All Episodes
March 1, 2026 - InfoWars Sunday Briefing - Nick Sortor
43:15
NICK SORTOR • INFOWARS SUNDAY BREIFING 3/1/26 • Iranian Sleeper Cells Activate within the U.S.

Nick Sortor’s Infowars briefing exposes Iran’s alleged sleeper cell activation in the U.S., linking a 2001 Pentagon memo to post-9/11 invasions and Iran’s claimed nuclear readiness, while tying Austin’s mass shooting—a suspect wearing an "Allah" shirt—to Iranian retaliation. The episode ties this to Biden’s border chaos, citing 20M+ undocumented entries with discarded IDs, and highlights cases like Jose Bello’s fake police impersonation in South Carolina as proof of systemic fraud. Epstein’s blackmail operations and Clinton’s alleged cover-up are framed as part of a broader elite conspiracy, culminating in a call for mass deportations and armed resistance against perceived government failures on COVID-19 and immigration. [Automatically generated summary]

Participants
Main
n
nick sortor
25:12
Appearances
a
alex doran
fbi 01:26
a
alex jones
infowars 03:08
a
anna paulina luna
rep/r 01:08
j
joe biden
d 00:30
s
stephen miller
admin 00:42
t
tj roberts
rep/r 04:27
w
wesley clark
01:15
Clips
j
jesse watters
fox 00:11
|

Speaker Time Text
Israel's Nuclear Ambitions 00:05:00
alex jones
Look, everybody is debating this as are you for the MULAS or are you for regime change?
You have to look at all of this in the history of it and the neocons in 9-11 saying they were going to regime change seven countries and use 9-11 as the pretext.
wesley clark
Right after 9-11, about 10 days after 9-11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz.
I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the joint staff who used to work for me.
And one of the generals called me in.
He said, sir, you got to come in.
You got to come in and talk to me a second.
I said, well, you're too busy.
He said, no, no, he says, we've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq.
This was on or about the 20th of September.
I said, we're going to war with Iraq.
Why?
He said, I don't know.
He reached over on his desk.
He picked up a piece of paper.
He said, he said, I just got this down from upstairs, meaning the Secretary of Defense office today.
And he said, this is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran.
I said, is it classified?
He said, yes, sir.
I said, well, don't show it to me.
Were we to get out early, we'd be intensifying the threat against us of a super powerful Sunni extremist group, which was now legitimated by overt Saudi funding in an effort to hang on to a toehold inside Iraq and block Iranian expansionism.
alex jones
And it wasn't just Wesley Clark releasing classified info.
They said the Project for New American Century, a year before 9-11, that they needed a big attack to be able to do this.
And so I don't like the Mulas.
I don't like their dictatorship, but this is not America first.
So I've got a lot of the folks out there that don't like Iran because they blew up the Marine base and all the rest of it and attacked Israel.
I don't like the Iranian leadership either.
Neither does their population.
They're very unpopular.
Even Eric Prince, he's looked at the different ethnic and religious groups there.
There's a very good chance this is going to be a civil war.
We're going to be sucked into a new Vietnam.
And that's if we're successful getting rid of the Mulas.
So it's a real roll of the dice.
But no one can deny that this is an extremely bold move by Trump.
And Trump said, you know, if they're going to get a nuke, I'm going to go in and stop them.
Now, here's the big story.
And I told you this at least 15 years ago.
And then I talked about the Pentagon sources.
And they said, yeah, that's true.
And you shouldn't know that.
But they have cars, vans, taxi cabs, you name it, that the West has in Iran that drive around, that have sensors on them that scoop up the air, and then they send it back and have it tested.
And 15, 16 years ago, they were driving around the enrichment centers.
That's why they stick them out in the middle of nowhere trying to keep away from that.
But they can also follow vehicles that are transporting it.
And they picked up heavily enriched uranium from the centrifuges.
So when you hear Israel saying for 20 years, you know, oh, they're two weeks from a nuke, that's because they have been.
