Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 10, 2023 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

59:41

Prince Harry Saga – The TRUTH About The Deep State? - #055 - Stay Free With Russell Brand

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	so so
	so so
	brought to you by in this video you're going to see the future
	Welcome to our show that we've made for you.
	It's called Stay Free with Russell Brand.
	We are live online right now.
	We've come here explicitly and directly to tell you the truth as best as we understand it about contemporary events in a way that hopefully doesn't make you want to end your own life in a state of despondency and despair because we believe very deeply in the possibility of change.
	With me is Gareth Roy who due to various reasons, I mean what is your job title now?
	I think it's online assistant or something like that.
	That seems like a strange job title.
	On screen.
	I think that that's both undermining and potentially also Debilitating as a title.
	We've got so much to tell you.
	In a world of ever-shifting categories, you glorious awakening wonder, let us contemplate and consider together the state of contemporary affairs.
	We're going to be talking about this, and if you're watching us on YouTube now, we continue in 10 minutes time only on Rumble.
	You will know why when you hear what we're talking about.
	We're talking about Prince Harry in our presentation, Here's the News.
	That's where we go a little deeper and we'll be talking about Prince Harry's revelations and how alongside the ongoing censorship of the JFK files and the revelations about Twitter, that it shows that power is operating in accordance with the media in ways that In a sense, legitimise our ongoing distrust.
	Biden has got some classified documents now in his house.
	Now when Trump's got... They're not in his house.
	They're in his office.
	Not too bad news.
	And they checked his house though.
	What's he got down his house?
	What's he got on his lad's laptop?
	What's going on around the Biden household is what I want to know.
	You should see, have you seen Trump's true social post?
	Have they checked his many homes?
	Have they checked into him?
	And also we're looking at Zelensky working with BlackRock.
	This is like Again, if you're interested in the narrativization of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, you have to stay with us for this, because it's now explicit that there are profit opportunities being generated by this conflict, not only by the military-industrial complex, who, as you know, have benefited hugely from this war, just like they did with the conflict in Afghanistan,
	But also now for BlackRock, who are causing all sorts of domestic chaos, by the way, buying up properties in the United States, and now they're overtly benefiting from what they're calling the restructuring of Ukraine.
	We're going to restructure that.
	Anyway, and later, we've got Claire Daly, MEP, who's just been placed on Ukraine's Secret Service blacklist.
	We're going to talk about that and what is that blacklist and how you get on it.
	But before any of that, we just want to assure you that the system is fine.
	Don't collapse into existential despair.
	First reason not to collapse into despair is that surgeons are sorry for texting patients they had aggressive cancer instead of Happy New Year.
	I'm so sorry you've got aggressive cancer.
	What?
	Oh sorry, I meant Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you.
	Two days before Christmas that was.
	That's gonna affect Christmas.
	Yeah, because that's literally when you've finished work.
	I mean, then it's Christmas Eve.
	You're right into it at that point.
	Right, Christmas is coming.
	Goose is getting fat.
	Time to get in the spirit of things.
	Just check this message from my surgeon.
	Why would a surgeon even be messaging me?
	Of course!
	No, I'm not cancer!
	I knew God would never let me be happy!
	Oh, hold on, let me check, there's a follow-on.
	You also have AIDS.
	No, oh my God!
	Happy New Year.
	How do you make a mistake like that?
	No, it's too different from Happy Christmas, because what they wrote back was, please, because they sent a follow-up, luckily, saying otherwise Christmas would be ruined.
	How quickly did you get the follow-up?
	I don't know how quickly it was.
	Because I'm quite a volatile person.
	You tell me I've got aggressive cancer at 6pm on Christmas Eve.
	By 8pm I'm going to have made some pretty radical... I've been a crack house by the time... for reasons of evangelising that you should not take drugs.
	As you know, I'm 20 years in recovery.
	Drugs are bad for those of you on YouTube and for those of you everywhere.
	After, in 10 minutes time, man, we've got some stuff to tell you about that.
	Oh, that Pfizer Twitter stuff.
	I've got some stuff to tell you about that.
	You're going to love it.
	Go on.
	This follow-up said, please accept our sincere apologies for the previous text message sent.
	This has been sent in error for you.
	Our message to you should have read, we wish you a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, and then they add, in case of emergency, please contact NHS 111.
	Don't put that bit on!
	We've established there is no emergency!
	Yeah, don't leave me back to the emergency!
	Also, look at this pigeon.
	It's been smuggling crystal meth.
	Look at it.
	Doesn't seem right.
	A pigeon was found carrying a small backpack filled with crystal meth last week.
	It's sort of adorable, but it's got a little backpack.
	How does it count?
	What's its arm?
	Is it its wings, its arms, then?
	I think the process of putting a backpack on a pigeon's wing, like that little bit there, that sinew in a pigeon's armpit, I don't think it would like having something looped over that.
	Although, obviously, maybe it did.
	Because it worked, didn't it?
	It worked like a charm.
	At the Pacific Institution in Abbotsford, the correctional facility staff says the bird was spotted with its bag of drugs in the yard The point is, at a correctional facility, you have to at least consider, are any of the people in that correctional facility for the misuse of controlled substances?
	Yeah, like 70% of them actually.
	Well, do you think they might be involved in this scam?
	We're going to need a new wing to the prison.
	That's a joke.
	Well done.
	It's forbidden.
	Well done.
	I suspect some sort of coup.
	These are all jokes.
	These are all jokes that are available.
	...on December 29th, and officers set up a trap to catch it.
	They... They're still blaming the pigeon!
	When are you going to start implying... Also, how many drugs were in this small little pigeon's backpack?
	Like, how many can you get in there?
	Because a pigeon is not a weight-bearing creature, is it?
	You can only ask it to carry, I'd say, like, the amount... a bar of soaps worth of crystal meth.
	Max!
	Can't have like a kilo of meth on its back, can it?
	No, it's not as big of a deal.
	Unless the pigeon is using the meth and it's giving it super strength.
	Right.
	That's one way.
	They say they're always on the lookout for drones, but this is the first time they've encountered a pigeon drug smuggler.
	We smuggle our drugs.
	Old school, gangnam style.
	Pigeons, they might adore them drones.
	Futuristic, dystopian, terrifying things.
	In case you think that we've been lost in frivolity, ornithological crimes only covered here, have a look at, like, do you remember the climate around Pfizer and, like, when you, it was impossible to post on social media about Natural immunity.
