God's Debris: The Complete Works, Amazon https://tinyurl.com/GodsDebrisCompleteWorks
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com
Content:
Politics, President Biden's Health, Biden 25th Amendment, VP Harris, Mike Cernovich, Media Praises Kamala Harris, LLM Democrats, Trump Harris Debate, VP Harris Staff, President Trump, Anti-Trump Talking Points, E. Jean Carroll Trial, Eric Holder, Kimberly Cheatle, National Debt Crisis, Gen 4 Nuclear Reactors, Abortion Alternative, Anti-Loneliness Strategy, Scott Adams
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
---
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support
And if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or mug or a glass of Tancred, Chalice of Stein, a Kenton sugar flask, a vessel of any kind.
Fill it with your favorite liquid.
I like coffee.
Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine in the thing that makes everything better.
It's called the simultaneous sip.
It happens now.
Go.
Delightful.
Delightful.
Well, are you ready for a two whiteboard extravaganza?
The show of shows.
Something that you've never seen before.
I guarantee you that this show will have at least a few surprises.
Now, some of you know what I mean.
Some of you don't.
But we'll find out how this goes.
Story number one.
Trump's going to appeal his $454 million New York civil fraud case thing.
And his lawyers are going to say, this is the Letitia James one where he allegedly did something with no... Is this one where he overvalued some property and there were no victims and the bankers said, yeah, we'd love to do business with him again.
And for that, he owed half a billion dollars.
So, you know, the justice system.
So his lawyers are going to say, there were no victims and no losses.
And if appellant's conduct constituted fraud, under whatever statute, then that word has no meaning, etc.
I don't know how this really works.
I'm not sure how many appeals opportunities you would have for this case.
But doesn't it have to get out in New York before he has a chance?
I mean, the whole problem is that if you try Trump in New York, he's going to get convicted of anything.
You can convict Trump of murdering JFK.
It wouldn't matter if there was any evidence.
I don't think.
I think just New York jury is all it would take.
So basically, isn't the whole game to get it to some higher court where it's at in New York, right?
I don't know.
Well, if it delays things, or at least delays him paying that money, but I suppose there might be some interest if he loses.
I'm sure he's got some advantage in this.
And at the very least, he can say it's appealed.
All right, we're gonna have to talk about Biden's health.
There are many so far unsubstantiated stories.
You're going to have to tell me in the comments if anything changes dramatically while I'm talking.
Specifically about Biden's health.
So if you see, if you hear anything, just break into the comments and I'll, I'll let you know.
But, uh, the reports that are starting to sound credible, Cause it's coming from multiple independent journalists.
It's coming from multiple sources for each of them.
And it seems to be something like this, that when you believed that Biden got COVID in Las Vegas, that what might've happened is something worse than COVID and something that looked like a major stroke, which caused the Las Vegas medical and police people to organize quickly, you know, on command.
And they were going to take Biden to John Hopkins Hospital.
And then there was a change to taking him to Air Force One.
And now the story is, and I would say the credibility on this is, I don't know, 50 to 80%.
It feels like to me, I don't think this is 100% sure what's happening.
But, The idea was that it wasn't necessarily a full stroke.
There's something that looks like a full stroke.
There's a lesser condition.
Something called a transient ischemic.
Ischemic?
I love saying words I've never said before out loud.
Ischemic?
Ischemic?
I-S-C-H-E-M-I-C.
I'm going to say ischemic.
That feels right.
So, if you have one of those, apparently it can look like a stroke, but if it resolves itself in a few minutes, it's more obviously this, you know, transient thing.
So, again, we don't know if any of this is true.
This is just based on reporting that comes from sources I take seriously.
But we don't quite know.
And then the idea would be whether or not he ever had any COVID.
We don't know.
I mean, that might have been a cover story.
Maybe not.
And then it just keeps getting better.
I don't know how they can make this story seem any sketchier.
I mean, everything about Biden and everything about the assassination attempt on Trump Have the same weird quality where every time you learn something, it raises a bigger question.
Like, I'm just going to make this one up, but this is how it feels.
It's like, uh, and, uh, and we found out, you know, the name of the, uh, the sniper that took the shot and killed him.
And you're like, oh, wow.
Great.
Finally, we're getting some answers.
What's his name?
Uh, Elvis Presley.
Wait, what?
You mean the real Elvis?
The actual Elvis?
Is Elvis's live?
How's he?
And then you have to, like, wait till tomorrow.
And there's just always some answer that makes you go, what?
So my favorite one so far is that Biden called in to the Wilmington, Delaware campaign headquarters while Kamala Harris was there.
And they put him on the speakerphone and he gives a little talk, sounding quite good.
Sounding quite healthy.
And, uh, you know, not he slurred his words a little bit, but, you know, sort of baseline, you know, nothing special.
Um, and, uh, what did people say?
Did people say, Oh, thank you.
Thank you for confirming that he's alive and well, and that he's very much behind, uh, Kamala Harris rising to power.
So all of your questions are answered, right?
What?
What, that didn't answer all your questions?
People, you heard him with your own ears.
He was perfectly cogent.
If I were to describe it, sharp as a tack.
Sharp as a tack.
Healthy, for sure.
I mean, he's on the mend.
His doctor said so the other day.
He's like way better.
His symptoms are, we don't even remember the symptoms now.
So long ago, he's so much better.
Yeah.
He's doing a little, uh, he's doing some yoga and he's riding his bike.
We can't show you pictures.
No, no, no pictures.
Now you have questions about this?
Oh, oh, oh, you're, you're wondering why in the age of, Video, a president of the United States who probably has access to Wi-Fi.
Why?
Why would he make a phone call?
Knowing that everybody would listen to the phone call and say something like, why aren't you on video?
Shouldn't there be at least a still photo?
Now, I get that you don't want to get out of your pajamas.
But they couldn't comb your hair and put a shirt on you and put you up behind a desk?
You know, just for a still photo?
Nothing?
And so, they managed to make it even worse, because here's the question we're left with.
Was that really him?
Yeah, the first thing I thought was, is this AI?
Or, you know, some kind of pre-recorded AI thing?
You know, where I can imagine somebody had a bunch of sentences, And then they had a button to push, and they were all sort of generic responses.
