're going to have their license threatened.
	I think a lot of people are in fear.
	Many people, though, Russell, even I was in America recently, spoke to many doctors there.
	They, you know, in California, if you go against the dominant narrative now coming from the medical establishment, You automatically could get your license revoked but what I said was if the situation has got to that level as doctors if we can't speak up for our patients when we think harm is being committed
	The word doctor, the meaning of doctor disappears.
	And for me, as a way I was brought up and the way I behave, and my duty and responsibility is always to patients, my conscience wouldn't allow me to stay quiet.
	So, you know, I'm just trying to get the information out there in the best way possible.
	We have to have dialogue.
	It has to be compassionate.
	We have to understand that there are people getting angry with me.
	I'm getting trolled on Twitter.
	Suspend his medical license.
	Hatchet jobs in the Guardian and the Times over the weekend.
	But I don't have any animosity to these people.
	I feel sorry for them.
	I have compassion for them.
	I think it's rooted in ignorance and the illusion of knowledge.
	So I think if they go low, we go high.
	The facts speak for themselves.
	The information is getting more and more disseminated to the public.
	And I think we're reaching a tipping point, Russell, soon.
	And these vaccines will be suspended pending an investigation to investigate the true rate of adverse effects, especially to the cardiovascular system.
	The corporatizing and co-opting of the medical profession by the pharmaceutical industry is terrifying, and the idea that such an important social role as the doctor, as you've outlined, could become yet another node in the net of globalist corporate power is cause for great concern.
	I hope that one day, Aseem, we will see the reckoning that is required here, that the truth will come out
	and the truth will perhaps be nuanced, perhaps something akin to these vaccines
	ought to have been recommended to people that are vulnerable, it ought never have been shared
	that it was somehow a social responsibility for all of us to take it because otherwise
	there was a risk that we would infect other people.
	It seems that there needs to be a massive amendment and an apology and sort of the creation of the class and the term anti-vaxxer seemed to me to be kind of a PR spin to create a class and caste of people that could be condemned to sort of other and damn so that the light never shone on those that were really culpable.
	I've just got a little question as well, actually moving away from vaccines slightly and talking about lockdowns, because the things that you've talked about and Russell has in terms of the relationships between pharmaceutical companies and the government and the ways in which A lot of this messaging won't be able to be released.
	But when it comes to lockdowns, it also seems like there's an inability for anyone to talk about not even the vaccines, but the harms that the lockdowns have done.
	You know, we're in a situation at the moment where we're seeing the largest excess deaths outside the pandemic in 50 years.
	You even when you were on the BBC were talking about healthy lifestyles.
	That's something that during lockdowns we weren't able to have.
	We were told not to exercise.
	We were encouraged to eat bad food.
	We're now seeing skyrocketing cancer rates and all sorts of dreadful consequences from lockdowns.
	And yet this doesn't really have anything to do with Big Pharma but what it does have to do with is governments not even getting to the point where they'll admit we made a mistake in these lockdowns and I wondered what you thought and if that's a way of them clinging on to the idea of lockdowns for the future.
	Yeah, no, it's a great, great point.
	So I think, looking at the evidence now, you know, lockdowns ultimately seem to have caused a net harm, for sure.
	Interestingly, just before I became privy to looking at data properly, or certainly data being published that suggested a link between the vaccine and heart problems, I was interviewed by the Times, who asked me, there's been an increase in heart attacks, Dr. March, and what do you think's going on?
	And I said, actually, I predicted to some degree there would be an increase because, you know, and the headline of The Times from my interview was poor diets and stress, you know, chronic psychological stress, certainly from lockdowns, as a risk factor for heart disease is massive.
	So I think all of those factors played in.
	That's one of the reasons the lockdowns ultimately resulted in a net harm, because it didn't really ultimately, you know, stop the spread of COVID.
	And we didn't protect the vulnerable and we caused unnecessary harm to people who are much, much healthier.
	So it was a disaster.
	It was a complete public health disaster.
	I think one of the reasons, you know, I spoke about the link between COVID and obesity very early on.
	I started talking about it in March, you know, April 2020.