	And remember, on YouTube, I'm saying that's no bad thing either.
	Until we click over only onto Rumble in a minute when I might be a little more candid with my views.
	Well, look, it has been revealed as a result of the excellent investigations of Alex Berenson, who's coming on the show, I think, next week.
	Is that right, Gareth, my online assistant?
	On-screen assistant.
	Look at this.
	Alex Berenson's revelations from the Twitter files say that a Pfizer board member, Scott Gottlieb, secretly pressed Twitter to hide posts challenging his company's massively profitable Covid jabs.
	To funnel his demands, Gottlieb abused the same Twitter lobbyists the White House did.
	fresh evidence of overlap between the company selling mRNA shots and the government forcing
	them on the public.
	I think the mad thing about this, Ross, was that the tweet that he basically wanted to censor, I mean this has come out of the Twitter files, this is about Twitter censorship, is that the tweet actually was from a former head of the FDA, who was like, Natural immunity, we won't say much more about it, is, you know, people should maybe not be, anyway, we won't go too far down that line.
	Right, because we're still on YouTube.
	It's still like, this is the degree, that's the degree of ongoing censorship, that even at this point we have to be incredibly cautious.
	But that would appear to be evidence that people within Pfizer, who made a lot of money during that pandemic, were controlling Presumably!
	I mean I can think of only one reason and that reason is they care about people so much over at Pfizer they just want to do the right thing the whole time.
	I think it's being, well Alex is basically saying that this would have affected the profits which Pfizer made 81 billion sales in 2021 and him himself Gottlieb was paid 365,000 Yeah, but that ain't how Scott Gottlieb rolls.
	Look at this.
	The Pfizer director saw a tweet that explained what natural immunity was after COVID infection and how it's superior to vaccine protection.
	We're not saying that.
	That's what the tweet said.
	It called on the White House to follow the science and exempt people of natural immunity.
	Upcoming vaccine from upcoming vaccine mandates.
	Yeah.
	A person who was the head of the FDA, a former head of the FDA.
	That's right.
	Actually encouraged people who did not have natural immunity to get vaccinated.
	So it's OK.
	It's interesting.
	but the former FDA commissioner, CNBC contributor and prominent voice on COVID public policy
	was also a senior board member of Pfizer.
	It's so extraordinary when there is this, not conflict of interest,
	but apparent convergence of interest.
	Now we're gonna have to leave YouTube.
	Remember, in a minute, we're gonna talk about BlackRock's, that's the biggest investment firm in the world,
	and their new partnership with Zelensky.
	Typically, BlackRock do have an interest in generating profit,
	so it would seem that the Ukraine war is profitable for some of the most powerful financial interests in the
	world.
	That's a statement that it seems that you can make.
	We can't go much further on YouTube, so do join us right now.
	Click the link.
	Join us over on Rumble.
	We're going deeper into this.
	We're even going to look at apparently frivolous stories like the Prince Harry story and show how that Demonstrates further relationships between the media and powerful institutions.
	If you're watching this on YouTube now, click over onto Rumble.
	What do you think about all this, Gareth?
	What's going on?
	We're only on Rumble now.
	We're off.
	Right, come on.
	Tell us the bloody truth.
	Well, the thing about that is that, like, it was a tweet by a former FDA commissioner, and all he was saying is, you know, natural immunity should be considered as good as a vaccine for certain people.
	But then what he was saying is also if you're a certain age you should get vaccinated.
	So basically that's there's nothing... What's all these excess deaths?
	Nothing to do with... Why is everyone dying all of a sudden gal?
	What's all these excess deaths?
	One of the explanations about excess Covid deaths especially in the UK which has like risen massively is that the impact of Covid and lockdowns on for example our national health service Is having a massive effect.
	I've also noticed that a lot of pigeons are serving up crystal meth.
	That's right.
	They're very slight.
	I've never trusted them.
	No.
	BDI killers, I call them.
	That's on the rise.
	You've got to watch out for the BDI sky killers.
	All right, so listen, we'll be talking about that in more depth, will we, over the course of the week?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Will we do a presentation?
	Of course we will.
	One of our presentations, we certainly will.
	What's been going on now, I remember when Donald Trump had some files at Mar-a-Lago.
	Yeah.
	It was on the news, you couldn't get away from that bloody story.
	No.
	But apparently Joe Biden, you've clarified this, not at one of his houses, but his office at some sort of institute, the Biden Institute.
	That's right, Penn Biden Institute, I think it's called.
	I don't think he should have an institute.
	Here's the true social post by Donald Trump.
	When is the FBI going to raid the many homes?
	When is the FBI going to raid the many homes of Joe Biden?
	Perhaps even the White House?
	These documents were definitely not declassified, definitely not declassified.
	It's amazing that even in that he's got a lovely little dig in.
	Many homes of Joe Biden.
	Perhaps even the White House would encourage him to raid the White House.
	It doesn't matter if they're at the White House.
	What are all these files?
	These are classified.
	We're at work.
	This is the very centre of American political life.
	But the point, I guess the point is, yeah, if all this fuss was made about, I think the difference is like with Trump it was hundreds and they're saying in the case of Biden it's like 10 or 11 or something.
	It's not the amount of classified files.
	It is the principle, isn't it?
	Either you don't want people having classified files out of the places where classified files are meant to be.
	Right, look, do you know where I stand on this?
	Don't have classified files.
	Let's have a look.
	What's going on?
	We're paying for all this stuff.
	Yeah.
	We ain't no little kids.
	No.
	I'm sick of being governed like a little kid.
	No, absolutely.
	I want to be governed like an adult.
	What do yous lot think?
	Primal Collins says Biden, but Biden was still in office.
	Yeah, fair enough.
	Good point, mate.
	Crushed the whole story there.
	In a single post there.
	That's like happening over on locals.
	I don't think that's the point, though.
	They shouldn't be in a private office.
	I think that is the point.
	Why are they in a private office?
	Tell us that.
	Yeah.
	I don't think it's whether he should have had access to them or not.
	Someone's asking you, was Biden president when he took them?
	No, he wasn't.
	I'll answer that.
	You don't always need to go to my on-screen associate or whatever he's called.
	Hey, have a look at this.
	Let's have a look at the mainstream media reporting this.
	Watch very carefully and see if... I thought that this newscaster paused needlessly when he was saying President Biden.
