All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 16, 2022 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:05:40
Poland Missile Strike | Who REALLY Did It?! - #036 - Stay Free with Russell Brand
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
you you
brought to you by this video going on right now.
You're going to see the future.
Hello there you awakening wonders.
Thanks for joining me on Stay Free with Russell Brand.
You are watching me live right now.
I thought you were going to say Stay Free, Russell Brand, but you were talking to yourself.
Yeah, do stay free.
Don't let them drag you down.
You've got to stay awake, you've got to stay free in this crazy world.
We've got so much to talk to you about today.
Of course, Donald Trump has announced his candidacy for the 2024 presidential election.
There's a G20, B20 Klaus Schwab attended by summit taking place right now.
Poland are being struck by missiles of mysterious origin.
We've got so many things to tell you about.
And of course, in our item, here's the news.
No, here's the F in news.
We're going to talk about Joe Biden's pledge to cancel student debt which mobilized thousands of young voters who still haven't seen their student debt cancelled.
Let's have a look.
First of all, I want to have a little look at Donald Trump pledging to make America great again, again, He's going to make America great again, again!
How many times can you make America great?
Which bit do you want to see?
Do you want to see him talking about drug dealers or do you want to see him talking about just general stuff?
I suppose the first bit, I love this bit, like if you haven't watched the whole speech you won't know that there's one bit where he declares that one of the new policies will be The out-and-out execution of anyone caught and convicted of drug dealing.
It's weird though because it seems to indicate that the way that they'll be executed is by their personal consent.
Are we going to ask them to be executed?
It seems to me to be a bit severe and fraught and potentially something that'll be very difficult to enact but here is Trump saying it.
But before we get into this, I want to invite you To look at the major point that we're making here.
Whether you're virulently anti-Trump, as all of the late-night talk shows and the mainstream news will be, or like excited by Trump and now pumped and febrile at the possibility of his return, Remember, we have already had Donald Trump.
We've had pre-Trump, then we've had Trump, now we're having post-Trump, now we're about to have Trump again.
How can we retain this sense of exhausting excitement?
And do you ever wonder whether or not you're being stimulated into a state of delirium about these potential vicissitudes that amount to the shifting of a couple of colours?
Meanwhile, the deep state agenda continues uninterrupted.
That's why We'll be looking in particular at Trump's policy around Russia and Ukraine and his actions while in office.
But I want you to focus in the immediate future, I mean right now, on what he's going to do to drug dealers.
And when you think of some of the drug dealers that you've known over the years, some of them are quite sweet people.
I mean, I wouldn't like to think of Dear Gritty, for example.
Of course, we're on YouTube.
It is wrong, obviously.
Absolutely, I would like to... While we're broadcasting on YouTube, I'd like to point out that drugs are obviously bad.
Bad.
Only an idiot... I mean, you wouldn't change that opinion on Rumble, even.
On Rumble?
Wait till you get me over there on Rumble.
In ten minutes, when we stop... I think in five minutes, actually, when we're not on YouTube anymore.
I become unfettered.
I become free.
I become liberated.
I might even take my top off and tell you what I really think about some deep establishment issues.
While we're on YouTube, though, for God's sake, don't do drugs.
I mean, actually, don't do drugs in general, and we'll tell you about the sort of qualifications of that in a minute.
For now, I'll tell you a person who is unequivocal on drug dealers.
That's Donald Trump.
He's gonna kill them.
He's gonna ask them, then he's gonna kill them.
Let's have a look.
responsible for death, carnage and crime all over our country
I'd like that a little louder Every drug dealer, during his or her life on average, will
kill 500 people I like the idea firstly of an average drug dealer
and 500 people to be able to quantify the death toll of a drug dealer
If we're going to start looking at the impact of drugs on mortality, let's have another glance at the opioid crisis and how much blood there is on the Sackler family's hands.
Maybe he means them.
They should!
I'm going to ask them, do they want to be executed?
Yeah, it's interesting because what he's undoubtedly the master of is emotive rhetoric.
He gives you the ability to... he has an epitomising oratory ability.
Gives you clear symbols.
Drug dealer.
Could be a lady drug dealer or a male drug dealer.
500 people they kill on average.
That's such an extraordinary statistic.
How did we arrive at that fact?
And why would you not, similarly, those of you that hate Trump, those of you that love Trump, why would you not offer us the impact of food that is detrimental for us and the pharmaceutical industry's irresponsibility, like some of those Johnson & Johnson cases which we can't go into detail of until we flip over a rumble when we get Gideon carefree about those kind of facts.
Let's have a look.
The drugs they sell, not to mention the destruction of families.
But we're going to be asking everyone who sells drugs, gets caught selling drugs, to receive the death penalty for their heinous acts, because it's the only way.
It's sort of mad, isn't it, that that's happening at Mar-a-Lago, this sort of sunny, light-hearted holiday resort, where you're applauding the death of potentially innocent people, certainly people that have had a compromised and confusing life.
It's amazing, isn't it, that he says asks.
We're going to be asking them.
So, do you want to be executed?
I'd actually prefer to carry on living for decades more, experiencing sunsets and such.
There are like stratas to drug dealers as well, aren't there?
Again, all drugs are bad and selling drugs is bad, but surely there's got to be a difference between kids in schools dealing bits of... A little ten pound drawer, a little bag of weed here or there, magic mushrooms, all terrible, terrible drugs.
I just picked these up for Steve and Karen and kept a little bit for myself.
Death!
Death!
Yeah, it does seem like that.
Is there not a subset of drug dealers?
It's one of the things I'd ask.
Committees.
We don't need... I don't like to say this, and I don't even know if the American public is ready for it, and a lot of my people... Oh my God, what is it going to be?
We don't need committees.
Who's that, need committees?
That's the next thing to go after drug dealers.
Firstly drug committee, then committees!
We're executing all... We're going to ask them, then we're going to execute them.
That's not nice.
They kill five.
It's not nice.
It's not nice to kill 500 people.
You can't call it... It's not a nice thing.
Did you think it was nice?
Yeah, I thought it was quite nice.
It's not nice.
It's not.
Fair enough.
Thanks for putting it straight.
Jeffrey Dahmer did merely a handful.
Look at what we did to that guy.
For each on average... Yeah, so we had to qualify the difference between each and on average.
Like, each drug dealer has to hit a target of 500 kills.
If you don't do this, In China, when I was with President Xi, I said, President, do you have a drug problem?
No, no, no, no, we don't.
He looked at me like I didn't know what I was doing.