And if you listen to it, everything Biden says could have been said as a response to almost anything.
So he does his, you know, little opening thing where he just talks like Joe Biden for a while.
So that doesn't require any interaction.
But then there is a part where Kamala later says, are you still there, Joe?
And then he comes in with, I don't remember if I wrote it down, but he just had some generic responses like, I'm always behind you, kid.
And I'm thinking, that wasn't exactly what you'd expect in response to that.
And then there was another one that was like, sort of a little bit generic.
And I thought to myself, did they actually plan and execute a recorded, maybe AI, maybe something else, but a recorded piece, which they stitched together to make it look like it was interacting?
Now, it did not sound like an AI voice to me.
Specifically, because at one point there was some throat clearing, and you kind of think they wouldn't do the throat clearing, or at least they wouldn't make it sound completely believable.
And, you know, he sort of slurred some words, and I thought, well, would you do that if you were making a fake and you wanted it to sound healthy?
Would you have any slurred words?
And I thought, maybe.
You might.
And then I thought, I don't think there's any commercial version of AI that could make a voice that good.
You can still tell the AIs, but if there is a version where nobody can tell the difference, you wouldn't know about it yet, would you?
And don't you think that our CIA, for example, would have had to, for national security, Already created close ties with all the major AI developers in the US, at least.
And don't you think that they've already said to them, here's the deal.
We will let you operate.
In other words, we won't be a problem.
But if you come up with anything that has genuine military importance, you tell us and we'll decide what to do with it.
One of those things would be perfect AI voice I'm copying.
Because at the moment you can still kind of pick it out.
What if it were perfect?
Like what we heard.
The Biden recorded sounded to me perfectly like his voice.
Like it would be hard for me to imagine it was AI.
But Do you think that the best AI company hasn't made a perfect one yet?
Or do you think that you couldn't take additional samples and just keep working on it until it was perfect?
Or maybe take a sound engineer who gets it almost perfect and then tweaks out some pauses and stuff until it is perfect?
If you were a state actor?
So, we are left with the possibility that you cannot rule out That he was not the voice that we heard.
It can't be ruled out.
Now, I can't tell you what the odds are.
Is it over 50%?
Probably not.
I wouldn't put it over 50%.
But we're living in a world of zero trust.
And so if you think that you're sure that was a real voice, I don't know.
I'd wait.
So there are lots of questions to be answered.
Um, apparently Biden's scheduled for the return today.
Has anybody seen video that you know is him?
Yeah.
So I will remind you that, uh, it's only citizens who are, uh, presumed, uh, innocent.
The government is presumed guilty.
If they do something that looks this sketchy, you have to say, I think you're guilty.
You're going to have to show me some video.
Your government has an obligation to prove itself and be transparent all the time.
When they're not transparent, your most reasonable explanation for why, given that being transparent would be to their advantage if they didn't have anything to hide.
So a non-transparency has to be assumed as guilt, as a working assumption.
You know, not pick up your gun and send up to jail guilt, but as a working assumption you should assume they're guilty.
That's the most reasonable way to play the odds.
All right, so now the New York Post and others reported that Biden was threatened with the 25th Amendment.
Now, do you think that's the right way to phrase that?
Because, you know, you could tell this Biden story as a coup, and it would fit every definition of it.
And I wouldn't disagree with you.
It does look like a coup.
It looks like non-elected people are deciding who runs, and it could get worse.
But, if he is genuinely degraded, you know, you can say it's bad that we got to this point, but once you get to this point, is it really blackmail or threatening to say you're going to do a 25th Amendment?
Or is that more just like information?
Because if you're literally going to do the 25th Amendment because you just don't have any choice, he's just that gone, would you blame anybody for saying to him, look, we just have to be honest.
We have to do the 25th Amendment if you don't quit.
Is that a threat?
I think that's a judgment call, isn't it?
So you could tell this story as people who may have done terrible things in hiding his condition up to this point, may do terrible things in the future, may be terrible people.
But when you get to that point when he is legitimately, you know, done, I don't know that that's a threat.
That's just sort of like trying to explain to him what the situation is.
So, but we don't know what kind of shape he's in.
We'll find out.
The most suspicious thing is that Kamala seems to have wrapped up the nomination in a very non-democratic way.
She quite cleverly branded her potential opponents as vice president picks, and she's already hired somebody to vet her vice president picks for the things she has not been nominated for.
Now, if that sounds to you like there's any possibility someone else is going to get the nomination, I think you'd be wrong.
Because she's already pulled in a gazillion dollars of extra funding, like some record that we can barely believe.
As in, we do barely believe it.
Meaning there might be some money laundering or other shenanigans involved because it's so much so fast.
It's just hard to believe.
So now we know that the Democrats rigged the primary with Bernie Sanders, you know, back in Hillary's time.
We know that Biden's primary this year was rigged in the sense that nobody else could run against him.
And now this one seems to be rigged again, because even though Obama said, hey, there should be some speedy little mini primary, But other people, like Jen Psaki, even spoke of it as nothing but a way to coronate the obvious choice, Kamala.
And I think other people said, nobody's going to take the job of jumping over the DEI hire, if I can be crude about it, because Kamala's race and gender are largely why she is in the job and largely why she can't be replaced.
So it looks like she's clinched it and whatever they do from now on is just cover story.
Would you agree that that's an accurate characterization?
Whatever happens from now on is just a cover story.
Yeah.
So they might do some kind of mini primary.
You know what?
Here's what I think is the most likely outcome.
The DNC will say, all right, You have two days to register to be a candidate against Kamala Harris.
And if you do, we'll have a series of debates, and then the delegates will get to vote.
And then you know what will happen?
Two days will go by, and nobody will register.
And if anybody tried, they'd say, no, you don't want to register.
Yeah, I was actually thinking, I was thinking maybe I will.
No, no, you don't want to register.
No, I'm sure I do.
I thought I'd give it a run.
No, you don't.
No, you don't want to register.
So that would be one way to play it.
Let's see.
Let's see if we understand what the system looks like.
Now, one of the things that is fascinating about this past year is that with the help of smart people who help us understand what the system looks like, I'm talking about your Glenn Greenwald's, your Michael Schellenberger's, your Mike Ben's, your Mike Cernovich's, your Jack Posabeck's, your Tucker Carlson's.
