God's Debris: The Complete Works, Amazon https://tinyurl.com/GodsDebrisCompleteWorksFind my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.comContent:Politics, Governor Shapiro Firebombed, President Trump's Physical, Chaos Narrative, Dept. of Imaginary Concerns, President Bukele, El Salvador Safety Rating, Anti-Trump Law Firms, Rose Garden Renovation, CBS FCC License, Stephen A. Smith, Tariff Cost Customer Receipts, Crossfire Hurricane Documents Release, LA Homeless Funds Investigation, Complexity Equals Fraud, Fair Trade Framing, Rare Earth Refining, Elon Musk, Nuclear Energy SMR, AI Energy Needs, Budget Deficit Doom, Budget Hawks, Brain Interface Technology, Spell Check Word Bias, Rep. Jack Kimble, Scott Adams
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never had a better time.
But if you want to take a chance of even making it yet better...
All you need for that is a cup of burger, a glass of tanker gel, a canteen jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind.
Fill it with your favorite liquid.
I like coffee.
And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine at the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
It's called the Simultaneous Sip.
It happens now.
Oh.
Good stuff.
Well, if you subscribe to the Dilbert comic, Dilbert Reborn it's called, which you can only see if you're subscribing either on Axe or on Locals, you would know that Dilbert's company is having a problem with China.
So China is going to steal the IP of Dilbert's company, and Dilbert's going to try to fix that by moving his manufacturing to Albania.
Things don't go well.
That's all I can tell you.
It doesn't go well.
All right.
Let's see if there's any science that didn't need to happen.
Oh, here's one.
Did you know, according to Neuroscience News, that shared meals strongly link to greater happiness?
So one in four people don't eat a meal with other people, but the people who eat with other people are happier.
I think they could have just asked me on that one.
Do you know why people don't eat with other people?
Because they don't have any friends or family to eat with.
Pretty much everybody who has some kind of a functional social life is eating with other people.
So, yeah, I think I could have told you that you'd be happier if your social life is good enough that at least one person wants to eat with you.
If you can't find even one person.
You're probably lonely and single.
All right.
Well, you probably heard that there was a disgusting arson attack against Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro.
This one's a really scary one.
This is really scary.
So apparently the attacker, some 30-year-old, 38-year-old guy, he forcibly entered the residence while the family was asleep.
And set fire to the place while the family was asleep.
Now, luckily, it looks to me like the governor's residence is a pretty big place.
So people must have seen it and called it in and the police department, or I'm sorry, the fire department put it out and rescued the family.
So the family is okay.
I'd like to disavow that.
I don't know what the purpose was.
We don't know anything about the perpetrator, but I don't want to be like those Democrats who don't disavow the domestic terrorism against Tesla.
So the first thing I did was disavow.
David Axelrod, notable Democrat advisor type, he politicized it right away.
And he goes, Where's POTUS, the president?
Did I miss it?
Or has he not said or posted a word about it yet?
Well, that's a good question.
I would have liked to see Trump immediately respond to that and say that it's a horrible thing.
But J.D. Vance did.
He says...
Vance said, thanks be to God that Governor Shapiro and his family were unharmed in this attack.
Really disgusting violence.
I hope whoever did it is brought swiftly to justice.
So at least we got J.D. Vance in there.
I'll be interested to see what Trump says.
Because he's so unpredictable, you know, with his chaos and everything.
Well, I guess the all-female
on the Jeff Bezos rocket, they've already gone up and spent 10 minutes in space, and they're already down.
And
Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but none of them were driving the rocket, right?
It must have been all automated.
Because the people who were on the trip included one former NASA scientist, but the rest just seemed to be celebrities and one wife of Bezos.
So they were just sort of along for the ride, right?
I don't know.
So I guess nobody was driving that thing.
But it's back safely.
And I don't know what was the point of the all-female crew.
Did we really need to do an all-female crew?
Given that there was no skill whatsoever involved.
Had it been a skill job where you had highly trained people, then I would say, whoa, an all-female crew, maybe that's saying something.
But if they're just literally just sitting there as passengers, why do they have to be all-female?
Because women can be passengers too.
Every guy who's ever been married knows that women can be passengers.
How much do they drive the car when you're both in the car?
Yeah, I think women can be passengers.
I'm glad we settled that.
Well, Trump had his physical and official document that came out from the doctors, I guess.
And it didn't have the amusing hyperbole that I was expecting, but he does look healthier than 90% of the public.
