Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 31, 2022 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:03:31

Your Blood Is Being Sucked And Sold To China! - #024 - Stay Free with Russell Brand

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I'm going to go ahead and get the camera.
	I'm going to get the camera.
	So I'm looking for the seal, looking for the seal In this video, you're going to see the sea serpent.
	Hello, this is Mercury. Hi, I'm a little bit of a...
	I'm a little bit of a...
	We've got a live back there.
	Hey, welcome to Stay Free with Russell Brand.
	Just saying hello to some of you that are in the chat, like me, Shack88.
	Love you, Russell.
	You're the only reason I'm on Rumble.
	I read your 12-step book in jail and it was amazing.
	I'm so glad you're free.
	Do you know where I learned the phrase, stay free?
	In prison.
	In prison in Louisiana.
	I wasn't serving a custodial sentence.
	I was just visiting and they kept saying, tell Puffy, stay free.
	Tell Puffy, stay free.
	Because I was doing a film with Puff Daddy, who at that time wanted to be called I think Diddy, but I did call him Puffy.
	Happy Halloween, you lot!
	You know what Halloween means, doesn't it?
	It means that the veil between the realms is thin.
	It's on the approach to All Saints Day.
	It's a sacred time.
	Every culture has some iteration of this.
	Everywhere, people celebrate the dead.
	Ancestor worship, one of the most ancient forms of worship our kind has engaged in, Reverence for those that came before us.
	That to you might mean your grandmother or your grandfather or perhaps the people that are from the cultural tradition that you are from.
	Let me know what Halloween means for you.
	Does it mean little snacks, little treats?
	Does it mean vampires, ghouls and monsters?
	Today in the show we're talking about the CBDC, that's Centralised Banking Digital Currency.
	Yeah?
	That's it.
	Because those of you that have joined us from YouTube, because we're bringing the YouTube people with us.
	One of us, one of us, making one of us.
	We're talking about centralising forces and vampirism today.
	Whether that's the literal vampirism, I suppose it's not literal vampirism, but at least taking your blood for money.
	I suppose vampires were a bit more, seemed like they were in it just to survive and also there was a sort of a sexy component.
	Yeah, they liked it, didn't they?
	They were getting off on it.
	The lad out of Twilight was, wasn't he?
	He loved it, didn't he?
	He had to fight it though, didn't he?
	Well, he was like, I can't keep doing this.
	I can't do it.
	Well, not with her.
	I like it, but I won't do it.
	That's what it was.
	He was with the lass.
	That's why I like lass.
	He liked it, but no.
	But she actually liked the werewolf lad.
	That's right.
	See?
	That's the kind of political insights you're gonna be getting.
	We're also though, like this is a serious story I suppose.
	Will you tell me?
	Let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments.
	Do you think it's pretty serious that if you're donating your blood, thinking you're helping people get blood transfusions, but they're selling it abroad to China.
	China.
	No less.
	That's where it's going.
	Not that that sort of matters.
	I'm not like anti-Chinese or anything like that.
	I don't...
	Mind where you're from.
	But like that, this is just one aspect of it.
	And we'll be talking to Dr. Bob Gill, who I consider to be our family doctor, because one, he's a legit, lovely family doctor that will help you with any little problem.
	But also, he's a campaigner.
	He believes that health should be about helping people, not about business.
	And he sees the way it's going with this technocratic, technological, digital, Revolution, that in the end, your doctor will be like an Uber driver.
	Not that I don't like Uber drivers.
	Your doctor will just turn up, fill your pulse, stick their finger up your bum, no matter what you've asked for, and they'll be on their way.
	I mean that purely in a medical way, of course, because we're still on YouTube.
	But that's best-case scenario.
	That's best-case?
	Doctor!
	You know, Beverly, well, I'm here for a sore throat.
	Well, has that taken your mind off it?
	As a matter of fact, it has.
	Doctor, doctor, give me the news.
	And it will be...
	You forgot that went on longer, didn't you?
	We'll start with the medical matters and we'll deal with the emotional matters secondarily.
	Dr. Bob Gill's going to be talking about this practice of selling our blood abroad, our actual lifeblood.
	Just so you know, it's not our blood abroad so that the Chinese can have it and inject it.
	Again, it's a commodity.
	The Chinese, they own it, so then they sell it back to us.
	So our NHS, a bit like vaccines and things, are going to have to pay extortionate rates.
	But they ask for it for nothing.
	No, we sell it.
	So that you give it and then the government, like it owns the NHS and is selling off parts of the NHS, it'll sell off that blood to a company who then sell it to us when we need that blood.
	But then we're going to have to pay premium for it.
	There we go.
	That's how I understand it.
	Whether it's actual blood or whether it's the lifeblood of Ukraine, who of course have been given favourable loans by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.
	They're not just trouble-free loans.
	It's like me lending you money and saying, but from now on, you support West Ham United, right?
	Like it's money with strings.
	It's money that influences policy.
	So all these things like lethal aid and 70% of the weapons that are getting sent to Ukraine mysteriously go missing. There's a centralising bank
	component to that as well and because in our country Britain we've just not
	elected but somehow ended up with a globalist Prime Minister, former Goldman Sachs
	employee, former WAF stooge, advocate for central banking digital currencies,
	not the ones that you can do on your own. Oh no. They're bad for you.
	The ones like them, cryptocurrencies that don't involve the government, they're bad for you.
	And there's good arguments for why they're sort of, I don't know, they're ecologically unsound.
	But they're saying we're going to keep the idea, but we're going to control it.
	Also, cash. What do you want cash for?
	What do you want your own money for? That's our item. Here's the news now.
	Here's the effing news.
	So that's essentially what we're talking about.
	Vampiric energy.
	It's Halloween.
	Who are the real monsters?
	Who are the real ghosts?
	Who are the real ghoulies?
	In my country, that means something quite, quite different.
	Now let's get into what's going on in actual Earth, on the planet.
	It's good that you've got a president over there in the United States of America that doesn't know how many United States of America there are.
	Here he goes.
	Is it your president or is it a cadaver back from the dead Joe Biden?
	And by the way if they do that means not a joke everybody that's why we were defeated in 2018 when they tried to do we went to 54 states.
	So there's not I mean like I'm from England so I have to be reminded you know because there's ones like Hawaii and Alaska where you think oh they're quite far away how like you know but they're actually there's 50.
	It's a nice even number to remember.
	And isn't the stars and stripes, there's a reminder buried in that, isn't there?
	I guess so, yeah.
	The number of stars is a helpful reminder.
	But I don't think he would, in that moment, should be counting stars on us.
	Wait a second, back in... Hunter!
	It's risky.
	One of the things while we've been talking about this show, and by the way, I'm not an anti-Democrat party person, neither am I a pro-Republican person.
	I believe in decentralisation.
	I believe in you running your communities.
	I believe in the expertise of the people.
	I advocate for as close as possible to emulating the conditions we come from.
	Run your own community, run your own tribe, centralise power only where necessary.
	So I'm against big government, against big corporations, but I'm also against doddering lovely old soppy old sausages wandering about on stages and then I think trying to overcompensate.
	I think in this clip what Joe Biden's trying to do is overcompensate for the many times now Where he's wandered in the wrong direction from the stage.