	I was on Sky News and writing articles about it saying we need a public health message right now because we know that the immune system is better if people's diets are healthier, people are taking vitamin D, etc.
	Why was that not repeated throughout the pandemic?
	And I think we probably would have had we probably would have less deaths if if people were told to change their diets because actually dietary change has a big impact within a few weeks.
	So that's something I think that missed opportunity.
	But very quickly on that point you know I think one of the reasons why there wasn't a dedicated effort to say to the public It's time to quit ultra-processed foods.
	This is what ultra-processed foods are.
	You need to quit junk food for now.
	Your best protection, you know, right now from COVID is because that hits another industry very hard that have been manipulating the masses and engineering products to get them addicted.
	Big food.
	Doctor Asim Malhotra, you are a mighty David, standing against the Titans and Goliaths everywhere, merely with the sling of truth and a very nice complexion.
	We got through the entire conversation.
	There was no requirement for the wooden finger because of your moderated and brilliant abilities to convey and articulate these points so beautifully.
	Thank you, Doctor.
	We'll speak to you again soon, I'm sure.
	Thank you.
	Thank you, mate.
	Let us know if we can be of any use to you.
	Take care, mate.
	Well done, Gareth.
	I think your conversation points went over quite well with Dr Receive, didn't they?
	It did, one.
	I know, but that's the only one he sort of said it was a good point.
	Get angry about that.
	When we cut that for YouTube, make it like, let's just record me.
	I've got a question, Dr. Raseem.
	How about also the lockdown?
	They didn't go so well.
	Just use that.
	And this is from, look at this, this is from the New York Post.
	The CDC investigating whether Pfizer COVID vaccine increases stroke risk for people over 65.
	Also elsewhere, they've looked at whether or not young people are being damaged.
	So I guess this is a story that's going to continue to run and run.
	Do you reckon, Gal?
	Feels like it is going to.
	But it was quietly released on, I think, a Friday evening by the CDC.
	Let it out then.
	Let it out like a little pipsqueak fart.
	Yeah, before the weekend.
	Moving radically away from how the mainstream media in the establishment repress important information, our guest Whitney Webb.
	Author of One Nation Under Blackmail and writer for Unlimited Hangout is here to talk to us about deep state collusion, the hobbies of the powerful, and in particular, Jeffrey Epstein.
	Hello there, Whitney.
	I've been watching your content.
	You always seem to be in the, what is that environment you're in?
	Where are you?
	Are you in grandma's handbag?
	No, I actually live in Chile in South America.
	Oh, you were in Chile!
	Yeah, uh-huh.
	I just have like a wall hanging because it's, you know, a It's a perfect environment.
	Whitney, I've been watching some of your interviews and I've got to say, like, it's one of those, the area of your research and expertise is one of those areas that's actually almost scary to talk about because we on this show are continually talking about hypocrisy, corruption, the deep state, Democracy being a kind of hollow and theatrical affair where real power is beyond the reach of ordinary people.
	We sort of infer sometimes that people may get assassinated because their interests and the stories that they tell are at odds with the agenda of powerful people.
	How much proof you appear to have and your willingness to talk about it is somewhat staggering.
	So I guess there's to start with Jeffrey Epstein and his ties to incredibly powerful global figures, former President Bill Clinton and one of the world's most powerful tycoons, Bill Gates.
	Can you just sort of unpack for us the nature of these relationships, which sort of like, while people are peripherally aware of it, it seems to be something that's somehow been submerged and lost.
	Sure, so if you look at the mainstream narrative about Epstein, no one in mainstream media wants to talk about Jeffrey Epstein and what he was doing before the year 2000.
	So if you look at the timeline with Epstein and Bill Clinton, for example, what you see is that from 1987 till roughly 1993, Jeffrey Epstein was one of the masterminds of one of the biggest Ponzi schemes in U.S.
	history.
	And, you know, financial criminality is consistent throughout his career.
	When that was being prosecuted, Jeffrey Epstein's name was dropped from the case in 1993.
	And that same year, he appears at Clinton fundraisers, some of the most controversial fundraisers of the entire Clinton administration.