You know, given the details and the report, he looks pretty damn healthy.
But they had to work in, because it's Trump, he got the doctors to work in something about his busy schedule.
You know, he's healthy enough to do a busy schedule with lots of meetings.
And then this phrase is actually in his medical report.
Quote, infrequent victories in golf events.
Frequent victories in golf events.
Can you imagine your doctor putting that on your physical?
It's the only thing I'll remember.
He had frequent victories in golf events.
That's how healthy he is.
Well, Cory Booker was on NBC's show with Kristen Welker, and she asked him if he had any actual evidence.
For his accusation that the Trump administration is somehow profiting from tariffs and that it's all kind of an oligarch scheme to help Trump and his cronies.
And he had absolutely no answer for that because it's imaginary.
But the closest he got was there's enough smoke here that it should be investigated and Congress should be in charge and all that.
And I'm thinking to myself, If somebody asks for evidence and you say there's plenty of smoke, don't you need to list the smoke?
You know, even if it's not proof, say, well, you know, there's this and there's that.
Where's the smoke?
I don't see any.
I'm going to take this concern and assign it to the Department of Imaginary Concerns because, once again, Cory Booker is hallucinating.
A problem that is not part of the real world, but I suppose anything's possible in the future.
So he's got an imaginary concern about the future, which will be handled by the Department of Imaginary Concerns.
But what about Elizabeth Warren?
She was on ABC, and she said it's time for Congress right now to step into the emergency that Donald Trump has created.
The emergency he's created?
I don't remember that.
And roll back his chaos.
His chaos?
What problems is that causing?
The stock market's up again today.
And opportunities for corruption that he's now exploiting.
Well, I don't know if any opportunities for corruption that he's now exploiting.
Does she?
Nope. I'm going to assign that to the...
Department of Imaginary Concerns.
Now, here's a game you can play at home.
Turn on CNN at any time of day.
And then, if it's not a commercial, if it's the actual news, see how long before the word chaos appears in the program.
It will be so fast, it'll make you laugh.
Usually less than one minute.
Here's an example.
Then Elizabeth Warren was on CNN.
And Jake Tapper asked the following question.
Given all the chaos, that's how he started his question.
Given all the chaos, so obviously he's on Team Chaos, and he asked her a question, and then here's her answer.
You know, look, the way I look at this is that Donald Trump has created a lot of chaos.
They've got this one thing.
That's all they have.
Now, some of you are wondering, when is Trump going to get rid of this chaos thing?
You know, because you could reframe it.
You could pretend chaos is good, but that's a tough one because it doesn't sound good.
But you can laugh at it.
All they have is this chaos thing.
Anyway, the Department of Imaginary Concerns.
I saw in the Wall Street Journal somebody's opinion that the exemptions for the iPhone, which I'm not sure how real that is, puts Apple at the mercy of Trump.
Is that true?
If you were Apple, would you now be as scared to death that if you don't do everything Trump wants, he's going to put a tariff on your phones again?
Probably. Probably.
Yeah. I guess President Bukele is going to meet with Trump today.
And they're going to have a meeting.
The one thing I like about Trump meeting with Bukele is that Bukele is the bad cop.
No matter how bad Trump is, it's not going to look as badass as Bukele with his gigantic prisons.
Now, I've got a question about those prisons.
Do they put those people in there forever?
Or do they get out someday?
Because I don't remember anything about their legal rights or anything.
So, I've got big questions, but there's no doubt that whatever Bukele is doing, it's working.
Now, the interesting thing is, remember the case of the individual who was accidentally sent back to El Salvador?
And the reason that he didn't want to go to El Salvador specifically, that's where he came from, is that it was too dangerous and he wanted asylum.
But since any of that happened, correct me if I'm wrong, El Salvador is the safest place on earth.
So he didn't want to go back to the safest place on earth.
I mean, you know, maybe the people who were after him were the few people who were not in that gigantic jail.
But, I don't know.
So, apparently, the number of law firms that have made deals with Trump, these would be the law firms that were involved in any kind of lawfare against Trump.
And, you know, he decided to go after them and threatened to pull all their security clearance and contracts with the government, which would be a lot of money.
And so now...
Collectively, all of those law firms have promised, as part of the negotiation, collectively, altogether, $1 billion in pro bono work.
So in theory, Trump has a billion dollars of the top lawyers in the country to do his bidding, the same ones who went after him.