	Kamala Harris gets involved, and they look sort of like a dreadful Abbott and Costello, Laurel and Hardy, sort of silent comedy double act, but it ain't quite right.
	Have a look at this guys.
	Going now.
	Oh!
	Oh!
	So that's a joke, isn't it?
	I'm gonna jump.
	I'm gonna crowd surf.
	No, no, you didn't.
	She joins in.
	Now, these are not like people.
	Physical comedy is an art form.
	Clowning is a great, great skill.
	It requires a lot of dedication and devotion.
	They've not mastered normal level communication, have they?
	Like, say if it was a book when you're learning French or whatever, or Spanish, and you would say things like, What way is the shop, please?
	Can I have a croissant?
	Do you know where the train station is?
	I say, in comedic and communicative terms, they're very much the first textbooks.
	They're not in the advanced sort of, well, let's do some crazy pratfalling, wandering about, Kamala Harris pretending to get to grips on the shoulders of Biden.
	but nonetheless they want to take it to another level.
	I also think you know that your democracy is in trouble.
	That a man running at a light jogging pace across a stage elicits a round of, a rapturous round of applause.
	Hold on, watch that.
	I think really adds to the unrealness of this situation.
	It sounds like something you would hear at a fairground.
	Yeah, it's a carnival.
	Look, look, he runs.
	Now that applause is, see?
	He's alright, isn't it?
	That's what that applause is, see?
	Everyone that's laughing at him.
	Now we talk a lot, a lot on this show about Baudrillard and the idea that we've been presented so frequently and so immersively with synthetic image that we're sort of unable to have an anchored reference point now.
	Like, what is real power?
	Is that literally, really, the most powerful man in the world and the most powerful political ally of his, the Vice President, Running the country, is that what we're looking at there?
	Why does it seem so absurd?
	Why does it seem so unusual?
	Where has power gone?
	We all know now that the true power is the money that's behind political parties, don't we?
	Let me know in the chat, let me know in the comments.
	Do you still actually think that Joe Biden's sort of chewing a pencil and saying, oh, we'll do this, we'll do that?
	Or do you think he's responding to the edicts of lobbyists, the edicts of the WHO, the WEF, the IMF?
	Look, I'm being...
	Reductive, of course I am.
	We're talking about geopolitics, and I'm speaking as quick as I can, but I'm still not going to capture the entire spectra of possibilities.
	But generally speaking, what I'm trying to convey is the idea that this is closer to performance than it is to reality.
	That's why we have this sudden influx of political performers, and I mean that in a literal way.
	In Italy, Beppe Grillo, Yaman Zelensky, in Ukraine, Trump, a sort of a reality TV star, because it's It's starting to be understood that it's not real, that it's just the appearance of power.
	Real power is elsewhere.
	Where is it?
	Where is it coming from?
	Is it organizations like the IMF, WHO, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, unelected bodies with a great deal of power?
	You know by now, because we've told you enough, that of the hundred most powerful capital entities in the world, 67 of them are not nations anymore.
	Their corporations are more powerful On the whole, the nations.
	So, in a sense, what we're saying is we're witnessing the age of performative politics.
	We're well into that age, I would argue.
	Yeah.
	We know how to do our own performance, though.
	If our government puts together a promo video, oh, we know how to handle it.
	Get ready!
	You thought you could do propaganda over there in America?
	What, because you've had people like Jimi Hendrix and Spielberg?
	Take a little look at what we're up to.
	Because when we put together propaganda, Rishi Sunak, no matter what Joe Biden calls him, his name's Rishi Sunak, that's what they call him over at Goldman Sachs.
	When he puts together a bit of propaganda, it's slick, it's fantastic.
	Oh, one thing, they have used the soundtrack of a convicted paedophile to put it to.
	Yes, it's Gary Glitter's music scoring the intentions.
	Like, wouldn't you say that when you're putting together a promotional video, you go, what sort of music should we use?
	Oh, just, like, not a convicted paedophile.
	Yeah.
	That's rule one, I think, isn't it?
	Rule one?
	It's not.
	I even say that that's almost, you don't need to have that as a rule, because it's one of those unspoken rules.
	How's it still in, like, the palette of soundtracks?
	I don't understand.
	Okay, bring on the palette!
	Have you taken out all the paedophiles?
	No!
	I don't want to restrict us!
	I mean, we're not even talking Michael Jackson, who I don't believe was ever convicted of anything, and in my personal opinion, I mean... No.
	Let's leave that.
	We're still on YouTube.
	Allegedly.
	Still on YouTube.
	Like, we're talking about Gary Glitter, who I think is in jail for that particular crime.
	Anyway, let's have a look at this bit of propaganda.
	Stand back and regard.
	Look upon us and despair.
	This is propaganda.
	We're now at some pitchings that we have got.
	Rishi Sunak is going to have his first full day as the British Prime Minister.
	Earlier pounding beat of Gary Glitter.
	And, you know, guess what rhythm he's using in his mind.
	We ask Rishi Sunak to be the British Prime Minister.
	And I have been elected as leader of my party and your Prime Minister.
	And that work begins immediately.
	I should think so too.
	I was like, we're going to just hang for a while.
	And first I'll go on holiday.
	Right, now I'm just going to look out the window doing that weird stare I do.
	Seems to have taken the world by storm.
	Staring off into space, looking all weird.
	Yeah, of course start immediately.
	We're in a crisis.
	The pound's at a record low.
	You want to be a bit more immediate about the commas and the big pauses you put in between all your sentences.
	Why don't you be a bit more immediate when it comes to addressing syntactic gaps?
	I will be your Prime Minister.
	That's a bit more oomph.
	Sunny Jim is what's required to see what he does next.
	Is it a well edited video?
	Let us know in the chat, let us know in the comments.
	Do you know we're announcing the winners of our editor competitions?
	We've got a whole team of editors now.
	By God, they're some glorious people.
	Massey, Liam... Shavar.
	Shavar.
	I'm a bit confident saying Shavar, but it's actually an amazing name, isn't it?
	Do you think this is good editing?
	Like the bit when he was going down the corridor, thinking, oh yeah, this is a bit West Wing, this is... Hello?
	Like I was into that bit.
	Yeah, although they did have to do that big round of applause six weeks ago, didn't they?
	Did they?
	Well, they had to do it for trust, didn't they, when she walked through?
	Oh, another one of these rambles.
	It's like when we were applauding key workers in the National Health Service.
	Get your pots and pans out!
	Are we going to fund any of this stuff?
	No.
	I mean, we've got so many fantastic things to tell you.
	Are we going to be talking about this today, Gal?
	You know, like all those municipal workers that got sacked out of New York City and a judge decreed they should get their jobs back.
	They were booted out for not being vaccinated.
	A judge said, you can't do that to them.
	Give them their jobs back, New York State.
	No, we're not interested in Garbage collectors and their rights and their families and their rights to eat food.
	We oppose it!
	There's so many extraordinary stories.
	There's so many shifting narratives.
	The things you're told 12 months ago, six weeks ago, you're asked to sort of forget that it ever happened.
	You're asked to forget that you were told that the truckers were Nazis when it leaks out that those were entirely peaceful protests.