You're starting to see a picture of the machine.
And I don't know if we see it clearly, but let me tell you what it looks like.
So, that's all I can say for sure, is that this is what it looks like.
Is it real?
I don't know.
Let's go to the whiteboard.
If we can get this lighting just right, this will be amazing.
All right, I have to angle it a little bit because of my lighting issues.
But here's what it looks like.
It looks like there's some group of people in power, we don't know exactly who, but almost certainly it would include intelligence people.
Now, not necessarily all of them employed by some intelligence agency, might be ex-members who are still affiliated, but some group of people who have enough power that they can blackmail a handful of billionaires who are the primary funders of any candidate.
Now, have you noticed that a lot of the people who are the biggest billionaire donors, especially on the Democrat side, appear to you suspiciously like the most blackmailable people you could ever think of in your life?
Now, I'm not making a specific accusation.
I'm just saying, huh, if I were to try to pick people that I knew a little bit about, but not a lot about, and it was my job to guess which of them would be more likely to be blackmailable, I might end up luckily picking some of the people who are the biggest donors at the moment.
And I ask myself, why aren't other billionaires giant donors as well?
Let's say, I'll just take one example.
Sam Bankman Freed, right?
So I could use him because he's convicted.
Do you think that there was ever anybody in any kind of intelligence or power position Who knew exactly how vulnerable he was?
Maybe.
Maybe they did.
Who knows?
It's just suspiciously, it looks like billionaires either can be blackmailed for something they may have done in their personal life, but I'm not sure you'd call this blackmail, but you would assume that anybody who has a gigantic international business would need some people who also have giant power.
To either not get in their way, or help some things get out of their way.
So at some point, certain types of billionaires, I think it depends on what kind of business you're in, they really need people in important positions to say yes, and it could mean billions of dollars for them.
In other words, they might get a gigantic multi-billion dollar contract if they give Ten to a hundred million dollars a year to the candidate of the top people's choice.
Now, am I saying this is the way it works?
I don't know.
I'm saying this is the way it looks like it works.
I'm saying that the gears of the machine seem to have revealed themselves in this latest situation.
Because we saw that when I say, and friends, I would include Pelosi as an friend, and Obama, Hillary Clinton.
So they would be the in-friends group.
Now, they don't always agree with each other on everything, probably.
But collectively, they would be the ones that would be working with the people who almost certainly blackmail on the people who are the biggest donors, in my opinion.
And they get to select the candidate, as we just watched them do with Kamala Harris, because they said, Joe Biden, you'll never get any more money.
And that was the end of it.
So you don't have to wonder who's in charge.
The big donors just showed you that the machinery revealed itself.
And then, of course, the media belongs to the Democrats, so it can sell pretty much anything.
And if that model isn't good enough, if having the top secret people in power blackmail big donors to choose the candidate that they want, meaning the top people want, having the media sell it, if that's not enough, They have a second method.
They can rig the election.
I'll give you one.
And by the way, everything I'm saying here is not to be construed as a fact.
I'm telling you what it looks like.
Is that clear?
I'm just saying this is what it looks like.
So Mike Cernovich was recently on a talker show.
And I haven't watched it all, but I did see this one quote.
So this is Mike Cernovich explaining one of the potential risks of the upcoming election.
So Mike Cernovich.
Nobody can know.
Tucker asked him what's going to happen in the election.
And Mike says, nobody can know because the Democrats have all these tricks up their sleeves that people aren't prepared for.
For example, What they're doing now with motor voter registration is they're registering illegal immigrants who come into the country and they'll just harvest those ballots.
It's really easy to do.
We have 10 or 11 million people in it over the past couple years in the Biden administration.
You register them all to vote.
It doesn't matter because they're not going to vote.
So there's no voter prosecution.
Oh, I didn't think about that.
So you don't have to worry about the voters getting in trouble, because they're not actually going to vote.
So there's no voter prosecution, and there won't be any record of voter fraud by them.
But you have all these names now.
In a swing state, remember the elections are decided not by popular vote, it's decided by 50 to 100,000 votes in three to four states.
So, and then he talks through how all you need is small numbers to tip the election.
Now, is that accurate?
I don't know.
I don't know.
But I'll tell you what's obvious.
What's obvious is, If the people at the top actually exist, if this is a real concept, if they haven't figured out how to rig our election yet, well, it's just a matter of time.
It means they're not trying hard enough.
Because these would be the people who had all the skills and all the access and all the capability.
So if they didn't rig the election, but they were willing to do all this, how does that make sense?
So if you accept that the center part is reality, and again, I'm not saying it is.
I'm saying it's just what it looks like.
If you accept that they would blackmail people to get the candidates they want and they're really the power, then it also makes sense since they have all the tools they would need.
It would be trivial, actually.
And we still don't understand why there are electronic voting machines at all.
Like, nobody can figure out, okay, it doesn't seem to be cheaper.
It doesn't seem to be more credible to the public.
It doesn't seem to be faster.
It doesn't seem to be less maintenance.
So there might be a reason that I'm not aware of, but I've been asking for years and nobody's ever offered even an explanation.
Never.
Not once.
Nobody has ever said, Scott, you idiot.
Let me explain how this works.
You have to have the machines because, and then they tell me why, Never happened.
Not even once.
Anyway, so if you imagine that the center part is obvious and we've seen it in action this week, then it seems equally obvious that they would have the option for rigging an election, whether it was ours or anybody else they got their mitts into.
And then it also makes sense if you believe that JFK was assassinated by members of the intelligence people.
That it would be the same capabilities, same people, same mindset, and that they would have the option to try to take out a candidate.
So what we witnessed was something that looks exactly like this picture.
Meaning that, is it true?
Is that an accurate picture of what's happening in the world?
I don't know.
I mean, I genuinely don't know.
But if I had to make a bet, you know, bet your life, I think I'd be leaning toward betting my life that this is closer than whatever you were trained to believe.
I'm going to make a little diversion right now, just for fun.
Robert Cialdini, who wrote the book Influence, talks about a study Where you could get people to change their opinions by asking them to write down the opposite argument from their opinion.
And then they would check back with them in a year, and they found out that, statistically, there were a lot of them who had changed their opinion.