Now, just because that's true doesn't mean Israel has a right to strike them.
We're going to attack North Korea because they have nukes.
I want to be clear.
Iran is trying to get a weapons program.
They refused the peaceful program and the free fuel to build power reactors.
They don't need reactors.
They are full of oil and gas.
So it is true that they've been pursuing a nuclear program.
I don't believe you have a right to attack them just because of that.
Can Iran attack Israel because they've got nukes?
Now, here's the headline.
And this is officially on the Iranian news channels.
Iran needs only one week to conduct a nuclear test, says a member of Iranian security to many their security council and a high-level member of parliament.
There's a bunch of statements by the council: we can have a bomb in one hour, we can have a bomb in one day, we can have a nuclear test within one week.
And Iran could test a nuke and show everybody.
And, you know, we've had Witkoff saying this earlier in the week.
And the bigger deal is they have the delivery systems now with their medium-range ballistic missiles.
Now, when I state those facts, people go, oh my God, you're agreeing with Israeli propaganda.
Not everything Israel says is a lie.
Now, Iran says they're one week away from being able to test one.
And I predict it because that's the obvious move to say, hey, we got nukes.
Okay, we got nukes.
Because they look at North Korea and others that have nukes that don't get attacked.
nick sortor
And welcome to the InfoWorld Sunday briefing.
I am Nick Sortor in a location where I will not be yelled at.
I will not be interrupted.
I will not be, I will not lose my signal.
FBI Warns of Vigilance 00:08:57
nick sortor
I will not, I don't know, be attacked in the street.
I mean, which are all things that tend to happen when we do, you know, live hits here on the Sunday briefing, which is actually live, by the way.
A lot of Sunday shows aren't live.
This one is live.
And we're actually in the American heartland at this time.
I'm going to tell you exactly which state I'm in.
And there's a reason for that.
And you'll find out hopefully next week.
But in the American heartland, a state that I'm telling you, I came to this state in the Midwest.
I'll give you that much of a hint.
After coming from what, Minnesota, Portland, D.C., where I technically reside-ish, spent a lot of time in Washington, D.C.
And then you come back to the Midwestern states and you really start to miss it.
I was raised in Kentucky and the simple things of being able to get an Uber driver named Thomas that speaks English.
Little things like that, you start to appreciate when you come back to the American Midwest.
But obviously, there's a lot to talk about today.
I'm not going to be the guy that is going to sit here and preach to you about whatever's going on in Iran, right?
I just, that's that's not up my alley.
I prefer to talk about things that are happening here in the United States of America.
Mass deportations have been pretty much my shtick for a while because I feel like that is the 20, 30, 40, 50 million illegals that are inside of this country could even be more than that.
We have no idea.
That's part of the problem.
We have no idea how many of these people are in the United States of America, how many illegals came in, even under Joe Biden.
We have no clue.
And so if you want to hear about somebody just talking out their ass about what happened over in Iran and what continues happening over in Iran, this probably isn't the program for you because we're going to try to keep it more local here.
And unfortunately, the biggest story out of the United States of America has been what just happened in Texas, Austin, Texas.
Last night, we had a mass shooting at a bar, at least two confirmed dead.
I've heard reports of three.
Not sure if somebody, if one of the injured have unfortunately passed away.
You can see the just the sheer terror in this bar, these Americans that were shot, some of them killed by A Senegalese man that was let into our country, a Senegalese Islamist man wearing a shirt that said property of Ava.
I don't know if we have that photo up here because that just came out right before we went live here.
But a Senegalese man, a third worlder.
Why?
Why do we need third worlders from Senegal in our country?
What have the Senegalese ever produced?
Has anything good ever come out of Senegal?
Their main export is terror.
And that's what we just saw here in Austin, the FBI looking at this and saying that there is a potential terror nexus here, especially.
I mean, I guess the property of Ava shirt didn't really give it away.
He also had a Quran in his car.
And I'll let the FBI speak for this here.
