Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 13, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

03:21:09

WEF SPECIAL: The Most Terrifying Event Of 2023 - #059 - Stay Free With Russell Brand

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	And it's the W.E.F.
	Davos Convention.
	And that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include all of these world leaders.
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	who will be the ultimate warrior and who will be the ultimate victims.
	We already know who that is.
	Join us for an extended stream 7am PT, 10am ET and 3pm GMT.
	W E W E I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea. W F World Rumble. See you there.
	Stay free.
	Stay free with Russell Brand.
	See it first on Rumble.
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, like.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here,
	we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your
	brainwaves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include All of these world leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	You get the idea, WF World Rumble, see you there, stay free.
	Stay free with Russell Brand, see it first on Rumble.
	Good morning Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here,
	we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can, and we measure
	your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include all of these World leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Logan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea!
	WF World Rumble!
	See you there!
	Stay free!
	Stay free with Russell Brand!
	See it first on Rumble!
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Leik.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in 10 years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his crowds from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include All of these world leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Logan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	W-E-T!
	W... I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea.
	WF World Rumble.
	See you there.
	Stay free.
	Stay free with Russell Brand.
	See it first on Rumble.
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	Can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his crowds from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include all of these World leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be the Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be the ultimate warrior?
	And who will be the ultimate victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea!
	WF Royal Rumble!
	See you there!
	Stay free!
	Stay free with Russell Brand!
	See it first on Rumble!
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Leik.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in ten years when we are sitting here we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include all of these World leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Logan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET and 3pm GMT!
	W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea!
	WF Royal Rumble!
	See you there!
	Stay free!
	Stay free with Russell Brand!
	See it first on Rumble!
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Leik.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in 10 years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include All of these world leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET and 3pm GMT!
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	Stay free with Russell Brand. See it first on Rumble.
	Good morning Klaus.
	Good morning Like.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here we have an implant in our brains
	and I can immediately feel because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include all of these World leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea!
	WF World Rumble!
	See you there!
	Stay free!
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Leik.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in 10 years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include all of these World leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea!
	WF Royal Rumble!
	See you there!
	Stay free!
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Leik.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in 10 years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include all of these World leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea!
	WF Royal Rumble!
	See you there!
	Stay free!
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Leik.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in 10 years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include All of these world leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	WF... I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea.
	WF World Rumble.
	See you there.
	Stay free.
	Stay free with Russell Brand.
	See it first on Rumble.
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	Can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include all of these World leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be the Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be the ultimate warrior?
	And who will be the ultimate victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream 7 a.m PT 10 a.m ET and 3 p.m GMT Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	You get the idea, WF World Rumble, see you there, stay free.
	Stay free with Russell Brand, see it first on Rumble.
	Good morning Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here,
	we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can, and we measure
	your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include all of these World leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be the Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be the ultimate warrior?
	And who will be the ultimate victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea!
	WF Royal Rumble!
	See you there!
	Stay free!
	Stay free with Russell Brand!
	See it first on Rumble!
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Leik.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in ten years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include All of these world leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	W... I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea.
	WF World Rumble.
	See you there.
	Stay free.
	Stay free with Russell Brand.
	See it first on Rumble.
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	Can you imagine Sir, in ten years when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include all of these world leaders.
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea!
	WF Royal Rumble!
	See you there!
	Stay free!
	Stay free with Russell Brand!
	See it first on Rumble!
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Leik.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in ten years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include All of these world leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET and 3pm GMT!
	W... I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea.
	WF World Rumble.
	See you there.
	Stay free.
	Stay free with Russell Brand.
	See it first on Rumble.
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	Can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include all of these World leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be the Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be the ultimate warrior?
	And who will be the ultimate victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream 7 a.m PT 10 a.m ET and 3 p.m GMT Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	You get the idea. WF World Rumble. See you there. Stay free.
	Stay free with Russell Brand. See it first on Rumble.
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here,
	we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can, and we measure
	your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include all of these World leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be the Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be the Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be the Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	W-E-W-E- I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea!
	WF Royal Rumble!
	See you there!
	Stay free!
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Leik.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in ten years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include All of these world leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	You get the idea, WF, Royal Rumble, see you there, stay free.
	Stay free with Russell Brand, see it first on Rumble.
	Good morning Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here,
	we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can, and we measure
	your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include all All of these world leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	W-E-T!
	I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea.
	WF World Rumble.
	See you there.
	Stay free.
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	Can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include All of these world leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	W E Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	You get the idea, WF World Rumble, see you there, stay free.
	Stay free with Russell Brand, see it first on Rumble.
	Good morning Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here,
	we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can, and we measure
	your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include All of these world leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be The Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be The Ultimate Warrior?
	And who will be The Ultimate Victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET, and 3pm GMT!
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	You get the idea. WF World Rumble. See you there. Stay free.
	Stay free with Russell Brand. See it first on Rumble.
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here,
	we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can and we measure
	your brain waves.
	As I mentioned, January the 16th is round again.
	It's the WEF Davos Convention and that is why we are presenting the WEF Royal Rumble.
	Join us for an extended stream where we'll be looking at Klaus Schwab and all of his pals from around the world.
	Tech giants, politicians, former WEF stooges.
	They include all of these World leaders!
	Who will be representing Pfizer?
	Who will be representing Big Tech?
	What's Rishi Sunak gonna do there?
	Will we get to see Mark Zuckerberg?
	Who will be the Undertaker?
	Who will be Hulk Hogan?
	Who will be the ultimate warrior?
	And who will be the ultimate victims?
	We already know who that is!
	Join us for an extended stream!
	7am PT, 10am ET and 3pm GMT!
	WF... I can't think of a sign for it.
	You get the idea.
	WF World Rumble.
	See you there.
	Stay free.
	Stay free with Russell Brand.
	See it first on Rumble.
	Good morning, Klaus.
	Good morning, Mike.
	Where are we?
	We are here at the headquarters of the World Economic Forum.
	In this video, you're going to see the future.
	you you
	Hello there, you awakening wonders.
	Welcome to WAF Davos Conference Royal Rumble with me, Russell Brand, my online amanuensis, Mr. Senor Gareth Roy.
	All right, Gareth?
	Hello, mate.
	You all right?
	Can you believe it's already Davos again?
	Incredible.
	If you're watching this on YouTube, stay with us, because we're going to be with you for a while here, but there'll be a certain point where what we're saying is so controversial, so at odds with the existing power structures imposed upon you by elites, that they simply will not allow it on YouTube, which, as you know, takes its guidelines when it comes to medical and health matters from the WHO.
	One of the arguments we're making when we're talking about the WEF and this Royal Rumble spectacular is unelected globalist bodies are now able to exert more power than democratic governments in liberal democracies or even in dictatorships.
	That we are moving towards a globalist state and globalists will always want more surveillance, more digital IDs, more social credit scoring, more abilities to lock down.
	So they will create the conditions Not that I'm saying that's happened already or historically.
	I'm not saying that.
	Certainly I'm not saying that on YouTube.
	We're not conspiracy theorists, in spite of the visible tinfoil hat just there, just there out of shot.
	See that guy?
	We're not conspiracy theorists.
	We are looking to find evidence that demonstrates how power operates.
	We've got some fantastic guests coming up in the show.
	We're sponsored by Johnson & Johnson today.
	They are, well they do a lot of things really.
	They make baby powders that have never been criminally proven to be carcinogenic, even though they have been out of a court settlement.
	Quite a hefty one.
	There's been some hefty out of court settlements because some people said that the baby powder was carcinogenic but that was never ever legally proven and I want to be absolutely clear about that.
	They also made a bloody good vaccine.
	What about that shampoo for babies as well?
	What did that do wrong?
	I don't know if it's done anything.
	It doesn't make you cry does it?
	It's nice isn't it?
	No tears.
	But the tears may start if you start using the baby powder but certainly not if you're pregnant.
	But that's never been legally proven.
	No.
	So some of the things we're looking at with WEF, we want to approach this like this.
	Imagine that you approach the WEF how the mainstream media approach it.
	There's nothing wrong with it.
	It's just an opportunity for the best and the brightest to come together to discuss the rest of our future.
	We're going to be looking at how convenience and safety are always presented as ways to assert control.
	Do you know they're talking about misinformation this year?
	Misinformation and disinformation and malinformation and all the whole Information family, really.
	Yeah.
	Like Donald Duck's nephews.
	That's right, yeah.
	There's Huey, Louie and Dewey.
	Miss, Mal, Dis.
	Imagine them as just Donald Duck's nephews.
	Then they're less offensive.
	We're looking at some of their best catchphrases.
	The Great Reset.
	That was a good one.
	That's their most famous brand.
	Yeah.
	Isn't it?
	We're going to do a great reset.
	I think they regret that one a little bit.
	It came across bad because it came across like we're going to sort of assert undemocratic power.
	Then, You Will Owe Nothing and Be Happy.
	They keep getting it wrong, don't they?
	Their catchphrases are not good!
	No.
	They want to come up with better ones, like, just do it!
	Like or innit?
	The real thing!
	Yeah.
	More, you know, they're good catchphrases.
	We're going to be looking at how environmental controls might soon be asserted.
	There's loads of stuff.
	And the question that we're asking you over the course of this free hour marathon, this WEF marathon, is are the WEF a threat to your freedom?
	Let me know in the comments.
	Let me know in the chat if you believe that they're a real threat or are they little more than a soft power organization?
	Where some of the most influential people in the world can come together to discuss important ideas and we're getting all het up about nothing.
	We're going to look at some of our... Even that's pretty bad though, isn't it?
	Yeah, even the... Even when people say, oh it's not that bad, it's just the world's most powerful people coming together to conspire.
	The best case scenario ain't that good.
	It's not that great.
	It's just the world's most powerful people coming together to conspire.
	And Bono.
	Why are you excluding Bono from the World's Most Powerful People?
	Well, musically, maybe.
	Apart from when they did that free album.
	I didn't like that.
	That album that forces its way onto your phone, like every time that my Bluetooth syncs up with my car and I hear some weird song about like wolves or something.
	Hold on, I don't know this.
	This isn't what I want.
	I've met some of the people from YouTube and they were really nice.
	Bono, Edge.
	But the way that thing keeps putting itself on my car radio, that's pissed me off.
	As a matter of fact.
	We'll cover that.
	That's one of the key issues.
	What the hell are you two doing all over my iPod?
	We're going to be talking to James Melville live in the studio.
	Why he's interesting, Gareth, why you're going to love him, is he's someone from what you might call the conventional traditional left who has become deeply suspicious of the WEF and indeed now believes in the more extreme ideas about them like that there are You know, a bunch of cackling villains.
	Also, Andrew Lawton, we're going to talk to.
	He's actually at Dallas.
	Was he going to be there now?
	Yeah, he's there.
	He's right now.
	He's doing clips on Twitter and stuff, having a hell of a time.
	Do you think we could get him to get a picture with Klaus Schwab or someone?
	It should.
	I think that should be the thing we demand from him.
	James, if you're watching this now, and you should be, it's a professional obligation, make sure you get some selfies with some top WF stars, like as if it's a Panini sticker book.
	Or baseball cards if you're an American.
	The top trumps of WEF, Dazzle, Davos.
	That's going to be people like Larry Fink, Blackrock CEO.
	I want at least one tech oligarch.
	I'm talking Zuckerbergs, someone like that.
	Trudeau, we want him.
	If you can get Trudeau, that's fantastic.
	Trudeau, when he attended, I think in 2018, 800 grand it cost the Canadian taxpayers, just on Davos costs.
	It's a good fact that, Russ.
	What was he doing in the minibar?
	Well, it's because you know I'm an investigative journalist and I just investigated that by talking to our guest earlier.
	I'm just remembering what he said really.
	Tim Hinchliffe, he's coming on.
	What's he going to tell us?
	He's saying about WF managing director Adrian Monk who once called him a bad faith actor because of his articles on WF.
	And Schellenberger, my favourite.
	Can I just call him Schellenberger?
	No.
	Michael Schellenberger.
	You loved him.
	I really loved him because I like people... I saw your eyes come alive during that interview.
	When someone comes on our show and they start saying stuff, I'm like, go on mate.
	Like when they're pushing it more than I would, that's why I push it real good.
	That's what I like, you know, when they're like pushing that.
	Where did the phrase come from, pushing the envelope?
	What's so good about pushing an envelope?
	Is it that you're meant to be, you're putting something, like you've written a letter and you're really pushing the envelope and you're going to post it?
	Yeah.
	And then, oh, am I really going to post this envelope?
	You're really pushing the envelope.
	Is that what it is?
	That doesn't seem like that should be it.
	It's not that big of a deal to push an envelope, is it?
	Not really.
	Let us know in the comments, in the chat.
	We're going to have a look now.
	Right, so hey, later on in the show, you've got to stay with us for this because we're doing a great presentation.
	Here's the news.
	No, here's the effing news that we literally will not be able to show you on YouTube except with extreme censorship because The WHO made an amazing bit of propaganda about how anti-vaxxers are worse than terrorists.
	Worse than them.
	They cause more damage.
	But we present that with a new study about adverse vaccine reactions, which we simply wouldn't be able to show you on YouTube.
	So stay for that.
	And if you know anyone, by chance, that's not watching this yet...
	Get them watching because this is, anyone that you know that thinks that you're a crackpot tinfoil hat wearing nut job then get them to watch this and we'll help, we'll explain for you why you're not crazy.
	Also we're on for so long today that you could probably be on the actual show.
	If you want to come on, all you've got to do is find us and you can come on with us and come and be here.
	Yeah, we've got ages.
	We've got probably wherever you are in the world.
	You could be at Davos and like whip off your lanyard, unhook yourself from Klaus Schwab and I believe like a sow, he has nipples all the way down his body.
	Oh, is that it?
	Like a sow.
	Yeah.
	That's what gives him his power, is that he's got nipples up and down his body.
	He's a jolly old, bowled Father Christmas in many ways.
	He's got something about him that's quite adorable.
	Pussy Blanco! She will own us and she will be happy.
	He's a jolly old, bald Father Christmas in many ways. He's got something about him that's quite adorable.
	We've got some great facts about Klaus coming up as well.
	We're going to tell you the score on Klaus.
	Okay, so what are we going to look at first?
	Are we looking at a news report on Davos?
	Yeah, I think we should.
	Maybe we could either look at, here's what the news is saying about Davos, or we could look at a bit of an explanation as to what Davos is.
	Let's see normal news reporting about it to see if they capture its truth.
	What if we're wrong?
	What if it is just the world's most powerful people coming together to come up with ideas that ultimately lead to social credit score systems, more surveillance, more ability for big tech and big government to control you?
	Essentially, a lot of what we're talking about today is covered in this fantastic book, The Revolt of the Public, written by Martin Goury, who's a man who's got a very... Look at the size of his name in comparison to the size of the title.
	You wouldn't do that, would you?
	Check this out.
	Your books are all called Russell Brand.
	Look at this one.
	Revolution by me.
	All right.
	Look, firstly... I'm amazed.
	Revolution's got as big a font on there.
	I know, but look at old Russ.
	Funny, full of charm and engaging.
	And that's just what I've written about myself there.
	That's by Owen Jones, that.
	And look at this.
	Yeah, he's just put his name on that.
	What he contests, Martin Goury, who's coming on the show next week, I think, in this book is that the powerful are simply unable to deal with the changing dynamic between the public and the establishment.
	The public being described in this book using Walter Lippmann's terminology as any group that's interested in a particular subject and can agitate in one direction for that issue or against that issue.
	This is a fantastic book.
	We're going to be talking to the author of it next week.
	But let's see how the old news, who have to control the narrative on behalf of established elites, we'll be contesting.
	Let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments if you agree with that, are covering Davos to see if we've got anything to worry about at all.
	Let's have a look.
	Well, in addition to a lot of snow, Charles, we're going to be having a lot of very high level discussions.
	Why are you mentioning the weather for?
	They love the weather, don't they?
	The weather and the news, they're always together, aren't they?
	They also have traffic report, they'll let that in a little bit, but weather and news are very much the mum and dad of information.
	About the challenges ahead, the theme of this year's meeting is cooperation in a fragmented world.
	Cooperation in a fragmented world means centralised power.
	How do you cooperate in a fragmented world?
	Why don't you create the ability to exert centralised authority?
	Yeah also cooperation isn't exactly right is it?
	You're not cooperating when you're like mandating things.
	Would you mind cooperating?
	Oh no I don't want to.
	Well you will cooperate because we're going to lock you in your house and you're going to own nothing and you're going to be happy.
	Oh well we'll cooperate then.
	That's taking away people's ability to choose.
	I don't mean cooperate.
	So is it that WF are soft selling tyrannical ideas?
	Is it that we once believed that Fascism was an Orwellian idea, easy to read aesthetics, greyness, militarised, and we're moving towards a Huxley-esque idea of dystopia, where it's sanitised, banalised, easy and acceptable.
	With snow.
	There's plenty of snow here in Dystopia, Dyssnopia.
	That's the spirit of it, a globalized world of cooperation.
	thread that runs through all of those challenges that you just mentioned. Now
	the divisions were felt a little bit at last year's rather unusual midseason
	meeting. It was held back in May, it was the first in over two years since the
	start of the pandemic. But the very spirit and identity of Davos is that
	globalized world of cooperation and it's a... That's the spirit of it, a globalized world of cooperation.
	That's the spirit. The problem I suppose with globalization is that it's created
	disassociation, detachment and the ability for corporations to exert more
	power than perhaps is due to them.
	But over the course of our marathon WEF Royal Rumble session, we're going to be showing you that we view the world now through a false lens, that ultimately corporations are much more powerful than governments now.
	I know most of you know that.
	Let me know if you knew that already in the chat.
	and the comments and that we can demonstrate that both through GDP and the ability to implement policy.
	So in a sense the idea that corporations are a subset of nations is erroneous.
	Therefore we're already further along the globalism trajectory than we imagined ourselves to be.
	So when they're talking about cooperation in a fragmented world, whose cooperation?
	It's not you or dear Gareth Royce out there.
	You don't get a look in this geezer. It's going to be about the power of already incredibly powerful organizations and
	corporations isn't it?
	It's one of those phrases you know when you're talking about cooperation in a fragmented world
	and that's the spirit of Davos that is about cooperation.
	I mean, that doesn't necessarily mean it's a good thing, does it?
	No.
	If all these powers are coming together and cooperating with each other to basically negatively impact the citizens then that you know you can't just use a phrase like that and expect people to go oh that does sound nice that you're cooperating after this i'm gonna i'm gonna shock you by showing you the wef in numbers gal so some important figures that demonstrate can i just ask a bit more of a personal question
	See this necklace?
	Yeah, it's very jangling.
	It's jangling and it's bothering me a bit but I do want everyone to know that it's quite a good necklace and do you think I should take it off to stop the jangling?
	This is one of the ones we have trouble with when we do our presentations.
	This one, this has to be taped right down.
	It's the worst one.
	My nemesis.
	I don't know.
	Stop wearing it.
	Should I take it off because it's really jangling?
	All right.
	Shall I take it off?
	You've never done that before.
	Memorise what I look like with this on.
	I don't want people thinking I don't look as good because suddenly I feel a bit bland and banalised like a globalised world in which I don't own anything.
	That everything's centrally owned and I rent it like the licensing agreements that we have with Apple.
	That's all you've got.
	Do you think you own your records?
	Absolutely not.
	Do you think you own their movies?
	Well, I've got the U2 one.
	That I own!
	For life!