That doesn't sound like the best deal in the world, because how much effort are they going to put into a pro bono deal to help the guy that they want to destroy?
Don't you think that if they were working on a deal for Trump, if it were about Trump, I wouldn't trust them at all?
Yeah, we took care of that.
The bill's $20 million for 10 minutes of work.
And yeah, we crossed every T and dotted every I. I don't think so.
But I did hear that Trump was thinking about using them to negotiate trade deals, which might be actually kind of genius because the law firms don't want to have bad trade deals.
You know, it wouldn't be so much about Trump.
It would just be about America versus whoever we're trading with.
So that might work, interestingly.
So, as you might have heard, that Trump wants to pave over the Rose Garden and put a ballroom there.
Because if you're Trump, you need a lot of ballroom.
You know what I mean?
A lot of it.
But I didn't realize, you know, the first time I heard this story and the tenth time I heard it, I didn't realize that there was a good reason to get rid of the Rose Garden.
Because apparently when they do events out there, if the grass is a little wet...
Like, you can't wear high heels, and it's sort of a mess.
So, yeah, if they can't fix that, and you can only use it when the weather is just so, might as well have a ballroom.
Actually, that makes perfect sense to me.
So, Trump is mad at the TV show 60 Minutes again.
I guess on Sunday they had at least two segments that he...
Consider dishonestly negative to him.
And he just went off on him.
And he's already claimed that they rigged the interview with Kamala Harris to edit in answers that didn't sound stupid.
And so he's already suing.
Now he's calling for their license to be revoked.
60 minutes.
Do you think that's too far?
I don't know.
Because they definitely don't seem to be acting like a news program, but they're presenting themselves as some kind of objective, you know, trusting the news source.
But they are a little bit more on the propaganda side.
So he's got a good case there.
We'll see.
Stephen A. Smith was asked yet again on one of the shows.
If he's thinking about running for president, I remember the question is, are you thinking about it, not are you going to do it?
And he said, I have no choice.
I have no choice.
He says that a whole bunch of important people and elected officials are coming up to him and asking him to run because they think he'd be good.
But he just signed a massive deal with ESPN, the kind that...
You know, completely changes your life.
The money is just gigantic.
And you would have to give that up if you ran for president.
And so I'm going to predict, because he mentioned that as well, I'm going to predict that nobody gives up that much money to run for president.
So I think he's having fun with it.
In the same way Trump used to.
You know, just sort of tease that you might do it.
And I don't know how old he is, Stephen A. Smith.
He's in good shape, so...
You know, could be anything.
But it would make sense for him to run out his ESPN contract, having people begging him to be running for president, and then decide if he wants to run for president after he's done with ESPN.
So, maybe.
Unless he gets another enormous deal, he might.
So, according to Fox News, there's at least one retailer, I think it's a retailer, somebody called Dame.
D-A-M-E.
I don't even know who that is.
That's going to put the tariff cost on the bill, the receipt.
So that when you're buying your stuff, you'll see the taxes and then you'll see the tariff.
And how is Trump going to explain that?
To me, the funniest thing that's happened in a while.
Remember how Trump started off saying that China would be paying us all these tariffs?
And then the people who know how tariffs work would say, China doesn't pay the tariff.
It's the American company who has the product who's going to pass that tariff cost along to the consumer.
So the consumer pays the tariff unless the American company absorbs it.
If you start putting the tariff on the receipt, doesn't that settle the question of who's paying it?
Because you're literally handing them a credit card, and you can see right there, it says, here's the tariff amount.
So how is Trump going to explain that China pays the tariff when you've got in your hand the actual receipt showing that you paid the tariff?
How many of you knew that that was never true, that China was paying billions of dollars in tariffs?
Did all of you know that wasn't true?
But somehow, early on when Trump was making these claims, the news would try to fact-check him.
And then he'd just sort of talk over him until the topic changed.
And they finally just gave up on that.
They just stopped fact-checking it.
Somehow, he convinced the world.
That China was paying the tariffs.
And I've been watching this with just amazement.
I mean, but how many of you thought China was paying the tariffs?
Or any other country?
Anyway. It works for him, because directionally it gets him what he wants.
This whole question about tariffs on iPhones and the markets up because Trump made an exemption for iPhones and other Chinese-made electronics.
But it's not that clear.
Trump says nobody's getting off the hook and there's some kind of tariffs and other kinds of tariffs and there's no exemption.