There could be a number of reasons for that.
That's so fascinating that he's reporting on geopolitics in such a conversational and disposable way.
And again, this is part of the mastery of Trump, the simultaneous simplification and grandiosity.
Suddenly everything becomes vivid and clear.
And if you think that Trump ain't the answer, you're going to have to look at the current incumbent before suggesting that Trump would be an improvement.
Listen, we're only on YouTube for a couple more seconds now, so switch over.
Watch us on Rumble where we're going to unpack this story a little more.
We're going to talk about what's going on at the B20 Summit.
This is a little business-oriented brother of the G20 Summit.
We're going to be talking about those missiles and how it was misreported and potentially why.
And I'm going to really let my hair down and release some very unusual opinions.
See you over on Rumble in, it seems to me, about five seconds.
Have a little look at this.
Can we look at Joe Biden?
No, let's look at Trump the way he wraps up first.
This is how, like, so again, when people are dismissive of Trump, and you know that I'm, like, I'm not a pro-Trump person, because our belief is transcendent of these systems.
We believe that we need to look for genuine alternatives.
But I can still see how this, look at this, greatest hits, a beautiful medley that he uses as the denouement for his speech.
Check it out.
And together we will make America powerful again.
Ooh, powerful again.
That's good.
He says powerful quickly, like people are expecting him to say great.
He's like, no!
Powerful.
Because that's where he's got to introduce the device.
We will make America wealthy again.
Ah, I see what you're doing.
People are getting excited now.
The phones are going up in the crowd.
We will make America strong again.
Oh, more phones going up!
He's doing good gestures!
I love it when he does his gestures.
Strong, strong.
Where are these gestures going?
He's getting better and better!
We will make America proud again.
Proud.
It's like a sort of a YMCA of positive emotions.
We will make America safe again.
Oh safe!
You chop down to get the safety.
We will make America glorious again.
Glorious of all the gestures I think is the most dubious because glorious appears to be... I think that was his idea though.
Glorious, glorious, how about this?
That does seem glorious.
And we will make America great again.
Thank you very much.
God bless you all.
Thank you.
Why would anybody be impressed by Donald Trump?
It's not as if the current incumbent of the White House can't string a sentence together.
It's not like... Get ready.
That's a cute baby.
It's not like the current incumbent of the White House is lacking in any particular skills when it comes to oratory.
Let's check him out.
Reuters, the tangent about both.
Oh dear, a literal sepulchral figure issuing a stumbling speech from a crypt.
And again, it's not like I'm super excited by the prospect of Donald Trump.
I think that in a way, what it's going to do is create hysteria, it's going to create distraction, it's going to create the illusion of choice.
And it is an illusion as well.
It's going to make America confusing again.
It's going to make America baffled again.
It's going to make America delirious again.
So when he was talking about drug dealers in China, there was a bit we didn't quite get to the end of it, but when he was talking about...
In China, this reaction to Trump talking about drug dealers was they were baffled that they thought he didn't know what he was talking about.
So the Chinese government itself reported that there were 1.49 million registered drug users nationwide, as of the end of 2021.
In the past, officials in China have acknowledged that the number of registered drug users are a significant undercount of actual drug use there.
So I think they did know what he meant.
But you know, It was a nice story.
Certainly easier to control addiction if you have a totalitarian state.
There's no question about that.
Also, of course, we've been shaken by the news that Poland has been struck twice by missiles.
One of my favourite reports is when it says Missile or missiles.
That's like they're being so accurate and attentive to detail they want to get the number exactly right while being pretty incorrect when it comes to the origin of those missiles.
The news broke during the B-20 summit which sort of amounts to a collection of world leaders coming together to collude against an extraordinary Indonesian backdrop.
Have a look at this Extraordinary scene.
Check it out.
Mr. President, can you tell us what we know so far about the explosion at Colon, sir?
I think that Trudeau looks like he's recently removed makeup.
Rishi Sunak is drifting into his cyborg mode.
Joe Biden gets to sit in the middle between two tilted parasols.
I said parasols!
And that bizarre flower arrangement in the front.
I suppose you can learn a lot about global power dynamics right there.
And the influence and power of the WEF and Davos affiliates, which is largely regarded as a kind of conspiracy theory.
However, Klaus Schwab was attending that event.
He's present there.
He gave a speech where he talked about the problems of a multipolar world.
Now, I'll tell you one thing about the world.
It's got two poles.
And it requires them in order to spin on its axis.
But of course, what Schwalbe is talking about is the nature of different and diffuse power.
For a long time, there's been a clash of civilisations where the other side has been painted as negative, smeared, whether you're talking about the Cold War, where there's a narrative of the Free West and, you know, the Soviet Union, or Orientalism, the sort of idea that there are others, whether it's within what we regard as the Orient, like Eastern countries or Islamic power.
But the idea that you have one world, one order, one central dominating force from which all government flows is, I suppose, central To the project of the WEF and I suppose many of us fear that even national sovereignty, which is already hugely compromised, is being further diluted by unelected officials and bodies such as WHO or, you know, even summits like this.
Do they mean anything?
Do they mean nothing at all?
Are they things like The COP27, things that sort of appear like empty gestures where greenwashing is available, or are they opportunities for powerful people to come together and ultimately make decisions that do not affect their own interests and instead dilute and dissolve responsibility into the hands of ordinary people?
Ultimately, you know, you do your recycling, we'll carry on flying around in our private jets.
Let's have a look at what Klaus Schwab has to offer at the B20.
Of course, if we look at all the challenges, we can speak about a multi-crisis, an economic, a political, a social, an ecological, an institutional crisis.
But actually, what we have to confront is a deep systemic and structural restructuring of a Sounds like sort of restructuring is a rebranding of the reset.
Yeah.
It's not as catchy, but at least it doesn't sound like reset anymore.
We need a great reset.
Stop saying great reset.
People think that you're trying to create a new world order.
Restructuring?
A fantastic restructuring?
Yeah, that's less offensive.
So, you know, like when people say that Klaus Schwab doesn't have any real power and don't be such a tinfoil hat wearing lunatic.
Yeah, well, he's got himself to the B20, hasn't he?
There he is.
That is meant to be for global leaders.
So what's he doing there?
Well, you could argue he's got as much power as global leaders or potentially more.
Certainly appears to have some influence.
Oh, God.
And this will take some time.
As the world will look differently after we have gone through this transition process.
Politically, it's the driving forces.
What does need restructuring is the amount of spit that he's holding in his mouth.