	It's like tinnitus!
	I wouldn't be surprised if they organised for Adam Clayton to start tapping away in my brain whenever he feels like it.
	Adam, I'm trying to go to bed!
	Alright, let's look at a bit more of the news, shall we?
	...system that's really struggling to keep up with the shifting balance of global power and the crises of the moment.
	Now, we are expecting to hear this week from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, although whether by video link or possibly in person is... Maybe by Dalek?
	Hello, I am talking to you here today.
	Are you not allowed to take the mickey out of people's voices?
	Well, we're on YouTube.
	I didn't even mean that.
	Everyone's right to say that.
	That man's a hero.
	Isn't he though?
	Yes.
	Is he?
	Do you think it's easy?
	To be a comedian and then suddenly now you're leading the country.
	Do you think it's easy to get Blackrock in to rebuild your country?
	Yes, I think that's probably quite easy.
	There's a flow.
	I think they were going to do that anyway.
	That was pretty planned.
	But it's difficult to run Ukraine and to keep people's spirits up when they're being, you know, that is a criminal invasion by Russia.
	It's bad.
	And what about when he had to pose in Vanity Fair?
	Do you think it's easy to pose?
	I've done that myself and it's actually quite annoying.
	You didn't like it.
	I hated it, it's irritating.
	Didn't his wife go on a shopping spree in Paris?
	Apparently so, yeah.
	Do you think it's easy for your wife to go on a shopping spree in Paris?
	People are complicated.
	When you simplify it into like, Zelensky's nothing but a hero that's having an ear, it's offensive.
	I think you can be both, personally.
	Both what?
	I think you can be a hero and go on a shopping spree.
	I think both are possible.
	I'm a hero, I'm on a shopping spree.
	Not many films about it though, are there, Gail?
	Indiana Jones and the shopping spree of Rodeo Drive.
	No, because he's got to get that egg.
	And he... I thought he was about Zelensky.
	Is that how the war's going to end?
	You've got to get that egg before that little king boy.
	This will never happen in my kingdom again.
	It's still unclear.
	There will be no Russian presence here at all.
	Ursula von der Leyen will be here from Brussels.
	Not going to help the fractured world.
	Make sure, this is how we're going to solve fractured world.
	We're going to completely exclude all countries that we don't agree with.
	Oh, so you want centralised unipolar world, isn't it?
	Yeah.
	I've told you this.
	No, I know.
	I mean, I guess it's very reductive, isn't it?
	This is going to be the best Davos ever.
	I mean, when we're talking about fragmented worlds, it usually comes about as a reaction to reductivism, doesn't it?
	Different people want different things.
	Right.
	And yet we get along.
	I guess there'll be, I don't know, People from, well we know, Black Rock.
	There'll probably be people from Raytheon and all other kind of arms companies.
	It's alright, they can be there, but there couldn't be anyone from Russia.
	Even if it was like a tennis player or something.
	Can't have tennis players turning up willy-nilly.
	That's complicated.
	You're not going to help the fragmented world.
	Yeah, if you've got Raytheon and all them.
	Are you worried about my papers?
	I'm worried that you've got things written on the side of that cat.
	Where's my notes?
	It says here, we're not really sponsored by Johnson & Johnson.
	It's a joke.
	Put that cat back down.
	Because some of our ardent fans thought we were actually sponsored by Vanguard, but we're not.
	Sponsored by, frankly, not by anyone.
	We're not getting enough sponsorship opportunities.
	We should have.
	We should have more contacts like at Davos.
	Klaus, do you think Klaus isn't getting sponsored?
	Klaus gets a sponsorship!
	Pfizer!
	Medicine.
	Good for you, that.
	Have a medicine.
	Not all of them.
	What do you mean, not all of the medicines?
	What I'm saying, not the ones you think.
	Not the ones you think.
	There have been lawsuits.
	What?
	Against Pfizer?
	No, no, no.
	I have a tattoo of them on me.
	They've done such sterling work.
	Come on, I'm trying to watch the news.
	Come on, mainstream media, tell me what to think.
	China is sending its vice premier, that's the highest level delegation from China in Davos, in several years and it will be the first foreign trip for a high-level government official since China lifted its COVID travel restrictions.
	Now, the risk of a looming global recession, the effects of the energy crisis and high inflation on households and businesses, especially on the most vulnerable families, the ever-widening impact of climate change—all of these are going to be headline issues, along with discussions on things like labor trends, the culture of leadership, gender parity, digitalization, data They've got it all covered.
	All of it.
	And they're going to make it all better.
	I don't think I'd like it there.
	Should we go next year?
	Do you reckon they'll let us in?
	Do you think they will?
	I don't think they will, no.
	In a minute I'm going to show you the WEF by numbers.
	You'd have to go down as... You'd have to have one of those journalist lanyards.
	But you'd have to do your proper journalism.
	But I will!
	Right.
	...curity. I'll be bringing you all the latest throughout the week, including a special debate in partnership with
	the World Economic Forum.
	Have a great time?
	That's their slogan.
	Have a great time.
	Oh, okay then.
	You will own nothing and have a great time.
	She also said, as the news, she just said, we'll be doing a special session next week in partnership with the WEF.
	It's like, well, it's not the news then, is it?
	If you're in partnership with them.
	You can't be in partnership with them and do proper news.
	No.
	You've got to be radical, baby.
	you gotta be independent like us man.
	...forum about Europe's energy security and competitiveness that'll be
	broadcast on France 24 this Friday.
	Lovely, there you go.
	That's the mainstream media reporting about it.
	Some people are talking to us on our numerous platforms, like our special membership community on local Stay Free AF.
	Colin says, how are they actually becoming unelected overlords?
	How are we giving up sovereignty to these people?
	I suppose, mate, it was the gradual trend of corporatism taking over liberal democracies.
	It was the advent of neoliberalism.
	It was the decline in true opposition in American politics in particular that took place in the 90s.
	Tony Blair, who will be at Davos this year, is one of the architects of dismantling democracy in our little old country and some say in advocating for an illegal war.
	in Iraq that was quite profitable, the reconstruction-wise.
	Frank says, is there anything formal in government's legislation around
	the world against government officials being an executive representative of a
	private organization?
	If so, how are these conflicts of interest typically resolved? I'm going to ask that
	to a proper journalist, that was quite a difficult question.
	Keep letting us know what questions you have.
	If I can answer them, I will.
	Gareth will answer them if he can.
	Some of the top journalists that we're talking to, like Schellenberger, he'll be on.
	You can't wait, can you?
	I can't wait to talk to him.
	You've been counting down the minutes until Schellenberger's back on.
	I just want to ask you a question.
	Do you think that Schellenberger's been thinking about me since the last chat?
	I think so, yeah.
	Probably a bit, hasn't he?
	Okay, so in 2013, the American taxpayer, so if you're American and you pay your tax, that's you, Helped fund the sponsoring organisation with tens of millions of dollars in federal grants.
	Since 2013, the WEF received nearly $60 million from taxpayers.
	Schwab, or himself, has come under scrutiny for using WEF funds and business contracts to enhance his own personal wealth.
	Oh, he's trying his hardest.
	Attendees pay $28,000 just for a ticket.
	We've coveted all-access badges fetching more like $50,000.
	That's for all-access though.
	Before you start saying that's expensive, you can go wherever you want with that.
	Just wander in one of the tents, see what Klaus is doing.
	See him chalking himself up.
	Not with Johnson & Johnson.
	Would he have them all on display, the teats?
	I think what he's got is Velcro strips and go like that and all the teats can come out and then Trudeau can be on a teat there.
	Rishi Sunak, Merkel, she can get a teat.
	There's a teat for everybody.
	Look at this, we're flashing around the facts.
	Here's a Schwab fact.
	Klaus Schwab has been known to tell underlings he anticipates one day receiving a Nobel Peace Prize.
	Do you know what I anticipate?
	I sense it.
	I sense a movement in the force.
	There'll be a Nobel Peace Prize coming this way.
	Grab a nipple.
	On his travels, he demands the privileges of visiting heads of state, complete with welcoming delegations at the airport.
	Does he really?
	Apparently so, yeah.
	At the Forum's headquarters in Switzerland, a glass-fronted campus looking out over Lake Geneva.
	Nice.
	A hallway connecting two wings, he's lined with photos of Schwab posing with world leaders.
	He's trying his hardest.
	He loves it.
	Let's go back to the WF in numbers.
	Can we go back to that?
	Yeah, let's have a look at that.
	50,000, that's it.
	Those are the numbers.
	It's 50 grand for that.
	You can have a little ski while you're there, can't you?
	Yeah, you can.
	That's nice to know.
	Is that it for the numbers?
	Should we have a look at you will own nothing?
	Sure thing.
	Because if one thing has brought Davos, you just settle, if one thing has brought Davos to the attention of the world and perhaps one of the things that's made people query their intentions is their famous slogan, their number one hit, you will own nothing and you will be happy.
	Let's have a look at that to remind ourselves of how this phrase entered the public consciousness.
	He is quite happy that blow.
	Yeah.
	And whatever you want, you'll rent.
	Okay.
	Some of it's sort of, you know, like quite spiritual in a sense, like that you don't own anything, you can't take it with you when you go.
	Yeah.
	I'm not sure they mean that.
	I'm not sure they mean that when they're having discussions with Microsoft and Apple.
	No.
	Microsoft and Apple are more wealthy and powerful than a significant number of the world's nations, aren't they?
	Yeah, they're doing alright.
	And then when you see pictures of drones with parcels, and this was a few years ago, and now we are seeing that.
	If you can't trust a drone to accurately bomb a terrorist and instead blow up a wedding,
	I'm certainly not going to have them delivering me my supplies.
	How about that one?
	on.
	Surely, I mean, the Americans aren't going to like that.
	No, I don't think they'll enjoy that.
	But I think that's the thing, isn't it, about the WEF and Davos is that it's, I mean, it's propaganda that's sneaking things like you learn nothing in with messages like, oh, and also the U.S.
	won't be the richest country in the world anymore.
	So it's kind of telling you some things that you feel like, oh, that might be good.
	And then other stuff.
	Don't worry about that bit.
	You know, they're not just some evil organisation that's just pumping out loads of, you know, like, stuff that we're going to find really quite vulgar.
	No one's suggesting that the WF themselves think of themselves as malfeasant while they're doing it.
	I mean, in fact, isn't, like, this year Idris Elba going to be there?
	Yeah, of course.
	Who I really like.
	Yeah, I mean, loads of amazing... Luffa!
	Right.
	Like, he's a great actor.
	Will.i.am.
	Will.i.am!
	He's gonna be there.
	Yeah.
	These are not offensive characters on the international stage.
	And like, what about David Attenborough?
	Exactly.
	He's been there.
	People that you kind of like.
	But it's just, I suppose, when you have a convergence of interests that have such unprecedented power, not Idris Elba or David Attenborough.
	That's the lovely wallpaper.
	The actual power is big tech organizations such as Facebook and Microsoft and how their interests might align with state officials who want a world where for example digital ID becomes Or mandated and where social credit scores becomes acceptable.
	And it feels like we're being eased towards these type of ideas.
	Always they use convenience and safety as the kind of lubricant for tyranny.
	Well, even just there, we just saw a drone delivering and you might go, what's wrong with the drone delivering parcels?
	You go, well, probably quite a lot.
	First of all, the advancement of drone technologies, not a great thing because of all the other ways in which it's useful.
	The ways in which the corporations that create those things, usually military industrial complex,
	so it's the expansion of that, the expansion of that into police forces, also the loss of
	human labour, I mean there's all sorts of ways in which that just isn't good is it for human
	beings, that drones are going to replace people. Globalism in and of itself implies a
	centralised power and the ability to map one narrative onto a divergent and diverse space,
	where naturally, ordinarily and understandably, there will be different sets of interests,
	regional interests, cultural, political interests.
	In a sense, the opposite of globalism is what ought to be happening.
	Devolution, more and more community power.
	More and more localism.
	The maximum amount of democracy possible.
	Not creating a world where an aristocratic elite are able to dictate, through soft power, the agenda of the world.
	That's why the pandemic, I think, was so significant.
	Because a pandemic, by its nature, requires a global perspective.
	In one of the pieces of the WEF's own propaganda, they point out that the world's richest organizations, corporations and institutions benefited from the pandemic.
	I wonder, therefore, what is to prevent comparable conditions being created again?
	Not that I'm suggesting that the pandemic was anything other than an organic, biological condition, but I'm saying that there already seems to be the creation of a narrative around climate lockdowns.
	I suppose if what you're interested in is globalism and creating a one-world narrative, It appears that what ends up getting promoted are circumstances and ideas that are advantageous to centralised regulatory authorities, whether they're government or corporate or NGOs.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	I mean, one of the things we were talking about, the you'll learn nothing, you'll be happy.
	And we were speaking earlier about the kind of real world example of how that's manifesting.
	I think we've got a graphic of the This is brilliant.
	The Black Rock example.
	This is so good this and like our recent presentation on Black Rock rebuilding Ukraine after Russia's criminal invasion has garnered a lot of interest and attention because it's one way of showing how a geopolitical event has led to profits for a powerful investment company.
	Black Rock as well as we showed in that presentation are involved due to their vastness in a numerous financial activities and in particular in this
	case what we highlighted in that presentation was BlackRock's practice of acquiring real estate in
	America which is unduly biasing the real estate market and in fact meaning it's more and more difficult for
	ordinary Americans to purchase a home which leads to a kind of you will learn
	nothing and you will be happy reality. So whilst it might seem like a kind of phatic and
	easy phrase when it's presented in that loopy little video that you can see here from this
	beautifully created graphic.
	Wall Street giants want to be your landlord.
	Data shows that mega banks are buying up a significant amount of US real estate.
	Renting is up.
	Home ownership is down.
	BlackRock CEO Larry Fink takes a private jet to Davos.
	He'll be there this year, will he, Larry Fink?
	Yep.
	He'll be there.
	One of the stars.
	He's one of the best ones.
	Yeah, amongst his deals with Ukraine and Zelensky.
	So it shows how a globalist agenda can be achieved and how events like this, as well as being opportunities just for sort of off-the-record conflabs, also demonstrates where these interests converge.
	Shall we look at our presentation on Klaus Schwab, Gal?
	Why not?
	This is a beautiful presentation on Klaus.
	You're going to love this because Klaus Schwab, in spite of the presence of the pussy Blanco, is not like a cartoonish Bond villain.
	He's a real man with feelings and a wife and a parking space.
	And those teats.
	He's got sow teats down his flanks.
	But having a set of sow teats down your flanks don't make of you necessarily a villain, does it?
	No.
	Not necessarily, baby.
	So here is a presentation on Klaus Schwab where we see what make the man tick.
	What make him tick, gal?
	What is Klaus Schwab all about?
	How did he get himself into this position of power?
	How did a plucky little... Is he German?
	Swiss?
	How did this plucky little Germanic seeming guy get himself in there?
	He was just a Germanic kid with a dream and a pussy blanco and teats up his flanks.
	How's he got himself in this position?
	He's a German, isn't he?
	He's a former economics professor or something, I think.
	That's what he used to be.
	Don't judge him by that, Gal.
	He's moved on.
	Why can't you?
	Let's learn a little bit more about Klaus Schwab.
	It's January.
	Clear skies and crispness.
	New beginnings.
	And to celebrate that, that global festival of oneness, Davos.
	Yes, Klaus Schwab is putting on his festival once again.
	You will owe nothing and you will be happy!
	We all know Davos.
	We all know its great reset agenda.
	We all know its catchphrase, you'll own nothing and be happy.
	But who is Klaus Schwab?
	What does he want?
	What goes on at the World Economic Forum?
	And should we be afraid of their evil malicious agenda?
	Klaus Schwab, the ringmaster of festivities at the World Economic Forum in Davos, has been known to tell underlings that he anticipates one day receiving a Nobel Peace Prize.
	Probably get a Nobel Peace Prize one day, don't you reckon?
	No?
	Schwab's greatest accomplishment is decidedly entrepreneurial.
	He has developed a forum from an earnest meeting of policy wonks into a glittering assembly of the world's richest people.
	That's pretty good, isn't it?
	To sort of start something.
	And then before you know it, Obama, Fauci, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, I think all the top bods all show up.
	So what's going on there?
	He's achieved this by ingratiating himself with those who wield power, and especially the billionaire class, a tribe known as Davos Man.
	Schwab has constructed a refuge for the outlandishly wealthy, an exclusive zone where they are free to pursue deals and sundry shenanigans while enjoying the cover of participating in a virtuous undertaking.
	Their mere presence in Davos at the forum signals their empathy and sensitivity.
	Not to me, it bloody well doesn't.
	Makes me think there is a global conspiracy.
	People that are banned from the internet now for saying stuff like, oh there's this group of people, they're meeting up, they've got the same financial interests, they're looking to put pressure on governments to implement a set of policies that will lead to centralised power that facilitates an ongoing march towards dystopia.
	Makes me think, oh no, that's definitely happening.
	Because who are the folks showing up at this stuff?
	And what are they saying?
	Like, if you get big tech, big pharma, government all in one place, and then you look out your window or sort of watch the news if it's not too propagandised, you start thinking, wait a minute!
	These people are in cahoots, I tell ya!
	In the prevailing pantomime, Davos Man is intent on channeling his intellect and compassion towards solving the great crisis of the age.
	He might have retreated to his mountaintop palace in Jackson Hole, or his yacht moored off Mykonos, but he is too obsessed with rescuing the poor and sparing humanity from the ravages of climate change, so he's in Davos, paying fees reaching several hundred thousands of dollars a year for a forum membership, plus tens of thousands more per head to attend the meeting.
	It's a really, really expensive club, And you're not in it!
	For the billionaires, participation in Schwab's charade may be proffered as evidence that they adhere to the ubiquitous slogan of the forum itself, committed to improving the state of the world.
	If you wanna improve the state of the world...
	Don't invite the people that are most responsible for ruining the fucking thing in the first place.
	These are the people that are causing the bloody problem.
	In truth, Davos Man has pillaged the global economy, exploiting workers, plundering housing and healthcare, and dismantling government programs while transferring the bounty to his personal accounts tucked in jurisdictions beyond the reach of any pain-in-the-ass tax collector.
	Do you remember that we worked out a while ago, somewhat because of Julian Assange's maxim, that the function of government is to extract your money from you and give it to private interests.
	So it's a taxation model and that taxation is then passed on to various private interests which they have affiliations with through their revolving doors.
	If you use that little equation you'll see how often it's helpful in understanding what's going on.
	Yet the fact that Schwab appears to believe in his credentials as a moral figure worthy of a Nobel speaks to his faith in the effectiveness of his creation.
	Like the people he gathers annually in the Alps, or at least virtually during the pandemic, Schwab is an exemplar of the force of pious words as a prophylactic against the consequences of unsavoury deeds.
	We're more than used to reporting on this channel, aren't we?
	And let me know what you think in the comments below.
	That the function of politics is to provide the appearance of change, the appearance of order, the appearance of caring, as opposed to actually doing stuff like that.
	And it seems that this is, in a sense, I don't know, the Disney world of that, the duck's eye, the bull's eye, the apotheosis of the ideologies of technocratic indifference and paliation that dominate our planet right now.
	Like most Davos men, Schwab has mastered the art of holding two irreconcilable positions at once, unencumbered by the typical constraints of rank hypocrisy.
	He blithely disregards... I like blithely.
	Blithely means like this... Disregards the obvious contradictions between the pristine values he publicly champions, inclusion, equity, transparency, and the unsavory compromises that he makes in wooing people with money and influence.