Even though they had received no new information, they had just been forced to write their opinion.
And what that shows is that making somebody create a part of their brain, which is really a physical structure based on your experience, the physical brain changes.
That's how you can remember anything.
There's something physically that's different.
So if you make somebody write an essay that's the opposite of their opinion, it starts taking up more real estate in their brain than their original opinion.
And it turns out that we're very much like AI.
We're large language models.
So whatever pattern is most dominant in your brain, you think is your opinion.
I hate to tell you, this is the hypnotist's point of view.
You think it's your opinion because it's the thing you thought about the most and has the most structure in your brain.
It's not your opinion.
It's just the thing that took up the most space in your brain.
It's just, it's like a machine.
If you have more gears of the machine in one direction, that's where you are.
And then you put this rationalization on top of it that you change your mind for reasons.
No, it wasn't reasons.
Did you know that in the OJ trial, when they said, if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit?
And you said to yourself, wow, that's clever.
And then experts later, like me, said, you know, it's been proven that rhymes are more persuasive.
And you say to yourself, oh, rhymes are more persuasive.
But I'm here to tell you that the reason it's more persuasive is that it takes up more space in your brain.
In other words, the rhyme makes you repeat it.
Makes you remember it.
It hardens it into a physical structure in your brain.
So the next time you get asked, do you think O.J.
was guilty?
There's a structure in your brain that irrationally has been formed by that rhyme because it repeated.
And now you think he might be a benefit of a doubt.
He might be actually innocent because that glove didn't fit and it rhymed and it took up space.
So whatever you do to take up space in somebody's head, Convince them.
Did you know that you can also persuade somebody by making them repeat something?
Even if they don't believe it, so if you say I would like you every day to repeat ten times I'm good at playing golf Probably it would make you convinced you were going to play in golf eventually even if your golf game didn't improve You would come back thinking you know The score is still the same
But I've had so much improvement with my strokes that really, and you would say something ridiculous, and it would only be because the repeating it every day created a structure in your brain that took up a lot of space.
Once you understand that humans and large language models are the same, you will unleash a huge amount of ability to understand your environment.
Because you'll understand why people are doing what they do.
It's what they've heard the most.
Now, you know those people at the top of that whiteboard?
Do you know what else they'd like you to do?
They'd like your children to stand up and look at the flag, and put their hand on their heart, and pledge allegiance to the country.
Do you know why?
Because they're building a structure in the child's head so that their rational thinking will not be able to overcome the embedded pattern that they are going to give their lives for the country.
Are they giving their lives for the country?
In a way.
But they're really giving their lives to the hypnotizers.
The people in charge have been overtly, consciously hypnotizing the public Since the beginning of the Republic, with different methods.
Where you see repetition, such as standing for the National Anthem, that's the hypnosis.
And where you see what you call the Marxists and the people trying to destroy the country, where you see them taking down the past and dismantling history, These people were slave owners, stop talking about them, take them off your money, etc.
All of the founders are part of that structure that got put into your head when you were little, that made you loyal to your country.
And so as those structures are dismantled, and now when I think of George Washington, do you know what the first thing I think of is?
Slave owner.
That's the truth.
If you said to me, hey, George Washington, what's your first thought?
I would actually think slave owner first.
I definitely didn't think that when I was a kid, even though I knew it.
I mean, I knew it as a kid, but I didn't think of it first.
So that's how the large language model that is your physical brain gets programmed.
It's just whatever they put in there the most.
And they own, they own the news.
So the reason that the people on top have to own the news, it's not optional.
Is that the only way to control the citizens is by increasing the frequency of certain messages.
And that's the world you live in.
And that's just one side of the whiteboard.
It's getting wilder.
All right, if you watch Morning Joe, you saw that Micah, is that her name?
Micah Brozinski?
Micah Brozinski.
She's the wife of that guy, John.
Morning, John.
Anyway, Micah says that when you pronounce Kamala Harris's name wrong, you're a racist.
So, I don't know.
I think she's right.
I think Micah Brozinski.
I think she's got a point there.
That's super racist when you say somebody's name wrong.
Um, anyway, moving on, uh, the Harris versus Trump polls.
Uh, apparently Trump has a 2.5% lead based on 72 polls, according to the Hill.
Now, uh, I think the polls are largely garbage at the moment because do you know what's about to kick in?
Chug, chug, chug, chug, chug, chug, chug.
Let's go back to the whiteboard.
The people who picked Kamala Harris controlled the media.
You saw the media just flip and lockstep to tell you that Kamala Harris was so awesome, and it's amazing you hadn't noticed till now.
There must have been probably some white guy, maybe Joe Biden, who was keeping her genius under a bushel.
She might be the most capable person we've seen in, I don't know, generations.
And by the way, Trump's way too old.
Are you kidding me?
Would you even consider putting an old man into that office?
What are you talking about, people?
And they will say that stuff.
Until 49% of the country thinks it's true, and they've really seen the truth there.
Because Democrats are largely large language models, and all they need is repetition, and they will become whatever they need to become.
I think that Trump's confidence in debating Kamala Harris might be for show.
You know, confidence is a good thing to show.
But I don't think that Trump can beat Kamala Harris in a debate.
I guess I'll just say it directly.
I don't believe that Trump can beat Kamala Harris in a debate.
Because remember, a debate is not about who did the best by some objective standard.
Who won the debate Will be what these people say, the media.
So if the media says, well, that was a, that was total destruction.
That Kabbalah Harris, I, we, you know, we told you, we told you she was always a genius and you just hadn't seen it till now.
But now she tore apart Trump.
She made him look like a fool.
And if I don't mind saying, his age was showing.
He seemed a little chaotic.
He's got a lot of chaos.
Um, seemed racist.
And, uh, I think he slightly mispronounced her name once.
And, you know, if you happen to be the person who allegedly called, you know, Nazis, fine people, and you said Kamala, just not exactly the right way, that's obviously racist.
And she won that debate.
Now you might say to yourself, Scott, That's not true, because both sides knew that Biden lost the debate.
That was the most special case in the world.
When it's so bad that it would just be laughably ridiculous to say that Biden won when he could barely function, that's not what we're looking at.