Would you swallow before doing speech?
I'd be more willing to comply with your, I'll have nothing and I'll be happy, if you'd just swallow down that little bit of gargley fluid.
Everything's gonna be a lot better.
It's very unnerving to hear someone's larynx so lubricated at a time like that.
It's his political transformation.
Of course, is the transition into a multipolar world, which has a tendency to make our world much more fragmented.
It's interesting because of course we talk about diversity all the time, the importance of diversity, the significance of diversity, but when it comes to power there's only one option, a unipolar world.
Suddenly a multipolar world is dangerous, that you can't achieve a balance, that is going to be necessarily unstable.
Critics of the current conflict, regarded by many as a proxy war between America and Russia, argue that the intention is to hollow out Russia as a potential military force in the pursuit of the ultimate conflict.
And this is a sort of terrifying story that we'll have to do in more depth.
It's not on here no more.
Gal, tell me what that was, the story that...
Well, yeah, the one about that basically Ukraine was being used as a beta test for how we're actually going to approach warfare in the future.
I mean, that's pretty terrifying.
It was in the New York Times, an article that was written a couple of days ago.
But this was, yeah, military leaders have been talking about how Ukraine is kind of just the start in terms of where we're going.
Military-wise.
And why is it that they were so keen to report this as the missiles landing in Poland?
Why were they so hasty to attribute that?
We can look at the headlines that came out based upon, here we go, so we've got Russian bombs hit Poland, Russian missiles hit Poland, Putin's war escalates, even telegraphed Russian missile strikes Poland.
We've also got a little bit of a few clips that we put together of this as well.
Well, of the various, like, mainstream media news outlets reporting on it.
Reports of at least two dead tonight in Poland from a missile not far from the Ukrainian border.
Ukraine tonight saying it was Russia.
Russian missiles crossed into NATO member Poland, killing two people.
Russian missiles obstruct Poland this morning.
Russian missile or missiles.
Crossed into?
Could be missile, could be missiles.
What it definitely is, is Russian.
There's no way that it could have come from anywhere else.
Now apparently even when Zelensky announced that this act of aggression had taken place, it was already known by NATO who had been tracking those missiles that it It couldn't have come from Russia.
Yeah, in fact, even Biden himself at one point does say that it's unlikely that it could have come from Russia, which is amazing.
But at the same time, President Biden is asking Congress to provide more than $37 billion in emergency aid to Ukraine, a massive infusion of cash that would help support the nation as Russia forces suffer battlefield losses in the nine month old invasion.
So we had Max Blumenthal on the other day, didn't we?
And we were talking about A report that came out last week about America apparently starting to nudge Ukraine towards peace talks.
And we asked Max about whether it was true and how much had been reported about Boris Johnson going to Ukraine, to tell him to basically cut off peace talks with Russia back in April.
And what he was saying is, this was interesting, because this was happening at a time when Congress was trying to pass a $40 billion deal.
relief, you know, fund to Ukraine. And so what these things are basically doing is kind of facilitating these
deals into happening and it's interesting that this is coming at a time when they're trying to pass another
37 billion dollars in emergency aid to Ukraine of which you would imagine a lot of that will go to the military-industrial
complex. Let me know in the comments, let me know in the chat, if you think it's as simple as military-industrial
complex managing congressional and White House strings in order to
sustain a war that will increase profitability while potentially bringing the planet to the brink of Armageddon.
Doesn't that seem like a Terrifying prospect to you.
So terrifying, in fact, that it's difficult to regard it as feasible.
It seems absurd that such a catastrophic risk would be undertaken in pursuit of profit.
But remember some of the things you've seen during this conflict, like Sean Penn delivering an Oscar to Zelensky, the idea that peace talks have been disrupted in order to allow time for yet another lethal aid package to be offered.
And again, I remind you, as I continually feel that I have to, that my sympathy for people in Ukraine who are, like, caught in the middle of a terrifying conflict, like, remains undimmed.
It's just, it seems that, in all doubt, like, you immediately, when questioning these narratives, your integrity is called into question.
It's demanded of you that you simply imbibe the information that's spewed at you from various screens, and if you query it at all, It seems like you're the issue.
I know a lot of you feel like that.
Do you want to see anything else?
We've got another little clip from the B20 if you'd like to see it.
What happened?
Well, basically, we read an article today about how the B20 is calling on the G20 to adopt vaccine passports using WHO standards and to promote digital identity schemes.
So like the B20 and the G20, they have conversations with each other.
The G20, we all know what that is, that's sort of powerful heads of state coming together to talk about like a global agenda, and that's not a conspiracy theory, that's sort of literally the explicit function of it.
The B20 is like it's little brother, it's like a spin-off show that's more oriented towards business.
But the G20 is pretty economically and financially undergirded anyway, so to have a B20, that's a bit of a hat On a hat.
That's like having a pornography conference and then having a masturbation wing.
And it seems pretty odd that they're talking about vaccine passports after Pfizer said that they never tested for transmission.
So the point of having a passport is diminished.
Also, you would say, what's it got to do with business?
I mean, that is what the... Make a lot of money from them?
So, I mean, I guess that's where this is going, is the B in B20 stands for business.
The G in G20 is like, this is the collection of the world's economies, but it is about economics, ultimately.
But this is the business arm of the G20.
So if you've got a situation where they are literally talking about digital ID, you've got to wonder, how is that affecting business?
And as you say, Ross, like, we can make quite a lot of money out of this.
Let's have a look at them saying that then.
So let's have a digital health certificate acknowledged by WHO.
If you have been vaccinated or tested properly, then you can move around.
So for the next pandemic, instead of stopping the movement of the people 100%, which clogs the economy globally, you know, you can... Also, I don't like the easy way that they're saying the next pandemic.
Yeah, they're already planning.
We'll get this next pandemic going, this one.
You can continue to move around as long as you comply.
I suppose it seems so explicit that it's difficult to call it a conspiracy theory.
It's just an obvious and observable convergence of interests that would benefit from social credit score systems and the ability to use big tech to surveil, monitor and accredit us as individuals and whole populations.
They're just literally Talking about it in, at least in that guy's case, some traditional dress.
Yes, at least there's that.
At least they're observing some Indonesian customs over there, which I think is what, is there more stuff in there?
We'll see.
What more do you like?
Still provide some movement of the people.
Indonesia has achieved, G20 country has agreed to have this digital certificate using WHO standard and we will submit into the next The World Health Assembly in Geneva adds the revision to international health regulations.