	Schwab's movements through the Congress Center unfold like military exercises, a coterie of agitated minions accompanying him everywhere.
	On his travels, he demands the privileges of a visiting head of state, complete with welcoming delegations at the airport.
	I'm sorry, I'm a bit jealous of Klaus Schwab, the way he's marching around, like a dignitary.
	Klaus Schwab!
	Is my Nobel Prize here yet?
	You're not getting a Nobel Peace Prize for trying to destroy everyone's lives.
	What do you get them for?
	Peace!
	At the Forum's headquarters in Switzerland, a tax haven.
	What are you there for?
	Toblerones?
	A glass-fronted campus looking out on Lake Geneva.
	A hallway connecting two wings is lined with photos of Schwab posing with world leaders.
	What a prat!
	When a forum employee who was late for a meeting once pulled into Schwab's spot in the parking lot, aware that the boss was overseas, he caught wind of it and insisted she be fired, relenting only after senior staff intervened to save her.
	Senior staff?
	Oh no, don't sack somebody, Klaus, for taking your parking spot.
	But what about my Nobel Prize?
	Well, that's not that peaceful.
	We're dealing with someone nicking his parking spot.
	Where's his slogan, their catchphrase down the front?
	Committed to improving the state of the world.
	Hey!
	Get out of my fucking parking spot!
	Oh sorry, I thought you were on holiday.
	And you were.
	Yeah, but it's still in my parking spot.
	It should be empty.
	Sorry, sorry.
	You're fucking fired!
	There, the world is a little bit improved now.
	In the mid-90s, when the Forum convened a gathering in South Africa, Schwab delivered a speech in front of Nelson Mandela at the closing plenary, in which he cribbed from Martin Luther King Jr.' 's I Have a Dream.
	He said dramatically, You're like this, Nelson?
	I also have a dream!
	Hey!
	Get out of my fucking parking spot!
	Several of us almost threw up, recalled Barbara Erskine, who then ran the Forum's communications.
	But if Schwab is something of a ludicrous character, He is also begrudgingly admired as a savant.
	He has a knack, an incredible knack, to smell the next fad and jump into it, said one former colleague.
	Pogs!
	People are gonna like pogs!
	Drones, but just for kids, you know, fly them around!
	NSYNC, gonna be big!
	He recognized early on that the forum had to distinguish itself from the run-of-the-mill business conferences, where people sat around talking about money, in defining a high-minded mission improving the state of the world.
	Hey, get out of my parking spot!
	Schwalb turned attendance into a demonstration of social concern.
	He's the creator of virtual signaling.
	He reinforced the value proposition through relentless networking, making Davos an indispensable venue for business.
	He enticed multinational corporations to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars a year for the privilege of serving as strategic partners Securing access to exclusive lounges and private conference rooms inside the Congress Center.
	There, executives encounter one another along with heads of state, investors and other people capable of improving the state of their balance sheets.
	Schwab choreographs bilateral meetings at which heads of global banks and energy companies can personally beseech presidents of countries for preferential tax treatment and access to promising oil fields.
	And that is not improving the state of the world, is it?
	Like granting global banks the opportunity to pressurise heads of state and new oil fields.
	I thought one of the main things they're into is climate change and that.
	Here, look at this, we've got to do something about climate change.
	Why don't you guys talk about new oil fields?
	Consulting giants and software companies make plays for government contracts by speaking directly with the decision makers.
	Top executives can fly in and meet a dozen heads of state in the course of four or five days, sitting across tables in soundproof rooms beyond the purview of securities, regulators, journalists and other hindrances.
	Despite the forum's status as a not-for-profit organisation, I mean, take profit out of it.
	How long to fix that?
	One thing we're gonna have to not do is make profit.
	Wait, where are you all going?
	Where are you going?
	You can have my parking space!
	Schwab and his wife Hilda Schwab, the organisation's co-founder, have adeptly positioned themselves to benefit from the gusher of money moving through.
	This is not for profit!
	They're actually drowning in money!
	The Forum budget covers his globetrotting and the catering and security services at his palatial home in the colony neighborhood of Geneva, the Beverly Hills of Switzerland, where Schwab frequently hosts extravagant dinners.
	Over the years, the Forum has spent almost 70 million Swiss francs, nearly 80 million dollars, to purchase land in the area.
	I will own something and be happy.
	Including two parcels bridging Schwab's home and the Forum headquarters.
	Even in the 1990s, when the Forum employed only a few dozen staff, Schwab's salary was tied to the pay for the Secretary General of the United Nations, supplying him roughly 400,000 a year.
	We had a few people.
	I should probably earn the same amount as the Secretary General of the United Nations.
	But Schwab was not satisfied by ordinary wealth.
	He entrusted his nephew, Hans Schwab, with the construction of a series of for-profit businesses, tapping the forum as a venture capital fund.
	Schwab was cognizant that running a for-profit company on the side of a non-profit could bring unwanted scrutiny from the authorities.
	Well, yeah, because it's corrupt and awful.
	Yeah, he was so proud of his entrepreneurial exploits that he pressed Erskine, the communications chief, to write about the event's business in the forum's annual report.
	I shouldn't let people know about this money I'm making because it's meant to be a not-for-profit enterprise.
	But then again, Klaus has done so well!
	Tell everybody!
	When she balked, suggesting that this would constitute an admission that the forum was taking liberties with its non-profit status, Schwab was not grateful for her counsel.
	He was furious.
	He sat me down and said, look, I want to be regarded as a businessman.
	According to his website, the Schwab Foundation promotes small scale enterprises that address issues of social importance, extending the reach of clean water and electricity in the developing world and creating opportunities for women.
	Where the money has gone is effectively unknowable.
	Well, I bloody well hope it's gone that way.
	It won't help that woman who parked in his spot very much, will it?
	Swizzle for it, it's required minimal disclosure, which is why he lives there and why all this stuff happens there.
	Well, there you go.
	Davos, the Great Reset, the mystery of Klaus Schwab.
	What do you think about it?
	Do you think it seems like a place where conspiracies come to live?
	Do you see the hubris, the reality, the truth that when all those people come together, of course they have a shared interest?
	I like this story because it shows us that stuff that It gets called conspiracy, and you know how you've suffered for being called a conspiracy theorist, which someone in our comments once said, conspiracy theories should be known as spoiler alerts now.
	Why don't you hit us up with a good bit of content in the comments?
	When you read a story like that, you see the kind of figures that are behind these movements.
	Fascinating, what a terrific book, what a fantastic story, and what a great illustration of the reality of the Great Reset.
	You will own nothing and you will be happy.
	Klaus Schwab will have a fucking big house and two parcels of land!
	But that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the comments below.
	Please, if you enjoyed this video, have a look at this one or indeed this one.
	And if you want to know what I'm up to or want to come see me live, I'm all over the UK performing.
	Sign up to my mailing list and I'll keep in constant communication with you.
	But please don't park in my spot.
	Stay free.
	And what do you think about Klaus Schwab?
	Is he as bad as everyone says?
	What a fantastic conversation we're about to have now with James Melville, political pundit and WEF commentator, but not in a wrestling-type way, although that is a pun we've been mobilising.
	James, thanks for joining us.
	Russell, it's great to be here.
	I love your cardigan, by the way.
	I feel far too overdressed compared to you.
	Thank you very much for commenting on my physical appearance.
	It's one of the things that I pride myself in.
	Ah!
	James, you got some nerve coming in here saying that the WF have got anything other than our best interests at heart.
	Also, I noticed on Twitter you get much more traction out of our content than we do.
	But let's focus firstly and foremostly on the WF and their agenda.
	The number one question that we want to address to our viewers on Rumble, where we in a minute will be talking about some stuff that you simply cannot say on YouTube, And our awakening wonders there on YouTube is that the WAF do have an agenda that saying that the WAF are simply a lovely little conference where under the auspices of Klaus Schwab's generosity and potential six niplets they're doing nothing but discussing good ideas in the snow is reductive.
	So what is the agenda and what is the evidence that there is an agenda, James?
	I mean, I think it's aspects of control, first of all.
	I mean, if you look at the WF historically back in the 70s, it was effectively policy wonks coming up with some ideas, but not getting much mainstream traction.
	You know, it's very much in the shadows.
	And I think what's happened over the last two or three years because of the pandemic and the response to the pandemic is more and more people are scrutinizing what the WF is about.
	And I think there's a number of reasons why that's happened.
	First of all, Gross hypocrisy.
	When you get a bunch of political leaders, you're getting technocrats and you're getting billionaires and corporations who are going across on private jet and motorcades and effectively wanging on about saving the planet, people are going to look at that and say, well, that's a little bit rich.
	Secondly, a lot of the things that WF have been talking about historically, In particular, things like the response to the pandemic, globalised treaties, digitalisation, a lot of these things are coming down the tracks and a lot of governments are actually implementing them now, either in consultation stage or pilot stage.
	A perfect example of that is the digitalisation of currency and central bank digital currency.
	So I think what's happened with the WF, they were on the margins, but because of a lot of the agendas they've tried to set over the years, A lot of that's beginning to come down the tracks in terms of government policy.
	And then there's the optics as well of things like what Klaus Schwab has said about young leaders and penetrating the cabinets and, you know, you'll own nothing and be happy.
	And if you look at a lot of the papers and a lot of the tweets that WF have done as well.
	People look at that and think, actually, some of this is joined up here.
	This is all about technocratic, corporation and also aspects of government control that ends up looking like bureaucratic domain and control.
	And in particular, in a cost of living crisis, when you get individuals who are struggling to even put their heating on or they're facing a zero sum game choice of heat or eat, And you're looking at individuals who are clinking glasses in Davos when actually might be a better opt if you're in a volcano like a Bond villain or something like that.
	They're looking at these individuals and thinking this is so far removed from our day to day concerns.
	Most people just want to get through this winter discontent.
	And when they see individuals either at Davos or previously at COP or the G20 or the G7 when the same individuals are turning up And they're coming up with ideas supposedly for our convenience and our safety and our good.
	And yet over the last two years, the transfer of wealth to the super rich is at record levels.
	I get it.
	So listen, on one hand, what we're saying is that it don't look good flying about in private jets, talking about your carbon footprint when it's like the BFG's giant sandals banging down on the mountain sides up there in the snow.
	but perhaps significant and also that it's yet another one of these unelected globalist bodies
	where they preach in rarefied air about matters that will affect the lives of ordinary people
	and things that won't directly affect them because they're able to protect themselves from that through wealth.
	But the area that perhaps interests me most, James, is the actual policies that are conceived,
	discussed and popularized through the discourse at Davos that end up being implemented through governments.
	And you think that digitization and CBDCs, which I always nearly say CBBBs, don't I, Gail?
	It's so difficult because CBBBs, if you're a British person, is a very good children's TV scheduling section.
	So, mate, what in particular around the pandemic and digitisation and digital IDs did we see, as you say, come down the tracks, move from something being discussed to being implemented?
	If you look back historically with the WEF and some of the things they're putting out on social media, but also some of their agenda papers and so on, they were talking about this stuff quite a few years ago, but it really wasn't getting that much.
	Were they really?
	Yeah.
	I mean, we're talking about we've all got digital IDs.
	Well, they were nudging... And were they talking about pandemics as well?
	Well, they weren't saying so much that everyone's got to be and digitalise it, but they were saying there's aspects of digital ID that's coming down the tracks.
	They were talking about net zero responses.
	They're talking about, you know, globalised response for future emergencies through healthcare and so on.
	And so people have gone through their back catalogue in sort of real time now.
	So, well, actually, that's where they were nudging the agenda.
	But I think one of the key things at the moment is if you look at, say, the pandemic response, there's almost two stages.
	First of all, there was a lockdown stage and then it went into forms of digitalisation, particularly vaccine passports.
	Which for me, I had a massive problem with that.
	I think it was illiberal, it was unethical, there isn't actually a justifiable argument for something like that.
	I'll just point out that we're still on YouTube and YouTube is governed by the WHO's policies when it comes to discussing those medications and if you would just bear that in mind later on on Rumble we'll be able to talk without bearing in mind the WHO, another unelected body funded In part by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
	I think I can say that on YouTube.
	So just want to be careful.
	Remember to stay with us on Rumble when we come off YouTube.
	It's very important that you do that.
	Very important you do that.
	Please continue.
	So I think in terms of digitalization, we're now heading at stage where if you look at all the different aspects of emergency response, And also the issues that the WF and governments and also corporations are moving towards, whether it's a net zero, whether it's due to a pandemic response, whether it's due to financial, it looks like we're heading toward aspects of digitalization control.
	Central Bank Digital Currency is a perfect example of that.
	In fact, the UK government produced a consultation document last week to talk about digital ID.
	Now, these are things that came out on the 4th of January.
	I mean, this is something that's been coming down the tracks and Sunak's been talking about
	central bank digital currencies for quite some time.
	He did it when he was chancellor.
	I've seen him talking about that.
	I've seen him talking to camera like when he does that thing where he don't look like
	he knows where he's looking properly, you know, saying that digital currencies are coming.
	We all have moments of that.
	You know, I'm getting that here.
	We all have moments of that.
	But I think what's happened with the WF, they were talking about a lot of these issues quite
	a few years ago.
	So you end up having a global response to the pandemic, which ends up with aspects of
	increased digital ID.
	And then you end up having these functions, not just the WF, but also things like COP
	and also things like the G20 and the G7, where they're talking about globalized coordination
	agendas.
	And you're talking about potential treaties coming down the track.
	And then you're getting individual governments are putting consultation exercises for digital
	ID.
	People look at, well, who are the conduits for this?
	Who are nudging us towards this?
	We know the WF, they haven't got Any sort of legitimacy and authority in terms of legislation.
	But they have been talking about this for quite some time.
	They're nudging governments in a particular direction.
	You have a bunch of young leaders of the WF who are now, as Klaus Schwab said, penetrating government.
	And you end up with a situation where people start asking a lot of questions and people start getting very suspicious about this.
	This is not some sort of conspiracy theory.
	When you end up having governments Doing consultation exercises and also pilot schemes for something like central bank, digital currency or other forms of digital ID when you end up having things like vaccine passports through the pandemic.
	And so people end up taking a step and go, well, how did this actually begin?
	What organizations were talking about this before?
	The WF, it's one of those organizations.
	So in a sense, they provide lubrication for ideas to enter into the mainstream and help to house and frame these notions.
	A couple of good examples that you've just explained, First James.
	Digital ideas, which for a long time, in British politics particularly, people have talked about that and rejected it.
	The WEF at best are a soft sell for a globalist agenda and soft influence rather than direct political power because they are of course unelected.
	I suppose you could also say Ross is that the pandemic was a way in which these ideas were utilised and brought into the kind of mainstream ideas because when you're saying things like digital passports and people are broadly agreeing with them because of health reasons Maybe 10, 20 years ago when Tony Blair was bringing in the idea of ideas, national ideas, people were rejecting them.
	Because there's no reason for it.
	It wasn't the virtue to create this.
	Well, this is, I suppose, one of the concerns is that if you have a particular agenda, then perhaps, and this is for you to let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments, do you imagine that they Let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments.
	James, I want you to talk me through some of the star players of the WEF.
	in the chat, let me know in the comments. James, I want you to talk me through some of the star
	players of the WEF. Have a look now at some of the key figures that we're looking to highlight.
	Let's see them as a football team.
	There they are.
	Right.
	So tell me, out of this starting 11, who in particular stands out?
	These are some of the great heroes of the WF.
	Some of the players, obviously, Klaus Schwab's up front with his missus, Hilda Schwab.
	Them two, they're a deadly duo up front.
	Elsewhere in that team are some other significant players.
	Who else there is important and influential within the organization?
	Well, I think they all have that in terms of their own influence in different markets.
	Like Man City.
	They've all got a role to play and they can all carry the ball forward, but they've all got to feed Erling Haaland.
	But whether they can play total football, I'm not sure about that.
	Whether they can change positions, I'm not sure at all.
	Yeah, and whether or not it biases the team to have Haaland up there because he needs to run onto forward boards.
	We can see that now!
	But ultimately they don't have fan support, and that's people like us.
	I mean, people in the wider communities are suffering a cost of living crisis.
	I think one of the major problems we've got at the moment is there seems to be, you know, I used to be, and to an extent still am, a huge fan of aspects of globalism that came out of the Second World War, which is basically to stop perpetually warring Europe and go down the same route again.
	So they looked at trade, they looked at defence, and largely for a period of time they were successful with
	institutions like the WHO, the WEF, you know the UN, the EU, they're all aspects of
	that. But there is a suspicion now that these organisations are not in the best interest of
	day-to-day concerns of people.
	Yes, and if militarised conflict is being diffused because economic interests have
	already been centralised and are already cooperating, then that isn't an enormous
	It's just nullified the necessity for conflict at the level of a sovereign nation because those interests have already coalesced, much in the way that we can see that in American politics it doesn't...
	Ultimately matter that much whether you have the Republican Party or the Democrat Party in power because the same interests are finding it.
	Let me know in the comments.
	Let me know in the chat if you think that's true.
	Have a look at some of the corporate partners of the WF.
	There are some of the finest names in medicine, entertainment, sugary drinks, investment and football and weapons.
	Lockheed Martin.
	They're there.
	We've not had to say if we've been sponsored by Lockheed Martin yet.
	We're still here.
	So when you talk about fragmentation, one of the ways in which they want to solve a fragmented world, I mean, and they mentioned the energy crisis, didn't they, and the cost of living crisis.
	When you're sponsored by Shell, do you think how much of a... You can't take Shell's money if you're interested in an energy crisis.
	When Shell are having record profits at the moment, or Lockheed Martin, who are profiting up 50% in their stocks now.
	Coca-Cola were sponsoring COP.
	Considering the pollution levels of, you know, plastic... The worst plastic pollutants in the world.
	So there's baked in hypocrisy.
	That's one of the things that you know.
	But it's not only that though, is it?
	It's that this, surely this will affect... That's how they can do it, yeah.
	It's also about ethical governance as well.
	They wrap it around, you know, so social responsibility is now morphed into, for instance, ESG and so on.
	So you're taking some good values there about environmental sustainability, corporate government's ethical behavior and management, providing aspects of community re-engagement and transformation in areas that have been sort of hollowed out in terms of de-industrialization over the last 40 years.
	These are good ideas, but it's rhetoric.
	And what's happening is these institutions, whether it's from a corporate point of view, a technocratic point of view, or a political point of view, There's been decline for decades.
	If you look at what's happening in this country, the industrialized areas have been completely hollowed out for 40 years, you know, and nothing has rebooted.
	We get a lot of cheap talk from governments going on about northern powerhouses and so on, but it's not happened.
	We've got forgotten communities and people in those communities.
	What's happening right now in Davos is so far removed from them, and it's not addressing their needs.
	And people hear this talk, whether it's coming from our politicians, from our government, whether it's from corporates or technocrats.
	I think we've heard this before.
	What they do is like Emperor's New Clothes rhetoric.
	They just sort of unwrap it and then come and put more wrapping on and come up with a new phrase.
	They move social responsibility to ESG.
	But meanwhile, communities are getting poorer, more and more people in poverty.
	We've got a cost of living crisis, an energy crisis.
	We've got inflation going through the roof and you've got talking shops in Davos We're effectively going to save the planet and help your lives, but they're not.
	They're getting richer, but everyone else is getting poorer.
	Of course.
	I suppose one of the main things that institutions and organizations like this have to achieve is...