	Just see if you can spot that when you're watching it at home.
	Let's have a look.
	Breaking news.
	The Department of Justice is looking into classified documents found at an office once used by President Biden.
	Ah, he's doing it like it's a little joke.
	President, wait for it.
	Exactly.
	Maybe he is.
	It's a little joke.
	Because it's like he expects to say Trump.
	Yeah.
	Trump, oh that's terrible.
	Biden, oh no, he's loads of reasons why he could have just forgot about them.
	And you know, poor old son, he forgets everything else.
	Where are those five?
	Yeah, he could have just wandered off.
	Exactly, yeah.
	He's in the middle of mixing a drink for the lad.
	Alright.
	Does he say anything else in this?
	Not sure.
	About 10 documents dating to his time as Vice President were discovered in November at the Penn Biden Center in DC.
	A lawyer for President Biden found the material, which should be in the National Archives.
	Hmm, should be in the old National Archives, eh?
	What you doing with that in there?
	Look, do you know what I want to look at before?
	Because we've got some great stuff coming up on the show.
	Claire Daly at MEP is coming up on the show later.
	We're going to take an in-depth look at the Prince Harry story.
	I want to get into this deal between Zelensky and Black Rock.
	In my mind, that is conflated with the film Black Adam.
	Yeah, I know you keep going on about that.
	Because I've seen Black Adam because I took my children.
	We didn't watch the entire film because they didn't want it.
	Right.
	Is that a review?
	Yeah.
	Black Adam, we watched the beginning bit, we won't watch all of it.
	Pierce Brosnan's hair looks good.
	Oh yeah.
	He always had good hair.
	It's lovely, so lustrous and I get my fingers right down in there, getting in the scalp of Brosnan.
	Have a look, when we talk about this conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
	One of the things that we continually point out is that mainstream media coverage of the conflict highlights Putin's malevolence and Russia's criminal invasion without ever pointing out NATO's infringement on the agreed territories of the former Soviet Union and neither does it point out military industrial complex profit And now, Black Rock Prophet.
	Have a look at this bit.
	This is just a little bit of mainstream media reporting on it.
	Look, it's like something from Black Adam.
	It's really sort of simplistic, DC, goodies and baddies stuff.
	Have a look.
	As Putin's war rages on, costing ordinary Ukrainians their lives and livelihoods.
	Putin's war, lives, livelihoods.
	Of course it's true and terrible that it's costing lives and livelihoods, but can you even hear in the tone an invitation into idiocy that you're just, that's how to understand this.
	Late Tuesday, the U.S.
	House overwhelmingly passing a $40 billion aid package.
	Ukraine... Aid package?
	We're just going to aid you?
	Now, that $40 billion, where is it going to end up?
	It's like, you know, because what you've just been told is Putin's war and lives and livelihoods of Ukrainian people are being impacted.
	So in your mind, just thinking, oh, this aid, that's going to help Ukrainian people.
	The word aid is sort of Designed, I think, to evoke images of care and help.
	I wouldn't mind betting that this $40 billion will be carved up, ultimately, into what was called lethal aid, briefly, in a ludicrous port man 2, and it will end up with the military-industrial complex, as 50% of all Pentagon spending does, doesn't it mate?
	It certainly does, yeah.
	Well, there you go.
	That can't be right.
	Look at this.
	I suppose it's the reductiveness that we're objecting to.
	This is the reasons we're told that the US are supporting Ukraine, and these reasons might all be legit.
	Putin's evil.
	Yep, fair enough.
	Humanitarian aid, that's a good thing.
	Global stability.
	But look at some other things that you might want to consider.
	Check it out.
	Other potential reasons include destabilizing Russia, 5% of the Earth's mineral resources there, and the military-industrial complex profits, as well as, of course, you know, I guess violence.
	the 5% of those mineral resources, organisations like BlackRock could benefit.
	But there's no evidence that there's any integral connection between BlackRock and the Biden
	administration.
	Is there, Gareth?
	None whatsoever.
	Is there a little bit, though?
	Yeah, there's loads, actually.
	What is it?
	Do you want me to read it or do you want to read it?
	Yeah, this first bit, tell us.
	BlackRock's managing director Eric Van Nostrand was hired straight into a senior advisory position in the Biden administration's Treasury Department in August, explicitly to shape US economic policy on Russia and Ukraine.
	So yeah, it's a pretty big deal, pretty big link.
	Someone from Blackrock, the managing director, has been brought into the Treasury to reshape US economic policy, and what do you know, a little while later Zelensky and Blackrock are doing a deal.
	Sometimes I want to know what the counter narrative to that will be.
	I want to hear.
	Someone say no look what well, of course, there's gonna need to be restructuring There's just been a war but it seems to me like colonization like Ukraine are being bought into that Now familiar position of taking on IMF loans that are highly conditional, you know They're borrowing money off like the IMF and the World Bank and you think well Oh, that's you know to help them restructure, but then loans come with conditions Absolutely.
	Like Mike Skinner used to say, a grand don't come for free.
	The IMF don't go doling out dollar and then say, spend it wisely, do as you will.
	Countries that refuse those loans, like Yemen and stuff, are getting all sorts of scrapes.
	The IMF leverages loans to push governments to adopt friendly positions to US investors or Western investors.
	This is not just giving out, just do what you want with that and pay it back when you want.
	We're absolutely fine, this is for you, it's aid really.
	colonization. What do you think? Tell me in the chat, are we conspiracy
	theorists? Have we gone mad? And in case you think that we have gone mad, say
	you're watching this just to like to criticize us, you've come here to
	criticize, we're trying our hardest on Stay Free. Look at Mitch McConnell
	literally just openly, because sometimes I think, oh these things are conspiracies, but
	they're not. Look, Mitch McConnell literally just says it on your TV set, check it out.
	And let's be clear, the reason that a big bipartisan majority of the American
	people and a big bipartisan majority in Congress support continuing to assist
	Ukraine is not primarily about inspiring speeches or desire to engage.
	He was inspiring speeches.
	One of them delivered by Mitch McConnell, a quivering, lukewarm platter of sperm.
	I don't come there for my speeches.
	He's lacking in razzmatazz.
	He certainly is.
	In philanthropy, President Zelensky is an inspiring leader.
	But the most basic reasons for continuing to help Ukraine degrade And those American interests don't mean, like, folk in Connecticut and Iowa and ordinary Americans everywhere.