So hopefully, for the next pandemic, we can still see some movement of the people, some movement of the goods, and movement of the economy.
Whether or not but it's all tracked is like a global conspiracy, the idea that you wouldn't query it when seeing something that's as overt as that, but that you shouldn't even talk about it.
Yeah, this is tracked movement, isn't it though?
We saw some of that with this pandemic with the CDC admitted tracking people through their mobile phones.
Now we're getting to a case with Digital IDs.
And of course, the reason for digital IDs was all to do with stop the spread in the first place, wasn't it?
That was literally the whole point of it.
It was that we can track you and if you have got coronavirus, you can't access these things so you can spread the virus.
And now we're at a stage where we know more about the stop the spread and the fact that it wasn't true anyway.
And yet digital IDs are still important and are still being discussed at a business event, a global business event for the next pandemic.
It's a little worrying.
Yeah I suppose so because it shows that it's profitable it shows it's in the interest of the powerful and all that leads me to conclude that it's pretty likely that it will happen.
Still coming up on the show, we've got, here's the news, no, here's the effing news,
where we're talking about Joe Biden's pledge to cancel student debt,
which evidently mobilized a lot of young voters, and how that effort is going now.
Has student debt been relieved?
And also, did they take the necessary measures to ensure that the policy would ever see the light of day,
or did they introduce it in a crazy little way that gave all sorts of opportunities
for it to be rescinded and interrupted?
You might enjoy having a little look at this image if you're curious about the nature of global power.
This is Klaus Schwab, Rishi Sunak and Justin Trudeau hanging out in, I would say, clashing garments there.
Klaus Schwab, he's such a chameleon-like individual, his skin is turning into a part of his shirt.
Again, look, it's just an innocuous photo opportunity really.
Just some politicians with limited policies and great hair hanging out with a man who says that we will own nothing and that we will be happy.
All of them have previous affiliations with Davos, the WEF.
In the case of dear old Rishi Sunak, he worked for Goldman Sachs.
He's not willing to admit whether the hedge fund that he set up profited from the Moderna vaccines.
He's married to a person whose dad owns, what's it called?
Infosys.
Infosys, which is a digital tracking agency that has a partnership with the WEF.
Like at this point, I don't know man, Like how we're still talking about whether or not something suspicious is going on.
It's like it's sort of surrounding you from every potential direction.
But look at the shirts!
Look at that!
How could you not trust some guys who are plainly wearing traditional Indonesian dress?
True though, he's undone two buttons, hasn't he?
He's done more of a brand.
I think Trudeau had to be restrained from unbuttoning that shirt to the waist and not wearing any trousers with it.
Klaus Schwab, he's switched off there.
What should be a glorious and triumphant moment for him is sort of, I suppose, like Alexander on realising that he'd conquered the known world.
He sort of thought, well, what was it all for?
Here I am, all my protégés are in government, but I've still got so much Qatar on the back of my throat.
I can't really enjoy it.
I don't see him as, like, part of the jokes.
I think he's not a humorous man, Klaus, I don't think.
I think he's leaving the jokes to, evidently, Rishi and Trudeau.
Yeah, Trudeau there surely just asking Rishi Sunak if he minds if he uses any kind of skin darkening material so that he can relax.
Trudeau there probably the longest amount of time he's gone without doing an ethnically inappropriate facial costume.
All right, well, listen, we've all had a lot of fun looking at the way that global elites manipulate narratives and control what passes for democracy.
But on a more micro level, we can see now how particularly popular policies like the cancellation of student debt may have mobilized young voters in the midterms in America.
But are the promises made Gonna be delivered.
Certainly we've seen the promises about controlling Big Pharma haven't been meaningfully delivered on.
Releasing people from federal prisons that had cannabis convictions.
Well, they were all released, but that's mostly because there was nobody in there.
Saudi Arabia are not really that much of a pariah.
Dealings are carrying on as usual.
So will this student debt ever be cancelled?
It's time now for Here's the News.
No.
No.
Here's the effing news.
Here's the fucking news!
Did Biden and the Dems stop a midterm rout by lying that they were going to cancel student debt when in fact they might not do that at all?
It is of course commonly understood now that an expected red wave did not materialise.
Is this because Trump is no longer an effective politician?
Or could another explanation be that young people turned out in record numbers, in part because of student debt cancellation, a pledge made by Biden that a little like his cannabis laws, may not amount to very much at all.
This is a fascinating story that shows that the pledge to cancel student debt may not be as straightforward
as we'd first thought.
That there were numerous ways that this legislation could have been passed and the route that's been chosen
actually means that student debt may not be meaningfully canceled at all.
Have a look.
Hey folks, I wanted you to hear it right from me.
Ha ha ha ha ha.
Who else would it be from?
Who else is going to tell you?
Would you wait to read it on your son's laptop?
Here's what you should know.
We're going to forgive $10,000 of federal student loan debt, keeping my campaign promise.
For the people who need the help the most, the folks who went to school on Pell Grants, we're going to forgive a total of $20,000.
This seems like a good pledge to me.
Now, I know many of you will think, why should a particular class of people, the educated class, get relief that's not being afforded to, for example, tradespeople?
And that's an interesting argument and an argument I'm sympathetic to.
Broadly speaking, though, I think that education, whether it's in trades or in academia, should be granted for as close to free as possible.
Educate your population, awaken and enlighten them.
But this information that Biden is conveying here is not true in the manner that he's explaining.
Let's get into it a little more deeply.
In the midterms, voters under the age of 29 broke for the Democrats in overwhelming numbers, helping turn the much feared red wave into a red trickle.
In a speech on Wednesday night, President Biden acknowledged that student debt relief played a big role in motivating the historic turnout of young people.
Debt relief almost certainly played a decisive role in key races, including Senate races.
Consider Pennsylvania, where cancellation champion John Fetterman beat Dr. Oz.
In Arizona, Mark Kelly, another proponent of cancellation, exceeded expectations.
Not so for Ohio Democrat and Senate hopeful Tim Ryan, who strongly opposed Biden's cancellation plan and lost to J.D.
Vance.
On Twitter, the White House Chief of Staff, Ron Klain, made a similar point, saying that President Biden kept his promises to younger Americans and they responded with energy and enthusiasm.
Not like when he sniffs their heads.
The problem is that Klain's comment isn't totally accurate.
Young people did indeed respond with energy and enthusiasm to at least one promise that is to date unfulfilled.
Almost three months after Biden's cancellation program was announced, not a single person has seen a penny of relief.