	The good thing, I believe, the thing that gives me optimism, and let me know in the chat if it gives you optimism, is it seems to me there is a global oppositionist movement emerging.
	Whether you're in India, or Sri Lanka, or Germany, or the Netherlands, or Britain, or the USA, or Canada, people are waking up, realising that their land is being stolen, that their rights are being taken away from them, that centralised, unelected forces are taking power away in slippery ways that don't seem to make sense.
	Do you feel some optimism sometimes?
	Are you deluged in doubt?
	Let's see where this points.
	Also being asked to forget that he was literally fined for Partygate, our new Prime Minister.
	It seems to have gone under the radar a little bit.
	It's gone under my radar!
	I'm literally, all I think about is where the bottom of the, what's going, what's going on at the bottom of that radar?
	Oh, what's that down there at the bottom of the radar?
	And he, he's been, he was... Yeah, he was one of the people fined for it.
	He was out of the party!
	That's right, yeah.
	What a bastard!
	You can't have people that were at the... Like, you can't... Allegedly.
	You can't have people that were at the... Because, I don't know if you know this, in our country, Britain, they locked us all down.
	Then they just went, right, is everyone locked in?
	Party!
	And they just carried on, like, all of them.
	And, like, this guy was one of them.
	I didn't even know that.
	Let alone the fact that he's a hedge funder, one of the founders, a hedge fund that founded Moderna, and we don't know to what degree, if at all, he will profit from the Moderna vaccine.
	I mean, that's an extraordinary thing to be floating around in a Prime Minister's immediate orbit, isn't it?
	Sure is.
	Want to watch any more?
	I love him.
	I will unite our country, not with words, I will work day in, day out.
	I'm just a normal guy, I'm having a biscuit.
	I'm a normal guy, you saw me at the gas station.
	Normal guy, my wife, she's a billionaire.
	Normal guy, working at Goldman Sachs.
	Normal guy at the W.E.F.
	So normal, like you, with my biscuit.
	The car in the garage.
	Yeah, there's no way, there's no way that's his biscuit.
	No chance.
	That's someone else's biscuit.
	Like that short ends, isn't that sort of a working class cleaner.
	Can I have my biscuit?
	Hey, take that back!
	Can I still eat it?
	You certainly can't!
	That's got my DNA in it!
	And day out to deliver for you.
	Hello, Joe Biden here.
	Mr. President, it's Rishi Sunak.
	How are you?
	Yeah, best to clarify.
	Do the full name and do the pronunciation, because he thinks he's called Radhik Sushi or... Rashid Sanook, I think it was.
	Rashid Sanook.
	And it's not... I don't think Joe Biden's being malicious.
	It's like a person that can't remember the direction he came to a podium from 25 seconds ago is not going to remember an atypical Hindu name, I believe.
	Oh, Rishi, how are you?
	Congratulations, Mr. Prime Minister.
	That pause was just him thinking, God, I hope he knows who I am.
	Sometimes I forget myself that I'm 70.
	Like, yeah, that thing when he sort of, like the times when he tries to use the joke about his age.
	I do sometimes wonder that in those moments of frozen hesitancy that Joe Biden is having the kind of existential crisis that might come.
	After a powerful dose of hallucinogens, or awakening from a shamanic dream.
	We think, who am I really?
	What is the ego?
	What is the self?
	Maybe what it is, is Joe Biden is actually transcending, and he's the perfect person to be in charge, and at some point he's going to come to one of them podiums, one way or another, we don't care how he leaves, and just casually announce, nothing is real, awaken from the dream of self.
	All borders, all boundaries are temporary.
	We are here to love one another, and of course we need organisation and administration, but everything should come from a place of love.
	Now, I'm going to show you a few examples of how to practice that on my boy's laptop.
	Now, he's been experimenting... We won't be able to see that.
	Not with the midterms coming up!
	After the midterms, then we'll show you the lecture.
	We're not on YouTube anymore, are we?
	So we're all cool.
	I think we were already out by the time we did the Michael Jackson joke.
	You've been worried?
	Bit of a sigh of relief though.
	Were you worried about a strike?
	Well you said at one point you said bastard and I was a little worried.
	Oh no!
	Yeah but I used it as a colloquialism.
	Were we off by the time that we got to bastard everyone?
	Can you check that?
	We're off.
	We're safe here on the Enclave of Rumble, where we're safe to talk to Tulsi Gabbard, where we're safe to talk to Jordan Peterson later this week, which we're sort of not even sure how to promote anymore.
	We're still in regular contact with the Musk man who tells us that he's busy at Twitter.
	Tomorrow, I think, we're going to have an in-depth look.
	Maybe tomorrow, later this week, we're going to have an in-depth look at this Twitter takeover.
	Like, is Elon Musk a novel and unique case of billionaire, or does just the class of billionaire mean you have the kind of affiliations, support, background and heritage that ultimately means that there are limitations on what you can do when it comes to helping the ordinary people?
	Just thought, now we're clear of YouTube, I thought I'd just go back to something.
	Can I take my pants off now?
	You absolutely can.
	If I want to.
	Well, I took them off before we even came on air.
	You took a real risk there, Gareth.
	Sitting there, bare buttocks.
	It's the only way I can do it.
	Talcum powder to within an inch of his life.
	Thank God you don't have ovaries, because Johnson & Johnson have done a number of out-of-court settlements that seem to suggest that there's a connection between Baby talc and ovarian cancer.
	Yeah.
	But you don't have no ovaries anyway.
	No I don't, no.
	So we can talc you up to our heart's content.
	No, only on locals.
	Oh yeah, join us for Stay Free AF, that's when we get talc.
	It is time to get talc-y baby.
	I can see you're up to something, what is it?
	Well yeah, I was interested in the Gary Glitter song because a dossier, this is from 2014, a dossier compiled by an MP detailing allegations of a 1980s Westminster paedophile ring is one of more than a hundred potentially relevant, potentially relevant, you'd think it would be, Home Office files destroyed, lost or missing as a merge.
	So these allegations were all compiled and then mysteriously in 2014 all went missing.
	What is it about these paedophiles that they always want to be in a ring?
	Why are they all holding hands?
	They should do a support group while they're sat in that circle and say, why can't we start having adult sexual partners?
	Yeah, well there's nothing to worry about at Westminster because it's all gone missing.
	Oh dear.
	I know you use that in the chat.
	You'll be right down with all that stuff, won't you?
	There'll be like Pizzagate stuff going on.
	Our powerful... I mean, oh gosh.
	Yeah, we don't do it in pizza shops.
	It's Westminster.
	We do it in the houses of... We're old school!
	We do it in the offices of the powerful!
	Allegedly, that's where the... Allegedly!
	That's where the pedophilia tends to take place.
	We've got some other headlines.
	Did you know that Vladimir Putin apparently... Vladimir Putin uses three body doubles who've had plastic surgery to look like him.
	That's a claim made by the Ukrainian military intelligence organization.
	This could be one of them.
	Do you think he's a double?
	I think it's the real thing.
	I don't know.
	I like them both.
	I mean, if they need one, look no further than our own young Putin.
	Not only can we provide you with a double, we can provide you with time travel.