	American interests are American elite interests, military-industrial complex interests, interests of people that are heavily invested in Black Rock.
	And I'm astonished to see it outlined and espoused so plainly.
	Yeah.
	They're certainly not in the interests of people.
	When you consider the Blackrock deal in place now, and you were talking about the property earlier on, when you hear that Blackrock is buying up, in some cases, when you mention places like Ottawa and Connecticut then, in some cases it's like three quarters of the housing in those cities and states, enabling people to never be able to afford to buy a house.
	So it's kind of crazy that now the same investment company is going, we'll stick you into Ukraine, you can buy up that part of Ukraine, you can privatise Ukraine now.
	It's driving foreign policy, it's driving domestic policy, it's affecting your life and I personally believe it's part of a globalist agenda.
	When you hear a phrase like, you will own nothing and you will be happy, it's because of policies like that and the financial clout and ability of organisations like BlackRock.
	They're literally biasing the housing market.
	We're having a deeper look at it.
	Later in the week, and you've got to join us for our WEF Royal Rumble.
	We'll tell you a little bit more about that.
	But making money out of war, and war being a racket, war being a big, war being business, is like, it's a great American tradition.
	And again, I'm not criticising ordinary American people.
	And here is Hillary Clinton literally describing the Iraq war as a business opportunity.
	I don't know, but I feel like a million children maybe died in that business opportunity.
	Have a look at Hillary.
	Iraq has one of the largest customer bases in the entire Arab world.
	It has one of the world's largest supplies of oil.
	And it has one of the best educated workforces in the region.
	Some of them might be a bit traumatised by the bombing and the loss of their children, but they're pretty well educated.
	So when you hear Mitch McConnell speaking like that, Hillary Clinton talking like that, Zelensky and BlackRock doing a deal like that, it surely invites you to consider that there's more to this...
	...than humanitarian aid for Ukrainian people who are doubtlessly suffering, the criminality of Russia's invasion.
	You have to look at the context, and I don't think it should be considered a conspiracy theory, to investigate these ideas when you know that the people that are telling us these stories have been lying to us for as long as they've had access to this kind of media machinery.
	Yeah, and when you get kind of mainstream media telling stories, but again, we, you know, I have to keep caveat in it with, yeah, the war's awful.
	These are terrible things that happened to Ukraine.
	But when it just says things like it's crippling the lives of Ukrainian people, well, when these IMF loans get leveraged and they want their money back, that's going to pretty much cripple the people of Ukraine as well.
	You know, it's not just now that this stuff's happening.
	It's going to be later on when, when the loans have to be paid back.
	Ordinary Ukrainians will suffer as a result of these actions and continue to suffer.
	Ordinary Americans will suffer as a result of the same interests due to the housing and real estate activity of BlackRock.
	Ordinary people across the world suffer as a result of globalist elite corporate interests.
	And unless we are able to provide a cohesive counter-narrative and some inspiration for people to come together around a different set of beliefs, then I don't know how else we're going to prevent this.
	Should we watch a bit more of Hillary?
	Because I think she says some more crazy stuff, doesn't she?
	Today, Turkish, Chinese, French, Jordanian, Iranian companies are lining up to do business.
	But very honestly, we see too few American companies alongside our soldiers and our diplomats.
	Telling off American companies for not trying hard enough to profiteer.
	Get on in there!
	You're great!
	You're as good as the others!
	Go and make some money!
	Look at them oilfields!
	Did you see the way we pulled that statue over?
	Get in there!
	You're a good kid!
	Get in!
	I don't know.
	Can you apply the same lens that was applied to the analysis of Iraq to the current conflict?
	It's up to you, really, to decide.
	We'll be talking about that in more depth later this week.
	Remember, coming up in a minute, we've got an actual member of the European Parliament, Claire Daly.
	She's on a Ukraine blacklist, actually, for suggesting that there's some nefarious... What is it she said?
	No, I was just saying, skullduggery.
	I think her point is exactly this, that Ukrainians are going to be suffering from some of the things that are going on at the moment, and that why is this proliferation of weapons and this money going to arms manufacturers not being in some way criticized or spoken about?
	I thought we were supposed to be able to criticise and converse and talk about stuff without getting censored and shut down the whole time.
	What's going on?
	What are they afraid of?
	I don't think it looks like a confident and robust political system when it's so sensorial and tyrannical.
	That's some of the things I'm saying.
	Hey, should we have a look at this Prince Harry thing now?
	Of course, all of you will have seen Prince Harry, someone said to me today, re-traumatising himself.
	Sort of like he's re-evoking the trauma of his rather tragic childhood.
	Um, and you know, and you will have a variety of opinions, I'm sure, on whether or not he's doing the right thing, but what we think's interesting about it is that explicit within his revelations is the fact that there are relationships between Powerful institutions, in this case the royal family and the mainstream media, that they literally will hold back information if it's convenient, inflate, amplify certain stories.
	Have a look at that and tell us what you think.
	Stay with us in the chat and comments.
	In our presentation, here's the news.
	Here's the effing news.
	Here it is.
	Thanks for refusing Fox News.
	The news.
	No.
	Here's the fucking news.
	Prince Harry has got a new book out in which he talks about the challenges of being a royal person.
	But does this round of interviews reveal more about the relationship between powerful institutions and the deep state and media than they were intended to?
	Even with a story like this about Prince Harry and Meghan, which could initially be seen as senseless distraction and online frou-frou and froth, but I feel like in revealing the way that certain stories about the royals can be prevented from breaking, we can ascertain the way that power functions in media spaces.
	In particular, it could be argued that this story is an anomaly, like Elon Musk acquiring Twitter that reveals information that would typically be kept from us.
	Let's have a look at some of the interview and see if we can make any diagnosis from it about the way that media and power operate more generally.
	What was different here was this level of frustration.
	And I talk about the red mist that I had for so many years, and I saw this red mist in him.
	He wanted me to hit him back, but I chose not to.
	There's a fair amount of drugs.
	Marijuana, magic mushrooms, cocaine.
	I mean, that's going to surprise people.
	But important to acknowledge.
	The royal family have always had marginal figures like Edward and Mrs. Simpson, and more laterally, and perhaps more pertinently, Princess Diana.
	Figures that can be regarded as external to the dominant culture of the family, and in this case, I suppose, with the media having involved in the way that it is, Prince Harry can operate as a kind of whistleblower, or at least an alternative perspective on the machinations and movements of that family.