	The appearance of presenting solutions that will never impact the interests of the powerful.
	You can never present a solution that would meaningfully impact the interests of the powerful.
	Would you go back to those logos just for a minute because there's a few comments I want to make.
	Firstly, what the hell are Lego investing in it for?
	Lego seem to be needlessly investing in Davos and Dow Jones need to work on their logo.
	There are my two main points.
	I mean, that is some collection of companies there.
	That's some of the best, isn't it?
	I mean, it is.
	I mean, if you look at this, for me as someone who's left of centre, People think I'm somehow off on the right because I've got a lot of questions about the pandemic response and also digitalisation that came out of the pandemic response and also the role of the WUF.
	Not at all.
	What I care about is basically having most communities to have the opportunity to flourish or regenerate, opportunities for next generation, good education, good schools, good public services generally, the opportunity for enterprise culture.
	These are things that should be mandatories that a government should be focusing on.
	And these are things that these guys who are attending Davos claim that they're doing all this.
	They're trying to do it for the best interest of the people.
	But based on their track record over the last, say, 30, 40 years, where there's terminal decline in so many communities, and yet they're saying that somehow, yet again, they're going to change the world.
	I and many others aren't buying it.
	Well, I suppose there's two things.
	You have to eliminate any solutions that would meaningfully impact the interests of the
	powerful and you have to delegitimize any dissent.
	As long as dissent can be dismissed as being, for example, a conspiracy theory or alt-right,
	then you don't have to address those concerns.
	And even when it's huge numbers of people, you know, 50% of a country,
	let's say in the case of the United States or the post-Brexit argument, it doesn't matter.
	As long as you can delegitimize dissenting voices, then you don't have to meaningfully address the fact that there is inertia at the center of democracy or the direction that inertia is heading in.
	This is another study from Oxfam.
	Oxfam has called for immediate action to tackle a post-Covid widening gap in global inequality.
	Can I have that article back on the screen, please?
	Two-thirds of new wealth amassed since the start of the pandemic has gone to the richest 1%.
	We talk a lot on this show about Naomi Klein and how, when Naomi Klein was talking a lot in her
	book Shock Doctrine about the CIA agenda as implemented in Central and Latin American
	countries, this was a talking point of the left.
	The destabilization of sovereign nations so that American corporate interest could be implemented and pursued in those nations was understood to be an area that was of concern for the left.
	This appears to be a narrative that has slipped out of the conversation in the sort of shuffling that's occurred in the last ten years.
	I think a lot of the left have been duped over the last two or three years.
	And I say this as someone who stayed pretty consistently left of centre.
	My views in terms of sorting out inequality and poverty and looking at good governance in terms of corporate, but also good governance in terms of governments, that hasn't changed.
	And yet what's happened with this, under the auspices of virtue and safety and convenience, I think we've now got a virtual contract whereby what's happening is that more and more assets are getting hoovered up by the same corporations, by governments and technocrats actually kind of putting it on there and saying to governments and also to corporations, this is the kind of new message, this is new ESG, this is SDG or this is social responsibility.
	and governments then saying we've got to do this because it's in your best interest.
	But based on the track record of governments over the last 30, 40 years,
	there's no evidence to suggest that they are acting in accordance to the best interests
	of millions of people in the countries they're supposed to be governing.
	We're paying our taxes to have good public services, good infrastructures, and government that is competent
	to reach out to communities right around the country.
	But all that's happening is more and more communities feel forgotten about, they feel disenfranchised,
	they're getting poorer, we've got to cost a living crisis, and in terms of the last two or three years,
	the super rich are getting richer.
	And they're getting richer in a number of different ways in terms of whether it's land, whether it's data,
	whether it's energy, whether it's tech.
	These are the same institutions individuals are all going to be at this jamboree over the next few days.
	And meanwhile, the majority of people are so far removed from that.
	So Davos isn't simply a PR exercise, a meaningless affair, but in fact, a significant conference where the world's most powerful interests come together to set and delineate the agenda for coming years.
	Let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments what you think.
	But what do any of us really know about Davos and the WF?
	We can't say we're actually there.
	Andrew Lawton will be joining us live from Davos.
	He's actually there.
	He's got the snow on his boots.
	We will be talking to him in a minute.
	James, you said so much that was interesting there.
	The thing I took most from it is how the WF and their virtue signalling agenda is part of the bifurcation that has occurred between the class that governs and ordinary folk that govern.
	Let me know in the chat and the comments what you think.
	We're going to be having a look now at that aspect of the WF in particular and the use of philanthropy by organisations like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Clinton Foundation and the sort of soft sell that occurs here and how often we're being told that the agenda of an organisation is philanthropic but sometimes there's real examples of tax avoidance, tax evasion and certainly not paying tax that can also come along as a side dish to that apparent philanthropic agenda.
	Thanks for joining us, James.
	Have a look at this now.
	See you in a moment.
	Every year, billionaires turn up at Davos to discuss philanthropic solutions to the world's problems.
	But many of these solutions actually help them to increase their wealth.
	Let's learn about this hypocrisy and see if there's anything we can do to understand it better and even stop it.
	The World Economic Forum ended last week.
	Historian Rutger Bregman made a claim that took many attendees by surprise.
	Let's listen.
	I mean, I hear people talk in the language of participation and justice and equality and transparency.
	But then, I mean, almost no one raises the real issue of tax avoidance, right?
	And of the rich just not paying their fair share.
	10 years ago, the World Economic Forum asked the question, what must industry do to prevent a broad social backlash?
	The answer is very simple.
	Just stop talking about philanthropy.
	I mean, we can talk for a very long time about all these stupid philanthropy schemes.
	We can invite Bono once more.
	But come on, we've got to be talking about taxes.
	They won't be having him back next year.
	All right, well, thanks for coming, mate.
	Next year at Davos, I think we'll have someone who plays by the rules a bit and sings from the same hymn sheet that comes in here and takes the piss out of you, too.
	The world is more than 2,000 billionaires.
	Many of them are being asked to give half of their fortunes to charity.
	The Giving Pledge was created by Bill Gates, his wife, Melinda, and Warren Buffett.
	A decade ago, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, and, like, we're only mentioning them because they're famous billionaires.
	You know, a lot of billionaires, they're faceless.
	I don't mean literally, although possibly they are.
	I mean in a sense that it's difficult to get a handle on them.
	But Buffett and Gates organised the Giving Pledge to inspire their fellow billionaires to donate money to charity.
	Well, it led to, a decade later, which is where we are now, the reality is that billionaire wealth has increased by 95%.
	They pledged when they came up with the Giving Pledge to give away half.
	Instead, their wealth has almost doubled.
	So the pledge was, give away half.
	The reality was, it's nearly doubled.
	What's gone on with this pledge?
	And how can you create a Giving Pledge that involves so much taking?
	The US Treasury estimates philanthropy will cost it $740 billion in lost tax revenue over the next decade.
	So how do they set up these kind of philanthro-capitalist funds?
	How does it work?
	How do you seem like you're giving?
	When actually you're taking?
	Well the fastest growing areas of the giving sector are private foundations and donor advised funds.
	So watch out if you hear words like foundation or donor advised funds.
	These are often these slippery backdoor channels for appearing like you're donating when actually you're taking or moving capital around in ways that tax can be avoided.
	There's over 1.2 trillion parked in private foundations and an estimated 120 billion in donor advised funds.
	The super-rich have created foundations at a rapid pace.
	From 2003 to 2015, the number of foundations grew by 28%.
	The amount of assets held in those foundations doubled over that period.
	Here's some of the rules around these esoteric and bureaucratic terms.
	DAFs, that's Donor Advised Funds, which I'm going to be calling DAFs from now on.
	It's probably DAFs, isn't it?
	Donor advised funds have no mandated payout at all.
	The donor takes a generous tax break when placing funds in the DAF, but the DAF does not legally have to pay out ever.
	Donors can set up a DAF and pass it on to their grandchildren who may or may not ever share the money with active charities.
	So, in a sense, it's like a promise, isn't it?
	It's just like saying, at some point, Unspecified, I might give this money to charity.
	Meanwhile, there it is, safe in me old daff.
	If you ain't a mad fan of the government, say, you might think, I don't want to pay tax either.
	I don't want to pay loads of half my money, or 40% of my money, or 30% of my money, whatever bracket you fall in, so it can be spent on ...bombing the Yemen or doing stuff that I'm not particularly into, that if you as a normal person try tax avoidance, you ain't getting nowhere.
	You're not going to be able to set up a DAF or a foundation and say, in the future, I might give this tax to someone.
	Meanwhile, I'm getting an extension done.
	You're not going to get away with it.
	This is another layer of hypocrisy and a further, I don't know, augmentation, say, of the distinction between a billionaire class and the rest of us.
	The Chronicle of Philanthropy calls them a personal charitable savings account.
	The money, even when it comes in large amounts or mega gifts, doesn't always trickle down to grassroots organisations it's supposed to help.
	Whenever you hear the phrase trickle down, aren't you a bit concerned?
	It never trickles down, does it?
	What about trickle down economics?
	It'll trickle down, it'll trickle... Hold on a minute!
	Where's it trickling off to?
	Oh no!
	It's gone into Bill Gates's pocket!
	Hey, I can't help it.
	It trickled there.
	Today's super wealthy are richer than ever.
	And they're giving away their billions like never before.
	Let's drill down on some specific billionaires.
	We're not saying these billionaires are worse than anyone else.
	Don't wanna bully.
	Billionaires, alright?
	Billionaire bullying is at an all-time high.
	Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg promising to give away 99% of his shares of the company to charity.
	In 2015, him and his missus, Priscilla Chan, wrote and published a letter to their new baby, Max.
	The letter made a commitment that over the course of their lives they would donate 99% of their shares in Facebook, at the time valued at $45 billion, to the mission of advancing human potential and promoting equality.
	Firstly, Why are you writing a letter to a baby for, anyway, about tax?
	They wrote in an open letter on Facebook that they were creating the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.
	The wording of Zuckerberg's 2015 letter could have been interpreted as meaning he was intended to donate 45 billion to charity.
	But, as the reporter Jesse Isinger, whose name's too close to the geezer who played him in Social Network, reported at the time, the Chan Zuckerberg initiative through which this was given is not a not-for-profit charitable foundation, but an LLC, a limited liability company.
	This legal status has significant practical implications, especially when it comes to tax.
	As a company, the initiative can do much more than charitable activity.
	Its legal status gives it the right to invest in other companies and to make political donations.
	Effectively, the company does not restrict Zuckerberg's decision-making as to what he wants to do with his money.
	Really, all that happened is his money went from here to here.
	It didn't go anywhere else.
	Details on the new foundation haven't been released.
	Let's not bog this down in details.
	This is a happy occasion!
	Max is a baby!
	Max doesn't want details about our LLC and how ultimately what we're doing is moving the money over there, then there, then there, then there.
	In fact, Max would probably be quite grateful.
	Talk about a baby present!
	So that Zuckerberg, what he could have written, if he was going to be more accurate, is I'm going to set up a Limited liability company, Max, and we're going to move a lot of the assets into that, some of which will be used for commercial purposes.
	Are you still reading this, Max?
	What do you really want to ask?
	Get to bed!
	America, the charitable.
	There are a number of billionaires in this country, but of these, who is the most philanthropic?
	Now, again, in the spirit of not billionaire bullying, but just billionaire observation, Bill Gates, who the first syllable of his name is the same first syllable of the word billionaire, coincidence.
	Bill Gates ranks second for giving since they created their foundation in 1994.
	He launched his foundation in 94 after the Microsoft antitrust case.
	Is that to do with that little Pipperclip guy?
	That Pepperclip?
	I never trusted him when he used to pop up.
	Hey, why don't you try opening a document?
	Gates has invested 36 billion into this foundation he set up in 94, which has a value of 46 billion, and him and his wife exercise total control over it.
	The foundation has given away 23 billion in charitable grants.
	These gifts include billions in tax-deductible donations to companies in which Gates is invested, like Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Sanofi.
	If someone says I'm making a charitable donation and it's to GlaxoSmithKline, I'm gonna think, well, hold a minute, ain't that a big massive company?
	That's what's interesting about this, is it places the power in the hands of the already powerful and diminishes the power of, for example, the state to impose wealth distribution.
	There's a lot of talk now about breaking up these monopolies and it seems that this is a necessity because as long as they have the power they do.
	You can't rely on them to make decisions that are going to do anything other than stay in alignment with their raison d'etre, the accumulation of profit, service of their shareholders.
	You know, in fact, the jokes I was making about billionaire bullying, they're just, as far as I'm concerned, human beings like you or me.
	They're born, they're going to die.
	But the systems within which they operate advantage particular mindsets and behaviours.
	And unless they fundamentally ought to, which they will not do if the most powerful people benefit from them staying the same, Then you're going to perpetuate these systems.
	The balance tipped in the year 2000 when the Institute for Policy Studies in the US reported that of the 100 largest economies in the world, 51 were corporations and 49 were national economies.
	So now we live in a world where even though the nation might be the primary way that you understand geography and you understand politics, from an economic perspective that is an inaccurate perception.
	You are literally living in an illusion, because 51 of the most powerful economic entities are corporations.
	What are the implications, therefore, in the kind of laws that we're going to see around economics?
	Taxation.
	National taxation models are no longer going to be sufficient when 51 of the most powerful economic entities transcend national boundaries, where their interests transcend national interests.
	So we have to start recognizing now that the logo of a brand like Facebook or Amazon or Microsoft is a kind of
	flag.
	They have planted their flag in the territory of the earth and whether you believe in it or not,
	you salute to it every time you put your hand in your pocket.
	You know, after I had given my short speech, the response in the room, you know, from the audience was quite
	aggressive.
	And no one really came up to me to say, hey, that was a good speech.
	So, you know, I went home with a bit of a bad feeling, to be honest.
	When you look at Davos and who attends it, it's clear to see the balance of world power shifting.
	CEOs and the heads of recognizable corporations are at least as significant as the political figures that also attend.
	So we can see At this event, how there is collaboration and cooperation, there's another C word for that, is taking place at Davos, and also how the balance of power is shifting.
	The T word is really the forbidden word in places like Davos.
	You can talk about anything, about education, about feminism, about climate change, as long as you don't talk about higher taxes on the rich.
	That can't be a coincidence, can it?
	It's because, and Adam Curtis is big on this, and if you watch our Under the Skin with him, you'll see him talk about it, that nations, as yet, do still have the power to control corporations.
	They can pass anti-monopolisation legislation.
	They can pass legislature for higher taxation.
	I ain't talking about taxation on normal bods, or even people that are well off.
	I'm talking about super powerful corporations.
	Like, for example, in 2008, when at the stroke of a pen, Barack Obama wrote off through quantitative easing the financial mismanagement and corruption of Wall Street.
	That was a government that did that.
	That is the kind of power governments have.
	It's not that they don't have the power, it's that they won't use it.
	The Gates have already committed to giving 95% of their wealth away.
	Warren Buffett, 99%.
	What do they mean by that?
	Are they actually going to do it?
	Do you think they're actually going to go, right, I had 100 quid, now I've got a quid.
	The rest of it I've give away.
	No, it's going to be this skullduggery, isn't it?
	We moved the 99 quid there, then we moved it there, then we moved it back here.
	I've still got it!
	They say that kind of extreme giving is needed because the rich have been getting so much richer.
	Tech innovations and rising global markets have produced vast fortunes not seen since the industrial revolution.
	There's a terrible problem with capitalism.
	These elites have risen to the top, creating these sort of uber-powerful figures that have got much more money than everyone else combined.
	Who should we turn to to create a solution for it?
	Them?
	No!
	Not them.
	We've seen what they do already.
	The 45 billion dollar giveaway was applauded by some big names.
	Melinda Gates wrote to Max Zuckerberg, You are lucky to have such an amazing mom and dad.
	You can't have Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates and all these people in charge of wealth distribution.
	They're experts in wealth accumulation.
	If you want some advice on wealth accumulation, they're the people to go to.
	But if it's wealth distribution, you've got to go to someone with a little bit more objectivity, I would say.
	What conditions are there?
	I mean, can they say, yes, I'm with you, I'm here, but I want to give it to this institution or that institution?
	We're not endorsing any flavor of philanthropy.
	We celebrate the diversity of philanthropy.
	The American dream is anyone can make it.
	The problem with a myth like that is one, it ain't true.
	Not anyone can make it.
	And two, it suggests that if you aren't a billionaire, it's somehow your fault and that it's laudable and admirable to accrue obscene wealth.
	You can't really, though, call a nation a society when the free richest people have as much money as the 50% of the poorest people.
	That's no longer a society.
	There's no longer a relationship between them.
	You may as well accept the truth that some of us are under this flag, the flag of corporation and the transnational globalist privilege that it represents, and others are under this flag, a tattered, battered, decaying rag that stands for nothing but inequality and exploitation.
	One panel hidden away in the media center that was actually about tax avoidance?
	I mean, it feels like I'm at a firefighters conference and no one's allowed to speak about water.
	I suppose then, if the point of Davos is to come up with solutions, one of the things they might consider discussing next time is the breakup of monopolies and the taxation of the extreme wealthy, and placing that power in the hands of nations, states, governments, better yet, ordinary people.
	Rather than in the hands of the people that are set to gain most from things staying the same.
	If you enjoyed that video, please like, subscribe, set up the notification bells if you're crazy and you want a ringing in your ears, and please go over to my mailing list and sign up on RussellBrand.com to receive things directly from me should something ever happen to our direct access to you.
	Also, I've got a book coming out, Revelation, in which I talk about the spiritual principles that underwrite my personal transformation and transition.
	There's a link here to the pre-order.
	Most of all though, Thank you very much indeed for watching this video.
	appreciate your time.
	Hello, thanks for joining us for our WF Royal Rumble where we cover Davos live.
	This conference, is it little more than a PR fair, a jamboree, or is it truly the crucible of where the agenda for globalists are set?
	Not to say that people are like, this year Idris Elba's there.
	Who doesn't love Idris Elba?
	Everyone loves Idris Elba.
	I'd like an agenda set by Idris Elba.
	Put Idris in charge, but also who's there is Tony Blair.
	Tony Blair's there.
	I bet he's going to have more influence than Idris.
	Yeah.
	Isn't he?
	Idris Elba never said, as far as I can remember, Idris Elba has never gone, Iraq have got weapons of mass destruction.
	They're going to have to kill at least a million people to get this under any kind of control.
	I don't know.
	Maybe I missed that episode of The Wire.
	No, or Luther.
	In Luther, he was a reliable cop who got the job done.
	We're going to be talking to Andrew Lawton in a minute, live from Davos, but here are some more of your comments.
	Sarah Jefferson says, I want to see what pandemic they're planning for us next.
	Well, they had to have planned a pandemic in the first place.
	I don't think anyone's Suggesting that that's happened, Sarah Jefferson, especially not while we're still on YouTube.
	We'll be only on Rumble in a minute, so if you're watching this on YouTube, remember to click over, particularly to see our presentation on the WHO's propaganda and how that relates, or rather is at odds with, an incredible new study about adverse reactions that we literally are unable to discuss on YouTube, but I know you're going to love.
	You're going to feel vindicated by it, you're going to feel educated by it, you're going to feel informed.
	Shall we talk to Andrew Lawton now, who's actually at Davos, because whatever we may feel or think about Davos, we simply haven't got the snow under our feet.
	We're simply unable, unlike Andrew, to feel the genuine atmosphere of Davos.
	Andrew, what's it like there?
	Are you having a nice time?
	Yeah, it's great.