Basically, it's completely impossible to understand.
So I'm not even going to try to explain it to you, because it looks like it's a moving target, and who knows?
It's complicated.
I have no idea what's happening with iPhones.
According to PJ Media, Matt Morgolis is writing, that Kash Patel has released a massive trove of crossfire hurricane documents.
Now, that was the operation that created the Russia collusion hoax.
One of the new things coming out of it, I don't know how much will come out of it, is that one of the main sources for the belief that Trump was having some kind of communication with Russia,
some collusion, was this guy Halpern.
What was his name?
I forget his first name, but Halpern.
So this was a British guy.
Who claimed that General Flynn had left a 2014 foreign meeting alone with a Russian scholar named Svetlana or something when he was a three-star general leading the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Now, apparently, that was just made up.
And when I think it was the FBI realized it was just made up, what did they do?
Totally low credibility and their source is not reliable.
What did they do?
What did they do when I found out Christopher Steele wasn't reliable?
They used it anyway.
So they very clearly knew that they were putting together a whole bunch of bullshit and they just did it anyway.
So it's just what you think it was.
It was an op and it was completely illegal.
And every one of the people involved should go to jail, but probably none will.
Well, I was wondering how popular it was that Trump is dismantling the Department of Education.
But according to Breitbart's Catherine Hamilton, she's writing about this, Rasmussen had a poll that 51% of likely U.S. voters think it's a good idea.
So Trump, once again, is on the side of...
Most Americans.
Slightly. Just over 50%.
But it's still a majority.
So he's doing a hell of a job of being on the right side of things, at least in terms of the majority of the country.
This is fun.
There's a newly appointed U.S. attorney that handles the L.A. area.
And he's going to look into where all the money went that was supposed to go to helping the homeless.
You know, the part where it was millions and millions of dollars and there was just nothing happened?
What do you think he's going to find?
I'll tell you, my view on the cities is that they're all criminal organizations.
You can't really expect to have all these elected officials whose job it is to decide who gets the contracts for the millions of dollars that are flowing through.
You can't expect that not to be corrupt.
It's designed so you're just begging for it.
Of course they're corrupt.
Every time.
Probably every city.
Doesn't matter, red or blue.
Because you put people in that position and they're going to get a lot of offers.
And some of them are going to look irresistible.
So yeah, I assume that all the cities are basically criminal organizations.
Frank Luntz had an amusing Survey.
The first question was, America would be better off if more people worked in manufacturing.
So Americans were asked, you know, America would be better off if more people worked in manufacturing.
80% agreed.
80% said it'd be good if more Americans were in manufacturing.
But then he said, I would be better off if I worked in a factory.
And it turns out that 73% disagree.
So this is something I've been observing for a while.
We Americans think that other Americans should work in factories and that they'd be so happy.
Do you know anybody who's ever worked in a factory?
Were they delighted?
My mother used to work in a factory in upstate New York.
She was getting the money together to pay for college for the kids.
And it was a, I think it was minimum wage.
And her job was to wind copper wire around the coils of speakers.
So it was a company that made stereo speakers.
And so for eight hours a day, she would just wind wire around an object.
Do you think she loved it for a minimum?
I think it was actually a minimum wage.
She didn't love it.
No, she didn't love it at all.
But she did it so that her kids could go to college.
She was awesome that way.
Fareed Zakaria said something that sounds like it came from me.
So you decide.
Have you ever heard me say this?
He said that the upcoming negotiations over tariffs will inevitably result in an orgy of corruption.
No, that's not what I said.
But he gives a reason.
He says the reason is it will create a lot of complexity because tariffs are complex and that whenever you introduce complexity, you almost always introduce the opportunity for cronyism and fraud.
Right. This is exactly what I've been saying.
Wherever you see complexity and there's money involved, Somebody's stealing.
Complexity is where you hide all the bad stuff.
So yes, we should be worrying about this.
This is actually a good point.
The more complicated our trade deals are, the more likely somebody's skimming because it would be harder to find.
So I think he's right on on this, and it's something that we need to think about.
Now, in a perfect world, The end of the tariff negotiations would be no tariffs and everything would be simplified.
But in the short run, it's definitely not going to be simplified because, you know, it's getting fun.
So China's President Xi said that no one wins in a trade war.
So he was off in Vietnam trying to do a deal.
And what do you think of that?
No one wins in a trade war.
Now, the problem with that is that I kind of agree that no one wins in a trade war.