	For example, in 1993, it was a fundraiser associated with the White House Historical Association being nominally run by the office of Hillary Clinton.
	It makes an appearance in Vince Foster's alleged suicide note.
	And who was the White House counsel that died under very suspicious circumstances.
	And then Epstein was involved in roughly after that, 15 visits to the White House in less than a two year span
	with a man named Mark Middleton, who, well, most of them were with Mark Middleton,
	who was a central figure in the 1996 campaign finance scandal
	also known as Chinagate in some circles.
	And essentially there you have Epstein being involved in a massive way with those financial tricks,
	I guess you could say for lack of a better word.
	And at the same time, he's involved in relocating Southern Air Transport, the CIA linked airline
	involved in Iran-Contra from its headquarters in Miami, Florida to Ohio to ostensibly run cargo
	for Leslie Wexner's Enterprises, where they'll be going from Columbus to Hong Kong,
	which interestingly enough was a major hub for a lot of this corruption in 1996
	involving Mark Middleton, who Epstein's meeting with at the same time.
	Subsequently after this, which is the only time where mainstream media starts to talk about the Clinton-Epstein relationship, Clinton is out of office and setting up the Clinton Foundation, and a lot of the setup for the Clinton Foundation he is doing while flying on Jeffrey Epstein's plane, specifically the Africa trip, but also the Asia trip, and things that come out of this are things like the Clinton Health Access Initiative, which later partners with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in very significant ways.
	So, essentially what you have there is, considering that the Clinton Foundation's sort of been treated as a political slush fund of the Clinton family, you have Jeffrey Epstein over a period of decades being involved in essentially guiding the most suspect financial activity of the Clinton family from the early 90s onward, and including their rebranding of their, you know, political cronyism as philanthropy.
	And I'll pause before getting into Bill Gates, because that's a totally different story.
	I mean, yeah, this is before we've got to Bill Gates.
	I mean, I didn't know that Epstein's skullduggery went all the way back to Iran-Contra.
	It seems like wherever there's corruption, Jeffrey Epstein was there, like a kind of Forrest Gump of global corruption.
	So is it then that even before you get To the salacious, sexual, underage, sex trafficking, abuse side of the Jeffrey Epstein story.
	There's mammoth financial corruption and the involvement of significant political and corporate figures.
	Yeah, the financial criminality aspect of Epstein's career spans essentially from the late 70s all the way up until his second arrest in 2019.
	Whereas the sex crimes, as far as we know, span sometime between 1991 and up until his first arrest around 2006, 2007 or so, at least the bulk of those sex crimes that we know about.
	And what is the nature of the connection with Bill Gates?
	Now that you've done the first Bill, let's move on to the second.
	Right, so if you believe mainstream media, Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein didn't meet until 2011, but that is unfortunately for Bill Gates, contradicted by evidence that's actually in mainstream media.
	So for example, the Evening Standard, a pretty mainstream outlet in the United Kingdom, has an article from, I believe, January 2001, where it's talking about Ghislaine Maxwell and her relationship with Prince Andrew, and discusses Jeffrey Epstein introducing him to a UK Audience there introduces him as a property developer and says that he made most of his millions through his business links to three individuals, Leslie Wexner, Donald Trump, and the third one is Bill Gates.
	So why would the Evening Standard name Bill Gates as one of the main business partners of Jeffrey Epstein during the 1990s if they didn't meet until roughly a decade later?
	No one in mainstream media has been interested in following that up.
	With me, even though I've been contacted by outlets such as the BBC for that information, and then, you know, never goes anywhere.
	And even beyond that, if you're looking at some other aspects of the Epstein-Gates relationship, you have a woman named Melanie Walker come along, who was allegedly recruited by Jeffrey Epstein to be a Victoria's Secret model in 1992.
	There's no evidence she ever modeled, but she became Epstein's science advisor.
	In the late 90s and shortly thereafter became science advisor to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
	If you're Bill Gates and you're hiring a science advisor for your relatively new foundation and you're looking at her CV and all it really has is a science advisor to Jeffrey Epstein, you would have to know who Jeffrey Epstein is and what kind of science he was into.