	You walk through and everyone's giving you hot chocolate.
	Today I was given Saudi Arabian hot chocolate.
	I was given Facebook hot chocolate.
	I was given United Arab Emirates hot chocolate.
	There's lots of hospitality, although a little bit of a cold weather for those of us that are not necessarily used to it.
	I'm Canadian, so I'm good, but some of the others I worry for.
	You can't just douse yourself in hot chocolate in an attempt to inoculate yourself against circumstances.
	Andrew, have you seen anything so far?
	Firstly, I just want to get an idea of what it's like.
	Is it just like any ordinary conference or can you see any evidence of globalist skullduggery aside from what sounds like delicious hot chocolate?
	I haven't seen the globalist skullduggery just yet, but we're also still getting set up here.
	And it's a bit like a weird billionaire trade show because when you walk down the main street,
	all of these stores, which the rest of the year are ski shops and coffee shops,
	have all been taken over by corporations that pay a large amount of money
	just to basically turn themselves into exhibits.
	You've got Microsoft and Salesforce and Uber and Amazon, and they all just try to bring in politicians and investors
	into these little pavilions, they call them.
	Lovely metaphor for globalization.
	Little local stores taken over by big corporations.
	That's amazing.
	They just turn them into little temporary little booths, lure you in like you're going to be Shanghai'd.
	So essentially WAF Davos, it's a capitalist Coachella, it's globalist Glastonbury.
	It sounds like a lot of fun.
	Places where you would be buying a snowboard, you can be badgered about investing in Uber.
	That's what it's most Have you been lured into any of them yet, Andrew?
	Or are you remaining discerning as a journalist?
	Well, it can't both be true.
	I walked into them voluntarily because I want to get a sense of what the message is that they're giving.
	Interestingly enough, I went in earlier to the Mohammed bin Salman Foundation pavilion.
	This is the foundation that is run by the Saudi royal family, although not officially.
	And was thrown out of it because my videographer dared to take a video of me walking through what they said was an open tour because they wanted to show off all the work they were doing to the public.
	And it strikes me as a bit odd that they would have the expense and effort of being here to show off what they're doing and then kick out a journalist for daring to want a video of it.
	And I find this to be very perplexing, although not all that surprising at the same time.
	Andrew, I can explain that to you.
	You were about to engage in what is called malinformation.
	That's information that is true, but taken out of context.
	As long as they can control the context of the information, i.e.
	you're in a ski resort for globalists now, that's a fine context.
	But you start posting that on your social media and talking about what kind of... I'm going to use the word tomfoolery this time.
	The Saudi Arabian affiliates might have been engaged in that.
	That could be malinformation.
	It doesn't sound like Andrew's being granted the same kind of immunity that the Biden administration granted to Bin Salman himself.
	Do you see that?
	Because Bin Salman there, even though he's not a head of state, was granted immunity and the ability to travel into America, even after America said that they would make Saudi Arabia a pariah of the world.
	And presumably that was because of their involvement in the murder of... Well, they're alleged.
	They're alleged?
	Hold on, we're still on YouTube.
	What the hell am I saying?
	Sorry, hold on.
	Oh, crack it!
	This is the point.
	This is the key to the World Economic Forum, is that all of the rules that exist everywhere else in the world for these countries don't apply.
	This is the place that right now is talking about Russia as being public enemy number one, but a couple of years ago had Vladimir Putin as a keynote speaker.
	It's a country that talks about the importance of free market and international cooperation.
	But rolled out the red carpet for Chairman Xi Jinping.
	They talk about press freedom on one side, but invite Saudi Arabia as being the special partner on the other.
	And they don't even seem to really care about that hypocrisy, because they really are above criticism.
	And that term malinformation is, I think, a great way that they deflect against that criticism.
	Because you just don't understand it.
	You're a conspiracy theorist.
	You just don't get it.
	You're a bad actor.
	And this is all that happens to anyone who raises what I think are pretty legitimate criticisms about what happens here.
	We're criticising it and I challenge anyone to call me a bad actor, especially if they've seen the film Arthur, which I believe was very well acted indeed.
	Yes by Mirren, but mainly by me.
	Mate, what kind of workshops they got going on there?
	We've got some of the events that could be attended.
	It reminds me a little bit as a comedian of the Edinburgh Festival.
	Can we see on screen some of those classes that are taking place?
	I know that Tony Blair is running a sesh over there.
	Look at that.
	There's Brian Stelters doing the clear and present danger of disinformation with Brian Stelter.
	That's going to be a good one.
	Al Gore still going on about how difficult everything is.
	And look, Tony Blair, 100 days to outrace the next pandemic with Tony Blair.
	My God, he's got a head start.
	I hope that pandemic doesn't happen.
	It's all right, though, because it's him and Albert Boer, though.
	And you dared to mock that woman that asked the question about the next pandemic.
	They've got a session called The Next Pandemic.
	That's outrageous, isn't it?
	Extraordinary.
	Which sessions are you keen to attend, Andrew?
	Well, the one actually tonight that I'm interested in is about how we can all live a climate positive lifestyle.
	Because last time they all met in May, there was this executive with Alibaba bragging about how he was inventing this individual carbon footprint tracker that monitored What you weighed and where you travel and how you travel and what you do.
	So I'm wondering if that might feed into the climate positive lifestyle that they're going to be prescribing this evening.
	Yes, it seems like the management of behavior, the ability to observe transaction and the sort of BF Skinner style capacity to nudge or even, let's face it, control the way that we live our lives, where we spend our money, how we spend our money seems to be centrifugal to the tenets When you bring that into conjunction with the advances around AI, and that means another area where working people won't have any power or ability, i.e.
	to bond together in low paid work in order to form unions and to oppose the agenda of the powerful, Seems like they're, in a sense, creating the perfect conditions for globalism, shutting down dissent, controlling information through these new terms that are becoming popularised, mis-, mal-, and dis-information.
	Are you having a look at any of the AI stuff while you're there, Andrew?
	Yeah, AI is actually one of the big themes they're moving in towards this year.
	And I mean, obviously, it's here, there's no avoiding it.
	It's a part of life now and will become more of one.
	But what's interesting is that on one hand, they're celebrating it and really making AI the central focus.
	But on the other hand, one of the sessions on the agenda is about how to deal with technology displacing 1 billion people, billion with a B, from their jobs because of technology.
	And this is not just replacing some pair of hands on an assembly line with a machine.
	We're talking about now with AI, replacing human minds.
	We're talking about replacing thinking individuals.
	And I think it's gonna be a heck of a lot more than a billion people that are AI'd out of work.
	But the challenge is, it's not the people here at Davos that are ever gonna find themselves out of work
	because of these innovations and because of these technological developments.
	No one here suffered during the pandemic.
	No one here is going to suffer from the need for re-skilling or retraining
	because some computer has made their job redundant.
	James Melville, our guest in the studio, similarly was diagnosing as the main problem
	or flaw in the Davos and the Davos mentality is that it exposes this bifurcation
	between the governed and the governing.
	that essentially the...
	The inadvertent metaphor of them being in rarefied air on the top of a mountain issuing decrees that will not affect them but will affect ordinary people whose lives they do not understand nor wish to understand is central to this problem.
	And it seems to me that in a way, the amendment to the conditions created by the ability of people to instantaneously
	communicate through new technology and therefore organize, the ability to oppose centralized establishment agenda
	through the communication of our own stories and narratives, in particular those that expose hypocrisy and corruption,
	is one, to create this new terminology, misinformation, disinformation and malinformation,
	and of course to replace working people in this AI era, to disempower people so that there's even less leverage for
	ordinary people when it comes to countenancing the evident agenda that the WEF Davos perfectly represents,
	even if you do get a wide array of sweet chocolatey beverages, Andrew, which seem to have swayed you and
	brought you over to the dark side.
	Yeah, Andrew, I was just wondering if you might have any ideas around the kind of disinformation, because obviously one of their big main topics is around disinformation this year.
	And as we've seen with Davos before and the WEF, things that they've spoken about, for example, digital ID, that now we're seeing in California, Gavin Newsom is actually bringing in digital ID.
	So we are seeing the manifestation of things that are spoken about at Davos actually coming to become government policy.
	With disinformation and misinformation, we found a lot out through the Twitter files recently in ways in which there were these collusions between big tech and the government.
	So we are learning a bit more about that kind of influence.
	But what do you think the next big play might be to come out of Davos this year and what we might see in the future manifest?
	Well, a lot more people are paying attention to the World Economic Forum now than were five years ago.
	And I think a big part of this was when they came out with their Great Reset, which I know you're very well familiar with, in 2020, as far as rebuilding the world after the pandemic.
	A lot of people who had never really had this organization on their radar started to look into it.
	And as you were talking about with James earlier, they start looking through the back catalog and seeing all of these other things that have been talked about before.
	And I think in the context of this year, the big challenge we're seeing is that there are conspiracy theories about the World Economic Forum that have no basis in fact.
	When you hear people talking about, you know, everyone being, you know, For example, this pandemic was planned and orchestrated, people being injected with 5G chips and stuff like that.
	But the problem is that they use those and elevate those conspiracy theories to deflect all of the other criticism that is very reasoned, that is very rooted in fact, that is very much Defined and delivered in terms of their own language, their own prescriptions.
	And that's the challenge here.
	And to go back to the malinformation point, I think we're going to start to see more pushes to regulate this form of information, which means to censor this information.
	Last year at the annual meeting, there was a woman from Australia who has a government digital safety commission role.
	Who talked about the need to, in her words, recalibrate things that we've always understood, and she included in that specifically freedom of speech.
	So we need to recalibrate freedom of speech because it might not apply to the modern era.
	And I think that's going to be something we hear a lot more of.
	And if you look at what the UK is doing with the online harms bill, What Canada is doing with a number of internet regulations.
	These things are already coming and I think when you get all these leaders that are of a shared mindset in one place, it will accelerate that.
	It also shows that when people with shared interests come together, that there is an inevitability that a centralized agenda will emerge.
	Andrew, of course, you wrote the book Freedom Convoy.
	I wonder if you see in the WEF the topics discussed and in particular what you have just said about that we are likely now to see a calibration of freedom of speech.
	A lot of you I know watching this, let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments, regard freedom of speech as an absolute right, an absolute value, obviously excluding immediately and evidently harmful declarations, you know the famous fire in a theatre example.
	I wonder How did you, how do you feel a globalist agenda played out during the trucker convoy?
	I'm referring of course to the freezing of bank accounts of people that sought to fund that protest, the media, the ongoing media malignment of the trucker or maligning of the truckers and of course the fact that they were responding to a mandate decree that likely came from centralised and unelected bodies.
	Well, I don't think anyone who watched what was happening in Canada in February of last year would be surprised to learn that there's a lot of criticism towards central bank digital currencies.
	Why would we ever accept a digital currency that the government controls when we've already seen a government in a so-called democratic nation freeze the bank accounts Of its political critics.
	And as an added point, there was in Canada in, I believe it was in May, a system outage of the largest telecommunications provider.
	And for a day and a half, you could not send money to people.
	You could not use debit or credit cards in most retail outlets because they couldn't connect to the Internet.
	And I think that was actually a very useful illustration of what happens when everyone's finances are controlled in a very centralized Digital way.
	So I think that is very important here because we're talking about control and you cannot have centralization without control that can be used either in a very malicious way by governments or even just by virtue of technological issues.
	That can come down.
	So I think that this is something that people need to be more concerned about and people need to pay more attention to and not just be consumed by the so-called convenience of these innovations that they don't realize the inevitable, I think, outcomes of this in someone who doesn't actually value fundamental freedoms.
	That's brilliant, Andrew.
	Again and again, we hear how convenience and safety are used to advance the agenda of these authoritarian regimes that present themselves as anything but authoritarian.
	The promotion of digital IDs and centralized currencies ultimately lead to a greater ability to control.
	Even if you don't want to directly accuse existing administrations or corporate interests of having that agenda, certainly this new technology implemented in that way will afford that Ability.
	Now, Andrew, you're at Davos.
	I want you to include, over the coming days, I'd like you to stay in touch with us through a variety of social media outlets.
	Yes, locals, where our Stay Free AF community is housed, but Twitter and elsewhere.
	I'd like to see selfies of you with various power players.
	You, Klaus Schwab, in an embrace.
	Do you think that you can stay in touch with us and get us some of those assets, please?
	Absolutely.
	In fact, you mentioned Idris Elba earlier.
	All of the journalists covering Davos have tonight been invited to a reception just for journalists with Idris Elba.
	So I'll see if I can snag a selfie with him for you.
	Yeah, because Idris Elba, of everyone there, is probably my favourite person there because of Luther.
	I like him in a lot of films.
	Not Tony Blair, not Anthony Scaramucci.
	No, actually, I do like Tony Blair as well.
	I think in particular, I liked it when he said, Iraq definitely have got weapons of mass destruction.
	We're going to have to go to war with them.
	Then I think a million Iraqi folk died.
	And then he just sort of says, sorry about that.
	And then he grew his hair too long in that lockdown when he looked like sort of Nosferatu, turned himself into a sort of a literal vampire man.
	Yeah, him, that guy, Tony Blair.
	When I was here, when I was here last time, Nick Clegg had a security detail.
	So wacky things happen in Davos.
	Because who wants Nick Clegg, former leader of the Lib Dems in our little country, the UK, now, I believe, working, by coincidence, at Facebook Meta?
	It's weird, doesn't it?
	He used to work in the government, now he's got a job at Facebook Meta.
	Almost as if there's a sort of a porous relationship between those two organisations.
	He's just good at interviews.
	He's just so... Get that guy!
	I'll tell you who should run Met now.
	Him.
	That guy.
	But keep him safe.
	Make sure he's got a security detail at Davos.
	You don't want anyone sloshing hot chocolate up his abdomen.
	All right.
	Hey, Andrew, thanks so much for joining us.
	The first session's about to begin, which I'll tell you about in a second.
	Hopefully Andrew's going to scoot on over now to see Hilda Schwab and Idris Elba at the first WEF session.
	I think we're going to try and have a look at it.
	Do you know that Andrew wrote the book Freedom Convoy?
	You should follow him on social media and you should do what I do and adore Andrew, open-heartedly.
	Andrew, I hope we speak to you again soon.
	You're a lovely man.
	Thank you.
	See you, mate.
	Enjoy the rest of Davos.
	There he goes.
	Oh, I loved him.
	He was lovely, wasn't he?
	Brilliant.
	Klaus Schwab is literally on stage.
	This is right, guys.
	I don't want to get too excited, but Klaus Schwab is at Davos right now.
	I'm going to get my pussy Blanco at the ready and we are going to go over to Davos.
	Let's put on the audio.
	I want to hear what he's saying.
	What's he saying?
	Crystal Award Ceremony.
	What does that even mean?
	Good evening, and a very cordial welcome to the annual meeting 2023.
	I express this cordial welcome on behalf of the Board of Trustees and my colleague, Borge Brende, the President, and all the members of the Management Board, as well as all the people who are here.
	He's had so much time to prepare and he still hasn't swallowed that phlegm.
	Klaus, you've had a year to get rid of it.
	Before you go on the stage, Klaus, would you swallow?
	Just do this.
	Then swallow that down.
	Now talk.
	That's 2023.
	That's only the way it talks.
	You shouldn't ridicule a man for that.
	You should ridicule them instead for their globalist agenda.
	We're going to have to come off YouTube in a minute because there are things that we have to discuss that cannot be permitted on a platform that has ultimately allowed... It's not phlegm.
	What do you think it is?
	It's not his phlegm, is it?
	Well, what do you think it is?
	What other fluid could we have in it now?
	No, I meant that's not the thing we can't talk about.
	Oh yeah, it's not phlegm.
	No, we're not going to go deeper.
	What fluid is Klaus gargling and where did he get it from?
	Surely not his own, surely his own sow teats.
	That's enough.
	His shanky sow teats aren't so long that they can pull a nipple that's as long as a noodle.
	No.
	That can go into his own mouth, making himself a succulent circle.
	Uh-oh, an alarm's gone off there.
	That can't be good news.
	You've gone too far.
	That's YouTube, that is.
	A YouTube red flag has happened there.
	Listen, join us now over on Rumble.
	Click over right now.
	We have got a fantastic presentation for you on WHO propaganda, another unelected globalist body.
	And a recent study on adverse reactions that we simply are not able to discuss on this platform, but that you are going to love.
	You knew you were right.
	You knew something bad was going on.
	And now we're going to show you exactly how it's going down.
	And also Idris Elba, who I love as an actor.
	So let's check him out.
	Goodbye, YouTube.
	Hello, Rumble.
	Hello, Klaus.
	Now swallow that down, why don't you?
	Is he still alive?
	Are we able to pause him?
	Or do we just have to, once he starts, he just can't stop?
	Is that it with Klaus?
	To make your stay here enjoyable and productive.
	We couldn't meet at a more challenging time.
	We are confronted with so many crises simultaneously.
	What a coincidence!
	What does it need to master the future?
	I think to have a platform Where all stakeholders of global society are engaged.
	Government.
	Gareth, our clock by which I run the show, it's actually reached 99 minutes and 59 seconds.
	So I have to start it again.
	You could say.
	It's quite a great reset.
	Now, I've done that now.
	That's actually happened.
	OK, we've got a fantastic guest coming up.
	To explain more about events, that was Tim Hinchliffe, journalist and editor of The Sociable.
	He's been referred to as a bad faith actor.
	Not by us.
	Not by us, we like him.
	We were calling him earlier, we were booking him.
	Thank you, Gareth.
	But it was the MD of the WEF that called him that.
	Was that not stylish?
	It's not easy to do these great resets, actually.
	It's a lot of effort.
	Actually, let's get behind this Klaus Schwab guy.
	If there's someone willing to take on the task of great resets that can handle it, then we should get behind him.
	The WF for his article... Oh yes, I'm still talking about Tim Hinchliffe.
	Is Tim joining us now online?
	Is he there or are we talking to him later?
	He's enjoying this laser, is he?
	Okay, well, listen, one of the things that old Klaus Schwab's pretty keen to have happen is that we get... Now, without wanting to sound conspiratorial, I think he does literally want us to have microchips in our brain at some point.
	Who is saying that?
	Let's have a look.
	Are we gonna do that or do we... Okay, let's do that then.
	Let's have a look at there.
	By the way, I'm really enjoying this.
	That bit there was my favorite bit.
	When we went from the guest having Klaus Schwab live, I was like... Oh, amazing.
	This is actually... I'm well into this.
	Yeah, this is like football.
	At that point, it did fall apart a bit because the clock ran out.
	It's all about the clock.
	We can't find the clock.
	Right, so we're going to be talking to Tim In a minute.
	I'm not sure what the cue is for Tim and then but now let's have a look at Klaus Schwab.
	This is like one of the things that people say is like you know I like that Andrew just said they promote some of the more baroque ridiculous conspiracy theories like uh you know well no we're on rumble now like the pandemic was planned the plannedemic idea and that the vaccines have things in them like that make you trackable and stuff like that.
	These are not things that I believe by the way.
	But they do say some pretty crazy shit over there, like here's Klaus Schwab literally endorsing the idea of a microchip in the brain.
	This gives us questions about Elon Musk as well, because Neuralink is one of his prized projects, and sometimes we think You know, Musk, when it comes to the release of the Twitter files, is obviously a kind of a provocateur and an anti-establishment figure.
	They don't work that hard to bring someone down if their agenda is in alignment.
	But elsewhere, Musk is a transhumanist who believes in progressivism and that technology can solve all of humanity's problems.