But the problem is that we're calling it a trade war.
It's not a trade war.
It's an attempt to have fair trade.
So we should call it an attempt to have fair trade, not a trade war.
Because then President Xi has to explain why no one wins with fair trade.
You know, when he says no one wins in a trade war, he sounds a little bit like a burglar.
Who's mad that you started locking your door?
No, I've been burglarizing you for 20 years, and that's worked out great so far.
So when you lock your door, nobody wins.
Yes, somebody wins.
The person who locked their door.
It's not like things were great before the trade war.
So it's, yeah, don't call it a trade war.
Call it a trade fairness.
A trade negotiation.
Nobody wins in a trade negotiation?
Nope. Can't say it.
Apparently, China suspended exports of some rare earth minerals and magnets to the U.S. And I don't know how important those specific ones were.
Maybe that's just like a warning shot to tell us they can do it.
But I was looking at the Amuse account, and Amuse had some estimates.
I'm not sure the source of them, but the estimate is that it would only cost, only, you know, I act like this is only, $10 to $15 billion to replace America's dependence on rare earth minerals, but it would also take 7 to 10 years.
Yikes. 7 to 10 years.
The big problem is processing, not access.
So finding the rare earth minerals, not so hard.
They're not that rare.
But refining them is something that China is doing almost all the refining of that.
Now, I ask Grok, are there any rare earth materials that only China is refining and that nowhere else in the world can you even get them?
And the answer is...
Probably everything that China makes is made at least in small amounts in other places.
For example, Japan does some, Australia does some, you know, countries that we trade with.
Now, if it took seven to ten years to build this capability in America, how long would it take the countries that are already doing the refining to increase their production?
Could you go to Japan and say, all right, you're already doing a tiny bit of refining, so you know how to do it, you know machines, you know how to train people.
What if we do a deal with you where we'll give you a billion dollars to increase your production, and that'll get paid back by lower prices on rare earth minerals or something.
So I feel like there might be some way to...
Incentivize our trading partners that we like, that are safe, to ramp up.
Because it's got to be easier to ramp up than to start from zero, especially if you're doing it in the U.S. with all of our regulations.
And then I say to myself, is there anybody in the United States who could take a job that would normally take seven to ten years and figure out how to do it in three?
Elon Musk.
I hate how many jobs are only something he can do, but there you are again.
There's another example.
We can only think of one person in the entire country who could take that seven to ten years and turn it into something manageable, you know, two or three.
I don't think he wants to take that job, but...
There's only one person who could do it.
Anyway, we'll see where that goes.
So slowly but ramping up quickly is, according to the New York Post, America is making a huge, huge bunch of energy about nuclear energy.
So there's a whole bunch happening, such as...
Over 200 bills have already been introduced to support or subsidized nuclear energy.
25 states passed legislation to support advanced nuclear energy.
So pretty much everywhere realizes that they're going to need a lot more electricity.
Now, a lot of it is because of AI.
So nuclear now is looking like the thing.
And most of the interest is in these SMRs.
Small modular reactors.
So they'd be about a third the size of a big factory or a big nuclear plant.
But since the big ones have been built, from the time, I don't know how long it is, but from the time the first big nuclear facility has been built, there are all kinds of safety procedures and things that have been built into these new ones.
So it'd be a lot easier to build the small ones.
As needed and put them wherever you want.
So nuclear, definitely happening, happening fast.
But what about this?
According to NoRidge, there's a new chip that could cut energy use by 99% for AI.
So specifically, they're looking at AI and its massive energy needs.
And they have a chip that uses light As it's a major transmission part within the chip.
And they say they've got a major breakthrough.
They've created a new kind of AI hardware that uses light instead of electricity.
And that alone would reduce the electrical load by 99%.
Now, people who know how the real world work looked at this story and said, eh, that's not going to be so easy.
So going from a laboratory idea that works in a lab to actually building chips, not easy.
But this is part of my prediction.
My prediction is that the prediction of how much energy we'll need for the next 20 years is probably way off because there are going to be a number of people who try to figure out A low-cost, low-energy way to do the things that right now are high-energy.
So I think we'll be okay.
This fits within the Adam's Law of slow-moving disasters.
We don't have enough energy.
There's no way we'll...
But we have time.
Not a lot of time, but I think everybody knows it's a problem and a lot of people are working on it.
So I think lots more low-energy AI stuff is coming, I think.