We're looking at a woman who will reliably remember the pushback on each topic.
She will do her homework.
And she will know that when he says on this topic, she doesn't even have to address it directly.
She can just say the thing she was going to say on that topic.
She'll say it with emotion that the news will say was amazing and they will declare her the winner.
Now you might say to me, but Scott Fox News is going to say Trump won.
Of course, of course they will.
And I might even say that myself, but it won't matter.
Because everybody on Fox News was going to vote for Trump anyway.
So no votes gained.
But can you imagine how the entire conversation changes if they say she's not only ready for office now, she just beat an ex-president, one of the best persuaders we've ever seen in a debate.
And that's coming.
What's coming is a knockout story She completely annihilated the best persuader we've seen in generations.
We've never seen anybody with that kind of a performance.
Maybe the best performance we've ever seen.
Possibly the best debate of all time.
Just right there.
And they'll have tears in their eyes.
And they'll say how they love her.
They love her.
I love her.
I love her.
All right.
Have you noticed that Kamala Harris looks like at least two people when she's being her prosecutor self?
As her supporters say, she is awesome and she seems on target.
And by the way, the reason that I originally thought that she would become Trump's biggest competitor back in 2018, I was saying that, is because I'd seen her grilling people in a congressional setting.
And I said to myself, wow, you're pretty good at that.
That was some good grilling.
And then she had the, you know, the DEI check marks.
So I thought, well, if you put the DEI check marks there and she can look that good in public, that's actually a strong package.
I can see why she would go all the way.
So that's why I predicted that she would be the, you know, the big competitor, uh, and it turned out to be Biden instead.
But, You've all seen the videos where she's acting goofy.
It's almost like a different person, isn't it?
It feels like almost a different person.
I'm going to tell you an experience I had where I learned how to identify this.
Some years ago, I had a girlfriend who was a chef.
And she liked to cook for me while I was finishing work before dinner.
And before dinner, we'd have a delightful, you know, time hanging out.
And then I'd do some work.
She'd do some cooking.
And then we'd meet for dinner and she was just an asshole.
And I think, I was talking to you for, you know, two hours before dinner.
And you were just the most delightful person, friendly.
Now everything I say, you're like challenging and throwing it in my face.
And so anyway, the long story is it turned out that she was a guzzling my vodka and my, uh, that I used to have, don't have it anymore, but I used to have in my refrigerator while she was cooking.
So by the time I saw her, she was a different personality.
Now, that's when I learned, and it took a long time to figure out what it was, it was months before I deduced it, but it turns out that when I look at Kamala Harris, that's what I see.
I see two different people, and one of them looks drunk to me.
Now, in her case, I don't think she gets drunk angry, at least what we see is drunk laughing, and drunk, I love my school buses, I think the biggest story is going to be finding out that she has a drinking problem.
You want another hint on that?
one maybe isn't drunk. I think she just likes saying that.
So I think the biggest story is going to be finding out that she has a drinking problem.
You want another hint on that? I'll give you another hint. 92% of Kamala Harris's staff left in her first three years as vice president.
I think I saw a Molly Hemingway post on that.
And that's the highest I've ever heard.
I mean, have you ever heard of anything like that?
And here's my hypothesis.
Oh, and also there was a, there was an interview by Simone Sanders was on that morning show, Morning John.
With Micah Brozinski.
And Micah was asking Simone about what she thought about Kamala Harris.
Now, she worked for Kamala Harris.
Not at the moment, but she used to work for her.
And so you'd expect that, you know, one of the most important boosters of Democrats, you know, somebody who's worked on their campaigns, I think with Bernie Sanders at one point.
And Simone, instead of saying anything about Kamala Harris, she instead talked about how great Biden was and how, you know, selfless it was for him to step down.
Now, it seemed a little obvious to observers that she was avoiding the question.
She used to work for her.
She's a Democrat.
She wants a Democrat to win.
Here's what I think.
I think that The staff got along with Kamala except when she was drunk.
That's what I think.
I think that she may actually be known to the staff as an angry drunk.
And, I'm just speculating, but the hints are all there.
Strong hints.
So, if I were on the team who wanted to beat her in an election, I would be looking for her ex-staffers, and I'll bet you you could find at least one of them who would dump it all.
Because if Simone Sanders wasn't even willing to put in a kind word in the place where you were really, really expected to put in a kind word, I don't think she's alone.
I don't think she's alone.
And if you find out what that's all about, that might be quite important.
All right.
All right, well, here are all the arguments that the Democrats are making about Trump at the moment.
Let's see if you can find what they have in common.
See if you see any pattern here.
So they say Trump's going to steal your democracy.
He's going to implement Project 2025.
That's got all kinds of extreme, extreme things in it.
He's only in it for himself.
He's a cult.
He's a sex offender and he's a felon.
Now, how in the world can Democrats sell those things?
Do you see what's missing?
Does anybody see what's missing?
He's not experienced.
That's not up there, because he's clearly very experienced.
He has an unsuccessful track record.
You'd think that would be up there, if that's their claim.
His policies for the future are bad.
Where's that?
Is there?
Oh, yeah, the age.
The age, that's the funny one.
Now, do you know what to steal their democracy means when they have to give examples?
Here are some examples.
There are a few more that were as dumb as these.
He wants you to be able to own a gun.
That's stealing your democracy.
Do you understand why?
Because if you're allowed to own a gun, then you might use that gun to go take somebody's democracy away, their freedom.
Because you, you know, would rob them or shoot them or something.
So allowing people to do what the Constitution says they should do, have a gun, is one of their examples of stealing democracy.
Do you think the other ones are better than that?
They're not.
They're as dumb as that.
I think one of them is women's reproductive rights.
Trump has already said he doesn't want to do any federal thing about that at all.
He literally wants to be uninvolved in it.
So he's going to steal your democracy by being as consciously and actively uninvolved as he could possibly be, and being opposed to the things that you're worried about.
So that's what they're complaining about?
They don't have anything that he says he will do that they're worried about.
And remember the first time he ran?
They complained about the things he said he would do, like close the border and stuff, and then he did it, and it turned out that was better than not doing it.
So they have to make up these weird little tortured things.
Oh, the other one was discouraging people from voting.
That's how he's stealing your democracy.