OK, well that could be because bureaucratic processes take a while and we wouldn't expect those promises to have been delivered on yet.
But let's look at some of the administrative details in the way that this measure has been taken, some of which certainly raise questions.
And now they may not ever see relief.
On Thursday night, a Trump-appointed judge in Texas struck down the student loan cancellation program.
Now, of course, many people who dislike Donald Trump will say, well, of course, a Trump-appointed judge has struck this down.
However, what's curious is it needn't have gone that route at all.
Listen carefully.
While the President has blasted the Republicans behind these lawsuits, the real story is more complicated.
Biden could have directed the Education Secretary to cancel people's debts using the Compromise and Settlement Authority granted in the Higher Education Act of 1965.
But instead, his administration invoked a different and more limited legal authority.
It was this limited authority that the Texas judge formally took issue with.
Had he wanted to, a measure could have been immediately taken to instantly cancel that debt bypassing the Trump judge.
So one hypothesis could be that they took this route knowing it would get struck down by a Trump appointed judge.
Now, if we had proper access and proper investigative journalism, we would of course ask someone close to Biden, why didn't you use the Compromise and Settlement Act if it was always your intention?
Note how the cannabis laws were only enacted at a federal level, meaning nobody was released from prison, rather than some people were released from prison.
They also chose to make borrowers apply for the program instead of automatically issuing cancellation, a slow-moving process that bought their billionaire-backed opponents valuable time to cook up legal arguments, find plaintiffs, and line their cases up with sympathetic judges.
So again, the manner in which this was undertaken was not the only one, but it was the least efficient one.
It granted valuable time to opponents of the measures so they could line their ducks up and prevent the bill being passed if they wanted to.
Also, it provides a convenient get-out course because a Trump-appointed judge acts the idea.
The simple truth is, is whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, your party is significantly backed by billionaires.
Now, things get even more interesting here because Biden has publicly said that this law has already been passed, which is an absolute lie!
Now, Biden does get confused pretty regular, so let's give him the benefit of the doubt.
President Joe Biden falsely claimed last week that he got his student debt forgiveness initiative passed by Congress.
During an on-camera discussion conducted by progressive organization NowThis News, Biden told young activists that they are probably aware I just signed a law that is being challenged by Republicans.
Biden then said it's passed, I've got it passed by a vote or two and it's in effect.
That's one of those lies where you provide too much detail.
Yeah, I don't know why these earrings are by my bed.
I guess it's because I've become an earring salesman in my spare time?
What Biden's done there is he's provided too much detail on top of a lie.
It hasn't been passed.
It hasn't been subject to a vote.
So what on earth was he saying?
Facts First said Biden's claims are incorrect.
Biden created his student debt forgiveness initiative for executive action, not through
legislation, so he did not sign a law and he didn't get the initiatives passed by any number
of votes. The Biden administration has now stopped accepting applications for federal student loan
forgiveness. So what's interesting about this story is that whether or not you think that
student debt should be cancelled, and I personally think that it should be and that people ought be
I think that everybody should have access to education, whether that's in academia or in trades.
I think that's an important function of the state to provide that kind of education, especially when you look at how much is spent elsewhere.
But if you do deliver those kind of pledges and galvanize and mobilize voters in that way, then you certainly have to deliver, and I would say deliver efficiently, And not lie about it.
Perhaps the reason they feel free to make these kind of pledges and claims is because the way they regard young people, voters more generally, but young people in particular, is as kind of little more than children.
Perhaps as idiots.
And if you think that's extreme, have a look at this.
What's the other thing we know about this population?
And it's a specific phase of life.
Remember, age is more than a chronological fact.
It isn't, actually.
What else do we know about this population 18 through 24?
18 through 24. They are stupid. That is why we put them in dormitories and they
have a resident assistant.
They make really bad decisions.
Now perhaps Kamala Harris, given the benefit of the doubt, was joking in that situation.
But that does chime with my general assessment that we are regarded by people in power as little more than idiots and, at best, as children that have to be coordinated and guided, who it's okay to lie to.
I would not identify as a Republican or a Democrat and I would say that whoever had come out on top in those midterms, ordinary people's lives, generally speaking, would not have significantly improved, certainly not in the way that they would if we were to radically change our systems of government so they were representative of the interests of ordinary people and not a reflection of the requirements of corporate elites, globalist agenda, Mainstream media.
You know the list by now, surely.
It's interesting to see another apparent political victory boiling down to a bit of tactical ingenuity.
A pledge made that will only be delivered upon in a limited way, perhaps affording opponents of that legislation or regulation, however you regard it, whether it's the correct term, the opportunity to prevent it being meaningfully passed.
Why was it not passed in the most effective way?
Why was the debt not cancelled immediately?
Why are similar measures not afforded to people that trained in trades as well as just in academia?
Is it that it was simply a tactic to mobilize a certain demographic while alienating another portion of the population?
So, even in instances where it seems like something's being given back to ordinary people, there are often invisible administrative veils being drawn and levers being pulled to prevent real change happening.
We're gonna forgive $10,000 of federal student loan debt, keeping my campaign promise.
This is politics in microcosm.
Like many of Joe Biden's pre-election pledges, it's not being meaningfully fulfilled.
Saudi Arabia are not being made a pariah.
People are not being What does it tell you that people will enthusiastically respond to being offered just a meagre amount of hope?
What kind of state are we in as a people where piecemeal measures are seen as cause for celebration?
done in the most efficient way? What does it tell you that people will enthusiastically
respond to being offered just a meagre amount of hope? What kind of state are we in as a
people where piecemeal measures are seen as cause for celebration? This is how politics
operates now. So much deception, so much despondency, so much despair that small pledges inefficiently
delivered are seen as major victories when in fact probably what they are is just tactical
maneuvering in order to motivate voters while doing the minimum possible in order to continue
to not inconvenience your billionaire backers.
Whether it's this pledge that doesn't look like it's going to be delivered in anything like the degree that was promised or perhaps more significantly the pledge not to exacerbate tensions on a global scale that could lead to nuclear war.
It seems between the discourse of politics and the delivery of politics is a vast gap and in that gap there is continuing despondency, continuing despair and in my mind Reason to continue to be cynical and sceptical about the game of politics, the spectacle of modern democracy.
But that's just what I think.
Let me know what you think in the chat.
Let me know what you think in the comments.
I'll see you in a minute.
Thanks for choosing Fox News.
Here's the news.
No, here's the fucking news.