	In the Oprah interview, you accuse members of your family of racism.
	You don't even... Well, the British press said that.
	Right.
	After the Oprah interview, they said that they were going to bring in a diversity saw.
	That hasn't happened.
	Everything they said was going to happen hasn't happened.
	I suppose what this conversation shows you is that the royal family is an anachronistic and atavistic organisation.
	There is no rational reason to have a royal family.
	And beyond that, there is no reason to have such a deeply hierarchical and elitist society.
	In a way, it's peculiar to have an essentially former royal commenting on the hierarchical structures of the royal family and the obvious biases that are within it.
	The royal family has to be a propaganda machine to justify its ongoing existence.
	Because if we were to look, for a moment, in macro, at the problems of our planet, we would quickly deduce that having entrenched elitist structures is not necessary and not helpful for the ongoing survival of the planet and for the benefit of most ordinary people.
	So the Royal Family requires continual propping up, continual positive PR.
	The Royal Family have to be presented as enough like us for us to enjoy them and feel generally positive towards them, but distinct enough from us to warrant the elite treatment that they receive.
	Fact is, is that it provides a template for separating society into different categories.
	Even if you don't live in a monarchy, if you live in the United States, you accept that there are elite groups, but you have essentially an oligarch class of tycoons who are talking about space exploration while other people are talking about being able to eat or heat their homes.
	So having a conversation about the particularities of royalty is extraordinary.
	A few interesting things that are revealed by this press tour to promote this book are that there are intimate relationships between the royal family and the media, that classified information that's controlled exists here, that it's even possible to consider some of the more outlandish conspiracies that exist around the royal family because they have close relationships with the media and secret services.
	Two Protect an organisation like the Royal Family.
	You need ongoing propaganda.
	You need deep state relationships and strong media relationships.
	The monarchy is a PR exercise.
	Even a figure like Diana, who was anti-establishment, still operated ultimately within those spheres and fell out of favour because, to a degree, she was antithetical to the aims of the Royal Family.
	I suppose the challenge that Meghan and Harry have is that they want to start their own empire or industry or business, that they want to be able to exist outside of the royal family and the only collateral they have is the data that they possess on the royal family, that they can, like Diana, present a counter-narrative.
	But if you start to deconstruct royalty in an absolute way, what you're left with is, you shouldn't have royal families, you shouldn't have elitism of this degree.
	Ultimately all of these interests are antithetical to the interests and well-being of ordinary people.
	So while in the short term it could be beneficial for Harry and Meghan to present a counter-narrative to the royal family, Ultimately it's something that will unravel because if you scrutinise them through the same lens that you scrutinise the royal family, you have to ultimately deduce that these are unnecessary organisations.
	They're anachronistic residual leftovers from a time when we needed continual reminding that there was some benefit to having centralised sovereignty.
	That there was some advantage for ordinary people in being governed by out-of-touch leaders.
	And while you can say the power of the royal family is ultimately or largely ceremonial.
	The Guardian revealed in 2021 that a thousand laws were vetted by the Queen or Prince Charles.
	That, you know, some of their power is legislative as well as symbolic.
	When you consider that still in 2022 there are aspects of the JFK case that are still being booted into the future.
	There are still vetoed documents redacted.
	Well, if that kind of information can be controlled, it's very interesting to consider what other type of information may be constrained, restricted and redacted.
	files is information that goes beyond Lee Harvey Oswald was a lone nutter acting on
	his own intuition and instincts. Presumably there's information that shows a degree of
	conspiracy and collaboration. Well if that kind of information can be controlled it's
	very interesting to consider what other type of information may be constrained, restricted
	and redacted. It's possible to imagine that while Harry gives us some sort of personal
	insights into the dynamics of the royal family that there may similarly be information about
	the real power and the real reach and the real influence of, let's face it, an incredibly
	wealthy organisation that simply doesn't need to exist.
	It is possible, for example, to imagine those resources going elsewhere.
	In a way, it's comparable to the Twitter files, where Elon Musk's unique position at this moment means that he's willing to reveal that within that social media organisation there is deep state collaboration, that the FBI over a two year period paid three and a half million dollars in order to exert influence over the type of information that was published and the type of information that was restricted on an apparently neutral and private platform.
	Harry's revelations, I would say, are a brief anomaly that may ultimately be about kind of gossip and social and cultural issues that ultimately do not affect power, but from it I think you can infer that there are relationships between powerful institutions, The media and the state that control the flow of information and the control of data.
	Perhaps all the fibrility, all the heat that surrounds a subject like this is because on some level we know that if we knew the absolute truth about the royal family, if we knew the absolute truth about the government, If we knew the absolute truth about the degree of collaboration between social media, ordinary media, the corporate globalist state, and powerful elite organisations like the Royal Family, or other powerful families in America, the Bushes, the Clintons, etc, that we would be highly resistant to allowing those kind of undemocratic processes to continue indefinitely.
	When one of their number breaks ranks, whether it's Elon Musk or Donald Trump or Prince Harry, you get a kind of a shiver, a shudder of awareness that, hold on, all is not well within these institutions.
	All is not well within our societies.
	Something is indeed rotten in Denmark.
	There are alternative ways to organise society, and people that tell you that there aren't are vested in keeping things broadly the same.
	Are many of these revelations little more than gossip?
	I would say so.
	Are many of them heartbreaking revelations about a boy that lost his mum?
	Of course they are.
	Are some things deeply private, personal revelations about the nature of addiction, drug use, grief and trauma?
	Of course they are.
	All those things are interesting in a somewhat Personal, human, and maybe slightly frivolous way.
	But for me, what is interesting about these kind of conversations that I would rank alongside the ongoing censorship of JFK information and the revelations in the Twitter files is, as we have long suspected, there are relationships between powerful institutions that allow them to control the narrative of the way that most of us perceive reality.
	This kind of openness from a royal would have felt shocking a few years ago.
	We've heard so much, it's now less surprising.
	Despite it all, Harry keeps talking of reconciliation as his family, at least publicly, remain silent.
	At some level I feel then that it's quite a sad story about a person revealing the degree of suffering they went through when they lost their mother and feeling like an outsider in a family.
	I'm sure many of us can relate to that.
	But perhaps more importantly, and to me more interestingly, it reveals a degree of collaboration and relationship between the deep state, powerful institutions such as the royals, and the media.