Have you yet met that person who got discouraged from voting?
Has anybody met one?
Has the news ever done an interview with somebody who was discouraged from voting because they couldn't get an ID?
There's still not one example in a country of, you know, 350 million people.
Well, voters would be, what, 150?
But they can't find one example in one of the main pillars of stealing your democracy.
All right.
Project 2025.
He's got his own thing that's like Agenda 47, I think.
He says, this is what I'm going to do.
And it's not in that document.
And they're still using it.
Who in the world runs complaining about the thing that somebody says they're not willing to do?
I've never seen that before.
How about he's in it for himself?
I think they might be saying that less after watching Biden hanging on, but did you notice what they all said, all the Democrats said immediately when Biden resigned?
They immediately said, instead of saying he was so selfish that he hung on too long, which is what we all observed, what we all observed is that he was too selfish and he hung on too long.
That's what it looked like.
But as soon as they forced him probably into resigning, they turned it into, oh, he is so selfless.
He's like George Washington giving up power because their attack on Trump was that he's in it for himself.
And they had to change the story about Biden, who looked like he must've been in it for his family or himself or something.
And they had to immediately make sure everybody said the same thing.
What a patriot.
Only somebody like a great founder could do something like that.
The other one that's funny is that Trump supporters are a cult.
Now, do you know how they get away with that?
They just make words mean different things and definitions mean different things than they mean.
So what they mean is he's really popular and people like him a lot.
Now, let me test you, since I think almost all of you are Trump supporters watching this right now.
If Trump told you to murder your Democrat neighbor so that he could take full control, how quickly would you do it?
Would you be all over that?
You'd be grabbing a weapon, slaying the neighbor because your cult leader told you to?
What does it mean to be a cult leader?
What does it mean to be a cult?
People can't simply agree that they like a leader, they like a set of policies, and they're willing to fight for it.
And they turn it into a cult.
To me, it's just another way to insult Trump supporters.
And to imagine that one is a cult is a little crazy.
A little crazy.
Then there's all the sex offenses.
Now that one's pretty sticky because every female who's ever had any passing association with sexual offenses is just going to be triggered by that.
And there's probably no way to change that.
So you got a solid, huge percentage of the female population who is just way too triggered about that.
But if I were Trump, Or let's say a Trump supporter.
People ask me, how can you support somebody who's been convicted, they say, but that's not the right word.
Just 10 out of 12 jurors in the most biased place in the world decided to punish him because they didn't like him, probably.
So certainly the justice system didn't operate where that was a finding.
And Certainly that was political.
So if you know it's lawfare and you know it's political, you're two thirds of the way to understanding why it doesn't bother me.
But here's the final one third of why it doesn't bother me.
Number one, Biden is as credibly accused of things that are as bad.
Now that doesn't make them true.
It just means he's as credibly accused of things that sound as bad.
Now, here's the final one-third, which most of you would not be aware of, and it's because most people who haven't been as canceled as me can't tell you.
Public figures, if they're male, have all been falsely accused of sex offenses.
How many of you knew that?
That important male figures, like the famous ones, the rich and famous ones, they've all been accused of sexual offenses, falsely.
Now, some of them may have done actual sexual offenses, and I'm not defending that, obviously.
I'm saying that it's the most common thing in the world.
How do I know that?
Because I've been accused falsely of sexual offenses.
I think everybody in my position has.
I've told you about the one that comes out every few years.
So there's somebody in Canada who gets off her meds, I think, and calls my business partners, you know, like publishers and syndication companies when I had those, my restaurant, when I owned restaurants, they would call my restaurant and tell a story about me traveling up to Canada, rifling through her computers, breaking into her house, and sexually molesting her.
Now, if you just had some person call you and tell you that story, you'd think, well, I think he did.
And maybe my business partners did, but at least they called me and told me it happened.
I said, Oh, you know, she gets off her meds every three years and says that I've never been to even the part of Canada she lives in.
Now, Have I ever heard of anybody else being falsely accused?
Yes, I can think of two, three, four, four cases off the top of my head in which I know from the woman's side that she falsely accused somebody.
Do you?
How many of you know somebody, a woman, Who has admitted to you, in their own words, not your opinion, their own words, that they have falsely accused somebody of a sexual crime.
It's shockingly high.
Now, is it as high as the number of actual crimes?
I don't know.
I don't know.
But we live in a world where false accusations are so common, but the regular public is not aware of it.
The reason the regular public is not aware of it is that if you're a public figure, the last thing you want to do is say it in public, like I just did, right?
So another benefit of being canceled.
I can say anything I want in public.
So I'm going to tell you what not everybody knows.
It's really, really common.
The higher you go in office, the more common it is to be falsely accused.
You know all that there's some fund for settling these sexual accusations against members of Congress, and a lot of people are saying, we need to see that list, and, you know, who's doing all the settling?
Now, probably, there are some serious and real charges on that list.
But I can tell you with certainty that some of them are not real, and probably just got settled because it was easier.
So if you don't know the percentage of real versus fake, and then this one that comes out of nowhere with a bunch of suspicious elements to it in the justice system itself, I think they had to change the statute of limitations to make it stick, and really sketchy stuff.
Then I find that it's no more believable than Any other accusation against a famous man?
And I say, just because a jury was convinced in New York, that is not persuasive.
A criminal trial, I think I might have been persuaded.
But it wasn't a criminal trial.
It was just, do you think it's more likely it happened?
And then people use their bias.
Because the question of, is it more likely yes than more likely no?
That really brings in your bias.
It's like, well, Look at all the other things I think Trump has done.
Why wouldn't he?
Sounds just like him, right?
So no, he didn't have any chance of getting a fair trial.
So if he did those things, then he should be judged for them.
But I don't think I have any way of knowing.
And so my decision process is that for both Biden, who is also about equally credibly accused, I say, I don't know.
I know that when I hear the accusations, they sound credible.
But I also know that false accusations would sound credible.
So I give Biden a benefit of a doubt.
You've probably heard me not give him a hard time about, you know, similar accusations.
So it's never anything I emphasize because I just have a different view of how often the fake accusations come.
All right.
So, and then of course they're going to say Trump's a felon, but the argument against that is that they made him a felon.