So, we're following you, not literally, we're responding to what you're saying here.
We're not the CDC.
No, you can pretty much do what you want when it comes to what medicine you take and for what reason, but we're certainly observing what you're saying in the chat.
Salty Shrimp says, the elite crushing the monetary system as fast as possible.
Save your silver and gold, which is very convenient because we've got a sponsor for the show.
I'll try in a minute, and I've not watched the advert yet, although I did make the advert, so you'll be seeing an advert in a minute, mate.
Salty Shrimp, we're giving you a golden opportunity.
Medicus, forgive that, I didn't mean that.
Medicus, what about those who didn't go into further education due to fear of debt?
Yeah, what about that?
Yeah, that's a really good point.
Brad Wildman, a politician issuing false promises.
Chuck?
Come on, this is debt relief, not voting.
You must register.
Across the show, we've had some interesting comments.
We're talking about what we're beginning to frame as a false dichotomy between Trump and Biden.
What meow?
Make America literate again.
Jack's trees.
Yes, the Trump train is back.
Jump on board, people.
It's fun.
A lot of you still very excited by Donald Trump.
Voltaire 27, when a president's handlers rush out reporters when they try and ask questions, it's already a totalitarian government.
Yeah, that B20 clip, it was sort of macabre, wasn't it?
With it glitching in and out of vision, people sort of staring off listless and baffled.
I mean, not Biden, that's his general resting face.
But Trudeau and Rishi Sunak, to see them sort of transfixed in that way, maybe they are already AI.
Maybe if we are so conditioned and captured, whether or not we're literal cyborgs is less relevant.
Gabby Rios, 59.
The WF is running things right now, that's why they took out Trump.
Again, yous lot love Trump, I'm watching you now.
You love Trump, don't you?
He's ahead in the polls, just so you know.
In the polls between... A Politico poll taken the days before the poll closed, 33% of Republicans said they'd support DeSantis, 47% said they'd support Trump.
So all this kind of Trumpty Dumpty and he's the biggest loser and all of that, I mean, it still looks like if there was to be an election now between those two, it looks like he'd still get it.
So there's still power in that man.
I suppose what concerns me most of all is whether or not this is the generation of more hysteria.
That's all I'm questioning, is whether or not any of the alternatives you're being offered will meaningfully alter your life.
Now when we speak to people like Michael Singer, who was our guest on the show yesterday, he says that your primary function is to alter your inner life, to recognise that you're maintaining a state of stimulus,
obsessing with external things.
I mean, like, what he's essentially suggesting to us is a spiritual pathway
where we relinquish our attachments, not like, like, give up our money and give up our stuff.
Or gold.
Keep, for God's sake, you're gonna need gold more than ever.
But don't obsess about the gold.
No, just keep it safe.
Keep that gold safe for God's sake.
Shall we have a look at this?
I'd like to.
We're going to talk to Brad Evans in a minute for our item Books with Brad, where we talk about a classic book and in particular its relevance to contemporary sociological and political issues.
We already did 1984, George Orwell.
We're doing Alice in Wonderland now, a book that's about perspective, perception,
imagination, wonder, levels of being, consciousness itself.
We'll be talking about that with Brad.
But before that, should we see how my advert for gold worked out?
I'd love to.
You've created our own wonderland, haven't you?
I'd say it's a wonderland.
It's a sort of a kind of kingdom of Midas that we're about to enter into.
Shall we have a look at it?
Because I've not watched it before.
Have a look at this.
A word from our sponsors, which is also me.
Is it me, or does the future feel more insecure and uncertain?
Wars, pandemics, lies, trickery.
My cats keep having kittens.
The last one's personal.
For those who are in the United States, there is a way to secure your hard-earned nest egg.
American Heart for Gold make it easy to protect your savings and retirement accounts with physical gold and silver.
With one phone call, they can have physical gold and silver delivered right to your door or inside a qualifying retirement account like your IRA or 401k.
American Hartford Gold is the highest-rated firm in the U.S.
with an A-plus rating from the BBB and thousands of satisfied clients.
Right now, they will give you up to $5,000 of free silver on your first qualifying order.
This offer is only for U.S.
customers.
Call 866-505-8315.
That's 866-505-8315.
866 505 831 5 that's 866 505 831 5 or simply text brand to 99 88 99
Get up to five thousand dollars of silver and protect your future in this crazy crazy world with some solid precious
metals literally made in stars
Thank you.
There you go.
That's me doing that thing.
That's very good.
Did you think so, Gail?
Yeah.
I wasn't sure about that shot where I was looking off into the middle distance.
Oh, you do that quite a lot.
That's fine.
I could be at that B20 summit.
That was great.
Yeah?
Well, I like the bit where you talked about the IRA 401k, because I know you know a lot about that, don't you?
That's what motivated me to do the ad.
We've got to do something about the IRA 401k while we still bloody well can.
That's what I would advocate for.
It's time now for us to pivot dramatically and radically to the world of literature, for us to contemplate together the relevance of the great works of literature that define our culture and our language.
It's time, of course, for Books with Brad.
Suddenly, a white rabbit with pink eyes ran close by her.
Burning with curiosity, she ran across the field after it, and was just in time to see it pop down a large rabbit hole under the hedge.
In another moment, down went Alice after it, never once considering how in the world she was to get out again.
Hello, and thank you for joining me for our item, Books with Brad, or Books with Brand.
That's sort of one of the puns we're playing with.
Thanks for joining us, Brad Evans.
Always a pleasure.
Brad, why do you want to talk about Alice in Wonderland?
Why did you choose it for our next book?
At a time where we're spellbound by spectacle, what is the relevance of this book?
In a sense, regarded really as a children's book, isn't it?
Well, I think that's the misconception, right?
I think it's a really great question.
Why would we read a 19th century children's book to try to make sense of the world today?
No, I think, first of all, people forget how much of a radical and revolutionary book Wonderland was when it was first published.
It was the first book ever written, so children weren't just simply taught how to misbehave themselves.
Children were taught to question, to understand power, and I think that in itself is an important historical moment.
Now, to me, the importance of Wonderland, I always ask myself, you know, what is the singularity of a book?
And what I mean by that is, what is the guiding question which is at the centre of any book?
Wonderland, to me, has the most brilliant question of all.
Who am I?
And I think that is a question which I think all of us are deeply concerned with every single day.
Whether we're talking about our individual selves or we're talking about our collective selves.
And how do we actually deal then with what Carroll would call the adventure of life?