	Vladimir, if you're watching, if this whole damn war is an attempt to recapture your giddy youth or the youth of the Soviet Union, look here.
	A young man who, when you're on the very brink of joining the KGB, could be your doppelganger.
	Hold that photo up next to your face.
	I like the Stay Free Pumpkin.
	See that?
	That's you, Putin, as you know.
	I'm assuming he's watching Rumble because RT's up on our channel.
	And there's you and there's your body double.
	Putin, stop this crazy little thing called war and see how we could bring about a new era of peace by simply leaping back to the past.
	What do you think?
	This was Biden.
	There was a story earlier this year that he's been replaced.
	He's actually dead and being replaced by 10 different deepfake body doubles.
	Deep fake body doubles.
	Yeah and they're saying that these two videos were posted within a couple of hours of each other and apparently they're very very different.
	I don't know.
	They are different but you can achieve a lot with lighting.
	I don't know, the one on the left, he looks a bit stiff.
	He looks like he's saying, get the fuck out of my yard!
	Don't he?
	Like the one on the left.
	Whereas the one on the right is like, okay now calm down Martha!
	Don't it?
	Those two have got very different vibes.
	Yeah they do.
	Yeah, you're right, maybe.
	But, like, look.
	Look, what I want to say is, look, if we've brought people over from YouTube, if we've got people watching this, journalists from the mainstream media, investigating whether or not this is a conspiracy theory channel, and they see over here, like that old bonesy, old bonesy in a tinfoil hat, they're gonna think, you know, a really... Oh no!
	That's the sort of thing that that is.
	They're not going to be thrilled with your idea that there are 10 Joe Bidens, are they?
	No, there won't be, no.
	You know, it's a theory that's out there at the moment.
	Now before, oh, before we go to here's the news, no, here's the effing news, I just want to, like, on this theme of vampirism, one of the things we care about a lot in our country is the National Health Service.
	The reason we care about it is we're kind of a contract between The ordinary working people who fought in the Second World War and the government.
	Healthcare was provided forever.
	Now, many people, including our guest coming up later in the show, Dr. Bob, think that the NHS is being, well, it is being privatised, it's been balkanised into like 42 groups, it's been sold to American healthcare providers, many of whom have had out-of-court settlements themselves, like weighing into, I don't know, millions if not billions and stuff.
	So we have a great deal of affection for it.
	Rishi Sunak here.
	There's one of those lovely moments when inadvertently a person in power is confronted by what you would call an ordinary person and the ordinary person thinks, I'm gonna use this opportunity!
	Let us know in the chat and in fact send us links if you've got them of your best moments where a political figure is confronted with the cold hard truth of ordinary people.
	There was an amazing one during the pandemic.
	Where someone that was working in a hospital, they went to a doctor.
	I think it was the Javid... I can't remember the dude's name now, because you know what British politics is like.
	It's like 20 chancellors ago, 20 health ministers ago.
	He went like, hey, um, so, you know, should everyone get the vaccine?
	And this doctor went, well, I don't know.
	It's really up to individuals.
	I've not had it.
	And it was like, oh, no!
	That's on the news now!
	Shit!
	And that was a good one.
	So let us know what was your favourite moment where a political figure was confronted by a member of the public who hit him with some cold hard truths.
	Here's Rishi Sunak talking to a woman who's in hospital here in our country, the UK.
	She gives him some truths.
	This is solid gold Britishness.
	Check it out.
	How do you do ma'am?
	I'm Rishi.
	How's your day been?
	Oh, Rishi, I'm here to patronise you.
	Hello.
	I'm Rishi.
	I'm here to patronise you.
	Have you been patronised today yet?
	Oh, no, not yet.
	Well, I can give you a good patronise.
	How about I reach in and then reach away again?
	Not sure what to do under the circumstances.
	Oh, God, no, actually, you're poor.
	Would you like my cookie?
	I don't really want it.
	Look, this isn't mine.
	Now, we interviewed the woman in the next bed there.
	Let's have a look at her.
	We interviewed the woman in the next bed still.
	She's not cooperative.
	So I'm hoping you're going to be a little bit better.
	It's okay, thank you.
	Yeah, and have you had some family come visit you?
	Yeah, I did.
	Yeah.
	She's good.
	And they've looked after you really nice.
	She's warming up.
	She really is.
	She's warming up.
	Yeah, they always do.
	Yeah.
	You don't pay them all.
	Well, we are trying.
	We are trying.
	No, you're not trying.
	You need to try harder.
	Right, I will take that away.
	Yeah.
	They are a very nice team there, aren't they?
	They are, but it's important because they do very hard work.
	They do do very good work.
	She's not dropping it, she keeps going.
	These are the only occasions where people are confronted with it.
	They live in rarefied air.
	That's why it's so easy, I guess, to pass laws, because they're not affected by those regulations.
	They're not affected by that legislation.
	The lockdowns were not so severe for people in positions of power as they are for people that are in positions of economic deprivation or even scarcity.
	They're living in a different world.
	They're living on a different planet.
	Once in a while, those worlds collide.
	I mean, not least because they were having parties all the way through lockdown.
	We're going to be delving a little bit.
	David, do you have something?
	Well, a little fact just to add to that.
	So Pfizer has extracted nearly £2 billion in profits from the NHS for its vaccine, more than six times the total amount the government has spent on a pay rise for nurses who have worked through the COVID-19 pandemic.
	So this pay rise that the nurses wanted could have been paid for six times over with the profits that Pfizer have extracted from this country during the pandemic.
	Well, it goes there, Gareth.
	With that one, FISA wouldn't get their profits.
	I'm not suggesting that the function of government is to transfer public money into corporate hands one way or another because they have deep, deep relationships, whether that's through the revolving door between government and the corporate and financial world.
	I'm not suggesting that.
	I'm not suggesting that.
	There must be some other reason.
	Surely it can't be that Assange was right, that whether it's long, entrenching wars like Afghanistan, or potentially this one coming in Ukraine, Or these kind of relationships that emerge during times of medical crisis.
	Is the function of government to extract your money from you and to give it, like the military industrial complex of the 14 trillion spent since 2001, I think 40% of it or 50% of it ended up in the hands of private military contractors.
	That's the Lossard Martins, the Raytheons.
	It's interesting, man.
	And today we're looking at a new little move.
	Our man, What's his name again?
	Rishi.
	Sanuk.
	I think he's called Sanuk.
	He, as you know, was a former Goldman Sachs employee, former WEF stooge, and here he is as Chancellor talking about the necessity for CBDC, centralised currencies, the good kind though, the ones that they can control.
	This leads us to all sorts of questions about centralised globalist bodies that are unelected, like the IMF and the World Bank.
	Here's the news.
	I don't think so.
	No.
	Here's the fucking news!
	Good news everyone!
	The IMF, politicians and the private sector are all getting together to discuss central bank digital currencies.
	That means that we won't need cash no more and we can be monitored all the time.
	That's going to be a much better society for everyone and definitely won't lead to social credit scores and being manipulated and having your bank shut down.
	Will it?
	Surely?
	What?
	What are you thinking?
	What?
	You!
	There's a lot of talk about digital currencies.
	Some people are excited about Bitcoin and those ones that sound like Ethereum and metals from superhero movies that could change the world, those kind of ones.