Well, you might not know, but the Washington Examiner knows that there are some Republicans who are not happy at all with the budget process that the Trump administration and other Republicans are trying to push through because it does not meaningfully cut the budget to the point where we could survive.
So, I'm totally on board with the The Hawks.
Because I think Doge didn't give us anything close to the savings that we needed.
And I think Trump basically took the Doge savings and put it into the military.
Exactly what I was worried was going to happen.
So it's not really even the savings.
All they did was move the money somewhere else.
So if I were Elon Musk, I can't even tell you how mad I would be.
That I put that much work in it, and I sacrificed my stock price and possibly my company, and even risked my life for something that, in the end, I'm not sure it makes any difference.
Unless you think that increase in the military spending was all worth it.
But one possibility that the budget hawks, the Republicans have, is they'd like to get some kind of a review panel.
Made up of White House officials and lawmakers to look at every line item and make decisions on a line-by-line basis.
Now, that would be sort of like a poor man's doge.
You know, it would be ordinary people instead of geniuses.
But we need to try something.
What we can't do is just keep passing these stupid budgets.
This is complete doom.
I'm not sure if the public has really processed that we're heading off a cliff.
Maybe we use that too much.
Maybe we're always talking about, oh, there's going to be a nuclear war, the drones are going to kill us.
Maybe everything sounds like an emergency, the chaos.
The chaos is going to kill us.
So it's hard to get people serious about the budget, but the budget needs a major haircut.
Or we will not survive as a country.
And it needs to happen pretty quickly.
So I don't see anything that's going to make it happen.
Because I think the budget hawks don't have enough power.
But we'll see.
I'm on their side.
Well, according to Just the News, there was a Wisconsin teen who murdered his parents to come up with the finances to try to assassinate President Trump and overthrow the government.
I'm going to say that's not the best plan, but he did kill his parents and he did get arrested.
So, not the best plan, really.
George Institute of Technology has a really cool kind of a technology.
So, they figured out how to put a little sensor for your brain that's so tiny.
That it kind of slips in where a hair follicle would slip and basically is almost invisible.
So if you had hair, it'd be invisible.
The hair would cover it up.
So it fits in the minuscule spaces between hair follicles and just slightly under the skin.
Now, of course, it's not fully refined, but this would give a brain-computer interface so that you didn't have to walk around looking like a cyborg.
I don't know what is the upper limit of how good this could be, but it's kind of exciting.
Doesn't it seem like that would be kind of exciting?
How many of you would get a brain interface if you could?
If nobody could see it and it was easy to do, would you do it?
Well, what if you were a paraplegic and they helped you walk or helped you see or something like that?
But do you think you would do it just to control your computer?
I feel like I would not want to until I saw all the people were doing it and were doing cool things.
They just, like, look at something and something happens.
I think I would get jealous right away.
It's like, oh, man, you've got that superpower?
So I think I'd want that.
Well, in the funniest story of the day, Representative Jack Kimball apologized to the public today because, as he said, I'll just read his post the next, I wanted to make a quick apology.
Last night, I referred to President Bukele of El Salvador as President Bukaki.
This was the fault of Spellcheck and not me.
When you type a word a lot, spellcheck will start to change words that are close to it.
I will be complaining to Apple.
I'd like to give some advice to the men.
Now, this is just for the men.
If your wife or your girlfriend asks you what that word means, say you don't know.
Say, I don't even understand this story, honey.
What's this Bukkake thing?
I've never heard of it.
You don't want to apologize for that publicly.
And I do have my questions about why one person would have Bukele turned into Bukkake.
Doesn't your spell check...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't your spell check...
Isn't it biased toward words you've used before?
Am I wrong about that?
Tell me in the comments.
Because I think if you'd never used that word, your phone would never recommend it.
Doesn't it mean that at some point, and that's just a question, at some point, isn't he confessing that he's written that actual Bukkake word?
Yeah, it learns, right?
So, yeah.
So, good luck, Representative Jack Kimball.
Good luck at all of that.
All right.
That's all I got for today.
Stocks are up.
Everything's looking good.
Remember to read the Dilbert comic if you subscribe.
You'll see Dilbert's having trouble with China stealing his IP.
And he's moving his production to Elbonia.
Doesn't go well.
All right.
Yeah, we could test that on our own phones, but I don't recommend it.
All right, I'm going to say a few words privately to the people and locals, my beloved subscribers.
And the rest of you I'll see tomorrow, same time, same place.