And how do we deal with understandings of power?
How do we deal with hierarchies of power?
All of this is completely within this book.
Now, you know, I'm reminded, I think it was C.S.
Lewis who said, there are no great just children's books.
The book has to reach to an adult audience for it also to appeal to us.
And I think he's absolutely right.
And Virginia Woolf also said, you know, Wonderland was not a book where children learn to become themselves.
It's a book where also adults can see the world through the innocent beauty of children's eyes.
And I think there is so much to unpack in that book that it's tremendous.
Part of its mythic potency, I suppose, is that it's a book about shifting levels and constantly fluctuating perceptions.
I feel that when we were talking today about the re-emergence of Trump on the political scene, though in some ways his spectre has been ever-present, kept continually alive by a media that's obsessed with him, even as they hold him in disdain.
That as he becomes again, once more, part of the dominant narrative, it seems that he operates as a kind of pole that invites either side of, in my mind, a false dichotomy, to operate at a suspended state of near hysteria, condemning Trump Not acknowledging his ability even as an orator or placing a degree of faith in him as an anti-establishment figure that in my view is not justified by his record in office.
So I see more and more That we are living in a fabricated reality, that we are puppeted continually by sets of interests that converge and ultimately require all of us to be sort of suspended in slightly unreal states.
So are you saying that Alice, the protagonist, is being subject to these forces as she, I suppose, leaves childhood enters into a solitary world and is confronted by figures
all of whom appear to be framed by different types of madness. Is it a book
that is somewhat about madness and is it a book that is about dealing with
reality stroke realities? Well the reality you know the book begins with
Alice kind of She asks this question, what is the purpose of a book without conversation and pictures, right?
And that's the history of the book as well.
Now, you talk about the illusion.
Dialectics is always an illusion, this idea of a dichotomy.
It constructs narratives of the world which bear no resemblance to the actual truth of the world.
It's just kind of a false illusion.
And that's the history of, you know, dialectical thinking more generally, to be kind of technical on this.
Now, the brilliance, I think, of Wonderland in terms of it's a real journey this girl takes.
She goes through constant existential crises, but the brilliance is she's encountering all these figures who look remarkably different to her.
Some of them she can tolerate.
Others she'll speak to and get upset by.
Others she'll respond to and say, you know what, I'm going to walk away from you.
But she needs to have that conversation.
You talked about earlier about a unipolar world.
Wonderland is the opposite of a unipolar world.
It's a world in which difference is allowed to happen.
And of course, we might write of this as madness, right?
But why is it that a world that's not unipolar seems so mad to us?
Now you're right in terms of the constant running theme throughout the book is, and I think it's a question as well, where is the madness located?
Now we might often think of course of the Mad Hatter as being this kind of quintessential figure of madness.
But he's actually quite a likeable, harmless character in this.
And we know, as I was talking to you earlier about, you know, the work of Michel Foucault.
Foucault talks about the importance of any narrative of civilization, we always need to identify these mad characters to kind of make us feel more comfortable in our claims of civility.
And I think what Alice reveals in this story is the absolute nonsense of those claims as well.
You know, the nonsense actually becomes quite liberating because it reveals how mad sometimes the reason and the rationality is of any given society as well.
And what passes for normal understanding can also be mad if we just step back and look at the craziness of the world.
Yeah, I feel like it's appealing to collapse into subjectivity, to fully believe in my own experience as reality and to deny the reality of others.
It's interesting how much the claim of other people's insanity is made in contemporary political life.
Trump is a lunatic, that Biden has dementia, that Putin is like Hitler, that we kind of other them socio-psychologically, that we have to see them as operating in an entirely different reality and a reality that is pejorative also.
So I suppose that in this book, are you saying that we're invited to look at the the world of Alice in less damning terms?
That she meets like, I don't know, the Red Queen, the Hatter, the Cheshire Cat, all sorts of characters that seem sort of mental and that Alice's attitude is one of like Broad acceptance and curiosity, I suppose.
She's driven by curiosity rather than certainty.
And materialism... One of the things we say a lot on this show is that whether you think you're on the left or the right, you're part of a neoliberal, tyrannical conspiracy that will not allow you any kind of political freedom.
You'll be hedged into a framework.
And are you saying that Alice's curiosity is a sort of an openness, like in Christianity it says, become as little children, moment to moment, react with wonder to reality?
Well, what is ethics if it's not an openness?
An openness to unknown characters, to unknown ways of living, and unknown ways of understanding one another.
And I think there is something deeply ethical about that book in terms of the journey this girl takes.
And she doesn't like all the people.
I think that's an important point.
Who don't she like?
Well, she doesn't like the Mad Hatter by the end of it.
She thinks, you know, this guy is a bit too much.
I need to walk away from it.
It's too intense.
It's too overwhelming.
And we can often feel like... What, just because of the tea party?
Well, I think that the chaos of the Tea Party becomes kind of crazy.
And I think there's, there is something I think really important to recognize in all of us.
I think that we all are not perfect characters.
We all have, you know, difficulties we bring to the world.
And I think if that's the, you know, the brilliance I think about this book is we all face existential challenges to our life because of what the world throws at us.
But it's how we respond to them and don't get overwhelmed by it.
As you say, reach to a more transcendental plane.
Now the, you talk about then the transcendental plane.
We're living in this world of illusion, but the one thing we can say is it's absolutely bereft of imagination.
I mean, imagination of what a better world might look like.
And I think that's one of the calling cards of this book, about how can we imagine a different world?
Now, there's a real dark side to this when you think about, you know, there's a kind of a subtle gesture in the follow-on book through the looking glass.
Well, you're not quite so sure at the beginning whether Alice herself is actually in a mental asylum.
Oh my God!
So she has this remarkable journey of imagination and society's response is to lock her up, right?
And I think that is another lesson.
How many imaginative people do we know in history who society believes are too transgressive?
So we'd rather lock them away.
And I think what we need today is precisely people who might think we're on the side of madness because they actually see the world differently from the accepted norm.
The role of the shaman is to transition between levels, levels of reality, to flirt with insanity.
There are cultures where madness is treated as semi-divine.
I'm not talking about sort of slavering actual madness, people that are a risk to others and themselves, but a lack of certainty.
Materialism and rationalism demand a kind of certainty of us.
I've had guests on our show before that have said, you know, astrophysicist, famous one, if it cannot be measured, then it isn't there.
Well, in a sense, the imagination is about the immeasurable because it has not yet become manifest.
It exists in a state of potentiality as most things must before realised.