If you guys want to go ahead and roll that one, let's see what that's clip number clip number one, actually.
alex doran
I'm the acting special agent in charge for the San Antonio Field Office of the FBI.
We want to extend our deepest condolences as well to the victims and their families of this tragic incident.
I also want to sincerely thank Austin Police Department and the officers for their extremely rapid response to the incident.
There is no doubt that those officers saved countless lives with their quick reaction and quick training to respond to the shooter and address the threat.
The FBI is working in lockstep with our partners, with Austin Police Department.
We have members from our evidence response team, as well as our many other specialty teams, including our digital forensics folks that are on scene helping to address the scene and gather additional evidence.
Obviously, it's still way too early in the process to determine an exact motivation, but there were indicators that on the subject and in his vehicle that indicate potential nexus to terrorism.
Again, it's still too early to make a determination on that.
That's why we are investigating it very closely with our partners with Austin Police Department.
I just want to say, in conclusion, we are committed to seeing this process through to the very end, and we will continue to work very closely with our partners with Austin Police Department.
nick sortor
Yeah, and as you can see here, this is the photo that's been obtained by Fox News.
Bill Malujin is a fantastic reporter and a friend of mine posted this on X soon before the show went live.
Wearing this sweatshirt, this Senegalese man that shouldn't be here to begin with, holding a long rifle, wearing a shirt that says property of Allah.
There have also been reports that he had an undershirt on with an Iranian flag on it.
I mean, I haven't seen the photos of that yet.
That's what Fox News is also reporting.
However, this goes into a much bigger issue.
This ties back in with the idea of sleeper cells running rampant through the United States at a clip that could be activated at any moment, right?
It's seeming more and more like this attack, based on what the FBI has said.
The New York Post is also reporting this as well.
That this was in retaliation for the strikes on Iran.
And now, whether or not you agree with President Trump's strikes on Iran, it should be pretty easy to say that we should not have to be worried about this in the United States of America.
We shouldn't have to be worried that because our military strikes a foreign nation that terrorists in the United States within our borders are going to be activated to start killing Americans in the streets.
But unfortunately, that's the reality that we live in.
That's the reality that we live in.
And now you have the FBI coming out and saying to be vigilant when you go out.
I would go further than that.
I would stay strapped is what I would do.
Do not turn yourself into a sitting duck.
Do not go to a bar that you have to disarm yourself to go into.
And honestly, I mean, I'm going to say it live on air because I say whatever I want to live on air.
If they you're going to a bar, this is not legal advice.
It might be illegal in the state that you're going into, but let's just say that I'm not going to go into a bar unarmed.
That's just not going to happen.
Nobody needs to know that I'm armed, but I'm not going to, I'm not going to let myself, I'm not going to let my family turn into sitting ducks because Joe Biden, the Democrats, and honestly, a lot of the Republicans decided that they were going to allow in who the hell knows from third world countries, from Western Africa, majority Muslim countries, like Senegal.
Again, this guy was given citizenship.
He's a naturalized citizen of the United States.
Why?
Why do we need people like this?
The answer is we don't.
And again, so we don't just need mass deportations.
We need mass denaturalizations because way too many people that shouldn't have citizenship had been granted it by Bush era Republicans and Democrats like Chuck Schumer.
Citizenship Controversies 00:14:41
nick sortor
So, yeah, well, we're going to get into a lot more of this.
We get into, you know, the Clintons and the Epstein situation that just happened up there in Chappaqua, New York.
A couple of bombshells that came out of that.
Things that we've been talking about for a long time, but members of Congress are finally, finally catching up on.
We'll get into that and more right after the break.
Stay tuned here on Forrest Sunday briefing.
See you after a couple of minutes.
We have a little bit of breaking news here.
Actually, I can't really do this to you guys.
Go to my XP guys and pull that what I just posted out.
We'll get into that here in a second.
Do we have TJ Roberts, by the way?
Maybe?
Kind of?
unidentified
Kind of.