	And this again is well before the 2011 date we're alleged to You know, believe is when they first met.
	And I would argue that this isn't so much to protect Bill Gates.
	It's about protecting Microsoft.
	Because Epstein in the 1990s, as well as the Maxwell family, extensively involved in the activities of Microsoft to a very significant, it's just very extreme.
	And Ghislaine Maxwell herself was involved in some of those business connections, as well at a time when she was involved with Epstein.
	Epstein was also involved in a very suspicious trip, really a A delegation Microsoft sent to Russia in 1998 where he's touring local high schools in Russia with Microsoft executives.
	Some of those executives, like Nathan Myrvold, later are allegedly tied to his sex trafficking operations and named by prominent Epstein victims as their abusers.
	And you also have Microsoft executives like Linda Stone also being in the mix there as well.
	So there's several executives.
	And Melanie Walker, who I just mentioned, ended up dating a top Microsoft executive in the early 2000s as well.
	Sorry.
	Not at all Whitney.
	The sexual aspect of these crimes is of course independently heinous enough and exploitative in a manner that's almost difficult to conceive of in terms of its scale and scope and geographical reach and the number of people involved.
	But it appears that this is also merely one component, and in fact, an aspect of this is the use of this criminal sexual activity in order to create ties that are connected to power.
	Am I correct?
	And where is it, Whitney, that all of this is going?
	Because it seems to me that you're handling a great deal of information and a great deal of energy, and that you have a sense yourself that you're very close to how global power really Well, you know, that was my whole effort of the book.
	You know, I wrote a thousand pages.
	It's two volumes.
	The second volume focuses on Epstein, and the first volume focuses on how this happened and how this network that enabled Epstein essentially came into existence.
	And, you know, what I'm trying to do there is really just interrogate the power structures that are essentially running most of the Western world, and of course the Western world Particularly U.S.
	Empire has client states around the world.
	You know, in other words, this would be the power structure of most of the world today.
	And essentially what you have are major elements of organized crime and intelligence agencies, mainly in the U.S., U.K.
	and Israel, that essentially fused during, you know, the World War II and the immediate post-World War era.
	And a lot of really crazy things have gone on.
	And essentially, what I found is that history is littered with figures just like Jeffrey Epstein.
	He was not an anomaly at all, like we've been told by mainstream media.
	And thus, it's probably likely that people swimming in these elite circles for several decades, you know, found this type of activity in which Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were engaged to be perfectly normal.
	And actually there's reports in 2003 and I think the Evening Standard and other UK outlets that openly talk about Delaine Maxwell training young blonde girls and sex techniques and brandishing whips at parties.
	People knew about this well before Epstein was arrested the first time and nothing was done.
	And you even have the wife of the deceased Senator John McCain in the United States, Cindy McCain, saying in early January 2020, we all knew what he was doing, talking about Epstein.
	So this was known and nothing was done.
	It's extraordinary.
	So it seems like it would be impossible to have a significant connection to Jeffrey Epstein and not know what he was doing.
	Overtly and explicitly, Jeffrey Epstein then is a realtor, a fixer, a global playboy.
	But the nature of his connections means what?
	That he's integrally involved in the true structures of power that are usually concealed.
	Yeah, to an extent.
	I think he was really sort of a middle management figure who was sort of linking top tiers of this power structure and with people on the ground actually enacting a lot of these operations, policies and corrupt acts, and of course him himself being intimately involved.
	Uh, several acts of corruption, uh, as well.
	And ultimately, I think, uh, the reason the financial crimes are not discussed is because, uh, that's getting to the bottom of a lot of things that are still ongoing to this very day.
	Um, and, uh, there's a lot of powerful interests that definitely don't want that coming out.
	And if you look at, for example, when efforts have been made to investigate the tie of Epstein and Wall Street banks, most recently with this situation in the Virgin Islands, The Attorney General was fired after trying to file suit against Deutsche Bank, I believe, for their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
	And the previous attempt to prosecute that in a U.S.
	court saw the judge's son assassinated, essentially.
	By someone that had previously worked for an intelligence linked outfit called Kroll Associates.