Sometimes what I ponder, Brad, is the fact that we live in such a liminal space of certainty, i.e.
that which is known, our epistemological realm, is such a small component of all potential realities that it's negligible.
That which we know, compared to that which might be known, is a fraction of all potential realities.
So you have to have some sort of interface, or some space for an interface, with that which is unknowable.
Particularly if you want to change the world.
I suppose like the The dearth of imagination empowers those that are already dominant.
If you can't imagine new worlds, if you can't flirt with chaos, if you don't have a relationship with chaos, then order will prevail.
The existing order will prevail.
Or there will be a sort of a linear progression to more centralized powers.
When you see them talk about like, we've got to introduce vaccine passports, even though you can't rationally justify that anymore once it's been admitted that there were no tests on transmission.
Well then the power becomes the goal in itself.
We are, I believe, seeing a globalist project unfold, a unipolar one, mostly realised through the sort of American manifest destiny ideals.
So these In a sense, imagination is a very, very great tool.
It's not just the realm of harmless art or art as commodity.
It's potentially a weapon against order and a potential for the creation of new orders.
And I mean decentralised and democratic ones, before you panic.
I think there's a good example of this in terms of, you know, you think about, so first of all, you know, Lewis Carroll was actually a mathematician.
Was he?
So he's living in a world of kind of certainty, truth, but then he comes up with this, you know, fabulous tale of imagination.
And then when you think about, you know, I think the point that you're right in terms of, you know, we need imagination and we need imagination to trump this certainty.
But we also from time to time need certainty too, you know, and that's what the important function of the Cheshire Cat is in the story.
He's the one who kind of guides Alice and says, look, you can't dwell in this imaginative madness all the time.
You need to come back and kind of steer yourself through history.
So we need a bit of both.
We need the imagination, but we also need guidance from time to time to guide our history.
But also, a good example of the craziness of this, you might recall the Hydron Collider experiment.
In CERN, of course I do.
CERN, baby CERN.
Of course I know about it.
The attempt to kind of recreate the Big Bang.
Now Stephen Hawking came out and said, this is absolutely fucking insane.
Right?
He says that we've got no idea of the consequences of this.
That project was called the Alice Experiment.
Right?
So, the idea that we could enter this wonderland.
Now, Stephen Hawking said this was insane.
The scientists involved in this said, well, we're pretty certain there's not going to be any catastrophic event.
So that was their response.
And that is the power of the technology, the science, which could actually bring the world to its knees.
Now that's madness.
Yeah, where does rationalism lead us?
Even Dadaism as a response to the horrors of the First World War.
Is an acknowledgement that we need to invite imagination in, in times of crisis.
Rationalism is leading us deeper into the current conflict, the proxy war, as some are calling it, between America and Russia.
It's a rational, if you consider the rational economic proposition that governs the actions of the military-industrial complex, that this is merely a rational event.
And even something like the initial reporting on those missiles as being like, oh, they're Russian, and then it's revealed, oh no, they're clearly Ukrainian, but there's been enough time for yet more lethal aid to be released.
It seems like there is a rational trail that can be pursued there.
We're going to be talking more with Brad in a minute on Stay Free AF.
That's our membership community that's available on Locals.
You can click over to that.
In a minute, there's a link in the description and a small fee for participating in that.
Before you go anywhere at all though, I want to let you know that we are doing a live event on December the 5th in Gray's, my hometown.
Why, the Thameside Theatre, the very first place that I performed and once notably followed through on a fart in, is going to be closed down.
Those two incidents are unrelated.
It's not because it was ages ago.
They've cleaned that up by now and even I have emotionally overcome the shame that I experienced during that.
We're going to do a one day event there.
We're supporting the campaign to keep that theatre open.
Because do you know what?
When they were investigating why the Thameside Theatre was being closed down, the activists that are trying to take it over and run it as a community trust, decentralised power, communities running their own assets, literature, art, accessible to ordinary working class people, discovered that the council were...
Like a billion quid in debt for extraordinary reasons.
This is a chance to join me for a day of activism.
Brad's gonna be there, aren't you, Brad?
Absolutely, yes.
You'll be reading something.
You'll read one of your own books.
There's a library bit.
I'll show you the place where I've done that.
I can't show Brad the place I've done that.
So, Brad, this is where I've done that, near the... There's a museum in there as well, and there's a Neanderthal, and that's where I did that fart, as a matter of fact.
In homage!
In homage to an earlier incarnation!
That's what I've done.
So you can come there.
There's a link in the description.
It's on the 5th of December, which is a Monday.
Come there.
It's 22 quid.
All the money goes to the Stay Free Foundation, which is an organisation that we run here to make grants and donations to who?
None other than junkies and nutters.
Where Donald Trump would execute them, we keep them going.
Where Lewis Carroll celebrates the fissure that exists between sanity and insanity.
We keep them going.
We're going to wrap the show up now.
Tomorrow we've got Will Harris, who's a brilliant, what would you call him, a farmer?
Yeah, I mean, yeah.
He might be a brilliant farmer.
He's a bloody good farmer.
Oh, you should see him farm.
I've never seen farming like it.
The produce, oh, it's delicious.
But also, he's an anti-Bill Gates farmer who's able to articulate why Bill Gates' imperialist project must fail, should fail, and how it lines up with the narratives that we discuss on this show.
Also, we're talking to Adam Wagner, who's going to talk about, oh, uh-oh, he's going to be talking about what happened during the pandemic, Gal, and how it was actually It was an atrocity against our human rights and human freedoms, and you know we care about freedom on this show.
So, alright, we're going to wrap up now.
We're going to carry on on Stay Free AF, where we'll continue with our book club, where we're going to invite you to read Alice in Wonderland.
We're going to give you an opportunity to win a piece of art.
And also, we'll tell you a little bit more about, I don't know, probably just what I'm feeling.
We'll respond to your questions.
We've had some wonderful stuff over here.
People are talking about the rabbit hole.
That's you, Warday.
Farmer John talking about, just sort of a general message of support.
We're going to wrap up now.
We'll see you in a couple of minutes if you're a member of the Stay Free AF community on Locals.
Otherwise, see you tomorrow with a farmer.
With a farmer?
Absolutely.
Brilliant farmer.
Bloody good farmer!
He's been on Joe Rogan, that farmer.
He has, yeah.
But we knew about him before that, didn't we?
We did.
We knew about this farmer first.
See you tomorrow, or see you in a minute, on Stay Free AF.
▲
Export Selection