So the reason that he should be elected is to get rid of people who will use lawfare to turn a person into a felon.
That's how I would argue it.
I would say, I am absolutely a felon because of you.
And one of the reasons I'm running is to get rid of an administration that would lawfare somebody like me to keep them out of office.
The fact that I'm a felon is the indictment of the entire broken machine.
Here's how the machine works.
First, you just go through how the system is broken.
Joy Reid called the selection of Kamala, which looks like a done deal, as a Pelosi coup.
So she's actually using that word.
Anyway, I think what happened was that Biden was threatened by the 25th Amendment and the one thing he had to agree to was to select or to endorse somebody who would keep the racial divide going.
Because I've got a feeling that the people at the top don't want you, well the other side of the board, The people at the top don't want you knowing that it's the rich and powerful that are your problem.
They want you to think it's each other.
If you're watching this and you're thinking, what's wrong with these white people or what's wrong with these other people?
Maybe you should ask yourself who wants you to think that way.
If you realize that you're a large language model brain, ask yourself what content has been put into your patterns the most and who did it.
Was it the media that made you think about race all the time?
Why would they do such a thing?
And so you're not thinking about something else all the time, something that would be maybe more directly applicable.
Well, Eric Holder, I guess he's in charge of vetting Kamala Harris' picks.
And his law firm also does a lot of work in DEI audits to make sure big companies comply with DEI.
Let's see.
Eric Holder is doing a selection for Kamala Harris.
And his law firm is deeply into making sure that DEI is functioning in every big organization.
Who is he going to pick?
I think all the white people that were named as potential presidential candidates are probably also thinking they're not going to be vice presidential candidates.
But it might depend entirely upon how it polls.
So it might come down to whatever polls the best wins.
So she might have the option of a white guy in this case.
We'll see.
All right.
Let's talk about Cheadle.
Director Cheadle of the Secret Service was grilled by Congress.
I noticed that Representatives Luna and Mace were the, seemed to take the lead in attacking her, which was smart.
Because, uh, Cheadle's getting this, uh, DEI accusations, you know, that she's a DEI hire.
And I wouldn't say that there's direct evidence of that, but it always has to be your top three, um, suspicion in this case.
Uh, and so having the, uh, two of the strongest members of Congress who also happen to be female go hard at her was probably your best play.
I haven't seen anybody notice that.
They took the lead.
If they didn't take the lead, they were at least the most explosive, the most strategic, and the most damning.
So they did a great job.
Anyway, I keep noticing that People who are not answering questions are acting like they're under duress.
And I swear, Cheetal acts like she's under duress.
She does such a poor job of defending herself that it looks like she's signaling that she's being told what to do.
Now, can I prove that?
No.
Would I bet my life on it?
No.
It's just what it looks like to me.
It doesn't look like a genuine person acting in a genuine way. It looks like there's some force pushing her outside of her and that she's almost subconsciously signaling it. I guess it's the hypnotist in me. The hypnotist in me says that if she's being forced, she would choose different language than if she were doing it voluntarily.
So if you weren't paying attention to the exact language choice, you'd say, well, you know, she's just saying answers to questions.
But if you look at the language, it's so poor and you know that she couldn't possibly be that poor at communicating that it just signals that her subconscious is sending you a separate message.
So that's the hypnotist frame on it.
Anyway, Some bipartisan task force is gonna look into it.
I don't know if I trust any of that.
And the biggest story that nobody wants to talk about is that the debt crisis is coming and there's no way to pay off the debt crisis.
Does anybody know?
Should we do what Kim Dotcom says and buy gold?
I don't know if that's really a good idea, but I don't know if it's a bad idea.
Should you get Bitcoin?
If you think the dollar is going to be worthless?
Or does Bitcoin become less valuable, too, somehow?
What about real estate?
Is the reason that people like BlackRock are buying all those homes is that they think real estate will survive the crash better?
You know, because at least it's physical.
You know, paper money can disappear, but land is still land, so someday it might be worth something again.
I don't know.
But I would like to see why our candidates are not being asked about this.
Now, this is a case where I believe that there would be an enormous advantage for Trump if asked the question of what to do about the national debt.
Have you noticed, and I'll bet you in the next debate, nobody asks the question.
Now, the national debt is our number one problem.
You all know that, right?
If you made a list of all the problems in the country, it would be all the other problems in the country put together would be a distant second to the national debt.
Do you all know that?
We only have one problem.
A friend of mine used to say that if you can solve it with money, it's not a problem.
If you can solve it with money, it's not a problem.
The one thing we can't solve with money is the national debt.
So it's our only problem.
Everything else altogether are, you know, things we wish were better, but they're not going to kill us.
Climate change isn't going to kill us.
We're probably not going to run out of food.
I don't think we're going to get in a nuclear war.
I think Ukraine will figure out a way to wind down.
I think the Middle East will always be bubbling, but maybe not much worse than it is.
I think the economy will survive.
I think robots will figure out a way to make them work.
But the debt is unsolvable.
As far as I know, nobody's ever even suggested a solution.
So, imagine if in the debate, The liars in the media, who obviously are trying to cover up this problem, because they have to know it's the only real problem, they should ask the question, what would you do about $175 trillion debt?
Now, if they were being honest, they'd say, with the question, and nobody believes that you could grow the economy enough to make a difference, what would you do?
Because you want to take away Trump's first take on it.
Because Trump just says, I'm going to grow the economy, and by the way, I'll cut your taxes and that will make more taxes available.
Do you know how little that would make a difference?
Like if he doubled the GDP, which isn't going to happen.
But what if he did?
Not even close.
Yeah.
No, nothing he says will even be anywhere near an answer.
Whatever Trump says on that topic is going to be 100% better and more believable than whatever Kamala Harris says, because she doesn't understand the topic.
She won't be able to talk about debt.
I don't think she understands it.
And I'm not sure anybody does, honestly, because the national debt is not like personal debt.
It's a whole different deal.
But I think at least Trump knows where all the levers are.
If you at least know where the levers are, you can make a case that, okay, in the long run, we're going to have to get our robots to lower our costs.
Oh, here's what.
Here's what Trump can say.
The only way we can survive this is greatly lowering our costs, not just in the government, but in your personal lives.
Because probably the money will have to deflate.