	So there's a whole lot of crazy stuff there and so why was the, you know, I think it's pretty clear why the mainstream media won't touch this one if that's how it happened, you know, that's how it's played out on the legal side.
	have a sense that there are elite and inaccessible organizations that primarily are connected
	around the administration of power, the acquisition of profit, the manipulation of the media agenda,
	the top American political figures, significant corporate figures across the globe, some of
	the world's most powerful billionaires have connections and relationships that are illicit.
	And of course the nature of this story suggests that there is a sexual component that's a
	significant part of it.
	One of the other aspects of this is that I keep hearing people connected to this story
	die in mysterious circumstances.
	And then, of course, Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody doesn't seem to be entirely straightforward.
	What's your impression there, Whitney?
	Uh, of Epstein's death, I definitely think the official story is, uh, totally insane and very difficult to believe.
	Uh, and essentially, it's very hard to know what happened that day, because the guards were asleep, the cameras didn't work, and all these different things, you know, went wrong, and it's just a very difficult story to believe, especially if you believe the official, uh, story of how he allegedly hung himself after being on suicide watch with paper-thin sheets, and he's a tall guy.
	I mean, a lot of it doesn't really add up.
	And ultimately, if you look at other people in the Epstein case, for example, Mark Middleton,
	who I mentioned earlier, who was frequently meeting with Epstein at the White House around 94 and 1995,
	early, or in May of last year, he was found hanging by the neck by an extension cord
	and a shotgun blast to the chest.
	A couple months after the Daily Mail published the visitor logs between him and Epstein
	and revealed that what was thought to be five visits really closer to 17.
	And the local Arkansas court blocked all media and all files related to Middleton's death from being released and it was ruled a suicide.
	So you tell me how likely it is that someone hung themselves at the same time they shot themselves in the chest with a shotgun, you know, and how likely that was actually a suicide as authorities maintain.
	Occasionally these stories occur that reveal the true nature of power and it makes me a bit scared to tell you the truth, Whitney.
	Do you sometimes feel like, hold on a minute, if I keep talking about this stuff on the internet and write books about it, it's pretty clear that I'm in some risks.
	Do you ever feel that, mate?
	So there's the network I trace in the book has been reported by previous journalists who had things happen to them like Gary Webb and Danny Casolaro.
	But I think today, the media, you know, the powers that be are more likely to paint me as just a conspiracy theorist and ignore me than, you know, go to all the effort of coming all the way to South America and executing some sort of hit or something like that. And ultimately I feel that if
	you live in fear of these people you're giving them power over you and
	power over your life and if your goal is to free yourself and your family and
	ultimately the world from this type of corrupt power establishment we
	should not be giving them power over us. So that's how I feel personally about
	it.
	Encouraging.
	Also, they'd have to get into the grandma handbag, sneak in there, hang you, shoot you.
	It's a complicated murder to carry out.
	We've been talking about the WF and Davos this week, Wendy.
	This similarly seems like, this similar, Whitney, excuse me, This similarly seems like an organization where powerful people come together.
	Now at least in this instance it is overt.
	Opinions seem to range from thinking that it's a pretty banal event and it's just a sort of a trade fair and a conference to people thinking that it is a demonstration that there is collusion that takes place between heads of state and powerful corporate figures.
	Where do you stand and does the Jeffrey Epstein story and the Davos WF story ever intersect?
	Yeah, there are intersections with the World Economic Forum and the Epstein story.
	I can talk about that a little bit later.
	but in general, the World Economic Forum, they describe themselves as the premier organization
	promoting public private partnerships, which is essentially furthering the vision of Mussolini
	when he defined fascism as corporatism, the merging of the public and private sectors.
	And if you look, if you actually analyze a lot of the public private partnerships
	that the WEF produces, they're very alarming.
	And I don't think enough people actually spend the time to analyze those partnerships.
	So one that I've done a lot of reporting on in the past is called the Partnership Against Cybercrime
	at the World Economic Forum.
	It's led by the current head of strategy for the WEF, who is a top Israeli military intelligence figure, who was responsible for basically turning Black Cube, for example, into a Mossad cutout and advising Netanyahu.