Okay.
nick sortor
Well, then we'll hang on to it for just a second here.
Yeah, so obviously one of the things that we've been tracking this week were the Epstein situation out there where members of the House Oversight Committee went out to Chappaqua, New York to speak with Hillary and Bill Clinton on the record to see what they could have possibly known about Jeffrey Epstein.
Is it Bill Clinton, the guy that was out there?
I think he flew on the Lolita Express, which is, which was anyway, Jeffrey Epstein's plane 27 times.
He apparently also invited Jeffrey Epstein to the White House multiple times and still is pretending like he had no idea what was going on with that whole thing.
I had no idea that Jeffrey Epstein was trafficking children or having sex with underage children.
None of that, none of that, any idea.
I mean, Bill Clinton was one of those people that you would joke about if you didn't know the names of people that had any connection to Jeffrey Epstein.
You would be like, oh, yeah, he had ties to powerful people in the 90s.
Like, I'm sure Bill Clinton was there.
And, you know, sure enough, he's like best friends with Jeffrey Epstein.
And Hillary, in the normal Hillary fashion, decided in her deposition, which happened a day before Bill's totally lost it, apparently, and began screaming because she didn't like some of the questions that were being asked.
That's clip number five.
jesse watters
There is an accusation that there was a screaming match.
anna paulina luna
It was an accusation, Jesse.
It definitely Secretary Clinton definitely lost her cool.
unidentified
What happened?
anna paulina luna
Representative Mace was pushing her.
I think the question was something along the lines of her basically not doing anything regarding the trafficking, or it got into a pretty heated exchange.
And the secretary did lose her cool, and they were yelling at each other.
And then she kind of realized that I think it was being recorded and kind of collected herself again.
But that was not an exaggeration by Representative Mason that will come out.
And I think it was stupid for their spokespeople to deny that.
jesse watters
Yeah, we're going to see that video on Monday.
Was Representative Mace being respectful?
Was she just, was she also just getting under her skin?
Like, what was the dynamic?
anna paulina luna
I think Representative Mace has taken this obviously very seriously because she is a victim herself.
But I think the aspect was that Representative Mace kept trying to cut it and say, okay, we'll go to Rep Luna now.
And then Secretary Clinton was still obviously visibly upset and wanted to continue arguing.
nick sortor
Yeah, I mean, TJ, I'm sorry, TJ, I almost called you Hillary.
And that's probably the most insulting thing that anybody has ever said to me.
tj roberts
Never come back on the show ever again.
nick sortor
Yeah, so bringing in TJ Roberts here, guys.
We had him here last week, and he did me a favor.
TJ Roberts, a Kentucky state representative, hopefully U.S. Congressman at some point here.
But yeah, so TJ, you've seen these depositions.
And actually, I'm going to play one more clip before I ask you a question.
Share, I want to play clip number seven because Representative Luna came out.
And to be fair, Representative Luna says a lot of things, right?
So she tends to just, if there's a camera around, she's going to run through it and say things.
And a lot of things aren't necessarily backed up, I guess.
But in this case, it's like she's repeating what we've been saying for like quite some time about Jeffrey Epstein being an intelligence asset.
Clip number seven, guys.
anna paulina luna
Earlier, and that I do believe, and I'm sure some people on this committee also believe that Jeffrey Epstein was an intelligence asset and running some form of a honeypot operation.
I do believe that President Clinton, as well as the secretary, were potentially targets of the operation.
And we will leave it at that.
And I look forward to seeing you all react to the depositions as I think that this is information that's important and belongs to the American people.
nick sortor
Okay, so a lot of this stuff has come out since Thomas Massey forced the release of the Epstein files.
What are we missing here?
What new has come out that would all of a sudden make Luna say this?
Do you believe based on the depositions that we've had and what Bill Clinton has allegedly said in those deposits?
We don't have that information.
We don't know exactly what he said.
The tape hasn't been released yet.
What are your thoughts on this?