	Imperium, Objectivo, those kind of currencies.
	Well, New Prime Minister of UK and Goldman Sachs former employee of the year and WEF protégé and I hope none of these things contradict one another or bring about a conflict of interest.
	Rishi Sunak or Radish Sinatra as your President Joe Biden calls him.
	He's a keen advocate of CBDCs, Central Bank Digital Currencies.
	Here he is, in fact, advocating for them.
	Today, I'm proud to say that under the UK's presidency, the group of the world's seven most advanced economies, the G7, is launching a set of public policy principles for retail central bank digital currencies, CBDCs.
	Central bank digital currencies could be a digital version of money, a bit like a digital banknote.
	I like it, cos after you've got a broad concept, hmm, what if this person's an idiot?
	Which we think that they are.
	It's like a digital penny, for your digital money box, for your digital shithole that you live in.
	You will owe nothing, you will be happy.
	that could be used alongside physical notes and coins.
	For now, till we phase them out, have you started any little tracker protests?
	Oh, where's my money gone?
	The digital piggy bank is broken, I'm afraid.
	Start being a bit more cooperative.
	Unlike most of the digital money people use daily today, it would be issued directly by a central bank, like the Bank of England in the UK.
	That's good, a central bank.
	Nothing wrong with centralised authority, centralised power, globalist decrees coming down from on high, avoiding democracy.
	That's exactly what we want.
	Keep talking!
	And governments and central banks across the world are working together.
	Oh!
	Really?
	They're working together?
	Well, that's just such great news!
	The IMF, the World Bank.
	Why don't we involve the WEF and the WHO?
	What we need are unelected global bodies that have been able to co-opt political power, respond to financial power, and ignore and oppress ordinary people.
	Whether it's the recent medical emergency or the cost-of-living crisis, we're seeing the benefits all around us!
	I can't wait for your next policy!
	You're gonna take our money now?
	This is great!
	Looking into what having a digital currency might mean in practice.
	I think I know what it means in practice.
	More power for you, no power for us.
	This includes issues that people care about, such as ensuring users' money would be safe and secure, that it could work with other ways to pay, would be energy efficient.
	It's got to be energy efficient.
	I was about to say, is it energy efficient?
	Is it energy efficient?
	I've got to make sure.
	A few other questions.
	You wouldn't use this ever, would you, to implement control or to advance social credit type systems or to shut down the bank accounts of people you disagree with or to surveil people and have a surveillance network that you've developed in conjunction with big tech and now a financial arm that you're developing so that you can Lockstep together and gridlock us in a digital prison of surveillance tyranny.
	That's just, just off the top of my head.
	Would be energy efficient.
	Bitcoin and those other digital currencies that we don't control, they're bad.
	They're not energy efficient.
	This one that we will control, that'll be energy efficient.
	So yeah, it's about energy efficiency.
	It's not about control.
	And available to everyone.
	A potential CBDC could offer businesses and consumers new ways to pay in the future.
	I expect it'd be convenient, wouldn't it?
	Would it be nice and convenient?
	Could I have some convenience, please?
	It'd be so convenient to be in my cell, all lathered up with a nice bubble bath of convenience.
	It's all part of the wider story of digital innovation that has delivered benefits to millions around the world and in the UK.
	I was just talking to Edward Snowden and Julian Assange about the benefits delivered around the world for the people of Iraq or Afghanistan or the many people now in Western anglophonic countries starving to death and unable to heat their homes.
	What they need is the small amount of money they have got to disappear into binary code.
	These decisions raise important questions about the reshaping of our economy.
	Yeah, I've noticed you've been reshaping it, so that ordinary people have no power at all, no alternatives or options, and we can operate entirely at the behest of powerful financial interests, like Goldman Sachs, have you ever heard- You used to work for them!
	Oh!
	Financial systems, and the way in which people interact with money and payments.
	What, like through like a massive hedge fund that funded Moderna?
	You used to be part of a hedge fund that funded Moderna!
	Oh!
	That's why working together- Like you work together with your wife, who's like a billionaire!
	In the UK, earlier this year, I announced a new joint task force between the Treasury and the Bank of England to look into a potential CBDC as a complement to cash and bank deposits.
	It's just a complement.
	It's a lovely little complement.
	Over here, you've got your money in the bank.
	Over here, you've got your digital thing.
	Oh no, what's this one doing?
	Oh look, it's facing it out, look!
	And now what's happening?
	We're in digital prison!
	We're also hearing from firms, technology experts and others.
	Under the leadership of the UK, this report today will help support and inform exploration of CBDCs in the G7 and beyond.
	They're already talking in code with the acronyms and the shortened terms CBDC, G7.
	Because they have access to so much technology and so much data, they want to make us into machines, they want to make us into data, into entirely information.
	A component of humanity is doubtlessly our intelligence, but what of our awareness?
	What about the aspect of a human being that is difficult to define, describe, discern or tie down?
	The aspect of you and of me that amounts to our spirit?
	Our nature.
	That which cannot be governed and controlled.
	Will they not rest until every aspect of human life is tied down and digitised?
	Until every aspect of your life can be controlled and monitored?
	Your private conversations with your doctor now subject to state edicts.
	Your protests shut down.
	Your every conversation observed.
	Your entire life just data points in the hands of Google and Facebook and Apple.
	What are they turning us into?
	They are turning us into machines.
	They are denying us our humanness, our ability to disagree, our ability to be unusual, our ability to be strange, our right to be who we are, our right to freedom.
	With these principles... Principles?
	Sorry, principals, do you not mean Evil Masterplan?
	The G7 is leading an important step change in the global policy conversation.
	Our shared objective is to ensure that CBDCs will be grounded in long-standing commitments to transparency.
	Because you've been very good at that.
	You've been very good at that.
	I noticed during the lockdown, all the transparency while our government were having parties with various state officials in America were having parties where redacted documents from Pfizer just disappear like Kaiser Soze.
	No, you're the guys to bring us transparency.
	Keep talking.
	The rule of law and sound economic governance.
	The G7 will continue its work in this important area, working with others to enhance understanding and use of these principles.
	Do you think if you keep saying the word principles, we'll mistakenly think you have some?
	We're excited to be taking a leading role with G7 members in publishing this exploratory work, bringing money and finance into the 21st century.
	Let's look at it in a bit more detail.
	During the 2022 IMF World Bank Group Annual Meetings, Cecilia Skingsley, head of the Innovation Hub at the Bank for International Settlements, agreed with other speakers who said introducing a CBDC is not a universal solution and should instead come together with digital IDs in a package.
	You've tried a few times to get that package, I've noticed.
	People are commenting too much, why have they had a package?
	To make sure that everyone's taken the right medicine.
	But I thought that medicine...
	We just need the package, thank you.
	IMF Deputy Managing Director Bo Lee singled it out as one of the challenges in introducing CBDC.
	We need a better understanding of what's the cause, what's driving that hesitancy.
	I keep hearing this word, hesitancy.
	Normally, it's a total lack of trust.
	One way to resolve it relates back to our data question.
	That is, if we can create enough value, if by joining the ecosystem, if consumers can enjoy a lot more financial services, if they can get credit, maybe they will be willing to join the ecosystem, said Li.