	Particularly when taken in conjunction with the ongoing censorship of the JFK case, the revelations of the Twitter files, that demonstrates that the reality that you live in and that I live in is a highly curated one and one that is presented to us in order to continue to advance the interests of the powerful and to mask great tracts of reality, lest we should make very different decisions about how we'd like it organized.
	But that's just why I think.
	Let me know what you think in the comments.
	Let me know what you think in the chat below.
	See you soon.
	A lot of you saying in the chat that you feel broadly unsympathetic to Harry and Meghan is what I'm noticing and generally speaking you think that the royal family is an outdated, outmoded symbol of elitism that ought be evolved beyond.
	That seems to be the general You there, Gareth.
	I'm very excited because we have an actual politician.
	Imagine it.
	An actual one.
	You wonder what a politician is.
	It's our first, I think.
	It's our first ever politician.
	I've always been nervous of him.
	We once did speak to a leader of an opposition party.
	Yeah.
	It was not a success.
	Didn't go well.
	Not for anyone.
	We've got Claire Daly, though, who is a rare and special thing.
	A vocal critic of the war in Ukraine, therefore a voice for peace and diplomacy.
	I'm pretty excited to meet someone who's on a blacklist of any description and to have an... That's what you do have in common.
	Surely we're on black... That's where we're going to connect.
	We're on blacklist.
	But to get you in the mood and to get us right in the mood, even though I've seen this already, let's have a look at Claire Daly in Parliament, giving it some.
	Check it out.
	Billions of EU assistance going to Ukraine are not free, they're loans, which Ukraine will default on.
	And they come with neoliberal strings attached.
	If you listen to The Economist, Ukraine is marked for a nightmare round of shock therapy.
	A sell-off of public land, deregulation of labour, sale of public assets.
	On it goes.
	The country's future is being sold to finance a proxy war that's tearing it apart.
	And of course the loans have preconditions that Ukraine must uphold democracy and rule of law.
	But since the tap was turned on, Zelensky has banned most opposition parties, shuttered the media, attacked trade unions and workers' rights.
	But the billions keep flowing.
	This is a country our court of auditors have said was a country accused of grand corruption.
	Yeah, oh Clare Daly, she's banging ain't she? She ain't playing.
	Someone pointed out we've also had Tulsi Gabbard on the show who's also a politician so we have had politicians on
	the show.
	No, she left by then though, didn't she?
	Oh, she left for Democrats.
	I'm trying my hardest to do a broadcast here and you're meant to be assisting me.
	Hey Claire, that was a pretty amazing speech.
	You went for the jugular there.
	You ain't afraid of the truth.
	Thanks very much for joining us on our show.
	Thanks very much for having me.
	What does it mean to be blacklisted by the Ukraine Secret Service and what are the likely consequences of such a thing?
	Yeah, I mean look, it's your guess is probably as good as mine.
	I've been on this blacklist now for a couple of months.
	I believe actually President Lula is on it as well and quite a number of others.
	It's a list that was compiled by a Ukrainian department under the direct authority of Zelensky himself.
	There was maybe up to maybe a hundred international figures and we were accused of being Russian propagandists.
	Now my actual crime for getting on it was two things that I said which found outrage from the Ukrainians.
	And the first was that I had the audacity to say that the Ukraine war was a proxy war now between Russia and the US and NATO.
	That was the First thing.
	And my second crime was by saying that the sanctions which the European Union was imposing was having an impact on the ordinary citizens of Europe.
	Now, I happen to think that actually both those things are true, demonstrably so.
	But yet I was put on this blacklist.
	What does it mean?
	I don't know.
	But I mean, look, can you imagine what would happen if China, for example, did up a blacklist of people who had a different opinion?
	And of international figures of various persuasions, we'd have an outcry from the so-called democratic world that this was an outrageous authoritarian assault.
	Yet that's what happened by the Ukrainians.
	And there hasn't been a murmur.
	And, you know, you'd have to say against the backdrop of open borders with Europe, And guns, which Interpol and Europol have said are freely being sold on the black market and widely handled out across Ukraine, that putting up a hit list or a hate list of people who are supposedly anti-Ukrainian is a pretty dangerous hit list for the Ukrainian authorities to do.
	But look, nothing has happened so far.
	And, you know, it is what it is.
	It used to be an acceptable position to stand with people that were suffering, to be behind the rights of ordinary people, to broadly support humanitarianism.
	Who among us wouldn't without being regarded as somehow, I don't know, a conscientious objector or a traitor to the cause?
	We live in times where censorship has become normalized.
	If indeed this is a proxy war, if indeed this does afford opportunities to Black Rock,
	you know, what's more dangerous to us, Blacklists or Black Rock, I wonder?
	If indeed the military industrial complex in America are unduly benefiting from this conflict,
	what is the, why does it become necessary to tell that story?
	And why is it that we're being invited to believe such a reductive story, which of course has elements of truth in it?
	Criminal invasion, Putin as tyrant.
	Why is it that we're being offered such a reductive narrative?
	And why is it accepted by ordinary people and by, I know, by all of our viewers, That people usually and ordinarily in political spaces don't engage in this kind of discourse.
	Why has it become so rare?
	Why is information being so tightly controlled with regard to this matter in particular?
	Yeah, I mean, clearly we haven't got enough time to explore the whole thing, but this is really scary stuff.
	We do, and we must get... This is where the conclusion has to come in the next three or four minutes, and we're looking to you.
	I've seen you talk in that parliament.
	I think you're the woman for the job.
	OK, well, I normally get a minute, so three or four sounds like a luxury, but that's a pretty big topic.
	But look, OK, there are vested interests at stake here.
	That's the first thing we'll say.
	And they clearly are.
	And in any war, ordinary people lose out.
	It's ordinary Russians who are losing their lives.
	It's ordinary Ukrainians and it's ordinary Europeans who are suffering and choosing between heating or eating this winter as the sanctions go on.
	And we have a media and a political establishment that is hell-bent on ensuring that our people, I suppose, trundle along with their narrative that this is somehow a battle between authoritarianism and democracy, which was exactly the same type of rubbish that we heard in the Iraq war.
	It's not about that.
	It's been driven by the military-industrial complex.
	Putin's illegal invasion gave NATO what it wanted, sadly, was the excuse now to engage in what could almost be endless war at the level it's going at now.
	We've seen the billions of dollars being collected in the US, supposedly for Ukraine.