Was Jeffrey Epstein, was he an intelligence asset?
tj roberts
It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if he was.
I mean, we can look to the history of the deep state actively blackmailing members of the political class with information similar to what Jeffrey Epstein was having politicians do.
So it certainly wouldn't surprise me the fact that it took so long and took such a massive fight to get these files into the public eye.
Yeah, that wouldn't surprise me at all because I don't know anyone who would say that it was a wise political move to resist releasing these files when we're talking about one of the largest pedophile rings in human history.
So I would maintain, yeah, it's entirely possible that that's exactly what was going on of getting blackmail in order to control our political class through people who were so unsavory that they would never hold office in the United States.
So that would not shock me in the slightest.
nick sortor
Yeah, and I mean, so again, like, I don't want to speculate too, too much on what Bill Clinton and Hillary said in those depositions because, you know, honestly, we just, we really don't know because it wasn't public.
We haven't seen any sort of tapes from it yet.
So, yeah, I probably won't dive too, too deep into that.
James Comer and Nancy Mace say that President Clinton said under oath that Trump had no involvement that Clinton knew of, and he had never spoken about any sort of involvement with President Trump.
And that was one of the headlines that came out of that, but we haven't seen the clips, so I'm not exactly sure what the context was there.
Moving forward a little bit here, you know, I want to go back to this Austin shooting that just happened out there where it seems like, yeah, guys, if you want to just roll one of the clips that we have from Austin, just in the background here, just showing the sheer terror that happened down there.
A lot of this seems to be like you're a state representative, right?
So you represent a hell of a lot of Kentuckians.
Does this worry you about possible, like, this could happen in any state, it seems like, where people can just sweep their cells and potentially been activated?
They can just go shoot up a random bar.
Do you fear that for Kentuckians right now?
tj roberts
Nick, it concerns me absolutely.
I mean, we've seen the realities of radical Islamic terror and blowback from our continued involvement across the world in areas that are fundamentally incompatible with Western civilization.
And yeah, Kentuckians need to be concerned.
We need to be eternally vigilant.
And that is one of the reasons why protecting the Second Amendment is one of my top issues.
Is so that way Americans can defend themselves from invasions like what we are seeing right here right now.
And we can't give up that right.
unidentified
Yep.
nick sortor
And right after the break here, we'll keep TJ around.
We're going to talk about judicial warrants for illegals.
We're back with the InfoWars Sunday briefing.
Again, I am Nick Sortor here with a much less interesting background than usual, but at least I'm in the American heartland and not in a place where everybody hates me.
That is, I cannot express to you guys how nice that feeling is.
You know, I'll bring TJ Roberts back in here as well.
You are more than just a Kentucky state representative, TJ.
Also, an attorney.
I don't know if I, I mean, I don't know if you are technically a constitutional attorney.
You know a thing or two about the Constitution.
You're pretty good about it.
You've had cases in front of the Supreme Court as well.
And so I want to talk a little bit about this.
Where obviously we're monitoring what's happening there in Austin, Texas, what happened last night with that guy, that Senegalese guy that came in and shot up a bunch of people at the bar.
I believe two are dead, about 14 injured.
Thank God police responded as quickly as they did.
In that area of Austin, there's a pretty high police.
I lived in Austin for a little bit.
It was a pretty big police presence because there are a lot of bar fights at night in that area.
And so they have to diffuse those situations.
But, you know, TJ, instead of being able to deport people like this and other potential sleeper cells in the United States, the Democrats have shut down DHS, shut down DHS.
They're not giving them any sort of funding to be able to monitor these sleeper cells.
And it goes further than that.
One of their demands to reopen DHS is judicial warrants for every single person that is illegally in the United States.
And Stephen Miller just licked this up.
That's clip number 16, guys.
stephen miller
And I just wish we lived in a country where the media gave one-tenth a damn as much about Americans who were murdered and brutalized and savagely killed, beaten to death, as they did about whether illegal aliens that we all agree are illegal aliens should get a million days in court and a million trials and a million this and a million that.