So however much money you have now, the only way the debt goes away is your money is going to be worth less.
Your dollar is going to be worth 50 cents someday, maybe 10 cents.
The challenge will be to make sure that 10 cents or whatever you're left with can give you a high quality life.
And in the world of robots and AI, if you also have lots of energy, you would need, oh, by the way, Here's one of the biggest things in the world that just happened.
China just successfully tested a shutdown of a Gen 4 nuclear power plant.
Now, if that doesn't mean, if you don't immediately get what a big deal that is, Uh, you can't shut down a regular power plant without a meltdown.
You'll say you turn off the energy, it would melt down and that's the big risk.
But the, uh, the so-called fourth generation, and this is the first production one I've seen put into play in China, they did a controlled shutdown where they just turned it off.
And all it did was.
Turn off.
It worked.
Now, this is a design that has been talked about for years, but it just takes a long time for the engineering to catch up with the science so they can actually build the thing.
But then now they built it.
They've proven that you can build a fourth generation nuclear reactor.
You don't have to wait for fusion.
So the solution would be, if I were Trump, I'd say, here's the deal.
We're going to need a bunch of fourth generation, maybe some third generation power plants.
We're going to make sure that we have some designs that are approved by the federal government.
We're going to make sure the federal government removes any roadblocks.
We're going to make sure that the waste is stored on site so there's no extra risk to the community.
And we're gonna build them like crazy because whoever has the cheapest energy in the future wins So we're gonna we're gonna make an energy race To lower our expenses so that our cost of energy will be dropping dropping But we'll also have the best AI because you need the best energy to get AI.
We'll have the best electric cars and we'll be able to With completely voluntary process, get more electric vehicles, but without telling you, you can't have a gas car.
Eventually, you're still going to want the electric vehicle because the cost of electricity with these new energy plants will go down to almost nothing to power your electric car.
But your gas is still going to cost something because there's no way you can make getting gas out of the ground cheap, although maybe the robots can.
So these things are harder to predict than you think.
All right.
Anyway, there was a study on UBI giving people $1,000 a month that just made them lazy and stupid.
That's all you need to know.
Giving people money made them worse off, not better off.
They weren't even happier.
My next idea is that if the Republicans want to be anti-abortion, They would be far more credible if they also worked on something for adoption.
And here's what I would suggest.
I don't think this is going to work for Republicans because they're so pro-family.
And it would go like this.
There should be a second track for single women who get pregnant and don't want to be a mom.
In other words, there should be something that everybody knows about that you could say, oh, wow, You know what?
I'll give birth to the baby because the country needs babies, according to Elon Musk.
And he's right.
We need more babies.
And somebody is willing to put me up in a nice place.
I won't have to work for nine months.
And somebody will actually pay for my baby.
In other words, I will come out ahead.
Perhaps I will study a skill, you know, while I'm pregnant, so I don't have to go to work every day.
Maybe I can just, you know, learn a skill so that when I'm done, I got paid for having a baby, I lived in a nice place, I gave birth to life, I didn't have to go through an abortion, I learned a new skill, and now I'm back better than ever.
So, to me, if Trump could come up with an alternate path, there's no pressure, no pressure, it has to be a free market, and you say, we want abortion to go to zero, And here's how serious we are, and we want you to know that we think it's murder.
It has nothing to do with your freedom.
Whenever murder is involved, freedom is, of course, always in play.
But we'd like to be as positive as possible, because I think Trump could sell that.
I think he could sell, we're trying to be the most kind, freedom-giving, we'd like women who have a baby, but no husband or the husband left or whatever, We want to make sure that they get the maximum best life.
If you're bringing a human into the world, you're not garbage like maybe other people would say you are.
You're a star.
You're a star if you can bring a person into the world in America.
So we want to really help you do that.
We want to celebrate you.
And while our first choice is that you be part of a family.
First choice is that you're married.
First choice is, you know, you do the traditional family.
But we realize that things happen.
And once things happen, we'd love to give you a better option than terminating the pregnancy.
I think that would just be a great argument to have in the public sphere.
Anyway, um, Did you know that there's another study that says that loneliness makes you age faster and die?
Did you know there's another study that says being outside in nature, just 10 minutes, makes you healthier?
How many times have I told you there's a new study on those two things?
Going outdoors makes you healthier immediately, especially bare feet, especially in the sun in the morning.
You know, that's the Hooverman thing.
And loneliness, especially, you want to defeat.
Now, I'm going to solve both of those for you.
You ready?
You're President Trump.
You say we have a loneliness epidemic in this country.
Here's what I suggest.
Every night, eat dinner.
And as soon as you're done with dinner, walk outdoors and with the rest of your neighbors, take a walk.
Because your blood sugar will go immediately down if you take a walk.
Going outdoors will make you immediately healthier.
And walking with your friends will give you some less loneliness.
So, organize with your neighbors that you'll pick a time, let's say it's 6 p.m., and at 6 p.m.
you'll all meet after dinner and you'll just take a walk.
You don't have to walk the whole way, you can go halfway and come home, but you're going to meet up with your neighbors, you're going to introduce yourself, you're going to have something to do.
The trick with loneliness is you have to have an organized activity with a common goal, which is a walk.
And it has to be people that you're going to see more than once.
You do not get invested in people you're not going to see again.
So it's got to be repeated exposure to the same pool of people for a common thing.
That's how you cure loneliness.
If Trump said, I'm going to cure your loneliness, here's what you need to do.
That would be amazing.
Organized walks after dinner.
And there's some kind of metal that seems to be creating oxygen under the ocean, which means that maybe oxygen didn't come entirely from photosynthesis, which means that maybe there's oxygen in other places in the universe, which means maybe you can add some oxygen to Mars without plants, if you knew what the chemical reaction was.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is My show for today.
I think you'll agree it's one of the finest shows you've ever seen.
Would you agree?
Yeah, it was.
One of the best things you'll ever see.
And I'm going to go talk to the locals people in a minute.
How'd I do?
We've got a secret.
We're not going to tell you.
All right.
Thanks everybody on YouTube and Rumble and X.
I'm going to say bye to you.
We'll see you tomorrow.
Same time, same place.
And I'm going to go talk to my local subscribers privately.