	On a whole lot of really damaging policies.
	And essentially what that partnership against cybercrime involves are Wall Street banks, tech companies with ties to intelligence, and the U.S.
	Department of Justice, the FBI, the U.K.
	Crime Agency, I believe, and then the Israelis, one of their cyberintelligence directorates.
	And what they argue for is the end of online anonymity completely, linking all your Internet activity to a government-issued ID.
	Allegedly to fight against cybercrime and also the emerging of Wall Street banks, their regulators and intelligence agencies, allegedly as a means of hedging against what they believe is an imminent cyber attack that will collapse the existing financial system and then require that people essentially have a government issued ID to access the Internet.
	And a lot of these policies are being developed by these public-private partnerships under the I guess umbrella of the WEF and then they're handed to governments and a lot of these governments end up enacting that.
	And if you look at things, of course, like the Young Global Leaders Program, how certain governments around the world have a very high number of WEF affiliated individuals in their government, they receive a policy from the WEF, they're likely to enact it.
	So, you know, well, ultimately, what is that?
	What does that mean?
	And I mean, merging Wall Street banks, merging with their regulators is totally insane.
	But then combining that with like the CIA, which anyway, has its origins going back to corrupt Wall Street lawyers and the U.S.
	oligarchy in general.
	I mean, that is just a recipe for total disaster.
	And how does that actually prevent cybercrime when Wall Street banks regularly engage in actual criminal activity that's never prosecuted?
	You know, it's absolutely insane.
	And this is the type of policies the WEF sign off on.
	And so a lot of people do rightly point out that they're unaccountable and all of this stuff.
	But you know, sometimes it's low on facts and very much large on hype, some of those narratives.
	And I think people need to look a lot deeper into what's actually going on and what's actually being developed in terms of policy and how those policies are making their way to governments.
	And also, I think the relationship between the WEF and the UN needs to be interrogated.
	because it was actually Kofi Annan when he was director general of the UN
	speaking at the WEF in the late 90s, he said, thanks to the WEF, the UN has undergone,
	I think he called it a silent or quiet revolution where now the businesses of the UN
	are the businesses of the world, showing a pivot of the UN to champion the interests
	of banks and the private sector.
	That's a very significant influence exerted there by the WEF over a series of decades.
	And if you look at the history of Klaus Schwab, you know, his family history,
	his relationship to Henry Kissinger, how he was recruited by Henry Kissinger
	via a CIA funded program at Harvard and all of this stuff, it's very alarming.
	And then, you know, if you look at, you know, intelligence connections,
	as I mentioned a few, the WEF head of strategies and intelligence agent
	At this year's Davos, they've invited several prominent intelligence figures in the U.S.
	and from other countries around the world to meet in secret with top leaders.
	You know, people may consider me a conspiracy theorist for thinking that's bad, but I personally think that this is something that needs to be interrogated because these people have historical track records where they've engaged in corruption and criminality.
	There are some terrifying connections and schemes being proposed there, in particular the idea that Wall Street and the CIA might merge and then self-regulate in order to... We'll take the honesty of Wall Street and the kindness of the CIA and to make sure nothing goes wrong it can regulate itself.
	We'll take this bat coronavirus What ideas are these people going to come up with next?
	Whitney, it's extraordinary to speak with you.
	Also, you speak really, really quickly.
	I feel like there can't be that many people, and I count myself as one of the potential ones, that can speak that quickly and listen that quickly.
	What's it like inside your mind?
	Are things going fast in there, mate?
	I had coffee this morning.
	It's to blame.
	Probably, but people tend to say I do speak quickly, my brain moves kind of quickly, sorry about that.
	It's good, it's nice, it's a wonderful trait.
	Whitney, I think you're doing incredibly well bearing the freight of all of this incredible information, so much of which is ...continually condemned and criticized and presented as conspiratorial but your research suggests that there's a significant cause for in-depth investigation and the only reason these investigations aren't taking place is so much of this stuff is just flat-out true and to present it to a significant number of people to a wide audience would mean that there would be considerable opposition to many of these ideas.