	Whereas I, if you care about this, I believe that spirituality and personal awakening and a willingness to sacrifice, decentralised power, democratised communities has to be part of it.
	That you can't have an aristocratic solution.
	You can't have elites governing ordinary people and expect ordinary people's lives to improve.
	That's basically it.
	So let's have a look at Klaus Schwab right now advocating for sticking a microchip right down in the old grey matter.
	have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel because you all will have implants I can and we measure you all So they're mandated implants?
	We didn't like it when it was the vaccines!
	Wow!
	You won't be allowed into clubs, you won't be allowed to go on certain airlines.
	It's not safe for you to come into this discotheque without a microchip that will help you with the percussion.
	How are you going to move correctly to the boogie without a microchip in your brain?
	You will jitterbug and you will be happy.
	Your brainwaves, and I can immediately tell you how some people react.
	Brainwaves sounds like old-fashioned science as well.
	The two of us are on a pretty cutting edge, like Neuralink and sort of like chips in your brain.
	Your brainwaves are gonna be in alignment with a mush!
	Can feel how some people react to your answers.
	That used to be as well called compassion and empathy.
	So you could like recognize that this person is unhappy because they have water coming out their eyes like when my salteeds leak.
	Sorry about that metaphor.
	I came up with it quite early.
	Yeah, I know.
	It's not even a metaphor, is it?
	It's just an image, an unusual and unnecessary grotesque image of Klaus Schwab with a series of salteeds running down his flanks.
	And for some reason... I can see why you did it.
	I liked it!
	Because, like, he's the mother pig, the sow, the one that all little Trudeau and that suck off.
	Trudeau, Rishi, they'll come up to the teats.
	The thing is, every time I watch Clash Royale, I like him.
	Do you?
	Well, I like his vibe.
	I know what you mean.
	I think he seems friendly.
	Well, he does.
	He does seem friendly.
	But it is amazing when you watch him come out at the very start of Davos again.
	You see this guy that literally has never been elected to anything.
	Who are you, mate?
	It's incredible.
	And now he's going out in front of... I mean, you know, it's been spoken about everywhere now.
	There's global leaders from across the world.
	There's the biggest partners in the world in terms of corporations.
	And you've got this guy who basically just created this thing.
	It's astonishing.
	So let's talk about the power, but they say behind every great man there is a great woman.
	And I know that's true in your case.
	It certainly is.
	Let's have a look who's the great woman in Klaus's case.
	It's Hilda!
	Hilda Schwab.
	APPLAUSE What's going on with you?
	What's going on with you?
	What's going on with you?
	What's with the crystals and everything?
	What's happening?
	What's this image system?
	Why are they going into an amethyst space scape?
	Who's designing this?
	Come on, let's see what Hilda's got to say.
	I like her.
	Is it imaginable?
	What?
	They're doing an award ceremony within Davos?
	Yes.
	That's what's happening there?
	Yes.
	They're creating their own Golden Globes or something.
	What are they going to do?
	They're going to give this award to Idris Elba to justify Idris Elba being there.
	Got it.
	Again, it's difficult for me to do this because sometimes there's people that turn up, David Attenborough, Greta, Idris Elba, and I think these are good people.
	They're not saying they're bad people, obviously.
	So I guess Idris Elba is going to get the Crystal Award.
	I want to see how he's going to pull off taking it in a sincere way.
	Obviously, like we discussed this earlier, Idris Elba must have some foundation or organisation that he's very keen to help and he's doing this for the right reasons, obviously.
	But it's going to be weird.
	That's an amazing, that's a good trick though, isn't it?
	If you want to get a few celebrities in, get an award ceremony going.
	If they were to offer me a crystal, what would you want?
	That crystal looks alright.
	What would you want the title to be?
	What's it for?
	To do like my hair or something?
	Or like being a good guy just generally.
	The best guy on YouTube.
	Many of us have enjoyed his videos, his impersonations.
	Hey, would you like now, we've had a look at Klaus Schwab, we've had a look at Hilde Schwab and I want to look at how Do we want to look at your Idris Elba acceptance speech?
	I don't know.
	And we've also got an inside view from Andrew Lawton into the realities of Davos.
	It sounds like mostly a hot chocolate ceremony so far.
	Oh yeah, that's the bit I like.
	Sloshing about in the chalk.
	But now we've got Tim Hinschliff, journalist and editor of the Socialable.
	He's been referred to as a bad faith actor by the MD of the WF for his articles on the conference.
	Here he is Tim, have you been watching the conference so far?
	Have you got any highlights so far?
	No, actually I've been watching you so far, so the highlights are coming directly from you.
	That's right, and you can trust us to convey this story to you without any agenda.
	Sorry, we've got Davos on in the background and every so often they try to jam our stream.
	So listen, we know that big tech are, broadly speaking, in bed with Davos.
	So while we get a handle on that, let me tell you that Tim is going to give us some unique insights into exactly what it is that's so malevolent about the WF and Davos.
	Isn't this just a business conference, Tim?
	Are we making a lot of fuss about nothing?
	Exactly.
	They're all in this, you know, for the common good and for our benefits.
	And there's really nothing to worry about.
	No, but what they are doing is, you know, as James said earlier, bringing in the system of control, and they're doing that through many technological means, digital identity being one, central bank digital currencies being the other, but then also the internet of bodies.
	So there's going to be a session coming up ready for brain transparency, which is about hacking the human brain through neurotechnology.
	Which is basically discussing privacy and freedom once your brain can be decoded.
	So if you think disinformation is bad now, censorship and freedom of speech, then coming up is going to be freedom of thought.
	That's going to be one to look out for.
	You can see, in a sense, ideologically, that the curation of the public space might lead to a kind of self-censorship, but the idea that actual neurological activity could be interceded is extraordinary.
	And I suppose that an organisation that is interested primarily in control and selling the idea of control as positive and beneficial to ordinary people will have no upper limit, I suppose.
	I'm always struck, really, when I look at this stuff, by how anodyne it is.
	Seemingly lacking in menace it is, but I suppose that's what corporatism offers.
	Because it's come via commercialisation, they understand semiotics, they understand messaging, they understand that they have to capture a blend of sort of mundanity, sort of tedium, that it's kind of boring and banal, that you don't want to take it in.
	The kind of blue backgrounds, the kind of innocuousness.
	These aren't jagged and fascistic systems of messaging.
	They make their agenda seem normal and necessary and part of a progressive flow of life.
	Could you talk to me a bit as well, mate, about what circular economies are and how that's going to impact us in coming years?
	Oh yeah, definitely.
	So that's what Adrian Monk, the managing director, pretty much the propaganda minister of the World Economic Forum, had referred to One of my stories referred to me as a bad faith actor for targeting the forum's coverage on the circular economy.
	So the circular economy on the surface, like you say they incorporate, they make it look so mundane and nice and all these things, on the surface it's about reusing and recycling materials and longer lifespans and everything for supply chains.
	On the back end of that though is their business model.
	So their Circular economy business model is product as a service.
	This is where you'll own nothing and be happy actually comes from this business model.
	Of course, Ida Auken, the Danish MP, she wrote that in 2016, that story about owning nothing.
	But then, that's what she credited was the circular economy.
	Breakthroughs in the circular economy is what allowed a nation, a class of renters.
	So what the circular economy in business models looks like is that there's a small asset class of owners who own everything while they rent out every single product which has become a service to everyone else.
	And this can also tie into where, you know, if you own nothing and automation is taking over many jobs, then how do you get money?
	How do you survive?
	How do you live?
	That's when you introduced universal basic income using central bank digital currencies, which can be programmed To limit how much you can own.
	Where you can spend it, what you can spend it on, so on and so forth.
	And so while you're sitting there collecting your universal basic income, which is just a voucher pretty much to what you use it on, then they can say, we've eliminated poverty.
	That's one of the sustainable development goals.
	So if everyone's down here, you guys got all this income and you just plugged into the metaverse, then what's the problem?
	We'll take care of you.
	You just have to sit back, do nothing, and that's all that.
	All good.
	My God, that's a really terrifying depiction that you've just offered us there.
	I had the image of like citadels, the idea of walled cities that were only accessible to people that were sanctioned and permitted within the walls, but that's happening on a kind of a cyber level now that there are just there are certain boundaries and thresholds that won't be able to be crossed and With your idea there about the universal basic income and the elimination of poverty, presumably these vouchers that will be issued will only be able to be permissible to be spent in particular ways, allowing the kind of corporate partners, I might imagine, a kind of assurity that the money's only going to be spent within their organisations.
	And when, as we've not used that brilliant asset yet, of how many nations, Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, these are now essentially more powerful than I can't say any nation on earth because of China and the United States, but these corporations operate within those nations.
	So the idea that the corporation is a subset of the nation is gone.
	The idea that these unelected bodies like the WHO, IMF and WEF, in perhaps a less tangible way, we now have unelected private entities that have a lot more power than any nation and we're seeing now that democracy within
	those countries in itself is a kind of stitched up game because of lobbying,
	because of conflicts of interest.
	It's much easier Tim to imagine that sort of horrifying warly image sort of coming to fruition. Gail what do you
	want to say before we go back to Tim?
	Jump in and say like this, you know it sounds like conspiracy.
	You can quite easily get to the place where it sounds like, oh, they're going to control our lives.
	You know, this kind of universal credit and keep us all, you know, being able to spend on what we want.
	But literally, Tom Morton, the director of the Bank of England, said about CBDCs, he said there could be some socially beneficial outcomes.
	You could think of giving your children pocket money, but programming the money so that it can't be used for sweets.
	So, I mean, this is literally in response to, and that is for the source of the Telegraph, this is not from anywhere other than the mainstream media itself, where the director of the Bank of England is basically telling us that once digital currencies come in, we'll be able to control how people spend it.
	Again, it's not conspiracy.
	It's not a conspiracy.
	What do you think are some of the far, the more far out ideas that are likely to come out of this conference, Tim, and what kind of future does it infer?
	Well, one of them is, when you talked about kind of digital walling off of things, is an actual physical one within the cities.
	So, I don't know if you've heard the notion of a 15-minute city, but actually in the program of this year's Davos, there's a session called Bold New Cities Take the Stage, in which they talk about 10-minute cities.
	So that's basically where the thing, the city is sectioned off.
	So you have quadrants, you know, this is the Hunger Games kind of thing.
	So you got your sectors, 12, 10, and all that, and you're not allowed to go outside that area.
	How do you control and monitor and either incentivize or coerce people into staying in their quadrants?
	Well, you need a digital identity as a foundation for that.
	And guess what?
	We've already got that technological foundation all set up through The last couple of years with these digital health certificates, aka vaccine passports, that's at the stage because in order to do anything, participate in society, access essential goods and services, that's what's going to be needed.
	So that's one of the crazy ones that's out there.
	That's been going on for a while, still continuing.
	But again, talking about that brain transparency thing.
	Yeah, go ahead.
	Well, I'm saying like, what I imagine is that once the technology exists to do something, almost the incentive exists to implement it.
	I suppose we have weapons that have been invented that have, thank God, not yet been used.
	But it's easy now to look at a kind of history of piloting and say, oh, look, that's where they tested that idea.
	When you said the stuff about the 10 minute city, I thought about like the kind of tags you wear if you're sort of convicted of like, you know, tags that will buzz or inform people.
	And if we're all if we've all carrying digital IDs and our actions and movements would be easier to monitor.
	And it seems to me that they're using the climate change narrative to Introduce the possibility of lockdowns where ordinary people, not these guys who fly around on private jets at a whim, will have travel restricted.
	And it seems as well, even on Rumble, I'm not suggesting that the pandemic was not a legitimate biomedical event, but That you can see how they have piloted the idea of lockdowns now.
	In countries like the UK, wherever it is you're living, Tim, at the beginning of the lockdown they said, oh, in China they can lock people down because it's an authoritarian, centralized, communist country.
	You won't be able to pull that stuff off in Italy or the US or England.
	But they did.
	We just obediently did it.
	And all you have to do is condemn dissenters.
	If you smear dissenters as conspiracy theorists and whack jobs, Man, not that long ago, even if you were avowedly and overtly a conspiracy theorist entitled to be in a conversation, you can have edgeland views, unusual opinions that needn't be hateful.
	So already in the conversations we've had today, we've talked about freedom of speech being calibrated.
	We've talked about the ability to scan people's Consciousness and mental activity, the ability to monitor movement, the elimination of poverty, even a goal like that that seems so sort of beautiful and fruitful and noble being used as a way essentially to assert more regulation and control.
	So I suppose that's an interesting lens to use with the WF.
	Look at the stuff they've been saying in the past and look at what things have subsequently been implemented.
	Look at the technologies that are being introduced and then imagine how they might be used.
	No, even if you want to give people the benefit of the doubt and say, no, neoliberalist Western democracies don't have that kind of malevolent intent.
	Well, what if things change?
	What if a different or centralised authority were ever to get that authority?
	And I would say the way that things are heading at the moment, it's kind of looking like that's the kind of dystopic vision we're moving towards anyway.
	What are you saying, Tim?
	Yeah, well, you're exactly right about the narratives.
	So before COVID and before the Great Reset, the World Economic Forum was pushing these policies for climate change, you know, digital ID, limited mobility, climate refugees, things like that.
	And then once the pandemic came along, they just kind of transcribed all that climate stuff onto COVID.
	So instead of having climate lockdowns and things, you had health lockdowns and quarantines and Things like that.
	And so now that the COVID control narrative is all but collapsed, they're moving right back into climate change.
	So that's where digital ID is going to be needed for all these climate refugees they say are going to exist.
	There's what else?
	As Andrew mentioned earlier, the individual carbon footprint trackers.
	So measuring, you know, what you're consuming, you know, which is tied to digital ID.
	So it's like You go someplace and they say, well, you've eaten too much meat or you bought too much meat.
	You can't have that.
	Petrol and gasoline, you know, you can't use that and switch to electric and all that.
	And so what it is, is creating that system of, you know, behavior modification, which is a type of social credit system.
	It's all based on trying to incentivize manipulative or worse human behavior.
	It's very interesting.
	It seems that no matter what the problem is, the solution that will be presented is digital IDs, social credit scores, the ability to lock people down.
	So that's something we can watch for, isn't it?
	We can say, oh, wow, the problem used to be the pandemic.
	And these were the solutions.
	And now the problem is pollution or climate change.
	And these are the solutions.
	And also, you know, in a sense, you know, some of what you're talking about, about carbon emissions and, you know, carbon foot tracker.
	If, in a sense, for me personally, if I knew that, as a collective, this was the only way that we were going to tackle some of the issues, you know, to eat less meat so we all had to track what we ate, these were the only ways to tackle some of the issues that are facing this planet.
	And everyone was doing it.
	But then when you know that 71% of global emissions are caused by 100 of the biggest companies in the world, and they're getting tax breaks, They're represented at Davos by paying their money to be there and getting favourable decisions and colluding with governments.
	So you know, it's not them that's doing it, it is us.
	And this comes back to the hypocrisy that James was talking about.
	That's brilliant because they will only present solutions that do not meaningfully impact the agenda of the powerful.
	Solutions that are like, hey, why don't we just Shut down all of that type of fossil fuel, and at great expense, set up new systems of energy.
	We had a guest on the show the other week who told us that solar and wind could only meet one fifth of our energy needs, even operating at maximum capacity.
	So it seems that there is some disinformation that comes out of that anyway, and we'll check that further.
	But yeah, one of the, I think, the great tools for examining this stuff is Are the solutions that they present never a challenge to the existing framework?
	They never say that we're going to break up these monopolies, we're going to democratize these workplaces, we're going to give you control of your communities.
	These kind of solutions are never suggested.
	Tim, we've got to, unless you've got something to say mate, we've got Idris Elba's on stage at Davos.
	and we're about to convey that. You're very welcome to stay on the line.
	I think we're going to... Tim, stay with us, mate.
	If we've got that technical capacity.
	Let's have a look at Idris Elba now, an actor who I admire, addressing the Davos Massive. Let's have a look at him.
	Yes, she is a hard act to follow.
	Thank you, Sabrina.
	Shh.
	Thank you to the World Economic Forum, Hilda.
	Thank you, Professor Klaus, for this honour.
	We are very privileged to be here and don't take it lightly.
	But let's be frank.
	It's taken decades for corporates, for governments to understand, for economies to be built to last.
	We need to empower the youth.
	We need social equity.
	We need to protect our environment.
	Today is well recognized that economic, social and natural well-being of our planet are completely interrelated and Davos may be one of the first platforms to get it.
	We understand the power and the change that can come from this room.
	Davos has become the de facto platform for governments, for corporates, for philanthropists,
	for activism, for protesters, to mobilize quickly, which is why we're all here, because
	we can move with agility and speed and your speed.
	I like Idris Elba a lot and I wouldn't want to criticize Idris Elba for like a number of reasons.
	That's not a person who I would want to sort of feel ill about me because I feel like he's a good person and he's a self-made man.
	But he's got a cause obviously hasn't he?
	He wants to help the youth.
	Yeah.
	But it's pretty, when he said like this is a centre of power for governments and corporates it's I mean, if you look at the attendees and if you look at the agenda that's being represented, I feel like, you know, I'd love to directly talk to Idris Elba about the WEF and Davos.
	Maybe that's a conversation that we'll be able to have.
	I'm much more happy criticising politicians and corporate leaders because I feel like I don't trust their intention.
	Whereas I guess with Idris Elba, you feel like this guy wants to help this organisation that he's advocating for.
	Tim, we're going to do a video, we're going to show you a presentation now.
	This is something that we're rather excited about.
	We did a, I'm going to call it a short film.
	It's a bit lofty.
	It's a bit lofty and grandiose.
	I think seeing Idris Elba on stage, except in a crystal, reignited my appetite to be taken seriously as a content creator.
	We made a presentation about the WHO and their anti-vaxx propaganda, saying that anti-vaxxers are more dangerous than uh terrorists i mean they literally say it you'll see it in a moment in our short movie they call it anti uh vaccine active anti-vaccine activism activism is more dangerous than terrorism we've presented it alongside some information that we can talk about explicitly actually on rumble that's the advantage that there's been a new study that shows that the adverse reactions to some of the vaccines and this is using
	Information from the NIH and from Pfizer and Moderna comes back as regular as one in 800 events.
	And to give that some context, there's a couple of other vaccines historically that had adverse effects as infrequently as one in 100,000 that was pulled off the shelves.
	Another one, one in 10,000 that was pulled off the shelves.
	So it seems like this vaccine was not treated like other Vaccines and I suppose in order to do that, you have to present the problem is so enormous and significant that it warrants a new approach now over the course of the last couple of years.
	I think many of us changed our perspective on on the pandemic and the use of power and control around it and certainly the profits that Pfizer along with other pharmaceutical companies made.
	Certainly gave us some questions.
	Tim, thanks for joining us, man.
	These are presumably those what I just outlined there.
	They're subjects that you're interested in because you seem like that sort of person in your flat cap with your headphones on with your sparkling blue eyes.
	I mean, where are you?
	Thanks very much.
	I'm in Medellín, Colombia.
	Oh, you're in?
	OK, fair enough.
	You're reporting from Colombia.
	OK, fair enough.
	Right.
	All right.
	Well, fantastic.
	I'd love to have you on again.
	You really helped us to understand some of these complex issues in a very apposite and easy to discern fashion.
	Thanks, mate.
	I hope you'll join us again.
	Big fan.
	Always look at your website.
	Do you, Gal?
	Yeah.