	Sounds like a nice ecosystem.
	Don't sound like I'll be spied on in there, or controlled in there.
	I don't know why I'm so hesitant!
	Li also explained how institutions could take advantage of CBDC data by following the model of the Chinese Communist Party.
	Yeah, I love the Chinese Communist Party.
	Well, mostly I think it's the amount of freedom they give everyone, where non-traditional data can be very useful for financial service providers to give me a credit score.
	Yeah, non-traditional data, not just stuff that I willingly give, stuff that you take without telling me.
	In 2021, the Bank of England called on ministers to decide whether a central bank digital currency should be programmable, ultimately giving the issuer control over how it's spent by the recipient.
	Wow, that's what you want.
	Control over how you spend your money.
	That won't be misused by a powerful corporate state.
	Tom Mutton, a director at the Bank of England, said there could be some socially beneficial outcomes.
	Socially beneficial outcomes.
	Preventing activity which is seen to be socially harmful in some way.
	I see that as socially harmful in some way.
	Would you stop it?
	Nah, it's my right.
	I'm free.
	I said, would you stop it?
	Ah, me pennies is all gone.
	But me piggy bank, mister.
	That's right, that's socially beneficial for you to shut the fuck up.
	You could think of giving your children pocket money, but programming the money so that it couldn't be used on sweets.
	So much is revealed by the analogy.
	They think of us as children, over whom they oughtn't relinquish ultimate control.
	This is about nothing less than your freedom, who you are.
	Forget, don't forget, but recall in addition to your sexuality and your self-expression as an individual member of your class, religion, whatever, Your actual freedom to do stuff?
	You don't be regarded as a child who wants sweets!
	There is a whole range of things that money could do, programmable money, that we cannot do with the current technology, where people will just go around doing what they want, spending their money how they want.
	That's not good enough at all.
	PayPal recently shut down the accounts of anti-war publications.
	Yeah, that was a bit anti-social.
	Those wars are good for business!
	Consortium News and Mint Press News.
	At the same time, Facebook and Microsoft are working with several other web giants and the United Nations on a database to block potential extremist content.
	Extremist.
	Socially acceptable.
	Just language, just words, just words closing in like an iron fist around your throat.
	The growth of such restrictions could create a system in which individuals who do not hold certain political views could be blocked from polite society and left unable to make a living.
	They're not polite, they destroy people's lives.
	The potential scope of the social credit system under construction is enormous, it's boundless.
	The same companies that can track your activities and give you corporate rewards for compliant
	behavior could utilize their powers to block transactions, add surcharges, or restrict your
	use of products. At what point does free speech make someone a target in this new system? Well,
	I'll leave it for you to discuss in the chat and the comments.
	Do you imagine this power would be misused?
	Do you imagine it would co-align with other abilities to capture data?
	Do you think an agenda would be advanced?
	Do you sometimes feel that social engineering is taking place?
	That your beliefs are being challenged and eroded?
	That you're being controlled and told to be something other than you are?
	That your ability to decide for yourself the person that you want to be is being controlled, limited, manipulated?
	Give these people control over your money and it's game over, baby.
	Welcome to Downing Street, our new Prime Minister, straight from Goldman Sachs and the WEF, straight into your pocket, straight into your wallet.
	And don't worry if you're not British, it's coming to a country near you, unless you do something about it.
	But that's just what I think.
	Let me know what you think in the comments.
	Let me know what you think in the chat.
	I'm using Foxy and I'm on the move.
	No, he's the f***ing loser.
	Hey, can you send us your comment to you lot?
	What comments have you got from the video, Soobs?
	We've got actually a few people talking about the political blunders.
	Oh yeah, okay.
	Well, how about from what we were just talking about there?
	BluePanda64, he is cross-eyed.
	Justin Valentin, that didn't take long.
	I don't even know what you mean by some of that.
	Yeah, I thought so, David.
	That was a pretty telling phrase.
	for the EU. I don't even know what you mean by some of that.
	David Davids, which we can control. Yeah, I thought so David. That was a pretty
	telling phrase. Larry Jim Bob, use cash or lose it. P-Bell 547, then we can extract taxes at
	will, you indentured slave. Yeah, I feel you. Then Captain Josie, easier for us to take your
	money away.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Although we do have a catchy name for it apparently.
	It's going to be Britcoin.
	That'll be enough, won't it?
	That'll be enough to get us on board probably.
	Just giving something a catchy name.
	That's all it takes, isn't it?
	We're so pliable.
	Sometimes it's our innocence that I bemoan, our purity of spirit.
	Hey, those of you that are members of State Free AF, that's our members community, can join us for a live session with JP tomorrow.
	5 a.m.
	PT, so get up early, you know he would want that.
	8 a.m.
	ET, 12 p.m.
	GMT.
	Send us your questions and we will pass on and ask, I guess the best five questions.
	I'll ask the man himself.
	I mean, you know, he takes a little while to answer a question, so we can't ask too many, but that's tomorrow.
	You can join us live only if you're a member of our Stay Free AF membership community.
	There's a link in the description to tell you how to do that.
	Have we got any questions for JP, Sue B?
	Yes, I've got a couple here.
	So one from Alex Jamiah, who says, how do you help someone heal when their unconscious and harmful habits are used as self-soothing methods?
	I can help with that one.
	I'll answer that myself.
	JP will love that.
	What other questions have we got?
	Vestheshi asks, my question to him is, is he able to move beyond the left and right of politics?
	Oh, well, that's a good one, isn't it?
	Let's see if we can ask that question.
	Now, we've just had a deep look at the CBDC situation with our man Rishi.
	Gareth, tell us some more about the dangers of a centralised digital currency and how it will be used.
	Yeah, so this is an article that Kristen Tate, an author, wrote.
	So she was talking here about something that we've discussed on our channel before when it came to, for example, in Canada with the freezing of the bank accounts of people who donated to the truckers movement.
	She writes, working in conjunction with major tech companies, citizens not convicted of a crime could lose their ability to transact any business.
	In times, decentralized forms of money, such as cryptocurrencies, may be the main means for dissidents to operate, as long as the federal government doesn't move to squash them.
	We saw recently, didn't we, with PayPal shutting down accounts of, you know, at this time it was like left-leaning journalism from Mint Press.
	I mean, it's independent media, I suppose you could say, I don't know if they think of themselves as left or right, but really, you know, they're literally, they're independent, they're writing about Things that aren't in the mainstream media and even PayPal is moving to, you know, stop their bank accounts.
	This is why we need to look beyond our traditional or conventional historic Links and associations with left and right, because any centralized power, any ability to regulate what gets published on a social media platform, how currency can be controlled, it may be favorable.
	Like, you know, it's customary to describe what the left did as have a Twitter meltdown around Eckhart's, not Eckhart, Elon's, Elon's acquisition.
	I mean, Eckhart, I think we could trust him to run Twitter.
	I don't know, like, if he would keep it running for very long.
	I think it would be shut on day two.
	But Elon's acquisition of Twitter has caused such ruptures and ramifications because there is an assumption that he will align himself with a particular set of views because he is seemingly a radical libertarian.
	I don't know, though.
	This is one of the things we'll ask him about.