	Actually, most of that money stays in the US.
	and goes to the arms companies and the military industrial complex.
	We've the same things in Europe. Loans being given, conditions attached.
	This is capitalism's free-for-all really, where they have a, I suppose, what would you call it?
	I don't know, a little study, an economic study where the Ukrainian people are cannon fodder
	and their country is an experiment really for global capitalism.
	I mean, the EU has been investing in Ukraine for years now.
	The corruption, the money has been sidelined by their leaders.
	Now the opposition is This is shock therapy like we've never seen it before.
	out of their rights. And as you were highlighting earlier, global capital has its eyes on the
	price of going into a deregulated economy, whereby environmental protections are being
	removed, archaeological protections, planning and regulation, labour rights gone. This is
	shock therapy like we've never seen it before. And the reason why I suppose there's no discussion
	allowed is that vested interests are at play globally and they don't want any dissent.
	What I will say is that the majority of people worldwide can see through this nonsense.
	And we find even though we are, I suppose, not lone voices, but minority voices on a political stage, The feedback that we get globally is huge on this and actually a majority of the people who live in the countries that are outside of the US and Europe have already seen through this nonsense.
	They've been the victims of war before, they know what's going on and so yeah it's just we're not, we don't have a vehicle either politically or in terms of the media for getting that message really out.
	When the machinery of power has to work so hard to control a narrative, to some degree I suppose I find it encouraging that there must be an appetite for truth elsewhere and a genuine concern about the consequences of that truth being proliferated.
	We can, I suppose, deduce from BlackRock's involvement with the post-war Ukrainian project that profits will be made.
	Do you find that in the European Parliament there is a reluctance to have the kind of discourse that you were promoting in the clip that we showed there?
	How much traction does that kind of dialogue get in there?
	Is the European Parliament as turgid as I assume most parliamentary buildings are?
	Is it a place where you think real change can be instantiated from?
	Well, God no, I'd say it's way worse than most parliaments.
	The European Parliament is completely disconnected from the hearts and minds of the citizens of Europe in a manner even worse than what we see elsewhere.
	I mean, we've had, when we get up to speak, we have people Screaming, Moscow calling, go back to Russia, seeing as I was never there in the first place, that would be a pretty difficult thing to do.
	But all of that type of absolute nonsense being thrown up, and some of that is from being led by the sort of real zealots, anti-Russian people from the Baltic states and so on, and maybe They have an element of, you know, understandable, seeing us looking at their history or whatever, but it doesn't really excuse it.
	We find that some of the countries of Europe, maybe the old Paris, Germany, France and so on, where the economic impact of this war is beginning.
	And to have a real pressure on those economies.
	A recession in Europe is looming.
	Energy problems, absolutely massive.
	It was gas before Christmas that their good like-minded partners in the U.S.
	were caught with their trousers down with the Inflation Reduction Act, where contrary to the Europeans' belief that we were great pals in this together, the U.S.
	brought in again its protectionist measures and it was revealed that the Europeans now are paying four times as much for energy As is being paid in the U.S.
	for U.S.
	LNG and so on, which basically the war nearly forced us into taking on because they don't want to do business with authoritarian Russia.
	So I think the European establishment in terms of the politicians, a lot of them are shooting themselves in the foot, even from the point of view of capitalism.
	But I really think there's a yearning from citizens in a lot of countries for something different because people are feeling this.
	They don't like it.
	But they haven't got, I suppose, the vehicles to express that because their own politicians are kind of going along with that as well.
	And it's a bit scary.
	I mean, we were on a trip to Pakistan and the Pakistani representatives told us that a UN meeting, they were being bullied.
	Now, that's the eighth most populous country in the world.
	And they were being bullied by the US into forcing them to vote against the resolution condemning
	Russia and so on.
	And while they're obviously against the war and they're for peace, they weren't
	going to go along with the US-led line that wasn't calling for peace on this.
	But you can see when US imperialism is bullying big countries, the impact of
	that I suppose on countries.
	And Europe should know better.
	But we've abandoned any idea of neutrality and sort of played the role that the UK has played for years of sort of, you know, wagging the tail of the US dog.
	And I think that's really regrettable.
	And I think most people in Europe don't want that.
	And maybe as the economic conditions get worse, which sadly they are, in part as a consequence of the war, that people will begin to wake up for that.
	But isn't it a bit sickening that it takes that?
	It takes more pain inflicted on ordinary people for something to change.
	I mean, it's quite disgusting.
	And it does expose the media that we have now.
	I mean, anybody who says anything different is a Russian agent.
	And we see this constantly, that anybody who points out About the economic impact of European decisions on European citizens who live in standards by imposing these ridiculous sanctions is accused of being a Russian agent.
	I mean, how mad is that?
	Everything is down to Russian propaganda.
	Not that people could actually make up their own minds and critique the system we live under for themselves.
	It's very You know, paternalistic and, you know, sickening really.
	Claire, you're a very exciting politician and a rare thing.
	You appear to be a politician that's pro-democracy, pro-open conversation, pro-inclusivity, respects the electorate as being capable to make up our own minds about complex issues.
	Thank you so much for coming on our show and participating in a conversation that we hope may one day lead to some opposition to the relentless march to a unipolar world.
	You can find out more about Clare by going to claredaily.ie.
	That's, I guess, because you are... Are you the MEP for Dublin?
	Is that right, Clare?
	That's it.
	Yeah.
	One of them.
	One of four.
	But some of our media in Ireland will tell you I'm a national embarrassment and a disgrace.
	But there you are.
	Well, for the Nation of Freedom Fighters, you are nothing short of a glory.
	Thank you so much for joining us, Clare.
	We're getting a lot of love on our chat.
	Stay in the battle, Clare, says Turtle Mountain.
	You're awesome, says Lady Grey.
	You're bloody fantastic.
	Everybody loves you.
	You're adored here.
	And hopefully we are the vanguard of a future movement.
	Clare, thanks so much for joining us.
	It's great to talk to you.
	Thanks so much, Ross.
	A pleasure, all mine.
	Thanks, Mel.
	Take care, mate.
	Ta-ra.
	Do you know what that made me want to do?
	It made me want to watch that RT, you know, because we're allowed to watch that on here.
	You know, like that bit of, like, Russia made this amazing bit of propaganda about, like, oh, you think you're going to beat us in a war?
	We're going to have all your gas.