There's 15 million illegal aliens that violate the country.
If every one of them got the trial that you're asking for, it would take us centuries to remove them.
Centuries.
We've been talking about this in three, 400 years.
Their great-great-great-grandchildren would be the ones representing them in court.
That's how long it would take.
Illegal aliens who come to our country have to be removed and they have to remove quickly.
And that is an essential component of having something that we like to call a country.
nick sortor
Yeah, so TJ, Stephen Miller is saying that if the Democrats get what they want and we have to have judicial warrants for every single illegal in the United States of America, you're going to be talking about this four or five hundred years from now with their great, great, great, great grandchildren representing them in court.
Is this a total non-starter?
Is Stephen Miller right, TJ?
tj roberts
Yeah, Stephen Miller's right.
And as usual, the Democrats are wrong.
When you look to the immigration issue, the concept that there needs to be a judicial warrant to initiate deportation proceedings is a completely novel concept.
The founding fathers would balk at the idea that you don't have the ability to repel invasions.
In fact, they put an affirmative duty on all governments, federal, state, local, any government in the United States, has a guarantee to the people that they will repel invasion.
And the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement is specifically about crimes, putting people in jail.
It's about investigatory matters.
It's not about whether you're here legally.
It's frankly not.
unidentified
Okay.
tj roberts
Yes, excessive force can be a concern.
But in terms of the actual initiation, our history and tradition shows the government has the ability to remove invaders.
And I just think about it in my area.
I have the Eastern District of Kentucky Covington Division, which covers about 15 counties in Kentucky.
We only have two federal judges.
So this concept of the need for a judicial warrant, it's novel and it's also hypocritical for the left.
They're notorious for keeping everything within the executive branch.
The only reason they want it is because they know it would grind deportations of illegal immigrants to a halt in the United States.
That's the only reason they want it.
nick sortor
Yeah, and it seems that's exactly what they're trying to do because not only do they want to have these people count toward the census, which gives them more seats in places like California, where you have millions and millions of illegals that as we speak right now, congressional representation is not just determined based on U.S. citizen population.
It is based on total population, including illegals.
So of course they don't want to get rid of these people.
They want to keep them around as long as humanly possible and deporting them with administrative warrants.
The due process should be as simple as, are you illegal?
Yes.
Border Crossings Decline 00:11:06
nick sortor
Okay, you're gone.
That's it.
Why do we need to have 1500 court dates for one individual that we know is illegal?
It's not very difficult to determine whether or not somebody is illegal.
They're not here.
If they jumped the border or they overstayed their visa, send them back.
There's your due process.
I don't know.
It's just, it's a thing that obviously they want to give citizenship as well to people like this guy.
I'm not even going to try to pronounce his name, nor do I want to say his name because he just killed a bunch of Americans there in Austin.
This guy from Senegal that they gave citizenship to, he is a naturalized or was a naturalized citizen of the United States of America.
Now I guess he's a citizen of the seventh layer of hell.
He didn't probably get those 72 virgins he was promised or whatever, but we're giving citizenship to these people.
They're taking the oath of citizenship.
Why can't we denaturalize them?
Can we do that?
Like, what needs to be done in order to denaturalize people that are clearly violating their oath of citizenship to the United States of America?
tj roberts
Yeah, Nick, the Immigration and Nationality Act has several proceeds for denaturalization.
Now, when we're talking about someone who is a citizen who has committed a crime, there's two means.
There's civil denaturalization.
That's generally your fraud issues.
Then there's the criminal one, and that's for what is defined in Congress as an aggravated felony.
And it doesn't have to be an aggravated felony in your state, but murder, rape, mail fraud, wire fraud.
There is a long list of crimes that allow for the initiation of denaturalization proceedings.
You can absolutely strip a naturalized citizen of their citizenship in the event that they commit these types of horrific offenses.
That should happen.
But frankly, this guy should have never gotten citizenship to begin with.