	We've often said on our show that the whole The cast of data that is considered censored information, the FISA files being booted off into the future, the inability to release the JFK files, the fact that there is this degree of classification suggests that a great deal of information has to be kept from most people in order to prevent a significant uprising and a demand for a total reorganization of the system.
	There has to be this degree of censorship, misinformation, disinformation, smearing, In order to preserve the cartels that you describe, it's sort of bloody really, really frightening.
	I don't know why this in particular is frightening, because I suppose it shows people get really killed and some of the more smiley, happy, sort of Disney-fied political figures are in fact involved in weird sex stuff and murder.
	Going back to Bill Gates, the other kind of slightly terrifying thing for me is that you've got a figure like Bill Gates and a lot of the things that Witness just revealed to us, who's now essentially in charge of our global health policy.
	You know, you get someone who we know how much money that Bill Gates donates to the media and you can see that that must give him a certain amount of, I guess, protection through the media.
	But he's also been elevated to a position where he's incredibly influential.
	So it's not just that people in power are getting away with all sorts of pretty dreadful things.
	It's that those people are continually elevated to places where they can literally set the agenda for most of the rest of us in the world.
	As we saw in the pandemic, and as we still see with the regulation that takes place on YouTube, the WHO policy with regard to certain medical matters is the one that determines what can be said and not said on YouTube.
	That's just one simple example.
	I wonder sometimes, Whitney, what the counter-narrative could even be.
	Oh no, Jeffrey Epstein was just this kind of guy, and Bill Clinton was only hanging with him for this reason, and Bill Gates was only... Oh, and that's just... I mean, oh, this suicide is... I mean, it's just such a sort of...
	A tsunami of malign data that it's sort of, you can't ignore it really, can you?
	I mean, you obviously can't, Whitney.
	You're caffeinated up to the eyeballs.
	You're perched in there in a pastel universe, reporting all these terrifying facts.
	I don't know how you deal with it, but I'm really grateful to you that you do.
	Well, thanks.
	I really, really appreciate that.
	Will you come on our show again and terrify us with an inch of our lives with more information about how the global powerful can have us executed at will and can make it look like suicide?
	Sure, I'd love to be back.
	Thanks so much.
	Thank you.
	Well, thank you for joining us from that extraordinary location over there in Chile.
	And thank you for the great work you do.
	I'm sure it must take its toll on you and you're bearing it most wonderfully.
	Thank you.
	Whitney Webb is the author of One Nation Under Blackmail.
	We'll post a link so you can get that.
	And she's a writer for Unlimited Hangout.
	Well, there you go.
	I mean, that's worth, like, if you are not a member of our Stay Free AF community, where we put additional content up on locals, surely today's show was a significant prompt to take that step finally.
	Just for a few more weeks, it's available for $33.
	You get intimate access to me, even more intimate, Access to the world's favourite French horn player over there.
	And whatever you want from us, we will try our best to provide.
	We are doing our best to create a community where we can have open conversations about the true nature of power and hopefully create new systems among ourselves.
	I'm a believer that individual personal awakening, collective and community action He's the only thing that can countenance these systems of hypocrisy and corruption.
	On tomorrow's show we've got Alex Berenson.
	He's one of the Twitterphile journalists.
	Why are you laughing now?
	No, I'm just saying it keeps on coming, doesn't it?
	What, Alex Berenson?
	No, just, you know...
	Another great show coming.
	Yeah, Alex Berenson, he's the person that that dude from Pfizer wanted booted off Twitter because he was talking about natural immunity and all sorts of other stuff that turned out to be true.
	Also, we've got Andrew Lawton, our man in Davos.
	He came on the other day for our WEF Royal Rumble special.
	We charged him with the task Of getting a photo with or of Klaus Schwab.
	Has he done it?
	Join us tomorrow for that.
	Plus, remember, as I've said, to sign up to our community on Locals for access to our new special show, Stay Connected, where you will get so much bloody intimate access to me and Gareth, you'll probably be sick and have to hang yourself in your cell.
	Join us tomorrow, not just for more of the same, but for more of the different.
	Until then, stay free, stay free.

▲