	But the fact is, is if you have unchecked power, sooner or later, it will negatively impact you.
	This has to be the assumption.
	Hey, do you guys remember that we had a magnificent competition not so long ago to find an editor?
	Well, we have found not one, but three.
	Among them, we have announced a chief.
	His name is Massey Radfar.
	He is from Liverpool.
	He is in Canada.
	He is our champion.
	I challenged him To make a video immediately that demonstrated why he should be the victor.
	Have a quick look at this video and when we come back we're going to be talking to Dr. Bob this Halloween about vampirism.
	Are they stealing your blood?
	Has your blood become a commodity?
	Are we in some Foucauldian nightmare where the stuff of life itself is traded?
	Consciousness and attention?
	That's traded, we know that already.
	And now blood itself.
	Sperm, that was ages ago.
	Ovaries, you can flog them on the open market, as long as you don't use Johnson & Johnson baby powder.
	Allegedly!
	That's allegedly.
	We don't know for sure that that does anything to your ovaries.
	So, we're going to be talking to Dr. Bob in a minute about this licensed vampirism, but before that, meet our newest member of our team, as well as a couple of other glorious editors, Liam and Shiva.
	Shabba, hi guys.
	Cut this bit out.
	But also have a look at Massey and how he became victorious.
	Massey, congratulations.
	Of all the editors that sent in to our Stay Free with Russell Brand editor competition, one stood head, shoulders, gif, meme and graphic above all else.
	And it was you, Massey.
	You sweet son of Canada.
	You Mancunian madman.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	I want your response.
	We're going to run it in the show.
	What's your response?
	Wow, that's amazing news.
	But wait a minute, I'm not a mank.
	I'm from Merseyside.
	I know I don't have much of an accent, but surely you can tell the difference between these guys and these guys.
	Actually, at that point, though, I've not met you, have I?
	So, do you know, I know exactly the fucking difference.
	I've been outside Goodison, I've been outside Anfield, I could probably do fucking different bits of Toxteth, Croxteth, all of the tufts.
	Fair enough.
	There we go.
	Welcome to the team.
	You should see a lot better quality content flying around the social media space.
	Time now to talk to Dr. Bob Gill, who is a family doctor, as I've told you, and a campaigner.
	We're talking about, often, the corporatisation of medicine and healthcare.
	And how healthcare should, of course, be focused on patients.
	We've talked before about Gavin Newsom coming between you and your doctor via new legislation that prevents them being open about vaccines.
	Today, of course, this being Halloween and all, and blood being so significant and central to this festival, we're talking about the sale of plasma and how that actually goes down.
	Welcome, Dr. Bob.
	Welcome back.
	It's lovely to have you.
	Hi, Russell.
	You're looking a bit pale.
	Have you been selling your own blood?
	I haven't been tempted yet.
	But I would do it for altruistic reasons, not for sale.
	When you give blood, that's supposed to be one of the most generous things you can do, that you're transcending the transactional boundaries.
	So what exactly is happening when people are donating blood?
	Is it somehow ended up monetized?
	Not in the UK.
	Most countries ban being paid for blood, but in America and China, they're the two main countries that this goes on.
	And, you know, one of your previous guests, Alan MacLeod, wrote about this.
	He wrote about the harvesting of the poor, where they've set up blood-taking centers in the deprived parts of town and also along the U.S.-Mexican border so that the poor and the desperate come and donate blood for a very small sum, often a sum that changes over time.
	The more desperate you are, often the price goes down.
	But there's a 10 to 20 fold markup on the sale of their blood.
	There's another dystopic thread that you can kind of trace to the potential prison planet we're heading towards, where the poorest are forced to sell even their blood as AI becomes prevalent across our entire culture, as industries are diminished and profits increase.
	Let's have a look at those.
	There we go.
	Need books?
	No worries.
	Donate plasma.
	I do need books.
	I do need books.
	I am willing to give up my plasma.
	This is being sold to young people especially because blood of young people is big for big pharma these days because they're selling it to very rich people who are using the blood in the belief that it will make them live longer.
	I have everything.
	Life's been very kind to me.
	I'm rich.
	I'm loaded.
	But my blood somehow is tainted.
	Is there any way I could have young people's blood?
	There is a way.
	It's disgusting, though.
	It's immoral.
	Sorry, I stopped listening when you said it was possible to do it.
	So who's likely to be engaged by this scheme?
	And aside from the moral and ethical hellscape that it leads us towards, Doctor, are there any other problems?
	Well, obviously the people who are the poorest are going to be most tempted when they're desperate, when they can't feed their family.
	This is an easy way of getting money for them.
	The problem is, in commercialised blood, there is a greater risk of infection.
	You're going to attract the most desperate.
	And we know where blood is bought, the infection risk can go up almost 40%.
	So the problem with commercialized plasma and blood trade is it's all about getting in the donors, maybe bleeding them more than they can physically cope with, and to get a very big markup.
	And then what also comes in part of that deal is you cut back on safety procedures.
	So that's how infection creeps in.
	The big difference between blood and plasma, I think we need to make the distinction.
	If you have a blood transfusion, It's like sleeping with a person you don't know.
	You don't know their infection status.
	Talk to me more about that!
	But if you have a plasma donation, plasma is pooled from up to three to ten thousand people.
	Now if you have an infected donor in that pool, that can have a massive impact on the number of people receiving your plasma.
	Ah, I understand, and I'm going to put this into interesting terms given I'm a vegan, is the difference between a steak and a sausage.
	A steak, you know that has come from one cow, while sausage, that could be mullered out of a great big daft bunch of cows and their little hoofs and everything.
	So plasmas like that, because it hasn't got some determinants in the old haemoglobin and other blood-related words, they just slosh together a plasma of the unwashed thousands and knock it out.
	Yeah, so when you're donating plasma, they give you your blood back, they filter out the plasma, and then that goes off to be processed and pooled with thousands of other people's plasma.
	So, the risks are innately greater.
	You know, we have an ongoing scandal about tainted blood, where haemophiliacs... I believe that was by Mark Holman.
	Where haemophiliacs in the 80s and 90s were given contaminated factor VIII, which is a factor to help them clot normally.
	These people can't clot normally.
	And some of the donations came from very dubious sources, so it is casting a very long shadow.
	But if you let me give a bit of background, how did we get into this whole necessity?
	Because the UK does not provide its own plasma.
	The UK had to, in the early 2000s, buy an independent plasma company from America.
	And that's what ended up getting privatized.
	I would love to see your comments and inquiries for Dr. Bob.
	Let us know in the chat.
	Young Putin, can you put the chat up for me so that I can see the chat?
	I'd love to know what you lot want to ask and how it seems like the concurrent with a world where Big Pharma is still investing in gain-of-function research, where grants are still being given to the potentially dubious practice at creating Vaccines by experimenting with highly, highly infectious diseases.
	Has medicine and healthcare been utterly co-opted by profiteering corporatists?
	Are we at a point where, in a sense, the health, like any health benefit, is an inadvertent consequence rather than the aim of most medical endeavour?
	Is that the trend?
	Is that already the reality, Doc?
	I think to a large extent that's already the reality.
	You know, when new drugs are developed, they're often not that much better than the drugs they're supposedly replacing.