He should have never been allowed to come into this country in the first place.
We need to actually get tough on immigration.
And frankly, one of the ways to do it is to put a total moratorium on immigration until every illegal immigrant is gone.
And that needs to happen because right now it is depriving small states of their voice.
In Kentucky, we have about four and a half million human beings within our border.
California has more than that in terms of its illegal immigration population in general.
In terms of electoral college, in terms of congressional representation, California's sanctuary state policy has completely deprived Kentucky of a voice and has diluted our voice in Washington, D.C.
It has to stop.
nick sortor
Yeah, that is a fantastic point, actually.
You know, those additional electoral votes that the state of California gets those additional votes in Congress that California gets.
Science is the people of states like Kentucky, states like Ohio, states like, you know, you name it, Alabama, whatever, that don't have massive illegal immigrant populations.
So, I mean, it just obviously shows why Democrats have as much incentive as possible to stonewall deportations.
TJ Roberts, where do people find you, man?
tj roberts
Yeah, my ex is at real TJ Roberts, and my website is votetjr.com.
nick sortor
Thank you very much for joining us, TJ.
We always appreciate having you on.
And thankfully, this time I didn't get yelled at by a security guard outside of the hotel that I was staying at.
So stay tuned.
We'll be right back.
We're going to talk about this illegal let go by Alvin Bragg.
You know, guys, we all know what the border was like between 2021 and 20, with millions of people from God knows where, all across the world, jumping our border and just giving a free plane ticket to wherever the hell in the country they wanted to go.
But apparently, Joe Biden says your eyes are lying to you, guys.
That never actually happened.
He's the one that closed the border, not President Trump.
No, he did it himself.
That's what he told a bunch of people at this speech that he just gave in South Carolina.
I don't know who writes these.
I don't know who's paying for him to do this stuff.
Like, why the hell would you want some demented old fart, one of the worst presidents in history, one of the lowest rated presidents in history, as well giving a speech at your event?
Who the hell knows?
But it was a friendly crowd for him.
They didn't exactly give him much applause, though, when he lied straight to their face and said that he's the one or he's the reason that illegal immigration is at a historic low right now.
That's clip 17, guys.
joe biden
Around the world.
Despite everything you read, despite everything you read, despite the fact that COVID drove migration to record levels all around the world, the day I left office, border crossing into the United States were lower than the day that I entered an office inherited from Trump.
He is, I won't say it.
That's just a fact.
On the day I left office, I handed Trump the strongest economy in the world.
In the world, that's not hyperbole.
unidentified
That's a fact.
nick sortor
Meanwhile, you see, we can go back to the countless videos over and over and over again of illegals running through the border, fighting with Border Patrol.
which had been neutered because Joe Biden didn't want them doing their job.
And maybe it wouldn't even Joe Biden, maybe it was whoever the hell was pulling a string in the background, the autopen operator, didn't want them doing their job.
And so they were just out there sitting ducks.
They falsely accused Border Patrol agency.
Some of you guys might remember this of whipping Haitians, even though they were just using reins on their horses.
They weren't whipping anybody.
And the Biden regime knew that, but they lied about it, of course, as they usually do.
This guy is saying, despite everything that you read, the border was actually closed under me and that it was due to COVID that people were surging the border.
Doesn't make a hell of a lot of sense because the argument that the Democrats made, the Biden regime made, was that the United States was one of the worst hotspots for COVID, despite the fact that the Democrats had everything locked down in every single blue state.
So I don't know why you'd want to flee to the country that supposedly has the worst COVID outbreak of all of them.
Meanwhile, you're not allowed to leave your house.
I don't understand that argument, but look at these, look at these videos here.
This is Eagle Pass, Texas.
I remember this one very specifically because I was there.
Millions and millions of people endlessly all day crossing the border illegally.
And I know you keep hearing it, guys.
You hear it here.
You hear it everywhere else.
Us harping on this.
The border and the people that came across that are now in this country that we have to get rid of.