	Cheers.
	Yeah, we love you.
	What is this website so people can see it?
	The Sociable.
	Yeah, check out Tim Hinchliffe's website, Sociable, and Tim, we'll talk to you again soon.
	Now it's time for us to have a look at our presentation on the anti-vax activism movement as presented by the WHO and some information about adverse reactions I think you're going to love that you will only be able to see unedited and uncensored here on Rumble.
	Here's the news.
	No, here's the effing news.
	The WHO have released a delicious piece of propaganda explaining that anti-vaccine activism is worse than global terrorism.
	Meanwhile, you cannot discuss new studies that show information about adverse vaccine reactions.
	Now, we are up against some pretty powerful forces.
	For example, the WHO.
	Do you know where they get their funding from?
	They've released a beautiful little piece of propaganda that reveals that anti-vaccine activism is the worst threat facing the world.
	It's worse than terrorism.
	It's worse than anything.
	Imagine something.
	It's worse than that.
	It's the worst thing there is.
	Meanwhile, there are some studies that have come out that make some interesting claims about adverse vaccine reactions based on available information from the Let's have a look now at the WHO's brilliant piece of propaganda.
	We have to recognize that anti-vaccine activism, which I actually call anti-science aggression.
	That's what I call it, because that sounds worse.
	Anti-science aggression.
	Because science, that means objectivity.
	That means empiricism.
	That means experimentation.
	That's what science is.
	And of course, if science was funded in a particular way and had a particular desired outcome or agenda, like, for example, to accrue profits and revenue, It would still be science.
	That wouldn't mean that it was a subset of a corporatist globalist movement.
	No way.
	It's still science.
	It's science till I say it's not science.
	It's now become a major killing force globally.
	It's a major killing force.
	Are there any other killing forces you want to discuss?
	No.
	During the COVID pandemic in the United States, 200,000 Americans needlessly lost their lives because they refused a COVID vaccine.
	Okay, well let's make sure there's data on that.
	Even after vaccines became widely available, and now the anti-vaccine activism is expanding across the world, even into low- and middle-income countries.
	Even those people, poor people, even poor people are anti-vaccine now.
	I mean, that's not as bad because we won't give them vaccines anyway because Bill Gates won't allow them to have the patents, so that's not as bad.
	But it shows you how bad, even people that can't afford the vaccines don't want the vaccines, and that's a problem!
	It's a killing force.
	Anti-science now kills more people than things like gun violence.
	It's worse than guns.
	Global terrorism.
	Worse than terrorism, that's bad as well.
	Nuclear proliferation or cyber attacks.
	The worst thing you could have in this world is Putin and not being vaccinated.
	My God!
	Just imagine an unvaccinated Putin!
	And now it's become a political movement.
	In the U.S.
	it's linked to far-extremism on the far-right.
	Far-right as well, you know, similarly, there's two things.
	Not wanting to take a medicine for reasons that we'll be talking about in a minute, and also being a racist.
	Somehow those things have been combined, almost as if you want to smear people who dissent to ensure that that message can never reach people.
	Same in Germany, so this is a new... Literally got the word propaganda repeated again and again and again because it is propaganda!
	Face of anti-science aggression and so we need political solutions to address this.
	What, like censorship, misinformation, disinformation, malinformation?
	the subject of the current WEF Davos Convention.
	What a coincidence, yeah, it's almost like they're trying to create an appetite
	where people really want censorship.
	That's interesting, isn't it, that they're doing that?
	Almost as if the elite powers cannot cope with a technological revolution
	and the sudden ability to immediately communicate data, so need a machine now to crush dissent,
	smear opposing voices, and control the narrative, co-opting all available voices
	and shutting down any opposition.
	That's weird.
	To address this.
	World Health Organization.
	They're proud of it.
	They put the hairline up at the end of it.
	They shouldn't be embarrassed about that thing.
	Okay, so there's their propaganda.
	Now, this is written by two far-right, worse-than-terrorist nuclear threats.
	For example, this terrorist bastard, Robert M. Kaplan.
	Yeah, sure, he might be Emeritus Distinguished Professor at the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health and an adjunct professor of medicine at Stanford University's Clinical Excellence Research Center, but that's not the full picture.
	As well as that, he's a terrorist.
	Oh yeah, he's also an elected member of the National Academy of Medicine, but he's also worse than a nuclear bomb.
	Alongside him, his dastardly companion in this murderous endeavour, was Sander Greenland, Emeritus Professor of Epidemiology and Statistics at UCLA and Fellow of the American Statistical Association and Royal Statistical Society, and he's also worse than a loaded gun in the hand of a baby boy pointed at an orphan.
	In September 2022, along with an international group of physicians and scientists, we published a study suggesting that the risks of COVID-19 vaccines may be greater than previously reported.
	No!
	Using publicly available data from Pfizer and Moderna studies, okay, so it's Pfizer and Moderna's studies, they're just collating and presenting existing data.
	Which also, by the way, could be biased.
	Let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments, if you think you can trust wholly and solely Pfizer and Moderna.
	Before you tell me, have a look at how much money they made from the pandemic.
	We found one serious adverse event for each 800 vaccinees.
	That translates to about 1,250 serious events for each million vaccine recipients.
	Many physicians and scientists believe that vaccination programs are the key to ending the coronavirus pandemic.
	Some warn that our analysis might harm public health by stimulating more vaccine hesitancy.
	Yet if some concerns are valid, remaining quiet could also result in harm and further erode public trust in science.
	Seems like a reasonable argument.
	How about having a conversation and allowing people to decide for themselves?
	We believe that scientists have a responsibility to report on suspected hazards to authorities.
	Consider a 1 in 800 risk of a serious adverse reaction in the context of other vaccines.
	Okay, so here are some other vaccines that were pulled and what the ratios were there.
	The 1976 swine flu vaccine was withdrawn after it was associated with Guillain-Barre syndrome at a rate of approximately 1 in 100,000.
	So at a rate of 1 in 100,000, they pulled it.
	They ended it.
	Compare that to the other statistic.
	In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine, Rotashield, was withdrawn following reports of interception in about 1 or 2 in 10,000.
	As widely acknowledged, COVID vaccines prevent hospitalizations and the clinical trials estimated that between 225 and 625 hospitalizations were prevented per million vaccinated persons.
	So the same data that these guys are using has some information which I guess they want you to hear because it's advantageous and beneficial, and presumably also true.
	Perhaps both of these bits of information are true, which would mean that there is a place, according to this information, for those vaccines, but perhaps the case has been somewhat misrepresented.
	I don't know.
	Tell me what you think in the chat.
	But these benefits are likely to be concentrated among vaccinees who are elderly or have chronic illnesses.
	It's less clear which groups are at risk for serious adverse vaccine reactions.
	Those at low risk for hospitalisation may still be at risk of serious vaccine reactions.
	We only consider mRNA vaccines and it's not clear that other Covid-19 vaccines confer the same risk.
	Regrettably, our analysis was hindered by an addressable problem.
	The individual level data that could confirm or refute our analysis has not been made public.
	Presumably because that information would make us so excited we all might run into the streets vaccinating ourselves in an irresponsible way.
	For example, We would have greater confidence in our conclusions if we knew how often individuals experience multiple serious adverse events.
	Pfizer, Moderna and the FDA have these data but have kept them hidden from public view.
	For some reason.
	That data was a surprise for your birthday and you've spoiled it!
	This information is essential to the understanding of the balance between vaccine benefits and harms.
	Hmm, who would have a vested interest in influencing or biasing the balance between vaccine benefits and harms?
	I don't know, let me know in the chat.
	We are calling upon Pfizer, Moderna and the FDA to release all information needed for a comprehensive assessment of these products.
	Why would you not just do that anyway?
	COVID-19 vaccines are now among the most widely disseminated medicines in the history of the world.
	They've cost taxpayers tens of billions of dollars, which you'd think would give you a right to transparency, wouldn't you?
	Rivaling the annual US federal expenditure on biomedical research.
	There's no legitimate reason why scientists and the public should not have the access to the evidence that justified that purchase.
	Seems reasonable.
	Let me know if you hear anything here that sounds like a conspiracy theory or something.
	Like, when you hear something, tell me, tell me, put it in the comments.
	That bit, that was a conspiracy theory.
	At the moment, I'm just reading this thinking, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Except when I allow this thought to enter my mind.
	What is best for those organisations if the intention is power, control and profit?
	When I think that, everything makes sense again.
	Yet evidence is being withheld which adds uncertainty to our conclusions and leaves lingering questions about the scientific foundation for Covid-19 vaccine promotion.
	Public posting of raw data is a reasonable response.
	Open data is becoming the norm in science and is now required by many leading journals.
	The time has come for the FDA and EMA to reopen their investigations and for Pfizer, Moderna and all vaccine manufacturers to provide the data that will allow scientists and physicians to address outstanding concerns.
	Terrorists!
	You nuclear threat!
	That is worse than ISIS.
	I've seen some of ISIS's videos, have you?
	And they made me sick because of the lack of humanity, the barbarianism.
	But this, for example, statements like there is no legitimate reason why scientists and the public should not have access to the evidence that justified the purchase.
	You terrorists!
	That's actually took the wind out of my sails a bit, that bit.
	And what about the bit where they said, the vaccines are among the most widely disseminated medicines in history.
	They've cost the taxpayers tens of billions of dollars.
	Oh, you make me sick.
	I've heard some rumours in my time, but this!
	I wasn't ready for that.
	I thought I had a strong stomach, but that's actually turned it.
	Is Guantanamo Bay being closed?
	Because we need it open again.
	Get the orange jumpsuits.
	Get these guys in there.
	Get the water.
	Is Dick Cheney still around to do coaching on waterboarding?
	Because I want these so-called scientists with their wacky views, like allowing the public and other scientists access to data.
	I'll give you access to some waterboarding, you bloody terrorist!
	Anyway, maybe the WHO ain't that bad.
	They're probably an objective, agenda-free organisation with no concerns in the world other than helping us put your bloody conspiratorial mind at rest.
	The Gates Foundation, yeah, I've heard of them.
	Bill Gates' foundation.
	The Gates Foundation is the second largest contributor to the WHO.
	Okay.
	As of September 2021, it had invested nearly $780 million in its programs this year.
	That's a good program, though.
	That's charity, isn't it?
	That's philanthropy.
	Giving it to the old WHO, who, you know, they've got no real power except the power to control what's on, for example, YouTube.
	The community guidelines are controlled by WHO.
	You can read that for yourself.
	So in a way, you could say that Bill Gates has some influence over what's allowed on YouTube.
	Could you?
	Let me know in the chat.
	Let me know in the comments.
	For an intergovernmental organisation such as the WHO to be so reliant on private philanthropy, especially one whose leaders have personal interests and investments in healthcare, is problematic.
	For one, it gives a non-government actor an outsized influence on the development and health priorities carried on by the international organisation.
	Oh right, yeah, so this guy's never been elected by anybody.
	His wealth has now been accrued and is now invested in a highly influential body and is called philanthropy.
	There's no way that that influence could lead to further opportunity for profit and power, is there?
	Let me know in the chat.
	Let me know in the comments.
	While private foundations can be very generous, they can also be even faster than governments to change their mind about donations, or more dogged in demanding that their funding is used for specific priorities over others.
	Private foundations' resources tend to be more dependent on the stock market and other investments that could have financial interests that run contrary to their state admissions.
	Oh, that's weird.
	That would mean that their state admissions are untrue.
	This has been the case for the Gates Foundation, which was once a big investor in fossil fuel.
	And it's true of some of Bill Gates' personal investments, which include farmland that sells its produce to fast food chains.
	There you go then.
	I don't ever see him turning up on the TV saying, you know, well it's really bad for you McDonald's and stuff,
	but actually it's sort of quite profitable also, that's why I sell them stuff.
	Don't see him, he's all about like, oh, helping these farmers and corn on the cob
	and all that stuff, ain't he?
	They're never telling you what he's actually up to.
	I like to call another cub for lunch.
	If a private foundation were to become the WHO's highest donor,
	it would be transformational, said Lawrence Gostin, Faculty Director for the O'Neill Institute
	at Georgetown University and Director of WHO's Collaborating Centre on National and Global Health Law.
	When WHO was formed as an intergovernmental organisation, it would have been unimaginable that a private foundation could have such influence, he continued.
	Well, imagine harder then, because it's happening, baby.
	It would enable a single rich philanthropist to set the global health agenda.
	What?
	Gostin said, referring to Bill Gates, co-chair of the foundation.
	Gates himself was slammed by some global health experts last year when he defended stringent intellectual property rights as the best way to speed innovation and move some sort of prioritising profits over vaccinations.
	So, what you could say is if Bill Gates believes so strongly in this vaccination programme that he's willing to significantly invest in the WHO, which might give him some influence over the WHO's policies which affect what things are allowed to be said on YouTube, then similarly when it comes to other countries that haven't got the vaccines, which he believes in because Remember I've just explained to you all the investment in that.
	Then you would remove the patent so that they could make their own vaccines which you've already said you believe in because there's nothing to worry about there and it's not just because they're profitable or anything, it's because they're good for you.
	Oh, they're not willing to remove the patent.
	So he's explained in a variety of ways why that is but for me it just don't make sense.
	So there you are.
	You've seen some WHO propaganda.
	You've heard the gist of what this adverse events study has revealed and suggested using information from Pfizer, Moderna and the FDA.
	Why don't you make up your own mind?
	Or do you need someone else to make up your mind for you?
	Would you like someone to control the information you get access to?
	But that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the comments.
	Let me know what you think in the chat.
	I'll see you in a minute.
	Yeah?
	Oh, here we are.
	So what do you think about that?
	I've got something... Well, I'll tell you what you think about that by simply reading back your words to me.
	Because, Gareth, one of the things I love about our community... Do you want to hear just one of the things I love about our community?
	Is that they educate us.
	Think of the journey we've been on.
	When we first met you, we didn't even know what the W.E.F.
	was.
	Let alone the strings of influence it had attached to the centres of power.
	You've introduced us to great journalists, great views, great perspectives.
	You've helped us balance anti-authoritarianism with rigorous journalism, so that we don't just lean into mindless conspiracy theories.
	We want to demonstrate that elite establishments are controlling the world, subverting and avoiding democratic process, and that it isn't beneficial to ordinary people.
	We don't just want to deluge you in empty rhetoric.
	We want to amuse you, arouse you, stimulate and empower you, so that we can create a revolution.
	The truth is, we can reorganize reality however we want to.
	That is why they're working so hard to control information.
	That is why they're introducing these new categories of misinformation, malinformation, disinformation.
	If they were right, what would they have to be afraid of?
	They would say, let the ideas win out in the marketplace of communication.
	But they're unable to do that, Gareth.
	Because we're right.
	Because ordinary people should be running their own communities.
	Because they are trying to centralise power in needless and nefarious ways.
	And because the WEF Davos Conference is an example of globalist agenda being enacted on, well, the only stage it could be.
	A global one.
	Here's some comments from our beloved community.
	This is frickin' nuts!
	Frickin' Nuts said, a threat to their control.
	It's not about any illness, because they don't give a crap about us.
	They don't really care about us, said Frickin' Nuts.
	That's talking about the WHO, another unelected, privately funded body, though they do get some taxpayer dollars.
	The US is a big funder of them, of course.
	Daedalus777.
	Safe and effective, brought to you by Pfizer.
	Well done, Daedalus.
	Blessed old bird.
	I think it's the problem that they want complete obedience no matter what.
	I think they do want compliance and obedience, don't they?
	We watched a bit of WEF propaganda earlier.
	It was fascinating, actually, because they understand so much of the messaging, don't they?
	They even use, as a reference, that Is it Idiocracy?
	The film where, you know, the guy puts on the glasses and he can see that all adverts say obey and stuff.
	I mean, is it Them?
	I can't remember the name of that film.
	But anyway, it's like they do understand the nature of the accusations being levelled at them.
	And if you watch Idris Elba there, a person that I sort of respect and admire, it's like he's talking about a totally benign and, what do I want to say, sort of progressive But I just don't see how it can be that big pharma, big tech and the state can be the hero.
	I just don't see how that can be because I'm living in the world and I'm watching what's happening.
	We are now.
	We've not gone mad.
	No, we've not gone mad at all.
	I mean, we've got a little graphic just to kind of follow up one of the things we were talking about with Tim a few minutes ago around the kind of climate agenda.
	Again, it's something that, you know, we talk about with our audience and you talk about protection of the planet as being something that's important.
	I think it is important.
	I love the planet.
	But this is kind of a way in which the WEF and these kind of global elites use this kind of, these emotions that we feel about the planet and wanting to protect it.
	So here you've got Klaus talking about leaders.
	You are asking firms to replace any corporate board directors who is unwilling to transition to cleaner energy sources.
	So what they're suggesting that the WF have the power to replace corporate leaders.
	Now, what I would say, Gareth, if he's talking about organizations like Exxon Mobil and other traditional fossil fuel type organizations, I would have traditionally and conventionally seen them as part of the problem.
	And so I can see how someone like Idris Elba or Greta Thunberg or David Attenborough and people that love nature, like, you know, I'd include myself in that, think, well, look, there he is advocating for control.
	Well, you might say that, but one of the main sponsors or partners of the WF and Davos is Shell.
	So why would you accept Shell's money, Klaus?
	It does its right.
	You can't take their money.
	So, looking at this graphic here, we've just got Klaus saying we're aiming to ask firms to replace corporate directors, but then we know that just 100 companies are responsible for 71% of global emissions.
	At the same time, we know that the Dutch government are trying to shut down 3,000 farms over their emissions.
	Can I unpack each one of these a little bit?
	All of that 100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions, one of the themes that's come up over our WF Royal Rumble special, which I think has been a great success.
	Judging from the comments in the chat, you lot are loving it as well, aren't you?
	Will you let me know?
	Give us some more feedback on that.
	We know that they'll only suggest solutions that impact us at the level of the individual, but do not intervene, intercede, or negatively affect the agenda of the powerful.
	This is an example of that, is it Gary?
	Garifullo, they're bringing in measures that won't affect corporations but will affect
	ordinary people.
	Well not only are these global emissions by these hundred companies, but these big fossil
	fuel companies like Shell that are making massive record profits at the moment get government
	subsidies, get tax breaks, get all sorts.
	And these are the kind of partners that they are.
	So they control the agenda and they control the conversation.
	If the WF was what it purports to be, why don't they go, what we're advocating for is ending government subsidy for these type of energy companies.
	We're not accepting their funding anymore.
	That's what it would sound like.
	Right, good, good.
	Because sometimes it's my own naivety and optimism that gets in the way, my willingness to believe in this stuff.
	Yeah, and then you've got leaders like Justin Trudeau talking about the environment and things.
	We know at the same time he's flying around in his private jets.
	He's giving big subsidies to these fossil fuel companies themselves.
	He's just bought in F-35s.
	There you go.
	So at the same time, the Dutch government is trying to shut down 3,000 farms over emissions.
	Now, this is a story, again, like reported in The Guardian and all sorts of things.
	These farms that they're saying are contributing to emissions, which is in some cases true.
	And yet, But at the same time, we know that the vast majority of these emissions have been caused by the same companies that are sponsoring the WEF.
	Not the farmers.
	These individual farmers in Holland or the Netherlands aren't sponsoring the WEF, so they're not going to get favourable legislation.
	So the agenda is what sets the solution, not the problem.
	Because, of course, if you can centralise agriculture, then you grant more power to these elites that are in advantageous positions already.
	And so it penalises ordinary farmers.