	Big pharma spend a lot of money marketing these drugs and, you know, brainwashing The doctors and also, you know, controlling the regulators.
	So they end up getting these new drugs incorporated into guidelines.
	But what the public don't understand, they swallow the marketing.
	They think these are wonder drugs, but actually they only provide a marginal benefit.
	So you're ending up taking new drugs with a marginal benefit and you're thinking it's going to do a lot more for you than it really is.
	So you don't actually express informed consent.
	I've got some questions, well not questions, comments really.
	Jean Bondano, I knew a girl who was selling her eggs for 18 grand each to a Canadian operation.
	Jean Bondano, show your sources!
	EMP1990, I did a plasma donation once at 18 years old.
	During the recirculating process there was an issue and I passed out.
	After that I decided it wasn't for me.
	You know, can you give us a bit of insight into the recent revelations in those EU inquiries as to Janet Small's announcement that they did not trial the Pfizer vaccine for transmission, which of course is exactly the sort of thing we can only discuss here.
	Bob, like my concern is this that there were even though they didn't explicitly they're saying well we weren't supposed to the fact we never claimed that the vaccine was going to stop transmission I felt that culturally there was a sense that that it was supposed to do that and even we touched upon the story today of the New York City municipal workers who were sacked for being unvaccinated and New York still opposes their campaign And in deep case, to get their jobs back.
	How does this stand when Pfizer are saying that they never trialled it for transmission?
	How do we wrap our heads around that?
	The messaging was very clear at the beginning.
	You need to get the vaccine, not only to protect yourself, but to protect your loved ones and to protect society.
	That messaging was coming straight out of health leaders like Tony Fauci.
	And similarly, in this country, we had regular press conferences where people like Dr. Van Damme were getting next to Boris Johnson and saying, get your vaccine and protect others.
	It's not just about You know, just about the high-risk people.
	So we were compelled and emotionally blackmailed to do something that wasn't in our own best interest.
	If you're low risk and healthy, why subject yourself to a vaccine?
	So we were doing it for others.
	So why are YouTube giving us a strike?
	for... like why are we not able... sorry they gave us a strike for something else...
	why are we not allowed to talk about that explicitly on YouTube?
	Because I know why, it's because they follow WHO guidelines.
	And why are New York City appealing against those municipal workers getting their jobs back?
	What's going on?
	They have to maintain a charade because if you want to be objective,
	you look back and you realise the decisions they made, the talking points that were rammed down our throat were
	completely wrong.
	So they want to ward off a pushback, a political pushback, a consumer pushback, a public pushback, and they have to stick to their narrative.
	They're doubling down on their narrative.
	Whereas, in fact, they should be holding up their hands and say, look, we were wrong, we're correcting the record, and this is our new advice.
	But that's not happening.
	We talked about it earlier on, but in New York, I think 34,000 nurses were fired for being unvaccinated.
	And so if these 16 workers end up victorious in this case, and they get their money back from the time that they've not worked, that could literally, as the doctor says, you know, it will all start to fall apart in terms of not only the narrative, but the kind of money that is going to be involved, I would imagine.
	So they'll fight it pretty hard, you would say.
	I would say so.
	I think it was, if I remember, because I know it's your research, Gail, but I think it was 34,000 municipal workers in the state of New York generally, sort of beyond nurses, but I absolutely take your point.
	And that's right, isn't it, Doc?
	Is Gareth correct that once they start to say, you said already, they have to maintain the narrative.
	Once you start to say all of those people that were vilified for being unvaccinated All those people that lost their jobs to being unvaccinated, the existing travel regulations against unvaccinated people are starting to not make as much sense.
	Also, does it become a thread that might lead to other areas of inquiry around the vaccines and the profits and the funding?
	It made absolutely no sense to try and shoehorn in this vaccine passport narrative right at the beginning where they were saying in order for you to gain your freedoms you have to subject yourself to carrying a digital passport around.
	But in my mind, that was a way of softening us up and nudging us into accepting the digital currency.
	I don't think these things are separate.
	Wow.
	Really, Bob?
	I don't think they're separate, no.
	Are you willing to wear a tinfoil hat while you say that?
	I would say an analysis hat.
	This is objective analysis.
	That's analysis.
	We ain't got a hat for that.
	Oh, maybe.
	I don't know, this could be the analysis hat.
	Go on, tell us the answer while I work out which hat.
	Well, I mean, literally in today's video where we're talking about CBDCs, there have been talk about combining the digital passport with digital currency.
	So it is a move towards a kind of centralized, you know, operating system for all of these things together.
	Like a social credit score system where you are trackable from a medical perspective and a financial perspective where ultimately all of your data ends up trackable, traceable.
	Is that right, Doc?
	I'm still working on that.
	If you were going to do a rational system, you would say if you've had the virus, you have natural immunity, you can also get a passport.
	So why were those people excluded from this whole drive for a digital passport?
	It didn't make sense.
	It wasn't rational.
	I love it!
	A lot of people are questioning whether or not you're going to be murdered, Doc.
	We'll protect you.
	You're part of our team now.
	Can I ask one question relating back to the blood?
	Is it to do with the hats, Gal?
	It's not about the hats, no.
	Although, no, it's not about the hats.
	Go on, carry on then.
	Doctor, you were explaining about what's happening with the UK and the blood supply here.
	You were saying that originally we bought it from America.
	And what's the situation with now it being sold to China?
	What's happened there?
	Now listen, before Dr. Bob answers that question, you have to join us over on Stay Free AF.
	That is our membership community.
	Now, Dr. Bob, will you stay with us?
	Sure.
	And our members?
	You sure?
	I'm sure.
	You okay?
	Don't need a blood transfusion?
	No doubt about it.
	I've got a little blood.
	It's going cheap.
	It's very reasonable.
	It's at a price that's right.
	I'm knocking my blood out.
	In fact, I can give you two for one.
	A little bit of blood, a little bit of the other.
	Two for one, bit of both.
	Doctor Bob's going to stay with us then for Stay Free AF.
	If you are a member of the Stay Free AF community, you can join us for our live sessions, like for example, this Tuesday, that's tomorrow, I'll be talking to Doctor, Professor, I'm not sure which yet, Jordan Peterson at 5 a.m.
	PT, 8 a.m.
	ET, 12 p.m.
	GMT.
	Sign up to stay free AF and send us your questions.
	Already we've been sent some questions.
	I'm going to ask him, are the categories of left and right irrelevant?
	What do you do to help someone who's unconscious about their own habits?
	In tomorrow's show, we are talking to Eckhart Tolle.
	What a fantastic conversation it was.
	Eckhart Tolle had some fantastic Fantastic!
	He talks about the WAF, globalism, it's a really fantastic conversation.
	Also we've got Jeffrey Sachs, the economist.
	Coming up, Jeffrey Sachs, that guy.
	Thursday we've got Books with Brad.
	Right now, though, I'm going to be making a dignified doctor and campaigner wear one of these hats.
	Let me know in the comments, let me know in the chat, which hat, which hat?
	See you over there in a second on Locals on Stay Free AF.
	It's just one click and a couple of quid away.
	See you tomorrow.
	Stay free.

▲