20 plus million.
And we've got more people, like innocent Americans in Austin, Texas.
They're all around the country.
But we don't know who.
We don't know where.
And we don't know when.
We don't know when they're going to do things like this.
We don't know where.
And it's terrifying to think about.
I don't want Americans to live in fear.
But at this point, it's just a reality.
This was one of the guys that we knew of that was here because he was granted citizenship.
So you just imagine who we don't know of in this country.
These people can't do.
Border Patrol was unable to do any sort of background checks on these people as they entered the country because one of the first things that they would do, one of the first things that cartels would tell them to do was to ditch their ID.
So there was no ID.
There's no fingerprint database from these third world hell holes.
They don't keep good background information on these people.
You can't just pull their criminal record.
These are unknown people of unknown backgrounds coming into the country, or at least they were coming into the country under Joe Biden.
And honestly, like there's no other solution to this besides mass deportation.
I know people like to argue, well, this person didn't do anything wrong.
Oh, they're a hard worker.
They're whatever.
But we don't know how easily they can be radicalized.
We don't know if they've already been radicalized and they're just laying low for now.
We don't know.
That's the whole point.
That's why they all have to go.
But you have a bunch of people that are, I don't know, they want to make themselves feel better.
And so they'll be like, oh, you know, it's just not very nice.
This person came here for a better life or whatever.
And we can't, they haven't yet murdered anybody.
So maybe we shouldn't send them back to the hellhole that they came from, the hell hole that is all they know.
The hellhole that they were raised with.
They were raised with the values of the place that they came from.
Values Of A Hellhole 00:03:18
nick sortor
And that's terrifying when you look at some of these things where, like, now, like, actually, we have a clip for this actually.
Clip number 14: an illegal alien scamming and possibly even attempting to rape people that he was pulling over when he was impersonating a police officer in South Carolina, of all places.
Clip number 14.
unidentified
We're learning new details this afternoon about a man Greenville Police say impersonated an officer.
Back on January 21st, police responded to reports of a person conducting traffic stops.
After investigating, 57-year-old Jose Bello was confirmed not to be a law enforcement officer.
Then, while executing a search warrant on Caledon Court, detectives found multiple weapons, ammunition, badges, and other law enforcement-style gear.
You see it there on your screen.
Bello's vehicle was also equipped with blue lights.
Police say he received a $5,000 surety bond and was arrested Thursday.
He now faces several charges regarding the operation of an armed security business without the proper licensing, as well as six counts of possession of firearms by an unlawful alien.
nick sortor
And this is what these people know when you come from a third world country where the only thing that the way that people get ahead is by scamming others and cheating and lying.
That's why, that's why the Indian scams are so prevalent, for example.
This guy was an Indian, obviously, but you go to India, they're unable to scam other Indians because they all used to it.
They live with it.
That's what they, that's what they do.
They're like the amount of people in there that are doing scams is massive, right?
A lot of them have been victims of it themselves, so they have to go to other countries to do so.
That's what they know.
That's how they know to make money.
And so when you bring them over here and they're able to do things like this in their third world country and get away with it, and then they come to places like the United States where people are a lot more empathetic, a lot more willing to trust people, they take full advantage of it.
You know, in the state that I'm in right now, still not going to tell you exactly which one I'm in here in the heartland of America, here in the Midwest.
It's incredible to be able to go to stores around here, restaurants around here, and nobody's worried about you stealing anything.
One of my buddies that I'm here with, he actually lives in this area.
He drove me to like a diner last night that we went to, and he literally, it was cold, so he just got out of the car, left the car running in the parking lot, and spending so much time in these liberal hellholes like Minneapolis and Washington, D.C. and such, this is like now foreign to me.
Leaving the car, it would be gone in 30 seconds in Minneapolis.
But not places like this that have not accepted millions and millions of third world invaders.
Thank you guys for joining us today on the Sunday briefing.
We'll be back next week, same time, right here on InfoWars.
Export Selection