	It's a little bit like the previous example.
	If you know that 100 companies are responsible for 71% of global emissions, that's where the change needs to take place, not the level of the individual.
	You're not going to be tagging and digital ID'ing CEOs of big corporations.
	It will be ordinary people who have their movements restricted.
	Essentially, what you have is an organisation that are able to construct regulation and legislation that won't meaningfully impact them.
	Like our second guest.
	No, it was our first guest, wasn't it, James?
	The attendees of Davos are not people that are negatively impacted by the pandemic.
	And with the agricultural example, it's negative, meaningfully and negatively affects ordinary farmers,
	but it doesn't affect figures like Bill Gates that are acquiring farmland.
	Well, there you go. So there you go to our final point here.
	If we just go back to the previous slide, it was basically saying that Bill Gates is now the biggest farmland owner in the United States.
	So what is happening?
	Well, you know, it's quite demonstrable that this land that was owned by independent farmers is being transferred.
	Because they're being bankrupt because of these new edicts which are presented as ecological solutions, but actually they are designed to bankrupt Those farmers.
	Sometimes I hear in spaces like this, and let me know in the chat in the comments if you agree, that sometimes you can, if you just look at the effects of a piece of legislation, then you can see what the desired effect was.
	For example, you might argue that if the pandemic meant that some of the most powerful interests in the world became more powerful, that corporations became richer, that it benefited big tech, it benefited big pharma, and it benefited governments because of their ability to regulate, particularly at a time When they feel like they're losing control because of the availability of information and the new ability to organize, suddenly a situation occurred that was beneficial across the board to all those organizations.
	That's not the same as saying that it's a plannedemic or they made it up or there's microchips in the vaccines.
	You know, I don't care what people say in the comments in the chat.
	You lot can discuss what you want.
	I'm interested in what there's evidence for.
	And just with this one example around, you know, ecology and climate change,
	which I believe are important issues, and that's why they use them to leverage them.
	Same with popular ideas around identity and prejudice and inequality.
	All important ideas that are used rhetorically, but never are...
	the solutions that are presented will never negatively impact the sponsors of the event
	or the most powerful interest in the world.
	And that's just common sense, isn't it?
	What's the next one?
	We've got another one of these World Economic Forum breakdowns.
	This is, I think, one around big tech.
	Whatever you are, this is the famous number one, you'll own nothing and you'll be happy.
	Whatever you want, you'll rent and it'll be delivered by drone.
	So they said that in 2018.
	By 2022, robot grocery delivery services were launched.
	Bloody stupid looking things.
	Things with most robots, either it's like old Klip Klop, the robot police dog.
	They look like little bastards.
	Or it's that robot bouncer thing, that big scaffold skip, that dumpster made of scaffold.
	Yeah, from Robocop 2.
	I didn't like him.
	Well, sometimes they're a bit awkward, aren't they?
	They look embarrassed.
	Yeah, they look embarrassed about themselves.
	They skit about like Bambi on the ice and then fire off a few rounds, I think, to cover their own awkwardness.
	Then, oh, Gecko Robotics is an official partner of the WAF.
	And a lot of people are choosing to rent rather than buy.
	I don't think they're choosing.
	They can't afford to buy.
	And we've tagged that Blackrock and Larry Fink will be at Davos this year.
	Blackrock are buying up real estate across the United States of America, manipulating real estate prices.
	So why don't they have a session at Davos going, right, let's get into with Larry Fink, our special guest, Larry Fink from Blackrock.
	Why are you buying up all these houses?
	Yeah, these are the questions you want.
	Like Larry, mate.
	Like, all right, obviously, like all of us here, you're interested in a better, fairer world.
	That's why we came.
	Stop buying up all the houses, mate.
	Oh, I can't because we have to make profits.
	Albert Baller, back again.
	What a year it's been for you, Albert.
	Now, we remember you saying... He is a little bit taller.
	You are taller.
	Well, the reason I'm taller is I'm a little bit richer.
	Now, you said very plainly it would be unconscionable to make a profit from the pandemic, and yet Pfizer have returned their greatest ever profit.
	Presumably, you're going to be giving this profit to good causes in the field of medicine about which you care so much.
	Hello?
	Albert?
	Larry?
	Where you gone?
	So that's how you know, by their fruits shall you know them, to quote the Holy Bible.
	Now, Gareth, you've probably sensed I'm getting excited, have you?
	I certainly have.
	Do you know why that is?
	I've got a good idea.
	There's a little guy called Michael Schellenberg coming our way.
	He's been a guest on the show just last week.
	He's one of the ingenues, entrepreneurs and radicals that have bought you the Twitter files.
	He's currently releasing them, probably even as we speak.
	In fact, he was a bit late, probably because he was on the phone to Elon Musk.
	Michael, how are you?
	What's going on in your world?
	With you guys.
	Yeah.
	Exciting day.
	First day at Davos.
	I'm in a great mood.
	It's a magical time, isn't it?
	It's like bloody Christmas.
	You never forget your first Davos, do you?
	It thrills me.
	I feel giddy.
	I feel giddy as a school girl.
	I really do.
	Why are we late?
	What were you doing?
	Um, washing and combing my hair.
	It does look very nice.
	There's a bit of... No time to shave, but... No, fair enough.
	We'll let that pass.
	Now, Michael, when we spoke to you last week, which is obviously a seismic event in my life and the trajectory of my ongoing and ambiguous sexuality, since then the Davos...
	What can we anticipate this year?
	What are the elites working on this year to introduce into the mainstream and to indoctrinate us and prepare us for?
	sorts of wacky stuff like you're going to eat bugs now, you're going to have Chinese
	solar power, panels that are built by Uyghurs in concentration camps.
	What can we anticipate this year?
	What are the elites working on this year to introduce into the mainstream and to indoctrinate
	us and prepare us for?
	How are we being prepped this year?
	I mean, so what's so interesting about this conference and about World Economic Forum in general is just that all the conspiracy theories about it are true.
	So when you first hear them, they say they there's all these stories that go these conspiracy theories.
	About the Great Reset, that they want you to eat insects rather than meat, or that they want you to, you know, own nothing, give up your privacy and be happy.
	Those are all conspiracy theories.
	Well, actually, no, they all came out of Davos and are on the World Economic Forum website.
	A lot of them have been deleted, we discovered.
	And I did a piece that's up today at our Substack newsletter called Public with Izzy Kaminska, who used to work at Financial Times and has been researching world economic form for almost 10 years.
	And in fact, met with Klaus Schwab in his lair in Switzerland.
	And she's the one that described it.
	She described it as a James Bond villain lair.
	Like she said, that's how it looks.
	It's a lair.
	Fair enough.
	Is it inside a volcano?
	Are there people in silvery suits?
	Yeah, so I mean, that's what's going on.
	Now, look, Schwab himself has said that he's not going to be there.
	He's apparently sick.
	And also George Soros is not going to be there.
	Bill Gates is apparently not going to be there.
	Elon Musk said that he was not going to be there.
	They just have one lousy of the top 20 rich guys.
	They only got one of them.
	And he's also on the WEF board.
	But I think that this is the beginning of the end.
	I think you might have killed the World Economic Forum, Russell, because they just you drag them into the light and Sunlight is the best disinfectant and I think World Economic Forum has suffered such a reputational hit over the last two years that it really is on a downward trajectory.
	Whilst I'd like to claim that victory simply for myself and wear laurels and march through Rome receiving the plaudits of the mob, And the plebs, I would have to say that we are an organisation that are legion, that are many, that these victories belong to us all.
	And it is actually only through the power of the populari, through true populism, through an informed population, through true democracy, through collective action, through the democratisation of community, that these centralising globalist forces can ever be exposed.
	Now, you seem to be portraying Klaus Schwab rather childishly, in my view, Michael Schellenberger, as a James Bond style villain.
	Which is a trick so low that we'd never stoop to it.
	Oh, just my pussy blanco!
	But the WF, why would they be so transparent and willing to share their secrets and information about their own funding and investments if they had anything to hide?
	Is there anything around the lack of disclosure that you want to share with us, you mad conspiracy theorist?
	Well, right.
	So, I mean, here's an organization that part of its main message from the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab is that institutions need to be more transparent, particularly with their finances, that we need all the energy companies to open up the books, that really we need all this transparency.
	But when we asked for basic financial information for the World Economic Forum and the Klaus Schwab Foundation, They said they wouldn't give it to us.
	So we have basically almost no information about how they invest their resources.
	We know that the partnerships now cost up almost a million dollars up to a million dollars each just to and they made very clear that doesn't necessarily get you on stage.
	Which I'm assuming is something everybody would want for that money.
	But I think that, yeah, we basically don't know anything.
	And again, like I said, my co-author on this, who really deserves, I think, the disproportionate amount of credit, Izzy Kaminska, had been researching this organization for 10 years, and they basically won't say how their money is invested.
	We do know some of it is invested in minerals.
	And there's been a huge amount of controversy around the use of child labor to produce these minerals in Africa.
	There's an African minerals company on the W.F.
	board.
	So we know that W.F.
	is almost certainly invested in the various products that it's selling whether that's insect protein or electric vehicles or one of the many kind of proposals they have to move us to a sort of low energy lifestyle.
	It's pretty extraordinary that it seems, on a superficial analysis at least, that the best thing the WEF could do is simply stop.
	If they stopped, it would improve the world almost immediately.
	The idea we're told about in a lot of the kind of propaganda that we receive about the WDF is they just chose Switzerland by accident.
	They just chose it.
	It's just because it's nice and it's snowing and everyone can go skiing.
	But when you find out that Swiss authorities require minimal disclosure about anything financial, you kind of think, no, I think there might be another reason why they chose that.
	It's also, over the course of this, because we've been, you know, as a fellow investigative journalist, because we are resolute and rigorous in our examination of facts, I keep returning to the idea, is there anything wrong with it?
	And you see Idris Elba there and you think, no, I like Idris Elba.
	But actually, even just in the last 10 minutes when me and Gareth were talking about it,
	they've got Larry Fink there.
	They're not going to say, Larry Fink, hey, if you really want to help people, why are
	BlackRock continually invested in the real estate and biasing the markets?
	They've got Albert Baller from Pfizer there.
	Why are they not saying, hey, what are you going to do with the profits that Pfizer made
	this year after you said it would be unconscionable for Pfizer to make any profit?
	Why, if they're saying that fossil fuels are so much of a problem, are they accepting funding from Shell?
	I mean, just everywhere you look there is hypocrisy and, you know, yet more hypocrisy exposed even in the course of this short but very sexy conversation.
	Yeah, I think that to some extent you're right when you say like it just loses its power when you point out that it's just kind of an advertising spectacle or at worst, I think, kind of investment scheme.
	I mean, one of the people that didn't want to use their name, but is somebody that had been very close with WEF and close with Schwab over a period of years, Um, said that he called it a bit of a Ponzi scheme where investors come in and they kind of get early in on something and then they go sell it to the pension fund holders of Ontario or Florida or whatever.
	And they then end up owning stocks that really lose a lot of their value and don't have a really good underlying basis to really exist.
	And so we've seen that in some case, you go insect protein.
	You know, it's kind of dumb, probably not companies that are going to succeed because it's just a disgusting product.
	But certainly other things like these conflict minerals, you know, like I mentioned last time we were together, the Chinese made solar panels, the production of these mines in places like Africa and Asia, where we were, you know, the one of the experts on I told Joe Rogan recently that basically 100% of the cobalt In Congo is produced in mines with kids in them.
	So they do have real world impacts.
	And we're in the midst of an energy crisis.
	We should be moving away from coal to natural gas like everybody.
	Doesn't matter your point of view.
	Usually politically most people think that's benevolent.
	But last year we went back from gas to coal because of this war on natural gas.
	And so Groups like WF kind of platform the idea that we don't need natural gas to power our world.
	Europe obviously shows that it does, and that if you're not burning natural gas then you're going to end up burning something much worse like coal, wood, or even plastic waste.
	Yeah, I see.
	Mate, you've made a lot of sense, as you did last time you were on our show.
	Now, over the weekend you were, I'm not going to say frantically tweeting, because I don't like to imagine you frantic under any circumstances, Michael, but there were further revelations around their Biden classified documents.
	Can you tell us a little more about how that story has evolved, please?
	Well, this is a very interesting case because obviously during the summer, and I was surrounded by progressives because I was on Martha's Vineyard off the East Coast, but progressives were very excited because they had found classified documents in Trump's property, Mar-a-Lago, in Florida.
	And people made a very big deal about how terrible this was.
	I had a number of people say, well, this is really going to bring Trump down.
	This is finally what's going to get him to go to prison.
	There was intimations that maybe he had broken espionage or treason laws.
	Well, now we see that Biden not only had top secret documents, he actually, he did not make them public, the fact that he had them until after the election.
	So we know they discovered them on November 2nd.
	They did not notify the appropriate agencies until early January, and they did not notify the Department of Justice until they were contacted.
	So there's a lot of efforts right now in the media to sort of say, Oh, they're totally different because Trump had many more documents or because Trump resisted giving them to the federal government.
	But on both of those cases, you have a similar problem, which is that first, we don't know how many classified documents Biden had.
	So we can't say that Trump had more.
	And then on the issue of Trump resisting, he was resisting because he thought he was in the right legally, and maybe he wasn't.
	And maybe, you know, Biden behaved impeccably and Trump behaved terribly.
	The point is, we don't know.
	And there was this huge rush to judgment.
	I think that really betrayed a powerful, as we know, very powerful bias against Trump and for Biden.
	When we have two cases that look pretty similar, at least from what we know now, we can't tell that one person behaved less ethically or less legally than the other.
	The Bidens are very sensitive about releasing information close to elections.
	That much we can tell for sure.
	And this vanity of small differences and this outrage over differences that don't seem to be as important as we're being told by partisan interests appears to be a theme that's becoming easier to discern in our time.
	Michael, thanks for joining us again.
	Your hair looks magnificent.
	Whatever it was you were doing while preparing, it's certainly paid off.
	I hope we'll be seeing you on the show again soon.
	You can follow Michael on Substack, where you will gain access to his many fantastic articles.
	I'm thinking of just referring to you as Schellenberger for the rest of the time, and in fact I was doing that in much of the build-up.
	Is that alright with you?
	Yeah, or people even call me Shelly.
	My friends call me Shelly.
	Shelly!
	I don't think he said you were one of his friends.
	I think we're moving in the direction of friendship quite rapidly.
	That'd be great.
	Shelly, thanks Kevin.
	It's good to see you, mate.
	It's good to see you, Shelly.
	All right, thanks.
	Well, what a fantastic conversation with Michael.
	Shelly Schellenberger we had there.
	This is the end of our WF Royal Rumble and what a climax it was.
	They have a summit but we have arrived at a summit at an apex at a zenith and while they were at the mountaintops of exclusivity we here in the Olympia of popularity have realised that when people come together
	and collectivise and democratise, we can bring down these titans, these mighty Goliaths of
	corporate and state interest, simply by, I think a couple of our guests said, shining the
	light of truth on the sow's teats of Klaus Schwab's injurious flanks.
	There are the nipples that feed corporate and state interests and his many progeny of
	world leaders, from Rishi Sunak to Justin Trudeau.
	They can be brought down, I think, by ongoing conversation.
	There were points over the course of this marathon, Gal, where I was thinking, maybe the WF ain't that bad, but the bits that turned it for me most of all was when you said about why would you, if you really care about fossil fuels, why would you accept sponsorship from big fossil fuel companies?
	Why would you?
	And if you did care about For example, inequality, why would you have Blackrock as a major partner and why would you invite Larry Fink there and then not have a conversation with Larry Fink?
	Because if Larry Fink came here, we would say, I'd be respectful because I bet he's charming, he's the CEO of a massive corporation, I'd go, Larry, mate, with this thing with the housing market, do you think... You'd probably call him Finky or something.
	Finky, Finky, I like you!
	Finky, Finky!
	Finky, let us become Pinky friends!
	And after that, why don't you tell us the truth?
	You did Pinky promise me, Finky promise?
	And like, you know, you've got to have conversations, or if you had got Albert Baller from Pfizer, you'd have to say, what about the profits?
	Do you think that that was ethical, particularly when you presented it as a philanthropic endeavor, a moonshot that was saving humankind?
	These questions aren't answered because the answers to these, these questions aren't asked, because the answers to those questions are revelatory about globalist interests.
	So, While WEF presents itself either as a cosy little corporate conference or, you know, in the darker corners of the internet, as a nefarious cartel of world leaders and corporate interests coming together to set an agenda, it seems that, you know, of the two, it's closer to the latter.
	And certainly our brilliant investigation today, I think, has leaned in that direction.
	Would you say, Gareth?
	I would absolutely agree and I think that where we started off by suggesting, as you say, that it was a kind of business conference that maybe not all that much bad stuff happens and that maybe they just all go around drinking hot chocolate together.
	Actually when you get into it and just talking about digital ID for a start, you start to see that this was mentioned then, now it's been implemented, the same The technology that was used in vaccine passports is now getting used into digital IDs.
	This is something that was being proposed and is now actually happening.
	And the ways in which that could negatively affect people's lives, this is just, this isn't like this will never affect you.
	It's once people, once governments can control the way you spend money or where you're able to go because of The digital passports that you've got.
	This is like real life effects that this is going to have.
	So it's kind of, and I think, who was it earlier on who was saying to us?
	Was it Shelly?
	It wasn't Shelly, no.
	Timbo?
	It was Andrew.
	Julie Melville?
	And he was saying that they highlight the worst conspiracies to kind of, so that we focus on those.
	But actually the real ones are these things that are happening.
	You know, this stuff around farmers losing their farms or digital ID and digital currency actually starting to be implemented are the real things that are happening as a result.
	And no matter what the problem, the solution they suggest is always the same.
	Digital IDs, social credit scoring, more ability to regulate and control.
	So I believe that we've learned a great deal and it's only day one of the WEF conference.
	Can you believe that?
	And we've got a fantastic week coming up.
	We want you to join a cartel, but this is a good cartel.
	Join our Stay Free AF membership community for more More access to us and more access to truth and more access to conversation.
	We genuinely don't care if you're a traditionalist, a progressive, what you believe.
	You're welcome here because we believe you should run your community.
	We believe you should be in control of the information you consume.
	You should be in control of what freedom of speech means, not some centralised authority that veils itself behind snow and hot chocolate.
	So yeah, join us.
	We've got daily podcasts, we've got a big interview every Friday that you can gain live access to.
	We've got some fantastic guests coming up this week.
	Alex Berenson's going to be with us, David Sirota from the left right there, Jay Shetty, Jeremy Corbyn, a person who knows how the deep state can influence the direction of elections and how the media can corroborate stories that prevent meaningful change taking place.
	Tony Robbins, a friend and mentor of mine, will be joining us.
	He doesn't call himself a guru, he's specifically got a documentary called I Am Not Your Guru, but he's certainly a person who teaches you how to utilise your inner power.
	And Martin Goury, author of this book that I'm reading right now, that gives you a good understanding of the framing around information currently and how the centralised authority has to control information now by condemning dissenters and creating new categories like malinformation, disinformation, all that stuff.
	Okay, so it's going to be a fantastic week.
	You've got to join us for this week because we have to educate ourselves.
	We have to bind together.
	We have to become stronger together.
	All of the values that they present to us are the values that we should have, but we're not going to get it from these corrupted, centralized interests.
	We're going to get it from one another.
	See you tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
	Until then, stay free.
	Man he switchin', switch on, switch on.

▲