	It's an amazing piece.
	I like Russian entertainment.
	I don't think that war's very good.
	I'm against the war, just to clarify.
	I think war's a pretty bad thing.
	But they made this beautiful advert about sort of, was it eating a hamster?
	I think it was, yeah.
	It was that things were going to get so bad that the hamster's going to go from a gift to then something that's going to power our electricity to then we're going to have to eat it in a soup.
	What I've always thought when I see Russians around the place is they're really, really hard.
	Like, they're hard people.
	And I feel like that sort of slightly xenophobic generalisation is affirmed when I see the content they make for TV.
	Like, they made this beautiful advert Where it's like a little kid getting a hamster for Christmas to power the lights and the next year they eat it.
	I mean it's absolutely bloody brutal.
	I think we're looking for it now.
	We'll show you if we can find it.
	Mate, I think that show went pretty well, didn't it?
	Yeah, I thought she was fantastic.
	She was a really good guest.
	Because there was things that we were talking about that we were talking about before she came on where I mentioned kind of Zelensky censoring media in that in that country and of course it's a difficult conversation to have because every time you say something that feels like it's a negative take on any kind of Ukrainian action or assistance to Ukraine it was like boo you can't say that yeah we have to Talk about all of the things.
	You've got to talk about all of it and understand it.
	Do you know what I think we should do?
	I say let's get a Ukrainian family to live here so we support the people that are suffering as a result of the Ukrainian war.
	Last time it was buying a theatre.
	Are you saying, still doing that?
	Are you saying putting them in the theatre?
	They can work there, they can... Like, why don't we open our hearts and minds and homes to a Ukrainian family, have them live in here at our premises.
	Is this going to go wrong, this idea?
	Yes, it is.
	And then, we could say, look, we're not criticising, it's not like we're anti-Ukraine, we're anti-war, we're pro-peace.
	Yeah, look, Ashella in the chat, they love this idea.
	We're going to get some refugees!
	Ask your wife first, says Prime Files.
	I thought they could live here at the premises.
	I know there might be some complexity around planning for that.
	Have we got that hamster?
	It's not a hamster, it's a clip.
	Have we got that clip?
	Yeah, look at it.
	Firstly, interesting bit of casting because of the brows of the kid there.
	Okay.
	Night.
	Falling.
	You would never put a bow like that on a hamster.
	like that on a hamster.
	No.
	I don't think Russia today should be banned.
	Like, say, on YouTube, we were about to show this, because you're not allowed Russia Today on YouTube.
	And Rumbles, they have a complicated relationship with France, because France want to ban Russia Today.
	But I think I can watch propaganda and decide.
	That's not made me go, Russia's great.
	No, although you did say you like their entertainment.
	It's worked, doesn't it?
	I've been sucked right in.
	Wait a minute, this stuff's brilliant!
	From yon virgin mother and child Holy infant so tender and mild
	Sleep in heavenly peace So that's the concept, is that the Ampster
	Yeah, isn't that powering the electricity?
	Because you ain't getting no gas, baby.
	You keep giving us this grief.
	Sleep in heavenly peace.
	They don't play in Russia.
	in Russia.
	Are they going hard?
	You'll be eating your fucking bits next year!
	There you go.
	I mean, look, it's...
	Yes, it's funny and we can laugh at it.
	The issue about the gas and electricity and what Claire was saying a minute ago that we're paying four times the amount.
	Americans are charging us more!
	Right, exactly.
	And we have a situation where with the whole Nord Stream pipeline and now that conveniently that now we have to buy more gas from the United States.
	I mean, these things are true.
	They have happened.
	They're a bit truthy.
	They're a bit truthy.
	Like what about Condoleezza Rice saying they wouldn't like ideally Europe would buy its gas from America, then Joe Biden saying,
	don't believe us, we'll find a way.
	These are all just things that have happened.
	It's at least worth a conversation.
	And also I think I'm completely able to watch Russian propaganda without getting sucked into it.
	I will say this, go Russia.
	That's mental.
	I think we're able to discern correctly.
	Look at this.
	Loving Action says, at the authentic self level there exists only unconditional love, authenticity, joy, forgiveness, compassion, non-judgment, oneness and unified connectedness.
	There you go.
	That's nice.
	What we're trying to navigate ourselves to is a place of great glory.
	It's not a lot to do with anything.
	Just saying you'd want to be in that place of great love!
	And then you can sort of see that nation is a concept, ideologies are a concept, and that mapped upon the limitless unitary oneness that we all participate in through our individual consciousness are systems of profiteering and power that don't benefit ordinary people.
	That's why it's nice to see people like Claire Daly Yeah, and one of the points that she made was that everyone's suffering.
	She was saying Russian people are suffering, Ukrainian people are suffering, Europeans are suffering, American citizens are suffering.
	It's not these countries and these wars that are happening and these institutions like BlackRock and IMF These are all just operating at the very top of all this, and everyone else is suffering in the middle of it.
	We're believing in crazy propaganda, whether it's Russian propaganda, US propaganda, British propaganda, buying into all this stuff.
	Meanwhile, there is a cartel of powerful corporate interests profiting from the whole shebang.
	Hey, listen, tomorrow on the show, we've got the latest on the Twitter files with Michael Schellenberger.
	I want to be talking about them Fauci files, don't I?
	We want the Fauci files, baby.
	Give us them good stuff.
	Give us them Fauci leads.
	If you are a member of the Stay Free AF community that you can join for the low, low price of, I think, around $30 a year, we give a few away free through our mailing list.
	You should also sign up for that.
	I'm going to be talking to Rick Rubin in 10 minutes, the legendary record producer, run DMC, Jay-Z, Eminem, Johnny Cash.
	Finally, stripped back and raw.
	Just me and my music.
	He's finally answered the calls.
	Rick Rubin is going to record an album in a minute.
	Did he hear you do that Beatles cover?
	I once did a cover of a Beatles song, When I'm 64.
	Very disturbing.
	I think if the Russians see that, they would use that as a soundtrack for their next piece of propaganda.
	Me warbling my... Okay, listen.
	So we're going to have a little break after this.
	Then if you're a member of our Slay Free AF community, you can see our chat with Rick Rubin and I'll be answering your questions.
	So those of you watching this on locals now, Stay with us.
	We're going to be back tomorrow, of course, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
	What a great week it's been and will continue to be.
	We love you.
	Stay free.

▲